Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/05/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_(512_×_512_px)_(1280_×_512_px).png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_Woorkshop_(30368576891).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Profile_photo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![109 File:West Bromwich Albion "Baggies" logo.jpg](#File:West_Bromwich_Albion_"Baggies"_logo.jpg){kind=link}
![110 File:Cardiff City "Bluebirds" logo.jpg](#File:Cardiff_City_"Bluebirds"_logo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
不想自己出现在这里 Zhouhao1985 (talk) 02:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
This conatains confidential information / it is violating copyright laws / the original uploader (me) wants to redact this image IcedJelly (talk) 12:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Confidential Information. IcedJelly (talk) 10:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Kadı. --Rosenzweig τ 10:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo by non-contributor (F10) Wutsje 00:52, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedily per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
_(512_%C3%97_512_px)_(1280_%C3%97_512_px).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(512_%C3%97_512_px)_(1280_%C3%97_512_px).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Obivous advertisement (in Vietnamese) Quenhitran (talk) 02:57, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
_(512_×_512_px)_(1280_×_512_px).png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim55 (talk) 18:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
_(512_×_512_px)_(1280_×_512_px).png){kind=link}
Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2607:FB91:1908:B3BE:AC39:60F1:81CC:EEF0 16:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: vandalism by known LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 19:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Не используется Classiqq (talk) 19:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:53, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This flag is WP:OR so I suggested deleting it, explained on talk page, here: [[1]]93.136.10.179 23:54, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- This flag is in use in many projects. Before we can consider deletion, please replace it, accordingly. This will help us avoid disturbing so many projects. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 18:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: still in use, use {{Fact disputed}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Fix --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:22, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This flag https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Serbia_(1281).svg is WP:OR, explained on talk page, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Flag_of_Serbia#Flag_of_Stefan_Vladislav it should be deleted. We have a problem with it on the English wikipedia, they keep bringing it back. Edit war lasts 4 years with that flag. look here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_of_Serbia&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kingdom_of_Serbia_(medieval)&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stefan_Vladislav&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Serbian_flags&action=history 78.1.7.81 23:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Keep: In use & it's not a good idea trying to solve wp disputes here on Commons. --Achim55 (talk) 08:54, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --James F. (talk) 20:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
The basic rule of Wikipedia is violated, which is Original Research. There is no source ie RS which provides a reconstruction of flag from 1281. Using the modern Serbian flag as a template for two colors on some fabric from 1281. actually represents and fringe theory because the academic sources that would reconstruct that flag from 1281. the not exist. Mikola22 (talk) 16:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy close – no valid reason for deletion. If rules of Wikipedia are violated on a Wikipedia, then that's something for the Wikipedia to solve. Please don't bring the conflict over. As long as some Wikipedians want to use the image, it is in scope for Commons – and by now I assume the file already has an educational use in illustrating this conflict on Wikipedia, regardless of its original notability. –LPfi (talk) 19:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bencemac as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author request per ticket:2023050310004009 and Commons:Help_desk#I_want_to_delete_one_file Ankry (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- It is not clear from the ticket if author wants to delete this image or only File:Funny EdU cell.tif (already deleted). Let's wait for an explanation. Ankry (talk) 19:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope: Personal image Michel Bakni (talk) 06:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 07:19, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
I lied about this being my work ): — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malik Nursultan B (talk • contribs) 04:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 07:18, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
ho caricato per errore ELLE ANDA (talk) 21:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:16, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted characters Di (they-them) (talk) 23:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
-20230503232400-File:Disney_Game_6.png){kind=link}
Delete Not only is this a derivative work, but it's also a hoax. Omphalographer (talk) 00:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Early close; deleted per nomination and as uploader is blocked user. — Huntster (t @ c) 17:10, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Ap.anku306 (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Ap.anku306 (talk) 07:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- 9 months ago. --Achim55 (talk) 18:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Ap.anku306 (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: appears to be out of scope. Person seems to be not notable, file is not in use, was formerly used by a sandbox page in en.wp which got deleted for "misusing WP as a web host.". --Rosenzweig τ 14:00, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded this file yesterday, 2nd of May 2023. The painting is from 1930 and in public domain in Norway. But the second condition of licensing is not fullfilled; "This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1928." I ask you to delete the file, please. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 06:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Credited to Rainexart and used on Spotify before upload - we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 14:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
very out of focus Nv8200p (talk) 14:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
FoP in Indonesia prohibits commercial use. Canopus Grandiflora 03:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Modern copyrighted building. --Leoboudv (talk) 05:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 23:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Indonesia has no FOP 96.48.140.119 18:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, recreation of content deleted by community consensus. Taivo (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
This architectural work was completed in 2015, and designed by PT Sekawan Design Inc. who died on November 29, 2008. In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for a certain period of time after the death of the creator (be it the last-surviving architect, engineer, designer, sculptor, engraver, or painter). An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception Commons:Freedom of panorama (FoP). Sadly, Indonesia has no Commons-applicable FoP. Indonesian FOP is insufficient: for noncommercial only (failing one important test which is that files must be freely reusable even in post cards, stamps, and other commercial media without authorization from the artists and architects). As this filename was reused the third time, it's time to lock the file name for the meantime, until Indonesia removes commercial restriction for images of artistic works in their copyright law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:03, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Indonesia, but the Gama Tower is located in Indonesia. As architectural works are copyrighted in Indonesia until 70 years p.m.a., and the tower itself is less than 70 years old, this photograph is the derivative work of a non-free architectural work that must be deleted in line with our licensing policy and the precautionary principle. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and previous nominations & discussions of previous photos of same building. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.webp){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
obvious unfree logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
.webp){kind=link}
Speedy keep COM:INUSE and obviously below COM:TOO Peru. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: license changed to PD-text logo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.webp){kind=link}
I made a mistake regarding the license. Xәkim (talk) 03:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused, no evidence original is actually free licened. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Personal file. Out of COM:SCOPE. Streetlampguy301 (talk) 04:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not at all useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, uncat, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
veraltetes Foto Christa Kohler (talk) 06:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. Also in use. --Rosenzweig τ 06:27, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per Rosezweig. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In scope; Commons is not for most recent photo only. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:10, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded this file yesterday, 2nd of May 2023. The painting is from 1930 and in public domain in Norway. But the second condition of licensing is not fullfilled; "This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1928." I ask you to delete the file, please. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 06:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:10, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded this photo years ago but only just realized my real name is included in the metadata. Were it possible, I would like to take it off wikipedia and all related websites including wikimedia commons. Themidget17 (talk) 06:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Since no one has replied to your concern, I downloaded the file and removed the "Artist" tag with ExifTool; I reuploaded it to the same name. If my solution is sufficient, you may request for the original revision to be hidden. (I am not an admin.) Fezzy1347 (talk) 14:35, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- thank you! now how do i request for the original revision to be hidden? Also, I'd like to withdraw the deletion request now since you fixed the issue. ~~~ Themidget17 (talk) 17:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- See Commons:Revision deletion; you'll probably have to make the request in the talk page. Please note that I have never done this and I do not know how long it takes for admins to respond to a revision-deletion request. Fezzy1347 (talk) 19:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- thank you! now how do i request for the original revision to be hidden? Also, I'd like to withdraw the deletion request now since you fixed the issue. ~~~ Themidget17 (talk) 17:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: revised version; Deleted old version with EXIF name. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded this photo years ago but only just realized my real name is included in the metadata. Were it possible, I would like to take it off wikipedia and all related websites including wikimedia commons. Themidget17 (talk) 06:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Since no one has replied to your concern, I downloaded the file and removed the "Artist" tag with ExifTool; I reuploaded it to the same name. If my solution is sufficient, you may request for the original revision to be hidden. (I am not an admin.) Fezzy1347 (talk) 14:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: old version with EXIF name; KEPT new clean version. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Image derived from Pixabay, but cannot find it on the source. Since Pixabay image was not allowed on Commons after January 2019, unless a proper source can be provided, this image has to be deleted per COM:PRP A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The image appears to refer to this Pixabay user, but I'm not sure which of their images was intended. Regardless, this isn't even a stock photo; it's a user's personal forum signature, which is completely out of scope for Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 19:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per above; unused, uncat, apparent personal image referening other personal site by user not active in 2 years. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
File:MEducation Alliance Symposium Localizing Open Educational Resources (OER) Woorkshop (30368576891).jpg
[edit]_Woorkshop_(30368576891).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Woorkshop_(30368576891).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted leaflet A1Cafel (talk) 08:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, uncat DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Breaktheicees as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation - uploaded around the same time as numerous other copyright violations of similar subjects with sockpuppet accounts
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no external hits (TinEye, Google-Images) found. However, circumstances seem to support nominators copyvio-suspicion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- External hit for Rent - Broadway 2004 found - see :35 in this video:[2] Breaktheicees (talk) 06:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Geri Halliwell live 2001.jpg
- File:Geri Halliwell live Oman 1.jpg
- File:Geri Halliwell live Oman 2.jpg
- File:Geri 2000.jpg
- File:Geri Halliwell Rome 2000.jpg
- File:Geri Halliwell 2013.jpg
- File:Halliwell 2004.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
vandal. not in use Bilderling (talk) 09:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unsure what if any intended purpose, but dubious, unused, uncat, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 10:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, very blurry image without evident compensating importance nor uniqueness. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I think the "no sharing on facebook" disclaimer violates everything that wikimedia commons stands for. If a journalist features this photo in an article, even properly crediting the author as required, they then have no control over what users do with it and whether or not it ends up on facebook. But the use of this disclaimer makes it so that the author can then go after the journalist for money, if that happens. As an independent journalist whose livelihood has been threatened before by this type of scam, I honestly don't think it is ethical of Wikimedia Commons to allow it. This caveat has been invented with the sole purpose of scamming small and independent journalists, who can't afford to subscribe to expensive stock services and rely on WC for visual content. It is malevolent, intentional, and dishonest. 2003:E9:EF04:7F0E:454B:E23B:6BDA:90B8 10:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not a reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 10:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Rosenzweig --Lukas Beck (talk) 11:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep it's no requirement, and "please don't... [whatever]" doesn't affect FAL terms. --A.Savin 11:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
copyviol Fresh Blood (talk) 10:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused low-resolution image that adds nothing educationally distinct from better quality images. Nv8200p (talk) 13:01, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Unnecessary to hide, and do we have another view of the same street from the same spot in 2008? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:08, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. Mediocre but inoffensive; no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
test edit of a user on English Wikipedia; photo name is not related to image's content (it's actually a joke in Vietnamese) Quenhitran (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
obvious copyright violation - no such license found on original website Quenhitran (talk) 14:27, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content Omphalographer (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content Omphalographer (talk) 16:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:47, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot from Zoom Earth is copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot from Zoom Earth is copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Low quality COM:NUDE photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete seriously, we don’t need nor want to see your dick! Dronebogus (talk) 15:42, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
1932 British book that had w:Keppel Harcourt Barnard (died 1964) and Francis Downes Ommanney https://falklandsbiographies.org/biographies/ommanney_francis (died 1980) as authors. Undelete in 2051. Abzeronow (talk) 17:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unidentified location and out of scope. LevandeMänniska (talk), 17:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. QubeCube (talk) 10:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:52, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
As noticed by User:Abecedare in [3], this beautiful drawing is unfortunately clearly based on the author photograph at her publisher's website, which is not released under a free license. GRuban (talk) 17:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio. Innisfree987 (talk) 01:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Clearly closely based on one (non free) photo; COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:54, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
It can be easily found on Pinterest and other social medias Bloomingbyungchan (talk) 17:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo, a pin button makes not a state symbol therefrom! Ras67 (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted Materials: logo of Entity Michel Bakni (talk) 06:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Out of the scope: Personal photos Michel Bakni (talk) 06:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prince Ricardo De La Cerda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Own work to be doubted. Self-promotion.
- File:Prince Ricardo De La Cerda Business Magazine 2023.png
- File:Prince Ricardo De La Cerda, Wealth - Ricardo De La Cerda- wealth magazine.png
- File:Royal Magazine Prince Ricardo De La Cerda - Ricardo De La Cerda.png
- File:Prince Ricardo De La Cerda.png
Achim55 (talk) 13:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
There's nothing in the source link saying this is a satellite photo. It looks more like a drone photo? A larger crop is at https://twitter.com/joy_bishnoi/status/1641463635070586881/photo/1 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:12, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content, self-promotional (CV) Omphalographer (talk) 16:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content Omphalographer (talk) 16:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Dr. Muhammad Abu Yusuf Khan (অধ্যক্ষ ড. মুহাম্মাদ আবু ইউছুফ খান, তামিরুল মিল্লাত কামিল মাদ্রাসা ).pdf
[edit]COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content, self-promotional (CV) Omphalographer (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content Omphalographer (talk) 16:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of com:scope. C messier (talk) 17:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
This page should be deleted because ill update a new one CatGabi (talk) 18:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. If you want to improve this image, use the "Upload a new version of this file" button toward the lower left of the file page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 18:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AliGoudarzi83 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of com:PS
Hanooz 18:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content as PDF Omphalographer (talk) 18:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
non-free cover of animation film Euro know (talk) 19:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I don`t think there`s should be a problem for the file to be kept, It`s from the original page (English Version) and Its not copyrighted.
- Thanks Mieruko (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Outside of project scope. This is not free webhosting for fan-made blue screens of death or fan-made logos.
- File:Millar Gough Ink Public Television (2002-2005) Logo.webm
- File:Nickelodeon Home Entertainment Logo.png
- File:Windows Custom OS BSOD.png
- File:Windows XP Fan-made BSOD screen.png
- File:Windows 8 Earliest Build BSOD (Fan-made different text).png
- File:Windows Bugcheck "INTERNET EXPLORER APP FAILURE" (Fan-made).png
- File:Windows 7 BSOD Fan-made error.png
- File:WildBrain Animation Studios logo.png
- File:Millar Gough Ink Home Entertainment Logo.svg
- File:Millar Gough Ink 1999 logo.jpg
- File:2 bolder.gif
- File:Millar-Gough Ink 1995-2015 logo.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
B (talk) 20:53, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content Omphalographer (talk) 22:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Once Upon a Time Bankikodla-Hanehalli - Remembering Anglo Vernacular Middle School (Anandashram High School).pdf
[edit]COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content Omphalographer (talk) 22:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content (besides the cover page) Omphalographer (talk) 22:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content Omphalographer (talk) 22:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:58, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Unused text document of unclear notability. See COM:SCOPE. Stefan2 (talk) 20:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:46, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content, looks like a school assignment or otherwise unpublished paper Omphalographer (talk) 22:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 17:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by هالة القنوية (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works
- File:( A great picture of outer space ).jpg
- File:خنزير تر اني عصبت بكسرك كلب حمار خنظيررررر.jpg
- File:Closed-book-cartoon-vector-symbol-icon-design-beautiful-illustr-illustration-isolated-white-background-97502834.jpg
- File:IHGMF.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Юрий Д.К 18:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
This map contains misleading information, as it shows Phoenicia in a very exaggerated way, Phoenicia didn't control control Spain, Portugal, half of France, the entire islands of the western Mediterranean, Crete, and southern Anatolia. Amr F.Nagy (talk) 04:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. It seems a reasonably good match for w:History_of_Phoenicia#Ascendance_and_high_point_(1200–800_BC). If the map can be improved or replaced with something better, that's fine, but otherwise I see no reason to delete. Pashley (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
PR for a Vietnamese company Quenhitran (talk) 14:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 14:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
This image was uploaded at around the same time as numerous other related photos, many of which have already been taken down. My suspicion is that a user was making sockpuppet accounts and uploading edited versions of copyrighted photos. This image was taken at an exhibition for The Rolling Stones in 2016. In photos from the event, she is wearing the exact same outfit but here it has been recolored along with her hair. Though I haven't been able to find an exact match, the fact that it has been edited in a same manner as the others (to avoid copyright detection) and has the event/date listed incorrectly, is highly dubious. - Breaktheicees (talk) 16:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Geri Halliwell live 2001.jpg
- File:Geri Halliwell live Oman 1.jpg
- File:Geri Halliwell live Oman 2.jpg
- File:Geri 2000.jpg
- File:Geri Halliwell Rome 2000.jpg
- File:Geri Halliwell 2013.jpg
- File:Halliwell 2004.jpg
- Comment – Image edit/recolor is very similar to File:Mel B New York 2017.jpg and a few Emma Bunton images that have already been deleted. - Breaktheicees (talk) 19:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Standard license from Vimeo is not allowed on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 16:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- the uploader is actually the author, who uploaded it as part of the m:Africa Environment project. I chat with him several times on the project telegram channel. So licence is not an issue. See the mention of his name on the userpage here User:Aimty17. Anthere (talk) 23:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Uploader is also Author. Wilson (talk) 11:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Unidentifiable image, text may be promotional ("Every Rhythmic Song / Tap Bait Shaking The Soul...") Omphalographer (talk) 18:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete weird pointless image Dronebogus (talk) 12:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:45, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
similar file already exists as File:Form_W-9,_2011.pdf, bizarre name and categories Omphalographer (talk) 18:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:44, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Hu S -fatesh lebih baik- . Saat darah masuk ke Mrs. Serum -1 tingkat Baju Adam Sram L12nAAA-pria F Alto **- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...jpg
[edit]
unidentifiable handwritten material, nonsense filename and description Omphalographer (talk) 18:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:44, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Hu S -fatesh lebih baik- . Saat darah masuk ke Mrs. Serum -1 tingkat Baju Adam Sram L12nAAA-pria F Alto **- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...jpg
[edit]
unidentifiable handwritten material, nonsense filename and description Omphalographer (talk) 18:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content as PDF Omphalographer (talk) 18:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hey Omphalographer, I see I have a deletion request on both my commentary on Cardano's Standford encyclopedia of philosophy entry and on my notes on RGD&P. You'll have to excuse my ignorance on these matters as I'm new to Wikimedia Commons and don't know my way around yet. Can you please explain why my works have been selected for deletion, I don't think I understand why there is such a cause to delete them. The purpose of the works was to provide people with a general understanding of each topic (on Cardano and on writing). Also sorry for the late reply, I was extremely busy this past week and a half. Appreciate it! Calccc (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Wikimedia Commons is a site for uploading media (primarily photos) which are intended for use in other Wikimedia projects, such as Wikipedia, Wiktionary and Wikibooks. It isn't suitable for original written content like these PDF documents; if you want to contribute this content to a project, you might find a more suitable destination for them on Wikibooks or Wikiversity. Omphalographer (talk) 23:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE - primarily textual content as PDF Omphalographer (talk) 18:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:42, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
Per Commons:DW. C9mVio9JRy (talk) 08:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:32, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
no evidence of freely available license Evaders99 (talk) 21:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 13:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
The banner used as a subject uses the illustration of the Japanese TV animation "w:A Galaxy Next Door" (broadcasting in Japan from April 2023), and the banner itself Since the copyright credit is also written, there is a risk of infringing the copyright. Daraku K. (talk) 15:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Info Uploader ONPAT (talk · contributions · Statistics) is globally locked as a sockpuppet of Sidowpknbkhihj (talk · contributions · Statistics)(w:ja:LTA:HEATHROW). Daraku K. (talk) 22:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Comment This is “Ir-FOP” case, isn’t it? It is believed that the publishing of this derivative work of this building or artwork is allowed under the copyright laws of the country this photograph was taken, possibly with some restrictions, because it is permanently located in a public space, under an exemption generically referred to as freedom of panorama. Freedom of panorama does not apply in all countries, and often applies only to photographs of buildings that are permanently located in a public place. In some countries the freedom may apply more broadly, such as a "public space" being any place the public can access, or even allowing 2D objects and works of artistic craftsmanship to be exempt. See Commons:Freedom of panorama for a list of FOP exemptions by country.126.186.33.13 04:33, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as per COM:FOP Japan. --Yasu (talk) 15:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
The file was uploaded at a time when only images by Sony were available, so obviously not own work. It was uploaded "while editing the english language article PS VR2". But the wp article has as of yet a local fair use depiction. Obviously this is a COPYVIO C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 06:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in South Korea. According to w:en:Olympic Weightlifting Gymnasium, it was completed in 1986. Most likely the architect has not been dead for more than 70 years, hence the architectural work is unfree. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 01:12, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in South Korea. According to w:en:Olympic Weightlifting Gymnasium, it was completed in 1986. Most likely the architect has not been dead for more than 70 years, hence the architectural work is unfree. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 01:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
_Profile_photo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Profile_photo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 14:35, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
_Profile_photo.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per Xocolatl. Marbletan (talk) 17:35, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No evidence of permission from the copyright holder. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 17:47, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
_Profile_photo.jpg){kind=link}
This picture contains information that is IP of Saab AB. Saab AB (publ) is a Swedish company that develops, manufactures and sells sophisticated defence systems to various Governments throughout the worlds. Our products and systems are sensitive to our Customers and form part of our Customers national defence capability. We own all the IP and sensitive Know How and data included in our systems. We give our Customers limited rights to our IP in order for them to be able to operate the systems for defence purposes. Needless to say, we never give any general publishing rights, and certainly not for publishing on Wikipedia or the like. Please have the picture deleted form your website. 136.163.203.4 07:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion This is a large image with full camera EXIF. It is unlikely that it was stolen from SAAB. We do not generally react to takedown requests from IP users as they are often vandals. If you are actually a representative of SAAB, please send a message from an email adess at SAAB to VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Evelyn Kreinecker
[edit]copyright violation; contemporary artworks, needs permission.
- File:Evelyn Kreinecker Atelier (41251257024).jpg
- File:Evelyn Kreinecker Atelieransicht Wegstück by Andrea Groisböck (41251258064).jpg
- File:Evelyn Kreinecker Filmstill Wegstuecke (41070372205).jpg
- File:Evelyn Kreinecker Sensus Human gold Ausstellungsansicht (41070373185).jpg
- File:Evelyn Kreinecker Suchen Human gold Ausstellungsansicht (41070374715).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Martin Sg.: Sorry, aber wieso ist das eine URV, wenn sie von Flickr, wo die Fotos frei sind, ordnungsgemäß transfereiert wurden. Wo zu gibt es dann diese Überprüfungen beim Transfer? ---- K@rl (talk) Diskussion 19:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Die Herkunftsprüfung bezüglich Flickr betrifft nur den Fotografen. Hier aber sind urheberrechtlich geschützte Werke abgebildet. Auch auf Flickr ist nicht erkennbar, dass dafür der Status der Gemeinfreiheit erreicht worden wäre. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - The photos infringe on the copyrights for the works shown. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
These all show identifiable people in a non-public place in Austria. In order to keep these, we should have permission from the subjects.
- File:Galerie in der Schmiede Ausstellung Baumueller Heinz 12032014 7a.jpg
- File:Galerie in der Schmiede Ausstellung Baumueller Heinz 12032014 1a.jpg
- File:Galerie in der Schmiede Ausstellung Baumueller Heinz 12032014 2a.jpg
- File:GOLD CARPET Life Ball Wien Social-Art-Installation 2015.jpg
- File:Kristalltag-Enthuellung-Goldene-Rathauspassage-Steyr Johannes Angerbauer-Goldhoff 2014.tif
- File:Beni Altmüller Proben-zur-Tanzmalerei-Berlin-Beni-Altmueller-2011 4.jpg
- File:Beni Altmüller Proben-zur-Tanzmalerei-Berlin-Beni-Altmueller-2011 2.jpg
- File:Beni Altmüller Proben-zur-Tanzmalerei-Berlin-Beni-Altmueller-2011 1.jpg
- File:Happenstance Galerie Thiele 2012 Aufbau Tanzprobe9.jpg
- File:Happenstance Galerie Thiele 2012 Aufbau Tanzprobe6.jpg
- File:Happenstance Galerie Thiele 2012 Aufbau Tanzprobe1.jpg
- File:ProbenTanzmalerei Beni Altmueller2011 1.jpg
- File:ProbenTanzmalerei Beni Altmueller2011 2.jpg
- File:Social Gold Kiss - Bodeninstallation - GOLD Belvedere Wien 2012 11.tif
- File:Social Gold Kiss - Bodeninstallation - GOLD Belvedere Wien 2012 07.tif
- File:Social Gold Kiss - Bodeninstallation - GOLD Belvedere Wien 2012 02.tif
- File:"Open Up Point" Abiko (Japan) 2012 03.JPG
- File:Ooekv Lesung in der Ausstellung hintergruendig 2011.JPG
_2012_03.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Adding {{Personality}} should be enough. Commons can host files that are free in source country and free in the United States that can be legally hosted in a server in the United States. Even if there were privacy concerns about these images under Austrian law - which I doubt - this is not a copyright issue and they still can be hosted in Commons, because they are still free in Austria and the US and there is no privacy concern about them under US law.--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:34, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, Pere prlpz, what you propose is contrary to well established Commons policy:
- "An image is unacceptable to Commons if it is illegal, or arguably illegal, in any one or more of: (a) the country in which the photograph was taken; (b) the country from which the image was uploaded; (c) the USA (where Commons images are stored)."
- see Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people#Legal_issues (emphasis added)
- . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, Pere prlpz, what you propose is contrary to well established Commons policy:
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:53, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks.
- File:No.ccbbobbLg0112 (41381969895).jpg
- File:No.gobbLg2411 .+ o3 gobbLg2411 . o4 + No.bbobbLg1811 (41381972265).jpg
- File:No.bL1105 02 (41381976385).jpg
- File:No.ybcL1212 01 + ybcL1212 02 deflated (40477245530).jpg
- File:No. mbobbLg2209 (40477248920).jpg
- File:BybobbL2401 2018 39-x-29-x-6 (27413474897).jpg
- File:GobbLg2111 . o1 & gobbLg2111 . o2 2017 47-x-34-x-7 (40477257850).jpg
- File:YbcL1212 01 & ybcL1212 02 2017 39,5-x-30,5-x-5 (40477258940).jpg
- File:YphobbL0201 2018 47-x-34-x-7 (27413478017).jpg
- File:No. gbbbL1703 (28411824498).jpg
- File:No. mgbbL2003 (28411830998).jpg
- File:YwobbInkL06.10 2017 82-x-57-x-10 (40477261180).jpg
- File:Ballon and SuperSonicAirEar (28411817598).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Files by Driver8888
[edit]
Both images, used on w:ProVida, have been taken from the Petards Group website and falsely marked as Public Domain. First image is especially evidential, as it features an edited graphic on the screen that is also used on the website. I cannot find any declaration that images are PD on Petards website; in fact, a copyright tag from 2018 exists at the bottom of the page. Hullian111 (talk) 19:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:34, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chrispin Ngabirama (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works: subject is same as uploader, DW. And not notable.
- File:Chrispin Ngabirama Concerts.jpg
- File:Adieu l'Afrique Shida Cover Chrispin Ngabirama.jpg
- File:Chrispin Photo4.jpg
- File:Chrispin photo 1.jpg
- File:Chrispin Ngabirama Photo .jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW, no info on copyright status of these newspaper clippings. And blatant promotional or COM:WEBHOST purpose.
- File:Intel 12-11-1987.jpg
- File:Susquehanna River Band Review.jpg
- File:Tour Itinerary 1985.jpg
- File:Pennsylvania Musician Date 1983.jpg
- File:Pennsylvania Musician 1983.jpg
- File:Susquehanna River Band feature.jpg
- File:Lancaster Sunday News 10-28-1984.jpg
- File:Lancaster Sunday News 7-10-1983.jpg
- File:Lancaster Sunday News 5-27-1984.jpg
- File:Lancaster New Era 7-12-1985.jpg
- File:Intelligencer Journal 10-15-1984.jpg
- File:Intelligencer Journal 9-2-1988.jpg
- File:Intelligencer Journal 6-9-1983.jpg
- File:Concert Poster 8-26-1984.jpg
- File:Columbia PA News 8-21-1985.jpg
- File:Columbia PA News 1-20-1985.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:DW C9mVio9JRy (talk) 08:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- There are dozens of photos of Startrek starship models and/or from Star Trek Experience in Las Vegas. What's so special about this particular image to delete it? Einsamer Schütze (talk) 20:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. You can't photograph an image displayed on a wall at a show and claim that you own copyright to the image. It became Commons:Derivative works. --Royalbroil 12:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Breaktheicees as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation - uploaded around the same time as numerous other copyright violations of related subjects using sockpuppet accounts and editing images/backgrounds to avoid copyright checks |source = https://i.pinimg.com/736x/88/15/cb/8815cb8e6283e2644b61f76148b4f2d8.jpg
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why a discussion for this one is necessary rather than an immediate delete as it is very clearly a fan edit of this copyrighted image (this one has been flipped to more clearly show that it is a dupe): [4] Breaktheicees (talk) 15:57, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 13:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Indonesia, but the Gama Tower is located in Indonesia. As architectural works are copyrighted in Indonesia until 70 years p.m.a., and the tower itself is less than 70 years old, this photograph is the derivative work of a non-free architectural work that must be deleted in line with our licensing policy and the precautionary principle. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gama Tower
[edit]There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Indonesia, but the Gama Tower is located in Indonesia. As architectural works are copyrighted in Indonesia until 70 years p.m.a., and the tower itself is less than 70 years old, these photographs are derivative works of a non-free architectural work that must be deleted in line with our licensing policy and the precautionary principle.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
obvious unfree logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep It is not obvious that this image is above COM:TOO Peru. I tend to think it is not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Possibly above COM:TOO Peru (so COM:PCP applies), and definitely above COM:TOO US (so not free in US as required by COM:L and Commons:Project scope#Must be freely licensed or public domain). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Question What makes you sure it's above COM:TOO US? The hot pepper or the underline of inconsistent thickness? I'm not sure it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- The hot pepper. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:12, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Indonesia, but Wisma 46 is located in Indonesia. As architectural works are copyrighted in Indonesia until 70 years p.m.a., and the tower itself is less than 70 years old, this photograph is the derivative work of a non-free architectural work that must be deleted in line with our licensing policy and the precautionary principle. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk: kindly add FOP category to the FOP deletion requests that you will make. "Noinclude" tag is needed to avoid collateral inclusion of daily listing (where this DR is transcluded) to the FOP category. Thanks. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination: older photos have been redacted in the past: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Wisma 46. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded this file yesterday, 2nd of May 2023. The painting is from 1930 and in public domain in Norway. But the second condition of licensing is not fullfilled; "This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1928." I ask you to delete the file, please. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 06:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Pixabay images published after January 2019 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:15, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Irityablon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Different cameras, one has Copyright 2009 JB Foto in Exif. PCP - unlikely to be own work by new user
- File:Ladies of Dum.jpg - found here in 2019 https://www.facebook.com/ladiesofdum/photos/pb.100063521485818.-2207520000./2370138049876343/?type=3
- File:Raquy in Osaka.jpg
- File:Raquy.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hello,
- All pictures were approved for use by Raquy Danziger.
- what should I do in order to get wikipedia permittion? Irityablon (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Please send via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 13:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Image is watermarked and obviously copyrighted. Nate • (chatter) 00:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Image author obviously does not match signature; completely incorrect rationale. Nate • (chatter) 00:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Signature scraped off a user-gen content website only existing for AdSense revenue, and author obviously doesn't match signee. Nate • (chatter) 00:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
![02:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/05/03#c-Adeletron_3030-20230503024800-File:West_Bromwich_Albion_"Baggies"_logo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
![15:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/05/03#c-Jameslwoodward-20230708153500-File:West_Bromwich_Albion_"Baggies"_logo.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted logo. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
![02:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/05/03#c-Adeletron_3030-20230503024900-File:Cardiff_City_"Bluebirds"_logo.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
![15:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/05/03#c-Jameslwoodward-20230708153500-File:Cardiff_City_"Bluebirds"_logo.jpg){kind=link}
Appears to be taken from https://www.reddit.com/r/food/comments/eujzxy/i_ate_nepali_chilli_buffalo_momos/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:51, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
out of scope: Commons is not a place to store your custom designs Quenhitran (talk) 02:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be copied from a Flickr page at https://www.flickr.com/photos/32828971@N00/49037345261 ; no free license given there. We would need some communication from the Flickr author via COM:VRT (or have the license changed there) to keep it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Extremely small image missing full EXIF data, also the user's only uploads, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 10:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No free license of the file. Mheidegger (talk) 11:55, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- What do you mean? The video description source literally says "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", how is that not a "free license"? ShadZ01 (talk) 04:01, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry. I could not find the description when using mobile phone. Now I see that the file is ok! --Mheidegger (talk) 07:16, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Œuvre d'un artiste vivant sans possibilité de liberté de panorama H2O(talk) 13:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - THe uploader may, in fact, be the sculptor, but that requires confirmation via VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 14:34, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Dies ist kein "own work" des Einstellers, sondern ohne Angabe und Freigabe des Urhebers (Fotograf) eine URV Jbergner (talk) 15:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The correct license is "PD-EU-no author disclosure". --RAN (talk) 04:11, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - out of copyright in the EU too late to avoid URAA. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Circa early 1970s Ukrainian photograph. Too young to be public domain in Ukraine. Abzeronow (talk) 15:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
mordern work, publishted - https://www.spas-news.ru/tag/svyataya-nonna Testus (talk) 16:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Published here under the german label „gemeinfrei" („public domain“ in english). The text under the picture on said russian webiste only describes the life of saint Nonna. The date given under there ist NOT the publication date of the picture, but that of the text. SancteMichaelArchangele (talk) 18:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- So you confirm that this is not your job. You took an image from the Internet and uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons without the permission of its author or proof that the image is in the public domain. ---Testus (talk) 17:18, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
- The image appears in a lot of places online, but it looks like the version at the Orthodox Church of America's Lives of the Saints is the source for a lot of them, including version uploaded here and both the Russian and Germany instances listed by Testus and SancteMichaelArchangele. (The metadata for the files is identical and shows it was processed in Photoshop 7.0 in 2002.) The OCA website does include a copyright statement, but they use a wide range of images of icons that would be covered under {{PD-Art}}. It is quite possible this image is covered by {{PD-Art}} and {{PD-old-assumed}}, but I'm not finding enough information to make that claim definitively. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- This is a completely modern work and cannot relate to PD-Art or PD-old-assumed ---15:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC) Testus (talk) 15:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Do you have a source confirming that? I'm not finding one that confirms that one way or another. Does the OCA have a history of commissioning new icons for its website? —Tcr25 (talk) 22:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- This is obvious from the image. There will never be any confirmation that this icon of the old letter, this is the work of recent years. ---09:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC) Testus (talk) 09:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- So even if its a recent work, which isn't confirmed beyond your assertion that it's obviously modern, is there evidence that the German source erred in labeling it "gemeinfrei"? That site is connected to the Ökumenisches Heiligenlexikon which has a publication date on CD-ROM of 2003, which is closer to the 2002 date in the file's metadata. It could well be it's a modern image that was released to the public domain. The OCA's use of it is undated. The source you pointed to in the deletion request clearly isn't the first publication of it, nor does it provide any source information. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Have you seen the author's consent to transfer to the public domain? There is not even an indication of authorship anywhere. It turns out that it is possible to post an image on the site without the author's consent, not to put a copyright statement and then such an image can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons? --Testus (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- No, but you also have found no other indication of ownership or even the age of the image. The closest I've been able to determine is that the file metadata includes a 2002 date, that the Ökumenisches Heiligenlexikon was first published in 2003, and that the website SanceMichaelArchangele pointed to, the online version of the Ökumenisches Heiligenlexikon, labels it as public domain. It is possible for someone to falsely label an image's license (both online and in print), but absent a reason to doubt the veracity of the claim, I'm inclined to think that the Ökumenisches Heiligenlexikon's publisher has labeled the image correctly and it's inclusion here is in line with COM:PCP. —Tcr25 (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Have you seen the author's consent to transfer to the public domain? There is not even an indication of authorship anywhere. It turns out that it is possible to post an image on the site without the author's consent, not to put a copyright statement and then such an image can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons? --Testus (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- So even if its a recent work, which isn't confirmed beyond your assertion that it's obviously modern, is there evidence that the German source erred in labeling it "gemeinfrei"? That site is connected to the Ökumenisches Heiligenlexikon which has a publication date on CD-ROM of 2003, which is closer to the 2002 date in the file's metadata. It could well be it's a modern image that was released to the public domain. The OCA's use of it is undated. The source you pointed to in the deletion request clearly isn't the first publication of it, nor does it provide any source information. —Tcr25 (talk) 15:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- This is obvious from the image. There will never be any confirmation that this icon of the old letter, this is the work of recent years. ---09:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC) Testus (talk) 09:19, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- Do you have a source confirming that? I'm not finding one that confirms that one way or another. Does the OCA have a history of commissioning new icons for its website? —Tcr25 (talk) 22:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- This is a completely modern work and cannot relate to PD-Art or PD-old-assumed ---15:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC) Testus (talk) 15:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - too many questions about this. No evidence of a free license from the actual creator. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Unvalid license. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Source site is " Twitter Acesso àInformação Todo o conteúdo deste site está publicado sob a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-SemDerivações 3.0 Não Adaptada. " which is not acceptable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution + no EXIF + user has many copyvio records (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by WKDx417). Tim Wu (talk) 06:52, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no response. --GPSLeo (talk) 18:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete not anything special Dronebogus (talk) 14:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We need ethnic diversity to avoid selection bias. If every penis looked the same, we would only need one image. --RAN (talk) 02:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Delete Commons already has tons of photos of other penises of all races, and there's really nothing special about that one, so I say delete. --QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 12:37, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ):
Deleted: Consensus that the file is not unique enough to merit keeping in light of COM:Nudity's requirements for new uploads. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Sgef1211 (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:42, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
1960s or 1970s Indian photograph. If published before 1963, it would be public domain in India. Otherwise, it would still be in copyright in India unless it would be verified as falling under GODL-India or some other license of that type. Abzeronow (talk) 15:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- I'm quite sure the photo is an Indian Government photo, which would mean its public domain Captain AmericanBurger1775 (talk) 19:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: the source indicates 1970s. Cannot then be sure that it's published before 1963. Ruthven (msg) 07:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Privacy per this edit, and probably GDPR. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: non notable person, no permission from him. (VRTS ticket 2023050310005553 on info-fr file) JohnNewton8 (talk) 16:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
copy vio of File:Nhb-exterior-020.jpg Alabasterstein (talk) 18:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: smaller-sized duplicate. --Rosenzweig τ 10:50, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
First found here, in 2017. Uploaded on Commons 4 years later. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
obvious unfree logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see a similar example on the COM:TOO Peru page, so I don't know how Peruvian law would regard the rough circle and so forth. I'm guessing it's below Com:Too Peru, but an admin will decide. What it is not is "obvious." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's hard to say... I think a discreet copyright tag would be necessary to prevent any of these files getting nominated for deletion. What obvious is that it's not the uploader's right to release these into CC-BY licenses. They are not the author at all. Quenhitran (talk) 05:17, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- "Own work" is untrue, but the only sound basis for deletion would be a determination that the logo is above COM:TOO Peru. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Definitely above COM:TOO US (so not free in US as required by COM:L and Commons:Project scope#Must be freely licensed or public domain). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Yeah, I guess it's above COM:TOO US. Why doesn't Wikimedia move its servers to a country that has better COM:TOO and FoP rules? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Photo non libre de droit 2A01:CB06:A01E:ED81:488B:5CDE:C4E1:152E 10:16, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
photo non libre de droit Tmax8505 (talk) 09:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
photo non libre de droit Tmax8505 (talk) 09:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Been here since 2017 - INUSE and no evidence of copyvio given. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
user is already known for many copyright infrigements, no metadada and therefore unlikely to be own work. Lukas Beck (talk) 10:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Editorkinna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshots.
_cap..png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:56, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Editorkinna (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works.
- File:EL PARQUE SPREEPARK ES UN EJEMplo.jpg
- File:1 AX7fQT-6ZlJaym6KDyp74g.jpg
- File:Planeta muy caliente.jpg
- File:Exoplaneta TRES-5b.jpg
- File:Hd1122g.jpg
- File:ZcM4FZU4AqLCPBnMDcjQe5-1200-80.jpg
- File:Monte Rainier.jpg
Юрий Д.К 19:12, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Referencia de carretera erronea no existente Vilvestre (talk) 19:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Fake "historic" photo, hoax, out of scope. Unreliable uploader whose contributions on ru.wp were deleted. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Geom as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.facebook.com/105151408063565/photos/pcb.447882350457134/447882210457148/?type=3&theater Not the source, this one is bigger. Yann (talk) 21:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Yann: . I'm a sysop on eswiki. I have deleted the article about this person as promotional and irrelevant. The user who created it is new and is the same user who uploaded this image. According to my search, that photo is much older and has probably been taken from his Instagram account. I apologize for using speedy delete (maybe I should have used another type of delete request) with an incorrect link, but I don't have access to instagram to be able to link the original image. I put at your disposal the correct resolution of this request, including reversing it for insufficient reasons. Thanks for notifying. Geom (talk) 17:09, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Roman_Catholic_Territorial_Prelature_of_Marawi.svg, per request of original uploader GiovanniYosh12 (talk) 03:12, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Not strictly a duplicate, as this is a raster file and the other link is a vector file. They can be kept and marked as "other versions" of one another without issue, and I think that would be a better approach than deleting this raster file. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: We normally keep the raster versions of vector images, but I did tag it with {{Superseded}}, so feel free to replace any existing usage with the new file. —holly {chat} 17:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
obvious unfree logo Quenhitran (talk) 03:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Probably below COM:TOO Peru. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Possibly above COM:TOO Peru (so COM:PCP applies), and definitely above COM:TOO US (so not free in US as required by COM:L and Commons:Project scope#Must be freely licensed or public domain). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not sure it's above COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:57, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- I think the globe is. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- What's original about the globe? The particular distortion of the shapes of continents? That seems like a thin reed to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; I agree with Mdaniels5757 that the globe is above TOO; if they had used one with normal shapes of continents then it would have been OK. —holly {chat} 17:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Curbon7 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Clearly not an own work, unless the uploader has a time machine. Pre-1978 US photo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:37, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- This is actually a photograph from the Philippines. Source was updated but I cannot check if this was actually taken by a government employee in the Philippines. Abzeronow (talk) 17:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I just went to the National Museum of the Philippines site and could not find this image in their collection (also tried using Google). Even if {{PD-Philippines}} applied (50 years for anonymous/unknown authors), that would put past the 1996 URAA date, so it won't be PD in the US until at least 2057. —holly {chat} 17:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Holly. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
As the depicted original is likely still in copyright, it needs to be evaluated whether the legal terms for freedom-of-panorama exception of Peru are really met here. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Question: Where was this photograph of a photograph taken? The wall is extremely generic, and the metadata implies this was taken on null island. If we can't determine that the particular location is a public place, then we need to delete per COM:PRP, so I would very much like to understand where that photo is hanging up. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 14:43, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Uploader wrote "La imagen de ella se encuentra en la Facultad de Letras y Ciencias Humanas." --Túrelio (talk) 15:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: We don't even know if this is in Peru. "Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences" could belong any university in Central or South America (the es:Fondo de Cultural Económica operates throughout the Western hemisphere). As such, COM:PCP dictates that we must delete. —holly {chat} 17:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
The colorization of the original black and white photograph does not seem to be uploader’s own work, and since that process is sufficient to generate copyright, the image is a clear violation of such right, to begin with. Furthermore, the original file description, “Through a detailed study, the image of Machado de Assis was able to be created by restoring his negroid features and correcting a historical injustice”… this description does not cite any source that attests to that being the true skin color of Machado de Assis. In that sense, this image, widely used in Wikimedia projects without proper analysis, not only constitutes original research but also creates a chain of misinformation. I therefore consider it to be out of scope as well.
RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: The person depicted in this photograph is the w:en:Machado de Assis and the original photograph appears to be File:Machado de Assis aos 57 anos.jpg. The upload needs to be tagged+categorized as altered, but the jpg image nominated for deletion is COM:INUSE on multiple wikis and the tif image is currently in use on Portuguese wikibooks, so we can't delete either for reasons of scope alone. If you object to the use of either image on the various wikis, you are free to make edits on them (they are, after all, wikis), but that decision has to be made locally rather than via a Commons DR. (And this article confirms that this was the result of some academic work, so I don't see this as being purely OR; more on that later).Returning to the issue of copyright, there is non-trivial change that is made to the shape of Machado de Assis' head, and this goes beyond mere AI colorization and beyond what I would expect from an automated process, so I think that there is some unique copyright that arises in the retouched image that was not present in the original. And, upon further investigation: yes, there is some documentation on who created this: it appears to have been created by some group called "The Real Machado de Assis", which matches the username of the uploader. The one thing I'm not able to do is to independently confirm that the group actually licensed this photo under some COM:L term; the upload was made after a website with the photo was launched, so all I have to rely on is the username. We can try contacting them to confirm evidence of permission, but I'm not inclined to delete the photo at this moment in light of all of the above. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:08, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Pinging DarwIn, who may be interest on this deletion request. I’ll see what I can do about it as soon as possible. RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Thanks for the ping. I would tend to delete this as a non notable fake, and therefore out of scope. It should be replaced with the true photograph in the articles where it is in use, though. Darwin Ahoy! 22:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- I replaced its use in all articles. There are still a couple of pages using it, which seems to be botlike stuff, and therefore irrelevant. Darwin Ahoy! 22:17, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted 1, Kept 1 that is still in use by Portuguese Wikibooks. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Per https://www.pknic.net.pk/ this is not the logo of the company, nor do I see any indication that .pk has its own logo. If kept I suspect it will need a major summary/licensing change. Primefac (talk) 10:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In Use. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
COM:PCP: A Google Image search turned up a result to this post of 2017 suggesting it was posted there prior to Commons. Plus, uploader has a history of copyvio. Frodar (talk) 14:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Duck for a netcopyvio. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:29, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
_(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No free license of the file. Mheidegger (talk) 11:56, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
- Keep – the license template is valid, the source video on YouTube is under CC BY. Janhrach (talk) 17:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @ShadZ01: The video is 48 minutes long. Could you give us the time in the video where you got this screenshot? @Janhrach: If you could help, that would be great too. Thank you. —holly {chat} 17:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Howcheng: The image was cropped from File:Каракат Абден в интервью Динаре Сатжан, 2023 (1).jpg according to the infobox. There are two candidate time ranges in the video: during the first minute of the video and from between the tenth and the fifteenth minute. Right now, I don't have time to precisely identify the exact moment. Janhrach (talk) 18:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 18:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
Dies ist kein "own work" des Einstellers, sondern ohne Angabe und Freigabe des Urhebers (Fotograf) eine URV Jbergner (talk) 15:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader claims numerous contributions as own work on user page. As I could not find this photo via TinEye, I don't have any proof of copyvio. —holly {chat} 18:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
These are unused maps that don't convey much useful information about the relevant elections.
Elli (talk) 17:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion. This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. The file is subject to speedy deletion unless it is relicensed according to the Commons licensing policy. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: It is not known when it was published. Licence is invalid. No evidence that the author died 70 years ago. Photo scanned from book published in 1998. Please refer to Commons:Publication. There is no evidence that it was published 70 years ago. There are many indications that this is a photograph taken by a private person. Please refer to Commons:Project scope/Evidence. The uploader failed to prove that the photo was published over 70 years ago. This is not factory photography. All content in the book is copyrighted by the publisher. Respecting copyright is not about making claims without evidence. It never means that someone can scan a photo from a book and a recipe that they introduce shortly after creating it. The photo comes from a private collection with a high probability. There are no signs that this is a promotional photo. Many such photos were kept in private archival collections. Copyright should not be implied. This should be based on unequivocal evidence. No one can ever immediately assume that a photo was published immediately after it was taken. This can never be an arbitrary decision by one editor. This file is a copyright violation because it comes from - Heinz Herbert Schöning, "Die Eckernförder Kreisbahnen", Verlag Kenning, Nordhorn, 1998, ISBN 3-927587-70-2. Uoijm77 (talk) 17:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep This was very likely published before 1998, and this file of a 1930 photograph shows that it is a published photograph, likely within a few decades of creation if not contemporaneously with creation. 1998 book would likely be a republication that wouldn't have restarted the copyright clock. Uploader should provide us with more information on when and where this was first published to verify it was published before 1953. Abzeronow (talk) 18:13, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Aside all the issues around (anonymous) publication or not, this would certainly be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after publication, so since these traincars have only been in service since 1929, US copyright will not expire until 2025 at the very earliest. Felix QW (talk) 20:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: As I've said before, we normally assume publication soon after creation, but even we were to go with {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}, thanks to the URAA this won't be PD in the US until 2026 at the earliest. —holly {chat} 18:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2.38.140.112 as Copyvio (copyvio). It was uploaded from a Youtube video which has since been taken down, and was never verified. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 18:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:43, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation; likely not own work. See https://roundtable.io/keynewsnetwork/author/zak-holman-knn 199.208.172.35 19:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own work: low-res/web-size screengrab image, uploaded by user whose all other uploads are coyvios. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; we can only assume good faith for so long. —holly {chat} 18:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Miwako Sato as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The licence does not apply. This is not a constitution, law, regulation, judicial decision, etc, or translation thereof. Yann (talk) 21:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Originally, this emblem is derivative of File:Queen Sirikit arms.jpg which be mentioned GFDL license. I am not quite sure about when this emblem is initially drawn and distributed, but there are various versions of them. From my understanding, this one is going to be COM:COA. Wutkh (talk) 17:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: extracted from freely licensed file. —holly {chat} 18:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 05:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Filename suggests this is intended to illustrate physical traits of Chilean men (e.g. hazel eyes). Dcoetzee (talk) 05:23, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Stifle (talk) 16:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
image used in scam 181.212.74.9 21:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I don't see how the use of a picture of a man's face in a scam, if it happened, is relevant to whether it's a useful image. Indeed, if the scam were identified, that might possibly make this image more useful. However, it's not such a great portrait that I would object if the closing admin decided to delete it, now that it's not in use. Say something about the scam, though! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:28, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I too would like to hear more about this scam. —holly {chat} 18:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This map contains misleading information, as it shows the ancient Egyptian empire in a very exaggerated way. Ancient Egypt at its greatest extent did not control northern Yemen, nor Mesopotamia, as is evident in the map, nor even the whole of Sudan. Amr F.Nagy (talk) 04:14, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I can't read Arabic, but does the cross-hatching represent spheres of influence? If so, are you sure it's exaggerated? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Amr F.Nagy: According to Google Lens translation, the cross-hatched areas are regions that paid tribute to the empire. Does that make the map more accurate? —holly {chat} 17:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- No, even some green regions are not accurate. Ancient Egypt didn't invade Assyria or south of Anatolia, didn't seize Cyprus and I couldn't find any historical evidence that south Yemen paid tribute to the Egyptian Empire. Amr F.Nagy (talk) 18:05, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; if this were a SVG file I would say let's fix the image, but it's a JPG so that's not really doable, and besides it's unused anywhere so there's no point in keeping it. —holly {chat} 23:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
