Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/04/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 3rd, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These information signs clearly aren't the uploaders own work and there's no reason they would be freely licensed in the meantime. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 00:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. FoP apply. Invalid DR. These pictures were obviously taken in public places. If you have evidence of a copyright violation, then show it, otherwise don't open DRs like this. --Yann (talk) 10:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 10:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete COM:F1 Belbury (talk) 11:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article VictorRafaelzisfossato (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 17:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article VictorRafaelzisfossato (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 17:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry! I did something wrong! Chalk19 (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net 19113750 2030382720522701 6991384366697281798 n.jpg Pouchkine-center (talk) 12:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 12:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this was not the picture I wanted to upload GuillemMedina (talk) 13:46, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Closed: accidental deletion request, removed by user. seb26 (talk) 14:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I confused JulietaDerdoy (talk) 12:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andrei Icefield.jpg Volcanoguy (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 23:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was uploaded with the wrong Creative Common Licence LankasamOT (talk) 17:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request was made by error.
The file should be kept LankasamOT (talk) 17:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. --Achim55 (talk) 19:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded wrong version by accident (low res jpg) WikiFouf (talk) 03:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo ville Romelio62 (talk) 14:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph was published in a May 30, 2010 article at http://www.thebahamasweekly.com/publish/community/The_Perfect_Pair_Choosing_the_Right_Wine_for_the_Great_Bahamian_Seafood_Wine_Festival11039.shtml prior to Flickr upload on June 27, 2010 and I doubt the Flickr uploader is the photographer. Bahamas Weekly page says "© Copyright 2010 by thebahamasweekly.com" Abzeronow (talk) 20:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete. Copyrighted stock photo: https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/three-colors-of-wine-gm172768477-5883351. Omphalographer (talk) 22:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by EugeneZelenko. --Rosenzweig τ 11:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like an official portrait, own work not credible, user has history of copyright violation Hekerui (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: speedy deleted. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hanita13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

AI-generated images of a building that never existed, for a hoax enwiki draft at en:Draft:House of Spanish Surrealism.

Belbury (talk) 15:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I don't know if this is related to three other hoax Spanish architecture images from yesterday; "Pabellón deportivo en Wenzhou", "FlorPlast retiro" and "indoor oasis". Could be an ill-advised student project to test Wikipedia's resilience to AI-generated hoax content. Belbury (talk) 15:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Considering that the article was deleted as vandalism, I see no issue with deleting the files under the same rationale. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Source web site is a wiki about a video game mod; it is not a reliable source of historical information. Omphalographer (talk) 03:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 09:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. This church building was completed in 1964. I can find little information about the architect Choi Chang-kyu (최창규), so it is unclear if he is still living. However, he was alive at least up to 1978, so this building is undoubtedly protected by copyright. plicit 00:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. This is a contemporary building. plicit 01:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 05:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 05:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Argentina, artist Eduardo Catalano died in 2010 A1Cafel (talk) 08:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 08:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 08:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Singapore A1Cafel (talk) 09:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 09:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 09:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same no-FoP issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:The State Council (47954035406).jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion (ticket:2024040210012092) - unused personal photo and out of COM:SCOPE anyway. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 10:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double architectural copyright infringements. Both the Presidential Palace and the Parliament Building are copyrighted works: see both Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Ak Orda Presidential Palace and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Парламент Казахстана 2017.jpg. As there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan, commercial licensing clearances from the two designers (one architect of the Presidential Palace and the other architect of the Parliament Building) are required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the photo violates artist's copyright. The artist died in 1995 and the photo can be restored after copyright expiration in 2066 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 12:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double infringements to architects' copyrights, cosnidering UAE not providing Internet-friendly Freedom of Panorama. See both Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emirates Towers.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Museum of the Future. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Triple infringements to architects' copyrights, regarding the Museum of the Future, UP Tower, and al-Yaqoub Tower. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maze Tower, Capricorn Tower, Al Yaqoub Tower ^ Up Tower - panoramio.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Museum of the Future. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the UAE, and so this commercially-licensed image infringes the museum building designer's copyrights. See also past deletions at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Museum of the Future. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Greece A1Cafel (talk) 14:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 14:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the Philippines A1Cafel (talk) 14:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Interior architecture, but UAE has no Freedom of Panorama so this commercially-licensed image infringes architect's copyright. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dubai Mall - panoramio (3).jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: image used in an attack page, no clear education value. Mys_721tx (talk) 15:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: Taken from page 400 of "Fighter Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering" by Robert L. Shaw, 1985 [1]. —Bkell (talk) 15:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A kid's personal "artwork" lacking COM:EDUSE. Achim55 (talk) 17:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Intentional focus on Burj Khalifa, under architect Adrian Smith's copyright, but UAE does not permit Freedom of Panorama. See also the successful deletion requests here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Intentional focus on Burj Khalifa, under architect Adrian Smith's copyright, but UAE does not permit Freedom of Panorama. See also the successful deletion requests here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Intentional focus on Burj Khalifa, under architect Adrian Smith's copyright, but UAE does not permit Freedom of Panorama. See also the successful deletion requests here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Intentional focus on The Address Downtown Dubai, under structural designing firm Atkins' copyright, but UAE does not permit Freedom of Panorama. See also Commons:Deletion requests/The Address Downtown Dubai. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Intentional focus on Cayan Tower, under architectural firm Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP' copyright, but UAE does not permit Freedom of Panorama. See also the following successful deletion requests: #1, #2, #3, and #4. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double infringements to architectural copyright. The building in the foreground is DAMAC Heights, opened in 2018 and authored by architectural firm AEDAS. The building at its back is Cayan Tower: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dubai Marina, the Walk 01.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same no-FoP in UAE issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dubai Marina, the Walk 09.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the UAE. The building was completed in 2021 and authored by Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture. This commercially-licensed image infringes the architectural copyright of the said two authors. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only upload of ITSMENOMEE (talk · contribs). Personal image of a user who only contributed this image and did not substantially made other contributions. Out of COM:Project scope. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same no-FoP issue as the following: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:UAE Presidential Palace, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by E2568#Qasr al-Watan by User:E2568 (talk · contribs), and Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with Qasr al Watan incategory:"Images from UAE in Lens Competition". JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the UAE. While immediate online sources like this are "silent" on the building's origins, timelapse feature of Google Earth reveals the site of the mosque was a barren desert as of February 2005, and March 2009 satellite imagery shows it was under construction, and probably completed by August 2010. This hints it is a modern work of architecture still under architect's copyright and unfree for commercial Creative Commons licensing distribution. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the UAE. The Emirates Palace was inaugurated in 2005 and authored by WATG Architects, in cooperation with Reza Rahmanian who authored the building exteriors. This commercially-licensed image infringes their architectural copyrights on the building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Continuing from Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#File:Lester_Pearson_1957.jpg & CLindberg's points that were brought forward...
Photo is copyrighted in its source country. This photo currently states it is Public Domain in Sweden and the United States. However, this work originates from Canada, not Sweden. The assumption was it was taken for the Nobel Foundation and that tag would apply. It was actually taken and published in Canada in 1956 by Gaby, (Gabriel Desmarais).[2] The date on the photo show it existed physically as of December 1956. It is possibly Public Domain in the USA due to a lack of notice, but the work would need to be PD in both the source country and the USA to keep on the Commons. Copyright will not expire in Canada until January 1st, 2062 (Life+70 - d.1991+70).

PascalHD (talk) 15:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Undelete in 2062. —RP88 (talk) 09:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't find evidence this logo color scheme (dark blue flower, green PBS, lighter blue sprout has ever been used. No match from Tineye. Only instances from Google Images was an image on a fandom wiki. PBS Kids has previously been the target of hoax logo uploads. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:PBS Kids Sprout Logo 1989-2000.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Universal Sprout Logo.webp. Same uploader for all 3 files. William Graham (talk) 20:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. The blue part is text-only, but the green leaf is complex. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious AI-generated image, unencyclopedic Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The file description contains no info how this image was created. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: extremely low resolution, unused image consisting in large part of plain text; looks like it was part of a school project. Omphalographer (talk) 00:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sokemike (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text.

Omphalographer (talk) 00:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality and non-rasterized version of File:SEPTA B icon.svg Triphora (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality and non-rasterized version of File:SEPTA D icon.svg Triphora (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality and non-rasterized version of File:SEPTA G icon.svg Triphora (talk) 00:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality and non-rasterized version of File:SEPTA L icon.svg Triphora (talk) 00:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality and non-rasterized version of File:SEPTA M icon.svg Triphora (talk) 00:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality and non-rasterized version of File:SEPTA T icon.svg Triphora (talk) 00:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality and non-rasterized version of File:SEPTA T2 icon.svg Triphora (talk) 00:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused version of File:Flag of Barbados.svg with nonstandard colors. Omphalographer (talk) 03:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: looks like a personal photo, with a watermark as well. How is this photo educational? How/where/in which situation can it be reused? JopkeB (talk) 04:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious educational value (view of Malpica de Bergantiños) but for the figure in first plan. Restored, cropped and properly categorized.-- Darwin Ahoy! 15:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhamadbaneshi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Horst Tonne M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KM611 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User globally locked, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 11:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Caminhodoprodutor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo materials of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Mohammdaon (talk) 08:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not used anywhere on Wiki. I found no results for the image on a reverse Google image search. I found no mentions of "Nazi-Sionist Brazil" on Google. ‎דוד18:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... I always thought a majority of the micronation and alternative history flags in the SVG special or fictional flags category were out of scope, but at the time even unused ones, were deemed worth keeping if I recall correctly so with this one I fixed the seemingly empty file regardless of the content and moved on. TFerenczy (talk) 21:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, with extreme prejudice. The juxtaposition of "Nazi" and "Zionist" is pretty damned offensive, and I see no positive reason to keep this. - Jmabel ! talk 04:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like something the uploader dreamed up that does not have any connection to the real world whatsoever. The whole idea makes about as much sense as Commie-Nazis or an under-water cactus. Just dump it already. El Grafo (talk) 06:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ─ Aafī (talk) 07:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Karena sangat tidak boleh digunakan untuk kepentingan tertentu dan untuk yang artikel pilpres 2024 sudah ada foto surat suara yang khusus yang disediakan untuk gambar paslon Dmirnovv (talk) 22:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, saya pernah mengunggah gambar surat suara sebelumnya, malah yang sudah dicoblos, di akun saya yang lain, dan gambarnya masih aman sampai sekarang. Asal anda tahu saja, saya sudah berkontribusi di Wikipedia sejak 2013, sedangkan akun anda baru seumur jagung. Lagipula di gambar ini surat suaranya belum dicoblos sehingga tidak melanggar asas rahasia dalam pemilu. Adapula dua gambar surat suara pilpres yang sudah dicoblos tapi anda anehnya tidak menggugatnya sama sekali.
Hey, I've uploaded picture of ballot paper before, even ones that have been voted, on my other account, and the picture is still safe now. Just so you know, I've been contributing to Wikipedia since 2013, while your account is still a newbie. Moreover, in this picture the ballot paper has not been voted on so it does not violate the principle of secrecy in elections. There are also two pictures of presidential election ballot papers that have been voted on but strangely you don't dispute them at all. AIP2000 (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Gambar ini saya yang buat sendiri, dan semua gambar yang saya unggah adalah buatan saya sendiri. Sedangkan anda? Saya lihat anda pernah mengunggah gambar, tapi kemudian dihapus karena dicomot dari situs lain, ya? 🤭
I made this image myself, and all the images I upload are my own creation. While you? I see you once uploaded an image, but then it was deleted because it was taken from another site, right? 🤭 AIP2000 (talk) 00:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no acceptable Freedom of Panorama in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Zaïre). Images of copyrighted architectural works can only be freely used in "newspapers, journals and school textbooks," but not in the Internet. These commercially-licensed images violate the copyrights of two architectural engineers of the government building. Per w:fr:Palais du Peuple (Kinshasa), the building was completed in 1979 and was authored by both Chinese architectural engineer Lin Kia-Wu and Congolese architectural engineer Seka Fwatuyisa.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-incidental images of the National Assembly Building of Cambodia, completed in 2007. As Cambodia does not provide Freedom of Panorama, these images under commercial licensing require additional licensing permissions from the architect/designer of this building.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. Private picture of non-notable person Ciacho5 (talk) 11:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:12, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) uzziel.de M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) uzziel.de M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan. The building was built in 2004. As a copyrighted building, this commercially-licensed image requires licensing permit from the copyright holder (the architect) of this unfree building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Foto: Mareike Mähler M2k~dewiki (talk) 11:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same no-commercial FoP issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Парламент Казахстана 2017.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same no-commercial FoP issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Парламент Казахстана 2017.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Monaco. The building was completed in 2012 and authored by architect Jean-Michel Ughes. No evidence of commercial licensing permission from him.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First and third are a de minimis case imo. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 15:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Lyon-St-Clair unsure about DM applicability here. The entrance area is part of the same building. The third one does seem to show some details of the entrance. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission for photo (Photos from ebay are not in public domain), missing license for the photo. Wdwd (talk) 15:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP: Only old text, without the whole item, no image worthy of protection. -- Kürschner (talk) 08:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hinweis auf Deutsch: Es geht um das Foto (die Aufnahme), nicht um das dargestellte Logo/Text.--Wdwd (talk) 10:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Wdwd (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is via internet gemakkelijk te downloaden Verloren16 (talk) 15:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author's request, out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tried to abort but it didn't work. so I started upload again with proper info. SDudley (talk) 04:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dit brengt geen nieuwe informatie, het staat al in de inleiding van het artikel Verloren16 (talk) 10:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

geeft te weinig nieuwe informatie Verloren16 (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 21:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Een Wikipedia-foto met ruitjeshemd is ongepast Verloren16 (talk) 10:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --Rosenzweig τ 21:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone remarked: this looks like a butcher! Verloren16 (talk) 16:01, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Still COM:INUSE. --Rosenzweig τ 07:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

De "fotoreportage" is ongepast. Eén beeld volstaat Verloren16 (talk) 10:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 21:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Het luisterfragment bevat te weinig nieuwe informatie Verloren16 (talk) 10:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 21:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously uploaded and deleted file, not in the Public Domain. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yaroslav Hunka, SS Galizien.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yaroslav Hunka in the 1940s.webp

PascalHD (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The image should probably be uploaded on Wikipedia under Fair Use as the image itself would fit the requirements. Discouraging future re-uploading on the Commons. PascalHD (talk) 19:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: this is a Canadian work, which was created prior to 1949; no valid reason for deletion given. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Delete Per the caption: "Soldiers of the 14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Galician), including Yaroslav Hunka (standing in the centre) at the SS-Truppenübungsplatz Heidelager training camp". The SS-Truppenübungsplatz Heidelager camp was located in Poland, and where the photograph was taken. In no way is this a Canadian photograph where such copyright would apply. Regardless, he moved to Canada after the war. PascalHD (talk) 20:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hunka is a Canadian citizen who resides in Canada, so there is no reason why PD-Canada should not apply. Are you saying his copyright is protected by some other jurisdiction, and if so, which one? This photo was first published in 2010 by a Toronto-based journal. So yes, this is very much a Canadian work. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The photo was taken by someone other than Hunka. It's not even his photo. The copyright holder is whomever took the photo, which is Unknown. PascalHD (talk) 23:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And as mentioned, the other PD templates do not apply because it was first published in 2010, not the 1940s. PascalHD (talk) 23:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An anonymous work created prior to 1945 is still in the public domain in Canada according to PD-Canada-anon. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Taking a copyrighted unpublished photograph from Poland/EU and publishing it in Canada without possibly consulting the original unknown author. There’s certainly some form of Ethical and legal considerations here. The Unknown author did not publish it themselves, but could possibly be determined by asking Hunka. Anyway, even if it is Public Domain in Canada which is possible, in order to keep on the Commons it also needs to be Public Domain in the USA - which is 95 years after publication or 120 years after creation. {{PD-1996}} cannot apply as it fails 2/3 of the criteria. PascalHD (talk) 14:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep If PD-Yugoslavia applied it would also be in the public domain. The referenced previous deletion vote, had too little discussion before closure. --RAN (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We know the photo was taken in Poland. We do not know the author of the photo was. I don't think PD-Yugoslavia would apply. PascalHD (talk) 23:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Фото зроблене приблизно в 1943 році. Фотографу тоді мало б бути щонайменше 18 років, але це малоймовірно, бо військовими фотографами були певно старші чоловіки (і навряд чи Гунька міг знати цього фотографа, адже це, напевно, був фотограф-німець). Отже нині йому мало б бути щонайменше 88. Але якщо фотограф невідомий, то припускаємо, що він помер чи був убитий ще під час війни. Отже, припускаємо, що минуло 70 років від смерті фотографа. --Микола Василечко (talk) 08:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Copyright terms for Unknown authors are based on creation or publication, because we don’t know their age and cannot apply years to a death. When determining copyright status of a work, we have to apply the longest possible copyright term to ensure compliance with copyright laws. This means assuming the author survived and lived for the full duration of their copyright term. But we’re referring to a work by an unknown author though, 70 years for the European copyright terms after 1943 would be Jan 1 2014. It could have expired in Europe at that point. If the 2010 publication in Canada affected that it could still be under copyright. PascalHD (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; as before in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yaroslav Hunka, SS Galizien.jpg (same photo). --Rosenzweig τ 21:38, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI generated image of a non-existent building created for es:"Ball House" Pabellón Deportivo Wenzhou, seems to be part of an active Spanish (school?) project to write AI-generated hoax architecture articles on English/Spanish Wikipedia (see 1, 2, 3). Belbury (talk) 15:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Camila y valentin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

AI generated image of a non-existent building and its non-existent architect, and a map of its supposed site, created for hoax article es:"Ball House" Pabellón Deportivo Wenzhou. Seems to be part of an active Spanish (school?) project to write AI-generated hoax architecture articles on English/Spanish Wikipedia (see also 1, 2, 3).

Belbury (talk) 15:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused "artwork" created by editor, unlikely to ever be used for an article. Liz (talk) 04:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 17:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for vandalism purposes. discospinster (talk) 02:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It's spam and I doubt that it was created in 1887 Wizardofwords25 (talk) 02:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & no source. Uploader is blocked on enwiki as VOA. --Achim55 (talk) 10:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{subst:ofud}} Анастасия Давыдова (talk) 17:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. There is no rule that a photo has to be linked to on another page in order to be hosted here. Please do not nominate photos for deletion on such a basis, as it wastes everyone's time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural Keep. As the nominator has listed the same file for deletion twice, I am closing this first debate early to avoid confusion. The deletion discussion can continue in the second debate below. From Hill To Shore (talk) 00:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful because no pages that use this photo Анастасия Давыдова (talk) 17:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. There is no rule that a photo has to be linked to on another page in order to be hosted here. Please do not nominate photos for deletion on such a basis, as it wastes everyone's time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Don't you think this source should be an educational? In my opinion, Instagram is more suitable for such photos
    According to Commons:Deletion policy there is a rule:
    Out of scope: Not educationally useful - The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Examples of files that are not realistically useful include:
    Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on. There are plenty of other projects on the Internet you can use for such a purpose, such as Flickr. Such private image collections do not become educational even if displayed as a gallery on a user page on Commons or elsewhere. Анастасия Давыдова (talk) 16:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep No valid reason for deletion. Please note that the nominator removed this image from its category[3] and also tried to defeat a COM:INUSE argument on a related file by removing its usage on Wikidata.[4] I am tracking this user's global history now to see if similar edits have occured to alter the perception of other files they have nominated. From Hill To Shore (talk) 00:08, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Please remove this photo and all information about it as it violates the photographer's copyright. Unfortunately, I lost access to my old Robertsparks account from which I uploaded photos to the site in 2018 and wrote an article on Wikipedia about the model, which was later removed by the admins. I made a number of mistakes: I didn't include the photographer's name and chose a free licence. I have now been contacted by the photographer through the model and demanded the photo be removed as photographer haven’t given permission for free commercial use. Please, I ask you to remove the photo for me to avoid legal issues. I didn’t have enough knowledge about copyright at that time and uploaded those photos because I was asked by the model, but it turned out that I didn’t have a right to do that. Please help me. Furthermore, the main article of which the photo was a part has been removed and the photos are not relevant to any article at this time. Newrobertsparks (talk) 00:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My old account Robertsparks was used only to upload the photos of one particular model. When I uploaded it, I violated the copyright without understanding that. Please, check out this link as an evidence of the fact that Robertsparks is not the author and copyright holder. The photo was made in 2016 during the Mercedes Benz Fashion Week Moscow and was posted on the official fashion week website and social media. Several photos uploaded by Robertsparks have been already deleted due to the lack of copyright evidence. Newrobertsparks (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Copyvio. The image was posted on Instagram earlier than it's claimed by the uploader to be created Wizardofwords25 (talk) 02:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and discussion. --Yann (talk) 17:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license of website is "Todos os direitos reservados" or "All right reserved" Vitorperrut555 (talk) 23:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 19:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage outside wikidata, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hawaii Writer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

dubious copyright and appears to be spam, but link given as source is down

Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 19:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foi invadido e mudado tudo por um hacker. Exclua esse ficheiro. Apometria Bioenergética (talk) 16:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Não sei exatamente a qual página se refere, mas a página que linkou acima não é um ficheiro e provavelmente pretendia se referir a outra. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Probably mistaken with another page. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 19:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For some reason, some NARA document uploads within this category went very wrong - some multi-page documents were uploaded only partially. I replaced those partial versions with an upload of the full PDF.

  1. File:Alaska Hghway, Whitehorse Section, Mile 1464 to 1475.3, Construction, Proj. 3-H (B-1), 3-A (B-1), Levels 8C X-Sections, 1943, Book No. 5 - NARA - 83153313 (page 1).jpg series consists of 138 pages, but has only 106 uploaded. (see the redlinks in the "other pages" section) I replaced it with this PDF.
  2. File:Alaska Highway, Alaska Sec., As Constructed, General Notes, Mile 2000 to Mile 1955, 1943, Proj. 3-G, 3-D, 5 - NARA - 83153820 (page 1).jpg series consists of 41 pages, but has only 28 uploaded. Further, the uploaded "(page 1).jpg" is actually page 3 in the full version (which I uploaded here as PDF. (this means that the page numbers on the 28 uploaded pages are wrong too)
  3. File:Alaska Highway, Alaska sec., As Constructed, Levels & Topography, Mile 1954.7 to 1937, -1943-, Proj. 3-H, 8, (copy) - NARA - 83167027 (page 1).jpg series consists of 159 files, but has only 125 pages uploaded. Full version here.

The incomplete individual pages series are therefore redundant.

TheImaCow (talk) 15:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 11:30, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was taken from page 27 of this PDF published by the airport. Sunnya343 (talk) 00:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused infographic containing medical misinformation (blaming diseases on pseudoscientific causes like "structural imbalances" or "toxic emotions"). Omphalographer (talk) 00:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for vandalism purposes. discospinster (talk) 02:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Spam and meaningless Wizardofwords25 (talk) 02:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope nonsense image NorthTension (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. These are unacceptable derivatives of 2D works. plicit 04:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Mohammdaon (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:22, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Demande de suppression de fichier - Mandibule_l'homme_de_tighennif Je vous contacte aujourd'hui pour demander la suppression de la photo [Nom du fichier] que j'ai téléversée sur Wikimedia Commons. J'ai fourni deux fichiers de ce même artefact et je souhaiterais garder le meilleur d'entre eux. Le fichier que je souhaite supprimer est de qualité inférieure et n'est pas nécessaire. je vous prie de bien vouloir supprimer le fichier [Nom du fichier] de Wikimedia Commons. Cordialement, Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request, not used. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je vous contacte aujourd'hui pour demander la suppression de la photo. La_grande_Sebkha_D'Oran que j'ai téléversé sur Wikimedia Commons. J'ai fourni deux fichiers portant le même nom. Je souhaite modifier l'un d'eux en vue de le publier dans un autre contexte. Je vous prie donc de bien vouloir supprimer la photo [Nom du fichier] de Wikimedia Commons. Je vous remercie de votre compréhension. Cordialement, Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, image in use. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Demande de suppression de la photo [Nom du fichier] Motif de la suppression : Je souhaite supprimer la photo [Nom du fichier] de Wikimedia Commons pour des raisons personnelles. Cette photo a été utilisée pour me harceler et je ne souhaite plus qu'elle soit accessible au public. Je vous prie donc de bien vouloir supprimer cette photo dans les plus brefs délais. Je vous remercie de votre compréhension. Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Demande de suppression de la photo [Nom du fichier] Motif de la suppression : Je souhaite supprimer la photo [Nom du fichier] de Wikimedia Commons pour des raisons de droits d'auteur. Cette photo va être publiée dans un périodique et il est nécessaire de la retirer du domaine public. Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, this is not Public Domain it is CC BY SA. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Motif de la suppression : Je souhaite supprimer la photo [Nom du fichier] de Wikimedia Commons pour les raisons suivantes : Le consentement de la personne représentée n'a pas été obtenu. La personne figurant sur la photo m'a demandé de lui retirer de l'espace public. La diffusion de cette photo porte atteinte à la vie privée de la personne représentée. Justification : la personne est facilement identifiable. La publication de cette photo sans son consentement constitue une violation de sa vie privée. Demande : Je vous prie donc de bien vouloir supprimer cette photo de Wikimedia Commons dans les plus brefs délais. Je vous remercie de votre compréhension. Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Motif de la suppression : Je souhaite supprimer la photo [Nom du fichier] de Wikimedia Commons pour les raisons suivantes : Cette photo devra être imprimée dans une revue. Demande de suppression : Motif de la suppression : Cette photo est protégée par des droits d'auteur et je n'ai pas l'autorisation du détenteur des droits de l'utiliser. La photo est de mauvaise qualité et ne répond pas aux exigences de Wikimedia Commons. La photo est inappropriée ou offensante et ne devrait pas être hébergée sur Wikimedia Commons. Je vous prie de bien vouloir examiner ma demande et de supprimer la photo dans les plus brefs délais Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite supprimer la photo [Nom du fichier] de Wikimedia Commons pour les raisons suivantes : Je souhaite la modifier." Motif de la suppression : besoin de modification : je souhaite modifier la photo pour l'améliorer ou l'adapter à un usage spécifique. Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Terki hassaine samir, vous pouvez apporter vos modifications sur une nouvelle version du fichier sans avoir à le supprimer. Il suffit juste de téléverser une autre copie sur la même page. Cherchez «Upload a new version of this file» ou «Téléverser une nouvelle version de ce fichier». Merci — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite supprimer la photo [Nom du fichier] de Wikimedia Commons pour les raisons suivantes : Je souhaite la modifier." Motif de la suppression : besoin de modification : je souhaite modifier la photo pour l'améliorer ou l'adapter à un usage spécifique. Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je souhaite supprimer la photo [Nom du fichier] de Wikimedia Commons pour les raisons suivantes : Je souhaite la modifier." Motif de la suppression : besoin de modification : je souhaite modifier la photo pour l'améliorer ou l'adapter à un usage spécifique. Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour @Terki hassaine samir, vous pouvez apporter vos modifications sur une nouvelle version du fichier sans avoir à le supprimer. Il suffit juste de téléverser une autre copie sur la même page. Cherchez «Upload a new version of this file» ou «Téléverser une nouvelle version de ce fichier». Merci — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

12345678 Ayob zangeneh (talk) 03:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was uploaded incorrectly and does not match the name Ayob zangeneh (talk) 03:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Calm down, you have already managed cause 4 DRs to appear for this one image and put the template twice on the page. Considering you uploaded it over 2 years ago, why should it be deleted now?
(NOTE: It has not been used on any Wikimedia projects.)
All the best - Chuck Talk 03:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, author request, not in use. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: looks purely advertising. Does not look at all at the first photo, perhaps reverse it? JopkeB (talk) 04:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal logo, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree, not utherefor articles and the username of the uploader is similar to the logo name. Self promotion Wizardofwords25 (talk) 02:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by K02119 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images for forums, out of scope

Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, and the copyright for each of these logos will belong to the respective schools. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:De minimis ? eien20 (talk) 03:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

こんにちは。初めてトークに参加します
削除依頼というのは招き猫が著作権に抵触するということですか?
既に招き猫の車両写真が掲載されていたので問題ないと思うのですが如何でしょう? Souka Kinmei (talk) 12:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
こんにちは。猫のイラストは著作権保護の対象と考へられ, 映り込みとは言ひ切れないため, 著作権侵害のおそれがあるため依頼を提出しました。当該ファイルの以外のファイルは関係ありません。問題があるファイルは必要な対応をすべきです。 --eien20 (talk) 07:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
こんばんわ。そうしますと東急世田谷線
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9D%B1%E6%80%A5%E4%B8%96%E7%94%B0%E8%B0%B7%E7%B7%9A
にある招き猫の他の三枚については問題がないとの判断ですか?
理由を聞きたいです。 Souka Kinmei (talk) 13:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
他のファイルの話はしていません。問題があるファイルは必要な対応をすべきです。 --eien20 (talk) 14:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
他の招き猫の他の三枚は今まで放置していたのに私が一枚投稿したら途端に他の招き猫の二枚も削除ですか?
問題があるファイルは必要な対応をすべきなのにこれまで見逃してあげていたということですか? Souka Kinmei (talk) 14:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 16:02, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no link to the source - copyright? Xocolatl (talk) 11:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 16:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hubo una confusion , ese no es el estilo del escudo del apellido Risco Zzcarloszz (talk) 21:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Porque se creo otro escudo mas planificado y hecho Zzcarloszz (talk) 23:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falta mejorar la calidad de la imagen Zzcarloszz (talk) 22:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 17:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea for sculptures. plicit 04:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" such as posters or murals in the United Kingdom

A1Cafel (talk) 05:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete: All of these have the mural as the main subject, so COM:DM doesn't save them. --bjh21 (talk) 10:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Engelberthumperdink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Russia for modern sculpture

Xunks (talk) 05:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete as there is no specific regulation scheme for orphan works in Russian law, therefore, the sculpture in question is still subject to copyright protection. Biathlon (talk) 11:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Почему эта номинация отдельно? Почему этот файл не на удалении? Это не авторское право резчика по камню? А почему файл другого автора не вынесли на удаление? @Bogdanov-62. Разве между этой фотографией и, например, моей фотографией под номером 1 есть какая-то разница? И там бюст, и тут бюст, примерно на одном и том же расстоянии. Удивительная избирательность. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 14:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 10:46, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Engelberthumperdink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of 2D and 3D artworks, copyright status is unclear, no FoP in Russia except architecture.

Quick1984 (talk) 06:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ваш дебилизм не знает границ. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 08:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 08:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Which is the copyright banner? MiguelAlanCS (talk) 13:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Oman; therefore, this commercially-licensed image infringes the government building architect's copyright. The building was completed in 2013 and was "designed by q-dar and built by Carillion Alawi." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same no-FoP issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:The State Council (47954035406).jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission for photo (Photos from ebay are not in public domain) Wdwd (talk) 09:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dieses Logo besteht nur aus einfachen geometrischen Formen und Text. Es erreicht keine Schöpfungshöhe (spezifischere Beschreibung auf Englisch), die für urheberrechtlichen Schutz nötig ist, und ist daher gemeinfrei. Obwohl es zwar frei von urheberrechtlichen Beschränkungen ist, kann das Bild dennoch anderen Beschränkungen unterliegen. Siehe WP:PD § Fonts oder Template talk:PD-textlogo für weitere Informationen.
Es geht nicht um das dargestellte Werk bzw. Logo, sondern um das Foto. Und das ist kein einfacher "2D-Scan" sondern ein eigenständiges Werk, samt der "kreativen" Ausleuchtung und Falten. Und für dieses Foto (laut Quellenangabe von ebay kopiert) fehlt die Freigabe vom Fotografen/Rechteinhaber.--Wdwd (talk) 11:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, die Kopie einer Abbildung ist als solche nicht urheberrechtsgeschützt, ob gemalt, gedruckt oder gewebt. Hier ist keinerlei kreative Arbeit des Fotografen vorhanden. -- Kürschner (talk) 12:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing correct information about the author (who take the photo?) and missing license for the photo. Wdwd (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Einfache Kopie, in meinem Auftrag angefertigt, ohne weiteren schöpferischen Wert. -- Kürschner (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission (Author is not the uploader) and missing license for the photo. Wdwd (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. Das Foto hat keinerlei schöpferischen Wert und fällt damit nicht unter die von Commons festgelegten Bestimmungen. -- Kürschner (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Doch, das Foto erreicht Schöpfungshöhe. Und genau für das Foto (nicht Logo) fehlt die Freigabe/Lizenz. Das dargestellte/abgebildete Logo erreicht meiner Meinung eher keine Schöpfungshöhe, da ansich eher einfacher Schriftzug.--Wdwd (talk) 10:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:07, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very low quality private (mostly nude) amateur photographs by non-notable photographer. Unused, no educational value, out of project scope..

VLu (talk) 14:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:06, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Another batch, the same rationale: Very low quality private (including nude) amateur photographs by non-notable photographer. Unused, no educational value, out of project scope.

VLu (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 02:40, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vitold Muratov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Another batch, the same rationale: Very low quality private (including nude) amateur photographsof non-notable people made by a non-notable photographer. Unused, no educational value, out of project scope.

VLu (talk) 16:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Campfire in the rain.jpg in use in ru:Экологический туризм в России, File:Brothers at summer cottage.jpg in use in Italian Wiktionary --Butko (talk) 06:50, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 01:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately FOP in Belgium doesn't cover building interiors, which is where these photographs were taken. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 22:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Belgium doesn't cover building interiors and this map is probably copyrighted. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Belgium doesn't cover building interiors and this sign is probably copyrighted. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by artist Tomi Ungerer (1931–2019), still protected by copyright in France. The file can be restored in 2090. Rosenzweig τ 00:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:01, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect this is a copyvio given the lack of metadata and the iPhone XS screenshot size. I can find other uses of the image online but I suspect it was posted to Facebook/X and hence doesn't show in reverse image searches. Would be helpful if the supposed photographer could shed some light on this and perhaps upload the original file (if indeed they have it) rather than a screenshot of the photo taken on their phone. 5225C (talkcontributions) 02:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Video game screenshot Kirilloparma (talk) 02:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per a previous edit, "will no longer be used for future article" Johnj1995 (talk) 03:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, non-notable event. --P 1 9 9   00:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside old sandbox and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be image from 2020 with added watermarks, but listing is down so cannot confirm the original photographer; precautionary principle might apply especially since this seems spammy https://tineye.com/search/6fa760b8c1d3fdcbed01032106fc621746dd71eb?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not secure proper permission for it before uploading it. I just screenshotted it from someone's paper Footpathandstile (talk) 08:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   00:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image repeatadly used in vandalism, self promotion, and scams. Deleting this image and banning the offending user will make it more difficult for them to continue their activities in the future. Wincent01 (talk) 08:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --P 1 9 9   00:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Infringement Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9   00:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jaxa images are not Public domain Artem.G (talk) 09:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work? Looks like recent commercial comic drawings to me Mateus2019 (talk) 09:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

thers planty of beter images of the franch flag איש עיטי (talk) 10:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems be spam Wizardofwords25 (talk) 02:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   00:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image looks too similar to stock flower photos found long before upload date in 2012. WindEwriX (talk) 07:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that it's licensed under CC-By 4.0 licence, source is https://www.stokespace.com/rocket/. Artem.G (talk) 09:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:52, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 12:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unusable due to huge watermark. --P 1 9 9   01:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission no author no metadata and copyvio from https://www.mejudice.nl/auteurs/detail/age-bakker Hoyanova (talk) 12:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission from given author see metadata which read (C) Jeroen van der Meyde, Contact information jeroen@fotogeniek.nl www.fotogeniek.nl Berkstraat 13 Den Haag, , 2565MR Nederland 0653896103 Hoyanova (talk) 13:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission from given author see metadata which read (C) Jeroen van der Meyde, Contact information jeroen@fotogeniek.nl www.fotogeniek.nl Berkstraat 13 Den Haag, , 2565MR Nederland 0653896103 Hoyanova (talk) 13:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Slechts één opmerkelijke zin, dus verwijderen Verloren16 (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope (text-only image). --P 1 9 9   01:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not match with the actual results of the British House of ommons, fantasy parties Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious document with no obvious educational purpose. Omphalographer (talk) 20:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False logo uploaded by user with history of uploading hoax logos for PBS Kids/Sprout. I used Tineye on the image and all instances of this logo have a thick black outline around the speech bubble. So this is probably a hoax too. William Graham (talk) 20:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploader has history of uploading hoax logos. I can't find any use of this color way in Tineye. -- William Graham (talk) 20:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unusable map in black/white Enyavar (talk) 20:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to what rules is this card removed? Devlet Geray (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't convey any educational information. I assume the colored original once showed "linguistic families"; but this black-and-white version has no informational value. At best, it's abstract art. --Enyavar (talk) 20:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:00, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is he in scope? 45.250.252.152 21:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is he in scope? 45.250.252.152 21:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is he in scope? 45.250.252.152 21:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is he in scope? 45.250.252.152 21:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Advocata

[edit]

Several watermarked as coming from MyHeritage, and File:Lord and Lady Mountbatten with VK Krishna Menon; Prince Philip following.jpg has watermarks all across the image. File:VK Krishna Menon and Queen Elizabeth II.jpg has already been deleted as a screengrab from Youtube, some of these images look like they are probably are too but I don't see why I should waste time finding the source for every one when it's clear these uploads aren't "Own work" as claimed. Some of the images appear to be quite old and possibly may be free of copyright restrictions, but since the uploader deliberately hasn't provided us with the actual sources it's impossible to check easily. --Kathleen's bike (talk) 23:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:05, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a bad crop. The file isn't used in any Wikipediapage. I made a better crop from my picture File:Kristen Stewart at Berlinale 2024 cropped 1.tif Elena Ternovaja (talk) 19:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There can be more than one version of a file, this one is not a "bad crop", and your crop "isn't used in any Wikipediapage" either. If you don't like others editing the files you uploaded, you shouldn't be uploading anything here. --Nyxaros (talk) 21:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per user:Nyxaros. --P 1 9 9   02:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Несвободный файл Прикли (talk) 09:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, credit in watermark not matching the uploader. --P 1 9 9   14:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oran-Mosquée de Sidi El Houarie copie Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, and likely not own work anyway: DW without essential source info. --P 1 9 9   14:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Motif de la suppression : Je souhaite supprimer la photo [Nom du fichier] de Wikimedia Commons pour les raisons suivantes : La carte n'est pas précise et devrait être actualisée. Demande de suppression : La carte présente des inexactitudes et n'est pas à jour. Je souhaite la supprimer pour qu'elle ne soit plus utilisée comme source d'information erronée. Terki hassaine samir (talk) 02:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The map is from 1901, so of course "La carte présente des inexactitudes et n'est pas à jour.". --P 1 9 9   14:14, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These appear to be NECA statues of fictional characters, and the United States does not have freedom of panorama Di (they-them) (talk) 03:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unfree content per COM:PACKAGING

— Draceane talkcontrib. 07:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Osobní fotka Matatata 1 (talk) 08:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   14:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of starbucks and the copyrighted artwork on the cup A1Cafel (talk) 08:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

صورة لها حقوق Mohammed Qays (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW of File:الشيخ العلامة محمد عوامة حفظه الله.jpg. --P 1 9 9   14:19, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These two files were uploaded to Flickr by John Lord as cc-by-2.0. However copyright is still held by the artist or artist's estate, as Tacita Dean is still alive, and Lowry died in 1976, less than 70 years ago. Therefore these files are ineligible for use on Commons.

Voice of Clam 10:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the given informations, author of the the artwork (poster) died 1964 -> Missing permission for shown artwork. Can be undeleted 2035 Wdwd (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok! -- Kürschner (talk) 17:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 2001; pd in April 2071. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:27, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; artist died in 1966; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; artists died in 1965 / 1974; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; Artist Beyer died in 1985; no fop. (see https://www.uni-weimar.de/de/universitaet/profil/unesco-welterbe/hauptgebaeude/ no. 6 / 7) Martin Sg. (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found the photo at Find A Grave, which mentions it was uploaded in 2009, long before the 2022 upload. Is the FindAGrave user the same as the Commons user, or was it ripped from there, falsely increased resolution and colourized? I also found it at ParlInfo. I have my doubts about the Own Work status, but if it real is it can be kept. Clarification is gladly needed. PascalHD (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and dubious PD-Canada license. --P 1 9 9   14:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the work of Land Rover MENA - Getty Images photos accidentally Flickrwashed by Land Rover's regional Flickr account.

Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FurryManforme1976_Portrait_Picture.jpg FurryManforme1976 (talk) 21:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per self-nomination, U1. --P 1 9 9   14:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is it an own work? 45.250.252.152 21:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, scan with transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   14:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Ludwig Schedl M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je suis l'homme sur la photo et je ne souhaite plus qu'elle soit publiée sur internet Lukkas75 (talk) 22:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:45, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presenta una alteración en la calidad de la imagen y existe otro archivo muy similar a otro archivo de la misma categoría "San Martín de las Pirámides" Carlos Felipe G (talk) 22:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   14:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El archivo tiene granulado lo que dificulta su apreciación, en este caso del lugar, y es muy posible que no sea el lugar que dice ser la fotografía (San Martín de las Pirámides) Carlos Felipe G (talk) 22:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, unusable poor quality. --P 1 9 9   14:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Eino Räsänen (Wikidata:Q11857186), died in 1970, not PD yet, no freedom of Panorama for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 12:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Eino Räsänen (Wikidata:Q11857186), died in 1970, not PD yet, no freedom of Panorama for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 12:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:21, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Varenimo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images were taken from https://archive.org/details/nist-911 which states a public domain licence. The NIST website at https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/photos-videos-and-simulations says of its wider collection that Materials available in the repository may be protected by copyrights owned by private individuals or organizations, and may be subject to restrictions on use.

It's possible that the archive.org collection is an (officially or unofficially) curated subset of genuinely public domain images, but this seem contradicted by the fact that some of the photos in that archive have a bright red copyright watermark within the image (eg. https://archive.org/details/NIST_9-11_Release_39 which says © 2001. New York City Police Department. All rights reserved. Used with permission of the City of New York.) that contradicts the public domain licence being claimed.

Belbury (talk) 08:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Varenimo has posted on the talk page of this discussion page today to say that I got them from NIST release 31 and it said it was public domain and on the image upload page everything was checked out well.
What/where is NIST release 31? Is there a web page other than https://archive.org/details/nist-911 that claims all of these images to be in the public domain? Belbury (talk) 18:01, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, how can a work be by a federal employee if the author is unknown?. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kxf4YiLBHr8 - правообладатель: http://minimalTV.org Engelberthumperdink (talk) 09:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keep for now, I don't see evidence that minimaltv is the copyright holder. --Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Lamborghini badge logo. メイド理世 (talk) 13:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, non free logo. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is only one Flag here, and that flag is likely fake. Eehuiio (talk) 17:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The departments of Haiti didn't even have their own flags. The flag of Navassa deleted already Alexphangia Talk 18:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete It seems the same user has uploaded other non-exiting flags of subdivisions for random countries. I see no reason to believe these are anymore genuine then the others. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax logo or fan art, never used by WWE/WWF. Uploader has history of hoax logo uploads. William Graham (talk) 21:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is it an own work? 45.250.252.152 21:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP. No exif etc. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is it an own work? 45.250.252.152 21:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in the UAE. The work dates to 2020 and is authored by Dar Al Omran Planning, Architecture, Engineering. (source) Under the amphitheater designer's copyright.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo of NCAHP used here is not genuine because government of India not released any logo yet. A state association has no right to display the logo of the commission. Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has not released any logo yet Citizen arindam (talk) 04:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The logo has officially been used on a notice issued by the NCAHP secretary, uploaded on the website of 'department of personnel. I am attaching the link to the notice. You may also find it after searching "NCAHP notice" on google.
https://dopt.gov.in/sites/default/files/Notice%20for%20Walk-in%20Interview%20for%20retired%20US%20and%20SO%20of%20CSS.pdf FlaminMongrel (talk) 11:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: no evidence that the file has an appropriate licence for Commons to host; per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. The architect isn't yet dead for more than 70 years, so this building is unfree to be distributed under commercial licensing. Dozens of images of this building were deleted in the past: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Verkhovna Rada and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Verkhovna Rada building. Unsure if this is a reupload of File:Kyiv - Verkhovna rada.jpg, as both images were uploaded by the same uploader. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious PD claim. If the author is unknown (as stated), it's not clear how we also know that the author died over 70 years ago (the reason given for saying that this image is in the PD). Hoary (talk) 12:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn Hoary (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1947 was 77 years ago. Check this list out, List of countries' copyright lengths For UK it says "70 years if the author is unknown." This does fall under the UK's public domain laws btw, since this was taken in England. (talk) 14:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Now that TreeElf has changed the reason for claiming that the image is in the PD, I withdraw this nomination. -- Hoary (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This one might be OK, but TreeElf has a history of uploading incorrect licenses it seems. Someone might want to sit down and explain copyright to user. Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 04:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Researched this more. Seems like a delete maybe? The Guardian Gives this a citation of ownership etc, so author unknown is unlikely. I'm not too familar with UK copyright, so maybe it is OK because of age? But claiming it is author unknown seems deceptive. Ref: Article in the Guardian with this image ... Nesnad (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wdwd as Logo Kürschner (talk) 09:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP. Ein einfaches Textlogo, nur Schrift, ohne schützenswerte Teile. -- Kürschner (talk) 09:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info: Es ist mehr als nur das Ist ein Foto mit kmplexen Hintergrund und Lizenz dazu fehlt.--Wdwd (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The question is whether the script font is sufficiently more individual than this uncopyrightable file to exceed COM:TOO Germany. Both use distinctive fonts, and I don't know what German jurisprudence on script fonts is like. Does anyone reading know? For the record, I do think that script font has more individuality, so absent any more relevant evidence, I'd support deletion as a precaution. I guess the other issue is, why do we think the photo is not copyrighted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
German Wikipedia says: This logo consists only of simple geometric shapes and text. It does not reach the level of creativity (more specific description in English) required for copyright protection and is therefore in the public domain. Although it is free of copyright restrictions, the image may still be subject toother restrictions. -- Kürschner (talk) 08:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What about the photo? Why would the photo not be copyrighted? Also, I did read at least a rough translation of the German-language discussion before I posted, but I'm not convinced the script font is uncopyrightable in Germany. Why are you sure of that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: at least no permission for the photo. --Krd 11:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a de facto 1:1 duplicate of File:Routes of Advance to Rhine River from Prum-Bitung Area - NARA - 100384467 (page 2).jpg, only the map has a slightly different rotation. TheImaCow (talk) 11:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This one is straighter; the Page 2 scan is rotated a bit. I would delete the other. Both are there on NARA, unsure if the bot would just re-upload or not. Carl Lindberg (talk) 11:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is the issue of having them both and allowing users to make their choice. Different is different, let choice be there.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Billinghurst. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:37, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content under wrong license 3dollarsinmybankaccount (talk) 17:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The text is definitely PD-text. I'm not sure about the three symbols; they might be considered PD-shape but it may be too stylized with the "blood splatters". 11icewing (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Looks above the ToO to me. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately FOP in Belgium doesn't cover building interiors and these signs are probably copyrighted. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary.

Adamant1 (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@IronGargoyle: Is that not a window with a building outside of it in the first image? Also it looks like the other two images are lit with indoor lighting. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The glass in the first image shows the reflection of a building and sign behind the photographer. Note the reversed text, indicating a mirror image. As for the second two, I can't speak for why that looks like interior lighting to you, but there are cobblestone streets and the weathering pattern on the signs clearly indicates they are outdoors. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's such a thing as cobble paths indoors. It doesn't look like the path or paint job on the wall has the weathering r wear and tear to be consistent with it being outdoors either. There's essentially zero weathering what-so-ever on either one. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The weathering is likely rust and can be clearly seen if you zoom in to the edges of the sign. Of course a wall and cobblestone sidewalk are not going to have rust (though there is other weathering to been seen if you zoom in). In addition, tourist signs like this are also almost always outdoors. The sign refers to a specific building, which would make the most sense to be placed outside the building in question. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what your talking with the rust. If you look at the bar in the top of the first image some of the paint is chipped off and it doesn't look rusty underneath. It's not like that's the only kind of weathering anyway though or that rusting can't happen indoors. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, if you look at this image from Street View there's a sign almost exactly like this one inside of the building to the side of the word "personal" painted on the window. I'm not saying it's the exact sign, but they clearly have inside and the wall looks like it has the same yellow paint job. So it's not that much of a stretch. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The link you sent doesn't work. That aside, rusting happens WAY faster outdoors because of the salt and water and that weathering looks very much like rust. The color is right and the pattern of infiltration is right. Furthermore, yellow walls with light grey stone at the base and square cobbles are exactly what you find on the exterior of the Berlaymont Building (File:Brussels Schuman monument.jpg). IronGargoyle (talk) 04:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, per COM:FOP summary table, Belgian FOP doesn't cover text which is clearly legible on the 3 outdoors signs so I had to delete those too. --Abzeronow (talk) 01:52, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How does the website of the Moscow region government from 2020 own the copyright to a photograph published in 2019 on VKontakte? Time Machine? License laundering? Engelberthumperdink (talk) 09:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I suppose the moscow gov website published the image on 2020, but it could be obtained earlier, or they might have bougth the copyright in 2020. No reason to think an official website is showing the image with a false license. Errors can be made, but on Commons we can assume the file is rightfully published. --Ellywa (talk) 08:47, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The requirement for accurate reproduction in the license is a non-free restriction on derivative works and fails COM:L. The GODL does not apply to names, crests, logos and other official symbols of the data provider(s).

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AntiCompositeNumber Leaving GODL aside, the license of the department (https://www.bro.gov.in/index2.asp?slid=3746&sublinkid=28&lang=1) which is the same as the licenses of defence institutions in India allows free usage. Leoneix (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The license text on the source states "This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context". This will mean the file may not be used freely in all cases, independent of context, which is not in accordance of the Commons Licencing, per AntiCompositeNumber. --Ellywa (talk) 08:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source site has an explicit copyright notice. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the file has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 08:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das ist Werbung für eine pseudowissenschaftliche Therapie. Grassel123 (talk) 16:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ist aber kein Löschgrund. --Achim55 (talk) 17:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Das Foto ist keine Werbung für "Das heilende Radon", zumindest nicht in Wikipedia, sondern ein Blick in die reale Welt. Es gibt in Zentraleuropa 12 Radonbäder: "Ein Ursache-Wirkungsmechanismus, der eine mögliche positive Wirkung von Radonkuren erklärt, ist bislang nicht bekannt. Dennoch berichten Patienten von deutlichen Minderungen ihrer Beschwerden. Diese Diskrepanz zwischen subjektivem (Patienten)Empfinden und objektiver (wissenschaftlicher) Erklärung ist noch nicht zufriedenstellend erklärt." Sollten wir das in der WP verschweigen? Wenn wir alles Pseudowissenschaftliche aus der Wikipedia entfernen würden, wäre sie viel schlanker. Das Foto ist seit dem 22. Dez. 2017 in der WP und sollte dort bleiben. --Roderich Kahn (talk) 15:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wie die umworbene Therapie von Dritten beurteilt wird, ist doch für die Existenz der Bilddatei irrelevant.--Lysippos (talk) 17:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep The nominator's reason ("advertisement for a pseudo-scientific therapy") isn't a valid reason for deletion in this case of a photo taken in public space. I actually find it quite striking and interesting that radon therapy is still advertised that way (when at the same time radon is widely discussed as a cause of lung cancer), or at least was in 2017, when the photo was taken... It is an interesting document and in scope for Commons. However, there is the freedom of panorama issue no one has mentioned yet: What about the photo on the banner? To fall under German FoP, it must be located permanently in public space. The question is, how "permanent" is/was it? It does look like a banner that was placed there for a longer time, maybe for years, so FoP could be applicable - but I'm not sure. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion as discussed. Per Gestumblindi, imho an image of a flag in situ (not for some demonstration etc) can be published according to German FoP, as it is intended to stay on that location on a daily basis. --Ellywa (talk) 08:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP in Belgium doesn't cover building interiors and this map is probably copyrighted. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 22:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment. Is there anything creative about the sign? It contains a floor plan, but that is faithfully based on the architecture of Liège Cathedral, which has been in the public domain for hundreds of years. IronGargoyle (talk) 11:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly the floor plan. I'd consider it similar to a map. Although admittedly simpler then your average map of the globe. Regardless though map legends and particular design elements can be copyrighted. Sure it's just dots here, but they are in a particular style that's unique to the sign. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure I've seen other floor plans to cathedrals that look similar. I'm inclined to agree with IronGargoyle here. Abzeronow (talk) 01:45, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The original uploader did not state the photo was made in the interior, the category "interior" has been added by another user. @FrDr: , if you can remember this sign was made from the street, please comment, in that case the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 09:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]