Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/02/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
lower-resolution duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Perseverance%27s_first_photo.jpg vip (talk) 11:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- I'd like to cancel this deletion request. I didn't see NASA does not provide officially a better resolution yet. vip (talk) 11:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawal of the proposal. --Pyb (talk) 11:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Source is a copyright webite MB (talk) 04:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
source is a copyright website MB (talk) 04:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
source is a copyright website MB (talk) 04:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 | All images in this commons were uploaded in the JPEG format even though it consists of non-photographic data. This information could be stored more efficiently or accurately in the PNG or SVG format. If possible, please upload a PNG or SVG version of this image without compression artifacts, derived from a non-JPEG source (or with existing artifacts removed). After doing so, please tag the JPEG version with {{Superseded|NewImage.ext}} and remove this tag. This tag should not be applied to photographs or scans. If this image is a diagram or other image suitable for vectorisation, please tag this image with {{Convert to SVG}} instead of {{BadJPEG}}. If not suitable for vectorisation, use {{Convert to PNG}}. For more information, see {{BadJPEG}}. |  |
Keep No valid rationale for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep Dear Zamonin, please read our deletion policy! --Ras67 (talk) 11:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
not own work but copyrighted book cover Joostik (talk) 12:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted (non-sysop closed): Delete by EugeneZelenko. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Ich wollte die Datei nicht öffentlich machen da es keine Einstellungen gibt dass ich die Datei auf Privat stellen kann bitte ich daher sie zu löschen. Danke! Michael050D (talk) 13:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 16:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 16:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 16:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }}{ Michel (talk) 16:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Duplicate |file=File:Nicolas frey.JPG|reason=The same photo exists|user=DZwarrior1}} DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 19:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
est-ce utile d'expliquer ? Arroser (talk) 20:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 20:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 22:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 22:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahr tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
In my opinion this is hoax, no educational value. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
TBH I don't really care if it's deleted since I'm not really using it right now. It's not a hoax, nor does it have educational value. I just use it on a sandbox, I doubt anyone's gonna be searching through sandboxes or file records to find this and get angry because it's made-up entirely. I didn't mean to educate people of something inaccurately, which I believe I made fairly clear in the file description. I still have the file in my downloads so if it is delete because it violates some policy I don't know about, that's fine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xiphactinus A (talk • contribs) 21:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Hypothetical Map for 2024. There is no basis for this provided. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
hypothetical map. No context. No apparent relevance. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused private prediction map. No educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Author request Aaronw1109 (talk) 07:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Bild wird im Artikel nicht mehr verwendet, wenig Aussagekraft, schlechte Bildqualität Michael Löhr Höhr-Grenzhausen (talk) 11:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
wenig aussagekräftig, wird im Artikel nicht mehr verwendet, schlechte Qualität Michael Löhr Höhr-Grenzhausen (talk) 11:07, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Any artistic lighting combined with use of creative props and installations are certainly copyrighted, most especially in a country with no freedom of panorama. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Fête des lumières. See also this ResearchGate research paper which discusses the art of contemporary illumination of Fête des lumières. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Putting this
On hold as I started this thread, Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Fête des Lumières case, after seeing inconsistencies on verdicts on past Fête des Lumières FOP cases (most deleted, but several others kept or undeleted). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Putting this
- Keep No copyright on the light. Yann (talk) 20:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination (per Yann). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Yann (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Prince418 (talk) 17:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 17:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope image of non-contributor. Used for cross-wiki spam. IWI (talk) 10:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE overrides undemonstrated claims about spam. --Fæ (talk) 14:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Fæ in a stunning case of irony, many projects don't allow us to remove an image from articles because "let Commons delete it". Quakewoody (talk) 15:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- also worth noting - that quickly, it is no longer 'in use'... until the next editor comes around. Quakewoody (talk) 15:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Clear case for speedy deletion. Previously deleted. User is globally blocked. Quakewoody (talk) 15:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- The account that uploaded this file has not been blocked, nor have they been identified as a sock account of a globally blocked user. Before raising a DR, it would be better to sort out these basics, rather than making claims based on personal judgements before the policies have been applied. If everything claimed here is correct, then a DR would be unnecessary because we can use a speedy category, if policies are applied in the correct way. --Fæ (talk) 17:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Fæ: The whole point of me taking it here is because CSD will not allow deletion of in use files. All of the spam articles have now been deleted, anyway. Clear delete case. IWI (talk) 20:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Fæ: fix ping. IWI (talk) 20:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is incorrect, there are categories of speedy that apply regardless of use. However it is correct that being out of scope, per the deletion nomination, is not one of them.
- At the time of writing, the uploading account has neither been blocked nor warned about spamming. --Fæ (talk) 20:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- We don’t warn single-use throwaway socks, though they should probably be locked globally. IWI (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Given that your keep rationale no longer applies, would you consider retracting it Fæ. Delaying this deletion does not seem necessary. IWI (talk) 20:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- It is appreciated that vandal fighters do a good job, but raising a pre-emptive DR where serious allegations are being made against others before they have been demonstrated may become a means to bully contributors. It is disruptive to raise pre-emptive DRs, especially if the reasons for raising them do not pan out.
- If the timeline here is messy, that's the problem of the nominator not following policies, not those adding comments in good faith. --Fæ (talk) 20:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is a cross wiki spam LTA. Pretty uncontroversial, by any means. And I am going to raise the DR at the same time as tagging spam. The file was just as eligible for deletion when it was in use as it is now. IWI (talk) 21:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Given that your keep rationale no longer applies, would you consider retracting it Fæ. Delaying this deletion does not seem necessary. IWI (talk) 20:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- We don’t warn single-use throwaway socks, though they should probably be locked globally. IWI (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- This particular account may not have been blocked at the time of upload (otherwise, how would he have posted anything), but it was clearly a new account of a globally blocked person. Quakewoody (talk) 21:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Fæ: A steward has now globally locked the account as such. IWI (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Wow, look at that. There is another "new user" creating another new WD item using this image. Too bad that I have been blocked, or else I'd be able to report this.Quakewoody (talk) 22:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- This has now been deleted. Anyone want to close this discussion? Quakewoody (talk) 20:04, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jon Kolbert. --Minoraxtalk 08:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Dublette von https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Brunnen_bei_Schlo%C3%9Fauer_Wasserturm.jpg. Granpar (talk) 11:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 10:43, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
We would like to change this file to another media file. According to this file's licence we have a verbal agreement. It seems to be not enogh at this page, so we would like to use a photo with a written agreement. Pkoz2020 (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:30, 25 Februar 2021 UTC: No permission since 17 February 2021 --Krdbot 09:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation, artist died in 1986, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 12:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 16:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yogashala2021 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability
- File:Yogashala.jpg
- File:Yoga school Goa.jpg
- File:Yoga School.jpg
- File:Yoga courses.jpg
- File:YTTC course in India.jpg
- File:Yoga Retreat photo.jpg
- File:Yoga TTC.jpg
- File:Rishiguna Goa.jpg
- File:Yoga course.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sharpeidog (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Randomly taken from the Internet, copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 18:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no realistic source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 18:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Description says "this is a test". Test-files are usually a speedy delete, but mayby there are objections. The map does not look at all like the real maps in Category:Maps of French presidential election (2017) Jahobr (talk) 18:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
"alternative history" without context. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 18:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:wikt:Utente:Funzioni di correlazione/SandboxAnalisi, it:wikt:Calcolatore trasformata di Fourier, it:wikt:Analisi deterministica e filtraggio per i segnali impulsivi del sonar and it:wikt:Calcolatore dell'integrale di Fourier with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:wikt:Calcolatore trasformata di Fourier and it:wikt:Calcolatore dell'integrale di Fourier with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle \left\vert G(qf)\right\vert =\left[\left(\sum _{p=1}^{k}S(p)\cos \left({\frac {2\pi qp}{N}}\right)^{2}+\sum _{p=1}^{k}S(p)\sin \left({\frac {2\pi qp}{N}}\right)^{2}\right)\right]^{\frac {1}{2}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/968c208505e6b53196dd4a6e7c9ffd33b1e35d2e)
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:wikt:Analisi deterministica e filtraggio per i segnali impulsivi del sonar and it:wikt:Studio dell' impulso d'emissione per testa acustica di vettore subacqueo tracciabile with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle G(\omega )={\frac {A(t_{2}-t_{1})}{2}}\left\vert {\frac {\sin \left[{\frac {(\omega -\omega _{0})(t_{2}-t_{1})}{2}}\right]}{\left[{\frac {(\omega -\omega _{0})(t_{2}-t_{1})}{2}}\right]}}\right\vert }](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/1d20d0ee77f41b6a3c3f08b6f99dccb236d04801)
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:wikt:Calcolatore trasformata di Fourier and it:wikt:Calcolatore dell'integrale di Fourier with table equivalent:
p 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 S(p) 0,10 0,14 0,20 0,27 0,36 0,46 0,56 0,67 0,77 0,86 0,93 0,98 1,00 0,98 0,93 0,86 0,77 0,67 0,56 0,46 0,36 0,27 0,20 0,14 0,10
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Yes, I don't know why I have uploaded it; just delete it Grawiton (talk) 19:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC) (uploader)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
--WIKImaniac 19:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Presumable fake election map. I tried to figure out what it is. Searched the names … did not help. No description, no category since 2016. No educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Some correlation with 2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries, but the content does not really match. I tried to figure out what it is. I think it is fake / fantasy. No educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 19:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
This has no educational value, It is also incorrect and has no color key. Idkwmusb (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
File:LL-Q809 (pol)-Olaf-superbohater.wav, File:LL-Q809_(pol)-Olaf-roszczeniowy.wav, File:LL-Q809_(pol)-Olaf-Marsjanin.wav, File:LL-Q809 (pol)-Olaf-Franciszek Leja.wav
[edit]I have a speech impediment (rhotacism) and I can't spell /r/ correctly. I avoid recording words with this consonant, but in case of 4 files I made this mistake. These files are therefore invalid, they don't represent the standard Polish pronunciation. Olaf (talk) 20:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Threecharlie (talk) 20:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 20:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded this file and it has Copyright. I did not knew it until now. This file should be deleted. Julio van Gogh (talk) 20:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
unused personal poto, out of scope, as well as the second upload File:Man sleep on the earth.jpg. Pibwl (talk) 22:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation, a heavily compressed version of this video from 2014 by Riley Black (formerly Brian Switek), the camera movement is exactly the same. no evidence of permission. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Private unused fictional election map. No educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Private unused fictional election map. No educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://mastresearch.co.ke/ GuillaumeG (talk) 22:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. User does not have valid contribs m:Special:CentralAuth/Randi38320 Gikü (talk) 22:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Pekka Jylhä (Wikidata:Q1232078), born in 1955. Not in Public Domain, no Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptures. This sculpture Odotus ("Expectation") was published in 2010.. Htm (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nominator. ––Apalsola t • c 14:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:38, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Pekka Jylhä (Wikidata:Q1232078), born in 1955. Not in Public Domain, no Freedom of Panorama in Finland for sculptures. This sculpture Odotus ("Expectation") was published in 2010. Htm (talk) 23:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nominator. ––Apalsola t • c 14:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Askeuhd (talk) 23:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Askeuhd (talk) 23:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Vattennymfer - Lek II - Aallottaria - Leikki II - Water Nymphs - Play av Viktor Jansson 01.png
[edit]Derrivative work of Finnish sculptor Viktor Jansson (died in 1958). Not in Public domain yet, no Freedom of Panorama for sculptures in Finland. This statue Aallottaria ("Water Nymphs") was published in 1940. Htm (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nominator. ––Apalsola t • c 14:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Vattennymfer - Lek II - Aallottaria - Leikki II - Water Nymphs - Play av Viktor Jansson 02.png
[edit]Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Viktor Jansson (died in 1958). Not in Public domain yet, no Freedom of Panorama for sculptures in Finland. This statue Aallottaria ("Water Nymphs") was published in 1940. Htm (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nominator. ––Apalsola t • c 14:00, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Askeuhd (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Promo on wikidata Minoraxtalk 23:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Promo on wikidata Minoraxtalk 23:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Jianhui67 T★C 06:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, identifiable person, privacy (filename is a full name of someone, presumably the pictured person) Askeuhd (talk) 23:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
x-wiki self promo. oos Minoraxtalk 23:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per Minorax! --Alaa :)..! 07:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Labeled with "own work" despite obvious watermark from Jack Beyer, a launch photographer. Clearly copyrighted. N828335 (talk) 23:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
It's a snapshot of myself and I don't want it to be publicly available anymore. ►Sampayu 00:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete - F10. --E4024 (talk) 00:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused redundant image to File:Mailajf9457 38.JPG. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused redundant image to File:0133jfSanta Cruz Recto Avenue Binondo Streets Manilafvf 16.JPG which is more better. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Quezon Boulevard
[edit]Unused redundant images to those under Category:Quezon Boulevard
- File:01006jfQuezon Boulevard Times Theatre Barangays Quiapo Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:01006jfQuezon Boulevard Times Theatre Barangays Quiapo Manilafvf 15.jpg
- File:01021jfQuezon Boulevard Bridge Barangays Quiapo Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:01021jfQuezon Boulevard Bridge Barangays Quiapo Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:01392jfQuezon Boulevard Santa Cruz Recto Quiapo Sampaloc Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:01392jfQuezon Boulevard Santa Cruz Recto Quiapo Sampaloc Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:01489jfWelcome Rotonda Quezon Boulevard España Boulevard Sampaloc Manilafvf 15.jpg
- File:0383jfCaloocan City Abad Santos Rizal Avenue Tondo Manilafvf 15.JPG
- File:0399jfColleges Quezon Boulevard Roads Rizal Recto Avenue Manilafvf 04.JPG
- File:0399jfColleges Quezon Boulevard Roads Rizal Recto Avenue Manilafvf 05.JPG
- File:0399jfColleges Quezon Boulevard Roads Rizal Recto Avenue Manilafvf 06.JPG
- File:0399jfColleges Quezon Boulevard Roads Rizal Recto Avenue Manilafvf 07.JPG
- File:0399jfColleges Quezon Boulevard Roads Rizal Recto Avenue Manilafvf 09.JPG
- File:0399jfColleges Quezon Boulevard Roads Rizal Recto Avenue Manilafvf 10.JPG
- File:0399jfColleges Quezon Boulevard Roads Rizal Recto Avenue Manilafvf 11.JPG
- File:0869jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Streets Santa Cruz Manilafvf 14.jpg
- File:0884jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Streets Santa Cruz Manilafvf 01.jpg
- File:0920jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Streets Santa Cruz Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:0920jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Streets Santa Cruz Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:0939jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Streets Santa Cruz Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:0939jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Streets Santa Cruz Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:0939jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Streets Santa Cruz Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:0939jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Streets Santa Cruz Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:0939jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Streets Santa Cruz Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:0939jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Streets Santa Cruz Manilafvf 13.jpg
- File:0939jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Streets Santa Cruz Manilafvf 14.jpg
- File:0955jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:0955jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:0955jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:0955jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:0955jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:0955jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 11.jpg
- File:09680jfQuiapo Quezon Boulevard Manila Bridge Riverfvf 07.jpg
- File:0970jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 01.jpg
- File:0970jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:0970jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 03.jpg
- File:0970jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 04.jpg
- File:0970jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 05.jpg
- File:0970jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 06.jpg
- File:0970jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 07.jpg
- File:0970jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:0970jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 09.jpg
- File:0970jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 10.jpg
- File:0990jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 02.jpg
- File:0990jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 08.jpg
- File:0990jfQuezon Boulevard Barangays Santa Cruz Quiapo Manilafvf 12.jpg
- File:09910jfQuiapo Quezon Boulevard Manila Bridge Riverfvf 04.jpg
- File:09910jfQuiapo Quezon Boulevard Manila Bridge Riverfvf 05.jpg
- File:09910jfQuiapo Quezon Boulevard Manila Bridge Riverfvf 07.jpg
- File:09910jfQuiapo Quezon Boulevard Manila Bridge Riverfvf 10.jpg
- File:09925jfQuiapo Quezon Boulevard Manila Bridge Riverfvf 08.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Cleanup: Unused redundant to File:09791jfQuiapo Quezon Boulevard Manila Bridge Riverfvf 06.jpg JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Also: File:09791jfQuiapo Quezon Boulevard Manila Bridge Riverfvf 07.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in the Philippines. Subject is copyrighted advertising.
- File:2114SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 37.jpg
- File:2114SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 38.jpg
- File:2114SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 39.jpg
- File:2114SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 40.jpg
- File:2114SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 41.jpg
- File:2114SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 42.jpg
- File:2114SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 43.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- My comments herein are without prejudice to the legality of the Nominations by herein Nominator in view of the put on hold Check-user + series of En Masse Deletions;
- Ad cautelam, I desire to discuss that Commons has lots of allowed and permitted Category:Food menus by country 31; a careful perusal of the photos even recent ones, will prove that the instant Nomination is null and void ab initio; IMO, legal policies to which Commons must adhere can be expected from the Wikimedia lawyers who should take care of this. I state with certainty that would be my starting point..Judgefloro (talk) 11:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Food menus in the Philippines
[edit]COM:DW. Subjects are copyrighted advertising, photographs and other visual works.
- File:01191jfParsolingan Restaurant Fishes Resorts Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 41.JPG
- File:01191jfParsolingan Restaurant Fishes Resorts Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 42.JPG
- File:01191jfParsolingan Restaurant Fishes Resorts Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 43.JPG
- File:01191jfParsolingan Restaurant Fishes Resorts Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 44.JPG
- File:01191jfParsolingan Restaurant Fishes Resorts Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 45.JPG
- File:01191jfParsolingan Restaurant Fishes Resorts Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 46.JPG
- File:01191jfParsolingan Restaurant Fishes Resorts Gerona Tarlac Cityfvf 47.JPG
- File:02578jfCuisine Foods of Bulacanfvf 38.jpg
- File:02578jfCuisine Foods of Bulacanfvf 39.jpg
- File:02578jfCuisine Foods of Bulacanfvf 40.jpg
- File:02578jfCuisine Foods of Bulacanfvf 41.jpg
- File:02578jfCuisine Foods of Bulacanfvf 42.jpg
- File:02578jfCuisine Foods of Bulacanfvf 43.jpg
- File:02578jfCuisine Foods of Bulacanfvf 44.jpg
- File:02578jfCuisine Foods of Bulacanfvf 45.jpg
- File:06603jfYellow Cab Pizza Co. Food menus Philippinesfvf 01.jpg
- File:06603jfYellow Cab Pizza Co. Food menus Philippinesfvf 03.jpg
- File:06603jfYellow Cab Pizza Co. Food menus Philippinesfvf 05.jpg
- File:08757jfCuisine of Bulacan foodsfvf 10.jpg
- File:08757jfCuisine of Bulacan foodsfvf 11.jpg
- File:08757jfCuisine of Bulacan foodsfvf 12.jpg
- File:09975jfCongo Grille restaurants Pampangafvf 04.jpg
- File:09975jfCongo Grille restaurants Pampangafvf 06.jpg
- File:09975jfCongo Grille restaurants Pampangafvf 07.jpg
- File:160Perez Ancestral House Bustos 14.jpg
- File:160Perez Ancestral House Bustos 15.jpg
- File:2166SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 03.jpg
- File:2166SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 04.jpg
- File:2166SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 05.jpg
- File:2166SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 06.jpg
- File:2166SM Center Pulilan Bulacan 07.jpg
- File:2208Stan's Seafood Market Grill Sportshouse 10.jpg
- File:2208Stan's Seafood Market Grill Sportshouse 11.jpg
- File:2208Stan's Seafood Market Grill Sportshouse 15.jpg
- File:2208Stan's Seafood Market Grill Sportshouse 16.jpg
- File:2208Stan's Seafood Market Grill Sportshouse 19.jpg
- File:2208Stan's Seafood Market Grill Sportshouse 20.jpg
- File:6545Baliuag Bulacan Landmarks during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic 05.jpg
- File:6545Baliuag Bulacan Landmarks during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic 06.jpg
- File:6545Baliuag Bulacan Landmarks during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic 07.jpg
- File:6545Baliuag Bulacan Landmarks during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic 08.jpg
- File:6545Baliuag Bulacan Landmarks during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic 09.jpg
- File:6545Baliuag Bulacan Landmarks during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic 10.jpg
- File:9821Photos taken during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Baliuag, Bulacan 30.jpg
- File:9821Photos taken during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Baliuag, Bulacan 31.jpg
- File:9821Photos taken during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Baliuag, Bulacan 32.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- My comments herein are without prejudice to the legality of the Nominations by herein Nominator in view of the put on hold Check-user + series of En Masse Deletions;
- Ad cautelam, I desire to discuss that Commons has lots of allowed and permitted Category:Food menus by country 31; a careful perusal of the photos even recent ones, will prove that the instant Nomination is null and void ab initio; IMO, legal policies to which Commons must adhere can be expected from the Wikimedia lawyers who should take care of this. I state with certainty that would be my starting point..Judgefloro (talk) 11:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all. All derivative works of menus containing underlying photographs of food. Also I can see some of these as potentially out of scope. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted advertising. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete freely-licensed image violates graphic artist's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted advertising. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete freely-licensed image violates graphic artist's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted advertising. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete freely-licensed image violates graphic artist's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted advertising. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- My comments herein are without prejudice to the legality of the Nominations by herein Nominator in view of the put on hold Check-user + series of En Masse Deletions;
- Ad cautelam, I desire to discuss that Commons has lots of allowed and permitted Category:Food menus by country 31; a careful perusal of the photos even recent ones, will prove that the instant Nomination is null and void ab initio; IMO, legal policies to which Commons must adhere can be expected from the Wikimedia lawyers who should take care of this. I state with certainty that would be my starting point..Judgefloro (talk) 11:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete freely-licensed image violates graphic artist's copyright. @Judgefloro: , please read thoroughly Commons:Derivative works. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted advertisings. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete freely-licensed image violates graphic artist's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted advertising. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Exif info shows author is Raoof Zamani. Not match uploader name. Need OTRS confirmation. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 11:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
low quality personal image of a non-notable person, out of project scope Kotivalo (talk) 12:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
low quality personal image of a non-notable person, out of project scope Kotivalo (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:50, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
low quality personal image of a non-notable person, out of project scope Kotivalo (talk) 13:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Created cause of mistake in 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ჯეო (talk • contribs) 13:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - G1. --E4024 (talk) 19:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Privacy issues Silvan de Smit (talk) 04:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Perhaps the uploader meant to say “copyright issues”. No evidence of free licence at given source. Brianjd (talk) 12:50, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It is likely to be a copyright violation because there is no indication of publication under a free license, and the uploader has requested deletion on "privacy" grounds. --Ahmadtalk 21:00, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope logo Elliot321 (talk) 04:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
"Alternative history" - out of project scope. Elliot321 (talk) 04:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
not own work 190.231.216.85 04:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Published elsewhere on web (e.g. here) before being uploaded on Commons, no indication of publication under a free license on the said source. --Ahmadtalk 21:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Prank exercise with Photoshop Liquify tool, no educational value. Kotivalo (talk) 05:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal image used in a draft which has zero chances (no sources). E4024 (talk) 01:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The said draft was speedy deleted. --Ahmadtalk 21:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image. E4024 (talk) 01:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
File:COMPUTERHOTLINE-Et si le traite de paris de 1814 avait ete legerement different--Atramenta.net-.pdf
[edit]Personal essay about alternate history - out of the scope of Commons. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
This is taken from Facebook (FBMD at MD); can we keep it? E4024 (talk) 01:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Not own work - screenshot of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zBppB1oZW0 which is not under a free license. Elliot321 (talk) 05:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Logo for a nonexistent television show. Was formerly used in a now-deleted hoax article on en.wikipedia. Eureka Lott 06:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work. Appears to be a Twitter image based on the title A1Cafel (talk) 06:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
low quality personal image of a non-notable person, out of project scope Kotivalo (talk) 06:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 08:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Thanks for pointing out my error. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 10:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Clarion Alley Mural Project - house keys not handcuffs street art - San Francisco, California, USA.png
[edit]No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Thanks for pointing out my error. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 10:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Thanks for pointing out my error. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 10:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Elmgreen & Dragset’s sculpture Powerless Structures, Fig. 101 (rocking horse) at sunset outside Arken gallery, Ishøj, Denmark.png
[edit]No FoP for 3D works in Denmark A1Cafel (talk) 10:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Thanks for pointing out my error. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 10:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cape Impressionist (talk · contribs)
[edit]False license, images and content copyright 2015 at source
Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:09, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
It's probably a screenshot of a ban taken from any website. There is also a small photo in the user profile. I suggest delete this file because this small photo and software may be copyrighted per Commons:Screenshots. Uncitoyen (talk) 10:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, looks like Discord, but anyways I think this is out of scope. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused icon with no indication of importance. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 12:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://www.rouydad24.com/files/fa/news/1399/3/31/360919_722.jpg GuillaumeG (talk) 12:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation: http://www.chezmaya.com/2017/01/fond-ecran-oeufs-de-paques-multicolore/ GuillaumeG (talk) 13:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikrad2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Probable copyvios per uploader's history, pcp.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:20, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikrad2020 (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Another probable copyvio per uploader's history, pcp.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram XOMBP only exists on reddit, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
({{speedydelete}}) Michel (talk) 15:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
{{copyvio|Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot}} Michel (talk) 15:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 22:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- I additionally nominate (similar file):
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Is this e-mail really important for article? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist died in 1966; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 12:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 22:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation, artist died in 1986, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 12:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Túrelio. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
{{Löschen|1=''Künstler noch keine 70 Jahre tot'' }} Michel (talk) 16:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 21:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maikel Ansted Hoffmann (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Michael Ansted en la Universidad Panamericana.jpg
- File:Michael y San Juan Pablo II.jpg
- File:Michael Ansted.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio from www.utsidan.se which explicitly claims copyright Tournesol (talk) 17:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Promotion or advertisement of service C1MM (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 05:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Rahulrnath001 (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The image looks sharp to me. I can quite clearly distinguish the clouds and their edges. Askeuhd (talk) 21:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 19:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Picture out of COM:SCOPE. It is too blurry to be used anywhere. No educational value. Myloufa (talk) 15:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused private photo, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. The pictures are too blurry to clearly see anything on them. Not educational use. Myloufa (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused private photo, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
This text represents the synthesis of an original theory of historical reality, formulated by GIANO ROCCA and published in a series of books, in e-book format (and some, also, in paper format) by Smashwords (and made available on various platforms online, such as on Amazon). 20 February 2021 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nervi Giovanni Mario (talk • contribs) 18:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Google Maps clearly states that its maps are copyrighted, cropping the notice away doesn't change that Tournesol (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ah. Okay, delete it then. Also Tournesol, we have had a lot of clashes today (I mean, you literally blocked me on Swedish Wikipedia), so I want us to resolve that. Go to my talk page on the Swedish Wikipedia, where I have responded to your message, where i apologize for my behaviour. After you read that message, please think about unblocking me. Eribal0224 (talk) 16:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Eribal0224
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Satellite image captured somewhere not specified, not a work by the uploader, copyright unknowed. Pierre cb (talk) 17:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is quite obviously sourced from Windy.com, however the author doesn't even credit the website and the image is very low quality anyway. Hurricaneboy23 (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- If this is the case, Windy is a copyrighted site so it has to be deleted. Pierre cb (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 18:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:Marine SIREN/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité E with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:Marine SIREN/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité E with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:Marine SIREN/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité E with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:Marine SIREN/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité E with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:Marine SIREN/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité E with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:Marine SIREN/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité E with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:Marine SIREN/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité E with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:Marine SIREN/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité E with TeX equivalent:
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![79 File:Starship SN9 "landolása".jpg](#File:Starship_SN9_"landolása".jpg){kind=link}
_at_sunset_outside_Arken_gallery,_Ishøj,_Denmark.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![23:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/19#c-N828335-2021-02-19T23:59:00.000Z-File:Starship_SN9_"landolása".jpg){kind=link}
![05:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/02/19#c-Ellin_Beltz-2021-02-26T05:36:00.000Z-File:Starship_SN9_"landolása".jpg){kind=link}
_at_sunset_outside_Arken_gallery,_Ish%C3%B8j,_Denmark.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_at_sunset_outside_Arken_gallery,_Ish%C3%B8j,_Denmark.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 17:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
uploaded in error – doesn't work as svg Colin.champion (talk) 18:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
headless, low quality personal image of a non-notable person, out of project scope Kotivalo (talk) 18:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 18:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
looks like screenshot Oesterreicher12 (talk) 23:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
*This is an official photo taken from the website of the capital of the Republic of Bashkortostan, the city of Ufa--MR973 (talk) 04:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 18:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This appears to be the flag of the Regional Council of Réunion, a local governmental body. It doesn't appear that French local governmental works are PD. The design is too complicated for PD-shape. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Deleted per nomination. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Images from www.fotw.net. Thuresson (talk) 20:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, low-quality image of a COM:PENIS Elliot321 (talk) 04:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Soft or hard delete it per nom. The place is full of reproductive organ images, let us eliminate the lower quality ones. --E4024 (talk) 01:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 20:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 17:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Likely copyvio/license laundering - the flickr claims it as creative commons but the source Tumblr does not - nor is it likely that anyone involved here owns the license (the Tumblr blog is one that reposts many different people, and most likely does not own any of what they post). Elliot321 (talk) 04:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Deleted per nomination. From the same uploader who contributed a whole Playboy issue in pdf. Thuresson (talk) 21:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Likely copyvio/license laundering - the flickr claims it as creative commons but the source Tumblr does not - nor is it likely that anyone involved here owns the license (the Tumblr blog is one that reposts many different people, and most likely does not own any of what they post). Elliot321 (talk) 04:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment The flickr user seems, to me, a "collector" of nude imagery of several provenances, styles, authors, i.e. he is not the author\copyright holder of this image. Tm (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Alternate history flags
[edit]This is a fictional flag (see User:Roxanna#My fictional flags); it does not have any educational or historical value and is thus out of scope.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a flag of one of the countries in an unofficial mod to a pair of video games. It is unlikely to be used for any educational purpose - the mod itself gets a single sentence in the relevant articles - and is thus out of scope. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
metadata says ESPN owns rights SecretName101 (talk) 08:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Deleted. Nomination by uploader. "Copyright - (c) 2011 ESPN, Inc. All rights reserved. For editorial use only. NO ARCHIVING, NO RESALE" Thuresson (talk) 21:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Educational value is not shown. Also I doubt in own work, maybe this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable person doing nothing notable. Out of scope. Richard Avery (talk) 15:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Apparently uploader's only contribution/edit to Wikimedia. Thuresson (talk) 21:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
no country or year stated, useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Uploader's only edit/contribution to Wikimedia. Thuresson (talk) 21:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Picture taken without the consent of the person (the person tried to delete the picture a few times on the french article, it's not there anymore) Out of COM:SCOPE. The window inbetween the photographer and the person makes the picture blurry. Myloufa (talk) 15:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep -
Photographers don't need to ask permission to photograph someone so her request(s) are all but meaningless.
- The image is of poor quality and the dirty window is problematic however it's the only free image we have of her so it should remain until a better replacement becomes available. (I've also added the image back to the French article so it's INUSE too), Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 16:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Please do not do that. We don't want it on the french article. It's nearly considered as vandalism.--Myloufa (talk) 22:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Then French editors need to know and understand the difference between good faith edits and vandalism because my addition of that image to that article was not vandalism in any way, shape or form although I can agree it was pointy.
- Anywho I shan't get into an edit war over as INUSE isn't the be all and end all for images. –Davey2010Talk 01:53, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Please do not do that. We don't want it on the french article. It's nearly considered as vandalism.--Myloufa (talk) 22:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is the wrong place to discuss edits to pages on other projects. @Davey2010: There is a difference between photographing someone and publishing the photograph. We should consider Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Canada. Brianjd (talk) 13:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Consent requirements aside, even if there were other files depicting this person, the fact that this file is in the public domain would weigh towards keeping it. (Of course, this would not be true if the other files were in the public domain too, but this seems unlikely.) Brianjd (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ah okay I was unaware of that so thanks for linking that. I completely agree with your sentiments - if we had a better image of this person then my !vote here would be Delete and of course anyone can renominate if something better pops up, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Kept As far as I know Wikimedia do not have any other photo of Marie-Lyne Joncas. Thuresson (talk) 21:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Vattanac Capital
[edit]The building was completed in 2014 by Farrells. There is no freedom of panorama in Cambodia, permission from the architectural firm is required.
- File:Canadia Tower.jpg
- File:Phnom Penh.- Panorama vu de Diamond Hotel (5).jpg
- File:Phnom Penh.- Panorama vu de Diamond Hotel en2014 (10).jpg
- File:Vattanac Capital Tower and Canadia Tower.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- *@A1Cafel: regarding the two files: File:Phnom Penh.- Panorama vu de Diamond Hotel (5).jpg, File:Phnom Penh.- Panorama vu de Diamond Hotel en2014 (10).jpg, they are not of good quality and they were downloaded by mistake. Best regards. --Pierre André (talk) 21:50, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The building was completed in 2007 by architect Meeli Truu (1946–2013). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Estonia. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2084 A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The building was completed in 2007 by architect Meeli Truu (1946–2013). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Estonia. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2084 A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:SEB Estonia main building
[edit]The building was completed in 1999. There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia, permission from the architect is required.
- File:SEB Eesti peahoone.JPG
- File:SEB Tallinn 2017 1.jpg
- File:SEB Tallinn 2017 2.jpg
- File:SEB Tallinn.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:SEB Estonia main building
[edit]The building was completed in 1999. There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia, permission from the architect is required.
- File:Jaani Seegi Kirik Tallinn.jpg
- File:SEB Tallinn 2009.jpg
- File:Tallinn Blick vom Mariendom auf die Neustadt 2.JPG
- File:Tallinn Blick vom Rathausturm auf die Neustadt 2.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:26, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
The building was completed in 2008 by architect Vilen Künnapu (1948–) and Ain Padrik (1947–). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Estonia, permission from them is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
The building was completed in 2008 by architect Vilen Künnapu (1948–) and Ain Padrik (1947–). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Estonia, permission from them is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
But the focus on the picture is on the worker, not on the building--Sillerkiil (talk) 05:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per Sillerkiil, COM:DM (at least 2nd case) applied. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:10, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per user:Sillerkiil. --Wdwd (talk) 13:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Radisson Blu Hotel Olümpia
[edit]The building was completed in 1980. There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia, permission from the architect is needed
- File:Hotel "Olümpia" in evening.JPG
- File:Hotel Olümpia Tallinn 2015.jpg
- File:Hotel Olümpia Tallinn 2017.jpg
- File:Olümpia hotell2014.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:56, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Please, explain? Loode-Boreaallane (talk) 05:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Loode-Boreaallane: Should I copy-paste what this section said? Or is Estonian law modified so that the currently Estonian CRT page is outdated? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- As an Estonian, I have never ')heard of this law, never. So, could you please copy-paste the section, and let talk about it a litte. Alright? Loode-Boreaallane (talk) 08:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Loode-Boreaallane: Should I copy-paste what this section said? Or is Estonian law modified so that the currently Estonian CRT page is outdated? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- How come my photo is commercial? It is not for commercial use. Loode-Boreaallane (talk) 09:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Or, does HUAWEI own the photos I have taken? Don't be silly... Loode-Boreaallane (talk) 09:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Loode-Boreaallane: It's not what I'm requiring, it's a requirement of COM:L, files here must be commercial reproduction allowed, to which:
| “ | Under the Copyright Act of 11 November 1992 (consolidated text of February 1, 2017): It is permitted to reproduce works of architecture, works of visual art, works of applied art or photographic works which are permanently located in places open to the public, without the authorisation of the author and without payment of remuneration, by any means except for mechanical contact copying, and to communicate such reproductions of works to the public except if the work is the main subject of the reproduction and it is intended to be used for direct commercial purposes. If the work specified in this section carries the name of its author, it shall be indicated in communicating the reproduction to the public.[1992/2017 §20] | ” |
doesn't allow so. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep This deletion request is based on a total misunderstanding of Estonian copyrigh act. --VargaA (talk) 11:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @VargaA: Why? Is Estonian law modified recently and allowed FOP (like Belgium which did so in 2015)? If not I don't see why A1Cafel is "a total misunderstanding" (if the nominator is me then I would say "Estonia doesn't have a Commons-acceptable FOP, their FOP is for non-commercial purposes only and hence violates COM:L"). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- In which way has Paju 2.jpg been in commercial use? Is Wikimedia Commons a commercial platform? I don't get it... Boreaallane (talk) 14:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom, CC-BY-NC-SA like licenses are not welcome here. Commons files must be allowed for commercial using. --223.104.7.118 16:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Why does my photo need to be allowed for commercial use? Boreaallane (talk) 17:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- What is going on? So, I cannot post photos of newer buildings (in Estonia) on Wikipedia? Boreaallane (talk) 17:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Loode-Boreaallane: Please do not strike anybody's comments unless their comments are un constructive or nonsense. Please also read Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses: Commercial use of the work must be allowed. The FOP Estonia section violates this rule. --223.104.7.96 22:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Regarding the 223.104.*.* comments, I half-disagree and half-agree with em, the "CC-BY-NC-SA like licenses" points are utter nonsense and significant wrong, but later they pointed a correct thing that Commercial use must be allowed, so the question is that the above FOP-related rule is allowed for Commercial use or not. I would prefer to use File:Freedom of Panorama in Europe.svg as a diagram mentioned here. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep Please, keep the file. Boreaallane (talk) 20:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Loode-Boreaallane: To actually keep this file, you must have to provide a license that allows, as I said again and again, the freedom of commericial uses. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Estonia#Freedom_of_panorama. --Wdwd (talk) 14:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 10:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Residential buildings with typical construction are not copyrighted. Dmitry G (talk) 09:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Yet another complete misunderstanding of what FOP means. These destructive bulk nominations need to stop, or to be stopped.
- FoP is a permission to record objects "as part of a publicly accessible panorama" despite other constraints of copyright. So if something is copyrghted, but on display on a street in a country with FoP, then I may still photograph it. If there is nothing within the view that is subject to copyright anyway, then I don't need FoP to photograph it anyway, I can just do it. I see nothing here which would be thus protected, therefore FoP (or not) is irrelevant. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: The windows on this building are fairly styled, they are not simple geometric figures, and the blue bus stop in front of the building is also styled, non of them are COM:TOO nor COM:DM applicable for me. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Leaning towards Delete. As the title suggests, the building is the main focus. Also, Commons requires files to be licensed as such that these can be reused commercially (CC-BY/CC-BY-SA/PD licenses). Estonian FOP is noncommercial, and noncommercial licensing from architects is not allowed per COM:Licensing. The image must be deleted in line with COM:PCP, any architect or artist from countries with no commercial FOP can be like Claes Oldenburg of U.S.A. or Architect Min Gyu-am of SoKor. See also COM:CARES. There is also no evidence that Estonian copyright law has been amended to allow commercial reuses of photographic depictions of buildings and public art. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
- Leaning towards
- @Andy Dingley: The windows on this building are fairly styled, they are not simple geometric figures, and the blue bus stop in front of the building is also styled, non of them are COM:TOO nor COM:DM applicable for me. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; The building is in focus (=no COM:DM) and not a simple geometric figure (=not below COM:TOO). --Wdwd (talk) 14:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
This file already exists on wikimedia commons. The one uploaded earlier is called: Dracophyllum elegantissimum MRD.jpg Beeveria (talk) 08:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Д-р Медикус с экземпляром книги 'Being Human...', изданной на русском языке в 2020 году.jpg
[edit]
Michael Tratter's permission is needed Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:24, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Although there is permission for website http://eparhija-dalmatinska.hr, this image originates from official website of Serbian Orthodox Church, which is copyrighted (http://www.spc.rs/sr/mitropolit_zagrebachkoljubljanski_porfirije_izabran_za_patrijarha_srpskog and http://www.spc.rs/eng/metropolitan_porphyry_zagreb_and_ljubljana_elected_new_patriarch_serbia), as it is clearly stated here (http://eparhija-dalmatinska.hr/Frames-L.htm) that source is www.spc.rs. Smooth O (talk) 08:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Should be deleted, I havent notice that SPC is credited when fixing permissionon it was not there last evening.Stevanb (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Two cropped version also should be deleted: File:46 Patriarch of Serbia cropped.jpg and File:Патриарх Порфирије.jpg. --Smooth O (talk) 18:03, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
License review failed: No evidence that this image is licensed as "CC-BY-SA-4.0" in its source website https://avianbrands.com/avian_tower, or the website itself is freely-licensed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:49, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Remplacement par File:Philippes Basilique A plan.png Ursus (talk) 09:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Микола Василечко as no permission (No permission since)
Converted to regular DR to clarify what's going on here. Image is not available under provided source-link. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- As the uploader now admitted at User_talk:Túrelio#File:Πατριάρχης_Δημήτριος.jpg, this image is a photomontage. So, the face does not belong to the rest of the body. This is unencyclopedic. Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 09:37, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
@Túreliо, I understand that this is non-encyclopedic. But can't an exception be made for this image, because there are no free images of this patriarch, and a free image cannot be made because he is dead. Since you mentioned that the collage with the body of Patriarch Bartholomew is inadmissible, it is possible to replace it with the body of Patriarch Athenagoras, who, unlike him, is not alive.RC-1841 (talk) 13:00, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- What you are saying is, IMHO, "please follow my contributions closely, I have not understood Commons policies and can make serious mistakes any moment". --E4024 (talk) 13:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-SA 2.0) RyanCray (talk) 17:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 15:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
The artist whom i asked about the hostings of photos of artistic works on wikimedia told me that i shouldnt wait for more days while people can have access to infringe the artists copyright, by way of an online media database that has free media licensing. No freedom of pano in the phils and no permission from the sculptors to host photos of copyrighted phil artistic works like sculptures under free non-trad licensing.
- File:4090Pulilan Junction Maharlika Highway 24.jpg
- File:4090Pulilan Junction Maharlika Highway 25.jpg
- File:4090Pulilan Junction Maharlika Highway 26.jpg
- File:6630Carabao statues 01.jpg
- File:6630Carabao statues 02.jpg
- File:8690Pulilan Calumpit, Bulacan Road 01.jpg
- File:8690Pulilan Calumpit, Bulacan Road 02.jpg
- File:8690Pulilan Calumpit, Bulacan Road 03.jpg
- File:Jf3442San Isidro Santa Rosa Nueva Ecijafvf 02.JPG
- File:Jf3442San Isidro Santa Rosa Nueva Ecijafvf 04.JPG
- File:Jf3442San Isidro Santa Rosa Nueva Ecijafvf 06.JPG
- File:Jf3442San Isidro Santa Rosa Nueva Ecijafvf 07.JPG
- File:Jf3442San Isidro Santa Rosa Nueva Ecijafvf 09.JPG
- File:Jf3442San Isidro Santa Rosa Nueva Ecijafvf 10.JPG
- File:Jf3442San Isidro Santa Rosa Nueva Ecijafvf 20.JPG
- File:Jf3442San Isidro Santa Rosa Nueva Ecijafvf 21.JPG
- File:Jf3442San Isidro Santa Rosa Nueva Ecijafvf 22.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Keep Because Statue of boy on water buffalo, San Isidro has no copyright whatsoever being manufactured by laborers; in addition the façade or exterior is unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of National or Local Government which granted me express permission to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantage in the future elections, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; In support of my stance, opposition to the delition and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons administrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 09:43, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Keeping this for now due to the drama around the nominator. --Missvain (talk) 17:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
The Pulilan Carabao Marker is of recent publication (unveiling). Regular rules still apply while the amendment to the copyright law is pending: permission from the heirs of the sculptor is required.
- File:4090Pulilan Junction Maharlika Highway 24.jpg
- File:4090Pulilan Junction Maharlika Highway 25.jpg
- File:4090Pulilan Junction Maharlika Highway 26.jpg
- File:6630Carabao statues 01.jpg
- File:6630Carabao statues 02.jpg
- File:8690Pulilan Calumpit, Bulacan Road 01.jpg
- File:8690Pulilan Calumpit, Bulacan Road 02.jpg
- File:8690Pulilan Calumpit, Bulacan Road 03.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- CONSOLIDATED REPLY-OBJECTION: SYNOPSIS - The En Masse Nominations Request for Deletion by the herein Nominator in no uncertain terms, falls within the 4 corners of the The Cyberstalking and 2012 Cybercrime Law of the Philippines which provides grave penalties for its Violations of this Act: the Series of Unlawful Mass Deletions now being started by herein Nominator will cause irreparable damage and injury to the Meta Files of Wikimedia Commons: I vehemently object to the deletion on Substantive Legal Grounds, under my Lawyer's and Judge's Oath of Office, and as Authority on Criminal Law Review based on my Ateneo Law School records; I submit to the Commons Community In Seriatim, objectively (and based on USA and Philippine Jurisprudence vis-à-vis Substantive laws both Civil - Copyright law of the Philippines amending the New Civil Code provisions on the Law of Property) and Criminal law 1932 Revised Penal Code as amended by the Penal Provisions of both [ https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/09/12/republic-act-no-10175/ Republic Act No. 10175] - Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 and Copyright Penal Provisions especially [https://acg.pnp.gov.ph/main/2-uncategorised/263-acg-cyber-security-bulletin-no-132-understanding-the-risk-of-cyberstalking Cyberstalking Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, group, or organization - monitoring, threats, or gathering information that may be used to threaten or harass);
- Now a) Who can question with Legal Personality to the Special Courts on Copyright and Trademark Infringement - Vide: The Intellectual Property of the Philippines (IPOPHL) vis-à-vis the Supreme Court’s (SC) 2020 Special Rules on the Prosecution of Intellectual Property (IP) Cases; and b) within what period of time based on Civil Law on Extinctive Prescription); here are my legal grounds to dismiss the Nomination or Request for Deletion, to wit:
- i) I talked to the former Parish Priest Msgr. Jo Aguilan whom I healed as healing Judge in the Barasoain Convent and in his room, now deceased and b) Parish Priest on 24 August 2014, 18:50:54 Fr. Dario V. Cabral, incumbent Parish Priest of Barasoain Church; he confirmed in our discussion, that the Titular Bishop Oliveros now Dennis Villarojo has acquired all rights and properties, Torrens titles of Barasoain Church including all the Monuments therein; hence, the Creator of the Statues transferred all his rights by virtue of the Strict Provisions of Canon law of the Catholic Church on Parish Creation; and in this case, Saint Andrew the Apostle Church the Titular Bishop of Broderick Pabillo the apostolic administrator of the sede vacante Archdiocese of Manila.
- ii) I also talked with the PIO Office of Baliuag including Tourism Office, when I was requesting for photos of the Feb 2 2021 Episcopal Coronation; I was told that Mayor Ferdie Estrella, as SOP, following the Strict LGU DILG guidelines, has a signed written contract between the paid official photographer to have waived all his rights in favor of the Municipal government of Baliuag whoever is the Mayor; under the Local Government Code and DILG Laws, all architects and sculptors cannot retain copyrights without violating the Penal Provisions of these codes and the Anti-Graft Law RA 3019 as amended; Ergo, all LGUs including the herein Malolos City Government ipso facto acquires all moral rights surrendered by alleged and all creators of Copyrights subjects and objects;
- ii) I will quote here my past rendition for emphasis: 29 January 2012 [File:Emilio222jf.JPG this file] by virtue of Substantive Philippine law on Extinctive prescription of FOUR YEARS from Commons Uploading, that is, legal public and open publishing in any forum or format, nobody including the alleged creators can now question in any court or forum even by the Creator; [File:FvfMalolos1335 01.JPG this also] 18 April 2014, 15:45:57; This also, [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 15.JPG This also] This also [File:FvfMalolosCity1317 17.JPG This also] 18 April 2014, 15:42:36; assuming Ex Gratia Argumenti or Arguendo, that Flickr Photobucket or any Commons Editor has opined otherwise, even if the IPO Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director now incumbents, would say otherwise, even if possibly reversing the former Learned Verbal Answers to my Personal Query and long discussions with my Ateneo School Mate Director Blancaflor, still, the Laws, I cited hold; it is for the Commons Community to decide between my submitted Legal Treatise any the alleged IPO zooms and others;
- At this point, I humbly ask a transcript of the IPO Zooms for the guidance of the Bench and the Bar; I would like to examine Legally the contents thereof for a single purpose: I will try my best if I have time and access due to COVID 19 restrictions to personally talk with the a) Integrated Bar of the Philippines President at Pasig City Main Office and b) the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyrights; if they will maintain wrong legal Opinions, then I reserve my Lawyer's Judge's Right to question them individually with the Ombudsman regarding Gross Ignorance of the Law or possible Disbarment in the IBP Office;
- Counter-Argument versus alleged Dicta, sayings, Virtual Answers or even Email correspondence of the Bureau of Copyright and IPO Director: Burden of proof (law) - Rule 131. BURDEN OF PROOF AND PRESUMPTIONS - Burden of Evidence and Preponderance of the evidence : Judicial Supremacy of the S.C. of the Philippines:
- i) FIRST, the Copyright Law cannot be interpreted by them for ONLY the Supreme Court of the Philippines (in a ripe judicial controvery elevated to it either by Petition for Review or Appeal from Special Courts on Copyrights towards Certiorari under Rule 65 to the Court of Appeals) has original and exclusive Jurisdiction expressly GRANTED and mandated by the 1987 Constitution to Say with definiteness what the Law is, that is Stare Decisis or Philippine Specific Jurisprudence on a) who has the copyright or moral rights with legal personality to file in the Special Courts created under the law and S.C. latest Circulars under C.J. Peralta - infringement of copyrights or trademarks b) within 4 years from publication so public in public domain like Commons Uploading in Meta Details, under the New Civil Code law on Extinctive Prescription and Copyright Law; c) any ruling issued on Copyright whether virtual, email or correspondence including Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration FB discussions; d) any ruling or the DOJ Opinion by the Secretary of Justice my classmate; Vide: 2019 Amendments to the 1989 Revised Rules on Evidence A.M. No. 19-08-15-SC
- ii) SECOND: it is legally absurd to claim that the Burden of Evidence is upon the herein Uploader Editor; in any country including Germany and USA, inter alia, the Burden of Proof vis-a-vis Burden of Evidence are clearly defined by Federal Rules and here the 1989 Rules on Evidence as amended by C.J. Peralta's Watch New Rules of Court - Burden of Proof is fixed: it stays with the a in Criminal cases particulary Penal Provisions of Copyright Law, the Complainant, here, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest, must must must, alleged in the Criminal Information to be filed by the Private Prosecutor under the control of the Fiscal, the ultimate facts, their rights to Copyright or Trademark; the Proof of the Burden is Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt, that is Moral Certainty to Convict by Majority Vote of S.C. Justices on Appeal; any Decision whether by the Special Court or IPO or Bureau or DOJ if not elevated and ruled upon by the S.C. are or is not Law or Jurisprudence b) in Civil Cases, the Proof is Preponderance of Evidence resting on the Plaintiff, the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; III) the Burden of Evidence shifts from the Proponent, that is, the Plaintiff, or herein Nominator of Deletion Request in Commons, or in Flickr or in any Fora, if he or she has the right emanating by Special Power of Attorney from the creators, architect or sculptors and owners of trademarks and their heirs, assigns or successors-in-interest; the Burden of Evidence is shifted by Law on Evidence to the defendant, that is, the alleged Copyright violator, when the Judge rules in the Trial amid objections from the opposing counsel or parties; iv) The IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright Head, can never interpret the Copyright Law; it is only in one case that the Executive Department acquired quasi-judicial powers to rule: in P.D. 1529, the LRA Administrator can say what is the Law on Torrens title upon filing of fees in En Consulta cases versus the Register of Deeds; but but but that is not jurisprudence; the ruling only becomes jurisprudence when elevated to the C.A. and finally to the S.C. issuing a Stare Decisis Decision; this is the same banana with Quasi-Judicial Powers and Rulings of the Executive Agencies, like Immigration, Bureaus of Customs, here Bureau of Copyright (who has no such power); v) The Integrated Bar of the Philippines has jurisdiction to discipline the IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if lawyers based even on Anonymous Complaint more frequently under R.A. 6713 which is broader than Sunlights in the Philippines, or R.A. 3019; the IBP has concurrent jurisdiction with the SC Disbarment Office to suspend or dismiss lawyers including IPO Director and Bureau of Copyright heads if they issue comedy of errors or simply put, refusal to reply to my 2 Letters within a fast time required thereat; but the Lawyer under and representing Director Blanclaflor replied to my query: Can I upload any photos falling under FOP in Commons? He replied yes, since if there is no proviso in the Copyright law prohibiting it, then, the Law permits what is not prohibited; I understand that Blancaflor was succeeded by the former and the incumbent IPO Director; YES, they can reply by email and they should under the mandatory provisions of R.A. 6713 "Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees" or even via Zoom Zoom Zoom or Arbitration Virtual under COVID-19 pandemic restrictions; but they can never interpret the Copyright Law, only, they should as they had issued Implementing Guidelines or Circulars;
- vi) More important Now is the Exclusive Original Jurisdiction of the Department of Justice via the NBI's Cybercrime Monitoring Division to assume jurisdiction even upon Anonymous Complaint or NOW by Pandemic Emails against 2 matters that I often repeat and repeat herein as Law and Jurisprudence : a) creation of Anonymous Accounts b) Cyberstalking (which incidentally, I state as my opinion, is part and parcel of the specific provisos of the 2012 Cybercrime Philippine Law, as I did read Wikipedia's edit regarding Congress Bills on the matter; for me that is a surplusage; c) Cybercrime proper : to be specific En Masse (including schemes, habit or trends towards) deletion of Photobucket, Flickr, Instagram or here, Commons Valued Photos of National Interest like Churches, Schools, Monuments and Memorial which are Owned by the Domain here Commons Photos uploaded under Public Domain License, like mine, specifying that My Authorship need not be cited when anybody copies my Commons Photos, permanently transferred to Commons Ownership without anything remaining to me; Vi) In all my archives including my Ramon FVelasquez Photos, I never objected to deletions but most rarely; in Template, I just say submitted to the sound discretion of Commons Community; since 2012, many of my files were deleted under either Speedy Deletion or Regular Deletions filed even by Commons Administrators; Vii) But now, I have a reasonable Ground to fear that there is a "Testing of the Waters", that is a) start or stub deletions by trickles just 1% of 99% edits by a specific editor that apparently is aimed towards b) Domino Deletions or En Masse Deletions as had been done by a) Parent and b) Child anonymous Mass Deleters beginning September 2020 stopping just lately but Nakaabang lang po or just watching for opportune time; On the advice that I should obtain COM:OTRS from the Sculptors, I state with all fairness and legality, that it is a legal absurdity to obtain any permission from the heirs of the Deceased alleged but not proven Copyright holder; Anastacio Caedo (14 August 1907 – 12 May 1990) was a Filipino sculptor; and FYI, the Intestate or Testate Courts would first issue Letters Testamentary or Letters of Administration with the Will Annexed(Letters of Administration by Probate Court Letters Testamentary) only the One Armed with the RTC Probate Orders of Appointment can legally issue the COM:OTRS; and this will take maybe 20 years of protracted litigations;
- Example of stupidity because of False News: Fr. Ladra said the church’s interior now features a ceiling painting called “Communion of Saints” by Maestro Eladio Santos; I always come to this Church; I witnessed personally how the ceiling was painted; I saw with my 2 eyes the Bayanihan or Communal Donation of Money and Labor; specifically, it is next to impossible for Maestro Eladio Santos to have painted the ceiling; Does he have the legs to climbs thereat look at his age - paid workers, like stonemasons, carpenters, catwalks scaffoldings and painters were paid sorry to say minimum wages and other for free due to Bayanihan; I saw Fr. Labra talking to architects; but I suppose these architects and alleged Maestro Eladio Santos may have suggested the Brand of Oil Paints or sketches; but Why deny these Men at Work in Bulacan the Copyrigthts they waived for this Great Shrine? “Communion of Saints” was not done by Maestro Eladio Santos: PROMISE.
- Keep I humbly submit the Unabridged Legal Treatise, ONLY as persuasion to Keep; I underscore that amid my Legal Expertise, I have just One Commons Editor Vote co-equal with any Nominator or Opposing Uploader under the Commons Admin who will keep or deletes; the foregoing Legal Submissions are not meant to touch upon Commons Legal Policy on FOP;
- Keep PREMISES CONSIDERED, I humbly submit and register a the Strongest Legal Objection EVER to the Requested Deletion and Fervently Appeal to Commons Community to wait for the Supreme Court Ruling on the Matter of FOP and I guess that would be my starting point... I reiterate with all due respect, that I respectfully and humbly submit to the Sound Discretion of the Commons Community considering that the subject photos are National Cultural Treasures Most Valued Photos for present and future generations, very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 11:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Judgefloro: see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Emilio Aguinaldo Monument in Malolos, Bulacan. Also, if you believe that COM:EVIDENCE policy is "not conducive", you should raise it at COM:Village pump. However, COM:EVIDENCE is perhaps one of the fundamental policies of Wikimedia Commons. It is you who will prove the freedom of the files nominated: contact the heirs of the sculptor and ask if they will agree your choice of free and commercial licensing of your images of the sculptor's 3D artwork. Please read COM:OTRS. Thank you for your understanding. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- a) Your opinion - like that of my b) fish vendor which had tons of wisdom not only in Fish but in Commerce, of my c) Trike Driver who is expert in Transportation - may be believed by the onlookers or Voters in Elections Periods; but without Citation of Philippine Jurisprudence, without basing you argument on any USA or Federal ruling, and worst, without supporting your above Repeated opinions-comments-mirror replies, whatever you may term them - is not worth a Lawyer's salt, or here, a Commons Community Policy on keeping or deleting; rest assured that if you are believe, I never filed any Undeletions, for I know my limitations in time and effort; I would rather go inside the DOJ, the IPO and Bureau of Copyright for Official Statements, PROMISE Judgefloro (talk) 11:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
I want to delete privacy data and pictures. 49.228.168.47 15:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- 1. File is used. We cannot delete it while being used. 2. If you care about your privacy why do you disclose your IP? (I mean other than uploading your own image here.) --E4024 (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Once file is no longer used, Delete as out-of-scope. I did a quick internet search and it looks like this image is only appearing on WMF projects and mirror sites. Davidwr (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete the ns in-between the original image please. E4024 (talk) 17:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monthanat kondee (talk • contribs) 12:15, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept, the file cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is used. I'll delete second version due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 02:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 21:13, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
No meaningful description, unused for 7 years. no intuitive educative value. Richard Avery (talk) 15:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Info All uploads from this user seem to be about an abandonded project at wikiversity:User:Kszostak2139/ENES 100/Project 4: Pet Food Controller. Thuresson (talk) 21:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW. Subjects are copyrighted advertising and other visual works.
- File:2505Dau Pampanga Landmarks 09.jpg
- File:3347Bulacan Province Landmarks 03.jpg
- File:3347Bulacan Province Landmarks 04.jpg
- File:3347Bulacan Province Landmarks 05.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- My comments herein are without prejudice to the legality of the Nominations by herein Nominator in view of the put on hold Check-user + series of En Masse Deletions;
- Ad cautelam, I desire to discuss that Commons has lots of allowed and permitted Category:Food menus by country 31; a careful perusal of the photos even recent ones, will prove that the instant Nomination is null and void ab initio; IMO, legal policies to which Commons must adhere can be expected from the Wikimedia lawyers who should take care of this. I state with certainty that would be my starting point..Judgefloro (talk) 11:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete menus include underlying images of food. @Judgefloro: the reason why images in categories like Category:Food menus in Hong Kong and Category:Food menus in Hungary are usually accepted is that their layouts are simple and do not bear images of food. Such images make food menus copyrighted. If you see some problematic images, you may start deletion requests by yourself, like what I did at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Magritta Pizza in Haikou - 02.jpg. Magog the Ogre told me before that existence of other files in Commons is not a good reason (Commons roughly follows Wikipedia's w:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS policy). If you see others with problematic derived works, just start deletion requests. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW. Subject is copyrighted advertising.
Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- My comments herein are without prejudice to the legality of the Nominations by herein Nominator in view of the put on hold Check-user + series of En Masse Deletions;
- Ad cautelam, I desire to discuss that Commons has lots of allowed and permitted Category:Food menus by country 31; a careful perusal of the photos even recent ones, will prove that the instant Nomination is null and void ab initio; IMO, legal policies to which Commons must adhere can be expected from the Wikimedia lawyers who should take care of this. I state with certainty that would be my starting point..Judgefloro (talk) 11:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete menus include underlying images of food. @Judgefloro: the reason why images in categories like Category:Food menus in Hong Kong and Category:Food menus in Hungary are usually accepted is that their layouts are simple and do not bear images of food. Such images make food menus copyrighted. If you see some problematic images, you may start deletion requests by yourself, like what I did at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Magritta Pizza in Haikou - 02.jpg. Magog the Ogre told me before that existence of other files in Commons is not a good reason (Commons roughly follows Wikipedia's w:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS policy). If you see others with problematic derived works, just start deletion requests. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:54, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
HFR does not exist, useless file. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete last remaining contributions of Harfang207 (talk · contribs) due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
May be coprightable. Sprite logo was deleted previously per dicussion. COM:Deletion requests/File:Sprite logo.svg Larryasou (talk) 01:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep doesn't meet the threshold of originality. It's trademarked, but that is not the same as copyrightable. oknazevad (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sprite new logo.svg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Better version already available at File:ROU Timis County CoA 2.png. Gikü (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 22:18, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tour Total, Paris
[edit]The building was completed in 1985 by Roger Saubot (1931–1999). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, and they can be undeleted in 2070.
- File:92800 Puteaux, France - panoramio - Mietek Ł.jpg
- File:La Defense (142277187).jpeg
- File:La Défense - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Paris La Défense - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:Paris La Défense - panoramio (7).jpg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
No FOP in Azerbaijan (statue of 1992) Brateevsky {talk} 15:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose All materials on the website are available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Solavirum (talk) 15:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- russian: president.az тут не причём. Думайте, что грузите на Викисклад. Почитайте статьи Свобода панорамы (на русском), Freedom of panorama и на других языках, а также тут — Commons:Freedom of panorama. У любого современного памятника есть автор (скульптор), и в странах, где свободы панорамы нет, просто так на Commons подобные фотографии вы не загрузите (в России кстати тоже её нет по отношению к памятникам/статуям и пр.; только к зданиям). --Brateevsky {talk} 15:42, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hosseinronaghi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: raw text. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:کدام آبان.png.
- File:Sattar-Beheshti.jpg
- File:Sahar-Khodayari.jpg
- File:Neda-Aghasoltan.jpg
- File:Ramin-Pourandarjani.jpg
- File:Pouya-Bakhtiyari.jpg
- File:Edam Nakonid.svg
4nn1l2 (talk) 07:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- اینجا ماجرا کمی متفاوت است. نامها در صفحهٔ کاربر استفاده شدهاند و به دلیل مشارکت مفید کاربر در انبار مشمول COM:INUSE میشوند. «اعدام نکنید» هم در دو صفحهٔ ویکی پدیا استفاده شده. من به @Hosseinronaghi: پیشنهاد میکنم پروندههای اینچنینی را از این به بعد در همان ویکیپدیای فارسی بارگزاری کند اما به نظرم نیازی نیست که برای انتقال اینها به ویکیپدیای فارسی وقت صرف شود. Hanooz 11:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: deleted one and kept other files per COM:INUSE. --Hanooz 11:34, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hosseinronaghi (talk · contribs)
[edit]The user cannot be trusted with own-work claims. Too many high-end cameras including:
- Canon EOS 6D Mark II: File:Shahriyar Shams.jpg
- Canon EOS Kiss X7i: File:Juastina.jpg
- NIKON D850: File:Faravaz Farvardini.jpg
- NIKON D800: File:Hamed Esmaeelion 1.jpg
- Canon EOS Rebel T7i: File:Majid Tavakoli - Shiraz.jpg
- NIKON D80: File:Baktash Abtin 3.jpg
- Canon EOS 500D: File:Mohammad Norizad.jpg
- AND many more
The exif of File:Hamed Esmaeelion 1.jpg clearly casts doubts on the veracity of his own-work claims where the author and the copyright holder have been recorded as BABAK PAYAMI. I guess the images have been sent to him to be uploaded to Commons without bothering to go through the COM:OTRS procedure.
I only nominated a very small subset of his "own-work" files. Someone needs to go through his uploads and nominate the dubious ones.
- File:Juastina.jpg
- File:Faravaz Farvardini 1.jpg
- File:Faravaz Farvardini.jpg
- File:Hamed Esmaeelion 1.jpg
- File:Hamed Esmaeelion.jpg
- File:Majid Tavakoli - Shiraz.jpg
- File:Baktash Abtin 3.jpg
- File:Baktash Abtin 2.jpg
- File:Baktash Abtin.jpg
- File:Esfahan-Protest5.jpg
- File:Mehdi Hajati.jpg
- File:Sasan Aghaei.jpg
- File:Sasan Aghaei 2.jpg
- File:Sasan Aghaei 1.jpg
- File:Majid Tavakoli.jpg
- File:Mehdi mousavii.jpeg
- File:Ghanei44 (cropped).JPG
- File:Emadeddin Baghi-2018 5.jpg
- File:Emadeddin Baghi-2018 4.jpg
- File:Emadeddin Baghi-2018-2.jpg
- File:Emadeddin Baghi-2018.jpg
- File:Emadeddin Baghi-2018 3.jpg
- File:BehrouzBoroomand.jpg
- File:Arya Aramnejad.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
4nn1l2 (talk) 01:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- delete all per nom. i noticed this issue last night. they are not own work. he can be every where in the world(!) with different cameras! --Miha2020 (talk) 11:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- فارسی بنویسند، همه تصاویر بر اساس قوانین ویکیپدیا بدون نقض حق کپی رایت منتشر شدهاست. نوع دوربین تعیین کننده حق کپی رایت نیست.
- @4nn1l2
- این کار شما مصداق آزار کاربر ویکیمدیا است چرا در برچسب زنی به تصاویر پیش از این نیز سابقه داشته و بهخاطر وضعیت موجود و درگیری شخصی اقدام به این کار می کنید
- برای همین از کاربر مرد تنها و هنوز درخواست مشورت می کنم
- @Mardetanha
- @Hanooz Hosseinronaghi (talk) 06:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- No, nominating images for deletion is not harassment. Instead of making baseless allegations, please address the issues. The exif of these images (File:Hamed Esmaeelion.jpg and File:Hamed Esmaeelion 1.jpg) clearly shows that your own-work claims cannot be taken at face value. The author and the copyright holder of these images is Babak Payami, not you, according to their exif. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- I'm the copyright owner of these images. These images were never uploaded anywhere and were solely taken upon my request. I emphasize that I hild the rights to these photos and I put them on Wikimedia for public release.
- You are familiar with copyright regulations as a moderator. The behavior displayed by you which is caused by personal conflicts with other users is not a moderator-appropriate behavior.
- مالک این تصاویر هستم. این تصاویر هیچ وقت هیچ کجا بارگذاری نشدهاند صرفا به درخواست من و برای ویکی پدیا عکاسی شدن و تاکید میکنم مالک تصاویر هستم و برای انتشار عمومی در ویکیمدیا قرار دادم.
- شما بهعنوان مدیر با قوانین حق کپی رایت آشنا هستید این رفتار شما که نشات گرفته از درگیری های شخصی با کاربران است رفتار مدیریتی نیست. Hosseinronaghi (talk) 07:06, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- "and were solely taken upon my request". So you admit that you are not the photographer of these images. Yet, you claim to be the author and call them your own works!
- Yes, I am familiar with copyright laws, but it seems you are not familiar with Wikimedia Commons policies, including COM:VRT. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- No, nominating images for deletion is not harassment. Instead of making baseless allegations, please address the issues. The exif of these images (File:Hamed Esmaeelion.jpg and File:Hamed Esmaeelion 1.jpg) clearly shows that your own-work claims cannot be taken at face value. The author and the copyright holder of these images is Babak Payami, not you, according to their exif. 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:56, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Recolored version of File:ElectoralCollege2016.svg in poor qualty. I see no use of this file. Unused, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:57, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of France.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk • contribs) 01:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:17, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Estonia A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:18, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viru Hotel
[edit]The building was completed in 1972 by Mart Port (1922–2012) and Henno Sepmann (1925–1985). There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia. The copyright terms of the country lasted for 70 years, and they can be undeleted in 2083.
- File:07-06-21-tallinn-by-RalfR-141.jpg
- File:15-08-14-Tallinn-RalfR-028.jpg
- File:Conference Center Tallinn - Sokos Hotel Viru - panoramio.jpg
- File:Hotel Viru (2000) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Hotel Viru - panoramio.jpg
- File:Hotel Viru Tallinn.JPG
- File:Original Sokos Hotel Viru Tallinn.jpg
- File:Repairs of the Hotel Viru - panoramio.jpg
- File:Sokos Holtel Viru 2015.jpg
- File:Sokos Hotel Viru in Tallinn 25 August 2011.jpg
- File:Tallinn - panoramio (62).jpg
- File:Tallinn - panoramio (65).jpg
- File:Tallinn Estonia. Skoda 15Tr trolleybus at Hotel Voru. May 1996.jpg
- File:Tallinn scrycrapper (8599324421).jpg
- File:Viru - panoramio.jpg
- File:Viru center (7954376960).jpg
- File:Viru Hotel from Tammsaare park.jpg
- File:Viru Hotel.jpg
- File:Viru street, Hotel Viru - panoramio.jpg
- File:Virutakso.jpg
- File:``VIRU``hotell, Tallinn.JPG
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep wer stoppt diesen Löschtroll? Ein ganz normaler Betonklotz wie tausende in der SU, außerdem 2005 äußerlich stark verändert. --Ralf Roletschek 08:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ralf Roletschek: {{PD-Soviet}} = {{SD|F1}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Das hat nichts mit dieser Vorlage zu tun, auf den Fotos ist nichts, was geschützt wäre. --Ralf Roletschek 08:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ralf Roletschek: {{PD-Soviet}} = {{SD|F1}}. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep A good example of the total misunderstanding of the Estonian copyright act. It is a destructive bulk nomination for deleting. --VargaA (talk) 11:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @VargaA: I'm still wondering that what means "the total misunderstanding" from you, the COM:FOP Estonia is said that they don't allow Commericial uses. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete no FoP in Estonia Buidhe (talk) 10:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete That said, no FOP in Estonia is just no FOP in Estonia. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Man braucht hier keine Panoramafreiheit, weil nichts Geschütztes auf den Fotos ist. --Ralf Roletschek 08:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:21, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Not enough material to infringe the copyright of the architect. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 16:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:22, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:22, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Tibesti artwork by Jean Vérame
[edit]
This artwork is located in Chad, and there is no freedom of panorama in Chad. The images focus on the art in a more than an incidental way. Brycehughes (talk) 03:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No FOP in Chad (COM:FOP Chad) and missing evidence of permission from the artist. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:50, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:22, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
I've donated my photo. It shows several buildings from the outside, partially hiding each other. Therefore I don't think it has to be deleted. But do as you think, I don't have any influence anyway. Myriam Thyes 08:10, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. @MyriamThyes: the freely-licensed image infringe's the copyright of the still-alive Architect w:Jean-Paul Viguier over this architectural artwork. All recent buildings of France (whose architects are either still alive or dead for less than 70 years) are copyrighted. See also w:Freedom of panorama#France. French DM doesn't apply as I cannot see the building's blending to a public domain building. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:49, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:22, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Fictional flags without educational of historical value. We have plenty of files in Category:National flag proposals of the Confederate States of America for flags that were actually historically proposed.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, obvious reason.--Antemister (talk) 17:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
These are supposedly fictional flags of the "Confederate States of America." Although there doesn't appear to be any historical precedent for any of these flags being used IRL in the Confederacy. So the images should be deleted as OOS. Commons isn't a personal file host.
- File:Confederate States of America Flags.png
- File:Confederate States of America union variant.png
- File:CSA 20stars.jpg
- File:CSA Commemoration Flag.png
- File:Freedom Party Flag (Harry Turtledoves's Southern Victory).png
- File:The Confederate States of America Flag.png
- File:The South Will Rise Again.png
.png){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 05:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:Freedom Party Flag (Harry Turtledoves's Southern Victory).png; this is a flag from a specific, notable work of fiction (en:Southern Victory). Delete the rest. Omphalographer (talk) 17:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Same as Omphalographer--Trade (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: (with one kept) per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Sarubobo is Very simple and abstract shape. conventional toy. --Benzoyl (talk) 13:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Pictures of Andrew Scheer (and his portrait). All located on Andrew Scheer's Flickr page. Now the flickr license may be OK, but these are not selfies, so we have an unknown photographer with no evidence of permission, and also the image with the painting is even more of an issue.
- File:Andrew Scheer portrait hanging.jpg
- File:Andrew Scheer portrait hanging (crop2).jpg
- File:Andrew Scheer portrait hanging (crop1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ronhjones (Talk) 18:24, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Maps of a user-created alternate history, with no likely educational or historical value
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
metadata says ESPN owns rights SecretName101 (talk) 08:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Adding the following to the nomination
- File:Art Ward (5552625645).jpg
- File:Dannel Malloy and Art Ward (5552625645).jpg
- File:Edwin Durso (5552625787).jpg
- File:Visit & jobs announcement at ESPN campus in Bristol - March 22, 2011 (5552625297).jpg
- File:Visit & jobs announcement at ESPN campus in Bristol - March 22, 2011 (5552625385).jpg
- File:Visit & jobs announcement at ESPN campus in Bristol - March 22, 2011 (5552625481).jpg
- File:Visit & jobs announcement at ESPN campus in Bristol - March 22, 2011 (5552625645).jpg
- File:Visit & jobs announcement at ESPN campus in Bristol - March 22, 2011 (5552625787).jpg
- File:Visit & jobs announcement at ESPN campus in Bristol - March 22, 2011 (5552626321).jpg
- File:Visit & jobs announcement at ESPN campus in Bristol - March 22, 2011 (5553209394).jpg
- File:Visit & jobs announcement at ESPN campus in Bristol - March 22, 2011 (5553209482).jpg
- File:Visit & jobs announcement at ESPN campus in Bristol - March 22, 2011 (5553210258).jpg
- File:Visit & jobs announcement at ESPN campus in Bristol - March 22, 2011 (5553210498).jpg
- File:Visit & jobs announcement at ESPN campus in Bristol - March 22, 2011 (5553210598).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
저작권자 권한으로 삭제 신청 GBW1541 (Talk · Contribution) 22:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: CC is irrovocable and it's in use. — regards, Revi 14:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
I apply for deletion as the copyright holder. (Not using anymore) GBW1541 (Talk · Contribution) 09:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep cc license cannot be revoked. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @-akko: TOO? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226 I also have this question, but revi decided to keep it (see above). (｀・ω・´) (talk) 10:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- @-akko: The picture shows the inside of my home. I don't want to show it. This is the real reason I want to delete this photo. Hope to reconsider. Thank you. --GBW1541 (talk) 00:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- @-akko: TOO? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This is the only file in Category:Mountain Dew bottles that shows a Korean Mountain Dew bottle. Brianjd (talk) 12:58, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:25, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
The main focus of this image are the modern buildings of Jakarta, most especially Gama Tower (©️2015 PT Sekawan Design Inc.) at the center. There is no FOP in Indonesia, and Indonesian copyright law only limits any reuses of images of architecture and public art to noncommercial and educational uses only, which are not acceptable under COM:Licensing#Acceptable licenses. Permission and consent for uploader's choice of CC licensing from PT Sekawan Design Inc. and the architectural firms of two other prominent buildings here is required. Usage on enwiki article about Gama Tower has failed its compliance to COM:De minimis. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- See also the outcome of this forum: Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/01#Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque should be focused by professors in this grey area. No commercial FOP in Indonesia status remains. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:26, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
There is no commercial FOP in Indonesia, and this freely-licensed image lacks permission from the building's copyright holder, architectural firm Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:26, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Avian Surabaya
[edit]Per w:Avian Tower, the building was completed in 2018. There is no commercial FOP in Indonesia, and permission from the architect/architectural firm is required.
- File:Avian Tower (August 2018).jpg
- File:Gedung Avian (Agustus 2018).jpg
- File:Menara Avian (Agustus 2018).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:26, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
hey, sayorian here. i'm here just to say one thing. the file "Hofman123.jpg" is actually work of my friend, Adrian Kowalik, that he allowed me to use. the picture shows Józef Hofman, a fictional character made for a Facebook group. soo, it's not really my own work, but I was allowed to use it by the author of it. peace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayorian (talk • contribs) 19:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted. Was only used to vandalize pl:Józef Hofmann for 3 minutes in February 2021. Thuresson (talk) 13:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
User is uploading a whole host of images with no evidence of permission, at least one of which is a clear copyright violation from a television interview.
- File:Dr. WILL KIRBY.jpg
- File:Dr Kirby Candid.png
- File:Dr. Kirby Teaching.jpg
- File:Dr. Kirby LaserAway.png
- File:Dr. Will Kirby.jpg
– GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am willing to keep this one - assuming that both the Wikidata Item is kept, AND we can verify that the person in the photo is the person it claims to be. Quakewoody (talk) 19:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete WD item deleted, out of COM:SCOPE --Martin Urbanec (talk) 16:07, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 15:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
fichier que j'ai crée et remplacé par son équivalent en .png Ursus (talk) 13:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Philippes Forum.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
fichier que j'ai crée et remplacé par son équivalent en .png Ursus (talk) 13:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Philippes Octogone.png. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately, it is not specified whether there is a permission for publishing this photo under a CC license. The source is also imprecise and the name of the photographer does not match the name of the user who uploaded the photo. I hope, we can obtain a valid OTRS-permission. Mosbatho (talk) 12:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Ich besitze die Rechte für die eigenen Werbung vom Fotograf. Ich bin berechtig meine Bilder von mir Online zustellen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DimetrioGiovanni (talk • contribs) 12:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- DimetrioGiovanni, ok, folgendes sollte dir weiterhelfen, sodass bzgl. des Bildes alles Erforderliche dokumentiert wird. Siehe Template:OTRS pending/de. Regards, Mosbatho (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 01:37, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
there were 638 seats in the assembly of 1871. The convention nationale existed in 1795, not in 1871 Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
This is a low quality copy of File:ElectoralCollege2000.svg (only names are removed). I see no additional value in keeping this file. Jahobr (talk) 16:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in it:wikt:Calcolatore trasformata di Fourier and it:wikt:Calcolatore dell'integrale di Fourier with table equivalent:
1,000 0,309 -0,808 -0,810 0,306 0,999 0,312 -0,806 -0,812 0,303 0,999 0,315 -0,804 -0,813 0,300 0,999 0,318 -0,802 -0,815 0,297
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 19:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Grazie per tutto il lavoro; una domanda: la ricostruzione delle formule è fatta passo passo ho utilizzi un compilatore ? --Funzioni di correlazione (talk) 08:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Prego, scrivo le formule manualmente. --WIKImaniac 18:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Atdheu Fragmentar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Ëndrrra Futuriste (105x175 cm).jpg
- File:Loja (75x105 cm).jpg
- File:Relievi i Ëndrrave (105x75 cm).jpg
- File:Triptih akrilik (210x300 cm) (2003).jpg
- File:Mozaik i kaltër (50x70 cm).jpg
- File:Protestë (150x150 cm) 2011.webp
- File:Nga cikli Midis Realitetit dhe Abstrakcionit (105x70 cm) 2008.jpg
- File:Kompozicion (50x70 cm).png
- File:Gjysmë harku (75x105 cm).png
- File:Formimi i hijes (150X150 cm) 2011.webp
- File:Kështjella II (150X140 cm) 2010.webp
- File:Nga cikli Lajmëtari i Kohës.jpg
- File:Mallengjimi (105x105 cm) 2010.jpg
- File:Arti i luftës , The Art of War , Die Kunst des Krieges.jpg
- File:Formimi i hijes , Shadow Formation , Schattenbildung (150X150 cm).webp
- File:Portret i Harruar Forgotten Portrait (140x150 cm).jpg
- File:Diptih Atdheu Fragmentar (144X204 cm)-Diptych Fragmentary Fatherland (2004).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2003).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2011.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2008.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2011.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2010.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2010.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Diptych_Fragmentary_Fatherland_(2004).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Can someone give me an explanation as to why you are deleting them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atdheu Fragmentar (talk • contribs) 05:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Processed as speedy - source given as insta. --Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Snap of someones personal dog. Unchecked import from panormino. Commons is not the place for cute animal shots. 62.216.207.152 17:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:37, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
No indication of release under a free license given by source. CentreLeftRight ✉ 23:54, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:37, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Burundi.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk • contribs) 01:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, not an exact duplicate. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: wrong, unused flag. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:44, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused redundant image of File:0001jfQuezon Avenue MRT Stations Eton Centris EDSA roadfvf 23.jpg JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Magandang hapon at tapos Gabeng Madilim Sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 07:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:42, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The shape and proportions are very inaccurate. I have uploaded a corrected version of this drawing and wish this one to be removed (it is not in use anyway). Conty (talk) 08:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:44, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Seems very unlikely to be own work. The description seems to imply it's from the linked article, but the images of that page don't load for me so I can't confirm if that's the case. I think there is enough uncertainty here that the PCP applies. Perryprog (talk) 16:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, no useful labels. 62.216.207.152 17:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:47, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Photographed by Erzsébet Zinner (1909–1977) and Lívia Busztin (1911–1994), see here. Regasterios (talk) 18:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Notable in his country, Northern Cyprus, as a net expert and heads a space observation institute. We cannot expect that they write a book for him or make his life into a Holywood movie. Stop trying to eliminate the images of people you do not accept to your precious WP. Commons has a different scope. We are an image repository. --E4024 (talk) 01:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not notable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kharkivian as no permission (No permission since) Anatoliy (talk) 23:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not obvious npd. Who should give permission?--Anatoliy (talk) 23:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ahonc: There are no metadata of the photo so uploader (it was uploaded by Білецький В.С.) should give proofs that it is his photo (I think not hia, he didn't take this photo) and also give permission. --Kharkivian (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Please give proper source. Якщо ви знайдете джерело в Інтернеті, тоді це очевидне порушення. Наразі ж відсутність метаданих не є причиною для вилучення.--Anatoliy (talk) 00:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ahonc: There are no metadata of the photo so uploader (it was uploaded by Білецький В.С.) should give proofs that it is his photo (I think not hia, he didn't take this photo) and also give permission. --Kharkivian (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- One more groundless nomination. Keep, of course, until reasons for deletion are provided. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 21:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from FB as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
성기 노출이 심함 121.164.151.100 07:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep 12 years old video, has been nominated twice and kept. Has earlier been in use for several years. Richiex (talk) 07:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per Richiex. No valid reason to delete. And is always funny how this drive-thru IP´s seem to continually and "accidentally" find this kind of imagery. Tm (talk) 14:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Richiex. Ruthven (msg) 12:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
민감한 요소가 있다 121.164.151.100 07:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason to delete. And is always funny how this drive-thru IP´s seem to continually and "accidentally" find this kind of imagery and them (if the automatic translation is correct) open a deletion request with the rationale that "there are sensitive factors", that is not a valid reason and file is in scope. Tm (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per Tm. Ruthven (msg) 12:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
existuje soubor "Logo Sčítání lidu 2021.webp" ve vhodnějším formátu (bezeztrátová komprese) Avayak (talk) 14:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Ich halte die Lizenzierung für falsch - Urheber soll angeblich Lothar Hohmann selbst sein, aber meines Erachtens ist dies kein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:VRT permission needed from the photographer. Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Benin.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk • contribs) 01:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, not an exact duplicate. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: They both looked the same. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 01:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- merge I had merged them as I thought that the differences were insignificant (width of the green section) when it comes to an official flag. I hve since undeleted I would suggest that someone checks the official documentation for the proportions and we keep the official version. I see no value in two competing versions of what should be one. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:REDUNDANT. Image is not used. So supposedly on the projects they prefer the other image. --Ellywa (talk) 03:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
The resolution of the banknote breach the law – as stated in Template:PD-money-CZ/en, the maximal resolution should be 72 dpi. The nominal height of this banknote is 74 mm, the height of 1819 px is too much (74/25.4*72 = approx. 210 px). File:5000 Czech koruna Obverse.jpg should be used instead. Other solution would be downscaling this image and delete other file as a duplicate. — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: It seems this is no reason for deletion. There are more high resolution images with this template in https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:PD-money-CZ&limit=500 . The regulations in dpi are valid when printing the image, not when showing the image on the internet. This appears to me to not be illegal. So therefore the image can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 03:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of the copyrighted work. SCP-2000 10:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 03:32, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of the copyrighted work. Not meet {{FoP-Myanmar}}. SCP-2000 10:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - No FoP for 2D artworks in Myanmar. STSC (talk) 06:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- @STSC: The problem is that if this protest painting is legally painted here or not, if not legal, then some administrators might want to keep per the Nfg template mentioned above. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- A stencil graffiti on a surface is artwork and the copyright still belongs to the artist even it's done illegally. STSC (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:GRAFFITI--A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep COM:GRAFFITI and fail threshold of originality COM:TOO --Ooligan (talk) 20:47, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:GRAFFITI Dr Lotus Black (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: by discussion and Template:Non-free graffiti. --Ellywa (talk) 03:35, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
No information about author and first publication Venzz (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Nikolai Krylenko died in 1938, so the photo is from this date or earlier. might be safely undeleted 120 years later, so in 2058
Per Commons:SIG#South Korea, calligraphic signature still under copyright protection. minhhuy (talk) 12:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 03:43, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
上傳檔案後才此圖發現並非原來要上傳的 南瀛墨客 (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @南瀛墨客 您可以点击上传新版本来更换文件。 (｀・ω・´) (talk) 15:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @(｀・ω・´) 瞭解,感謝,將會把模板移除南瀛墨客 (talk) 12:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:COURTESY. Uploader did not upload a new version as advised. --Ellywa (talk) 03:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sir Yhatski (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader did not comment. --Ellywa (talk) 03:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fête des lumières 2016
[edit]Any artistic lighting combined with use of creative props and installations are certainly copyrighted, most especially in a country with no freedom of panorama. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Fête des lumières. See also this ResearchGate thesis which discusses the art of contemporary illumination of Fête des lumières.
- File:Chinese dragon warriors, Place de la Republique, Lyon, France.jpg Delete
- File:Chinese dragons, Place de la Republique, Lyon, France.jpg Delete
File:Illuminated Towers at the Rhône, Quai Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.jpg Keep
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Putting this On hold as I started this thread, Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Fête des Lumières case, after seeing inconsistencies on verdicts on past Fête des Lumières FOP cases (most deleted, but several others kept or undeleted). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Link to the archived discussion: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2021/02#Fête_des_Lumières_case. Ellywa (talk) 04:00, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- I think there should be two different DRs. One about the dragons and one about the towers. The dragons seem to be recent artworks, so delete. The fact that they use light doesn't seem important. For the towers, which also look recent, what is the nature of those structures? Are they artworks, architectural works or utilitarian objects? If the structures are recent artworks, then delete. If the structures can be freely photographed, then the light along them may or may not constitute an artwork. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- See my votes above. Delete the first 2, keep the third. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann: I slashed the third one, and removed the deletion template on the file's page. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion, deleted the images of the dragons. I wil renominate the Towers, because I think this is copyrighted due to Fop France. --Ellywa (talk) 04:02, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 20:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader did not comment. --Ellywa (talk) 04:14, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:LeaveHomeSafe
[edit]COM:DW of the copyrighted work and beyond COM:TOO HK. Hong Kong TOO is low. See also this news report [1]
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 摩頓台 Moreton Terrace near HKCL Hong Kong Central Library November 2020 SS2 01.jpg
- File:HK MK 旺角 Mongkok Shanghai Street November 2020 SSG 108.jpg
- File:HK poster Centre For Health Protection QR Code LeaveHomeSafe sign November 2020 SS2 01.jpg
- File:HK SPK 新蒲崗 San Po Kong 彩虹道 Choi Hung Road 遊樂場 Playground near 雙喜街 Sheung Hei Street December 2020 SS2 26.jpg
- File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 差館上街 Upper Station Street shop December 2020 SS2 04.jpg
- File:HK SYP Sai Ying Pun 第三街 88 Third Street sign LeaveHomeSave January 2021 SS2 01.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 干諾道中 Connaught Road QR Code Leave Home Safe sign November 2020 SS2 20.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 怡和大廈 Jardine House QR Code Leave Home Safe sign November 2020 SS2.jpg
- File:HK 港島東區 Eastern 炮台山 Fortress Hill 歷山酒店 Hotel Alexandra 餐廳 Restaurant buffet January 2021 SS2 QR code Leave Home Safe.jpg
- File:HK 鑽石山 Diamond Hill 荷里活廣場 Plaza Hollywood 商場 mall shop Broadway Cinema pyrometer n LeaveHomeSave sign 11am December 2020 SS2 02.jpg
- File:HKCL sign Leave Home Safe November 2020 SS2 01.jpg
- File:HKCL sign Leave Home Safe November 2020 SS2 02.jpg
- File:HKCL sign Leave Home Safe November 2020 SS2 03.jpg
- File:Leave Home Safe label in the rest area 202012.jpg
- File:LeaveHomeSafe QR Code in Lee Tung Avenue.jpg
SCP-2000 09:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep:Some of them are not clear enough to see the label. Such as
- File:Leave Home Safe label in the rest area 202012.jpg, File:HK MK 旺角 Mongkok Shanghai Street November 2020 SSG 108.jpg
- File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 差館上街 Upper Station Street shop December 2020 SS2 04.jpg
- File:HK 港島東區 Eastern 炮台山 Fortress Hill 歷山酒店 Hotel Alexandra 餐廳 Restaurant buffet January 2021 SS2 QR code Leave Home Safe.jpg and
- File:HKCL sign Leave Home Safe November 2020 SS2 02.jpg
It is not reasonable to delete those picture, they are just QR code.--Wpcpey (talk) 13:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Since LeaveHomeSafe label is a key part of these photos per category, I don't think these photos can meet COM:DM. SCP-2000 10:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000: Have you also checked COM:FOP Hong Kong? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Since LeaveHomeSafe is only used for covid-19 pandemic, thus these label are not meet " is permanently" requirement. SCP-2000 10:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- What if the files aren't included in the category. Would that affect the judgement of COM:DM? Sun8908 (talk) 11:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000: Files can be placed into many categories. It does not mean that every categorised part is a "key part". I was under the impression that only when something is actually described as a "key part", does it become a DM issue. Of course, most of the filenames do this anyway, so perhaps this comment is moot. Brianjd (talk) 04:14, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- @SCP-2000: Have you also checked COM:FOP Hong Kong? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Since LeaveHomeSafe label is a key part of these photos per category, I don't think these photos can meet COM:DM. SCP-2000 10:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted most images, which were intended to show the LeaveHomeSafe poster. Kept one which can be considered de minimis. --Ellywa (talk) 04:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:LeaveHomeSafe
[edit]Per above. Not meet COM:FOP HK and beyond COM:TOO HK.
File:Entrance of Che Kung Temple, Sha Tin on 2021-02-13.jpgFile:HK Central 60 Stanley Street Pearl Oriental House shop 太平館 TPK Cafe Tai Ping Kung Restaurant March 2021 SS2 08.jpg- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 溫莎大廈 Windsor House mall shop 稻香酒家 Tao Heung Restaurant April 2021 SS2 34.jpg
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 記利佐治街 Great George Street 翡翠明珠廣場 JP Plaza mall restaurants September 2021 SS2 01.jpg
- File:HK CWB 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 記利佐治街 Great George Street 翡翠明珠廣場 JP Plaza mall shop 上海姥姥 Shanghai Lao Lao Restaurant QR code LeaveHomeSafe February 2021 SS2 03.jpg
- File:HK Fortress Hill night 133 King's Road February 2021 SS2 08.jpg
- File:HK KTD Kwun Tong District 彩德邨 Choi Tak Estate Shopping Centre mall 龍順軒海鮮酒家 Lung Shun Hin Seafood Restaurant June 2021 SSG 04.jpg
- File:HK KTD Kwun Tong HoI Yuen Road May 2021 SS2 38.jpg
- File:HK KTD Kwun Tong 翠屏道 3 Tsui Ping Road June 2021 SS2 15.jpg
- File:HK MK 旺角 Mongkok Bute Street Shanghai Street March 2021 SS2 16.jpg
- File:HK Quarry Bay 太古城中心 CityPlaza mall void Live Happy event July 2021 SS2 QR code LeaveHomeSafe.jpg
- File:HK SKD TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 坑口 Hang Hau 東港城 East Point City mall shop 上海 謝謝儂餐廳 Shanghai Xie Xie Nogn Restaurant documents LeaveHomeSafe QR code July 2021 SS2.jpg
- File:HK SKD 將軍澳 TKO 康城路1號 Lohas Park Road Montara LOHAS Park 日出康城商場 The Lohas Shopping Mall shop 太興集團 Tai Hing Roast Restaurant diner Octopus payment June 2021 SS2.jpg
- File:HK STD 沙田 Sha Tin 新城市廣場 New Town Plaza mall shop August 2021 SS2 089.jpg
- File:HK SW Sheung Wan Victoria Restaurant tea May 2021 SS2 05.jpg
- File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 皇后大道中 299 Queen's Road Central 麥當勞 McDonald's QR code LeaveHomeSave February 2021 SS2 06.jpg
- File:HK SYP 西環 Sai Ying Pun 高陞街 Ko Shing Street 永興商業大廈 Wing Hing Commercial Building shop 6 SIX Green sign 修打蘭街 16 Sutherland Street March 2021 SS2 02.jpg
- File:HK TPD 大埔 Tai Po 大埔超級城 Tai Po Mega Mall 大埔中心 Tai Po Centre mall LeaveHomeSafe QR code July 2021 S64.jpg
- File:HK Wan Chai North Gloucester Road Immigration Tower LeaveHomeSafe QR code n forms March 2021 SS2.jpg
File:HK WTS 黃大仙 Wong Tai Sin 黃大仙祠 Temple 嗇色園 Sik Sik Yuen 龍翔道 Lung Cheung Road September 2021 SS2 08.jpg- File:HK 上環 Sheung Wan 皇后大道中 368 Queen's Road Central 偉利大廈 Welland Plaza 偉利廣場 shop 大快活餐廳 Fairwood Restaurant QR code LeaveHomeSave sign February 2021 SS2 03.jpg
SCP-2000 11:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Nihil obstat Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
- Most of the delete requests are unreasonable, these work is shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity and it is not a key part of the subject, so de minimis may apply. I don't think these files have problem, the files listed below can Keep.
- Most of the delete requests are unreasonable, these work is shown in insufficient detail and/or with insufficient clarity and it is not a key part of the subject, so de minimis may apply. I don't think these files have problem, the files listed below can
- copyrighted images appearing on it are de minimis.
- copyrighted image appearing on it are de minimi, the poster on the wall is not related information.
- the images can show people can use different way to entry the restaurant, use paper or use the LeaveHomeSafe QR Code. Copyrighted image appearing on it is the logo.
- copyrighted images appearing are de minimis. (QR code is the focal point, not the logo)
- copyrighted images appearing on the above (restaurant table) are de minimis. (QR code and the instruction is not clear)
- File:HK KTD Kwun Tong District 彩德邨 Choi Tak Estate Shopping Centre mall 龍順軒海鮮酒家 Lung Shun Hin Seafood Restaurant June 2021 SSG 04.jpg
- File:HK KTD Kwun Tong HoI Yuen Road May 2021 SS2 38.jpg
- copyrighted image appearing is de minimi, restaurant entrance is the focal point of the picture, no the label
- the image is focus the table bar, copyrighted image appearing is de minimis
- entrance of the recycle centre is the focal point of the picture, no the label
--Wpcpey (talk) 13:41, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Could you please explain why most of request are unreasonable? Thank you. SCP-2000 09:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Withdraw deletion requests of some images per COM:DM (i.e. Copyrighted work is identifiable, but is a small part of a larger work and its inclusion is unavoidable.). SCP-2000 09:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion deleted most. Some had other copyrighted elements then the LHS poster. Some could be considered de minimis and could be kept. Added de minimis template. --Ellywa (talk) 04:45, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fæ as Dw no source since (dw no source since). It is not a derivative work. It is based on non-copyrightable map data, but none of the creative elements are based on copyrighted work. – Quadell (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- What is the source for the "non-copyrightable map data"? Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- The actual geographical borders in Asia.– Quadell (talk) 14:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- All maps are basically maps of borders. They still have copyright. Someone either published this map and it was copied and has not been credited, or it was published and someone traced the details, making it a derived work. The precautionary principle applies. The only "Arab Atlas" found that appeared relevant was someone's personal site, there's yet to be a tool or map publication that has popped up in a Google search. Though some due diligence may be reasonable, copyright must be validated and the own work claim by a Wikipedia account does not explain where the underpinning map came from, or why the name in the legend is "Arab Atlas". @Cplakidas: who may have more information. --Fæ (talk) 14:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Country borders are not copyrightable. Anyone can make a map based on actual, factual data (such as the locations of borders, rivers, etc.), and has sole creative credit. Even if factual information is copied, if no creative content is copied, it is not a derivative work. See, for instance, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/6/6f/Protection_of_Collaborative_Online_Maps_under_US_Copyright_Law.pdf – Quadell (talk) 17:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- You may want to reread the OSM link you provided. The summary is perfectly reasonable. At no point does it either say or indicate that country borders are not copyrightable. The paper carefully highlights that almost any additions to a map may have their own copyright and the paper makes no statement about an original underlying map such as this country-level map image up for deletion was based on.
- It would be more effective if assertions about copyright were based on Commons policies rather than briefing papers of uncertain publication status or authority hosted elsewhere on the internet. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Country borders are not copyrightable. Anyone can make a map based on actual, factual data (such as the locations of borders, rivers, etc.), and has sole creative credit. Even if factual information is copied, if no creative content is copied, it is not a derivative work. See, for instance, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/6/6f/Protection_of_Collaborative_Online_Maps_under_US_Copyright_Law.pdf – Quadell (talk) 17:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- All maps are basically maps of borders. They still have copyright. Someone either published this map and it was copied and has not been credited, or it was published and someone traced the details, making it a derived work. The precautionary principle applies. The only "Arab Atlas" found that appeared relevant was someone's personal site, there's yet to be a tool or map publication that has popped up in a Google search. Though some due diligence may be reasonable, copyright must be validated and the own work claim by a Wikipedia account does not explain where the underpinning map came from, or why the name in the legend is "Arab Atlas". @Cplakidas: who may have more information. --Fæ (talk) 14:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- The actual geographical borders in Asia.– Quadell (talk) 14:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: I don't see any obvious copyvio here nor do I have significant doubt that this is unfree. I won't delete a file used in so many articles for such a long time based on some kind of hunch. Accd. to en:User:Arab Hafez/Map, the original uploader at en.wp created lots of similar maps. If somebody wants to investigate further, that might be a place to start. Or maybe simply ask that user?. --Rosenzweig τ 13:57, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
