Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/11/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
http://bazneshastegi.tehran.ir/default.aspx?tabid=540&ArticleId=4455
Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by FitIndia. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Liphon (talk) 04:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Wasn't created. --Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:OP_Logo_-.jpg Offishall Prestige (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Kept: troll request to delete the fr author portal. Martin H. (talk) 22:38, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
erreur de personnes sur la photo Baronfuzz (talk) 17:44, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
- Quelle photo ? JackPotte (talk) 17:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Kept: --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Wrong size 3peay (talk) 12:49, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
yes Sujanphoto (talk) 08:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: wrong ns. --Achim (talk) 20:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
no choice Sujanphoto (talk) 08:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's req on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 20:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Alain Douillard is born in 1929. No freedom of panorama in France. 86.249.243.224 20:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
copyvio (http://lemouvementradical.fr/timeline_date/2016-sylvia-pinel-devient-la-premiere-femme-presidente-des-radicaux-de-gauche/) Cheep (talk) 19:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
This image was published at this website before. The PD licence there does neither state explicitely why it is in the public domain, nor was it added by the original uploader ([1]). So the copyright situation is unclear. De728631 (talk) 21:39, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 18:17, 29 November 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:49, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) Regasterios (talk) 13:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 19:06, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded wrong image by mistake (resolution was too high and could be concern of privacy) Matt Hafner (talk) 13:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation (OSM data, no attribution, no Share-alike, misleading author information) j.budissin+/- 19:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- OSM attribution was given by the uploader, so I will withdraw the request. --j.budissin+/- 09:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: request withdrawn. --Emha (talk) 16:43, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
I checked videos on the channel. They did not have Creative Commons license enabled on the videos. This is copyrighted. Lullabying (talk) 08:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 06:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Wrong name in the drawing, it is the Jakobskirche in Toruń.Mehlauge (talk) 13:58, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
-
Marienkirche -
Jakobskirche -
wrong name
.JPG)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Derivative image of copyrighted work. This is someone's photoshop of commercial porn. See here for likely source. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 15:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)- Delete per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 11:03, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 06:13, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Extremely blurry. 94.197.121.98 17:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete: Absolutely no COM:EDUSE. --Achim (talk) 20:30, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 06:14, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Because it is Nonsense Diabolical2539 (talk) 03:20, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Should probably be nominated as speedy deletion (advertisement) --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 01:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 06:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Blurry Diabolical2539 (talk) 03:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work, horrible quality. --Strakhov (talk) 06:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by هاشم العقابي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:6el3etro7i.jpg
- File:Naharabookom eswed.jpg
- File:Anahowa albaghdadi.jpg
- File:Baghdadi kazraji.jpg
- File:Commonspic.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination by Fitindia. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:О1206021.jpg
- File:О120602.jpg
- File:Оламафруз8.jpg
- File:Оламафруз7.jpg
- File:Оламафруз6.jpg
- File:Оламафруз4.jpg
- File:3d SpecialEffects 862.png
- File:Оламафруз3.jpg
- File:Оламафруз2.jpg
- File:Оламафруз1.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by FitIndia. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Артем Кучма (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos and advertisement of companies of questionable notability.
- File:Kuchma-development.jpg
- File:Дружный коллектив.jpg
- File:Агентство недвижимости Новострой.jpg
- File:Офис АН Новострой.jpg
- File:Компания Новострой Ирпень.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by FitIndia. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio : Rageot (edition) and Jean-Louis Thouard (illustrator) Tylwyth Eldar (talk) 21:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tyler Richard moore (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Tyler moore office.jpg
- File:Tyler jcvd Jean claude Van Damme.jpg
- File:Tyler Moore and Maykel Fonts.jpg
- File:Tyler Moore et son Père Spirituel Eddy Elzas.jpg
- File:Tyler Moore maurice Nguesso.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by FitIndia. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Doreenescardin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Turkey IMG 120 Somayeh Persian model 2016.jpg
- File:Turkey IMG 120 Somayeh Persian model 2016 (2).jpg
- File:Emirate of Dubai, Sofitel Dubai Downtown IMG 70 Somayeh Persian model 2017.jpg
- File:Rixos Premium Bodrum IMG 123 Somayeh Persian model 2016.jpg
- File:Emirate of Dubai, Sofitel Dubai Downtown IMG 68 Somayeh Persian model 2017.jpg
- File:Bodrum, Muğla Province IMG 144 Somayeh Persian model 2016 2.jpg
- File:Bodrum, Muğla Province IMG 144 Somayeh Persian model 2016.jpg
- File:Emirate of Dubai, Radisson Blu Resort, Sharjah UAE IMG 85 Somayeh Persian model 2017.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by FitIndia. --Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
This is my picture, and I don't want it to be seen in the site. It is not related to site itself, the picture is uploaded without any permission. Thanks for your help! Best regards Han AKÇADAĞ 88.250.145.254 23:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP, likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
blurry Diabolical2539 (talk) 03:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of a private student party GAndy (talk) 01:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photo of a private student party. GAndy (talk) 01:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Logo of an insignificant student collective. +copyvio GAndy (talk) 01:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photos of insignificant people, members of insignificant student collective. GAndy (talk) 01:40, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Photos of insignificant people, members of insignificant student collective. GAndy (talk) 01:40, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Low quality structure, composite of two images; alt. File:Methylcyclopentaan.png. Wostr (talk) 02:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Even if there is no problem of compositing (a policy problem), there is a stray black dot on the right edge (quality problem). DMacks (talk) 09:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; unused & poor-quality chemical structure. Proposed replacement has the same orientation. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 05:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:02, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
(C) by RICOH R10 User in the EXIF, violating Commons licensing policy
- File:HK Robenson Road 80 evening 06 Home Affairs Department Central & Westerm Deistrict Council.JPG
- File:HK Robenson Road 80 evening 07.JPG
- File:HK Robenson Road 80 evening 09 柏道 Park Road.JPG
- File:HK Robenson Road evening Ying Wah Girls School Bus stop.JPG
- File:HK Robenson Road evening Ying Wah Girls School NWFBus Citybus stop signs.JPG
- File:HK Robenson Road evening 英華女校 Ying Wah Girls School.JPG
- File:HK Robenson Road evening 瓊林閣 Kings Court 01.JPG
- File:HK Robenson Road evening 瓊林閣 Kings Court no parking sign.JPG
- File:HK Robenson Road 猶太教莉亞堂 Ohel Leah Synagogue 猶太廟 evening 1.JPG
- File:HK Robenson Road 猶太教莉亞堂 Ohel Leah Synagogue 猶太廟 evening 2.JPG
- File:HK Robenson Road 羅便臣道 evening Multistory Car Park 106.JPG
- File:HK 西摩道 Seymour Road 輝煌豪園 Palatial Crest evening 恒基地產.JPG
- File:HK Sheung Wan night 桃花源小廚 Tim's Kitchen.JPG
- File:HK Sheung Wan 必烈者士街街市 Bridges Street Market interior 03.JPG
- File:HK Sheung Wan 必烈者士街街市 Bridges Street Market interior 02.JPG
- File:HK Sheung Wan 必烈者士街街市 Bridges Street Market interior 01.JPG
- File:HK Sheung Wan 永利街 Wing Lee Street 01 城皇街 Shing Wong Street.JPG
- File:HK Sheung Wan 永利街 Wing Lee Street 02 back lane.JPG
- File:HK Sheung Wan 永利街 Wing Lee Street 03 偉志印務公司 Wai Che Printing Company.JPG
- File:HK Sheung Wan 城皇街 Shing Wong Street Ladder 1.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Ricoh R10 is a digital camera. --Sealle (talk) 11:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Bonjour je suis la personne qui apparaît sur cette photo et je souhaite la supprimer car elle est visible sur internet Merci d'avance DeMiras75 (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 06:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Merci de supprimer cette photo en urgence DeMiras75 (talk) 05:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
S'il vous plais il faut absolument supprimer cette photo qui m'appartient DeMiras75 (talk) 05:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 06:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Из сообщения из службы OTRS, данный файл не является указанным автором фото. Dogad75 (talk) 05:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:05, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Uncategorised. Handwritten worked example of little education value. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Picture of two plastic cups with no obvious educational value. Malcolma (talk) 17:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Unused file with no meaningful description. It's titled fig 2 but without evidence of any fig 1. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 18:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING
Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tomandmary (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artist still living - needs OTRS permission from artist
- File:Up in the Air (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Untitled (Pencils) (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Untitled (Fly) (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Everything (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Untitled (Self Portrait) (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Hot Balls (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Untitled (Bubble Gum) (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Don't use this one either.jpg
- File:Don't use this one.jpg
- File:Untitled (Eraser Shavings) (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Untitled (Tarantula) (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Don't use either.jpg
- File:Untitled (Self Portrait Splat) (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Untitled (Garbage Bag)(Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Untitled (Curse) (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Circle Dance (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:1000 Hours of Staring (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Cocktail Party (Tom Friedman).jpg
- File:Being (Tom Friedman).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Tom_Friedman).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Tom_Friedman).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Tom_Friedman).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Tom_Friedman).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Tom_Friedman).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Tom_Friedman).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Tom_Friedman).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(Tom_Friedman).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Tom_Friedman).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Artist still living, needs permission Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
No permission, author 2009 Patrick D. Wright per exif Gbawden (talk) 11:40, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Structure with serif font that should not be used in chemical structures; three alt. images in Category:Methylcyclopentane. Wostr (talk) 02:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 00:35, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
en attente du document de droit d'auteur Canais88 (talk) 01:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
supression rapide Canais88 (talk) 01:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 12:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted image. Image has watermark on top left-hand corner and it was not uploaded by original photographer. Lullabying (talk) 08:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no free license at source. --Strakhov (talk) 12:40, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Acting as proxy: Hello, I would kindly ask for deleting photo, which was uploaded here and I didn´t get any permission to it. It is me on the photo and I do not want to have the photo here. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eva_Weissova_Austrian_Masters_2008.jpg. Thank you for deleting it. Best regards, Eva Weissová [2] Túrelio (talk) 10:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment I do not necessarily support the deletion, but filed it the formally correct way, as the nominator choose the wrong platform[3]. --Túrelio (talk) 10:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Do I understand correctly that this is a request for a courtesy deletion by the subject of the photo? Or is it something else? - Jmabel ! talk 19:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, the IP, claiming to be the depicted lady, asks for removal of the image. --Túrelio (talk) 21:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Neutral leaning on keep for now.@Tschaensky: , the uploader and righs holder, hasn't been active for years which could be the most simple courtesy way of handling this. Otherwise, this was taken in Austria so Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Austria applies. The commercial reuse restriction is the only claim but I don't see any violation of their legitimate interests from this as it was a public sporting event. Either way, I'm 50/50 on the issue without some more detail as to the concern. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:17, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete If we have (a) an unused photo (b) that the subject wants deleted and (c) the uploader wants deleted, then I'm for it. To Jmabel's proposal, is this someone really notable enough to need a photograph of? Doesn't seem like she has a page anywhere so it would just be another unused photograph of her. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:52, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello, please, the photo is very bad, I do not like it, and really, I kindly ask you to delete it. I didn´t give any permission to use this photo here. Thank you for deleting it. Best regards, Eva Weissová — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eva Weissová (talk • contribs) 5 December 2019 14:13 (UTC)
- @Túrelio, Ricky81682, and Eva Weissová: I have a proposal here. Is there anyone who would object if Ms. Weissová would provide a better picture of herself, duly licensed, and then we would delete this one as a courtesy? By "better" and "duly licensed" I mean:
- Satisfactory to her.
- Reasonable for purposes of identification in an article.
- Reasonably high resolution, no noticeable camera jitter, decent focus, etc.
- License clearly from the person that owns the copyright of the photo in question (probably provided through the OTRS process unless that is someone who already has a longstanding account here)
- NOTE that Ms. Weissová is presumably not the copyright holder of a photograph of her, unless it is a selfie.
- License must allow derivative versions and both commercial and non-commercial use. It's fine if it requires attribution.
- Jmabel ! talk 16:51, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
I'm the photographer und uploader of this photo and I strongly support Eva Weissová's wish to delete this photo --Tschaensky (talk) 17:13, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks! I think that makes this pretty simple. Both the photographer and subject want a courtesy deletion, and the subject is not notable enough that it is important that we have a photo of her (though she is notable enough that it would be nice to have one, but not this one). Delete. - Jmabel ! talk 01:40, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. (I prefer not to close this DR by myself, as I had opened it) --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Who will delete it? Thank you, Eva Weissová — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eva Weissová (talk • contribs)
- @Eva Weissová: Presumably an uninvolved administrator. Since Túrelio and myself have been involved in the discussion, we can't close the discussion. But if you want it to happen, please don't keep the discussion going, because that admin is unlikely to close something with a very recent comment, since they'd want to leave time for any needed response. - Jmabel ! talk 18:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 12:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
violation des droits a l'image Marie-Laure KACZALA (talk) 16:15, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il faudrait, peut être, demander un tickets ORTS à Peyre (talk), qui à visiblement pris la photo ?! Marianne Casamance (talk) 16:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep Rubbish. This is just poor import. @Clpo13: you see anything relevant that I don't? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Peyre claims own work. Peyre uploaded the picture. --Strakhov (talk) 12:46, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Screenshot from Austrian TV Schnabeltassentier (talk) 13:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Fitindia. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:48, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Passenger in aircraft no longer works for the company which owns KAN, and we wish to have the image removed. 2001:8003:8C95:6F01:3940:1F8C:DB2C:6B2E 08:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. license is irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Unauthorised use of identifiable subject. 2001:8003:8998:8301:DD27:75E6:A2A3:9C0A 05:56, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Kept: authorization not required, subject not even identifiable. (non-admin closure) --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hakob Hakobyan-Armen Hovhannisyan (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE? Not own work.
- File:Song of the Year Awards 2019 Sochi.jpg
- File:Revelation of the Year 2018.jpg
- File:Hakob Armen.jpg
- File:Charity Concert in Moscow, Russia.jpg
- File:Music of the Year 2018.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:58, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for maps in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. Copyrighted architectural plan. --Hanooz 22:12, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for maps in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted plan and photos. --Hanooz 22:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Literariocreative (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art and promo photo. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 22:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Sign in15 AllImagesVideosMapsNewsShopping|My saves There are no results for worlhttps://www.bing.com/maps?q=1+microsoft+way%2c+redmond&form=monitr&traffictype=wintest&qs=pf&cvid=27e22dc710004276a304eb0f15042027&cc=gb&setlang=en-us&plvar=0 Check your spelling or try different keywords Ref A: 3D71DA3E484E4160AD2A5739ADE3F810 Ref B: WSTEDGE0422 Ref C: 2019-11-28T06:46:26Z © 2019 Microsoft Privacy and Cookies Legal Advertise About our ads Help Feedback European Data Protection 🐞 376 ms FeedbackHelloWORLD. 2001:4898:80E8:2:62E8:725D:4F18:834A 06:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 08:36, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:49, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:49, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyright; image has watermark Lullabying (talk) 06:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:49, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Unacceptable derivative work of a coupon and surrounding packaging.
ƏXPLICIT 07:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Outdated map for the 2016 JESC. The correct version is already available at File:JESC 2016 Map.svg. Lordtobi (✉) 10:24, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not sure why I uploaded this, but it's clearly unneeded now. [[ axg // ✉ ]] 11:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Sahakanush S. Matinyan (d. 1993), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:46, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ղուկասյան Մարո (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Sahakanush S. Matinyan (d. 1993), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
I have the permission of relatives of Sahakanush Matinyan to publish this photos, also this photos I have taken from Sahakanush Matinyan's catalogue, which I was given from her relatives, who want all these files to be published in her Wikipedia article. --Ղուկասյան Մարո (talk) 11:27, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Ղուկասյան Մարո: Matinyan's heirs must send themselves a permission via COM:OTRS. Please note too you are not allowed to claim "own work" if it's not true. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:37, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Ok, thank you, I'll tell them to send permission letter. --Ղուկասյան Մարո (talk) 12:33, 29 November 2019 (UTC) I just can't understand the rules in wikidata, as for some pictures which I have browsed to wikidata the authors have sent permission letters, but the photos are deleted. Please help me understand how this works. --Ղուկասյան Մարո (talk) 13:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Ղուկասյան Մարո: It's not Wikidata here. However Wikidata doesn't store images; they are stored here on Commons. Please refer to your talk page: images have been deleted because they weren't your own works. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:04, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: thank you, sorry, I meant Wikimedia Commons, I have written Data by mistake, here is the link of one deleted photo (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ղուկասյան_Մարո#File%3ARazmik_Grigoryan.jpg), but the author of the photo Mkhitar Serobyan has sent his permission to permission-commons@wikimedia.org, also the author of the photo Manne1.jpg (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ղուկասյան_Մարո#File_tagging_File%3AManne1.jpg) Ararat Grigoryan has sent his permission to the same email, but there is no answer so far, the photos haven't been recovered yet. So please help me, what to do, that the photos haven't been deleted.
- @Ղուկասյան Մարո: Mkhitar Serobyan should contact OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Dear @Patrick Rogel: Sorry to answer you late, but Mkhitar Serobyan sent his permission letter to OTRS a few mounths ago, but the photo wasn't recovered yet, there is no answer so far.--Ղուկասյան Մարո (talk) 05:34, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:45, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work or COM:DW of copyrighted work by David Consuegra (d. 2004), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Most are copyvios of http://alfalfastudio.com/2016/11/03/the-graphic-design-of-david-consuegra/.
- File:Other one.jpg
- File:Other work.jpg
- File:Work david 2.jpg
- File:Work david.jpg
- File:Work david 3.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign LasVeintiseisletras LetterQ2 Book.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign LasVeintiseisletras LetterQ Book.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign LasVeintiseisletras LetterI Book.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign LasVeintiseisletras LetterI2 Book.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign LasVeintiseisletras LetterG2 Book.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign LasVeintiseisletras LetterG Book.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign LasVeintiseisletras LetterB2 Book.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign LasVeintiseisletras LetterA2 Book.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign LasVeintiseisletras LetterA Book.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign LasVeintiseisletras LetterB Book.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign MuseoDelOro PosterDesign.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign MuseoDeArteModerno PosterDesign.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign MuseoDeArteModerno Barrios PosterDesign.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign MuseoDeArteModerno JuliaAVila PosterDesign.jpg
- File:DavidConsuegra GraphicDesign LasVeintiseisletras Book.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
low quality selfie, unlikely to be used for anything other than the hoax the uploader keeps creating. Praxidicae (talk) 14:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 16:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WM Commons (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical logos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Protection Corps, Finland.svg
- File:Finnish People's Democratic League.svg
- File:Social Democrats of Finland.svg
- File:Suomi-Filmi, old.svg
- File:Suomi-Filmi.svg
- File:Red Guard of Finland.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep
- The file: Protection Corps, Finland.svg: the license {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} has been changed to permission = {{PD self}} like in the files in the category: Shoulder sleeve insignia of the Protection Corps of Finland
- The file: Finnish People's Democratic League.svg and the file: Social Democrats of Finland.svg has already the license {{Trademark}} like the file: Sozialdemokratische Partei Finnlands Logo.svg
- The file: Suomi-Filmi, old.svg and the file: Suomi-Filmi.svg: the license {{PD-textlogo}} has been changed to {{Trademark}} like in the file: 20th Century Fox Studio Classics logo.png
- The file: Red Guard of Finland.svg: the license {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} has been changed to permission = {{PD self}} like in the files in the category: Shoulder sleeve insignia of the Protection Corps of Finland
- --2001:999:60:710E:1CD4:2890:A618:44D1 06:20, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Logos are complex enough to be copyrightable and were created and belong by organizations, not uploader. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: It can not be so, that showing logos are forbidden in Wikipedia! At least, when the licenses are correct like they are now. Furthermore, the Protection Corpses were disbanded 1944 and the Red Guard 1918. 2001:999:60:710E:34F8:72A7:133F:7F27 17:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: In the file: Finnish People's Democratic League.svg and the file: Social Democrats of Finland.svg has been added the license {{PD-ineligible}} like in the file: Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands Logo.svg. --2001:999:72:AD38:5411:8306:F4D9:EC98 07:42, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, but design of all these logos are complex enough. Some logos may be in public domain by age, but relevant information about authorship should be found. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: Please, look at this and this: This file has a license. --2001:999:43:83A6:4003:9366:4CF5:1539 16:34, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, but design of all these logos are complex enough. Some logos may be in public domain by age, but relevant information about authorship should be found. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Logos are complex enough to be copyrightable and were created and belong by organizations, not uploader. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:China Railway High-speed
[edit]Complex logo in China per COM:TOO China, cf. "Gang Heng" logo.
Wcam (talk) 22:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see this design being more original than the "matchstick man" case given at COM:TOO China. As over 500 articles use this logo, I would expect a detailed argument explaining why this file meets the threshold of originality. AlasdairW (talk) 00:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- See the "LY company" and "Gang Heng" logos as they are both comprised of extremely simple shapes and texts and yet they are ruled copyrightable by the courts. These CRH logos are apparently more sophisticated than those two. Whether the image is being used by many articles is irrelevant when its copyright freedom is in question. --Wcam (talk) 01:39, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
doesn't look like FoP Albinfo (talk) 23:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:24, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK 香港 上環 Sheung Wan 108 Queen's Road West posters 民建聯 DAB 民主黨 Democratic Party Feb-2012.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK TKL 調景嶺 Tiu Keng Leng HKDI 香港知專設計學院 Hong Kong Design Institute floorplan signs December 2018 SSG 01.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for maps in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK TKL 調景嶺 Tiu Keng Leng 彩明苑 Choi Ming Court Market December 2018 SSG floorplan map sign.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for maps in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK Admiralty 太古廣場 Pacific Place AMC current movies posters Nov-2013 Now Showing n Next signs Buberry.JPG
[edit]
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK North Point 北角 新光戲院 SunBeam Theatre 梅葆玖 Mei Baojiu Beijing Opera coming soon Jan-2013.JPG
[edit]
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for indoor works in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for indoor works in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for indoor works in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for indoor works in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK WC 灣仔 Footbridge between Immigration Tower and 港鐵站 Wan Chai Station Government poster please love your family October 2019 SSG 01.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK posters Thai female signer 朗嘎拉姆 วนัฎษญา วิเศษกุล Vanatsaya Viseskul VV look like as Teresa Teng n a man back Jan-2018 IX1.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:52, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK MTR 觀塘站 Kwun Tong Station concourse poster pls wait till next stop n view factory building January 2019 IX2.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK 西貢 Sai Kung 清水灣半島 Clear Water Bay Peninsula 布袋澳 Po Toi O shop Restaurant sign August 2018 SSG poster 方國珊 Fong Kwok Shan.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK 西貢 Sai Kung 清水灣半島 Clear Water Bay Peninsula 布袋澳 Po Toi O restaurant soft drink August 2018 SSG 08.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK 西貢 Sai Kung 清水灣半島 Clear Water Bay Peninsula 布袋澳 Po Toi O Chuen Road August 2018 SSG Chinese Opera banner.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
File:HK 西貢 Sai Kung 清水灣半島 Clear Water Bay Peninsula 布袋澳 Po Toi O shop Restaurant sign August 2018 SSG 02.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
The person who uploaded this image has admitted to being the creator of the page Charles Prast on Wikipedia. That article has since been deleted as he is not notable and seems to be gaming Wikipedia for promotional purposes. He also indicates he is the copyright holder of these images in Wikimedia Commons however, he is the subject of the picture, making it difficult for him to be the copyright holder. This image and the others on Wikimedia Commons can also be seen in other online locations which means he likely used them without the permission of the photographer who took them. Navycrafted (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym at 22:41, 1 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
http://ymuhin.info/node/1870/href?page=7 coppivo Pavel9891 (talk) 16:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym at 22:41, 1 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ainun Nishat
[edit]Near duplicate of each other.
- File:Professor Dr. Ainun Nishat in Dhaka 2019 (2).jpg
- File:Professor Dr. Ainun Nishat in Dhaka 2019 (3).jpg
- File:Professor Dr. Ainun Nishat in Dhaka 2019 (4).jpg
- File:Professor Dr. Ainun Nishat in Dhaka 2019 (5).jpg
- File:Professor Dr. Ainun Nishat in Dhaka 2019 (7).jpg
- File:Professor Dr. Ainun Nishat in Dhaka 2019 (8).jpg
- File:Professor Dr. Ainun Nishat in Dhaka 2019 (9).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ~ Nahid Talk 23:02, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
The person who uploaded this image has admitted to being the creator of the page Charles Prast on Wikipedia. That article has since been deleted as he is not notable and seems to be gaming Wikipedia for promotional purposes. He also indicates he is the copyright holder of these images in Wikimedia Commons however, he is the subject of the picture, making it difficult for him to be the copyright holder. This image and the others on Wikimedia Commons can also be seen in other online locations which means he likely used them without the permission of the photographer who took them. Navycrafted (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by GreenMeansGo at 16:21, 6 Januar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: No original meta data, multiple preexisting versions available online, likely promotional in nature --Krdbot 01:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
The original was deleted by PatríciaR as a copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
All I did was translate the previous version of the image which was in German, so its license was considered the same. I think an excerpt as small as this should be fair use for this purpose, so I don't really agree with the deletion of the original, but ultimately I am not strongly attached to this image. - Rainwarrior (talk) 02:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- I might make one further comment that this image is a reductive analysis. The original score is for a symphony of instruments, and this particular arrangement is a simplified reduction to just two staves by its author, and not a direct copy of the score itself. None of the annotation and text is from the original either, it is the analysis which is being presented. Much of the content of the excerpted portion of the score it was derived from has been deliberately excluded (e.g. instrumentation), removed for the purpose of demonstrating the kind of harmony it's using. It is still a derivative work, of course, but the extent of this is clearly limited and mitigated in service of the commentary it's making. - Rainwarrior (talk) 02:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear DW of Hindemith work. Fair use is not available on Commons. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
There's no evidence the copyright holder has given permission for the picture to be uploaded here and assigned a free license. The uploader is not the copyright holder. The ownership is also unclear; this may really be, despite the claim that it's the intellectual property of Colorado Democrats, an official Colorado General Assembly picture. In any case, there is no evidence of permission being given to publish the image here. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 01:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Although the Democrats have put a CC-BY license on it, they are obviously not the photographer and I doubt that they actually have the right to freely license it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
There's no evidence the copyright holder has given permission for the picture to be uploaded here and assigned a free license. The uploader is not the copyright holder. The ownership is also unclear; this may really be, despite the claim that it's the intellectual property of Colorado Democrats, an official Colorado General Assembly picture. In any case, there is no evidence of permission being given to publish the image here. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 01:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:24, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
COMPLAINT BY CHARLES PRAST AS BACKGROUND IS COPYRIGHTED 84.14.151.100 18:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Background is just de minimis. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: agree with above--Desyman (talk) 15:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: COM:De minimis. — regards, Revi 11:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
The person who uploaded this image has admitted to being the creator of the page Charles Prast on Wikipedia. That article has since been deleted as he is not notable and seems to be gaming Wikipedia for promotional purposes. He also indicates he is the copyright holder of these images in Wikimedia Commons however, he is the subject of the picture, making it difficult for him to be the copyright holder. This image and the others on Wikimedia Commons can also be seen in other online locations which means he likely used them without the permission of the photographer who took them. Navycrafted (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
No permission of artist - copyright infringement JopkeB (talk) 04:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This shot includes at least 2 images by other photographers/videographers, whose rights might be violated. We could discuss whether they (photo in the centre and in upper right corner) might be considered de minimis. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the Ryan Russell photo is the only reason that the image is useful. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Ha Young Lee in Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 3 by Brinkhoff-Moegenburg cropped.JPG
[edit]
As the author, I do not want the image to be used freely on the Internet. Ralf Brinkhoff 2003:E1:BF0C:3A00:3439:D814:5F6B:4F6C 10:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - file si in use, license is irrevocable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:31, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
As the author, I do not want the image to be used freely on the Internet. Ralf Brinkhoff 2003:E1:BF0C:3A00:3439:D814:5F6B:4F6C 10:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Do not discuss here, please, but at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 1 by Brinkhoff-Mogenburg.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 5 by Brinkhoff-Moegenburg (Reference 863-1336).JPG
[edit].JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As the author, I do not want the image to be used freely on the Internet. Ralf Brinkhoff 2003:E1:BF0C:3A00:3439:D814:5F6B:4F6C 10:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Do not discuss here, please, but at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 1 by Brinkhoff-Mogenburg.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 4 by Brinkhoff-Moegenburg (Reference 863-1254).JPG
[edit].JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As the author, I do not want the image to be used freely on the Internet. Ralf Brinkhoff 2003:E1:BF0C:3A00:3439:D814:5F6B:4F6C 10:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Do not discuss here, please, but at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 1 by Brinkhoff-Mogenburg.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
As the author, I do not want the image to be used freely on the Internet. Ralf Brinkhoff 2003:E1:BF0C:3A00:3439:D814:5F6B:4F6C 10:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Do not discuss here, please, but at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 1 by Brinkhoff-Mogenburg.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 6 by Brinkhoff-Moegenburg (Reference 863-1435).JPG
[edit].JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As the author, I do not want the image to be used freely on the Internet. Ralf Brinkhoff 2003:E1:BF0C:3A00:3439:D814:5F6B:4F6C 10:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Do not discuss here, please, but at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 1 by Brinkhoff-Mogenburg.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
As the author, I do not want the image to be used freely on the Internet. Ralf Brinkhoff 2003:E1:BF0C:3A00:3439:D814:5F6B:4F6C 10:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
The same request by the same IP has been filed for:
- File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 2 by Brinkhoff-Moegenburg.jpg
- File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 3 by Brinkhoff-Moegenburg.jpg
- File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 4 by Brinkhoff-Moegenburg (Reference 863-1254).JPG]
- File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 5 by Brinkhoff-Moegenburg (Reference 863-1336).JPG
- File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 6 by Brinkhoff-Moegenburg (Reference 863-1435).JPG
- File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 7 by Brinkhoff-Moegenburg (Reference 863-1687).JPG]
.JPG){kind=link}
Just for the record: all these images seem to have a permission: {{PermissionOTRS|id=2012030810010124|Techman224}}. --Túrelio (talk) 16:09, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - files are in use -- license is irrevocable. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Mural painting from before 1960s in the parish hall of Bircle. Year of death of artist Harry Johnson not known but must be established to verify copyright status. Thuresson (talk) 12:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Infobox says: "Copyright owned by Phyllis Cheng and reproduced with permission". This permission should be presented through OTRS-system. But Phyllis Cheng is herself depicted and she is unlikely to be copyright holder. Per EXIF author and copyright holder is Asa Mathat. Explanation is needed about who is the photographer and who is the copyright holder. Probably OTRS-permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:06, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
This is my mother's photo. It's one of her photo's. I didn't give you permission to delete it. Especially on a holiday like Thanksgiving. What kind of a person are you? -Mah29001 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mah29001 (talk • contribs) 16:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- I am such kind of person who does not know, what is thanksgiving. Really, there's no thanksgiving in my homeland. Please open COM:OTRS page and look, what kind of e-mail should be sent by your mother to our permissions department at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Taivo (talk) 19:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the user's only upload. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Milan Kerac.jpg
- File:Ankica Oprešnik 3.jpg
- File:Ankica Oprešnik.jpg
- File:Ankica Oprešnik 2.jpg
- File:Sasha Skenderija Prague selphie 2017 12 14.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
This request applies only for first version, not for whole file. Per {{FoP-Hong Kong}}, there is freedom of panorama only for permanently installed objects, not for banners, so I cropped a banner out. Taivo (talk) 17:30, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: original, kept revision. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
the claim of being copyright holder is rather questionable (says "home archive", but this looks like a poorly colorized and rendered derivative work, not an original of a family photo) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:09, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oye Gureje (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder of these photos as he appears to be the subject of the photos. Evidence of permission should be sent to COM:OTRS.
T CellsTalk 19:39, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
No reliable source given, random date of creation, no evidence of PD Sealle (talk) 22:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
looks like something from a museum, so no FoP Albinfo (talk) 23:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep it is from 1602... Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:32, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Autor:Pedro Banhos Navarro, então não é brasão oficial ( Author: Pedro Banhos Navarro, So It's Not Official Coat of Arms) O revolucionário aliado (talk) 02:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: The representation being made by an individual doesn't make this unofficial; the blazon is the bit that matters. See Commons:Coat of arms. Keeping. --James F. (talk) 21:52, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
Found similar image on Twitter, also lack of EXIF data, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 04:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - I took the picture during the protest on 16th June. The perspective is different. The reason for the lack of EXIF metadata is that I uploaded it to the Telegram before uploading it on the desktop interface. I have uploaded a version with a higher resolution and intact metadata. If necessary, I will show the OTRS that I am not infringing copyright. --Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 05:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --James F. (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 7 by Brinkhoff-Moegenburg (Reference 863-1687).JPG
[edit].JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As the author, I do not want the image to be used freely on the Internet. Ralf Brinkhoff 2003:E1:BF0C:3A00:3439:D814:5F6B:4F6C 10:29, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Do not discuss here, please, but at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 1 by Brinkhoff-Mogenburg.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 16:05, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lear at Hamburgische Staatsoper 2012 - Photo No 1 by Brinkhoff-Mogenburg.jpg. --James F. (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm believe this is a flickrwashed photo. I spent some time at the Wayback Machine and TinEye and other archives trying to find direct proof, but I can't find any relevant pages that kept an archive of this actual image. I can tell you from memory that it was used online by w:Erica C. Barnett for several years prior to 2008. It was probably on her Myspace in 2003 or so. It was also at sites like publicola.net and thestranger.com well before 2008.m The Flickr account that this photo is copied from doesn't give any confidence that they are the photographer or copyright holder. It looks like they are a cartoonist who remixes photos with their own drawings. Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete
KeepI recall seeing this image at a date prior to the upload date of 2008, however, on those occasions I recall seeing it credited to Buster Benson (the Flickr uploader). The uploader, Buster Benson, appears to be a person known to the subject of the photograph (e.g. [4]), therefore, it is not unlikely that he was in a position to take this headshot. Further, the headshot in original form is inscribed with writing he appears to have applied indicating his personal knowledge of the subject. The uploader, Buster Benson, is a book author published by Penguin ([5]) and a close review of his Flickr account shows no evidence of purloined images, even though he has uploaded many thousands (a combination of personal photography of friends and family and original artwork). It seems unlikely to me he would have uploaded thousands of personal photographs and one stolen photo. I have conducted a reverse image search which failed to find this image in other form on an earlier date elsewhere. I have manually checked Publicola.net (via the Wayback Machine) and TheStranger.com and failed to find this image there. The image shows correct licensure ([6]) and no competing copyright claim has been made through OTRS. Chetsford (talk) 06:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)- This is an indication that Barnett has been in communication with Buster Benson, in regards to a review of his app. "Known to" is correct in the sense that they've communicated in their respective professional capacities. Not sure how that translates to any kind of copyright or personality rights. It takes a lot of imagination to make anything of it. Erica C. Barnett herself has tried to tell us that the photo is used without permission. Benson is claiming to have once met Barnett, he posted a modified version of an image of her, and she says it's used without permission.
A close review of his Flickr account? Can't have been all that close. I didn't have to scroll down very far to find evidence of purloined images. And again, from here. And this taken from here, captioned "At @jessicahische’s happening book launch party.", indicating perhaps acquaintance? Or just showing up at an event? To take social media like flickr or instagram posts and imagine "personal knowledge" is a stretch.
And so on. This isn't evidence of some grand intellectual property piracy scheme. This flickr account is filled with family snapshots, Benson's own artwork, and various social media images of things like the T-shirt from the Unknown Mortal Orchestra show, or pages from a book he likes. ALL the images are tagged CC BY-SA. To me it looks like someone who set their default flickr licensing to CC BY-SA 15 years ago and hasn't thought about it since, going on to post 9,300 images from all manner of sources, all with the same CC BY-SA license. It's pretty strong evidence that Benson either doesn't understand copyright, or doesn't think it's something to make an effort to get exactly right on his flickr account.
Commons:License laundering doesn't encourage bending over backwards to extend the benefit of the doubt to suspected flickrwashing. The exif data, and the fact that it's a png, make it an outlier compared with similar photos that do look like Benson took himself[7][8], etc. The photo stream is 9,000 jpgs and this one png outlier, a typical default screeshot format, again suggesting the original photo was browsed on the web, then altered, probably for innocent purposes, probably using the same default license as all the other images, original and copied. It's not impossible he took the photo, but we need way more confidence than this, and by the way, it's a terrible bio image. We really prefer not to have weird Dutch angles and this odd cropping on a photo intended only to identify a person for a Wikipedia biography.
It gets even weirder if you wonder, if it's true this person is not notable by Wikipedia standards, why do we even need a photo of them at all? The subject doesn't want this photo of her on Wikipedia, Chetsford doesn't want there to be an article about her, yet wants to keep a dubiously licensed, not very useful or informative portrait of her? Why? --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:38, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Based on the additional context provided here, I think - out of a preponderance of caution - delete would be advisable. Chetsford (talk) 21:12, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- It seems clear that there is enough doubt here that we would want OTRS, and lacking that we should delete. I say delete unless we get explicit permission via OTRS. - Jmabel ! talk 22:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- No objection. Enough valid concerns have been raised that prudence suggests deletion would be the best course of action. Chetsford (talk) 21:12, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- This is an indication that Barnett has been in communication with Buster Benson, in regards to a review of his app. "Known to" is correct in the sense that they've communicated in their respective professional capacities. Not sure how that translates to any kind of copyright or personality rights. It takes a lot of imagination to make anything of it. Erica C. Barnett herself has tried to tell us that the photo is used without permission. Benson is claiming to have once met Barnett, he posted a modified version of an image of her, and she says it's used without permission.
SpeedyDelete per criterion CSD G8 - no longer used on any Main namespace article page. Also, nom's rationale seems sound for a "delete." Dmehus (talk) 20:43, 29 November 2019 (UTC)- @Dmehus: Your link is to a Wikipedia disambiguation page concerning the acronym CSD. In any case, Wikipedia CSD criteria do not apply at Commons, which has its own criteria. I fail to see how Wikipedia's G8 (Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page) or the G8 of Commons (Page dependent on deleted or non-existent content) would apply to this file. Indeed, there is no criterion requiring that a file be used in a "Main namespace article page", nor even one that requires it to be used anywhere, at all. --Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 12:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- It was already up for routine deletion on Wikipedia on the grounds that it had been copied here to Commons, so on WP it's moot. The only deletion that's contested is this one. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 00:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Dmehus: Your link is to a Wikipedia disambiguation page concerning the acronym CSD. In any case, Wikipedia CSD criteria do not apply at Commons, which has its own criteria. I fail to see how Wikipedia's G8 (Pages dependent on a non-existent or deleted page) or the G8 of Commons (Page dependent on deleted or non-existent content) would apply to this file. Indeed, there is no criterion requiring that a file be used in a "Main namespace article page", nor even one that requires it to be used anywhere, at all. --Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 12:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete "Small file with no EXIF" Which seems to be rationale enough, all of its own, these days, even when INUSE. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:51, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: , what do you mean by "no EXIF"? --Dmehus (talk) 01:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- The image metadata is missing. Commons deletes on that basis. (I don't think it should, but I wouldn't miss this image) Andy Dingley (talk) 01:58, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Andy Dingley Thanks. And, I agree with you that I personally don't think that should be a deletion reason. However, in this case, this low quality, extreme close up image, I wouldn't miss it, either. --Dmehus (talk) 02:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- The image metadata is missing. Commons deletes on that basis. (I don't think it should, but I wouldn't miss this image) Andy Dingley (talk) 01:58, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley: , what do you mean by "no EXIF"? --Dmehus (talk) 01:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Delete for dubious licensing (appears to be a selfie, so difficult to see how someone other than the subject can claim it), for being a poor quality image of dubious value, for being a photo of a recognisable person apparently used without their consent, and out of courtesy for the subject's desire for this photograph not to be used. SilkTork (talk) 19:10, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- There's no telling if this is a selfie or not. Just the angle isn't enough to tell. Is she notable? Dunno, but notable enough for Commons at least, I think. Did the subject object to the use of this photo? Maybe, is Ericacbarnett a verified account? Is the photo in scope? I think so, but it's questionable how useful it is for an infobox. Conclusion? Meh. Probably a COM:PRP deletion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Licence invalide : voir ici. En aucun cas le contributeur n'indique une autorisation de "© Julie Perreault" pour le transfert de son oeuvre sur Commons. False license claim. Nonovian [Communications] 16:13, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work 94.197.121.98 18:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
copyvio from https://vk.com/dimka_sw?z=photo49278566_457248027%2Fwall49278566_23529 90.190.209.44 20:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
File:HK 銅鑼灣 Causeway Bay 糖街 Sugar Street evening The Point Causeway Square shop 領域電訊 CityLink Mar-2013 Miss Chrissie Chau.JPG
[edit]
This request does not apply to the last version of the file. Per {{FoP-Hong Kong}}, there is freedom of panorama only for permanently installed objects, so I cropped a movable advertisement (paper sculpture?) out. Taivo (talk) 18:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Previous version removed from history. --Majora (talk) 21:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Superseded Vlixes (talk) 11:59, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Bad quality of image. Bad colors. Bad resolutuion. --Vlixes (talk) 12:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Oppose. No need to delete different resolution images. This is unnecessary work for everyone in multiple affected projects. Just inform people that there is a an alternative version in the original file's description and allow editors to decide for themselves. -84user (talk) 12:09, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Better would be to "upload a new version of this file", as is done for File:Tycho_Brahe.JPG. But keep in any case. -84user (talk) 12:19, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- 84user, so do it, because i can't. --Vlixes (talk) 13:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion not necessary. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:08, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
I ask for deletion to create redirection. --Vlixes (talk) 00:24, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: Per above. Superseded by itself is not a valid reason for deletion anyways. --Majora (talk) 19:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
coppivo https://www.peoplelife.ru/38098 Pavel9891 (talk) 17:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Majora (talk) 19:16, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bradford as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-simple logo Regasterios (talk) 19:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:TOO Chile appears to imply that there is a rather lower TOO in Chile. The logo is unused anyways so PCP. --Majora (talk) 19:31, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation, recent bank note. Are the banknotes of Peru freely licensed, like the USA ones? C messier (talk) 12:26, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: see Commons:Currency#Peru . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MiguelAlanCS as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Peru#Currency Regasterios (talk) 18:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Don't know what happened between the previous close and this one but it clearly says that Peru's currency cannot be uploaded here. --Majora (talk) 17:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos and advertisement. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Obvio828.jpg
- File:PackardPanAmerican.jpg
- File:MinicarRSV.jpg
- File:AMCRamblerTarpon.jpg
- File:SirVival4.jpg
- File:SirVival3.jpg
- File:SirVival2.jpg
- File:SirVivalMechanix.jpg
- File:GMXStiletto.jpg
- File:PontiacBansheeXP798.jpg
- File:BuickCenturyCruiser.jpg
- File:BuickBengal.jpg
- File:PontiacClubDeMer.jpg
- File:OldsmobileF88Brochure.jpg
- File:OldsmobileF88.jpg
- File:SaturnCurveconceptside.jpg
- File:SaturnCurveConceptrear.jpg
- File:SaturnCurveconcept.jpg
- File:FordGyronConcept.jpg
- File:PlymouthExpressoConcept.jpg
- File:Ala Kart (custom car) old photo.jpg
- File:Showboat (dragster) old photo.jpg
- File:Glass Slipper (dragster).jpg
- File:Rambunctious (dragster) photo 3.jpg
- File:Rambunctious (dragster) photo 2.jpg
- File:Rambunctious (dragster) photo 1.jpg
- File:Alfa Romeo New York Taxi.jpg
_old_photo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_old_photo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_photo_3.jpg){kind=link}
_photo_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_photo_1.jpg){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete In addition, a trawl is needed for anything (any uploader) sourced from the Flickr account "Insomnia Cured Here" - they all look to be in-copyright scans. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Rambunctious 1 & 3 These are a different Flickr source and are plausibly their own work. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, i'm the uploader of these files. I'm not too familiar with appealing deletion requests here on Commons. What criteria would I need to provide in order for a photo here to remain on Commons? As well, I haven't gone through all the photos thoroughly yet but two photos on this list immediately stand out in particular. Photos 1 and 3 of the Rambunctious dragster both seem to be scans of photos taken by the Flickr uploader (John Lloyd) but dated with the dates of the scans, how would I go about proving they're allowed? TKOIII (talk) 19:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- I haven't gone through all of these. Having looked at them now, I'd agree that 1 & 3 are fine. But the problem is the Flickr user account "Insomnia Cured Here" who is uploading recent scans (recent w.r. to copyright still being in force) and claiming to license them as CC-by-sa. We can't fix that, you can't fix that. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. I assume you assume then that it's the same case with the images in this list uploaded by authors other than "Insomnia Cured Here", or is it just a problem with photos uploaded by him? Because a significant portion of these photos are not from his Flickr. TKOIII (talk) 21:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- I haven't gone through all of these. Having looked at them now, I'd agree that 1 & 3 are fine. But the problem is the Flickr user account "Insomnia Cured Here" who is uploading recent scans (recent w.r. to copyright still being in force) and claiming to license them as CC-by-sa. We can't fix that, you can't fix that. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination mostly, two kept per User:Andy Dingley. Please take more care when uploading from Flickr. --Green Giant (talk) 18:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Rafiqul Islam (educationist)
[edit]Near duplicate of each other.
- File:Professor Dr. Rafiqul Islam in Dhaka 2019 (3).jpg
- File:Professor Dr. Rafiqul Islam in Dhaka 2019 (5).jpg
- File:Professor Dr. Rafiqul Islam in Dhaka 2019 (6).jpg
- File:Professor Dr. Rafiqul Islam in Dhaka 2019 (7).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 18:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Md. Azad Ali
[edit]Near duplicate of each other.
- File:Md. Azad Ali, Bir Protik 02.jpg
- File:Md. Azad Ali, Bir Protik 03.jpg
- File:Md. Azad Ali, Bir Protik 04.jpg
- File:Md. Azad Ali, Bir Protik 06.jpg
- File:Md. Azad Ali, Bir Protik 07.jpg
- File:Md. Azad Ali, Bir Protik 08.jpg
- File:Md. Azad Ali, Bir Protik 09.jpg
আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:20, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 18:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jannatul Ferdous Oishee
[edit]Near duplicate of each other. (i only nominated duplicate one. e.g if there is two duplicate file, i nominated one)
- File:Jannatul Ferdous Oishee (11).jpg
- File:Jannatul Ferdous Oishee (12).jpg
- File:Jannatul Ferdous Oishee (14).jpg
- File:Jannatul Ferdous Oishee (17).jpg
- File:Jannatul Ferdous Oishee (24).jpg
- File:Jannatul Ferdous Oishee (30).jpg
- File:Jannatul Ferdous Oishee (6).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 18:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wakar Hassan
[edit]Near duplicate of each other.
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (10).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (11).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (14).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (15).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (17).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (18).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (4).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (5).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (6).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (7).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (8).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (9).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:27, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (10).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (11).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (14).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (15).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (17).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (18).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (4).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (5).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (6).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (7).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (8).jpg
- File:Wakar Hassan Bir Protik (9).jpg
Hard to deny they do look similar. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 18:24, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation علاء فحصي (talk) 16:33, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- From where?--Anatoliy (talk) 19:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep Looks like own work. This photo can be found in different sites but in lower resolution. Not full resolution.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:51, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Per Anatoliy, uploader name matches depicted name, who seems to be a photographer. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:46, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.gweek.com.ua/2017/04/blog-post_73.html Regasterios (talk) 12:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- I took this photo of Lorraine Thomson in 1973. Since I am the photographer, I believe I can assign CC rights, no?
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:05, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- I took this photo at a Christmas party. I worked with Lorraine on Front Page Challenge.Guinness323 (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 17:05, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Icons of Tashkent Metro lines
[edit]Есть подозрение, что система этих иконок на самом деле копирайченная (используются на маршрутных дисплеях составов типа 81-765.5/766.5/767.5), а эта - плагиат с иконки Сокольнической линии метро Vladislavus (talk) 16:21, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: pd-ineligible. --Krd 17:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Mostly procedural nomination; file was prematurely transferred to Commons with unresolved licensing issues.
This image is a scan of an illustration from a childrens' book, Elemoont by Andrei Lubensky, that was uploaded to English Wikisource by the author along with other images from the book, and the text of the book (Wikisource version was edited by the author).
At the time of upload OTRS confirmation was solicited and received resulting in tickets 2008032110005275, 2008032510017013, 1427529, and 2008032510005044 (I'm going by references found; I don't have OTRS access myself). However, it appears an oversight was made: the OTRS releases cover contributions by the author and one credited illustrator (Dmitry Boyarchuk), but not the second credited illustrator (Alexandr Saphonov).
It seems essentially impossible now to determine what the contributors contributions actually were. The cover image (s:File:Слун англ.jpg) seems likely to have been a collaboration. The internal illustrations, of which this file is one of a series (1, 2, 3), could have been drawn by anyone, including Lubensky (the book's author), but do not appear likely to be collaborative works in any technical sense (they were clearly drawn by a single person). My highly personal and unsubstantiated take is that these were most likely drawn by Lubensky both because they are extremely simple and they are intrinsic to the story in the chapters that they appear in.
The intent to license this work, including illustrations, freely is clear and uncontroversial; so this nom is mainly about the failure to specify in detail the legal author of the internal illustrations or the failure to cover Saphonov's contributions in the OTRS ticket.
In addition, these internal illustrations are extremely simple. They are just numbers and a question mark that have been mirrored and combined with the unmirrored original. There is certainly some creativity there, but, I would assert, it is at best questionable whether it rises above the threshold of originality.
Putting the factors together (clear intent to license freely, at best borderline TOO, problem stemming from a technicality with 2007 OTRS) I would like to see this kept (in which case I will transfer the remaining illustrations here from enWS), but I may be missing something and in any case I think it merits community discussion (hence the nom). Xover (talk) 08:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Srittau: I somehow just knew this was imported by Calvinkulit. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:31, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Xover: isn't this all just one big hoax? Look at that cover. What's up with the eyes? I made them bigger and centered them: https://imgur.com/a/cZxGYTj. See how much better it looks! And those MS Office stars/explosions? How poorly the elephant was cut out? Are we to believe this was the work of a professional, or a prankster who shrunk the eyes of some elephant found in a coloring book? No mention of this work whatsoever to be found with Google besides Wikimedia projects? This just reeks of Urker Vistaart.. (which is a really disgusting dish) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:49, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Possibly. But when I researched this a while back I found enough to substantiate it as at least minimally plausible.Andrey Lubensky (Андрей Лубенский) is a journalist currently writing for ukraina.ru, and Elemoont (Слун, lit. Slun) has artefacts in other databases. The writing is not actually very good (at least in the English translation) so I'm not surprised no critical attention is evident, and provided one accepts the story that it was given away for charitable purposes it could not have provided any commercial success for the author (that might have induced him to write more and gain a reputation as an author).If it had been a new upload today I would have applied a more stringent standard—out of the concern you raise, and because as potential self-publishing it would be out of scope for Wikisource—but we have a lot of grandfathered-in works on enWS and the community there has consistently given them a pass even if far shy of modern policy and standards (to my great frustration, but them's the breaks). --Xover (talk) 10:49, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Possibly. But when I researched this a while back I found enough to substantiate it as at least minimally plausible.Andrey Lubensky (
- Didn't we discuss this somewhere else previously? On Meta or WS? GMGtalk 13:40, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- @GreenMeansGo: m:Talk:OTRS/Archives/2019#Checking scope of OTRS permission. Subsequent to which I raised the issue with the uploader, but have as yet received no response. --Xover (talk) 14:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment for the record, this file File:11texta.jpg is the same image as the one used in The Simpsons episode en:Lisa the Simpson (March 8, 1998). I would say it's TOO so no copyright problem but plagiarism doesn't look for the general case. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:31, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- This file, and the remaining ones at Wikisource, are indeed good candidates for being uncopyrightable as falling below the threshold of originality. However, I would strongly prefer to have some documentable level of consensus for that before transferring the remaining files here. --Xover (talk) 09:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 16:52, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
