Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/12/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 1st, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Copy from wikipedia fair use logo. The logo itself seem complex enough for TOO 125.209.131.156 02:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted False license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privacy Majvdl (talk) 13:39, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no privacy problems here, painter is 98 years dead. Deleted as uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 13:45, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Elimayanti Elimayanti (talk) 17:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: errr I just moved Commons talk:Elimayanti back to user talk space. If you need more assistence, explain in proper detail on COM:AN what you want. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm done. Delete my shit Garrettdevon (talk) 21:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rubina Bajwa.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

first 14s is AFP. more AFP and Reuters footage in the middle. please black the screen for those parts. Roy17 (talk) 04:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:11, 1 Dezember 2019 UTC: Uploader requested deletion within a week of upload(G7), If I black the screen or cut those important parts of the video then "It's basicaly useless IMO", please delete it asap. --Krdbot 19:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Leaning. Photographer's request 切干大根 (talk) 06:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:12, 1 Dezember 2019 UTC: G7. uploader request deletion --Krdbot 19:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pic was not perfect Adv.Shoaib (talk) 17:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's req on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 21:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Forgot Catagory CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 21:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Car il est inutile Thegameur59 (talk) 10:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:25, 1 Dezember 2019 UTC: COM:CSD#G4, Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus. --Krdbot 01:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No for public Hommenue90 (talk) 16:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as requested by uploader on day of upload. --Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User's other uploads have been web scrapes. I can't prove it with this image, but I have reason to suspect this one is too. C.Fred (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Com:PCP. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User's other uploads have been web scrapes. I can't prove it with this image, but I have reason to suspect this one is too. C.Fred (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Com:PCP. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Harlling iki Lakone (talk) 01:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Harlling iki Lakone (talk) 04:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Aizo Betten, who died in 2014 (d. 2014), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:15, 2 Dezember 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: This is not Bekemawarffum's own work, but a portrait painted by nl:Aizo Betten, who died in 2014. The uploader - Bekemawarffum - agrees with the removal of the images placed by him ( see here) --Krdbot 19:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alaamroweh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/93339309@N06/albums/72157693419060972

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/93339309@N06/albums/72157693419060972 and following.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Fitindia. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, we are not for personal uploads  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, we are not for personal uploads  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own photo (see white text CHEHOV-VID.RU on photo). Brateevsky {talk} 15:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by ~riley at 05:33, 4 Dezember 2019 UTC: Media missing permission since 26 November 2019 or earlier --Krdbot 07:42, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just delete it Sonicalm (talk) 17:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 12:50, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich bezweifle, dass die Person, die das Bild hochgeladen hat, über entsprechende Publikationsrechte verfügt. Sie hat nach eigenen Angaben (!) eine offizielle Fotografie abfotografiert. I repeat in English: I doubt that the person who uploaded the image has the appropriate publication rights. She has photographed by herself (!) an official photograph. And I take out the personal attack of the uploading person against me.Mr. bobby (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

According to my own words, I photographed a prayer card.----Cockamouse (talk) 08:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC) 08:16, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Cockamouse, o.k. Who created the prayer card and who shot the original photography of Domenico da Cese on that prayer card? --Túrelio (talk) 10:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The words are those of Sr. Petra-Maria Steiner of Vita Communis and neither the card nor Sr. Petra-Maria indicated who shot the (old) photography. The uploaded detail of that card is of much poorer quality.--Cockamouse (talk) 10:41, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what you meant by "words" as your upload only shows the portrait. Anyway, then we have a problem. As Domenico da Cese died only in 1978, the original portrait (is it a photography or a painting?) is likely not so old. As copyright lasts for 70 years after the death of the artist, we have to assume it is still in copyright. The only thinkable exception could be, if it was painted (if a painting) or shot (if a photography) by another member of the Cappuchins, who might have waived his copyright or given it to the order. But that needs to be proven, which isn't that easy. The same image is used on the cover of a book[1], which should include information about its provenience and rights. --Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just to clarify: The upload showed "Detail eines Andachtsblättchens mit dem Gebet für die Seligsprechung". "The words" was related to the prayer for the beatification.--Cockamouse (talk) 11:11, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. May be you could get the required or at least some more information about that image from said Sr. Petra-Maria. --Túrelio (talk) 11:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I shall do that. Moreover, I'll write to an Italian Cappucchin who published about da Cese in order to get some permission from the order of Cappucchins to deal with the aforesaid (or another) picture. Thank you for your efforts --Cockamouse (talk) 08:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Túrelio: At least Sr. Petra Maria Steiner yesterday wrote to me and permitted the usage both of her prayer card and the detail. Now, how do I prove that? --Cockamouse (talk) 07:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Cockamouse, simply copy the text from Commons:E-Mail-Vorlagen#Einverständniserklärung_(Rechte-Inhaber) into an email, add the full link to the Domenico image and send it to her, asking to sign/date it and to send it back to permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org (OTRS).
However, it's important that, 1) she can issue such a permission/release under a free license only, if she holds the copyright; 2) the permission, which she needs to give, is not a "permission just for Wikipedia" (we can't accept that, per our policy), but a permission for everybody. You need to explain that to her, so that she really knows to what she agrees. If she is not the rights-holder, she can't give such a permission, but may still provide you the information who is the rights-holder. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I'll do that.--Cockamouse (talk) 10:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Um das klarzustellen: Die Einverständniserklärung muss von der Fotografin, nicht von Nutzern der Fotografie, sprich den Devotionalienproduzenten, stammen. Nur der Fotograf selber kann diese erteilen. Ist Petra Marias Steiner tatsächlich selber die Fotografin? Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 05:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wie bemerkt, es geht um das Detail eines Andachtsblättchens, das von ihr stammt. Dort ist das Bild übrigens in dieser Ausrichtung wiedergeben. Der Fotograf ist womöglich lange verblichen.--Cockamouse (talk) 11:40, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The photography (if it is one) has likely been shot between 1964 (when Domenico first came to Maopello) and 1978 (death). As copyright lasts for 70 years after death of the photographer, it can't be in the public domain just by age. --Túrelio (talk) 11:59, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nur zur Sicherheit noch mal auf Deutsch: Du musst entweder nachweisen, dass der Fotograf über 70 Jahre tot ist, also vor 1949 gestorben ist, oder dass er es unter einer freien Lizenz veröffentlicht hat (er selber, nicht wer anders dies lediglich behauptet), oder, so er noch lebt, kann er sich auch selber an das OTRS-Team wenden. Die Devotionalienherstellerin hat wahrscheinlich keinerlei Befugnisse diesbezüglich. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 12:36, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Well, the logic has to be turned around. Obviously, the uploader has not the publishing rights. So consequently, the image has to become deleted immidiately. If anyone has a picture and also the publishing rights, then it can be uploaded again. It is simply not allowed and also not true to take a photograph of a photograph and then call it "Eigene Arbeit" (= own work). Mr. bobby (talk) 21:27, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the wrong attributions about author and license from the file page. I fail to see, why such an obvious an blatant copyvio is not already deleted. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 07:37, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See above.--Cockamouse (talk) 07:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: sd, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 12:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The given source brings no evidence for a cc-by-4.0 license for this photograph. Please check it yourself and you will see. 188.99.114.95 15:45, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@4nn1l2: Hawijpolo uploads show some more stuff. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 16:18, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The focus of this photo is the subject's display on the monitor, which is an inappropriate derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 00:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked "All content all rights reserved" at source https://www.ci.saginaw.tx.us/site/copyright - would have speedy deleted but not sure if this logo is too simple to be copyrightable. MPF (talk) 00:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lotje (talk • contribs) 2019-11-24T15:29:36‎ (UTC)

  •  Delete. It's nearly impossible to even tell what is in the picture - were it not for the title, one would never know. It is of such poor quality that it is not realistically useful. --Sable232 (talk) 21:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Additional comment: Browsing though the uploader's other contributions, I believe most (if not all) could be deleted as well. They appear to be largely pictures of clouds with interpretations of what they may resemble, suggesting that this may be a case of someone using Commons as a free web host. All images are of rather poor quality (grainy and/or out of focus). --Sable232 (talk) 00:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:32, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised file. An advertisement. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:34, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Profil Pendiri ELITIS Air Minum Berenergi Karomah.jpg Elimayanti (talk) 17:25, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Uploader request, not particularly educational, not in use. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 10:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as stated on the edit of her article, the picture is from her instagram ZaaraTE (talk) 20:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Picture from her Instagram ZaaraTE (talk) 20:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:19, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Aizo Betten, who died in 2014 (d. 2014), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:19, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bekemawarffum (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Aizo Betten, who died in 2014 (d. 2014), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:19, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has watermark on it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commons sibi (talk • contribs) 12:18, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy delete Apparent false claim of authorship and licensing. -- 03:22, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 17:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No need for this jpg when an svg exists, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:57, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of nonfree software (w:en:MyEdu) Vahurzpu (talk) 23:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See also:


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 06:57, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BS the author is unknown. It is very likely the author of the book, who didn't die 70 years ago as claimed. See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hanoi and its environs.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 07:47, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from w:File:Atha Okinti Kodale.jpg. Not in the public domain in the United States and possibly India. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It may not be in the US public domain (when do Indian images reach PD status in the US?), but it still satisfies PD-India status as it is more than 60 years old. --Kailash29792 (talk) 03:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter. Commons policy requires images be public domain in the United States, per WMF directive: Template:Not-PD-US-URAA. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 07:46, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of nonfree software Vahurzpu (talk) 23:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:MyEdu 2.jpg. --Green Giant (talk) 07:44, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source provided is atasite.com. Uploader provides no proof or explanation of how this was copyleft. The site is inaccessible and hidden on archive.org behind Flash. In summary, this image is poorly sourced and should be deleted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 07:45, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File already uploaded under a different name. Calvin411 (talk) 23:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - uploader request. --Green Giant (talk) 07:46, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Other 37.182.36.238 22:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and likely wrongly categorised media. Out of the project scope? The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 23:07, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 23:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 23:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 23:09, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaipreet.loomba (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 23:10, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 23:10, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rubenhaarman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos serve no educational purpose. They were added to his userpage on nlwiki, but that userpage has been deleted because it didn't meet the local guidelines.

Mbch331 (talk) 16:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 23:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 23:11, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect chemical structure. Replaced by corrected version, File:YellowPig5thTry.png, by same uploader. Ed (Edgar181) 19:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:47, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 23:12, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 23:13, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by ~riley at 00:11, 9 Dezember 2019 UTC: Media without a license since 1 December 2019 --Krdbot 01:40, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of Non-notable person / self promotion Pugilist (talk) 19:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 11:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See EXIF, possibly a screenshot of a copyrighted image. Masum Reza📞 19:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a photocopy of another photo. Not to mention, the description is highly promotional. Possibly out of scope. Masum Reza📞 19:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:04, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer: Aubrey Howard Ninnis, died in 1956. Non-free in the UK until 2027. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proper declaration of rights release. See Commons:Deletion requests/Ibiblio Vietnam. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


For more information, see Help:SVG.

In other languages
Alemannisch  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  нохчийн  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  British English  Esperanto  español  eesti  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  Frysk  galego  Alemannisch  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  Ido  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  lietuvių  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  prūsiskan  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  Scots  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  ไทย  Türkçe  татарча / tatarça  українська  vèneto  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(中国大陆)  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(马来西亚)  中文(新加坡)  中文(臺灣)  中文(臺灣)  +/−
New SVG image

Janitoalevic (talk) 20:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused, replaced by svg version. --Wdwd (talk) 11:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader's own work. Looks like official/professional potrait. Obi2canibe (talk) 22:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be uploader's own work. Looks like official portrait. Obi2canibe (talk) 22:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by George Thomas Georgiadis (d. 2010), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknowed actress : created in 2015 on WP;fr https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=115706497&oldid=115635915&title=Pepe - deleted in 2015 on https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=127723559&oldid=127714449&title=Pepe -- a joke ? Drongou (talk) 01:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since)
 Comment Copyright status of files from Hague Municipal Archives unclear. Vysotsky (talk) 01:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the images of this archive are not released with a compatible license, see [2]. P 1 9 9   14:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploader by User:Atl68

[edit]

User has uploaded images of educational institutions Chiapas, Mexico, sometimes credited to University websites, other times as "own work". In both cases I have identified a number of them (already deleted) as copyright violations, not under the claimed free license at source website or PDF (eg multiple from [3]). I think the uploader has forfeited assumption of good will with the rest without need to hunt all down one by one. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think I agree here. Where EXIF details do exist on these photos, the use of a multiplicity of cameras and cell phones attributed to User:Atl68 seems suspicious. EXIF might suggest that the user has access to original photos, perhaps by a number of photographers who may or may not have given permission or acquiesced to publication, but with no better and exact information on authorship they cannot be trusted. On the argument by the proposer, and on balance, I think these photos should go. Acabashi (talk) 11:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has watermark on it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Commons sibi (talk • contribs) 12:16, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   14:25, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the image has been uploaded on 27 June 2019 , same image has been used widely in newspapers and web site way before that https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/aiadmks-lone-mp-and-ops-son-ravindranath-eyes-mos-post-102377 - May 2019--Commons sibi (talk) 06:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

es gibt eine Datei gleichen Namens und Inhalts mit dem Zusatz '(cropped)', die gerader ausgerichtet ist Im Fokus (talk) 02:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as source file of the cropped version it needs to be kept so that source/author/liccense can be checked. P 1 9 9   14:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Like many former uploads by OmicronR, this one is clearly not own work, and is taken from some website. Most likely copyright. HistoryofIran (talk) 03:22, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, all over the internet. P 1 9 9   14:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, taken from some website. HistoryofIran (talk) 03:22, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate of File:Coin of the Artaxiad monarch Artavasdes II, minted at Artaxata.jpg. P 1 9 9   14:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, taken from some website. HistoryofIran (talk) 03:24, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no description, no clear reason why this file would be considered within scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 04:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be out of scope, but {{Information}} and license was removed by Boundjoum diaa (uploader) in Special:Diff/378563902 and Special:Diff/378564177. I re-placed them on file's page, as there is no reason provided for the removal. Ahmadtalk 12:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:58, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. P 1 9 9   15:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looks like low-quality screengrab. P 1 9 9   15:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looks like low-quality screengrab. P 1 9 9   15:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looks like low-quality screengrab. P 1 9 9   15:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this personal photo by mistake and does not contribute anything to any article Yo Obvio (talk) 05:06, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   15:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of the one on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Society_(TV_series)_Title_Card.jpg and false claimed as own work. YoungForever (talk) 05:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think this image belongs on commons because of copyright reasons and as the uploader claims it their own work. I nominated it for deletion under no permission.--Breawycker (talk) 20:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 22:08, 8 December 2019, by ~riley. P 1 9 9   15:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request - Not an actual Marvel logo. This was homemade by uploader and never served as a logo for any Marvel product. --2A02:A03F:8C5A:9B00:A5AA:FF2B:3518:A4F0 06:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   15:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Nick Thorne (talk) 06:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC) I accidentally uploaded this file, which is a working file I use when creating these distribution files. The correct file G-fuscus-dist.jpg has already been uploaded. This file does not contain the correct information. - Nick Thorne (talk) 06:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   15:12, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted ticket A1Cafel (talk) 07:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:12, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In this case, de minimis would apply only if the file is cropped, since the main subject is clearly the copyrighted movie poster. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. P 1 9 9   15:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, can be replaced by other images A1Cafel (talk) 08:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, can be replaced by other images A1Cafel (talk) 08:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, can be replaced by other images A1Cafel (talk) 08:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:14, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Limited resolution, no exif data -> probably not uploader's own work Le Petit Chat (talk) 08:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, too tiny to be unusable. P 1 9 9   15:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe this is own work. See here Wouter (talk) 09:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems unlikely to be their image, no metadata for modern image, small size  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: found elsewhere on the internet, copyvio. P 1 9 9   15:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error Abes58 (talk) 10:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   15:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty, see also corresponding empty cat Category:Xenoturbella churro 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia and the poster is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:20, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, found elsewhere on-line, copyvio. P 1 9 9   15:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused art of non-notable artist is usually considered out of project scope. In addition, own work is here quite unlikely, maybe real artist's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes a bunch of copyrighted posters/characters/illustrations. Derivative work of copyrighted works. Masum Reza📞 11:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by EMFAMOU$). Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Procedural close - duplicate. Masum Reza📞 16:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope/. P 1 9 9   17:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable person, Commons is not a personal album. Richard Avery (talk) 12:02, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 12:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, unknown author for the old logotype. Chabe01 (talk) 06:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, http://giantsofscience.weebly.com/percy-julian.html. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://romanlazik.com/galleries/mayerling-crown-prince-rudolf-ch-keneth-macmillan/ Not own work: uploader is pictured in. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, although no proof that uploader actually is the same person. P 1 9 9   17:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 12:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 12:39, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violantion Docosong (talk) 12:45, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 13:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. Hasleytalk 13:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:58, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free university logo.

Wcam (talk) 13:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:59, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Film still: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:04, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. P 1 9 9   18:05, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brunobreckt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Magazine scans: copyrighted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. P 1 9 9   18:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 14:54, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated as "author unknown" and from the internet so cannot be cc-by-2.5.Would not be pd-russia owing to age. Nigel Ish (talk) 15:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated as "author unknown" and from the internet so cannot be cc-by-2.5.Would not be pd-russia owing to age. Nigel Ish (talk) 15:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated as "author unknown" and from the internet so cannot be cc-by-2.5.Would not be pd-russia owing to age. Nigel Ish (talk) 15:50, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of a series of photos uploaded from [4] and claimed to be cc-by-2.5 despite being author unknown and the source website not stating this license. Cannot be pd owing to the age of the subject aircraft. Nigel Ish (talk) 15:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emilieacw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and promo photo. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 19:11, 8 December 2019, by ~riley. P 1 9 9   18:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: info was provided, old enough. P 1 9 9   18:44, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. The depicted person cannot be an author of the photograph. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aarthurmckinley (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:51, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mary915 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jcpaule.17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Linkedeirl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tepuyesccs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from movie posters. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: posters are DM, only small portions visible, not reusable by themselves. P 1 9 9   18:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is a photo provided by the family to newspapers and media for educational use. Giuseppebarb


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:39, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:39, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Wave Phenomena (talk) 16:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wave Phenomena: , seriously? Because it is blurry? GreatLakesShips (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Wave Phenomena: I don't think this image should be deleted, because the reason it is on Wikimedia Commons is to show what the pilothouse of this sunken vessel looks like. The fact that it is blurry doesn't matter, because the features of the pilothouse is visible.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ GreatLakesShips (talk • contribs) 14:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no better alternative available. P 1 9 9   18:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore हेमंत तिवाङी (talk) 17:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   18:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Melitta Schnarrenberger (d. 1996), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Armanndo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Vintage low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo above COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:57, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This isn't the best brand of photoshop, and I suspect a derivative work. (the bottle and splashing water is probably a stock photo or from an ad) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:02, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, blurred photo, no educational value. ~Cybularny Speak? 19:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not selfie, therefore, the creator is not Dan Jones. In any case, the claim of "own work" is dubious and this file should be deleted per COM:PCP. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 20:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person who uploaded it uploaded images from Instagram in his history. The picture also seems strange. ZaaraTE (talk) 21:05, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There's another deletion request on right now Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sue Ramirez.jpg. Other images of "him" may be affected. ZaaraTE (talk) 21:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
He has uploaded another picture from Ben Chase before, which was deleted [[5]] ZaaraTE (talk) 21:57, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unreliable uploader. P 1 9 9   18:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect font and layout; image does not depict an actual route shield and therefore is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. --Sable232 (talk) 21:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect font and layout; image does not depict an actual route shield and therefore is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. --Sable232 (talk) 21:20, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is very low resolution. Also has watermark in image. There are several better images of this species available in Commons. GRDN711 (talk) 21:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Available in gettyimages (here). Can be Flickr washing, but I'm not sure. Ahmadtalk 11:57, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2019-02#Mass_TechCrunch_restore_request. --Hanooz 17:20, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SirElliotSpootz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Everything by user is copyvio.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @Patrick Rogel: please provide stronger deletion rationale. It is insufficient to vaguely claim copyvio without elaborating why and expect admins to figure it out. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@P199: Everything by user is copyvio, all images are low-re and have no metadata. Perhaps we may ask uploader to provide full resolutions images with intact EXIF instead? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: You should know by know that low-res and missing EXIF data are not deletion reasons, merely contributing factors at best. Did you check if these images are already online? Is there a pattern in their uploads that proves copyvio? You are an experienced nominator, creating many DN's. So you should do better job for the rationales. Thanks. --P 1 9 9   18:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   20:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: on second review. It's highly unlikely that the photos were actually taken by this user (who was blocked for one week for repeated copyvio) and the sock-puppet User:BerrixGote. File:MichaelGruenin2015.png was found online which has Everipedia has a source but comes from the profile pic of the Instagram account: https://www.instagram.com/michaelgruen/. --P 1 9 9   17:27, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SirElliotSpootz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SirElliotSpootz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Like many former uploads of OmicronR, clearly not own work, and taken from some website. Most likely copyright. HistoryofIran (talk) 03:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, photos of coins need permission from photographer. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Like many former uploads by OmicronR, this one is clearly not own work, and is taken from some website. Most likely copyright. HistoryofIran (talk) 03:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, coins need permission from photographer. Taivo (talk) 17:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, taken from some website. HistoryofIran (talk) 03:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, coins need permission from photographer. Taivo (talk) 17:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, permission from the painter is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, the mural is not the main subject Chabe01 (talk) 06:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, mural is main subject of the photo. Taivo (talk) 18:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France, permission from the painter is required A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, the mural is not the main subject Chabe01 (talk) 06:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, mural is main subject of the photo. Taivo (talk) 18:10, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by On-The-Wings-Of-Eagles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In same style as other deleted content by this uploader, from a construction/contractor website highlighting the project. I can't find these exact images but they have lots of videos and no coherent search ability. COM:PCP?

DMacks (talk) 04:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to discuss any aspect of the deletion request as it does not have merit under the copy-write provisions of Wikipedia unless I have misunderstood the rules. These particular photos are free for use by anyone who would like to use them, they have been supplied for use by Brindabella and they were subsequently used in several promotions in the past two years. Firstly in general College material, then in MBA Awards material, then in LEA Awards material, then in Brindabella Architectural contractor marketing material and also Bus advertising material through Go Transit. So the deletions should not occur. This also goes for File:BCC Junior School Wing-2.jpg & File:BCC Junior School Wing-3.jpg

On-The-Wings-Of-Eagles (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)On-The-Wings-Of-EaglesOn-The-Wings-Of-Eagles (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That may all be true, none of that is close to sufficient for a free license. Commons:Licensing is the policy. The actual owner of the original has to asssert that they permanently release the image for essentially any use by anyone. A free license that includes redistribution, modification, and commerercial use, without any ability to control who uses it how, is very different from hosting an image and using it themselves in a way that others can see it. DMacks (talk) 05:06, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of the original - so what are you saying?

On-The-Wings-Of-Eagles (talk) 11:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)On-The-Wings-Of-EaglesOn-The-Wings-Of-Eagles (talk) 11:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"I am the owner of the original" is the key idea we need to verify. Sounds like we are in a situation of Commons:OTRS#Licensing images: when do I contact OTRS?, second and probably third entries. If you took the photograph or created logo/promotional images as part of your job at the school or similar arrangement, your school might actually own the license as a en:work for hire). An email to OTRS with more complete details, where it is confidential, can help document the situation (and un-delete any images that are deleted, as necessary). DMacks (talk) 03:04, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have sent through an OTRS release and the images should be reinstated as a result, thank you

120.17.97.101 03:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)On-The-Wings-Of-Eagles120.17.97.101 03:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, after OTRS-permission is received, processed and accepted, the photos can be restored. Taivo (talk) 18:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per OTRS permission. --Krd 10:28, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncertain to what extent the original painting (of which this is a photograph) was within COM:FOP Chile as "adorn[ing] squares, avenues and public places on a permanent basis". DMacks (talk) 04:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, seems like if the mural was outside of railway station, then it was free, but if inside, than it's not. If you have evidence, that the mural was outside, then please present it and the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 18:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission (same photo on Facebook [6]) Tyseria (d) 08:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS-permission is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 18:29, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission (same photo on Facebook [7]) Tyseria (d) 08:22, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS-permission is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 18:31, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission (same photo on Facebook [8]) Tyseria (d) 08:22, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS-permission is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission (same photo on Facebook [9]) Tyseria (d) 08:22, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS-permission is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 18:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are European parliament images free game ? Hektor (talk) 11:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is scaled-down file:Nicola Danti.jpg and I'll delete both as copyright violations. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illustrations by Sybil Tawse

[edit]

These files are not in the public domain in their country of origin. They are works of the UK by a British illustrator who died in 1971. The deletion may be undone on 1 January 2042. —Elyaqim (talk) 10:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Texture (pattern) of the colors on the letters are above COM:TOO, imo. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 11:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unfortunately I must agree. Taivo (talk) 19:03, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fun StuntShow TV is probably not the copyright holder. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, taken from some website. Probably copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, coins need OTRS-permission from photographer. Taivo (talk) 19:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, taken from some website. Probably copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, taken from some website. Probably copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, taken from some website. Probably copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:21, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, taken from some website. Probably copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, taken from some website. Probably copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, taken from some website. Probably copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, taken from some website. Probably copyrighted. HistoryofIran (talk) 13:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, coins need OTRS-permission from photographer. Taivo (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Lebanon. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Freimut Bahlo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Lebanon.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No COM:FOP in Lebanon.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:33, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the official badge for Independiente. 181.229.208.62 14:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This was discussed previously in another related file.The image should not be deleted.--Overviews (talk) 01:56, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the file cannot be deleted on that reason, because it is used. Taivo (talk) 19:50, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date. Why is the image public domain in Turkey? Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD in the country of origin (now Czech Republic) until 2023 VLu (talk) 14:45, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted in 2048 (95+1 years after first publication). Taivo (talk) 19:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope. 2A02:2168:A00:2413:0:0:0:1 15:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, ru:Атабеков, Николай Николаевич was deleted due to non-notability. Taivo (talk) 20:01, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be an invalid video Estopedist1 (talk) 14:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What's the definition of "invalid video"?--BugWarp (talk) 14:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This video has only black screen and some background noise--Estopedist1 (talk) 18:07, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, you can clearly see the satellites flares, if you can't see it, try another resolution.--BugWarp (talk) 21:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I used different browsers, but did not see anything. Taivo (talk) 21:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be an invalid video Estopedist1 (talk) 14:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What's the definition of "invalid video"?--BugWarp (talk) 14:40, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I used different browsers, but did not see anything. Taivo (talk) 21:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated as "author unknown" and from the internet so cannot be cc-by-2.5.Would not be pd-russia owing to age. Nigel Ish (talk) 15:42, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file is used, but I'll delete it nevertheless as copyright violation. Per EXIF, author is Daro Janos. He must give OTRS-permission to restore the file. Taivo (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, coats of arms in Peru are copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rfr2505 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rfr2505 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see no use of the first and last image elsewhere. Is there any indication that any of these images were used without permission? It seems that the goal of the uploaded photos was to promote the band via commons, not having been previously used elsewhere. The band, or at leas the church to which it belongs, have been known to use the platform for that purpose. While I am not in favour of this behaviour, it is not a reason for deletion, as much as I'd like it to be. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. 7 files, but only 2 different cameras. All files have EXIF. All files are claimed own work and I believe that this is true. Files are used, some of them even in multiple projects. Taivo (talk) 20:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lomita as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.galeriepascalgabert.com/artistes.html
Converted by me to regular DR, as the external version of this image has far lower resolution than our version. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:53, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. The photo is not a selfie and it violates photographer's copyright. Taivo (talk) 21:07, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP in Finland only for buildings. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 13:51, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:58, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 13:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Regasterios (talk) 13:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper licensing; see this thread. Winged Blades Godric 18:44, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have added OTRS pending template in this and other images. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 18:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Contrary to your assertions, there's nothing in OTRS. Winged Blades Godric 18:48, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am hoping that the copyright holder will send the email soon, a day or two. --Satdeep Gill (talk) 10:34, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS permission added. --Regasterios (talk) 13:40, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

can be undeleted 2114 PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:07, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 09:42, 26 Dezember 2019 UTC: can be undeleted 2114 --Krdbot 13:28, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DR: Non-free movie poster.

CptViraj (📧) 04:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per TwoWings above. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The coloration is copyrighted. We need the artist's permission via OTRS! Ras67 (talk) 03:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The coloration is copyrighted. We need the artist's permission! Ras67 (talk) 03:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BotBln (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scans from old works without any information, so that copyright situation cannot be determined, all uploaded with a false own work claim.

Jcb (talk) 18:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Its because the upload dont allow the correct claim: but i changed it at all. - like BraeseckesReiseDurchBerlin to

Quelle: Eigener Scan und Bearbeitung (Eigenes Werk) Urheber: Hochgeladen von --BotBln (Diskussion)

- and the other will get the same claim

- its all more about 100 years old - and it will get in some days the print information.

- wait with deletion till the changes will be done. If you cant read german: let it translate. --BotBln (talk) 22:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

change at files:
sorry i dont know a correct translation for english. but in german there is all information for copyright etc. --BotBln (talk) 23:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
its nearly the same like: File:Hamburg Museum 2011-3434-0.jpg
i hope that is how it is needed: File:Belagerungsspiel Nr2012 2017 11 25 J.jpg --BotBln (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
if not help me to manage it. --BotBln (talk) 23:51, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
for all file of „Belagerungsspiel“ all is clear: its from 1800 and all info exist about it is in de:WP Belagerungsspiel - the information is in all this files - so do that file out of Deletion request. --BotBln (talk) 17:21, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
other important infomations are in the template {{GLAM on Tour MEK 2017}} --BotBln (talk) 18:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Das Angelspiel ist von 1910 Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 14:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Braesecke's Reise durch Berlin ist vom Ende 19. Jahrhundert Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 14:22, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

lot of the files i give more Information, i think enough to keep it. --BotBln (talk) 16:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For the other files i need more time. to lot of changes needed. and im a few days not on computer from 8 to 11 decemember 2017. So give me more time. --BotBln (talk) 16:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All images where scans were made during a GLAM event in Berlin. The museum only provided material for scans where the copyright has expired. This was one of the requirements by Wikimedia Deutschland who organized this event for the German community. WMDE informed us that they will forward this permission to OTRS where OTRS members can confirm that all content can be used on Wiikimedia Commons. The ticket will be linked in the GLAM template. With this information given, none of the images should be deleted without further investigation whether the museum made a mistake at some point (which is possible but quite unlikely). Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 00:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also was ist denn nun? Für die Files die jetzt um ein vielfaches besser gekennzeichnet als der Durchschnitt aller Files wieder den Baustein rausnehmen. Denn es ist nicht sehr dekorativ. und es ist auch nicht schön wenn jetzt die Institution, die uns so freundlich aufgenommen hat solange dieses Brandzeichen sieht. Das tut jetzt der künftigen Zusammenarbeit mit Instutionen nicht gerade gut. (ich bin zu müde nach der langen reise um das jetzt englisch zu schreiben) --BotBln (talk) 17:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the requested publication data is given now since some time. There's no longer a valide cause for a deletion. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BotBln (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please explain why documents are public domain in Germany.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:34, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep These Files are official published by the government/army of the GDR. Its an offical work, so it is PD in Germany. As you could see at page 19 or page 22. -- Gunnar (💬) 13:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gunnar.offel: Document is far too recent to be public domain in Germany yet. Government work is not a valid reason neither. Is there another reason? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
i refered allready the impressum. So i repeat: by government -.-
[..] in the public domain according to German copyright law because it is part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment (official work) issued by a German authority or court (§ 5 Abs.1 UrhG). -->Template:PD-GermanGov-- Gunnar (💬) 14:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gunnar.offel: It's not a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment by a German authority or court, it's a photographic work protected 70 years. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:06, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Kurze Frage, verstehst du eigentlich was im deutschen Recht dahintersteckt, oder diskutierst du hier nur anhand der verkürzten Bannertexte ? -- Gunnar (💬) 15:30, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - photographs are not included in PD German government works. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:28, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure how to go about this; this image is clearly a mashup of different images by Jogn Sibbick for a 1985 dinosaur book, but the dinosaurs each have elements from different of the paintings of that book. The one in the background is a flipped version of the upper left one here[10], with the head again turned the opposite way. The one in the right takes the head from the left one in this image[11], and puts it on the body on the one that can be seen at the middle far right in this poster which uses images from the book:[12] So I'm not sure, though it is a clear rip off, is the new composition enough to make it distinct? FunkMonk (talk) 18:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivatives of artworks by now living sculptor, dubious licensing - there's no evidence these are "state approved, as well as internationally recognized official symbols and signs (flags, Coats of Arms, anthems, and awards), the use of which is subject to specific regulatory enactments".

Sealle (talk) 08:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; living sculptor; no permission provided by the author. As mentioned in the deletion request, there is no evidence that these medals are "state approved" or "internationally recognized symbols and signs". --Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:53, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any proof this shape isn't copyrightable in Mexico? It would be in many nations. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can't find anything re Mexico at COM:TOO. It seems a pretty simple shape to me, and certainly simpler than very many deemed permissible for countries like US. If Mexico's rules are closer to the UK then I guess it might be open to interpretation... I'll defer to the judgement of others, but I'll keep a local copy, so please ping me if the decision is to delete so that I can reupload it (if necessary) as fair use on any projects where that's permissible and it's in use, so as not to inconvenience their readers too much (unless someone else does that first). Thank you. -- Begoon 23:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-Textlogo}}. --P 1 9 9   01:22, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clevfool (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded files with no EXIF Data, low resolutions and obviously not Own work.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by FitIndia. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HernandoJoseAJ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Texts created by Spanish government are free to use, but images are not. I would delete the images, but the last has OTRS-permission. I cannot see the permission and cannot decide, is it valid. Taivo (talk) 20:16, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The website of the Ministry allows any use given that the source is mentioned for the latter two files [13]. I deleted the first logo. Ruthven (msg) 16:08, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]