Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/02/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 23rd, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:يحيى توبالي.jpg

[edit]

Self promo. I also asked for the deletion of their self-service WD item. E4024 (talk) 01:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy: personal picture of non-contributor, re-upload of deleted file. --Lymantria (talk) 06:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sefer Ha-Hayim portada.jpg

[edit]

para hacer uno nuevo Booheadphones (talk) 22:50, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Booheadphones (talk) 00:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

speedydelete duplicate of Otros archivos Booheadphones (talk) 00:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, G7. --Túrelio (talk) 07:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tesbih Atolyesi.jpg

[edit]

Please search with "satin al", as I indicated at Admins, to find out the commercial adds like this one and delete them. E4024 (talk) 13:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is spam-only user and I'll block him/her indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kanlıdivane Anıt Mezar.jpg

[edit]

Please search with "satin al", as I indicated at Admins, to find out the commercial adds like this one and delete them. Note that now they are using cultural heritage images to give link to their commercial sites. E4024 (talk) 13:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: I removed the link to the commercial site, so this can be kept; only revdel the version with internet link. --E4024 (talk) 13:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please consider this DR as withdrawn, I opened it because I first noticed the commercial link and missed that this and other uploads by the same user have valid camera EXIF. No problem with the files (other than the link that must be rev/del'ed and not present in all files BTW). --E4024 (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Spamlink removed by User:E4024, withdrawn. --Achim (talk) 17:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lingerie-models-001.jpg

[edit]

Flickr user seems to be an aggregator of lingerie photos, not the creator Ytoyoda (talk) 16:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: License laundering (F6) - from here, etc. --Эlcobbola talk 16:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harunkiraz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, no eduse

Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Spam. Uploader blocked indef as a member of a spam gang from Turkey. --Achim (talk) 19:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paula Berwanger headshot 2017.jpg

[edit]

Wikipedia thinks it's copyright violation. Although it isn't, I prefer to upload a new one later. Onlinestuff123 (talk) 16:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, by John DeAmara. --Túrelio (talk) 17:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia username- Egombute,. Name- Fabian Ofoegbu . The Facilities in the Federal Medical Center, Imo State, Nigeria.jpg

[edit]

Older at https://www.birminghammedicalnews.com/news.php?keyword=nursing Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia username- Egombute., Name- Fabian Ofoegbu. Traditional Medicine (A herbal Doctor treating his Patient).jpg

[edit]

Obviously with this much JPG artefact, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, blatant copyvio [1]. --Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia username- Egombute,. Name- Ofoegbu Fabian; Traditional Medicines (Cure for Headache).jpg

[edit]

Here's the original, uncropped image from which this was stolen: https://www.modernghana.com/news/363280/medical-herbalists-call-for-full-integration-into-national-h.html Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 19:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia username- Egombute,. My Name- Fabian Ofoegbu,. This is "Okro Soup". One of the best Nigeria soups for eating Garri, Fufu or Semovita.jpg

[edit]

I found an older published version at https://it-it.facebook.com/pg/foodobenin/photos/?ref=page_internal. Requires COM:OTRS to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, blatant copyvio from https://www.shutterstock.com/de/image-photo/close-view-white-bowl-okra-soup-1297923112. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia username- Egombute,. My Name- Fabian Ofoegbu. This is called "Moi-moi", it is made from grinded Beans.jpg

[edit]

I got a google hit on this image, but I couldn't get to the website. I do not think this is own work, the website was older. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, blatant copyvio from Shutterstock. --Túrelio (talk) 19:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tram.Oran.jpg

[edit]

no exif data, and watermark at bottom left, probably a copyright violation F (talk) 13:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 21:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ataşehir'de yükselen yeni binalar.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Ail Subway as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Name surname in metadata
Converted to regular DR, as uploader's deletion-rationale is unclear. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

Since metadata includes personal info (Name, surname) and can be found via web search, metadata removal or file deletion is the only way to remove the personal info. --Ail Subway (talk) 19:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but that does not require removal of all metadata or even deletion of the images. You can simply remove the name "A..........R" from the metadata and re-upload the "cleaned" file as a new version under the same filename. By the way, all these images are really your original work? (1 or 2 of them were found on Flickr already in 2012). --Túrelio (talk) 19:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes some photos are in my Flickr account as well, some approved previously: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kad%C4%B1k%C3%B6y_Y%C4%B1lba%C5%9F%C4%B1.jpg I re-uploaded the file, however, how can I remove the original? Thanks for your support. --Ail Subway (talk) 19:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done for this file. You can do the same for the 4 others and I will follow. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you're fast! Thank you for your help. We can remove deletion request then? --Ail Subway (talk) 20:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ähem, you missed the first one. --Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, realized shortly, and fixed that one as well. --Ail Subway (talk) 20:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, if you are satisfied with this solution (original images are hidden from sight for the public, though admins have access to them), we can close this DR. --Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes we can, than you for your support again! --Ail Subway (talk) 20:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as a file-preserving solution was found. --Túrelio (talk) 20:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several times deleted files uploaded again

[edit]

PetrusdictusA (talk · contribs) has again uploaded the alleged flag and coa of Banat that have been again and again, last time by P199 (talk · contribs) a year ago, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steagul Banatului. Flag of the Banat.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banat coat of arms.png with links to earlier cases. The upload log of the user here reveals up towards ten attempts for the flag, a few less for the coa. --TU-nor (talk) 21:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedy deletion per COM:CSD#G4. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 21:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SlipperyT jenny.jpg

[edit]

I am the uploader and am requesting for it to be deleted Anon6969anon (talk) 10:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

this image is copyrighted 5.80.64.220 10:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader of this file and have discovered it is copyrighted therefore I have no right to use it here Anon6969anon (talk) 11:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is copyrighted and wikimedia is unauthorised to use it Anon6969anon (talk) 09:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sholosohor Railway station 2.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Hosainluv1 (talk) 15:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request, dupe of File:Sholosohor Railway station.jpg. --Achim (talk) 19:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muchangi Nyaga The diplomat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muchangi Nyaga The diplomat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muchangi Nyaga The diplomat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, see COM:PSS

Discostu (talk) 10:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilifeguru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion of another famous youtuber, out of scope. Commons is neither your personal free web host nor the right place to promote yourself. No contributions to wm projects.

Achim (talk) 19:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: done by Dyolf77. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ilifeguru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

{{SD|F10}}

QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 08:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: done by Dyolf77. --Jianhui67 T★C 03:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:US Army 51198 Staff Sgt Beach - courtesy photo.jpg

[edit]

Author is courtesy photo, which means the photo is not from US Army A1Cafel (talk) 02:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Though the author field say “PFC Andrya Hill”, PFC is a US Army rank. Bidgee (talk) 02:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel: what's the point in rehashing last time?  Keep. Multichill (talk) 23:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Bidgee and Multichill. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Governor Beshear's Official Picture.jpg

[edit]

No proof of self work 47.223.78.205 03:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted conflicting dubious source claims; on KY State Gov website (eg [2]; per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/United_States#US_States_and_Territories Kentucky is not one of the US States where state gov't work is PD. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Französisches Landbrot 13.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Shisma (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 10:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stephen Timms portrait (3x4 crop) (cropped).jpg

[edit]

Mistakenly uploaded a new version instead of overwriting MisterElection2001 (talk) 22:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 20:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puerto Madryn y sus Playas.jpg

[edit]

Delete EduWiki 19:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: new unused upload request by uploader. --JuTa 12:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Mvsked blvck

[edit]

Unused media with no obvious encyclopedic value. Also, some of the image appear to be derivative works and the source materials are not specified.

Ytoyoda (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Obvious spam. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:47, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Militia of the Immaculata logo.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted logo. No evidence of a license. The organization was founded in 1917, so even if the logo were designed in the founding year, it is too recent to assume that the designer has been dead for 50 years as required by the applicable (pre 1994) Italian copyright law. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File talk:Viaducto Las Polvorillas.jpg

[edit]

{{Delete}} EduWiki 18:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ethyl methyl amine.svg

[edit]

Low-quality chemical structure with pixelated atom groups and white areas located around each atom group. Superseded by File:Ethylmethylamine-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 23:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arif wazir.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely own work, Unknown metadata Nooritahir734 (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. A cropped version of it was published here before it was uploaded on Commons. Needs OTRS permission. --Ahmadtalk 05:57, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1944 United States presidential election(191).png

[edit]

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 00:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 05:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aarhusboy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. All files can be found on-line on various sources.

Smooth O (talk) 08:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ОлегОксана Кондратюк (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these artworks need permission from their artists or an explanation why they are free

Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samotsamot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Paintings of cs:Vilém Kocych (died 2007). No permission.

Smooth O (talk) 15:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Govind601singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ejiet jūs visi nahuj

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ISLEM MOD.pdf

[edit]

Taken from here, and on the below of the website, it says that the content is copyrighted. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johannheinrich96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All uploads appear to be copyrighted works which appear elsewhere on the internet. Note, Johannheinrich96, if you own the copyright for these images, please see COM:OTRS for how you can authenticate this.

— Rhododendrites talk |  21:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Johannheinrich96: I see you added the category "I have permission to use these images" to this page. To comment here it's necessary to click "edit source" near the top of this page and comment below this one. "Permission to use" is not sufficient here, unfortunately. To release something on Commons is to say that anyone can use or modify the images for any purpose, commercial or noncommercial, without requesting permission. Only the person who owns the copyright can make that release. See COM:OTRS. — Rhododendrites talk |  19:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prime Minister Theresa May and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.jpg

[edit]

NC-ND license on Flickr. No proof that OGL license overrides the NC-ND license of Flickr A1Cafel (talk) 01:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: per above.--Larryasou (talk) 13:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 13:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gd20210221-141613~2.png

[edit]

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mr.Kakar.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely own work, facebook file. Nooritahir734 (talk) 00:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sefer Ha-Hayim.jpg

[edit]

Para subir uno nuevo corregido Booheadphones (talk) 22:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Booheadphones (talk) 00:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KSFB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope text content

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mukhiya Binod lal das.jpg

[edit]

Photo of a photo of unknown provenience. jdx Re: 01:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 23:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sam Whittingham Medal Back.jpg

[edit]

author request for this image to be deleted Luke780 (talk) 15:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 23:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:SM City Tarlac

[edit]

COM:Derivative works of architecture and action figures

Exterior architecture, no freedom of panorama in the Philippines

More intricate parts of interior architecture, also no FOP in the Philippines

COM:DW of Iron Man action figures, copyvio, violation of Marvel's copyright, COM:TOYS

For the architecture, the mall was opened on April 30, 2010 according to the SM Supermalls website. Permission from the architect Jose Siao Ling & Associates is required.

The two photos of Iron Man figures, meanwhile, are licensed under a commercial license. Violation of the copyright of Marvel for licensing the images of these action figures under public domain/Creative Commons free licensing. See also COM:TOYS. A related reference DR is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ויקיג'אנקי.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gandang Mabagyong Hapon sa Imo poe The Chief Justice Diosdado Peralta and the Joint Force of IPO including the Bureau of Copyrights; did issue the Latest Circulars Implementing the Copyright Law of the Philippines, to wit:
  • Supreme Court’s Revised Rules on IP Cases Improves Litigation, Driving Innovation and Creativity December 23, 2020: "The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) said the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases is testament to the whole-of-society work in ensuring an effective and speedy adjudication of IP rights cases – essential in creating an environment that fosters innovation, investments and entrepreneurship. participated and signed by "IPOPHL Deputy Director General Nelson P. Laluces IPOPHL’s Bureau of Patents Director IV Lolibeth R. Medrano Former IPOPHL DG Ricardo R. Blancaflor IP Rights Practitioner Atty. Ferdinand M Negre IP RIghts Practitioner Atty. Ramon S. Esguerra";
a) the Creator, or Copyright Holder must prove Legal Personality by preponderance of evidence, that is - Documentary proofs of the alleged in the complaint for Copyright or trademark infringement; b) the Special Court taking cognizance of the Filed with paid Docket fees Copyright case will either dismiss or try the case; c) the Case must be filed within 4 years Prescriptive period from the alleged in the complaint publication in any format whether in newspaper, internet etc.; the tolling of the period starts from the publications, here, in Uploading in Commons irrespective of the knowledge of the Complainant, Commons Uploading being Public; d) A Motion to Dismiss may strike out the Complaint upon the ground of Extinctive prescription; irrespective of the Commons Policies, the Court has the mandate to strictly follow the Peralta-IPO Circular of 2019 amending In Toto the pertinent provisions of the 1989 Rules on Evidence or previous Webinars, IPO or Bureau of Copyright issuances by the former and present Directors or Heads; even the former Issued DOJ Opinions are Ipso Facto amended to conform to the above-enumerated requirement; e) Nobody including any Nominator of Commons, including especially herein Mass Deleter, can legally and validly file or tag in Commons, a single or Mass Deletion request, without first obtaining a Special Power of Attorney from the alleged Creators, here for example, SM City Supermalls; f) Any SPA that may be issued must must and must be submitted to Commons Permissions, and without such SPA, any and all Nominations by herein or any Deleter on FOP inter alia, arising from the alleged rights of Copyrights Holders, the Nomination is Null and Void Ab Initio; any repeated repeated and repeated references to the alleged verbal and not official (Vide: criminal violations of public officials under R.A. 6713 and R.A. 3019) and written statements are Legal Falsehoods, not countenanced by the Rule of Law vis-à-vis the Highest 1987 Constitutional Due Process and Press Freedom or Expression tightly guarded by Philippine Laws;
In the specific case of SM Supermalls including here photos of SM, suffice it to say, that SM Supermalls owns the Copyright and no artist or architect outside it did ever create or did have any moral or copyrights issues; this is so, since SM Supermalls have their own creators, architects etc. who before and after the works, waived any rights whatsoever in favor of the SM Corporation and its Holding Corporation; sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 09:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content: Judgefloro's sermon on irrelevant matter like cybercrime, unfounded claims about denial of Philippine architects' and sculptors' copyrights over their works here, some form of legal threat against IPOPHL officials, etc.
  • Urgent and Fervent Appeal to Commons Community to Put On Hold the Mass Deletion Requests Non-Stop and Unlawful under the Strict Provisions of Philippines Criminal (Penal) Law on Cybercrimes-stalking : to Defer possible Mass Deletions - Erasing of Valued Photos of National Interest from the Herein User Deleter, based on Moral grounds and most certain irreparable Damage and Injury to Commons files and contrary to the Universal Code of Conduct of Users, with all Due Respect: I am reproduce herein as part hereof My Legal Treatise for the kindness of the Commons Community to review and to Declare Null and Void Ab Initio all the Mass Deletions by herein Nominator: to wit - Judgefloro (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


CONSOLIDATED REPLY-OBJECTION: SYNOPSIS - The En Masse Nominations Request for Deletion by the herein Nominator in no uncertain terms, falls within the 4 corners of the The Cyberstalking and 2012 Cybercrime Law of the Philippines which provides grave penalties for its Violations of this Act: the Series of Unlawful Mass Deletions now being started by herein Nominator will cause irreparable damage and injury to the Meta Files of Wikimedia Commons: I vehemently object to the deletion on Substantive Legal Grounds, under my Lawyer's and Judge's Oath of Office, and as Authority on Criminal Law Review based on my Ateneo Law School records; I submit to the Commons Community In Seriatim, objectively (and based on USA and Philippine Jurisprudence vis-à-vis Substantive laws both Civil - Copyright law of the Philippines amending the New Civil Code provisions on the Law of Property) and Criminal law 1932 Revised Penal Code as amended by the Penal Provisions of both [ https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/09/12/republic-act-no-10175/ Republic Act No. 10175] - Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 and Copyright Penal Provisions especially [https://acg.pnp.gov.ph/main/2-uncategorised/263-acg-cyber-security-bulletin-no-132-understanding-the-risk-of-cyberstalking Cyberstalking Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, group, or organization - monitoring, threats, or gathering information that may be used to threaten or harass);
Now a) Who can question with Legal Personality to the Special Courts on Copyright and Trademark Infringement - Vide: The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) vis-à-vis the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases; and b) within what period of time based on Civil Law on Extinctive Prescription); here are my legal grounds to dismiss the Nomination or Request for Deletion, to wit:
i) I talked to the former Parish Priest Msgr. Jo Aguilan whom I healed as healing Judge in the Barasoain Convent and in his room, now deceased and b) Parish Priest on 24 August 2014, 18:50:54 Fr. Dario V. Cabral, incumbent Parish Priest of Barasoain Church; he confirmed in our discussion, that the Titular Bishop Oliveros now Dennis Villarojo has acquired all rights and properties, Torrens titles of Barasoain Church including all the Monuments therein; hence, the Creator of the Statues transferred all his rights by virtue of the Strict Provisions of Canon law of the Catholic Church on Parish Creation; and in this case, Saint Andrew the Apostle Church the Titular Bishop of Broderick Pabillo the apostolic administrator of the sede vacante Archdiocese of Manila.


ii) I also talked with the PIO Office of Baliuag including Tourism Office, when I was requesting for photos of the Feb 2 2021 Episcopal Coronation; I was told that Mayor Ferdie Estrella, as SOP, following the Strict LGU DILG guidelines, has a signed written contract between the paid official photographer to have waived all his rights in favor of the Municipal government of Baliuag whoever is the Mayor; under the Local Government Code and DILG Laws, all architects and sculptors cannot retain copyrights without violating the Penal Provisions of these codes and the Anti-Graft Law RA 3019 as amended; Ergo, all LGUs including the herein Malolos City Government ipso facto acquires all moral rights surrendered by alleged and all creators of Copyrights subjects and objects;
ii) I will quote here my past rendition for emphasis: 29 January 2012 [File:Emilio222jf.JPG this file] by virtue of Substantive Philippine law on Extinctive prescription of FOUR YEARS from Commons Uploading, that is, legal public and open publishing in any forum or format, nobody including the alleged creators can now question in any court or forum even by the Creator; [File:FvfMalolos1335 01.JPG this also] 18 April 2014, 15:45:57; This also, [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 15.JPG This also] This also [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 17.JPG This also] 18 April 2014, 15:42:36; assuming Ex Gratia Argumenti or Arguendo, that Flickr Photobucket or any Commons Editor has opined otherwise, even if the IPO Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director now incumbents, would say otherwise, even if possibly reversing the former Learned Verbal Answers to my Personal Query and long discussions with my Ateneo School Mate Director Blancaflor, still, the Laws, I cited hold; it is for the Commons Community to decide between my submitted Legal Treatise any the alleged IPO zooms and others;
At this point, I humbly ask a transcript of the IPO Zooms for the guidance of the Bench and the Bar; I would like to examine Legally the contents thereof for a single purpose: I will try my best if I have time and access due to COVID 19 restrictions to personally talk with the a) Integrated Bar of the Philippines President at Pasig City Main Office and b) the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyrights; if they will maintain wrong legal Opinions, then I reserve my Lawyer's Judge's Right to question them individually with the Ombudsman regarding Gross Ignorance of the Law or possible Disbarment in the IBP Office;
Counter-Argument versus alleged Dicta, sayings, Virtual Answers or even Email correspondence of the Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director: Burden of proof (law) - Rule 131. BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTIONS - Burden of Evidence and Preponderance of the evidence  : Judicial Supremacy of the S.C. of the Philippines:


i) FIRST, the Copyright Law cannot be interpreted by them for ONLY the Supreme Court of the Philippines (in a ripe judicial controversy elevated to it either by Petition for Review or Appeal from Special Courts on Copyrights towards Certiorari under Rule 65 to the Court of Appeals) has original and exclusive Jurisdiction expressly GRANTED and mandated by the 1987 Constitution to Say with definiteness what the Law is, that is Stare Decisis or Philippine Specific Jurisprudence on a) who has the copyright or moral rights with legal personality to file in the Special Courts created under the law and S.C. latest Circulars under C.J. Peralta - infringement of copyrights or trademarks b) within 4 years from publication so public in public domain like Commons Uploading in Meta Details, under the New Civil Code law on Extinctive Prescription and Copyright Law; c) any ruling issued on Copyright whether virtual, email or correspondence including Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration FB discussions; d) any ruling or the DOJ Opinion by the Secretary of Justice my classmate; Vide: 2019 Amendments to the 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC
ii) SECOND: it is legally absurd to claim that the Burden of Evidence is upon the herein Uploader Editor; in any country including Germany and USA, inter alia, the Burden of Proof vis-à-vis Burden of Evidence are clearly defined by Federal Rules and here the 1989 Rules on Evidence as amended by C.J. Peralta's Watch New Rules of Court - Burden of Proof is fixed: it stays with the a in Criminal cases particularly Penal Provisions of Copyright Law, the Complainant, here, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest, must must must, alleged in the Criminal Information to be filed by the Private Prosecutor under the control of the Fiscal, the ultimate facts, their rights to Copyright or Trademark; the Proof of the Burden is Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt, that is Moral Certainty to Convict by Majority Vote of S.C. Justices on Appeal; any Decision whether by the Special Court or IPO or Bureau or DOJ if not elevated and ruled upon by the S.C. are or is not Law or Jurisprudence b) in Civil Cases, the Proof is Preponderance of Evidence resting on the Plaintiff, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; III) the Burden of Evidence shifts from the Proponent, that is, the Plaintiff, or herein Nominator of Deletion Request in Commons, or in Flickr or in any Fora, if he or she has the right emanating by Special Power of Attorney from the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; the Burden of Evidence is shifted by Law on Evidence to the defendant, that is, the alleged Copyright violator, when the Judge rules in the Trial amid objections from the opposing counsel or parties; iv) The IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright Head, can never interpret the Copyright Law; it is only in one case that the Executive Department acquired quasi-judicial powers to rule: in P.D. 1529, the LRA Administrator can say what is the Law on Torrens title upon filing of fees in En Consulta cases versus the Register of Deeds; but but but that is not jurisprudence; the ruling only becomes jurisprudence when elevated to the C.A. and finally to the S.C. issuing a Stare Decisis Decision; this is the same banana with Quasi-Judicial Powers and Rulings of the Executive Agencies, like Immigration, Bureaus of Customs, here Bureau of Copyright (who has no such power); v) The Integrated Bar of the Philippines has jurisdiction to discipline the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if lawyers based even on Anonymous Complaint more frequently under R.A. 6713 which is broader than Sunlights in the Philippines, or R.A. 3019; the IBP has concurrent jurisdiction with the SC Disbarment Office to suspend or dismiss lawyers including IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if they issue comedy of errors or simply put, refusal to reply to my 2 Letters within a fast time required thereat; but the Lawyer under and representing Director Blanclaflor replied to my query: Can I upload any photos falling under FOP in Commons? He replied yes, since if there is no proviso in the Copyright law prohibiting it, then, the Law permits what is not prohibited; I understand that Blancaflor was succeeded by the former and the incumbent IPO Director; YES, they can reply by email and they should under the mandatory provisions of R.A. 6713 "Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees" or even via Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration Virtual under COVID-19 pandemic restrictions; but they can never interpret the Copyright Law, only, they should as they had issued Implementing Guidelines or Circulars;
vi) More important Now is the Exclusive Original Jurisdiction of the Department of Justice via the NBI's Cybercrime Monitoring Division to assume jurisdiction even upon Anonymous Complaint or NOW by Pandemic Emails against 2 matters that I often repeat and repeat herein as Law and Jurisprudence : a) creation of Anonymous Accounts b) Cyberstalking (which incidentally, I state as my opinion, is part and parcel of the specific provisos of the 2012 Cybercrime Philippine Law, as I did read Wikipedia's edit regarding Congress Bills on the matter; for me that is a surplusage; c) Cybercrime proper : to be specific En Masse (including schemes, habit or trends towards) deletion of Photobucket, Flickr, Instagram or here, Commons Valued Photos of National Interest like Churches, Schools, Monuments and Memorial which are Owned by the Domain here Commons Photos uploaded under Public Domain License, like mine, specifying that My Authorship need not be cited when anybody copies my Commons Photos, permanently transferred to Commons Ownership without anything remaining to me; Vi) In all my archives including my Ramon FVelasquez Photos, I never objected to deletions but most rarely; in Template, I just say submitted to the sound discretion of Commons Community; since 2012, many of my files were deleted under either Speedy Deletion or Regular Deletions filed even by Commons Administrators; Vii) But now, I have a reasonable Ground to fear that there is a "Testing of the Waters", that is a) start or stub deletions by trickles just 1% of 99% edits by a specific editor that apparently is aimed towards b) Domino Deletions or En Masse Deletions as had been done by a) Parent and b) Child anonymous Mass Deleters beginning September 2020 stopping just lately but Nakaabang lang po or just watching for opportune time; On the advice that I should obtain COM:OTRS from the Sculptors, I state with all fairness and legality, that it is a legal absurdity to obtain any permission from the heirs of the Deceased alleged but not proven Copyright holder; Anastacio Caedo (14 August 1907 – 12 May 1990) was a Filipino sculptor; and FYI, the Intestate or Testate Courts would first issue Letters Testamentary or Letters of Administration with the Will Annexed(Letters of Administration by Probate Court Letters Testamentary) only the One Armed with the RTC Probate Orders of Appointment can legally issue the COM:OTRS; and this will take maybe 20 years of protracted litigations;
  • Example of stupidity because of False News: Fr. Ladra said the church’s interior now features a ceiling painting called “Communion of Saints” by Maestro Eladio Santos; I always come to this Church; I witnessed personally how the ceiling was painted; I saw with my 2 eyes the Bayanihan or Communal Donation of Money and Labor; specifically, it is next to impossible for Maestro Eladio Santos to have painted the ceiling; Does he have the legs to climbs thereat look at his age - paid workers, like stonemasons, carpenters, catwalks scaffoldings and painters were paid sorry to say minimum wages and other for free due to Bayanihan; I saw Fr. Labra talking to architects; but I suppose these architects and alleged Maestro Eladio Santos may have suggested the Brand of Oil Paints or sketches; but Why deny these Men at Work in Bulacan the Copyrights they waived for this Great Shrine? “Communion of Saints” was not done by Maestro Eladio Santos: PROMISE.
  •  Keep I humbly submit the Unabridged Legal Treatise, ONLY as persuasion to Keep; I underscore that amid my Legal Expertise, I have just One Commons Editor Vote co-equal with any Nominator or Opposing Uploader under the Commons Admin who will keep or deletes; the foregoing Legal Submissions are not meant to touch upon Commons Legal Policy on FOP;
  •  Keep PREMISES CONSIDERED, I humbly submit and register a the Strongest Legal Objection EVER to the Requested Deletion and Fervently Appeal to Commons Community to wait for the Supreme Court Ruling on the Matter of FOP and I guess that would be my starting point... I reiterate with all due respect, that I respectfully and humbly submit to the Sound Discretion of the Commons Community considering that the subject photos are National Cultural Treasures Most Valued Photos for present and future generations, very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juno214-6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:30, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juno214-6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free book cover.

(｀・ω・´) (talk) 13:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juno214-6 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Without exif information, it is unlikely to be uploader's own work.

(｀・ω・´) (talk) 13:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:صورة لأحمد جوجل.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:47, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Michael Coveto Singer , Songwriter , Designer.jpg

[edit]

Taken from Facebook. Previously published photos require COM:OTRS verification. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pokémon statue at Pokemon Center Tokyo DX.jpg

[edit]

No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:44, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KimHyunsoo.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. Pinterest is not licensed under CC. Paper9oll (talk) 09:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Robinsons Townville Pulilan

[edit]

Various COM:Derivative works. See the request proper for more info.

Substantial inclusion of a painting. Missing permission for uploader's use of commercial licensing from the artist

Derivative work of an informational board/poster with an underlying copyrighted photo

All exterior architecture: freedom of panorama is not provided in the copyright law of the Philippines, and permission from the architect of this November 2008 mall is required

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gandang Mabagyong Hapon sa Imo poe The Chief Justice Diosdado Peralta and the Joint Force of IPO including the Bureau of Copyrights; did issue the Latest Circulars Implementing the Copyright Law of the Philippines, to wit:
  • Supreme Court’s Revised Rules on IP Cases Improves Litigation, Driving Innovation and Creativity December 23, 2020: "The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) said the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases is testament to the whole-of-society work in ensuring an effective and speedy adjudication of IP rights cases – essential in creating an environment that fosters innovation, investments and entrepreneurship. participated and signed by "IPOPHL Deputy Director General Nelson P. Laluces IPOPHL’s Bureau of Patents Director IV Lolibeth R. Medrano Former IPOPHL DG Ricardo R. Blancaflor IP Rights Practitioner Atty. Ferdinand M Negre IP RIghts Practitioner Atty. Ramon S. Esguerra";
a) the Creator, or Copyright Holder must prove Legal Personality by preponderance of evidence, that is - Documentary proofs of the alleged in the complaint for Copyright or trademark infringement; b) the Special Court taking cognizance of the Filed with paid Docket fees Copyright case will either dismiss or try the case; c) the Case must be filed within 4 years Prescriptive period from the alleged in the complaint publication in any format whether in newspaper, internet etc.; the tolling of the period starts from the publications, here, in Uploading in Commons irrespective of the knowledge of the Complainant, Commons Uploading being Public; d) A Motion to Dismiss may strike out the Complaint upon the ground of Extinctive prescription; irrespective of the Commons Policies, the Court has the mandate to strictly follow the Peralta-IPO Circular of 2019 amending In Toto the pertinent provisions of the 1989 Rules on Evidence or previous Webinars, IPO or Bureau of Copyright issuances by the former and present Directors or Heads; even the former Issued DOJ Opinions are Ipso Facto amended to conform to the above-enumerated requirement; e) Nobody including any Nominator of Commons, including especially herein Mass Deleter, can legally and validly file or tag in Commons, a single or Mass Deletion request, without first obtaining a Special Power of Attorney from the alleged Creators, here for example, SM City Supermalls; f) Any SPA that may be issued must must and must be submitted to Commons Permissions, and without such SPA, any and all Nominations by herein or any Deleter on FOP inter alia, arising from the alleged rights of Copyrights Holders, the Nomination is Null and Void Ab Initio; any repeated repeated and repeated references to the alleged verbal and not official (Vide: criminal violations of public officials under R.A. 6713 and R.A. 3019) and written statements are Legal Falsehoods, not countenanced by the Rule of Law vis-à-vis the Highest 1987 Constitutional Due Process and Press Freedom or Expression tightly guarded by Philippine Laws;
In the specific case of SM Supermalls including here photos of SM, suffice it to say, that SM Supermalls owns the Copyright and no artist or architect outside it did ever create or did have any moral or copyrights issues; this is so, since SM Supermalls have their own creators, architects etc. who before and after the works, waived any rights whatsoever in favor of the SM Corporation and its Holding Corporation; sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 09:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mirrored reply. @Judgefloro: look back at the Section 172.2 of the Republic Act No. 8293.: Works are protected by the sole fact of their creation, irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose. While registration still exists, it only helps to give additional benefits to the copyright holders like architects, sculptors or their heirs, but copyright protection itself already starts from the moment of creation, not from the time of optional registration. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Extended content: Judgefloro's sermon on irrelevant matter like cybercrime, unfounded claims about denial of Philippine architects' and sculptors' copyrights, some form of threat against IPOPHL officials, etc.
  • Urgent and Fervent Appeal to Commons Community to Put On Hold the Mass Deletion Requests Non-Stop and Unlawful under the Strict Provisions of Philippines Criminal (Penal) Law on Cybercrimes-stalking : to Defer possible Mass Deletions - Erasing of Valued Photos of National Interest from the Herein User Deleter, based on Moral grounds and most certain irreparable Damage and Injury to Commons files and contrary to the Universal Code of Conduct of Users, with all Due Respect: I am reproduce herein as part hereof My Legal Treatise for the kindness of the Commons Community to review and to Declare Null and Void Ab Initio all the Mass Deletions by herein Nominator: to wit - Judgefloro (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


CONSOLIDATED REPLY-OBJECTION: SYNOPSIS - The En Masse Nominations Request for Deletion by the herein Nominator in no uncertain terms, falls within the 4 corners of the The Cyberstalking and 2012 Cybercrime Law of the Philippines which provides grave penalties for its Violations of this Act: the Series of Unlawful Mass Deletions now being started by herein Nominator will cause irreparable damage and injury to the Meta Files of Wikimedia Commons: I vehemently object to the deletion on Substantive Legal Grounds, under my Lawyer's and Judge's Oath of Office, and as Authority on Criminal Law Review based on my Ateneo Law School records; I submit to the Commons Community In Seriatim, objectively (and based on USA and Philippine Jurisprudence vis-à-vis Substantive laws both Civil - Copyright law of the Philippines amending the New Civil Code provisions on the Law of Property) and Criminal law 1932 Revised Penal Code as amended by the Penal Provisions of both [ https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/09/12/republic-act-no-10175/ Republic Act No. 10175] - Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 and Copyright Penal Provisions especially [https://acg.pnp.gov.ph/main/2-uncategorised/263-acg-cyber-security-bulletin-no-132-understanding-the-risk-of-cyberstalking Cyberstalking Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, group, or organization - monitoring, threats, or gathering information that may be used to threaten or harass);
Now a) Who can question with Legal Personality to the Special Courts on Copyright and Trademark Infringement - Vide: The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) vis-à-vis the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases; and b) within what period of time based on Civil Law on Extinctive Prescription); here are my legal grounds to dismiss the Nomination or Request for Deletion, to wit:
i) I talked to the former Parish Priest Msgr. Jo Aguilan whom I healed as healing Judge in the Barasoain Convent and in his room, now deceased and b) Parish Priest on 24 August 2014, 18:50:54 Fr. Dario V. Cabral, incumbent Parish Priest of Barasoain Church; he confirmed in our discussion, that the Titular Bishop Oliveros now Dennis Villarojo has acquired all rights and properties, Torrens titles of Barasoain Church including all the Monuments therein; hence, the Creator of the Statues transferred all his rights by virtue of the Strict Provisions of Canon law of the Catholic Church on Parish Creation; and in this case, Saint Andrew the Apostle Church the Titular Bishop of Broderick Pabillo the apostolic administrator of the sede vacante Archdiocese of Manila.


ii) I also talked with the PIO Office of Baliuag including Tourism Office, when I was requesting for photos of the Feb 2 2021 Episcopal Coronation; I was told that Mayor Ferdie Estrella, as SOP, following the Strict LGU DILG guidelines, has a signed written contract between the paid official photographer to have waived all his rights in favor of the Municipal government of Baliuag whoever is the Mayor; under the Local Government Code and DILG Laws, all architects and sculptors cannot retain copyrights without violating the Penal Provisions of these codes and the Anti-Graft Law RA 3019 as amended; Ergo, all LGUs including the herein Malolos City Government ipso facto acquires all moral rights surrendered by alleged and all creators of Copyrights subjects and objects;
ii) I will quote here my past rendition for emphasis: 29 January 2012 [File:Emilio222jf.JPG this file] by virtue of Substantive Philippine law on Extinctive prescription of FOUR YEARS from Commons Uploading, that is, legal public and open publishing in any forum or format, nobody including the alleged creators can now question in any court or forum even by the Creator; [File:FvfMalolos1335 01.JPG this also] 18 April 2014, 15:45:57; This also, [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 15.JPG This also] This also [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 17.JPG This also] 18 April 2014, 15:42:36; assuming Ex Gratia Argumenti or Arguendo, that Flickr Photobucket or any Commons Editor has opined otherwise, even if the IPO Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director now incumbents, would say otherwise, even if possibly reversing the former Learned Verbal Answers to my Personal Query and long discussions with my Ateneo School Mate Director Blancaflor, still, the Laws, I cited hold; it is for the Commons Community to decide between my submitted Legal Treatise any the alleged IPO zooms and others;
At this point, I humbly ask a transcript of the IPO Zooms for the guidance of the Bench and the Bar; I would like to examine Legally the contents thereof for a single purpose: I will try my best if I have time and access due to COVID 19 restrictions to personally talk with the a) Integrated Bar of the Philippines President at Pasig City Main Office and b) the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyrights; if they will maintain wrong legal Opinions, then I reserve my Lawyer's Judge's Right to question them individually with the Ombudsman regarding Gross Ignorance of the Law or possible Disbarment in the IBP Office;
Counter-Argument versus alleged Dicta, sayings, Virtual Answers or even Email correspondence of the Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director: Burden of proof (law) - Rule 131. BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTIONS - Burden of Evidence and Preponderance of the evidence  : Judicial Supremacy of the S.C. of the Philippines:


i) FIRST, the Copyright Law cannot be interpreted by them for ONLY the Supreme Court of the Philippines (in a ripe judicial controversy elevated to it either by Petition for Review or Appeal from Special Courts on Copyrights towards Certiorari under Rule 65 to the Court of Appeals) has original and exclusive Jurisdiction expressly GRANTED and mandated by the 1987 Constitution to Say with definiteness what the Law is, that is Stare Decisis or Philippine Specific Jurisprudence on a) who has the copyright or moral rights with legal personality to file in the Special Courts created under the law and S.C. latest Circulars under C.J. Peralta - infringement of copyrights or trademarks b) within 4 years from publication so public in public domain like Commons Uploading in Meta Details, under the New Civil Code law on Extinctive Prescription and Copyright Law; c) any ruling issued on Copyright whether virtual, email or correspondence including Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration FB discussions; d) any ruling or the DOJ Opinion by the Secretary of Justice my classmate; Vide: 2019 Amendments to the 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC
ii) SECOND: it is legally absurd to claim that the Burden of Evidence is upon the herein Uploader Editor; in any country including Germany and USA, inter alia, the Burden of Proof vis-à-vis Burden of Evidence are clearly defined by Federal Rules and here the 1989 Rules on Evidence as amended by C.J. Peralta's Watch New Rules of Court - Burden of Proof is fixed: it stays with the a in Criminal cases particularly Penal Provisions of Copyright Law, the Complainant, here, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest, must must must, alleged in the Criminal Information to be filed by the Private Prosecutor under the control of the Fiscal, the ultimate facts, their rights to Copyright or Trademark; the Proof of the Burden is Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt, that is Moral Certainty to Convict by Majority Vote of S.C. Justices on Appeal; any Decision whether by the Special Court or IPO or Bureau or DOJ if not elevated and ruled upon by the S.C. are or is not Law or Jurisprudence b) in Civil Cases, the Proof is Preponderance of Evidence resting on the Plaintiff, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; III) the Burden of Evidence shifts from the Proponent, that is, the Plaintiff, or herein Nominator of Deletion Request in Commons, or in Flickr or in any Fora, if he or she has the right emanating by Special Power of Attorney from the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; the Burden of Evidence is shifted by Law on Evidence to the defendant, that is, the alleged Copyright violator, when the Judge rules in the Trial amid objections from the opposing counsel or parties; iv) The IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright Head, can never interpret the Copyright Law; it is only in one case that the Executive Department acquired quasi-judicial powers to rule: in P.D. 1529, the LRA Administrator can say what is the Law on Torrens title upon filing of fees in En Consulta cases versus the Register of Deeds; but but but that is not jurisprudence; the ruling only becomes jurisprudence when elevated to the C.A. and finally to the S.C. issuing a Stare Decisis Decision; this is the same banana with Quasi-Judicial Powers and Rulings of the Executive Agencies, like Immigration, Bureaus of Customs, here Bureau of Copyright (who has no such power); v) The Integrated Bar of the Philippines has jurisdiction to discipline the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if lawyers based even on Anonymous Complaint more frequently under R.A. 6713 which is broader than Sunlights in the Philippines, or R.A. 3019; the IBP has concurrent jurisdiction with the SC Disbarment Office to suspend or dismiss lawyers including IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if they issue comedy of errors or simply put, refusal to reply to my 2 Letters within a fast time required thereat; but the Lawyer under and representing Director Blanclaflor replied to my query: Can I upload any photos falling under FOP in Commons? He replied yes, since if there is no proviso in the Copyright law prohibiting it, then, the Law permits what is not prohibited; I understand that Blancaflor was succeeded by the former and the incumbent IPO Director; YES, they can reply by email and they should under the mandatory provisions of R.A. 6713 "Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees" or even via Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration Virtual under COVID-19 pandemic restrictions; but they can never interpret the Copyright Law, only, they should as they had issued Implementing Guidelines or Circulars;
vi) More important Now is the Exclusive Original Jurisdiction of the Department of Justice via the NBI's Cybercrime Monitoring Division to assume jurisdiction even upon Anonymous Complaint or NOW by Pandemic Emails against 2 matters that I often repeat and repeat herein as Law and Jurisprudence : a) creation of Anonymous Accounts b) Cyberstalking (which incidentally, I state as my opinion, is part and parcel of the specific provisos of the 2012 Cybercrime Philippine Law, as I did read Wikipedia's edit regarding Congress Bills on the matter; for me that is a surplusage; c) Cybercrime proper : to be specific En Masse (including schemes, habit or trends towards) deletion of Photobucket, Flickr, Instagram or here, Commons Valued Photos of National Interest like Churches, Schools, Monuments and Memorial which are Owned by the Domain here Commons Photos uploaded under Public Domain License, like mine, specifying that My Authorship need not be cited when anybody copies my Commons Photos, permanently transferred to Commons Ownership without anything remaining to me; Vi) In all my archives including my Ramon FVelasquez Photos, I never objected to deletions but most rarely; in Template, I just say submitted to the sound discretion of Commons Community; since 2012, many of my files were deleted under either Speedy Deletion or Regular Deletions filed even by Commons Administrators; Vii) But now, I have a reasonable Ground to fear that there is a "Testing of the Waters", that is a) start or stub deletions by trickles just 1% of 99% edits by a specific editor that apparently is aimed towards b) Domino Deletions or En Masse Deletions as had been done by a) Parent and b) Child anonymous Mass Deleters beginning September 2020 stopping just lately but Nakaabang lang po or just watching for opportune time; On the advice that I should obtain COM:OTRS from the Sculptors, I state with all fairness and legality, that it is a legal absurdity to obtain any permission from the heirs of the Deceased alleged but not proven Copyright holder; Anastacio Caedo (14 August 1907 – 12 May 1990) was a Filipino sculptor; and FYI, the Intestate or Testate Courts would first issue Letters Testamentary or Letters of Administration with the Will Annexed(Letters of Administration by Probate Court Letters Testamentary) only the One Armed with the RTC Probate Orders of Appointment can legally issue the COM:OTRS; and this will take maybe 20 years of protracted litigations;
  • Example of stupidity because of False News: Fr. Ladra said the church’s interior now features a ceiling painting called “Communion of Saints” by Maestro Eladio Santos; I always come to this Church; I witnessed personally how the ceiling was painted; I saw with my 2 eyes the Bayanihan or Communal Donation of Money and Labor; specifically, it is next to impossible for Maestro Eladio Santos to have painted the ceiling; Does he have the legs to climbs thereat look at his age - paid workers, like stonemasons, carpenters, catwalks scaffoldings and painters were paid sorry to say minimum wages and other for free due to Bayanihan; I saw Fr. Labra talking to architects; but I suppose these architects and alleged Maestro Eladio Santos may have suggested the Brand of Oil Paints or sketches; but Why deny these Men at Work in Bulacan the Copyrights they waived for this Great Shrine? “Communion of Saints” was not done by Maestro Eladio Santos: PROMISE.
Legal Addendum: In the Revision history of "Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines herein Nominator (like any editor whether administrator or mere user whom, I admit has rights to edit), had (from September 20, 2020 to February 14, 2021) did input Legal Edits on this FOP with a total number of 40 edits more or less; there was a Wise Statement that Wikimedia Commons Lawyers are able and willing to formulate Commons Legal Policies; I am not saying that any or all edits of Herein Mass Nominator of Deletion are wrong on Commons views;
What I am Appealing (to the Commons Community) is the FIRST and FOREMOST Review by the IPO and Supreme Court Division on this, before any Deletion on FOP may be tagged or decided; for Clarity's sake I am HUMBLY asking the Commons Community to Kindly Put On Hold all the Mass Deletion Request of herein Nominator on the Legal Ground of Null and Void Nominations Ab Initio, being Contrary to the The Chief Justice Diosdado Peralta and the Joint Force of IPO including the Bureau of Copyrights; did issue the Latest Circulars Implementing the Copyright Law of the Philippines, to wit: Supreme Court’s Revised Rules on IP Cases Improves Litigation, Driving Innovation and Creativity December 23, 2020: "The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) said the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases is testament to the whole-of-society work in ensuring an effective and speedy adjudication of IP rights cases – essential in creating an environment that fosters innovation, investments and entrepreneurship. participated and signed by "IPOPHL Deputy Director General Nelson P. Laluces IPOPHL’s Bureau of Patents Director IV Lolibeth R. Medrano Former IPOPHL DG Ricardo R. Blancaflor IP Rights Practitioner Atty. Ferdinand M Negre IP RIghts Practitioner Atty. Ramon S. Esguerra"; sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 09:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I humbly submit the Unabridged Legal Treatise, ONLY as persuasion to Keep; I underscore that amid my Legal Expertise, I have just One Commons Editor Vote co-equal with any Nominator or Opposing Uploader under the Commons Admin who will keep or deletes; the foregoing Legal Submissions are not meant to touch upon Commons Legal Policy on FOP;
  •  Keep PREMISES CONSIDERED, I humbly submit and register a the Strongest Legal Objection EVER to the Requested Deletion and Fervently Appeal to Commons Community to wait for the Supreme Court Ruling on the Matter of FOP and I guess that would be my starting point... I reiterate with all due respect, that I respectfully and humbly submit to the Sound Discretion of the Commons Community considering that the subject photos are National Cultural Treasures Most Valued Photos for present and future generations, very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 09:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • a) Your opinion - like that of my b) fish vendor which had tons of wisdom not only in Fish but in Commerce, of my c) Trike Driver who is expert in Transportation - may be believed by the onlookers or Voters in Elections Periods; but without Citation of Philippine Jurisprudence, without basing you argument on any USA or Federal ruling, and worst, without supporting your above Repeated opinions-comments-mirror replies, whatever you may term them - is not worth a Lawyer's salt, or here, a Commons Community Policy on keeping or deleting; rest assured that if you are believed, I never filed or would ever file any Undeletions Requests, for I know my limitations in time and effort; I would rather go inside the corridors of the DOJ, the IPO and or Bureau of Copyright for Official Statements, PROMISE Judgefloro (talk) 10:57, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as per nomination esp. copyright on paintings included in the images. Markoolio97 (talk) 16:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 07:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Buildings and structures uploaded by David Wadie Fisher-Freberg

[edit]

Since I think there would be no chance Commons would reverse its position on FoP-Indonesia, I kindly request that all of my contributions that will run into contrary with the position to be deleted. Thank you. dwf² ✉ 14:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree. Photos of Indonesian buildings that carry the risk for Wikimedia Foundation to be sued for Billions of Dollars should be purged (and besides they are very very unfair to the poor architects who have sacrificed a lot to go to architecture schools only for their works to be uploaded without permission here). They carry substantial risk. Similar photos uploaded by yours truly will be following soon. Bennylin (yes?) 14:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Some can be keep because they may already PD now, though, I'm not sure which files are met this. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If someone would love to ask me which files should keep:
Some that I'm not sure if keeping is okay or not:

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:32, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you ask me, I'd rather delete all of it, for the sake of making things simpler. dwf² ✉ 07:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom/uploader.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:37, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Nicht alles, was gebaut wird, ist auch ein Kunstwerk und geschützt. Was soll z. B. hier geschützt sein? Das kann genauso irgendwo anders auf der Erde sein. Schlichte Betonbauwerke sind nirgendwo geschützt, Moscheen sehen seit Jahrhunderten gleich aus, deren Gestaltung ist auch nichts Besonderesss. --Ralf Roletschek 07:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete all that shows buildings and also accompanying sculptures if any;  Keep those that either fulfill COM:De minimis (unless Indonesia doesn't recognize de minimis) or those that show buildings that are in public domain (70 years have passed since architects' death or 50 years have passed since publication, if the building is a joint work of architectural firms, see COM:Indonesia). I almost concur with Liuxinyu970226 for this case. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Slashing my input on DM, if Indonesia is like the Philippines where de minimis doesn't exist in reality (and the application is subjective). Also if threshold of originality in Indonesia is very low (even simple buildings are copyrighted). However, I still poll for keep those structures whose architects and sculptors have been dead for more than 70 years. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Admins: the longer this request goes, the longer time I would be exposed to legal liability under your interpretation of Indonesian law. Please resolve it now. dwf² ✉ 11:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per my comment in here: please have the decency not to stall this request and go with what you want. Thanks! dwf² ✉ 14:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted most of them, kept some of them. --4nn1l2 (talk) 03:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:P.U.M.A. (2798220539).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted mask A1Cafel (talk) 07:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Mask is not the only focus of the image, and mask (judging by hair part and facial expression) very much appears like it was derived from her public domain senate portrait. SecretName101 (talk) 02:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per SecretName101. --ƏXPLICIT 03:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Park in woo.jpg

[edit]

다른 사용자가 다시 올림 Darkhomme (talk) 11:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 03:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:0-218-Fonds.png

[edit]

A logo of an obscure gaming group, out of scope. — Yerpo Eh? 13:06, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bharat oraon.jpg

[edit]

out of scope Discostu (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bharatoraon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Discostu (talk) 15:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Retrograde single kapağı.jpg

[edit]

Album cover; requires OTRS. E4024 (talk) 18:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:INFORMATICO.jpg

[edit]

Unused image (a {{Badjpg}}) showing only black-edged white text (upper case Impact) on a radial pattern of 6 rainbow colors, showing what reads as an ad, containing a telephone number and showing a watermark for the meme/macro maker website ImageChef.com. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nikesh Jeewna2.jpg

[edit]

As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 16:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Fitindia at 02:19, 18 März 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by BIT Meerut --Krdbot 09:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paul Tavares Transparent Profile.png

[edit]

Unused vanity portrait of non-notable person. out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 13:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Das Konzept der STEIERMARK SCHAU mit den vier Standorten.jpg

[edit]

Sämtliche Inhalte der verlinkten Quelle sind urheberrechtlich geschützt [3] 2003:DE:722:E717:34A4:EDA8:81E2:2F2D 18:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 22:17, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Offizielles Logo der STEIERMARK SCHAU.jpg

[edit]

Sämtliche Inhalte der verlinkten Quelle sind urheberrechtlich geschützt [4] 2003:DE:722:E717:34A4:EDA8:81E2:2F2D 18:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 22:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rendering des mobilen Pavillons.jpg

[edit]

Sämtliche Inhalte der verlinkten Quelle sind urheberrechtlich geschützt [5] 2003:DE:722:E717:34A4:EDA8:81E2:2F2D 20:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 22:16, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:02-dusenbery-pedogna-web-paulbardagjy.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:03, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Obamacare wagon at Virginia Square (4047699302).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Obamacare wagon at Virginia Square (4047699366).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:23, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DNC (2797649289).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DNC (2817617141).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2008 DNC protest (2795839508).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2008 DNC protest (2795853018).jpg

[edit]

No FoPfor 2D and 3D artworks in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:29, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2008 DNC day 2 protest (2802520008).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1980Ele.png

[edit]

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 00:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 15:46, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:USelecti1944Tim191(1).png

[edit]

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 00:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 15:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:GravelVersusBuckley.png

[edit]

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 15:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SixTribesparliamentarch.svg

[edit]

"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 00:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 15:49, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sixtribesparliament.svg

[edit]

"alternate History" fictional map. Private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 00:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 15:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SupremeDirector1.svg

[edit]

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 00:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 15:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tno 1984.svg

[edit]

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 01:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 15:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kausthob das.jpg

[edit]

Used in a draft with no sources and no chances of being accepted. E4024 (talk) 01:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 15:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:画像 2 2019-06-04 14-14-11.jpg

[edit]

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:United States presidential election, 2016 (Hypothetical) - Trump vs. Clinton vs. Sanders vs. Cruz.svg

[edit]

Hypothetical map not based on professional election poll. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alt2020.svg

[edit]

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rishi Sunak phone call with Janet Yellen.jpg

[edit]

No proof that the Twitter account of Rishi Sunak was licensed under OGL A1Cafel (talk) 02:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: permission from photographer is needed. --Ezarateesteban 22:41, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hacienda Buena Vista.jpg

[edit]

Photo courtesy of the Puerto Rico Office of Historic Preservation, not works from US National Park Service A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and license laudering. --Ezarateesteban 22:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Merav Ben-David.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of self work 47.223.78.205 03:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: it isn't a selfie, the person portraites doesn't take photo. --Ezarateesteban 22:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Merav Ben-David.jpg

[edit]

I do not think that her election campaign took the pic from Commons, where it is a small file w/o camera EXIF, and uploaded by a one-time visitor. Please see: https://www.bendavid2020.com/ E4024 (talk) 00:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bayawan City Hall.jpg

[edit]

Structure was renovated and being used by another company. Angeloantique (talk) 03:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 22:45, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Escudo Municipio San Juan de Capistrano.png

[edit]

Author request deletion Daniqui04 (talk) 04:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request. --Ezarateesteban 22:46, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Governor Brian P. Kemp.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of free use 47.223.78.205 04:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 22:47, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:USJ (49055258388).jpg

[edit]

Personal image uploaded from Flickr to Commons Evan0512 (talk) 05:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 22:47, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:President Donald Trump and Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Mohammed bin Salman.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted board A1Cafel (talk) 02:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Malique Cruise.jpg

[edit]

Used on a promo WP draft. F10 or copyvio as the uploader is in the photo Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Czech US Embassy in flag of France-1.jpg

[edit]

Fails the criteria of Czechia Government PD image 116.48.250.98 07:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Czech US Embassy in flag of France-2.jpg

[edit]

Fails the criteria of Czechia Government PD image 116.48.250.98 07:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2008 DNC protest (2795006635).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:9-12 Signs.JPG

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Artist Rendition of Obama (3912792061).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chains You Can Believe In (3912789797).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:John Allen Hendricks.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Updater500 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: withdraw copyright permission
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for speedy.-- Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--Jon Kolbert I am respectfully requesting again that this photo be deleted. As a new contributor at the time, I made a mistake. I have learned that the photo is owned by the university for which the individual is employed for marketing purposes. It was a miscommunication on my part as a new contributor at the time. Thank you.

{{copyvio|Professional headshot/photo owned by individual's employer/university--SEE HERE where the photo is copyrighted by the university https://photos.sfasu.edu/pages/search.php }} Updater500 (talk) 20:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See here where the university owns this photo: https://photos.sfasu.edu/pages/search.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by Updater500 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|copyright violation can be found by typing subject's name in this webpage-https://photos.sfasu.edu/pages/home.php}} Updater500 (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|copyright violation can be seen by typing subject's name here in simple search box https://photos.sfasu.edu/pages/home.php}} Updater500 (talk) 19:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Professional headshot/photo owned by individual's employer/university. It is a copyright violation Updater500 (talk) 04:12, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, in my opinion the uploader is not a trustable user and I'll delete all his uploads as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Government and its minions as Medusa (3914149000).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:He Changed (3912788961).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Obama Collage (3913577596).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Libotenická borovice náčrt.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Xth-Floor as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7 |2=
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for speedy deletion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:P1010420 (3920243508).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Send This Photo to Nancy! (3920321708).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2008 DNC day 1 protest (2798214417).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2008 DNC day 2 protest (2801674215).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 08:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2008 DNC day 2 protest (2801674909).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 08:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2008 DNC day 2 protest (2802513672).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 08:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Banner is not main focus of image as I see it. The signs in the upper portion of the image and the women in the lower half of the image are more a focus than the banner. SecretName101 (talk) 02:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It occupies a large portion of the image, IMO it fails de minimis--A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:-xAAAgFfzeA-960.jpg

[edit]

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not everyone has a fancy camera. images are bigger than typical web rips. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Шенджей 210.jpg

[edit]

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not everyone has a fancy camera. images are bigger than typical web rips. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:37, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Obama Time Capsule - 3623440741.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of copyrighted works A1Cafel (talk) 08:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The artwork is a work of the photographer Steve Jurvetson, so he presumably is correct in posting this license. The rest of the items in the photo are largely created by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies. Other items have only de minumus copyrighted elements. There is not a copyright issue here. 15:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hursh.jpg

[edit]

keine Kategorien, keine Bildbeschreibung oder Dateiname, aus der erkennbar wäre, wofür die Datei gut ist. Hochgeladen offenbar von einem Zweit-Account von user:Hursh. Dieser Dateiname wurde schon für eine gelöschte Datei von Hursh verwendet. Der Autorname war Teil des Namens einer gelöschten Datei von Hursh. Alle Uploads und Edits von Hursh auf commons und Wikidata wurden gelöscht. 7 der 8 Edits von Hursh auf en.wp wurden gelöscht. Der 8. Edit auf en.wp wurde innerhalb 2 Minuten revertiert, aber aus dem edit-comment geht hervor, dass Hursh einen Artikel über den Pakistanischen Choreographen Hursh schreibt. Der einzige andere Edit von Team_Hursh ist das einfügen des Namens Hursh in die Userpage von Team_Hursh, der edit-comment wurde von User:Achim55 ausgeblendet. C.Suthorn (talk) 08:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: F10. --Achim (talk) 08:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by م.ناامید (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history

4nn1l2 (talk) 08:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:India location map 3.png

[edit]

The map shows the Kashmir region of Pakistan in India, which is a violation of NPOV. The Pakistani area should be grey and a dotted line around it should be enough to identify it as an area of dispute. Pakistan-administered Kashmir is not part of India proper, showing it as part of India is just not neutral. I don't see a Pakistani location map showing Indian Kashmir as part of Pakistan. This map is being used on several articles on Wikipedia, which is also misleading for readers. Lyk4 (talk) 05:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This map shows the official Indian view which claims complete Jammu and Kashmir being part of India. If somebody doesn't want to use this map he/she can use File:India location map.svg or File:India location map2.svg. NNW (talk) 06:46, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: - user editing on these articles from en.wikipedia - this is the Indian view point, not the neutral view which is even being endorsed by the user above who is !voting for keep. It is not a neutral map, rather an Indian claim. --lTopGunl (talk) 12:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter if you or me or anybody else here likes or endorses what this map shows or not. It's the offical view of India. This is reason enough to keep this map. As I said above: no one is forced to use this map but it shows Indian claims, so it is educational and within the project scope. Please read Commons:Project scope/Neutral point of view. NNW (talk) 12:50, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Official view of India does not matter while determining NPOV. Location maps should follow NPOV. --lTopGunl (talk) 12:58, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has to be made at en:Template:Location map India, not in Commons. I don't know why this edit by an IP was accepted by the community, but obviously no one protested until now. NNW (talk) 13:12, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Commons does not require NPOV -- in fact, we encourage maps and drawings showing different points of view. It is up to editors on the WPs and other users to pick the maps they want to use.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Renominating this file for deletion—normally I wouldn't do this because I support the inclusion of diverse POV maps, but this one has been ridiculously overused and included on as many Indian-related articles as possible. This map is not neutral and therefore should see use in a limited manner, yet it is being used on dozens of pages on the English-language Wikipedia. It is not educational in the contexts it is being used it, and I don't see its Pakistani equivalent being used to this extreme on Pakistan-related articles. Zeex.rice (talk) 03:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per previous DR and in use. If it is so bad and overused, then first replace it with an alternative version. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:24, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arturo Di Modica Early Abstract.png

[edit]

This is to begin a deletion discussion of the following files to clarify whether there is an adequate license for the art depicted and for the depiction (given PNG file format of some, is it the user’s own photograph or a screenshot of someone else’s?)

Files at issue:

  1. File:Arturo Di Modica Early Abstract.png
  2. File:1970 Arturo Di Modica Moore Inspired Bronze.jpg
  3. File:C.1977 Di Modica Monumental Abstract outside Grande St.png
  4. File:Di Modica 2000 abstraction.png
  5. File:1990-5 ADM and Charging Bull.jpg
  6. File:Arturo Di Modica in Ciprianni Downtone.png
  7. File:Jacob Harmer 6ft Charging Bull.jpg

They are uploaded by user Artislife1406 who may be able to clarify. Thank you. Innisfree987 (talk) 06:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment One of them I foun on some blog, where it was posted in a fuller size in 2014 already, the other was a derivative work (modern ar piece not falling under FoP). I heavily doubt that the uploader is a copyright holder for the remaining ones. Masur (talk) 11:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom, Masur, and pcp.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Close wing of Matapa-- -Matapa cresta Evans, 1949 – Fringed Branded Redeye.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Sourabh.biswas003 (talk) 08:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Открытие памятника в Екатеринбурге.jpg

[edit]

COM:Copyvio obvious watermark Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 08:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:46, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Szeged, Tápé, 6753 Hungary - panoramio (13).jpg

[edit]

Duplicate of File:Szeged, Tápé, 6753 Hungary - panoramio (5).jpg Pasztilla (talk) 08:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Szeged, Tápé, 6753 Hungary - panoramio (14).jpg

[edit]

Duplicate of File:Szeged, Tápé, 6753 Hungary - panoramio (5).jpg Pasztilla (talk) 08:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, near duplicate. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Judd-deere-2.png

[edit]

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, not found using Google Images. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stalin at port.jpg

[edit]

Famous photo of censorship of Nikolai Yezhov. Already deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nikolai Yezhov under the name of File:Voroshilov, Molotov, Stalin, with Nikolai Yezhov.jpg 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dani21261355 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own-wok claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history

4nn1l2 (talk) 09:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, not found using Google Images. But renominate if non-notable and not in scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jerome Foster II with Greta Thunerg at 2019 Friday climate strike.jpg

[edit]

attributed as work of Jerome Foster ||, but obviously not a selfie. Permission granted by Jerome Foster ||, but neither OTRS-Ticket, nor a link to the permission. Three previous images of Foster - uploaded by the same account - were deleted as copyvio C.Suthorn (talk) 09:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jerome Foster II Headshot Outdoors.jpg

[edit]

author given as Jerome Foster ||, but not a selfie. Source given as own, but actually https://www.onemillionof.us/jerome-foster-ii. No Exif, no permission, 3 more images of Foster uploaded by the same account have been deleted as copyvio, an image of Thunberg and Foster by the same account has DR. can be kept if Foster sends permisson from @onmillionof.us via mail to OTRS team. C.Suthorn (talk) 09:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hadianto Rasyid.jpg

[edit]

Probably cropped from here https://palumantapbergerak.com/ or similar as a google search finds a number of these. Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, previously published needs COM:OTRS. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:'All or Nothing' - Flickr - ardenswayoflife.jpg

[edit]

Nice photo but the artworks would need OTRS from the artist Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AOCvTrump.png

[edit]

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marta Petreu Paris02.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Martin Greslou as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: usage inapproprié & non respect de mes droits d'auteur|source=https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Marta_Petreu_Paris02.jpg&action=edit — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 10:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)  Comment reason from the uploader: demande de la personne concernée, pour cause de dénigrement personnalisé, translation: request from the person depicted on the image because of bashing.[reply]

Deleted: User:Taivo is right, but no harm to do a courtesy deletion of unused file. Numerous alternative photos available of her. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CH296's 2016 presidential prediction.png

[edit]

Private unused election guess. Not reputable polling data. No educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MapChart Map-removebg-preview.png

[edit]

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2016 USA Map.png

[edit]

Hypothetical "alternate History" fictional map. (real result here: File:ElectoralCollege2016.svg). Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Glen or Glenda (1953).webm

[edit]

Copyright registered and renewed per discussion here — Racconish 💬 10:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Governor General of Barbados Dame Sandra Prunella Mason, GCMG, D.A., Q.C.jpg

[edit]

This is most likely copivio, as the Barbados website doesn't list any Creative Commons license (instead "Copyright © 2021 Government of Barbados. All Rights Reserved"). Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 10:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JPR SN 1 .jpg

[edit]

Jean-Pierre Ryngaert, pictured on this photo (left) is obviously not the author of this photo. Culex (talk) 11:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JPR PM 2 .jpg

[edit]

Jean-Pierre Ryngaert, pictured on this photo (right) is obviously not the author of this photo. Culex (talk) 11:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aslı Kırar.jpg

[edit]

Deleted: Unused personal images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ERI CAHYADI.jpg

[edit]

Outright copyright violation - work is by "selalu.id", and the uploader has no indication of being affiliated. Juxlos (talk) 12:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Academy-Li -4.jpg

[edit]

copyright holder in metadata 83.250.136.207 12:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nithu E-Techjh.png

[edit]

Unused logo of non-notable YouTube channel. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 12:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Annotation 2020-08-14 132914.png

[edit]

Unused logo of non-notable YouTube channel. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 12:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Poularde truffée Lucien Tendret.jpg

[edit]

Obvious copyright infringement 2A00:23C7:2B89:BE00:C4FF:B846:8A9D:AF3A 12:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RcHmU.png

[edit]

An unused logo of an online gamer. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 13:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kim Chiu as a Judge in It's Showtime.jpg

[edit]

User’s all other contributions are web photos. This is also low-res web quality photo. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sundarbancov-1200x600.jpg

[edit]

Better version exists at File:Tiger Sundarbans Tiger Reserve 22.07.2015.jpg Boylarva99 (talk) 13:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Predicacion.png

[edit]

Unused chart with no indication of purpose. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 14:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:אסף פרי.jpg

[edit]

A formal PR picture that appears in at least one more place on the web (in the website of this actor's agent). It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 14:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:24, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per VRT. -- Geagea (talk) 15:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Me and My Icon.jpg

[edit]

Not in-use picture of an art work. The Commons is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 14:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:24, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MikaelChristensen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical images. I doubt very much that the uploader is actually the photographer as claimed.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MikaelChristensen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very small size, no EXIF. I doubt that these are actually the work of the uploader as claimed.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Found online using Google Images. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:25, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MattesKoeln (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted book cover.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:200527112315-03-george-floyd-super-tease.jpg

[edit]

Image non-libre de droit. L'auteur est  : Ben Crump Law Firm via CNN Olivier Tanguy (talk) 15:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:-front-de-mer-d-oran.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation 86.212.183.132 15:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: insufficient reason for deletion, not found using Google Images. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rmh querschnitt.pdf

[edit]

Unused, unexplained diagram. not intuitively educative. Richard Avery (talk) 15:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:30, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zentrumspassage Weinfelden.jpg

[edit]

much better version is File:Zentrumspassage in Weinfelden.jpg Martin Sg. (talk) 15:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, near duplicate. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:40, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jon Gomm.jpg

[edit]

Fordi det er ikkje mitt bilete, men det er gratis, men eg fekk ikkje skreve inn fotografen, derfor Milirhus (talk) 15:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:41, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ataturk's Hidden Hand.jpg

[edit]

Bogus license 4nn1l2 (talk) 08:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: wrong license. --Ezarateesteban 22:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Wind's Tale - Anne Anderson.jpg

[edit]

Anne Anderson died 1952 - thats less then 70 years ago Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 22:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Swineherd - Anne Anderson.jpg

[edit]

Anne Anderson died 1952 - thats less then 70 years ago Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 22:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Swan Princes - Anne Anderson.jpg

[edit]

Anne Anderson died 1952 - thats less then 70 years ago Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 22:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gerda and the Ravens - Anne Anderson.jpg

[edit]

Anne Anderson died 1952 - thats less then 70 years ago Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 22:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anne Anderson04.jpg

[edit]

Anne Anderson died 1952 - thats less then 70 years ago Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 22:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: now in public domain. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:23, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cinderella - Anne Anderson.jpg

[edit]

Anne Anderson died 1952 - thats less then 70 years ago Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 22:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zhōngzhèngjīchángjiéyùn.JPG

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G1|It's Taiwan High Speed Rail, not Taoyuan Airport MRT. The file has been 13½ years under wrong name, so I allow regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can be deleted. The option to don't leave a redirect for this strange name, was not available. Because the file is from 2007, this is probably the best way, not by a speedy delete or by filemover.. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pal do clown.png

[edit]

there is not about art 95.70.145.216 15:38, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:43, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pexels-keilah-gepte-4065021.jpg

[edit]

Please see Template:Pexels-Cc-zero. Image was published on Pexels after 2018, when the site switched to a more restrictive license than CC-Zero. Pexels uploads since 2018 are incompatible with Commons. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RZ.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal image of a non-notable person. Richard Avery (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Art+Feminism Editathon in Gyumri 19.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: art depicted is very small, DM. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aldeia Latina.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BANKS.pdf

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project or tabular data if useful. Used on user page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ilenya fra il cuore e una nuvola.jpg

[edit]

The same image is available on her official homepage [8]; as long as we don't have a clear permission for a publication under a free license, it is a copyvio. Mosbatho (talk) 15:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Signature 2014-06-05 16-26.jpg

[edit]

Unused, unidentified signature. No educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 15:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Retour des femmes du jardin.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eric Klinenberg at PopTech.jpg

[edit]

Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 16:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Сергей Лёвочкин.jpg

[edit]

YouTube video was not available, cannot determine copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 16:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2020 Nissan Sentra (United States).png

[edit]

YouTube link was unavailable, cannot determine copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 16:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was a wrong link, fixed now. Andra Febrian (talk) 16:26, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: link fixed and license confirmed. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:50, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Craig Revel Horwood - Strictly Passenger Dancing Competition.jpg

[edit]

YouTube video was unavailable, cannot determine copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 16:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akshin Əliyev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. EXIF data reveals credit to someone else and transmission code. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DEULA RASIKARAJ JIYU.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FB IMG 1597334192236(276).jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sophieatg.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Robbie Fazle.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zainahmad.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity draft. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S M Fahim Hossain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. FB and transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The7bab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HITLA.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vincent Ryan Rompies on Tonight Show Netmediatama.jpg

[edit]

The YouTube source is not licensed under CC but the Standard license from YouTube. Dimma21 (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:תרשים נתיבים ומנחתים.jpg

[edit]

As the uploader mentioned (in Hebrew), this is a screenshot from a website. It is definitely not a free file, hence it has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Camino la Culata.jpg

[edit]

Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not a great photo but in scope of its categories. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kombi-servisi.jpg

[edit]

Another commercial upload. E4024 (talk) 18:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M3 Half-track.jpg

[edit]

Why would Panzer Groups South.com be created by US Government? I don't find any reason or statement there that this was a Govenment work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MM Park France.jpg

[edit]

I do not find this license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M4 Half-track 01.jpg

[edit]

Source reads "© OLIVE-DRAB.COM. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED." no indication of US Government work at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M4 Half-track 03.jpg

[edit]

Source reads "© OLIVE-DRAB.COM. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED." no indication of US Government work at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M4 Half-track 02.jpg

[edit]

Source reads "© OLIVE-DRAB.COM. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED." no indication of US Government work at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M21-MMC2.jpg

[edit]

One source given is 404, not found, The other one is an image only (not this one) and no license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M21-MMC3.jpg

[edit]

One source is 404, not found. The other one is only a photo, no license - and it's not even THIS photo, but another one/. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M21-MMC.jpg

[edit]

Obviously from a printed source, not found at either source given, probably copyright violation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M4A1-MMC2.jpg

[edit]

Image has cleverly had a watermark of true source removed. Looking at source shows these watermarks and a (C) symbol. From this source there is no indication of US Government photos.' Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M4A1-MMC3.jpg

[edit]

At source, these photos have overprinting showing source to that website. However, someone has cleverly removed the overprinting, and claimed these as government work without anything to back that up. If you can find this photo in a government source, I will withdraw the nomination, but at this point, the way this image is documented it's a copyright violation. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia username- Egombute,. Name- Ofoegbu Fabian. Traditional Doctor (A Herbal Doctor selling Medicines).jpg

[edit]

No indication of user's own work, very small - low quality. Review deleted uploads for shutterstock and other stock company image deletions. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palawan Bear Cat.png

[edit]

OTRS-permission from photographer Rey Ibarra (look description) is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2021-02-04-Dreikönigenpförtchen-Köln-9.jpg

[edit]

Sorry but an image from Ebay with Unknown Author cannot be licensed as if we know the lifedates of the author. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2021-02-04-Dreikönigenpförtchen-Köln-10.png

[edit]

With Unknown Author, it is not possible to say that they have been dead long enough to apply this license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More than 70 years dead: Signatur "Eckstein" Wilhelm Eckstein (* 28. Oktober 1863 in Lauterbach, Provinz Oberhessen;[1] † 29. Juli 1936 in Düsseldorf) -- Kürschner (talk) 09:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep -- Kürschner (talk) 09:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Kürschner. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Egmontroute Zottegem.jpg

[edit]

Geen indicatie dat uploader het auteursrecht op de brochure bezit. Dat is wel nodig om een foto van de brochure te mogen vrijgeven. Gasthuis (talk) 19:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:中國成都232.jpg

[edit]

Bad quality, illegibility Dmk121 jako Ciut Szalony Artur¿¡ (talk) 20:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:中國成都220.jpg

[edit]

Bad quality, out of focus Dmk121 jako Ciut Szalony Artur¿¡ (talk) 20:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:中國成都223.jpg

[edit]

Bad quality. It is not known what it is. Dmk121 jako Ciut Szalony Artur¿¡ (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:中國成都221.jpg

[edit]

Bad quality. Out of focus. Dmk121 jako Ciut Szalony Artur¿¡ (talk) 20:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images depicting Maria Tkachivska

[edit]

This is a request for a courtesy deletion. The depicted living person would rather not have these pictures on Commons.

Files are not used in wikiprojects; there are other photos from the same public event in the person's category; there is a better image currently used on Wikipedia; I am the author and uploader. I trust that deleting these files will not hurt Commons' scope. -- Ата (talk) 20:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Weak delete The nominator has not made a case for courtesy deletion. These pictures are not in use and are similar to the others in the person’s category, which is an argument for honouring the request. But the fact that the images depict a public event and were uploaded over five years ago is an argument against deletion. Brianjd (talk) 06:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Star Comedy.png

[edit]

This logo is not the original. FosforitoFernandez2001 (talk) 20:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unused logo. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MANAVGAT KAYMAKAMLIĞI DOLBAZLAR İLKÖĞRETİM OKULU MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ EĞİTİM ORTAMLARINDA ŞİDDETİN ÖNLENMESİ VE AZALTILMASI STRATEJİ VE EYLEM PLANI.pdf

[edit]

A document of a local government in Turkey. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:08, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Antek ev yemekleri.png

[edit]

contains ad Satirdan kahraman (talk) 21:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:طبیعت نجوبران (نژی وران) بیستون soheilchehri.jpg

[edit]

چون عکس اصلی با لوگو نیست Soheilchehri (talk) 21:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hanooz 15:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:طبیعت نجوبران (نژی وران) بیستون soheilchehri.jpg

[edit]

به دلیل تکرار بودن عکس Soheilchehri (talk) 21:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Google Translate: Due to the repetition of the photo. Repetition/duplication of what photo? And in use. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:طبیعت نجوبران (نژی وران) بیستون soheilchehri.jpg

[edit]

به دلیل ناقصی و تکرار بودن صفحه Soheilchehri (talk) 10:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Soheilchehri: Please refrain from repeatedly nominating this file for deletion for no valid reason. If you wish to nominate it again, please explain clearly why it should be deleted, based on the deletion policy. Thank you. --Ahmadtalk 23:06, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

لطفاً از نامزد کردن چندباره صفحه به دلایل نامعتبر خودداری کنید. اگر تمایل دارید تا دوباره این صفحه را نامزد حذف کنید، لطفاً توضیح واضحی ارائه دهید که چرا، بر اساس سیاست حذف، این تصویر باید حذف شود. با تشکر. Ahmadtalk 23:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:طبیعت نجوبران (نژی وران) بیستون soheilchehri.jpg

[edit]

حذف و کراپ غیر قانونی لوگو عکاس Soheilchehri (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No FOP in Iran. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 10:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Google Translate: "Remove and crop illegal photographer logo". I see no logo or any other reason for deletion. FOP restrictions only apply to copyrighted works. And in use. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:طبیعت نجوبران (نژی وران) بیستون soheilchehri.jpg

[edit]

به چند دلیل : Soheilchehri (talk) 21:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, Google translation of the nomination from Persian is 'for some reasons', so no valid reason has been given for deletion. The nominator has previously nominated this file for deletion four times, with the file being kept each time. The nominator's issue is unclear, but it may relate to the absence of a copyright watermark in this image: the nominator is the uploader, and their other uploads have a copyright watermark. This would not be a valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. No courtesy deletion since Commons license is irrevocable. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 18:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Samuel Tello en febrero de 2021.jpg

[edit]

Perquè sí Foto aleatòria d'Internet Jantidot (talk) 22:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal logo/image, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chloe Molloy Collingwood.jpg

[edit]

Commercial image reproduced without appropriate permission DustyNail (talk) 23:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Photo by Dylan Burns/AFL Photos. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 20:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A Portrait in Darkness (3289448299).jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:11, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Federicomartinelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artist Ebe Poli died in 1993. Not uploaders own work.

GeorgHH • talk   20:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 08:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Federicomartinelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artworks by Ernesto Lamagna. Living Italian artist. We need a written VRT permission in order to keep these photographs.

Ruthven (msg) 15:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:38, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Greg Hands & Guillermo Dietrich.jpg

[edit]

No proof that OGL apples to the Facebook page of UK Embassy in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 09:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 11:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Staatssekretär von Kühlmann.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted in the source country. Regasterios (talk) 02:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per the precautionary principle. "E. Bieber", as noted on the photo, actually was the name of a photo studio, and it stood for Emilie Biber (the woman who founded it in Hamburg), not for Emil Biber. If it is from 1918 in Berlin as noted, it could be the work of a photographer called Julius Rosenberg (accd. to de:Leonard Berlin-Bieber), who owned the studio at the time, or it could be the work of some employed photographer. As I simply don't know, I'll put the file up for restoration with {{PD-old-assumed}} in 2039. --Rosenzweig τ 13:09, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yewtharaptor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant license laundering - uploader serial copyright violator, lower resolution, no EXIF or disparate cameras (DMC-FZ5, E5200, etc.), variously attributed to "Marianne Falbe Nattestad", "Romeomustdie73", "Grzegorz Pieńkowski", etc. -- a single Deviant Art account is not simultaneously three people. Indeed, source pages say "Image Given By Marianne Falbe Nattestad" [9], "PHOTO GIVEN BY Grzegorz Pieńkowski" [10], etc. COM:OTRS evidence of permission from the actual authors is needed.

Эlcobbola talk 19:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: all the files already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lilbabymainpresspicdecember2020.png

[edit]

No evidence of ownership or permission to release under a free license. Copyright is held by Lil Baby, who uses this photo on his social media. CentreLeftRight ✉ 21:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agree with CentreLeftRight --Headlock0225 (talk) 18:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:04, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Forward on Climate Rally -101- (9725220307).jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:06, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PCP (Símbolo Eleitoral).png

[edit]

The intelectual property of this particular image belongs to the Portuguese Communist Party, not to the person that uploaded it after taking it from official documents 194.79.82.42 08:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hencefort, any use of it can't be under this CC license, but only with a formal authorization of the Portuguese Communist Party. The image was first registered in 1974: https://www.tribunalconstitucional.pt/tc/partidos.html — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.79.82.42 (talk) 09:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: The o.p. is right about CC-BY-SA not being the correct license for this image (as also for all other Portuguese political party emblems uploaded by this user), however proper licensinng might be possible, under Portuguese law, through means other than asking permission from the owning entity. I’m not sure of the details, but for this case I’d point out that, unlike most Portuguese political parties, P.C.P. was created in the 1920s and has been using the same symbol ever since. Copyright law being what it is, ironically this might place the symbol itself in the public domain, unlike those of newer parties, although with ample reservations considering its trademark status. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: likely out of copyright as per above. Moreover, this is a universal symbol, not an original design. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:08, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HallgrímurBenediktsson.jpg

[edit]

1935 photo, uploader needs to show how this is free Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallgrímur Benediktsson is my wife's paternal grandfather. The photo was taken by his sister-in-law, Sigríður Zoega (a professional photographer), and is owned by the family. It is widely used, for example on the website of Alþingi (Icelandic Parliament) and in local newspapers, and the family considers it public domain. I put it on Wikipedia at the family's request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FreyrÞórarinsson (talk • contribs) 10:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: needs permission from photographer, see COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baby Maurren Tam In Hong Kong.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation. This is a photo of a photo but we know nothing about the original, when or where it was taken and by whom. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tom Harwood Headshot.jpg

[edit]

Likely copyright violation. Uploaded by new user. Same image as subject's Linkedin. No evidence provided that this is their own work and they have given permission. Cowlibob (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not copyright violation. My picture. Break99New (talk) 11:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The LinkedIn picture is clearly far lower quality than the original, which I have uploaded here under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. It is implausible to suggest that this has been taken from somewhere else as it does not exist on the internet in this quality anywhere else.Break99New (talk) 11:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also present at the subject's personal Instagram account. [[11]] Cowlibob (talk) 08:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Said photograph you link to is in much lower quality, and more cropped than the original - which I own and have uploaded here under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.Break99New (talk) 10:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Photograph (seemingly uncropped) appears on the subject’s personal website, which makes no mention of being under a CC license. [12] A smart kitten (talk) 12:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is cropped on subject's website and appeared there after here. Photo is mine. Not sure what more you need to establish this.Break99New (talk) 10:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per uploader's claim, AGF. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:17, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Richard Holden MP photograph in Westminster.jpg

[edit]

Likely copyright violation. Uploaded by new user as own work. No evidence provided of ownership or permission. Cowlibob (talk) 12:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:17, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Richard Holden MP photograph in Westminster (cropped).jpg

[edit]

Likely copyright violation. Uploaded by new user as own work. No evidence provided of ownership or permission to use. Cowlibob (talk) 12:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:17, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bubba europe outline.svg

[edit]

No Denmark. Czech rep & Slovakia reunited.Inaccurate. Cabayi (talk) 13:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, waste of time and misleading, should be thrown out.-- Seelefant (talk) 11:07, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Statues in RKV.jpg

[edit]

The sculptural installation Directions (“Áttir”) was unveiled in April 2007 and created by still-living Steinunn Þórarinsdóttir.[13] There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Iceland, and this freely-licensed image is missing permission from Þórarinsdóttir. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think it's DM. This is because there are other things besides sculptures in this image. Ox1997cow (talk) 14:50, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: the image fails de minimis in the first place, the title and the intended meaning of the image speaks for itself. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:35, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: But I think it's a photo of a interior of an airport. And the title and description do not affect the copyright status. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:35, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ox1997cow: airport interior is not OK either. Iceland's FOP is just like the FOP of SoKor: no commercial FOP for anything. Whether the building depicts exterior or interior is irrelevant at this point. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:37, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: OK. Therefore,  I withdraw my nomination Ox1997cow (talk) 11:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Retrouniverse.webp

[edit]

TVTropes is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available from thestaff@tvtropes.org. Is this OK? E4024 (talk) 14:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:33, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/191535454@N02

[edit]

The source appears to be a Flickrwashing account - just two images that appear to be from two different cameras.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding that the uploader, Wakuwaku999 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  is a likely sockpuppet of another user accused of license laundering, Yamacyan (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . Ytoyoda (talk) 14:00, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:YB Rozman Isli, 2018 Labuan.jpg

[edit]

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIO - low res, no EXIF, all other user uploads copyvios of similar subject matter, etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 18:39, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Secretary Buchanan Wyo.jpg

[edit]

Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIO - low res, no EXIF, close vantage of notable person, all other user uploads copyvios (including of this person - File:Ed Buchanan Wyo.jpg), etc. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 18:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rajbhog - sweet.jpg

[edit]

Larger version of this at https://www.zomato.com/sk/varanasi/shri-narayan-mishthan-bhandar-durgakund/order Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reverend Billy Graham Delivering The Prayer At the Inauguration of Bill Clinton.jpg

[edit]

Possibly a copyright vilation as it is being commercially distributed at https://www.alamy.com/1201993-photograph-of-reverend-billy-graham-delivering-the-prayer-at-the-inauguration-of-william-jefferson-clinton-as-president-image376481694.html but is also present in https://dp.la/item/1209bedd981d83640f8cb2b8287da042?page=1&partner=%22National%20Archives%20and%20Records%20Administration%22&subject=%22Speeches%2C%20addresses%2C%20etc%22&type=%22image%22 Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:RandomUserGuy1738. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:38, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tonton-David-ma-capture-de-ecran.png

[edit]

Copyvio YouTube. Cheep (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cette demande de destruction d'image est contraire à la politique de wikipedia en matière de capture d'écrant, je cite :

Politique proposée ♦ Niveau 1: accord présumé, Pas de restriction en tant que telle.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Autorisation_d%27utilisation_d%27image/Capture_d%27%C3%A9cran — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chicadelmundo (talk • contribs) 21:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:39, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stewart Portrait 4x5+(1).jpg

[edit]

Works created by the Ohio government aren't public domain; the source website has a copyright notice. Elliot321 (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:40, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Korea Polytechnics

[edit]

Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea, where the threshold of originality for structures is incredibly low.

ƏXPLICIT 01:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See also COM:DM South Korea. Ox1997cow (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Ox1997cow, looks like Panmunjeom cases, below TOO. (wait, File:Korea Polytechnic IV Daejeon 01.jpg is problemic? that logo on pillar might be beyond TOO, ditto for File:Korea Polytechnic IV Daejeon 03.jpg and File:Korea Polytechnic IV Daejeon 04.jpg). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding Panmunjeom , photos of structures in North Korea or photos of structures in South Korea taken from North Korea both benefit from the FOP provisions of the latter. As noted at COM:FOP SK, this wall is protected by copyright. I highly doubt an entire building would get a pass. ƏXPLICIT 02:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Explicit: You screenshot is to me an automobile advertisement, which hence the cars are copyrighted enough, but here I see only many simple buildings. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think you have misunderstand my comment, as it had nothing to do with the car. The company that produced the advertisement linked above was sued by the architect of the building for infringing on his rights. The Seoul Central District Court agreed and ruled that the company must compensate him. My point was that a single wall exterior of a building is protected by South Korea's FOP laws. If that basic wall is considered complex enough to be protected—which wasn't even the focus of the commercial to begin with—then these more complex buildings would be, too. ƏXPLICIT 05:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Explicit:  Comment I agree that the ruling is a case in which it can be seen that there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. However, I did some analysis. The building in the ruling is the UV House, and according to this introduction, the building is recognized for its creativity and art. (The UV House, designed by architectural designer Min Gyu-am, is a representative structure of Heyri that is recognized for its creativity and art in terms of the overall framework including the arrangement and combination of space and various components. I used Google Translate.) Then think of a building that doesn't. According to COM:TOO South Korea, As a condition of originality that can be recognized as a copyright, it is said that it is not an imitation, but that it can be distinguished from existing ones. If so, how about this one?
File:Microsoft Korea Building.jpg
If I talk about the building that appears as the main object in this photo, I would say that it is a simple rectangular shape and the walls are made of glass. If this is the originality that deserves copyright, I think it's like saying that there are so many copyright infringement buildings in the world. Therefore, I think it is not good to say that South Korea's threshold of originality for structures is very low. Ox1997cow (talk) 22:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of the ruling, the very definition of architecture is art. From en:Architecture: "Architectural works, in the material form of buildings, are often perceived as cultural symbols and as works of art." From Cambridge dictionary: "the art and practice of designing and making buildings". The UV House wall has already been deemed copyrightable—which does set a low threshold, just look at it—so we have to work from that in applying COM:FOP SK. The original Korean text of COM:TOO SK suggests (via machine translation, this Korean beyond me): "Article 2, No. 1 of the Copyright Act stipulates a work as a “creative work that expresses human thoughts or emotions.” In this context, creativity does not mean originality in a complete sense, and it is not just a work that imitates others, but the author. It only means that it contains the expression of one's own thoughts or feelings, and in order to meet these requirements, the work is only given the characteristics as the product of the author's own mental effort and can be distinguished from the existing works of other authors. It would be enough to be there." So a work does not even have to be completely original, it just requires the author to express themselves through their work. ƏXPLICIT 00:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No matter how very low the standard for threshold of originality is, there are certainly buildings that are not subject to copyright protection. Look at this file.
File:Seoul and N Seoul Tower.jpg (This file was undeleted by this undeletion request.)
Many of the buildings in this photo are simple, consisting of brick or stone walls and windows. If these buildings are copyrighted, the buildings in this photo are infringing on the copyrights of other buildings. But what about reality? When someone built one of the buildings in this photo, did they get the copyright permission of the other building? Of course, two or more buildings may have the same architect or construction company, but most of them do not know the architect or construction company, or even if they do know, the architect or construction company is often different.
Ox1997cow (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The onus of proving that a building in not copyrighted lies with the user arguing to keep it, which you have failed to do. South Korea's highest court in the country ruled a two-dimensional view of a wall in the background of a commercial shown for five seconds violated the architect's copyright. It is you who must argue that these three-dimensional photos of buildings are less original than that wall, which you have yet to do. What you have done, in addition to citing other files exist, is completely misrepresent the case of File:Seoul and N Seoul Tower.jpg, which was undeleted after being determined that the photo is of a cityscape that falls under the de minimis clause because there isn't a single building or structure as the main focal point. You should be well aware of this since you initiated the undeletion discussion to begin with. ƏXPLICIT 13:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. Therefore,  I withdraw my nomination. However, I do not withdraw my claim to refer to COM:DM South Korea. Ox1997cow (talk) 20:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. There is no freedom of panorama for (modern) buildings in South Korea, per COM:FOP South Korea. As the example of the wall shows, this is also valid for parts of buildings. These images were all made to show the complete building, so they have to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 12:32, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grimms Fairy Tales - Snow White - Anne Anderson.jpg

[edit]

Anne Anderson died 1952 - thats less then 70 years ago Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:45, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Anderson died in 1930, aged fifty-six . See alsoː (British Library, DNB, Library of congress and more.--Fiona (talk) 21:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Portugueselanguagedialects-Angola.png

[edit]

These supposed dialects do not exist; the map was created based on a random synthesis of information available across a range of articles, as I was informed by the creator when I asked about it. On the page itself, he says "created from Wikipedia's maps". I have deleted the map on the ptwiki and enwiki before, but it keeps on being added. Thank you. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 12:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. There is no copyright problem. The image may be of no educational value and out of COM:SCOPE, but that should be discussed on the projects, as it is in use today. Can be nominated again if the image is not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 12:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Portugueselanguagedialects-Angola.png

[edit]

Hi Ellywa. The image has since been deleted from all projects. Could you please review your earlier decision? Thanks, regards, Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 11:18, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not in use on the projects since May 4, of no educational value, see previous DR. Ellywa (talk) 08:53, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rui Gabriel Correia, thanks for the ping an the action. I created a new version of this DR, according to procedure. Regards, Ellywa (talk) 08:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per original nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:10, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Islandsvardan Sculpture, Reykjavik (7115807343).jpg

[edit]

This sculpture was created by w:Jóhann Eyfells (source) who died in 2019 according to enwiki. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Iceland. The sculpture is still within 70 years of posthumous copyright term. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. Artist died in 2019, see en: Johann Eyfells. The image(s) will be in PD 70 years after this year and can be undeleted in 2080. Can be undeleted earlier if permission for publication with a free licence is obtained from the heirs per VRT. --Ellywa (talk) 12:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:הילד חולם, קאמרי - אסף פרי.jpg

[edit]

A picture of a theatrical scene. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 14:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I do not see specific copyrighted elements. Actors on a stage without particular stage design. If you are more specific why this is copyrighted the image can be nominated a second time. --Ellywa (talk) 12:43, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:המלט, הבימה - אסף פרי.jpg

[edit]

A picture of a theatrical scene. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 14:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I do not see specific copyrighted elements. Actors on a stage without particular stage design. If you are more specific why this is copyrighted the image can be nominated a second time. --Ellywa. --Ellywa (talk) 12:44, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Graffito with Violence against Women-Never Again - Along the Canal - Old Town - Riga - Latvia.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Latvia A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP Latvia. --Ellywa (talk) 12:45, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Long-slender-legs-01.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely that this Flickr user is the original photographer. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 12:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1920s ice box using ice blocks to keep food cold.jpg

[edit]

No indication of this license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It is not shown this image falls in public domain. --Ellywa (talk) 12:49, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/23&oldid=610303283"