Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/07/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 23rd, 2020
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this different file which is uploaded.correct one is uploaded later Pratik jadhav111 (talk) 08:05, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

any binding copyright law Realfno (talk) 21:49, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it by mistake and I regret it Realfno (talk) 21:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

any binding copyright law 5.124.151.97 14:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

any binding copyright law 5.124.151.97 14:16, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

any binding copyright law 5.124.151.97 14:16, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

any binding copyright law 5.124.151.97 14:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 23:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 193.56.244.126 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free image, can be found on internet. "CAN BE FOUND" is not the same thing as Copyright, when the image is old. I am wondering why this particular painting keeps reappearing in speedy from anonymous nominators, but unless additional information is provided, this is not a candidate for speedy deletion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can i abandon my request ? 193.56.244.126 (talk) 19:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC) (sorry im using a new private navigation page my other ip not saved)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion & DR withdrawn. --Achim (talk) 20:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gani Gashi grup (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and promo photos. Artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. Also it's a sock of Gabi Gashi LTA who has a record of uploading self promotion files. Please see Category:Sockpuppets_of_Gani_Gashi_piktor and Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Gani_GG_Gashi. Thanks.

Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 19:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As they are re-uploads I have deleted, and have started a conversation with an administrator at sqWP to see if we can communicate with the uploader to better understand the issue.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Image clearly marked as from Getty Images, and uploader acknowledges them as the source. Getty Images do not have a license compatible with Commons. Exact source is here, which shows the image has not been released under a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 00:00, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 01:31, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 06:48, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pornographic content without educational purposes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyrank411 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio: no free license @ source. --Achim (talk) 08:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image violates this users' privacy, and is written like an advertisement / business promotion. It is also invalid and does not belong to any current Wikipedia Article about the topic, so therefore is not needed on Wikipedia for any use. Finally, the book series it represents does not exist. Please delete as soon as possible, as requested by the user and creator of this image. 2003jh0571 (talk) 22:29, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. --Achim (talk) 09:49, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ałfred Moltke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Block evasion by A3cb1.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vituzzu, Elcobbola, Ruthven, and Guanaco: Please note.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Commentthe reason for cancellation for LTA reasons and a simply strange motivation that is not in heaven or on earth, if you take each file individually, you will see that they are faithful to the source entered and the information that follows. the reason for the cancellation personally call it absurd and that's it --Ałfred Moltke (talk) 07:54, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: LTA. --Krd 10:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image violates this user's privacy and it is invalid (out of date). It also does not belong to any current Wikipedia Article, and the book series it represents does not exist. Please delete as soon as possible. (This is the creator of the image requesting speedy deletion). 2003jh0571 (talk) 22:24, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete by courtesy, uploader's request, unused. --Achim (talk) 09:48, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image violates this user's privacy and it is invalid (out of date). It also does not belong to any current Wikipedia Article, and the book series it represents does not exist. Please delete as soon as possible. (This is the creator of the image requesting speedy deletion). 2003jh0571 (talk) 04:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IS WHAT A MISTAKE BY IGNORANCE,PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/SophieEntersoft&ilshowall=1 SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:48, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:48, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:48, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:ListFiles/SophieEntersoft&ilshowall=1 SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:52, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:52, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:52, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:52, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:08, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FRON IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:06, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:05, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE UPLOAD FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 14:05, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 19:04, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:58, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:58, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MISTAKE FROM IGNORANCE PLS DELETE IT SophieEntersoft (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. - FitIndia Talk 18:57, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:S%27Albufera_des_Grau_(Parc_Natural_de)_018.jpg Nicolas G. Mertens (talk) 09:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do NOT delete the new file. The new file is of better quality (size and resolution). Furthermore, it is part of a collection of 33 photos depicting the nature reserve of Albufera des Grau. It has also been submitted to Wiki Loves Earth 2020, as is the rest of the collection. Please, note that I spent a lot of time to rework these photos and to make them part of a consistent collection, with consistent titles and numbering. Please, do not destroy the homogeneity and logical flow of the collection by deleting the new file. It makes more sense to me to, please, delete the old version. Nicolas G. Mertens (talk) 08:27, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as the other files is uploaded by the photographer. --JuTa 08:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:S%27Albufera_des_Grau_(Parc_Natural_de)_019.jpg Nicolas G. Mertens (talk) 10:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do NOT delete the new file. The new file is of better quality (size and resolution). Furthermore, it is part of a collection of 33 photos depicting the nature reserve of Albufera des Grau. It has also been submitted to Wiki Loves Earth 2020, as is the rest of the collection. Please, note that I spent a lot of time to rework these photos and to make them part of a consistent collection, with consistent titles and numbering. Please, do not destroy the homogeneity and logical flow of the collection by deleting the new file. It makes more sense to me to, please, delete the old version. Nicolas G. Mertens (talk) 08:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as the other one is uploaded by the photographer. --JuTa 08:37, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Somebody's little joke, for the same user's en:Draft:A317. Hoary (talk) 00:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just the uploader's little joke. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:A317&diff=prev&oldid=968903153 Hoary (talk) 00:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree...plus image not by up-loader....BS all around.--Moxy (talk) 00:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not an own work, like all other uploads of this user. E4024 (talk) 02:47, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio from https://www.austrianaviation.net/detail/im-focus-lufthansa-a380/. --Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same File as File:Fitschbandeisen 05.jpg Volker hemavom (talk) 15:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Change from no.4 to no.5 by --Volker hemavom (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 08:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is advertising for Samochody.pl . GTHO (talk) 23:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This copyvio - lack of proof that the uploader is a copyright holder. --Masur (talk) 09:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong picture Ravave (talk) 17:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 14:21, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photoshoot by Naver - needs permission Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --ƏXPLICIT 04:36, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was originally published at source given with a Non-Commercial license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PENIS, we really have enough of these. -- Wutsje 03:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say more than enough. Delete. --E4024 (talk) 04:47, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 03:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cathexisrecords (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional imagery related to recording artist thraeyce and her record label Cathexis Records AKA CatheXis Records, NOTINUSE, OOS, COM:CSD#F10, and COM:CSD#G10. Some images are screenshots from her artist page on Spotify and VEVO. 4 direct copyvios detected with Google Images, see also multiple social media sites and abuse filter log. Uses promotional username.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying. I am new here and still learning, which is why I chose sandbox. This is understood. I will make the appropriate adjustments. I do not dispute the need to delete all the promotional imagery. However, I request that the first image remain, as these are not promotional in nature. The username is not intended to be promotional and can be changed if that's even possible. I manage a few artists now, but to indicate an official source, not just some random person. I hope that makes sense. I do not intend to use this account for promotional purposes but to provide detailed information. Cathexisrecords (talk) 04:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:32, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:06, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 03:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 03:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 03:47, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreone93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted works. These files have no description of the shooting location. Therefore, FoP cannot be applied. No evidence of free-use.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreone93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in San Marino.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreone93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in San Marino.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 12:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sharonroselaw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A mix of old photos, posters and screenshots. not own work

Gbawden (talk) 09:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Gbawden Thank you for bringing to my attention that the photo of Emanuele Cannistraci praying for the president of the Philippines is a copyright of ZOE Broadcasting Network. I have researched the issue about ZOE. I have permission to use the photo from Emanuele Cannistraci. Eddie Villanueva, in 2001 the owner/chairman of ZOE Broadcasting Network (seen in the photo), sent Emanuele Cannistraci the videotape for his use. What else if anything does Wiki require to use the photo? Thank you. <<Sharonroselaw>>

Fitindia I have written permission to post the photos, brochures, booklets below on Wiki. Permission was obtained from World MAP, Gateway City Church and Emanuele Cannistraci. I request that you reinstate the photos and brochures. I am writing several Wiki articles including Emanuele Cannistraci, Gateway City Church and Network of Christian Ministries and contemplating more. Please advise what else if anything Wiki requires to use the photos, brochures etc? Thank you. <<Sharonroselaw>>

SHARONROSELAW photographed the following: (This is my own original work)

WORLD MAP photographed the following: (World Map gave me these photos with written permission to use and publish on Wiki)

EMANUELE CANNISTRACI: The following was photographed by him or on his camera (He gave me these photos with permission to use and publish on Wiki):

EMANUELE CANNISTRACI: These family photos of him were taken by his parents who died in 1962. He is their heir. (He gave them to me with permission to use)

EMANUELE CANNISTRACI authored and published the following: (He gave me these brochures and booklet with permission to use and publish on Wiki):

GATEWAY CITY CHURCH photographed/owns/published the following and gave them to me with permission to use on Wiki:

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused flag replaced by SVG — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CMack689 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos & images promoting director Charles A. Mack III AKA CMack AKA Mack Daddy and his works & products, NOTINUSE, OOS, COM:CSD#F10, and COM:CSD#G10. Multiple photos came via Facebook & Picasa. 5 copyvios found via Google Images. Multiple film posters. See also the many photos & images at http://www.livingomlove.com/charles-s-biography.html.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:09, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:18, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robonoski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some are old photos, another is a photo of a photo, others are OoS

Gbawden (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:35, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrick Scott (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Violation of rule COM:FOP Russia.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:36, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vikshay Vashist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity draft.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boris Busorgin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ibrhendi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very small images all claimed to show Adnan Ramahi, but none seem to be created by uploader, small file sizes, no metadata, etc.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ibrhendi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:48, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anaasatryan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ericpoulet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:16, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aymym (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:50, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maazarshad45 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All rights reserved at Flickr ... https://www.flickr.com/photos/35309730@N06/4003399865

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cassius Chaerea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Violation of rule COM:FOP Russia.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for statues. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:54, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, showing artworks by Domenig who died in 1952, no freedom of panorama (and no permission by the photographer who isn't the uploader, imho).

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:56, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, artist died in 1952, no freedom of panorama.

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:58, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accoring to de:Panoramafreiheit there is at least partial FOP indoors in Austria. --Ailura (talk) 18:16, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly! And the altar in the Stille-Nacht-Kapelle is not by Max Domenig, but by Hermann Hutter from 1915 (who might well have died more than 70 years ago)! --Luftschiffhafen (talk) 21:42, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: some with {{FoP-Austria}}, deleted the others. The deleted files can be restored in 2023. --Rosenzweig τ 22:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

 Delete: After explaining it, the uploader now knows they did not understand copyright and in an OTRS ticket has stated we can /should delete their recent uploads.

Ww2censor (talk) 18:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:57, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Different image at source, that one is (C). Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't provide proof in the proper way, so please delete! CáitChrainn (talk) 16:17, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly marked (C) at source Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't provide proof in the proper way, so please delete! CáitChrainn (talk) 16:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly marked (C) at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not same image as source given. Image at source is labeled (C). Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly marked (C) at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, cover says "By John Gell." Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Figaro1810 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The claim of own work is questionable. All of this user's uploads have been claimed as own work but many of them have been deleted as copyright violations with EXIF data attributing images variously to "Carly Erickson/BFA.com", "Al Powers, Powers Imagery", and "Madeline Wolf - Mad Wolf Photography". There is no good reason to believe these images are own work as claimed given the other copyright violations. For example, File:Los Dragon SMA.jpg can be seen here in black and white. All of the uploads appear to be related to Casa Dragones tequila and I suspect these images are all promotional images that might have appeared on the Casa Dragones site at one time or another.

Whpq (talk) 19:45, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gengatchalian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebook image with no license at source.

FredWalsh (talk) 19:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personnal image, out of scope Gyrostat (talk) 21:13, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless picture submitted during Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Canada Amqui (talk) 22:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless picture submitted for Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Canada Amqui (talk) 22:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless picture submitted for Wiki Loves Earth 2020 in Canada Amqui (talk) 22:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I suspect all the files by this uploader are problematic CRwise. I am speedying File:Closing A Fair.jpg as it has a CR sign on it, and leave to the closing admin to decide what to do with the rest of their uploads... E4024 (talk) 00:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I think this one must be treated as an advertising. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

14 KB dubious own work claim. I also doubt scope as I cannot see any use but that is not so important. E4024 (talk) 00:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope of the project anyway. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 07:25, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: a person of no notability. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can be removed, not necessary on page in question. PainProf (talk) 07:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete I uploaded this picture because I was being accused of WP:SELF and having a massive undeclared COI in a deletion discussion. The photo was meant to show that I was not the subject of the article in question. This issue has since been resolved and the photo is not necessary. Samsmachado (talk) 13:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: upon agreement with the uploader. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:08, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope? 192.145.240.245 15:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: a person of no notability. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:13, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 16:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: a person of no notability. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely hoax. This does not appear to be a photograph of a self portrait from 1936. It appears to be a photograph of a person that was run through sharpening and edge-detection routines to make it look like a drawing, especially due to the presence of heavily sharpened JPEG artifacts. No indication of what the original source was that was supposedly destroyed in a fire, or where the uploader obtained this portrait from. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 17:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Per nom. Clearly a modern photo that has been run through a ton of photoshop filters in an attempt to make it look "old". The article this is used in is up for deletion on enwiki and huwiki as a hoax. Spicy (talk) 20:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:18, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User request FunkyCanute (talk) 16:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own user space. --Achim (talk) 19:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Trimtextingtv (talk) 00:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo. Out of scope. --Alaa :)..! 21:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, out of scope Gyrostat (talk) 01:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo of a non-notable person, out of project scope Krd 06:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons is not a personal photostorage. Non notable Agora (talk) 13:29, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and out of scope. --Alaa :)..! 21:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://diopuava.org.br/?pg=bispos.htm Py4nf (talk) 00:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With "unknown author" it is impossible to verify the license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:44, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With "unknown author" it is impossible to verify the license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't provide proof in the proper way, so please delete! CáitChrainn (talk) 16:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:44, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With "unknown author" it is impossible to verify the license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get proper permission like an eejit CáitChrainn (talk) 19:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CáitChrainn: Use the easy email form at COM:OTRS! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:45, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private snap of non-notable individual, out of project scope DCB (talk) 20:25, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, this file was a "fair use" picture in wp/tr Magurale (talk) 13:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 07:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy of File:EPP 2015 logo.png from enwiki 95.49.64.86 18:09, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: fair use. --JuTa 07:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not needed anymore. WLM India has almost completed migrating the monuments to Wikidata. So, as the creator of this page, requesting its deletion. Bodhisattwa (talk) 05:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 05:30, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(CC BY-NC) Skivsamlare (talk) 19:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 13:37, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pics depict Templo Central of the Iglesia ni Cristo. Person behind this is Carlos Santos-Viola (per enwiki), who died in 1994. Therefore, it won't be un PD until 2045. No Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to no FOP, the structure was completed in 1984, hence the non-application of copyright protection for pre-1971 architecture (non-retroactivity as the American-era copyright law before 1972 doesn't explicitly include architecture) as stated by User:Clindberg doesn't apply for INC's Temple Central. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also adding: File:Iglesia ni Cristo (34381678065).jpg. Please also check thoroughly ALL categories of Iglesia ni Cristo churches.seems possible that he (Viola) is also the architect of these INC church buildings. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:21, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing my nomination. A personal friend cautioned me that such DR because of "no FOP issue" might constitute "cyberbulling" against the uploaders, most especially that I'm in the bounds of the Philippine cybercrime laws. According to him, no court case regarding this hasn't been filed nor prospered at the court challenging Filipino photographers. So I hereby withdraw this deletion nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:00, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nomination withdrawn. - FitIndia Talk 18:59, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Iglesia Ni Cristo churches in the Philippines 2

[edit]

No freedom of pano in the Philippines. Refer to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Philippines#Freedom_of_panorama phil copy law doesnt allow non-fair use of photos of copyrighted architecture and sculpture in the phils. An architecture or sculpture is said to enter allowable commercial use of their photos if it has been 50 years after the death of the last surviving person architect engineer or designer or if 50 years after the completion if it is a work of joint companies in architecture Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:15, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment, the person behind the HQ (Central Temple) was Carlos Santos-Viola (https://eusebioarnil.wordpress.com/architecture/), who died in 1994 (enwiki). Various architects were involved for INC churches of the 70s to present-day, but it seems that their designs were overseen by the Engineering and Construction Department of INC (est. 1971). To quote:

The Central Temple which opened in July 1984 can accommodate up to 7,000 persons, and cost about US$2 million. The Central Temple features octagonal spires, “fine latticework” and ribbed windows. Recent buildings are variations of Carlos A. Santos-Viola’s designs on the Central Temple. These are designed to accommodate 250 to 1,000 persons while larger churches in Metro Manila and provincial capitals can accommodate up to 3,000 persons. Prominent architects, such as Juan Nakpil (a National Artist of the Philippines for architecture) and Carlos Raul Villanueva, had been involved in designing INC churches, while the Engineering and Construction Department of INC, established in 1971, oversees the uniformity in design of church buildings.

{But, FOP in the Philippines discussion exists at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP, so DR's made by the foolish troll named User:Mrcl lxmna like this should be put on hold (or better still,  Keep) until a conclusion has been reached. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete all. Striken out my earlier input as events between September 2020 and February 2021 have rendered my older inputs obsolete. Much of the INC edifices were completed between 1960s and 2010s, failing {{PD-Philippines-artistic work}}. No FOP still in the Philippines as confirmed in the 02/10/2021 IPOPHL-WMF online dialogue on FOP. A pending bill to amend the copyright law is in works, but until then, regular rules apply. Otherwise, restore if FOP is introduced here officially and formally. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I sincerely hope that Editors will note my Underscoring of the 4 years Legal Bar on Deletion of FOP photos, I repeat from 2016, thus the tons of Mass Deletions tags by the Smart One on RamonFVelasquez should be stricken off the Talk Page as grave violations of Criminal Law ...
  •  Keep Keep Because the Nominator has been blocked recently due to mass deletion nominations. It is fervently petitioned that - going to keep this for now until someone else can nominate if they see fit; Wherefore premises considered I humbly register my Strong Objection to this and the Mass Deletions Requests of this Single Editor, respectfully Judgefloro (talk) 07:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. plicit 13:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OoS in my opinion Gbawden (talk) 11:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:33, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is twitter. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source is twitter.... I meant to tag it for deletion! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Daibutsu (large statues of Buddha) was erected in 1977 [1]. No FoP in Japan for statues. Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of non-free explanation board. The explanation board is a copyrighted work. COM:FOP Japan (Template:NoFoP-Japan) Batholith (talk) 16:29, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PACKAGING 毒島みるく (talk) 23:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is a frame from a youtube video not published under the youtube-cc license, but published under the standard youtube license, which is not a free license. Thus, the image shouldn't be on commons per Commons:Licensing. Nyamo Kurosawa (talk) 14:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  JGHowes  talk 13:48, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://diopuava.org.br/?id=5061 Py4nf (talk) 01:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant and not accurate Throneb (talk) 15:10, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

copyright Throneb (talk) 11:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant and not accurate Throneb (talk) 15:11, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

copyright Throneb (talk) 11:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from this website that are taken on sets are copyrighted. মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 12:16, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. See https://www.wionews.com/entertainment/irrfan-khan-returns-to-films-with-english-medium-producer-dinesh-vijan-confirms-with-a-photo-208125 for example (link provided by uploader). --MGA73 (talk) 17:02, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the copyright on the photo is released by the uploader, the item depicted is a mural in Eureka, California painted by Duane Flatmo. We do not have OTRS from Mr. Flatmo and there is no COM:FOP in the US for murals. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 05:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, in my opinion Sije (talk) 18:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:42, 2 November 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Anime/manga/comics --Krdbot 02:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image used on Twitter, autorization needed Shev123 (talk) 16:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC) Twitter account belongs to user and photo was taken and uploaded by said user (jackxparker). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackxparker (talk • contribs) 16:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not see indication that this was published before 1925, or that the author is deceased 70 years ago. Photo dates from 1947. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:01, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of parties and events from this site are licensed under CC-BY-3.0. Other images including this one are copyrighted. মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 12:12, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the files is not acceptable because it's not of a Bollywood set, party, or event in India; or taken by a Bollywood Hungama photographer; C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, actually it is Bollywood party in India. But the license demands: the photo must be attributed to Bollywood Hungama photographer. This condition is not met (the author can be or not be Bollywood Hungama photographer) and the license does not apply. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 11:30, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 11:30, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 11:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://diopuava.org.br/?pg=bispos.htm Py4nf (talk) 00:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of free license. --Jianhui67 TC 13:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neither CC-BY-SA, nor public domain. Source: https://diopuava.org.br/?pg=bispos.htm Py4nf (talk) 00:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

36 KB, not an own work as declared, probably. OTOH I see no scope. E4024 (talk) 05:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 16:25, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, vanity spam. --Jianhui67 TC 13:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. Two other files in the category not nominated because of the statue is merely an accessory for those photos. But these 3 photos clearly illustrates what is the main subject. Subject looks it was made and installed after 1972, so the the non-application of copyright protection for pre-1971 architecture (non-retroactivity as the American-era copyright law before 1972 doesn't explicitly include architecture) as stated by User:Clindberg doesn't apply here. Understanding from Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, what is not indicated (e.g. no mention of FOP) means it is not allowed on Commons.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:30, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

::Withdrawing my nomination. I was not at good mood during that time, and a personal friend cautioned me that such DR because of "no FOP issue" might constitute "cyberbulling" against the uploaders, most especially that I'm in the bounds of the Philippine cybercrime laws. According to him, no court case regarding this hasn't been filed nor prospered at the court challenging Filipino photographers. So I hereby withdraw this deletion nomination. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:59, 28 July 2020 (UTC) -- Reinstating my deletion requests: pls see Commons:Deletion requests/File:RoxasBoulevardjf1833 03.JPG for reason. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update I hereby put this DR on hold in response to a renewed discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Application of recent Philippine Supreme Court decisions on mere allegations of copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:53, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was taken at the Aquarium Mondo Marino in Italy. No FOP in Italy. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:24, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination: recent sculpture. Ruthven (msg) 11:22, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. plicit 12:47, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope / commercial description Velocitas (talk) 14:55, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:48, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

These images seem to be out of scope. The tables are better done as a wikitable and the logo seems to be a personal logo of no use for people other than the artist.

Stefan4 (talk) 16:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:34, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2013. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obs.: I found several uncategorized Minecraft related screenshots etc. which I categorized in this category after iniciating this DR. Please evaluate these files too. Gunnex (talk) 18:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded in 2014. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above. Reference-DR might be eventually Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minecraft 1.1 Title.png.

Gunnex (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. JurgenNL (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Various screenshots, logos and textures from Minecraft (which isn't freely licensed)

Logos
Screenshots
Derivative works of Minecraft textures

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by INeverCry. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of a non-free video game, thus making these images non-free deriative works.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 00:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't make sense to me. I understand that Minecraft is closed source so a general screenshot of landscape that was generated by the program or programmers would not be my work. But there are a huge number of photos of real buildings in the Wikimedia Commons. The person who took that photo of a building probably didn't build the building, they only took the photo. Isn't that "derivative" work? I made that Bitcoin icon myself with several hours of labor, and then I took the photos/screenshots. Two parts of the creative process were my own and that creative work would not exist without my significant efforts. Can the brick maker sue the architect for his "derivative" work? And then the architect sue the photographer for using their building in the photographic "derivative" work? If what I posted is illegal to post, then it shouldn't be, and we should fight stupid laws like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beatljuice (talk • contribs) 00:40, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

All real buildings have copyrights, until they expire. In many countries, Commons photographs are permitted by laws which specifically exempt the photographs from being derivative works, see COM:FOP. However, that is a bad analogy. Think, instead, of drawings of real buildings, including both the architectural drawings used to construct them, renderings used to show them before construction, and post construction drawings. All of them have copyrights and you will not see them on Commons without a specific license from the creator.
The brick maker cannot sue because bricks aren't copyrighted, but the architect can sue a photographer in many countries (those with no FOP law) and can sue someone who copies his drawings in every country.
Copyright law is not stupid. If it were not for copyright laws, few people would go to the effort of writing books or creating sculptures, because they could not earn money for doing it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that my analogy isn't perfect, but I think it's closer to accurate than yours James. Copies, or photos of architectural drawings would be more like copies or photos of computer code. A more accurate analogy would be if I went to Disneyland and built a tower out of foam blocks that are supplied by Disney and then took a picture of my creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

No, sorry, you are wrong. As I noted above, there are explicit exemptions in some countries for photographs of actual buildings. Minecraft is not buildings. Your Disney block creation would be a sculpture. In any event, with limited exceptions which don't apply here, every created work has a copyright. While there are exceptions for actual buildings (and other things) in some countries, any other copy of such a work is a copyvio. Since no exception applies to computer generated works anywhere, this is a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're saying I'm wrong about. I'm trying to come up with an analogy that we can agree on so that arguments can be made from some sort of common ground. I understand that legally there may be a problem. I don't claim to know international IP law (I live in the US). I do believe that if there are laws that restrict what I posted, then those laws should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.208.15 (talk • contribs) 17:00, 2 October 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]



Let's start from scratch. There is nothing international about this -- it is all US law and Commons rules. One of two things is true. Either:
  • You drew these completely from your own mind with no reference to anything on Minecraft, or
  • These are derived from or use images or parts of images from Minecraft.
In the first case, they are your personal creations and we do not keep personal art from non-notable artists, see COM:SCOPE.
In the second case, your images are derivative works of the copyrighted work of other people and therefore must be deleted as copyvios.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:06, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Jim, derivative works from a copyrighted game artworks. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots, figures, etc. from the game Minecraft, mostly all uploaded 2015. Inumerous related deletion requests and discussions available and - as I could follow - the related files were all deleted, see also above.

Gunnex (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than "Other stuff doesn't exist", do you have a policy-based reason for deletion? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
COM:L. Screenshots of a non-free video game (COM:SS). Gunnex (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. INeverCry 00:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Self-promotional logo uploads and artwork by non-notable individuals. Out of scope, and on top of that many are likely copyvios.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as per nom. --P 1 9 9   14:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots and assets from a copyrighted video game. I wonder how many of these I'll actually have to make.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What part of File:Discobeat Skin.png is Mojang's IP? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch on that one, I would've said the background but it doesn't appear to be Mojang's textures. However, we still can't be sure whether the background is freely licensed. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be the personal player model skin used by the uploader. From the publicly available logs at de.wp it appears that this may have been used for a self-promotional article that was deleted speedily – which raises the additional question of COM:SCOPE. --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment maybe a warning message equivalent to {{NoUploads}} might help to keep new uploads to the category down a little bit? --El Grafo (talk) 08:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyrighted video game screenshots, derivitave content or otherwise out of scope uploads.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File:Skin de Diamantum576.jpg has a watermark from novaskin.me/wallpapers, a page that seems to provide a functionality where you can place your own player skin into a pre-made wallpaper. They use CC-BY-SA-NC as a license for their stuff, so even if the background image was their own (which I'm tempted to doubt based on the other clearly non-free stuff they use) we can't keep it. --El Grafo (talk) 14:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:The Feed The Beast Launcher.png seems to show a separate software called Feed The Beast Launcher, which is licensed {{Apache}}. The screenshot shows logos for different Minecraft modpacks which might not be part of that license, however. Don't know if these might qualify for COM:De minimis/{{De minimis}}? --El Grafo (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've updated the page to show the Apache license, rather than the CC-own work claim. Checking the Feed the Beast modpack list the modpacks included in the screenshot are All Rights Reserved, which I would assume includes the logo too. I'm not too sure about de minimis either, especially since one of the logos cover a decent amount of the image, but in the worst case the logos could be edited out in order to keep the image. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:46, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I'd like to point out that the three which are struck out and stated to be "in use" are likely all COM:COPYVIOs as they are COM:DW of copyrighted game "Minecraft". A copyvio "in use" does not become ineligible to delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The last one (File:Tinkers Construct smeltery.png) is fine, I think: It doesn't contain anything from the original game, everything displayed comes from the Tinkers Construct mod which has a free license. --El Grafo (talk) 16:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment (Edit conflict) Not all of these files were nominated as copyright violations, some were also nominated as out of scope.
-Lewis Hulbert (talk) 16:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:18, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Screenshots of Minecraft, or derivative content using textures owned by Mojang.

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The head of the skin appears to me to be a derivative of the Pig that appears in Minecraft, and I'd also imagine there was some issue with the Spider-Man uniform too. Either way, out of scope. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:19, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations or out of scope uploads.

Copyright violations
Out of scope

--Lewis Hulbert (talk) 02:05, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voglio farti notare che la dichiarazione sulla immagine File:Herobrine skin ver. mod.png, non è esatta, non risulta nessuna copyright della Mojang su questo personaggi perché il personaggio è stato creato dalla comunità di Minecraft, inoltre l’immagine non deriva dal videogioco e stata realizzata dall’autore che la pubblicata, soprattutto il personaggio è una creepy-pasta ispirato a Minecraft. Inoltre Notch ha più volte dichiarato che il personaggio non esiste nel videogioco. Per tanto Mojang non ha mai avuto copyright sul questo personaggio immaginario. Qualsiasi riferimento della Mojang su Herobrine e solamente uno scherzò che fa alla comunità. Inoltre dire che l’immagine e derivato della skin del giocatore predefinito di Minecraft, ti poso dire che è deriva solo dalle abilità del autore della immagine che la realizzato in SVG e poi la salvato su http://minecraft.gamepedia.com in formato PNG.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 08:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter whether Mojang claim ownership or acknowledge the character, as this representation of it was made by modifying Minecraft textres. The Herobrine skin is clearly a derivative work of the Steve skin. Making minor modifications by colouring the eyes white and adding a smile does not mean that the editor now owns rights to the skin, thus they are not able to release the image under a free license. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:00, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Additonally, even if it were the sole authorship of the uploader on Gamepedia, the image is only licensed CC-BY-NC, which is not allowed on Wikimedia Commons. The source has no mention of the GDFL license that you claimed when uploading the file. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Su questo ti posso dare una spiegazione, essendo che non esiste il Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) o perché non sono riuscito a trovarlo (probabilmente e stato nominato sotto un altro nome). Ho caricato immagine sotto la licenza che l’autore mia detto che era adeguata. Se mi stai dicendo che l’immagine come il colore della pelle e legata al copyright, l’immagine e composta da geometria semplice e colori che formano l’immagine non possono essere considerati come materiale protetto da copyright perché comuni a tutti, Non supera quindi la soglia di originalità. Inoltre cito il trademark.--0 Noctis 0 (talk) 20:10, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


As the creator of File:Flag of Satigris.svg I do not object to its deletion. I don't even remember why I uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons, to be honest. Bowwow828 (talk) 10:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Daphne Lantier 21:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Minecraft

Copyright violations (including screenshots and derivative works) and out of scope uploads related to Minecraft. Copyright violations

Out of scope

Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:30, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Herobrine.png

Previously {{copyvio|1=© Mojang Studios. The fact that they state that they are "quite relaxed about non-commercial things" is not enough per COM:Licensing – commercial reuse MUST be allowed for all files at Commons.}}, see User_talk:Herobrine303. The uploader removed the copyvio tag without starting a regular deletion request, so here we go.

This is a derivative work of the original default Minecraft Steve player skin (the old one, before he got a shave, low-res version of the original image here). Similar or identical files have been deleted repeatedly in the past (CTRL+F Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minecraft for "herobrine.png"), so I don't think {{PD-ineligible}} applies. --El Grafo (talk) 13:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close: already deleted as noted above. Эlcobbola talk 20:55, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are of a Minecraft Papercraft Chess board. The artwork on all the pieces is from the game Minecraft (by Mojang AB) and Pixel Papercraft may also arguably hold some copyright in the chess designs. These photos seem to exceed COM:DM, as the only purpose/value in the photos is to showcase the copyrighted artwork (i.e. blacking out the copyrighted parts would mean blocking out basically the entire photo). COM:DM Sweden would apply since Mojang AB is a Swedish company, and from the few examples listed on that page, it seems Sweden may have even stricter laws than the U.S., making it more likely these are not de minimis.

IagoQnsi (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of scope.

Leonel Sohns 15:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I've tagged a few of these for speedy deletion as clear copyvios, and the rest I agree are out of scope. –IagoQnsi (talk) 02:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Four of these were speedy deleted as copyright violations. The remainder aren't screenshots, so weren't speedy deleted, though I do agree with the deletion nomination. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:EXPLICATIONZONE.png is lacking a bit of an explanation, but it could hypothetically be used in some sort of expert guide on how to select a volume using commands. Not sure on that none.  Delete all of the remaining ones as out of scope. Especially File:MoistMeter.pdf, which as far as I can tell is just made-up nonsense. --El Grafo (talk) 09:26, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:50, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CáitChrainn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images clearly marked (C) at source given.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz:

Hello Ellin, I have gotten permission from the Manx Museum and Culture Vannin (David Fisher has given permission to them to use the photos) to use those images but I hadn't realised I needed to submit proof. Thanks for marking them for deletion. Sorry making that mistake, I really thought I was doing it all correctly!

CáitChrainn (talk) 18:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CáitChrainn: Please have Mr. Fisher send the simple form located at COM:OTRS. Thank you! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Ellin Beltz Sorry, last question! Some of those images are definitely out of copyright because the creator is dead well over 70 years. The Manx Museum (the Museum on the Isle of Man who gave me permission to use them) have the digital image, but don't know know who author/photographer was because it was never recorded. How can I prove that it is out of copyright in this case? Or would the Manx Museum have to submit a form or something? CáitChrainn (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CáitChrainn: Ask all the questions you want!! How would they know the creator is dead 70 years if they don't know who it was? Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Ellin Beltz I'm glad I can ask questions here, because Janey Mack this is a lot more complicated than I thought! Would you have a link to a form/template that the Manx Museum can send to prove they are releasing the copyright or that the copyright has run out? I have this template (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Email_templates) for Culture Vannin to send to David Fisher. CáitChrainn (talk) 19:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CáitChrainn: Use the easy email form at COM:OTRS! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - No OTRS added since last comment in July 2020. OTRS agent will restore, or request restoration, once valid evidence of pemrission/free status is received. --Эlcobbola talk 21:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by OhanaUnited as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image taken from a book published in 2002 (ISBN-10: 7-80047-333-3/J) from Palace Museum Publishing House. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive696 for past history of this user committing copyvios.. Not a valid reason for speedy deletion because the source given is not that book. There are more of these images at Category:Empress Xiao Quan Cheng. Sent to Deletion Nomination instead. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is cropped from a larger work reliably attributed to a scroll from the Qing dynasty. The nature of the document, visual characteristics, dynasty dating, etc. suggest this is reasonable likely to be {{PD-US-expired}}/{{PD-China}}. Doubts of "Image taken from a book published in 2002 (ISBN-10: 7-80047-333-3/J) from Palace Museum Publishing House" do not rise to the "significant" threshold established by COM:PRP, and the Commons has elected not to recognize copyright in slavish 2D derivatives (see w:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.). --Эlcobbola talk 21:41, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by OhanaUnited as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image taken from a book published in 2002 (ISBN-10: 7-80047-333-3/J) from Palace Museum Publishing House. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive696 for more info.. Image widely in use, this should go to Deletion Nomination, not speedy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This is cropped from a larger work reliably attributed to a scroll from the Qing dynasty. The nature of the document, visual characteristics, dynasty dating, etc. suggest this is reasonable likely to be {{PD-US-expired}}/{{PD-China}}. Doubts of "Image taken from a book published in 2002 (ISBN-10: 7-80047-333-3/J) from Palace Museum Publishing House" do not rise to the "significant" threshold established by COM:PRP, and the Commons has elected not to recognize copyright in slavish 2D derivatives (see w:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.). --Эlcobbola talk 21:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by OhanaUnited as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image taken from a book published in 2002 (ISBN-10: 7-80047-333-3/J) from Palace Museum Publishing House. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive696 for more info. Image widely in use, this should go to Deletion Nomination, not speedy. The point being that we do not know who painted it. It could be an Anonymous Qing painter as listed in the upload template and an out-of-copyright image was used in the book. And so on for all these images. I have mentioned the difference between speedy and deletion nomination to the speedy nominator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Unless there's some evidence that the paintings were painted in 2002 (or after the 19th century, as per the date listed), this seems to be a case of when to use the PD-Art tag. Just because it was published in 2002 doesn't mean it's copyrighted. Vahurzpu (talk) 23:26, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is cropped from a larger work reliably attributed to a scroll from the Qing dynasty. The nature of the document, visual characteristics, dynasty dating, etc. suggest this is reasonable likely to be {{PD-US-expired}}/{{PD-China}}. Doubts of "Image taken from a book published in 2002 (ISBN-10: 7-80047-333-3/J) from Palace Museum Publishing House" do not rise to the "significant" threshold established by COM:PRP, and the Commons has elected not to recognize copyright in slavish 2D derivatives (see w:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.). --Эlcobbola talk 21:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of another cropped photo that I did. Tibet Nation (talk) 18:53, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It appears not to be a duplicate of any image. Maybe similar, but not even a crop of the same frame. SecretName101 (talk) 00:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is not identical to File:Ambassador of Japan shakes hand with Gerald Ford, from- Ford B2477 NLGRF photo contact sheet (1976-12-10)(Gerald Ford Library) (cropped).jpg and, if another file is meant, it was not identified. --Эlcobbola talk 21:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation – book cover is usually not free content Albinfo (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work of non-free content (F3). --Эlcobbola talk 20:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation – book cover is usually not free content – bad quality Albinfo (talk) 18:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative work of non-free content (F3). --Эlcobbola talk 20:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is unknown, CC-BY-SA 4.0 is probably invalid, there is no information about copyright on the website ([2], logo can be downloaded as the .zip archive from the bottom of the page), so it should be assumed this file is copyrighted and should be deleted. Thoji (talk) 19:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - no indication of a free license on the source site (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 20:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free content logo Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:30, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 20:32, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file depicting an unsourced flag, possibly someone's arbitrary personal creation, although named as if it were a real flag. Furthermore, the real flag of Oulu has been uploaded to Commons, which leaves even less room for this flag's plausibility, as well as further increasing the likeliness that this file will remain unused. VulpesVulpes42 (talk) 07:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:58, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be selfie, but person in image has same name as uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, only image in gallery at Flickr... does not seem to be own work by Flickr user which calls into question if we can accept the PD license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Quality is good enough and it is released under a CC-zero license at the flickr source, but as it is the only image of that flickr account, it looks too much like Flickr washing, so deleted per COM:PCP. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

199 KB dubious own work. One of two uploads by a visitor whose other file I also proposed for deletion. E4024 (talk) 00:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have File:Picture of businesswoman Pilar O'Leary.jpg but I doubt none of the three files by this uploader is a real "own work" as declared. E4024 (talk) 00:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete both as copyright violations. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is Ana Basurko? I do not see a meaningful categorization. "Hand on chin" etc and she is all dressed up. What is the scope? E4024 (talk) 00:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, we keep photos about non-notable people, if they are in some sense better then existing photos about notable people, but here quality is not so good. In categories "Chin on both hands" and "People with water (non-contact)" we have enough better photos. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

61 KB dubious "own work" picture of someone we do not know uploaded by a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 01:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At source, Observation © M Rutherford · all rights reserved. Also iNaturalist uses a non-commercial license overall. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The picture is under creative coomns 4.0 cc-by, also the name of the person who took the picture is under given as the author, so I do not see a reason as to why it should be removed, could someone explain? thank you Darmozrac (talk) 01:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At the source given, the license is stated "Observation © M Rutherford · all rights reserved" to the lower right of the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, 2 days after creation of the request free license was confirmed by bot and the photo has still free CC-BY license on source. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At source has non-commercial license and statement Observation © M Rutherford · all rights reserved Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, 2 days after creation of the request free license was confirmed by bot and the photo has still free CC-BY license on source. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This statue was a temporary exhibit for promotion. Not permanently situated. So, FOP in UK does not apply to this. Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addition,

(Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Ghostbusters (2016 film) --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed CC-self license is very dubious as there is no indication that the uploader holds the copyright. This book appears to be authored by "Heinz Bartlich" or possibly "Heinz Bartling", but I cannot find a death date for him. I believe that the letter styling likely places this above COM:TOO Germany. Buidhe (talk) 02:55, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Updated the source but I'm not the original uploader who set the license. The fraktur appears to read Heinz Bartsch, and from what I can see from a quick search, this person was a prisoner of war in Germany on and off during the war, described as a "Dr. Heinz Bartsch", ergo it cannot be Karl-Heinz Bartsch who would've been 15 at that time. Content is likely replaceable as well.--Simtropolitan (talk) 22:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, does not surpass threshold of originaölity. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake ShakyIsles (talk) 05:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file depicting an unsourced flag, possibly someone's arbitrary personal creation, although named as if it were a real flag. Furthermore, the real flag of Oulu has been uploaded to Commons, which leaves even less room for this flag's plausibility, as well as further increasing the likeliness that this file will remain unused. VulpesVulpes42 (talk) 07:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, correct flag is file:Oulu.lippu.svg, the nominated image is still unused. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD in Poland, but not PD in US, because author died in 1949, so we must use URAA (date of publication + 95 years). To restored in 2030 (or 2031?) Matlin (talk) 08:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted in 2031. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because there is a duplicate file called "File:Gwnu-ui"Dreamyden (talk) 08:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per COM:INUSE. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only photos of parties and events from Bollywood Hungama taken by their own photographers are licensed under CC-BY-3.0. Every other photos including this one are copyrighted. মোহাম্মাদ ইসমাইল (talk) 09:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Bollywood Hungama (formerly IndiaFM) grants permission to copy, distribute and/or modify this photograph, provided it is: attributed to Bollywood Hungama; from BollywoodHungama.com (with a link to the source page); of a Bollywood set, party, or event in India; taken by a Bollywood Hungama photographer; --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, per Nicholas Michael Halim. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, Company or brand logo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all uploads of VDFVogtland (talk · contribs) due to same reason. They are all simple logos, ineligible for copyright, but they are all unused and the organizations are not mentioned neither in de.wiki nor in en.wiki. They are all out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily own work appears - https://www.itv.com/news/tyne-tees/2020-07-07/first-acts-to-play-uks-first-covid-19-secure-music-arena-announced credited to JAC media ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant photos, some cannot be meaningfully used even outside Wikimedia scope. Per precedent with Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro#Files uploaded by Judgefloro (talk · contribs) 3, to quote P199's verdict: "As per COM:PSExamples of files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. = meaning we don't need a massive collection of nearly duplicate images. We have told Judgefloro/Ramon FVelasquez many times in the past to be more selective when uploading. And no need to give a long sermon on the notability, that is irrelevant to the number of needless images." However, unlike two "massive" deletion attempts to Judgefloro files, this DR is meticulous and carefully-made so that not less than 95% of the subject collection on Commons is still intact.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your messages and good afternoon hereat Bulacan, Philippines; It is respectfully submitted that the purpose of taking 2019 version of Rizal Park is to update on the Tourist aspect of remarkably different spots for Rizal Park was renovated and well cleaned unlike before at any rate I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons sincerely yours Judgefloro (talk) 06:48, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination. I was not in good mood at that time. These pictures are educational in scope, since they depict important scenes of the park. So I hereby withdraw. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:56, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi and the Bulacan lockdown pandemic prevents me from taking photos of La Union and Pangasinan and Benguet; but my depression is cured by daily waking up at 5:30 am racing to buy the fresh fish from Pamarawan Island of Malolos City, then a cup of choco or coffee and at Jollibee, then taking photos of the fish, fruits, vegies and Kakanin; I bought the Globe Home Wifi and this is my daily dose against unhappiness of being humbled by Pandemic; I wish you the best, for the Pandemic is a great blessing since I savour fresh fish, fresh home cooking and Food photography; for I discovered that I was able to take precious valued photos of Fishes never ever seen in the internet, yes very rare, and I have them due to good luck and early rising from bed, cheers sincerelyJudgefloro (talk) 13:42, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the nomination is withdrawn, the photos are well in scope. Two files are  deleted as derivative works of copyrighted objects (sculpture and information board). Taivo (talk) 11:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I fear that tis image of a model in a turkish museum is nit covered by COM:FOP Turkey. JuTa 09:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really an expert in these things, bat what is the difference between photographing a statue of Atatürk on a place or a model of a building in a museum? Greetings --Kpisimon (talk) 10:04, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The first is "Works of fine arts permanently placed on public streets, avenues or squares", the second not as its indoors. Compare the FOP link above. --JuTa 10:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but the museum is open for public, but as I said, I don' really know. --Kpisimon (talk) 10:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, art can be freely used only if it is in "public streets, avenues or squares". That menas unfortunately: inside museums it's not allowed. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Merely used for the uploader's defense at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall), and his defense was unaccepted because the true artistic ownership of the subject of the deleted files falls to their creators, NOT the municipality of Bustos (as the uploader claims) - per Commons:Derivative works and Commons:FOP, which states that PHL has NO FOP. Back to the photos, there's no use in all Wikimedia projects (thereby out of scope), and even outside wikiCommons.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your messages and good afternoon hereat Bulacan, Philippines; It is respectfully submitted that the purpose of obtaining the Bustos Permit is to take educational and tourism photos of Bustos Heritage and landmarks, at any rate I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons sincerely yours Judgefloro (talk) 06:46, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep:

Example of official Filipino letterhead and permit.

Signage could be COM:EDUSE

 Delete: everything else per COM:Redundant. — BriefEdits (talk) 06:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, but two files are  kept per BriefEdits. I thought about keeping file 3, but decided to delete it, because you do not need any permission to take photos almost anywhere, publication is different. If kept, then some can think, that anybody must obtain permission from city government to take photos in public place. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as http://bookfelva.com/2019/05/18/presskit/ - dubious claim of own work Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:50, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD in US, as publicated in 1896. But the translator (Maria Milkuszyc, born 1869, fl.ca. 1894-99) death date is unknown making its copyright status in Poland unclear. Matlin (talk) 10:29, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep We on Polish Wikisourse assumed that works done by authors born more than 140 years (ca 70 years of life expectancy at the time +70 years post mortem) are PD now. Maria Milkuszyc was born 151 years ago, so it is assumed that her works are PD now. The works made by Maria Milkuszyc are recognized as PD by National Polish Library, as well, see: [3] Electron   10:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added the template {{PD-old-assumed}}, that is more suitable for the translator. It can be used for the works published more than 120 years ago... Electron   11:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Electron: It's deletion request on Wikimedia Commons, not Wikisource xD And in many, many polish digital libraries the statements about licence are invalid and don't describe why is certain work in public domain. So only Template-argument is valuable. Thenks, i don't even know about this template. I hope that there is unitary knowledge and application of this rule. Matlin (talk) 09:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK. You think you the one who now better than the experts working in National Polish Library? I do not suposes so... Of course they can be wrong, but I would trust them more than you. Electron   10:28, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd --Matlin (talk) 10:46, 26 July 2020 (UTC) Explanation: "Experts", who remove access to the whole magazine issue (from beginning of 20th century), then write me, that this is not in PD, and after that they send me second mail, that that is however in PD and will be reopen. Matlin (talk) 10:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As I wrote: As everybody they only the human and sometimes they can be wrong, but nevertheles I would trust them more than you. Sorry... Especially, after this yours strange behavior. Electron   11:39, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, really, Commons is not Wikisource. Commons has rule 120 years from creation and this has also passed. Taivo (talk) 13:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It's good that it has finally been verified. I will remember this case and ask for your help if anyone wants to delete my file. Matlin (talk) 15:18, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found here before upload - https://www.sfgate.com/parties/article/Stars-honor-Mavis-Staples-at-SFJAZZ-Gala-15032579.php - uploader claims to be Drew Altizer - think we need OTRS confirmation Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From Talk Page
"I am Drew Altizer, the copyright holder for this image. It was photographed by Devlin Shand under contract for Drew Altizer Photography. That contract transfers the copyright entirely to me under its work for hire provision. You may notice that I logged in as Drew Altizer to upload the image and it is unclear why there is any issue at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewaltizer (talk • contribs) 15:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)"
@Drewaltizer: Please comment here
The thing is anyone can claim to be Drew Altizer so we need confirmation of that. Plus if Devlin Shand took it, we need a confirmation of that release via COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, after receiving and accepting OTRS-permission the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 14:00, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMHO this file needs OTRS permission. Thoughts? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Re-uploaded Commons:Deletion requests/File:Photo wikiwipedia ej.jpg. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il faut une meilleur photo 86.238.129.70 12:05, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 kept. Quality is acceptable, depicted person notable. Uploader's selfie. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by uploader Pranayraj Vangari (talk) |Contribs) 12:32, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after upload, here 7 years have passed. I quite like the photo and do not want to delete it. Taivo (talk) 14:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by uploader Pranayraj Vangari (talk) |Contribs) 12:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, uploader's request is valid reason for deletion during first week after upload, here 7 years have passed. I quite like the photo and do not want to delete it. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope and/or unwanted self-advertising: This is the logo of someones personal Minecraft server. The corresponding article was deleted from simple Wikipedia in May.

The server doesn't even seem to exist anymore: all links listed at its entry at everybodywiki are broken, the domain leecraft.de does not appear to exist and the server is listed as "offline" at both minecraft-statistic.net and minecraft-servers.de El Grafo (talk) 13:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DmitoSklyarenko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Violation of rule COM:FOP Ukraine.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 14:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of this file 👦 14:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 14:32, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minor changes of size. I need the first version of the picture, that I took and uploaded myself, deleted. Thank you! Karlisjm (talk) 15:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of this file 👦 15:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 14:38, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from art. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Sheila Ortega isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. I'll delete the photo as out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of temporary exhibits in India. These statues were not permanently situated. So, FOP in India does not apply to these files, unfortunately.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak oppose - the exhibits have been installed permanently in different science parks of West Bengal which are public spaces or premises accessible to public. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 17:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks for your comment. If these are permanently exhibited in different place, I think it's better to upload photos taken that place. I think that FOP in India does not applied to these photos because these are temporary exhibits at this place. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Papago machine translation of Ralf Roletschek's input: I can't see protected works of art. Can (Dino)Saurs claim their personal rights? Translation conducted by JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:06, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: per Bodhisattwa. --Materialscientist (talk) 09:14, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely that this image, which has an in image date of 1913 is own work of uploader. It's also very small and of low quality. If kept, closing administrator please fix the category, this item is in Trinidad, California not in the Caribbean! The image has "Seely Bros." as possible authors. The Seely Brothers were in business for a long time: "The Seely Studio was in business from 1908-1954 in Eureka, then from 1954-1988 in Arcata." See https://www.times-standard.com/2012/12/28/forgotten-photos-of-eureka/ for more details of their lives and companies. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


KEPT published in 1913 = PD US.--RZuo (talk) 19:51, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naqx1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the photo is free of copyright, the item depicted is a mural painted by Randy Spicer and we do not seem to have OTRS from Mr. Spicer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the copyright of the photo is ok, we do not have permission from artist Duane Flatmo, of Eureka, CA. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the copyright of the photo is ok, we do not have permission from artist Duane Flatmo, of Eureka, CA. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 18:21, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm proposing to delete all photographs in Category:Photographs of men socks by Sebastián Arena for the following reasons:

  • No educational value
  • Low quality blurry photos
  • Privacy violation

This includes all of the following photos:

Kaldari (talk) 17:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose The reason of “low quality” doesn't apply to all the photos. About the non-educational value, I don't think that my photographs can be compared to those that belong to Category:Nude or partially nude men wearing socks, that it's more irrelevant to all the Wikimedia projects. Additionally, we can ask about the same “educational” value of even having the category of Category:Men wearing socks, because most of the photos depicts soccer players, and that would be a better category that “men wearing socks”. To answer the last point, If my photos are a privacy violation, I wonder why that couldn't be applied to all the photographs that belong to Category:Street photography and Category:Street photography in Sweden, for example. Anyways, it doesn't matter what I say, you would do whatever you want. Sebastián Arena... 16:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Sebastián Arena: So what in your view is the value of these photos? I'm just having a hard time understanding why we would want to have 22 blurry almost identical photographs of a man wearing socks. Sure, there are lots of other useless photographs on Commons, but that isn't a very good excuse. And street photography is very different than taking photos of someone through their window, as one is a public space and the other is a private space. If someone took photos of you through the window of your house and posted them on Commons, wouldn't you feel like your privacy had been violated? Kaldari (talk) 04:10, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete hardly useful photos.--RZuo (talk) 19:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 07:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe that the subject of this is very useful, but the recording has been cleaned so much that it has destorted the sound of a human voice to the point that it is not recognizable the sound one makes without looking at the page. Once you know what this is meant to be, you can kind of hear that, but even then not very well. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 10:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:29, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of this file 👦 15:46, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: processed as dupe already. --rubin16 (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of this file 👦 15:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: these are not duplicates as I see. --rubin16 (talk) 09:32, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, no permission for the photo, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 16:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Fisherman statue is not Public Domain, because the artist Dick Crane has not been dead 70 years. https://www.times-standard.com/2016/10/31/art-grows-here-public-art-is-easily-accessible/ ... "Two of Eureka’s most treasured pieces of public art (proudly owned and maintained by the Humboldt Arts Council) — “The Fisherman” statue of Woodley Island and the Romano Gabriel Sculpture Garden..." Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work on this postcard which might date early enough to be kept if there were a real source to check it against. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely that this 1966 photo is own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Per Exif data and the characteristics of this image (specks of dust, shape of the border), it was probably scanned directly from an original slide. That slide could be the uploader's own work (we do have contributors who scan their own old photos/slide of about that time period); however, as User:Carly.marino also uploaded other, older images that are obviously not their own work, such as File:Fields Landing Wharf.jpeg, I think the doubts may by justified. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source here is a license, author is claimed as own work. It's likely the photo is old enough to be kept, but it's not licensed correctly and with no source, it can't be checked. If the photographer is accepted as Erickson as shown on the photo, the license could be PD-old-auto-1923|deathyear=1927. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the photographic copyright is ok, this is a mural painted by Duane Flatmo or Eureka, California and we do not have OTRS from Mr. Flatmo for this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the copyright on the photo may be correct, you can clearly read "Mural by C.R. Spicer" in lower right corner of the painting and we do not have OTRS from Mr. Spicer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:37, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the copyright on the photo may be correct, it is a mural by Randy Spicer and we do not have OTRS from Mr. Spicer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:37, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file depicting Helsinki's flag with incorrect tinctures. There are other files showing the flag with correct tinctures. VulpesVulpes42 (talk) 17:55, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the copyright on the photo may be correct, you can clearly read "Mural by C.R. Spicer" in lower right corner of the painting and we do not have OTRS from Mr. Spicer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lewis Crellin.jpg CáitChrainn (talk) 17:58, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have emails from Culture Vannin (the organisation that David Fisher has given these images to) to show that I have permission to use these images freely. Sorry if this isn't the right place to write this discussion, I'm new to this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by CáitChrainn (talk • contribs) 18:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 09:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bill Radcliffe.jpg CáitChrainn (talk) 17:59, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have emails from Culture Vannin (the organisation that David Fisher has given these images to) to show that I have permission to use these images freely. Sorry if this isn't the right place to write this discussion, I'm new to this!


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --rubin16 (talk) 09:38, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work" in tiny size by this uploader, without attributing that the image came from Commons in the first place ... by a different uploader File:Statue of Hope, Kund Malir, Pakistan (1).jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: processed as duplicate. --rubin16 (talk) 09:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not actually Creative Commons licensed on YouTube, not even in the archived version, http://web.archive.org/web/20200308031915/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSDhxaz0wbY (I looked in the source code). A rare exception, most of the uploader's other uploads from this same source are fine. GRuban (talk) 18:14, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GRuban: The Creative Commons license on the mentioned YouTube video was changed after I uploaded, so I will find another one as [4]. Thanks for your kind reminder. -- Lethal Magma (talk) 08:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: this one deleted, the new one could be obtained from the better source, of course. --rubin16 (talk) 09:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am not certain this can be retained without COM:OTRS. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete derivative.--RZuo (talk) 19:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be a selfie, although uploader's name is same as the name of the person in the photo (per description). Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted theme cover/movie ad by Amazon Prime. Very likely no CC licensing Mosbatho (talk) 18:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found an earlier use than this upload, https://www.cafehistoria.com.br/https-www-cafehistoria-com-br-memorias-da-pandemia-do-novo-coronavirus/ and at the source given, the actual uploader is stated to be anonymous, which leads me to wonder if "Elly" was the one who uploaded to the source we have or not. It's a very small photo of low quality, it seems to have been around a while. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2001:861:4005:E950:6DFA:2CEF:2B35:7190 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Unknown Author/Source|year=2020|month=July|day=23 With which I agree, however we have other copies of this image ex: File:《孝全成皇后朝服像》.jpg found in Category:Empress Xiao Quan Cheng Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: processed as duplicate. --rubin16 (talk) 09:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, book cover. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought me taking a scan of my own book counted as my own work. Please delete! CáitChrainn (talk) 16:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the author, send email to COM:OTRS. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak keep The simple pattern framing an otherwise text-only cover might be below the threshold of originality anyway. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on the template supports the license that the author's life is 70 years or fewer in the past, since Author is given as "unknown". Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get proper permission like an eejit CáitChrainn (talk) 19:59, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CáitChrainn: Use the easy email form at COM:OTRS! Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With unknown photographer it is impossible to verify license given. No additional information at source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't provide proof in the proper way, so please delete! CáitChrainn (talk) 16:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this file still up for deletion? It seems unreasonable to assume that a picture take in the late 19th century may still be under copyright laws. CáitChrainn (talk) 10:31, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The template has some pretty clear (C) symbols on it, this does need to be resolved. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 09:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio in spite of OTRS ticket: Copyright holder is NOT the uploader or the person depicted in the image, as the file claims, but - according to this source - the German government and a photographer named Nicole Dartsch. Please check for their licensing rules. And while you are at it, please check if the gentleman on the right has given his consent to having his picture uploaded on Commons. 87.150.10.183 14:41, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted till we get better/another explanation from the person who wrote to OTRS. We performed some investigation with MGA73 and more information needed to keep it. --rubin16 (talk) 18:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 2600:1700:E34:7740:59FD:949A:670B:FD4F 23:50, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Belle photo ne pas supprimer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kikijaco (talk • contribs) 06:02, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete --Hérisson grognon (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]