Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/08/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Because it is Blurry, Nonsense Divine PHuta khonde (talk) 23:19, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: nonsense nomination, but file deleted as F10. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Divine PHuta khonde (talk) 23:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. What's nonsense is the deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request as usual by Android app users who cannot resist. --Achim55 (talk) 18:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|1=G7}} Wtubby (talk) 15:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio https://thewest.com.au/news/cleo-smith/cleo-smith-podcast-my-name-is-cleo-episode-one-c-4582168 WWGB (talk) 14:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:17, 28 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Promo/press photo --Krdbot 19:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Saya salah meng-upload untuk halaman ini Michel Ticoalu (talk) 15:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Contested speedy. Copyrighted logo from https://www.threebrandcentral.com/assets (already deleted, see File:3-brand.svg), fake license. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danielonwen1122 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: unused personal pictures/logos.
- File:Ousmane Sharif4.jpg
- File:Ousmane Sharif 3.jpg
- File:Ousmane Sharif 1.jpg
- File:Ousmane Sharif 2.jpg
- File:Ousmane Sharif.jpg
- File:Aesthetic 1.jpg
Lymantria (talk) 05:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused logo. Lymantria (talk) 05:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Low quality, not used, there is a better PNG replacement File:Glycidylaldehyde structuur.png. Wostr (talk) 10:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused. Bad pdf. Superseded by File:Logo AREA - 1971.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused. Bad pdf. Superseded by File:Logo AREA - 1995.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmadasaff11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images outside the scope of this project
Herby talk thyme 14:18, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
mistake please vrevert Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:25, 28 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: mistake i thought the page is still there sorry please revert --Krdbot 01:35, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Americanma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fictional maps, out of COM:SCOPE.
Lord Belbury (talk) 15:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic montage uploaded by spammer account containing likely copyvios. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:55, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused file, out of scope (Not providing educational content) QuickQuokka [talk • contribs] 19:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farhad ataeiyar7570 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal file collection, out of scope.
- File:Farhad ataeiyar italy.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyar tehran.jpg
- File:فرهاد عطايي يار farhad ataeiyar siemens.jpg
- File:فرهاد عطايي يار.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyar medica2018.jpg
- File:Alireza ataei.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyar tokyo.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyar usa.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyar medica.jpg
- File:Farhad ataei.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyar germany.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyar Arab Helth.jpg
- File:Alireza ataeiyar.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyar فرهاد عطايي يار.jpg
- File:فرهاد عطايي يار farhad ataeiyar.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyar.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyar medica tokyoفرهاد عطايي يار.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyar Arab Helthفرهاد عطايي يار.jpg
- File:Farhad ataeiyarفرهاد عطايي يار.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 20:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Crop from an unknown book. All his edits here and on pt.Wikisource are copyvios. Lugusto • ※ 21:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (speedied as copyvio). --DMacks (talk) 04:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
This seems to be a case of licence washing at Flickr. While the photo is correctly licensed, there is no evidence that the creator of the model agreed to free licence of the derivative photo. De728631 (talk) 17:59, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Vera (talk) 12:10, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
This image is asserted to be Public Domain because it was published between 1927 and 1977 and without a copyright notice specific to the advertisement., but the this logo was adopted in 1984 according to the file description and the source newspaper is from 1985 which is clearly outside the bounds of the applicable years. This is potentially PD-US-1978-89 but it would need to be demonstrsated that no copyright registration took place Whpq (talk) 20:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7: Speedy-tagged by uploader. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
According to Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Leonaardog (talk) 03:34, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: Remember to close the thread. -- Leonaardog (talk) 16:46, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
clearly a copyviol... — danyele 16:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious netcopyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
プライバシー情報を消去せずにアップしたため削除したい。 あっちゃん2011 (talk) 00:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
COM:BOOK A09 (talk) 19:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
No compliant with Wikimedia Commons policy. LKeon (talk) 20:25, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Incorrectly claimed as own work 331dot (talk) 18:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:16, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Monument to the soldiers of the Soviet Army - the liberators of Soviet Latvia and Riga from the Nazi invaders (Riga).jpg
[edit]This "photo" appears to be a Photoshopped version of a photo from at least 2013 (TinEye). (You can see the artifacts of Photoshop's sky replace feature around tree leaves and left sculpture.) The uploader has claimed it's their work and public domain, but it's clearly derivative work. They also claim this is from 2022 [1], which is clearly false. I would normally say the uploader may be confused about the copyright and dates, but the sky replacement really looks like a deliberate attempt at deception. — HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK ∣ enWiki 13:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Compare ru:Файл:Monument to Soviet soldiers liberated Latvia from Nazi invaders.01.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 16:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete – Agree with nominator's reasons. Also note that User:АнИгМа has a long history of unhelpful activity here, with little communication. Eric talk 12:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Leave - No reason for deleting. User:АнИгМа did really a lot, but in this case he just made a little cut. Your words “the sky replacement really looks like a deliberate attempt at deception…”- it looks as you have some idea and decided to present it to society. That’s all. I made this photo, I improved it and uploaded. If you have a real evidence to declare that something was really wrong, why I must delete it, please tell me. Otherwse we can fabricate any ideas and write them everywhere. GrIgMaNN (talk) 12:38, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Your photo is clearly made from this one. You did not make it. You replaced the sky on a different photo. Then you reuploaded it without any credit to the original (used an invalid license), claimed it as just your own work, and claimed it is from 2022. You even replaced the date on English Wikipedia even you know it is not from 2022. There is no educational value in fake photos, so this is against the scope of the project — HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK ∣ enWiki 13:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete Even if we leave the Photoshop antics aside, per COM:FOP Latvia there is no freedom of panorama in Latvia, and a 1985 monument is still protected by copyright. Per en:Monument to the Liberators of Soviet Latvia and Riga from the German Fascist Invaders, there were multiple creators, and the monument, even if it was torn down, is still protected for 70 years after the last of them has died. --Rosenzweig τ 12:50, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Leave Please read below regarding :Compare ru:Файл:Monument to Soviet soldiers liberated Latvia from Nazi invaders.01.jpg please carefully translate from Russian what is written below the photo:
“ User:Kalnroze, the copyright owner of this work, has voluntarily released it into the public domain ... , the contributor authorizes everyone to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, except as required by law. “GrIgMaNN (talk) 12:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- That does not change the fact that the monument itself is still copyrighted. --Rosenzweig τ 12:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- It doesn’t exist anymore, it was destroyed. Died! So, no option anymore to get photo in reality. Memory about the monument is still copyrighted?GrIgMaNN (talk) 16:49, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Not the memory, but its representation on photos is. --Rosenzweig τ 04:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- It doesn’t exist anymore, it was destroyed. Died! So, no option anymore to get photo in reality. Memory about the monument is still copyrighted?GrIgMaNN (talk) 16:49, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Obviously this is a hoax. Additionally I believe that User:GrIgMaNN is the same person as User:АнИгМа (the same element IgMa=ИгМа, the same method of using capital letters); I have applied for chekcusers at ru.wiki to check it. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 13:16, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Андрей Романенко, looks as you are clairvoyant! You may think whatever you want. But stop transferring your obviously fabled conclusions here, just because you have a status of admin or you are Дмитрий Кузьмин or whatever else. Stop mislead users and put me down!!! АнИгМа (talk) 12:59, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:05, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Somewhere between F10 as personal photos, G10 as advertising an NFT (with nowhere to buy it?) and against COM:LICENCING to ask "Please do not misuse his photos."
Lord Belbury (talk) 12:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logoy. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:08, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Публикации научных статей.pdf
- File:Математические формулы.pdf
- File:Патенты и изобретения.pdf
- File:Научные открытия.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Orphan images. Remnants of a self-promotional activities. Wiki is not a hosting or a PR channel.
- File:Публикации научных статей.pdf
- File:Математические формулы.pdf
- File:Патенты и изобретения.pdf
- File:Научные открытия.pdf
- File:Алексей Николаевич в детстве.jpg
- File:Белашов Алексей.jpg
Bilderling (talk) 07:37, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Je suis la personne sur cette photo. Je ne veux pas que celle-ci soit sur Internet et demande ainsi sa suppression immédiate. Wikiplusss (talk) 23:38, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm, "suppression immédiate" - wasn't it you, who uploaded it by yourself 3 years ago? --Túrelio (talk) 06:56, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- My question would be whether he's notable. Seemingly not? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed. Then the rationale should be: out of COM:SCOPE. --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
重複アップのため あっちゃん2011 (talk) 00:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by CptViraj at 08:41, 4 September 2022 UTC: Bot: Redirect to a deleted or non-existent page --Krdbot 13:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
unused, very poor quality Ske (talk) 06:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
bad quality, new version available, --> File:Sekolah Kebangsaan Seksyen 6 Kota Damansara (220826) 2.jpg Wiki Farazi (talk) 12:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:15, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Tiny image, no EXIF, probable copyvio and probably out of scope personal image . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Jim, this is an image of an Open Educator who is working with me on Open Education projects. The image was uploaded on the 27th August, it seems a bit unfair to expect it to be used immediately on upload, when so many are not. If you still think that is not enough reason to keep, please continue. Islahaddow (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Non commercial licence. FunkMonk (talk) 12:20, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 07:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
ordinary person, not notable, not used at WM, google search: 3 hits with the same texts https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ravi+Kumar+Singh+Kashyap%22+musician&client=firefox-b-d&sxsrf=ALiCzsY_TyBbWUHnwADOKKmud8f5DUNjHA%3A1661666769987&ei=0QULY7TkO8Hc7_UP8JOs-AY&ved=0ahUKEwj0kL2M7-j5AhVB7rsIHfAJC28Q4dUDCA0&uact=5&oq=%22Ravi+Kumar+Singh+Kashyap%22+musician&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBQgAEKIEMgUIABCiBDIFCAAQogQ6CAgAEKIEELADOgUIIRCgAToECCEQFToHCCEQoAEQCkoECEEYAUoECEYYAFCRC1j-MGCnPWgBcAB4AIABjgGIAccLkgEEMi4xMZgBAKABAcgBAcABAQ&sclient=gws-wiz Mateus2019 (talk) 06:14, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo- Out of project scope. --Alaa :)..! 12:20, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvito : https://lelynx.net/2022/02/culture-une-communaute-doit-utiliser-sa-langue/de-la-gauche-vers-la-droite-ibrahima-barry-et-abdoulaye-barry-createurs-de-lalphabet-adlam/ Wyslijp16 (talk) 16:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvito, original author : 7 FOR ALL MANKIND (+ copyvito : https://www.designscene.net/2022/03/cara-delevingne-7-for-all-mankind-ss22.html). Wyslijp16 (talk) 16:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio - Artist not in public domain Culex (talk) 17:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio - Artist not in public domain Culex (talk) 17:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio - Artist not in public domain Culex (talk) 17:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio - Artist not in public domain Culex (talk) 17:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio - Artist not in public domain Culex (talk) 17:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio - Artist not in public domain Culex (talk) 17:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio - Artist not in public domain Culex (talk) 17:52, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio - Artist not in public domain Culex (talk) 17:52, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by KCCruQWXJ1Sj as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: G7. По желанию автора или человека, загрузившего изображение
Converted to regular DR, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy (uploaded in 2020 and in use).-- Túrelio (talk) 13:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Нарушение авторского права KCCruQWXJ1Sj (talk) 13:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, no longer in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:48, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The website in the source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Redundant of File:2020 United States Senate election in Kansas results map by county.svg TylerKutschbach (talk) 04:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment If you toggle between the two files at the largest size linked, you'll see that they're not the same. Which file is more accurate? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: the svg file is more accurate. TylerKutschbach
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful that this is actually the uploader's own work. The image of the woman appears to be a stock photo (see here); the image of sea ice is doubtful as well. I previously deleted two other images by this uploader that were copyright violations falsely claimed as own work. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:34, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by El Nuevo Doge (talk · contribs)
[edit]Violations of COM:FOP US. Copyrighted 3D works, 2D works, packaging, etc. Some also featuring copyrighted characters
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639760692).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639760146).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639759720).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639759298).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638655343).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639758374).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638654621).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639757572).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639757088).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639756678).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638652883).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639755700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638649147).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648681).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648319).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639751128).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638647293).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639749706).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639749118).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638645065).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638644613).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639747600).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638643667).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639746590).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639746092).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639745516).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638641581).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638640977).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639743798).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639743254).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639742762).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639742284).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638638381).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639741256).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639740770).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638636965).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638636097).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639738802).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638634927).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638634403).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639737242).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639736700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639736296).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639735728).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639735046).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638630493).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638626289).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638626757).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639727328).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639724244).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639725170).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639724700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639723792).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639722928).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639723364).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639721700).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639721258).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638616959).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639720854).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638616467).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638615677).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638615313).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639718492).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638614823).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638614437).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638613033).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638613615).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639713528).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638605959).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639709932).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638605411).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639708116).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638603953).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638602301).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639706746).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639707636).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639706070).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638601541).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638600523).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639704280).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638599881).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639702080).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639699974).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639702502).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638597391).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8638598321).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639701086).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639698812).jpg
- File:Snow White The Creation of a Classic (8639698050).jpg
(Oinkers42) (talk) 20:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Keep File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8639759720).jpg Is a simple utilitarian object without any artistic merit and the head is completely de minimis, also File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648681).jpg the packaging has an ivalid copyright notice due to the lack of year in the claim so it is public domain. El Nuevo Doge (talk) 04:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am unconvinced about the first of the two; simple design but Disney character.-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
- Keep File:Walt Disney Family Museum (8638648681).jpg as {{PD-US-defective notice}}, though for safety I suggest cropping out the cardboard box (as all sides of the box are not visible, the possiblity of a valid notice on a side not seen cannot be ruled out); the toy guitar seems ok. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- It is still a derivative work, no matter how bad license requirements are on Ebay. This is Wikimedia Commons. A09 (talk) 22:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have Delted what I think are the obvious cases. Some of the remaining ones there might be some argument at being out of copyright for lack of compliance with the old US copyright laws - however as Disney was generally fastidious about copyright and remains litigious in protection of their properties, unless a strong case can be made about images individually, I and precaution favor Delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; kept those believed more general. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
fake license and non-free screenshot 109.172.98.69 09:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
But it is my screenshot
Deleted: INeverCry 00:14, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free software. Siyuwj (talk) 00:20, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
While parts of the Windows 10 user interface do not cross over COM:TOO, multiple non-free icons exist in the screenshot, along with a non-free Star vs. the Forces of Evil wallpaper. No pages currently use this file, and files of this name have been repeatedly deleted for similar reasons (see Special:WhatLinksHere/File:Windows_10_Desktop.png). Ntx61 (talk) 05:19, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
low quality, misattributed version of File:Operation_Tidal_Wave_in_1943.jpg Poliocretes (talk) 05:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:36, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Work of art by living artist. No FOP in Norway. Morten Haugen (talk) 06:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Work of art by living artist. No FOP in Norway. Morten Haugen (talk) 06:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Work of art by living artist. No FOP in Norway. Morten Haugen (talk) 06:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Work of art by living artist. No FOP in Norway. Morten Haugen (talk) 06:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
"Author unknown" does not mean it is automatically in public domain. Section 213.3 of the Philippines copyright law states that anonymous works are prptected for 50 years after the date of first lawful publication, or if previously unpublished, 50 years after the date of creation (see COM:Philippines#General rules). The cited source is kulogatkidlat2006.blogspot.com, but it is uncertain if the photo's hosting on the said blog is equivalent to first publication. Assuming the claimed date 2006 is the date when it was first published, then this photo will still remain unfree until January 1, 2057, the date when this photograph falls public domain. If ever, undelete/restore this to-be-deleted image file in 2057. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Rochester, August 2022 36.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 08:12, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Own work? Higher resolution images can be found here. Wouter (talk) 10:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a scan of a 1970s sales brochure rather than the uploader's own work. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Saya mengunggahnya secara tidak sengaja Jamaludin FN (talk) 12:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:52, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Owner request: duplicate of File:Plant with orange strings.jpg Downtowngal (talk) 14:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Możliwe nękanie, osoba prywatna, bez związku z kategorią. Kso (talk) 14:20, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:54, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Watermarked to https://www.instagram.com/focus_to_life, user's other uploads have been taken from many different web sources, all copyvios. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Looks like example of COM:LL. Old files that are reuploaded to flickr and then to Commons under "free licence". First file seems like was posed on mtv website originally and obviously does not have free licence. Second one is screenshot from music video
Renvoy (talk) 16:27, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- There was a license, I'm not that familiar with the laws, if you think it should be deleted then delete it פיטר פן (talk) 16:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Nesutradia does not exist, fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 16:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyvito : https://opengolf.es/actualidad/sabias-que-angel-de-la-torre-fue-el-pionero-e-iniciador-del-golf-profesional-espanol/ Wyslijp16 (talk) 16:34, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- This photo is of Angel de la Torre at the age of 14. He was born in 1896. That makes the photo over 100 years old. 2600:1700:A110:8B00:AC14:DE4E:E497:A3DF 18:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: 16:26, 13 October 2022, by Túrelio (Copyright violation). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
If this is "completely fictional species", what kind of educational value the image has? Taivo (talk) 16:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Артём 13327 as Screenshot EEIM (talk) 16:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Just delete it. Magnatyrannus (talk) 17:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio, stolen from tweet: https://twitter.com/dcpaleo/status/939111691069083648 IJReid (talk) 17:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Inteligentemente grande (talk · contribs)
[edit]I suspect all images uploaded by this user are copyright violations. Several images are watermarked (File:Imperial Shopping em Imperatriz. png.jpg), and many others can be found in the web with dates before upload date:
- File:Getúlio Vargas, 2021. Imperatriz. jpg.jpg: https://www.folhadobico.com.br/imperatriz-balsas-e-acailandia-estao-entre-as-cidades-mais-ricas-do-maranhao/
- File:Campus Imperatriz, Ciências Agrarias. jpg.jpg: https://www.uemasul.edu.br/portal/wp-content/gallery/inauguracao-cca/Inauguracao-CCA-3.JPG
- File:Ponte Dom Afonso, MA x TO, png.jpg: https://www.facebook.com/ENQUANTOISSONOMARANHAO/photos/a.531235473646712/2564040593699513/?type=3
- File:Vista aérea da Cidade. png.jpg: https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/maranh%C3%A3o-imperatriz-e-regi%C3%A3o-not%C3%ADcias-i.2311199/#post-177125801
- File:Estadio Frei Epifânio.jpg: https://ecvitoria.com.br/copa-do-brasil-21/
- File:Imperial Shopping em Imperatriz. png.jpg
- File:Vista aérea da Cidade. png.jpg
- File:Alvorada Complexo Clube.jpg
- File:Freitas Park Aquático. png.jpg
- File:Kartódromo Imperatriz.jpg
- File:Estadio Frei Epifânio.jpg
- File:50 Bis Imperatriz, png.jpg
- File:Rodoviária de Imperatriz.jpg
- File:Aeroporto Regional, Renato Cortez. jpg.jpg
- File:Zona Leste da cidade. png.jpg
- File:Bairro Santa Inês, Imperatriz. png.jpg
- File:Ponte Dom Afonso, MA x TO, png.jpg
- File:Bernardo sayão, Três Poderes. png.jpg
- File:Vista panorâmica da Cidade, Imperatriz. jpg.jpg
- File:Beira Rio, Imperatriz. jpg.jpg
- File:Campus Imperatriz, Ciências Agrarias. jpg.jpg
- File:Getúlio Vargas, 2021. Imperatriz. jpg.jpg
MKFI (talk) 19:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken mostly from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:44, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
artists decision Croppy Peace Sign (talk) 21:12, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violations. Screenshots from British television series Keeping Up Appearances. Series is copyrighted by the BBC and uploaded to Flickr with a false license (license laundering).
- File:Identify the Artist XIII Week 4 ...a musical soiree (49594302247).jpg
- File:Identify the Artist XIII Week 4 (49569353906).jpg
- File:Identify the Artist XIII (...Room for a Pony) (49535754153).jpg
- File:Riparian Entertainments(2) (49503637521).jpg
- File:Riparian Entertainments(1) (49478309607).jpg
mattbr 21:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
No notice on website that this is under Creative Commons, also the wikipedia article is under AfD and has copyright issues. Dr vulpes (talk) 21:52, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Has serious copyright problems on the article, and there is no Creative Commons notice on website. JML1148 (talk) 23:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No VRT ticket - have to go with delete based on pattern of issues Atsme Talk 📧 20:58, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:47, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Professional-looking photos, unlikely the uploader's own work. File:Ambience-Livery-Front-Quarter.jpg can be found on Tineye prior to being uploaded here, e.g. https://www.bne.com.au/blog/escapes/52-quick-getaways credited to P&O Cruises.
-M.nelson (talk) 22:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:50, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
The LA Times (2000-07-04) is clearly still copyright. Someone using it as the basis for an art installation (removing just the central image) doesn't change that. Discussion about German copyright of the art piece further blocking this upload is possible, but unnecessary I think. Prosfilaes (talk) 17:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio, original from tweet: https://twitter.com/mcgratherium/status/1329842759985889281 IJReid (talk) 17:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Corporate and copyrighted image from Mercedes-Benz (visible on many websites such as https://www.hellopro.fr/autocars-mercedes-benz-tourismo-2006172-5848474-produit.html) Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 18:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Licence washing at Flickr. The flyer itself is copyrighted and non-free, and there is no evidence that the band or their record label agreed to the derivative photo. De728631 (talk) 18:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Image seen in other publications, such as this one from the April before this was uploaded in July. https://www.mundodeportivo.com/elotromundo/gente/20220406/1001781807/detenido-de-nuevo-morad-el-famoso-rapero-de-hospitalet-act-pau.html Image has no metadata to confirm that uploader took this photo. I am getting sick and tired of new users uploading copyrighted photos of celebrities and calling them "own work", as lying and stealing are sins in all societies. Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:38, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, taken from FB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, same as a tv screenshot of a commercial or so Mateus2019 (talk) 18:52, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FOB. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
copyvio (commercial) Mateus2019 (talk) 18:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FOP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
copyvio (commercial) Mateus2019 (talk) 19:04, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FOP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
very blurry, better files File:Bad Doberan, Münster, zwei Figuren.JPG, File:13-06-21-muenster-bad-doberan-by-RalfR-041.jpg, File:13-06-21-muenster-bad-doberan-by-RalfR-041 cropped left.jpg, File:13-06-21-muenster-bad-doberan-by-RalfR-041-cropped right.jpg Oursana (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:49, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pbritti as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: I'm fairly certain this is a reupload of the previously copyvio'd File:Major Archbishop George Alencherry.jpg; image appears on old versions of Wiki scrubbers and is a portrait
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as mentioned formerly deleted file was a different photo. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete My apologies on linking the wrong image as there are a lot in this sock nest, see the deleted files of the likely sockmaster Esthappanos Bar Geevarghese for prior instances of this image under the various Alencherry uploads. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: Requesting a deletion not only on the same grounds as above but also Commons:Photographs of identifiable people, as the original image is a copyvio photoshop of a living person for promotional purposes. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The Martiner (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- The 3 images does not violates any copyright. The 3 images were given to my the the artist himself and they do not have any copyright and will never have. I can show you a letter handwritten by the artist himself with his signature telling this 3 images will never have copyright, they are for press usage and for periodistic notes, so everybody can make use of them. The Martiner (talk) 22:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- @The Martiner Please use COM:VRT as requested. Not doing so means there is a strong probability that these pictures will be deleted. There is no such thing as "Will never have copyright", but there is such a thing as being licenced for free use. Your task is to show that licencing allows the pictures to be here. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 07:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not own work per admission, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
"Coins and banknotes produced before 23 July 1928 entered the public domain before the law changed on 23 July 2003, and remain in the public domain. Do not upload images of currency designed after 1928." This is a quote from the
Ooligan (talk) 03:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
-20231125035800-File:Womencryingoverclimate.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-20231125041100-File:Womencryingoverclimate.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603761440.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603163287.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico_-_6118056009.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico_-_6118056593.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico_-_6118056427.jpg){kind=link}
_Sinaloa.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico_-_6118058571.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603166835.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603746416.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603767696.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Estado_de_Sinaloa,M%C3%A9xico._-_5603746904.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(49535754153).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(49503637521).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(49478309607).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:22, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
this is not own work [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 16:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Tiny image, no EXIF -- copyvio? . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:25, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
SVG Version existiert mittlerweile Bratwurst mit Sauerkraut (talk) 14:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
SVG Version existiert mittlerweile Bratwurst mit Sauerkraut (talk) 14:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
SVG Version existiert mittlerweile Bratwurst mit Sauerkraut (talk) 14:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
SVG Version existiert mittlerweile Bratwurst mit Sauerkraut (talk) 14:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
SVG Version existiert mittlerweile Bratwurst mit Sauerkraut (talk) 14:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
SVG Version existiert mittlerweile Bratwurst mit Sauerkraut (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The deletion policy says that "Self-created artwork without obvious educational use." has no place on this platform. Since it is not backed by source (i.e. not reliably factual correct), it cannot be educational, thus it qualifies as private artwork. The description is saying it: "This should not be used in articles as it is just an idea of the relationship and is not necessarily supported by sourcing." TheRandomIP (talk) 20:25, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment But it's in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:53, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's a mistake. Should not be in use. This is why we need to delete it to avoid further unintended usage. TheRandomIP (talk) 22:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment No, I don't think it works that way. Files that are in use cannot be deleted, per policy. Make an argument on the relevant Wikipedia for removal of the thumbnail of the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- I removed the images, not in use any more. (except for a talk page) TheRandomIP (talk) 21:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: COM:INUSE and per this discussion. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:48, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
per fourthords request for deletion. Changing from speedy deletion as I wish to contest it. I did see its prior deletion however these photos are the official ones taken by the US Army. They're basically like yearbook photos. More recently they do often have a US flag in the background for enlisted members/lower officers but previously the uniform color background was the norm. It might've been listed as coming from the family in the past but that would likely be because it's the family's copy of the photo that was given to the news agency. The original photo was still taken by the military Jasonkwe (talk) (contribs) 06:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- There's no explicit source for this photo's provenance as a work by a US Army member in the course of their duties. That was sufficient at the nominations for File:PFC Micah Xavier Johnson, U.S. Army.png, File:Kristian Menchaca ACU.png, File:Special Warfare Operator First Class Jonathan Y. Kim.jpg, and File:Amir Mirza Hekmati USMC.png. Further, the discussion at File:PV2 Micah Xavier Johnson, U.S. Army.jpg established that the US military sometimes contracts out their portrait photography, meaning that in the absence of a specific credit to a military photographer, we cannot assume PD-USGov-Military. Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Fourthords Oh....dang it. I didn't know that they sometimes have private contractors do the photos. Yeah, I change my recommendation and believe this should be deleted per copyvio. Thanks for this info. Jasonkwe (talk) (contribs) 00:22, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:43, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
The subject of this photo is the trophy, but there is no license for the trophy. Just the logo would be above TOO-Sweden. Glrx (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. See COM:TROPHY. Glrx (talk) 16:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
The date is 1929 and there is no author information, so this could still be under copyright UrielAcosta (talk) 17:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC) It is a broadside (or Street poster) and details to welcome Rabbi. There is no author for such material. I am the photographer of this poster. --Sf2000 (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: With an anonymous author, this entered the public domain 70 years after publication per PD-Israel. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful. Skazi 20:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:47, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope - the portrayed minor is a blocked sockpuppeteer on nl-wiki as well, privacy of this person should be protected so he can grow up and not be hunted by juvenile wrong doings later. Also non-free flickr picture --MoiraMoira (talk) 11:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- Comment The source photo on Flickr is free licensed, and the license is accurately reflected in the copy here. The photo is in use in articles in Wikipedias in multiple languages, so apparently is within project scope. The photograph appears to show a young man in a public place, and I see nothing compromising or violating about it. Whatever the connection to a blocked user, I don't understand why this particular image is a problem that needs deleting. Could you please elaborate as to what the problem is? Wondering, Infrogmation (talk) 23:22, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
- the person brags about it using his full name on the internet. It is a child and its privacy should be protected later once he grows up and realises what he has done. Wikimedia should be considerate with juveniles who cannot oversee their actions now. MoiraMoira (talk) 18:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- "once he grows up and realises what he has done" sounds to me like there is some suggestion someone might have done something at least slightly embarrassing or improper? As far as I can see, the young fellow has visited a popular theme park. I and millions of others have visited theme parks as well, and I'm not aware of any shame attaching to that activity. Seriously, what am I missing? Still puzzled, Infrogmation (talk) 19:28, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- the person brags about it using his full name on the internet. It is a child and its privacy should be protected later once he grows up and realises what he has done. Wikimedia should be considerate with juveniles who cannot oversee their actions now. MoiraMoira (talk) 18:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I think MoiraMoira objects to the fact that the boy has managed to get his photograph on 16 different Wikipedias. That also makes me uneasy, but the images used on the individual Wikipedias is not our concern. As for protecting the kid, if he or his parents wanted the image taken down, I would do it, but I see no potential harm to him by this. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Actually, I am the kid in the picture. I think it's awesome, I'm famous without doing anything haha :D I don't have a problem with this photo being on Wikipedia, my parents don't either. --80.57.61.230 12:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Kept, file is within project scope and file is freely licensed. Kameraad Pjotr 19:03, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Ooit naar Flickr geüploaded met een CC2.0-licentie. Ik weet dat je die eigenlijk niet meer kunt intrekken wanneer je die licentie ooit op een foto hebt geplakt, maar ik zou 't toch waarderen als mijn foto in ieder geval van Wikimedia zou verdwijnen: Ik probeer m'n online voetafdruk wat te verkleinen, én de foto verschijnt nu ook in wat minder leuke context, namelijk het verkopen van nep-pakken: https://www.looopings.nl/weblog/20514/Frans-bedrijf-claimt-origineel-Walibi-kostuum-te-verkopen.html Luuk58 (talk) 14:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Mechanical translation: "uploaded to Flickr with a CC2.0 license. I know you can't actually revoke it once you've pasted that license on a photo, but I'd still appreciate it if my photo would at least disappear from Wikimedia: I'm trying to reduce my online footprint a bit, and the photo now also appears in a less fun context, namely selling fake suits:" -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
- Comment Image in use, in scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per the previous decision on 19:03, 26 November 2010. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The photograph was released under a free license, which is, of course, irrevocable. The nomination does not address that the image is in use, so it should be declined. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 03:22, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: In use, free licensed, no support for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:33, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Very likely created after 1977, probably 1998 based on https://www.sculpturecenter.org/oosi/items/show/1356. US FOP does not extend to sculptures. Eiim (talk) 18:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- It is my understanding that the artist has given permission for use of this image. I will contact him for a formal release. --Elonka (talk) 22:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:45, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Not CC0. Dima st bk (talk) 23:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:45, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Anntinomy as no permission and self publication Anntinomy (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, EXIF does not match uploader. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
The certificate is Crown Copyright see https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/reproduction-of-birth-death-marriage-certificates.pdf Graham Beards (talk) 16:09, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Question Does that mean it can or can't be hosted here? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:55, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
ːNo it cannot.Graham Beards (talk) 07:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. A simple birth certificate is not a creative work. It consists only of simple factual information. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with IronGargoyle, there is not anything copyrightable about the birth certificate itself. Abzeronow (talk) 18:21, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
fake PD-EU-Anon claim, the source website makes no such claim Denniss (talk) 09:25, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- The website claims all rights but isn't in a position to back that up. The uploaders comments are not helpful. There's a less cropped version of the image here but no credit given unlike other images on page. Other sites suggest its the second prototype (or second production vehicle) GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:34, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- The Panzer Tracts book "Panzerkampfwagen VI P" uses the same source image for its title photo (little bit chopped off from top/bottom but some more people visible on the left. --Denniss (talk) 00:41, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- So we have at least 3 sources of this image, and neither of them give author any credit. So maybe the author is really unknown. Since photo was taken in Europe and April 1942 was more than 80 years ago, I guess that PD-Anon-70-EU applies here. Arado Ar 196 (talk) 19:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- We can't guess anything here. The uploader has to proof he made reasonable attempts to find an author for this image. If it's used by multiple books then he would have to go through them to look for authors lists/credits. Another problem is that many books do not properly credit image sources/authors. The image may have been made by the manufacturer and the rights would now be held by Steyr-Daimler-Puch. --Denniss (talk) 10:33, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- So we have at least 3 sources of this image, and neither of them give author any credit. So maybe the author is really unknown. Since photo was taken in Europe and April 1942 was more than 80 years ago, I guess that PD-Anon-70-EU applies here. Arado Ar 196 (talk) 19:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- The Panzer Tracts book "Panzerkampfwagen VI P" uses the same source image for its title photo (little bit chopped off from top/bottom but some more people visible on the left. --Denniss (talk) 00:41, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PCP. The file can be restored in 2063 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 19:10, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
SVG Version existiert mittlerweile Bratwurst mit Sauerkraut (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (nominated by creator & uploader), seems have been a PNG derived from an Inkscape file anyway. --Rosenzweig τ 19:13, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Refer to my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Tun en Okey Mr. Pancho (1981) (cropped).jpg Tbhotch™ 01:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}