Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/11/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 23rd, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 02:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 03:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 02:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 02:23, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 02:23, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 02:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same orientation, same reflections as here: http://www.ruianzy.com/Upload/1516277586.jpg and other locations. Highly unlikely to have been photographed by uploader. 2606:6000:CB81:1700:E058:8CEB:61DA:BF90 05:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: CSD#F1. ~riley (talk) 05:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blank file (Talk/留言) 02:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File page with no file. --Achim (talk) 09:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anjhely Bellido (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promo on es.wiki

(Talk/留言) 02:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, self promotion out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope (Talk/留言) 02:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 12:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 02:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 02:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 02:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 02:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 02:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. (Talk/留言) 02:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for self promo on en.wiki. (Talk/留言) 02:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 13:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:MC JW Marriott 澳門銀河 Galaxy Macau mall The Promenade shop Kate Spade New York Jan 2017 IX1.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:MC 澳門 Macau 萬豪酒店 JW Marriott Hotel room 28th Floor view Saturday morning November 2019 SS2 03.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:MC 澳門 Macau JW Marriott 萬豪酒店 hotel restaurant 自助餐廳 buffet breakfast food November 2019 SS2 01.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saratrout (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saratrout (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Warriorashwani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:53, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file Partial suspension (talk) 01:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope GPSLeo (talk) 17:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 18:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif shows this image is from google, may not be the origin uploader's own work, requires OTRS authorization. 轻语者 (talk) 08:26, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 17:21, 23 November 2019 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE by non-contributors) --Krdbot 19:52, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non PD work (unknown translator death - H. R. Winlan. Matlin (talk) 16:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:04, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 21:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. These are all derivatives of modern architecture (and a sign) in France. France's Freedom of Panorama exemption is non-commercial only, which is not compatible with our licensing policy. --Storkk (talk) 12:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

More images that violate France's lack of FOP

Elisfkc (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This in no way is the extent of all of this user's violations of FOP, nor did I check for who designed each building/bridge/sign. This is merely the extent of the structures that look to be too modern to be in the public domain in France that the user has uploaded from 2016-05-17 through the time of the nomination. Elisfkc (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I could see a de minimis argument for keeping a bunch of these... I'll look more in detail when I have some time. Storkk (talk) 19:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Êtes-vous sérieux ? je vois qu'une cabine téléphonique de type "France Télécom" est considérée comme soumise à copyright. Demandez l'avis d'administrateurs français avant de vous lancer dans ces suppressions (Are you serious? I see that a phone box of type(chap) "France Télécom" is considered as subjected(submitted) to copyright. Ask for the opinion(notice) of French administrators(directors) before throwing(launching) to you in these abolitions(deletions)). --François GOGLINS (talk) 13:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion for so many files in one nomination, especially with nothing better than suspicion of age. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No COM:FOP in France, sculptor's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:08, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above, minus 2. ~riley (talk) 03:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No COM:FOP in France (again). When user will understand?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

Copyrighted work by Édouard Manchuelle (d. 1984), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

Who is the sculptor? Permission?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:44, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 02:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

No COM:FOP in France. Who are the sculptors? Permission of their heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The author of the war memorial of Resistance is unknown and it is the municipality of Nogent-sur-Marne. Hence, it can't be deleted. Besides, the war memorial was made by Charles Billon in 1926 and died before 1950.
The request was made without any check and I am a bit circumspect about that. Chabe01 (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To my knowledge there's no architect or sculptor named Charles billon who worked for the City of Nogent-sur-Marne. May uploader disclose his source? The same way it's very unlikely that the author of a 1950's work paid by a municipality is anonym. Besides it's up to the uploader to provide accurate informations proving that the work is public domain, not to the nominator. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

Derivative works of non-free signs/posters. Some files have had blurring applied, but the extent of the blurring is not sufficient to remove the non-free copyrightable authorship. The copyrighted works form a significant portion of the derivative works and are intentionally included in the images, so COM:DM France does not apply. There is no FoP in France.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chabe01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The building shown is w:fr:Maison des Hommes et des Techniques, built in 1917 and authored by René Ménard, who died in 1958. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in France (see COM:FOP France), this architectural work is still under his posthumous copyright and is unfree. Copyright expires on January 1, 2029 (70+1 years after his death), at which point these photos will be restored/undeleted.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel Pradilla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:53, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of COM:SCOPE. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonnystanciu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is unused, not Edisonunhunybvtfbyg's own work, and is out of scope. Nutshinou Talk! 16:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Adobe stock image, oldest tineye ref of September 2012. --Achim (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with no meaningful description. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:49, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Video inclued elements and icons which are copyrighted. Might be de minimis since the video's main subject is the gecko, however previous similar DRs has been closed as delete due to the intentional inclusion (and set up) of this work. to include the full screen including the copyrighted elements. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Josvea what's your opinion about the following icons, there are many more.....

-- Eatcha (talk) 15:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Those are either freely licensed (File:VLC Icon.svg being GPL and not compatible with CC) or public domain. But there are many more icons such as the Notepad, File explorer, the actual stylized Windows icons (and not the "mockup" of the Media Player you've linked above), the Excel icons (not including the actual UI of the program and OS which might be copyrightable). I think it is worth actually discussing. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This image has been protected above. Jkg1997 (talkcontribsCA) 16:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Huh, that is not a reason to either keep or delete a file on copyright grounds (non sequitur). It is currently protected due to it being on the main page of Commons. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:26, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note: I have stricken the above "vote" as it is no valid reason for keep or deletion. ~riley (talk) 19:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page. Striking out text constitutes a change in meaning, and should only be done by the user who wrote it or as otherwise provided in this talk page guideline." (en:Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#EDIT) Contrary to other sections of this platform like COM:FPC or Commons:Administrators/Requests, the final decision here is not done by a bot or based on an exact pourcentage pro/against. A human will evaluate the consensus. Just let Jkg1997 strike their own vote if they like, but DO NOT change the meaning of their contribution. Perhaps they have another reason to vote {{Keep}}, and in any case users should be notified. When we disagree with someone here, we just reply below, asking questions or contesting the reason, using indentation. No need to strike anything. This is a discussion -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As I understand this vote, which is indented on Eatcha's comment above, it is an implicit support this opinion, or keep: per Eatcha (to compensate for the lack of vote of the previous review). The additional note can be interpreted as a superfluous warning, if the DR is seen as completely unjustified, this says "the file is protected against any further attack" (media of the day) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:11, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
English Wikipedia guidelines do not apply to Commons - we follow guidelines voted in by our community, however, I respect your opinion. Rationale for keeping or deleting should not be left to interpretation, @Jkg1997: is encouraged to express his rationale for why this file should be kept or deleted if he wishes for his "keep" argument to have value. ~riley (talk) 04:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Erwan Corre (talk) 19:26, 23 November 2019 (UTC) Je propose que quelqu'un reprenne la vidéo en floutant les éléments litigieux...[reply]
I propose that someone resume the video by blurring the disputed items — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erwan Corre (talk • contribs)
  •  Speedy Not only de minimis, but also these logos are very simple geometrical shapes, not valid for copyright (Template:PD-shape). Speedy because this is a candidature for WLS, occurring this month, and the DR template may affect the fair evaluation by the jury -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Speedy keeps should only ever be done if a DR is clearly opened in error (or snowball chance). The icons are not all "geometrical shapes". The fields in the excel document, sure, but the desktop background shown on the right side, the different icons in the dock as well as on the desktop, different small interface icons in the program are all different individual icons which may be above TOO, and put together may also be copyrighted as a whole.
I've raised this as a potential copyright issue, and should not be closed before the 7 day period. The fact that a file is in a competition or not is not a reason to keep a file. We should discuss the copyright, and not care about where the file is used or anything like that.
Despite the gecko being the main subject, the fact that a computer mouse is also a main subject, it caused the screens' content to become secondary subjects, which makes the video it to be a semi-Commons:Screenshot --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:37, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is not Microsoft Excel but OpenOffice, an open-source software (Category:OpenOffice.org screenshots). Which icon is disputed, exactly? Please be precise. The gecko is the main subject, the video is not so large, the icons are all extremely small, invisible in detail, shaking with the camera, and moreover they are hosted in high resolution on Commons. What is the problem, seriously? Hence my vote. Watching again the video in full, there's nothing on the right side of the screen. The background is black. We have {{Trademark}} and {{De minimis}} -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Eatcha: You have clearly identified why you think this file should be speedy closed, but can you please expand on what grounds you feel that this request should be closed as kept? Although you have asked the OP's opinion on linked images above, you have not made any comment on if the elements or icons are de minimis. ~riley (talk) 04:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    ~riley 80% of the screen is a spreadsheet document (the software Apache OpenOffice is licensed Apache License 2.0 ), 5% is other freely licensed Icons. We are left with 15% unfree part (If we consider the background is unfree, but User:Basile Morin is one of the finest photographers on wikimedia commons maybe he took that picture himself, if yes more 92% is freely licensed ).

Here are some files tagged with de minimis:

By looking at these, the video clearly falls under de minimis. -- Eatcha (talk) 05:11, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Speedy closure - For the elements or icons shown that are not copyrighted (i.e. COM:TOO), it is quite clear that any other copyright concerns are addressed by de minimis. This DR has served its purpose in documenting the copyright of elements or icons that are in the background. Having performed a comparison to case studies of similar images, including the DRs linked above, I see no evident copyright concern that requires this file be further scrutinized. While this file being featured as Media of the Day is not rationale for keep, it is a contributing factor in speedy closing this discussion. ~riley (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Furqaanis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 04:30, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Furqaanis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fair-use (movie poster)

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 15:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 17:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 21:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file not used within own user space (used on Laila Nur Salim's userpage on id.wiki) (Talk/留言) 02:32, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no edits since 2018, not an active user. --Gbawden (talk) 07:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused chemical structural formula with opaque (white) background! Superseded by File:4-Aminoacetanilid Structural Formula V2.svg with transparent background (uploaded by the same author). Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 11:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:52, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 10:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

panorama Mostafameraji (talk) 22:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Walkeru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:39, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
...это все мои авторские фотографии, что Вас смущает ? Walkeru (Walkeru) (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walkeru (talk • contribs) 12:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Walkeru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for statues.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Walkeru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Low-re vintage photos: unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, кажется мне, что загрузчик сам находится на этих фотографиях, значит, они не собственная работа. Нужно получить OTRS-разрешение от фотографов (русская версия COM:OTRS/ru). Иногда лицензия скажет, что автор 70 лет умер – это конечно ерунда. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

third party data Igouros (talk) 08:43, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   19:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake Zkovar (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:09, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Shubham karosiya (talk) 16:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deletion requested by uploader within 7 days of uploading. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:08, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from https://www.transplantsystems.co.nz/field/semi-automatic-planters ? Sunpriat (talk) 07:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:21, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Explanation is needed about how the image is in project scope. In addition, maybe the text is protected with copyright? How old the text is and who is the author? Taivo (talk) 12:47, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP. --Sealle (talk) 08:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo about non-notable person, out of project scope. Uploader is indefinitely blocked in en.wiki for advertizing and self-promotion. Taivo (talk) 14:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader seems to be Mikho Mosulishvili (File:Mikho Mosulishvili -2017.jpg), not Nika Sabulua. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:28, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:28, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mimosfinn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Almost everything by user seems copyvio. These uploads must be verified too.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:25, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mimosfinn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 18:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Datei sollte nicht veröffentlicht werden. Wikifriend04 (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:45, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked as own work from 2019, but subject died in 1990s). Larry Hockett (talk) 19:01, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work Larry Hockett (talk) 19:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:10, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:10, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:10, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. User has uploaded loads of images that each differ completely, many of them tha can quite easily be found on the internet. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of COM:SCOPE. Hasleytalk 19:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:35, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a derivative work of a 3D object that is uploaded from Internet with no photographer's permission. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:28, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:34, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple undefined stereocenters. File:Gonadorelin.svg has them DMacks (talk) 21:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:34, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here is. Its the same image but without the white background. --Gindomarlo (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete It is just a photo used by the YouTube channel Todo Noticias, to illustrate the person. Not own content of Todo Noticias. Frodar (talk) 23:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --Sealle (talk) 08:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 14:43, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:26, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mis-positioned "H3C" (bond needs to go to the C not H). Have File:Midazolam 200.svg DMacks (talk) 15:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly written methyl group (bond appears to go to the H, not the C, of "the group"). Have File:Midazolam 200.svg. DMacks (talk) 15:26, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:21, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. OTRS-permission from author Salka is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:20, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:16, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:16, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MeetMyTour (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Random unidentified scenery, solely for promotion of some tourism company.

DMacks (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:13, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Janeser12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:12, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation as the image is a screenshot from the game Dead by Daylight. Mps (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:06, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a likely chemical (ammonium is probably more acidic than the di-alpha CH2 of malonate). Refs and links in previous use-cases were consistent that the title compound was not the enolate form. Replaced by File:Diammonium malonate.png. DMacks (talk) 04:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 11:44, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious composite (license violation) and not correct structurally (see en:Ammonium paratungstate) DMacks (talk) 04:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 11:44, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemical nonsense: NaI is ionic, and representing it as such is trivial in plaintext/wikitext DMacks (talk) 04:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 11:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorised media. Commons is not a private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:23, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:46, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a crop offshoot at https://www.sounderatheart.com/platform/amp/2018/8/11/17678092/raul-ruidiaz-mural Ytoyoda (talk) 11:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:45, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be taken from https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nKORsihytlU&feature=youtu.be Ytoyoda (talk) 11:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:45, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot of a video. The user’s other uploads are all copyvios Ytoyoda (talk) 11:47, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:45, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free image: this image is captured from TV program. 新幹線 (talk) 12:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, previously published in Facebook. Own work is not sure. OTRS-permission from photographer is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 11:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, have clearer (SVG) in Category:Fluoride ion, or heck, could even use plain-text. DMacks (talk) 04:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:21, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Andrei Merlotti 62.10.165.32 06:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 23:05, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted by Folhapress, as seen here: https://noticias.uol.com.br/politica/listas/brasil-teve-vice-assumindo-a-presidencia-ja-no-1-governo-veja-os-7-casos.htm Paladinum2 (talk) 23:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I blocked the uploader for a week due to repeated copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Vip Ankit sahani (talk) 04:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Vip Ankit sahani (talk) 04:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per uploader request; unused personal photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing all 6 stereochemical details. Replaced by File:Trichoviridin.png DMacks (talk) 04:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Will it be better to request for an "update" at COM:GL/I? (Talk/留言)
The .png replacement is high quality, so I don't think creating an equivalent .svg should be a high priority. ChemNerd (talk) 17:57, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per discussion. --Leyo 22:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None free map in Japan Batholith (talk) 12:40, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:09, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumed-nonfree corporate logo that seems above TOO, and the main purpose (per description content) is to promote it. DMacks (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a date on the bottom, it's likely in public domain Eatcha (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Eatcha: File:Шахтерка.jpg - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:22, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept license changed to reflect copyright status of original painting rather than photo per PD-Art. Painter died 1930; PD. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:06, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a poster -- no indication poster is copyright-free Renata3 (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Clear DW problem. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Blatant false claims by uploader, false license. (Might have been PD, but would need factual information about the photo to make a determination.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Fair use (Fair use)
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Same problem with File:WW Nullnummer.jpg

Zur Erklärung: Die Wechselwirkung wurde mit einer kollektiv arbeitenden Redaktion erstellt. Demzufolge gab es auch kein individuelles Copyright auf das Titelbild ("gezeichneter Kopf") der Nr. 0. Als offizieller Inhaber des Verlages Reinhard Behnisch, gegründet im Sommer 1978 zur Herausgabe der Zeitschrift, gehe ich davon aus, dass ich das Bild auch nutzen kann. Reinhard Behnisch Behnisch (talk) 12:03, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, derivative work. (If you are not the artist, you do not have rights to license the image. If the artwork is out of copyright, provide verifiable information showing that to be so.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:22, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 19:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per uploader request; unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal file, out of project scope. Hasleytalk 16:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a poster -- no indication poster is copyright-free Renata3 (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No referential integrity (uploaded by mistake) Therewillbehotcake (talk) 19:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded wrongly Dick Falkentoft (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posted as my work by mistake, page has been deleted Surajkoll (talk) 21:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

do not have source that shows the license of the image Paladinum2 (talk) 17:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:35, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an image taken off the internet. There is no indication that the source blog page's author is actually the photographer (the ship sank in 1990), and no indication of a license there anyways. We would need to know more about where the photo came from. Tineye did find another copy from 2014 so there is likely some other source. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is there any educational use for this? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked (and not the subject named in the description) Larry Hockett (talk) 02:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless for an encyclopedia, very inaccurate, roughly drawn, use on a page is only the review page where we decided it was worthless to display in an article so shouldn't be a reason for keeping IJReid (talk) 02:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

agree--Bubblesorg (talk) 06:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
so, are we going to delete it or what? Why aren't they enough people here?--Bubblesorg (talk) 18:52, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Clarifications for admins: The person above who just agreed to deletion is the author of the image itself ... so deletion is in order. IJReid (talk) 22:57, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To jest podrobiony bezprawnie herb Biskupa Marka Solarczyka. 178.42.17.243 10:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To nie jest herb Biskupa Marka tylko marna podróba i naruszenie praw autorskich. Proszę tego nie rozpowszechniać i usunąć ze strony bo to wstyd. 178.42.17.243 10:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User who uploaded the map said here that is not his own work and he uploaded as if it is. I asked him to put the author's name and license, but nothing happened. Renato de carvalho ferreira (talk) 20:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David Darkthrone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

watermarked.

(Talk/留言) 02:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality; hundreds of better photos of the same subject MPF (talk) 01:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete. Entirely replaced by File:OP-CRPD-members.svg. No reason to keep. Ratherous (talk) 01:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete. Entirely replaced by File:ICCPR-OP1 members.svg. No reason to keep. Ratherous (talk) 02:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:42, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 05:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 05:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are 2004 sculptures. The images infringe on the sculptor's copyright. There is no FoP for sculpture in the United States.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:48, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roman Bojda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official documents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roman Bojda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:39, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 12:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When it comes to C-SPAN footage from committee hearings, I thought only commercial use was prohibited and that non-commercial use was okay per C-SPAN's copyright & licensing policy? Regards, AzureCitizen (talk) 14:32, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That is exactly why it should be deleted. NC license is prohibited on Commons. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 20:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Valid point. This should be moved to Wikipedia, assuming it meets WP:NFCC. - MrX 12:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As he is still alive, this photo does not qualify for NFCC, unless somehow how he looked during the testimony is discussed in the article. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 20:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is of me and I never gave any right for it to be here 2600:6C63:647F:E51E:ACEC:D911:39C3:6687 04:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. While I'm not satisfied about the identity of the anon nominator, this does fit with similar images by the same uploader since deleted; image not in use, and Commons has better alternative images to illustrate the subject. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:53, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 12:39, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 12:39, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 12:39, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 12:39, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage, if not on the House or Senate floor, is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 12:39, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Danyele nominated the redirect for speedy deletion. It has been open couple of days and nobody wants neither to accept nor decline it, so I create a regular DR. Taivo (talk) 13:49, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 12:42, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Danyele nominated the redirect for speedy deletion. It has been open couple of days and nobody wants neither to accept nor decline it, so I create a regular DR. Taivo (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 12:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Danyele nominated the redirect for speedy deletion. It has been open couple of days and nobody wants neither to accept nor decline it, so I create a regular DR. Taivo (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MB-one (talk) 12:41, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Бадави (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photos of domesticated cats.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and Category:Pája Čubrovka. Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in unapproved self-promotional article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Batholith as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This file from something website. Please serch by Google Images. See also other deletion requests (commons)(jawiki)
Converted by me to regular DR, as there is no convincing evidence for a copyvio; all external hits are later that our upload. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No response on jawiki. --Batholith (talk) 12:14, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per c&c. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Описание не соответствует действительности Андрей Лу (talk) 21:23, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:52, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not know whether or not this counts as de minimis as the administrator-added tag notes. The file name and description explicitly reference the use of characters from the Oreimo manga, so I doubt this is an incidental depiction of the characters. The other images in the category have a reasonable basis for being part of a larger work, but they're front-and-center in this one, and I would like to have confirmation on whether this is permissible. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 02:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:53, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by me and I want it to be deleted now. P.S. This file is not used in any article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renamed user Ad1527gwi9272g (talk • contribs) 06:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 Delete @Explicit: Unused /Leonel Sohns 17:33, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no new reasons given. --P 1 9 9   16:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by me and I want it to be deleted now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renamed user Ad1527gwi9272g (talk • contribs) 06:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by me and I want it to be deleted now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renamed user Ad1527gwi9272g (talk • contribs) 06:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:49, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by me and I want it to be deleted now. PinnuDas 06:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renamed user Ad1527gwi9272g (talk • contribs) 06:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by me and I want it to be deleted now. P.S. This file is not used in any article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renamed user Ad1527gwi9272g (talk • contribs) 06:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 Delete @Explicit: Unused /Leonel Sohns 10:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   15:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by me and I want it to be deleted now. P.S. This file is not used in any article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renamed user Ad1527gwi9272g (talk • contribs) 06:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
 Delete @Explicit: Unused /Leonel Sohns 10:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no new reasons given. --P 1 9 9   15:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by me and I want it to be deleted now. P.S. This file is not used in any article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renamed user Ad1527gwi9272g (talk • contribs) 06:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded by me and I want it to be deleted now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renamed user Ad1527gwi9272g (talk • contribs) 06:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 01:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In France, there is no freedom of panorama 219.78.191.85 15:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:45, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In France, there is no freedom of panorama 219.78.191.85 15:03, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:44, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the beginning of the video it's the logo of the true copyright holder, Agencia Efe. Frodar (talk) 23:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete PER NOM. Eldistritotv is becoming an increasingly problematic youtube channel.--Asqueladd (talk) 00:49, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:10, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage, if not on the House or Senate floor, is not in the public domain. There is no evidence this video was recorded by a White House employee. This is most likely a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage, if not on the House or Senate floor, is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage, if not on the House or Senate floor, is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by RandomUserGuy1738 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Amy Coney Barrett official portrait.jpg. Requires DR (PNG -> JPG), but this file should be deleted and redirected to File:Amy Coney Barrett official portrait.jpg IMO: blurred compared to the JPG. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage, if not on the House or Senate floor, is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:24, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage, if not on the House or Senate floor, is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:28, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage, if not on the House or Senate floor, is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:29, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage, if not on the House or Senate floor, is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:31, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:32, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage, if not on the House or Senate floors, is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CSPAN footage from committee hearings is not in the public domain. This is a copyright violation. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 13:35, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and precedent. --Majora (talk) 02:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted newspapers.
Converted by me to regular DR, as this case merits a discussion. Sure, newspaper content is copyrighted. However, this prototypical image shows smaller parts of several newspapers. Could this influence the legitimacy of this image? -- Túrelio (talk) 10:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say any copyrighted content is de minimis. It is also in scope as it illustrates Category:Newspaper stands in Taiwan (which does not exist yet!).--Roy17 (talk) 17:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I'm generally wary of de minimis claims but this seems to meet that standard. --Majora (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source for this image says, "(Photo Credit: Courtesy of the University of Arkansas)". There is no evidence that this was ever published without notice or that this is a US Army photograph. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 16:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:24, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. 2A02:2168:A00:44CB:0:0:0:1 18:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. There exists ru:Ассоциация юристов России and the file can be used there. Taivo (talk) 20:10, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
But this is not a reward by Ассоциация юристов России (there's a mistake in the description). So this file cannot be used there. 2A02:2168:A01:CCE0:0:0:0:1 16:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: permission of the 3D artwork author is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of pre-1946 publication required for it to be PD in Russia+US PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request, replaced with SVG version DiegoAma (talk) 05:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is usseles and as file contains a lot of mistakes SlavicSpirits (talk) 10:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:25, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was taken on September 4, 1957. The Arkansas National Guard was not nationalized by Eisenhower until September 23. Therefore, even if the image was taken by an Arkansas National Guard photographer, he was not a Federal employee at that time. Therefore the copyright belongs to the state of Arknsas and is not PD. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extraction from File:USSR, Jack and fortress flag of naval fortresses 1964.svg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I also add File:Random params 2.jpg, File:Random params 3.jpg and File:Random params 3.jpg to the nomination, they are copies of File:Random 1.png, File:Random 2.png, File:Random 3.1.png and File:Random 4.png. Nutshinou Talk! 15:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Coffeeandcrumbs. --Majora (talk) 21:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Billy Glenn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images from patents. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per {{PD-US-patent}} only those published before March 1, 1989 are PD. All those after are likely copyrighted. --Majora (talk) 21:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). Also out of Commons:Project scope. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep it's a good illustration of what Smart Glass, or Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal (PDLC), can do.--Roy17 (talk) 18:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Roy17. It is even now used on hewiki's smart glass article. --Majora (talk) 21:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nizarbk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of pre-1946 PUBLICATION required for PD status in US and Russia PlanespotterA320 (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:25, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:53, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Same arguments for keeping as here. Source clearly states that it is under CC BY 4.0. --URunICon (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:25, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of pre-1946 publication required for this photo to be PD in Russia+US PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of pre-1946 publication required for this photo to be PD in Russia+US PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of pre-1946 publication required for this photo to be PD in Russia+US PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:27, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-RU-exempt does not permit cropping postal covers like this (see footnotes) PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:27, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Consejo_de_Ministros_presidido_por_Adolfo_Suárez_(1980-09-09).jpg IngenieroLoco (talk) 21:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not find the photo on source site, but we have very similar file:LUCAS PALACIOS.jpg, where the license review successed. Out of project scope as near-duplicate? Taivo (talk) 12:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright is fine. Deleted as a duplicate of a better version. --Majora (talk) 15:50, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no indication of pre-1946 publication required for PD status in US+Russia PlanespotterA320 (talk) 04:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although this image appears on a US Army web site, the credit line reads "Photo Credit: courtesy of University of Arkansas at Little Rock archives", so there is no evidence that it was not taken by one of the many newspaper photographers on the scene. There is also no evidence that it appeared before 1989 without notice. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does not appear at the cited source. The only image that does appear there has the credit line "Photo Credit: courtesy of University of Arkansas at Little Rock archives". There is no evidence that this was not taken by one of the many newspaper photographers present there. There is also no evidence that it appeared anywhere without notice before 1989. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete. Entirely replaced by File:OPCAT members.svg. No reason to keep. Ratherous (talk) 02:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The format is quite the same. Just worse quality. --Ratherous (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: old file, no reason for deletion. --Krd 18:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete. Entirely replaced by File:CAT members.svg. No reason to keep. Ratherous (talk) 03:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The format is quite the same. Just worse quality. --Ratherous (talk) 07:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: old file, no reason for deletion. --Krd 18:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - there is a file of the statue without the tourist, see File:Volendam.2010 (145) (8171346706).jpg JopkeB (talk) 12:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's one photograph that I uploaded as a part of a series from Flickr with a valid copyright tag. I didn't know that 'out of scope' is a valid reason on Commons to delete something. I thought we use the template {{Personality rights}} in stead. Am I not correct there? Ymnes (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See my comment on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Volendam.2010_(147)_(8171344490).jpg#File%3AVolendam.2010_%28147%29_%288171344490%29.jpg JopkeB (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - there is a file of the statue without the tourist, see File:Volendam.2010 (145) (8171346706).jpg JopkeB (talk) 12:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's one photograph that I uploaded as a part of a series from Flickr with a valid copyright tag. I didn't know that 'out of scope' is a valid reason on Commons to delete something. I thought we use the template {{Personality rights}} in stead. Am I not correct there? Ymnes (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is not about copyrights. It is about the project scope of WikiMediaCommons. One of the requirements is that a file "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose", see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Project_scope#Must_be_realistically_useful_for_an_educational_purpose. Out of scope are files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose, such as photos of yourself and your friends or holiday snaps. And that is exactly what this photo looks like to me. That is why I nominated it for deletion. JopkeB (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Indication "prise par moi-même" mais la source est un iPhone 5 alors que la personne est morte depuis 1993 Pierrette13 (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La photo de Gladys Swain est authentique. J'ai pris cette photo moi-même quelques années avant son décès avec un appareil argentique de l'époque. J'ai rephotographié cette ancienne photo avec mon iphone5 en la recadrant sur son portrait pour l'isoler du reste de la photo, ainsi j'ai pu la numériser dans le but de l'insérer sur sa page Wiki. Gladys Swain était mon amie et celle de mon mari Alain Chevrier qui a travaillé avec elle en psychiatrie et en histoire de la psychiatrie. Nous avons trouvé dommage que son image soit absente et nous tenons à la communiquer. J'espère qu'elle sera rétablie.
Dr Annie Germain, épouse Chevrier.
--Anniegermain (talk) 11:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Il faut faire une demande sur OTRS, --Pierrette13 (talk) 18:12, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have File:Trinquete no watermark.png, the exact same file, but without the watermark. Nutshinou Talk! 14:53, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 19:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File taken from here: http://www.impresedilinews.it/tegole-di-copertura-in-eta-romana-questioni-di-forma-posa-in-opera-e-impiego/ Carnby (talk) 23:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 19:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:PACKAGING

Given its use, this is about the fly. I could go on a blurring streak here (and any admin who considers deleting this image should ask me that instead), but I think the packaging is actually de minimis here. The fly also makes this image unsuitable to illustrate any packaging. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: border case, perhaps blurring was the better choice. --Krd 10:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file from something website. however not come up on Google Images. This user is not willing to protect copyright. A request for deletion has also been submitted on the Japanese Wikipedia[5]. Batholith (talk) 10:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No response on jawiki. --Batholith (talk) 12:13, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that picture has been ever published. Original source, please. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The original source is unknown. But Dr Ali Ibrahim was ministr of health (1940-1941) and died in 1947. It's in public domain in Egypt.--Ashashyou (talk) 22:10, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of publication, which is required by COM:PUB. --ƏXPLICIT 03:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashashyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW, permission required

Didym (talk) 22:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - except two images whose copyrightable content is De Minimis, and one image cropped. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashashyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that picture has been ever published. Original source, please.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

as indicated in all files. The original author is unknown. All photos are in public domain in Egypt. The first photo for example was published by Ismail Serageldin (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ismail_Serageldin) grandson of Dr Ali Ibrahim at his official page on Facebook. I think Facebook and Twitter are treated as pintrust and other websites. Again all the photos have unknown author are in public domain in Egypt. It's practically nearly impossible to reach the original author for my capacity. I have made all efforts to try to teach other sources or the author, but didn't succeed. Kindly, unless you can find an original source or data about the author, it is unfair to delete it. Don't delete based on suspicion. Photos are in public domain in Egypt. Regards,--Ashashyou (talk) 22:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ashashyou: An image published 2013 is not public domain in Egypt. If published earlier please provide evidence by modifying the source. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The person in the photo has died in 1947. The photos depicted him in official Royal uniform. He was not allowed to wear such a uniform before being appointed as a minister of health. He served as minister of health between 1940-1941. The photo has been shot anytime between 1940-1947. That is what i mean. The author of the photo is the one who shot the photo, not the one who has put it online. The photographer is unknown. So according to Egyptian law it is in public domain. You can check {{PD-Egypt}} for end of copyright of unknown authors. Regards. --Ashashyou (talk) 16:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No there's a confusion betweed creation and publication: Egyptian law and template above you refer to always talks about publication, not creation and there's no evidence that image has been published before 2013 so please have Ismail Serageldin sending a permission via COM:OTRS since it's quite likely he inherited of this picture. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The evidence that the photo was publicized before 2013 is that the person in the photo has died in 1947 and has signed it in 1946. The photo was taken inbetween 1940 and 1946.--Ashashyou (talk) 07:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of publication prior to 2013, which is required by COM:PUB. --ƏXPLICIT 03:25, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashashyou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGING.

Ruthven (msg) 15:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this should be kept, but would like to clarify license status. Currently tagged {{PD-USGov}}, which is definitely wrong. Source Flickr says PD, but account bio says "Any photos used from this Flickr account must be credited appropriately: 'Photo courtesy of City of Indianapolis | Mayor's Office'". Is this a non-copyright restriction, so we can assume PD-author? Alex Cohn (talk) 18:51, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --ƏXPLICIT 03:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit: kindly remove del request from the pages File:P090819AZS (48727861583).jpg as per mentioned.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Malo-Renault died in 1938; therefore his work was under copyright in France until 2008 and does not meet the requirements under URAA to be free of copyright in the USA until at least 2020. Note that I have selected only those works with unknown dates or those after 1924. Works from 1923 and earlier are PD-USA.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that the first item is an article written by Émile_Dacier, who died in 1952. The article will be under copyright in France until 1/1/2023.
Hello Jameslwoodward,as far as I understand, a 2D work should be in the Public Domain 70 years after its author's death, in France. Although Wikimedia Commons servers are in the USA, the French licensing should prevail, doesn't it? Regards, --Daehan (talk) 09:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No. Because Commons computer servers are in the United States, all images on Commons must be PD or freely licensed in both the country of origin and the United States. See Commons:Licensing where it says:
Wikimedia Commons only accepts media
  • that are explicitly freely licensed, or
  • that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work.
.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 11:46, 4 April 2020 (UTC) Restored the last of the four -- t is a 1906 work, therefore PD in the USA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The trailer does indeed have a CC license on Youtube, but I have heavy doubts that MTV indeed has got the permission to release scenes from a Sony Pictures movie under a free license. Kam Solusar (talk) 17:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment MTV International official YouTube seems to have had it online under that license since April. Releasing a promotional trailer under a CC license is unusual, but seems possible and may not be bad marketing. Media is in use. Anyone have ideas as to who to contact regarding confirmation of stated license? (I have commented on the YouTube video asking.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete MTV is not the copyright holder of that work.--BevinKacon (talk) 17:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Copyright is held by the producers, Columbia et al, not MTV. --Green Giant (talk) 11:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]