Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/10/27
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Copyright violation; This is a screen capture of a website, not original work Di (they-them) (talk) 01:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Me and my dog. Or my girlfriend and her dog. I am sure for "some" people this is in scope and own work. For me none of them. E4024 (talk) 01:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ARAHMAN420 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos of non-notable event and people, no description, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Osm16.jpg
- File:Osm15.jpg
- File:Osm14.jpg
- File:Osm12.jpg
- File:Osm13.jpg
- File:Osm10.jpg
- File:Osm11.jpg
- File:Osm9.jpg
- File:Osm8.jpg
- File:Osm7.jpg
- File:Osm6.jpg
- File:Osm5.jpg
- File:Osm2.jpg
- File:Osm3.jpg
- File:Osm1.jpg
- File:Data for action 03.jpg
- File:Data for action 02.jpg
- File:Data for action 01.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nobleschool (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logo, photos of non-notable person and school building, no educational value, out of scope. Likely screengrabs as well.
- File:Noble School Alipur Logo.jpg
- File:Noble School Alipur.jpg
- File:Noble School Alipur-Director.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
no evidence of the uploader holding the copyright; no free licenses for photos on the source website Schwede66 02:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
棕铭和群丽在马德里照片 62.57.66.70 03:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- What is this about? I don't understand the motivation, which makes no sense with Google Translate either, and I don't see any reason for it either. Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 07:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Not own work, from https://www.disaster.go.th/th/cdetail-14054-perimeter_fence-129-3/ Podzemnik (talk) 04:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Podzemnik. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
The photo looks like its own creation, but has no metadata. Given the user's history (1, 2, 3, 4), it is likely to be a capture of some original image or video. Jardel talk 04:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation [1]. The creator should not have been informed about its use here, noting that there is a cut and blur in this image. Jardel talk 04:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Photoshopped and nonsense file name Firestar464 (talk) 06:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: a photoshopped, useless photograph, serves no worthwhile educational purpose for keeping. JavaHurricane (talk) 06:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per JavaHurricane.
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:PCP, low image quality and has watermark. Potential Copyright violation. SCP-2000 07:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
As, freedom-of-panorama exception of Finland covers only buildings, the portrait-poster to the right needs to be blanked-out or cropped away. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- I cropped the poster away and uploaded a new version of the photo. But I guess the original need to be deleted anyhow? --Estormiz (talk) 17:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: as the problem has been solved. --Túrelio (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Zdjęcie umieszczone na stronie prezentujące mnie jako osobę duchowną jest nieaktualne i nieadekwatne do mojej obecnej sytuacji. Piotr Ochotny (piotrochotny@gmail.com) 83.24.144.33 19:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 20:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
own work? https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiv5ZOOadcJanZ0qZGHd9054DFkbuyZOY5KXvSd2hkbS82DnslWSSoatpNyswvvr93d7jq5QEsG9-Of7h0_1C7A_1GY-CVGlKDVj2W-Pm7nw7fuLXIfiCCyYyL3bySWWgNcmEgjiU_1tWpeA0Z6QcEbw2wxnmBUyenAX8tTOwZHmmOAaycPV1LWc_1ZBX9lPlRoRRBBAeIccnYzJmfFyseuc49JJBLk-w8T-UGTPbcfkblYGBJzmJf87r9P4FKnzMEqPTZmgJL0ioYjt2VB2uIyqCFW6g1AYSJtjxcHIM_1wZTcAu5y6dU68XICekhSPEotxrG2Xf4oKHND1-iSmR7yyYQIouLfqs9w Túrelio (talk) 17:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 22:21, 27 Oktober 2020 UTC: Commons:Licensing: album cover --Krdbot 03:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake NBTFTV 2 (talk) 01:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7. --Túrelio (talk) 14:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
fehlerhafter Kommentar Simon Hegele (talk) 13:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Ich ziehe den Antrag zurück.
I withdraw my nomination Simon Hegele (talk) 14:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --轻语者 (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
There was a quick delete request by @MiguelAlanCS claiming a copyright violation because there are book covers on the photograph. Yet imo the main subject of the image is a person portrait. The book covers are each very small and are only padding. Imo file should be kept. – Hubo una solicitud de eliminación rápida por parte de MiguelAlanCS alegando una violación de los derechos de autor porque hay portadas de libros en la fotografía. Sin embargo, yo pienso que el tema principal de la imagen es un retrato de una persona. Las portadas de los libros son cada una muy pequeña y son sólo rellenos. Yo pienso que el archivo debería ser guardado. Mussklprozz (talk) 20:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- As Reinhard Kraasch has now cropped the image, there is no more protected content on them. --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Covers were pixelated. --DaB. (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
misnamed, should have been named "Diel vertical migration" Epipelagic (talk) 09:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 06:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Files of Wikisamuele
[edit]Here are last remaining uploads of Wikisamuele (talk · contribs):
- File:Commendatore Borsotti 2015.jpg (1178×1767)
- File:Renato Borsotti 1.jpg (212×254)
- File:Renato Borsotti 0.jpg (496×576)
Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
No source/permission
- File:Ickes in 94.png
- File:Nader in the 90s.png
- File:Jerry Brown in 1988.png
- File:ICKES IN 1993.png
- File:Ron Paul in 2012.png
- File:Reagan in 1984.png
- File:Iacocca in 1980.png
- File:Reagan in 1980.png
- File:Mike Gravel in the 70s.jpg
- File:Alger Hiss in 1980.png
- File:Earl Warren in color.png
- File:LBJ in 1972.png
- File:Karl Hess.png
- File:Johnson in 1968.png
- File:Goldwater in 1964.png
- File:Richard Nixon 1964.png
- File:LBJ in 64.png
- File:Goldwater color 64.png
- File:Fielding L. Wright.png
- File:Henry A. Wallace portrait.png
- File:Arthur Vandenberg 48.png
- File:Robert A. Taft portrait shot.png
- File:Arthur Vandenberg Jan 1.png
- File:Dwight Eisenhower in Europe.png
- File:Eisenhower52.png
- File:Rex Tugwell Portrait.png
- File:Strom Thurmond 1961.png
- File:AlgerhissUN.png
Minoraxtalk 07:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:18, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
No source/permission
- File:Reagan 60s brick wall portrait.png
- File:Mcgovern color 72.png
- File:Mcgovern 76 in color.png
- File:Trumkaportrait.png
- File:Trumka2000.png
- File:Buchanan2000.png
Minoraxtalk 08:54, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:19, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious maps of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:1992 ickes v amato.png
- File:Kroc vs moscone.png
- File:Kroc v landrieu.png
- File:Landrieu vs bennett.png
- File:1968 bennett vs ribicoff.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Morwitzalfrod (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Morwitz Alfrod.jpg
- File:Resepsiyon1.jpg
- File:Cavit Caglar.jpg
- File:Ilhan-selcuk 3944 b.jpg
- File:Joji-Miller.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tcheugoue Ngadjui (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Cyril Dorand Domche Nzeugang on Set.jpg
- File:Cyril Dorand Domche Nzeugang and formal minister Cécile kyenge.jpg
- File:Cyril Dorand Domche Nzeugang with actress.jpg
- File:Cyril Dorand Domche Nzeugang Top Model.jpg
- File:Cyril Dorand Domche Nzeugang in Alice nella città.jpg
- File:Cyril Dorand Domche Nzeugang At five stars hotel.jpg
- File:Cyril Dorand Domche Nzeugang on the Red carpet.jpg
- File:Zombie Film Workshop at Barbuka production.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
IRC images by Serge1958
[edit]- File:IRC-Image092.jpg
- File:IRC-Image093.jpg
- File:IRC-Image096.jpg
- File:IRC-Image097.jpg
- File:IRC-Image099.jpg
- File:IRC-Image109.jpg
- File:IRC-Image110.jpg
- File:IRC-Image116.jpg
- File:IRC-Image117.jpg
- File:IRC-Image118.jpg
- File:IRC-Image119.jpg
- File:IRC-Image123.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Serge1958 user a {{CC0}} license and an "own work/own copyright" claim. I believe they should be deleted because they are modern artistic designs and the copyright is owned either by the individual artists or the UPU. SV1XV (talk) 15:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cesar TruCe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears to match content from [2]. No evidence of permission. At most, was only used transiently as part of now-deleted content on eswiki.
- File:Screen Fabrication.jpg
- File:Unit Pump Egypt.jpg
- File:OSI Offices.jpg
- File:OSI Logo copia.png
- File:ESP Premium Packages Tools.jpg
- File:Chemical Treatment.jpg
- File:Gas Separator Tools.jpg
- File:Sand Control Tools.jpg
- File:Sand Control.png
- File:Tubing Screen .png
- File:Logo OSI US.png
DMacks (talk) 16:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Can't really see how this could ever be used, I believe this file was uploaded as part of an album but never got round to sorting files out - Can't see how this could be used, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, Uploaded as part of a Flickr album hence upload, Thanks –Davey2010Talk 19:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a Flickr album years ago - out of scope and cannot see how this could be used. Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:06, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded years ago as part of an album - out of scope, thanks Davey2010|Davey2010]]Talk 19:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 19:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:14, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:14, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:28, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:57, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 20:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 21:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 21:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Low res, no EXIF, uploaded by sockpuppeteer who primarily takes images from social media and whose socks have uploaded copyvios of this subject. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 21:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 21:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 21:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 21:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 21:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a flickr album years ago - out of scope –Davey2010Talk 22:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Abraj Al Bait Towers
[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabian. The Makkah Royal Clock Tower Hotel is copyrighted by Dar Al-Handasah.
- File:Kabah is main location of muslims 2014-07-10 17-42.jpeg
- File:Makka.jpeg
- File:Makkah Clock.jpg
- File:MeccaTower01.JPG
- File:MeccaTower02.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Abraj Al Bait Towers
[edit]No FoP in Saudi Arabia and de minimis does not apply to these particular photographs, where the building is the most prominent if not the only subject.
- File:Clock Tower Saudi Arabia.jpg
- File:Mohamad shrine 2 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Mohamad shrine 3 - panoramio.jpg
- File:برج الساعه بالسعودية.jpg
- File:Ajyad, Mecca 24231, Saudi Arabia - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Al Abraj al Bait ZamZam Tawer hotel - panoramio.jpg
- File:Al Hajlah, Mecca Saudi Arabia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Al Haram, Mecca 24231, Saudi Arabia - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Al Haram, Mecca 24231, Saudi Arabia - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:Clock Tawer Hotel - panoramio.jpg
- File:Kaba - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Makkah towers - panoramio.jpg
- File:Oh nice image - panoramio.jpg
- File:Saudi arabia makkah - panoramio (11).jpg
- File:Saudi arabia makkah - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:V.amazing image - panoramio.jpg
HyperGaruda (talk) 08:40, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Abraj Al Bait Towers
[edit]No FoP in Saudi Arabia, while this building was only completed in 2011, i.e. too new for PD.
- File:Kaaba and tower behind.jpg
- File:Kakbah dan Menara Mekkah.jpg
- File:Makkah clock tower with Abraj Al Bait Towers.jpg
- File:Makkah clock tower.jpg
HyperGaruda (talk) 22:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and the previous DRs above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 12:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Abraj Al Bait Towers
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia, the copyright belongs to Dar Al-Handasah.
- File:Abraj Al-Bait.jpg
- File:Ajyad, Mecca 24231, Saudi Arabia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Makkah clock tower.jpg
- File:ساعة البرج من مكة.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 23:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and the previous DRs above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Commons is not a private photo collection Podzemnik (talk) 00:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:25, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Commons is not a private photo collection Podzemnik (talk) 00:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:25, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Low quality ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 00:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mecca
[edit]No Freedom of Panorama in Saudi Arabia. The uploaders have not the right to publish photos of copyrighted architectonics under a free licence.
- File:Abraj Al Bait Mecca.jpg
- File:Azizija-pogled na brdo Nur - panoramio.jpg
- File:DIYANET HAC 2010 JUHEYNI HOTEL - panoramio.jpg
- File:HAC 2010 DIYANET OTELI JUHEYNIDEN NUR DAGINA BAKIS - panoramio.jpg
- File:Hotel Hebaollah - panoramio.jpg
- File:Makkah Tower, Makkah Mukarma - panoramio.jpg
- File:Masjid Ul Jaranan Near Makkah - panoramio.jpg
- File:Towers in Makkah - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Towers in Makkah - panoramio.jpg
- File:UMRE 2011 MESCIDI HARAM GÖKDELEN VE KRALIN SARAYI - panoramio.jpg
- File:أبراج مكة تعلوها ساعة مكة المكرمة - panoramio.jpg
- File:بالقرب من الحرم المكي الشريف - panoramio.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 20:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, kept two images that don't seem to depict anything copyrightable. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mecca 2
[edit]Probably not own work, given the uploader's track record and prp.
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 20:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Chart with no indication of importance, obsolete, hard to read Podzemnik (talk) 05:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused other than for vandalism EvergreenFir (talk) 05:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Retratos pessoais de pessoa não notória (Personal portraits of non notorious person) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 05:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 08:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 08:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 08:28, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio Nanahuatl (talk) 08:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader. Not being used. Wumingbai (talk) 08:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused screenshot with no indication of significance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused file with no meaningful explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of unexplained objects. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused file. Some sort of abandoned project? No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
I do not see educational value. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
No educational use, only promotional. Article deleted as not notable. Drakosh (talk) 09:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope. If the information is really useful, then it should be written directly into articles. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Jimmy Wilson is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
self portrait, no use XRay talk 10:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused document. Looks like some sort of playlist. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 10:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploader is himself depicted and this is not a selfie. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal document. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining contribution, not yet nominated for deletion. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
perspektivisch gestaucht; es gibt bessere Bearbeitungen desselben Motivs Mussklprozz (talk) 13:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Agreement from me. No arguments against deletion. Pittigrilli~commonswiki (talk) 08:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I would like for it to be deleted, please. I realized that I don't really have a point in having this picture anymore. Please delete it, thanks! Toad62 (talk) 16:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
attributed to User:Trebbia but looks like a scan from a document. Date of publication unknown. Vera (talk) 14:36, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
copyrighted text. outside scope of Wikimedia Commons Vera (talk) 14:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Perspektivisch gestaucht. Es gibt bessere Bearbeitungen derselben Vorlage Mussklprozz (talk) 14:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Agree. No Arguments against deletion available. Pittigrilli~commonswiki (talk) 09:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
The source claims this work is in the public domain, but it looks contemporary. It's a wiki so anyone could have uploaded the work of somewhere else. Vera (talk) 14:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Supadupamam3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ruslan Bozhko (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams/logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused image of unkown people. Rodrigolopes (talk) 15:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Photographed screen; four other screen photos uploaded by the author (File:Cz loko.jpg, File:Stadler dmu sž.jpg, File:Sodobna đura.jpg, File:SŽ 661 Kennedy.jpg) have been already deleted for copyvio as the original photos were found Upwinxp (talk) 15:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Photographed screen; four other screen photos uploaded by the author (File:Cz loko.jpg, File:Stadler dmu sž.jpg, File:Sodobna đura.jpg, File:SŽ 661 Kennedy.jpg) have been already deleted for copyvio as the original photos were found Upwinxp (talk) 15:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
völlig verpixelt Xocolatl (talk) 15:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Lack of COM:EDUSE because of very poor quality. Looks like a strongly blown up detail of a photograph. --Achim (talk) 15:13, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Incorrect representation of File:Trinitrobenzoic acid.svg. Bad geometry at several N with confusing way of writing the nitro groups, and one missing bond in the lower-most even compared to the other two. DMacks (talk) 15:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 17:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Small file w/o camera EXIF; dubious "own work". --E4024 (talk) 14:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Low resolution file without metadata. Unlikely to be own work. 109.238.80.62 17:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
This is a own work
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Dubious licensing, no evidence of PD. Sealle (talk) 17:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaders single user image. Unused, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 17:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Janardanparamguru (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaders user images. Both unused, out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 17:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaders single user image. Unused, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 18:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE – personal photo of non-notable individuals Gikü (talk) 18:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Uploaders user image. Unused, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 18:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: seems to have only been uploaded as part of this piece of vandalism. I also have serious doubts about the ownership claim for the picture of, presumably, Duncan Trussell. HyperGaruda (talk) 21:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
I am one of the legal representatives of SAEME. It can be checked at: www.saeme.org.br SAEME is an initiative from Brazilian Federal Medical Council and the logo was created by then. You can check my name as one of the responsible people for SAEME and, therefore, I can use the logo.--Matheus Torsani (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 07:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Sculpture in France, propably not in PD due to anti-FOP law. My error. Please don't kill me XDDD
- File:Wicker Pavilion @ Jardins de l'Europe @ Annecy (51301210254).jpg
- File:Wicker Pavilion @ Jardins de l'Europe @ Annecy (51300498846).jpg
- File:Wicker Pavilion @ Jardins de l'Europe @ Annecy (51301513155).jpg
- File:Wicker Pavilion @ Jardins de l'Europe @ Annecy (51299755727).jpg
- File:Ce à quoi pensent les arbres @ Canal du Vassé @ Annecy (51301208914).jpg
Matlin (talk) 18:27, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 13:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. The author of the book Auguste Mohrmann died in 1967. No idea who illustrated the book... Podzemnik (talk) 07:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP. With publication ca. 1930, the illustrator can well have died less than 70 years ago, and it's not claimed that the publication was anonymous (we can't just assume it because the illustrator is not named in this particular image from the publication). The style of the illustration looks also contemporary to the date of publication, so it's not a reproduction of an old picture. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
By request of the original uploader. Didn't see that the photo had my friend in it. Robot8A (talk) 10:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:18, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Theofanis Kavvadas --AinScept (talk) 12:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Source of the image doesn't state a free license. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:19, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
file in copyviol - screenshot from Italian television RAI, without indications about a free use, and inelegible for a Creative Commons licence — danyele 19:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
file in copyviol - screenshot without indications about a free use, and inelegible for a Creative Commons licence — danyele 19:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
file in copyviol - screenshot without indications about a free use, and inelegible for a Creative Commons licence — danyele 19:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Louis XVIII and the royal family assisting at the return of the troops of the Spanish expedition from the balcony of the Tuileries, 1824.jpg
[edit]Source is a deadlink and a better (uncropped) file is available at File:Painting, Louis XVIII and the French Royal Family, Louis Ducis.jpg DutchHoratius (talk) 09:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: work by Louis Ducis (1775–1847). Public Domain. Ruthven (msg) 17:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
this looks like a contemporary drawing and thus not public domain Vera (talk) 14:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Support The website is of a stained glass maker. I cannot even find the image on there, but I suppose it was made by the artist, and thus indeed contemporary. DutchHoratius (talk) 12:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Marlon Brando
[edit]The photos of en:Marlon Brando (1924-2004) transferred from Flickr [3]. The real photographer of these photos is not a Flickr user. Com:License laundering.
- File:Marlon Brando (cropped).jpg
- File:Marlon Brando.jpg
- File:No matter who you get married to, you wake up married to somebody else. Marlon Brando, 1924-2004 -en.svg
- File:No matter who you get married to, you wake up married to somebody else. Marlon Brando, 1924-2004 -pt.svg
Addition,
Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- This is an old photo that was taken at most in 1953, it is therefore in the public domain. The Flickr user's job must have been to color it because the original is in black and white. The photo is from Brando's movie The Wild One.--88marcus (talk) 01:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sadly, the original Flickr user who has uploaded File:Marlon Brando.jpg and File:Marlon Brando Dec 5,09.jpg, didn't own the copyright to those pictures. After a quick reverse image search on Google I've found both of them in the Getty Images collection. This one is from the w:Michael Ochs archives which are currently owned by Getty. --Brinkie (talk) 15:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
- This is an old photo that was taken at most in 1953, it is therefore in the public domain. The Flickr user's job must have been to color it because the original is in black and white. The photo is from Brando's movie The Wild One.--88marcus (talk) 01:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The informations provided in these photos are incorrect author, incorrect date, and incorrect license. Wikimedia Commons can not accept them if the correct informations are not provided. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Delete Files File:Marlon Brando.jpg (and File:Marlon Brando (cropped).jpg) and File:Marlon Brando Dec 5,09.jpg are a copyright violation, see https://www.gettyimages.nl/detail/nieuwsfoto's/headshot-of-marlon-brando-us-actor-in-a-studio-portrait-nieuwsfotos/120357792?adppopup=true and https://www.gettyimages.nl/detail/nieuwsfoto's/actor-marlon-brando-rides-a-triumph-motorcycle-in-a-scene-nieuwsfotos/74255169?adppopup=true and should be nominated for speedy deletion. --Brinkie (talk) 15:19, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. pretty classic images. --Missvain (talk) 23:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Mason County Sculpture Trail
[edit]- File:Harbor11.jpg
- File:Car Ferries display.JPG
- File:Hook on Hamlin sculpture.JPG
- File:Follow the children.jpg
- File:Logging wheels with horse display.JPG
- File:Dummy train display.JPG
- File:Fruits of Farming display.JPG
- File:Reflections stainless steel.JPG
- File:Flights of Learning.JPG
- File:Double the Fun 2014.jpg
- File:Community Cooperative.jpg
- File:Helping Hand sculpture.JPG
- File:The Abbie.jpg
- File:SportFishingSculpture.jpg
These images of recently-created and presumably-copyrighted sculptures were all found on en:Mason County Sculpture Trail (a park in the US), all uploaded by User:Doug Coldwell. Per COM:FOP US there is no freedom of panorama for public artworks in the US. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:41, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
By mistake I have uploaded someone work as my own. 169.149.251.163 05:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Bhupinder Singh Birring: Please confirm whether this ip is you? 轻语者 (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Watermarks O revolucionário aliado (talk) 06:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons isn't a webhost for personal photos. Try Flickr or Facebook. --Missvain (talk) 23:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no permission (No permission since) Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 06:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- This work by w:Chilukuri Narayana Rao published in 1955 is Public Domain in India. The author died in 1951. Please remove the deletion request. Thank you for the concern about the copyright regulations.--Rajasekhar1961 (talk) 06:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 23:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Not official UPM logo 193.24.67.8 10:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. This is post-Soviet sculpture. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- This photo is my own. How can I prove it? --Константин Александров (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- In my opinion, @Константин Александров: , you should contact the sculptor (or his heirs if he is already deceased) and kindly ask if they are willing to release their work (this particular artwork) under free license that can be utilized commercially. Noncommercial and/or fair use licensing are not accepted at Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
When I produced this audio exmaple I forgot a letter, correct spelling is Legespieles, correct Audio example already exists, hear . Sorry for the inconvenience Jeuwre (talk) 12:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZKang123 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Photo depicts copyrighted 2D artwork, non-FoP. The file has been 14 years in Commons and deserves a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
To elaborate, the photo depicts a 2D public artwork, but under Singapore's copyright laws such photos shouldn't be uploaded in Public Domain.--ZKang123 (talk) 13:22, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
screenshot of copyrighted software (Microsoft Windows) 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Penghu Wenshi (mineral)
[edit]Creator 余炳盛 is a university professor[5][6] and not an employee of Central Geological Survey, MOEA, as {{GWOIA}} does not extend to third-party contents. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chongguang Mazu Cultural Park.
Wcam (talk) 13:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
The paintings might be PD-old but the rest of this brochure is copyrighted text. The paintings could be cropped out and uploaded seperately. Vera (talk) 14:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
no proof of permission. Might be PD but no proof of publication date to verify with Vera (talk) 14:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I'm withdrawing my submission. Brittanykristen (talk) 14:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Flags and coat of arms of munipalities of Brazil, with no proper licensing
Rodrigolopes (talk) 15:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Identified and replaced by a better version File:Mourning Dove 2 (PSF).png. We have the raw file too File:PSF-M600008.png. I see no point in keeping this "work in progress" copy. Jahobr (talk) 17:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Identified and replaced by a better version File:Mourning Dove 1 (PSF).png. We have the raw file too File:PSF-M600008.png. I see no point in keeping this "work in progress" copy. Jahobr (talk) 17:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Dubious licensing, no evidence of PD. Sealle (talk) 17:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Daniil Kharms was rehabilitated in 1960, so his works are not free until 2031. COM:Russia#Durations: If the author was subjected to repression and rehabilitated posthumously, countdown of copyright protection is to begin not from the death date, but from the rehabilitation date. Sealle (talk) 17:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Modern art in Zelenogradsk
[edit]- File:Калининградская область. Зеленоградск. Арт-объекты на улицах. Влюблённые котики.jpg
- File:Калининградская область. Зеленоградск. Арт-объекты на улицах. Кот учёный.jpg
- File:Калининградская область. Зеленоградск. Арт-объекты на улицах. Кот-художник.jpg
- File:Калининградская область. Зеленоградск. Арт-объекты на улицах. Котик.jpg
- File:Калининградская область. Зеленоградск. Арт-объекты на улицах. Почти Шагал.jpg
- File:Калининградская область. Зеленоградск. Арт-объекты на улицах.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
exact copy of File:Computerspielemuseum-42 (16515743373).jpg Gunnar (💬) 19:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
file in copyviol - screenshot without indications about a free use, and inelegible for a Creative Commons licence — danyele 19:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
I am skeptical that the YouTube channel this was taken from owns the rights to the episodes of The Arsenio Hall Show. Three reasons, mainly on the the "about" page for it, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdWnM_bm3neIlQR-jX2zvPg/about:
- For one thing, its description is copied and pasted from our Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Arsenio_Hall_Show, even to having the [5][6][7] reference tags.
- Less obvious is that though it links to the official Arsenio Hall Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook pages there don't seem to be links to this YouTube channel from them back.
- Finally, the link to the Instagram page seems to specify the Turkish language. https://www.instagram.com/arseniohall/?hl=tr I'm not an Arsenio Hall expert, but I'm pretty sure Turkish is neither his first language, nor the first language of his production company. GRuban (talk) 19:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Bizarre low-res recreation of File:Hitchcock, Alfred 02.jpg with bogus self claim/cc license. Эlcobbola talk 21:34, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete for reasons stated above —Enervation (talk) 01:00, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:Toys. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Verification of free license is needed. Appears to have been previously published: http://www.worldofballpythons.com/morphs/4p/ Quercusechinus (talk) 22:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Outdated picture NandiniShankarMusic (talk) 20:10, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 20:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Author request Sureelaa (talk) 20:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Uploaded 6 years ago & in use. --Achim (talk) 20:28, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- I previously had permission to upload this picture, the person who owns the picture has now asked me to take it down. Sureelaa (talk) 20:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Minoraxtalk 02:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Credited to Janice Bryant Howard: https://www.nbcnews.com/know-your-value/feature/janice-bryant-howroyd-how-business-leader-s-health-can-affect-ncna1081971 Whatever the case, previously published photos require COM:OTRS verification. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Going to assume good faith here and allow the uploader a week to provide permission. We'll proceed accordingly. Thank you! Missvain (talk) 23:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minoraxtalk 02:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Town Hall meeting, is banning the burqa racist? Newtown, New South Wales (5173887888).jpg
[edit]No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- This is not a work on permanent display, so the FoP exemption would not apply. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:De minimis - copyright only applies to the artwork, but the subject of the photo is the flyer itself. Deus et lex (talk) 11:48, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- It is no way to be qualified as COM:DM. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:12, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: - What does that comment even mean? How is an photo of a flyer, mostly made up of text, on a telegraph pole a copyright breach? I really have to wonder at your justifications for deleting things on this site. Deus et lex (talk) 12:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
- It is no way to be qualified as COM:DM. --A1Cafel (talk) 14:12, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 06:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Português: Foram colocadas as fontes corretas e um licenciamento mais apropriado. Peço reconsiderar a eliminação. English: :The right sources and more appropriate licensing were put in place. I ask to reconsider the elimination. Ajmcbarreto (talk) 15:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: appears resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Source Own work - false information or flag is not official / appropriating someone else's image O revolucionário aliado (talk) 06:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Português: Foram colocadas as fontes corretas e um licenciamento mais apropriado. Peço reconsiderar a eliminação. English: :The right sources and more appropriate licensing were put in place. I ask to reconsider the elimination. Ajmcbarreto (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: appears resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Liviu Cotoarba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Botez Radu Andrei 23 August 2020-86.jpg. Non-notable individual (ro:Bogdan Iureș)
Gikü (talk) 19:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:Redundant. Plenty of photos from this particular event that do not have the subject with shut eyes, such as File:131215 IFC몰 딕펑스 사인회 김태현 33.jpg. More could be seen at Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist) BriefEdits (talk) 20:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Unconvincing rationale. We have Category:Men with closed eyes for this reason. ƏXPLICIT 23:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Per COM:SPAM, this photo adds nothing educationally distinct from the rest of the collection in Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist), as the over 35 photos that are currently occupying that category are from the same event/angle/shot/crop, none of whom are currently used in any Wikimedia projects. Furthermore, I would posit that using photos of people in between blinks as an example of their eyes being closed is a poor representation of the category. — BriefEdits (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:Redundant. Plenty of photos from this particular event that do not have the subject with shut eyes, such as File:131215 IFC몰 딕펑스 사인회 김태현 33.jpg. More could be seen at Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist) BriefEdits (talk) 20:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Unconvincing rationale. We have Category:Men with closed eyes for this reason. ƏXPLICIT 23:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Per COM:SPAM, this photo adds nothing educationally distinct from the rest of the collection in Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist), as the over 35 photos that are currently occupying that category are from the same event/angle/shot/crop, none of whom are currently used in any Wikimedia projects. Furthermore, I would posit that using photos of people in between blinks as an example of their eyes being closed is a poor representation of the category. — BriefEdits (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Per COM:Redundant. Plenty of photos from this particular event that do not have the subject with shut eyes, such as File:131215 IFC몰 딕펑스 사인회 김태현 33.jpg. More could be seen at Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist) BriefEdits (talk) 20:09, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Unconvincing rationale. We have Category:Men with closed eyes for this reason. ƏXPLICIT 23:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Per COM:SPAM, this photo adds nothing educationally distinct from the rest of the collection in Category:Kim Tae-hyun (vocalist), as the over 35 photos that are currently occupying that category are from the same event/angle/shot/crop, none of whom are currently used in any Wikimedia projects. Furthermore, I would posit that using photos of people in between blinks as an example of their eyes being closed is a poor representation of the category. — BriefEdits (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 20:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, it is Gurojas here.I don't know exactly where to discuss this issue, so please forgive me if this is not the right place to do it.
Regarding Duilia's photo, I uploaded it at her request, to update the old photo that is 2 decades old. It was her husband who took it. Duilia asked me to update the photo (nor her or the husband know how to edit a Wikipedia article).
Regarding the OLAA and IOAA pictures, I am one of the organizing members of these student competitions and was present at the events. I did not upload the original pictures, I uploaded edited and scaled down versions.
Please give me some directions on how to maintain these pictures on the pages. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gurojas (talk • contribs) 14:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work as per uploader's comments. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
L'auteur de la photo prise en 2008 ne veut plus qu'elle soit utilisée. En respect du droit à l'image, il convient de la retirer. 2A01:E0A:F:B3D0:A0DE:F4AC:B05:287 20:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Suppression à la demande de l'auteur (photos personnelle obsolète) Sanaphor (talk) 05:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Suppression à la demande de l'auteur (photos personnelle obsolète) Dedene75 (talk) 06:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- According to the file history, the uploader is User:Karcyn. I guess this file will be kept; then I can rename it for you if you so wish. --E4024 (talk) 22:23, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nothing has significantly changed since the three previous deletion requests, here and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jch.png. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
A derivative, no FoP in Ukraine. Sealle (talk) 16:13, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sealle, can I then upload this photo locally in ruwiki? It is used in the good article. --Delasse (talk) 11:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, if this meets ru:ВП:КДИ policy criteria. Sealle (talk) 11:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Хотя постойте, на складе множество фотографий из Крыма, причем объекты сделаны явно не раньше чем эта доска, к примеру: file:Парк Місхор 8.JPG, File:Палацовий комплекс «Дюльбер» +++.jpg, File:Місхорський парк6.JPG, File:Unnamed - panoramio (432).jpg, да тысячи таких. Их почему-то не удаляют. --Delasse (talk) 11:26, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- ru:ВП:АПОЧЕМУИММОЖНО — относительно выбранной аргументации. Относительно примеров: File:Палацовий комплекс «Дюльбер» +++.jpg — существует правило COM:DM, по остальным — COM:FOP Russia предусматривает свободу панорамы для элементов паркового дизайна. Да, украинское законодательство не предусматривает, и Вы смело можете вынести их на удаление. В целом — сам факт повторения Вами сразу в нескольких обсуждениях общеизвестных и многократно ранее опровергнутых аргументов показывает, что пока скорость действий в Вашем случае существенно уступает скорости изучения правил. Sealle (talk) 12:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Спасибо за ответ. Ну, скажем так, правила с FoP очень запутанны, не очень легко понять :( --Delasse (talk) 12:13, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- ru:ВП:АПОЧЕМУИММОЖНО — относительно выбранной аргументации. Относительно примеров: File:Палацовий комплекс «Дюльбер» +++.jpg — существует правило COM:DM, по остальным — COM:FOP Russia предусматривает свободу панорамы для элементов паркового дизайна. Да, украинское законодательство не предусматривает, и Вы смело можете вынести их на удаление. В целом — сам факт повторения Вами сразу в нескольких обсуждениях общеизвестных и многократно ранее опровергнутых аргументов показывает, что пока скорость действий в Вашем случае существенно уступает скорости изучения правил. Sealle (talk) 12:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Хотя постойте, на складе множество фотографий из Крыма, причем объекты сделаны явно не раньше чем эта доска, к примеру: file:Парк Місхор 8.JPG, File:Палацовий комплекс «Дюльбер» +++.jpg, File:Місхорський парк6.JPG, File:Unnamed - panoramio (432).jpg, да тысячи таких. Их почему-то не удаляют. --Delasse (talk) 11:26, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, if this meets ru:ВП:КДИ policy criteria. Sealle (talk) 11:15, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for non-artistic craftsmanship works in Australia B dash (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted per COM:FOP Australia and Australia laws which explicitly applies to works, artistic or not. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia. @VIGNERON: It was a misunderstanding from Chris.sherlock. It has been clarified at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-10#File:ACDC Lane Face in window.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep - the user has misunderstood Australian copyright law, which allows for freedom of panorama for works of "artistic craftsmanship" (See (s65 Copyright Act 1968) and the definition of "artistic work" in s10 which can include paintings. This is an artistic mural that falls in that category and does not infringe Australian copyright law. Deus et lex (talk) 09:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. s65 Copyright Act 1968 declares "This section applies to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship of the kind referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of artistic work in section 10." s10 doesn't define "work of artistic craftsmanship" but does differentiate it from painting, which is paragraph (a) in that definition. https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/protecting-your-designs/ defines works of artistic craftsmanship as "[...] using materials to create the work and devices to transform the materials into the work" (sounds more like . The nominated item is more of a painting than a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, so isn't allowed FOP. -M.nelson (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for non-artistic craftsmanship works in Australia B dash (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Can be cropped to have the "honour roll", which is of "artistic craftsmanship". Bidgee (talk) 09:46, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- The honour roll would be unreadable though if cropped Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:00, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted per COM:FOP Australia and Australia laws which explicitly applies to works, artistic or not. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia. @VIGNERON: It was a misunderstanding from Chris.sherlock. It has been clarified at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-10#File:ACDC Lane Face in window.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep - the user has misunderstood Australian copyright law, which allows for freedom of panorama for works of "artistic craftsmanship" (See (s65 Copyright Act 1968) and the definition of "artistic work" in s10 which can include paintings. This is an artwork that falls in that category and does not infringe Australian copyright law. In addition, the artwork represents only a portion of the sign so COM:De minimis applies. Deus et lex (talk) 09:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. s65 Copyright Act 1968 declares "This section applies to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship of the kind referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of artistic work in section 10." s10 doesn't define "work of artistic craftsmanship" but does differentiate it from painting, which is paragraph (a) in that definition. https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/protecting-your-designs/ defines works of artistic craftsmanship as "[...] using materials to create the work and devices to transform the materials into the work" (sounds more like . The nominated item is more of a painting than a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, so isn't allowed FOP. -M.nelson (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for non-artistic craftsmanship works in Australia B dash (talk) 05:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted per COM:FOP Australia and Australia laws which explicitly applies to works, artistic or not. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia. @VIGNERON: It was a misunderstanding from Chris.sherlock. It has been clarified at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-10#File:ACDC Lane Face in window.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep - the user has misunderstood Australian copyright law, which allows for freedom of panorama for works of "artistic craftsmanship" (See (s65 Copyright Act 1968) and the definition of "artistic work" in s10 which can include paintings. This is an artistic mural that falls in that category and does not infringe Australian copyright law. Deus et lex (talk) 09:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. s65 Copyright Act 1968 declares "This section applies to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship of the kind referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of artistic work in section 10." s10 doesn't define "work of artistic craftsmanship" but does differentiate it from painting, which is paragraph (a) in that definition. https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/protecting-your-designs/ defines works of artistic craftsmanship as "[...] using materials to create the work and devices to transform the materials into the work" (sounds more like . The nominated item is more of a painting than a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, so isn't allowed FOP. -M.nelson (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for non-artistic craftsmanship works in Australia B dash (talk) 05:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted per COM:FOP Australia and Australia laws which explicitly applies to works, artistic or not. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia. @VIGNERON: It was a misunderstanding from Chris.sherlock. It has been clarified at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-10#File:ACDC Lane Face in window.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep - the user has misunderstood Australian copyright law, which allows for freedom of panorama for works of "artistic craftsmanship" (See (s65 Copyright Act 1968) and the definition of "artistic work" in s10 which can include paintings. This is an artistic mural that falls in that category and does not infringe Australian copyright law. Deus et lex (talk) 09:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. s65 Copyright Act 1968 declares "This section applies to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship of the kind referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of artistic work in section 10." s10 doesn't define "work of artistic craftsmanship" but does differentiate it from painting, which is paragraph (a) in that definition. https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/protecting-your-designs/ defines works of artistic craftsmanship as "[...] using materials to create the work and devices to transform the materials into the work" (sounds more like . The nominated item is more of a painting than a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, so isn't allowed FOP. -M.nelson (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for non-artistic craftsmanship works in Australia B dash (talk) 05:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted per COM:FOP Australia and Australia laws which explicitly applies to works, artistic or not. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia. @VIGNERON: It was a misunderstanding from Chris.sherlock. It has been clarified at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-10#File:ACDC Lane Face in window.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep - the user has misunderstood Australian copyright law, which allows for freedom of panorama for works of "artistic craftsmanship" (See (s65 Copyright Act 1968) and the definition of "artistic work" in s10 which can include paintings. This is an artistic mural that falls in that category and does not infringe Australian copyright law. Deus et lex (talk) 09:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. s65 Copyright Act 1968 declares "This section applies to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship of the kind referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of artistic work in section 10." s10 doesn't define "work of artistic craftsmanship" but does differentiate it from painting, which is paragraph (a) in that definition. https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/protecting-your-designs/ defines works of artistic craftsmanship as "[...] using materials to create the work and devices to transform the materials into the work" (sounds more like . The nominated item is more of a painting than a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, so isn't allowed FOP. -M.nelson (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for non-artistic craftsmanship works in Australia B dash (talk) 05:21, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted per COM:FOP Australia and Australia laws which explicitly applies to works, artistic or not. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia. @VIGNERON: It was a misunderstanding from Chris.sherlock. It has been clarified at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-10#File:ACDC Lane Face in window.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 02:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep - the user has misunderstood Australian copyright law, which allows for freedom of panorama for works of "artistic craftsmanship" (See (s65 Copyright Act 1968) and the definition of "artistic work" in s10 which can include paintings. This is an artistic mural that falls in that category and does not infringe Australian copyright law. Deus et lex (talk) 09:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. s65 Copyright Act 1968 declares "This section applies to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship of the kind referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of artistic work in section 10." s10 doesn't define "work of artistic craftsmanship" but does differentiate it from painting, which is paragraph (a) in that definition. https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/protecting-your-designs/ defines works of artistic craftsmanship as "[...] using materials to create the work and devices to transform the materials into the work" (sounds more like . The nominated item is more of a painting than a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, so isn't allowed FOP. -M.nelson (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for non-artistic craftsmanship works in Australia B dash (talk) 05:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted per COM:FOP Australia and Australia laws which explicitly applies to works, artistic or not. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia. @VIGNERON: It was a misunderstanding from Chris.sherlock. It has been clarified at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-10#File:ACDC Lane Face in window.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep - the user has misunderstood Australian copyright law, which allows for freedom of panorama for works of "artistic craftsmanship" (See (s65 Copyright Act 1968) and the definition of "artistic work" in s10 which can include paintings. This is an artistic mural that falls in that category and does not infringe Australian copyright law. Deus et lex (talk) 09:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. s65 Copyright Act 1968 declares "This section applies to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship of the kind referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of artistic work in section 10." s10 doesn't define "work of artistic craftsmanship" but does differentiate it from painting, which is paragraph (a) in that definition. https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/protecting-your-designs/ defines works of artistic craftsmanship as "[...] using materials to create the work and devices to transform the materials into the work" (sounds more like . The nominated item is more of a painting than a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, so isn't allowed FOP. -M.nelson (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for non-artistic craftsmanship works in Australia B dash (talk) 05:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted per COM:FOP Australia and Australia laws which explicitly applies to works, artistic or not. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia. @VIGNERON: It was a misunderstanding from Chris.sherlock. It has been clarified at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-10#File:ACDC Lane Face in window.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep - the user has misunderstood Australian copyright law, which allows for freedom of panorama for works of "artistic craftsmanship" (See (s65 Copyright Act 1968) and the definition of "artistic work" in s10 which can include paintings. This is an artistic mural that falls in that category and does not infringe Australian copyright law. Further, it should be kept per COM:De minimis. Deus et lex (talk) 09:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. s65 Copyright Act 1968 declares "This section applies to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship of the kind referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of artistic work in section 10." s10 doesn't define "work of artistic craftsmanship" but does differentiate it from painting, which is paragraph (a) in that definition. https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/protecting-your-designs/ defines works of artistic craftsmanship as "[...] using materials to create the work and devices to transform the materials into the work" (sounds more like . The nominated item is more of a painting than a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, so isn't allowed FOP. -M.nelson (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for non-artistic craftsmanship works in Australia B dash (talk) 05:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Undeleted per COM:FOP Australia and Australia laws which explicitly applies to works, artistic or not. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia. @VIGNERON: It was a misunderstanding from Chris.sherlock. It has been clarified at Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2020-10#File:ACDC Lane Face in window.JPG A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep - the user has misunderstood Australian copyright law, which allows for freedom of panorama for works of "artistic craftsmanship" (See (s65 Copyright Act 1968) and the definition of "artistic work" in s10 which can include paintings. This is an artistic mural that falls in that category and does not infringe Australian copyright law. Deus et lex (talk) 09:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. s65 Copyright Act 1968 declares "This section applies to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship of the kind referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of artistic work in section 10." s10 doesn't define "work of artistic craftsmanship" but does differentiate it from painting, which is paragraph (a) in that definition. https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/protecting-your-designs/ defines works of artistic craftsmanship as "[...] using materials to create the work and devices to transform the materials into the work" (sounds more like . The nominated item is more of a painting than a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, so isn't allowed FOP. -M.nelson (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. s65 Copyright Act 1968 declares "This section applies to sculptures and to works of artistic craftsmanship of the kind referred to in paragraph (c) of the definition of artistic work in section 10." s10 doesn't define "work of artistic craftsmanship" but does differentiate it from painting, which is paragraph (a) in that definition. https://www.artslaw.com.au/information-sheet/protecting-your-designs/ defines works of artistic craftsmanship as "[...] using materials to create the work and devices to transform the materials into the work" (sounds more like . The nominated item is more of a painting than a sculpture or work of artistic craftsmanship, so isn't allowed FOP. -M.nelson (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)