Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/08/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 15th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a good image. Sachinthonakkara (talk) 08:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate|PH3.jpg Sachinthonakkara (talk) 08:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as dupe of File:Paris Hamilton in 2019 in Barbican 3.jpg. -- User: Perhelion 10:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vsept17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NETCOPYRIGHT: Please send permission via COM:OTRS. Kind regards,

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIOs may use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 10:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyvio and no educational use per COM:PORN Hamish (talk) 05:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIOs should use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 14:46, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

копирайт чужое 109.184.45.94 10:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 14:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MariaFacebook (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MariaFacebook (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy - re-creation. ~riley (talk) 05:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit media? Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit media? Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

illegal gambling promotion Veracious (talk) 08:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete for being an out-of-scope advertisement, rather than for being illegal. --bjh21 (talk) 14:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per Bjh21. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

insufficient license SecretName101 (talk) 08:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 15:20, 15 August 2019 UTC: PDM --Krdbot 01:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate image SecretName101 (talk) 08:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, orphan new dupe of File:Mayor_Bill_de_Blasio_and_Rabbi_Shimon_Hecht.jpg -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur de fichier Lunakh (talk) 20:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Lunakh, c'est dommage de supprimer cette image ! Si tu as l'autorisation de l'auteur, tu peux la conserver ! Elle est superbe cette photo, ça serait bien de la conserver ! Genium (talk)
Cette photo ne fait peut-être pas partie de La Légende de Saint-Germain-des-Prés ? Auquel cas, on pourrait la placer ailleurs dans l'article ! Si c'est la raison, ce n'est pas grave, au contraire, cela renforce l'admissibilité de l'article. Genium (talk) 08:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Si c'est pour le nom du fichier, on peut le renommer facilement… Genium (talk) 11:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
delete copyvio from a book --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lots of human dicks on commons. Sachinthonakkara (talk) 07:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This adolescent male genitalia portrays the erect penis, and is of higher quality then other penile images on Wikipedia. This picture is meant for educational purposes only, and not just to be another “human dick” on commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexxxl1099 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jerrybanty123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:08, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:EDUSE (msali raso 12:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 12:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 12:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be used for self promo on enwiki (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This file has been superseded by Grilling In Progress At Guadec Pre Registration Event (169441747).jpeg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
new file
Sachinthonakkara (talk) 23:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 21:03, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation : from https://sencanada.ca/en/senators/saint-germain-raymonde/ (as stated, it's not own work), no reason to believe uploader has the right to choose the license they did. Esprit Fugace (talk) 17:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per OTRS Ticket#2019081610006791, permission will not be forthcoming.  JGHowes  talk 15:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:CSD#F10 COM:EDUSE (msali raso 10:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 10:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 10:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio as sent via whatsapp. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo for non-Wikipedia - Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 10:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette photo semble appartenir à l'agence Gamma-Keystone. Une image très similaire est en effet disponible à la vente sur le site Getty Images. Elle daterait d'ailleurs de 1968, et non de 1976, comme indiqué de façon incorrecte dans les métadonnées et légendes actuelles. Il serait souhaitable de trouver une photo plus ancienne de l'artiste, réalisé par un auteur mort depuis 70 ans ou plus (c'est-à-dire avant 1949). 185.126.228.126 10:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I do agree that this image is closely related to [1] (compare the bends on the scarf), but, both images were taken in a public place, thus there is no reason to claim that Keystone owns copyright for File:Max Ernst 1968.jpg. Materialscientist (talk) 12:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The original source, Dutch National Archives, is quite clear: CC-zero. The photograph is almost certainly taken at the same occasion, and possibly by the same photographer, but that doesn't prove anything re copyright. More background information on this photo collection in Commons can be found here. Vysotsky (talk) 16:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I still see no evidence whatsoever for "possibly by the same photographer" - different photographers line up at such events and often produce very similar photos. Materialscientist (talk) 19:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

metadata states "©Dave Thorp Photography 01443 814020" with no evidence that this is associated with uploader  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i add this photo .through video talk plz delete Raghbirkhanna (talk) 11:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i upload it pls delete this Raghbirkhanna (talk) 11:46, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Jcb. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the creator of the work has licensed the work under the specified Creative Commons license. Aoi (talk) 20:52, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting withdrawal of this nomination; I did not notice that this had already passed a license review. My apologies. Aoi (talk) 20:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Ebrahim. 大诺史 (talk) 14:59, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jimmie Armentrout is not the copyright holder: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwDVd0SxDiw Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@The Salvator: It's quite simple: ELLE is the copyright holder (the video is watermarked) and their videos are not under CC. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ariana Grande Elle 2018.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrigted, non-architectural work. No freedom, no FoP. Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 13:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanjaybalor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly fufilling F10, photos by non contributors and sockmaster (per en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sanjaybalor/Archive)

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kuldhoj bamjan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possibly fufilling F10

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; only used on a promotional user page. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want to publish this photo on public anymore Nabil29 (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not want to publish this photo on public anymore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nabil29 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion specified. --Jcb (talk) 10:26, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lighting Candles around a flag out of respect is usually an un-Islamic practice (Bidaah) and resembles the ritual of Hindu Religion. Innovation in worshiping and imitating other beliefs in religious affairs, both are prohibited in Islam. When I captured this image 6 years ago, I didn't know that. Now as a practicing Muslim, I don't want this image to be shared in public. So to honor my faith please delete this photo. Nabil29 (talk) 14:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.afisha.ru/people/273057/ копирайт 109.184.45.94 14:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://nookatym.blogspot.com/2015/12/blog-post_4.html?m=0 копирайт Панн23 (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Sprouse's Instagram, no evidence of free use release Edithian (talk) 19:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusef personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the proximate source of this video on Youtube is CC-licensed, it's a reupload of a Microsoft-produced Xbox briefing video and thus the reuploader did not have the rights to release under a free license. David Fuchs (talk) 21:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD01000a9e0d0000533f0000b376000099840000348f00003ca8000072f700003d0201006a1101004a200100d0b70100 Delwar 23:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DelwarHossain (talk • contribs) 23:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality incorrect structure; cf. File:(+)-Macrosphelide B.svg. Wostr (talk) 23:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

قمت برفع هذه الصورة قديما و الان اريد حذفها لانها بلا اهمية وقد تخلق مشكلا.. رجاءا حذفها MH HR HRX (talk) 13:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope orphan promotional -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yet another penis picture, out of focus and poorly cropped, no encyclopedic merit as we have large numbers of far better images of the same subject The Anome (talk) 09:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and obsoleted by multi-ling version File:Mitternachtsdämmerung Europa.svg Aeroid (talk) 09:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:CSD#F10 COM:EDUSE COM:PARTYPICS (msali raso 09:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)) msali raso 09:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by أحمد الحيدي القرمودي (talk • contribs) 09:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file of screenshot. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:45, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file of screenshot. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file of screenshot. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file of screenshot. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 10:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per C:OOS. Moreover it is not used. Basilicofresco (msg) 13:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Out of scope. Moreover it is not used. Basilicofresco (msg) 13:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saturday Chrispo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eurides Guerrero Paulino (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:51, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality structure + incorrect; cf. File:(+)-Macrosphelide A.svg. Wostr (talk) 23:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Snowflake91 (talk) 08:04, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leadubost (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photo : Nicolas Cortes, autorisation du photographe nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr

Shev123 (talk) 08:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo : Nicolas Cortes, autorisation du photographe nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 08:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vishalchauhan8000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 + unused personal file + self promotion + no educational value + Out of scope. Kind regards,

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhinav.msc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Facebbok metadata, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:43, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhinav.msc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:10, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mortezaata (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS + unused personal file + COM:NOTHOST + Out of scope.

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yet another penis picture, poorly cropped, no encyclopedic merit as we have large numbers of far better images of the same subject The Anome (talk) 09:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olivia1976 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:59, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:42, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can we crop the pictures? Jonashtand (talk) 18:37, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:25, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photo. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

同様のプリペイドカード(図書カード)の画像
は問題にならないのでしょうか。Starbacks (talk) 23:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Highway card 5200 contains a photo by other. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:50, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper scan: copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Poljoprivreda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Poljoprivreda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:06, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iustitia mex (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:05, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright material 2A01:C22:A81F:3500:7C37:3797:FC6C:C6A9 15:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter? Permission? Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

metadata reveals image belongs to Getty Images SecretName101 (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:49, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Meta data shows that this was in Facebook or Instagram from transmission #. Also file size. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

immagine non necessaria Winners240 (talk) 19:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 12:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. João Justiceiro (talk) 20:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was previously published at https://archive.alahednews.com.lb/details.php?id=145500, needs permission Ytoyoda (talk) 02:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JennaCairaFan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Highly unlikely own work, images look like crops or grabbed from the internet. At least one confirmed copyvio: File:Jenna Caira.png is taken from http://www.jennacaira.com/gallery/.

P 1 9 9   03:17, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says screenshot, but no source indicated. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:21, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW. Copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:20, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photos.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:19, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:11, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:09, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo, definitely not fitting for Commons Raymie (talk) 20:04, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:56, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this is too complex to be considered PD-textlogo. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 16:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:24, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Just where is the copyright material? The exploitation of any such material here is trivial, clearly well below de minimis Andy Dingley (talk) 20:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Well, I suppose it is the artistic food model in the image which is the main subject of the photograph? I suppose that such an elaborate creation indeed might count as a "copyrighted artwork". Gestumblindi (talk) 21:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, no freedom of panorama in Japan for sculptures. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Reutilización de información: chapter which states that "Que el contenido de la información no sea alterado." which is similar to Non-Derivative on Commons.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So if the argument is "Reutilización de información" = "Non-derivative work", then these files should effectively be deleted, as per Commons:Licensing#Well-known licenses. What if an explicit authorization from the Congress resp. the Senate of Spain were granted? My apologies for not being used to the licensing details, any help would be appreciated. Thanks everyone! --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk)
@Alvaro Vidal-Abarca: You can of course ask for a permission using COM:CONSENT. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:36, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 11:05, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted photo.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:09, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:34, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:18, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo of copyrigted, non-architectural work. No freedom, no FoP. Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 13:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CHNNEBOY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Complex logo per COM:TOO China. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of television channels and networks of China.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:13, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of maps or artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This has nothing to do with "Frank Locco". Could simply be renamed. Emiko356 (talk) 12:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unknown person and we have enough photos of those. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die unteren drei Bilder in der Dateiliste bitte wieder löschen. Das obere soll das Artikelbild bleiben Wassermannnixe (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 07:57, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anis De Ridder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anis De Ridder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - Note to uploader: Please upload original files and/or send permission via COM:OTRS. Kind regads,

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 09:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 09:04, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by SergeWoodzing as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright claim at Flickr is unacceptable;|www.flickr.com and Facebbok is not a valid inage source www.facebook.com - the authenticity an not even the age of this otherwise unknown drawing can be ascertained. Subject to numerous discussions and at least one edit war. Certainly not speedy-able. I am converting to a full DR, and also protecting the file page. Storkk (talk) 10:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - copyrighted to uploader at Flickr. Uploader (as far as I can tell) only ever refers to h-self as a source for everything h/s uploads to Commons & spreads to Wikipedia articles and has shown no interest in reliable sources in spite of reminders (also see this discussion & this reply). Besides this mysterious drawing, uploader also deals in a multitude of excellent, interesting and valuable images but with no clear copyright status on any of them & (as far as I can tell) is exceptionally unreliable; blocked indefinitely at enWP once in 2017 under this user name & again recently under a similar user name. This image is unidentified, its origin & age cannot be ascertained, nor the identity of the person shown. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:48, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I managed to find another source for this picture – identified therein as Anna of Austria, Queen of Poland, the new identification is by myself and rationale is provided in the sources. Artinpl (talk) 07:34, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The image is till tagged in its Flickr link as copyrighted to the uploader. That in itself warrants deletion, which should have been speedy. Identifying the image as 2 different women won't help & removing the deletion tag is most inappropriate. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr pic is not the same photo. It's my right to decide which of my work I want upload and at what licence. Appartently this stalker won't stop until this file will be deleted, so please delete it as I don't want to preoccupy myself with this anymore. Artinpl (talk) 08:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This Flickr listing provided by the uploader clearly shows this image and "© ML, all rights reserved", "ML" being the uploader according to h own postings.
No license exists which would allow any image with an unfettered copyright to be uploaded to Commons.
It is not acceptable that I am being called a "stalker" again in this matter. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:46, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This is clearly old. Of course, we need an identification from a reliable source to be used in Wikipedia, but meanwhile it can be kept as a portrait of an anonymous person. There is obviously no reason for speedy deletion. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I need to understand this.
  1. It's OK for anyone else, too, to copyright an image on Flickr and then upload it to Commons?
  2. An image should be kept even if the uploader h-self (who has it copyrighted to h-self on Flickr) concedes that it should be deleted?
  3. Will you (or who?) remove all the unsourced identification conjecture that the uploader keeps re-adding? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:01, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Flickr account is obviously not the author, so the copyright notice there is not valid. A {{Fact disputed}} or {{Factual accuracy}} tag can added to the description until a consensus is reached about its content. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The image is completely unidentified and may or may not be old. Using simple image programs even I could create a new image that looks like this (wanna see?), without even using a derivative of an old image, and purport that it is a 16th-century portrait, upload it to Flickr under my own copyright (as has been done here), then to Commons (ditto) and proceed to spread it all over Wikimedia projects (as was done here) to portray whatever woman I wanted to assert that it is. Those (all) are the basic problems here. The face is almost an exact copy of that of a playmate of mine, when I was 7-12 and she 5-10, so all I'd need to do is add a bonnet and some incidental clothing/jewelry and use a Paint filter for some convincing patina. Voilá: "Princess Anna" (with Mickey Mouse sarcastically added to a gallery of hers). This metod would also be very useful if I needed to add a portrait of some famous ancestress of mine to a genealogy blog which might lack a portrait of her, and where its presence in Wikipedia articles would be very useful.
If and when this image is reliably identified (or preferably a better vrsion of it), I will be very pleased to welcome it back to Commons and will personally add it to appropriate articles, as space and quality may allow. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:41, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No reliable source for the image which can prove its authenticity, age, or subject. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plushie toys DW of copyrighted characters with no permission per COM:TOYS, COM:PLUSHIES, and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Wikimedia Cuteness Association at Wikimania 2017.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 01:14, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:16, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements. Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:17, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:17, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisements. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted advertisement. Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture does not accurately depict the "Larssen" Interlock. 169.239.45.194 09:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on en:Larssen sheet piling and ru:Шпунт Ларсена. Under COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete used files just because they're inaccurate. If you think the use of this file in those articles is inappropriate, you can edit them or discuss the matter on their talk pages. If you think the descriptions in Russian or English are inappropriate, you can use the "Edit" link at the top of File:Flarsena 25.jpg to correct them or discuss the matter on File talk:Flarsena 25.jpg. If you think the name "Flarsena 25.jpg" is inappropriate, you can request that it be renamed using the "Move" link from the "More" menu (see COM:FR). --bjh21 (talk) 14:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Edoardo Giordano (d. 1974), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:23, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file described as Redirect. Not sure waht the photo is of. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 17:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1973 photo from HK (check the sash). Undelete in 2024 maybe. Roy17 (talk) 18:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false date/license claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not good and Needs editting Nirvana dwaik1 (talk) 21:19, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

needs editing Nirvana dwaik1 (talk) 21:32, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Clear DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per Andy Dingley; rather generic sauropod of the type seen in pop ideas of dinosaurs for about a century. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privacy concerns i do not want it up Mrkoww (talk) 15:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mrkoww: Are you User:M.Zalewski? I don't see why this can't stay - it serves its purpose as a talk page Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per Gbawden. No evident privacy concern; simple blank user page. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 06:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

privacy concerns and harassment Mrkoww (talk) 15:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept User talk page, mostly blank; no evident concerns. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 07:01, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The performance of Eddie Floyd's "Knock on Wood" at the White House is subject to copyright. A video being a work by an on-duty employee of a US federal government doesn't make the video and audio being automatically in the public domain and separate from the copyright of the song. Copyright of the song was renewed (RE0000662445) in 1994 when the song's co-writer Steve Cropper filed as claimant. Either the video must be fully muted or deleted. George Ho (talk) 03:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clear at the moment as to who owns this pic. I am talking with Mvgalea and will update this when it is clear Victuallers (talk) 09:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The image does not look like a selfie -- the claimed author is the subject and the OTRS permission comes from the subject. In order to restore this, we will need either OTRS permission from the actual photographer or OTRS evidence that the copyright was transferred to the subject. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

投稿者の依頼(メタデータに問題があるため) 223系新快速 (talk) 11:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - I see no problem in the Metadata. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Familia oyd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In scope now (es:Olga Duque de Ospina). COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:25, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Small size, missing or inconsistent EXIF, unlikely to be "own work" as claimed. At least one is forty years old. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Familia oyd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In scope now (es:Olga Duque de Ospina). COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all uploads, even those not listed in this DR, unlikely to be own work. --Didym (talk) 13:51, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Old photos -- unlikely to be "own work" of the uploader. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:26, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it." Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:53, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:19, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:26, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion Tucvbif (talk) 12:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -- poor quality image. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose当該写真に、単純ではないまたはデザイン性のないパッケージデザインが施されているわけでもないのに、削除することには反対です。少なくとも日本の著作権法や知的財産法に触れるアップロードにはあたらないものと解しています。--吉田宅浪 (talk) 13:56, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This package includes photo. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:01, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:45, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:46, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted artwork. Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted statue. Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a complex logo. See en:File:Royal Brunei Airlines logo.svg. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:37, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: and deleted per discussion -- except deleted one that included stromtroopers -- they are not de minimis. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It contains personally identifiable information in the EXIF data including an unlisted private phone number. Gameonetech (talk) 15:21, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per INoO. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE - see COM:SELFIE DannyS712 (talk) 17:50, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recreation of deleted content - see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Abishek Mahi and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abishek Mahi.jpg DannyS712 (talk) 16:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - user's only contribution has been vandalism. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of duplicate of File:OPRAVA Moravské Budějovice - socha bl. Jana Sankandra.jpg Frettie (talk) 14:33, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and redirected. P 1 9 9   16:11, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that file was sourced from http://stfb.ntl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dbook&s=id=%22jpli2011-bk-sxt_0774_59_8888%22.&searchmode=basic We need a proof via OTRS, that User:CartoDD897 had the right to upload this image.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that file was sourced from http://stfj.ntl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dgraph&s=id=%22jpli2010-pm-sxt_0746_132_68816%22.&searchmode=basic We need a proof via OTRS, that User:CartoDD897 had the right to upload this image.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:14, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite apart from the fact that this is original research: it is not clear what this image is trying to illustrate. It could be either be how the capacitor sizes afect the output, or how the capacitor type affects the output. Since the provider of this image has changed both type and size at the same time, it is impossible to infer the effect of either change (and either change will have an effect). 109.152.210.68 17:11, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The file is in use on ja:コッククロフト・ウォルトン回路 and has been for years. Under COM:INUSE, used files should not be deleted from Commons just for being unclear. In any case, I think the chart is quite clear: the number and type of capacitor were varied independently, so you can see from the chart the effect of changing either the type or the number of capacitors (or both). Each line represents one type of capacitor and shows how varying the number of that type of capacitor changes the output voltage. Note that Commons (unlike most Wikipedias) has no restrictions on original research. --bjh21 (talk) 16:16, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You are incorrect on the main plank of your argument. There are five curves for different types and values of capacitors. All the capacitor types changed with the change in value with the single exception of two values of electrolytic capacitor (though the added illustrations are actually of the same capacitors). Thus the illustration is useless for illustrating the effect of changing either the value or the type of capacitor. None of the capacitors tried are actually the correct one for this type of circuit. The illustration should be deleted from the :ja Wikipedia article as original research. -109.152.210.68 13:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, I'm very sorry. For some reason I'd misinterpreted "size" in your request as "number". Anyway, COM:INUSE still applies. If you think that ja:コッククロフト・ウォルトン回路 shouldn't use that picture, take that up at Japanese Wikipedia (maybe at ja:ノート:コッククロフト・ウォルトン回路, or maybe by editing the article yourself), not here. --bjh21 (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Image is in use. Commons does not prohibit original research. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requested by displayed person 2eight (talk) 18:18, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - as a general rule we do not delete images at the request of the subject and we almost never delete them at the request of a thrid party. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Latvia: non-free architecture.

Eleassar (t/p) 16:14, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:33, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2006 building, no FOP in Latvia per COM:FOP Latvia.

kyykaarme (talk) 18:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If not, does it mean that no images of any object built in Latvia after 2000 are appropriate for Commons? And, for example, there is no possibility to illustrate articles about sport events on Arēna Rīga, such as FIBA Women's EuroBasket 2019?
Some photos, e.g. File:Skanstes iela (5).jpg, were taken not for Arēna Rīga exactly, but rather for common landscape view. Arēna Rīga keeps less than 10% of the image. — Olgerts V (talk) 06:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Olgerts V: According to this PDF, creative works in Latvia are protected by copyright during the creator's life + 70 years. In this case I assume that means the architect and I mentioned the year because I didn't have info about the architect, but for a modern building it seems apparent that the copyright still stands. Because there is no FOP in Latvia, it's my understanding that Commons won't host images of such buildings. There are several categories of modern Latvian buildings and some have also had previous deletion requests, but unfortunately there is no warning in the categories, and they have been repopulated like this category has, for example Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Saules Akmens. I started with this category, and if these images are deleted, I will probably check other categories and nominate more images to be deleted. -kyykaarme (talk) 11:11, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Commons requires that images be free for commercial use. The argument that one of the images shows only two buildings and a field, with the buildings relatively small is not valid. For "de minimis" to apply, the removal of the copyrighted object will not be noticed by a casual viewer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is porno. Phonon.b (talk) 06:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Commons is not censored. --ƏXPLICIT 01:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that file was sourced from http://stfb.ntl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dbook&s=id=%22jpli2010-bk-sxt_0741_150_1935%22.&searchmode=basic We need a proof via OTRS, that User:CartoDD897 had the right to upload this image.--Kai3952 (talk) 21:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No OTRS on image after a long time. --Herby talk thyme 16:37, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that file was sourced from http://nrch.culture.tw/view.aspx?keyword=%E5%8B%B8%E6%A5%AD%E9%8A%80%E8%A1%8C&s=3385800&id=0000601298&proj=MOC_IMD_001# We need a proof via OTRS, that User:CartoDD897 had the right to upload this image.--Kai3952 (talk) 21:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No OTRS on image after a long time. --Herby talk thyme 16:37, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Afonsomsilva97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely false authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, the nature of several of the images, and the uploader's history. Some of these may be old enough to be in the public domain, but truthful source, authorship and PD rationales are required to determine that.

LX (talk, contribs) 21:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep File:Angelina Vidal 1.jpg: No TinEye nor Google Images finds; non-suspicious EXIF (might be the only properly licensed image of the whole set). -- Tuválkin 15:34, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Not everything is indexed by Tineye or Google. Given their other uploads, I'd trust this user about as far as I could throw them, so metadata for a single photo isn't convincing enough to think that they actually happened to tell the truth for once. Maybe if they could provide a full resolution version – this camera is capable of producing images 67 times the size of this one. LX (talk, contribs) 17:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, kept some per above. P 1 9 9   17:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it." Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:54, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel Here you can see that the photo quoted is from the 1973 election campaign, when Cresto was elected governor of Entre Ríos. That was 46 years ago. In a nutshell, under Argentine law it is not copyrighted.--FelipeRev (talk) 12:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@FelipeRev: And where's the evidence of first publication in 1973? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:04, 15 August 2019 (UTC) @FelipeRev: Please note I've already asked you the same informations about File:Roberto Requeijo.jpg back in January. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 13:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FelipeRev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"Date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated so anyone can check it."

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Rogel Voy a escribir en español, espero sepas disculparme. Las dos primeras el link dice con claridad absoluta, en el primer renglón, que las fotos son de 1992 (hace ya más de 20 años de eso, si las cuentas no me fallan. [2]

La tercera, en los comentarios se aclara que la foto es de 1973, no hay que explayarse demasiado al respecto.

Con respecto a las dos últimas. Las elecciones de 1989 fue la única ocasión en la que Eduardo Angeloz fue candidato presidencial, y la última vez que Carlos Menem compartió fórmula con Eduardo Duhalde (la tarima lo dice "Menem-Duhalde"), y 1989 hace ya 30 años (el mismo link lo dice). Las fotos son de los cierres de campañas de ambas fuerzas el 12 de mayo de 1989, lo dice el mismo link y no cuesta tanto verlo. En ambas fotos se cita al medio Telám, argentino, como fuente de las fotos y, por lo tanto, aplicanse las leyes de copyright argentinas (25 años de la publicación). No necesito más evidencia que esa, las leyes de derechos de autor en Argentina son claras al respecto.--FelipeRev (talk) 12:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that some of them are part of a stock from a photo agency does not mean they have been published one day. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Para las dos últimas fotos aplica perfectamente, ya que la "agencia" en cuestión cita al medio de comunicación en el que fueron publicadas (Telám), como fuente.--FelipeRev (talk) 13:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 13:29, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FelipeRev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Permission should be asked for specific version of Creative Commons license.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recibí autorización expresa para utilizar esas imágenes en la misma cuenta de Facebook donde fueron publicadas. Lean los comentarios. En caso de ser requerido, puedo pedir al dueño que envíe una autorización expresa.--FelipeRev (talk) 16:15, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( Please read w:es:Licencias Creative Commons to understand ambiguity of original permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:02, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
EugeneZelenko I said: I received express authorization to use those images in the same Facebook account where they were published. Read the comments. If required, I can ask the owner to send an express authorization. The photographs are, however, quite old, before 1960. I would prefer someone who understands Spanish to review it (it is not an aggression or offense, I say it so that he can understand what the link says). Regards and sorry :)--FelipeRev (talk) 09:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I could believe Google Translate you asked permission for licencia "Creative Commons". If you didn't read Spanish article yet, you could read shorter Commons:Licensing: there are Creative Commons licenses not allowed on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
EugeneZelenko I already sent another comment to the owner of the image specifying the license. Soon we will have your answer.--FelipeRev (talk) 12:42, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We have an answer--FelipeRev (talk) 12:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Photographer permission needed. — Racconish💬 13:32, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FelipeRev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

better version of this photo exists, e.g. File:Chen Duxiu.jpg File:Chen Duxiu4.jpg. no need to crop a photo of a poster that printed this photo... notice how the eyebrow is different from the original, probably due to scanning and printing and scanning... over and over.

RZuo (talk) 13:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9   15:06, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that file was sourced from http://stfj.ntl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dpjournal&s=id=%22jpli2008-pd-sxt_0705_84_v006n001-014_no11_j%22.& We need a proof via OTRS, that User:CartoDD897 had the right to upload this image.--Kai3952 (talk) 21:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 13:32, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that file was sourced from http://stfb.ntl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dbook&s=id=%22jpli2012-bk-sxt_0757_149_1939%22.&searchmode=basic We need a proof via OTRS, that User:CartoDD897 had the right to upload this image.--Kai3952 (talk) 21:39, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 13:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims that file was sourced from http://stfb.ntl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dbook&s=id=%22jpli2012-bk-sxt_0757_149_1939%22.&searchmode=basic We need a proof via OTRS, that User:CartoDD897 had the right to upload this image.--Kai3952 (talk) 22:13, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 13:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]