Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/10/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
由中文維基百科破壞者韓導上傳，用於破壞的檔案。（[1]） Bagakuco (talk) 17:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Speedy delete, uploaded by LTA that does not have a source/permission. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This image is probably a screenshot. Delete per above. The uploader is constantly removing DR templates and refactoring others' messages. No to mention their LTA like nature. Masum Reza📞 22:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:30, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per Ticket:2019102810001231. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. See [2] Catherine Laurence discussion 13:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 05:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Issue by mistake, i am sorry :( Michelle MetalRockImpressions (talk) 21:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1Veertje at 23:51, 27 Oktober 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nitrogods Album.jpg: Copyright Issue by mistake, i am sorry :( --Krdbot 02:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Issue, uploaded by mistake, sorry Michelle MetalRockImpressions (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1Veertje at 23:50, 27 Oktober 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nitrogods Mayhem.jpg: Copyright Issue, uploaded by mistake, sorry --Krdbot 02:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Issue, uploaded by mistake, sorry Michelle MetalRockImpressions (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1Veertje at 23:50, 27 Oktober 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nitrogods Rats and Rumours.jpg: Copyright Issue, uploaded by mistake, sorry --Krdbot 02:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Issue by mistake, i am sorry :( Michelle MetalRockImpressions (talk) 22:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by 1Veertje at 23:50, 27 Oktober 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nitrogods Roadkill BBQ.jpg: Copyright Issue by mistake, i am sorry :( --Krdbot 02:01, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
No permission. Some are book covers which require explicit permission for them to be on commons. For the quotes(?), source/permission for the background image is needed if they aren't the uploader's own work. Majority of the remaining are selfies which might be from Facebook. Last 2 files (File:الحسين داود.jpg & File:رحلات وعمل.jpg) that have metadata might not be the uploader's own work as one of them translates to Hussein Dawood.
- File:الشاعره هانم داود.jpg
- File:الروائيه هانم داود.jpg
- File:هانم داود.jpg
- File:الكاتبه هانم داةد.jpg
- File:شعر.jpg
- File:روايه وخنت قلبى للكاتبه هانم داود هل أتحول إلى شيطانه مقابل سحر الكلمات الت.jpg
- File:مائه عشيقه.jpg
- File:كتاب نهايه أسطوره للكاتبه هانم داود،.jpg
- File:مراهقه.jpg
- File:تحت العشرين.jpg
- File:كتاب أمل وعتاب ،يأخذ بيدك لجو كله صفاء يجعل رغباتك لا تتعارض،مع أجواء الحاضر حتى ولو مرت سنين العمر،ولم يتحقق بعضها.jpg
- File:العصيان.jpg
- File:نهايه-أسطوره-.jpg
- File:الكهف.jpg
- File:Quran0035.jpg
- File:Shof 281b67fd993f29b.jpg
- File:ربنا آتنا.jpg
- File:الاكثار.jpg
- File:ألا.jpg
- File:افضل الذكر.jpg
- File:جمعه.jpg
- File:لا اله الا انت سبحانك.jpg
- File:كل حاجه.jpg
- File:من صلى.jpg
- File:الصلاه.jpg
- File:لاحول ولا قوه.jpg
- File:اقرأ.png
- File:صور-اذكار-الصباح.jpg
- File:أذكار الصباح.jpg
- File:هل أنت.jpg
- File:هانم5.jpg
- File:سيمفونية رائعة تعزفها قلوب عاشقه للحريه للحب للحياه.jpg
- File:ثوره العراق.jpg
- File:لبنان ثائره.jpg
- File:ماذا تقول.jpg
- File:فصول.jpg
- File:معرض القاهره الدولى للكتاب.jpg
- File:الحسين داود.jpg
- File:رحلات وعمل.jpg
- File:المصايف.jpg
- File:هانم صبره.jpg
- File:كتاب نهابه أسطوره هانم داود.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:27, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) + Derivative work of non-free content (F3)/COM:NETCOPYVIO --Эlcobbola talk 08:18, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope.
- File:هل تود ان تعيش زمن.jpg
- File:هنا فى.jpg
- File:فى عالم البحث.jpg
- File:كيف تشعر.jpg
- File:الشوارع والناس والزحمه فين.jpg
- File:الجليد الشتاء.jpg
- File:رأس السنه.jpg
- File:مسلسل.jpg
- File:كل الناس.jpg
- File:كل بلاد الدنيا.jpg
- File:المناظر الحلوه تحلى.jpg
- File:ماهذا.jpg
- File:تمثال مين.jpg
- File:ناس الفلبين.jpg
- File:الفلبين وناس.jpg
- File:الخليج الحكايات.jpg
- File:وراء ل صوره.jpg
- File:دوله تعرف من.jpg
- File:فى مطاعم فنادق العمل.jpg
- File:الصقر النسر الصيد.jpg
- File:أ.الحسين داود.jpg
- File:العمل وحكايات.jpg
- File:فى بلاد.jpg
- File:تحلى مع الحبايب.jpg
- File:مصايف وراها.jpg
- File:الاطفال فى.jpg
- File:المكان هو.jpg
- File:استاد بلاد.jpg
- File:كيف تواجهه المطر والحر.jpg
- File:الناس فى.jpg
- File:هنا تحلى الحياه بصحبه الناس الطيبه اللى بتخاف ربنا.jpg
- File:من أمثالنا الشعبيه.jpg
- File:الحياه والناس.jpg
- File:قل ما هى.jpg
- File:صباح الخير.jpg
- File:جبال وبلدان.jpg
- File:الطبيعه.jpg
- File:لبنان.jpg
- File:انظر حولك.jpg
- File:تطع فبقلبه، وذلك أضعف الإيمان، وليس وراء ذلك حبة خردل من إيمان.jpg
- File:وما اختلفتم فيه من شيء فحكمه إلى الله ذلكم الله ربي عليه توكلت وإليه أنيب.jpg
- File:ذلكم الله ربي عليه توكلت وإليه أنيب.jpg
- File:وإليه أنيب.jpg
- File:لواجب إلا به فهو واجب.jpg
- File:صور الحسين داود.jpg
- File:رحلات الحسين داود.jpg
- File:( وإنما يأكل الذئب من الغنم القاصية.jpg
- File:الشتاء فى روسيا.jpg
- File:دول وسياحه.jpg
- File:غير المؤمنين المعلقة قلوبهم.jpg
- File:إن الذين يكتمون ما أنزلنا من البينات والهدى من بعد ما بيناه للناس في الكتاب أولئك يلعنهم الله ويلعنهم.jpg
- File:إ في الكتاب أولئك يلعنهم الله ويلعنهم.jpg
- File:في الكتاب أولئك يلعنهم الله ويلعنهم.jpg
- File:س في الكتاب أولئك يلعنهم الله ويلعنهم.jpg
- File:ن البينات والهدى من بعد ما بيناه للناس في الكتاب أولئك يلعنهم الله ويلعنهم.jpg
- File:ولا تعاونوا على الإثم والعدوان.jpg
- File:وكلهم آتيه يوم القيامة فردًا.jpg
- File:ولا تزر وازرة وزر أخرى.jpg
- File:شوارع روسيا.jpg
- File:ومن يتق الله فهو حسبه إن الله بالغ أمره قد جعل الله لكل شيء قدرًا.jpg
- File:وإن تتولوا يستبدل قومًا غيركم ثم لا يكونوا أمثالكم.jpg
- File:صوت العصيان هانم داود.jpg
- File:كتاب نهايه أسطوره هانم داود.jpg
- File:إليك من ربك فإن لم تفعل فما بلغت رسالته.jpg
- File:ك من ربك فإن لم تفعل فما بلغت رسالته.jpg
- File:يا أيها الرسول بلغ ما أنزل إليك من ربك فإن لم تفعل فما بلغت رسالته.jpg
- File:وقوله الله تعالى يا أيها الرسول بلغ ما أنزل إليك من ربك فإن لم تفعل فما بلغت رسالته.jpg
- File:والعصر إن الإنسان لفي خسر إلا الذين آمنوا وعملوا الصالحات وتواصوا بالحق وتواصوا بالصبر.jpg
- File:قوله ِ تعالى والعصر إن الإنسان لفي خسر إلا الذين آمنوا وعملوا الصالحات وتواصوا بالحق وتواصوا بالصبر.jpg
- File:مازلت أؤكد أن العمل الصعب هو تغيير الشعوب, أما تغيير الحكومات فإنه يقع تلقائياً عندما تريد الشعوب ذلك.jpg
- File:فإنه يقع تلقائياً عندما تريد الشعوب ذلك.jpg
- File:ه يقع تلقائياً عندما تريد الشعوب ذلك.jpg
- File:لحكومات فإنه يقع تلقائياً عندما تريد الشعوب ذلك.jpg
- File:ير الحكومات فإنه يقع تلقائياً عندما تريد الشعوب ذلك.jpg
- File:مازل غيير الحكومات فإنه يقع تلقائياً عندما تريد الشعوب ذلك.jpg
- File:ل الصعب هو تغيير الشعوب, أما تغيير الحكومات فإنه يقع تلقائياً عندما تريد الشعوب ذلك.jpg
- File:اً عندما تريد الشعوب ذلك.jpg
- File:ر الحكومات فإنه يقع تلقائياً عندما تريد الشعوب ذلك.jpg
- File:روايه نهايه أسطوره هانم داود.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 08:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 08:19, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Beliag29 (talk) 19:31, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 11:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
I realized it is bad for my privacy Imrannigam (talk) 10:46, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
The file taken from an Israeli magazine - במחנה. The source says:
- "צלם: יוסי צבקר, במחנה" = Photographer: Yossi Zwecker, Bamahane.
- "תורם הצילום: ארכיון צה"ל ומערכת הביטחון"=Photo contributer: IDF Archive. The author is not the uploader. Permission is needed.
This allegedly shuld be PD-Israel but it's a 2010 photo by professional photographer. -- Geagea (talk) 18:50, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Keep The source website says also something along "courtesy of the IDF archives" i.e. the Israeli Defence Forces. I think this is whole setup at the source page is credible and does not need further verification. De728631 (talk) 19:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- But IDF did not release the files under free license. -- Geagea (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Maybe Yoshi Zwecker did so though. Have you checked the OTRS archives for this filename? I'm asking because ShaulaH wrote on the PikiwikiIsrael talk page that documentation had been sent for this file. De728631 (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:PikiWiki_Israel_38811_IDF_navy.jpg” under ticket:2019101910002622. -- Geagea (talk) 22:32, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 22:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Засвічено багато персональних даних--Еколог Світлана (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Delete Disclosures of others' personal information (user may be blocked to protect the its users). --Микола Василечко (talk) 07:45, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
This file is added by me. Htawmonzel (talk) 14:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1: Came via Facebook; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation.
Converted by me to regular DR, as the evidence is too low for speedy IMO. Image contains Facebook/Instagram code, but Google and TinEye did not yield any hits. – Túrelio (talk) 10:14, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Please remove this file from Wikimedia Commens. The person who sent the file to me did not tall me that he copied it from Facebook. Htawmonzel (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
no copyright status S.Rayne.2 (talk) 01:50, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, and welcome to Wikimedia Commons! To request deletion of your uploaded files that are younger than 7 days and that are unused, just place
{{SD|G7}}to the file page. You do not need to start a deletion request! I've marked this file for speedy deletion, so you don't need to do anything more. Thanks. Masum Reza📞 06:37, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Turelio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Files uploaded by مراد عباس but used on عبد الحميد الياسين.
- File:حميد العلي 6 (1).jpg
- File:حميد العلي 6 (2).jpg
- File:حميد العلي3.jpg
- File:حميد العلي 4.jpg
- File:حميد العلي 1.jpg
- File:حميد العلي 2.jpg
- File:حميد العلي.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 08:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: Out of COM:SCOPE and not used anymore. -- CptViraj (📧) 10:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Florence Barthélémy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE family pictures.
- File:Composition1.pubpage.jpg
- File:Numérisation 20191027 (5).jpg
- File:Numérisation 20191027 (6).jpg
- File:Numérisation 20191027 (3).jpg
- File:Numérisation 20191027 (4).jpg
- File:Numérisation 20191027 (2).jpg
- File:SAM 2625 (2).jpg
- File:SAM 2564 (11).jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:50, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
duplicates with File:Jacques Chirac (1997) (cropped).jpg 84.238.170.189 12:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Same file with minor crop. Why do we need two cropped versions? It could be overwritten IMO. Masum Reza📞 02:23, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete useless. Cheep (talk) 06:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Lakewood Uniform 66.png: Kept per ticket. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- File:Mike Rae.jpg: Kept per ticket. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 05:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- File:John T Ford 1976 II.png
- File:John T Ford 1976.png
- File:LakewoodvsMayfairMilkBucket.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:31, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Mike_Rae.jpg” under ticket:2019102810001241. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Lakewood_Uniform_66.png” under ticket:2019102810001231. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted the John T Ford images because no permission achievable. --Krd 08:39, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: 2 kept with OTRS, 2 deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
This file was not mentioned if it was supposed to be kept or deleted in the previous DR, and the closing admin did not remove the deletion template from the file. So, opening a DR specifically for this file. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: GIven that no permission was received during the last DR for this file, and we still lack it, I'm gonna delete this as it was in an active DR for more than 7 days. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright Issue, uploaded by mistake, sorry Michelle MetalRockImpressions (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:03, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Issue, uploaded by mistake, sorry Michelle MetalRockImpressions (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzamathiw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. Should be relicensed/souced if in public domain
- File:100 DH 2002 FRONT SIDE.jpg
- File:50 DH 2002 BACK SIDE.jpg
- File:50 DH 2002.jpg
- File:100 DH 2002.jpg
- File:100 DH BACK SIDE.jpg
- File:200 DH FRONT SIDE.jpg
- File:200 DH BACK SIDE.jpg
- File:20 DH FRONT SIDE.jpg
- File:20 DH BACK SIDE.jpg
- File:50 DH BACK SIDE.jpg
- File:50 DH FRONT SIDE.jpg
- File:100DH.jpg
大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:49, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzamathiw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbol and document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.
- File:شعار جهة الداخلة وادي الذهب.jpg
- File:GIS Sudan (New Logo).jpg
- File:البطاقة الوطنية للتعريف الإلكترونية (المغرب).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzamathiw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain.
- File:شعار المجلس الإقليمي لزاكورة.png
- File:شعار شركة الشرڭي.png
- File:شعار المجلس الإقليمي لآسا الزاك.jpg
- File:شعار المجلس الإقليمي لتارودانت.png
- File:شعار جماعة بئر كندوز.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzamathiw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:مشروع مجمع الحرف والمهارات بتارودانت.jpg
- File:صورة قديمة للمحاربين في تارودانت.jpg
- File:صورة قديمة لشخصيات سياسية في مدينة تارودانت.jpg
- File:صورة قديمة لحديقة إبراهيم الروداني (تارودانت).jpg
- File:صورة قديمة لساحة أسراك (تارودانت).jpg
- File:صورة قديمة لقصبة تارودانت.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzamathiw (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some have FBMD, but were left in this nomination to be part of it. Those and the rest are unlikely own work on maps, photos and logos. Many are 960x720 and other typical facebook sizes - even if they don't have FBMD in the metadata There are several cameras and an iPhone given as meta, others have no meta at all. Seems more like a gallery of local photos than own work.
- File:مسجد الشيخ ماء العينين في السمارة.jpg
- File:إستخدام الطاقة الشمسية لإستخراج الماء الصالح للشرب بدوار أوزليضا.jpg
- File:دوار أوزليضا - جماعة تافراوتن.jpg
- File:خريطة التقسيم الإداري (إقليم زاكورة).jpg
- File:خريطة إقليم زاكورة (باللغة العربية).jpg
- File:الواجهة الرئيسية لمطار بني ملال.jpg
- File:الخراجات.jpg
- File:مقر جماعة أحمر لڭلالشة.jpg
- File:دوار البيضة بجماعة أحمر لڭلالشة.jpg
- File:شعار شركة رفيع.png
- File:مدرسة اللوز في أولوز.jpg
- File:مجموعة مدارس أوميكا بتارودانت.jpg
- File:الكلية متعددة التخصصات بتارودانت.jpg
- File:لحظة إحتراق الجامع الكبير.jpg
- File:ملاعب التنس في حي لاسطاح بتارودانت.jpg
- File:قصر كلوديو برافو.jpg
- File:ثانوية محمد الخامس في تارودانت.jpg
- File:Logo-mefra768.jpg
- File:شعار التعاونية الفلاحية كوباك.png
- File:Air Ocean Maroc Logo.png
- File:التقسيم الإداري لإقليم تارودانت.jpg
- File:CTM Drivers with Neoplan bus.jpg
- File:CTM Bus Station in Marrakech City.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:13, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperostheoros2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader probably took the photos. No freedom of panorama in Zambia.
Masum Reza📞 06:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Emperostheoros2: It would be helpful if you comment here instead of commenting on my talk page. Masum Reza📞 15:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- [copied from Masum Reza's talk page: "Re: File:Kappata No Development 1999.jpg and File:Kappata Makishi 1999.jpg The paintings were purchased, are privately held, and were photographed in the United States, if that makes a difference. Thanks. Emperostheoros2 (talk) 11:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC) "]
- It does not make a difference. Owning a work of art does not give the owner any right to freely license it any more than owning a book gives you the right to make and sell copies of it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:38, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Who took the photos is irrelevant. There is no evidence of a free license from Stephen Kappata (1936-2007). In order to keep these on Commons, Kappata's heir must send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperostheoros2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Deleted: derivatives, permission missing. --Sealle (talk) 06:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
There is no evidence of a free license from Stephen Kappata (1936-2007). In order to keep these on Commons, Kappata's heir must send a free license using OTRS.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
@Jameslwoodward: Just so you know, I already nominated these files for deletion. Closing this as duplicate. Masum Reza📞 15:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
This file has "FBMD" in the exif-data, this indicates that the file was downloaded from Facebook.--Kai3952 (talk) 07:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- An obvious copyrignt violation. Per Facebook's Terms of Use, files from FB are incompatible for publishing here. If it was truly the uploader's Own work. They should have uploaded the original file. Anyway I have marked it for speedy deletion. Masum Reza📞 08:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:35, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Urheber ist nicht, wie angegeben Uli Funke sondern Marius Ahlers. Wurde das Bild entsprechend lizensiert? XoMEoX (talk) 08:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
preview: picture used to test site functionality. Arilwan (talk) 11:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader requested. --Sealle (talk) 06:38, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Heavenleeki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Stills from unfree videos.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:41, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Mayor Ernesto Olmedo in a interview with EL LIBERAL Santiago del Estero's journal. 1986.png
[edit]Newspaper scan: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:36, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
https://www.instagram.com/p/B27gh3OhMvB/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link coppivo 85.140.1.145 13:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation by user:Панн. --Sealle (talk) 06:51, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Newspaper scans: copyrighted.
- File:Dos acontecimientos auspiciosos. El liberal diario. 1986.pdf
- File:Mayor Livio Ernesto Olmedo, Jorge Daniel Rocchi and LIONS Club. 1986.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:CASCANUECES DISCOTECA JORGE ROCCHI 1993.jpg
- File:SPECKTRA 1983 ROCCHI AND PARTNERS 2.jpg
- File:Arquitecto Jorge Rocchi.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Can someone tell me why is not right this? There nothing about this information EugeneZelenko
https://www.instagram.com/p/B27gh3OhMvB/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link coppivo 85.140.1.145 13:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation by user:Панн. --Sealle (talk) 06:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:18, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation Trade (talk) 19:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement.--Kai3952 (talk) 06:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use , albeit copyright status needs to be cleared up. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:23, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 09:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
the description itself states that it is a copyvio 2001:A61:25CC:6701:58D6:9291:D2A0:27E9 22:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- It does? Where? Masum Reza📞 23:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative of non-free map. --Sealle (talk) 07:42, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roman00007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Too many camera types (13 so far) in too less time, too many different locations: unlikely to be same person's work.
- File:Kharchenko ta okabe.jpg
- File:OkabeBP.jpg
- File:Okabe i.jpg
- File:Окабе та Парубій.jpg
- File:Окабе та Джемілєв.jpg
- File:Kan.Okabe.JPG
- File:Jemirev. Okabe.JPG
- File:Koval.okabe.jpg
- File:Scripka.Okabe.JPG
- File:Maria. Okabe.jpg
- File:URC.Okabe.JPG
- File:Okabe.aso.jpg
- File:Yukio Hatoyama & Yoshihiko Okabe.jpg
- File:Yoshihiko Noda & Okabe.JPG
- File:Klimkin, OKabe.JPG
- File:Filaret and Okabe.jpg
- File:Dalairama.okabe.jpg
- File:Okabe Dalai lama.JPG
- File:Abe i Okabe.JPG
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted work by Nikolai Ivanovich Kasatkin (d. 2019), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:20, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted work by azirov Vagif Osman oglu, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:30, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation: watermarked (c) Presse Gouv-Maniema Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted work by Marie-Lise Babu, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:26, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted work by Marie-Lise Babu, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:26, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW. No COM:FOP South Korea. No authors' permission.
- File:신자연주의 몸시 선언.jpg
- File:'검은 기둥'.jpg
- File:가나인 적요심곡.jpg
- File:신자연주의 작가 정복수.jpg
- File:신자연주의 선언 타임라인.jpg
- File:신자연주의 타임라인.jpg
- File:2017 신자연주의 두 몸의 만남.jpg
Roy17 (talk) 17:05, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Historical publication. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Missing info and permission. --Wdwd (talk) 16:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:15, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:44, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Facebook image, no permission and unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:43, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
out of scope, somebody's random selfie Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
unused low quality picture of flower Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation Trade (talk) 19:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:41, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
nahráno omylem, děkuji Jachympe (talk) 19:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
translation: "Uploaded by accident, thank you" --Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 08:10, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 16:41, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
out of scope - personal photo Mindmatrix 19:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused logo — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:08, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused promotional image with a dubious claim of own work — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:37, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Considering the uploader's history, the low resolution and the missing EXIF data, it's unlikely own work by the uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 16:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1988. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:36, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Guinea. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:34, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Alexey Vasilyevich Kamensky
[edit]Copyrighted work by Alexey Vasilyevich Kamensky (d. 2014), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:А. Каменский. Автопортрет.jpg
- File:А.В. Каменский. Автопортрет. На выставке в Нашем наследии, Москва, 2017..jpg
- File:А.В. Каменский. Мостик.jpg
- File:Алексей Каменский. Автопортрет.jpg
- File:Алексей Каменский. Деревья и фигуры. Пастель. 1989, 25х35. Из коллекции Игоря Катаева, Пермь.jpg
- File:Работа папы у Булатова.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:37, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:33, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
cropped file created by myself - duplicates with File:Pierre Messmer01 (cropped 2).JPG, not used anymore Cheep (talk) 21:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 16:32, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Author or uploader request deletion Jean-Lucien Sanchez (talk) 08:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: can't do a courtesy deletion for in--use images. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Courtesy deletion can be applied, as the file is no more in use. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:17, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
この画像は宮内庁のウェブサイトではないところから転載されているので、政府標準利用規約(GJSTU)の適用外です。 kahusi (會話) 14:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC) correction: 14:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Translate: This image is copied from a website that is not the website of the Imperial Household Agency, so it is inapplicable to the Government of Japan Standard Terms of Use (GJSTU). --kahusi (會話) 14:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Comment The photos were attributed to the Imperial Household Agency (signatures under photos). --Павло Гетманцев (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment GJSTUを読んで下さい(ja / en)。これは指定されたウェブサイト内にだけ適用されるものです。宮内庁ホームページ（=ウェブサイト）も同じです。 Please read GJSTU (ja / en). This is applied only in the designated website. The same applies to the Imperial Household Agency homepage (= website).
- 文章の比較 Sentence comparison:
- 政府標準利用規約 Original GJSTU:
- 「1.当ウェブサイトのコンテンツの利用について」 "1. Using the content on this website"
- 「当ウェブサイトで公開している情報」 "Information made available on this website"
- 宮内庁ホームページ利用規約 Imperial Household Agency homepage Terms of Use:
- 「1.宮内庁ホームページのコンテンツの利用について」 "1. Using the content on the Imperial Household Agency homepage"
- 「当ホームページで公開している情報」 "Information made available on this homepage"
- 政府標準利用規約 Original GJSTU:
- --kahusi (會話) 08:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Official images of the imperial family are not commons-compatible. See http://www.kunaicho.go.jp/copyright/rule.html. We've had this argument before at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Japanese Emperor 2016.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako 02.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emperor Akihito official.png, etc. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete For the same reason as Kahusi and Celia Homeford.--Momiji-Penguin (talk) 05:22, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - apparently copyrighted by Kyodo. --whym (talk) 04:42, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from modern art. Should be blanked to keep.
- File:Worlds-graphic-design-day-2018-iran 14-800x533.jpg
- File:Worlds-graphic-design-day-2018-iran 05-800x533.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 05:05, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Hossein Mohammadi Vahidi Signature.jpg
- File:Mehr Eghtesad Bank Logo.jpg
- File:Ansar bank logo.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: although the second and third files are notable (logos of w:fa:بانک مهر اقتصاد and w:fa:بانک انصار, respectively), but because there is no COM:TOO Iran, I deleted them based on copyright grounds. --Ahmadtalk 20:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Appears to be taken of the net (https://www.newtv.co.th/news/27092 and others); "own work" is doubtful and would need COM:OTRS permission from the copyright holders. Carl Lindberg (talk) 09:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 20:23, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Blatant copyright violation. This is a well-known Australian Defence Force PR photo from the 1990s. It is not the uploader's own work as they claimed. Nick-D (talk) 00:55, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: https://www.navy.gov.au/hmas-darwin-part-two. – Kwj2772 (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be taken off the net ( https://seawaves.com/2019/10/23/king-of-thailand-christens-new-frigate/ and others), "own work" doubtful and requires COM:OTRS from the copyright owner. Carl Lindberg (talk) 09:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
The original uploader and maintainer of the image has retired, and this image has not been updated in months. On all wikis it appears as if the image has been superseded by File:Mittelwerte der Umfragen und Prognosen zur 20. Bundestagswahl.png HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 03:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; eventuell einfach deutlich in der Dateibeschreibung deutlich machen, bis wann es aktualisiert ist. --Indeedous (talk) 20:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
no file. Probably the right file is file:Wildbienen 2017 by RaBoe-1.webm Estopedist1 (talk) 12:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 20:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
no video? Wrong format? Estopedist1 (talk) 12:14, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- The file was opened correctly. I don't know what's failing
Rauletemunoz 09:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped)_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_連接通道.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped)_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped)_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped)_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped)_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 20:39, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
_-_2021-05-23_-_6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-23_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-22_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-21_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-21_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-05-20_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The building shown is w:fr:Maison des Hommes et des Techniques, built in 1917 and authored by René Ménard, who died in 1958. As there is no commercial freedom of panorama in France (see COM:FOP France), this architectural work is still under his posthumous copyright and is unfree. Copyright expires on January 1, 2029 (70+1 years after his death), at which point these photos will be restored/undeleted.
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 4.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 3.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 2.jpg
- File:Maison Hommes Techniques - Nantes (FR44) - 2022-09-18 - 1.jpg
_-_2022-09-18_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2022-09-18_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyvio upload: No source or licence VKras (talk) 15:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 20:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 05:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:18, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 05:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:18, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 05:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:17, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 05:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:17, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 06:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Eu fiz o carregamento por engano Carolaabr (talk) 06:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request within seven days of upload. --Green Giant (talk) 19:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D artwork in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 06:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1995. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:13, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Your recommendation to delete the pic uploaded. Hi Patrick, I am sorry but I could not understand your reason to recommend deletion of the picture uploaded by me. Could you clarify? The picture I have uploaded is that of my father, so I am not too sure what "Permission required" means. Thanks, Nirvan NGKrishna2019 (talk) 13:51, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @NGKrishna2019: Hi. Photographer must send a permission via COM:OTRS. Besides is your father is within COM:SCOPE? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Deletion request Hi Patrick, I am clearly new to wiki so I am taking the liberty to ask you what may be some very basic questions: When you say "Photographer must send a permission via COM:OTRS" - It's a family picture that was taken many years back. What exactly does one need to do? Do I need to send an email or something? Also you ask: "is your father is within COM:SCOPE": Not too sure what that means? Is there a help desk who can guide me as to what needs to be done to upload the photos? Just so that we are on the same page, there is an article on Wikipedia and the pic is being uploaded for use with that article. Any inputs / guidance will be appreciated. Thanks, NGKrishna2019 (talk) 15:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @NGKrishna2019: Hi again. First if any there's any page (in Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikinews...) about your father so his image can't be hosted here. It's useless to upload it here BEFORE submiting a draft about your father, for example to the English Wikipedia. Regarding the copyrights of the photo only the initial photographer may allow permission to use it here so you must contact him/her and tell him/her to send such a permission via COM:OTRS. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:13, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Deletion request Hi Patrick, I am clearly new to wiki so I am taking the liberty to ask you what may be some very basic questions: When you say "Photographer must send a permission via COM:OTRS" - It's a family picture that was taken many years back. What exactly does one need to do? Do I need to send an email or something? Also you ask: "is your father is within COM:SCOPE": Not too sure what that means? Is there a help desk who can guide me as to what needs to be done to upload the photos? Just so that we are on the same page, there is an article on Wikipedia and the pic is being uploaded for use with that article. Any inputs / guidance will be appreciated. Thanks, NGKrishna2019 (talk) 15:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @NGKrishna2019: Hi. Photographer must send a permission via COM:OTRS. Besides is your father is within COM:SCOPE? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not in use elsewhere. The uploader needs to obtain either a license from the photographer or evidence to show copyright was transferred to the subject. This is best done through COM:OTRS. --Green Giant (talk) 19:34, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D artwork in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 12:28, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 19:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Archivioventurinoventuri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted works by Venturino Venturi (d. 2002), permission from his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:45, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Archivioventurinoventuri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted works by Venturino Venturi (d. 2002), permission from his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:43, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Archivioventurinoventuri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted works by Venturino Venturi (d. 2002), permission from his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:35, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
The CC-BY-SA license from the uploader is clearly wrong, as this is the work of Samuel Kitrosser (1912-2000). It may be PD, if it can be shown that it was published without notice before 3/1/1989 , but that must be proven. Otherwise, it is under copyright until 1/1/2071. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:13, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 20:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
The TV signal of the event was exclusively produced by en:Televisión Española and distributed to the rest of broadcasters, national and international. No notice of the filming having been released under a creative commons licence by the public tv station, presumed to hold the rights. DistritoTV looks like a wacky youtube account, besides.... Asqueladd (talk) 06:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
From exif can judge that the original source of the image is facebook, which may not be the uploader’s own work. Catherine Laurence discussion 06:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Also, no useful categories or file description -- this image is useless. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
_%E9%80%A3%E6%8E%A5%E9%80%9A%E9%81%93.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E9%80%A3%E6%8E%A5%E9%80%9A%E9%81%93.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work. Image description suggest this might be a selfie or cropped from a still frame in a copyrighted TV show. Techyan（Talk） 07:55, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
_連接通道.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
_連接通道.jpg){kind=link}
This image has been posted elsewhere under another license. The uploader may not be able to claim he/she is the copyright holder. Poem (talk) 10:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
This 1971 poster is not Uklondoncom's own work, the licence is wrong! Maybe {{PD-US-no notice}} is possible, that have to prove the uploader, COM:PCP. Ras67 (talk) 12:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: It's actually a postcard, not a poster, so it is unlikely the uploader has actually seen it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
The license was not reviewed during 8 years and now source link is dead. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 13:54, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Source link does not work. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
This file has bugs. It just doesn't show the latest version! I don't know why. Unnamelessness (talk) 14:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- I just want to delete it and straight upload the latest version of this image to a new file. Unnamelessness (talk) 14:08, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Now the bug seems to have been fixed, so I think we can keep. Unnamelessness (talk) 07:14, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
There is a SVG-Version File:Army West Point logo.svg Malo95 (talk) 14:36, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep — Just because there is a SVG version doesn’t mean the PNG needs deleted. It’s not a valid reason. Corky 16:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
There is a SVG-Version File:Air Force Falcons logo.svg Malo95 (talk) 14:38, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep — Just because there is a SVG version doesn’t mean the PNG needs deleted. It’s not a valid reason. Corky 16:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: The SVG version is of far higher quality and size flexibility, making the PNG version have very little value (as it's not used anywhere). Arbor to SJ (talk) 04:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We do not delete pre-existing PNGs when an SVG is created. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:42, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio upload. --VKras (talk) 14:55, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo. Out of scope. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:40, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Is it not a candidate for Category:Cuisine of South Korea? I'm afraid I'm only familiar with Kimchi as far as Korea goes. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Seems to be some sort of bread/muffin(?), it's nowhere near for it to be in the category IMO. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment It seems something similar to Category:Panettone. Strakhov (talk) 20:30, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Seems to be some sort of bread/muffin(?), it's nowhere near for it to be in the category IMO. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 17:59, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio upload. --VKras (talk) 14:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio upload. --VKras (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio upload. --VKras (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio: http://www.valmisa.com/1677/corinaldo-il-prefetto-donofrio-per-la-promozione-turistica-e-la-sicurezza-urbana --VKras (talk) 16:59, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio upload. --VKras (talk) 15:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio upload. --VKras (talk) 15:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio upload. --VKras (talk) 15:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio --VKras (talk) 17:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio: http://www.casertanews.it/cronaca/libero-sindaco-di-muro-santa-maria-capua-vetere.html --VKras (talk) 17:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio --VKras (talk) 17:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio --VKras (talk) 17:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio upload: No source or licence VKras (talk) 15:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio upload: No source or licence VKras (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Copyvio: http://www.casertatoday.net/news/primo-piano/smcv-al-voto-programma-green-antonio-mirra-gioco-futuro-dei-nostri-figli/ --VKras (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Missing source VKras (talk) 15:18, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Thumbnail Picture of K Appavu pillai.jpg
- File:Thumbnail Picture of Hosur K. Appavu Pillai.jpg
- File:1991 State Assembly Election result.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
More historical images claimed as "own work", no proper attribution, source, and dates.
- File:R. Sivagnanam Pillai.png
- File:K.Rajaram with Indira Gandhi.jpg
- File:K A Manoharan.jpg
- File:K Rajaram.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:59, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - In use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danisclaud (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Some images might be old enough for PD, but no information on author and date.
- File:1-Alexandru-Domsa.jpg
- File:Teatrul national cluj.jpg
- File:Iuliu hirte.jpg
- File:Iuliu hirtea.jpg
- File:04 Iuliu Hirtea 1.jpg
- File:Iuliu-Hirtea clandestin.jpg
- File:Hirtea-student-seminarist.jpg
- File:Caldarusani casa domiciuliu obligatoriu I.Hossu.jpg
- File:Manifestul de unire - 1698.jpg
- File:Actul-de unire din-1698.jpg
- File:Sicriul cu osemintele Mitropolitului Atanasie Anghel la Blaj.jpg
- File:Sicriul cu rămăşiţele pământeşti ale Mitropolitului Atanasie (+19 august 1713) - Reședința Mitropolitană din Blaj.jpg
- File:Sicriul cu rămăşiţele pământeşti ale Mitropolitului Atanasie Anghel.jpg
- File:Bis. Maieri AB mormantul mitrop At.Anghel.jpg
- File:Manifest unire 1698.jpg
- File:Manifest unire 6 oct. 1698.jpg
- File:Athanasiu Anghel.jpg
- File:Episcop Demetriu Radu de Oradea Mare.jpg
- File:Alunisu de Rusalii.jpg
- File:Alunisul de sub Horaita.jpg
- File:Alunisu - Sancraiu, CJ.jpg
- File:Satul Alunisu - jud. Cluj.jpg
- File:Alunisu - CJ.jpg
- File:Foto vasile topa.jpg
- File:Sigla UTCN.jpg
- File:Rectorat UTCN.jpg
- File:Academician Ionel Valentin VLAD.jpg
- File:Ionel Haiduc.jpg
- File:Muzeu manastire viforata.jpg
- File:Veche manast. biserica Viforita.jpg
- File:Iconostas viforata.jpg
- File:Biserica manastirii Viforata.jpg
- File:Tit-Liviu-Chinezu.jpg
- File:PS FLORENTIN.01.jpg
- File:Iuliu hossu in zeghe.jpg
- File:Iuliu tanarul seminarist.jpg
- File:3-iuliu-hossu.jpg
- File:Mihai bustvest.jpg
- File:Mihai color2.jpg
- File:1Carol 2 1936.jpg
- File:Carol2 unif.jpg
- File:Ferdinand pe scaun.jpg
- File:Ferdinand color1.jpg
- File:Regele Carol1.jpg
- File:Carol1 color pict.jpg
- File:Arhiereu3.jpg
- File:Portret003.jpg
- File:Catedrala-sf-vasile-2.jpg
- File:Tablou1.jpg
- File:Ep.de lugoj.jpg
- File:Imaginivechi 7431 28 baia-mare.jpg
- File:PS ALEXANDRU RUSU, episcop, predicând la Mănăstirea Bixad sărbătoarea Sfinţilor Petru şi Pavel-1942.jpg
- File:Foto ep. maramures.jpg
- File:Ep.MM Alex. Rusu.jpg
- File:Alexandru rusu zeghe.jpg
- File:3ep. alex.rusu.jpg
- File:V. Aftenie.jpg
- File:Mormantaftenie.jpg
- File:1-episcopul iuliu.jpg
- File:Iuliu Hossu, ofiter capelan militar.jpg
- File:Ofiter capelan militar.jpg
- File:HossuMemorii.jpg
- File:Episcopul iuliu hossu.jpg
- File:Moneda oamagiala1.jpg
- File:Fresca diin biserica.jpg
- File:Fresca biserica.jpg
- File:Bust resita.jpg
- File:Catedrala greco-catolică "Sf. Nicolae" din Oradea.jpg
- File:Palat episcopal interbelic.jpg
- File:Catedrala si palatul episcopal oradea.jpg
- File:Circulara 1947.jpg
- File:PS Episcop Dr. Valeriu Traian Frenţiu la Stâna de Vale.jpg
- File:Val. Tr. Frentiu - 1935 inaug. linie ferate Bulz-Satana de Vale.jpg
- File:Episcop Dr. Valeriu Traian Frenţiu alături de preoţi şi seminarişti români în biserica Colegiului Pio Romeno din Roma-1940.jpg
- File:Ep.Valeriu Traian Frentiu (Lugoj & Oradea).jpg
- File:IPS Dr. Valeriu Traian Frenţiu (25.04.1875, Reşiţa - 11.07.1952, Sighet).jpg
- File:Ep. Valeriu Traian Frentiu (Lugoj 14 iunie 1913).jpg
- File:Liturghie arhiereasca PS Ioan Suciu.jpg
- File:Seminarist biologie.jpg
- File:Tanar seminarist.jpg
- File:Istorie sighet vechi b.jpg
- File:Lugoj catedrala gr.cat..jpg
- File:PSS Vasile Aftenie in gara Blaj 1943,3-15 Mai..jpg
- File:Episcop Aftenie camilafca.jpg
- File:Vasile Aftenie.jpg
- File:92797A.jpg
- File:Ep. Vasile Aftenie.jpg
- File:Tit liviu chinezu.jpg
- File:Chinezu.jpg
- File:Tit liviu chinezu protopop de bucuresti.jpg
- File:Chinezu tit liviu.jpg
- File:Istorie sighet b.jpg
- File:Ep. ioan suciu 2.jpg
- File:Ep. ioan suciu1948.jpg
- File:Ep. Ioan Suciu procesiune prima cuminecare copii iunie 1947.jpg
- File:Episcopul in zeghe.jpg
- File:Ep. ioan suciu 4.jpg
- File:Ep. ioan suciu 3.jpg
- File:Ep. Suciu cu cruce2.jpg
- File:Ep. Suciu cu cruce.jpg
- File:Mitropolitul nicolae impreuna cu ep. ioan ploscaru.jpg
- File:Cat. gr.cat. gherla.jpg
- File:Arhiereul in catedrala Sch. la Fata Cluj.jpg
- File:Delegatia unirii la Bucuresti.jpg
- File:Iuliu hossu, regina maria, regele ferdinand, gherla, 1919.jpg
- File:Morrmant cardinal Iuliu Hossu in Bellu-Buc..jpg
- File:IPS Iuliu Hossu - Vestitorul Unirii.jpg
- File:Caldarusani 1966.jpg
- File:Fişa matricolă penală.jpg
- File:Catedrala unită din Lugoj la jumătatea secolului XIX.jpg
- File:Cat.gr.cat. Lugoj.jpg
- File:Catedrala sf. sec.19.jpg
- File:Cat.gr.cat. Lugoj 1905.jpg
- File:Interbelic.jpg
- File:Pelerinaj la Nicula 1948.jpg
- File:1338280796 ps iuliu hossu nicula 1942 b.jpg
- File:Episcop Iuliu Hossu la Nicula 1947.23 (1).jpg
- File:Manast.nicula pelerinaj gr-cat 1940-44.jpg
- File:Calugarii greco-catolici de la Nicula in 1948.jpg
- File:Maica Domnului-icoana din biserica Piariştilor-Cluj.jpg
- File:Icoana Maicii Domnului din biserica Piariştilor din Cluj.jpg
- File:Icoana actuală a Maicii Domnului de la Mănăstirea Nicula.jpg
- File:Icoana veche de la Nicula.jpg
- File:Vicarul foraneu al Năsăudului, Pr. Grigore Moisil.jpg
_-_Re%C8%99edin%C8%9Ba_Mitropolitan%C4%83_din_Blaj.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 21:10, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danisclaud (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos, publications, coats of arms, icons. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Absolvenții Gimnaziului superior fundațional din Năsăud (1911).jpg
- File:Abirurenii liceului graniceresc Nasaud 1927.jpg
- File:Promotia aniversara centenara.jpg
- File:Liceul confesional gr.cat. graniceresc - 1935.jpg
- File:Liceul george cosbuc.jpg
- File:Gimnaziul superior greco-catolic din Năsăud.jpg
- File:PS IULIU HOSSU NICULA 1942 D.jpg
- File:Renasterea 1938 - Icoana de la Nicula.jpg
- File:Leon manu-batran.jpg
- File:Nicula pelerinaj gr-cat. 1940-44.jpg
- File:1Episcop Iuliu Hossu la Nicula 1947.21.jpg
- File:Episcop Iuliu Hossu la Nicula 1947.18.jpg
- File:0 icoana-maica-domnului-manastirea-nicula11.jpg
- File:Icoana-Maicii-Domnului-Nicula-1.jpg
- File:Parohia Prilog - Sematism Ep. MM 1936.jpg
- File:Sematism MM & SM 1936 - Prilog.jpg
- File:Baru Mare sematism Lugoj 1903.jpg
- File:Baru Mare 2 sematism Lugoj 1903.jpg
- File:Simion Pop, ultimul vicar greco-catolic al Nasaudului, inainte de 1948.jpg
- File:Parohie Sarmasu sematism ABI&Fag. -1932.jpg
- File:Sematism 1932 pag. protopiat Sarmasu.jpg
- File:Sematism 1932 pag. parohie Sarmasu.jpg
- File:Sematism Margau 1947.jpg
- File:2109 stema-judetul-brasov-620x330.jpg
- File:Vechea cat. gherla.jpg
- File:Catedrala unită din Gherla la început de secol XX.jpg
- File:Gherla, 1937 – Biserica greco-catolica.jpg
- File:Catedrala unită din Gherla.jpg
- File:Episcop Ioan Suciu.jpg
- File:B072b83b442fea64e8b31af2a21671f1-643632-1000 1000.jpg
- File:Pr. Macedon Pop, vicar foraneu al Năsăudului și prepozit al episcopiei unite de la Gherla.jpg
- File:GHERASIM DOMIDE.jpg
- File:Grigore silasi.jpg
- File:Austria-Hungaria 2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- File:Austria-Hungaria 2.jpg is an edit of a 1915 drawing of H. G. Ströhl (dead 1919. At least this one should be Keep. Kathisma (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - We have three other versions of the CoA -- I see no reason to keep this unused one. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:05, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danisclaud (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and book pages. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Vechea biserică unită din Bistrița.jpg
- File:Pr. Liviu Pandrea an.jpg
- File:Colegiul Național "George Coșbuc".jpg
- File:Dretea cluj- sematism 1947.jpg
- File:Vicar Simion Pop.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:41, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Who is the painter? Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:30, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Original painter? I don't know nor do anyone else, I guess. It is based on Bhagavad Gita, authored by Vyasa. You may try your best to find the author, if you believe that the author is known. -- Eatcha (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Eatcha: And how do you know it has been created/published c. 1947? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Patrick Rogel, chanaged to 2019. I used 1947 previoulsy co-relating with printed versions, but that's just guess. But as per http://rasadasa.blogspot.com/2007/06/o-propsito-da-literatura-vdica.html (not notable blog at all, just found it using revese search) it was printed before, look at the URL 2007/06 but that's also not acceptable IMO. Circa 2019 should be fine, but I didn't find anything before 2007 using google reverse search. -- Eatcha (talk) 02:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Eatcha: And how do you know it has been created/published c. 1947? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:11, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - without dates or knowing who the painter is, we cannot keep it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Used in a userpage in bnwiki, but I think it won't make the file useful for an educational purpose. Ahmadtalk 17:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 00:07, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The photo was taken after 1929, the second set of arches are clearly visuable and were added 1929 (see J. F. Unsworth: Evaluation of the load capacity of a rehabilitated steel arch railway bridge. In: AREMA Proc. 2002 Annual Conference. Washington, D.C. 22.-25. September 2002.) Krib (talk) 20:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- see also the description at the original facebook-post: The final (and still current) steel span across Stoney Creek in the CPR steam era.
- the bridge befor 1929 (after 1893) are seen here or here
Krib (talk) 20:14, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I have found the original at the BC Archives, Date: Nov 1929 (Creation). --Krib (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- In my opinion it could be possible to use PD-Canada-anon as licence but I have no idea if or how it will work for the US, the actual licence PD-old-70-1923 is wrong. --Krib (talk) 22:12, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: The source says it is a 1929 image, which is logical,since the bridge was modified then. I am going to put {{PD-Canada}} on it, because that requires only that the photo was created before 1949. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by SamirKhalilov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by azirov Vagif Osman oglu, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
- File:ГРАНАТ - СИМВОЛ ВЕЧНОЙ ЖИЗНИ.jpg
- File:День - Ночь.jpg
- File:Чеканка "Материнство".jpg
- File:Памятник Насими (Сумгаит).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:15, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Incompleto M.martin.arr (talk) 21:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Comment request by uploader on upload day - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:19, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
No evidence this was released this under a free license. ɱ (talk) 22:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - This is a good sized image. The uploader has a good record -- only one deletion (for aphoto of a USA mural), so we should AGF. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:20, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: After a discussion on my talk page and in view of the fact that eight other images of this uploader now have DRs, I have reconsidered this one. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Uploaded by a user who has uploaded a fair few photos that weren't their own work Vera (talk) 23:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: This is a good sized image with full EXIF, so I think we should AGF. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Very likely to have been shot in Spain. Any reason for U.S. Law to apply? What is the country of first publication? Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: If country of Origin is Spain, it is still under copyright. If it is the USA, then it was probably published with notice or, perhaps, not published at all until recently. Without knowing its publication history, we can't keep it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:25, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
UK/US production shot entirely in UK and premiered in UK. Any reason for US law to apply? Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:14, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- Did the UK do publicity cards? Most of the ones I've seen are US, but I admit that may be selection bias (only US cards are PD and thus on Commons). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: The publicity card may be U.S. (besides there is a "Made in the U.S.A." mark which rather means "Printed in the U.S.A.) but the photo is obviously not. So it's likely it's a derivative work of an English work. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I disagree. It's literally just a publicity shot that could have occurred anywhere, including when the subject returned to the US. It's an American subject, with the source stating it was created in the US, and probably first published in the US. I vote
{{Keep}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:45, 27 October 2019 (UTC)- @Magog the Ogre: IMO you are wrong to vote on an assumption based on nothing concrete. On the contrary you can see here actress wearing the same dress and the same necklace in a scene from the film shot in England. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- That is fine. The actress would wear the same clothing since it's a promotional image. Regardless, on Commons we work with wear the image was originally taken, but for older images, we sometimes use where it was first published. The precautionary principle doesn't apply because we're simply deciding which country's laws should apply. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- What I see on the image itself is © 1959 Foxwell Productions Ltd., which is a British company. So, once again, any reason for US law to apply? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- They were the film producers, so I would expect them to take the publicity photo. You will notice it also lists Paramount, an American company. In any case, there the license tag is wrong. I strike my !vote unless it is fixed. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- What I see on the image itself is © 1959 Foxwell Productions Ltd., which is a British company. So, once again, any reason for US law to apply? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- That is fine. The actress would wear the same clothing since it's a promotional image. Regardless, on Commons we work with wear the image was originally taken, but for older images, we sometimes use where it was first published. The precautionary principle doesn't apply because we're simply deciding which country's laws should apply. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:03, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: IMO you are wrong to vote on an assumption based on nothing concrete. On the contrary you can see here actress wearing the same dress and the same necklace in a scene from the film shot in England. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: I disagree. It's literally just a publicity shot that could have occurred anywhere, including when the subject returned to the US. It's an American subject, with the source stating it was created in the US, and probably first published in the US. I vote
- @Magog the Ogre: The publicity card may be U.S. (besides there is a "Made in the U.S.A." mark which rather means "Printed in the U.S.A.) but the photo is obviously not. So it's likely it's a derivative work of an English work. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- I am the last editor to edit the image, but I had not noticed that the previous editor trimmed off the copyright notice when he trimmed off the borders. The text following the copyright notice says: "Permission granted for newspaper and magazine reproduction where credit given to Paramount Pictures Corporation (Made in U.S.A.)". This text, of course, was written long before the web existed. I'm no wiki-lawyer, but Wikimedia may fall within a contemporary interpretation of the "newspaper and magazine" category, since the picture was obviously intended for publicity purposes and free publicity is what publication by Wikimedia is giving it. And the explicit "Made in U.S.A." notation seems to imply that the photo is of U.S. provenance, which would mean that it falls within the jurisdiction of US rules. Seems to me that keeping the image with the addition of a Paramount Pictures credit is reasonable. So, I'm for {{Keep}}. -- WikiPedant (talk) 18:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @WikiPedant: Once again and as said above the copyright was issued by a British company so evoking U.S. law is irrelevant. I really don't see what is not clear. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:07, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: I replaced the permission template with what I think is an appropriate one (although there are so damn many templates that there may be a better one). -- WikiPedant (talk) 19:31, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
- @WikiPedant: that is not appropriate. The license statement is nowhere close to acceptable enough for Commons. And we` can't just randomly assign a license for someone even if it is. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- @WikiPedant: you might be able to select {{PD-US-not renewed}}. Someone would have to do considerable research though to find the original registration and check if it was renewed. This is a serious task, which is why I haven't done so. You can start here: http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Magog the Ogre: No, thanks. I'm really not all that invested in this one. -- WikiPedant (talk) 04:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. This publicity was ostensibly to be published in the United States. It was printed in the United States. Its copyright notice has a United States style. It is a reasonable assumption that the photo was published in the United States first or at least simultaneously. It would seem unreasonable to ignore those facts and prefer speculation that the photo might have been first published elsewhere, without evidence. That the copyright owner was based in the UK or the advertised film made in the UK or the photo taken anywhere is unimportant. The question is if the copyright was renewed for that publicity, which seems improbable. The Copyright database returns a 31 December 1987 renewal of copyright by Paramount Pictures Corporation, renewing the original 1959 copyright notice (entered in the catalog 21 January 1960) for the film A Touch of Larceny by Foxwell Film Productions, Ltd. There does not seem to be anything about a renewal for publicity photographs for that film. I removed the license that certainly can't be there and for now temporarily restored a status tag. -- Asclepias (talk) 03:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Asclepias: Sorry to disagree again but the only American stuff here is the text (which is not copyrightable), the image being British and if copyrighted in 1959 is still under copyright. As I've said before, it's an American derivative work of a British work so copyright law being not extraterritorial American law doen't apply to it except if you erase the photo and keep the text (which is not what the uploader has in mind). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't look like an image taken from a film scene. It looks like a stand-alone publicity photograph. What matters is its publication. There is apparent evidence that the image was distributed in the U.S., whereas no evidence has been provided that it was previously distributed in another country. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Asclepias: Sorry to disagree again but the only American stuff here is the text (which is not copyrightable), the image being British and if copyrighted in 1959 is still under copyright. As I've said before, it's an American derivative work of a British work so copyright law being not extraterritorial American law doen't apply to it except if you erase the photo and keep the text (which is not what the uploader has in mind). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep It seems clear to me that
- This copy of the image was published in the United States in 1959 with notice.
- The copyright was not renewed -- my search came up with same results as Asclepias - none. Therefore, the image is free of copyright in the United States.
- The image was actually photographed in the UK -- the dress and pearls are from the movie and it seems very unlikely that they would have been brought across the Atlantic to take publicity photos in the USA.
- There is no evidence that the image was published in the UK. I see no disagreement with this above.
- The statement "Permission is granted for newspaper and magazine reproduction..." is not a free license -- permission for Commons must permit use anywhere, not just newspapers and magazines.
- Commons requires that images be free in both the United States and in the country of origin. At Commons:Licensing#Interaction_of_US_and_non-US_copyright_law, we have:
- "The "country of origin" of a work is generally the country where the work was first published."
Therefore, since the work was almost certainly first published in the USA, I believe the image is acceptable on Commons. I think that Carl's opinion might be helpful here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- I tend to agree. The country of origin is the country of first publication. It doesn't matter where it was taken. Secondly, a publicity photo taken on set (as opposed to a film still) is not a derivative work of the movie -- it is a separate work entirely. So the question is where was that publicity photo first published. The only evidence we have is publication in the US, so that would seem to be the country of origin. If it was simultaneously published, it could get more interesting, though it's still fine in the US and the US could still be the country of origin regardless. We would need some evidence of UK when publication happened to go there, I think.
- If it was a still frame from the movie, you could get into the derivative work situation -- but the U.S. in that era was a bit different, with federal protection starting from the moment of publication. So, publicity materials extracted from the movie but published before would not be derivative works -- rather, pretty sure the "derivative work" status would be the other way around. In the Warner Bros. v Avila decision, which was about some publicity materials of the Tom and Jerry cartoon and the Wizard of Oz movie, materials published prior to the movies were public domain due to lack of notice. The movies then established the character copyright, so that publicity material published *after* the movie was still derivative of the character copyrights even if notice was forgotten, but ones published prior were not. In this case, the photo was published the year before the movie was released. So for the U.S., it's not derivative even if a film still.
- So for me, the available evidence is first publication in the US, and not renewed per above, so PD-US-no_notice. Keep Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:03, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
File:ASC Leiden - van Achterberg Collection - 1 - 007 - Hôtel l'Océan - Kribi, Cameroun - 6-12 février 1997.tif
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since) Hansmuller (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by another --Majora (talk) 05:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
File:ASC Leiden - van Achterberg Collection - 1 - 008 - Signe de l'hôtel l'Océan - Kribi, Cameroun - 6-12 février 1997.tif
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since) Hansmuller (talk) 14:31, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by another --Majora (talk) 05:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
File:ASC Leiden - van Achterberg Collection - 1 - 009 - Le port de Kribi avec piroques - Kribi, Cameroun - 6-12 février 1997.tif
[edit]This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since) Hansmuller (talk) 14:32, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by another --Majora (talk) 05:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Personal name campaign ImranAvenger (talk) 11:58, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of a free license at source site. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:20, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Icones_plantarum_asiaticarum_(13603807784).jpg Badlydrawnboy22 (talk) 13:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- We should keep this file, which has a higher resolution and delete the duplicate: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Icones_plantarum_asiaticarum_(13603807784).jpg Badlydrawnboy22 (talk) 14:52, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: duplicate is a redirect now. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.nntt.jac.go.jp/opera/asters/interview_column.html
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. The alleged (linked hit) source was published in September 2018, whereas the image was uploaded to Commons in 2017. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: linked site most likely got the image from Commons. Still, this is very unlikely to be own work, and probably scanned from somewhere. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Image is low quality and grainy; image may be out of scope. WikiFan (talk) 23:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:25, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
A kép forrásának ez a cikk van megadva. Ez nyilvánvalóan nem 1943 előtt készült. A forrásoldalon le van írva, hogy a "Képek Kóger László gyűjteményét mutatják be". Semmilyen bizonyíték, forrás nem támasztja elő azt, hogy ezt a képet 1943 előtt hozták nyilvánosságra. Lehetséges, hogy történt ilyen, de jelenleg ez nincs alátámasztva. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 15:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
A fénykép 1933-ban jelent meg a Philips Híradóban közzétett --Elekes Andor (talk) 14:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Dr. Patai Imreː "A VATEA gyártási technikájának mai célkitűzései" című cikkben.--Elekes Andor (talk) 14:53, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Hol van erre forrás? Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 08:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Azért kellene forrás, mert az említett cikknek láthatóan nincs nyoma. Itt ugyan található egy ilyen című valami, de ez viszont 2003. 06.-ai. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 18:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Kept: A source from 1933 is specified. No reason to doubt that. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:28, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
A Dr. Patai Imreː "A VATEA gyártási technikájának mai célkitűzései" inː Philips Hiradó 1933 nem létezik. Semmilyen forrás nem található a létezésére. Kértem a törlési megbeszélésen bizonyítékát a létezésére, de nem lett ilyen bemutatva. A forrásmegjelölés ezáltal fals. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 09:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Stifle (talk) 15:50, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
File:SPD-Kandidaten für Köln- Martin Dörrmann, Elfi Scho-Antwerpes, Dr. Rolf Mützenich und Prof. Dr. Karl Lauterbach (37388077235).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There has been clear consensus not to allow any uploads from this Flickr-photographer on Commons, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch, Commons:Deletion requests/undefinedMarco Verch and Commons:Deletion requests/Remaining files uploaded by Wuestenigel. The nominated image had been deleted already in 2018, but was restored today, due to an UDR-request, by a colleague likely not familiar with this case. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Same problem with:
Neutral here. However I would like to explain my undeletion rationale.
- not to allow any uploads is IMO not the same to not allow to undelete on case per case basis.
- "User problem" (like a LTA case) is often the reason to not allow / delete user uploads; however, they are sometimes accepted if used and there is no copyright doubts (noting here an advanced user's opinion that there were no copyright doubts in this case)
- If the user is sending unjustified copyright related claims or is sending justified claims against reusers who do not meet the license requirements, then maybe a warning is enough? (unfortunately I did not find detailed info what is the exact base of this user problem)
- My opinion is that while a replacement image would be preferred, usage needs take precedence over general user problems. But let the community to decide. Note, that my comment concerns only the main image, which was undeleted. Not the extra ones. Ankry (talk) 06:52, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- When I made the request I wasn't aware that Verch was a persona non grata on Commons and I hadn't read any of the previous threads concerning him. I've caught up on them now, and while I'm not quite happy with the blanket ban, I don't really have the time and energy to make a proper argument against it. I just want to point out a couple of things:
- I agree with Ankry's first point. A blanket ban may have been necessary when Verch's pictures were all over the place, but now that they're not, I think it's reasonable to look at each case individually.
- Many of Verch's deleted pictures were apparently little more than stock photos and therefore easily reproducible. This isn't the case here; his portrait of Rolf Mützenich (or rather, the crop I made) is the only one we've got. I think it's hard to argue that we should refuse a freely licenced picture when the alternative is not to have a picture at all.
- I'm not a fan of Verch's business practices (as far as I could figure them out from the old threads) but I'm even more uncomfortable with the idea that Commons is in any way obliged to "protect" reusers from getting into licence trouble. This is clearly not our job. Again, I realise that I'm in the minority on this but I think Tokfo summed it up very well in March 2018: "There is no problem with these files' licenses. [...] The licenses are apparently being very strictly enforced, but going down any route of 'we only host files whose copyright holders are not too strict about enforcing their copyright' would be a very fundamental redefinition of what Commons does and does not host."
- —Máel Milscothach talk 16:32, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- PS. If the main file should get deleted, please consider at least keeping my portrait version. Given that it was me who adapted it and published it under a new licence (CC-BY-SA 4.0 instead of CC-BY 2.0), reusers getting in hypothetical trouble shouldn't be an issue anymore. —Máel Milscothach talk 16:34, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Máel Milscothach: You made a derivative work of a cc-by-sa-2.0-licensed work, but licensed it under cc-by-sa-4.0 (without the original author adding a cc-by-sa-4.0 license to his work), doesn't this mean your work has to be deleted because of having no valid license?? And you gave "Mario Verch" as author, while in reality the author is "Máel Milscothach & Mario Verch". --C.Suthorn (talk) 21:13, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- When I made the request I wasn't aware that Verch was a persona non grata on Commons and I hadn't read any of the previous threads concerning him. I've caught up on them now, and while I'm not quite happy with the blanket ban, I don't really have the time and energy to make a proper argument against it. I just want to point out a couple of things:
- Nope. There was no share-alike requirement for the original picture, so I could have chosen any Commons-compatible licence I wanted. But even if there had been, a later version of the same licence would have been fine. Please read up on what "share-alike" means.
- As for authorship, I don't know if cropping a picture is enough of a creative act to actually make me co-author. Either way, it does say "Modifications made by Máel Milscothach" in the description, so I'm honestly not sure what you're objecting to. —Máel Milscothach talk 21:44, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- Simple cropping, if I may say so, does not really require creativity and thereby should not give own authorship. You might add "cropped by ..", but I don't follow C.Suthorn WRT author-entry. --Túrelio (talk) 21:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- "cropped, colour-corrected, sharpened." --C.Suthorn (talk) 22:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
- Simple cropping, if I may say so, does not really require creativity and thereby should not give own authorship. You might add "cropped by ..", but I don't follow C.Suthorn WRT author-entry. --Túrelio (talk) 21:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Keep: As stated above, it is not the responsibility of Commons to "protect" reusers from getting into licence trouble. Commons must only verify that the individual imported photos have the correct license (without ambiguity or tricks). --Arosio Stefano (talk) 09:30, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- If you read Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Images by Marco Verch thoroughly, you will realize that you are quite in a minority position with your opinion about the claimed "non-responsibility of Commons". Otherwise, why should all those admins and recent-upload patrolers spend thousands of unpaid hours each year trying to identify all the copyvios among the new uploads? We could do nicer things with our time and let the copyright-holders file DMCA take-down requests on their own against the WMF and all the re-users, who get sued by the copyright-holders, could be referred to our disclaimer. --Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- I agree with you: as you said, Commons must " identify all the copyvios among the new uploads" and delete them. But if the licence of a photo is an accepted cc-by-sa, cc-by, etc... the photo should be accepted also if the author is the Devil. --Arosio Stefano (talk) 22:58, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Túrelio, this isn't about whether new files should be checked for copyright violations. (Of course they should, and of course we should only host files with an acceptable, i. e. free, licence.) It's about whether files released under a free licence should be refused on the grounds that we don't like the way the author chooses to enforce it. There's a major difference there, and I think going down the latter road has pretty strong implications on the way Commons works. —Máel Milscothach talk 15:26, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- To be clear, I think what Verch does is deeply scummy and I'm not trying to defend him. But as far as I can see, his "business model" can only work if there's a massive amount of his pictures spread out over a large number of articles. I don't really see him profiting from individual images of his being used in particular cases where we don't have anyone else's. —Máel Milscothach talk 15:27, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per previous discussions these photos pose a severe risk for reusers. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:29, 12 January 2020 (UTC)