Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive13
![9 File:Рене Науфаху в роли сенсея Джи в сериале "Power Rangers Samurai" 2013-11-02 15-39.jpg](#File:Рене_Науфаху_в_роли_сенсея_Джи_в_сериале_"Power_Rangers_Samurai"_2013-11-02_15-39.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-11-06_09-10.jpg){kind=link}
![45 File:A common wardrobe of a "Hipster" 2013-11-13 17-14.jpg](#File:A_common_wardrobe_of_a_"Hipster"_2013-11-13_17-14.jpg){kind=link}
_-_1.jpeg){kind=link}
_-_3.jpeg){kind=link}
_-_4.jpeg){kind=link}
_-_5.jpeg){kind=link}
![62 File:" The Crew" 2013-11-14 15-18.jpg](#File:"_The_Crew"_2013-11-14_15-18.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-11-16_13-04.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-11-16_15-35.jpeg){kind=link}
_2013-10-06_00-17.jpg){kind=link}
![100 File:يتجاهلونني ويريدون ان اسأل عنهم-عفواً" انا لا اركض خلف الطيور المهاجرة 2013-10-12 16-48.jpg](#File:يتجاهلونني_ويريدون_ان_اسأل_عنهم-عفواً"_انا_لا_اركض_خلف_الطيور_المهاجرة_2013-10-12_16-48.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-11-04_00-08.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 15:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Anndrea, I am, a true World Female Composer born on June 28, 1970 in Mt- Pleasant, Utah, USA to Brad and Kathy Rasmussen- 2013-11-05 16-20.jpg
[edit]
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission(s). -- Steinsplitter (talk) 15:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
out of project scope Trex2001 (talk) 19:18, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
out of scope. personal unused image McZusatz (talk) 22:20, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted OS. Fry1989 eh? 19:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:24, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
not fair use, fake license Hercules63 (talk) 19:02, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Obvious copyright violation Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:14, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
not fair use, fake licens Hercules63 (talk) 19:14, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Speedy as copyvio - better to use {{Copyvio}} rather than DRs on obvious examples. Refer to http://www.magweb.com/photos_rene_naufahu --Fæ (talk) 00:06, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
not fair use, fake licens Hercules63 (talk) 19:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
not fair use, fake licens Hercules63 (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as copyvio refer to http://tvnz.co.nz/shortland-street-characters/sophie-mckay-962581 --Fæ (talk) 00:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
not fair use, fake licens Hercules63 (talk) 19:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 21:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-06_09-10.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-11-06_09-10.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Useless. What we see? Members of what? Educational use exactly for what? Marcus Cyron (talk) 02:37, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-06_09-10.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:17, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-06_09-10.jpg){kind=link}
It shouldn't be deleted. Its about someone I know that I talk about in my blog.
Out of project scope, personal image Acroterion (talk) 04:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:53, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Lovely girl third compliments with some Spanish words version- -She is wonderful,cool, amazing and beautiful- For the lovely girl 4 I'm revealing the names of the lovely girl and the one who introduce me to he 2013-11-08 20-35.jpg
[edit]
out of project scope, includes off topic text not used Motopark (talk) 04:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope, potential defamation. Fæ (talk) 06:40, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
möglicher Urheberrechtsverstoß (Bild ist auch hier zu finden) Der Checkerboy (talk) 07:29, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, EXIF data suggest that the photo is not original but was processed with a graphics editor. The uploader has multiple copyvio notices.Ymblanter (talk) 21:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
möglicher Urheberrechtsverstoß (Bild ist auch hier zu finden) Der Checkerboy (talk) 07:38, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Tagged with copyvio via (example) http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/miss-world-2010-alexandria-mills-in-nude-picture-scandal/story-e6frewyr-1225953352272 (2010, credit: "AFP PHOTO / LIU Jin Source: AFP") or grabbed from internet. Gunnex (talk) 12:30, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
möglicher Urheberrechtsverstoß (Bild ist auch hier zu finden) Der Checkerboy (talk) 07:40, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation -- Steinsplitter (talk) 09:20, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:55, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bilal hanjra keeranwala (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Bilal hanjra keeranwala 2013-11-07 17-44.jpeg
- File:Keeranwala 2013-11-07 17-43.jpeg
- File:Bilal hanjra keeranwala 2013-11-07 17-29.jpeg
- File:Bilal hanjra keeranwlala 2013-11-07 17-17.JPG
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bilal hanjra keeranwala (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
- File:Keeranwala 2013-11-15 16-20.jpeg
- File:Bilal hanjra keeranwala 2013-11-15 12-39.jpeg
- File:Keeranwala 2013-11-15 12-38.jpeg
Didym (talk) 23:15, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 02:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
File:Biodata Nama abdul razak barus pria kelahiran medan 17 oktober 1992-Anak dari junansen barus dan dewi bungsu--Dia bersaudara 4--1- Winanda barus-2- Abdul razak barus-3- Adinda ulina br- Barus-4- Egy ramanov ba 2013-11-07 07-20.jpg
[edit]
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:53, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
The main image is an official army photo, not own work as stated. So copyright violation. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: No source, no author, no permission. Yann (talk) 09:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 20:13, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope, personal image Acroterion (talk) 01:20, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope, personal image more suited to MySpace or Facebook. User has other images of questionable notability. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Apparently taken from Internet. ghouston (talk) 10:37, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Any camera which could take this photo would leave metadata on the upload, if the uploader were the photographer. This was a long-lens on tripod professional shot, not something someone caught with a mobile camera. Also why the file names with "U 2013..." etc. from differently named uploaders?? Please answer any questions on my talk page, not here! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Google doesn't find this image in this size on the Internet. I don't buy the no EXIF argument -- none of my own images have EXIF because I use an old version of editing software that doesn't support EXIF. So, why am I deleting it? Becaue all of this uploaders other images have been copyvios. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. ghouston (talk) 10:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, personal image, and yes, out of scope too. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 01:54, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused black color only image.
- DeleteTotally black image, the upload description makes no sense. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:D R PHOTOGRAPHY 2013-11-09 18-16.jpg
- File:Faheemuddin Ahmed.jpg
- File:Abdul Ahad Tariq..jpg
- File:X2..jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator and point out each image is also watermarked. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't look free to use Mattythewhite (talk) 22:54, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:14, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't look free to use. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:54, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't look free to use. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Poor quality image with no educational value. Grayfell (talk) 23:04, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is out of scope, and unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
A a milf at it's finest !!!!! Out Of scope. Tarawneh (talk) 14:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy as defamatory or a potential attack page. --Fæ (talk) 07:03, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Watermarked on the image, and in the meta data to http://infevents.com/ 117Avenue (talk) 03:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Low quality penis pictures.
- File:Side view of adult male penis 2013-11-12 17-22.jpg
- File:Underside of an adult male penis 2013-11-12 17-20.jpg
- File:Penis of an uncircumcised adult male 2013-11-12 17-15.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 08:08, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree, to delete all the 3 pictures.-- Ciaurlec (talk) 16:31, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: As per nom russavia (talk) 19:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Supermariofan1219 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.
- File:'N Sync during their one-off performance at the --2013 MTV Video Music Awards--- 2013-11-12 00-06.jpg
- File:'N Sync after their performance at the 2013 Video Music Awards- 2013-11-10 23-09.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Swapnilc15 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 17:51, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
advertisement Wer?Du?! (talk) 00:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- I could see a use. Rename? Yann (talk) 18:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
unused photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:20, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
too blurry to be useful Mjrmtg (talk) 03:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:46, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
No educational value, out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:02, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
![06:02, 14 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/mobile_tracking/archive13#c-Magog_the_Ogre-2013-11-14T06:02:00.000Z-File:A_common_wardrobe_of_a_"Hipster"_2013-11-13_17-14.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
![18:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/mobile_tracking/archive13#c-Yann-2013-11-22T18:49:00.000Z-File:A_common_wardrobe_of_a_"Hipster"_2013-11-13_17-14.jpg){kind=link}
_-_1.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_1.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:PioneerSquareWeatherMachine.jpg for centralized discussion on photographs of the Weather Machine sculpture. – Quadell (talk) 13:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
_-_1.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
_-_1.jpeg){kind=link}
_-_3.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_3.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:PioneerSquareWeatherMachine.jpg for centralized discussion on photographs of the Weather Machine sculpture. – Quadell (talk) 13:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
_-_3.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
_-_3.jpeg){kind=link}
_-_4.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_4.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:PioneerSquareWeatherMachine.jpg for centralized discussion on photographs of the Weather Machine sculpture. – Quadell (talk) 13:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
_-_4.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
_-_4.jpeg){kind=link}
_-_5.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_5.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:PioneerSquareWeatherMachine.jpg for centralized discussion on photographs of the Weather Machine sculpture. – Quadell (talk) 13:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
_-_5.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
_-_5.jpeg){kind=link}
Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 16:43, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - unused, terrible quality, derivative of screen Эlcobbola talk 22:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:19, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - unused selfie(s)of non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 22:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - unused, poor quality, non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 23:11, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
This is a screenshot, probably from this site, and therefore most probably a copyright infringement. As the given information isn't sufficient to determine the real status, it should be deleted from Commons.
@ uploader Laura1999love: Please give us details about the license status if you believe that this is not the case. Regards, PanchoS (talk) 23:29, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
File:11 yr old singer from Tulsa, Oklahoma--Born April 2, 2002- STAR RECORDS 2013-11-13 22-20.jpg
[edit]
Out of project scope, personal image of a minor Acroterion (talk) 00:23, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
I highly doubt this is the uploader's own work, as it seems to consist of a logo and promotional image that would definitely be copyrighted by the company in question. Purplewowies (talk) 01:59, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk)
- Delete Unsed in personal pages too. -- --Ciaurlec (talk) 14:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
(contribs) 02:54, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted, Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:06, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. -- Ciaurlec (talk) 14:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. -- Ciaurlec (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:09, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. -- Ciaurlec (talk) 14:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:10, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. -- Ciaurlec (talk) 14:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:49, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
No description, low quality, unclear purpose. Magog the Ogre (talk)(contribs) 03:24, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
![03:24, 15 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/mobile_tracking/archive13#c-Magog_the_Ogre-2013-11-15T03:24:00.000Z-File:"_The_Crew"_2013-11-14_15-18.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete I agree. -- Ciaurlec (talk) 14:49, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
![20:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/mobile_tracking/archive13#c-INeverCry-2013-11-25T20:13:00.000Z-File:"_The_Crew"_2013-11-14_15-18.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality selfie Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. -- Ciaurlec (talk) 14:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't correpsond to COM:EDUSE. Niklem (talk) 13:21, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't correpsond to COM:EDUSE. Niklem (talk) 13:21, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't correpsond to COM:EDUSE. Niklem (talk) 13:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't correpsond to COM:EDUSE. Niklem (talk) 13:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't correspond to COM:EDUSE. Niklem (talk) 13:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't correspond to COM:EDUSE. Niklem (talk) 13:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't correspond to COM:EDUSE. Niklem (talk) 13:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Doesn't correspond to COM:EDUSE. Niklem (talk) 13:22, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 19:31, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Jianhui67 talk★contribs 08:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't correspond to COM:EDUSE. Niklem (talk) 13:23, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
File:RadBrony is a Brony boy name Ray or people in reality call him Ramon Santiago- A inspiring person born in America, what is so special about this person? --It's because he help's teenagers and young kids to kee 2013-10-19 14-42.jpg
[edit]
Commons is not Facebook. Low image quality. Self promotion The Photographer (talk) 15:45, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. -- Ciaurlec (talk) 15:44, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 19:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Well people don't know her but i know her, I want you to show you affection to it because when I saw her in the wwe I thought it was bad but then I like their feelings and attitude- she's my favorite diva beca 2013-10-29 23-00.jpg
[edit]
Commons is not Facebook. Low image quality. Self promotion The Photographer (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Comment: Funny nomination:
- «Commons is not Facebook.» Yes, and Commons is also not a famous 19th cent. singer, nor a species of dormouse, nor many other things which are likewise irrelevant to list when presenting a deletion request.
- «Low image quality.» Nominator’s photographic competence noted. This was colorized to tackishness (Belgium flag’s yellow become green!), but that’s still a pro’s work. Note also how some of the original’s evident qualities were retained, namely composition, framing, and timing, as well as other techical aspects, such as depth of field.
- «Self promotion». No, no, no. It may be promotion, but it is obviously not self promotion — while the subject is a famous wrestler (Category:Celeste Bonin, en:Kaitlyn (wrestler)), the uploader is only a 3rd rate stalker/fan. And of course “promotion” is what brings most content into Commons — I for one like trains and trams, and therefore I “promote” them (at the expense of, say, cars or planes) by uploading photos of them to Commons, and making sure they are properly categorized. What’s wrong is the promotion of non-encyclopedic subjects and/or promotion done in a non-encyclopedic way. This image would be acceptable promotion-wise as soon as its filnemane is changed to something less creepy/ridiculous.
- -- Tuválkin ✉ 11:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Sadly, this seems to be a copyright violation from the original photographer’s Matt Roberts: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattwroberts/7885025428/ — too bad because this is a great portrait and would be a worthy permanent addition to Category:Celeste Bonin. (Please note that I am not supporting the frivolous deletion request above: my vote is only due to the copyvio I detected.) -- Tuválkin ✉ 11:03, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- You're right, it was a copy and paste error. I due place "Profesional picture in low size, 90% copyright cases". thank you, nice review --The Photographer (talk) 16:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - unused, poor quality, non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 19:31, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. -- Ciaurlec (talk) 16:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
advertisement, low res, linkspam in en wikipedia Wer?Du?! (talk) 01:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Renamed to be more meaningful and the CV style text removed. The en.wp article will doubtless be deleted soon enough. --Fæ (talk) 00:02, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:33, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-16_13-04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-11-16_13-04.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Claimed as own work, but this is very unlikely; pic has been doing the rounds on the internet for a while... here it's "© 2013 The Interpretation of Dreams" bobrayner (talk) 12:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-16_13-04.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-16_13-04.jpg){kind=link}
Self promotion, low quality image and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 14:08, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion, low quality image and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 14:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion, low quality image and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 14:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 20:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-16_15-35.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-11-16_15-35.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's copyrighted and not owned by the uploader as they state. FruitMonkey (talk) 15:45, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-16_15-35.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: Speedy deleted as copyvio. January (talk) 16:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-16_15-35.jpeg){kind=link}
Self promotion.Non enciclopedical value The Photographer (talk) 16:01, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Self-shots or personal photos are not "promotion" as covered by Commons:What Commons is not. The nomination is incorrect to identify this personal photo as such. "Encyclopaedic value" is a guideline on the English Wikipedia, but not on Commons, a nomination on this basis is incorrect. --Fæ (talk) 16:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-10-06_00-17.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-10-06_00-17.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sef promotion, non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-10-06_00-17.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: INeverCry 20:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-10-06_00-17.jpg){kind=link}
File:Una foto tomado del blog de Oliver James- Yo, como su fotógrafo, tomó ésta foto y tengo los derechos- 2013-08-24 22-50.jpg
[edit]
Low image quality, self promotion and non enciclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 16:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:57, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
If you put the copyright sign, then it can't be used in Wikipedia Edgars2007 (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs a permission. Yann (talk) 09:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. See Google image search. discospinster (talk) 03:00, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: http://jackgriffo.com/wordpress/wp-content/gallery/editorial/2.jpg Yann (talk) 09:48, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:31, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:36, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion. Low quality image. Non Encyclopedic value. Commons is not Facebook The Photographer (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:55, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation 188.104.100.232 13:48, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio, closed by . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE; Commons is not Facebook and alike. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Uploader is not copyright holder. The image comes from IKEA's web site. discospinster (talk) 15:01, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete http://www.ikea.com/us/en/catalog/products/20159174/ Yann (talk) 09:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
I think it was taken from here Hanay (talk) 16:57, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 20:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
low quality image, commons is not facebook. The Photographer (talk) 22:32, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Estel Campistol --Nacida en Girona el 18 de septiembre de 1989, dedicada desde época muy temprana a la escritura se formó en distinguidos colegios de la ciudad, como tal, dando su agradecida experiencia, ded 2013-07-01 19-19.jpg
[edit]
low image quality, commons is not facebook. Null encyclopedic value The Photographer (talk) 22:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:54, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Low image quality. Non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 22:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
File:انا مابيك انا مابيك- ولابي ذكرك وطاريك-- خساره فيك اشواقي- خساره اسمك على اوراقي-- خساره يوم حبيتك- خساره قلبي اهديتك- 2013-10-14 14-59.jpg
[edit]
Self promotion. Low quality image. Null encyclopedic value, Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:41, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion. Low quality image. Null encyclopedic value, Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, this is an unused personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
File:يتجاهلونني ويريدون ان اسأل عنهم-عفواً" انا لا اركض خلف الطيور المهاجرة 2013-10-12 16-48.jpg
[edit]
Self promotion. Low quality image. Null encyclopedic value, Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 23:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 09:43, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
File:ازكى من سنيكرز واحلى من التوت- واجمل من الامواج في بحر هادي-- الله عليك شلون مدرى ترى كيوت- يانرجس الاحساس وزهرة الكا 2013-10-14 14-58.jpg
[edit]
Self promotion. Low quality image. Null encyclopedic value, Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 23:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Non notable person who we have no article for. Suspect strongly just your average person. Was added as part of vandalism to page Livingston on en.wiki Blethering Scot (talk) 23:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: McZusatz (talk) 19:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album, personal snaps are out of scope of the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:23, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:25, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album, personal snaps are out of scope of the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:12, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album, personal snaps are out of scope of the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:09, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:34, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album, personal snaps are out of scope of the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 10:53, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 10:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:28, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 10:57, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:46, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of COM:SCOPE -- Steinsplitter (talk) 10:58, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Stay strong, beautiful and always find hope and faith even within the most littlest things- 2013-11-12 11-13.jpg
[edit]
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
File:THE RAJESH PRASAD--LOVE AND DEATH ARE TWO UNINVITED THINGS ,-ONE TAKES YOUR HEART AND OTHER TAKE YOU BEATS- BY DR R- J- PRASAD 2013-11-12 18-38.jpg
[edit]
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:49, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
File:We need to develop a personal leader within ourselves- As doses of self-motivation is required daily in order to make success- Discover that leader within you- 2013-11-12 22-37.jpg
[edit]
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:25, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:31, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion, low quality image, non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 01:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator that it's out of scope, but it's a rephotograph of an advertisement, poster or some other published image, note the vertical blue printing on left side of image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:42, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:08, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album, personal snaps are out of scope of the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:43, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Indeedous (talk) 17:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete This is not the same image as deleted above, but it is the same uploader and the same subject. The same reasons apply for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Deleted Out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:59, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
unused personal photo, commons is not a photo gallery, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album, personal snaps are out of scope of the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:44, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion, low quality image, non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 02:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- "Self promotion" is not a deletion rationale for selfies.
- Low quality image is not a deletion rationale of itself.
- "non encyclopedic value" is not a deletion rationale.
- "Commons is not facebook" is not a deletion rationale.
--Fæ (talk) 02:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator even if he didn't phrase it perfectly. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album, personal snaps are out of scope of the project. There is no encylopedic use for this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
File:This is kylie jenner and she awesome she is tall just like me and she is model and want to be model 2013-11-02 15-22.jpeg
[edit]
Self promotion, low quality image, non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 02:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:56, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:39, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion, low quality image, non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 02:45, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:57, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Very low quality, looks like a family photo album pic, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:African Renaissance Monument 1
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Senegal: non-free (2010) monument.
- File:A Maersk truck driving in front of the African Renaissance Monument in Dakar, Senegal.jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument (5502494604).jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument (5503209541).jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument (5538226284).jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument - From Above (5556496295).jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument - From Above (5556503597).jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument - From Above (5556513069).jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument - From Above (5557084924).jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument - From Above (5557094050).jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument - From Above (5557101948).jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument.jpg
- File:Africanrenaissance.JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine (10).JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine (11).JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine (12).JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine (13).JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine (14).JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine (2).JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine (3).JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine (4).JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine (6).JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine (8).JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine (9).JPG
- File:Dakar - Monument de la renaissance africaine.JPG
- File:Monument de la renaissance africaine, Dakar, senegal 2013-04-07 02-26.jpg
- File:Monument de la Renaissance africaine, vue arrière.JPG
- File:Monument from afar (5334156462).jpg
- File:Monument renaissance africaine.JPG
- File:Monument Renaissance Africaine.JPG
- File:Obvious (5874610448).jpg
- File:Projet de monument Renaissance.jpg
- File:Renaissance africaine.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Eleassar (t/p) 09:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment These need to be looked individually, as some such as File:Monument from afar (5334156462).jpg are clearly de minimis. russavia (talk) 11:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Not at all de minimis, considering that the title of the image is "monument from afar" and that the caption says "A view of the African Renaissance Monument from Ouakam. Wish the shot came out clearer. Next time." --Eleassar (t/p) 11:51, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- I suggest the name the uploader chose for the image is not particularly relevant. Below I asked "What if File:African Renaissance Monument (5502494604).jpg had been named File:New construction in Senegal, with the African Renaissance Monument in the background -a.jpg?" My suggested alternate name is more accurate, and I suggest illustrates why our conclusions should not rely on the images' names. Geo Swan (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I find FOP highly counter-intuitive. Some countries, like France, have troubling, idiosyncratic FOP rules. I am cutting and pasting the short Senegal section:
- There is no freedom of panorama in Senegal. In fact the Senegal's law is very similar to the french law. The Loi 2008-09 du 25 janvier 2008 sur le droit d’auteur et les droits voisins au Senegal, (article 46) (Archive) says that it not possible to reproduce an artwork if it's the main subject of the photo or it is for commercial purpose (source: Bureau Sénégalais du Droit d'Auteur).
- « L’auteur ne peut interdire la reproduction ou la communication d'une oeuvre graphique ou plastique située en permanence dans un endroit ouvert au public, sauf si l'image de l’oeuvre est le sujet principal d'une telle reproduction, radiodiffusion ou communication et si elle est utilisée à des fins commerciales. » (Official link) (Archive)
- The question still on: does it apply to things before 2008?
- Heck! COM:FOP#Senegal says "Senegal's law is very similar to the french law."
- File:African Renaissance Monument (5538226284).jpg only shows the monument, but File:A Maersk truck driving in front of the African Renaissance Monument in Dakar, Senegal.jpg showed a truck in front of the monument -- the truck is larger than the monument. What if File:African Renaissance Monument (5502494604).jpg had been named File:New construction in Senegal, with the African Renaissance Monument in the background -a.jpg? I suggest that when we know there are images that comply with COM:FOP#Senegal, because the monument is just one element in a wider picture we should not be considering removing this category, because those compliant images belong in it. Further, I suggest our nominator could have saved the rest of us a lot of time. I suggest our nominator shouldn't have nominated the category, and everything in it -- since they recognized some of the images were FOP compliant. Rather I think they should have made a mass nomination of images that did not include those images they were sure were FOP compliant. Geo Swan (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Good day Eleassar,
I regret to state that I understand too well what the fuss is about!
So the French law, or the Senegalese law, or the Yankee laws say that... but please realize that in the whole world laws are so numerous and so complex that, at any time, anyone can be reproached something!! I believe you may be staying in Slovenia. Did you country and society did not suffer enough of censorship during the communist rule? Would you really prefer to see it now replaced by United States dictatorship and thought control??
Judging at the continuous vanishing of images, the trend appears to move towards a Wikipedia with no picture at all! But make no mistake, when the images and pictures will be all gone, then the attack will be against the text, any form of free thinking text...
Now, to answer your remarks squarely: the "Projet de monument Renaissance" is mostly a photograph of a public poster describing the project while the monument itself is only shown by its basement and occupies only the top of the picture.
The "Renaissance africaine" is not really a picture of a work of art, but of workings, as a North-Korean company was then building this stalinian style and controversial monument. I also believe the picture marvelously describes the political situation then prevalent in Senegal: the family chief has no head while his partner and their child have theirs in full...
Finally I add what cannot be shown by the picture: that the whole group is not looking towards the North (former colonial powers) nor to the East (holy cities) but to the North-West: the all invading, overbearing and bankrupt United States...
Regards,
B.J. Noël
- Ad Geo Swan: thanks for having provided the excerpt of the relevant article from the copyright act.
- As to File:African Renaissance Monument (5502494604).jpg, what is relevant per COM:DM is whether the photographer's intent was to reproduce the monument or something else. Per the title in flickr ('monument from afar') and the description ('A view of the African Renaissance Monument from Ouakam. Wish the shot came out clearer. Next time.') the intent is clear, and there is no good reason to pretend it was something else.
- As to File:A Maersk truck driving in front of the African Renaissance Monument in Dakar, Senegal.jpg, the monument is clearly one of the two principal subjects. I don't object to cropping this image though. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Ad B.J. Noël: Thanks for your opinion, but the purpose of this page is not a political discussion about the scope of Commons and Wikipedia (you can try opening it elsewhere), but whether the nominated images are free or not.
- File:Projet de monument Renaissance.jpg - the poster itself is just as much copyrightable as the monument. There is no exception in the law for 2D works.
- File:Renaissance africaine.jpg - the photograph shows the majority of the copyrighted monument, and parts of author's works are copyrightable too. -Eleassar (t/p) 10:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- In File:African Renaissance Monument (5502494604).jpg the intention might have been to take a photo of the monument, but the result is a photo of the city with the monument - probably a camera in a kite is difficult to point accurately. I don't see this image different from photos of the Louvre with its de minimis copyrighted pyramid.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Per COM:DM, the intent is of the key importance in deciding whether a work is de minimis or not: "If the poster forms an essential part of the overall photographic composition, or if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the poster, there is likely to be copyright infringement, and it is no defence to say that the poster was 'just in the background'. If the existence of the poster was the reason the photograph was taken in the first place, copyright infringement cannot be avoided by additionally including within the frame more of the setting or the surrounding area." The prime difference between this image and the Louvre image is that whereas the Louvre image was taken primarily to depict the square and not the pyramid, this one has been taken to depict the monument. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Do you mean that if file name and description were "Buildings in Dakar" it would be OK to keep under de minimis? We can reupload it.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- I've been discussing the image as it stands at Flickr, where it originates from. --Eleassar (t/p) 18:20, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Do you mean that if file name and description were "Buildings in Dakar" it would be OK to keep under de minimis? We can reupload it.--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Per COM:DM, the intent is of the key importance in deciding whether a work is de minimis or not: "If the poster forms an essential part of the overall photographic composition, or if the photograph was taken deliberately to include the poster, there is likely to be copyright infringement, and it is no defence to say that the poster was 'just in the background'. If the existence of the poster was the reason the photograph was taken in the first place, copyright infringement cannot be avoided by additionally including within the frame more of the setting or the surrounding area." The prime difference between this image and the Louvre image is that whereas the Louvre image was taken primarily to depict the square and not the pyramid, this one has been taken to depict the monument. --Eleassar (t/p) 13:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- In File:African Renaissance Monument (5502494604).jpg the intention might have been to take a photo of the monument, but the result is a photo of the city with the monument - probably a camera in a kite is difficult to point accurately. I don't see this image different from photos of the Louvre with its de minimis copyrighted pyramid.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: If you cropped out the truck in the first image, you would have a better photograph. If you cropped out the monument, you would have a picutre of a Maersk container at an angle -- not very useful. THe same argument can applied to the two or three images that include significant parts of the city -- the monument is still the center of interest. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:African Renaissance Monument 2
[edit]This statue was designed by architect Pierre Goudiaby and completed in 2010. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Senegal has no Commons-acceptable FoP. Accordingly, reproductions of Senegalese architecture and sculptures by means of images are only permitted on noncommercial basis, conflicting with Commons:Licensing which states that all files must be freely usable by anyone in the world.
- File:20130503-IMG 2235 (8744109863).jpg
- File:20130503-IMG 2243 (8745327878).jpg
- File:Le Monument de la Renaissance africaine.jpg
- File:Monument de la Renaissance africaine (cropped).JPG
- File:Monument de la renaissance africaine 1.JPG
- File:Monument de la renaissance africaine 3.JPG
- File:Monument de la Renaissance africaine, Dakar, Senegal.jpg
- File:Monument de la Renaissance africaine.JPG
- File:Senegal-La renaissance.jpg
- File:SN-dakar-renaiss-monum-01.jpg
- File:SN-dakar-renaiss-monum-2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:African Renaissance Monument 3
[edit]This monument has been designed by the Senegalese Pierre Goudiaby Atepa (b. 1947) who is still alive. As there is no Freedom of Panorama in Senegal, the pictures depicting this building have to be removed from Commons.
- File:African Renaissance Monument (5503209541).jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument - 2009 - panoramio.jpg
- File:African Renaissance Monument.jpg
- File:Le mobile nous suit partout.jpg
- File:Le Monument de la Renaissance africaine (49333168042).jpg
- File:Monument de la renaissance africaine 2.JPG
- File:Promenade Monument de la Renaissance.jpg
- File:StatueDakarInsideFace.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- There are two files mentioned in the previous DRs above File:African Renaissance Monument (5502494604).jpg and File:Obvious (5874610448).jpg, to which I'm not sure if they are restored or kept, or directly re-uploaded, should both be re-nominated? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:30, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: Both of them have been deleted on 26 November 2013 after the first DR concerning this building and have been re-uploaded on 16 May 2021. I think they should be added to this present DR. Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:07, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:African Renaissance Monument 4
[edit]There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Senegal, and these commercially-licensed images that show the 3D artwork as main subject violate the copyright of the artwork's living artist, sculptor w:fr:Pierre Goudiaby Atepa (1947–). Needs COM:VRTS permission for commercial Creative Commons license from the sculptor himself.
- File:African Renaissance Monument (5503209541).jpg - reuploaded 2x (see prior nominations at nos. 1 and 3). Must be eligible for SPEEDY this time per COM:SPEEDY#G4. — JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.)
- File:African Renaissance Monument - From Above (5557101948).jpg - reuploaded (see prior nomination at no. 3) — JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- File:Balade à la statue de renaissance de Sénégal.jpg - could be dismissed as complying Senegalese de minimis (work is not the main subject), but if this is cropped, will become an unused personal image; take note that this is the only upload of Bahdonelmi (talk · contribs), and the monument's inclusion is the only way for this file to meet Commons' COM:SCOPE.
- File:Monument der afrikanischen Renaissance hinter einem Baobab.jpg
- File:Monument der afrikanischen Renaissance.jpg
- File:Renaissance Monument.jpg
- File:The African Renaissance Monument .jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:13, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
The part of the French/Senegalese law says "It is prohibited EXCEPT when the image is the center of the subject". Which it is. Key word: 'sauf". You folks are 180, i.e. not 100. Get a French speaker when in doubt. But doubt is the last thing I notice on this platform monitored and administrated by a very special type of people. Put that image back on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:983:3772:1:ed2c:160d:a6ad:d136 (talk • contribs) 09:31, 15 January 2022 (UTC+8)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Radicxlmalik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos with bad file names, no educational use, out of scope
- File:@radicxlmalik wants to fuck @zaynmalik hard 2013-11-18 19-53.jpg
- File:@radicxlmalik wants to fuck @zaynmalik hard 2013-11-18 19-50.jpg
- File:@radicxlmalik wants to fuck @zaynmalik 2013-11-18 19-46.jpg
- File:@radicxlmalik wants to fuck the shit out if @Zaynmalik 2013-11-18 19-38.jpg
Mjrmtg (talk) 12:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion. Non encyclopedic value. Low image quality. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 18:57, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Self promotion. Non encyclopedic value. Low image quality. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 18:57, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator, at a minimum. I've reviewed the images nominated today, and each one this comment is placed on has at least one significant problem with it: obvious personal photo, poor quality, probable copyvio, no file information to show where the person is from, personality rights issues, and other problems. Some of the nominator comments are a little on the laconic side, but the points made are still in essence valid for each image, at least to a degree justifying deletion. We shouldn't have to compose a mathematically precise argument to justify deletion of obviously out-of-scope images.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:01, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Not useful for educational purposes. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 21:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nominator. Wikicommons is not a personal photo album, these personal holiday snaps are out of scope of the project. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
- delete poor quality, out of scope.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:46, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Originally had a DR on ko.wiki. However, kowiki cannot delete Commons file, that DR should be continued here. Original reason for DR was: "Not sure about copyright status" by ko:User:이준엽. 레비ReviD✉CM 14:00, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: http://syndi.tistory.com/551 Yann (talk) 09:52, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
File:T-Nem, um cantor,produtor musical,bailarino e comédiante- Conhecido pelo seu talento e pela maneira de levar a vida sempre na alegria, Atualmente mora em Mãe luiza,Nascido no dia 21 de dezembro de dezembro1 2013-09-14 19-28.jpeg
[edit]
Low image quality. Self promotion. Out of scope. Non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 14:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. -- Ciaurlec (talk) 16:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:36, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Low image quality. Self promotion. Out of scope. Non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 14:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Low image quality (Bad lighting and composition cut). Self promotion. Out of scope. Non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 14:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-04_00-08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-11-04_00-08.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low image quality (Blur, lighting, white balance...). Self promotion. Non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 14:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-04_00-08.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
_2013-11-04_00-08.jpg){kind=link}
Low image quality. Self promotion. Non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 14:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Low image quality. Self promotion. Non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 14:31, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 10:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Copyrighted image per metadata BilCat (talk) 14:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted -FASTILY 09:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Software engineers apply the principles of engineering to the design, development, maintenance, testing, and evaluation of the software and systems that make computers or anything containing software work-They 2013-11-20 20-07.jpg
[edit]
Commons is not your free webhost, and this image is clearly out of scope. russavia (talk) 14:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 09:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)