Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/12/23
![]() |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
![]() |
no rights Romaneuliège (talk) 13:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Product_packaging; photo on packaging clearly above COM:TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
File for Advertising, Possibly Stolen Image BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Advert - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 16:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted - Registered Brgesto (talk) 10:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 16:38, 23 Dezember 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 21:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 10:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 14:34, 23 Dezember 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 21:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 11:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 16:38, 23 Dezember 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 21:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
May be a copyright violation, above the Threshold of originality Brgesto (talk) 11:01, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 16:38, 23 Dezember 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo --Krdbot 21:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Es handelt sich um einen versehentlichen Upload. Ich wollte sehen, wie der Upload funktioniert Masterjakobean (talk) 22:33, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Description makes it seem as if this file was uploaded for the purpose of advertising under the brand Pet Zone Dog Training BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 21:38, 23 Dezember 2020 UTC: Cross-wiki spam --Krdbot 03:13, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
likely web downloads
- File:Onna to Otoko no Lullaby Game regular.jpg
- File:Fukudamarch2020.jpg
- File:TakeuchiAkari-Anju28thSingle.jpg
- File:H% 21P2020August (1).jpg
- File:CountryGirls-November2019.jpg
- File:°C-utelastconcert.jpg
- File:Satodamai2007png.jpg
- File:Aramajapan.com-momoko-hello-project-graduation.jpg
- File:Buonosolasido.jpg
- File:梅-764x1024.jpg
- File:NakanishiKana2020.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 19:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- I found some files on the website. So, I submitted them for speedy deletions. Please see User talk:Lmngr34. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:21, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: CV; per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:56, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 02:52, 24 Dezember 2020 UTC: CSD F3 (derivative work of non-free content) --Krdbot 09:12, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused user graphic, intended for self-promotion based on attempt to create an article about themselves. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 00:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, OOS, no other contributions by user after more than 3 years. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:39, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
JPG of a common stock photo of a piglet https://www.google.com/search?tbs=simg:CAQSnQIJK5XK94qK9BkakQILELCMpwgaYgpgCAMSKI4EjQSBBesL8wryCsIWzQvZFs8L3yGiI7AggiqaI5Q1oS3kIZotoSMaMP6dkQJKkQ25xjeyk7z89Vg33ZV2P1iUcsLDq02BQUvFAZ_1QDAcNVKhza55ErkAAJCAEDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIEUur7QQwLEJ3twQkaiQEKIQoNbWluaWF0dXJlIHBpZ9qliPYDDAoKL20vMDY0cDZ5bgojCg9zbWFsbCB3aGl0ZSBwaWfapYj2AwwKCi9tLzBiYnp5MGcKIwoPbGFyZ2Ugd2hpdGUgcGln2qWI9gMMCgovbS8wN3M3dGJtChoKBnN1aW5hZdqliPYDDAoKL20vMDNjZjh6bgw&sxsrf=ALeKk02hn5W-ILy1yk6aRG6sQ5Kq7mZsSQ:1608736348506&q=cute+pictures+of+piglets&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiX4Nv0seTtAhXbHc0KHZPzAB8Q2A4oAXoECBAQMg&biw=1366&bih=625 BlinxTheKitty (talk) 15:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:43, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
I assumed that album covers were public domain, but I was wrong GravityIsForSuckers (talk) 21:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. You can also tag them as CSD G7. --Ahmadtalk 05:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
I assumed that album covers were public domain, but I was wrong GravityIsForSuckers (talk) 21:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. You can also tag them as CSD G7. --Ahmadtalk 05:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Personal selfies of a non-notable individual, out of COM:SCOPE
- File:1985 Florin, glasul conștiinței lui Adi .jpg
- File:Florin, glasul conștiinței lui Adi .jpg
- File:Florin, glasul conștiinței lui Adi.jpg
Gikü (talk) 17:20, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 08:17, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Same problem as before: out of COM:SCOPE
Gikü (talk) 00:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 10:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nishmovies (talk · contribs)
[edit]Stills and promotional material from copyrighted film. OTRS permission needed.
- File:Patong beach sign.jpg
- File:La Fosse aux Tigres-Combat bangla.jpg
- File:La Fosse aux Tigres-Dave-ring.jpg
- File:La Fosse aux Tigres-Dave s'entraine.jpg
- File:La Fosse aux Tigres-Dave sur un ring.jpg
- File:La Fosse aux Tigres-Dave avant match.jpg
- File:La Fosse aux Tigres-Dave.jpg
- File:Extrait du film-documentaire La Fosse aux Tigres.jpg
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Non-free content JyunWaan (talk) 02:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 10:36, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Non-free content JyunWaan (talk) 02:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 10:36, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Non-free content JyunWaan (talk) 02:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --CptViraj (talk) 10:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
2014 on the web[1] --> not own work 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 10:40, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Paintings of Karlo Kacharava (died 1994 - http://www.artguild.club/karlo_kacharava_en.html). No permission.
- File:Wobern. For Beckett.jpg
- File:Dedicated to Lika.jpg
- File:A man with a newspaper.jpg
- File:Dedicated to Krapotkin.jpg
- File:The art of darkness.jpg
- File:Karlo Katcharava - Untitled.jpg
- File:Beyond the big cities.jpg
- File:England is big, sir!.jpg
- File:Karlo Katcharava - Liverpool.jpg
- File:Karlo Katcharava - Puppe.jpg
- File:BORN, NEVER ASKED.jpg
- File:Vobern is going.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 12:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:انور كلشات.jpg
- File:علي سالم الحريزي المرجعية الأشرافية لمجلس الإنقاذ الوطني اليمني الجنوبي.jpg
- File:محمد علي ياسر.jpg
- File:محمد عبدالله كده.jpg
- File:صورة اللواء قحطان المجيبي رئيس مجلس الانقاذ الوطني اليمني الجنوبي.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Loaial-draji (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:الفنان محمد السامرائي مع الكادر التمثيلي في العراق.jpg
- File:الفنان محمد السامرائي مع الكادر التمثيلي.jpg
- File:الفنان محمد السامرائي.jpg
- File:الفنان محمد السامرائي والفنان عبد الستار البصري.jpg
- File:الفنان محمد السامرائي والشاعر يوسف الرزاق العتيبي.jpg
- File:الفنان محمد السامرائي و الفنان محمد هاشم.jpg
- File:محمد السامرائي وقاسم الملاك.jpg
- File:Mohammed alsamaray.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:33, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- REDIRECT[[]]
File:Письменность языка кротоль (кручский язык). The Krotol or Crootch language writing system.jpg
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:10, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
No proper source, author unknown – delete as per COM:PRP. jdx Re: 17:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Spam and copyright violation Lunyaah (talk) 17:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete: Blatant self-promotion, draft on en:wp declined. --Achim (talk) 17:49, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Spam.... Lunyaah (talk) 17:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete: Blatant self-promotion, draft on en:wp declined. --Achim (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in sandbox. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:22, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:22, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Petra de la O (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
This is actually 1,4-dioxane (not 1,2- of title), but it's also incorrect in its 3D nature: the molecule is not planar. Using a pretty 3D image to mis-illustrate the 3D nature of something fails COM:EDUSE DMacks (talk) 03:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete Correct version available: File:1,4-Dioxane-3D-balls.png --Leyo 10:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:34, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Request Deletion SoumeshBanerjee (talk) 08:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Keep, no valid reason for deletion. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Photographed with a Samsung S7, Source here, questionable if rights belong to uploader. Rocky187 (talk) 09:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
These photographs were uploaded by a user named Ghis mu. The name suggests that the uploader is Ghislain Muller or someone close to him. The copyright status of all these photographs needs to be clarified through our support team. We need to have the photographers identified and their written permission to release these photos under a free license forwarded to our support team.
- File:Ghislain Muller vibraphone compositeur arrangeur alphorn cor des Alpes.png
- File:Ghislain muller vibraphone composer arranger alphorn cor Alpes jazz.jpg
- File:Vsp orkestra concert.jpg
- File:VSP orkestra.jpg
- File:Ghislain-muller-vibraphone-08.jpg
AFBorchert (talk) 09:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Some of these photographs have been published before at https://ghislainmuller.wixsite.com/ghislain-muller:
- * File:Ghislain-muller-vibraphone-08.jpg at [2]
- * File:Ghislain muller vibraphone composer arranger alphorn cor Alpes jazz.jpg at [3]
- --AFBorchert (talk) 09:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
obvious non-free work Lugnuts (talk) 11:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Per file desc album cover. No fair use on Commons. Not in use. Achim (talk) 11:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Hardly an "own work", obviously a scanned poster. Exif data shows it's a scan, and the uploader has no other works. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation. No EXIF data that would suggest the uploader took it. Similar photo can be found at https://www.filmibeat.com/photos/riya-sen-10865.html#photos-5 Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:10, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- The file is in use. -- Geagea (talk) 01:01, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP. Unlikely to be own work, no exif, new user. --Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
not intended for public MirDre (talk) 16:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; G7. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 17:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- At a first glance I had some hesitation if we had any other images of the Chikendu Library of Political Science, but I think the out-of-scope gentleman in front is the focus of this image, which makes it of no educational use. Therefore delete. --E4024 (talk) 17:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio. Not own work as claimed. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete Copyrighted cartoon character. DMacks (talk) 05:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete Source is incorrect, art is copyrighted. HenryCrun15 (talk) 08:40, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
The professional photograph uploaded by a single-edit account. Likely not own work. 188.123.231.31 17:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
While Signal itself is free and open source (licensed under GPL), I see no indication that the logo itself is CC-licensed. Unless there's a special rule for logos that I'm unaware of, I don't see how this image is free. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding is that logos are generally considered simple enough that they're covered by trademark law, not copyright. Unless there's something especially original in the logo you think changes this, the image isn't being used in a way that violates any copyright or trademark. E.g., see the WhatsApp logo, the Facebook logo, and the failed deletion proposal on the Facebook logo. --Tga.D (talk) 05:50, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Tga.D: I'm not a lawyer either, but the existence of two major companies' logos on Commons seems strong evidence that you're right and I'm wrong. I've just added {{PD-textlogo}} and {{Trademarked}} to File:Signal-Logo.svg, as those are presumably closer to the legal status than the generic CC license that was there before. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 07:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Threshold of originality is not always very clear. However, the stated souce file belongs to a GitHub repo which is licensed under AGPL v3. —Dexxor (talk) 10:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- And with that, I withdraw. Thanks, all, for teaching me a few lessons about copyright. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 17:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Threshold of originality is not always very clear. However, the stated souce file belongs to a GitHub repo which is licensed under AGPL v3. —Dexxor (talk) 10:51, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Tga.D: I'm not a lawyer either, but the existence of two major companies' logos on Commons seems strong evidence that you're right and I'm wrong. I've just added {{PD-textlogo}} and {{Trademarked}} to File:Signal-Logo.svg, as those are presumably closer to the legal status than the generic CC license that was there before. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 07:09, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Promo photo. All previous uploads from same user have been deleted. Smooth O (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 20:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Primmerkid88 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Vanity account. Commons is not your personal free web host.
Achim (talk) 21:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
sex I love girls all over the world! (talk) 21:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Speedy keep per COM:CENSOR, this nomination is fatuous, no valid reason for deletion. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Christian Ferrer. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 22:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
personal photo for non wikipedian Faisal talk 22:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted video game covers. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:03, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of a copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:26, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. 176.59.41.248 23:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. 176.59.41.248 23:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. 176.59.41.248 23:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
image du Facebook officiel du 28 novembre 2020 : https://www.facebook.com/RBW.MAMAMOO/photos/3548931551840789 Arroser (talk) 23:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Photographer would like this image removed from the website Yelliyeet (talk) 00:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, it is being used, we cannot make courtesy deletions of used files. --E4024 (talk) 00:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 20:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Potentially out of scope since it is only used in the rejected draft en:Draft:CODA Cognitive Architecture Thuresson (talk) 00:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:PCP possibly a press image? ViperSnake151 (talk) 04:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
This map is a "Hypothetical 2020 result" for the presidential election, as stated in its description, and has no place on Wikimedia Commons. This is a digital library for media, and not a fandom wiki. Politicsfan4 (talk) 06:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Photographed with a Samsung S7, Source here, questionable if rights belong to uploader.. Rocky187 (talk) 09:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
The metadata contains the name of the copyright holder, this does not appear to be the uploader; need permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Low quality; better alternatives available in Category:1,4-Dioxane. Leyo 10:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom. The opaque (white) background & the tiny bonds are both graphics disadvantages. I suggest to use File:1-4-Dioxane.svg instead. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:05, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Image from a scotish magazine Brgesto (talk) 10:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://www.google.com/search?tbs=simg:CAQSsgIJaWtdVjQYRRYapgILEKjU2AQaAghCDAsQsIynCBpiCmAIAxIopB6sEJYFpR7QH-MXtxuWG-sbsxuwK6E5ojmEILIrryutK4UvjC_14Ihowlpt1Bcfzu9PbCMhAozY4Kd4hFgadsFAvI45jhHM3t_1ZLpc-WRmrXtn1SErdpkEg3IAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgScXtaxDAsQne3BCRqTAQodCgpmb3Igc29jY2Vy2qWI9gMLCgkvYS9kdGJ0eHkKIAoMcnVnYnkgc2hvcnRz2qWI9gMMCgovbS8wYl9fbl9fChsKCGtuZWVsaW5n2qWI9gMLCgkvbS8wNmM3Y3YKGgoIZm9vdGJhbGzapYj2AwoKCC9tLzAydng0ChcKBHRlYW3apYj2AwsKCS9tLzAxMWw3OAw&sxsrf=ALeKk00sewbyYpIHI-D9b_A5plNOe68W_A:1608721057096&q=celtic+campeon+de+la+champions&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjJ25n5-OPtAhU6DmMBHYtIBdIQ2A4oAXoECBAQMg&biw=1745&bih=852 Brgesto (talk) 10:57, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 10:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 10:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 10:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Not own work taken by phone as stated by uploader. In one of the photos EXIF data points to proffesional news photographer from Montenegro (https://www.vijesti.me/autor/3658/savo-prelevic).
Smooth O (talk) 11:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:39, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Not own work. All photos can be found on-line, even one has watermark for source.
- File:Federation Jiu jitsu of Guanabara.jpg
- File:World's SJJIF tournament Los Angeles 2013.jpg
- File:Starting World's SJJIF tournament at the Pyramid in Los Angeles 2013.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 12:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
1951: cant' be à picture made by Crulder (born in 1931 ?) - copyvio from an unknown newspaper Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:00, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:58, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:03, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:02, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:02, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:55, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:51, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:51, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:38, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:50, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:03, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:55, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:02, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:03, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:02, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:55, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:03, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:58, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:03, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 10:03, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:58, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque la permission de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:50, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:58, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:51, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:51, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:55, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:51, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:50, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 09:55, 31 Dezember 2020 UTC: No permission since 23 December 2020 --Krdbot 15:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
"FBMD" in metadata indicates this is a Facebook download Ytoyoda (talk) 21:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Comment The uploader has informed me that [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ytoyoda&diff=520695381&oldid=519998952&diffmode=source they have received permission from the copyright owner. I have advised them to follow the steps described at COM:OTRS to verify the permission. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
ist von 1985 und nicht gemeinfrei; created 1985 and not in the public domain Tozina (talk) 21:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
ist von 1985 und nicht gemeinfrei; created 1985 and not in the public domain Tozina (talk) 21:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC) Torzina, ich weiß nicht, ob eine Werbetüte von 1985 gemeinfrei ist, ich denke schon sie wurde für diese Zwecke tausendfach gedruckt. Der Urheber gehörte zur DEWAG, das war ein Betrieb der Gebrauchsgrafik entwarf, es gab quasi keine Einzelwerbezeichner. Die Plastiktüte ist vom Verpackungsmittelkombinat, diesen Betrieb gibt es seit der Wende 1990 nicht mehr, auch kein Nachfolgebetrieb. Ich bin abschließend doch der Meinung es ist ein Zeitdokument, schließlich war es die erste "Plastetüte" die anlässlich des Stadtjubiläums herausgegeben wurde, vorher gab es Stoffbeute in der DDR. Lass sie bitte drin. Bei Beschwerden kann man sie dann doch löschen.16Exul82 (talk) 22:07, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Source site does not say anything about CC; this does not show that the file is free to upload to Commons. (Uploaded by a one-time-only visitor.) E4024 (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ciell (talk) 22:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Taken From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UakwRGjcX1Q&list=UUIX5Sni6eua6aXVQY6MoO1Q BlinxTheKitty (talk) 00:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, YouTube video from which this is derived does not have CC-BY licensing required for Commons. JGHowes talk 18:06, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for sculptures. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 18:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted characters. https://www.linefriends.jp/others/brown/ No FoP in South Korea for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:11, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, exceeds de minimis. JGHowes talk 18:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
no rights Romaneuliège (talk) 13:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and PCP due to no provenance provided. JGHowes talk 18:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of given license at source listed, A file with this name was previously deleted for lacking evidence of license/permission ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted mascots. https://www.softbankhawks.co.jp/entame/hawkfamily/ No FoP in Japan for artistic works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:33, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 18:12, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Apparently non-commercial use Creative Commons isn't allowed here. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 13:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, CC-by-NC-3.0 not allowed at Commons. JGHowes talk 18:13, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.
- File:Muppets (23105287369).jpg
- File:Muppets (23105296279).jpg
- File:Muppets (23105358009).jpg
- File:Muppets (23177506810).jpg
- File:Muppets (23446782296).jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 18:14, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Fan art. Derivative of copyrighted work. Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We can compare the design with File:Toto.svg -- Xfigpower (pssst) 09:17, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom. It is well above TOO. DMacks (talk) 00:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete per COM:TOO. Too close to the original work. --Kinu (talk) 01:53, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. JGHowes talk 18:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
dupe of File:Mugasto argipäev.jpg WikedKentaur (talk) 19:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Redirect. --Regasterios (talk) 15:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 01:38, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - overinterpretatio nof "freedom of panorama". We cannot remove all photos of Italy because there may be a building somewhere. If an architect asks Wikimedia Commons to remove photos of his work (e.g. a building) - then we will do it. Subtropical-man (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Comment: A photo of a modern building is regarded as a derivative work. In this case, before uploading a photo, a permission from the copyright holder is required. Freedom of panorama is an "exception" of giving permission before uploading to Commons. Unfortunately, there is no FOP in Italy, thus permission from the copyrighted holder is required. Indeed, we have to remove all the photos of building in Italy (and other countries with no FOP exception), unless they are granted with OTRS permission or de minimis can be applied. Your above opinion is violating COM:PCP. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per Subtropical-man. Besides, the building is not considred of particular artistic/creative interest by the MiBAC (the Ministry). See the list of individual decrees. Ruthven (msg) 20:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Willard Park (Cleveland)
[edit]The central focus of these images is the Free Stamp, a work of art by Claes Oldenburg (still alive). American FOP doesn't extend to sculptures even in public places, and the camp of Oldenburg had one time requested Wikimedia to remove images of his sculptures situated in the United States in 2012 (see https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/DMCA_Oldenburg). See also Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle.
- File:Cleveland City Free Stamp - panoramio.jpg
- File:Cleveland Free Stamp (26133931884).jpg
- File:Dude! You Dropped Your Stamp! (8762349089).jpg
- File:Free Stamp (28078342876).jpg
- File:Free Stamp (29744780866).jpg
- File:Free Stamp (815084).jpeg
- File:Free! Free! Free! (8809964079).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Info it appears this artistic work was included in the DMCA takedown notice. To quote:
19. 4029
Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen Free Stamp, 1991 Steel and aluminum; painted with polyurethane enamel 28 ft. 10 in. x 26 ft. x 49 ft. (8.8 x 7.9 x 14.9 m) Collection Willard Park, Cleveland, Ohio Copyright 1991 Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen
_JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
The file is a derivative work of the gravestone of Timo Sarpaneva, designed by Marjatta Sarpaneva (b. 1944) and located in Helsinki, Finland. The author of the original work (the gravestone) is still living, so it is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. Freedom of panorama is for buildings only in Finland. Apalsola t • c 17:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:39, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Le photographe est apparemment le père du téléverseur, qui en possède donc les droits. Un message a été adressé à l'OTRS pour le grand lot de photos mises sur Commons. - Groupir ! (talk) 23:28, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Fitindia On peut attendre la validation ou non du message envoyé à l'OTRS, non ? - Groupir ! (talk) 10:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Restored --- FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 22:53, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Certainly not own work. Please also take a look at other upload by the user, most of other are probably copyright violations as well. Wikisaurus (talk) 08:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: the image is taken from https://warspot.ru/10161-vlasteliny-velikih-ozyor, its authorship is obscure but definitely not own work. Deleted as erroneously licensed. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC) -- Chers amis, je vous remercie de tout cœur pour votre initiative et votre aide à "lier" mes nombreuses photos, aux différentes pages et applications WIKI , qui je dois l'avouer sont un peu ésotériques pour moi, qui suis très "anciennes écoles".
Mon père ayant été , pendant de nombreuses années, photographe AFP, UNIVERSAL et d'autres agences, il m'a laissé, à son décès, des centaines de photos que j'essaie d'insérer autant que faire se peut sur les pages WIKI, or je ne sais même pas comment argumenter et insérer la permission de mon défunt père.
Devant de telles fallacieuses attitudes, vraiment obtuses, je pense même cesser de collaborer avec WIKI et tant pis pour la suite... je suis sincèrement désolé que ces insertions de photos puissent engendrer de telles "prises de tête" et autres désagréments non-mérités. Si la diffusion de ce patrimoine sur Wiki, qui se veut en mon for-intérieur, universel, non-lucratif et toujours altruiste, doit être en contrepartie, agrémentée par une telle NOMENKLATURA qui , à mes yeux s'avère liberticide, alors je songe réellement à m'abstenir de telles démarches...
En tout cas, je réitère mes plus chaleureux remerciements pour votre aide.
Bien à vous
ERNESTO (Sans pseudonyme)--Crulder (talk) 20:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted by Fitindia. --Thibaut (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:49, 23 December 2020 (UTC) -- Chers amis, je vous remercie de tout cœur pour votre initiative et votre aide à "lier" mes nombreuses photos, aux différentes pages et applications WIKI , qui je dois l'avouer sont un peu ésotériques pour moi, qui suis très "anciennes écoles".
Mon père ayant été , pendant de nombreuses années, photographe AFP, UNIVERSAL et d'autres agences, il m'a laissé, à son décès, des centaines de photos que j'essaie d'insérer autant que faire se peut sur les pages WIKI, or je ne sais même pas comment argumenter et insérer la permission de mon défunt père.
Devant de telles fallacieuses attitudes, vraiment obtuses, je pense même cesser de collaborer avec WIKI et tant pis pour la suite... je suis sincèrement désolé que ces insertions de photos puissent engendrer de telles "prises de tête" et autres désagréments non-mérités. Si la diffusion de ce patrimoine sur Wiki, qui se veut en mon for-intérieur, universel, non-lucratif et toujours altruiste, doit être en contrepartie, agrémentée par une telle NOMENKLATURA qui , à mes yeux s'avère liberticide, alors je songe réellement à m'abstenir de telles démarches...
En tout cas, je réitère mes plus chaleureux remerciements pour votre aide.
Bien à vous
ERNESTO (Sans pseudonyme)
Deleted: Speedy deleted by Fitindia. --Thibaut (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:49, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
--Chers amis, je vous remercie de tout cœur pour votre initiative et votre aide à "lier" mes nombreuses photos, aux différentes pages et applications WIKI , qui je dois l'avouer sont un peu ésotériques pour moi, qui suis très "anciennes écoles".
Mon père ayant été , pendant de nombreuses années, photographe AFP, UNIVERSAL et d'autres agences, il m'a laissé, à son décès, des centaines de photos que j'essaie d'insérer autant que faire se peut sur les pages WIKI, or je ne sais même pas comment argumenter et insérer la permission de mon défunt père.
Devant de telles fallacieuses attitudes, vraiment obtuses, je pense même cesser de collaborer avec WIKI et tant pis pour la suite... je suis sincèrement désolé que ces insertions de photos puissent engendrer de telles "prises de tête" et autres désagréments non-mérités. Si la diffusion de ce patrimoine sur Wiki, qui se veut en mon for-intérieur, universel, non-lucratif et toujours altruiste, doit être en contrepartie, agrémentée par une telle NOMENKLATURA qui , à mes yeux s'avère liberticide, alors je songe réellement à m'abstenir de telles démarches...
En tout cas, je réitère mes plus chaleureux remerciements pour votre aide.
Bien à vous
ERNESTO (Sans pseudonyme)
Deleted: Speedy deleted by Fitindia. --Thibaut (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:49, 23 December 2020 (UTC) - Chers amis, je vous remercie de tout cœur pour votre initiative et votre aide à "lier" mes nombreuses photos, aux différentes pages et applications WIKI , qui je dois l'avouer sont un peu ésotériques pour moi, qui suis très "anciennes écoles".
Mon père ayant été , pendant de nombreuses années, photographe AFP, UNIVERSAL et d'autres agences, il m'a laissé, à son décès, des centaines de photos que j'essaie d'insérer autant que faire se peut sur les pages WIKI, or je ne sais même pas comment argumenter et insérer la permission de mon défunt père.
Devant de telles fallacieuses attitudes, vraiment obtuses, je pense même cesser de collaborer avec WIKI et tant pis pour la suite... je suis sincèrement désolé que ces insertions de photos puissent engendrer de telles "prises de tête" et autres désagréments non-mérités. Si la diffusion de ce patrimoine sur Wiki, qui se veut en mon for-intérieur, universel, non-lucratif et toujours altruiste, doit être en contrepartie, agrémentée par une telle NOMENKLATURA qui , à mes yeux s'avère liberticide, alors je songe réellement à m'abstenir de telles démarches...
En tout cas, je réitère mes plus chaleureux remerciements pour votre aide.
Bien à vous
ERNESTO (Sans pseudonyme)
Deleted: Speedy deleted by Fitindia. --Thibaut (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:50, 23 December 2020 (UTC) - Chers amis, je vous remercie de tout cœur pour votre initiative et votre aide à "lier" mes nombreuses photos, aux différentes pages et applications WIKI , qui je dois l'avouer sont un peu ésotériques pour moi, qui suis très "anciennes écoles".
Mon père ayant été , pendant de nombreuses années, photographe AFP, UNIVERSAL et d'autres agences, il m'a laissé, à son décès, des centaines de photos que j'essaie d'insérer autant que faire se peut sur les pages WIKI, or je ne sais même pas comment argumenter et insérer la permission de mon défunt père.
Devant de telles fallacieuses attitudes, vraiment obtuses, je pense même cesser de collaborer avec WIKI et tant pis pour la suite... je suis sincèrement désolé que ces insertions de photos puissent engendrer de telles "prises de tête" et autres désagréments non-mérités. Si la diffusion de ce patrimoine sur Wiki, qui se veut en mon for-intérieur, universel, non-lucratif et toujours altruiste, doit être en contrepartie, agrémentée par une telle NOMENKLATURA qui , à mes yeux s'avère liberticide, alors je songe réellement à m'abstenir de telles démarches...
En tout cas, je réitère mes plus chaleureux remerciements pour votre aide.
Bien à vous
ERNESTO (Sans pseudonyme)
Deleted: Speedy deleted by Fitindia. --Thibaut (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:50, 23 December 2020 (UTC) - Chers amis, je vous remercie de tout cœur pour votre initiative et votre aide à "lier" mes nombreuses photos, aux différentes pages et applications WIKI , qui je dois l'avouer sont un peu ésotériques pour moi, qui suis très "anciennes écoles".
Mon père ayant été , pendant de nombreuses années, photographe AFP, UNIVERSAL et d'autres agences, il m'a laissé, à son décès, des centaines de photos que j'essaie d'insérer autant que faire se peut sur les pages WIKI, or je ne sais même pas comment argumenter et insérer la permission de mon défunt père.
Devant de telles fallacieuses attitudes, vraiment obtuses, je pense même cesser de collaborer avec WIKI et tant pis pour la suite... je suis sincèrement désolé que ces insertions de photos puissent engendrer de telles "prises de tête" et autres désagréments non-mérités. Si la diffusion de ce patrimoine sur Wiki, qui se veut en mon for-intérieur, universel, non-lucratif et toujours altruiste, doit être en contrepartie, agrémentée par une telle NOMENKLATURA qui , à mes yeux s'avère liberticide, alors je songe réellement à m'abstenir de telles démarches...
En tout cas, je réitère mes plus chaleureux remerciements pour votre aide.
Bien à vous
ERNESTO (Sans pseudonyme)
Deleted: Speedy deleted by Fitindia. --Thibaut (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC) - Chers amis, je vous remercie de tout cœur pour votre initiative et votre aide à "lier" mes nombreuses photos, aux différentes pages et applications WIKI , qui je dois l'avouer sont un peu ésotériques pour moi, qui suis très "anciennes écoles".
Mon père ayant été , pendant de nombreuses années, photographe AFP, UNIVERSAL et d'autres agences, il m'a laissé, à son décès, des centaines de photos que j'essaie d'insérer autant que faire se peut sur les pages WIKI, or je ne sais même pas comment argumenter et insérer la permission de mon défunt père.
Devant de telles fallacieuses attitudes, vraiment obtuses, je pense même cesser de collaborer avec WIKI et tant pis pour la suite... je suis sincèrement désolé que ces insertions de photos puissent engendrer de telles "prises de tête" et autres désagréments non-mérités. Si la diffusion de ce patrimoine sur Wiki, qui se veut en mon for-intérieur, universel, non-lucratif et toujours altruiste, doit être en contrepartie, agrémentée par une telle NOMENKLATURA qui , à mes yeux s'avère liberticide, alors je songe réellement à m'abstenir de telles démarches...
En tout cas, je réitère mes plus chaleureux remerciements pour votre aide.
Bien à vous
ERNESTO (Sans pseudonyme)
Deleted: Speedy deleted by Fitindia. --Thibaut (talk) 17:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC) Chers amis, je vous remercie de tout cœur pour votre initiative et votre aide à "lier" mes nombreuses photos, aux différentes pages et applications WIKI , qui je dois l'avouer sont un peu ésotériques pour moi, qui suis très "anciennes écoles".
Mon père ayant été , pendant de nombreuses années, photographe AFP, UNIVERSAL et d'autres agences, il m'a laissé, à son décès, des centaines de photos que j'essaie d'insérer autant que faire se peut sur les pages WIKI, or je ne sais même pas comment argumenter et insérer la permission de mon défunt père.
Devant de telles fallacieuses attitudes, vraiment obtuses, je pense même cesser de collaborer avec WIKI et tant pis pour la suite... je suis sincèrement désolé que ces insertions de photos puissent engendrer de telles "prises de tête" et autres désagréments non-mérités. Si la diffusion de ce patrimoine sur Wiki, qui se veut en mon for-intérieur, universel, non-lucratif et toujours altruiste, doit être en contrepartie, agrémentée par une telle NOMENKLATURA qui , à mes yeux s'avère liberticide, alors je songe réellement à m'abstenir de telles démarches...
En tout cas, je réitère mes plus chaleureux remerciements pour votre aide.
Bien à vous
ERNESTO (Sans pseudonyme)--Crulder (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted by Fitindia. --Thibaut (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Chers amis, je vous remercie de tout cœur pour votre initiative et votre aide à "lier" mes nombreuses photos, aux différentes pages et applications WIKI , qui je dois l'avouer sont un peu ésotériques pour moi, qui suis très "anciennes écoles".
Mon père ayant été , pendant de nombreuses années, photographe AFP, UNIVERSAL et d'autres agences, il m'a laissé, à son décès, des centaines de photos que j'essaie d'insérer autant que faire se peut sur les pages WIKI, or je ne sais même pas comment argumenter et insérer la permission de mon défunt père.
Devant de telles fallacieuses attitudes, vraiment obtuses, je pense même cesser de collaborer avec WIKI et tant pis pour la suite... je suis sincèrement désolé que ces insertions de photos puissent engendrer de telles "prises de tête" et autres désagréments non-mérités. Si la diffusion de ce patrimoine sur Wiki, qui se veut en mon for-intérieur, universel, non-lucratif et toujours altruiste, doit être en contrepartie, agrémentée par une telle NOMENKLATURA qui , à mes yeux s'avère liberticide, alors je songe réellement à m'abstenir de telles démarches...
En tout cas, je réitère mes plus chaleureux remerciements pour votre aide.
Bien à vous
ERNESTO (Sans pseudonyme) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crulder (talk • contribs)
Deleted: Speedy deleted by Fitindia. --Thibaut (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
manque le nom et la permission du photographe et de AFP => see https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:52, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Chers amis, je vous remercie de tout cœur pour votre initiative et votre aide à "lier" mes nombreuses photos, aux différentes pages et applications WIKI , qui je dois l'avouer sont un peu ésotériques pour moi, qui suis très "anciennes écoles".
Mon père ayant été , pendant de nombreuses années, photographe AFP, UNIVERSAL et d'autres agences, il m'a laissé, à son décès, des centaines de photos que j'essaie d'insérer autant que faire se peut sur les pages WIKI, or je ne sais même pas comment argumenter et insérer la permission de mon défunt père.
Devant de telles fallacieuses attitudes, vraiment obtuses, je pense même cesser de collaborer avec WIKI et tant pis pour la suite... je suis sincèrement désolé que ces insertions de photos puissent engendrer de telles "prises de tête" et autres désagréments non-mérités. Si la diffusion de ce patrimoine sur Wiki, qui se veut en mon for-intérieur, universel, non-lucratif et toujours altruiste, doit être en contrepartie, agrémentée par une telle NOMENKLATURA qui , à mes yeux s'avère liberticide, alors je songe réellement à m'abstenir de telles démarches...
En tout cas, je réitère mes plus chaleureux remerciements pour votre aide.
Bien à vous
ERNESTO (Sans pseudonyme)
- Bonjour. Difficile de vous faire confiance. Sur votre page de discussion de wikipédia en français, vous affirmez que ces photos vous ont été données par votre cousin, journaliste AFP https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discussion_utilisateur:Crulder&diff=177448692&oldid=177365035
- Désormais, vous affirmez que ces photos proviennent de votre père.
- Ce que nous pouvons constater, c'est que plusieurs des photos que vous avez téléchargées sur commons sont propriété de l'AFP.
- Bien à vous
- --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 18:06, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted by Fitindia, no evidence of permission. --Thibaut (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Manewry_parowozu_Ty42-107_na_stacji_w_%C5%BBabnie.png Imaginexttyu (talk) 14:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Work of art by Claes Oldenburg (still alive). American FOP doesn't extend to sculptures even in public places, and the camp of Oldenburg had one time requested Wikimedia to remove images of his sculptures situated in the United States in 2012 (see https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/DMCA_Oldenburg). See also Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Info it appears this artistic work was included in the DMCA takedown notice. To quote:
19. 4029
Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen Free Stamp, 1991 Steel and aluminum; painted with polyurethane enamel 28 ft. 10 in. x 26 ft. x 49 ft. (8.8 x 7.9 x 14.9 m) Collection Willard Park, Cleveland, Ohio Copyright 1991 Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen
_JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Batcolumn
[edit]These files are focused on Batcolumn (as their titles speak), a work of art by Claes Oldenburg, who was noted to have sent a formal DMCA correspondence in 2012 to remove many images of his artwork in countries were FOP doesn't extend to 3D artwork like sculptures. True to that, American FOP is limited to architecture only. The three other files in the category that I didn't nominate may fulfill de minimis, but may become borderline because of the 2012 action made by Oldenburg's side against Wikimedia Foundation.
- File:Batcolumn (14581985852).jpg
- File:Batcolumn, Chicago (15676546997) (cropped).jpg
- File:Batcolumn, Chicago (15676546997).jpg
- File:Sculpture "Batcolumn" at Harold Washington Social Security Center, Chicago, Illinois LCCN2010719962.tif
- File:Sculpture "Batcolumn" at Harold Washington Social Security Center, Chicago, Illinois LCCN2010719963.tif
- File:Sculpture Batcolumn at Harold Washington Social Security Center, Chicago, Illinois LCCN2010719962 (cropped).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Batcolumn
[edit]It seems the remainder are also violations of no-US FOP for non-architectural artistic works. Their titles and their principal category speaks of their intended motif - to present the image of sculpture by Claes Oldenburg who is alive. The fact that "Batcolumn (14602833243).jpg", though the sculpture is at the side, is used to illustrate an article of the sculpture itself and of the artist himself means it cannot be qualified for COM:DM. Batcolumn sculpture is the central motif of these remaining images. Perhaps moving one copy to enwiki under reduced quality and resolution (to comply with w:WP:Non-free content and fair use) is strongly suggested, unless there will be an FOP movement in America to finally include outdoor sculptures.
- File:Batcolumn (14602833243).jpg
- File:Sculpture "Batcolumn" at Harold Washington Social Security Center, Chicago, Illinois LCCN2010719951.tif
- File:Sculpture Batcolumn at Harold Washington Social Security Center, Chicago, Illinois LCCN2010719951 (cropped).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:31, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Joint work of art by Claes Oldenburg (still alive) and his wife van Bruggen (d. 2009). The camp of Oldenburg had one time requested Wikimedia to remove images of his sculptures situated in the United States in 2012 (see https://foundation.wikimedia.org/wiki/DMCA_Oldenburg). For SoKor, there's no FOP permitting commercial reuses of images of copyrighted buildings and sculptures in the country. See also Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle.
- File:Coosje van Bruggen and Claes Oldenburg, Spring (2006).JPG
- File:Coosje van bruggen spring beeniru 1.JPG
- File:Coosje van bruggen spring beeniru 2.JPG
- File:Coosje van bruggen spring beeniru 4.JPG
- File:Coosje van bruggen spring beeniru.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Seems that this artwork is only created by Coosje van Bruggen. Her husband didn't involve in it. Nonetheless,
Delete per COM:FOP SK and they can be undeleted on 1 January 2080. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
- Therefore, I uploaded a black-painted file with copyright-protected parts only for files that can be used even if the copyright-protected part is painted black.
- I think that these files can be used as square and street photos if the copyrighted areas are painted black. Ox1997cow (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: these blacked-out photos can also be used in the future: if ever a new movement to remove restrictions emerge in SoKor (analogous to the campaign of European Wikipedians in saving FOP in Europe way back 2015). If possible, may I request you to black-out also the image of Lotte Tower while still not yet deleted? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Sorry. It's impossible right now because I'm busy. However, I will make it later. Ox1997cow (talk) 04:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: these blacked-out photos can also be used in the future: if ever a new movement to remove restrictions emerge in SoKor (analogous to the campaign of European Wikipedians in saving FOP in Europe way back 2015). If possible, may I request you to black-out also the image of Lotte Tower while still not yet deleted? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:19, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
no indication at source page that jmage is released under the stated licence. The exif information states explicitly that the image is copyrighted. Nthep (talk) 23:10, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. The Natural History Museum is publicly funded, and the image is part of a press release intended for public dissemination. Wjfox2005 (talk) 08:44, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I've asked for clarification from the NHM re copyright status. Mjroots (talk) 10:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I've now emailed the press office at the NHM. Waiting to hear back from them. Wjfox2005 (talk) 09:39, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Wjfox2005: When you uploaded the image, presumably you just picked CC-BY-SA-4.0 as a licence that you assumed the museum ought to have used, rather than actually confirming it was released with that licence? --Pontificalibus (talk) 18:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Mjroots: There is no evidence that the image has a suitable licence - the fact the museum is publicly funded is not relevant, because unlike the US there is no general expectation in the UK publicly funded organisations will freely license their works. A quick search does not reveal that the museum ever licenses images using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.--Pontificalibus (talk) 18:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Pontificalibus: given that we cannot verify the status of this image, it's a Delete from me. We've given this one enough time. Mjroots (talk) 18:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This isn't complicated and should be closed - the image is clearly designated as copyright on the source page and was uploaded with a made-up commons license which it demonstrably does not have.--Pontificalibus (talk) 09:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, © Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London. --Túrelio (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. The building already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, and they are subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 01:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: still under construction, it is an unfinished work thus not copyrightable in Italy. Ruthven (msg) 07:53, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. The building already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, and they are subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 01:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: It is still under construction, it is an unfinished work thus not copyrightable in Italy. Ruthven (msg) 07:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. The building already shows most of the permanent exterior architecture, and they are subject to copyright A1Cafel (talk) 01:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: still under construction, it is an unfinished work thus not copyrightable in Italy. Ruthven (msg) 07:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
dominican republic (5-8) Lumia1234 (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minoraxtalk 12:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
This image has been mis-labelled with the intention to deceive Richard Avery (talk) 10:51, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 02:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Low quality photograph. Date is mislabeled - the scene is Celtic supporters before the 2003 UEFA Cup Final, not in October 2005 as claimed. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:21, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 12:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, I appreciate the communication. Originally I uploaded the image for public use and distribution. As far as the copyright code, somehow it was misplaced via upload. If you could make it available for public domain that would be great, otherwise, I will just have to reupload it with proper settings in due time. I appreciate you and thank you for your communication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitalytennant (talk • contribs)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 06:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
100% identical to File:Map of UT of Jammu and Kashmir and UT of Ladakh.jpg with an incorrect licence. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 07:26, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
bogus licence, but the logo may not reach the TOO Veverve (talk) 23:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
File:Das Mädchen von Treppi.- Marion. Two Novelettes for Use in School and College (IA dasmdchenvontre01heysgoog).pdf
[edit]Essentially the same edition as File:Das Mädchen von Treppi, Marion; two novelettes for use in school and college. Edited by Wilhelm Bernhardt (IA dasmdchenvontr00heys).pdf plus a front page by Google. Redundant. De728631 (talk) 00:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 18:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
File:The Annals and magazine of natural history; zoology, botany, and geology (IA annalsmagazineof8161915lond).pdf
[edit]This journal issue was first published in London. It contains contributions by various authors whose copyright term of 70 years pma has not yet expired, so the work is not free in the country of origin. De728631 (talk) 20:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Individual illustrations in Category:Annals and Magazine of Natural History (1915) are not affected. They are all out of copyright. De728631 (talk) 20:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The last contributor apparently died in 1972 (as far as I saw), so I'll put it up for restoration in 2043. --Rosenzweig τ 18:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
This location map is inferior to File:India Jammu and Kashmir location map Indian view.svg and is used by none. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 07:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Both maps are different. This deletion request has no valid rationale. --RaviC (talk) 19:25, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The slight difference in shading is superficial and not even explained. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
I drew this map on Microsoft Paint according to similar Balıkesir maps on Commons. It has somewhat low resolution and there are some unrealistic district frontiers. Some drawing mistakes are also visible. This file isn't using on wiki projects. There is this map that performs the same function, has more realistic district frontiers and is better drawn. I suggest it will be to deleted for these reasons. Uncitoyen (talk) 08:08, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:01, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
I drew this map on Microsoft Paint according to similar Balıkesir maps on Commons. It has somewhat low resolution and there are some unrealistic district frontiers. Some drawing mistakes are also visible. (eg: There are problems on painting the map.) This file isn't using on wiki projects. There is this map that performs the same function, has more realistic district frontiers and is better drawn. I suggest it will be to deleted for these reasons. Uncitoyen (talk) 08:09, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Letter by deputy US chief prosecutor in the Nuremberg Trials Robert M. W. Kempner to Rainer Hildebrandt.jpg
[edit]This file was initially tagged by IamNotU as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader claims "own work", but the author is clearly Robert Kempner, died 1993 - no evidence of a free license.
Due to complicated US copyright terms, a regular DR seems the be more appropriate in order to assess whether this letter is still in copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- From my understanding, and reading the Village Pump copyright discussions, there is no particular exemption for personal letters. The recipient (or in this case his heir) owns the physical object and may display or sell it, but they don't have the right to publish it unless they secure publishing rights from the author or his estate/heirs, or until it passes into the public domain, in the case of unpublished works created before 1978, 70 years after the author's death, which would be the year 2063. There's no evidence or reason to believe that the author published the letter, that I know of. I'd be happy to know if there are other considerations that make it more complicated than that. The person who uploaded it also uploaded at least one other file that was a clear copyright violation, so we can't assume that they've done due diligence regarding copyright status. --IamNotU (talk) 10:44, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by IamNotU as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Uploader claims "own work", but the author is clearly Henry Kissinger - no evidence of a free license.
Converted to regular DR due to rather complicated US copyright terms and to allow for discussion about whether this letter is above COM:TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and little educational/historical value. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Not in use formal PR picture. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Actually, it cannot stay in the Commons as it is not an online photo album and cannot be a repository for just anything. Ldorfman (talk) 14:42, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
non free logo of commercial TV channel 188.162.65.167 16:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:06, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Apparently I made a mistake by cropping this file. Based on this comment VOA copyright does not apply to the logo. Are we supposed to delete the original image as well?--Balyozxane (talk) 16:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Keep The logo is a derivative work of a symbol (Faravahar) which is in the public domain. And the typeface having nothing special so I think we can keep it.--Ghybu (talk) 02:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Ghybu. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
This was first published in France, so the copyright term is 70 years pma. The illustrator Lalau died in 1961, so this book is not yet free in the country of origin. De728631 (talk) 17:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Related category Category:Contes mauve (1921), the images by Lalu will sadly have to be deleted. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Indeed. I have tagged the remaining files in the category. De728631 (talk) 19:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luis.Goecken (talk · contribs)
[edit]Own work from 1908-1916? Very unlikely.
- File:Bahnhof Zuchering 1916 Ortsseite.jpg
- File:Bahnhof Zuchering 1916.jpg
- File:Kirche Zuchering 1908.jpg
- File:Brauhaus Zuchering.jpg
Didym (talk) 20:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, historical images missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Albrecht Vorherr (talk · contribs)
[edit]OTRS ticket is missing
Mutter Erde (talk) 16:06, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. A Walter Schürer is given as the author, but I don't see anything on when he died. When he was alive in 1938/39 to take these images, he might have been still alive post-1950. --Rosenzweig τ 22:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Generali Tower
[edit]No FoP in Italy. Architect Zaha Hadid died in 2016, still within the 70 pma of the country
- File:Generali Tower (Hadid) Milan 01.jpg
- File:Torre Hadid (lo Storto).jpg
- File:Torre Hadid.jpg
- File:Torre Hadid.png
- File:Via Luciano Berio, Milan, May 2018 (03).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 01:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- I started handling this request, but this picture mentions Commons:Deletion requests/File:Torre Hadid.jpg, handled by Ruthven, who has a different interpretaton of this tower. "not a "building with important artistic character" protected by the Ministry"
- Restoring the images for now, awaiting the opinion of Ruthven, because I've noticed A1Cafel nominating a lot of pictures from Italy the last few days because of no-FOP. Ciell (talk) 22:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks Ciell. In Italy the threshold of originality is very high. This applies for architectural works as well: what are explicitly protected are the recent buildings with an "original and artistic character" (Codice dei Beni Culturali art. 11 co. 1.e). Actually the Ministry in charge of Ministry of Cultural Heritage and Tourism publishes a list of the protected buildings for which this character of originality is recognised. This list should be examined before proposing an architectural work in Italy for deletion.
NB: This doesn't apply to architetures older than 50 or 70 years, and for the blueprints. --Ruthven (msg) 19:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)- @Ruthven: And now, the problem is that if {{Italy-MiBAC-disclaimer}} is suitable here or not. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep See COM:FOP Italy. Italian buildings of deceased authors are allowed. Ox1997cow (talk) 00:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep per 1st exception at the updated COM:FOP Italy: work of a deceased author. The architect, as evidence here states, died in 2016. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 01:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Auferstanden aus Ruinen
[edit]These are recordings of East Germany's national anthem. Some are claimed to be {{PD-US-not renewed}}, but since the country of first publication is not the US, but East Germany (November 1949), that is not true, and German Urheberrecht applies.
The recordings as such may not be protected anymore, but the song itself still is. The lyricist died in 1958, the composer in 1962, so this is still protected until the beginning of 2033, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2033.
- File:Anthem of East Germany (First Vocal Recording).ogg
- File:Auferstanden aus Ruinen (Instrumental).oga
- File:Auferstanden aus Ruinen (Vocal).ogg
Rosenzweig τ 15:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Why is Anthem of the DDR is copyrighted? DDR does not exist now, but for example - Anthem of the Soviet Union. Soviet Union doesn't exist now [and it's doesn't exist yet] but according to article 1259 of Book IV of the Civil Code of the RF, Soviet state symbols are in PD because «<...> Shall not be objects of copyright: state symbols and signs (flags, emblems, orders, any forms of money, and the like), as well as symbols and signs of municipal formations <...>». I do not know the laws of the FRG, but perhaps it can say something about state symbols. FRG is the legal successor of the GDR, isn't it? CommonsUser (talk) 13:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Soviet law is not relevant for German works. There is no provision in German Urheberrecht (copyright) that puts anthems in the public domain. Germany's current anthem (the Deutschlandlied) is in the PD because both the composer and the lyricist died over 70 years ago. --Rosenzweig τ 11:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- You misunderstood me, but that's a common situation for Wikimedia Commons. Please, take care to read the text more carefully.
Soviet law is not relevant for German works
- You misunderstood me, but that's a common situation for Wikimedia Commons. Please, take care to read the text more carefully.
. That's just an example. Nothing more. But I must admit, you said something right. You said that.<...> for example - Anthem of the Soviet Union.<...>
As I said before, I don't know German laws (You must admit, that there's so few works with German copyright state tag in the Wikimedia Commons, aren't it?). But there's still a few things left to decide. At first, there's a some things related with Anthem of the DDR. Should we remove the text from Wikipedia? An how about the text and musical notes on papers? For example (ha-ha, example again) - File:Nationalhymne der DDR.jpg and File:Nationalhymne der DDR.svg. As you noted before:<...> There is no provision in German Urheberrecht (copyright) that puts anthems in the public domain. Germany's current anthem (the Deutschlandlied) is in the PD because both the composer and the lyricist died over 70 years ago.
Well, good point. Yes, these papers now is in the public domain, but text and musical notes, however, is not. As a result, I suppose, this is a violation of copyright (related rights, maybe). Should we remove them? Yes. If you are looking for a violations, you can find them almost everywhere [i found!]. CommonsUser (talk) 19:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)<...>The recordings as such may not be protected anymore, but the song itself still is.<..>
- Please, pay your attention to that nomination: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Auferstanden aus Ruinen.oga.
<...>The recordings as such may not be protected anymore, but the song itself still is.<...>
— Rosenzweig 15:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
It is true that song itself is public domain, but this recording is probably copyrighted.
— SpanishSnake 01:47, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Info:
- Object for deletion: File:Auferstanden aus Ruinen.oga
- Deletion request state: successful
- Deletion reason: It is true that song itself is public domain, but this recording is probably copyrighted.
- Deletion date: 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted: per nomination
- Deleted by: User:Stifle
- Nominated by: User:SpanishSnake
- CommonsUser (talk) 00:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- I don't really see a point in your rambling remarks. If something is not relevant (like Soviet law), don't bring it up in such a discussion, you're wasting everybody's time. If you think other files should be deleted, nominate them for deletion and don't use them fo further complicate this discussion. The same goes for questions if some text should be removed from Wikipedia. --Rosenzweig τ 07:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- You're trying to avoid my question, because it's inconvenient for you. As I can see, you are not even trying to read the text carefully. A query, have you ever heard the word "example"? I suppose you didn't. Since you not understand me, I advise you to take a minute and look at the "Example" article here. Please, note that I didn’t even mention the Copyright Law of USSR. I have mentioned the Civil Code of Russia, but it was an example. The problem is that there is copyright violations in all these files. Do you agree or not? Or maybe you only consider the sound recording, but not the text, to be a "violation"? Make your own choice and answer me. 09:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CommonsUser (talk • contribs) 09:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Russian law is just as irrelevant here as Soviet law or random example articles. And what exactly is your question that I'm supposedly trying to avoid? Please state it clearly and succinctly and don't bury it in rambling paragraphs. I won't play guessing games here. --Rosenzweig τ 11:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- In German law, official government works (e.g. flags, anthems, legal texts) are not copyrightable, regardless of medium. And since the Federal Republic of Germany is the legal successor of East Germany, this anthem would likely be an official government work, thus in the public domain. This overrides any composition, sound recording, or performance rights. I think this is what CommonsUser is trying to say. SpellingNinja (talk) 14:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- Russian law is just as irrelevant here as Soviet law or random example articles. And what exactly is your question that I'm supposedly trying to avoid? Please state it clearly and succinctly and don't bury it in rambling paragraphs. I won't play guessing games here. --Rosenzweig τ 11:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- You're trying to avoid my question, because it's inconvenient for you. As I can see, you are not even trying to read the text carefully. A query, have you ever heard the word "example"? I suppose you didn't. Since you not understand me, I advise you to take a minute and look at the "Example" article here. Please, note that I didn’t even mention the Copyright Law of USSR. I have mentioned the Civil Code of Russia, but it was an example. The problem is that there is copyright violations in all these files. Do you agree or not? Or maybe you only consider the sound recording, but not the text, to be a "violation"? Make your own choice and answer me. 09:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CommonsUser (talk • contribs) 09:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- You're wrong. There is no provision in German Urheberrecht (copyright) that puts anthems in the public domain. The kind of official works to which PD applies in German law can be found in Template:PD-GermanGov: statutes, ordinances, official decrees or judgments. Not anything produced or published by the government or an official body in German is in the public domain (unlike works of the US federal government). --Rosenzweig τ 18:31, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
This anthem shouldn't be removed until the government call to do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cesar kaiser kolmer (talk • contribs) 23:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- The precautionary principle disagrees with that approach. --Rosenzweig τ 11:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Auferstanden aus Ruinen
[edit]Files with the text or melody of East Germany's national anthem, which is still protected by copyright. The lyricist died in 1958, the composer in 1962, so this is still protected until the beginning of 2033, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2033. And, as before: There is no provision in German Urheberrecht (copyright) that puts anthems in the public domain. Germany's current anthem (the Deutschlandlied) is in the PD because both the composer and the lyricist died over 70 years ago. So Auferstanden aus Ruinen is not an official work in the legal sense.
- File:Auferstanden aus Ruinen (Deutsche Nationalhymne).jpg
- File:Nationalhymne der DDR (ohne Emblem).svg
- File:Nationalhymne der DDR - 1949, sheet music.jpg
- File:Nationalhymne der DDR - 1950, sheet music.jpg
- File:Nationalhymne der DDR.jpg
- File:Nationalhymne der DDR.svg
- File:Risen-From-Ruins(Instrumental).ogg
Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Was soll dieses Rumgetrolle. Behalten, weil Nationalhymnen keinem Schutz unterliegen. Als amtliche Werke, wie ich 2007 schrieb:
- 2001:9E8:4A22:9600:409E:F3C9:3C2A:A8FE 20:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- Und in welchem amtlichen Werk gem. § 5 (1) UrhG wurde Auferstanden aus Ruinen veröffentlicht? --Rosenzweig τ 21:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Latvia. 188.123.231.31 17:29, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
What a waste of time and effort - what is the benefit to you, or anyone else, of deleting this? Do you think that the headstone maker from 1992 is harmed by this image being shared? Also, I'm not exactly sure that a headstone classifies as an original work of art. --Unlikelylads (talk) 18:28, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Keep calm and see COM:PRP and COM:DW. --188.123.231.31 11:03, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
NOTE: When undeleting in 2022, please also remove the delete nomination from the files in Category:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897). I did not do this, because it was forgotten, and its only 2 months before 2022. Ellywa (talk) 20:29, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
This is a Dutch publication with a copyright term of 70 years pma. The author died in 1951, so the work is not yet free in the country of origin. De728631 (talk) 20:58, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
See also the related Category:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897). De728631 (talk) 20:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Also deleted (and can be undeleted 2022)
- File:Arkiv för zoologi (1909) (20147390468).jpg
- File:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897) (20845267945).jpg
- File:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897) (20818780636).jpg
- File:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897) (20818777426).jpg
- File:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897) (20818774116).jpg
- File:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897) (20818764246).jpg
- File:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897) (20657273918).jpg
- File:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897) (20657006100).jpg
- File:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897) (20658529299).jpg
- File:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897) (20657216250).jpg
- File:De dierlijke vijanden der koffiecultuur op Java (1897) (20657003180).jpg
Ellywa (talk) 22:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation, artist died in 1970. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
No sé qui envia això però no s'ha violat cap dret d'autor. L'artista Anton Català Gomis era el meu pare i les fotografies dels gravats les he fetes jo mateixa. Espero que no eliminin res. Gràcies!
Glòria Català Agràs — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 93.176.147.210 (talk) 09:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hola Glòria. Pots escriur-ho un'altra vegada com a Usuària:Glòria Català i Agràs? Salutacions a Barcelona. --E4024 (talk) 16:48, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. If the uploader is the author's daughter as claimed a VRT permission would be needed. --Rosenzweig τ 17:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
not simple enough to be public domain. Shades and forms are original enough. Kuatrero (talk) 05:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
-- @Kuatrero: Después de haberte "retirado" parece que no te has cansado de perseguirme. There are multiple images in Lipa's category that were uploaded by other users for their so-called "own work" that you should focus on. This one that you indicate does not have the sufficient threshold of originality to be protected by copyright and therefore must reside in the public domain. Alexismata7 (talk) 12:03, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - This is a UK logo. The UK has a specific copyright for typography which applies here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
This is an early recording of East Germany's national anthem. The file is claimed to be {{PD-US-not renewed}}, but since the country of first publication is not the US, but East Germany (November 1949), that is not true, and German Urheberrecht applies.
The recording as such may not be protected anymore, but the song itself still is. The lyricist died in 1958, the composer in 1962, so this is still protected until the beginning of 2033, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2033. Rosenzweig τ 15:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Word mistakenly recorded in Tamil Language instead of Dagbani Language Shahadusadik (talk) 07:23, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- yes.File:Dag-Babito.ogg available. So this is the duplicate file with wrong language tag i.e., "ta-" Please do Remove--Info-farmer (talk) 01:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Let's not delete it, instead we can renames it. -—M@sssly✉ 14:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Question I'm confused. If this was recorded in Tamil and is also labeled as "Ta-", this should be correct, shouldn't it? Why should the file be deleted or renamed? --Rosenzweig τ 12:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right Rosenzweig, thanks for asking. Yes indeed, it was recorded in Tamil and also labeled as "Ta-". However, the uploader actually made a mistake using the Spell4Wiki app, they meant to record in Dag. There are plenty of the same issues with the uploader at Category:Files uploaded by spell4wiki in CHECK. All of their recordings of Kasi Fadila there should be in Dag and not Ta. -—M@sssly✉ 08:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- So if it is labeled correctly, why did you propose to rename it to an incorrect file name? --Rosenzweig τ 08:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't mean it's labeled correctly, I meant to say your reasoning is absolutely correct. The current labeling is wrong and should also have said ...Dagbani. The app adds the labels automatically based on whatever language is selected. -—M@sssly✉ 08:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- So contrary to what you wrote, it was NOT recorded in Tamil, but in Dagbani, and some setting in whatever app used for this was wrong? (Does it even make a difference? Sounds basically the same to me.) --Rosenzweig τ 11:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- You're absolutely right Rosenzweig, thanks for asking. Yes indeed, it was recorded in Tamil and also labeled as "Ta-". However, the uploader actually made a mistake using the Spell4Wiki app, they meant to record in Dag. There are plenty of the same issues with the uploader at Category:Files uploaded by spell4wiki in CHECK. All of their recordings of Kasi Fadila there should be in Dag and not Ta. -—M@sssly✉ 08:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: as I understand, we can just rename the file. I don't know the language and can't notice the difference, just trusting Masssly, who, as I see, is working with Dagbani files and is an experienced contributor. --rubin16 (talk) 12:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)