Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/11/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Please send permission using COM:OTRS, exif says facebook. I don't think we should allow nudes, without exif if uploaded by a newbie.
- File:23 year old male with an erection.jpg
- File:Public masturbation.jpg
- File:Erect penis of a 23 year old male.jpg
Eatcha (talk) 03:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. ~riley (talk) 05:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Jamal9111 (talk) 06:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept : non administrator clousure. "Because it is" clearly either an new user (with 8 edits) making some rookie mistake or an vandal account. Either no valid reason given to delete and files has no problems. Disclamer: File was uploaded by myself. Tm (talk) 07:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Jamal9111 (talk) 06:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept : non administrator clousure. "Because it is" clearly either an new user (with 8 edits) making some rookie mistake or an vandal account. Either no valid reason given to delete and files has no problems. Tm (talk) 07:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Obviously copyrighted image inappropriately uploaded to Commons TAnthony (talk) 15:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Movie poster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Obviously copyrighted image improperly uploaded to Commons TAnthony (talk) 15:21, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Movie poster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Obviously copyrighted image improperly uploaded to Commons TAnthony (talk) 15:21, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Movie poster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Obviously copyrighted image improperly uploaded to Commons TAnthony (talk) 15:21, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Movie poster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Copy of File:Copper Riot - Ernest Lissner.jpg with wrong title and description: that's not a Salt Riot, and the author isn't Nekrasov (source in Russian). Facenapalm (talk) 15:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 4343donyas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:IMG-20191106-WA0004.jpg
- File:IMG-20191106-WA0007.jpg
- File:IMG-20191106-WA0006.jpg
- File:IMG-20191106-WA0000.jpg
- File:IMG-20191106-WA0001.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination out of COM:SCOPE. --FitIndia Talk Mail 19:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hayk Barseghyan Photographer (talk · contribs)
[edit]All uploads claimed as own work, but it seems many are stolen from wallpaperswide.com website, as can be seen from the lack of meta data and the watermark at the bottom right.
So I have only listed those missing authors name in meta data.
A very unique case, where it seems some good photos are actually uploaders own work! Of the 74 uploads, 50 are missing authors name in meta data.
- File:Yerevan Opera Theatre building, Armenia - Ա. Սպենդիարյանի անվան օպերայի և բալետի ազգային ակադեմիական թատրոնի շենք, Հայաստան 02.jpg
- File:Yerevan Opera Theatre building, Armenia - Ա. Սպենդիարյանի անվան օպերայի և բալետի ազգային ակադեմիական թատրոնի շենք, Հայաստան 01.jpg
- File:Nature of Vayots Dzor Province, Armenia - Վայոց ձորի մարզի բնություն, Հայաստան.jpg
- File:Window in Spitak city, Armenia - Պատուհան Սպիտակ քաղաքում.jpg
- File:Spandaryan Reservoir, Armenia - Սպանդարյանի ջրամբար, Հայաստան.jpg
- File:Holy Saviour's Church, Gyumri, Armenia - Գյումրու Սուրբ Ամենափրկիչ եկեղեցի, Հայաստան 02.jpg
- File:Building in Gyumri, Armenia - Շինություն Գյումիում, Հայաստան.jpg
- File:Nature of Shaghap village, Armenia - Շաղափ գյուղի բնություն.jpg
- File:Panoramic view of Meghri, Armenia - Մեղրի քաղաքի համայնապատկեր, Հայաստան.jpg
- File:Karen Demirchyan Complex - Կարեն Դեմիրճյանի անվան մարզահամերգային համալիր.jpg
- File:Square In Gyumri, Armenia - Հրապարակ Գյումրում, Հայաստան.jpg
- File:Mount Harsnasar - Հարսնասար լեռ.jpg
- File:South Caucasus Railway's train - Հարավկովկասյան երկաթուղու գնացք.jpg
- File:Haykadzor Lusavorich church - Հայկաձորի Սուրբ Գրիգոր Լուսավորիչ եկեղեցի.jpg
- File:Mount Khustup - Խուստուփ լեռ 06.jpg
- File:Mount Khustup - Խուստուփ լեռ 05.jpg
- File:Mount Khustup - Խուստուփ լեռ 04.jpg
- File:Mount Khustup - Խուստուփ լեռ 03.jpg
- File:Mount Khustup - Խուստուփ լեռ 02.jpg
- File:Mount Khustup - Խուստուփ լեռ 01.jpg
- File:Cave Lion, Artsakh - Ժայռակերտ առյուծ, Արցախ.jpg
- File:Teghut forest - Թեղուտի անտառ 03.jpg
- File:Teghut forest - Թեղուտի անտառ 01.jpg
- File:Zvartnots International Airport old terminal - Զվարթնոց միջազգային օդանավակայանի հին մասնաշենքը 02.jpg
- File:Mountains near Zangakatun village - Լեռներ Զանգակատուն գյուղի մոտակայքում.jpg
- File:Greenhouse Yerevan Botanical garden - Երևանի բուսաբանական այգու ջերմոց 01.jpg
- File:Panoramic view of Yerevan at night - Երևանի համայնապատկերը երեկոյան 02.jpg
- File:Panoramic view of Yerevan at night - Երևանի համայնապատկերը երեկոյան 01.jpg
- File:Panoramic view of Yerevan - Երևանի համայնապատկեր.jpg
- File:Slabodka quarter, Gyumri - Գյումրու Սլաբոդկա թաղամաս.jpg
- File:Statue of Mother Armenia, Gyumri - Գյումրու Մայր Հայաստան հուշարձան.jpg
- File:Gyumri city panorama - Գյումրու համայնապատկեր 02.jpg
- File:Gyumri city panorama - Գյումրու համայնապատկեր 01.jpg
- File:Reconstruction of Holy Saviour's Church, Gyumri - Գյումրու Սուրբ Ամենափրկիչ եկեղեցու վերակառուցում.jpg
- File:Old building in Gyumri city - Հին շինություն Գյումրի քաղաքում.jpg
- File:Gyumri State Drama Theatre after Vardan Adjemian - Գյումրու Վարդան Աճեմյանի անվան պետական դրամատիկական թատրոն.jpg
- File:Gyumri, Charles Aznavour Square - Գյումրի, Շառլ Ազնավուրի հրապարակ.jpg
- File:Geghanush tailings - Գեղանուշի պոչամբար.jpg
- File:Gyumri panorama - Գյումրու համայնապատկեր.jpg
- File:Greenhouse Yerevan Botanical garden - Երևանի բուսաբանական այգու ջերմոց.jpg
- File:Arpi, Armenia - Արփի, Հայաստան.jpg
- File:Baghaberd Fortress, Armenia - Բաղաբերդ ամրոց, Հայաստան 01.jpg
- File:Arev project, Paris Herouni - Արև նախագիծ, Պարիս Հերունի 01.jpg
- File:Massif Arteni - Արտենի լեռնազանգված.jpg
- File:Arev project, Paris Herouni - Արև նախագիծ, Պարիս Հերունի 02.jpg
- File:Mount Ara (Արա լեռ) 01.jpg
- File:Արագած լեռ (Mount Aragats) 03.jpg
- File:Արագած լեռ (Mount Aragats) 01.jpg
- File:Աշտարակի կամուրջ (Ashtarak bridge).jpg
- File:Ara Mountain in winter (Արա լեռը ձմռանը).jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 21:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 03:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Blurred and general poor quality, we have many many better photos of this. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:33, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion: copyvio. --Mys_721tx (talk) 20:32, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Blurred and general poor quality, we have many many better photos of this. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:33, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deletion: copyvio. --Mys_721tx (talk) 20:30, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Description states "Please do not upload this photo on any other website (e.g Flickr) without my permission!", thus meaning that licence is not acceptable for Commons. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:30, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Mys 721tx at 20:29, 7 November 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: not marked for reuse and claimed as own work. --Krdbot 01:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Fichier de test Koslambrou (talk) 13:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 13:40, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Plain text, single page pdf. + seems to be promotional (caption). 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 10:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
This is a redirect to a deleted file LiberatorG (talk) 16:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 16:37, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Possibly out of scope. Masum Reza📞 07:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: user blocked for Spamming for Khabina Kan Kha a General Store the file was a Copyright violation https://khabinakankha.business.site/. - FitIndia Talk Mail 19:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
User signature, out of scope Masum Reza📞 08:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 19:14, 9 November 2019 UTC: Spamming Khabina Kan Kha a General Store for https://khabinakankha.business.site/ --Krdbot 01:54, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Yet another instance of Geo Swan uploading an image of unknown origin and making dubious claims about copyright and authorship. In this case, Geo Swan has dated the map as being from the "1750s". It is clearly not from the 1750s, although it includes the locations of places that existed in the 1750s. Similarly, he has "Pierre Robinault" as the author (possibly because the map includes an image of Robinault's coat of arms). The source includes neither an author nor a date. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 21:08, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Author and date have been corrected. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Information corrected by Asclepias. Geo Swan, please be more attentive. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. A photo of a person insignificant by Wikipedia rules. Used only in the article itself (the article has been removed). GAndy (talk) 12:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. A photo of a person insignificant by Wikipedia rules. Used only in the article itself (the article has been removed). GAndy (talk) 12:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. A photo of a person insignificant by Wikipedia rules. Used only in the article itself (the article has been removed). GAndy (talk) 12:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. A photo of a person insignificant by Wikipedia rules. Used only in the article itself (the article has been removed). GAndy (talk) 12:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. A photo of a person insignificant by Wikipedia rules. Used only in the article itself (the article has been removed). GAndy (talk) 12:33, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. A photo of a person insignificant by Wikipedia rules. Used only in the article itself (the article has been removed). GAndy (talk) 12:33, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. A photo of a person insignificant by Wikipedia rules. Used only in the article itself (the article has been removed). GAndy (talk) 12:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. A photo of a person insignificant by Wikipedia rules. Used only in the article itself (the article has been removed). GAndy (talk) 12:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: F10. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Demolitionbaby1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to fulfil COM:CSD#F10.
- File:The park just before the 2019 place by Eezze.jpg
- File:Stairway at Moon Slides 2019 by Eezze.jpg
- File:Johannesburg Northcliff by Eezze 2019.jpg
- File:Introverted and Secluded individual be Eezze.jpg
- File:F37 Reminder 2019 by Eezze.jpg
- File:Eezze feeling the general breeze of eaze.jpg
- File:Eezze Night Time Standing on the road with a car passing behind him.jpg
- File:Demolition Baby Eezze.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言) 11:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, per nomination, (personal photos out of COM:SCOPE by non-contributors). - FitIndia Talk Mail 16:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Demolitionbaby1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Mean Face Displayed By Eezze On Screen.jpg
- File:Eezze Looking Out On The Street In Pumula East Bulawayo.jpg
- File:Eezze standing behind a green hedge with Vape Juice.jpg
- File:Eezze Gazing Above the big blue sky.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:01, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Fitindia. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 12:18, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
No reason Justiniano Sardinha (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Cropped version of a deleted photo, which was deleted as it likely isn't free — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaiser matias (talk • contribs) 2019-11-06T22:26:19 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/rock/8469300/mac-demarco-starts-record-label-announces-first-solo-tour likely not a free image 100cellsman (talk) 22:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentations of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:مصحف حضرت علی علیه السلام با دستخط منسوب به آن حضرت.pdf
- File:عیون اخبار الرضا با دستخط منسوب به امام رضا علیه السلام.pdf
- File:زیارت عاشورا با دستخط منسوب به امام صادق علیه السلام.pdf
- File:مناجات حضرت علی علیه السلام در مسجد کوفه.pdf
- File:مناجات شعبانیه با دستخط منسوب به امام رضا علیه السلام.pdf
- File:دعای ابوحمزه ثمالی با دستخط منسوب به امام سجاد علیه السلام.pdf
- File:دعای کمیل با دستخط منسوب به امام علی علیه السلام.pdf
- File:دعای عرفه با دستخط منسوب به امام حسین علیه السلام.pdf
- File:قرآن منسوب به امام حسن علیه السلام.pdf
- File:Quran aqr kufi2.pdf
- File:Quran aqr kufi35.pdf
- File:Quran aqr kufi16.pdf
- File:قرآن منسوب به بامام رضا علیه السلام.pdf
- File:قرآن منسوب به امام حسین علیه السلام.pdf
- File:قرآن منسوب به حضرت علی علیه السلام.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Unused or used in articles nominated for deletion.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Nahjolfasaheh.pdf
- File:Khotbeh-qadir.pdf
- File:Prophet-Muhammad-Quran.pdf
- File:Cadbury-Quran.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + questioalbe authorship (possibilty of copyvio). --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:57, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:44, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Photoshoot image with watermark, permission needed. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:55, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:48, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:48, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
used for self promo on en.wiki 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 18:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:50, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal photo. Used in self-promotion of himself and the book GAndy (talk) 22:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 08:50, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Low quality penis. -mattbuck (Talk) 09:08, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
weak keep While the size really isn't very high, it's correctly focused and the perspective is one that we don't seem to really have yet in Category:Male masturbation and Category:Male masturbation before ejaculation. darkweasel94 09:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Info With respect to image size, see comparative report below. --Fæ (talk) 00:07, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- Target file File:Male masturbation.jpg
- Pixel resolution = 423 x 500
- Source category: Male masturbation (filter by mime 'image')
- Total number of unique images in category, 8 child and 11 grandchild categories: 250
- Number with pixel resolution >= target resolution: 233 (in bottom 8%)
- Number with file size >= target file size: 241 (in bottom 5%)
- Report completed: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 01:01 (43.8s runtime)
| 20 smallest images |
|---|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![48 File:Моя книга "Гид по молдавским свадебным традициям" .jpg](#File:Моя_книга_"Гид_по_молдавским_свадебным_традициям"_.jpg){kind=link}
1-PDL-71-26.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Le_Christ_parmi_les_docteurs.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Пам'ятник_Шептицькому.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(11955766986).jpg){kind=link}
_Love_and_the_Mermaid_(1895-6)_left_-_Walker_Art_Gallery,_Liverpool,_May_2012_(7225083708).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete Plenty of alternatives given, nothing we donna have already (COM:PORN). --Yikrazuul (talk) 08:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, low quality, and there's alternatives aplenty FASTILY 09:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
illustration vandalisme sur fr.wiki https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Michel_Bouillon Antoniex (talk) 21:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
vous pouvez supprimer ce fichier Michel Bouillon (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:29, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
COM:NUDE Out of scope - don't see educational value on this one ~riley (talk) 05:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:23, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted. Yet another user who wants to drops his pants. The GPS data who shows where the user lives is a small concern also. Thuresson (talk) 23:18, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
1-PDL-71-26.jpg){kind=link}
1-PDL-71-26.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Small, dark, blurred and unused image. Not useful in Commons A1Cafel (talk) 06:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
1-PDL-71-26.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: It uniquely documents the Ponta Delgada municipal license plate, in use 2000 km away from the issuing location — amazing feat for a moped! Portuguese municipal license plates were discontinued in 2009, so unless a better photo is found, this is all we have. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 07:08, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Tuválkin. Very poor photo, but it seems to have some documentary value. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:12, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
1-PDL-71-26.jpg){kind=link}
Unused file. Drawing of unidentified building project. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 08:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Unexplained data table of no educational value. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Unreadable table. No educational use. Malcolma (talk) 09:08, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Screenshot without useful explanation. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 20:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:15, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Description states "Please do not upload this photo on any other website (e.g Flickr) without my permission!", thus meaning that licence is not acceptable for Commons. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 22:07, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorised media. Commons is not a private media album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This image is present in web site www.cairn-monnaie.com, which is copyrighted. Please verify copyviol. 85.68.194.246 16:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorised media. Commons is not a private media repository. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 16:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be a selfie, http://af.china-embassy.org/chn/sgxw/t1698660.htm Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:24, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file is outside of Commons scope. It is COM:NOTUSED, and can hardly be "realistically useful for an educational purpose" anytime in the future. DmitTrix (talk) 18:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:23, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused and uncategorised media. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 19:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Diagram with little explanation. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 20:30, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexandre17fr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two Google street view images claimed as own work, no meta data on any except 2 derivates put through photoshop, mixed resolutions, unlikely any are own works...
- File:Bouddha Chökhor Ling.jpg
- File:Petite fille kham tibet.jpg
- File:Orphelins dharamsala inde.jpg
- File:Davina Delor.jpg
- File:Monastère Chökhor Ling.jpg
- File:Chokhor Ling.jpg
- File:Davina et des moines au Tibet.jpg
- File:Coachclub Veronique et Davina.JPG
- File:Enfants tibet aidés grâce à Chokhör Ling.JPG
BevinKacon (talk) 20:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniel Armando Hernandez Gonzalez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bulk copyvio upload from social media: File:Leofranner Sanchez.jpg is here; File:Travieso.jpg is here; File:Aslan dj.jpg is here; File:Staff America Project.png is here; etc. Moot, but also COM:NOTHOST as promotion of non-notable band.
- File:Banner america project.png
- File:America project party.png
- File:Arianna martinez.jpg
- File:Aslan dj.jpg
- File:Travieso.jpg
- File:Leofranner Sanchez.jpg
- File:Staff America Project.png
Эlcobbola talk 21:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
I, as the original artist of this piece, do not believe that it serves any academic or Wikipedia-related purpose. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 22:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Borrado de Imagenes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Dubai skyline (2).jpg
- File:Torre Willis.webm
- File:Marina 101 feb2014.jpg
- File:23 Marina 2, Nov 2014.jpg
- File:KAFD World Trade Center jul2014.jpg
- File:Lotte World Tower (April 30 2017).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Borrado de Imagenes (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
- File:International.png
- File:Minecraft Aprendiendo Construir Edificios de Persjen.webm
- File:Actualmente no hay texto en esta página. Puedes buscar este título de página en otras páginas, o buscar en los registros relacionados, pero no tienes permiso para crear esta página. KumaMomnTV.ogg
- File:Aprender KumaMomnTV.ogg
- File:Audio Tutorial de Chile de KumaMomnTV.ogg
- File:Documento de Jeddah Tower.pdf
Didym (talk) 20:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. - FitIndia Talk Mail 00:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Hoge Naarderweg 199 1937.pdf
- File:Hoge Naarderweg 199 2908.jpg
- File:Villa La Vetta omstreeks 1908.jpg
- File:Villa La Vetta 1894.tif
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:06, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nina Canelita (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Pieza de arte contemporáneo ˈ"Concierto para tres machetes".jpg
- File:Obraː ˈ"Concierto para tres machetes".jpg
- File:Obra de arte titulada Instrumento.jpg
- File:Pieza de arte titulada Instrumento.jpg
- File:Obraː Instrumento (vista de frente).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:05, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Romaramacey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Любовь Пушкарь 2.jpg
- File:Любовь Пушкарь 1.jpg
- File:Любовь Пушкарь 4.jpg
- File:Любовь Пушкарь 3.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
threshold of originality / copyrighted. JD {æ} 16:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Moknine5jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine21jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine22jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine20jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine19jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine18jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine17jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine15jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine16jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine14jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine12jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine13jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine11jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine8jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine10jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine9jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine7jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine6jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine3jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine2 jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine4jpg.jpg
- File:Moknine 1jpg.jpg
- File:Histoire de ville moknine.jpg
- File:السوق الدخلاني.jpg
- File:سوق الحلفاء والسمار.jpg
- File:منتوجات من صناعة الحلفاء.jpg
- File:سوق الدواب.jpg
- File:قهوة النخلة.jpg
- File:Poterie.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
and File:Bruce Nauman's Life Death Knows Doesn't Know Cropped.jpg. Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Likely copyviol from https://egypt-museum.com/post/187646761251/ostracon-of-prince-sethherkhepshef Khruner (talk) 16:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused table. If this is really useful, then should be replaced with wikitable. Seems out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Per EXIF, author is CHi busque. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
No exif, small size, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Ldorfman, can you explain please why this photo is A formal PR picture. -- Geagea (talk) 01:33, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Can you explain the claim this picture isn't a PR one? It looks like it was set up in a studio, or at least taken by a professional photographer rather than a simple ordinary photo by an amature. Whatever the answer is, OTRS release note is needed in such a case. Ldorfman (talk) 13:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nothing in the file page implies that it is a A formal PR picture. Not the file name, not the description and not the EXIF. I can't find the file elsewhere in the net. Unless you have another info I'm in a favor to keep the file. -- Geagea (talk) 06:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
- Can you explain the claim this picture isn't a PR one? It looks like it was set up in a studio, or at least taken by a professional photographer rather than a simple ordinary photo by an amature. Whatever the answer is, OTRS release note is needed in such a case. Ldorfman (talk) 13:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:06, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
We have an SVG of this flag. Fry1989 eh? 04:30, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:01, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Recently uploaded PNG that is redundant to File:Flag of Nigeria.svg 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 13:55, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
vandalism?! Veliensis (talk) 13:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
vandalism?! Veliensis (talk) 13:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RAUL CASTRO ESONO ADA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Salud mental 11.jpg
- File:Salud mental 24.jpg
- File:Salud mental 23.jpg
- File:Salud mental 22.jpg
- File:Salud mental 21.jpg
- File:Salud mental 19.jpg
- File:Salud mental 20.jpg
- File:Salud mental 18.jpg
- File:Salud mental 17.jpg
- File:Salud mental 16.jpg
- File:Salud mental 15.jpg
- File:Salud mental 12.jpg
- File:Salud mental 14.jpg
- File:Salud mental 13.jpg
- File:Salud mental 10.jpg
- File:Salud mental 9.jpg
- File:Salud mental 8.jpg
- File:Salud mental 7.jpg
- File:Salud mental 6.jpg
- File:Salud mental 5.jpg
- File:Salud mental 4.jpg
- File:Salud mental 2.jpg
- File:Salud mental 3.jpg
- File:Cuerpo medico salud mental 2.jpg
- File:Salud mental 1.jpg
- File:Cuerpo medico salud mental 1.jpg
- File:Hospital salud mental de RGE.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
It can be seen from the exif that the author is not the origin uploader. So maybe not own work. Catherine Laurence discussion 15:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
It can be seen from the exif that the author is not the origin uploader. So maybe not own work. Catherine Laurence discussion 15:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical book covers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Dashiell Hammett. The return of the Continental Op (Dell Mystery).jpg
- File:Chester Himes. For love of Imabelle (Gold Medal Book).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:54, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sinarigi81 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable, out of scope, promotional. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:53, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:53, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical publication. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 08:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused file. Unexplained piece of writing of no obvous educational value. Malcolma (talk) 09:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Subroto Siregar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be used for self promo on id.wiki
大诺史 (Talk/留言) 09:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorised media. Commons is not a private media album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 09:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:39, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Encyclopedias are copyrighted. The text is totally readable. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:37, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorised media. No context. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 10:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Cover page of a book. No Metadata. Clear copyright violation of original creator of the cover. Also this cover uses copyrighted photograph of a person. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 11:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:17, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded by Chapatahi but used on Chandanomprakash kumar's user page on hi.wiki 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 11:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:16, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
violation du droit d"auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8486067078/in/photolist-2ejXjjk-28bMV97-2d38q46-eVX3H7-eXTXY5-zBJJf4-er4Ldp-j9aa2R-dPSJ9S-er543R-ekUY5j-dPSXwq-eg4Sd4-dW9sWb-dVTj6m-dTDXUv-dTKvzL-dYM7oS-dPMwoP-e1vUE6-dRY9NJ-e7BbES-f3vR1C-eXTVn1-fzntaH 2.13.33.129 00:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’œuvre est attribué a Claudio Francesco Beaumont et il est mort en 1766 ainsi qu'a Jean Raoux mort en 1734.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 21:57, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8627094647/in/photolist-e9m7Fa 2.13.33.129 00:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Claes Claesz. Wou et il est mort en 1665.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:33, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 21:58, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: comparez exif https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8627094647/in/photolist-e9m7Fa 2.14.195.51 16:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment Renominated without valid rationale. Pinging @Strakhov. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 23:07, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100, IP blocked. --Achim (talk) 11:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luis1944MX (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non simple logo, protected by multiples companies. All media is missing permission information.
- File:SCHLogo.png
- File:Azteca Trece 2007.png
- File:Azteca Trece HD 2007.png
- File:CitaACiegasLogo.png
- File:UnPoquitoTuyo.jpg
- File:Andrés Santamaría Gamboa.jpg (This media is missing permission information).
--Bradford (talk) 02:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Right of reply
The accusing user has been sabotaging the logos. Although it is not the first time that sabotage a Wikimedia Foundation project, it has already sabotaged since the beginning of the decade, until March 2019, Wikipedia in Spanish. Although, in that WP it has been sabotaged to support its words, ideas and opinions, it has been blocked several times, to which the user has evaded blockages, in order to want to make any user, including myself, be sanctioned or banned of any project The last sabotage attempt was at the beginning of October 2019. And it is being checked if he went (through a VPN) if he evaded blocking to do his own in an article of the WP in which an editorial conflict was being resolved. I can even show evidence of the user's sabotaging attitude so they can see who he really is. --Luis1944MX (talk) 03:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: The user is deviating from the main subject and is using the page to solve personal problems.--Bradford (talk) 03:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Permission from Gwidon Libera needed via OTRS.
- File:Tarnacki.jpg.jpg
- File:Mistrzostwa polski micro class.jpg.jpg
- File:77 twierdza gdansk.jpg.jpg
- File:Mistrzostwa Świata na jeziorze Liptovska Mara.jpg.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言) 03:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-free logo; not eligible for Commons Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:51, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 06:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- not intended
The image is not intended as a derivative but as an actual picture of an event I attended, and all participants agreed to the use of and sharing of images as part of the organisation.
There is no way to identify the owner of the banner and so the image taken is copyright of myself as uploaded, or of the organisation. Kaybeesquared (talk) 19:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 06:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 06:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8628187960/in/photolist-e9rHFo 2.13.33.183 15:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Abraham Hondius et il est mort en 1691.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: PD-Art-100 --Achim (talk) 15:03, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 22:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8628187960/in/photolist-e9rHFo 2.14.195.51 13:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment DR renominated without valid rationale. Pinging @Strakhov. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 22:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, IP blocked. --Achim (talk) 22:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8418032430/in/photolist-dPSBLb-dPSzJw 2.13.33.183 15:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est René-Antoine Houasse et il est mort en 1710.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 22:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8418032430/in/photolist-dPSBLb-dPSzJw 2.14.195.51 13:47, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment DR renominated without valid rationale. Pinging @Strakhov. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 22:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100, IP blocked. --Achim (talk) 10:40, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8441757518/in/photolist-dRYdpq 2.13.33.183 15:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Hans Jordaens III et il est mort en 1643.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 22:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8441757518/in/photolist-ESh3h2-fmCb2s-zHYyci-yM6gbt-dRYdpq-iDTcei-yLWiSj 2.14.195.51 13:51, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment DR renominated without valid rationale. Pinging @Strakhov. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 22:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100, IP blocked. --Achim (talk) 10:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/9050460815/in/photolist-eMKYFR 2.13.33.183 14:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Michele Tosini et il est mort en 1577.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
faux : cette oeuvre ne fait pas partie de la collection du musée des Beaux-Arts de Brest, c'était un dépôt temporaire d'une collection particulière. 2.14.195.51 18:56, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, PD-Art-100, IP blocked. --Achim (talk) 22:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8416972233/in/photolist-er543R-dPMbAV-dYMe9N-ztu6Ef-eTqiDu 2.13.33.183 15:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Charles de La Fosse et il est mort en 1716.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 22:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8416983055/in/photolist-dPMePv 2.13.33.183 15:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Sébastien Leclerc et il est mort en 1763.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 22:44, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8416994177/in/photolist-jeaa6u-dPMi8g 2.13.33.183 15:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jean-Laurent Mosnier et il est mort en 1808.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:03, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 22:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
_Le_Christ_parmi_les_docteurs.jpg){kind=link}
_Le_Christ_parmi_les_docteurs.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8518994436/in/photolist-dYN5fq-JVMuWR 2.13.33.183 15:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
_Le_Christ_parmi_les_docteurs.jpg){kind=link}
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jacopo Amigoni et il est mort en 1752.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 22:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
_Le_Christ_parmi_les_docteurs.jpg){kind=link}
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8518792522/in/photolist-oBvK1E-dYM3e9-zBJVeZ 2.13.33.183 16:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Luca Giordano et il est mort en 1705.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 09:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8485037495/in/photolist-dVN32V 2.13.33.183 16:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Giovanni Battista Benaschi et il est mort en 1688.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 09:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8416779253/in/photolist-27Y4wuL-26ET1ZB-eTdXC8-tZix8C-dRFDfG-dPLceF-eqNhYF 2.13.33.183 16:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Sébastien Bourdon et il est mort en 1671.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 09:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8440680287/in/photolist-dRSGbt 2.13.33.183 16:30, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Leonard Bramer du 17e.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 09:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8726109420/in/photolist-ei6Ajq 2.13.33.183 16:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Bartholomeus Breenbergh et il est mort en 1657.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 09:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8487942909/in/photolist-JVMuWR-dW3VHg-28ExoGq-zJT6Ui 2.13.33.183 16:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Cavalier d'Arpin et il est mort en 1640.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 09:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8417886738/in/photolist-dPRSsf 2.13.33.183 16:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jean-Baptiste Corneille et il est mort en 1695.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:37, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 09:37, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8417948098/in/photolist-dPSbGb 2.13.33.183 16:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jacques Courtois et il est mort en 1676.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:37, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 09:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8416834689/in/photolist-dPLtHt 2.13.33.183 16:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jacques Courtois et il est mort en 1676.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:37, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 09:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8487936793/in/photolist-dW3TTP 2.13.33.183 16:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Daniele Crespi et il est mort en 1630.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 09:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8417124287/in/photolist-er7A9T-dPMXNx-dPN3ng 2.13.33.183 14:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Charles André van Loo et il est mort en 1765.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 10:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8417139641/in/photolist-er7A9T-dPMXNx-dPN3ng 2.13.33.183 14:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Charles André van Loo et il est mort en 1765.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 10:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8417158379/in/photolist-dPN8Wk 2.13.33.183 15:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Charles André van Loo et il est mort en 1765.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 10:44, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8418053930/in/photolist-dPSJ9S 2.13.33.183 15:45, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Angelica Kauffmann et elle est morte en 1807.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 10:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8417984126/in/photolist-dPSnpm 2.13.33.183 15:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Thomas Germain Joseph Duvivier et il est mort en 1814.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 10:34, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8417999304/in/photolist-dPSrV3 2.13.33.183 15:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre d'un anonyme du 17e.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:33, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 10:31, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8518829274/in/photolist-dYMe9N 2.13.33.183 15:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre d'un anonyme du 17e.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:33, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 10:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8518820714/in/photolist-ztAHuZ-dYMbBd 2.13.33.183 16:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre d'un anonyme du 16e.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:33, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 10:27, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8518806542/in/photolist-N7uKP7-24m774B-yP5TBA-yLWiSj-zJZT8J-dPLGRg-okaRPm-nM2ddg-nuscCR-nut1Rg-et9pDi-eau9L6-dRHVfd-dVMU2D-dRVnym-e5uK1S-dW9zbA-dYM7oS-dUnoJb-eZK2CS 2.13.33.183 16:08, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Luca Giordano et il est mort en 1705.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 10:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8628170568/in/photolist-e9rCvw 2.13.33.183 14:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jan Weenix et il est mort en 1719.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:33, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 11:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8517874815/in/photolist-nLDRrR-dYGkqB 2.13.33.183 14:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Bartolomeo Passarotti et il est mort en 1592.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 11:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8441745414/in/photolist-gMuWaG-dRY9NJ-fnEp6H-fZ3d57-fpn9eN-fnEqgP 2.13.33.183 14:22, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Bonaventura Peeters et il est mort en 1652.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 11:25, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8517957705/in/photolist-dYGL4K 2.13.33.183 14:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Giuseppe Recco et il est mort en 1695 et il est aussi attribué a Giacomo Legi mort en 16945.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 11:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8418165368/in/photolist-e7foc5-dPTihd 2.13.33.183 14:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jacques SABLET et il est mort en 1803.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 11:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8539354738/in/photolist-e1AqE7-e1uVor 2.13.33.183 14:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Carlo Saraceni un auteur du 17e.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 11:20, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8441735706/in/photolist-dRY6Vm 2.13.33.183 14:35, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Godfried Schalken et il est mort en 1706.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 11:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
suspicion de violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8423589559/in/photolist-dQn6GK-LrV2mC-JVMD3R-283MtED-PJWKh7-qXGhCz-er4Ldp-erJwz7-eqNDQD-er5bpv-e1B3om-e6veLU-dQT9tn-e6vfTu-PV8WdU-dYGpHX 2.13.33.183 14:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jean-François de Troy et il est mort en 1752.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100. --Achim (talk) 11:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
And also
- File:Андрій Кузьменко (1).jpg
- File:Андрій Кузьменко (2).jpg
- File:Андрій Кузьменко (3).jpg
- File:Андрій Кузьменко (5).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1 October, 2015. No Permission from the sculptor Андрій Покровський. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:04, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Переславль-Залесский, обелиск в память воинов-переславцев, погибших в годы ВОВ 1941-1945г.jpg
[edit]
No FOP in Russia; this memorial has its author. PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: No artistic value. --A.Savin 15:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Переславль-Залесский, Левая Набережная, обелиск в память воинов-переславцев, погибших в годы ВОВ 1941-1945г.jpg
[edit]
No FOP in Russia; this memorial has its author. PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: No artistic value. --A.Savin 15:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
No FOP in Russia; this memorial has its author. PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: No artistic value. --A.Savin 15:03, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Переславль-Залесский, площадь Красная, могила борцов за сосетскую власть С.А.Петрова и И.П.Кусина.jpg
[edit]
No FOP in Russia; this memorial has its author. PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: No artistic value. --A.Savin 15:03, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
No information on the source about the Creative Commons License Paladinum2 (talk) 02:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Papua New Guinea A1Cafel (talk) 07:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep image - oppose deletion - The image is an official photo and work published by the U.S. Federal government (public domain under copyright laws). U.S. gov officials took and published the image in an official capacity during their work & visit to PNG. Scanlan (talk) 17:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted Useful image, but unfortunately seems not allowed per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Papua_New_Guinea. Published by US Gov so PD in the USA, but Commons has to respect country of origin copyright as well, and photo clearly taken in Papau New Guinea. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Link was broken, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 09:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, link fixed, no reason to delete it. --182.239.87.88 02:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept per anon, problem seems resolved. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
This photo is stolen from my website. Please delete it as i didn´t give permission to use it. 2A02:8108:41C0:3298:4D37:7A07:66AA:F67C 10:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Any chance you could tell us where your Web site is? --bjh21 (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hello. I am the uploader of this picture. It came originally from Flickr [1] where it was posted by the user Photocapy using the CC-BY-SA 2.0 licence. It was subsequently uploaded by me under the same licence with attribution (so far, so good). If you are not Photocapy, please provide us with evidence that you have published this picture earlier. If you are Photocapy, there is not much you can do. As far as I know, you cannot revoke the licence of your own pictures. Best, --Ephramac (talk) 23:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Closing as Kept; free licensed on Flickr. If the Flickr photo is under a false license, please provide information, and you might wish to file a complaint on Flickr as well. If you have information on a different original source for the photo which you don't wish to share publicly, you can contact Commons:OTRS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Matlin as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Oscar Wilde - Kobieta bez znaczenia.pdf|later upload. Not an exact copy, PDF vs djvu Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept per above, deletion not required. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Bad name Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:34, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted because it was a prompt request by the uploader. (Note however that files can be renamed, and a need for renaming is not by itself a reason for deletion.) Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) -- 18:07, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
No reliable sources available. Juniorpetjua (talk) 15:01, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Bad name Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 15:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted as very prompt request by uploader. (Note that "bad name" is by itself not a reason for deletion, as files can be renamed.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for murals in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 15:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Neither COM:FOP nor COM:DM can save this one. --bjh21 (talk) 16:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Me equivoqué al subir este archivo, quisiera eliminarlo por favor Jddavila7 (talk) 18:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Derivatives of works with unclear copyright status. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
"Date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it."
- File:Bernabé Arnaudo.png
- File:Reunión de Gobernadores del Nuevo Cuyo, 1992.png
- File:Aníbal Salom.png
- File:Cierre de campaña de Angeloz 1989.jpg
- File:Cierre de campaña de Menem 1989.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel Voy a escribir en español, espero sepas disculparme. Las dos primeras el link dice con claridad absoluta, en el primer renglón, que las fotos son de 1992 (hace ya más de 20 años de eso, si las cuentas no me fallan. [2]
La tercera, en los comentarios se aclara que la foto es de 1973, no hay que explayarse demasiado al respecto.
Con respecto a las dos últimas. Las elecciones de 1989 fue la única ocasión en la que Eduardo Angeloz fue candidato presidencial, y la última vez que Carlos Menem compartió fórmula con Eduardo Duhalde (la tarima lo dice "Menem-Duhalde"), y 1989 hace ya 30 años (el mismo link lo dice). Las fotos son de los cierres de campañas de ambas fuerzas el 12 de mayo de 1989, lo dice el mismo link y no cuesta tanto verlo. En ambas fotos se cita al medio Telám, argentino, como fuente de las fotos y, por lo tanto, aplicanse las leyes de copyright argentinas (25 años de la publicación). No necesito más evidencia que esa, las leyes de derechos de autor en Argentina son claras al respecto.--FelipeRev (talk) 12:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- The fact that some of them are part of a stock from a photo agency does not mean they have been published one day. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- Para las dos últimas fotos aplica perfectamente, ya que la "agencia" en cuestión cita al medio de comunicación en el que fueron publicadas (Telám), como fuente.--FelipeRev (talk) 13:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Permission should be asked for specific version of Creative Commons license.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Recibí autorización expresa para utilizar esas imágenes en la misma cuenta de Facebook donde fueron publicadas. Lean los comentarios. En caso de ser requerido, puedo pedir al dueño que envíe una autorización expresa.--FelipeRev (talk) 16:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Please read w:es:Licencias Creative Commons to understand ambiguity of original permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko I said: I received express authorization to use those images in the same Facebook account where they were published. Read the comments. If required, I can ask the owner to send an express authorization. The photographs are, however, quite old, before 1960. I would prefer someone who understands Spanish to review it (it is not an aggression or offense, I say it so that he can understand what the link says). Regards and sorry :)--FelipeRev (talk) 09:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- As far as I could believe Google Translate you asked permission for licencia "Creative Commons". If you didn't read Spanish article yet, you could read shorter Commons:Licensing: there are Creative Commons licenses not allowed on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko I said: I received express authorization to use those images in the same Facebook account where they were published. Read the comments. If required, I can ask the owner to send an express authorization. The photographs are, however, quite old, before 1960. I would prefer someone who understands Spanish to review it (it is not an aggression or offense, I say it so that he can understand what the link says). Regards and sorry :)--FelipeRev (talk) 09:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko I already sent another comment to the owner of the image specifying the license. Soon we will have your answer.--FelipeRev (talk) 12:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Photographer permission needed. — Racconish 💬 13:32, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
better version of this photo exists, e.g. File:Chen Duxiu.jpg File:Chen Duxiu4.jpg. no need to crop a photo of a poster that printed this photo... notice how the eyebrow is different from the original, probably due to scanning and printing and scanning... over and over.
RZuo (talk) 13:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1996. No Permission from the sculptor В.Федорченко / architect Я.Троцько. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:17, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
_%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%27%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%A8%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%83.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%BC%27%D1%8F%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA_%D0%A8%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%83.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1996. No Permission from the sculptor В.Федорченко / architect Я.Троцько. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:17, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
_Пам'ятник_Шептицькому.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:08, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
_Пам'ятник_Шептицькому.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1996. No Permission from the sculptor В.Федорченко / architect Я.Троцько. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:17, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:11, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1996. No Permission from the sculptor В.Федорченко / architect Я.Троцько. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:17, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:12, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
erreur : décès 1993 S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/48073350768/in/photolist-2gf5ukj 2.13.33.183 17:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
erreur : décès 1993 S. DÉNIEL (talk) 08:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France. 4ing (talk) 11:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:23, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
ชื่อไม่ดี Stangwiki (talk) 15:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 01:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
No FoP for graphic works in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:19, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Caption indicates this photo was taken by Gordon Lonsdale, but there is no indication that the user who uploaded it had permission to do so. WikiDan61 (talk) 17:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I work on NCIS: New Orleans and was given this photo by Vanessa Ferlito as she wishes it to be her new picture on her Wikipedia page. Gordon Lonsdale too the photo and is the cinematographer on the show. I have been given permission by both parties to put this on her wikipedia page. I'm very new to this and was given the task of uploading. I would appreciate any help. --MarisaWhy (talk) 18:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
{{stale}} I'm not familiar with Commons licensing practices. Can someone knowledgeable please answer MarisaWhy about how to indicate that she has permission to publish this photo from the photographer? WikiDan61 (talk) 12:58, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Please send permission information via Commons:OTRS, following the instructions at that link. (Please pardon the delayed response, we have a bad backlog of deletion discussions.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, no evidence of action, no permission. (If proper permission from copyright holder can be shown, image may be reuploaded then.) -- 19:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Aung San Suu Kyi Image on National League for Democracy Sticker - On Motorbike Gas Tank - Near H'pa-an - Myanmar (Burma) (11955766986).jpg
[edit]_(11955766986).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(11955766986).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in Myanmar A1Cafel (talk) 05:19, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 05:56, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Antoni Tàpies (d. 2012), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Patrick Rogel
I attach in a mail to the adress: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org the OTRS permissions of the file:
Antoni Tàpies. 7 de novembre.jpg
Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Antoni_T%C3%A0pies._7_de_novembre.jpg
Soon ( approx. 3-4 days), I will attach the permissions of the following images:
Antoni Tàpies. Núvol i cadira.jpg (file)
Antoni Tàpies (1).jpg (file)
Antoni tàpies mod.jpg (file)
Autoretrat d'Antoni Tàpies.jpg (file)
Antoni Tàpies. Les quatre cròniques.tif (file)
Please, don't eliminate these items.
Thank you for the pacience.
Ticket:2019112010008711 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 06:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)- I have just accepted permission for “File:Autoretrat_d'Antoni_Tàpies.jpg” under ticket:2019112010008711. Ruthven (msg) 15:37, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 15:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DanielSBello (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Antoni Tàpies (d. 2012), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:07, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019112010008711 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 06:00, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 15:38, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in France, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:00, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
no Freedom of panorama in France Cheep (talk) 20:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: The puzzling presence of a ticket from an anonymous author is sort of explained on this user talk page, but it should really be explained on the description page or on the talk page of the file itself, so readers who notice the problem will not need to ask the same question. (Not sure though how the volunteer could be sure that the correspondent is really the anonymous author, but anyway.) -- Asclepias (talk) 02:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- The author is declared via the OTRS procedure... Is it not enough?
- Erwan Corre (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- I was not suggesting that the name be on the page, I was suggesting that what is mentioned on your talk page should be mentioned on the file's page, to be easier to find, because currently it is predictable that other readers will be puzzled by this unexplained ticket, like the nominator was. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Erwan Corre (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: OTRS permission from the copyright holder. Ruthven (msg) 15:42, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
redundant of Tram map of Iasi.xcf, png-Preview no longer necessary Bürgerentscheid (talk) 12:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. Maintaining --Majora (talk) 23:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to Tram map of Cottbus.xcf. PNG-version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 12:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. Maintaining --Majora (talk) 23:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to Tram map of Essen.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 12:35, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. Maintaining --Majora (talk) 23:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to Tram map of Brandenburg.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 12:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. Maintaining --Majora (talk) 23:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to Tram map of Krefeld.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 12:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. Maintaining --Majora (talk) 23:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to Tram map of Zwickau.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 12:47, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. Maintaining --Majora (talk) 23:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to Tram map of Bochum and Gelsenkirchen.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 12:49, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. Maintaining --Majora (talk) 23:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to Tram map of Bydgoszcz.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundandt to Tram map of Mülheim and Oberhausen.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to Tram map of Miskolc.xcf. PNG-version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 17:11, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to DebrecenTramwayNetwork1970.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 17:21, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to Tram map of Debrecen.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 17:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to file:Tram map of Botosani.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 17:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to File:Tram map of Oradea.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 17:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to File:Tram map of Ploiesti.xcf. PNG-version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 17:37, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to File:Tram map of Braila.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 17:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to File:Tram map of Cluj-Napoca.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 17:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- One disadvantage of xcf files: files of this format can't be georeferenced with Wikimedia Warper. The Openstreetmap template provides this feature. It can't be used with xcf files. So I rather don't agree. Are there other advantages using a xcf file?
Another option could be using a svg file. This would be even better then a xcf in regards of edits. But I haven't any clue which tools do exist to generate a svg from a openstreetmap map tile. And I don't know if the warper works with svg. --Elutz (talk) 20:19, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
redundant to File:Tram map of Craiova.xcf. PNG-Version no longer necessary. Bürgerentscheid (talk) 17:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Redundant needs a specific reason why something should be deleted beyond redundancy. Simply being superseded is not a reason to delete something. Besides, as we are a repository for other people to use our images and I've never even heard of .XCF until now it doesn't hurt to maintain a .PNG file that more people are familiar with and can use if they so choose to. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Author and uploader request: Test file. MaksimPinigin (talk) 00:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment It looks ok. Not used but in scope. Why wait 2 years to request deletion? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of test file. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
This photo is stolen from my website. Please delete it as i didn´t give permission to use it. 2A02:8108:41C0:3298:4D37:7A07:66AA:F67C 10:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Any chance you could tell us where your Web site is? --bjh21 (talk) 16:36, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Please share a link where this was stolen from. If you don't want to share the info publicly here, you can message via Commons:OTRS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Das Foto wurde von mir aufgenommen. stolen from my website. is a lie. Show me your website! --Nifoto (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Charles John Allen (1862-1956) Love and the Mermaid (1895-6) left - Walker Art Gallery, Liverpool, May 2012 (7225083708).png
[edit]_Love_and_the_Mermaid_(1895-6)_left_-_Walker_Art_Gallery,_Liverpool,_May_2012_(7225083708).png){kind=link}
_Love_and_the_Mermaid_(1895-6)_left_-_Walker_Art_Gallery,_Liverpool,_May_2012_(7225083708).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Charles John Allen (1862-1956) . Indoor statues are not allowed on commons before 2027 Mutter Erde (talk) 12:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:FOP UK. Ham II (talk) 18:39, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per COM:FOP UK. --Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
G10: uploaded for commercial promotion in the absence of any encyclopedic value Rdavout (talk) 15:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Marchellus (talk • contribs) 13:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
G10: Not only every encyclopedia should provide a diversity of photos. But it was also uploaded with similar text as the current tablets photo which was used as an example when submitting. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spirulina_tablets.jpg Marchellus (talk) 8:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: I removed the promo stuff from the description. --Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:OviraptorFan
[edit]- File:Koparion NT.jpg
- File:Cumnoria NT.jpg
- File:Iguanodon new NT.jpg
- File:Spinostropheus NT.png
- File:Elrhazosaurus NT.png
- File:Geminiraptor NT.jpg
All files were uploaded in good faith under the belief they are CC-BY-SA but are actually covered by a CC-BY-NC-SA license on their original sources which means we can't host them here. --IJReid ( talk) 16:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Aw man! That stinks! OviraptorFan (talk) 16:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Newer images have the following text, though, which appears to apply to all images on the blog: "All illustrations on this site are copyrighted to Nobu Tamura. The low resolution versions of the images are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license meaning that you are free to use them as long as you properly credit the author (© N. Tamura)." FunkMonk (talk) 17:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- The individual pages for these still have CC-BY-NC-SA, and as far as I'm aware licenses are irrevocable and unchanging. IJReid (talk) 03:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Commons:dual licenses are allowed, though, so the two copyright notices are not mutually exclusive. FunkMonk (talk) 08:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Older pages have the same text but "All images on this site are copyrighted to Nobu Tamura under a Creative Commons 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license meaning that you are free to use them for non commercial purposes as long as you properly credit the author (© N. Tamura)." which is the same but specifies Non-Commercial. So do we assume the newer license change applies retroactively? IJReid (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Wait i'm lost here, so does that mean they do follow copyright laws or do they not? The chat here didn't really give a clear answer(unless i'm an idiot and this is flying over my head) OviraptorFan (talk) 20:59, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- CC lcences can be made freer retroactively but not more restrictive as far as I know. So since he makes a general statement about images on his blog, it would appear it includes them all. But would be good with some more opinions. FunkMonk (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- So in other words, these still are able to be used? OviraptorFan (talk) 15:03, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- I'd say so, but it would be best to have an uninvolved admin close this. FunkMonk (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
- So in other words, these still are able to be used? OviraptorFan (talk) 15:03, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- CC lcences can be made freer retroactively but not more restrictive as far as I know. So since he makes a general statement about images on his blog, it would appear it includes them all. But would be good with some more opinions. FunkMonk (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Wait i'm lost here, so does that mean they do follow copyright laws or do they not? The chat here didn't really give a clear answer(unless i'm an idiot and this is flying over my head) OviraptorFan (talk) 20:59, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Older pages have the same text but "All images on this site are copyrighted to Nobu Tamura under a Creative Commons 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license meaning that you are free to use them for non commercial purposes as long as you properly credit the author (© N. Tamura)." which is the same but specifies Non-Commercial. So do we assume the newer license change applies retroactively? IJReid (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Commons:dual licenses are allowed, though, so the two copyright notices are not mutually exclusive. FunkMonk (talk) 08:47, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- The individual pages for these still have CC-BY-NC-SA, and as far as I'm aware licenses are irrevocable and unchanging. IJReid (talk) 03:46, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Newer images have the following text, though, which appears to apply to all images on the blog: "All illustrations on this site are copyrighted to Nobu Tamura. The low resolution versions of the images are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license meaning that you are free to use them as long as you properly credit the author (© N. Tamura)." FunkMonk (talk) 17:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- I contacted the author and he said "Hi,
Yes, CC BY-SA is fine for all images on my site. NT" Gbawden (talk) 04:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: CY-BY-SA applies to whole site per author. --Gbawden (talk) 04:52, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Details eines Mietvertrags, die auf Commons nichts zu suchen haben. WolfgangRieger (talk) 09:44, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Die Details des Ausrisses des Mietvertrags sind bekannt und belegen zudem die Angaben auf diversen Diskseiten, wie z.B. hier. Dass eine andere Seite des Mietvertrags seit langem in Commons hochgeladen ist, mit sehr viel mehr Details der angemieteten Räumlichkeiten, hier verlinkt hat bisher niemand gestört, im Gegenteil, die Offenlegung solcher Details trägt zur Transparenz der kontrovers diskutierten Thematik um die Wikipedia-Spaces in Deutschland bei. Bitte nicht löschen! Grüße --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 13:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Copy-right violation. -- Michael F. Schönitzer 22:38, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: used by a Wiki chapter; standard legal text, doubtful to reach any threshold of originality. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by John Weitzmann (WMDE) as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: This is a tenancy contract between a third party and WMDE as tenants, I am General Counsel for the latter. This is not a public document, neither regarding copyright nor in any other respect, and it thus must not be published here by anyone. It requires immediate deletion. Thank you. --John Weitzmann (WMDE) (talk) 08:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Should be kept:The file is a standard legal text, doubtful to reach any threshold of originality, so it doesn´t require an immideate deletion. There are two more files from pages of the contract in Commons, since 2017, no one has been bothered. Thank you, kind regards --Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC • 08:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete This is an unauthorized uploaded confidential document. It must be deleted immediately and the uploader must be given a clear warning. --Stepro (talk) 12:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Should've been speedied, per nom. — regards, Revi 13:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
PNA terms of use#8 disallowed commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 10:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The Philippine News Agency is an official "is the official news agency of the Philippine government" [3], so it would seem that {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} would apply regardless of any disclaimers on the website. Perhaps some broader discussion is merited if this is not the case, and possibly revise the template? Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) -- 17:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: the template contains the text "unless otherwise noted", the Wikipedia article about the copyright law of the Philippines also mentions that the government might levy fees for the use of copyrighted material, making it non-free. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:49, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Per consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jessie Lacuna 2020.jpg (with a summary at Category:Philippine News Agency-related deletion requests), PNA photos made by PNA employees themselves are not free enough for Commons, but those that PNA obtained from government agencies and entities like File:Itbayat Church 2019 earthquake.jpg are fine. PNA, despite being a state media agency, continues to assert copyright over content produced by their own employees. This photo in particular was taken by PNA photographer Avito Dalan. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
PNA terms of use#8 disallowed commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 10:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- See comment at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Adopted_Son_of_Shakba_Ko_Lawaisig.jpg -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adopted Son of Shakba Ko Lawaisig.jpg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:49, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Per consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jessie Lacuna 2020.jpg (with a summary at Category:Philippine News Agency-related deletion requests), PNA photos made by PNA employees themselves are not free enough for Commons, but those that PNA obtained from government agencies and entities like File:Itbayat Church 2019 earthquake.jpg are fine. PNA, despite being a state media agency, continues to assert copyright over content produced by their own employees. This photo in particular was taken by PNA photographer Avito Dalan. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:14, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
PNA terms of use#8 disallowed commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 10:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- See comment at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Adopted_Son_of_Shakba_Ko_Lawaisig.jpg -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adopted Son of Shakba Ko Lawaisig.jpg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Per consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jessie Lacuna 2020.jpg (with a summary at Category:Philippine News Agency-related deletion requests), PNA photos made by PNA employees themselves are not free enough for Commons, but those that PNA obtained from government agencies and entities like File:Itbayat Church 2019 earthquake.jpg are fine. PNA, despite being a state media agency, continues to assert copyright over content produced by their own employees. This photo in particular was taken by PNA photographer Joey O. Razon. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:02, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
PNA terms of use#8 disallowed commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- See comment at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Adopted_Son_of_Shakba_Ko_Lawaisig.jpg -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adopted Son of Shakba Ko Lawaisig.jpg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
PNA terms of use#8 disallowed commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- See comment at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Adopted_Son_of_Shakba_Ko_Lawaisig.jpg -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adopted Son of Shakba Ko Lawaisig.jpg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
PNA terms of use#8 disallowed commercial use A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- See comment at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Adopted_Son_of_Shakba_Ko_Lawaisig.jpg -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Adopted Son of Shakba Ko Lawaisig.jpg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- I have not been able to determine the copyright status in Russia of this photo, but I intend to transfer this to en.Wikipedia once this has been deleted as copyright in the US is clear.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
I have not been able to determine the copyright status in Russia of this photo, but I intend to transfer this to en.Wikipedia once this has been deleted as copyright in the US is clear.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:51, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
