Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/02/26
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
это не моя работа Maaria.tk (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 10:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Dfcvcgchvsxrxgcfcgcfghbgbgbj the Greg hope guys get g get g have had his girlfriend g the 41.113.246.130 14:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense. --Achim (talk) 15:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Bogus license despite user has been explained what to do Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 17:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
I want to upload a better clarity picture. This one seems dark Burrin2020 (talk) 20:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by User:Túrelio, CSD G7. GFJ (talk) 16:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
I´m the author of the foto. Uploading without my approval 2001:16B8:5C1F:4600:A1FC:C140:C09C:20A6 09:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per precautionary principle: Sole two uploads by Blaxxun 7 years ago, 'own work' can be doubted, no EXIF, no permission. No other edits of User:Blaxxun on any WM project. --Achim (talk) 12:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- I got an email from the photographer Thorsten Monschein who confirmed this to be a copyright infringement. --Achim (talk) 18:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Achim (talk) 18:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Dieses Foto ist nicht von nir hochgeladen worden. Ich bin der Autor. Bitte löschen!!!! 2001:16B8:5C1F:4600:A1FC:C140:C09C:20A6 09:22, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, f'up Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abhörstation Teufelsberg.jpg. --Achim (talk) 12:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- I got an email from the photographer Thorsten Monschein who confirmed this to be a copyright infringement. --Achim (talk) 18:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Achim (talk) 18:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
This file has been nominated for deletion. However, it was uploaded by user 'hatoncross' who represents the publisher Haton Cross Press, also named in the copyright notice. The image was uploaded with the permission of the author and a letter from the author of the book from which the image is taken can be provided on request. Hatoncross (talk) 20:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Moheen at 11:20, 27 Februar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 14:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Rights holder refused to grant a free licence. Kreuzschnabel 13:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 22:14, 27 Februar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial logo --Krdbot 02:29, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Copyright file (https://www.premiot.cz/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Ondrej-Spodniak-Premiot-investice-970x1455.jpg, used here: https://www.premiot.cz/o-nas-investicni-skupina-premiot/) Patriccck (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 21:31, 29 Februar 2020 UTC: https://www.premiot.cz/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Ondrej-Spodniak-Premiot-investice-970x1455.jpg --Krdbot 02:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
miss contents Fellow65 (talk) 13:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd at 08:38, 3 März 2020 UTC: Broken redirect (G2) --Krdbot 14:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Владимир О. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Георгий Мамиконов.jpg
- File:Георгий Мамиконов и Барри Алибасов.jpg
- File:Афиша шоу-группа "Доктор Ватсон".jpg
- File:Шоу-группа "Доктор Ватсон".jpg
- File:20180912 142100 Moment 1.jpg
- File:Звезда шоу-группы Доктор Ватсон.jpg
- File:Шоу-группа Доктор Ватсон.jpg
- File:Мамиконов Георгий Рубенович (1).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and FBMD in exif. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Владимир О. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Шоу-группа Доктор Ватсон 4.jpg
- File:Шоу-группа Доктор Ватсон 3.jpg
- File:Шоу-группа Доктор Ватсон 2.jpg
- File:Шоу-группа Доктор Ватсон 1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Herky relativo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Too big collection for user page.
- File:Karatongto.jpg
- File:CurtMenor.jpg
- File:PogiRetailed.jpg
- File:Friendnaminto.jpg
- File:PrinceCarlAragon.jpg
- File:PrinceDelaCruz.jpg
- File:PrinceAragon.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:46, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
missing permission and holiday photos are not allowed --Killarnee (T•R•P) 19:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per F10. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 05:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DaniloBimbati (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MAGDAHOSRI1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Rafik El Hariri Illustration).
- File:Butterflies by Rafik El Hariri Illustration.jpg
- File:Compassion by Rafik El Hariri Illustration.jpg
- File:Endless Love by Rafik El Hariri Illustration.jpg
- File:Autumn by Rafik El Hariri Illustration.jpg
- File:Books by Rafik El Hariri Illustration.jpg
- File:Mother by Rafik El Hariri Illustration.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 09:49, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, small, no EXIF. Ahmadtalk 09:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Amir mehmannavaz Artist , singer music producer rap & pop امیر مهمان نواز خواننده و آهنگساز سبک رپ و پاپ متولد 1370 در ایران و شهر رشت بدنیا آمد.jpg
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE, small, no EXIF, can be found on the web using Google search by image. Ahmadtalk 08:55, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused. Probably private photo Hjart (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
promo content (logo) for deleted article in ru-wiki Khinkali (talk) 12:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope as representative of raw text. Formerly in w:User:Ifarhanism/sandbox/A and N Mortgage. —Cryptic (talk) 15:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Francisco Antonio García Romero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:3A. LA ROSA SIN LAS ESPINAS.pdf
- File:La muerte de Arrio.pdf
- File:Hipatia en Sócrates Escolástico.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Underexposed blurry picture, part of mass upload. We have several fine pictures of trees and leaves in autumn. Out of scope. Pugilist (talk) 15:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CubeyTheCube (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused maps of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal/promotional photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
not used file, not edicational. out of project scope. commons is not web host. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image, sole contribution of the uploader. GFJ (talk) 21:07, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
uploaded for a deleted spam-article in ru-wiki Khinkali (talk) 21:21, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. 2001:4BB8:250:41D1:3589:9A7D:CFA9:97E9 21:22, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image lacking encyclopedic relevance. GFJ (talk) 21:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image. GFJ (talk) 21:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. GFJ (talk) 21:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image that appears to lack encyclopedic relevance. GFJ (talk) 21:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, no apparent encyclopedic relevance. GFJ (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope, no apparent encyclopedic relevance. GFJ (talk) 21:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused low-resolution image that appears to lack encyclopedic relevance or context. Only upload of this user. GFJ (talk) 22:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope and unused, no links to this page. GFJ (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Photo was cover of a Time magazine. https://www.flickr.com/photos/andreasheumann/153077161 Michelling (talk) 00:49, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Subí por error el archivo, quiero que eliminen la foto. Lugo Wonka (talk) 21:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 23:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Previously published https://mexico.as.com/mexico/2019/12/17/tikitakas/1576546407_006091.html Ytoyoda (talk) 03:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 06:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Metadata contains a "FBMD" tag, which means this image may have been taken from Facebook. OTRS permission is required from the copyright holder in this case.--Kai3952 (talk) 06:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
The album cover of Dedication by Bay City Rollers is still copyrighted. The copyright notice can be seen on the back cover... well, in very tiny print but still readable. (see eBay item) Looks like Flickr license laundering, isn't it? George Ho (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: a version of the same image but as non-free w:File:Bay0.jpg is in the enwiki article w:Dedication (Bay City Rollers album). Seems to still be in copyright to either the record company and attributed to an Allan Ballard who may still be alive and even if he died the year the album was produced it would be copyright until 2047. Ww2censor (talk) 17:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Hector Suarez from Buenos Aires incategory:"All media needing categories as of 2018"
[edit]Flickrwashing. Old photos and scans uploaded to flickr. Some may be PD but require more info to do so
- File:G.6 -Loria 1946 (43318889041).jpg
- File:G.4. Actuaciones varias (28449714337).jpg
- File:D-M. LESCAUT (43269324212).jpg
- File:F- 1936 (28449718987).jpg
- File:C-M DE BARRO (43269325842).jpg
- File:A-foto 1965 (43269327092).jpg
- File:Con Hugo del Carril (43319283591).jpg
- File:G.5-LR9 (28449711927).jpg
- File:3. 1.El Fortin (Velez) (28449588497).jpg
- File:8.Germinal Bar c. 1942 (28449581837).jpg
- File:Grupal con H. del Carril (43319283421).jpg
- File:G.2 con Tito Lusiardp (43269319722).jpg
- File:6.1. Antena sector 1942 (43296500072).jpg
- File:Dedicatoria de H del Carril (43319283471).jpg
- File:4.2. Cine Argentino 10-10-40 (sector) (42600912864).jpg
- File:7. Club SyD Gral Belgrano 29-11-42 (28449582737).jpg
- File:2.Revista Cine Argentino 27-06-40 (42600913034).jpg
- File:2. Casa Balear 21-9-41 (41508988310).jpg
- File:11.1-Club Odeón 12-12-42 (41508977740).jpg
- File:4.2. Cine Argentino 10-10-40 (sector) (43296500392).jpg
- File:2.Revista Cine Argentino 27-06-40 (43296500522).jpg
- File:11.2-Club Odeón 12-12-42 (28449577757).jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:03, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
work by Hans van Drumpt, not by the author - so missing permission Velocitas (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
work by Hans van Drumpt, not by the author - so missing permission Velocitas (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
work by Hans van Drumpt, not by the author - so missing permission Velocitas (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
still no own work and no permission, see previous nomination: maker Hans van Drumpt died in 2015 Velocitas (talk) 17:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
work by Hans van Drumpt, not by the author - so missing permission Velocitas (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
still no own work and no permission, see previous nomination: maker Hans van Drumpt died in 2015 Velocitas (talk) 17:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
work by Hans van Drumpt, not by the author - so missing permission Velocitas (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
still no own work and no permission, see previous nomination: maker Hans van Drumpt died in 2015 Velocitas (talk) 17:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:04, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
work by Hans van Drumpt, not by the author - so missing permission Velocitas (talk) 15:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
still no own work and no permission, see previous nomination: maker Hans van Drumpt died in 2015 Velocitas (talk) 17:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:06, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zdravkopetrov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, documents, book covers, music sheets - all tagged as own works without permissions and evidence of PD.
- File:Krastanovia rod.jpg
- File:Старите песни.png
- File:Yanco Ganev Img113.jpg
- File:Yanco Ganev2Img114.jpg
- File:Dimitar GaneoluImg1151.jpg
- File:Fuga1.png
- File:Fuga.png
- File:Димитър Вълчев2Image0278.JPG
- File:Димитър Вълчев-1Image0277.JPG
- File:OrpheusGeorgi Ganev.tif
- File:Georgi Ganev & Omara PortuondoUntitled - Copy.png
- File:Georgi Ganev.tif
- File:Димитър Ганев-порртретUntitled.png
- File:Prokofiev5555555.png
- File:Panco Vladigerov and Lyuben Vladigerov.jpg
- File:Panco Vladigerov, 1924.jpg
- File:Bach-fuga)2-II1535489 10151915776578775 1199696695 n.jpg
- File:Клементи - Сонатина-б 222222.png
- File:Клементи - Сонатина №1,а1111111.png
- File:До-ре-ми-фаImage0187.JPG
- File:Emilia 1966 02.jpg
- File:Маргарита РадинскаScan10508.JPG
- File:Ani.png
- File:Студио В -1973Image (110).jpg
- File:Мария Ганева-1976-112211234.jpg
- File:Балкантон-оркестър3567 - Копие.jpg
- File:Балкантон, оркестър3567 - Копие.jpg
- File:Орк.Балкантон3567 - Копие.jpg
- File:Студио В, 1973Image (110).jpg
- File:Студио ВImage (110).jpg
- File:Ани Върбанова-Златният Орфей343434.png
- File:Начални сорфежи - част петаImage0275.JPG
- File:1976 г. с Председателя на журито.JPG
- File:Росица Николова44444.JPG
- File:Начални солфежиCad4clfz1ar3gk2c9552mm82a4k04.jpg
- File:Асен ДиамандиевImage0016.JPG
VLu (talk) 15:47, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: grabbed from Facebook. --Sealle (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It can be out of COM:SCOPE as well, I think. --Ahmadtalk 16:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 16:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by İnsaatci muhendis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Falses dates of shooting, mostly photos of photos in .tiff format. Since almost every .jpg file is copyvio I suspect .tiffs are as well (Google reverse search doesn't work with .tiffs). Besides too many cameras (7 at least), unlikely to be the same people's work.
- File:Behram Ibrahimov.tif
- File:Salamzade Z.tif
- File:Shahin Hesenov islenmis.jpg
- File:Shahin Hesenov.jpg
- File:Oqtay Ceferov.jpg
- File:Telman Eliyev (alim).jpg
- File:Hesenov Esger.tif
- File:Suleyman-Qaradagli.jpg
- File:Mahmudov Gave.tif
- File:Memishov Alipasha Azizaqa oglu - копия.tif
- File:Esedov Elshad.tif
- File:Eli bey Novruzi.jpg
- File:Axundov Aga Yusif Hebib oglu.jpg
- File:Musedin Namazov.jpg
- File:Rüstəm Rüstəmov (Polkovnik).jpg
- File:Ilqar Beylerov.tif
- File:Ilgar beylerov.jpg
- File:Knyaz Haciyev HAZIR (1).tif
- File:Vaqif Ağayar oğlu Qurbanov yenir.tif
- File:Dadaşov Qərib Kamran oğlu (2).tif
- File:Qərib Dadaşov.tif
- File:Məmmədov Saleh Ərşad oğlu.tif
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by İnsaatci muhendis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re corporate/official portraits: unlikely to be own works.
- File:Nuriyev-Eldar.jpg
- File:Seyfullayev Xanlar.jpg
- File:M. Namazov.jpg
- File:Hesenov-Esger-.jpg
- File:Esger Hesenov.jpg
- File:Nasir Mustafazade.jpg
- File:ElşəJPGn Qəniyev..jpg
- File:Nəriman Talıb oglu Nağıyev.jpg
- File:Leysan Məmmədov.jpg
- File:Nasir Mustafazadə.jpg
- File:Nebiyev akif musa oglu.jpg
- File:Asir Nadir oğlu Mustafazadə yenir.jpg
- File:Leysan Memmedov.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:54, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by İnsaatci muhendis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-re corporate/official portraits: unlikely to be own works.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The poster belongs to Episcopal Conference of Brazil, and the site of origin informs at the footer that all rights to its content are reserved. Leon saudanha (talk) 00:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 18:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BIKASH NANDA GOSWAMI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Chuni Goswami.jpg
- File:Kishore Kumar.jpg
- File:Shreya Ghoshal 12.jpg
- File:Kumar Sanu.jpg
- File:Dr Rajdeep Roy.jpg
- File:Kripanath Mallah.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete User is just uploading images from search engine. Coderzombie (talk) 17:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bashir Shatima Mustapha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Cooking stone.jpg
- File:Hausa traditional grinder.jpg
- File:Palace of emir of kano (Fadan Sarkin Kano).jpg
- File:Hausa food 02.jpg
- File:Hausa hen.jpg
- File:Hausa store hut.jpg
- File:Hausa Fish.jpg
- File:Hausa traditional shoe for Emirs.jpg
- File:Hausa traditional groom room.jpg
- File:Type of Mosque in Hausa land.jpg
- File:Inside Mosque.jpg
- File:Hausa Groom dress.jpg
- File:Hausa Bride.jpg
- File:Hausa Quranic School (Makarantar Al-Qurani) 01.jpg
- File:Hausa Quranic writing (Ajami).jpg
- File:Hausa Quranic School (Makarantar Al-Qurani).jpg
- File:Suya meat pepper (Yajin suua).jpg
- File:Hausa traditional dressing for men.jpg
- File:Tamarin (tsamiya).jpg
- File:Suya meat (naman suya).jpg
- File:Pap (Kunu).jpg
- File:Soup and Tuwo (Tuwo da miya).jpg
- File:Hausa traditional iron (Dutsen guga).jpg
- File:Rope catcher (Kwugiya).jpg
- File:African Star Apple (agwalumo).jpg
- File:A 21th century hausa female dress.jpg
- File:Hausa traditional Axe.jpg
- File:A hoe (Partanya).jpg
- File:Maize vegetable cook (chacchanga).jpg
- File:Doum palm fruit (goruba).jpg
- File:Hausa Cap.jpg
- File:Hausa Traditional attire.jpg
- File:Traditional turban.jpg
- File:Traditional Hausa Basket.jpg
- File:Traditional Hausa pot.jpg
- File:Hausa Traditional plate for eating food.jpg
- File:Hausa Traditional shoe.jpg
- File:Twins spear, Royal Trumpet, King Staff of office.jpg
- File:Hausa Traditional drum.jpg
- File:Gong Rattle (Kuge).jpg
- File:A traditional Hausa Hand fan.jpg
- File:Royal sandals.jpg
- File:Hausa Traditional Drum.jpg
- File:Hausa Traditional Emir's Dress.jpg
- File:A Hausa Traditional lighting stone.jpg
- File:Azare Local government traditional gate.jpg
- File:Hausa traditional Male dress.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bashir Shatima Mustapha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:An ancient Hausa mosque.jpg
- File:Ganuwa (ancient Hausa Traditional wall).jpg
- File:Ancient Hausa Horse riders.jpg
- File:Hausa Traditional Rider.jpg
- File:Hausa Traditional boxing (Dambe).jpg
- File:Ancient Hausa warrior.jpg
- File:Ancient city of Kano State Nigeria.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:09, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
I need to delete this because all marilyn screw art of efi needs to be unpublished thanks. I need to change the image also Ebfa2019 (talk) 16:40, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Authors request Ebfa2019 (talk) 16:43, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:09, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lisa Hanawalt
[edit]It looks like the Flickr uploader has requested deletion. The Flickr upload, which has a NC-ND license, predates the YouTube upload by a couple of months. Pinging @Leoboudv: who verified the license.
Ytoyoda (talk) 20:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete then. No objections. I had reviewed the Youtube source but it was filmed after this photo. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:15, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:11, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation, as this appears to be a photograph of someone else's picture. GFJ (talk) 21:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:11, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 19:11, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
missing permission, looks like a professional picture --Killarnee (T•R•P) 20:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Missing source, permission and license. --Ahmadtalk 15:51, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio. Copied directly from the report with no changes to formatting or design. oknazevad (talk) 22:21, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright infringement. Veverve (talk) 22:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
This chemical is not strictly "W–O–" and "W=O" but instead "WO42–" has resonance. Replaceable by File:Natriumwolframaat.png DMacks (talk) 18:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
as it’s my account and want it removed and deleted Joe Peters (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and as a courtesy, as well as the user page per COM:CSD#G10 and COM:CSD#U3. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & by courtesy. All the best!. --Achim (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Request by uploader- possible copyright issue. Tibet Nation (talk) 09:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 07:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted figures A1Cafel (talk) 14:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Already deleted once as a sophisticated logo. I recognize that it could be below the threshold of originality, so listing as a DR. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Uploading error, fixed version at File:Cody_Townsend_new.jpg U+1F360 (talk) 15:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:11, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
user has been explained what to do Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
В Казахстане нет свободы панорамы, поэтому прошу удалить данный файл User 0100 (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Previously published at http://www.sacredwaternepal.com/blog/2014/12/stone-spouts-the-names Ytoyoda (talk) 17:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Gikü (talk) 17:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
This file appears to be a professional photo for an advertising campaign. User uploading claims this and another photo (selfie) are their own work. Original photo credit here: https://www.facebook.com/emmacfuhrmann/posts/2004216736354860 Ckoerner (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Is this own work? Saayeeh (talk) 18:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from FaceBook. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Britanny is not an independent country, 2046 is in the future, none of these parties currently exist in Brittany, except the PCF. Fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 18:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Poor to the point of no good use. ɱ (talk) 20:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
This flag not represent Albanian in north macedonia Vestacka Nacija (talk) 22:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Photoshop Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Photoshop Gunofficial1998 (talk) 12:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Scan or photo of a photo, not own work Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Book covers are protected with copyright. Copyright belongs to Disney company. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Not cc licensed on YouTube Eatcha (talk · contribs) 14:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 01:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of project scope per Commons:Project scope#Non-allowable reasons for PDF and DjVu formats, ¶ 2: "The content is essentially raw text; such files are not considered media files." Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 02:17, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
This has no use anymore Unfpa.vientiane.laopdr (talk) 03:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Because it is Press photo LamarLLC (talk) 05:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Bing imagery is not free; see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps 沈澄心✉ 07:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
This screenshot contains copyrighted aerial imagery from Microsoft in the background. The OpenStreetMap project has special permission to trace from these images, but the aerial imagery itself cannot be republished under the terms of a open licenses. (Likely also OSM Wiki cannot use such images but that is a separate story to be solved in a different project). Bing imagery can be identified by attribution in bottom left of aerial. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note to self: after this is processed look through https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:ID_(software) and other related categories for next one Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Wait? why it was not deleted after previous one? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, it was. NMaia reuploaded it Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 11:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G4. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
promo for deleted article in ru-wiki Khinkali (talk) 10:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
No metadata available, surely a copyvio image. No proof from uploaded that it was captured by him. Störm (talk) 10:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
uploaded in error K LAL ARORA BOB (talk) 11:07, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Per what author stated on Wikipedia here [1], it is not "own work" Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Apparently it's from here [2], but as I understand it, that doesn't make it ok to use. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:38, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
missing permission --Killarnee (T•R•P) 20:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- L'image utilisée est libre de droit et ne viole aucune règle
- Je ne comprend pas pourquoi vous signalez cela — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigNumber7 (talk • contribs) 23:04, 26 February 2020 (UTCUTC)
- 1. The license is missing in the "Permission" section, there are predefined templates.
- 2. On the website given as the source, it is not clear whether the image is really under a free license.
- --Killarnee (T•R•P) 01:33, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 09:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Evident hoax image; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afshin Moghaddam TenPoundHammer (talk) 22:55, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep These are prominent Iranian musicians (Dariush Eghbali, etc.) Hanooz 23:47, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per Hanooz. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos, book covers, newspaper, map, document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:"Мунхаузени Саргузаштон" (Приключения Мюнхгаузена) 1936г.jpg
- File:"Арктика Дастаны" (Эпопея Арктики) З. Ахмедзаде.jpg
- File:"Даварда ружон" (Прошедшие дни) З. Ахмедзаде. 1932г.jpg
- File:Сыа Толыш от 07.01.1936 №1 (328).jpg
- File:Ахундов Ширали Бахшали оглы.jpg
- File:Талышинский уезд на карте Кавказского края 1842 года.jpg
- File:Зульфугар Ахмедзаде.jpg
- File:Заявление Зульфугара Ахмедзаде.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Made corrections for these shortcomings. Please do not delete files. If there are errors, tell me where. Гусейнага (talk) 19:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except one. --Sealle (talk) 06:51, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for Argentina for sculptures. Maybe the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Who is the sculptor and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 09:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:17, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for Argentina for sculptures. Maybe the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Who is the sculptor and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 09:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for Argentina for sculptures. Maybe the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Who is the sculptor and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 09:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
duplicate, lower resolution version of File:Balloon Rally White Sands NM.jpg (was copied to Flickr and then copied back to Wikimedia as this file) Maps and stuff (talk) 11:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia and maybe the photo violates architect's copyright. Who is the architect and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 09:17, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment We maybe did not notice if there was not the statue on the photo, maybe it can be considered as De mininmis. Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- I even did not notice the sculpture, but the buildings are also copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 13:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, before this one I closed FoP dr about another country, I did not notice that we talked now about Indonesia. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Link dead + no lr Eatcha (talk · contribs) 14:01, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
This photo is not an authorized usage of FCA property. Access to photos from FCA testing facilities are strictly restricted in internal, employee use and not for public consumption unless otherwise permitted. Amydrill (talk) 14:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Commons is not subject to internal FCA rules. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 轻语者 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Exif show author is "marco"
Confused here. It is actually categorised as an OSM image however the watermark says MAXAR. Assuming that means MAXAR here )the logo is similar) then this image is copyrighted. Herby talk thyme 16:40, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Hallo, I'm Mbranco2.
- about 'Copyvio': yes, the author is 'marco', it's my first name...
- about Maxar: I did the jpeg having made a screenshot on my pc from the site www.openstreetmap.org. From this site, clicking on "edit", the map is replaced by aerial imagery.
There are several providers who grant permission using their imagery to OpenStreetMap, Maxar is one of these (currently, Maxar is also the default imagery, to edit the map).
I used this image for OpenStreetMap purposes: indeed it's linked here: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Mapping-Morancas-in-Guinea-Bissau-tp5959142.html
17:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OSM free license only applies to OSM data, not the underlying sat image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
low quality + not sure about copyright Houstička (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
subject of the image claiming copyright — billinghurst sDrewth 22:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
This flag not represent Albanian in norh macedonia this is flag of north macedonia just aded eagle Vestacka Nacija (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep It does, at least in UNPO, and the file is COM:INUSE. Finnusertop (talk) 14:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Finnusertop. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
No pass license Gunofficial1998 (talk) 22:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Because it's a duplicate of another file Chicago Mapper (talk) 23:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination, superseded by File:CoA Ulm, BW.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. Svg. File Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 00:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: We must keep both version for licensing. --Ezarateesteban 20:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced. This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 12:30, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 12:42, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 03:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:07, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: we must keep both version. --Ezarateesteban 20:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Mongolia44 01:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per last nomination. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 12:31, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:07, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: we must keep both version. --Ezarateesteban 20:04, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Mongolia44 01:10, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: same as last time. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 02:24, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:09, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ezarateesteban 20:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Un autorretrato Ismael Olea (talk) 11:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: used only in a sandbox, promotional content. --Ezarateesteban 20:10, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Un autorretrato Ismael Olea (talk) 11:20, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, out of scope. --Ezarateesteban 20:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Porque sí Un autorretrato Ismael Olea (talk) 11:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, personal photo, out of scope. --Ezarateesteban 20:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
copyrighted Gunofficial1998 (talk) 11:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation, multiple sources. --Ezarateesteban 20:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
No evidence of publication before 1960. Maybe this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 20:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Dubious licence. See https://spd.berlin/impressum/ Alle Texte, Fotos und sonstige Gestaltungselemente dieses Internetangebots sind für den SPD-Landesverband Berlin urheberrechtlich geschützt, sofern nicht ein*e andere*r Urheber*in oder ein*e andere*r Urheberrechtsinhaber*in angegeben ist. Jede Nutzung dieser Inhalte darf nur mit schriftlicher Zustimmung des SPD-Landesverbands Berlin erfolgen. Eine Verwendung in Veröffentlichungen konkurrierender Parteien ist nicht gestattet. Mutter Erde (talk) 06:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: not in the PD, the license tag used does not apply. --Rosenzweig τ 21:18, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
herb jest nieaktualny i niepoprawny. Zakrzewo (talk) 12:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Being out of date is no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 12:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Herb poprawiłem zgodnie z najnowszą wersją statutu zawierającą załącznik graficzny, ale i tak nieaktualność herbu nie jest powodem do jego usuwania. Poznaniak (dyskusja) 15:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Per Achim & Poznaniak. Also the COA was updated. Electron ツ ➧☎ 23:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep PiotrMig (talk) 12:53, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 18:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
copyright protected artwork - see https://www.rockystatue.com/the-statue Brian W. Schaller (talk) 07:01, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Previously published at http://www.sacredwaternepal.com/blog/2014/12/the-components-of-a-hiti Ytoyoda (talk) 17:07, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Might be a copyvio. Appears at [3] (File) published as early as on 7 September 2009 in contrast to 2014 as stated in the description of file here. No EXIF. Though the image published at the address has the same resolution as image here, the former has copyright watermark, therefore I can't say that it was downloaded directly from there. Jarash (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:15, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 沈澄心 as Dw no source since (dw no source since) However, the file may also be kept under COM:DM, as the words on the plaque is not clear enough, so the deletion itself is debatable. 廣九直通車 (talk) 02:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep As per 廣九直通車, the text is not really clear (I can't even read the first word) so I believe that it can be kept as DM. Not really clear with China's FOP law ({{FoP-China}}) but I think that it fulfills the criteria, however, the only issue with this is that it requires an attribution to the author. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 02:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- 城關鎮黨委、政府,為興建城關第一中學... clearly legible.--Roy17 (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. ƏXPLICIT 06:07, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Provided URL is inactive. Flickr says all rights reserved: https://flickr.com/photos/itsbeach/1664254147/ Ytoyoda (talk) 02:49, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Now, the Internet Archive does show a CC-By-SA license at the provided link, it says nothing about the photographs on Flickr. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: image is not available even in the archived link, so the image presumed to be fully copyrighted per the Flickr link. --ƏXPLICIT 05:57, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
В Казахстане нет свободы панорамы, поэтому данный файл должен быть удален User 0100 (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:14, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
В Казахстане нет свободы панорамы, поэтому данный файл должен быть удален User 0100 (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
В Казахстане нет свободы панорамы, поэтому данный файл должен быть удален User 0100 (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:14, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
В Казахстане нет свободы панорамы, поэтому данный файл должен быть удален User 0100 (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
В Казахстане нет свободы панорамы, поэтому данный файл должен быть удален User 0100 (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
В Казахстане нет свободы панорамы, поэтому данный файл должен быть удален User 0100 (talk) 16:55, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:16, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
В Казахстане нет свободы панорамы, поэтому данный файл должен быть удален User 0100 (talk) 16:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:17, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
В Казахстане нет свободы панорамы, поэтому прошу удалить данный файл User 0100 (talk) 16:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:13, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
duplicate: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Faustynov_2015,_Polsko.jpg Houstička (talk) 17:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Not a duplicate, the linked one is a derivative photo with a different composition. --ŠJů (talk) 05:58, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to delete. --ƏXPLICIT 07:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 02:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
The source image licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0, not CC-BY-SA-2.5 as the uploader claimed. VLu (talk) 12:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- I have asked Nina to send a permission to OTRS. Jeblad (talk) 17:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Checked this again, and I can't see any real rationale for this deletion request, given that Nina-no herself has licensed the image CC-by-sa-2.5.[4] Nina-no is the owner of Kunsthistorie.com, and is the same Nina as credited at the source page.[5] I'm helping her with the site. Jeblad (talk) 17:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep No valid rationale for deletion. Hearsay about licensing is not cause for deletion requests, nor is "because I say so" evidence. Please get your facts straight before sending files to deletion. Nemo 20:20, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nemo, I'm gonna give you a hint - it’s very simple even for those who are used to talking before thinking. You open the source link (it's available right at the
|Source=
field) and read there: This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License. Believe me, this is not at all difficult, much easier than lecturing fellow Commoners. And it's the uploader, who must show appropriate evidence the file is free, no one is obliged to rummage through history and wonder if any account belongs to someone who posted the image on another website. --VLu (talk) 21:11, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nemo, I'm gonna give you a hint - it’s very simple even for those who are used to talking before thinking. You open the source link (it's available right at the
Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 00:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
not own work, copied from https://www.instagram.com/p/B7JhoGziIsp/ Bradipo Lento (talk) 17:27, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- It is most probably below COM:TOO, so it can be tagged as {{PD-textlogo}}. That being said, I don't know if it falls within COM:SCOPE or not. Apparently, there is a International Mixed Martial Arts Federation (which is notable), and there are members. SMMAF is one of those members. Some members have Wikipedia articles (such as Albania or Pakistan, while most don't. I'd say Keep and tag as {{PD-textlogo}}. Ahmadtalk 15:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --ƏXPLICIT 00:11, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
No use for this redirect as the file was not in use by the time it was renamed. Tobias ToMar Maier (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 03:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
this logo has changed, i want to upload a new logo to wikipedia.the new logo of Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute is not red. It is Blue 5.237.87.251 16:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per my comment here. Ahmadtalk 15:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep In my opinion, the logo is too simple to be protected. The Iranian TOO may be low, but it cannot be zero. The new logo can be uploaded as a new version of the file (i.e., the old logo can be overwritten). 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
The original logo was designed decades ago, and was printed on papers with black inks, on tableau and signs with colors on arbitrary bases. R.pardis (talk) 05:55, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to delete. --ƏXPLICIT 03:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Maungan DOTS (Directly Observed Treatment Strategy) combats tuberculosis in Kiribati, 2009. Photo- AusAID (10698552036).jpg
[edit]Is AusAID a part of Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade? Otherwise it is a derivative work. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 12:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Photo made in Kiribati in 2009. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 12:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
There is freedom of panorama in Argentina for architecture, but not for advertizing boards. In my opinion the photo violates advertisment authors' copyright. Taivo (talk) 13:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 00:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 13:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Mission patch obtained at NASA Kennedy Space Center on mission launch date. Mission patches are not copyrighted. O'Dea (talk) 15:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @O'Dea: "Mission patches are not copyrighted". Could you explain such a statement? It's an obvious creative work and Arabsat is not a NASA satellite... --Discasto talk 21:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- It's a SpaceX patch. SpaceX release imagery under a Creative Commons license. O'Dea (talk) 03:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- First it was a NASA patch. Now it's SpaceX's, which happens to release things under a "Creative Commons" license. It's all we need --Discasto talk 07:54, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- It's a SpaceX patch. SpaceX release imagery under a Creative Commons license. O'Dea (talk) 03:19, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @O'Dea: "Mission patches are not copyrighted". Could you explain such a statement? It's an obvious creative work and Arabsat is not a NASA satellite... --Discasto talk 21:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
The patch is copyrighted and not free to use! You have not the right to reproduce the patch here with your own (ineffective) licence. Ras67 (talk) 22:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- No "ineffective licence" is being used. Both NASA (where the patch was obtained in person as already described) and SpaceX release imagery under a Creative Commons licence.
- Also, please note the notice at the top of this page: "This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive." This is an archive and you have edited it in contravention of the notice. O'Dea (talk) 23:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The DR was reopened correctly. Your prior statements are not correct. Either NASA nor SpaceX release this patch under a free licence, thats only your allegation! And why your name must attributed if it is a work of NASA/SpaceX? You are not the copyright holder. --Ras67 (talk) 01:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- 1. The issue was resolved on 23 July 2019.
- 2. Please consult NASA and SpaceX Creative Commons policies.
- 3. Please do not use this page again. It is an archive. I repeat what I quoted before from the notice at the top of the page: "This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive." You are incorrect to say that " The DR was reopened correctly." THIS IS AN ARCHIVE OF AN OLD DISCUSSION.
- O'Dea (talk) 00:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Also when you shout, the closen archiv is the blue area above! And here is the correct new discussion. And no, the issue was not resolved. It is not a NASA patch and SpaceX releases patches not under a free licence. You have licenced it without the authorship. --Ras67 (talk) 13:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The DR was reopened correctly. Your prior statements are not correct. Either NASA nor SpaceX release this patch under a free licence, thats only your allegation! And why your name must attributed if it is a work of NASA/SpaceX? You are not the copyright holder. --Ras67 (talk) 01:12, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Also, please note the notice at the top of this page: "This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive." This is an archive and you have edited it in contravention of the notice. O'Dea (talk) 23:23, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- I did not shout: The interpretation of capitals as shouting is a convention which does not apply in all cases. I used capital letters to draw your attention to something already said, but which you ignored – twice – so I decided to use justified emphasis to see if I could capture your attention that way.
- This discussion was closed and the archive should not have been edited after the debate was closed (see rules above). See COMMONS:DEL for further instructions if you wish to re-nominate, as mandated above.
- Elon Musk announced SpaceX's adoption of the Creative Commons licence in 2015. O'Dea (talk) 23:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- SpaceX's logos were not licenced by the company under free conditions. Please provide a link for your contrary allegation and add the correct licence to the image page. At this time there is your license not SpaceX's. BTW, currently all new images from SpaceX are CC BY-NC 2.0 and not eligible for Commons. --Ras67 (talk) 12:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Elon Musk announced SpaceX's adoption of the Creative Commons licence in 2015. O'Dea (talk) 23:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- O'Dea, I really cannot fathom where you get the idea that SpaceX releases their patches under any kind of free license. They do not now, and have never done so. Let me be absolutely blunt: unless this physical product and design can be proven to be released by SpaceX under terms laid out under their OTRS agreement with Wikimedia, then it is not permissible. This is a photograph of a patch, and while you can release the photograph, you cannot release the design. It remains copyrighted. — Huntster (t @ c) 11:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- I already explained this last July, almost a year ago: "SpaceX release imagery under a Creative Commons license." SpaceX announced their adoption of the Creative Commons licence, and Elon Musk confirmed this in a personal tweet. O'Dea (talk) 21:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- We can only operate under what the OTRS release gives us. That encompasses specific imagery released through the SpaceX website and the material (at the time) that was available through the SpaceX Flickr page. Since SpaceX changed their license on Flickr, that avenue is no longer applicable. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:42, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- I already explained this last July, almost a year ago: "SpaceX release imagery under a Creative Commons license." SpaceX announced their adoption of the Creative Commons licence, and Elon Musk confirmed this in a personal tweet. O'Dea (talk) 21:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and User:Huntster. To clarify, the discussion can be reopened if there is a new reason to delete or restore. The blue area should not be disturbed by non-admins unless there is something urgent. --Green Giant (talk) 00:18, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by John Doe Texas (talk · contribs)
[edit]User uploaded Special:ListFiles/John_Doe_Texas 29 files and many of them have a bad source or unclear copyright:
Files that look okay
[edit]- File:Nathan Mayo(cropped).jpg – just a crop of another file and looks okay
- File:岡野繁蔵議員.jpg – from 1947 and looks okay
- File:Edward J. Gurney 1965.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} and that looks okay – congressional image
- File:John Anton Blatnik.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check. But if we can find it the file should be okay – congressional image
- File:David M. Hall (Congressman 1918-1960) 1959.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} and that looks okay – congressional image
- File:Edward J. Stack.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} and that looks okay
- File:Henderson L. Lanham (Georgia Congressman).jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} and that looks okay – congressional image
They may however need some cleanup etc.
Files that look bad
[edit]- File:木杉五右衛門.jpg – according to info its from 1790 but source is bad.
- File:柚原委員長.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but it does not look like a US-gov file.
- File:Eisenhower vs Stevenson vs Mayo.png – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but it also says author John Doe Texas
- File:Nathaniel Taylor.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:Doyle Conner 1964.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:サーモンド議員.png – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:Portrait of William T. Mayo.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:懐かしい広告.pdf – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check and it’s a Japanese text
- File:Nathan Mayo Florida.png – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:Pull.Back Dump Car.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:Cordel Cook Signature.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check. Could be okay but who is he anyway?
- File:1944年デイド郡郡議会選挙.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check. Might be {{PD-ineligible}}. But are we sure its correct?
- File:Lennon Hall.png – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:W H Landon.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:Alton King 1901-1968.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check. Could be a scan or photo of an old paper manual.
- File:Nathan Mayo 1939.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check. Source says Carolina News and that sounds like a newspaper.
- File:Paul Moris Small (Founder of American Ship Company).png – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:Nathan Mayo Speech 1947 (Cropped).jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:Woman Driver in North Carolina.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check. But the source mention a newspaper
- File:Donohue Miniature “Fire Engine” Restore.png – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:Donohue Ho Scale Structure in 1964 Catalogue.jpg – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check
- File:Flag of Florida Swimming Conference (1933-1960).png – the license is {{PD-USGov}} but there is no online source we can check. Might be {{PD-ineligible}} but are we sure its correct
Duscussion
[edit]I did not know how to make the DR the best way. If someone know a better way feel free to fix it. When referring to files we could call them G1 for good file 1 or B7 for bad file 7. Anyway just an idea. --MGA73 (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: File:Lennon Hall.png has no source. Also uploader is blocked as sockpuppet.--QTHCCAN (talk) 20:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 23:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
В Казахстане нет свободы панорамы, поэтому прошу удалить данный файл User 0100 (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 23:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:20, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:48, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
A vector file of traffic signs has been replaced.This removal reorganized the traffic signs. Mongolia44 00:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
The Seal will not be repeated with the svg file and the Seal is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the Seal that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Svg file Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 02:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
В Казахстане нет свободы панорамы, поэтому данный файл должен быть удален User 0100 (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Already exist Project 2019.png that also have transparency 2001:B07:6442:8903:2C1D:D04F:8178:4558 17:15, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Are you referring to File:Project 2019.png? I don't understand why they are considered Creative Commons. Both look like either copyrighted images or possibly too simple a logo but I don't see Creative Commons licensing. Support deleting both as I learn towards too complex to be preventative and neither are being used. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
official symbol of government under allegation of Source Own work O revolucionário aliado (talk) 17:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality and unused. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
official symbol of government under allegation of Source Own work O revolucionário aliado (talk) 17:19, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Appears to be own work by the uploader - coats of arms are generally only described, and different authors produce different versions. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)