Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/08/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 26th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

так Мойсей Дмитро (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Exact duplicate of File:Mukaishima 172.jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 08:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bórrelo por favor. 191.126.167.104 11:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Photos-Celebs-attend-the-GQ35-Most-Influential-Young-Indians-909-2.jpg (thumbnail version of that one). --Platonides (talk) 22:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not Creative Commons license https://www.instagram.com/p/CrvkrBePk73/?img_index=1 Urang Kamang (talk) 04:50, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Urang Kamang Thank you for marking this image for deletion. You can request such images for speedy deletion as well. You can use Gadget Twinkle from your Preferences to do it easily. - Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:07, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 14:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Good reasons to think it's a copyvio (no proof). 1-The user has already downloaded a copyvio the same day (File:Nick Paul.jpg). 2-It's obviously not a own work but an official pic. This kind of pic are from hockeydb - see here: google lens Supertoff (talk) 05:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The pic is completly the same (check facial expression, hairs, clothes) than this one but with beard added. Supertoff (talk) 07:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:FOP Japan. According to the local government press release[1], this statue was put up in 2022 and its copyright is kept. Netora (talk) 10:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Agree I understood that article 46 of the Japanese copyright act is only applicable for non-commercial purposes, and Wikimedia Commons does not accept photos for non-commercial use only. Katayokusan (talk) 13:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Katayokusanさん、画像ファイルのアップロードありがとうございます。もしこのファイルの削除に同意される場合は、当該ファイルのページに「{{SD|G7}}」と付記して保存してください。これで投稿者希望でファイルを即時削除依頼することができます。また、屋外美術作品はコモンズではなく日本語版ウィキペディアで特定の条件を満たすことで投稿可能です。詳しくはja:WP:FOPを参照ください。 Netora (talk) 13:55, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
即時削除対象のテンプレートを付記しました。
日本語版Wikipediaへのアップロードについてもご教示ありがとうございます。 Katayokusan (talk) 14:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted as G7. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

signature is not by the individual, but by the author (not necessary crop) Engineerchange (talk) 19:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file of File:Melchior Lorck Sultan Suleiman.jpg Di (they-them) (talk) 19:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this an own work? 186.173.53.24 19:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per F10 - personal photo by non-contributor. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake Nicola (talk) 20:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and G7. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded by mistake Nicola (talk) 20:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and G7. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is unlikely that an individual is the copyright holder for the seal of a Community College with the ability to publish it under a CC-SA license. If it is their "own work," then it likely isn't encyclopedic but if it isn't then there should be a source that shows it in use. If it is actually the logo, it likely exceeds COM:TOO. BigrTex (talk) 23:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quién es Joao? 191.125.62.127 23:20, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 01:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 06:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 07:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 07:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:57, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 07:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 07:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was not aware of copyright laws at the time of publishing this image. Please delete this image. Garshaasp (talk) 07:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Uploaded by locked cross-wiki vandal account. EstrellaSuecia (talk) 09:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Vandalism. Image searches through Google are supposed to come from a secret porn site. --Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 01:33, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake George Muttathil Pulikurumba (talk) 15:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete. Personal 186.173.53.24 20:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Didym. --Rosenzweig τ 18:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this an own work? 186.173.53.24 20:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Didym. --Rosenzweig τ 18:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of com:scope. Jonteemil (talk) 03:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Even if it weren't for the watermark, the image quality is awful - it's like it was taken with a very old cell phone camera. The uploader has other images taken with better cameras, so it's unclear why this one is so bad. Omphalographer (talk) 20:53, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
my camera uplod Chhanchhana zote hmar (talk) 00:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for self-promotion Wolverène (talk) 19:59, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Kadı. --Rosenzweig τ 07:29, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El Chavo del Ocho, crecimos con el. Es permitido? 191.125.62.127 23:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creo que sí, porque no encontré absolutamente nada en internet en contra de esta imagen, entonces creo que esta imagen es pública, gratuita y usarla sería un buen aporte a la página de El Chavo Animado. Pero si hay algo en contra de esta imagen, acepto eliminarla. JoãoRI (talk) 23:41, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CHARLIEHUSSAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: a set of documents and screenshots of unclear significance. Many of them appear to be related to international banking and business name registrations, but it's hard to tell what they're supposed to convey (or, for that matter, if they're even real; some of the account balances are rather difficult to believe).

Omphalographer (talk) 19:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CHARLIEHUSSAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: printed certificates of unclear significance, similar to previous deleted uploads.

Omphalographer (talk) 18:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CHARLIEHUSSAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: additional certificates, spreadsheets, and screenshots of unclear significance.

Omphalographer (talk) 18:51, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CHARLIEHUSSAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: another certificate and spreadsheet of unclear significance.

Omphalographer (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:VAGINA Adsci8 (talk) 19:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freely licensed photograph that has an American painting as its focus. We would need permission from the artist to host this photograph here. Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dmartin576 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: "badly draw" fantasy maps and charts.

Omphalographer (talk) 06:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is unused CzarJobKhaya (talk) 06:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Commons:Project scope. --Polarlys (talk) 15:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious election results map. Actual results for the 1788 US presidential election are in File:ElectoralCollege1789.svg. Omphalographer (talk) 06:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file CzarJobKhaya (talk) 06:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image lacks COM:EVIDENCE of being Own Work/Public Domain. Original 2010 upload was a very low-resolution file that has since been "improved" by another uploader. Muzilon (talk) 06:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eight months ago I asked the original uploader to clarify if the work was really created by him and he has not responded since. File talk:Rudolf Bultmann Portrait.jpg Bari' bin Farangi (talk) 09:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: insufficient information for the chosen licensing, the photo is very likely protected by copyright due to its age and the results of Muzilon's research. --Polarlys (talk) 15:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khaire123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal photos uploaded by a non-contributor. Out of project scope

Vis M (talk) 08:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2007 publication of a German museum, with a clear (C) notice in the front matter, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2007 published journal with a clear (C) notice in the front matter, this is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:38, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this own work? It looks like a photoshopped image from this photo and that photo. Wouter (talk) 08:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See also here where is mentioned copyright RVD-Koos Breukel. Wouter (talk) 12:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2003 journal with clear (C) notice in the front matter, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:48, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2002 Journal, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 report by an agency of a US state (Montana), clear (C) notice in front matter, Report was however submitted to a "Federal" agency..

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1998 report by an agency of a US state, clear 1998 (C) notice in front matter. Report was submitted to a "Federal" Agency (BLM) however.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1998 report/publication of an agency of a US state (Idaho). This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - This would seem to be PD-US-Gov, based on comments by another contributor on a related DR. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1998 publication of a US state agency (Montana). This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1996 report / publication by an agency of a US state (Montana) with a clear copyright notice. Report was however prepared for a "Federal" agency (BLM).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 15:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, artist Anish Kapoor is still alive and these Panoramio imports under commercial licenses violate his sculptural copyrights. See also deleted files at Category:Cloud Gate-related deletion requests/deleted. No suitable exception to copyright under U.S. law that would legally allow the public to freely exploit copyrighted public arts of the United States like this.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Survey/report undertaken by an agency of a US state (Montana), with clear (C) notice in front matter. This survey was however "prepared" for a "Federal" agency.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1996 report by an agency of a US State (Montana) with a clear (C) notice. Report was however submitted to the USDA Forest service, does that make it "Federal"?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1996 report/survey by an agency of a US state (Montana) with a clear (C) notice. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired, However report was submitted to USDA Forest Service, does that make it "Federal"?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. Di (they-them) (talk) 18:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. Till (talk) 18:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alfa-ketosav as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: superior version available (File:Biotin structure.svg), unused|Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, unused low quality chemical structure. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 07:24, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: blurry and tilted image. Does not meet speedy criteria IMO, but possibly out of COM:SCOPE. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unlikely to be useful for educational purposes. Adsci8 (talk) 19:31, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Arbitrary Jpthefish (talk) 01:21, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep I don't see a valid reason for deletion, although I'd be willing to reconsider if a more convincing argument was put forward. Adsci8 (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, also exists here with no cc4 or other compatible license 2406:3003:2077:1E60:442D:25D6:E09A:2D1F 03:53, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, experiments, no usage Gampe (talk) 04:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly an unauthorized, poorly cropped, screenshot of a PR photo taken by a photographer. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 05:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: primarily plain text content; somewhat promotional. Omphalographer (talk) 06:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. Replaced by File:2-Methylbutanoic acid.svg as high-quality vector version drawn according to MOS guidelines. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. --Karim talk to me :)..! 09:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I have noticed that the uploader claims that the author is social media! --Karim talk to me :)..! 07:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

improperly licensed company logo, should be a fair use image 331dot (talk) 11:00, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Romania and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. This is not text-only plaque. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thought a bit and cropped the copyrighted part out, so the request applies only for first version. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Unsure because while the copyrighted part is now cropped out, I can't say if this affects COM:EDUSE. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:41, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I am convinced, that they are not trivial. Taivo (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The remaining portion is PD-text. --King of ♥ 17:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The previous deletion request ended to be kept, but I think the plaque is also copyrighted. There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per KoH. --Yann (talk) 17:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author's request. Tabrus (talk) 11:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of copyrighted film. Moved back to local wiki Bultro (talk) 12:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotomontage (Original: https://img.haikudeck.com/mg/fee4866d19_1454005432763.jpg) Ruhrgur📣ψ 12:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:48, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1997 journal, this is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  • Despite the statement on the file page indicating a 1974 publication, this image is derived from a photograph taken in June 1996 and published in March 1997. Neither the issue nor the volume contain a statement as to copyright. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA. Komarof (talk) 13:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep 1910 image is PD-Hungary, the website can release it as CC-NC, it appears to be their default scanner copyright claim in their metadata. But by Hungarian copyright law it is PD with no restrictions. Therefore also PD in USA. --RAN (talk) 15:54, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello RAN, you changed here some information in the file description. You claimed the author was anonymous and in that same edit you put there a {{PD-Hungary}} template. So if the author is not known, in what year was that work first/legally disclosed and what proof do you have for that year? - Robotje (talk) 18:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hungary is a copyright jurisdiction where the copyright clock starts from creation. That takes us to the year 1953 (70 years ago). The image is of Lányi Sarolta (1891-1975) who was 62 years old in 1953, the image is of someone in their late 20s, 30 yo at most. BTW, you do not have to ping me, you don't have to convince me, just the person closing the deletion nomination. As I pointed out in previous deletion arguments that prior to date and gps stamps on cameras, we use contextual clues for locations and dates. For someone who was born and died in Hungary, the image jurisdiction is Hungary, till proven otherwise. It is called Occam's Razor, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. Everything else is just unspecified fear, uncertainty and doubt, deletion requires significant specific doubt. --RAN (talk) 01:05, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello RAN, thanks for your reply. At COM:EVIDENCE, an official policy on Wikimedia Commons, you can read:
In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained to demonstrate that as far as can reasonably be determined:

• the file is in the public domain or is properly licensed, and
• that any required consent has been obtained.
In this case you claimed the author was not just unknown but it was anonymous [2] and in that same edit you put there a {{PD-Hungary}} template. In the discussion above you also stated it is a PD-Hungary image. So you were arguing for the file to be retained and according to that official policy here, the burden of proof for the PD-Hungary claim lies on you!
In that PD-Hungary template there are 6 options given for applying that template:
  1. Published works by known authors
  2. Published works by unknown authors
  3. Unpublished works by unknown authors
  4. Official works
  5. Facts and daily news
  6. Folklore
From this list it looks like only option 2 and 3 could be relevant here. If you disagree, please explain which other option you is applicable here and why. For the 2nd option it is important to explain in what year or period the photo was published by the author ("Seventy years have passed since 1 January of the year following the year in which the work was first disclosed"). So far you didn't explain what year or period that was.
For the 3rd option it says "Seventy years have passed since the date when the work was created, and 25 years have passed since 1 January of the year following the year in which the work was legally disclosed by a person other than the author" So 2 conditions need to be met. For the first one your explanation looks OK. So far I didn't see any attempt from your side to explain why the 2nd condition is met. In what year or period prior to 1998 was this photo legally disclosed and what is your proof for that year or period?
It is true I don't have to ping you. Sure, as far as I know pinging is not mandatory in a discussion here. Since the burden of proof for the PD-Hungary claim lies on you, than pinging is certainly an option for me. Especially because you quite often quickly delete a new topic on your talk page without any feedback and without archiving that topic. Even if there is a question to you in that new topic on your talk page. You don't have to answer questions on your talk page but with that behaviour, pinging you in a discussion outside your talk page becomes then a more logic choice. I noticed you often argue to retain a file using a template for which a decades old (usually 70 years) publication or so is needed. By far in the most cases I've seen, there is not even an attempt to explain in what year or period that publication or so was.
If in the next week you don't come with some convicing proof that the photo was
  • published before 1953 without mentioning the name of the photographer, or
  • legally disclosed before 1998
and you also don't come up with some evidence why option 1, 4, 5 or 6 of the PD Hungary template is applicable, I will consider the template incorrectly applied and remove it from the file description. The burden of proof lies on you! - Robotje (talk) 11:15, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per RAN. --Yann (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality, very low resolution better file File:Monet - Bordighera 1884.jpg Oursana (talk) 14:48, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fictionnal + not in use = out of com:scope 82.124.119.228 15:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1917 painting by an artist that we don't have a deathdate for, Undelete in 2038 when PD-old-assumed kicks in. Abzeronow (talk) 16:55, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1917 date is from https://www.historicvietnam.com/monograph-of-saigon-parish/admiral-pierre-paul-de-la-grandiere-by-mascre-souville-musee-du-quai-branly/ Abzeronow (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you get 1941 from? That might be a good clue for me looking through birth, marriage, and death records online. I have access to some French census records. He did a painting of Pierre-Paul de La Grandière (1807-1876), if it was done from life, it would have been in the 1800s. Do you think Mascré-Souville is the family name? It looks like other have been using Mascré (given name) Souville (family name), I can't find him in the French records using either combination. He may be Mascre (family name) of Souville (location) --RAN (talk) 02:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A painting by Mascré-Souville is dated circa 1927-1941 on https://www.frieze.com/article/fraught-future-ethnographic-museum, 1941 could not be in the possible range of creation if he were dead. 1870s as the start of his career is possible but a bit of a stretch. Abzeronow (talk) 15:32, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See comment below. 1927–1941 was the reign of King Sisowath Monivong of Cambodia, who Mascré-Souville also painted, which is likely the reason for that dating. The painting Frieze is showing is of Sisowath I, his father, but painted from a photograph, probably at the same time. From what I'm seeing "Mascré-Souville" is the surname. There are two instances of auction houses or collections giving "Charles" as a first name, but the largest collection of his work lists him simply as "Mr. Mascré-Souville" with a question mark for his given name. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Mascré-Souville Since no institution that we have Identifiers for, over the past 100 years, has been able to figure out who they are, perhaps we should assume they used a pseudonym and "PD-EU-no author disclosure" would apply. We have access to birth, marriage, and death records for France as well as the French census. None of the paintings remained with the artist, they all appear to have been with the sitter or the sitter's institution. If they had remained with the artists, never seen by the public, we would have known who the artist was, and had a death date. Most EU jurisdictions have a clawback from the public domain if the creator becomes known and has died less than 70 years ago. --RAN (talk) 16:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Even if we accept an Anonymous in the EU license for these paintings, we'd still need to know when they are made available to the public. If it was after 1938, URAA would have restored the U.S. copyright for them. Abzeronow (talk) 16:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment All these paintings are in the Musée du quai Branly having previously been part of the Musée national des Arts d'Afrique et d'Océanie collection, which existed from 1931 to 2003; nothing in the inventory numbers indicates an acquisition date. The museum dates them to "late 19th Century to first third 20th Century":
There are two paintings listed from between 1927 and 1941. These were previously in the collection of Ministry of the Overseas, which appears to have assigned the different date to Mascré-Souville's work. The 1927–1941 dates are the reign of Sisowath Monivong (who is the subject of one of the paintings), which may explain the given date of creation. The one mentioned above is of his father, Sisowath of Cambodia (d. 1927), and is described as having been made from a photograph, not from life.
There is one painting attributed to "Charles Mascré-Souville" at the Alexandre Vassiliev Foundation dated to 1926. (This is the only work I'm finding, assuming it's the same artist, with a definitive date of creation listed.)
I tried searching several major auction houses (Christie's, Sotheby's, Barnaby's, etc.) and none showed any works by Mascré-Souville having appeared in upcoming or past auctions; no results for them in MutualArt, Invaluable, or ArtNet either. Proantic has one landscape attributed to Charles Mascré-Souville, but the style is a bit different and there are no further details about the artist. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:54, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the information, Tcr25. First third of the 20th century essentially ends around 1933 or 1934 and late 19th Century gives us a start of circa 1880 (circa 1870 if we want to stretch a little). At least this gives us a date that we can restore all of these if deleted. Abzeronow (talk) 15:43, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. Unlikely to be still under a copyright. --Yann (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We don't know the death date of the artist. So far, I've deleted one that was created 1927-1941 per DR, nominated another one from 1917 and these three paintings all seem like they could be also from the 20th Century.

Abzeronow (talk) 17:03, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:De_la_Grandière_amiral_05097.jpg. Unlikely to be still under a copyright. --Yann (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: YouTube video given as source is not attributed with the cc-by-3.0. Hjaekel (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cover of a publication. I doubt this is an own work of the uploader, is this above the ToO in Turkey? Also is this in our scope? Abzeronow (talk) 18:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any book is in scope but I don't know what ToO means. 200.111.227.94 16:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Threshold of Originality COM:ToO Abzeronow (talk) 16:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Probable copyvio, possibly out of scope. Adsci8 (talk) 19:29, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alfa-ketosav as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: unused low quality chemical formula, use File:7-Dehydrocholesterol.svg or redirect|Alfa-ketosav (talk) 07:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC). Converting to DR, see COM:REDUNDANT. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:41, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, unused low quality chemical formula (as per {{Low quality chem}}). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 07:24, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Der Barbar as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Durch ein anderes Bild ersetzt, falsch, wird nicht mehr benötigt. Too old for COM:CSD#G7, but  Delete as courtesy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did this picture, but it was wrong. I already made an other picture with an other name, witch I gave another name. I don't know, what is the problem of deleting the wrong file? I don't understand your short message. Der Barbar (talk) 12:28, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vladymir.cure as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Данный человек умер —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vladymir.cure: Did you take the photo yourself? Or where did you get it from?
(Google Translate: Ты сам сделал фото? Или откуда ты это взял?) —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unlkely to be own work. No answer. --Yann (talk) 18:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour. Je pense être un peu trop "frontal" pour échapper au problème de copyvio. J'ai refait un shoot avec un "apport artistique" plus marqué et des couvertures non complétement visibles. Je préfererais que cette version disparaisse avant de télécharger la nouvelle. Bertrand Labévue (talk) 18:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tata poussière as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <doublon>. Of what file? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

people did not respect copyright protections Antuang (talk) 19:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Uploader's request, uploaded 4 years ago, in use. CC license cannot be revoked. --Achim55 (talk) 19:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Yann (talk) 19:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the photo is an anonymous photo taken in 1918 and is public domain Hakikatco (talk) 22:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Question When and where was this first published? And how do we know it is anonymous rather than the Flickr uploader not bothering to give us details on the photograph? Abzeronow (talk) 15:47, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as per Hakikatco. Yann (talk) 19:25, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to fail COM:EDUSE, description is nonsensical, user uploaded this just to use the image on external website https://pronoun-dysphoria.org/ which seems to border on hate speech Brainy J (talk) 21:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Feliz cumpleaños Eloise! 💟 Por qué subieron esta imagen personal a Commons? 191.125.62.127 23:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es permitido. 191.125.62.127 23:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quién es? 191.125.62.127 23:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal image by non contributor. --Yann (talk) 18:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i need to reupload Dirops850E (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't bother to upload photos without permission of the copyright owner. 200.111.227.94 16:09, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have tagged this as missing evidence of permission, as the photographer name does not match the uploader's username. Verbcatcher (talk) 17:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and discussion. Either this is a G7 or an F5, but both lead to deletion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:26, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Admins, when you delete a file also delete the broken redirects. 186.172.71.55 08:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 08:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission

Lukas Beck (talk) 18:23, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@L. Beck Did you have permission for these at any point? If so, what type? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There was no permission anyway. Lets say, this photos should have never been uploaded. I feel very sorra for it. Lukas Beck (talk) 19:46, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because of the size and license LilyLopez.Account (talk) 04:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo by non-contributor/F10. --Wdwd (talk) 09:21, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2009 publication with a clear copyright notice in front matter, this is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The Internet Archive record for this journal indicates that the license is CC-BY-NC-SA. holly {chat} 18:09, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2009 publication, with a clear (C) notice, This is too recent for copyrights too have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The Internet Archive record for this issue indicates the license is CC-BY-NC-SA. holly {chat} 18:10, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IVE (아이브) when they won their first major award for Song of the Year at the 2022 Melon Music Awards

[edit]

License laundering, the source obviously uses recorded/screenshotted footage owned by the original copyrighted holder (Melon Music Awards; Kakao Entertainment) whom broadcast and/or hosted the award ceremony. The Tistory's uploader didn't owned the work however they marked it as licensed under CC in which I couldn't find any evidence that the original copyrighted holder has released it as such nor was there any evidence of such listed on the source. I believe this file should be deleted under Commons:PCP and Commons:License laundering. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 08:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete no CC authorization.
Tychou12 (talk) 14:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

اطلاعات عکس را نمایش میدهد آراد وب (talk) 13:51, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per Google Translate, the deletion reason is "Displays photo information", which doesn't make sense to me, but there is no source or author information either and this is an uploader request that could have been done as a speedy, so that's good enough for me. holly {chat} 01:15, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1987 statue (the 62nd year of the Showa era) [3]. Not in PD, and COM:FOP Japan doesn't cover such statues. Yasu (talk) 15:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 01:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2000 bust [4]. Not in PD, and COM:FOP Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 15:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 01:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blahaj design is copyrighted, and photos focusing on Blahaj (e.g. photos where the Blahaj is not Commons:De minimis) have been deleted from Commons previously Brainy J (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom. and COM:TOYS. SergioFLS (talk) 01:11, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 01:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Substantial presence of the copyrighted Cloud Gate sculpture authored by still-living litigious artist Anish Kapoor. See Category:Cloud Gate-related deletion requests/deleted for prior deletions. U.S. de minimis appears to be narrower as based in triviality concept as opposed to "not-the-main-subject" principle that the European Union DM standard adheres. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, especially considering that it's being used in en:Cloud Gate to depict the Bean. holly {chat} 01:25, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not my own work

Lukas Beck (talk) 17:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 01:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2002 journal, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:53, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1997 report by an agency of a US state (Idaho). This is too recent for copyrights to have expired. However this was submitted to /prepared for a "Federal" agency.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:36, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-USGov: These images and documents are in the public domain in the United States because they are a work of the United States federal government, in this case: Bureau of Land Management, Idaho State Office. Vysotsky (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Concur. Withdrawn ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:09, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn. holly {chat} 23:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by К.Лаврентьев (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violation. File don't have information about first publication.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 11:13, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 13:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by К.Лаврентьев (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works, no FoP in both Russia and Ukraine for modern sculpture.

Komarof (talk) 13:10, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:10, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Titlutin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No Freedom of panorama in DRC: COM:FOP DRC
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is hardly anything copyrightable seen in this image; so FoP seems to be irrelevant.-- Túrelio (talk) 16:05, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It can, provided it is above threshold of originality. Is it? --Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no COM:TOO Democratic Republic of Congo page, so how would we judge what is allowed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:16, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Hello! Sorry, I didn't know about this "threshold of originality" rule when I nominated this file for deletion. I thought all buildings could be protected in countries without FOP (except if ancient enough). I don't have any opinion about the "originality" of this one, so I'll follow whatever decision is taken. Regards --Titlutin (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If we have no information about TOO in DR Congo, then we must assume it's very low. holly {chat} 23:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es un trabajo personal (own work)? 191.125.62.127 23:16, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My idea, what's the problem? XMHNHMX (talk) 15:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you need a license for pixels? XMHNHMX (talk) 16:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 23:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not my own work

Lukas Beck (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Lukas: For this and the other DRs you created for your own uploads, could you give us some more explanation? holly {chat} 19:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure! I am not the author of these files and have not explicitly asked the real authors for permission. Of course I shouldn't have uploaded the files. And I wouldn't do that anymore today. Therefore I ask that these images be deleted. Lukas Beck (talk) 20:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not my own work

Lukas Beck (talk) 17:44, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not my own work

Lukas Beck (talk) 17:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work

Lukas Beck (talk) 17:52, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Lukas Beck (talk) 17:53, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work

Lukas Beck (talk) 17:55, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work

Lukas Beck (talk) 18:11, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Lukas Beck (talk) 18:11, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work

Lukas Beck (talk) 18:13, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Lukas Beck (talk) 18:14, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission Lukas Beck (talk) 18:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission

Lukas Beck (talk) 18:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission Lukas Beck (talk) 18:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission

Lukas Beck (talk) 18:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission

Lukas Beck (talk) 18:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission

Lukas Beck (talk) 18:22, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission Lukas Beck (talk) 18:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission Lukas Beck (talk) 18:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Greater focus on street art in Australia, in which freedom of panorama does not apply. A couple of Hosier Lane street art works were authored by ABOVE (USA), Shepard Fairey (USA), Invader (France), D*FACE (GB), Ha Ha (Australia), Prism (Australia), and Rone (Australia). Fairey appears to be the author of the mural at the left part of the photo. The "Copyright law protections" section of this article includes graffiti as eligible for copyright, and that users who wish to use the copyright-eligible street art need permission from the artists if they want to "photograph the artwork, particularly for commercial purposes; feature the work on a website; use the location for a film shoot; or publish images of the artwork in a book or magazine." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to 2006 journal with a clear (C) notice in front matter. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:41, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: BHL says "In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder.". holly {chat} 00:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2005 journal with a clear (C) notice. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:43, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: BHL says "In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder.". holly {chat} 00:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2005 journal of a German museum, with a clear (C) notice in the front matter, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:45, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Internet Archive sayst CC-BY-NC-SA. holly {chat} 00:13, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 2001 journal. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:57, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, but this page contained out-of-copyright photos, which I uploaded separately as File:Frank Mace MacFarland, 1898.jpg and File:Frank Mace MacFarland, 1935.jpg. holly {chat} 01:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is, or appears to be, a picture of the uploader, but there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather than the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Evidence of any transfer of licencing must be sent via COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 01:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to report published 2000 , for an agency of a US state (Montana), with clear (C) notice in front matter. This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1999 published Journal of a Canadian entity, This is too recent for copyrights to have expired.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1999 report prepared by an agency of a US state (Montana) , with a clear (C) notice in front matter. The report however was submitted to a "Federal" agency.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:11, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Comment From the acknowledgement section "This project was funded under two, separate one-year work order and challenge cost-share agreements between the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Program, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service - Ecological Services Office in Helena, and the Montana Natural Heritage Program." My understanding is reports funded by and performed under contract for a federal agency are considered federal works. —Tcr25 (talk) 12:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per [5], reports funded by federal grants do not automatically make those federal work. The project owner can still claim a copyright (section 4.8). holly {chat} 18:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1998 publication/report of an agency of a US state (Montana), with a clear (C) notice. However, Report was submitted to a "Federal" agency.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per [6] , federal funding does not automatically make a work public domain. The project owner can still claim copyright (see section 4.8). holly {chat} 18:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1995 report by an agency of a US state (Montana), this is too recent for copyrights to have expired. However this is marked as being a report to the Legislature, does that mean different rules apply?

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:41, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  • This looks to be a report produced pursuant to a legislative command, in the general sense. The report is an audit of a new system implemented by the legislature (or by the department). In my view, neither the authors nor the subject matter are sufficiently tied to the legislative act for this report to qualify as PD-EdictGov (per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc.). The report was not prepared by or under the name of the legislature or a committee thereof. The report is like any other report prepared by an officer of the Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, with the one exception that this report may have been more specifically authorized (as opposed to a general authorization to allow for the creation of reports necessary to the functioning of the department). As to the content, the report shows the results of an audit of a computerized system set up by the State. While that report might heavily influence legislative decisionmakers, it is in no sense any statement of the law by legislators; the same report, prepared by a private contractor for the department, would have the same influential powers (and the same lack of legislative authority). For these reasons, I believe that the report does not qualify as an “edict of government” and is not in the public domain thereby. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:11, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sourced to a 1995 report/survey of an agency of a US state (Montana) , with clear (C) notice. However report was prepared for a 'Federal' agency (US Forest Service)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:54, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per [7] , federal funding does not automatically make a work public domain. The project owner can still claim copyright (see section 4.8). holly {chat} 18:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1998 report/publication of an agency of a US state (Montana), clear (C) notice in front matter. However report was submitted to a "Federal" agency.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Baja calidad. Ya existe un archivo de mejor calidad que cumple. NACLE (talk) 16:41, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Me parece que la calidad es bien. Cierto, es pequeño, pero es un SVG y entonces la talle no es un problema. holly {chat} 01:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Holly. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this an own work? 191.125.62.127 23:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per [8] the person depicted lived 1870–91, so it's definitely not "own work", but {{PD-old-assumed}} should be valid here. holly {chat} 01:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Holly, will fix some of the file. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Мокрицький Павло (talk) 09:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Poor quality by itself is not normally a valid reason for deletion, but I really don't see a practical use for this photo. holly {chat} 17:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Robertius as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Persönlichkeitsrechte verletzt --Robertius (talk) 10:24, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Converted to regular DR, as this needs discussion. Depicted persons are politicians and this shot is likely a publicity-shot. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertius: We have VRT verification for this. Could you explain your reasoning more? Thanks. holly {chat} 01:18, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Holly Cheng: The original author would like to revoke the usage rights. Who can he contact and how? Robertius (talk)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What protectable design content is there that would fall under COM:TOYS? These are two simple Pepe Frogs, there is no additional design input, such that would attract protection. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:39, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley, is Pepe in the public domain or freely licensed? RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So you're abandoning the COM:TOYS rationale now and looking for a different one? Are you going to delete the whole of Category:Pepe the Frog too? Andy Dingley (talk) 18:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]