Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/12/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 3rd, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Webアーカイブ (https://web.archive.org/web/20170826114054/http://www.vbp.jp/talent/anna_fujii/) からの無断転載(Copyright violation) 114.156.135.145 09:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed (© All rights reserved). Taivo (talk) 15:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License violation, uncited derivative of File:Hexafluorosilicic-acid-3D.png with false author data; not used. Wostr (talk) 00:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Jistrum (talk) 00:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jistrum: Can you explain to me the reason of the request? “Because it is Other” is not enough to delete a file. --Luisalvaz (talk) 00:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On the Wikimedia Commons app, we can only check boxes, and I checked the box "other" with no way to explain. May be I am wrong, but this photo don't show the piece, but only spectators, so the subject is not good.

@Jistrum: I have a request for you. Check the reasons to request a file deletion. If an image has a mistake on the name, you can ask the change of the title, but not its deletion. In the other hand, this image shows the audience of the play Ubú Rey on the Teatro Morelos, so the title is correct. --Luisalvaz (talk) 02:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With the Android app, you can't ask for a change of the titre. And if this picture show the audience, is it useful?

@Jistrum: If you are going to do this patrolling labor (request file deletion) you need to do it properly (with all the tools). To answer your question: Yes, the image with the audience is a photographic documentation of an artistic event that probably will be useful in the future for research purposes. --Luisalvaz (talk) 14:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. No reason for deletion. (One may suggest a better title, but imperfect file title is not reason for deletion.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Press photo Jistrum (talk) 00:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, copyright violation, false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious advertising, possible copyright violation The Mirror Cracked (talk) 06:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; spam. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

being used only for xwiki vanity spam and highly unlikely to be own work Praxidicae (talk) 16:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope per COM:NUDITY Alex Cohn (talk) 01:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See watermark in lower left - COM:OTRS evidence of permission from bobal photography needed. Эlcobbola talk 18:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:CSD#G4. --Wdwd (talk) 09:10, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valmir de Teófilo Otoni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope.

(Talk/留言) 03:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE by non-contributors). - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:48, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Valmir de Teófilo Otoni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Jistrum (talk) 04:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 15:54, 4 Dezember 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:National Football League logo.png: Because it is Logo --Krdbot 01:54, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't mean to post this as a PDF Alicesworld (talk) 02:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader agrees with deletion. --Achim (talk) 17:29, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Press photo Jistrum (talk) 17:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by DMacks at 01:44, 6 Dezember 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cartaz 4º Cinefantasy.jpg: Because it is Press photo --Krdbot 07:46, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other 49.181.177.51 00:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: vandalism: fake nomination - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lili hihi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:01, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lili hihi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lili hihi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:03, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes a bunch of copyrighted posters/characters/illustrations. Derivative work of copyrighted works. Masum Reza📞 11:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by EMFAMOU$). Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close - duplicate. Masum Reza📞 16:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Jistrum (talk) 00:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dubious own work. COM:OTRS needed. ~riley (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different uncited images, not used. Wostr (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different uncited images, not used. Wostr (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different images, not used, salt depicted as anions+cation instead of a crystal structure. Wostr (talk) 00:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different uncited images, not used. Wostr (talk) 00:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different uncited images, not used. Wostr (talk) 00:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Jistrum (talk) 00:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a photo that documents an event and it is useful to the art community in Mexico. Although the photo is imperfect, it accomplish its goal. --Luisalvaz (talk) 00:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different uncited images, not used. Wostr (talk) 00:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different uncited images, not used. Wostr (talk) 00:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different images, not used, salt depicted as anions+cation instead of a crystal structure. Wostr (talk) 00:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different uncited images, not used. Wostr (talk) 00:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different uncited images, not used. Wostr (talk) 00:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Jistrum (talk) 00:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 09:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different uncited images, not used. Wostr (talk) 00:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different uncited images, not used. Wostr (talk) 00:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within the scope of the project, no educational value Oursana (talk) 00:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no reasoning provided for why this art may not be useful. ~riley (talk) 09:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of different uncited images, not used. Wostr (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License violation, uncited derivative of File:Hexafluorosilicic-acid-3D.png with false author data. Wostr (talk) 00:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol, the image is taken from laurapausini.com Giammarco Ferrari (talk) 00:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:OTRS needed. ~riley (talk) 09:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is taken from laurapausini.com Giammarco Ferrari (talk) 00:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of recent copyrighted artwork. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:50, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Jistrum (talk) 04:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That's it, is a Non-free logo because of copyrighted. I agree for deleted them. Regards, Jkg1997 (talkcontribsCA) 17:57, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:OOS. Pbrks (talk) 05:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:OOS. Pbrks (talk) 05:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:OOS. Pbrks (talk) 05:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unikely to be own work. See Google search. An unused and uncategorised file. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:41, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised file. Looks like some sort of personal artwork. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A blocked user. An unused and uncategorised file. Out of the project scope? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Amrutha.kvb (talk) 07:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Editasdo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Look like screenshots

Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chemcatcher (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Needs permission as these are all from the Chemcatcher website https://chemcatcher.ie/

Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. https://studier.se/utbildare/sommenbygdens-folkhogskola/ EPIC (talk) 09:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private Picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 10:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private Picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 10:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private Picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 10:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like screenshot taken from a video Frodar (talk) 10:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marsha Ribeiro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Ribero died in 2010. The art needs permission from the artists heirs. The other photos need permission from the photographers

Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden: Request for undeletion of the files, User: Marsha Ribeiro is the artist's daughter. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 42.107.80.52 (talk) 20:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE, unused and has no educational value) - FitIndia Talk Mail 10:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD does not go to DR. ~riley (talk) 09:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wagner Cinelli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most photos credited to MARCIO OLIVEIRA. rest likely copyvio too. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 11:25, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture. We have tons of such images. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed: I did this one as a test. Feel free to delete.

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 14:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of no significance or use to Wikimedia Waddie96 (talk) 14:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary redirect. João Justiceiro (talk) 14:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Uploader Gunnar (💬) 14:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:BLP; also states © in description Waddie96 (talk) 15:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aespel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is license laundering. This image is credited by numerous news organizations as ©EPA (e.g., [1], [2]) or even Getty Images. In either case, this is not an eldiario.es image, and their terms even say their CC license does not apply to content used from other organizations ("Estas condiciones tienen las siguientes excepciones: No se aplica a los contenidos (textos, gráficos, informaciones, imágenes...) publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, Europa Press...) o a cualquier otra empresa diferente de Diario de Prensa Digital, S.L. Todos los derechos sobre estos contenidos quedan estrictamente reservados a su titular (la agencia) y, por tanto, no podrán ser reproducidos, distribuidos, transformados o comunicados públicamente sin el consentimiento expreso de su titular.") Эlcobbola talk 15:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note also the source even says "EFE - Bangkok"; EFE is explicitly referenced as an agency to which the CC license does not apply ("No se aplica a los contenidos [...] publicados por eldiario.es procedentes de terceros que vayan firmados o sean atribuibles a agencias de información (EFE, [...]" Эlcobbola talk 15:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lkhrzhr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the uploader's username is similar to that of the artist, we require OTRS confirmation of that. Without it, there is no good evidence of permission from the artist. Note that the other works shown in this category are murals and are OK per Polish FoP.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Baraa Mahameed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PatilAsavari94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and promo photo. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabriel Albieri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jacekgaw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by دانية عيد (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGRcd7RxXjE&list=PLlzjmrqvAscShkob_ojvsd0oWyYq4_T_d&index=5&t=0s). Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They may be an agent for the person. But they haven't properly declared this and have had previous issues with uploads and sourcing. In any case, it's not likely it's their work. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK  ▎enWiki 17:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phil98Pr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nayyef.katash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 13:54, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nayyef.katash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, not uploader's work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GabrielDorneles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GabrielDorneles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GabrielDorneles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Who is (are) the painter(s)? Permissions?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:08, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GabrielDorneles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, drawings, paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GabrielDorneles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no permission

Mutter Erde (talk) 14:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1382.reza.phoenix (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:50, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Dietolive2 (talk) 16:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WorkV507 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too many different photographers, too many different cameras: unlikely to be the same person's work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WorkV507 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is our police aircraft. The picture was taked illegally in a secured location and must be removed for security reasons 31.154.41.13 17:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

עברית: שלום, אני מהמערך האווירי. תמונה זו צולמה בבסיס מסווג ומהווה עבירת בטחון שדה. אתה מתבקש להסיר תמונה זו. תודה 31.154.41.13 17:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 09:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cametongue001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of video game title screens

Эlcobbola talk 18:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CharisTra (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW of stamps - Swiss and Austrian stamps are not free per Commons:Stamps/Public domain/Europe

Эlcobbola talk 18:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamveryshy22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios - all user uploads have been blatant copyvios related to the Somali military and the uniform images, for example, appear derivative of Internet clip art, e.g. here. COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 23:06, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Iamveryshy22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios - all user uploads have been blatant copyvios related to the Somali military and the uniform images, for example, appear derivative of Internet clip art, e.g. here. COM:PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 02:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 13:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 13:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamveryshy22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus CC claims by serial copyvio uploader. No indication of a free license on the source sites (COM:NETCOPYVIO)

Эlcobbola talk 18:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edward P. Simmons (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots.

Edit1: Os demais são sim screenshots, porém não sabia dessa regra.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 09:54, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Jistrum (talk) 04:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo. --Wdwd (talk) 12:11, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploader's own work. Possibly screenshots from video, but likely just downloaded from elsewhere. See here for example. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:35, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploader's own work. Screenshot from video. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of a copyrighted packaging design. Ytoyoda (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was approved on Creative Commons licensing as an example of antihistamines. Bdbwiki1990 (talk) 17:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What does "approved on Creative Commons licensing" mean? I think you mean that you found it through the creativecommons.org search engine, which just pulls images that are tagged with CC licenses, but the machine can't actually determine if the licensing is correct (if I incorrectly upload a copyrighted photo to Flickr and give it a CC license, it'll still show up in a search), especially in a case like this, a photograph of a copyrighted work. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE so in scope. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Uploader's userpage in en.wiki was deleted due to misusing userspace as web host. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well (other uploads were deleted as copyvios). Taivo (talk) 21:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image might be problematic on commons because it's not a coat of arms but a logo. Especially the lion in the top right's design might meet criteria of creative work, making the image non-PD. I'm not 100% sure (I'm not a lawyer) but thought somebody should have a look at this. Taktaal (talk) 22:50, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of File:Guptodhon news letter.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo non originale THK2003 (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used for vandalism Snowflake91 (talk) 12:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

agree. delete please. Robertsky (talk) 15:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus license. This photo is explicitly credited to Thinkstock (see watermark in lower right). PD-USGov applies only to works created by federal employees in the course of their normal duties. No evidence of federal authorship--indeed, to the contrary (for example, the Federal government is allowed to use non-federal, non-government images under fair use provisions like any other entity; mere federal usage ≠ federal authorship) Эlcobbola talk 16:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope! Ras67 (talk) 16:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears on the Web with a signature in the lower right which has been cropped here. Almost certainly not the uploader's own work as claimed. First upload by new user. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

esta repetido Dalia y John (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fue un error se inserto 2 veces el archivo Dalia y John (talk) 17:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. In addition, educational value os not clear, maybe out of project scope as well. Taivo (talk) 18:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, and from serial copyvio uploader (see talk/deleted contribs). Source/evidence of permission required. Эlcobbola talk 18:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DWSpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 18:41, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of sculpture/trophy - see User:Elcobbola/Awards#Trophies,_statuettes,_and_figurines, for example Эlcobbola talk 18:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion this is derivative work of copyrighted cartoon characters. Taivo (talk) 18:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Schlurcher (talk) 19:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:57, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private Picture. Out of project scope. Schlurcher (talk) 19:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See watermark in upper left - permission from photographer (Atefeh Bahramnezhad) not mere subject (implied by uploader user name) required. Эlcobbola talk 20:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Found here. Эlcobbola talk 21:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSD F10 (personal photos of or by non-contributors) - IndrajitDas 08:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm terribly sorry, but these photos are photos of a PowerPoint or other slide presentation, so the copyright is held by the person who took the photo that the presentation came from, not (only) the person who took the photograph of the screen. If the first photo were cropped down to the little figure in the lower right, who I imagine is Heutz herself, that would be acceptable, but the picture from the screen is not.

GRuban (talk) 21:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Jistrum (talk) 00:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality U+1F360 (talk) 04:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Jistrum (talk) 04:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per es:Antonio Moreno, the organization is non-notable and also complex logos need OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A copyrighted cassette tape cover (as stated by the uploader himself on the image description). The cover depicts singer Shaaban Abdel Rahim who died today. As Commons doesn't allow fair use, the image should be deleted from here and reuploaded on enwiki if there is no available free images of the singer (which I am not sure about). Meno25 (talk) 12:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Jistrum (talk) 13:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per filename this is screenshot of Instagram, protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense Jistrum (talk) 03:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--GREAMAENS UMLDZO (talk) 06:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   19:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged as no source. Added later (a forum or smth., I see just error 403), but dates of creation and/or first publication are still unclear. Sealle (talk) 07:42, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No verifiable source provided, no indication this photograph of the 3d object is free, photographer's permission missing (see COM:COIN#Important points). Sealle (talk) 07:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative of presumed-copyrighted cover art/photograph. No evidence of permission.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether the likely copyrighted graphic elements on the depicted label aren't de minimis. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:54, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative of copyrightable box/carton artwork.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether the likely copyrighted graphic element on the depicted label isn't de minimis. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, COM;PACKAGING. --P 1 9 9   19:54, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ubcule as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative of presumed-copyrighted cover art/photograph. No evidence of permission.
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. I've contacted Nestle company and asked whether they would grant us a permission. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: ; I'd have assumed the likelihood of Nestle releasing the artwork under a Commons-compatible free license was unlikely enough to not be worth considering.
If you wish to put in your own time and effort into doing that in this case, I won't criticise that decision- it's your choice.
However, regardless of the chance of success, it's obviously unworkable to assume you (or anyone else) would- or could- put that much effort into every case where it's clear (or extremely likely) that the uploader doesn't have permission. I'd personally still mark anything that was (clearly) above the threshold of copyright as a "copyvio", or nominate it for deletion if I felt it was less clear-cut. Ubcule (talk) 19:10, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As I didn't receive any answer from Nestle, they are obviously neither interested nor willing to grant a permission.
So, the discussion might focus on whether the depicted package-design is likely copyrightable. If it is  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same picture is since 20 apr. 2019 in use on the YouTube channel Thomas J Splinter, this picture seems te be a proffesional shoot, cannot imagine that is was done by someone with a name like "Tommie9811". So, there's no indication of an author of permission, it maybe under protection of copyright. D'Arch (talk) 12:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you see the edit history of that YouTube page and does it have any proof that this specific picture was at that profile page since April 20? Or could it have been posted there yesterday as well, after the picture was taken, as indicated by the metadata of this picture? That the YouTube profile was created in April is no proof that this specific picture was there since that time. RonnieV (talk) 13:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See cache from one month ago. I rest my case. --D'Arch (talk) 17:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See talkPage of the image as well. Klaas `Z4␟` V14:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 02:17, 11 December 2019, by ~riley. --P 1 9 9   19:56, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other Jistrum (talk) 13:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the resolution and the fact that I can't find this poster anywhere else, this may actually have been uploaded by the movie makers. However, we'd need OTRS permission for that. In the meantime I've uploaded the file to w:File:Raahgir – The Wayfarers, poster.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:44, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: User:Alexis Jazz. --P 1 9 9   19:58, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old version of our brand logo 212.61.149.229 13:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: company is notable, logo kept for historical value. --P 1 9 9   19:59, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif shows that the author is Elias Iirola and may not be the original uploader's own work.Need the OTRS authorization required. 轻语者 (talk) 14:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:00, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Sent by depicted person's daughter" is not an acceptable source. OTRS-permission from photographer (not from uploader or Debora Cynamon) is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell how to do. 186.244.162.31 Joper Padrão
Please open COM:OTRS page and look, which kind of e-mail should be sent to our permissions department at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Taivo (talk) 18:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever OTRS ticket is received. --P 1 9 9   20:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Jistrum (talk) 17:25, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This image is simple enough that it likely qualifies as {{Pd-textlogo}}. Alex Cohn (talk) 02:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep too simple, under threshold —Vale93b (talk) 09:12, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:03, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May or may not be COM:DM. According to guidelines, this is a case #5 or 6. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ping me plz 18:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:06, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NedaKewan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus CC license claims. Scans of old photos with no free license at source websites and no author/publication information to make PD determination.

Эlcobbola talk 18:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by ~riley --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 03:26, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NedaKewan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus CC license (see source: "google"). Discussion needed as to whether {{Pd-simple}}. Эlcobbola talk 19:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not notable topic, deleted on it.wiki Melquíades (talk) 19:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Copyright violation, it would appear that the LizardDrinkin is not in fact the painter of this image. –MJLTalk 20:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep logo blurred, otherwise utilitarian packaging. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:19, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In use on page that appears to be an advertisement. I do not think this image was uploaded for encyclopedic purposes, more likely COM:ADVERTising. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is not true, w:Body spray is just a stub and under "major brands" it lists various brands. Sure the article needs work, but it's not an advertisement. And even if it was, that doesn't invalidate the fact that this image is in scope. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:58, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Donald Trung, GreenMeansGo second/third opinion? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the creative parts are blurred and even if it was originally intended to be an advertisement for such a widely known and used brand of body sprays, it most certainly fulfills an educational purpose, note that advertisements are only excluded when they aren't realistically useful, Axe body spray is a major global brand and this file falls under "COM:INUSE". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 09:52, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not entirely sure that five "swooshy" lines [3] necessarily qualifies as sufficiently creative. GMGtalk 14:19, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9   20:12, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

is a lower res copy of File:DEU_Coburg_COA.svg Gunnar (💬) 20:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   20:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corporate logo asserted as "own work." May not meet the threshold of originality and thus would be acceptable here, but as it stands the licensing appears invalid. Kinu (talk) 21:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:14, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: No evidence of a free license at the claimed source. Permission needs to go through our OTRS system. But this might be below the threshold of originality Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   20:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SirElliotSpootz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Everything by user is copyvio.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @Patrick Rogel: please provide stronger deletion rationale. It is insufficient to vaguely claim copyvio without elaborating why and expect admins to figure it out. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@P199: Everything by user is copyvio, all images are low-re and have no metadata. Perhaps we may ask uploader to provide full resolutions images with intact EXIF instead? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: You should know by know that low-res and missing EXIF data are not deletion reasons, merely contributing factors at best. Did you check if these images are already online? Is there a pattern in their uploads that proves copyvio? You are an experienced nominator, creating many DN's. So you should do better job for the rationales. Thanks. --P 1 9 9   18:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: on second review. It's highly unlikely that the photos were actually taken by this user (who was blocked for one week for repeated copyvio) and the sock-puppet User:BerrixGote. File:MichaelGruenin2015.png was found online which has Everipedia has a source but comes from the profile pic of the Instagram account: https://www.instagram.com/michaelgruen/. --P 1 9 9   17:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SirElliotSpootz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SirElliotSpootz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader, User:Rodney wayne lomack jr, claims this is "own work". However, the description says, " Shot By Y.O.U. Multi Media LLC at Y.O.U. Headquarters", so who is really the photographer? It has full EXIF and is 2,717 x 3,555 px, so it was not taken from the Web. There are no Google hits for the image. There is also the question of whether this is in scope. The subject has no relevant Google hits. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Com:PCP and Com:PS. --Hanooz 03:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its here https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065101121/in/album-72157711781067698/ Paladinum2 (talk) 03:58, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Fixed by the uploader and reviewed by FlickreviewR 2. --Hanooz 12:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

its here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065312637/in/album-72157711781067698/ Paladinum2 (talk) 03:56, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Fixed by the uploader and reviewed by FlickreviewR 2. --Hanooz 12:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a non-free artwork. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{United Kingdom logo with incorrectly claiming Creative Commons license.}} Senator2029 02:38, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - © UCLES 2020. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Jistrum (talk) 03:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - UK logo. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture in the foreground is copyright and no FOP in the US for art and sculptures Gbawden (talk) 08:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although according to the source the creator is unknown, according to the IMDb the still photographer of the film was Tibor Inkey. Probably these photos were taken by him. He died in 1998. --Regasterios (talk) 12:40, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This should be a derivative work of the prose pictured that, implied by the photo itself, is copyright 1976 to the state of Texas. — fourthords | =Λ= | 17:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP US. This monument built between 2009 and 2011 in Washington, D.C. See here. Regasterios (talk) 17:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published as cc-by-2.0 in flickr on 2010 (now entry deleted) but no proof of permission for doing that. en:File:RobertJohson.png claims it was initially published in 1989 and registered for copyright. Platonides (talk) 12:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I'm just entering a few links that may be useful for consideration here in terms of copyright status. This purports to be a Wall Street Journal article that clearly describes the photograph and also the copyright conflict at that time taking place over it. This court case discusses further the copyright conflicts and would seem to affirm that the images are copyrighted, although it seems that at least at that time ownership was in dispute. This 2008 Vanity Fair article talks extensively about the issue of Johnson photographs. The image is described on the first page, which asserts that first publication was in 1990. Page 4 discusses ownership of the photographs, while the legal conflict is lightly touched upon near the bottom of page 5 and top of page 6. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Flickrwashing. sweetclementine's photostream is full of low-quality casual P&S shots and there's no way she is or represents a professional photographer. Dcoetzee (talk) 20:33, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See en:File:Robert Johnson.png and previous deletion discussion. howcheng {chat} 19:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License laundering: see previous deletion nominations. There are no known free images of Robert Johnson. howcheng {chat} 23:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete This Flickr account looks like a Tumblr or a cheap Facebook page without any actual owned content but one personnal picture. This account needs to be added to the bad author list. --QTHCCAN (talk) 18:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded among other copyvios of this subject (see uploader talk/deleted contribs), lower resolution, no camera EXIF, etc.--Duck copyvio/COM:PRP Эlcobbola talk 19:53, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Uploader purports to be the mere subject; evidence of permission from the author (photographer) would be required. Эlcobbola talk 20:50, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Pedro Felipe as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Source of derivative work is not properly indicated. Potential, but certainly not an obvious copyright violation. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. The rationale is false: it is not a derivative work and the source is properly indicated: [4]. The file was marked to speddy deletion by pedro Felipe (talk · contribs) as revenge because I marked some of his uploads as derivative work without source: [5]. He marked also 17 images I uploaded and he reverted himself. Also his message in my talk page: [6]. -- LMLM (talk) 14:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- clearly marked CC-BY-SA at the source. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo definitely eligible for copyright as it has enough detail to be considered a creative work Atomicdragon136 (talk) 23:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do see the formation of lines to create letters and the added detail with the “spray paint” style as adding creativity. The Subway and Geek Squad logo uses a simple typeface. —-Atomicdragon136 (talk) 15:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- This is a USA logo. Unlike the UK and other places, in the USA a logo made solely from a type font, however complex, cannot have a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The following file was a test project for the university and still contained content errors. The correct file has now been uploaded under the title: Gedicht auf die freudige Wiederkunft des Kur = Fürsten Wilhelm I. in Hessen. Robin Freers (talk) 15:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File was just a test project, content errors, low quality pictures


Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 09:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kajo2019 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: überflüsig. Not a valid speedy deletion rationale. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kajo2019 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: überflüssig Not a valid speedy deletion rationale. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:23, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kajo2019 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Grund hier Not a valid speedy deletion rationale. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kajo2019 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: überflüssig Not a valid speedy deletion rationale. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kajo2019 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: überflüssig Not a valid speedy deletion rationale. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the photo is created before 1976, then it is in public domain due to age. Evidence is needed for creation before 1976. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if evidence is ever provided. --P 1 9 9   19:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what happened, but the image is actually here in another link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065096051/in/album-72157711781067698/ Paladinum2 (talk) 03:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   19:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its actually here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065309492/in/album-72157711781067698/ Paladinum2 (talk) 03:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   19:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065100731/in/album-72157711781067698/ Paladinum2 (talk) 03:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   19:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

its here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065532501/in/album-72157711781413083/ Paladinum2 (talk) 04:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   19:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its actually here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065533366/in/album-72157711781413083/ Paladinum2 (talk) 04:03, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   19:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065746947/in/album-72157711781413083/ Paladinum2 (talk) 04:04, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   19:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065533681/in/album-72157711781413083/ Paladinum2 (talk) 04:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   19:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065534066/in/album-72157711781413083/ Paladinum2 (talk) 04:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   19:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065747692/in/album-72157711781413083/ Paladinum2 (talk) 04:07, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   19:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065746342/in/album-72157711781413083/ Paladinum2 (talk) 04:07, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   19:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 15:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here https://www.flickr.com/photos/palaciodoplanalto/49065747362/in/album-72157711781413083/ Paladinum2 (talk) 04:08, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:MGA73. --P 1 9 9   19:27, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect logo, file not used in any pages. Tasmanianeditor (talk) 22:18, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Was part of official logo, subject is notable, therefore old logos are in scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is incorrectly labeled as the Young Liberals logo, this is incorrect. 131.217.255.210 15:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Original author requests deletion of file Australianguy2015 (talk) 15:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   19:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is it really simple logo? I mean grey curves in background. COM:TOO does not mention Bolivia. Taivo (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: below TOO. The curves are merely elipses, hence simple geometric shape. --P 1 9 9   19:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bogus PD claim - if the uploader doesn't know who the author is, where does 'the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer' come from?

VLu (talk) 10:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Сабж казнён в 1947 году. Следовательно, фотография в немецкой форме сделана до 1945 года (капитуляция), а в советской — до 1942 года (сдача в немецкий плен). Фото опубликованы на сайте генпрокуратуры, авторство не установлено, прошло больше 70 лет. Теперь устраивает? --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 10:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • So you've replaced your random license tags now. Ok. As for PD-Russia - do you have evidence these photos were first published before 1949? --VLu (talk) 10:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Доказательств того, что фото были опубликованы где-то ещё раньше чем на сайте генпрокуратуры РФ, у меня нет. Пойдём от обратного. Допустим, что фото пролежали больше 70 лет в советском-российском архиве. Авторство их неизвестно, об авторстве за эти 70 лет никто не заявлял, и после опубликования на сайте генпрокуратуры в 2019 году никто не заявил об авторстве. Вы занимаетесь крючкотворством. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 11:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • Прекратите переходы на личности оппонентов. Вы заменили один ложный шаблон об общественном достоянии на другой, тоже заведомо ложный. Мы ничего не допустим, поскольку от вас требуются не допущения, а доказательства (COM:EVID). А обоснованные сомнения в отсутствии таких доказательств ведут к удалению, см. COM:PRP. --VLu (talk) 12:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • So you have no such an evidence. Then  Delete per COM:PRP. VLu (talk) 12:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
          • Были «переходы»? Я признаю только один переход на личность — про крючкотворство. А вот про то, что я лгу, расставляя данныее шаблоны, это и есть переход на личности. Я не лгу, а пытаюсь удовлетворить ваши требования, хотя не до конца понимаю в чём они заключаются. Далее. Я должен подтвердить отсутствие авторства на данные фотографии? Как я должен подтвердить отсутствие того, чего нет? Доказательством отсутствия заявленного авторства является само отсутствие заявленного авторства. Вот это и есть в моём понимании крючкотворство: поди туда — не знаю куда, принеси то — не знаю что. Установленный в этих файлах шаблон гласит — «Это изображение (или иной медиафайл) находится в общественном достоянии, поскольку срок авторских прав на него истёк и его автор — анонимен. Это относится и к Евросоюзу и тем странам, где срок охраны составляет 70 лет после опубликования работы, причём автор произведения впоследствии так и не раскрыл свою личность». Прошло более 70 лет, авторство неизвестно и не было заявлено. Точка. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 12:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
            • Хорошо читаете по-русски? Понимаете слово опубликования? Вот доказательство этой публикации с датой вы и обязаны по правилам предоставить. VLu (talk) 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • To admins: At the moment it is the third time the uploader is replacing license tags, and all of them require the date of first publication to start counting 70 years. --VLu (talk) 12:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, especially last comment. --Green Giant (talk) 20:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richard.vanek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The size of these files and the professional images suggests that there is an "original" source somewhere that needs crediting and validly licensing these images. Having tagged them as "no source" I am informed that there should be a DR so it's here. The uploader may well hold copyright however I do think that needs confirming via OTRS regardless of whether they are in use.

Herby talk thyme 17:25, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of the most of the pictures is Archive of the Czech National Theater, vide: http://archiv.narodni-divadlo.cz/default.aspx?jz=cs&dk=Umelec.aspx&ju=4064&sz=0&abc=V&pn=356affcc-f301-3000-85ff-c11223344aaa

In my opinion the uploader should always ask for permission from the National Theater. I do so myself, if I want to use any pictures from this Archive from time to time. --David Sedlecký (talk) 17:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the original images is from NASA, it was modified and must get the permission from the derived copyright holders. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 08:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: if the derivative work was just adding few words, it's not original enough to add a new copyright. Ruthven (msg) 16:14, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DMacks as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Presumed-nonfree book cover
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. IMO, this image could be under {{PD-text}}, as it contains merely text. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, I've overlooked that. However, IMO it's still rather simple and might go per {{PD-shape}}. --Túrelio (talk) 10:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Turelio. Ruthven (msg) 16:14, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SVG, PNG verfügbar, falsche Farbe, Niedrigauflösend, JPG Artefakte Gunnar (💬) 13:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:15, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieses Bild zeigt lediglich ein Modell des Tauchboots und ist leider nicht sehr realistisch. Es können sehr viel besser Bilder des Orginals zur Verfügung gestellt werden Clivar av (talk) 10:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag, ja, es ist ein Modell (so ist das Pic auch zutreffend beschrieben), und zwar von Geomar selbst. Vor kurzem wurde es zu einer Daueraustellung im Ostseebad Eckernförde (OIC) hinzugefügt <ref>https://www.shz.de/lokales/eckernfoerder-zeitung/tauchboot-nachbau-neue-attraktion-im-ostsee-info-center-id26324227.html>/ref>. Ich halte es für eine relevante Information/Abbildung, denn das Original bekommt man kaum zu sehen ... ob es unrealistisch ist bezweifle ich, es ist nur nicht echt, also kann schlicht nicht tauchen. Im Übrigen finde ich es bedenklich, wenn unangemeldete, anonyme Personen Löschanträge stellen. Beste Grüße --KarleHorn (talk) 16:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bis dato ist keine Reaktion auf meine Stellungnahme erfolgt; der Löschantrag kann m.E. entfernt werden. Beste Grüße--KarleHorn (talk) 18:53, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Da seit 6 Wochen keine Reaktion des nicht angemeldeten Users erfolgt ist, habe ich den Löscheintrag beim Pic entfernt. --KarleHorn (talk) 17:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wdwd as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copy from Facebook, see EXIF. Possibly below the threshold of originality Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: textlogo. --Krd 17:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HadleyOnFire (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus licenses - these are scans of an existing work. An image published in 1947 in US would be PD if copyright notice was not included or not renewed. Picture of the book's copyright page (typically on the back of title page) required to confirm. Currently no COM:EVID regarding status.

Эlcobbola talk 20:35, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not sure how to respond properly in these discussion, so please bear with me. I'm a researched whose dissertation focuses on Sylvester. I've been updating his Wikipedia page as often as possible to try and boost his recognition. The images I posted today are part of that effort.

Regarding the images, you are correct that they are scans. I'm attaching the image of the copyright page, as you requested, but it will not do you much good. thumb Henry Holt released the rights of Moon Gaffney to Sylvester in 1949 under the terms of his contract. I have the letter, but it is not mine to share with you under Georgetown Library's research regulations. In addition, the book was reprinted by Arno Press, and again released to Sylvester in the 1980s (I do not know the exact date of that contract release). Currently, his children own his estate. Would you need something from them to permit the photos to stay? I have been in contact with them, and they would much prefer for Sylvester's work to be getting recognition on Wikipedia than for it to not. Let me know what you need to permit the image to stay and I will see what I can do.

@HadleyOnFire: You can share the copyright transfer with COM:OTRS, as the exchange with volunteers there is kept private. So, what we need is the copyright transfer and a mail from Sylvester's estate releasing the photos under free license. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 16:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. No emails found at OTRS. --Green Giant (talk) 23:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HadleyOnFire (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Original artists are not provided, so it is not clear whether the covers can be PD-Old.

Gumruch (talk) 17:57, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9   01:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Regasterios as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as All Rights Reserved. Only free files are allowed on Commons. Uploaded in 2006! Not speedy deletable. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Tagged by the script to copyvio. I have found no free license on the source page. See the archive page with this photo from 2006. No free license. --Regasterios (talk) 15:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Considering that the source site seems to belong to the uploader, I assume that source is actually {{Own}}. Please remember that in 2006 many of today's templates, policies and rules regarding attribution did not exist. We could also tag it per COM:GOF. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:56, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete This image has been protected by the copyright, the background in this picture was edited; therefore, it is a copyright violation. I disagree for deletion above. There is a problem of fi.wikipedia, Paul Young was reverted by Matthäus Gehägeberg (Commons), see here. Regards, Jkg1997 (talkcontribsCA) 16:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Srittau. --Krd 12:07, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]