Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/03/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 26th, 2019


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nomination withdrawn - Fæ identified a comment in the source I found that solidly implies this work was Crown Copyright and became so public domain by 1991. — Scott talk 14:37, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Scott as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The reasoning given on the rationale for this image is incorrect. The image is copyright Getty, who purchased the Hulton Archive, who purchased Fox Photos Limited - see [1], [2]. (talk) 12:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep 1940, corporate photograph rather than an agency for an individual photographer, consequently PD by 2011. May have been PD by 1991, if part of MOI (therefore Crown) wartime commissions. -- (talk) 12:37, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please elaborate by linking to relevant documentation? Thanks. Also "if part of..." - we can't rely on guesses. — Scott talk 12:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No thanks. The worst case scenario is that this was PD by 2011, per the sources given on the image page. -- (talk) 12:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No thanks, you don't want to link to policy? How is that helpful for anyone else? "Per the sources" - I think you'll find that the sources are as described in this DR, above, rather than some broken Twitter conversation. — Scott talk 12:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom -- (talk) 12:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See, was that so hard? — Scott talk 12:50, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK so. "Corporate photograph" - there's nothing at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom that describes how long copyright persists when assigned to a corporate entity, unless you're claiming that this qualifies as having an anonymous author. However, the author is not anonymous - the photographer's name was Harrison, as mentioned in "Lapsus Imaginis": The Image in Ruins (Eduardo Cadava, October Vol. 96 (MIT Press, Spring, 2001), pp. 35-60) [3]. As I understand it, that means if we imagine that Harrison was, say, 40 years old in 1940, and died at the age of 70, this photograph would remain copyrighted until 2040. — Scott talk 13:14, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The JSTOR article cites the photograph as Crown Copyright, making it public domain before 1991. If the article is to be believed as correct, then first publication was officially by the MOI/Press and Censorship Bureau, thereby confirming this was a Crown publication and copyright expired 50 years after being taken (not publication). As a source, the article throws doubt on the reliability of Fox Press' archives. -- (talk) 14:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I missed that part - seems solid. Withdrawing DR on that basis then. — Scott talk 14:37, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted work File:Holland House library after an air raid.jpg which should also be deleted. — Scott talk 12:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Please note that this DR depends on the resolution of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Holland House library after an air raid.jpg. — Scott talk 12:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, the request is withdrawn. Taivo (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 17:20, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Любий друже, дивись дозвіл від автора-архітектора тут --AMY (talk)

Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 17:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Любий друже, дивись дозвіл від автора-архітектора тут --AMY (talk) 18:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 17:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Любий друже, дивись дозвіл від автора-архітектора тут --AMY (talk) 18:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 17:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Любий друже, дивись дозвіл від автора-архітектора тут. --AMY (talk)

Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 17:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Любий друже, дивись дозвіл від автора-архітектора тут. --AMY (talk) 18:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 17:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Любий друже, дивись дозвіл від автора-архітектора тут. --AMY (talk) 18:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Goed, ik ga uittrekken.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 17:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Любий друже, дивись дозвіл від автора-архітектора тут. --AMY (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload to Commons instead of Wiki Toa Nidhiki05 (Work) (talk) 12:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:55, 26 März 2019 UTC: Fair use is not allowed on Commons --Krdbot 20:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pre-upload for undeletion in 2068. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 22:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam/advertisement --Alaa :)..! 13:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 00:06, 27 März 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zakno130 --Krdbot 02:01, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hola, le saqué esta foto a mi perro. ¿Me la podrían eliminar? Estoy arrepentido :( 181.72.246.170 20:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 21:05, 26 März 2019 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Perro pastor alemán.jpg: --Krdbot 02:02, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake redirect David290 (talk) 18:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a user-generated picture of an in-copyright work by Andy Warhol dated 1974. KR26740 (talk) 00:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if this is the right place to respond. I own this artwork. It is a commissioned portrait made by Warhol for Mr. Accame and Warhol transferred the artwork and the copyright to Mr Accame. Then I bought it. Topjur01 (talk) 06:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User Topjur01's response to a deletion nomination for this same image on 5 Nov 2017 was different than what they say here. At that time, when an editor explained that, as with the purchase of a book, their ownership of the painting does not imply ownership of its copyright, Topjur01 replied:
Thanks for explaining. I understand. You are right. It should be on Wikipedia under the fair use.
It can be confirmed by email with Artists Rights Society, the administrator of Warhol’s copyrights, if the artist's estate still owns copyright in this painting. Glancing through copyright notices in a few Warhol catalogues on my shelves, including one of portraits, I believe it would have been unusual for Warhol to have given or sold copyright in an artwork he created. KR26740 (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reminding me about the 2017 discussion. I somehow forgot about it. I agree with the deletion. Today I uploaded the file under the fair use. Please delete this commons entry. I do not know how to delete it myself. Thank you for all your help. Topjur01 (talk) 09:48, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: User Request. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:51, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A picture was here since 2014 and still used only in a draft? Is he in scope somehow? E4024 (talk) 18:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Screenshot of non-free content. --1989 (talk) 00:22, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has a link to the YouTube channel as a source but I don't see any proof there that it's licensed with the claimed CC license. kyykaarme (talk) 06:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete While he does now have an article on en and de, there isn't any evidence that this is CC licensed, it's just been taken from the YouTube channel's display picture. Ym2X (talk) 11:17, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file was tagged for no permission and deleted by Fitindia. I don't know if I should close this myself so I'll ping them. -kyykaarme (talk) 20:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 20:47, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine Ymblanter (talk) 17:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There is permission from architect: ticket:2019032810007945. --Anatoliy (talk) 13:54, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornografi, sexuellt stötande innehåll Omiran (talk) 13:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred dark picture with no meaningful subject, no educational content: out of scope Phso2 (talk) 15:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

by author's request Ⴂ. ႡႠႪႠႾႠႻႤ 17:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have mistakenly uploaded my photo here, please delete this. Abhi179 (talk) 18:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dublette von File:2019-03-23 - DJI Inspire 2 -3986.jpg ST 18:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Challenged speedy deletion of "non free logo" Andy Dingley (talk) 21:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)SARRASIN JEAN-CLAUDE, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© EUROPA-KOLLEG HAMBURG 2014 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Matey Ghosloww, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Matey Ghosloww, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:22, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Matey Ghosloww, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Matey Ghosloww, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infrigment: [4] Skepsiz (talk) 22:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work as per file data A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 10:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valuable content whatsoever, just an image of two treetops with a dissolving contrail on a blue sky; doesn't represent the place of origin (Šumava) by any mean, too. GeXeS (talk) 10:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No immediate reason, no. I just stumbled upon it and thought to myself, why would anyone upload something like this... And that the dataspace is too valuable to be filled with such random shots.--GeXeS (talk) 21:32, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Dataspace for this photo is not so valuable as our time spent by discussions of such useless deletion requests. The photo is properly described and at least roughly localized. The two trees are photographed at Šumava and they naturally correspond to the location, as well as other photos of nature. Its quality is adequate, tree species are possibly identifiable. Also the depicted form of contrail is possibly usable for educational purposes, as well as other photos of athmospherical phenomena. Commons is not an elimination tournament. Geocoordinates would make the photo more valuable but specification of 4km route is relatively precise. --ŠJů (talk) 15:52, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, sorry for bothering you (meant in a good tone, no sarcasm). --GeXeS (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows

[edit]

I uploaded a bunch of photos of 2018 MacArthur Fellows from the MacArthur Foundation site as their licensing indicates the videos and images are CC-BY. However, I got a message on my English Wikipedia account pointing me to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:MacArthur Foundation Images of Fellows. I was not aware the the issue with the CC-BY licensing from the MacArthur Foundation. As these images are not considered to be sufficiently free despite the CC-BY note on the foundation's site, these need to be deleted.

Whpq (talk) 12:34, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Ronhjones, reviewer of that file.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:41, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: The permission link was to https://www.macfound.org/creative-commons/ - which shows most of the web content is cc-by-nc-nd and shows MacArthur Fellows Images and Video are cc-by with A Media Organization as defined below may use the photographs and videos on this website pertaining to the MacArthur Fellows provided that each such use is credited as follows: © John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation- used with permission. When used herein, Media Organization means a legal entity, for profit or not for profit, engaged in disseminating information to the general public through a newspaper, magazine, other publication, radio, television, the internet, cable television, or other medium of mass communication including by digital means.(Why does that statement not fit commons?) The photo page clearly shows they are John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation photos. As the image page used all the correct data, I passed the review. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ronhjones: Thank you for that information. The WMF does not qualify because MF's General Counsel says so in ticket:2016102610013764.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ronhjones: We do not want to just use the images. We want to publish them under a free license so that anyone can use them for any purpose. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@4nn1l2 and Ronhjones: Agreed, the use of a cc-by logo on their site is not helpful. I suspect this will end up as a recurring issue as other editors "find" the photos on that site in the future. You might want to note I also found File:Barzilay 2017 hi-res-download 1.jpg and File:Mavalvala-1000.jpg with an insource: search for "https://www.macfound.org" - these probably need nominating as well. Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:01, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by 4nn1l2. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright mentioned in exif as belonging to Beatriz Montero Mateo but uploaded by user AlberMoon "own work". To uploader: please read COM:OTRS. Takeaway (talk) 12:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maqbool ahmed sifu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Maqbool ahmed sifu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete not for educational use. --Migebert (talk) 15:43, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unencylopedic photo. photograph of identifiable persons Robertsky (talk) 11:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:58, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope MiguelAlanCS (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 23:12, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:07, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nuestrooamoor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images. Out of scope. Commons is not a web host

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amosaynor1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:37, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jenychris (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE (es:Ricardo Asensio)

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment These are artworks that may potentially have an educational use. Delete those that don't have OTRS permission, keep those that do Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - artwork of non notable artist. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article pages belong to Wikipedia, out of project scope. Achim (talk) 14:13, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 14:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Angelica Verdan is unlikely to be the copyright holder. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:11, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:10, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo. maybe malicious upload. not used on any pages. Robertsky (talk) 10:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To explain better my position on requesting a deletion, the photo appears to be from sggirls.com, titled as 'NYGH Upskirt'. This is contrary to the user's claim that it is from an official school instagram page. Even if it is from an official school instagram page, it should be the school to upload and release the rights here, not the user. The photo contains an identifiable school girl, likely under the age of 16 at the time of photo, sitting in a potentially compromising position. As such, I believe that the deletion request is warranted. - Robertsky (talk) 19:17, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. COM:PRP. According to Information box: "Source -> tumblr" & "Permission -> tumblr.com". {{License review}} needed, no link provided. Strakhov (talk) 14:44, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still from an unfree video + French-UK film, any reason for U.S. law to apply? Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata includes an explicit copyright claim that contradicts the uploader's claim of a free license. ElKevbo (talk) 00:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value except it teaches us what we have come to after all these years Untitled.docx (talk) 01:16, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture twice : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Smaranananda.jpg Richard Reinhardt (talk) 06:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1rhb as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Permission withdrawn by Jim Kahr
Converted by me to DR, as image does not qualify for speedy. A courtesy-deletion might be discussed. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ein Jahr nach der mündlichen Freigabe, hat de:Jim Kahr seine Einwilligung in Schriftform zurückgezogen. Er bittet um Löschung auf Grund von Persönlichkeitsrechten. --1rhb (talk) 14:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Independant of the initial rationale, this image might be considered a derivative of the completely depicted poster behind the artist. --Túrelio (talk) 15:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It looks more like a caricature of itself. A photo that shows an artist tired after a busy concert is not benevolent. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.211.118.176 (talk) 20:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Die Löschung des Fotos aus dem öffentlichen Bereich stellt für niemanden irgendeinen Schaden oder Verlust dar, es ist auch nicht ersichtlich, welchen Nutzen gerade dieses Bild bei Wikipedia hätte, zumal eine mündlich gegebene Einwilligung rechtlich auf schwachen Füßen steht.
The deletion of the photo from the public domain does not represent any damage or loss to anyone, it is also not clear what benefit just this image would have on Wikipedia, especially as a verbally given consent is legally on weak grounds.
https://www.datenschutz-wiki.de/Recht_am_eigenen_Bild
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.7.99.125 (talk • contribs)

Deleted: Would need an OTRS-permission (at least for the poster in the background). --DaB. (talk) 13:29, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: There are more than enoung details visible. --DaB. (talk) 13:31, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in USA for text and the photo violates text author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:32, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work. It is published by newspaper or magazine. It is a copyright violation. A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 09:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work. It is published by newspaper or magazine. It is a copyright violation. A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 09:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work. It is published by newspaper or magazine. It is a copyright violation. A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 09:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work. It is published by newspaper or magazine. It is a copyright violation. A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 09:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work. It is published by newspaper or magazine. It is a copyright violation. A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 09:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anjaagnieszka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are apparently from flikr, but credit "Getty Images for Victoria's Secret" in the meta-data. the uploader at Flikr has pro status, but it's not clear if he's a staff photogrpaher for Getty or Victoria's Secret. OTRS needed for definitive status confirmation.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:16, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anjaagnieszka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stills from an unfree video.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:16, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I do not know where this information came from, but looking for a video on youtube.com, I deliberately marked in the filters a "commons license" and used screenshots from the video, which then appeared on the list. In my opinion, everything is fine with the license.

Anjaagnieszka (talk) 18:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Can’t find a CC-License in the video or in the video-description. --DaB. (talk) 13:35, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlberMoon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded as "own work" but all images could be found online prior to Commons upload: small files; no exif; one file contains credits to a website; probably copyright violations.

Takeaway (talk) 12:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:38, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want my photo to be deleted due to excessive use in other sites. I do not want my pictures to be public and to have more publicity. Radoslav.parvanov (talk) 13:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It’s not possible to redeem a CC-license. --DaB. (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) Subject purported also to be author and clearly not a selfie (copyvio); 2) Non-notable person--same issue as Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SAJID ALI THAHIM--and used to create self-promoting encyclopedia article of commons (SAJID ALI THAHIM) and elsewhere (e.g., see en.wiki edits; 3) User is NOTHERE and a sockpuppeteer. Эlcobbola talk 13:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred redondant picture. Same pictures with better quality are available. Phso2 (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs taken at Dinosaur Land (Rügen), and as a managed entertainment park that charges for entry, this is not a public space that would fall under FOP. The models are recently designed and are unlikely to be "permanently" situated.

(talk) 14:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not sure File:Excavation of a Dinosaur Model 2009.jpg should be included. You can barely see the model as it's covered by sand and can't really identify it. But you get the idea that children can dig to uncover 'something' resembling a dinosaur fossil. Bermicourt (talk) 17:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Excavation of a Dinosaur Model 2009.jpg seems ok. --DaB. (talk) 13:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The primary focus of this image is the Captain Marvel poster. A de minimis rationale does not work. (talk) 15:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@: The image has been edited to obscure the non-free portion. I request nomination be withdrawn.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pixelation is itself controversial, reverse pixelation being a realistic thing these days. I suggest other opinions. -- (talk) 20:57, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@: I know its been done in the past. See File:PixelatedHuyFongSriracha.jpg for example. @Krd: , who suggested a similar thing be done to File:Karen Gillan - Guardians of the Galaxy London premiere.jpg.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:17, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think both images are not blurred enough. When you look at the thumbs they are identical to the unblurred images while still having a nearly reasonable resolution. --Krd 06:18, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Krd: The image has been further pixelated, how is it now? You may need to refresh the page.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd say it's ok now. --Krd 16:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Krd: Thank you, could you also perhaps revdel the previous versions.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:05, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Delted the old versions, the current seems ok to me. --DaB. (talk) 13:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As a composite of other works, COM:PRP has to apply unless at least the skull statue and the ears/horns have a copyright free source. (talk) 15:47, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 15:59, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There was a known source when I reviewed the file for nl.wikipedia.org in 2010. However, I regret not noting it down at the time. I don't remember from where, but I found that the copyright belonged to a company that ceased to exist in 1917. Assuming it was published in some form by the company, and not found post-bankruptcy, I believe that would make it public domain under {{PD-US-expired}} at least.
The claim about 1949 is indeed false and was not intended. This the me in 2010 wrongly assumed {{PD-old}} is the same as "PD-oud" on Dutch Wikipedia. The "PD-oud" template on Dutch Wikipedia used to say that "the copyright belonged to a non-personal entity and the work was published more than 70 years ago". Which, looking at it now, doesn't seem like a generally valid public domain claim. --Krinkle 16:18, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So probably PD in the US, but no evidence that it is PD in the country of origin (Belgium). That would be a delete then. Copyright of a picture being owned by a company rather than a person is rare, so probably the copyright would expire 70 years after the death of the photographer, so that 1949 is still a relevant year for the determination of the copyright situation of this picture. Jcb (talk) 16:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It may be rare, but it is the claim we have. --Krinkle 18:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but such claims tend to be mistaken. Jcb (talk) 20:28, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PRess image, not own work. ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:22, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected press image. ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:23, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope image by a one-time uploader. Also MD is not clear enough to believe the "own work" claim. E4024 (talk) 18:52, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own images false own work claim. Scanned images. Bogus license. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also

Not own images false own work claim. Scanned images. Bogus license. Bogus date. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 13:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DaB.: File:ПОРТРЕТ.jpg? --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Threshold_of_originality#China_(PRC): Calligraphy works shizhao (talk) 14:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Nominator's reasoning is NOT applicable, as the organization is based in Hong Kong, but the nominator's link is about the Mainland China, which is a different area of jurisdiction. --Moonian (talk) 14:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 06:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex calligraphy logo. Hong Kong has a very low threshold of originality per Commons:TOO Hong Kong. Wcam (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: That’s only letters. --DaB. (talk) 14:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DaB.: Please see the closing admin's rationale for deletion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:SCAA logo.svg. This is really calligraphy rather than simple standard characters. --Wcam (talk) 15:15, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Wcam: I know what calligraphy is. The logo you nominated for deletion is in my eyes just a bunch of (maybe nice written) letters with circles – and that’s just not enough. File:SCAA logo.svg had at least some graphical elements. I’m sorry, but I will not change my mind here. But you can of course re-nominate it (with a good explation) and maybe you can persuade another admin. --DaB. (talk) 21:23, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TOO in Hong Kong is as low as that in the United Kingdom which is extremely low. Logos that are literally "only letters" are not ok per COM:TOO United Kingdom, let alone calligraphy. Those admins who are not familiar with UK TOO are advised to see past DRs regarding UK TOO. Wcam (talk) 15:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep logo has been in use at least since 1938 = copyright expired.--Roy17 (talk) 14:07, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Roy17: Thanks for the info. Could you change the license tags accordingly? --Wcam (talk) 15:51, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination as license tags are updated. --Wcam (talk) 17:53, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nomination withdrawn, no reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:29, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex calligraphy logo. Hong Kong has a very low threshold of originality per Commons:TOO Hong Kong. Wcam (talk) 20:25, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Only letters. --DaB. (talk) 14:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is watermark "Video: Reuters" bottom right corner. Probably VOA license does not apply and this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:59, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:42, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fan art used on a bad page Doomdorm64 (talk) 21:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tables such as this are out of scope for Commons particularly when they are out of focus. If the information here is useful for educational purposes, it should be set as a WikiTable. I also note that there are no cites for any of the numbers included here, so this table could not be properly used in WP which does not permit numbers without ooutside sources.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:46, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no free licence to allow the upload here (source : https://presselib.com/section-paloise-aux-racines-du-mythe/) - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 21:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no free licence to allow the upload here, the source (a blog) probably does not respect the author rights - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 21:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:47, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work by a one-time uploader. No EXIF. E4024 (talk) 22:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this an own work? E4024 (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:48, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image. There are sharper images covering the same topic. Nv8200p (talk) 23:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This is, admittedly, blurred, but it is part of a large group of images showing various stages of team roping, and to the best of my knowledge, is the only image showing a completed “catch” with the steer laid down on the ground. As such, it is unique in commons. Were it not, it would be a different situation. Montanabw (talk) 00:30, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DaB. (talk) 14:49, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Sculpture was unveiled in 2014. No freedom of panonrama for 3-D art in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DaB. (talk) 14:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phamat123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright images - see Commons:Currency#Argentina

Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:24, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Phamat123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright images - see Commons:Currency#Angola

Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:28, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phamat123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspected copyright images, similar to Commons:Currency#Bahamas,_The.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:32, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: they are not original works by the uploader. License of original works (banknotes) is unknown. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free. From a protected source. 1233 (talk) 16:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea whether this is hand written from texts from a source or what after talking with the course teachers. I assume that there is no photo like that.--1233 (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence this is published under a free licence. --Stifle (talk) 14:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error in image Mamtapawar512 (talk) 19:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

error in image Mamtapawar512 (talk) 19:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:53, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:59, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 12:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the website of the "world's leading digital asset exchange" is indeed the uploader's own work and they own the copyright, we'll need a confirmation via OTRS. Huon (talk) 02:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Now has OTRS permission. --Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WestRail642fan

[edit]

Reasons for deletion request: Obvious copyright infringement. SageWater (talk) 16:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious why? --Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 12:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The image of the 720 has been ripped from this article, and the 755 is listed as a screencap from this YouTube video. LostCause231 (talk) 13:57, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then SageWater should have stated as such at the outset, we shouldn't be made to carry out our own searches. --Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 14:52, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete both: No sign of a free licence either on the video or on the source page for the photo. --bjh21 (talk) 20:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Agree, should be deleted. Clear copyright violation. ElshadK (talk)

Deleted: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused art of non-notable artist, seems out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:54, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded a higher resolution of the video: File:President Obama’s Nowruz 2015 Message to the Iranian People (English).webm Hanooz 16:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:54, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free. From a protected source. 1233 (talk) 16:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:59, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is a copyright source. Not free. 1233 (talk) 16:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:59, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not the current Thai highway route shield. (That route is local road not highway) Oum13928 (talk) 16:20, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infringement of Copyright Oum13928 (talk) 15:12, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just use {{Rename}} instead. Whose copyright has been infringed? P 1 9 9   19:57, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This File is stop using Oum13928 (talk) 07:17, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  JGHowes  talk 03:22, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is no longer in use. Oum13928 (talk) 12:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This file is in use on en:Thai highway network and has been since May this year. Until the picture is permanently removed from Wikipedia, it should be kept here under COM:INUSE. --bjh21 (talk) 13:21, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Feel free to rename that file if necessary. --Achim (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not the current Thai highway route shield. (That route is rural road not highway) Oum13928 (talk) 16:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just use {{Rename}} instead. P 1 9 9   19:56, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is essentially a duplicate of File:Videotron Le superclub logo.png but with a 3D cube and some red colour. It is not notable enough to warrant a duplicate upload. Due to trademark restrictions, it is best to just keep one copy, and we will go with the current (flat/non-2D) logo. LABcrabs (talk) 05:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would disagree. Since it is not an exact duplicate, it should be kept. Fry1989 eh? 22:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   15:57, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as {{Copyvio}} by Krdbot. Artist has been dead for over 70 years. Abzeronow (talk) 16:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Abzeronow hello. I took this file here. The fact is that the article I am writing about the Danish artist Gustav Holmbom is very important for me and for the community. About this artist very little is known and there are no examples of his works on the free media repository. I found the above article with a link to this file. This article on this resource was created by a distant relative of Gustav Holmbom Беляев ИП (talk) 16:51, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi, the reason why this DR exists is that I needed to remove the copyvio tag, and this DR allowed me to do it. The version with the frame probably should be deleted since frame makes it 3D object but the frameless version should be kept since it appears Holmbom died in 1903 (I found results for same name dying in 1946 so that's why I said dead for over 70 years, not 100 since there was some ambiguity as far as death date) Abzeronow (talk) 16:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: old enough. P 1 9 9   15:59, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Galerie Malaquais (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Maurice Mazo (d. 1989), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS.

* File:Buste de Jane Poupelet, 1901, plâtre, Roubaix, La Piscine.jpeg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Patrick, Those files you want deleted, paintings by Maurice Mazo, were photographed by someone working for the Galerie Malaquais, in which case, the photos' copyrights do belong to the Galerie if I'm not mistaken. Moreover, the heirs of Maurice Mazo are aware and gave us their permisssion since the photographed paintings were part of Mazo's workshop, which will be sold at auction next Monday, 1st of April, in Paris. Thus, I sincerely think those photos can stay on Mazo's Wikipedia page. Galerie Malaquais. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galerie Malaquais (talk • contribs) 15:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Galerie Malaquais: Non, vous vous trompez: ces photos sont des oeuvres dérivées et le droit d'auteur demeure entre les mains de(s) (l')héritier(s). Ce(s) dernier(s) et non vous doi(ven)t adresser une permission via COM:OTRS/fr. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Voir aussi Commons:Deletion requests/File:Félix Schivo Charpentes de Saint-Eustache.jpg -- Habertix (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:01, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Félix Schivo (d. 2006), permission of his heirs needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Patrick, The file you want deleted called "Charpentes de Saint-Eustache" was photographed by someone working for the Galerie Malaquais, in which case, the copyright's photo does belong to the Galerie if I'm not mistaken. Moreover, the heirs of Félix Schivo are aware and did give us their permission since the photographed "Charpentes" were part of Schivo's workshop, which was sold at auction at the heirs' request, Monday 18th of March 2019 in Paris. Thus, I sincerely think the photo can stay on Schivo's Wikipedia notice.

Sincerely, Galerie Malaquais. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galerie Malaquais (talk • contribs) 14:39, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

La réponse est la même que celle apportée sur Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Galerie Malaquais.-- Habertix (talk) 00:38, 28 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:02, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo creado por mí, en desuso y reemplazado por otro archivo Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:45, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:47, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:47, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo actualmente en desuso, reemplazado por uno de más calidad. Lobo kun mfc (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ist eine Variation des Logos mit Kontur für die Verwendung an der Unterkante. Richiges Logo unter File:DEU_Umweltbundesamt_Logo.svg einsehbar. Gunnar (💬) 17:50, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's variation that is used on the official page of the Federal Agency for environment, so it isn't an irrelevant logo. So no valide reason for deletion. Also the very old symbol of an angle is used in an very simple form, so it falls also under TOO. In conlusion  Keep --Habitator terrae 🌍 17:05, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Habitator terrae. P 1 9 9   16:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Diese Darstellung stellt keine Variation des Logos dar, sondern ist das Logo mit einer Druckabstandskante, wenn es an der Unterseite eines Plakats oder anderen Drucksache positioniert wurde. Das Logo existiert unter File:DEU_Umweltbundesamt_Logo.svg. Gunnar (💬) 00:37, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Der Umstand, dass es sich bei dem Balken nicht um ein Logo oder Variation handelt, wurde dem Befürworter und Uploader bereits mehrfach mitgeteilt. Siehe Diff -- Gunnar (💬) 00:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Bitte hören Sie auf, irrelevante Löschanfragen zu stellen. Wir haben genug Stauraum, um beides aufzubewahren. -- Eatcha (talk) 03:34, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Eatcha: , da sie gesiezt werden wollen, bitte. Ich würde Sie daher bitten mir nicht diese Art und Weise zu unterstellen. Ich stelle diesen Löschantrag, da diese Darstellung KEIN offizielles Logo ist und genau nur deshalb. Diese Darstellung ist ein Logo plus Designerweiterung, welche nichts mit dem Logo zu tun hat. Es handelt sich also NICHT um die KORREKTE Darstellung. Wenn es nach Stauraum gehen würde wären andere Punkte relevanter. -- Gunnar (💬) 19:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; auch diese Variante kann hier ihre Berechtigung haben und aus irgendwelchen Gründen genutzt werden, auch außerhalb von Commons. Bringe doch einfach einen Hinweis in der Dateibeschreibung an, dass es sich hierbei um kein offizielles Logo handelt. --Indeedous (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Sculpture was unveiled in 2014. No freedom of panonrama for 3-D art in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Sculpture was unveiled in 2014. No freedom of panonrama for 3-D art in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Sculpture was unveiled in 2014. No freedom of panonrama for 3-D art in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Sculpture was unveiled in 2014. No freedom of panonrama for 3-D art in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Sculpture was unveiled in 2014. No freedom of panonrama for 3-D art in the United States. Nv8200p (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:25, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]