Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/07/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 3rd, 2019


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it was not correctly named Lingiorgia (talk) 08:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio. Reason for deletion: {{SDG7}}. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the author proposes to delete this picture Lingiorgia (talk) 08:33, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio. Reason for deletion:{{SDG7}}. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 12:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work per image search. Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 09:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 10:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kenrick95 as Fair use (fairuse) Uploader not informed. Yann (talk) 10:24, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly uplo Sayan Garai 94 (talk) 12:25, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 14:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Roy17 as no source (No source since) — Racconish💬 16:46, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: thanks to the bot. — Racconish💬 16:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of a likely non-notable person; hardly in scope. Any use for it? -- Túrelio (talk) 12:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No copyright statement on the site, most probably the picture is not free. BugWarp (talk) 00:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This should have been a speedy delete. Clear copyvio. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 17:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Copyviol. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not own work; Copyright violation from https://keepersecurity.com/ — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not own work; Copyright violation: File from https://keepersecurity.com/ — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not own work; Copyright violation: File from https://keepersecurity.com/ — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:54, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 13:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-trivial logo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Clear case. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:16, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work per image search Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 11:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 14:36, 3 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 19:25, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Racconish at 16:52, 3 Juli 2019 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 19:25, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Belongs to Getty Images per source cited by uploader Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 11:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola at 20:02, 3 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 01:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Actually, there is a copyright notice in [1], at 00:38, but was this copyright renewed? Yann (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 05:44, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission in the ticket, and very unlikely to come. Yann (talk) 17:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake M.sivaraja (talk) 12:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted mistake; uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:49, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ManFromNord as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 13:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, Copyviol -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:46, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La Gaceta © 2019 Todos los derechos reservados Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:43, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Copyright Regione Lombardia tutti i diritti riservati Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Copyviol, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Copyright Regione Lombardia tutti i diritti riservati Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Copyviol, false license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a copyrighted show and is not available under Creative Commons CC0 Vistadan 12:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deletion, copyright is held and vigorously enforced by NBC Universal. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albertpapuagimbal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:18, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albertpapuagimbal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam by a user who has been blocked elsewhere.

Mahir256 (talk) 22:46, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, user blocked indef. --Achim (talk) 23:05, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

my mistake. i thought it was PD because it was posted by the Twitter account of the US Embassy but looking at it know, there is an AP Logo in the bottom left corner of the photograph Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 10:38, 5 Juli 2019 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license (No license since). The uploader has subsequently asserted it is public domain. Please provide evidence of its public domain status. Green Giant (talk) 06:06, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Am new to posting photos to Wikipedia so please bear with me. This photo is not from the internet - it is an image in my possession. Taken by an unknown photographer at an event held by a defunct organization. Never published. Taken 70 years ago. Who holds copyright? Impossible to determine. Shanghailander1941 (talk) 16:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Shanghailander1941: If it is an unpublished US work, the copyright term ends 120 years after creation. If it was definitely taken in 1950, it won’t enter the public domain until 2071 per Cornell.edu. The only tag that comes to mind is {{PD-US-unpublished}} but this work does not meet any of the three conditions listed on the tag. I don’t think we can keep this photo on Commons. If you are intending to use it on the relevant English Wikipedia article, it may be possible to upload it locally to be used only on that wiki but you would have to ensure it meets all the criteria at WP:NFCC and add a non-free rationale to the file description page. --Green Giant (talk) 17:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no license for over 7 days. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm - there is no reasonable way to determine who took the photo, or who holds copyright. It seems a shame others cannot view the photo until 2071. That seems draconian and overreaching. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shanghailander1941 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:13, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 2019 State of Vermont. All rights reserved. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - no source - no license - no permission. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 04:45, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is too old i want to delete this file now Vidhinboda (talk) 15:43, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 22:18, 5 Juli 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vidhinboda --Krdbot 01:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2019 Me and Mommy Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 04:04, 6 Juli 2019 UTC: Page is promotional, please see our project scope --Krdbot 07:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is of a private individual and has no public interest, it was taken at a private event without consent. The photographer/author has removed the photos from Flickr and we would request that its also removed from wiki commons. Many thanks for considering. 5.148.61.229 11:24, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - "private" events? That explains the microphone. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is of a private individual and has no public interest, it was taken at a private event without consent. The photographer/author has removed the photos from Flickr and we would request that its also removed from wiki commons. Many thanks for considering. 5.148.61.229 11:24, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - "private" events? That explains the microphone. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:54, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann at 08:50, 8 Juli 2019 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 13:19, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Comandante Valadão (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos

Gbawden (talk) 08:22, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

У нас появилась доработанная версия логотипа. Я являюсь Автором данного логотипа. Сергей Иванович Тенеков (talk) 11:33, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victor B Angel - Zambia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete my photos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor B Angel - Zambia (talk • contribs) 12:10, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victor B Angel - Zambia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTHOST (en:User:Victor B Angel - Zambia).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:05, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and previous deletions. --Herby talk thyme 12:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is he? 212.174.190.24 13:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC) 李武斌 (talk)这个可以删除。[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:00, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Morteza256 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matheuspelegrini22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). Questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cesar pirata (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality Olybrius (talk) 18:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Strange photo without rational explanation. No educaTIONAL VALUE Malcolma (talk) 18:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal art work. Malcolma (talk) 21:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:04, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image (fr:Fabien FTC). Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:06, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:05, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:05, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:51, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:42, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:52, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:44, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, last remaining image, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 10:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:36, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:PS: pure text; personal essay; articles belong to Wikipedia, not Commons. 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:58, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:34, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Prongs31 03:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibile copyviol from https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx0BtFRoO70/  L'Ospite Inatteso - I love to love you 06:52, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image Denniss (talk) 07:26, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 ผมเป็นคนที่อยู่ในรูปนี้ และไม่ประสงค์จะเผยแพร่ I am the person in this photo and do not want to publicly publish. Therefore please delete this picture of me as soon as possible.


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want anymore Wikimedia displaying my files uploaded on Wikimedia Javali2080 (talk) 08:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Therohitsethi

[edit]

Collection of images of certificates issued to the uploader. Little or no educational value and also possibly self promotion Malcolma (talk) 09:26, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:17, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eland8309 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 13:06, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:16, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Accy Al-Qahhar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely claims of own work, even on the two large images, one is facebook sized (x720) and the other could also be from Facebook, but all meta data has been removed from all four images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:12, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Accy Al-Qahhar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Accy Al-Qahhar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:16, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by الرشيد (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Currency from Jordan. I have looked an cannot find anything that says Jordan currency is not copyrighted.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:08, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment there's Template:PD-Jordan-money, which lists the date as 1968. I am also worried about the photograph, which the uploader hasn't sourced. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:14, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyright violation, all is sourced to the Central Bank of Jordan, and the website has copyright. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by الرشيد (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

The original uploader is rather adamant that these are in fact copyright violations. See User talk:الرشيد#my own page.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:05, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by الرشيد (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Probably unfree uploads of an indefinitely blocked admitted copyright violator. See also the previous DRs above, Commons:Deletion requests/File:جمل تل حلف.jpg, and Commons:Deletion requests/File:لوحة تعريفية بجبل القلعة.jpg.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per norm. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 05:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, available elsewhere online (eg https://allstarpics.famousfix.com/pictures/clarissa-bowers/p85605962, https://indianandworldpageant.com/2017/09/24/photos-meet-the-miss-world-2017-contestants/usa-clarissa-bowers/) DannyS712 (talk) 17:06, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image Vauxford (talk) 17:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is doubtful. No timer is indicated in any metadata.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 19:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination;PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine Dogad75 (talk) 20:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine Dogad75 (talk) 20:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine Dogad75 (talk) 20:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2015-2019 Pics - Tous droits réservés. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Centralesevens (talk · contribs)

[edit]

© 2015-2019 Pics - Tous droits réservés.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine Dogad75 (talk) 20:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ermell as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The owner of the car does not agree with the publication
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; number plate can be blurred. Owner should expect photos to be taken at a car show. --Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Roberto Montanari (d. 2017), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:25, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:09, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skupinalagioia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

http://lagioia.sk/en

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:08, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeremy.toma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

© copyright 2019 Commune de Pregny-Chambésy

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jeremy.toma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are either:

  • photos/scans which are correctly sourced, but re-licensed under CC-by-sa. Some evidence of permission is needed for that licensing. Example: File:Peugeot 404 catalogue 5.jpg
  • 20th-Century photos where the author is marked as unknown, yet the copyright is marked as PD-old (70 years after the death of the author). Those documents are not old enough to reasonably assume that PD-old applies (e.g. a 1945 photo by a 20 year-old photographer who died at 80 would enter public domain in 2075). Example: File:Vue aérienne Chambésy autrefois.jpg
If the author is anonymous in the EU, copyright law doesn't speculate, the clock starts when the image was "made public" and goes for 70 years. Images pre-1953 are PD-EU-no disclosure. --RAN (talk) 00:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes they are, and they should be either dated and tagged correctly, or deleted. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Read the terms of {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} there is no such rule as "1945 photo by a 20 year-old photographer who died at 80". --RAN (talk) 20:31, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What I mean with this example is that undated photos from the 20th Century with unknown author can’t be tagged with PD-old. If you want to check each of those files and fix their date and licensing one by one, by all means do so. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:32, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • 20th-Century photos where the author is named, that are marked as PD-old, but there is no easy way to check that the author died before 1953. Example: File:Château de Tournay 1943 (1).jpg

In all three cases, more work is needed to source those photos and make sure that we are not license-laundering these (valuable) images. -- Ariadacapo (talk) 14:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ariadacapo (talk) 14:10, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, some other files need checking:
All files are by Max Oettli and are tagged with PD-old, but the pictures were taken from 1986 to 2001. From what I could find, Oettli is still alive. I asked Jeremy.toma the reason behind this but he is yet to answer. Kind regards, Espandero (talk) 17:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not all files are copyright violations.

File:Château de L'Impératrice autrefois (3).png
I fixed the licensing on that one, please fix the licensing on the other postcards you are refering to. --Ariadacapo (talk) 07:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, deleted all, except those striked by @Ariadacapo: , thanks so much for your help. --Ellywa (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; need permission from Hujar. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© 2015 АНО «Московский гуманитарный университет». Все права защищены. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Это несвободная фотография умершего человека. Новую фотографию невозможно сделать, что при отсутствии альтернативных фотографий со свободной лицензией может служить обоснованием добросовестного использования фотографии для иллюстрации статьи об этом человеке. Фото добросовестно используется для иллюстрации статьи о человеке, не ограничивая обладателя авторских прав в возможности их использования и извлечения выгоды из оригинального источника, и улучшает статью, т.к. изображение полезнее для читателя, нежели исключительно текстовое описание. Использование данного изображения зрительно идентифицирует предмет статьи и соответствует критериям добросовестного использования 9:45, 9 July 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lexalozhkin (talk • contribs) 09:43, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Lexalozhkin: There's no fair use here. Besides adding an image to a Wikipedia page has never been mandatory. Try to upload it on your local Wikipedia. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:13, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination;; no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brecht Warnez.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious claim of own work Roy17 (talk) 15:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment这张照片的像素、画质等,的确会让某些用户觉得它不像上传者自己拍摄的。我想我没必要再做更多解释,因为解释了可能也无法说服其他人。我今后上传自己拍摄的照片,都使用原图吧,这样一来可以保留我的camera information,免得引起其他人质疑。这张照片你们如果认为可疑,要删除的话我也不反对。我的相机里面还有一些高质量的照片,我可以拿它们来取代这张照片。--Masdggg (talk) 16:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Masdggg: please feel free to upload the higher resolution version, or send emails via COM:OTRS to clarify your authorship, then technically this photo could be kept.--Roy17 (talk) 16:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • OTRS邮件处理较慢,可能要将近半年才有回复;再者,照片本身质量低下,个人认为其不符合百科全书的价值。倒不如 Delete。--Masdggg (talk) 17:33, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Masdggg: why not simply upload the 原图 original photo as you said? When you provide the original version, then this DR could be resolved straightaway since we assume good faith in contributors.--Roy17 (talk) 17:46, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
因为我还有更好的照片能够替代它。这张照片也没有保留的必要。CSD G7。--Masdggg (talk) 18:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am looking forward to User:Masdggg's new uploads. I hope they would not be taken from the Internet like this one (from http://www.bjnews.com.cn/edu/2018/11/12/520656.html ).--Roy17 (talk) 19:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: User request. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagevio? Digital watermarking. OJJ (talk) 11:06, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The watermark is for soccer.ru, and we appear to have OTRS permission from that site to use their images. Commons:Deletion requests/Files from Soccer.ru was closed by an OTRS member on the basis of that permission. @OJJ: DO you have reason to believe this permission is invalid or inapplicable in this case? --bjh21 (talk) 11:54, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for informations. --OJJ (talk) 11:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Keep: as per nomination, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files from Soccer.ru. (non-admin closure) -- CptViraj (📧) 07:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per image search, higher-resolution copyrighted version can be found at https://pcpress.rs/nortal-izdao-obveznice-u-iznosu-od-50-miliona-evra-za-jacanje-ekspanzije-i-ubrzanje-rasta/ and many other places Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 11:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio. (non-admin closure) -- CptViraj (📧) 06:37, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per image search, clear copyright notice can be found at https://nortal.com/blog/nortal-merges-leading-northern-european-marketing-automation-company-element/ Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 11:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image for abandoned userspace draft (w:Draft:TheGrandIvan Records) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:32, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:32, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:54, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:54, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:54, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:34, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:34, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نبالرم کاا ه Avini25 (talk) 06:34, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request regarding personal file. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want anymore Wikimedia displaying my files uploaded on Wikimedia Javali2080 (talk) 08:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ok, no specific EV. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want anymore Wikimedia displaying my files uploaded on Wikimedia Javali2080 (talk) 08:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in scope, categorized. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The first photo's EXIF has "FBMD" words, and indicates that the photo was published on Facebook first. The other photos lack the details in the EXIF, assumed that these photos were published somewhere first. These photos must get the permissions via OTRS.

This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 08:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

因為我用手機拍的,我先利用fb的私訊功能傳給我另一假帳號再從電腦下載--User:Joe123890508 2019年7月3日 (三) 08:26 (UTC)
Translate: These photo was taken by my mobile, and was send to my another fake account via Facebook Messenger. Then, I download these photo to my computer from Facebook Messenger. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 00:14, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Joe123890508: I see. You must upload the original photos from your mobile included the complete EXIF information. 我知道了,但請您上傳手機原始的完整照片,並且要附上完整的 EXIF 資料。您可以直接由維基共享資源的手機網頁上傳,並且盡量不要用繞道方式。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 00:14, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Joe123890508:  Keep for the photo Number 2 to 6. Number 1 still lack the EXIF information. 2號至6號照片可以保留。但1號照片EXIF仍然不完整。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 14:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Own works credible. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:Bangladesh-army-OF-9.svg Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:51, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Missmojorising (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful claim of own work. Some of their uploads were tagged as speedies as the author Brooke Bowen was in the exif. These are also likely to be copyvios

Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I, Brooke Bowen, using the psedonym missmojorising, am the lawful and legal copyright holder to each of the images uploaded via user name, missmojorising. I am happy to provide VAU certificate numbers from the United States Copyright Office to validate my claims if I am provided with an email address to forward. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missmojorising (talk • contribs) 19:44, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Missmojorising: Thanks for that. Could you please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: permissions have been added. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

full size watermark, copyright violation? Joschi71 (talk) 10:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self created artwork Malcolma (talk) 11:51, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: + above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work (through reverse google image search it looks to be an old version of his S&D EP group profile pic). ORTS permission needed. According to the metadata the copyright holder is the European Parliament. Asqueladd (talk) 13:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:57, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly inaccurate. Image wrongly and inappropriately created by the uploader. The Angus Maddison's chart based on historical trends can be found at page 259. The image does match with each other. Laviaread78b (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • DELETE or EDIT: Identical image here, but 4 more centuries were added. The book published by the author does not show.--85.211.169.198 14:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep – This is not a reproduction of any chart in Maddison's book. It is a graph of data in the cited table (Table A.7. World per Capita GDP: 20 Countries and Regional Averages, 1–2003AD) on page 382 of the book. The table has columns for years 1, 1000, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1820, 1870, 1913, 1950, 1973 and 2003, and rows for the selected countries among others. This table gives GDP per capita, whereas the table linked by the nominator gives total GDP for each country. Kanguole (talk) 15:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit – As the chart is used in articles in many languages, if there are inaccuracies and correct data from reputable sources are available, it is much preferred to fix it than to delete it. I'm happy to redraw it if someone can point me to the relevant data. Cheers, cmɢʟee ⋅τaʟκ 21:57, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • The graph has a cited source, and no-one has yet indicated a single point in the graph that does not accurately reflect that source. I suspect that the nominator is confused about what is represented by the graph and the table it is based on. Kanguole (talk) 22:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Under COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete a used file simply because it's alleged to be (or even because it is) inaccurate. If everyone agrees, the file could be overwritten by a corrected one. If not, upload your preferred version under a different name and take the question of which one to use to the Wikipedias that are using them. --bjh21 (talk) 12:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly inaccurate. Image wrongly and inappropriately created by the uploader. The Angus Maddison's chart based on historical trends can be found at page 259. The image does match with each other. Laviaread78b (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


EDIT. It is useful to have. And broadly correct - China and India were richer than Europe till about 1500. Adam Smith says it in The Wealth of Nations, though I have seen his words repeatedly misquoted by right-wingers to play this down. If it could be improved on, improve rather than throwing away! --GwydionM (talk) 08:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is widely used and under COM:NPOV that's enough that we should keep it on Commons even if it's inaccurate. The question of whether is should be used on any particular Wikipedia should be handled on that Wikipedia. Constructive updates to the file description are of course welcome, and you can upload an improved version either under a different name or, if no-one objects, under the same name. --bjh21 (talk) 12:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:29, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dethosh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Song and album cover. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hassanelbadawy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map. Looks like a map from a popular map source (Google maps, maybe), unlikely to be freely licensed and unlikely to be own work. ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 15:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another map. Unlikely to be freely licensed and unlikely to be own work. ParticipantOfTheEncyclopedia (talk) 15:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WeChat logo appears to exceed China's threshold of originality (COM:TOO China). "Society Person" Peppa Pig (talk) 16:11, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot of WeChat Moments. "Society Person" Peppa Pig (talk) 16:14, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

foto di scarsa qualità, sostituita con una foto migliore Bavarese87 (talk) 16:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blurry. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, dubious claim of own work when it is more of a derivative work. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:50, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:04, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also

Small size, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - 3 images have "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:06, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work based on Google Maps Чорний Кіт (talk) 19:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:07, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake SVG duplicate of File:CoA of Russian Empire (1830).svg Thespoondragon (talk) 19:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I'm generally against keeping superseeded {{FakeSVG}}s, and it seems to be a common rule to delete such {{Duplicate}}s (some of them even speedy).  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 16:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirect affects the rendering of en:File:Capcom Cup logo.png on its file page. Pbroks13 (talk) 04:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – The Wikipedia version of the Capcom Cup logo is only used on the primary article of the Capcom Cup on Wikipedia. Per its fair use requirements, it is only used on a single article, while there are several articles on English Wikipedia on the Capcom Cup that use the cropped logo. I also do not know if other projects (such as other languages) want to use a PD-Textlogo version of this logo. Rather, one or both of these images should be renamed. ~Mable (chat) 09:14, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Maplestrip: I'm not asking for the file to be deleted; I'm asking for the redirect page to be deleted.As far as I can tell, the redirect link is not used anywhere, and when the deletion tag is not present on File:Capcom Cup logo.png, the file page for en:File:Capcom Cup logo.png get entirely messed up. Pbroks13 (talk) 14:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, the image was already moved! That explains it. My apologies for my confusement. This seems like a non-controversial delete then. ~Mable (chat) 20:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:13, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нарушено АП -- Tomasina (talk) 05:55, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Still should not be deleted. Still from a film, image is public domain in county (Italy) where film was made, now has correct license. Therefore, image should not be deleted. Deanlaw (talk) 21:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Taivo (talk) 11:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong PD picture is not of 1923 Goesseln (talk) 12:46, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The license was of course wrong, but now – with {{PD-Polish}} – is OK. You can read in the photograph's license on the Polona.pl (bar on the right) website (in Polish): prawa do utworu: Domena Publiczna. Wolno zwielokrotniać, zmieniać i rozpowszechniać oraz wykonywać utwór, nawet w celach komercyjnych, bez konieczności pytania o zgodę. Wykorzystując utwór należy pamiętać o poszanowaniu autorskich praw osobistych Twórcy. English translation: rights to the work: Public domain. You may multiply, change, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, without having to ask for permission. Using the work, one should remember about respect for the author's personal rights of the creator. The uploader did a mistake with the inappropriate license… The discussion can be closed. --Pit rock (talk) 17:10, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Taivo (talk) 11:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eatcha as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 13:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I do not see problems. Big photo with complete EXIF, own work seems plausible. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:31, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request. Wrong file. 維基小霸王 (talk) 15:51, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, apparently fixed. At least it's used. I'll delete first version. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Xigua Video logo appears to exceed China's threshold of originality (COM:TOO China). "Society Person" Peppa Pig (talk) 16:08, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@社会我佩奇: emmm, why is this LOGO allowed to upload? File:TOUTIAO_WEB_LOGO.png--Bigbullfrog1996 (talk) 17:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bigbullfrog1996: Copyright infringement. "Society Person" Peppa Pig (talk) 17:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@社会我佩奇: Oh I got it, the rules of uploading of Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia are not same, right?--Bigbullfrog1996 (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. "Society Person" Peppa Pig (talk) 18:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I don't see this logo is comparable to any of those unacceptable examples listed in COM:TOO China. --TechyanTalk12:52, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — Racconish💬 16:43, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, derivative work of screenshot with unknown origin. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless image Luispihormiguero (talk) 18:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept. letter between two important indian social activists, w:Bhaurao Patil and w:B. R. Ambedkar. DieBuche (talk) 18:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by QueerEcofeminist as Dw no source since (dw no source since) — Racconish💬 16:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Still no source. In addition, no publication data. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was uploaded one year ago and it says that is the eclipse of 2019 2 July. So it is a fake photo Ezarateesteban 18:20, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ezarate This is a simulated image that I designed for the solar eclipse (02.07.2019). It is a composition image for such astronomical event. OF COURSE, IT IS NOT REAL!!!... Actually the amateur o profesional astronomers can predict the celestials objects with astronomical programs. See the complet article here that I wrote. Please, don't erase it. Yours trully. Fernando T. de Gorocica (talk) 20:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
El problema es que las presentando como si fuesen reales y en los metadatos figuran que fueron tomadas por un celular Ezarateesteban 20:50, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Before July 2 it had been clear that is shows not the solar eclipse, but now title and text is misleading, we should move the page and improve text in English. --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 11:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete there is no problem about the "fake" photo. However, the photo is a COM:DW, which was created base on another image. If the user can't proof that the background image is free to use, then the photo has to be deleted. --A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The original photo is a sunset like many others with a low Threshold of originality.
 Keep The File is used in wikipedia, that and the changes (covered by moon disk) are the intellectual work of Fernando. --LudwigSebastianMicheler (talk) 11:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Being a fake photo should not be a reason to delete by its own (but I find it really odd without any disclaimer and understand what Ezarate means). If metadata creates confusion, then delete metadata; adding a "it is a simulation" disclaimer and/or title should warn what the image really is. It is not out of scope and has educative uses, so keep it. -Aleator (talk) 12:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know exactly, but I think we should  Keep this photo if it's a work of Fernando T. de Gorocica. I think it is because he could make the photo of sunset (when the sun is above 1-2 degrees) and after that replace the sun with black circle. According to metadata, the sunset can be photographed at 19:17, 3 March 2018 (local time, I think). So it's free. I think this case similar to this file (scheme of lunar eclipse). --Brateevsky {talk} 18:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It should be clarified in the description and the name of the file that it's a simulation of the eclipse. It would also be good to upload the original photograph.--Frodar (talk) 18:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is derivative work of sunset photo with unknown author. "The original photo is a sunset like many others with a low threshold of originality" is false. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is illegal because my quadrocopter took it from a position where flights are not allowed. Plenz (talk) 18:59, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since I am the uploader and also the deletion requester, I think, there is no discussion and no waiting time needed. --Plenz (talk) 19:01, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, this is non-copyright restriction and Commons does not care about that. Uploader's request is valid reason during first week after upload; here whole month has passed. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Muschio Di Quercia as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: This is not the original picture by Klimt, but a copy
Converted by me to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, seems like copy by unknown author, maybe still copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permitted use under claimed license. Only use on English Wikipedia states copyright is held by Colette Fu. CentreLeftRight 23:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I believe that the uploader Fusansan is Colette Fu as they have uploaded all the photographs of paper art created by Colette Fu in Category:Colette Fu, and Colette Fu's website gives her Chinese name as Fu Sansan 傅三三. There is no reason why an artist should not upload their own work under a suitable license, and all uploads by Fusansan are under a CC license, so I do not see any justification for deletion. In the case of this particular photograph, its title includes the year "1995", and Colette Fu's CV indicates that she was studying in Yunnan in 1995, so there is no reason to doubt that the photographs in the collage are the own work of Colette Fu / Fusansan. Of course, it would have been preferable to have uploaded the individual photographs that create the collage, and then create the collage; and of course where Fu's photos are used on Wikipedia they should not be labelled "©Colette Fu". But I do not see any licensing issues with this or any other uploads by Fusansan. BabelStone (talk) 07:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, by Babelstone. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

casa privata nessuna autorazazzione alla foto. violazione della privacy. 87.12.195.192 23:24, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per Insider. Taivo (talk) 12:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot. Unlikely own work Shxahxh (talk) 00:09, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

foto di scarsa qualità, sostituito con una foto migliore Bavarese87 (talk) 16:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

foto di scarsa qualità, sostituita con una foto migliore Bavarese87 (talk) 16:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

foto di scarsa qualità, sostituita con una foto migliore Bavarese87 (talk) 16:40, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 20:12, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Phonogram producer rights owned by Paraty [3]. OTRS permission needed. — Racconish💬 05:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is Ivan Ilić. I am the pianist who recorded and uploaded this file. The master recording belongs to me, and which I licensed to French label Paraty, in 2008. The license has since expired. Irrespective of Paraty's use, the master and all rights are mine. Therefore I request that the nomination for deletion be removed. Please let me know if you need additional information. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 93.23.198.57 (talk) 05:44, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A clarification through COM:OTRS is needed here. — Racconish💬 05:58, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]