Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/04/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Скинул фото по ошибке BondarAleksey (talk) 19:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Error in upload. I m not the autor of the photography Lytsu29 (talk) 21:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 21:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
This is a movie promotional poster and as such it is copyright material. The uploader did not provide any evidence that the copyright holder released it under a free license. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 05:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington at 18:46, 11 April 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monster promotional poster.jpg: This is a movie promotional poster and as such it is copyright material. The uploader did not provide any evidence that the copyright holder released it under a free license. --Krdbot 02:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Лжефлаг [1] VadimSPb78 (talk) 05:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
-
СТАТЬЯ 112. Государственным флагом Крымской Автономной Советской Социалистической Республики является государственный флаг РСФСР, состоящий из красного полотнища, в левом углу которого, у древка наверху, помещены золотые буквы «РСФСР» на русском и татарском языках, с добавлением под надписью «РСФСР» буквами меньшего размера надписи «Крымская АССР» на русском и татарском языках. -
после перевода крымскотатарского языка, с латиницы на кириллицу.
.gif)
.gif)
VadimSPb78 (talk) 05:19, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. Commons not Wikipedia. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 15:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
https://crwflags.com/FOTW/FLAGS/su-uakr.html Гуськов (talk) 12:19, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
kept. The flag is ineligible for copyright, because it is very simple. Taivo (talk) 06:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Для переименования File:Flag of the Crimean ASSR (1939).svg 37.122.53.61 04:43, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- It looks like this is the third nomination from the same person. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 14:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
重複上傳 Aqh26201 (talk) 14:30, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 02:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Право на неприкосновенность частной жизни, личную и семейную тайну, защиту своей чести и доброго имени Exemnia (talk) 14:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept, the file has never existed in Commons. Taivo (talk) 13:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Albania.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, Out of scope - IndrajitDas 16:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
This photo should be deleted.user talk:RIDHVAN SHARMA
This file should be deleted because its irrelevant to the topic. RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Irrelevant Victorbasu (talk) 21:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 03:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Not owned work, owned by Univision Communications. Qwkjw (talk) 01:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, false claims, false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was very obviously created as a joke, and thus does not belong on Wikimedia Commons. Helloguyswhatisup (talk) 19:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 07:25, 16 April 2021 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 14:41, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Stock image: http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/1161765602 The linked source site https://www.lasexta.com/noticias/deportes/motor/formula1/george-russell-responde-que-situan-2022-mercedes-junto-verstappen_20210326605d8889a6140c0001a2449e.html attributes it to Getty Dylsss (talk) 04:38, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- That was meant to be a copyvio, not a deletion request, obvious copyright violation. Dylsss (talk) 04:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Nipunshihara (talk) 18:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Nipunshihara (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Low quality, stolen and a violation of copyright Lyanbox782 (talk) 01:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" image of a person (or not) who was barred from editing WP as a "troll" . E4024 (talk) 02:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
FBMD in metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Copyvio? Correct permission is required See COM:OTRS Timtrent (talk) 11:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal photo by non-contributor so SD F10 applies. --Randykitty (talk) 11:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Copied from here: https://www.mako.co.il/music-news/local/Article-4f8e271e07a5d31006.htm Tomer T (talk) 13:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Acid903156 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Shubhangi, ranjan..jpg
- File:Shubhangi,in,2020.jpg
- File:Shubhangi,home,.jpg
- File:Shubhangi , at , home , covid 19.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
© 2014 - Francesco Tonelli E4024 (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 15:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it and i want it deleted Er surgi (talk) 23:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, uploader has problems with copyright. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 06:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Diplomas. Proper license tags should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Abbasov M.M Certificate 08.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M. Honorary Decree 03.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M Diploma 03.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M Diploma 02.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M Diploma 01.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M. Honorary Decree 02.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M. Honorary Decree 01.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M Certificate 05.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M Certificate 04.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M Certificate 06.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M Certificate 07.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M Certificate 09.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M Certificate 03.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M Certificate 02.jpg
- File:Abbasov M.M Certificate 01.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:Sefa Abasov.jpg
- File:Chingiz Rasulov.jpg
- File:Azer Qasimov.jpg
- File:Narmina Abdullayeva.jpg
- File:Meherrem Memmedyarov.jpg
- File:Vahab Aliyev.jpg
- File:Seadet Esgerzade.jpg
- File:Rena Ceferova.jpg
- File:Fuzuli Nesirov.jpg
- File:Zaur Agamaliyev.jpg
- File:Mutellim Abbasov.jpg
- File:Menzer Amiraslanova.jpg
- File:Elmira Qasimzade.jpg
- File:Minaver Ibrahimova.jpg
- File:Dilare Dostuzade.jpg
- File:Institute of Petrochemical Processes named after Yu.G.Mamedaliyev.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Rauf Tağıyev.jpg
- File:Əkbər Ağayev.jpg
- File:Arif Əfəndiyev.jpg
- File:Yaşar Mehrəliyev.jpg
- File:Almaz Tağıyeva.jpg
- File:İsmayıl Teyyub oğlu İsmayılov.jpg
- File:Ismayıl İsmayılov.jpg
- File:Firdovsi Seyidov.jpg
- File:Qalina Hüseynova.jpg
- File:Balacaxanım Hüseynova.jpg
- File:Lalə Əfəndiyeva.jpg
- File:Məhəddin Abbasov.jpg
- File:Rəvan Rəhimov.jpg
- File:Əli Məmmədov.jpg
- File:Sultan Sultanov.jpg
- File:Cavid Xıdırov.jpg
- File:Gülarə Fərhadova.jpg
- File:Abdülrza Əbilov.jpg
- File:Ziyarət Paşayeva.jpg
- File:Gülbəniz Muxtarova.jpg
- File:Elmar Abdullayev.jpg
- File:Maise Necefova.jpg
- File:Salmanova Chimnaz.jpg
- File:Yaqub Abdullayev.jpg
- File:Reyhaniya Hasanova.jpg
- File:Aftandil Talibov.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thisyer bot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Shri Narendra is entering the Jessoreswari Kali Temple.jpg
- File:2021 during the worship of Shri Narendra Modi at Jessoreswari Kali Mandir.jpg
- File:Jessoreswari welcomes Shri Narendra Modi at Kali Mandir.jpg
- File:যশোরেশ্বরী কালী মন্দিরে শ্রী নরেন্দ্র মোদী কে স্বাগত জানাচ্ছেন.jpg
- File:যশোরেশ্বরী কালী মন্দির শ্রী নরেন্দ্র মোদী পূজা অর্চনার সময় ২০২১.jpg
- File:যশোরেশ্বরী কালী মন্দির শ্রী নরেন্দ্র মোদী পূজা অর্চনা করছেন ১.jpg
- File:যশোরেশ্বরী কালী মাতা ২০২১.jpg
- File:যশোরেশ্বরী কালী মন্দির (ছবি ২০২১).jpg
- File:Bhakti Charu Swami America 2000 During the year.jpg
- File:Sri Sri Anandamayi Kali Temple.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:36, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carolinacoveta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Huesito Carac¡ù Gustavo Monje.jpg
- File:IMG-20180418-WA0017~4.jpg
- File:Zorba.jpg
- File:Le Petit Grand hotel gustavo monje giselle pessacq.png
- File:Gustavo monje escandalosas.jpg
- File:Gustavo monje ana maria cores ensayo premios hugo.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:37, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pleiadian.planetaire (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Space people to saori we our meillleure.jpg
- File:I do know.jpg
- File:I do know that this is a top secrecy to do with your facial expression and this is top secrecy.jpg
- File:Oui do know.jpg
- File:Oui do not know.jpg
- File:Light weight.jpg
- File:Spouse to louvre.jpg
- File:Spouse geneve international.jpg
- File:Spouse.jpg
- File:Spouse geneve.jpg
- File:Brenden.jpg
- File:From brenden.jpg
- File:From brenden thomas fisher to saori.jpg
- File:From brenden thomas.jpg
- File:From brenden thomas fisher.jpg
- File:From brenden thomas fisher to saori i was murdered.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. Unlikely to be public domain or usable for our purposes. Javert2113 (talk) 17:55, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:37, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Own work? E4024 (talk) 00:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Own work? Scope? E4024 (talk) 00:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Modern Adnan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal selfies, out of COM:SCOPE. Not sure if this needs oversight as well.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:47, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicolas444 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Nicolas Zubieta en villeta.jpg
- File:Nicolas Zubieta.jpg
- File:Nicolas Zubieta rapero.jpg
- File:Nicolas Zubieta Piñeros.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
unknown source And most likely uploaded from the internet Hoseina051311 (talk) 15:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
unsued, out of scope. Shows a picture of a child covering his face. Oaktree b (talk) 17:22, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
unused photo, low resolution, out of scope Oaktree b (talk) 18:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted map Mindmatrix 18:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused suspicious personal photo, no metadata, possible copyright violation. Sakhalinio (talk) 20:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused suspicious personal photo, no metadata, possible copyright violation. Sakhalinio (talk) 20:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Unused suspicious personal photo, no metadata, possible copyright violation. Sakhalinio (talk) 20:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Personal image and Out of scope of Wikipedia education policy - IndrajitDas 04:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Irrelevant Victorbasu (talk) 21:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Personal photograph, Out of scope - IndrajitDas 08:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Irrelevant Victorbasu (talk) 21:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:47, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Not self published, possible copyvio Askeuhd (talk) 21:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, unused, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 22:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
book cover, probably copyrighted, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 22:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 14:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
AFAIK there is no W3C validation service for PNG files. Achim (talk) 21:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Test or nonsense. --Achim (talk) 19:51, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by E.tribunskaya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:МОК, Московский оружейник и компания, логотип.jpg
- File:Московский оружейник и компания логотип полная версия.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 09:10, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:CP VT.jpg
- File:CP Bình Tân.png
- File:CP AD.jpg
- File:CP PVH.jpg
- File:CoopmartDTH.jpg
- File:Coopmartbinhtan2.jpg
- File:Co.opXtra Phạm Văn Đồng.jpg
- File:Co-opmart-cong-quynh-1996-1459244835.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Tram Arriving at Morden Road (geograph 4925140).jpg, with same resolution but less satisfactory description and categorisation. Chris j wood (talk) 15:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, per nomination, but adding {{Duplicate}} in the file page would be faster and simpler for everybody. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:37, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- OK, replaced deletion request with duplicate
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
@Podzemnik: You deleted the file and kept the redirect. Please fix. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 06:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Podzemnik: Oh right, thanks, fixed. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:03, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Podzemnik: Please try again, as now both files are gone. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:25, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
Doublon de https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bibliothèque_de_Massillon_1905_ou_avant.png Pierre Tribhou (talk) 15:13, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials?
- File:Ejaculation educational slow.webmhd.webm
- File:Ejaculation short man.webm
- File:Condom use.webmhd.webm
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carrieli822 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Biogeochemical Copper Cycle .png
- File:Biogeochemical Copper Cycle.png
- File:Copper Cycle.2.png
- File:Copper Biogeochemical Cycle.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
personal file with myself it was uploaded by me when I was a kid and i had no idea about how the internet is working Andre1utzw (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
chyba v legendě Miroslava Fišerová (talk) 16:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Per description, not "own work." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
A small, thumbnail sized photo with no metadata. Could be a possible copyright violation. Ur Nan123 (talk) 17:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyvio. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Why-Publishing-Everything-Is-More-Effective-than-Selective-Publishing-of-Statistically-Significant-pone.0084896.e011.jpg
[edit]unused simple expression; can easily be replaced by TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
unused simple expression; can easily be replaced by TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Why-Publishing-Everything-Is-More-Effective-than-Selective-Publishing-of-Statistically-Significant-pone.0084896.e002.jpg
[edit]unused simple expression; can easily be replaced by TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Not only was this image added only to ridiculize Kast, it's just a blatant screenshot from this copyrighted video: https://www.t13.cl/videos/politica/video-felipe-kast-se-viste-mujer-y-enfatiza-compromiso-equidad-genero AgeOfPlastic (talk) 18:47, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 18:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete clearly not own work. No information provided. Gharouni (talk) 14:17, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 18:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes, it is. I personally took the picture. I just had to edit it to put it on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clement de Dadelsen (talk • contribs) 15:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Well there is no proof that it's a copyvio so let's keep it for now unless we can prove otherwise. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request by the uploader No1lovesu (talk) 18:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Still no valid reason. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Bad censorship; Request as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:13, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Are you the uploader? --E4024 (talk) 18:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Request by the uploader No1lovesu (talk) 19:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Still no valid reason. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Request for deletion as the uploader. No1lovesu2 (talk) 18:24, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request by the uploader No1lovesu (talk) 19:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Still no valid reason. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
No evidence image has been released on claimed licence. FDW777 (talk) 19:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
May have been licensed incorrectly. How to change licensing? Faren29 (talk) 21:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of CC license. (Unless uploader is the person who posted it on twitter, which is unlikely.) Zoozaz1 (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:17, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
I have inputted the wrong Copyright information - the camera is ex -miltary The joy of all things (talk) 20:19, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:16, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
I have inputted trhe wrong copyright information - the camera is ex-military The joy of all things (talk) 20:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:16, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
I have inputted the wrong copyright information - the camera is ex-military The joy of all things (talk) 20:21, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, see File:Bramham Moor hangar door grooves.jpg. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:16, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:15, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:15, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE image of a non-notable individual (ro:Siropmov) Gikü (talk) 21:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE image of an unknown/undescribed device: promo attempt at ro:Tehnologia ROBOTERR Gikü (talk) 21:07, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE logo of a non-notable organization Gikü (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Can be categorized under Category:Buses in Romania, but has very little encyclopedic/informational value, the main reason for upload being advertisement (see ro:Agenţia de turism Luna Tour) Gikü (talk) 21:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
A single page of plain text, out of project scope. Achim (talk) 21:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NineFour44 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Hoaxes/fictional flags, personal artwork that has been added to Wikidata and so misleadingly looks up on some wp pages.
- File:LIBERTADOR ESTADO SUCRE (Municipio).jpg
- File:Bandera Santa Bárbara del Zulia colon.jpg
- File:Bandera de municipio Vargas el cobre.jpg
Achim (talk) 22:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
potential copyvio, no indication the University has released it under a free license. Red-linked username as uploader Oaktree b (talk) 22:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
potential copyvio, no indication the University has released it under a free license. Red-linked username as uploader Oaktree b (talk) 22:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
wrong name choosen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvicola (talk • contribs) 22:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Not owned work, owned by Univision Communications. Qwkjw (talk) 01:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --✗plicit 08:59, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Not owned work, owned by Univision Communications. Qwkjw (talk) 01:29, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --✗plicit 08:59, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Not owned work, owned by Univision Communications. Qwkjw (talk) 01:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --✗plicit 09:00, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Not owned work, owned by Univision Communications. Qwkjw (talk) 01:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --✗plicit 08:59, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Not owned work, owned by Univision Communications. Qwkjw (talk) 01:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --✗plicit 08:58, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Better pictures were found. J. Y. Baker (talk) 03:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:NOPENIS. --E4024 (talk) 03:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 08:42, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Promotional and out of scope - IndrajitDas 07:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 08:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Unfree sculpture, according to Lakbay ng Lakan, this is a recent addition to the park (no precise date is given). As there is no freedom of panorama yet in the Philippines, restore only when FOP is introduced here.
- File:0868jfPlaza de las Flores Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 29.jpg
- File:0868jfPlaza de las Flores Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 30.jpg
- File:0868jfPlaza de las Flores Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 31.jpg
- File:0868jfPlaza de las Flores Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 32.jpg
- File:0868jfPlaza de las Flores Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 33.jpg
- File:0868jfPlaza de las Flores Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 34.jpg
- File:0868jfPlaza de las Flores Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 35.jpg
- File:0903jfChapels Schools Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:0903jfChapels Schools Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:0903jfChapels Schools Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:0903jfChapels Schools Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:0903jfChapels Schools Tañong Barangka Loyola Memorial park Marikina Cityfvf 05.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 09:06, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/File:Ataqatigiit logo
[edit]Complex logo above the threshold of originality. Three of these files have own work/cc-by-sa claims, which does not make sense for the logo of an organization (see https://ia.gl/?s=logo&lang=ka).
- File:Inuit Ataqatigiit logo.png
- File:Inuit Ataqatigiit logo.svg
- File:Inuit Ataqatigiit logo round.svg
- File:Logo of the Inuit Ataqatigiit.svg
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 13:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 09:00, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, self promotion Lotje (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 08:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sunview Palace (Manila)
[edit]A building from 2000 - https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/building/sunview-palace/35388 no freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:Manilajf120 07.JPG
- File:Manilajf120 09.JPG
- File:Manilajf120 12.JPG
- File:Manilajf120 15.JPG
- File:Manilajf120 33.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 09:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
A 2012 residential architecture https://www.pressreader.com/philippines/the-philippine-star/20120413/282222302740850 No freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:9838Diego Cera Avenue 08.jpg
- File:9838Diego Cera Avenue 09.jpg
- File:9838Diego Cera Avenue 10.jpg
- File:9838Diego Cera Avenue 11.jpg
- File:9838Diego Cera Avenue 12.jpg
- File:9838Diego Cera Avenue 13.jpg
- File:9838Diego Cera Avenue 15.jpg
- File:9838Diego Cera Avenue 16.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 09:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Modern building by Asuncion-Berenguer Inc., Architects and Designers (ABI) - - http://cebuphilsrealty.weebly.com/marquee-residences.html No freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:Marquee Residences in Angeles City, Pampanga, Philippines (under construction) 2.jpg
- File:Marquee Residences in Angeles City, Pampanga, Philippines (under construction) 3.jpg
- File:Marquee Residences in Angeles City, Pampanga, Philippines (under construction).jpg
- File:Marqueejf0544 05.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 19:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 09:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:One Roxas Triangle
[edit]A 2000 building by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, LLP, in cooperation with Pimentel Rodriguez Simbulan & Partners. No freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:08934jfUrdaneta Makati Central District Paseo de Roxas Buendia Gil Puyat Avenuefvf 42.jpg
- File:08934jfUrdaneta Makati Central District Paseo de Roxas Buendia Gil Puyat Avenuefvf 46.jpg
- File:08983jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building One Roxas Triangle Paseo de Roxas Gil Puyat Makati Avenuesfvf 05.jpg
- File:08983jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building One Roxas Triangle Paseo de Roxas Gil Puyat Makati Avenuesfvf 06.jpg
- File:08983jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building One Roxas Triangle Paseo de Roxas Gil Puyat Makati Avenuesfvf 07.jpg
- File:08983jfUrdaneta Zuellig Building One Roxas Triangle Paseo de Roxas Gil Puyat Makati Avenuesfvf 39.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 19:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 09:06, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Condo architecture by Design Alliance - http://origenesconsulting.com/projects/san-lorenzo-place no freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 14.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 15.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 17.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 18.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 19.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 20.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 21.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 22.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 23.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 24.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 25.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 26.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 27.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 28.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 29.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 30.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 31.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 32.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 33.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 34.jpg
- File:03452jfMagallanes Interchange MRT Station EDSA Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Makati Cityfvf 35.jpg
- File:03633jfMagallanes Interchange San Lorenzo Chino Roces Avenue Bangkal Tunnel Makati Cityfvf 30.jpg
- File:San Lorenzo Place and Condominiums in Makati.jpg
- File:San Lorenzo Place Showroom in Makati, Philippines.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 19:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all unfortunately. Modern building, one showing its final stage (of construction, with most of its façade now formed), and one (File:San Lorenzo Place Showroom in Makati, Philippines.jpg) apparently focuses on another building that is too recent to be {{PD-Philippines-artistic work}}). Restore when FOP is formally and officially here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 09:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Theresa Tower Condominium
[edit]Residental contemporary architecture - https://www.emporis.com/buildings/1210118/theresa-tower-condominium-quezon-city-philippines No freedom of panorama in the philippines
- File:09803jfBarangays Quezon City Streets Roads Buildings Landmarksfvf 16.jpg
- File:09803jfBarangays Quezon City Streets Roads Buildings Landmarksfvf 17.jpg
- File:09803jfBarangays Quezon City Streets Roads Buildings Landmarksfvf 20.jpg
- File:09828jfBarangays Quezon City Streets Roads Buildings Landmarksfvf 01.jpg
- File:09828jfBarangays Quezon City Streets Roads Buildings Landmarksfvf 02.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 19:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 09:07, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
pornographic images that contribute nothing educationally useful may be removed Babygap430 (talk) 01:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- why do you think, that there is no education case? Vit; talk 18:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Per this diff, a larger version of the image has been published elsewhere, so OTRS permission or clarification of the license is needed. —Granger (talk · contribs) 07:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 09:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per DW (in case someone uses it somewhere before deletion :). --E4024 (talk) 19:04, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
from a photoshoot, not own work Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Plagiarism of official twitter of team and other social networks. West 29 (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 13:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- The picture is the property of Monom Records, a company I work for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hercules Anton (talk • contribs) 13:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Hercules Anton That means that it is, immediately, declared as a copyright violation, unless you get your employer to release the picture via Commons:OTRS and that you have made an incorrect licence declaration when you uploaded it. You are not the copyright holder. They are.
- As a creator of intellectual property yourself you will have an even better understanding than most uploaders of the responsibilities to owners of IP Timtrent (talk) 13:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:22, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
The Phantom comic and figure is the work of en:Lee Falk, who died only in 1999. So, why should this character be free? -- Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Cover art for single "Perfect Strangers". Requires artist's permission through OTRS. E4024 (talk) 18:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:23, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Право на неприкосновенность частной жизни, личную и семейную тайну, защиту своей чести и доброго имени Exemnia (talk) 11:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm, you have uploaded this image nearly 2 years ago by yourself. --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Право на неприкосновенность частной жизни, личную и семейную тайну, защиту своей чести и доброго имени
The right to inviolability of private life, personal and family secrets, protection of one's honor and good name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exemnia (talk • contribs) 10:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm, you have uploaded this image nearly 2 years ago by yourself. --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Touristy photo out of scope. Jcornelius (talk) 19:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Anthere at 22:46, 4 Mai 2021 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 02:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Who is he? E4024 (talk) 00:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Requires OTRS if she is in scope. E4024 (talk) 00:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Is he in scope? E4024 (talk) 01:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
10 KB w/o EXIF. Very possibly not an own work. E4024 (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
The design, colors, drawing and more are clearly not enough generic to justify be considered in public domain, is not mere geometry like a flag is clearly a logo Ochentero (talk) 02:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
The person in the image is not Hannah Bergstedt. 62.20.228.92 19:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
The person on the picture is not Hannah Bergstedt. Just google her and you will see. 62.20.228.92 16:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Sure looks like her to me. I googled her. --Missvain (talk) 21:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom-of-panorama exception in Greece. So, this photo violates the copyright of the photographer(s) of the 3 photos on this poster. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
This is not a photo but a poster which encompasses photos. Why would a propaganda poster violate freedom of panorama when its sole purpose is to be disseminated as far as possible? Besides the author of the poster is not a Greek citizen since DHKP-C is a Turkish terrorist organization.--Catlemur (talk) 21:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- See Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Posters. --Túrelio (talk) 22:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Understandable, have a nice day.--Catlemur (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Found on lots of places online; EXIF data mention copyrighter's name which is not the sea was username (which does not have to mean anything), but the user has a history of bad uploads. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:00, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
This photo posted on Flickr by John Dramani Mahama with copyrighted on September 5, 2014. [2] I think it is difficult that this user is owner of the copyright for this photo. I suggest this photo be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 22:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
This photo posted on Flickr by John Dramani Mahama with copyrighted on November 5, 2013. [3] I think it is difficult that this user is owner of the copyright for this photo. I suggest this photo be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 22:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Photographer cannot be named, license cannot be cleared, according to correspondence in Ticket:2021040710008487 Mussklprozz (talk) 09:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
There is an OTRS email received for “File:Alice Gillig tenue GDF.jpg” but not giving valid permission, ticket:2021040710008487. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)- Bonjour, Je pense que cette photo, fournie par la famille Gillig, peut rentrer dans le cadre de la convention de Berne comme indiqué dans la page d'aide https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules/fr (Titre : « Quand le photographe est inconnu ») et donc être utilisée dans les articles Wikipédia https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Gillig et https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_de_r%C3%A9sistants_alsaciens#G.
L'auteur de la photo est inconnu, cette photo fournie par la famille, a été réalisée il y a environ 74 ans. Si l'auteur avait 20 ans à l'époque, il aurait aujourd'hui 94 ans. Pendant la Seconde Guerre mondiale, l'Alsace a été annexée ce qui a entrainé l'interdiction des Guides de France et du port de leur uniforme. Dans ce cas, si l'on retient la date de 1940, suivant le raisonnement donné sur la page d'aide, l'auteur pourrait avoir actuellement 101 ans ou plus. Nous sommes donc largement au dessus des 50 ans préconisés par la convention de Berne. De plus, à l'époque, il n'était pas courant de remplir des documents pour transmettre des droits d'auteur, surtout pour des photos de famille. Ce problème se pose pour les photos de la période troublée de la Seconde Guerre mondiale sur laquelle j'écris des articles. J'aimerais trouver une solution pérenne et je suivrais avec intérêt le débat qui s'ouvre. En vous remerciant, cordialement, Froideval67 (talk) 13:15, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:06, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in et:Grignardi reaktsioon, id:Reaksi Grignard, nl:Grignard-reagens, ru:Получение спиртов, simple:Grignard reaction and sl:Grignardova reakcija with TeX equivalent:
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 13:55, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. In this case, I think it's better to use the TeX code. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:55, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
The image is available under a free license on flickr, but it is doubtful that this is the flickr user's own work. The same image is widely available on the Internet (see here), even in better resolution. In general, uploads from this flickr stream should be checked. Indeed, this problem does not seem to be an isolated case. Mosbatho (talk) 14:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:00, 20 Mai 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with 191257163@N07 --Krdbot 13:58, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Doublon avec le fichier : File:Baie de Saint-Brieuc à partir de la digue de Pissoison.jpg Kev22 (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Je ne comprends pas votre décision ... Ces deux fichiers ne sont : ni identiques, ni même photos, ni le même nom, ni les même dates. Elles concernent la Baie de Saint Brieuc qui est un vaste territoire avec tout au long de la baie de multiples plages ou criques. Merci. (Lidine Mia) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lidine Mia (talk • contribs) 07:50, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
doublon signalé par Kev22 (d). Lidine Mia (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination and approval of the uploader in the 11 April 2021 edit (effectively withdrawing the 9 April 2021 misunderstanding). Duplicate. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Doublon avec le fichier: File:Baie de Saint-Brieuc-Plage de Lermot.jpg Kev22 (talk) 09:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Doublon signalé par Kev22 (d) Lidine Mia (talk) 15:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 00:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The nomination rationale is too weak in a case like this. The nomination provides no serious basis for an hypothesis of "unlikely to be own work" or to reverse AGF. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:59, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Is not used anymore Tajala (talk) 18:39, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Unknown source. Obviously NOT from 1100 AD because the headwear is in the style of the Ming dynasty (14th-17th century) Yinweiaiqing (talk) 02:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Is not used anymore Tajala (talk) 18:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Is not used anymore Tajala (talk) 18:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File description page blanked by original uploader without comment, assuming to be a request for deletion. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This image is not from the book "Wan hsiao tang", whoever uploaded this found the image from the Internet then claimed it was from the book. It is clearly not. Yinweiaiqing (talk) 03:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyright holder serkan-eldeleklioglu E4024 (talk) 03:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: This is used in an article. I'm going to give User:Ytsdmr95 ONE WEEK to provide COMMONS:OTRS permissions. If they do not, we will delete the image. Thank you. --Missvain (talk) 02:20, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Image is not generic enough to be considered public domain, colors, design and more show it to be clearly a logo Ochentero (talk) 03:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:TOYS. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:40, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:27, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused file. Searching Guiltfree Pte Ltd resulted in nothing remotely close to the image. Seloloving (talk) 06:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file is of no use right now imo. SlavicSpirits (talk) 07:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Dublicate of the 
Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 07:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Dublicate of the .jpg)
Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 07:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Dublicate of the 
Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 08:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Dublicate of the 
Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 08:02, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Dublicate of the File:Qarabəyov Qara b., Hacinski Isa b., Ashurbəyov Əli b.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 08:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Please keep both files, one with the watermark and one without. It makes sense to keep both files, and if only, to check how it looked before being retouched. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 11:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep per NearEMPTiness --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
@Missvain: Please undelete File:Qarabəyov Qara b., Hacinski Isa b., Ashurbəyov Əli b.jpg. The nomination is clearly wrong, because it is not a duplicate: It has no watermark, while File:Qarabəyov Qara b., Hacinski Isa b., Ashurbəyov Əli b.png has a watermark. Please explain in more detail, if you do not want to undelete it. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 07:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- NearEMPTiness - Done. I am going to delete the one with the watermark. Missvain (talk) 16:20, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Also, next time please come to my talk page, don't modify the closed deletion discussion. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 16:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Missvain: Please undelete also File:Qarabəyov Qara b., Hacinski Isa b., Ashurbəyov Əli b.png, as it is not identical to File:Qarabəyov Qara b., Hacinski Isa b., Ashurbəyov Əli b.jpg, which clearly has no watermark. Please keep both versions, as it is usual at least on de:Wikipedia:Fotowerkstatt. It is clearly not a "dublicate", as stated it the request for deletion. Please keep both files, as stated in my commment.--NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Also, next time please come to my talk page, don't modify the closed deletion discussion. Thanks. Missvain (talk) 16:21, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- NearEMPTiness - Done. I am going to delete the one with the watermark. Missvain (talk) 16:20, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Dublicate of the 
Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 08:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Dublicate and Worse version of the 
Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 08:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Dublicate of the 
Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 08:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Dublicate of the 
Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 08:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Also bad quality problem --Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 09:38, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Unfree sculpture; the work here is The Redemption (1974), by Eduardo Castrillo.[4] Freedom of panorama is not yet granted in the Philippines, and restore only if FOP is formally and officially introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
scan, subject died 1965, unlikely own work Polarlys (talk) 09:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Fake licenses. One if claimed to be gov work but there is no source to prove it, others are taken by newspapers, need OTRS or proof of a free license
- File:1267alisha-oyler-abc-jt-210329 1617046910603 hpEmbed 16x9 992.jpg
- File:Genevieve hansen.jpg
- File:Donald williams 2.png
- File:Jena Scurry.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:35, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
pas d'autorisation de publier Pierrette13 (talk) 10:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Score Beethoven qui indique être l'auteur de cette photo peut-il confirmer qu'il en est l'auteur et qu'il possède les droits lui permettant d'importer la photo sur Commons ? Merci, --Pierrette13 (talk) 19:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Photo published in 2017 on facebook : uncropped version. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Brice Ateba 3.png” but not processed yet, ticket:2021041110003812. --Mussklprozz (talk) 16:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Brice Ateba 3.png” under ticket:2021041110003812. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- So, to be clear, from the present state of the description page, you confirm that:
- 1. User:Score Beethoven was mistaken when he wrote that he was the author.
- 2. Brice Ateba sent to Wikimedia an e-mail directly from the e-mail address verifiably associated with him at briceateba.fr.
- 3. In that e-mail, Brice Ateba states that he sent this particular file personally to Score Beethoven. (Instead of Score Beethoven having taken it on facebook or another internet site.)
- 4. In that e-mail, Brice Ateba offers this particular derivative version of the photo (although perhaps not the original photo) under CC by-sa 4.0.
- 5. This version was created in 2020 despite it having already been published in 2017.
- -- Asclepias (talk) 20:19, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
FEHLERː SVG-Datei nicht sichtbarǃ Wird auf keiner Seite verwendet. Wurde durch File:Squaring the circle-Ramanujan-1913.png ersetzt! Petrus3743 (talk) 15:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Um die history zu behalten sollte die Datei auch behalten werden. Ausserdem ist ein nicht sichtbares SVG evtl noch gut für den Bugfix. --Sanandros (talk) 15:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
This is a FAKE SVG from the existing Squaring the circle-Ramanujan-1913.png and therefore it is not only unwanted but also obsolete.
The uploader itself requested on the day of the upload the deletion of that erroneously uploaded file.
The above argumentation of User:Sanandros gives no sense to me, there is not any reason to keep a non-visible unuseable FAKE SVG.
-- sarang♥사랑 10:16, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 12:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sisuma tripathi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation
- File:Gaji-namul -Mumbai - Maharastra -0004.jpg
- File:Paan laddoo - Mumbai - Maharastra - 0003.jpg
- File:Malai Paneer - Mumbai - Maharastra -0002.jpg
- File:Chocolate ParleG Cake - Varanasi - Uttar Pradesh - 0001.jpg
Timtrent (talk) 12:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted map Mindmatrix 13:24, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
No FOP in Denmark. Artist is still living. |EPO| da: 13:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
No FOP in Denmark. Artist is still living. |EPO| da: 13:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Neither source nor author is provided for that image. Not to mention that Bulgars arrived on the Balkans on the 7th century. Jingiby (talk) 14:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- NO This is rather obnoxious, I don't see any reason why this image should be deleted, and user Jingiby claims against it are dubious. This is a reconstructive sketch of this terracotta tile, here: [5] found at the Vinitza fortress, it say "BOLGAR [and] SCLAVIGI". Also, this map refers to Bulgar Migration in the 6th and 7th century, here: [6]. So, I'm not sure why user Jingiby claims the dates are wrong. --E-960 (talk) 15:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Also, found original reference source to this terracotta tile, which contains the exact sketch user Jingiby wants to delete, on pages 120-121, here: [7]. Talk about a rush to judgment! --E-960 (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe we must put this source on the image and correct the author Ivo there. Jingiby (talk) 15:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bolgari_sclavi_teracota_Vinitza_FYROM.jpg){kind=link}
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bulgarians_and_Slavs_VI-VII_century.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Reason for the nomination: The image is available under a free license on flickr, but it is doubtful that this is the flickr user's own work. The same image is widely available on the Internet (see here), even in better resolution. In general, uploads from this flickr stream should be checked. Indeed, this problem does not seem to be an isolated case. Mosbatho (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from wall painting. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- True, but this audio file was the result in a project: Introduction to "Wikimedia Commons" of a school class with 15 Students. (Page in German) They had to make their own recordings, und upload them. We want to motivate them for further recordings of objects of everyday in 2021. Please do not delete this file. It is an example, and not only a storage file. --DrTrumpet (talk) 17:48, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Black Kite as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Flickr-washed from an account that actually gives the source as "Nikkigrahamblog" - this image appears to derive rom the image here - this page. The other images uploaded by the Flickr account all lack EXIF as well and are tagged as originating from "nikkigramhameblog". Black Kite (talk) 13:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Case seems to be not as simple (as often with long-standing uploads). The external hit[8] shows a very-low-resolution image, which is also cropped compared to our upload. The Flickr-account, from which our image was copied, has more portraits of the late Nikki Grahame in good quality and rel. high resolution. --Túrelio (talk) 15:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- i was working on the basis of "most likely". It's a Flickr account with zero followers which uploaded six images of Grahame 12 years ago, and this one is pretty obviously a modified publicity shot. The website "nikkigrahameblog" appears to have been offline for some time. Black Kite (talk) 08:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
![[8]](https://www.nikkigrahame.info/uploaded/_nikki_grahame_book_cover_pic.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This one seems a little tricky but this seems to be a picture of someone else's picture inside a church. Evidence for this is:
- Photographer's text "Picture of John Paul II in the cathedral, I am not sure if he visited or not." This is the only of the photographer's images in this set that says that the image is a "picture" implying it's a photo of a preexisting photo.
- The photographer's uncertainty about whether JPII visited their cathedral also suggests they were not present at the initial taking of this photo.
- Metadata suggests this file was created in 2013, well after JPII's death in 2005.
- There appear to be reflections in the upper left corner, suggesting this is possibly a photo in a frame behind glass.
I think it's fairly safe to assume this is not the photographer's original image of JPII and there is not enough information to know the original source, so I think it probably has to be deleted unless a source can be uncovered. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 15:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The original photograph was taken in 1988 during a pastoral trip to Austria. It was therefore still copyrighted in Italy on the URAA date (1 January 1996), so its copyright in the U.S. was restored by the URAA. It should not have been uploaded here in 2018 and has to be treated as other violations of the Commons:Licensing policy.
- I recommend transferring the file to it.wikipedia and then removing it here. Rossel44 (talk) 05:54, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence why this image, which seems to have been taken from a 2003 book, should be in the public domain, as claimed by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Same problem with crop: File:Prinzessin Ileana von Rumänien.png
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama for 2D works in the UK Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file doesn't have any description. Also this ship is not the SS Columbus of 1913 (after, RMS Homeric). This ship probably is her sister ship, the SS Columbus of 1924 (former SS Hindemburg) HefePine23 (talk) 17:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license. 95.41.106.225 18:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
The film's director Dziga Vertov died in 1954. It is not under PD untill 2025 Kharkivian (talk) 19:07, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
g11 Numberblocks (talk) 23:01, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 02:48, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File doppione, ne esiste già una versione più fruibile Astubudustu (talk) 23:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
File:Matt groening, kelsey grammer, nancy cartwright, julie kavner, james l brooks, dan castellenata, yeardley smith - 3511471167.jpg
[edit]
COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for 2D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Yuraily Lic: Heads up that I moved the file as the name was inaccurate. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - Perhaps someone can just crop out or black out the stamps and keep the celebs and upload a new version. Missvain (talk) 02:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted; 2 cropped versions kept. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
The uploader has declared in this permalink that they are mr Goodden. No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright).
- File:Goodden teaching seminar in China at the request of the Chinese Government.jpg
- File:Speaking at the U.S. State Dept.jpg
Timtrent (talk) 21:46, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
This diff indicates a serious concern with this editor, expressed on their en WP talk page in that they either are, or are not Randall Lee Goodden. In this deletion nomination I am applying COM:PCP, something that can easily be resolved via COM:OTRS with relevant proofs of copyright and permission.
I am assuming that the subject of these pictures and the uploader are one and the same person. On that basis there is no evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright).
Timtrent (talk) 09:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader has now confirmed finally that they are Randall Lee Goodden, on my en WP talk page Timtrent (talk) 21:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Well and good, but doesn't take care of issues above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (Images unused, uncategorized since April) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation? Themightyquill (talk) 12:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:46, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Pas d'autorisation de publier Pierrette13 (talk) 10:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Score Beethoven qui indique être l'auteur de cette photo peut-il confirmer qu'il en est l'auteur et qu'il possède les droits lui permettant d'importer la photo sur Commons ? Merci, --Pierrette13 (talk) 19:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021041110003812 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 00:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Brice Ateba 4.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021041110003812. --Mussklprozz (talk) 16:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Brice Ateba 4.jpg” under ticket:2021041110003812. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:39, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:51, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Possibly a promotional image owned by the manager. It may be protected as copyright. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 12:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Also images below:
- This file (original version, no WM)
- File:Cokelat Band 2.jpg (source)
- File:Aiu Ratna Cokelat band 1.jpg (source)
- File:Cokelat Band.jpg (source)
All the images were watermarked with Cokelat band logo, which may be copyrighted by the manager. If the uploader of the files was a staff, OTRS can be used as a courtesy. Thank you. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 12:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Closed listing, images had already been Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:53, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
There is no release to commons on the website. Tohma (talk) 12:53, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, you requested I comment: on the bottom of the page from which the document is sourced it says: "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where copyright is otherwise reserved", which should cover this document. (I emailed them back at the time to include a specific cc label on the photo of the authors just in case there was an issue raised, and they happily did so immediately, hence the explicit note for that.) Thanks, Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 15:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, please. If this is PD then it can go to Wikisource, and if it's not, we can't host it at all. Guy 20:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hello again - trying to remove things you disagree with and don't like again I see, just like last time... Please clarify, can Commons only host PD materials? Not those with a Creative Commons license? Also, if on Wikisource, can the image be linked in to the articles in eighteen languages where this is used (the hebrew page has been deleted repeatedly, and the arabic one has been too)? My understanding from last time I used Wikisource was that the source document (which this is) went to Commons - is this not/no longer the case? Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 05:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Keep license is clear per previous comments Nweil (talk) 22:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- KEEP **Obviously attempt to delete this document is due to content disagreement. Document has been discussed in multiple public forums and was produced by its writers and publicists obviously for purposes of public information and furthering public discussion. Document discusses factual observations of virus effects which are not disputed and therefore is not providing anything but factual information. No informationally harmful intent. Document then assimilates this information into a possibly improved plan over that taken by current officials which is more likely to decrease negative outcomes of current policy and less likely to decrease positive outcomes of current policy. A savings account with a 6% return rate is almost always worth considering over one with a 5% return rate. The recommendations in this document do not have evidence of causing harm and the current information indicates they will likely reduce harm. It would be morally shameful and intellectually dishonest to remove document under a spurrious license pretense for purposes of furthering a political agenda or controlling public discussion. In an open society it is okay for our leaders to be wrong. That's how we learn and do better next time. To think that policies cannot be improved is a toxic combination of arrogance and foolishness and if an improvement can save even one life the whole purpose of open discussion is then vindicated and justified. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 73.118.186.187 (talk) 03:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept per User:Maculosae tegmine lyncis above; license seen on source page. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)