Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2014-18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-notable organization. Out of scope. Rapsar (talk) 08:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The uploader's last remaining contribution, self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 14:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)}}[reply]

Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:43, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:28, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator, out of scope -- Meisam (talk) 19:55, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

People living image of the TV screen.. i.е. v-mail 13:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: screenshot Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation. i.е. v-mail 13:56, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyright violation. i.е. v-mail 13:56, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use content. Apparent copyright violation. i.е. v-mail 13:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:57, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text-only file. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was only used at en:User:TypicalTeensYT by non-contributing user (misuse of Wikipedia as personal webspace only). That page now blanked, and this image is no longer (and never was) in legitimate personal use. Ubcule (talk) 18:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, girl and boy make faces. But most people are able to make much more strange faces. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:59, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image and/or out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 19:52, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, unused bad art of non-notable artist, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely unlikely that this is uploader's own work, particularly given how the format matches previously deleted images: 1,2. Looks almost like a screenshot from a video. The claimed datestamp in the file name is obviously bunk, given Akeson would be preparing for an NHL playoff game that night, not appearing in a Halloween skit. Resolute (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add for deletion all her other uploads not yet nominated. They are small photos without metadata, quality is bad. Nothing here Commons hasn't tons. Taivo (talk) 12:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicacion falsa Urjc 2014 (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom: useless photoshopping; unused. Lupo 17:09, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lisa denis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-quality nudie pics, very similar to, and no better than, existing images; and Commons is not an amateur porn site. Additionally, in three images, one non-nude, all taken in private places, the subject is identifiable, and there is no evidence of consent to permit them to be published.

Rrburke (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lisa denis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Yesterday deleted images (out of project scope) today uploaded again.

Ies (talk) 08:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 00:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unclear source. Leyo 22:43, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, merely personal shot. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 06:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV Cap, uploader is definitely not the creator Odeesi (talk) 09:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:55, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMO inappropriate shot, as there is no evidence of consent by the depicted person, thereby a violation of personality rigths. As we have another shot of the same person, we can easily go without this one. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Not a public place, not used. Yann (talk) 06:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SepulvedaElite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logo, probably a test of the Wikipedia mobile beta.

   FDMS  4    12:58, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:06, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubt about authorship of uploader, due to the watermark in the middle of the image. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 07:12, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low educational value in this unused personal photo by a user whose only edit on Commons was to upload this photo. They also have 7 edits on en-wiki, incuding 5 to the userpage/biography. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 23:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:28, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rubiahot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of the images.

Jespinos (talk) 00:32, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. Lupo 15:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (Source). Areaseven (talk) 05:20, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation. @Areaseven: For clear-cut cases like this one please use {{Copyvio}} which will ensure the image is speedily deleted. Thanks and regards, ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 07:44, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio. Image appears here http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WowvZJ7JXtk/TVljBbjmiCI/AAAAAAAAAI4/7OpvYZpE2tk/s1600/guevara+che.jpg and several other places on internet. Description is "LOL". Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:39, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: apparently ok FASTILY 08:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a copyvio, but a completely redundant personal image. Per COM:SCOPE: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality are not realistically useful for an educational purpose. As this image is not in use on any Wikimedia project it is therefore out of scope. Otherwise we could host thousands of such images with different captions, but Commons is not a meme generator …    FDMS  4    15:35, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 03:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a QRcode which appears to convert to the text "SAMSUNG GALAXY NOTE 2". Commons has a large selection of QRcodes and there is no limit on the text variations that can be encoded this way. I am raising this DR to set a precedent of reasonable interpretation of the scope definition which specifically mentions raw text as outside the aims of this project as covering the infinite variations possible by encoding raw text as barcodes or QRcodes. (talk) 06:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC) This DR mentioned at Commons_talk:Project_scope#QR_codes.[reply]


Kept: Procedural (backlog) close. This nomination has not had any participation after a reasonable amount of time; the impetus for the request may be best handled through a noticeboard, but closure is without prejudice or comment on the issue. Эlcobbola talk 08:57, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality are not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Also per User:Fæ.    FDMS  4    15:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 03:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation/invalid license: This is a logo of a video game, and is not the uploader's own work. The font typeface is a proprietary font that is not FOSS (free and open source). -- 李博杰  Talk contribs 15:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either self-promotion or "No permission since".    FDMS  4    15:54, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used as vehicle for propaganda text (now deleted) in description Tournesol (talk) 18:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Clearly out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE], sorry, but here is not Facebook. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:27, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammadraihanazhar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small resolution photos, each with watermarks, probably not own

Mjrmtg (talk) 12:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alfibellamy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image; see COM:SCOPE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:34, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:29, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Alpha1bravo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality, daily exhebitionists spam, no educational use. Probably also stolen, no Metatdata but seems to be cropped out of other images.

Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:02, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho non-free work, no links to images used in that montage, as of today only contribution by uploader, Roland zh (talk) 00:47, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: This cannot be kept without a documentation of the individual images and their copyright statuses which were used. AFBorchert (talk) 06:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:08, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:14, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:14, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:17, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:17, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:18, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope, put it on facebook Mjrmtg (talk) 02:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator but also because of the copyright/credibility issue. If the person in the photo is the user, then they are falsely claiming credit for someone else's photo. Green Giant (talk) 04:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It's a photo of a fisherman holding an American paddlefish, which is, as per its article, a sport fish, so the photo would be a good illustration for an article on it. We assume good faith for photos of the contributor for which the contributor says he owns the rights to, this does not seem like a professional work, and seems quite likely to have been a timed exposure or made by a friend or relative who would have been fine to transfer the rights to the contributor. "Falsely claiming credit" is uncalled for. --GRuban (talk) 09:58, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Could you highlight the guidelines on assuming good faith in such circumstances? It isn't a case of being uncalled for, it is a case of sloppiness on the part of an uploader. Would it really hurt to type a few extra words and explain it was a timer? As for articles, COM:EDUSE states that a file doesn't "magically" gain educational value just because it could be used elsewhere. I can see the "educational value" that the uploader thought it had when they added it to List of archaeological periods (North America). If you can find some decent contributions by this user, I might be willing to change my opinion. Green Giant (talk) 11:16, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: We generally assume good faith when an uploader claims "own work". There are limits to that, and they are crossed when it is obviiously not own work. That is particularly the case when, as here, it is the only contribution of this uploader. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:22, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:24, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:56, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not a useful image, and I doubt that the uploaded holds copyright for it because its from a well known Internet meme. Also, this was uploaded with the single purpose of vandalising en:9/11 Truth movement. Rcsprinter123 (talk) 08:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 02:04, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unuseful file for Wikimedia projects Marco 08:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE merely promotional. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:50, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; hardly showing a 31-year-old, as claimed by uploaders edit[1]. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; unused personal shot of probably non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:18, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; unused personal shot of non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; seems to be a personal shot of a non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; seems to be a personal shot of a non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:24, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:42, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:38, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Magnolia677 (talk) 15:18, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep somebody seems to be on a bad mission: en:Lloyd Williams (rugby union player born 1989) <- used here --High Contrast (talk) 16:51, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Nonsense request. Yann (talk) 17:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not free to use. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:22, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of sign LGA talkedits 23:55, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

this is not a derivative work, it's a woodblock graffiti, which is an original work of vandalism that is fixed to a post independently of any signageVictorgrigas (talk) 00:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We need the consent of the person who's original work it is to host the picture here. LGA talkedits 01:16, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:56, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not free to use. Mattythewhite (talk) 09:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, by Steinsplitter. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Massive upload of content generally taken from social media - nominated here instead of speedy due to volume. For example, File:المقر.png is here, File:ريم العبدالله.png is here, File:ذي عين.png is here, etc.) Others appear to be obvious derivative works (e.g., photos of photos - File:ياسة الكويتية.jpg, File:ابتسام لطفي - 1.png and photos of screens - File:منى_شداد.jpeg, File:ابتسام لطفي - 2.png)

Эlcobbola talk 18:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:04, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Twitter/Instagram/Facebook/etc.) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:مجووود العدواني/logs (serial copyright violator/266 copyvios, also per previous mass DR a social media grabber. IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either. Most of the uploads are somehow manipulated (photoshopped, cropped, watermarks removed etc.), considering also:

etc. Ignoring some higher res (without exif) files and files taken with a Samsung GT-I8262, which are revealing the photographer real (technical/etc.) skills, compared to the nominated ones.

Gunnex (talk) 09:23, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamsinpajribro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:29, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Star Wars logo is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 18:50, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Didym (talk) 01:22, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:50, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata band picture, possibly from Facebook, but mostly likely a COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 09:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:34, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Fry1989 eh? 02:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]