Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/11/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
~2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Mosque_,_Isfahan.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Yardimcikitaplar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. Most, if not all, files can be found on other websites.
- File:Yky-kitabevi-yardimci-kitaplar-blog.jpg
- File:Yks-yardimci-kitaplar-blog.jpg
- File:Yds-hazirlik-kitaplari-yardimci-kitaplar.jpg
- File:Yardimci-kitaplar-lgs-kitaplari.jpg
- File:Yardimci-kitaplar-fiyatlari.jpg
- File:Tyt-yardimci-kitaplari-1.jpg
- File:Sanatsal-malzemeler-akilli-kampanya-yardimci-kitaplar-1.jpg
- File:Sanatsal-malzemeler-akilli-kampanya-yardimci-kitaplar.jpg
- File:Robinson-Crusoe-389-Kitabevi-yardimci-kitaplar-blog.jpg
- File:Riverrun-kitabevi-yardimci-kitaplar-blog.jpg
- File:Pandora-kitabevi-yardimci-kitaplar-blog.jpg
- File:Okunmasi-gereken-kitaplar-yardimci-kitaplar.jpg
- File:Okuma-yazma-setleri-yardimci-kitaplar-2.jpg
- File:Okuma-yazma-setleri-yardimci-kitaplar-1.jpg
- File:Okul-cantasi-markalari-yardimci-kitaplar-blog.jpg
- File:Kitap-siteleri-yardimci-kitaplar.jpg
- File:Kitap-satis-siteleri-yardimci-kitaplar.jpg
- File:Cocuklar-icin-kitap-yardimci-kitaplar-blog.jpg
- File:Cocuk-kitaplari-yardimci-kitaplar-2.jpg
- File:Cocuk-kitaplari-yardimci-kitaplar-1.jpg
- File:Cocuk-kitabı-yardimci-kitaplar-blog.jpg
- File:8-sinif-kitaplari-yardimci-kitaplar-1-2.jpg
- File:8-sinif-kitaplari-yardimci-kitaplar-1-1.jpg
- File:8-sinif-en-iyi-test-kitaplari.jpg
- File:Yks-kitaplari.jpg
- File:Yardimci-kitaplar-magaza-banner-1.jpg
- File:Tyt-temel-yeterlilik-testi-sinavlari.jpg
- File:Ortaokul-yardimci-kaynak-kitaplar.jpg
- File:Ortaogretim-8-sinif-yardimci-kitaplar.jpg
- File:Ortaogretim-7-sinif-yardimci-kitaplar.jpg
- File:Open-graph-image.jpg
- File:Okuma-yazma-setleri-yardimci-kitaplari.jpg
- File:Okul-oncesi-dikkat-guclendirme-setleri.jpg
- File:Okul-oncesi-kitaplari-yardimcikitaplar.jpg
- File:Lise-yardimci-kaynak-kitaplari.jpg
- File:Ilkokul-yardimci-kaynak-kitaplar.jpg
- File:Ilkokul-4-sinif-kitaplari.jpg
- File:Ilkokul-3-sinif-kitaplari.jpg
- File:Ilkokul-2-sinif-kitaplari.jpg
- File:Banner-kucuk-yardimci-kitaplar.jpg
- File:Ayt-alan-yeterlilik-testi-kitaplari.jpg
- File:10-sinif-lise-yardimci-kitaplar.jpg
- File:9-sinif-yardimci-kitaplar.jpg
- File:1-sinif-ilkogretim-kitaplari.jpg
- File:5-sinif-yardimci-kaynak-kitaplar.jpg
- File:6-sinif-ortaogretim-kitaplari.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 08:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
~2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Pointless DimensionShifter (talk) 01:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
~2.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Gbawden at 08:07, 5 November 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1) --Krdbot 13:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
~2.jpg){kind=link}
The uploader removed themselves from the author field in the information template. So I doubt it is an Own work. Masum Reza📞 10:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: was speedied for copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --FitIndia Talk Mail 14:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shuvo chandra pall (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Shuvo chandra pall speaking time.jpg
- File:Shuvo chandra pall in kolkata.jpg
- File:Shuvo chandra pall pust.jpg
- File:Shuvo chandra pall in ranaghat.jpg
- File:Power plant under sky with beautiful house and person.jpg
- File:Person around a wall.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: all speedied as personal photos of a non-contributor. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Not used,same as File:Ronco logo.svg on English Wikipedia, and low resolution 104.194.218.5 22:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Same as File:Ronco logo.svg on English Wikipedia, not used, lower resolution 173.239.197.2 16:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept, this is textlogo, ineligible for copyright. In addition, local copy in en.wiki does not replace file in commons. Taivo (talk) 19:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Not used, same as Ronco logo.svg on en:wiki 2605:B100:D0D:9C5E:F175:32C3:973F:C577 15:32, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no new arguments. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 104.194.218.5 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Not used, same as Ronco logo.svg on en:wiki|subpage=File:Ronco Always Innovating logo.png|year=2019|month=November|day=3. Invalid speedy deletion criterium. Previously kept. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no new arguments. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Possible hoax. This logo does not appear on Bitly's website, and I could not find evidence that they have ever used it. If Bitly is indeed rebranding, these images are missing a source. Alex Cohn (talk) 04:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Bjh21: Removed from de, fr, ja, and zh. Requested global lock on meta for involved accounts, which were confirmed by an enwiki checkuser to be socks of a known LTA. Alex Cohn (talk) 21:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nice one.
Delete. --bjh21 (talk) 22:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nice one.
- @Bjh21: Removed from de, fr, ja, and zh. Requested global lock on meta for involved accounts, which were confirmed by an enwiki checkuser to be socks of a known LTA. Alex Cohn (talk) 21:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:14, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Reine Selbstdarstellung ohne enzyklopädischen Wert, die in diversen Wikis gestreut wird. Siehe auch [1] Alnilam (talk) 14:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Srittau at 19:24, 5 November 2019 UTC: Content intended as Vandalism (G3) --Krdbot 02:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Reine Selbstdarstellung ohne enzyklopädischen Wert, die in diversen Wikis gestreut wird. Siehe auch [2]| Alnilam (talk) 14:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Srittau at 19:24, 5 November 2019 UTC: Content intended as Vandalism (G3) --Krdbot 02:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asloobhashmi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. Also, the pictures used in files can be found on the web. We need OTRS permission for them.
- File:Cheap long distance movers.jpg
- File:Benefits of Obtaining Free Moving Quotes From Movers.jpg
- File:Moving Quotes.jpg
- File:Free Moving Quotes.jpg
- File:How to Move to Another State.jpg
- File:Cheap Long Distance Moving Companies.jpg
- File:Daytona Beach Moving Companies.jpg
- File:Cheapest Way to Move Across Country.jpg
Ahmadtalk 13:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
No ticket with a proof to release this picture to the public domain plus a personality rights infringement. Zeitungsente0815 (talk) 07:42, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: 2007 file, with an expalination of the license used. GOF. Ruthven (msg) 19:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
OTRS permission required. @Ruthven: COM:GOF: This tag can be applied only to files uploaded prior to 1 January 2007. Sealle (talk) 02:40, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:08, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Copyright infringement; this picture is not the own work of the uploader as stated but stems from an autograph card, cf. http://www.stoffwechsel-aktiv.com Zeitungsente0815 (talk) 18:41, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Note. This 3rd deletion request is about another image as the 1st and 2nd. They were for a color photograhy, this one is for a b/w photography. Reason for deletion: Copyright violation seems clear to me. Neve own work, no source, no author given. --Raymond 16:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio: Scan of a newspaper Karsten11 (talk) 17:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 16:09, 6 November 2019 UTC: Commons:Derivative work: newspaper/magazine --Krdbot 19:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hernán Precht (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
What ? Are you Kidding me? It´s my work. But Please DELETE IT FAST!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hernán Precht (talk • contribs) 16:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC) DELETE IT FAST, PLEASE. WHO THE HELL HE THINKS HE IS TO ASK MY WORK TO BE DELETED?. ANYWAY, PLEASE DELETE MY BOOKS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hernán Precht (talk • contribs) 16:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- You do not need to start another DR. Masum Reza📞 13:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
(posted on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Música Clásica ( Para ignorantes como Yo ).pdf): Because an administrator asks for its deletion Alexander precht06 (talk) 13:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
(posted on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Isla de Pascua - Lentes en Viaje.pdf): I dont´t have the time nor the age to fight for a Collaboration in good faith. Delete it as wel as other book uploaded by me, to be in peace . No need to be here. Alexander precht06 (talk) 13:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and uploader. --Herby talk thyme 11:58, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hernán Precht (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
What ? Are you Kidding me? It´s my work. But Please DELETE IT FAST!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hernán Precht (talk • contribs) 16:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC) DELETE IT FAST, PLEASE. WHO THE HELL HE THINKS HE IS TO ASK MY WORK TO BE DELETED?. ANYWAY, PLEASE DELETE MY BOOKS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hernán Precht (talk • contribs) 16:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- You do not need to start another DR. Masum Reza📞 13:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
(posted on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Música Clásica ( Para ignorantes como Yo ).pdf): Because an administrator asks for its deletion Alexander precht06 (talk) 13:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
(posted on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Isla de Pascua - Lentes en Viaje.pdf): I dont´t have the time nor the age to fight for a Collaboration in good faith. Delete it as wel as other book uploaded by me, to be in peace . No need to be here. Alexander precht06 (talk) 13:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and uploader. --Herby talk thyme 11:58, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Trespasser's photo 73.132.67.15 00:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC) The house depicted in this photo sits half a mile up a private road posted against trespassers, as the following Google Maps link shows. Please remove the photo now; let the photographer post her/his desire for permission to visit the home and take the photo, and I will visit again, put the photographer in touch with the homeowner, and enable that request. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 73.132.67.15 (talk) 00:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Trespass is not a reason to delete a picture from Commons. The picture's rights belong to Roy Klotz, he can do with it what he wants. Magic♪piano 02:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep obviously. This nomination is the continuation of the bizarre campaign at the top of this page. EEng (talk) 05:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep under COM:INUSE. We might consider deleting the picture as a courtesy, but not while English Wikipedia finds the picture useful on en:List of National Historic Landmarks in Maryland, en:National Register of Historic Places listings in Carroll County, Maryland, and en:Whittaker Chambers Farm. --bjh21 (talk) 15:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- As a courtesy? Courtesy to whom? All we have is this guy blathering. We have no idea who he is or whether anything he's saying is true. By his comment above he's not "the homeowner", so what business is it of his anyway? EEng (talk) 19:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NaveenSingh11 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by ~riley. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete Seems scanned or downlowded from somewhere; cf. this ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 20:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/33926605308/in/photolist-TFYHLQ 2.13.33.129 23:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Antoine Pesne et il est mort en 1757.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: comparer exif https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/33926605308/in/photolist-TFYHLQ 2.14.195.51 15:42, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment Renominated without valid rationale. Pinging @Strakhov. Pinging @Gbawden. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 23:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100, IP blocked. --Achim (talk) 11:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/46887171375/in/photolist-2erg1wt 2.13.33.129 23:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est un anonyme du 17e.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/46887171375/in/photolist-2erg1wt 2.14.195.51 14:56, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Renominated without valid rationale. Pinging @Strakhov Pinging @Gbawden. --Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, GSW-FR(ALS). 23:03, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Art-100, IP blocked. --Achim (talk) 12:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Marionna Schlatter herself requests deletion Baumis (talk) 21:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 09:37, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose.--Kai3952 (talk) 03:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Nearly-illegibly-low-res image of plain-text table, was replaced long ago with wikitable. DMacks (talk) 03:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete table as a graphics is always a huge accessibility issue. Wostr (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; poor-quality image of a table, hardly visible & pixelated text. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 09:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Equivalent to File:Reorientation of solvent.jpg but with in-image caption text that interferes with reuse. DMacks (talk) 03:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete not used, no need to keep it. Wostr (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Test image. Not a viable actual reaction, and uploader has been inactive for almost a year DMacks (talk) 06:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE, some recreations.
- File:Article de Pierre.png
- File:Les galas de catch.png
- File:Pierre et Jo Kassongo.png
- File:Pierre et PAPA WEMBA.png
- File:Pierre et Mousse.png
- File:Pierre et Santos.png
- File:Pierre et Karim.png
- File:Pierre en 1986.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Please use an other hosting website than Wikimedia Commons for alternate history or fan-fictions Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Please use an other hosting website than Wikimedia Commons for alternate history or fan-fictions Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Please use an other hosting website than Wikimedia Commons for alternate history or fan-fictions Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Please use an other hosting website than Wikimedia Commons for alternate history or fan-fictions Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Please use an other hosting website than Wikimedia Commons for alternate history, vkontakte jokes or fan-fictions Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Please use an other hosting website than Wikimedia Commons for alternate history, vkontakte jokes or fan-fictions Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Please use an other hosting website than Wikimedia Commons for alternate history, vkontakte jokes or fan-fictions Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 08:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Please use an other hosting website than Wikimedia Commons for alternate history, vkontakte jokes or fan-fictions Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope. Please use an other hosting website than Wikimedia Commons for alternate history, vkontakte jokes or fan-fictions Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 09:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused file, Looks like an orphaned diagram that has lost all context. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Poor quality, replaced by File:1111paddlane.svg. Leyo 09:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as much better alternative exists. Wostr (talk) 18:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, very poor quality. Leyo 09:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete not used, very low quality and not acceptable structures according to IUPAC recommendations. Wostr (talk) 18:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:21, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, poor quality, replaced by SVG version. Leyo 10:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete low quality, better version exists. Wostr (talk) 18:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; superseded by File:Clonazolam skeletal formula.svg as high-quality vector replacement. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 18:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:21, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, very poor quality, replaced by SVG version. Leyo 10:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete low quality, better version exists. Wostr (talk) 18:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; superseded by File:Truxillic and truxinic acid stereo.svg. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 17:07, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:21, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
out of scope Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
just a noise. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 12:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
unused, apparently out of scope VLu (talk) 13:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
let's delete it Soshial (talk) 17:07, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorised media. No description. Commons is not a private media album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorised media. Commons is not a private media album. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:55, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Mitte27 (talk) 15:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Spam, non-notorous person Stego (talk) 15:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kamanzi Delvin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
Mitte27 (talk) 15:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Masum Reza📞 07:43, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Mitte27 (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
and
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Video seems to be damaged. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:13, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:13, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. – Kwj2772 (talk) 14:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GuadoEduardo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:15, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
useless photo, low quality, blurred image of unknown birds Gower (talk) 17:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:15, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
useless photo, low quality, blurred image of unknown birds Gower (talk) 17:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
bad quality, little information about depicted view Gower (talk) 17:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
corrupt or empty (identical) files. I see no benefit to keep them.
- File:Menger4D w 001.png
- File:Menger4D w 002.png
- File:Menger4D w 003.png
- File:Menger4D w 004.png
- File:Menger4D w 005.png
- File:Menger4D w 006.png
- File:Menger4D w 007.png
- File:Menger4D w 008.png
- File:Menger4D w 009.png
- File:Menger4D w 010.png
- File:Menger4D w 011.png
- File:Menger4D w 012.png
- File:Menger4D w 013.png
- File:Menger4D w 014.png
JuTa 19:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Small pixelated GIF. Have File:Ir4(CO)12.svg and File:Ir4CO12.png as high-quality replacments DMacks (talk) 19:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
12.svg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Wostr (talk) 19:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; poor-quality & pixelated chemical structure. Superseded by appropriate alternatives. Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 18:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:21, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope, a non-notable person Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by София Бакуткина (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SCOPE (Sofya Plotnikova) ?
- File:Софья в родной Москве.jpg
- File:Now United в Лондоне.jpg
- File:Съемки Клипа "Каждый день".jpg
- File:Амбассадор Кати.jpg
- File:Now United в Бразилии.jpg
- File:Софья в туре.jpg
- File:Ильдарисоня.jpg
- File:NowUnited.jpg
- File:СОгойКугаевой.jpg
- File:КристинаКомаровская.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope Mindmatrix 22:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:21, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:PACKAGING, complex packagings that exceed COM:TOO Taiwan.--Kai3952 (talk) 03:02, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING, complex packagings that exceed COM:TOO Taiwan.--Kai3952 (talk) 03:02, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING, complex packagings that exceed COM:TOO Taiwan.--Kai3952 (talk) 03:02, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING, complex packagings that exceed COM:TOO Taiwan.--Kai3952 (talk) 03:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Agree、 Delete：同意刪除（agree the deletion）--竹筍弟弟 (talk) 10:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:30, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING, complex packagings that exceed COM:TOO Taiwan.--Kai3952 (talk) 03:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING, complex packagings that exceed COM:TOO Taiwan.--Kai3952 (talk) 03:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose.--Kai3952 (talk) 03:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose.--Kai3952 (talk) 03:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Nosmetana (talk) 04:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 12:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Image source is https://warktimes.com/2018/04/15/deputy-green-leader-says-mitton-can-win-riding-just-as-bob-hall-did-in-82/. Since the copyright for the photo is likely held by Bruce Wark (or whomever he received the photo from) and there is no evidence of the photo being published under a Commons-compatible license, recommending deletion per COM:PCP. RA0808 (talk) 04:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- It should be deleted, I had my doubts that this was under Creative Commons since I couldn't find it on flickr at all. - MikkelJSmith (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and, in the case of MikkelJSmith, the source of the image is from a WordPress blog. It may be CC, but if not explicitly stated, we need to err on the side of caution and delete. If she's notable, I'm sure CC photos of her will turn up soon enough. --Dmehus (talk) 03:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
This is a company property, not mine Abhirupmoitra93 (talk) 05:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 12:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
The wrong file has been uploaded Theedithub (talk) 06:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted (first file version). --Wdwd (talk) 12:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, very poor quality. Leyo 09:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete not used, very low quality. Wostr (talk) 18:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- comment I ported this image from en.wiki four years ago, but I didn't create it.
I left a note on the actual creator's en.wiki user talk page, but they haven't been around for a decade or so.
I don't specifically remember why I uploaded the image, but I can't imagine doing so if it weren't in use at the time, because I very rarely work on topics related to chemistry.
Granted, the image is small. While I am not a chemist I am sure I have seen chemistry books that lines that mix text with small images like this, then more text, mor image. So, I don't see its small size as a killer objection.
Neither Leyo or Wostr offered a superior replacement image, and I don't think there is any doubt it is in scope. So, I would need to see much stronger arguments for deletion, before I agreed with them. Geo Swan (talk) 22:01, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- Leyo, Wostr, clarification please, are you chemists, in real life? Did you study enough chemistry to be able to read a diagram like this? If not, on what do you base the concern that it is of "poor quality"? Geo Swan (talk) 23:38, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- File:Phosphinimide main group complex bridging.gif is in use, in Phosphinimide ligands#Structure and bonding, fwiw. Geo Swan (talk) 00:44, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- I don't provide real-life information, but the fact that I've been editing a few ten thousand chemistry articles will likely provide you with sufficient evidence.
- My deletion reasoning is based on its very poor graphical quality. In addition, it is orphaned/replaced by another (GIF) version. In fact, this image is of rather poor quality, too. --Leyo 10:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete both the .jpg and the .gif versions. I have uploaded an .svg equivalent, File:Bridging phosphinimide main group complex.svg and replaced the one use of the .gif version. In general, when a low resolution/lower quality image has been replaced by a higher quality, scalable image and it is no longer in use on any project, there is no reason to keep it and they are routinely deleted. (Many of my older images that that I uploaded >10 years ago when the quality standards were lower get replaced and deleted, and I have no objection to that. It's good that it happens.) Ed (Edgar181) 14:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete both per Edgar181, with thanks for a high-quality replacement. DMacks (talk) 14:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, poor quality, replaced. Leyo 10:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete not used, low quality. Wostr (talk) 18:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination; unused & useless "chemical structure". Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 19:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. In addition to being low quality and unused, in proper chemical nomenclature the "3" should be subscript. Ed (Edgar181) 14:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ghasemjasem (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 04:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
_Mosque_,_Isfahan.jpg){kind=link}
_Mosque_,_Isfahan.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Many people are using this image without illegally downloading it from wikipedia and it in over my control. MohammadReza (talk) 11:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
_Mosque_,_Isfahan.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Sorry, CC licenses are irrevocable. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept, you cannot control anything published under free license. Downloading files from Commons and using them without permission is totally legitimate. Actually Commons encourages that. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
_Mosque_,_Isfahan.jpg){kind=link}
_Mosque_,_Isfahan.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Many People are using my image illegally and without mentioning photographer name, so I decide it to be deleted (As a Photographer) MohammadReza (talk) 12:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Please do not re-open deletion requests without providing a valid reason. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:15, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Миодраг Крагуљ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Mati-ekatarina-manastir-jovanje.jpg
- File:Антоније Ђурђевић.jpg
- File:Biljni-preparati-manastira-draca-koje-s-ljubavlju-i-uz-molitvu-prave-monahinje-na-celu-sa-igumanijom-jelenom-cuveni-su-sirom-srbije s.png
- File:Monahinja Evgenija 001.jpg
- File:Ранка Мишић.jpg
- File:Митрополит црногорско приморски Данило.jpg
- File:Julijan.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy: per nomination & apparent copyright violation. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 10:10, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Миодраг Крагуљ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Vintage low-re images, unlikely to be own works.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 19:51, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Personal reasons Arorareshma (talk) 11:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Upload is recent enough that COM:CSD#G7 would have been applicable at the time of nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
couverture de bande dessinée soumise aux droits d'auteurs Olivier Tanguy (talk) 11:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Pareil. Il nous faudrait l'accord de tous les co-auteurs et naturellement de l'éditeur, qui possède les droits. --Bédévore (talk) 18:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:28, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
This is a painting of the USS United States by the British artist Geoff Hunt (born 1948). https://www.scrimshawgallery.com/product/u-s-s-united-states/ Not PD, not own work. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Was uploaded before on the Facebook profile of one of the depicted. Uploader is a multiple copyright violator, see his talk page for the respective deletion requests. King Rk (talk) 20:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:56, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio - [3] Silraks (talk) 21:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files and pages created as advertisements (cf. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_RP_Company#cite_ref-1) Naivuon (talk) 21:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:52, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF, unlikely own work.
Wcam (talk) 22:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://www.google.com/search?sxsrf=ACYBGNS_tl1lBBWMmCE9GI9CTtSZvIh1Wg:1572994705636&q=toys+r+us+founder+dies&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSmQEJwiSD9JMTjCoajQELEKjU2AQaBggXCD0IQgwLELCMpwgaYgpgCAMSKNUf1B-QDsAZiBmWEPwY-wSnELkazT7GOc4-6iTaLdk6yDnbLeo_1wS4aMBdZ9KlXCems1QRXCqP_1Lm-H7rWhg8wqsLXKUpbQA77dzo899e5-lG2SajIkRGdaLyAEDAsQjq7-CBoKCggIARIEaEuGyAw&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj6xKb1ldTlAhUKyaYKHYNjDLMQ2A4ILigB&biw=1280&bih=646#imgrc=Oyn6Zzemahid8M: Trade (talk) 22:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Armyn Fane
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Armyn Fane.jpg
- File:Armyn Fane.png
- File:ArmynFane.jpg
- File:Kaweellop.png.jpg
- File:Lalu Armin Sunardi.jpg
- File:Lalu Armin.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: also unlikely to be own work. --Didym (talk) 15:49, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorised media. Suspicious description. Unlikely to be own work. The only uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Otrs not confirmed Andrei (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MAURO QUARTERHORSE (talk · contribs)
[edit]
Ahmadtalk 13:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
unfree logo — Draceane talkcontrib. 15:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikola Veljković (talk · contribs)
[edit]From exif can judge that the original source of the image is facebook, which may not be the uploader’s own work.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Catherine Laurence discussion 15:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Logo is likely protected. Commons:De minimis obviously doesn't apply in this crop. Habitator terrae 🌍 16:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Laut https://fridaysforfuture.de/armbaender/ (März 2019, abgerufen heute) gibt es nur ein einziges offizielles FFF-Produkt: Ein Armband, das nur den Schriftzug ohne weitere grafische Gestaltung enthält. Die Website bezeichnet jedes andere Merch/Produkt/Logo, das es gibt, als nicht offiziell. Der grüne Kreis mit der Inschrift Fridays for future oder einer Variation davon und wechselnden Bildinhalten wird gerne und häufig von FFF-Anhängern als Profilbild in Sozialen Medien verwendet, jedoch nicht auf der offiziellen FFF-Site. Mit anderen Worten: Dasa Logo ist ganz offensichtlich nicht offiziell und demzufolge auch nicht als Waren- oder Markenzeichen oder auf andere Weise geschützt. --C.Suthorn (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#G4, Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus.
Improper rationale of G4 if it refers to File:Jean_Ballard_et_Puzant_Topalian.jpg [4]. That file was not deleted by community consensus. It was deleted because it had no license tag. Now it has one. Of course, it can be discussed for other reasons if there is reason to doubt the statements of the uploader. Asclepias (talk) 16:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=File:Jean_Ballard_et_Puzant_Topalian.jpg){kind=link}
Je suis la nièce de Puzant Topalian et cette photo fait partie de nos photos de famille. Comment vous le démontrer ? C'est un peu désespérant à la fin.--KAMBOURIAN Annie (talk) 19:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. In the above comment, the uploader seems to imply that the photo is not own work, and gives no other indication about the identity of the author. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table and w:en:Help:Math to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical logo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Le Petit Chat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: All these files are obviously copyvio. I checked the first 4 images. There's no need to reverse--search all the sources.
It seems to come form en wp. eventually first check there wether iti is a copyvio. Sanandros (talk) 16:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Sanandros: The same image with another cropping : http://defence.az/photosession/2018/01/new-weapons-Turkey-2_1515410865.jpg --Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Didym (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:1960s O Sensei Demo - Hombu Dojo.jpg
- File:1975 Chiba Sensei at Strasbourg University.jpg
- File:Uchideshi at Hombu Dojo 1960.jpg
- File:1967 BAC Summer School.jpg
- File:1962 Chiba and Nidai Doshu - Sankyo.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AmandaParanavithana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Guru Mosi.jpg
- File:Md Moshiur Rahman .jpg
- File:Md Moshiur Rahman - enlighten .png
- File:Md Moshiur Rahman Gurumia.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Selfie, low-quality U+1F360 (talk) 17:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Surpasses COM:TOO and this logo likely isn't the uploader's "own work". Masum Reza📞 17:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Limited resolution and no exif data. Since the user has uploaded tens of copyrighted files, this image is probably another copyright violation. Le Petit Chat (talk) 19:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by William Graham as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Low resolution, appears to be screenshot of video. Uploader's has had an other image of this subject deleted for copyright violation.
Converted by me to regular DR, as the evidence is too weak for a speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above mentioned other image was File:Matt jones4.jpg, which is identical to this one, and had as source "TV interview" in 2006. Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 19:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The uploader is a multiple copyright violator who claimed the authorship of many pictures that were uploaded to Facebook by differents users before he uploaded them to Commons (see his talk page for the respective deletion requests). While I'm convinced that some of his uploads are legitimate, this one from 2002 is not one of them. Mainly because he revealed his identity here and wrote a now deleted article about himself at German Wikipedia (link for German admins here), where he gave his year of birth as 2003. King Rk (talk) 19:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The uploader is a multiple copyright violator who claimed the authorship of many pictures that were uploaded to Facebook by differents users before he uploaded them to Commons (see his talk page for the respective deletion requests). While I'm convinced that some of his uploads are legitimate and I didn't found this picture elsewhere on the Internet (a similar one though, that could stem from the same photo session); the fact that he revealed his identity here and wrote a now deleted article about himself at German Wikipedia (link for German admins here), where he gave his year of birth as 2003 is in my opinion reason enough to assume another copyright violation rather than he took this picture as a six year old. King Rk (talk) 20:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image seems to be a screenshot from PlayStation, copyright likely with SONY. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Was uploaded before on the Facebook profile of the depicted ([5], (Original) Uploader is a multiple copyright violator (see his talk page for the respective deletion requests). King Rk (talk) 20:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative work Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
copyright infringement Maksim L. (talk) 07:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Flickrwashed, the author's Flickr account has a dozen+ of similar model images worn sportswear, the majority of the pics there has "All rights reserved" tag, the account has not been active for many years. Pr12402 (talk) 08:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Middnightde (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:PACKAGING
Gbawden (talk) 08:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:31, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
File description page says authot is CRISTINA PERALES (the subject, an actress), while EXIF data says author and copyright holder is TONO BALAGUER. In any case, we'd need a written permission via COM:OTRS. El Grafo (talk) 08:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
I no longer want this file on wikicommons. Monkeez (talk) 10:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 16:28, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dilanlekamge (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claims of own work, one camera, rest no exif. Others uploaded by this user were from FB. PCP
- File:Michelle dilhara.jpg
- File:Salsapuna character Podi Patharakari.jpg
- File:Salsapuana podi patharakari.jpg
- File:Michelle Dilhara.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Jean.elementos
[edit]Unused and uncategorised media. Songs uploaded from the non-contributor. Unlikely to be own work. No description --Estopedist1 (talk) 12:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Escritorporamor (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission at https://www.talokudo.com.br
- File:Talokudo e personagens.jpg
- File:Humorista Talokudo campeão do canjica Show.jpg
- File:Comediante Talokudo.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Talokudo 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 02:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
entrei em contato com o autor das imagens e aqui esta a permissão de uso das três imagens, publicada pelo próprio site https://www.talokudo.com.br — Preceding unsigned comment added by Escritorporamor (talk • contribs) 14:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4). --Эlcobbola talk 19:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/14295351332/in/photolist-nMepUG 2.13.33.129 23:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per Commons:PD-Art. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No evidence to this license on the source page. Regasterios (talk) 15:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8601946585/in/photolist-e78e2T 2.13.33.129 21:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Auguste Mayer et il est mort en 1890.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:PD-Art. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be user's own work based on (deleted) user contributions. Cannot locate original image via Google. JalenFolf (talk) 00:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Bi image, full EXIF, no Google hits. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Cropped image that is unlikely to be user's own work based on (deleted) user contributions. Cannot locate original image via Google. JalenFolf (talk) 00:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion Big image, full EXIF, no google hit. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:44, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Transferred here from dewiki by Ireas. Care to explain why? Otherwise this is obviously a copyvio unless there is some proof via OTRS or an external, verified, site that confirms the license. Majora (talk) 01:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- The original uploader confirmed that they are the photographer, which was sufficient at the time (at least on dewiki). I’ll try to get a confirmation via mail. – ireas (talk) 10:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - This is more than a photograph -- the background also has a copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
No FOP in Qatar.
- File:Side View of the National Museum of Qatar.jpg
- File:Exterior View of National Museum of Qatar.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Art Vuckovic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern paintings, if in scope then a permission from the artist (https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemanja_Vu%C4%8Dkovi%C4%87) must be sent to OTRS
Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:36, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Art Vuckovic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Needs permission from Artist(s)
- File:Južno voće, ulje na platnu, 190cm x 150cm, 2016. - 2019..jpg
- File:Ispod mora, ulje na platnu, 190cm x 150cm, 2016. - 2019..jpg
- File:Buržoazija, 300x120 cm, ulje na platnu, 2019..jpg
- File:Ljubičasta svila na medu, 190x150 cm, ulje na platnu, 2016. - 2019..jpg
- File:Unutrašnje stanje uma, .jpg
- File:Varoš.jpg
- File:Ekstaza, 190cm x 150cm, ulje na platnu..jpg
- File:Bujica, 190cm x 150cm, ulje na platnu..jpg
- File:Iluzija, 190cm x 150cm, ulje na platnu..jpg
- File:Zarr.jpg
- File:Zverr.jpg
- File:Mukk.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Sure, he upload copyrighted pictures on srwiki too. Possible self-promotion. Zoranzoki21 (talk) 16:02, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:06, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs of Taoyuan by 盈棻 吳
[edit]Selecting photographs of Taoyuan by the same photographer with fairly obvious copyright issues unlikely to be resolved by a de minimis rationale. These include shots focused on decorated menus, some restaurant decor which focuses on artworks and some maps which appear recent creations.
- File:2016-10-23桃園-潮味決鍋物 (30854172306).jpg
- File:2016-10-23桃園-潮味決鍋物 (30854172486).jpg
- File:2016-10-23桃園-潮味決鍋物 (30854172696).jpg
- File:2016-10-23桃園-潮味決鍋物 (30854181096).jpg
- File:2016-10-23桃園-潮味決鍋物 (30854181366).jpg
- File:2016-10-23桃園-潮味決鍋物 (30854181606).jpg
- File:2016-10-23桃園-潮味決鍋物 (30854181956).jpg
- File:2016-10-23桃園-潮味決鍋物 (30854182216).jpg
- File:2016-10-23桃園-潮味決鍋物 (30854183346).jpg
- File:【桃園。中壢】無名早餐。油飯加餐、肉羹湯 (33206461191).jpg
- File:【桃園市。美食】老咩~彩虹蛋糕 (32580409163).jpg
- File:【桃園市。美食】老咩~彩虹蛋糕 (32580409273).jpg
- File:【桃園市。美食】老咩~彩虹蛋糕 (33354060516).jpg
- File:【桃園景點】恩愛農場 (32956494400).jpg
- File:【桃園景點】恩愛農場 (33339160455).jpg
- File:【桃園景點】角板山形館彩繪 (32513922294).jpg
- File:【桃園景點】角板山形館彩繪 (32513946924).jpg
- File:【桃園景點】角板山形館彩繪 (32974259620).jpg
- File:【桃園景點】角板山形館彩繪 (33229044411).jpg
- File:【桃園景點】角板山形館彩繪 (33229046941).jpg
- File:【桃園景點】角板山形館彩繪 (33229048391).jpg
- File:【桃園景點】銀河鐵道 (31070246524).jpg
- File:【桃園美食。蘑菇義大利麵】 (31978404311).jpg
- File:【桃園美食。蘑菇義大利麵】 (32096370655).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】COFE FOR FUN (31677826100).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】COFE FOR FUN (31677839040).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】MR MAY 義式料理 (31704564613).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】MR MAY 義式料理 (31704564703).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】MR MAY 義式料理 (32516451195).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】MR MAY 義式料理 (32516451365).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】MR MAY 義式料理 (32516451895).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】MR MAY 義式料理 (32516452055).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】MR MAY 義式料理 (32525679252).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】新羅韓式 料理 (31908695313).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】泰集泰式料理 (32822487103).jpg
- File:【桃園美食】起司惡魔 (30095314643).jpg
- File:【桃園美髮】Velours汎蘿髮型 (30063577350).jpg
- File:彥靚診所 (30448639154).jpg
- File:彥靚診所 (30452294474).jpg
- File:桃園-T2餐廳 (30535967094).jpg
- File:桃園-T2餐廳 (30550331083).jpg
- File:桃園-T2餐廳 (31321804526).jpg
- File:桃園-T2餐廳 (31321804816).jpg
- File:桃園-T2餐廳 (31321805116).jpg
- File:桃園-T2餐廳 (31321805506).jpg
- File:桃園-T2餐廳 (31321805936).jpg
- File:桃園-T2餐廳 (31321806356).jpg
- File:桃園-T2餐廳 (31321807276).jpg
- File:桃園-T2餐廳 (31321808556).jpg
- File:桃園-T2餐廳 (31349312586).jpg
- File:桃園-回善寺櫻花 (32647857830).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (30593283564).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (30607465733).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (31299913501).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (31299914891).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (31299919971).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (31299920401).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (31299921701).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (31378606806).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (31395847786).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (31414496505).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (31414504795).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (31414505225).jpg
- File:桃園-好堡實驗室 (31414505795).jpg
- File:桃園-燒肉同話 (30928707703).jpg
- File:桃園-燒肉同話 (31591718402).jpg
- File:桃園-燒肉同話 (31612621202).jpg
- File:桃園-福田屋咖哩飯 (30338382954).jpg
- File:桃園-福田屋咖哩飯 (30352106743).jpg
- File:桃園-福田屋咖哩飯 (30791869850).jpg
- File:桃園-福田屋咖哩飯 (30791870190).jpg
- File:桃園-福田屋咖哩飯 (30791870530).jpg
- File:桃園-福田屋咖哩飯 (31123557996).jpg
- File:桃園-龍岡圖書館 (30887570340).jpg
- File:桃園-龍岡圖書館 (31219298126).jpg
- File:桃園-龍岡圖書館 (31219303536).jpg
- File:桃園客家文化館 (32250040802).jpg
- File:桃園客家文化館 (32279612351).jpg
- File:桃園客家文化館 (32279614991).jpg
- File:桃園客家文化館 (32279619201).jpg
- File:桃園客家文化館 (32279619381).jpg
- File:桃園客家文化館 (32279619571).jpg
- File:桃園客家文化館 (32279619731).jpg
- File:桃園美食-邦妮義饗世界 (31477923104).jpg
- File:桃園美食-邦妮義饗世界 (32200251581).jpg
- File:桃園美食-邦妮義饗世界 (32319705315).jpg
- File:桃園美食-邦妮義饗世界 (32319706355).jpg
- File:桃園美食-邦妮義饗世界 (32319708825).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Fæ (talk) 11:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs of Taoyuan by 盈棻 吳
[edit]photos of printed material = com:dw.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
RZuo (talk) 17:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Mynamar A1Cafel (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Mynamar A1Cafel (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:15, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
A professional shot of a celebrity, OTRS needed. Ymblanter (talk) 16:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The high resolution indicates, that uploader must have had access to the original photograph so maybe they had the rights to publish. Please contact the OTRS to undelete this image. --Amada44 talk to me 08:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Bombaykatze
[edit]- File:Bombay cat kitten video of Blue Sinfonie.ogg
- File:Bombay cat kitten video.ogg
- File:Bombay Cat kitten video movie of Blue Sinfonie.ogg
Right one is File:Bombay Cat kitten video of Blue Sinfonie.ogv. Ogg files on above are not worth of to be preserved --Estopedist1 (talk) 13:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Redundant to File:New-Play-Store-logo.png which is bigger and clearer. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 16:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
не правильно поступила Ssafarova (talk) 08:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: procedural close: specified file does not exist. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Мне нужно добавить его в другой текст Ssafarova (talk) 09:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request on upload day. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:50, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
taken from television programme (logo top left) Sporti (talk) 08:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:52, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Bad version without metadata of the file File:X. Xawery Szaniawski (43465).jpg Cyfrowabiblioteka (talk) 10:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:--Archon--
[edit]--
- File:Braun.ogg is maybe OK
invalid ogg files --Estopedist1 (talk) 12:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
bad quality. Seems like invalid audio file. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Roman 92
[edit]no sound. Wrong format? --Estopedist1 (talk) 13:53, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
I am the owner of this property, and I did not give permission for these photographs to be taken. Please delete them 82.68.211.30 14:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: authorization must go through OTRS, but even then this request is unlikely to be granted. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:57, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
البيانات الخاصه اوالهويه الداله ارجو الحذف 51.253.245.131 14:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: unclear deletion rationale, seems to be an official UN document. If there are any private data, we could possibly blacken them, though. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Crop of File:USS Delaware (1820) Model.jpg. Copyright is OK, but claim of "own work" is wrong, mistitled and misidentified ship, correct source/author/license not identified, and lower resolution. Could keep as a different crop, or could just delete. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
_Model.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8648197642/in/photolist-2hendpp-2henexm-2henfQX-ebdgRU 2.13.33.129 16:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur. --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8701686219/in/photolist-JoRX8r-28g6bvR-JBaFpz-FSxedj-F8DFLL-FoXPEb-Ev29By-EvnELk-FAdrK2-eXZeoG-eq2KpG-iSxqoL-fnE9Rg-esWSpd-efWq9K-dPSXwq-dPLkwR-dPLDDt-ewxoqf-i5og6U-dPTtm3 2.13.33.129 16:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Louis Roy et il est mort en 1907.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.
--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/10610506746/in/photolist-haBBZu-nrvTgR-haia4E 2.13.33.129 16:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/18409824088/in/photolist-gXzYCu-28KmWzd-ZH2F2z-ZH2Atr-Trepna-UBcmJd-Tbd7Sg-Tbd1cx-TnBnze-NUy4kp-NzKUtf-P3nrg6-FvSAdg-NzKSwj-FvSDL8-u3Paj9-rKuUqo-dYGvcx-nJehpy-exRnBC-dYGAyV-eg4Sd4-e1Bj1d-h9j2Ma-eNeJov-dYMhdC 2.13.33.129 17:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Georges Lacombe et il est mort en 1916.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.
--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/44266662834/in/photolist-2arGdCJ-dYGAyV-f1NotD 2.13.33.129 17:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Paul Sérusier et il est mort en 1927.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.
--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8703142997/in/photolist-271DeVy-dRPPJB-ok7FYD-eg4TcB-eNeJov-ztuVSW-wFYFYz 2.13.33.129 17:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Paul Sérusier et il est mort en 1927.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.
--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8703142997/in/photolist-271DeVy-dRPPJB-ok7FYD-eg4TcB-eNeJov-ztuVSW-wFYFYz 2.13.33.129 17:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri-Gabriel Ibels et il est mort en 1936.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/10885379086/in/photolist-hzUpXL 2.13.33.129 17:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Paul Gauguin et il est mort en 1903.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/17974970874/in/photolist-tooqAW 2.13.33.129 17:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri Delavallée et il est mort en 1943.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur; https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8677427751/in/photolist-o6cVeK-dPLGRg-iSxqoL-edN5Xi-f3LeiH-ojWkrQ-fmo2SR-fnUtY3-i9n98F 2.13.33.129 17:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Maxime Maufra et il est mort en 1918.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/14596740592/in/photolist-oeS7rf 2.13.33.129 17:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Léon Spilliaert et il est mort en 1946.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8677292189/in/album-72157710797471312/ 2.13.33.129 17:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Léon Germain Pelouse et il est mort en 1891.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:08, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur : https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8702801894/in/photolist-eg38Nw-efWnRn-jAC82S-fPBHSF-goPBon-eg39dW 2.13.33.129 17:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri Royer et il est mort en 1938.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8647078191/in/photolist-eb7x62-eYHmDq-ewQNXx-s48PaA-ocTtCY-ifvU2G 2.13.33.129 17:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Georges Clairin et il est mort en 1919.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8703437145/in/photolist-FMwu5k-eg6oD8-2gspEZJ-jkjmZ7 2.13.33.129 17:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Eugène Lawrence Vail et il est mort en 1934.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d"auteur : https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8667713809/in/photolist-NT4aJv-pPCkY1-pPy6DR-hcc2GN-ecWikx-exRs39-2gz8ciN-KeEZTq-26gQ1bf-HHwYdz-jehCFB-NXAtZY-exNewg 2.13.33.129 17:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Émile Jourdan et il est mort en 1931.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 17:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8639997809/in/photolist-eaufkt-eazWEq-TActGH-eYBgpm-fpRKw9-gnjUkz-gnkaQR-fpBt9c-fpRFEY 2.13.33.129 17:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Pierre Savigny de Belay et il est mort en 1947.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8640021413/in/photolist-eaunmr 2.13.33.129 18:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Pierre Savigny de Belay et il est mort en 1947.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:02, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8649212520/in/photolist-ebitxN 2.13.33.129 18:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Charles Cottet et il est mort en 1925.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8648134553/in/photolist-ebcX7a 2.13.33.129 18:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Charles Cottet et il est mort en 1925.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8649196400/in/photolist-ebd4ut-ebioKS 2.13.33.129 18:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Charles Cottet et il est mort en 1925.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8668871532/in/photolist-ed3euh 2.13.33.129 18:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri-Gabriel Ibels et il est mort en 1936.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8984713925/in/photolist-2hbRmQk-28vB7K4-zSoE3Y-sdLgQS-f2b83b-oSoQNd-nWp6VC-nLLUgf-iNwX8B-ezteNg-iUCRCw-fPwYrq-fPfbz8-eFX1qM-ikRneG-gnkaQR-goh55z-i9nNvW-2ggaCDa-egaysY-f21bXm-f3gDtH 2.13.33.129 18:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri-Gabriel Ibels et il est mort en 1936.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8668849884/in/photolist-ed3843 2.13.33.129 18:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri-Gabriel Ibelset il est mort en 1936.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8581611795/in/photolist-e5k1d4-e7oavp-fmo2SR-iSxqoL-ebd4ut-e3CL3U-dR9n7N-dQT9tn-e4bD9c-f21bXm-e5AqxH-euFy3Q 2.13.33.129 18:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Ambroise Louis Garneray et il est mort en 1857.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8574891482/in/photolist-dQn6GK-Jf4dcn-NzSdpP-JBZrtP-GfmZeb-EsZ7wY-EvnELk-Ev29By-FtMLwd-dRPPJB-yPcVTK-yR1y5y-wheFiv-wh5Gmb-xdjMi1-whetZD-vtU3DF-uzh8mH-vtPu7E-uzhnKx-eVKBpp-eVKAxx-vt1C39-v9CGD1-vryhQ8-f41p4y-iGWkZZ-mQ7128-dTJDLS-e4JyuA-e7odxz-evG8qL-e6veLU-QP7kb5-f3gDtH-gogugS-e4Jseb 2.13.33.129 18:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Julie Delance-Feurgard et elle est morte en 1892.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8574870404/in/photolist-e4Jseb 2.13.33.129 18:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Julie Delance-Feurgard et elle est morte en 1892.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8667680491/in/photolist-ecW8r6 2.13.33.129 18:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8592105601/in/photolist-Jf4dcn-eTdWpK-TbZT8W-KmLpJN-fmCb2s-edg6nc-eNeJov-et9pDi-dTKvzL-dTDXUv-dPMi8g-e6veLU-e6fMDK 2.13.33.129 18:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Paul Leroy et il est mort en 1942.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8704254408/in/photolist-egazzS-2aSon35 2.13.33.129 18:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Lucien Simon et il est mort en 1945.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8592147805/in/photolist-e6g1cp 2.13.33.129 18:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Léopold Le Guen et il est mort au 18e.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8592187311/in/photolist-e6gcWx 2.13.33.129 18:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Léopold Le Guen et il est mort au 18e.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:57, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8667667513/in/photolist-ecW4zk 2.13.33.129 18:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri Le Fauconnier et il est mort en 1946.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 18:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8667887283/in/photolist-ecXbUt-o7i7Cw 2.13.33.129 19:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri Le Fauconnier et il est mort en 1946.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8604871623/in/photolist-e7odxz 2.13.33.129 19:04, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Victor Schnetz et il est mort en 1870.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8646059078/in/photolist-eb2j97 2.13.33.129 19:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Bernard Boutet de Monvel et il est mort en 1949.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur : https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/10610480966/in/photolist-haBuk1 2.13.33.129 19:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Maurice Denis et il est mort en 1943.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/47751465612/in/photolist-2fKCK6f-28rXBew-zJZT8J 2.13.33.129 19:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Roderic O'Conor et il est mort en 1940.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur : https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/9055865635/in/photolist-eNeFmp 2.13.33.129 19:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Émile Schuffenecker et il est mort en 1934.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/9055859515/in/photolist-ewQNXx-f2SVP7-eNeDwT-iSxqoL-gXzMj6-dQT9tn-f1NotD 2.13.33.129 19:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Émile Schuffenecker et il est mort en 1934.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/9055880415/in/photolist-f2bipu-FsSwXM-Fw9xYp-eNeDwT-N7uKP7-eNeKKe-eagY3A 2.13.33.129 19:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Émile Schuffenecker et il est mort en 1934.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/9058075968/in/photolist-256EErh-f41p4y-eNr1pA 2.13.33.129 19:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Émile Schuffenecker et il est mort en 1934.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/10711697953/in/photolist-iJVFr4-hjyfBt-dYGAyV 2.13.33.129 19:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Maxime Maufra et il est mort en 1918.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8573806403/in/photolist-e4CZWk 2.13.33.129 19:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Michel Martin Drolling et il est mort en 1851.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8670752541/in/photolist-edcSDt 2.13.33.129 19:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri Le Sidaner et il est mort en 1939.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8538239157/in/photolist-L2LnXj-e1uH2X 2.13.33.129 19:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Johann Conrad Seekatz et il est mort en 1768.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/32860185757/in/photolist-S4K3oR 2.13.33.129 19:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jules-Élie Delaunay et il est mort en 1891.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8662853693/in/photolist-ecvoAr 2.13.33.129 19:49, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Louis-Marie Désiré-Lucas et il est mort en 1949.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8663942968/in/photolist-ecAYp3 2.13.33.129 19:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Louis-Marie Désiré-Lucas et il est mort en 1949.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:53, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8601179828/in/photolist-e74i6W-eTqfm1 2.13.33.129 19:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Georges Michel et il est mort en 1843.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 19:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8663967132/in/photolist-ecB6zE 2.13.33.129 19:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri Delavallée et il est mort en 1943.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/14574374036/in/photolist-UBPMMz-ocTtCY-eb7x62-eYHmDq-NVVTZG-iSxqoL 2.13.33.129 20:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Georges Cairin et il est mort en 1919.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/9049326364/in/photolist-oyRrMw-eMEasm 2.13.33.129 20:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est François Édouard Cibot et il est mort en 1877.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:08, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/32860144217/in/photolist-S4JQ3D 2.13.33.129 20:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Eugénie Servières et elle est morte en 1855.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8569695306/in/photolist-e4gVRm 2.13.33.129 20:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Edmond Chagot et il est mort en 1885.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8584819473/in/photolist-e5BrJR 2.13.33.129 20:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Gustave Guillaumet et il est mort en 1887.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8594925048/in/photolist-2geWwHk-e6veLU 2.13.33.129 20:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri Léopold Lévy et il est mort en 1904.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8668911384/in/photolist-ed3rko 2.13.33.129 20:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est James Hamilton Hay et il est mort en 1916.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8569733494/in/photolist-dRVnym-e4h8cL 2.13.33.129 20:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jules Coignet et il est mort en 1860.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8604861405/in/photolist-e7oavp 2.13.33.129 20:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Philippe Tanneur et il est mort en 1878.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8581646261/in/photolist-e5kbsi 2.13.33.129 20:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Pierre-Julien Gilbert et il est mort en 1860.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8677371499/in/photolist-edMNer 2.13.33.129 20:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est René Ménard et il est mort en 1930.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8605995334/in/photolist-e7tYzU 2.13.33.129 20:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est François-Alfred Delobbe et il est mort en 1920.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8581638339/in/photolist-euFMuw-e5k96H-f3Lcht 2.13.33.129 20:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Alexis-Auguste Darcy-Dumoulin et il est mort en 1864.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:41, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8583610536/in/photolist-oyRrMw-e5vfn7-e1AvMw 2.13.33.129 20:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Auguste-Barthélemy Glaize et il est mort en 1893.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8584614143/in/photolist-FZCggW-e5AoGF 2.13.33.129 20:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Charles Jacque et il est mort en 1894.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8569726426/in/photolist-f3gDtH-e4h66U 2.13.33.129 20:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre d'un artiste anonyme du 19e.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 20:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8677404161/in/photolist-2hdrAAc-edMXWz-ebd4ut-dRVnym-ehP4dt-f3gG9F-f21bXm-f3gDtH-f3gzv2-ebdd8k-ezteNg 2.13.33.129 20:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8677446963/in/photolist-dRPPJB-zSoE3Y-f3gDtH-f3LeiH-yzoDKm-yQZ8rY-edNbEx-eg4Sd4 2.13.33.129 20:58, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Henri Martin et il est mort en 1943.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8678517110/in/photolist-edTEMm 2.13.33.129 21:02, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8602225499/in/photolist-e79DWK 2.13.33.129 21:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Charles Francisque Raub et il est mort en 1926.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8603304396/in/photolist-e7fbEq 2.13.33.129 21:08, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Charles Francisque Raub et il est mort en 1926.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8636528113/in/photolist-eabsV8 2.13.33.129 21:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Edmond François Aman-Jean et il est mort en 1936.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Je suis d'accord il n'y a pas de violation de droit d'auteur, il faut retirer la bannière:
[edit]
Cordialement,--François Malo-Renault (talk) 15:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8667175949/in/photolist-ecTxs6 2.13.33.129 21:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Edward Henry Fahey et il est mort en 1907.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8668897622/in/photolist-ed3nf7 2.13.33.129 21:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Paul Helleu et il est mort en 1927.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/14410824768/in/photolist-nXrf91-eb7tQc 2.13.33.129 21:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Charles-Émile de Tournemine et il est mort en 1872.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/16577097659/in/photolist-e6g6N6-e3ntHK-rfRXAB 2.13.33.129 21:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Paul Leroy et il est mort en 1942.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8568654967/in/photolist-e4bAAt 2.13.33.129 21:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Yan' Dargent et il est mort en 1899.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8582724686/in/photolist-e5qH2Q 2.13.33.129 21:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Eugène Fromentin et il est mort en 1876.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:41, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8519055460/in/photolist-dYNooy 2.13.33.129 21:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Carlo Labruzzi et il est mort en 1817.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d(auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8485010567/in/photolist-okaRPm-dVMU2D 2.13.33.129 21:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Giovanni Martinelli et il est mort au 18e.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 21:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8539474928/in/photolist-dYGpHX-e1B3om 2.13.33.129 21:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Ludwig Stern et il est mort en 1777.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8518829274/in/photolist-dYMe9N 2.13.33.129 22:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est d'École italienne du 17e.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:41, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/14105466069/in/photolist-nuscCR 2.13.33.129 22:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Luca Giordano et il est mort en 1705.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/14288811201/in/photolist-nLDTKP 2.13.33.129 22:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Giuseppe Passeriet il est mort en 1714.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/14290178692/in/photolist-nLLUgf 2.13.33.129 22:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Ludovico Mazzanti et il est mort en 1775 et il a aussi été attribué a Pier Leone Ghezzi qui est mort en 1755.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8539360166/in/photolist-e1AsgG 2.13.33.129 22:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Alessandro Rosi et il est mort en 1697.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8539371988/in/photolist-oyRrMw-e1AvMw 2.13.33.129 22:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Francesco Rosa et il est mort en 1687 et il a aussi été attribué a Onofrio Palumbo qui lui est décédé en 1656.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/14105449159/in/photolist-nus7Bi-e1uTpi/ 2.13.33.129 22:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Marco Ricci et il est mort en 1730.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8485025845/in/photolist-dVMYz4 2.13.33.129 22:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jacopo Amigoni et il est mort en 1752.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8517889277/in/photolist-dYGpHX-e1B3om 2.13.33.129 22:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Francesco de Mura et il est mort en 1782.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8489023502/in/photolist-dW9sWb 2.13.33.129 22:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Giacinto Diano et il est mort en 1803.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/14292975669/in/photolist-nM2eGZ 2.13.33.129 22:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Francesco Casanova et il est mort en 1803.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 22:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/16739719551/in/photolist-rverqk 2.13.33.129 23:57, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Il n’y a pas de violation du droit d’auteur.
- 1 – L’auteur de l’œuvre est Jean Henry dit Henry d'Arles et il est mort en 1784.
- 2 – Un compte Flickr personnel (non officiel) n’est pas une source fiable sur le droit d’auteur.
- 3 – La copie numérique d’une œuvre ne peut prétendre supplanter les droits de l’auteur d’une œuvre originale.--S. DÉNIEL (talk) 16:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur 2.13.33.129 16:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
violation du droit d'auteur: https://www.flickr.com/photos/92600277@N02/8671443645/in/photolist-edgq64-dQsHUA 92.135.108.238 12:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. COM:PD-Art. --Majora (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
Because I can't find any reference to add. SirZubeen (talk) 08:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 01:28, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptor Олег Капустяк. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:27, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
And also
- File:Kniazia-Ostrozkoho-45-12062160.jpg
- File:Kniazia-Ostrozkoho-45-12062162.jpg
- File:Kniazia-Ostrozkoho-45-12062165.jpg
- File:Kniazia-Ostrozkoho-45-12062166.jpg
- File:Kniazia-Ostrozkoho-45-12062167.jpg
- File:Житловий будинок на вул. Князя Острозького 45 (фото 1).JPG
- File:61-101-0117 001 Ternopil reg.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine. Building 1954. No Permission from the architect Володимир Валовець. Микола Василечко (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 01:27, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Can I ask you why did you make a deletion request to my photo? The portrait was taken of me and the copyright of this picture belongs to me. And I don't want to have the previous profile picture of me on my wikipedia site because I think is not proper enough. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ba2019 (talk • contribs) 07:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Prosotas aluta GaroHills Meghalaya.jpg LamBoet (talk) 18:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
extremely bad quality Gower (talk) 18:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Not that bad. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lojwe as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Not encyclopedic content. Invalid speedy deletion criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#G4, Recreation of content previously deleted per community consensus. I could not find this image in the user's contributions. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Сомнения в лицензии: грамота (вензеля) защищены авторским правом, не является официальным документом государственного органа Dogad75 (talk) 19:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019111110003205 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 02:00, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: No OTRS for over 30 days. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by RobBoy1 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: This is a private house and the photographer had trespassed on private property - please remove. Not a valid speedy deletion criterium. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- it is a criminal offence to trespass and in addition France has strict privacy laws . What threshold has to be achieved before takedown would occur ? RobBoy1 (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This building is visible from the public road. This file is used on w:ca:Santa Maria de Corbiac. This appears to be a historic building. If someone lives there now, it doesn't stop being a historic building. @RobBoy1: Trespassing is irrevelant here. If I break into a bank vault and take a photo of a diamond, I can publish that photo on Commons. (also I will go to jail, but the photo itself is legal) You can contact your local police department to make a report of trespassing if you want, but that won't affact this photo. Also, if you had simply never said anything, we wouldn't have even thought of the possiblity of anyone living there. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mosset. Santa Maria de Corbiac 5.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:30, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Absolutely correct. In reality, every building is private property or on private land and to take this argument to its logical conclusion we could have no images of such anywhere. Emeraude (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note that RobBoy1 has twice deleted this image from the Corbiac Chapel Wikipedia page. Emeraude (talk) 13:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- On both English and Catalan. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note that RobBoy1 has twice deleted this image from the Corbiac Chapel Wikipedia page. Emeraude (talk) 13:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete We don't want to encourage trespassing. Guido den Broeder (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Great, we have an alien here. Would you please look at our COM:Deletion policy? Masum Reza📞 03:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note that we don't delete images of unlicensed drugs and weapons as long as they are educational and freely licensed. This doesn't mean Commons encourages the ownership and/or use of unlicensed drugs and weapons. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mosset. Santa Maria de Corbiac 5.jpg. Natives are advised to study basic concepts first. Guido den Broeder (talk) 17:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Alex. No valid reason for deletion. Masum Reza📞 15:45, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: similar case as with museums (Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Museum and interior photography). The trespassing is the photographer's problem, not Wikimedia's. --HyperGaruda (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This image is not a public domain, because it is a screenshot(digitally cleaned) from Hato no kyūjitsu(1978, still copyrighted)[6](0m54s-), a station identification video of Nippon Television Network Corporation. The logo is PD(File:NTV Symbol 1978.svg/File:Nippon_Television_Network_logo_before_2003.png), but other texts (“日本テレビ”, “JOAX-TV”) are not included in the logo. Y-route (talk) 06:41, 5 November 2019 (UTC) - fixed--Y-route (talk) 07:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep no reason. The image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. --eien20 (talk) 18:27, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, same as above. The “日本テレビ” and “JOAX-TV” texts, which the nominator is concerned about, are in plain non-calligraphy style expressing no creative thought; therefore this derivative work of File:NTV Symbol 1978.svg remains below the threshold and thus in the public domain. --Nemoschool (talk) 08:02, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 15:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Unless this article was released under a free license, hosting this image infringes on the authors' copyright over the text. ƏXPLICIT 06:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment This image was captured from "Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine". This site says "This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited."[7].―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 08:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Commons does not accept noncommercial licenses, please see {{Cc-by-nc}}. ƏXPLICIT 11:10, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- So this image deserves the Speedy deletion.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 22:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Agree Didn't know Wikimedia Commons was so restrictive. I agree with the speedy deletion. Sorry for the trouble. Koraskadi (talk) 12:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 15:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be taken from the net. Drawing style seems like the one used on shipbucket.com, such as here. Was not able to match this image exactly, but uploader also uploaded File:L'Hermione.png from the same source which I was able to find, and nominated separately. Would need to identify the artist and get COM:OTRS permission from them. Carl Lindberg (talk) 07:36, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:21, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mauuuuuu! as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Fehlende Urheberrechte, vgl. Internetseite der Gedenkstätte, Foto nicht mehr vorhanden --Mauuuuuu! (talk) 23:54, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as the nominator's rationale isn't very convincing. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Look description: "photos very likely by lung liu, post-processing by me." Lung Liu is friend of Jhayne and Flickr photographer. In my opinion Lung Liu must give OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:08, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as a derivative work of unknown/uncertain original authorship and unknown original license, thus lacking essential information. Note that, if Lung Liu is the original author, all of his work on Flickr are "all rights reserved." --Nemoschool (talk) 07:51, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Please provide evidence that image has been published more than 50 years ago. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:A-convoy-of-combat-vehicle-in-Iraq-July-20-1961-391768248197.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: assume good faith + photo appears on the web with this date. Ruthven (msg) 15:24, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by RobBoy1 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: some reason
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Original nominator's deletion rationale: The photographer did not have permission to take this photo as it is a private property. This is a private house and not a public building. The pictures on this site are of a private home and the person who took them trespassed and ignored ‘ private property ‘ signs. Please delete these photos. RobBoy1 (talk) 10:50, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep This is a Monument Historique. This side is also visible from the public road. This photo doesn't show anything private, only the historical architecture. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mosset. Santa Maria de Corbiac 10. Absis i costat nord.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete We don't want to encourage trespassing. Guido den Broeder (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Great, we have an alien here. Would you please look at our COM:Deletion policy? Masum Reza📞 03:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- I'm quite aware that many non-aliens lack common sense. However, FYI, policywise this is covered by courtesy deletions. Guido den Broeder (talk) 14:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- No, it obviously isn't. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:54, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- I'm quite aware that many non-aliens lack common sense. However, FYI, policywise this is covered by courtesy deletions. Guido den Broeder (talk) 14:48, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note that we don't delete images of unlicensed drugs and weapons as long as they are educational and freely licensed. This doesn't mean Commons encourages the ownership and/or use of unlicensed drugs and weapons. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 12:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- You're missing the point, as usual. We do, or should, delete such images when they (the images) were obtained illegally. Guido den Broeder (talk) 14:50, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Says you. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:54, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- How do you define the word "illegal" exactly? It doesn't seem to me that they were obtained illegally, not from a copyrignt viewpoint. Masum Reza📞 14:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- That explains your !vote, then. Look up tresspass, you may learn something. Guido den Broeder (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- You're missing the point, as usual. We do, or should, delete such images when they (the images) were obtained illegally. Guido den Broeder (talk) 14:50, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Great, we have an alien here. Would you please look at our COM:Deletion policy? Masum Reza📞 03:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Alex. No valid reason for deletion. Trespassing is irrelevant. Also accounts on Wikimedia are anonymous and we don't have any proof that they are the real owner of the property. Masum Reza📞 15:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: similar case as with museums: Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Museum and interior photography. The trespassing is the photographer's problem, not Wikimedia's. --HyperGaruda (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion; monument visible from outside, and we do not know if the photograph was trespassing or was invited to take pictures. Ruthven (msg) 15:25, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect description, location is Auckland Airport, New Zealand 103.21.172.205 21:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 15:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by MikkelJSmith (talk · contribs)
[edit]Cropped files that have little to no difference with the original file
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
File:Jagmeet Singh at the 2nd National Bike Summit - Ottawa - 2018 (42481105871) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg- File:Jagmeet Singh at the 2nd National Bike Summit - Ottawa - 2018 (42481105871) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg
- File:Jagmeet Singh at the 2nd National Bike Summit - Ottawa - 2018 (42481105871) (cropped) (cropped).jpg
_(cropped)_(cropped)_(cropped)_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped)_(cropped)_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped)_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- For this, File:Jagmeet Singh at the 2nd National Bike Summit - Ottawa - 2018 (42481105871) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg the crop was made so that the picture was consistent with the other pictures on the 2019 Canadian elections page. The original one was a bad fit. So, I don't think it should be deleted. The rest were mistakes so I have no problem with them being deleted. - MikkelJSmith (talk) 12:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Jagmeet Singh at the 2nd National Bike Summit - Ottawa - 2018 (42481105871) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg: it's used on pages from ar:الانتخابات الفيدرالية الكندية 2019 to vi:Bầu cử liên bang Canada, 2019 and is a significantly different crop from the original. --bjh21 (talk) 16:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Striked out the file. But it should be renamed though. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 16:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MikkelJSmith (talk · contribs)
[edit]Cropped files that have little to no difference with the original file
File:20190925 NDPCampaignTour2019 BTS-1737 (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg- File:20190925 NDPCampaignTour2019 BTS-1737 (cropped) (cropped).jpg
- File:20190925 NDPCampaignTour2019 BTS-1737 (cropped).jpg
_(cropped)_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Much like the other picture, this File:20190925 NDPCampaignTour2019 BTS-1737 (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg crop was made so that the picture fit the election infobox on the 44th Canadian election page, the original didn't. So, it shouldn't be deleted. As for the rest, they were mistakes (trial and error) so I have no problem with their deletion. - MikkelJSmith (talk) 12:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:20190925 NDPCampaignTour2019 BTS-1737 (cropped) (cropped) (cropped).jpg: COM:INUSE on en:44th Canadian federal election. --bjh21 (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Striked out the file. But it should be renamed though. 大诺史 (Talk/留言) 16:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Note that the source image is a copyvio and the original uploader on the source image has a history of uploading Jagmeet Singh's images they have no right to. // sikander { talk } 🦖 12:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted by User:Wdwd as copyright violation. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:49, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bigbear213 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.t
- File:Announcement for 1990 Pride Day March.jpg
- File:1990 Gay and Lesbian Pride Day Program.jpg
- File:Utah Pride Quilt.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Bigbear213's repsonse: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigbear213 (talk • contribs) 02:54, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
I work as the archivist for the Pride Center Festival, they were scanned by me to be uploaded.
I took this photo May 1, 2019 at the Utah Pride Center, so I own the rights.
Deleted: scanning a work doesn't confer copyright to you. Kept one as own work as claimed. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Draceane as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: imagevio from [8]
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion, as our upload is 2 years older than the external hit. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: OK. The original uploader contacted me on my talkpage with the explanation. The image on the external website must be original, as the Commons version is cropped. — Draceane talkcontrib. 21:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hi, you initiated deletion of image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Petr_%C5%A0ilar.jpg . I must admit that I don't know how to proceed with it. I checked documentation and hopefully I am doing the right thing now :). The problem is following: - I am Pavel Šilar, son of Petr Šilar (on photo). - Photo is taken by my brother (photographer). Then it was probably handled to my father's political party to use on their article. So i guess rights belong either to my brother or my father. I don't know how to proceed further - provide evidence? Edit something? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starojda (talk • contribs) 15:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC) |
Delete According to the uploader it is not possible for them to communicate the problem with their relative thus I would handle this "brother-made-it" picture with caution. Furthermore, as @Draceane: said, the picture is so cropped that it is impossible to use it (a portrait picture which gets extremely blurry even in infobox). --Mates (talk) 10:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and User:Mates. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JalenFolf as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo. Possible below TOO Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:25, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KAMBOURIAN Annie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted works by Puzant Topalian (d. 1970), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Cavaliers devant une forteresse.jpg
- File:Eglise arménienne par Puzant Topalian.jpg
- File:Paysage par Puzant Topalian.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:59, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, KAMBOURIAN Annie is the heir of Puzant Topalian as he was her uncle. Does she need to give her permission via OTRS or her putting the paintings herself on Commons is enough? Thanks! RSVartanian (talk) 10:50, 5 November 2019 (CEST)
- @RSVartanian: KAMBOURIAN Annie must send herself the permission. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I helped her last night to put these images on Commons. Why does she need to go through OTRS if she put them here herself? / Je l'ai aidée à mettre en ligne ces images hier soir. A quoi bon passer par le système OTRS si elle a posté les images elle-même ? La licence indique pourtant bien déjà que "En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre..." RSVartanian (talk) 13:40, 5 November 2019 (CEST)
- @RSVartanian: Les comptes Wikipédia sont anonymes et il n'est possible de vérifier l'identité de Mme Kabourian que via OTRS, où elle devra fournir un document prouvant son statut d'héritière de Puzant Topalian. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Je comprends mais par exemple, concernant le fichier "Atmadjian grave 1.jpg" que j'ai pris en photo, qu'est-ce qui prouve que je n'ai pas volé cette photo au véritable Raphaël S. Vartanian et que je ne me fais pas passer pour lui sur Commons sans qu'il le sache ?
- Sinon, concernant Annie Kambourian, quel document permettrait de prouver qu'elle est bien l'héritière, sachant qu'elle est la nièce de Puzant Topalian ? Merci pour votre réponse en tout cas RSVartanian (talk) 14:17, 5 November 2019 (CEST)
- @RSVartanian: Je n'en sais rien; elle doit le savoir elle-même. Le mieux est qu'elle contacte COM:OTRS/fr et elle recevra l'aide nécessaire là bas. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Voir aussi la section initiée par KAMBOURIAN Annie sur Commons:Service d'aide#Illustrations de la biographie de Puzant Topalian. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @RSVartanian : À votre première question, la différence entre vos photos et les images des tableaux est qu'il n'existe apparemment aucun élément qui pourrait laisser supposer un doute que vous ne seriez pas l'auteur des photos. Il n'y a donc rien à vérifier. Il y aurait doute par exemple si les photos avaient déjà été publiées ailleurs. Dans le cas des tableaux, il arrive parfois que des personnes confondent la propriété des objets et la propriété des droits d'auteur. Une vérification peut être utile. À votre seconde question, les préposés d'OTRS ne demandent pas nécessairement des documents, mais ils demanderont probablement au moins que la personne explique clairement la situation. Pour l'instant, la chaîne de transmission des droits d'auteur ne semble pas avoir été affirmée explicitement et cela laisse un doute sérieux. Il faudrait d'abord une explication claire. Ensuite, si les préposés d'OTRS croient qu'un document est nécessaire, ce serait peut-être une copie du contrat de transmission des droits d'auteur. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @RSVartanian : Dans votre commentaire, vous utilisez l'expression «l'héritière». Or, dans ses interventions sur Commons jusqu'à maintenant, KAMBOURIAN Annie n'a jamais affirmé être héritière de quoi que ce soit. Au contraire, ses commentaires semblent plutôt laisser entendre que les héritiers successifs auraient été des personnes de la famille de l'épouse de l'artiste. En l'état actuel des bribes d'information fournies, il semble exister une possibilité non négligeable que les droits d'auteur sur les oeuvres puissent encore être la propriété d'autres personnes de cette famille. C'est un des éléments qui devraient être clarifiés pour prévenir les contestations, dans l'intérêt de tous, y compris dans l'intérêt de KAMBOURIAN Annie elle-même, des possibles ayants droit, de Wikimedia et des réutilisateurs. Jusqu'à maintenant, KAMBOURIAN Annie a dit que des personnes de la famille de l'épouse lui ont «confié les oeuvres [...] présentes dans l'appartement». Elle a dit aussi qu'elle a donné ces oeuvres au monastère SLdA de Venise, comme si ce don qu'elle a fait à ce monastère avait eu comme effet de lui conférer à elle la propriété des droits d'auteur. Si KAMBOURIAN Annie est la titulaire actuelle des droits d'auteur patrimoniaux, il serait possible pour elle d'en préciser la raison en des termes clairs et non équivoques, quelque chose comme par exemple «Par contrat écrit fait en [année] conformément à la loi en vigueur en [pays], [X et Y], alors propriétaires des droits d'auteur sur les oeuvres de Puzant Topalian, droits d'auteur dont ils avaient hérité de [Z], m'ont cédé l'entièreté des droits d'auteur patrimoniaux légalement transmissibles sur ces oeuvres. Bien que j'ai fait don de la propriété matérielle de ces oeuvres elles-mêmes en 2017 [au monastère SLdA], j'ai toutefois conservé l'entièreté des droits d'auteur patrimoniaux sur ces oeuvres et je suis encore aujourd'hui l'unique titulaire de ces droits d'auteur.» Évidemment, il ne s'agit pas nécessairement d'utiliser ces mots. Ce n'est qu'un exemple théorique. Il s'agirait de décrire exactement les faits réels. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- @RSVartanian: Je n'en sais rien; elle doit le savoir elle-même. Le mieux est qu'elle contacte COM:OTRS/fr et elle recevra l'aide nécessaire là bas. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @RSVartanian: Les comptes Wikipédia sont anonymes et il n'est possible de vérifier l'identité de Mme Kabourian que via OTRS, où elle devra fournir un document prouvant son statut d'héritière de Puzant Topalian. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I helped her last night to put these images on Commons. Why does she need to go through OTRS if she put them here herself? / Je l'ai aidée à mettre en ligne ces images hier soir. A quoi bon passer par le système OTRS si elle a posté les images elle-même ? La licence indique pourtant bien déjà que "En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre..." RSVartanian (talk) 13:40, 5 November 2019 (CEST)
- @RSVartanian: KAMBOURIAN Annie must send herself the permission. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:17, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. So far, the information provided by the uploader seems insufficient to safely conclude that she owns the copyright. She did not explain by which type of legal instrument she might have acquired the copyright and she did not clarify the questions asked. An OTRS message would be useless if it does not come from someone who demonstrates convincingly being the copyright owner. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: 04:00, 4 February 2020, by Arthur Crbz. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KAMBOURIAN Annie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted works by Puzant Topalian (d. 1970), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:Jeune marin avec marine en arrière-plan par Puzant Topalian.jpg
- File:Marine avec ville en arrière-plan par Puzant Topalian.jpg
- File:Portrait de femme par Puzant Topalian.jpg
- File:Composition surréaliste par Puzant Topalian.jpg
- File:Le roi Achod le Charitable par Puzant Topalian.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Same as above. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Regular deletion request to replace request for speedy deletion. I think the file should be kept. Photos of advertisements are not usually considered derivate works. Watchduck (quack) 21:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: yes, photos of ads are DW. And it is out of scope as advertising. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
This is not the original version of the icon which is housed at Jasna Góra monastery, it is a later copy. The uploader claims that it is "own work", but unless he is a noted iconographer, that seems unlikely, so the question is, who painted this copy of the original and is it PD. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
This is a photo, taken from the copy (painting) of the Black Madonna. The painting is PD-old. The name of the painting is not copyrighted, as the painting itself is not copyrighted.--Elekes Andor (talk) 12:56, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, dubious source and author, so status can't be verified. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
Reupload of a older version of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Afghanistan#/media/File:Flag_of_Afghanistan_(2004%E2%80%932013).svg No Credit to original uploader BlinxTheKitty (talk) 23:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Comment: This is not any of the versions of File:Flag of Afghanistan (2004–2013).svg. All of those have markings on both sides of the dome, whereas this one only has markings on the right-hand side of the dome. There's in any case no need to credit any author of File:Flag of Afghanistan (2004–2013).svg since that file is in the public domain. --bjh21 (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: per User:Bjh21. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
License not provided for home country Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- User:Magog the Ogre, If you delete it on Commons, can you please take whatever steps are needed so that it is NOT deleted at en.Wikipedia? Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- I uploaded this image and I think it should stay. Broadwaygal (talk) 00:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: fixed. Ruthven (msg) 15:34, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from photographer Martin Mikoleit is needed. No evidence, that uploader PsydocGerman is the same person.
The photo was uploaded 14 years ago. This can be record from upload until copyvio detection. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
This image appears to be a derivative work of an image in the e-book "Deep Carbon" edited by Orcutt, B.N.; Daniel, I; and Dasgupta, R. The e-book is licensed as CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0. The complete book is available at https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677950. Copyright information is at https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/deep-carbon/copyright-page/EC38847D039C969D9D03E07FBDDEF270/core-reader . The SA ("share alike") part of the source image's licence forces this derivative work to also have a CC-BY-NC-SA licence (not the CC-BY-SA licence given by the uploader). A CC-BY-NC-SA licence is not compatible with the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons. GeoWriter (talk) 17:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Response from the author/uploader
Thanks for the note.
For the record, I'm the illustrator of both images in question. The second image (posted here on Wikipedia Commons) has been greatly simplified from its original form in the Cambridge U Press textbook to make it accessible to a wider audience. I made some cosmetic changes as well, as the color palette has been modified to better match the suite of figures for a separate project. I believe it is different enough from the original to stand on its own on Wikipedia Commons.
Regards, --Mice of Mu (talk) 17:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Mice of Mu. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Lacks a license for its home country Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Magog the Ogre, this is another one that should stay on en.Wikipedia. Would you please add the appropriate license info to keep it there? -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:37, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:43, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
