Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/10/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 5th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unneeded ShadZ01 (talk) 02:13, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:36, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 09:35, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tidak layak 36.72.216.197 02:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted low quality unused personal photo. Listed for deletion since June, no counterarguments. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 04:39, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tfm1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Com:NUDE, COM:PENIS. Commons is not a pornographic site. Uneducational. Out of project scope

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 12:03, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Already deleted by someone :). --PierreSelim (talk) 07:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sorry Skarshd (talk) 10:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: accidental creation. --Sealle (talk) 11:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cramos78 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The buildings in the photos may be protected by copyright. See COM:FOP France.

Catherine Laurence (discussion) 10:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Il s'agit de bâtiments sans intérêt architectural original construits il y a plus de 130 ans pour certains d'entre eux. Il y en a des milliers sur Commons. Cramos78 (talk) 10:50, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. All these buildings are very very old, often built at the end of the 19th century. Moreover, their architecture is really simple. And usually they have been reproduced identically for several stations of a railway network. This deletion request is incomprehensible. --Poudou99 (talk) 11:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since) Wikilover90 (talk) 08:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Tulsi Bhagat at 09:45, 5 Oktober 2019 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7) (https://w.wiki/9X6) --Krdbot 13:17, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Make way for FileExporter move Calvinkulittc 10:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Calvin stop stop stop stop - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep. I cannot, at all, consider this a remotely valid deletion rationale. Hiàn (talk) 16:56, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GilbWasa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution photos without EXIF data. Unlikely to be own work.

~Cybularny Speak? 16:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Does not need a full DR. --Green Giant (talk) 18:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓[OK] Support: The Getty Images watermark on Yuan Xinyue image speaks for itself. Flix11 (talk) 15:45, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, likely to be promotional. Ahmadtalk 17:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted unused personal promotional, OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 17:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted unused personal photo, OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a company, unlikely to be created by the uploader. If created by the uploader, unlikely that they have the authority to release it. Appears to have been previously published here: https://twitter.com/ClikitMedia/status/1106111052905885697. Appears to be too complicated for COM:TOO. BigrTex (talk) 18:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; dubious license claim, unused. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:09, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

strongly blured and unsharp photo image Fentriss (talk) 19:40, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Undistinguished but not bad. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:07, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

strongly blured and unsharp photo image Fentriss (talk) 19:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Unused badly blurred photo with no compensating importance nor uniqueness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo with unknown importance, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:50, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:52, 5 Oktober 2019 UTC: Copyright violation: COM:CSD#F4, License review NOT passed: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Google search --Krdbot 01:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nao ha interesse em uso. Noeli Ross (talk) 22:57, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept User talk page; no reason for deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:03, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Calvin, where did this come from? The truth, please. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Calvinkulit: What kind of film camera? You have done so many strange things here, I don't know what to believe anymore. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:05, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A Fujifilm Simple Ace disposable camera. And also, those strange things I have done were side effects of the Locke Cole incident. Calvinkulittc 16:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't know what to think, but AGF..  I withdraw my nomination - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Reverted non-admin closure. No confidence in uploader, a troll account. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:44, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I revised my opinion on the uploader's account and intent. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:54, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept as 1. the nominator withdrew this request 2. assumed good faith based on the comments above. Masum Reza📞 12:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hasn't remove sensitive data. Sparktour (talk) 12:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:12, 6 Oktober 2019 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hasn't remove sensitive data. Sparktour (talk) 12:56, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:12, 6 Oktober 2019 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecesary redirection Macucal (talk) 14:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

www.bing.com 2001:4898:80E8:9:54E0:CD9:2D8F:3F94 05:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MD WASIM RAZA ANSARI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos of non-contributors, all edits in own namespace.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of Leila Krüger but uploader claims as own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:57, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of Gregor Staub and Klaus Voormann, but uploader claims as own work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:58, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ryanportin1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:58, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ryanportin1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Proper source to the image should be provided for license verification, current source is very vague.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 03:23, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:59, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

as these have been blurred out,
Delete the other 2 as non-savable. –Davey2010Talk 11:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's not worth to keep photos which are blurred main subjects. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
People browsing through these may want to know what the building sort of looked like..... The blurred images still have some scope and value to them, You nominated these due to characters being present however I have obviously resolved that so at this point there's currently no valid reason to delete them. –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
BevinKacon as explained above users may want to know what the building inside looks like inside so as such IMHO there's atleast still some value to them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the question whether there is still sufficient educational value in images where integral parts have been blurred is likely neither a clear yes or no, but to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I agree with BevinKacon and Yuraily Lic that the blurred images are no longer useful and should be deleted, but in the end this is of course up to the the closing admin to decide. GFJ (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've struck 2 images since both of those sort of have the same view in other images, The 2 remaining images don't have that area in it and so for that reason imho those 2 should be kept,
These images IMHO still have some value to them and regardless of usage readers will want to know what the building inside looks like and the area in both images hasn't been taken in any other images in the main category. –Davey2010Talk 15:02, 13 February 2020
One image is currently not blurred due to WMF constantly bringing up server errors, Until the WMF get that fixed unfortunately for the time being the image will have to remain unblurred as there's no possible way new versions can be uploaded, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Taivo (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Fails DW and Out of scope anyway. (Not that it needs reiterating but these were all uploaded as part of an album and limitations at Flickr2Commons meant they all had to be uploaded IE couldn't pick and choose). –Davey2010Talk 00:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged or broken file ~Moheen (keep talking) 04:44, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:59, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent photo without EXIF data seems not own work. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:59, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent photo without EXIF data seems not own work. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:59, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality delete this Made575 (talk) 12:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 08:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Obviously NSFW!
May include content of a graphic, violent, or sexual nature.

Unremarkable photo of an unremarkable COM:PENIS. While Commons is not censored, this photo is unused, brings nothing new or better and is therefore out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Alan (talk) 12:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deleted earlier, but uploaded again Estopedist1 (talk) 05:38, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:00, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Porn, unused, uncategorised, related to the File:Flaccid human penis.jpg Estopedist1 (talk) 05:40, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image from the Internet. OTRS-permission is probably needed Estopedist1 (talk) 06:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. oos. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable blurred image. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:29, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not by Jim Thurston; it's by 130_ see https://www.flickr.com/photos/134803508@N03/28411653971/in/album-72157671308640316/ and is on a NC licence Llywelyn2000 (talk) 07:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:08, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:53, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

keep The image description in source is written "Self-categorization theory by Wikipedia. Licensed under CC Attribution 3.0 license." and I think it is not a copyright violation. (PS:Click the image and you can see the image description.) SCP-2000 (talk) 09:47, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose this is the author: http://psychology.exeter.ac.uk/staff/profile/index.php?web_id=alex_haslam https://twitter.com/alexanderhaslam?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor . Maybe it's better to contact him and get an explicit public permission.--Roy17 (talk) 10:37, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This file was deleted by Moheen because of copyright violation. --SCP-2000 (talk) 04:16, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the university has released the copyright on this image. David Biddulph (talk) 09:59, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:03, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eemiwan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:49, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eemiwan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 08:39, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MarThib (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work: some are by Thibault Maréchal (MarThib) but others are © Eyowz Photography, permission of each photographer needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:02, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:06, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wahaab Siddique (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:54, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:06, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikipediucom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:06, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikipediucom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:07, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Islandcc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.pictame.com/user/islandkoy/7993239701

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:07, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Majority, if not all, are duplicates of files that are already on commons. Notice that the uploader merge some words together so the files can be uploaded (Landedat instead of Landed at, Saudi ArabianAirlines instead of Saudi Arabian Airlines).

大诺史 (talk) 17:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

大诺史 sorry for the inconvenience it was due to Flickr to commons uploads as i thought this pictures contain name problems, i was not informed those are already uploaded. Agree on delectation. Thanks Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Majority, if not all, files are duplicates of files that are already available on commons.

大诺史 (talk) 12:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

大诺史 as transferring from Flickr i am not acknowledged about the duplicate except the name change. So i am also agree on delete these files. Thanks, Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Majority, if not all, files are duplicates of files that are already available on commons.

Aside to Jcb & JuTa: User re-uploaded numerous files that are duplicates despite warnings on talk page.

大诺史 (talk) 17:10, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Kerstin Boel Bernhard (d. 2004).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:41, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:47, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Galib Hasan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image, oos.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately this qualifies as a Derivative Work and can't therefore be used freely Vera (talk) 14:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC) Also:[reply]

If "Break The Silence Campaign" really did agree to publish this work under a CreativeCommons license then these graphics can be released through COM:OTRS. --Vera (talk) 14:28, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecesary redirection Macucal (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sokhieng Tim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cindy Marina.png

[edit]

Blatant copyright violation. --Flix11 (talk) 15:51, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ms. Phyo Phyo Aung (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, promotional (see also: w:en:Draft:Phyo Phyo Aung).

Ahmadtalk 16:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image. Permission not valid. Elly (talk) 16:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks a lot like an advertisement. Flora Opticals are a Chinese spectacles maker and distributor. Richard Avery (talk) 16:50, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

osu!lazer—the open source version—is licensed under the MIT license. This version—which is the "stable" version—is copyrighted by default. Abequinn14 (talk) 16:52, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

osu!lazer—the open source version—is licensed under the MIT license. This version—which is the "stable" version—is copyrighted by default. Abequinn14 (talk) 16:52, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just got the link to the verified GitHub source code. According to that, osu! is licensed under MIT. Note that the GitHub repo seems confusing to me, but I looked initially on Wikipedia for the license of the code. Awesome Aasim 16:03, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Again (and confirmed by the README), the github repo is a different project. Abequinn14 (talk) 03:16, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I see your point. Speedy delete then, the readme.md says that the open source project "is in a state where users are encouraged to try it out and keep it installed alongside the stable osu! client."[1] So you are right. These are two different clients. Awesome Aasim 16:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOO violation, university coat of arms Aloneinthewild (talk) 16:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work SADIQUI (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower quality than File:C3one.png in same format (oddly disconnected bonding, same image-content size but large margins). Also have File:Cyclopropanone Structural Formula V1.svg as SVG replacement DMacks (talk) 20:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also there is an inbound redirect:

that isn't even the correct chemical name. There is no PNG of it in Category:Cyclopropanol, so delete that rather than try to retarget for something its name means. DMacks (talk) 20:53, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:10, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value, used for advertising on Wikidata only Hoo man (talk) 11:59, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pointless 👦 12:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: done by ~riley. --Jianhui67 TC 08:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:32, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low resolution photo of domesticated cat. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of non-free software, permission very unlikely. Universalamateur (talk) 20:47, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad Flickr account. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:30, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused promo picture, map of company branches — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a copyright violation I cant delete this from Wikipedia Marsberra from Canberra (talk) 13:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BukhariSaeed as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: FBMD0f00076e010000d010000014270000392a0000212d000076390000a867000081680000 Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I own this work and it's my work. I took this image in Denmark. It was uploaded to Facebook because I allowed it. Tubi719
    Honestly I'm not getting it either. The fact that you allowed someone to upload to image to Facebook shouldn't detract from your rights as creator. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:02, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 04:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, and promotional. Ahmadtalk 16:54, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:PACKAGING. Stefan2 (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:43, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from facebook and uploaded with an absurd license tag (PD-Art (PD-old-70)) Tilon3 (talk) 20:36, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of likely non-free software (unless the uploader used AOSP). In any case, the license for the software is missing. Universalamateur (talk) 20:49, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of non-free software, permission very unlikely Universalamateur (talk) 20:49, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of non-free software Universalamateur (talk) 20:50, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of non-free software Universalamateur (talk) 20:50, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of non-free software (Mac OS) Universalamateur (talk) 20:51, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is incorrectly licensed. Its a 2d scan of an original and, as a derivative work, it does not create a new license. This can only be used here if the rights holder is correctly identified and a free license established. Spartaz (talk) 07:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The point is valid. However, with a different result. According to Copyright Law of Ghana ("Copyright Act, 2005, Act 690", р. 5/2005) there is not copyrighted if the "work is […] Law, sub-law act or other kind of law act" respectively "Official materials of state authorities or materials published by any other person or institution which do public function." Thus I have changed the licence accordingly. Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 21:02, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:08, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Query whether the tag includes a personally identifiable signature that is clearly the work of the issuing officer. I don't think the Ghanaian govt own the rights to the signature so the license is inadequate for the whole work. Spartaz (talk) 22:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep The law states that the whole document is copyright-free as this is an official document. In my opinion, this means that official documents are copyright-free as a whole even if they include materials that would otherwise be copyrightable. Otherwise - consider blurring the signature. --Botev (talk) 21:57, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep This signature was made by an Ghanian govt official on behalf of the govt for an official purpose and is thus part of the official document. The free nature of Ghanian documents has already been discussed. Alternatively, there is always the possibility to blur the signature. -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 20:32, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 04:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the Guatemala government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. Possible to simple for a license but there is an issuing officer' signature that clearly passes the threshold of originality and we have no license to display this. Spartaz (talk) 22:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 04:41, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May have copyright. See COM:TOO United Kingdom . Catherine Laurence (discussion) 10:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UK TOO is crap, but not this crap, is it? @Jdforrester: you are British, perhaps you can offer some insights here? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 10:14, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And other files from this category/

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1993. No Permission from the sculptors Д. Крвавич, М. Посікіра. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the cape Verde government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. Possible to simple for a license but there is an issuing officer' signature that clearly passes the threshold of originality and we have no license to display this. Spartaz (talk) 22:13, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the guinea bissau government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. Possible to simple for a license but there is an issuing officer' signature that clearly passes the threshold of originality and we have no license to display this. Spartaz (talk) 22:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous DR: (1), (2), (3), (4), (5): Derivative work of modern 3D sculpture that is copyrighted by FIFA. The trophy was designed in 1971 by Italian artist Silvio Gazzaniga, who died in 2016. - Fma12 (talk) 23:51, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copie profil facebook https://www.facebook.com/christophelegrandforum/ Habertix (talk) 22:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:43, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:08, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the statue, German Freedom of Panorama does not apply here. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:41, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (17 KB) Mutter Erde (talk) 15:05, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused and uncategorised image. Commons is not a private photo album. The only uploading by this user. What is Newton? Probably not same than en:Newton (band) Estopedist1 (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:04, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining upload. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:56, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:01, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient FOP, see COM:FOP Finland. The sculptor is fi:Kaarlo Mikkonen, who died in 2001. Stefan2 (talk) 20:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:29, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Hong Kong#Freedom of panorama in Hong Kong for posters or maps in public places. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:56, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted video game screen/works/advertisement.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:52, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:59, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Me di cuenta que es malo para mi privacidad Yungelita (talk) 05:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: broken redirect. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1994. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 08:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 2014. Photographer of portrait permissions missing. COM:COIN: non-free photos of public domain 3D objects. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Explanation is needed about how the image is in project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False license claim. Yogwi21 (talk) 09:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considering the only other contribution of this user was also likely a copyright violation of the depicted subject, this is probably as well. Not found on the web, but considering the age of the photographs could be from a magazine or book. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:52, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of free license - http://www.vniro.ru/ru/ GAndy (talk) 02:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of video game screen and characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:34, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Xabier as no license (No license since) Xabier (talk) 11:28, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo at 12:59, 26 Oktober 2019 UTC: author's request --Krdbot 18:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a still from an interview based on quality and framing and lack of relevant metadata.

La photo ressemble á une interview sur video à cause de le qualité, la perspective, et le manque de métadonnée. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:06, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C'est effectivement une image extraite d'une vidéo. La vidéo est celle d'une interview menée par S. Clément pour ABM-TV. Je faisais partie de l'équipe de prise de vue vidéo.--ClaudeH (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - derivative work of a video owned by ABM-TV. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW from card. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:44, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is full size picture of this on multiple websites with their own watermarks (1 2). I couldn't find who the real owner is, but since BH has cropped version (without Watermark) it's clear that this picture isn't taken by BH. -- CptViraj (📧) 05:38, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:39, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:43, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:25, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is a letter to a senator written by John Buchanan on behalf of People for the American Way, a not-for-profit organization, at 1990-06-20. As People for the American Way is not a US Federal Government agency, the Template:PD-USGov used here is invalid. Also, as the letter is written at 1990-06-20, it must be published after it, and therefore Template:PD-US-1978-89 is also not applicable here. Therefore the letter is likely to be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 08:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" like posters in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 09:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 2007. No Permission from the sculptor Микола Василечко (talk) 09:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And others files from this category.

No FoP in Ukraine. Created after 1990. No Permission from the sculptors Д. Крвавич and М. Посікіра / architects В. Дубиніна and М. Федик. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:31, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France.If dated 1982 sculpture is not public domain yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC) Retirez la photo si celle-ci pose problème ----[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims "own work" for a picture of a station c. 1865. While I think this is out of copyright, we need to say where the source is and why it is unambiguously PD before it can be retained. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:47, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The image is from a print in my possession. I took the photograph of it. The image is more than 150 years old and there's no way that it's not public domain. Das48.

[edit]

Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il ne respect pas les droits d'auteur et n'est pas de nature éducative. Nemo Le Poisson (talk) 11:30, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo from UK, and therefore above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:22, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Permanently installed in a place. --Clodion (talk) 13:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not in public places. No FoP in US. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep totally agreed with Clodion. There's no trouble here Jmex (talk) 09:18, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep FoP for buildings in the US. --Cody escouade delta (d) 13:14, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not buildings. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: These all infringe on the copyright for the scupltures. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Parce que c'est une photo de moi, et je ne suis pas avocat a New York. 2A01:CB1C:CC0:E400:B08F:32B9:28E5:41A6 13:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: seems out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Lithuania. Ymblanter (talk) 14:39, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This painting is clearly signed Ferrer-Dalmau, and cannot be the work of the uploader. When Ferrer-Dalmau releases his paintings to Wikimedia Commons, it is always confirmed. See: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ferrer_Dalmau_pintando_las_guerras_carlistas.jpg Creuzbourg (talk) 15:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not released by Ferrer-Dalmau himself. Taken from a Spanish daily paper. Not confirmed by an OTSR-member. Creuzbourg (talk) 16:04, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not released by Ferrer-Dalmau himself. Cannot be the work of the uploader as claimed. Not confirmed by an OTSR-member. Creuzbourg (talk) 16:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, likely to be promotional Ahmadtalk 16:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:55, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

strongly blured and unsharp photo image Fentriss (talk) 19:41, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:55, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source page states that the image is licensed as CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0, which is not the licence indicated on Commons. That said, the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence did not exist when the file was first uploaded to Commons, so the source page must have indicated a different licence at some point, unknown which one.

Additionally, there is only non-commercial FOP in South Korea and I don't know who the sculptor is. See COM:FOP South Korea. Stefan2 (talk) 20:09, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:58, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen Image, HD Version can be Found here, Uploader Has posted a JPG Version without permission https://www.larutadelsorigens.cat/wallpaper/bmbmoR_afghanistan-flag-wallpaper-black-red-green-flag-with/ BlinxTheKitty (talk) 21:23, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cover says "copyright". Not own work (screenshot of non-free work) and no indication of free license. I think that the real author (rights owner) doesn't want to dedicate this into public domain.

The name of the User is the same as the name of copyright holder, but not proof that it's really copyright owner uploaded it. Commons:OTRS permission should be used.

Attribution for deletion templates. Name of the Works: Template:Delete, Template:Idw. Licensing: CC BY-SA 3.0, source: Wikimedia Commons, authors - Special:History/Tempate:Delete, Special:History/Tempate:Afd. Note: there are translated versions. To see the page of a translated version, go to Template:Delete/xx, Template:Idw/xx and change the XX in the URL bar to the language code. To see the authors of translations, go to Special:History/Tempate:Delete/xx, Special:History/Tempate:Afd/xx and use the URL bar to change the XX to language code. Examples: Template:Delete/ru, Template:Idw/ru, Special:History/Tempate:Afd/ru,Special:History/Tempate:Delete/ru for RU language code. ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 08:29, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vycl1994 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see http://images.ulib.csuohio.edu/cdm/ref/collection/women/id/28 and http://www.clevelandmemory.org/copyright/, created 1 August 1927, so it cannot be tagged with Template:PD-old-1923. File is tagged {{PD-old}}, not {{PD-old-1923}}. Still, death date of photographer needs to be established. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - The source does not give any information as to the publication history, if any. This is probably OK, but COM:PRP requires more than "probably". .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danwoods/2018/09/28/is-google-search-fair-search-expert-grant-ingersoll-weighs-in/#266abfbb42a1. Source (WMF blog) has image under CC-BY-SA-4.0. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - the Commons image credits Lucidworks, Ingersoll's former employer. There is no evidence that Lucidworks or its photographer has freely licensed the image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This professional photograph is claimed to be own work of the person depicted. OTRS permission from the photographer is required. VLu (talk) 15:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not released by Ferrer-Dalmau himself. Cannot be the work of the uploader as claimed (I think Ferrer-Dalmau could spell his own name). Not confirmed by an OTSR-member. Creuzbourg (talk) 16:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - policy requires OTRS confirmation of the ownership of accounts with notable usernames. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not released by Ferrer-Dalmau himself. Cannot be the work of the uploader as claimed (I think Ferrer-Dalmau could spell his own name). Not confirmed by an OTSR-member. Creuzbourg (talk) 16:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not released by Ferrer-Dalmau himself. Cannot be the work of the uploader as claimed (I think Ferrer-Dalmau could spell his own name). Not confirmed by an OTSR-member. Creuzbourg (talk) 16:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not released by Ferrer-Dalmau himself. Cannot be the work of the uploader as claimed (I think Ferrer-Dalmau could spell his own name). Not confirmed by an OTSR-member. Creuzbourg (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not released by Ferrer-Dalmau himself. Cannot be the work of the uploader as claimed . Not confirmed by an OTSR-member. Creuzbourg (talk) 16:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of copyrighted artwork, see http://goldwellmuseum.org/ Quercusechinus (talk) 17:30, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the Bolivian government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release Spartaz (talk) 21:48, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:12, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the iranian government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release Spartaz (talk) 21:50, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Neutral “Per U.S. Circ. 38a., the following countries are not a participant in the Berne Convention or any other treaty on copyright with the United States: [..] Iran, [...] As such, works published by citizens of these countries in these countries are usually not subject to copyright protection outside of these countries. Hence, such works may be in the public domain in most other countries worldwide.” [1] which solves the US server based hosting. For othe territiories it may be a closer call. --Zenwort (talk) 18:03, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It may be PD outside of Iran, but it is under copyright in Iran. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:13, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder photographed a work of the Irish government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. It most definitely does not give them a license over the issuing officer's signature. Spartaz (talk) 21:52, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - per Botev. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

S can of a schengen style cat A/B/C visa. Scanning does not produce a license the uploaded can release. Possibly an DO or Italian license may apply but the visa has been signed by the issuing officer. Querying whether we can ever host that under a free license?? Spartaz (talk) 21:55, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Italian government works have a 20 year copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder photographed a work of the Gabon government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release Spartaz (talk) 21:56, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this image is not free, it seems to be cropped from another image, which does not indicate that the license is CC BY-SA. The footer indicates "© 2017 Agencia Peruana de Noticias. Todos los derechos reservados." Ovruni (talk) 21:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder photographed a work of the Kenyan government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. The label.is also signed by the issuing officer and this signature clearly does not have a license we can use. Spartaz (talk) 21:58, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - photographs of five animals and complex header line certainly well above ToO. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder photographed a work of the Korean overnment. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release Spartaz (talk) 21:59, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Neutral It must have been adopted by a legislative act of some sort. Consider keeping it under {{PD-KoreaGov}}.

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the Mexican government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release Spartaz (talk) 22:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the Montserrat government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release Spartaz (talk) 22:02, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We don't know the author so being PD is a guess. Suggestion has been released by the site found but not clear they own the rights and not registered with OTRS Spartaz (talk) 22:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the CAR government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. Possible to simple for a license but there is an issuing officer' signature that clearly passes the threshold of originality and we have no license to display this. Spartaz (talk) 22:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep To simple. Remove the signature if it's copyrightable and the keep the rest. --Botev (talk) 22:19, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Hello. I've never been in involved in one of these discussions - and honestly, I loathe the interface - so I apologize if I do something wrong. With that said, I really don't see the problem here. I seriously doubt that the people who were working in the embassy in 2011 are still there, or that there are roaming gangs looking for signatures they can use to cheat people. This is to say nothing of licenses, a concept I've never heard attached to visas or their paperwork. If the CAR government wishes to attach a license to their visas, they should explicitly state as such. That said, if any of the mods or admins want me to place a black bar over the signature, I'll be happy to do so. --droark42 (talk) 23:22, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - the signature is not a problem, but the photograph and the complex seal are. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the Chad government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. Possible to simple for a license but there is an issuing officer' signature that clearly passes the threshold of originality and we have no license to display this. Spartaz (talk) 22:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - A signature is not a problem, but the drawing in the seal is. Also note that this is not an "official text of a legislative, administrative or legal nature, or any translation thereof.”. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of a document of the Comoros government. As a derivative image the uploaded has no license to release. Spartaz (talk) 22:17, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the Congo government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. Possible to simple for a license but there is an issuing officer' signature that clearly passes the threshold of originality and we have no license to display this. Spartaz (talk) 22:17, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the Djibouti government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. Possible to simple for a license but there is an issuing officer' signature that clearly passes the threshold of originality and we have no license to display this. Spartaz (talk) 22:18, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the Swazi government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. Possible to simple for a license but there is an issuing officer' signature that clearly passes the threshold of originality and we have no license to display this. Spartaz (talk) 22:19, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the Ethiopian government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. Possible to simple for a license but there is an issuing officer' signature that clearly passes the threshold of originality and we have no license to display this. Spartaz (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Neutral Consider keeping it under {{PD-Ethiopia}} per "any official text of a legislative, administrative or of legal nature, as well as official translations thereof". This is not a text as such but the design of a visa must have been adopted by a legislative act of some sort. --Botev (talk) 22:08, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. Holder scanned a work of the Gambian government. As a derivative that doesn't give them a license to release. Possible to simple for a license but there is an issuing officer' signature that clearly passes the threshold of originality and we have no license to display this. Spartaz (talk) 22:22, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep To simple. Are signatures really considered copyrightable works? If so, it would be sufficient to remove the signature instead of deleting the whole picture. --Botev (talk) 21:41, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The desing of the stamp, which would be a problem here, is illegible. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by %USER% as no license Netha Hussain (talk) 20:23, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the deletion request. I actually want to save this and other files in the same category from deletion (I clicked the 'Nominate for deletion' tab unknowingly and hence this request). The category of images that I want to save from deletion can be found here. These images are from NIH History Office Flickr stream. This category mostly contains images of notable scientists who worked at NIH, most of whom have Wikipedia pages or Wikidata entries. There are some images of historical buildings and documents too. These images are automatically marked as 'unknown copyright status' by using the following template {{FlickreviewR|status=public_domain_mark}}. These images are indeed in public domain because NIH is the author of these images, and these images are taken in the USA. Please help me remove the copyright tag and indicate the license as public domain for all the images under this category. Thanks and regards, --Netha Hussain (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per {{PD-USGov-NIH}}. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:14, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AlexLeeCN as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|2=Deleted per community discusion previously,the File:Rugby 2.jpg is the previous name of this file,per enwp log.. File:Rugby 2.jpg is different, but the nominated file still seems like copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no description, no category, but it is in use. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was taken in 1950. So it may violate Uruguay Round Agreements Act. 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 20:53, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: China is PD after 50 years, so PD in 1990 -- URAA is 1996. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was taken in 1950. So it may violate Uruguay Round Agreements Act. 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 21:08, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion China is PD after 50 years, so PD in 1990 -- URAA is 1996. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A4 Não cumpre WP:DESPORTISTAS Atahide (talk) 21:25, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion --WP:DESPORTISTAS is not applicable on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]