Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/27

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 27th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://jamejamonline.ir/sima/2758352088626379530/آیین-نکوداشت-آلبرت-کوچویی-در-رادیو-تهران Tracy Von Doom (talk) 08:46, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 13:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disney_junior_logo.png Tarucha5000 (talk) 02:37, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 09:20, 27 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 13:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disney-junior-logo-01.png Tarucha5000 (talk) 02:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 09:20, 27 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 13:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fr:Georges Lepape (1887-1971), still under copyright in Europe Mutter Erde (talk) 10:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 15:35, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fr:Georges Lepape (1887-1971), still under copyright in Europe Mutter Erde (talk) 10:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of permission from original author. Vauxford (talk) 15:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied as copyvio, no evidence of permission at source website.  JGHowes  talk 16:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of permission from original author. Vauxford (talk) 15:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative of nonfree content.  JGHowes  talk 16:37, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PrinceAnand2003 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. please explain why images are public domain in India.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:21, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PrinceAnand2003 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + unfree files. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 16:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL, screenshot. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by 4nn1l2 at 13:14, 27 August 2019 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:آلبرت (5).jpg: Not found at URL, screenshot, watermak --Krdbot 19:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of permission from original author. Vauxford (talk) 15:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JGHowes at 16:39, 27 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Krdbot 19:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fair use not applicable, as there is no use Praxidicae (talk) 15:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amending my statement given it's released as CC but it's of such poor quality it's unlikely to be used, uploaded by a banned sock and we have far better images. Praxidicae (talk) 20:16, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae:  KeepThe image of where it came from is a real site, see the YouTube channel and you will know that it corresponds to a true and verified channel, in addition the license is valid--Román Sondoval (talk) 19:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae: Go to the YouTube channel where the file comes from, the channel is true, corresponds to the artist.--Román Sondoval (talk) 19:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae: The image is for this article by singer Kafu Banton, because in his biography he has no image Kafu Banton --Román Sondoval (talk) 19:55, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae: See the channel where the image comes from the channel is true--Román Sondoval (talk) 19:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop pinging me every reply and read the actual scope of what can be uploaded to commons, cause this ain't it. But I suppose you already know that. Praxidicae (talk) 20:02, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae: I use pins because you do not respond, respond, also the image does not violate copyright

1-The video was published with a creative commons license 2-The video where the image came from is true, watch the channel--Román Sondoval (talk) 20:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: What are you talking about? I don't know that user who mentions--Román Sondoval (talk) 20:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae: This image came from the same channel which you want to delete, the image was approved, it makes no sense to delete something that is true Daddy Yankee --Román Sondoval (talk) 20:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Blatant copyright violation. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Canada for 2-D works. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:47, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. This Image has been taken from oceandrive.com and doesn't appear to have the correct licence. Vistadan 21:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JGHowes at 21:22, 27 August 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Getty image --Krdbot 01:20, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC BY-NC-SA at source. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:37, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket is missing Mutter Erde (talk) 09:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the gallery of photos from 2007 from the recall... and many other places. Upload was 3 years post publication. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"In the gallery of photos from 2007 from the recall... and many other places." - I'm not entirely sure what this means, or how to contest a deletion. I took this a long while ago, but it seems to be an original, clean photograph posted to highlight this particular model year. If there are any issues in particular, could you please be more specific or link which guidelines it violated so I can avoid posting photographs like it in the future? I'm not quite sure how to contest this, don't understand why photographs that I own, which have been on Wikipedia for a decade, are being singled out, and would very much appreciate the help. Thank you, - Chris Toumanian Pandazoic (talk) 22:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept, original uploader has uploaded their high res original. See also Commons:Deletion_requests/File:AC1999ToyotaCelica.jpg. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:50, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LHamilton (WMF) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Who is the photographer? Permission?

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Patrick Rogel Thank you for the feedback. I am new to editing in Commons and am still learning. This is an image that I commissioned. My plan is to contact the photographer and walk them through the steps of uploading. If photographer performs the upload/submission, will that eliminate the risk of the image being deleted? --LHamilton (WMF) (talk) 21:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You are not authorized to state "own work" even if the work is commissioned. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS with the transfert of ownership enclosed. Perhaps file will be deleted in the meantime but it will be undeleted since the permission is granted. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:02, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the quick response Patrick Rogel Understood regarding commissioning vs ownership. However my question was if the photographer performs the upload themselves, would this resolve the issue? If the image I uploaded is deleted, so be it. But the photographer should be able to upload the image without issue, correct? --LHamilton (WMF) (talk) 21:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@LHamilton (WMF): Yes this is correct. :) –MJLTalk 21:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MJL Thank you for confirming! --LHamilton (WMF) (talk) 21:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He/she may but full resolution images and intact EXIF files with the photographer's name enclosed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:19, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The photographer uploaded File:Lydia Hamilton Updated Headshot.jpg. Therefor this can be closed as delete. The photographer is free to re-upload the rest of the files. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:51, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Juman dundees (talk · contribs)

[edit]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 11:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Tulsi Bhagat at 16:56, 1 September 2019 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10): Self-promotion --Krdbot 19:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 11:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Tulsi Bhagat at 16:56, 1 September 2019 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10): Self-promotion --Krdbot 19:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considero que puedo subir imagenes que puedan reemplazar estas en un futuro ArribaAlianza (talk) 01:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Directortariq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 03:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Here is higher resolution, more original version from that image, COM:NETCOPYVIO and COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 15:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, not uploader's own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:34, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(transfered) True, this is a selfie shot by Mr. Landi, who was given the uploader the right to use it.

So there is no conflict on the property. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:B07:6466:DF4:88C6:52CB:F263:FD67 (talk) 07:17, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Landi must send himself a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:33, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Someone's private photo from a flickr travelog. Other photos of same place available. Retired electrician (talk) 16:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contradictory copyright statements: uploader says "Unknown, owned by Richard Burgon" but EXIFs says "Gerard Oorloff", URL says "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0" and "©2019 Copyright Labour All rights reserved." Besides images seem not to be very large and may be found through the Internet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable political candidate, un-elected, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of unknown person and random location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rene Pineda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos of unknown person and random locations (without context), no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   16:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused. Uncategorized. Out of the project scope? Estopedist1 (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No description, no category. Potentially libelous. Yann (talk) 17:50, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP in Norway only for buildings Ketil3 (talk) 17:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: this 2005 stamp is copyright for 50 year after publication per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Suriname. The Flickr user has no right to release it under a free license. Ww2censor (talk) 18:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake TomeryKY (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Has already been deleted on Sep 3. --Achim (talk) 18:41, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imaqge seems to be online elsewhere since at least 2017:[1] User's other uploads also seem suspect. FunkMonk (talk) 19:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted stock photo[2], all uploader's files seem to be copyvios. FunkMonk (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stock photo[3], uploader is serial copyvio offender. FunkMonk (talk) 19:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo image, movie poster MiguelAlanCS (talk) 19:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower resolution compared to: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jamiroquai-JayKay.jpg 100cellsman (talk) 20:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE so tagging as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower resolution compared to: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jamiroquai-JayKay.jpg 100cellsman (talk) 20:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alitavousi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: promotional.

4nn1l2 (talk) 20:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 21:10, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nagendra70 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of photos, missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably repost of File:854x1280-lxuq8x0ouha.542.png Wikisaurus (talk) 23:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.

ƏXPLICIT 23:56, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Priyeshsinghrajput1999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems to be used for self-promo.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no image here Estopedist1 (talk) 06:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ConstantineAle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Nikos Siskos, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jjyenter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality penis picture, nothing new or extraordinary. COM:PENIS

Ies (talk) 12:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IrenePerea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very likely copyvios like the other uploads and not "own work". Note the different image sizes and missing exif data.

Ies (talk) 13:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CrashKK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected license laundering. Sources provided in description field say these are from pixabay, but no specific links provided.

TechyanTalk13:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Color enhanced satellite images are not "own work" Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:38, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems highly likely this is an isolated grabbed copyrighted image from the es:Metin2 game, which doesn't appear to be under a free license for derivative works. David Fuchs (talk) 19:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:36, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Ahmadtalk 21:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:35, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, low-quality reupload of File:Flag of the CIS.svg, pointless TFerenczy (talk) 21:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:34, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fleur4Ever (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope scribble; I usually don't nominate micronation and fictional flags for deletion because it's an unwritten rule I suppose but this is just too much...

TFerenczy (talk) 21:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:34, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is unused, appears broken, and has questionable educational use Elephanthunter (talk) 04:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 02:07, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader credits the photo to someone other than himself and the metadata contains copyright information; need permission from the copyright holder to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 02:08, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of a publication, it is likely copyrighted, need information about the copyright status of the publication. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:02, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 02:09, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pat1999moyo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. As the nonsense categories show this image was never intended to be useful.

Ies (talk) 12:41, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Source -> "Basa tutorial institute". COM:OTRS needed. --Strakhov (talk) 02:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:09, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 02:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was placed in the wrong place Brizton (talk) 22:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion within first week. --Strakhov (talk) 02:20, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely incorrect licensing; should be updated to be fair use under non-free license provisions Dmehus (talk) 22:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment - the logo is fairly simple and would likely fall under the threshold of originality. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - Ooh, so that's how people on Wikipedia use fancy word art for support, oppose, and comment!? Nice. Nevertheless, to be clear, I don't want to see this logo removed but rather just have its license updated to a non-free license but one in which the copyright owner permits re-use with attribution (most companies effectively license their media images and logos via their websites, right?). Or does Wikimedia not care about incorrectly tagged "public domain" images? I ask because if you check my Wikipedia Userpage, in 2007, I had a dozen images tagged by bots for removal despite me having coded legitimate non-free fair use licensing. Dmehus (talk) 22:27, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is Commons. Fair use works need to go to a Wikipedia with provisions for fair use files.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:08, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, fair use is prohibited in Commons. But after reading about threshold of originality in Canada I keep the logo as simple one. Taivo (talk) 20:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong info 203.116.128.238 01:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, likely copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

we know who the cosmonaut program photographers were (Pushkarev, Cheredintsev, Malyshev, etc) and who owns the archives (TASS, RIAN, RGAKFD, etc) - hence the own work and licence claim are obviously incorrect PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:34, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 20:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work. we know who the cosmonaut program photographers were (Pushkarev, Cheredintsev, Malyshev, etc) and who owns the archives (TASS, RIAN, RGAKFD, etc) - hence the own work and licence claim are obviously incorrect PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without camera data, own work is unlikely. I'll delete file:Архангай аймаг Булган уул.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 20:20, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, dubious license claim, no info on actual source nor copyright status. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, there was no CC-license in 1925. I feel, that the photo is still somehow in public domain, but I cannot specify, how. If you have more info about author and first publication, then present it and the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 20:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disney_junior_Logo.png Galva5000 (talk) 01:36, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Dupl. of File:Logo Disney Junior.png. --Yann (talk) 04:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Disney_junior_Logo.png Tarucha5000 (talk) 02:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden due to licensing problems. Taivo (talk) 20:28, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Demande de l'uploader Ldgdps (talk) 03:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 20:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

according to EXIF: "Urheberrechte Romedia Studios"  ??? Mutter Erde (talk) 05:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete a lot of his uploads due to same reason. Author is claimed to be Jonas Charway, but per userpage uploader's name is Edmund Laryea. Taivo (talk) 20:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Se han actualizado los colores en otra imagen, mantener esta induce a error y muchos internautas la utilizan sin darse cuenta de que es obsoleta. Pacov (talk) 19:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Se han actualizado los colores en otra imagen, mantener esta induce a error y muchos internautas la utilizan sin darse cuenta de que es obsoleta. 185.207.146.100 10:15, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on es:Historia antigua de la península ibérica and hy:Կինն Էլչեից. Under COM:INUSE, Commons should not delete used files for being inaccurate. You could update the description if you think it's incorrect. --bjh21 (talk) 21:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Bjh21; in use. Creation and uploading better free licensed images is very welcome. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.


ƏXPLICIT 06:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Buenas tardes from hereat Stormy Jenny Category:Tropical Storm Podul (2019); the snack food were given to me as gift so for memories sake only I uploaded to keep remembering them; I respectfully submit my humble thoughts and have no objection to the deletion, very sincerely Judgefloro 06:18, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:27, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not clear where the photo is located on the website given, but the website has clear copyright information. Also the photo is credited to someone other than the uploader, so need their permission to license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS-permission from Philippe Frisée is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 21:17, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christy lemon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty page. Original file in enwiki (see en:File:Andrew-Wyeth-Wind-from-the-.png) is not free Estopedist1 (talk) 06:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, empty pages can be deleted speedily using {{speedydelete|file page without file uploaded}}. Taivo (talk) 21:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image from https://www.pictame.com/media/1533264162280215869_1528004984 Tracy Von Doom (talk) 06:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Shefalii Rana .jpg, because it is taken from Facebook. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 21:36, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is already kept. See history of this file. But deleted in eswiki (see es:Usuario discusión:32bitsfilms). Notability? Estopedist1 (talk) 07:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:32BitsFilm.png due to same reason: out of project scope. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 21:43, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, https://www.flickr.com/photos/ski_bumm/6866244540. Copyright info says: (c) All rights reserved ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 07:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The architect, Henri Prouvé, died in 2012. No FOP in France. — Racconish💬 08:47, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be restored in 2083 (70+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 15:52, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumed-nonfree music. DMacks (talk) 09:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS-permission from band representative is needed to restore the file. Taivo (talk) 15:54, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Use copyrighted fonts WAN233 (talk) 09:54, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Eventuell Urherberrechtsverletzung; vgl. Foto auf http://kassel-zeitung.de/cms1/index.php?/archives/15373-18.01.2015-Wolfram-Mucha-im-Theaterstuebchen.html Rolf Acker (talk) 11:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:00, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Lebanon. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RomanDeckert (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No COM:FOP in Lebanon.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:52, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:15, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JourneywithAJ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:22, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shaan ahmad shaikh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:33, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muh. Hassanuddin Wahid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in addition, not own works, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 16:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:39, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:32, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo from an exhibition, ie not an original work cubic[*]star 12:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, although the exhibition is permanent, there's no freedom of panorama in Greece. Taivo (talk) 16:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:Katrin Gray as an ocean activist.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:52, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, out of COM:SCOPE too.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-- Bonjour, Je suis l'auteur du versement de ces six fichiers, versement effectué en vue d'illustrer une page consacrée au peintre Paul Cendron, que je m'apprête à publier. Je précise que je suis le fils de Paul Cendron et que celui-ci est décédé voici cinq ans. Merci de votre attention. --http://cahiersduvaldebargis.free.fr/ (talk) 15:19, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CVB: Bonjour. Etes-vous l'héritier de Paul Cendron? Si oui, merci de faire parvenir une permission via COM:OTRS/fr. Néanmoins, il m'étonnerait que votre père remplisse les fr:WP:CGN de Wikipédia. Vous devez vous préoccuper que votre article soit accepté là-bas avant de téléverser des photos ici. Cordialement, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Merci pour ces éclaircissements. Je ne m'attendais pas à ces complications ! Supprimons donc ces fichiers. La page paraîtra sans illustration, ce qui est tout de même dommage pour une page consacrée à un peintre... Bien cordialement. --http://cahiersduvaldebargis.free.fr/ (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@CVB: Merci de la proposer sur Wikipédia (pas ici) au fr:Wikipédia:Forum de relectureForum de relecture. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Ca y est. La page est créée : fr:Paul_Cendron.



 Deleted, as copyright violations, except signature, which is  kept. Will be undeleted in 2085 (70+1 years after death). Taivo (talk) 16:57, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:Germany nature.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 17:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently protected product packaging. Violation of COM:PACKAGING. And for close-ups, can't be considered COM:DM. Catherine Laurence 13:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:Vozol d1 disposable pod.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 17:08, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:36, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, used in telugu wiki article, which consists of only photo, no text. I think, that the person is still non-notable. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the screenshot, the website Fayaspace is marked with © 2019 Fayaspace. Does not match COM:SS. Catherine Laurence 13:37, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all contributions of Fayaspace (talk · contribs). The logo surpasses threshold of originality and demands OTRS-permission from company representative. Taivo (talk) 17:16, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This discussion is not necessary for the file. So please delete this talk page (and keep the file page). Thank you. XRay talk 13:44, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page should not be deleted as it records discussion on how the image should be annotated. — Fnielsen (talk) 14:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is not neccessary to record an error that will be fixed very soon. It may be important to discuss these kind of problems at the user talk page - as usual. If it's very important for you: Delete the property and this will fix the problem. I'll fix the bot and the bot won't set the property again. --XRay talk 15:07, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Problem fixed. Please delete the talk page. Thank you. --XRay talk 16:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

意味が分からないうちに Yoshiyasuo (talk) 13:46, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Commons has problem of very bad cat-photos. Taivo (talk) 17:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:56, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate|:File:New Basket Brindisi logo 2017.png}}| ZG 90 (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, redirected. Taivo (talk) 17:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense source show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the uploader has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpages in ar.wiki and de.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpages. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Ravi junval (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in hi.wiki and uploading selfies (all except one deleted), which are used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo by non-contributor CSD F10 Ies (talk) 14:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Keshav Kumar Keshav (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpages in Commons and en.wiki and uploading two photos about himself (one now deleted), which are used only on the userpages. All his activity in Commons is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:44, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Generalprocrew (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Author's own work. Where's the problem?--151.34.198.184 16:08, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What if it's not author work? Just scan? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:12, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, for first group, own work is unlikely. The photos can still be in public domain due to age. If you know source, author and publication data, then present them and the files can be restored. For second group, quality of the logos is extremely bad. Taivo (talk) 17:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus penis picture, nothing new or extraordinary. COM:PENIS Ies (talk) 14:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, bad quality penis. Taivo (talk) 18:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need evidence that this book cover is itself a free work, otherwise this image, consisting mostly of the two dimensional book cover, is a non-free derivative work GMGtalk 15:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:05, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a fair use logo. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:10, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Povesne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. Permission of the respective painters (or their heirs) needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Vladimir Dimitrov (d. 1960), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted in 2031 (70+1 years after death). Taivo (talk) 18:14, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent copyvio. Marked as "own work" and author has not declared relationship to company. But image is identical to product marketing material: https://stemrad.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/StemRad_360_Gamma_Product-300x223.jpg Bri.public (talk) 16:41, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:17, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Corporate logo, likely not "own work", not eligible for CC-BY license Bri.public (talk) 16:42, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope MiguelAlanCS (talk) 20:01, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

s. Linkǃ --AnToni (talk) 21:04, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent LTA who is harassing requester and violating BLP policy besides. StevenJ81 (talk) 21:16, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deleted as a harassment page. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the tourist spoils the photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:35, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per Strakhov. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcosmonteiroandrade (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images are not used. Looks like some sort of personal artwork.

  1. File:Vilarejo.jpg
  2. File:Paisangens maravilhosas.jpg
  3. File:Sao Paulo viaduto do Cha.jpg
  4. File:Jalapao.jpg
  5. File:Horto florestal de SP.jpg
  6. File:Entardecer Candido Oliveira.jpg
  7. File:Caminho da roça.jpg
  8. File:CÂNDIDO OLIVEIRA.jpg
  9. File:Candido oliveira retrato.jpg
  10. File:Amesterdan.jpg

--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of copyrighted work Mindmatrix 21:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted DW by Flickr photographer. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:44, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Perhelion as no source (No source since), but it looks like the uploader may have taken a photo of this portrait. The subject of the portrait is 1840, its unlikely to have been done from a photo ( which arrived around 1850 ) - so likely to be a "painted from life" image. I would like more information about where the painting is located and possible dates, but I don't think it should go to "no source." Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Maybe Hic et nunc knows more as he has uploaded another photo of the same painting with photograph Otto Pfeifer (probably a descendant and identical to User:Theodor200). So this painting is probably located at his hometown. PS: As we can see, the quality is not that of a professional. In the article Sommerau the source is mentioned. -- User: Perhelion 15:52, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Other image is located at File:Pfeifer, Valentin 1763 - 1840.JPG. I agree it's likely we can keep it, but it is not own work for the painting and more information is needed from the uploader if at all possible. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as Kept; problem seems to have been resolved. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission (what does "Permission: creative commons" mean?). The copyright holder is probably [name redacted], apparently the patient who made the drawing, not Plos Medicine. ErikvanB (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: The source says clearly what CC license is used (namely, CC-0 for the specific article and CC-BY-2.5 for the whole PLOS, therefore, applying {{CC0}} to the painting from the patient). The picture was published at PLOS more than 10 years ago, so, if the picture is still found, that means that the patient did not requested the removal in these 10 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amitie 10g (talk • contribs)

Kept: per discussion Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image no longer appears in the PLOS Medicine journal article due to unauthorised reproduction of the image contained in the PLOS Medicine Journal article. The image was attributed with a CC0 licence in the PLOS Medicine article in error and has been removed. 203.215.159.125 01:12, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The image has indeed been removed from the source. Per arhcive.org the image was present in the article (above the second last paragraph) in 2018, but no longer is. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

•Thank you for confirming. Please delete the image. Mr [redacted](the artist) notes that it is used across 5 other Wikimedia Commons pages and has a Global Usage Count on 93 wiki pages. We will be requesting a mass deletion of these remaining reproductions as a next step on his behalf, before attending to its use elsewhere across the internet. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.215.159.125 (talk) 23:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    • Pardon the delayed reply (we currently have a backlog in deletion requests). Could you please clarify the situation - was the image free licensed by the artist at the time, but that license has since been revoked? Or was the image never free licensed and it was published with an incorrect license in error? You might wish to send information via Commons:OTRS for faster more definitive attention. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:49, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closed, was Deleted per Commons:Office actions/DMCA notices/2019#Artistic view of how the world feels like with schizophrenia -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:57, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures and photos and the photo violates sculptor's and photographers' copyright. Taivo (talk) 14:32, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:47, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This does not seem to be original voice, see 1 or see this. This is most properly a good-faith fan-creation. Hence the current copyright license is not applicable. Tito Dutta (talk) 19:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Certainly bogus. (I'm familiar with early recording technology; this is clearly electrically recorded with some manipulation to imitate sounding "old", not the acoustical-mechanical recording process of the 1890s.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who ios the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:38, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:01, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Sabri alhaiki paintings. –MJLTalk 20:58, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted, out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Sabri al-Haiki).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted, out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Sabri al-Haiki)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:15, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Already deleted, out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Sabri al-Haiki).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]
  •  I withdraw my nomination Exists on Arabian Wikipedia.

Out of COM:SCOPE (en:Draft:Sabri al-Haiki)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nom Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. Should be confirmed through COM:OTRS by the real copyright holder(s).

JuTa 08:06, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:OTRS permission from the artist is needed.

Yann (talk) 07:58, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wasilsaly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 07:59, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paintings by Haider Ghaleb

[edit]

Potential copyvio of this artist. –MJLTalk 21:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, permission via OTRS needed. --Wdwd (talk) 11:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission after extended period of time. –MJLTalk 21:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by JuTa. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]