Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/03/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 4th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

previously deleted subject. does not meet notability. Lazypub (talk) 12:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I tagged this as a copyright violation however given the usage a DR seems better. While the bottom of the image is copyright the uploader it seems to me that this will actually be copyright Spacex? Herby talk thyme 15:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Pending OTRS clarification. --Herby talk thyme 15:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Archipeppe68 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appears to be copyright SpaceX

Herby talk thyme 15:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Pending OTRS clarification. --Herby talk thyme 15:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is no longer in use by WeTransfer and should always be replaced by the new logo. Nielsen219 (talk) 10:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i contacted the press department. i guess we can keep the now outdated logo and will get a new one from wetransfer directly. Maximilian (talk) 23:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep New logo: File:WeTransfer Logo.png and exchanged on Wikipedia. Keep the old logo for historical reasons. Raymond 14:58, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - kept for history. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the old WeTransfer Logo and is no longer relevant. 76.90.71.21 20:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Old versions of logos were kept for history reasons. --Raymond 20:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi, this logo is no longer in use. Can I ask you to take it down? Nielsen219 (talk) 14:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Old versions of logos were kept for history reasons. --Raymond 14:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Georgia Ymblanter (talk) 16:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 00:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Georgia Ymblanter (talk) 16:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 23:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file without EXIF. E4024 (talk) 01:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Neither of these are criteria for deletion. Sadads (talk) 01:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Educational value is unclear. Claimed to be a selfie, but does not look like that. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No hay licencia que justifique su uso; imagen no de su autoría. 187.188.77.216 22:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

esta mal subido DjavanRdrgz (talk) 02:01, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Corrupt upload. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed upload. E4024 (talk) 02:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed upload. E4024 (talk) 02:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. False own work claim by a one-time visitor. E4024 (talk) 02:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a contributing user. E4024 (talk) 02:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Copyright violation from Facebook. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken upload, already be replaced B dash (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:13, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Broken upload, already be replaced B dash (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, no indication that the file is under CC BY SA 4.0 from its source 100cellsman (talk) 04:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, no indication that the file is under CC BY SA 4.0 from its source 100cellsman (talk) 04:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdelrahman jamal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Multiple effectively identical images of someone would definitely seem outside the scope of this project

Herby talk thyme 07:53, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all uploads of Abdelrahman jamal. Small photos without camera data, copyright violation is possible. All files are unused, probably out of project scope as well. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete the PNG version of this logo because the SVG version is now available and I want to retain the SVG version. Fandi89 (talk) 08:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. File:Petrosains logo.svg is much more beautiful. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The adress is no longer correct, the Swedish Secretariat for Gender Research is no longer situatet at this buildning. 2001:6B0:D:738:110D:1791:A59C:E03A 08:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, this is not a reason to delete the photo. Commons hosts old and outdated photos to show history. We can always rename the file "Former building of ..." and change description. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete the PNG version of this logo because the SVG version is now available. Fandi89 (talk) 08:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Superseded by file:Ekuinas logo.svg. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE, no person of enyclopaedic relevance. Zenwort (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete this file and file:Nurdin Samudra.jpg as copyright violations. EXIF states: author ALDANY, copyright holder pura pura gila. But his some other uploads mark Nurdin Samudra as author and copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no the abductors CejeroC (talk) 09:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this gentleman within our scope? E4024 (talk) 19:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No. --1989 (talk) 04:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original file exists on this link with valid permissions. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dharitri-Terangpi.jpg Vrisle (talk) 16:22, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The original file exists on this link with valid permissions. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dharitri-Terangpi.jpg Vrisle (talk) 19:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom, duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not clearly public domain, likely not (I do not believe Colorado gov works are public domain by default) SecretName101 (talk) 16:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The website containing the photo is not up because Hickenlooper is no longer Governor. However you can find it on this website: https://www.westword.com/news/john-hickenloopers-plan-to-take-syrian-refugees-dissed-on-his-facebook-page-7350264 Hsidun (talk) 18:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean the photo's in the public domain. That being said, I would  Delete per nomination. --Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 02:36, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Formal photographs of Governors are ALWAYS public domain.Arglebargle79 (talk) 14:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naitangray (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:58, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copirate violation suspicion - the source link is an economical newspaper IKhitron (talk) 18:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:24, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 01:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 01:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 01:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 01:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 01:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:54, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is of a profesional photoshoot and is likely not by the uploader. (https://www.royalalberthall.com/tickets/events/2017/alexis-ffrench/) 100cellsman (talk) 04:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy without attribution of the author : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Renault_Kangoo_de_la_pr%C3%A9fecture_de_Police,_Paris_septembre_2013.JPG Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 08:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:48, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, reloaded again. User warned. Again

Gbawden (talk) 08:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by STUBLISH KHUPS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 15:00, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and blocked. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ez Grup

[edit]

After speedily deleting obvious copyvios, here are last remaining contributions of Ez Grup (talk · contribs):

Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation : photo taken by the "Mairie de Paris" Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 08:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and permission is necessary. --Jianhui67 TC 03:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation https://www.paris.fr/services-et-infos-pratiques/prevention-et-securite/prevention-et-securite/prevention-et-securite-2283 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 08:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation : https://www.paris.fr/services-et-infos-pratiques/prevention-et-securite/prevention-et-securite/prevention-et-securite-2283 Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 08:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Véhicule_e_golf_de_la_Préfecture_de_Police.png Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 08:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 03:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David kausiwa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The copyright holder of the images is "Fusion Multimedia Ltd". There is no evidence that uploader is the copyright holder. Delete per COM:PRP

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 08:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE no person or items of encyclopaedic relevance Zenwort (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Natenkiki2004

[edit]

Natenkiki2004 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

This is not own text and the photos violate text authors' copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of D-nx1999

[edit]

D-nx1999 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 09:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Jianhui67 TC 04:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Thierry Pierrard

[edit]

Thierry Pierrard (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Photos previously published in Facebook need OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Uraniumc

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Uraniumc (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, maybe not own work, but copyright violation. Quality is very bad. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Com:Packaging Gbawden (talk) 10:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Srkalinga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - unused self promotion

Cabayi (talk) 11:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 23:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - self promotion Cabayi (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, source ist facebook, see metadata Migebert (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - self promotion Cabayi (talk) 12:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - self promotion Cabayi (talk) 12:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:05, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.notimerica.com/sociedad/noticia-chantal-gayoso-reina-festival-vina-2019-20190228170046.html Carlos yo (Discusión) 12:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of a non-notable singer. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo for non-wikipedian = OoS --Alaa :)..! 12:45, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fantomas2019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Image of a non-free work. Copyvios

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unsed photo with no exif data. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright, no es trabajo propio: https://www.publico.es/politica/renovacion-direccion-madrid-isabel-serra-pensar-ganamos-madrid-unicamente-carmena-erroneo.html Marcelo (Abre la puerta y entra a mi hogar) 13:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JohnM1209 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Msgraphics007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perfect forever (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perfect forever (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image gallery, only self-promotion content. Out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   19:59, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:50, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shubham1811381 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:16, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shubhamsingh1437 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused person photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 15:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shvan aziz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 16:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Jonatan Fernstrom, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Robert Kothe, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:22, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)Karen French Photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://tricolortvmag.ru/article/canals/2018-11-19-idealnyy-uzhin-kulinarnoe-shou-premera-na-che/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Jon Kopaloff/FilmMagic, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to http://fotokto.ru/id197481#photo5988713 Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Lightsky Motion Pictures www.lightsky.in, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 20:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. PD? E4024 (talk) 00:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MigueDemo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS

Ronhjones  (Talk) 05:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INUSE ones kept, others already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Dogbert420

[edit]

Dogbert420 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

en:Jfameous was deleted due to non-notability, probably the photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Rolland 92

[edit]

Rolland 92 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Миродара

[edit]

Миродара (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Out of project scope due to very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Kara Pearson Photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by RockSkaPunkMetal as Copyvio (Copyright) and the most recent rationale was: la imagen contiene algunos derechos de autor. Que se vuelva revisar.
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not copyvio, this is taken from the official Flickrstream. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, user with no real edits. Commons is not webspace Migebert (talk) 12:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal image, IMHO. E4024 (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MUGISHA COHENS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos of a non-notable person(s). Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 15:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hans - Peter Firbas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 15:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 15:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Julian Meinhardt, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(transfered) Dear Patrick Rogel, The nominated file was sold to us (Rhetorik-Akademie Tübingen / Lorenz Brockmann) from the photographer Julian named in the metadata. We have the copyrights to use this picture for our commercial products, same a with the other file nominated a while ago (File:Lorenz Brockmann.jpg). Please reconsider your request for deletion, Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhetorik-Akademie Tübingen (talk • contribs) 07:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Rhetorik-Akademie Tübingen: Unfortunately the file File:Lorenz Brockmann.jpg has been deleted for the same reason. Copyright holder must send a permission via COM:OTRS with copy of the transfer of ownership. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Studio Claerhout, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://www.artblr.com/nersehkhalatyan/fr Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal image. Cjp24 (talk) 18:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. E4024 (talk) 19:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. E4024 (talk) 19:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. E4024 (talk) 19:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. E4024 (talk) 19:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Amateur art. E4024 (talk) 19:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE holiday snap Zenwort (talk) 19:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • There is a series of probably OoS pics of this lady (some CR vio also) and you chose the only one which is in use. If there is no permission problem,  Keep. --E4024 (talk) 20:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Found at https://bucketlistjourney.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/14523065_10210560219467365_325236930449594980_n.jpg, no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 19:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 19:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 19:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 20:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 20:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its a picture of me that i want to delete can you please delete it 80.184.109.101 20:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 20:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bella1369 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images, http://juravliova.com/portraits-2 and following.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Bella1369 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images, http://juravliova.com/portraits-2 and following.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:27, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; permission needed. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed upload in a sandbox. E4024 (talk) 01:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed upload in a sandbox. E4024 (talk) 01:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: corrupted file. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:13, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 15:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is he in scope? E4024 (talk) 23:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mararospuey

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Mararospuey (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of MuseoTME

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of MuseoTME (talk · contribs):

Mostly historical photos, the other lack metadata. Own work is unlikely. es:Manuel Muñoz Ruiz was deleted, probably the photos are out of project scope as well. Taivo (talk) 07:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Michael Gregori

[edit]

Michael Gregori (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Mostly small photos, camera is always missing. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Estados Unidos de América del Sur

[edit]

Estados Unidos de América del Sur (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

The photos violate photographers' copyright. Source country Peru demands 50 years from photographer's death. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jesusbella

[edit]

Jesusbella (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Derivative work of copyrighted screenshots. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Baburnavazkhan

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Baburnawazkhan (talk · contribs):

Small photos, sometimes historical, own work is unlikely. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Griira

[edit]

Griira (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is freedom of panorama in Russia only for architecture, but not for sculptures. The photos violate sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Turkistan

[edit]

Turkistan (talk · contribs) uploaded these logos:

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of OCI 1REC

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of OCI 1REC (talk · contribs):

Camera is always different, one photo is credited to another person. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Inforeduc

[edit]

Inforeduc~commonswiki (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

No author, no proper source (source "own work" was added by bot, not by uploader). Maybe the files are copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of 32cravenfan

[edit]

32cravenfan (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Metadata is usually missing and if exists, then mostly different. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Equestrian statue of Mikhail Yaroslavich

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures and the photos violate sculptor's copyright. The sculpture was erected in 2008, sculptor Andrei Kovaltchuk is still living. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to fail COM:PACKAGING

Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kyung-heeu2030 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User with history of copyvio, all descriptions say they were taken by the subject.

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:47, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own works. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kyung-heeu2030 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last remaining files, small files without EXIF, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kyung-heeu2030 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No metadata, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by -aristographic. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, the uploader's history and previous publications found elsewhere.

LX (talk, contribs) 22:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As User:Edgar181 says, "Ambiguous stereochemistry, inconsistent depiction of hydrogens on heteroatoms.". The missing H on the N is not an accepted standard in any drawing style, and the geometric problems are...problems indeed. Have File:Norscopolamine.svg as proper replacement. DMacks (talk) 19:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As User:Edgar181 says, "Ambiguous stereochemistry." Have File:Norscopolamine.svg as proper replacement. DMacks (talk) 19:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:07, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falscher Dateiname, Familienname falsch geschrieben, richtiger Name bei File:Stolperstein Hermann Reiss, 1, Klosterstraße 20, Eschwege, Werra-Meißner-Kreis.jpg GeorgDerReisende (talk) 12:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: replaced by File:Stolperstein Hermann Reiss, 1, Klosterstraße 20, Eschwege, Werra-Meißner-Kreis.jpg, unused, uploader request. --Wdwd (talk) 09:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

@Edeler von Janzweitdraußen Vor ein paar Tagen hatten Sie bereits ein Foto von der selben Veranstaltung mit der gleichen Person hochgeladen. Auf Nachfrage hatten Sie dann gesagt, dass Sie keine Erlaubnis für die Aufnahme hatte und das Bild wurde gelöscht. Sie selbst schrieben „No consent of the person whose picture was taken”. Nun haben Sie erneut ein Bild von der gleichen Veranstaltung mit der gleichen Person hochgeladen. Es gelten aus guten Gründen strenge Vorschriften für die Aufnahmen von Personen. Schon das vergangene Bild haben Sie entfernt. Bitte entfernen Sie auch dieses Bild, wenn Sie keine ausdrückliche Erlaubnis für die Aufnahme hatten. Weitere Informationen finden Sie unter Wikipedia:Bildrechte Zhanggu68 (talk) 17:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no details or diff-links given. In Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stephan Scheuer Neuss 2019 20190214233455.jpg the uploader agrees to delete a recent uploaded image which is not the case here. --Wdwd (talk) 09:02, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of consent of identifiable people. Picture taken at private event. User:Edeler von Janzweitdraußen already confirmed for other picture that he lacked consent. But he continued to upload more pictures of same people and same event. Contacting user failed as he was banned for vandalism. Contacting admin failed as well as he did not respond to email request. Zhanggu68 (talk) 13:36, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused now. P 1 9 9   17:09, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation: it was not allowed to take pictures during the concert by visitors (who was not accredited photographer by artist) JTs (talk) 17:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is clearly not a copyright violation: people cannot be copyrighted, and there is no evidence this photo was not taken by the uploader. It might have something to do with personality rights, but given that there were photographers accredited by the artist, there was no explicit ban on photography either. Thus at most this is a violation of concert rules which may be uploader's problem but not ours — NickK (talk) 18:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no copyvio. per user:NickK. --Wdwd (talk) 08:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -97.70.113.122 19:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This symbolic is a false representation as well as morally and ethically just to be removed.

the entire page should be deleted for security purposes 97.70.113.122 20:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete entire page and logs Michael Elliot Haudan (talk) 01:02, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 08:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's blurry. fail. there is a better version in commons: File:Starr-091106-9359-Heliotropium_anomalum_var_argenteum-leaves-Kanaha_Beach-Maui_(24962777396).jpg Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 20:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 08:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better alternatives exist SecretName101 (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 08:49, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

versehentlich doppelt hochgeladen Schubbay (talk) 21:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 08:49, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by WielkiPan as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: This is wrong, Głubczyce doesn't have flag
Converted by me to DR, as file does not qualify for speedy and is in use. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 09:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Głubczyce nie posiadają flagi. Czerwono-żółte paski to jedynie kolorystyka używana przez gazetę Głos Głubczyc. 5.173.64.172 07:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, considering the earlier request as well, nominated at that time by the uploader. Apparently it is a mistake. Educational not usefull and out of scope. Not used on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 20:11, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Regasterios as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: uploader's request (with FileImporter) Regasterios (talk) 08:45, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Converted by me to DR, as file does not qualify for speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Túrelio: See the history. The license tag added not by the author. Previously Damibot had marked it as untagged file and requested license from the author. As he not tagged the license Alensha did – without permission. I noticed it only after moving to Commons. Please delete this file. Thank you. --Regasterios (talk) 19:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Regasterios, converting from speedy to DR does not mean that the file is o.k. or that I am against its deletion, just that IMO it does not qualify for speedy deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: incorrect commons transfer, possible copyvio, per COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion per these edits.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also:
  1. Two entirely different photos (probably both from this same source) have been uploaded as "versions".
  2. I see no indication that the video from which these are taken has an appropriately free license.
    OK, this one issue is addressed: I didn't do the "See More" I needed to see the license. - Jmabel ! talk 01:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So: Delete. - Jmabel ! talk 17:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Jmabel, please make it clear – do you have difficulty with determining which license is used for certain videos on YouTube? I hope this may help you. Sealle (talk) 17:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is her only free image and I'd say it's somewhat unusual for Commons to delete images according to an anonymous letter. At the moment, I have no idea who the author of this message is, and who the "we" that he mentions are. If this is somehow related to the person depicted, it would be logical to expect that something else would be offered in return. Sealle (talk) 04:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, many thanks to you all for taking the time of looking into this issue. This is the first time I edit one of these pages, so please excuse me if I make any mistakes. I am the author of these messages. My name is Juan Martinez and I'm a very good friend of Maru Valdivielso. She has asked me to help her remove that picture from wikipedia. She will be willing to send you a more recent free license picture of her. --Juan.mart.rubi (talk) 08:51, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maru just send me three pictures you may choose from. The URLs are: [1]. The one with the footnote "Maru Valdivieso - Fotografía: Javier López" [2] [3] --Juan.mart.rubi (talk) 09:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: , I understand, I agree. I'm on it already. We will send you asap a better picture complying with your indications. --Juan.mart.rubi (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Dear all. Maru has already uploaded a recent personal photo she is the author of and sole owner. Please see [5]. Please, let me know whether you need anything else from us to replace the existing one by this one I just sent you. Many thanks to all of you for your time and efforts --Juan.mart.rubi (talk) 07:51, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Juan.mart.rubi and Maruvaldi: That photo seems quite small for a 2019 digital photo and has no EXIF metadata, who was the photographer?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 15:44, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: it was a friend of Maru's, not a professional photographer. They took it to have a recent picture for Maru's personal photo book. I don't know about EXIF metadata, but the picture has a better image resolution than the one we are trying to replace. Don't you think we could go ahead with it? it would be an improvement at least. Many thanks. --Juan.mart.rubi (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Juan.mart.rubi: I would prefer to wait until we have permission from that friend.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Dear Jeff, an email from "Sara Sánchez de la Morena", Maru's friend, who took the picture, has been sent to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" with the automatically generated text so as to grant permission to publish Maru's photo under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I hope this is enough to replace the existing picture by the new one. Would you be so kind as to let us know when that might take place please? Thanks again for your help! --Juan.mart.rubi (talk) 14:40, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Juan.mart.rubi: ✓ Done.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 14:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Many thanks Jeff. Maru has told me to thank you as well on her behalf. I can see that it has been changed in wikipedia, see [6], however, has the old picture been erased yet? I can still access it, see [7]. Maybe it is Wikipedia's cache and it will be erased soon? Thanks again. --Juan.mart.rubi (talk) 10:27, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Juan.mart.rubi: You're welcome. I prefer the new correctly spelled photo File:Maru Valdivielso.jpg too, but it is up to a Commons Admin to delete the old file and conclude this discussion, probably on or around 11 March per COM:DP.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:04, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above, redirected. --Sealle (talk) 12:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G., Jmabel, and Sealle: Many thanks! Juan.mart.rubi (talk) 14:13, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G., Jmabel, and Sealle: Dear all, since Wikipedia is the owner of the URL where the old picture was and the new one is, do you ask google to update (index) this URL for the old picture not to appear anymore on its search engine's results ? If that is not the case, do you know whether I can do anything to achieve that? Thanks again! Juan.mart.rubi (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: Thank you Jmabel! I will look into it and if I find something out I'll let you, only FYI --Juan.mart.rubi (talk) 12:56, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and uploader names are different and the file is not used. E4024 (talk) 01:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size and without EXIF. E4024 (talk) 01:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken 37 years after the death of the person. Sorry for not taking seriously the "own work" claim. E4024 (talk) 01:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:27, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work without EXIF. See uploader history. E4024 (talk) 01:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:28, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work and only in user space. E4024 (talk) 02:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in scope, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

より質の良いファイルをアップロードすることに対して障害となるため ゆっくり401 (talk) 06:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation : Telerama written in the description Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 08:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, author is Rossana Di Vincenzo. Taivo (talk) 11:35, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo : no authorization, copyright violation Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 08:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo : no authorization, copyright violation Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 08:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation : photo from an article of "Le Parisien", journal Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 08:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, author is Benjamin Derveaux. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Filo gèn' as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no good quality
Converted by me to DR, as file does not qualify for speedy. However, a courtesy-deletion might be possible. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:04, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, quality is acceptable, but courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Uploader as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no good quality
Converted by me to DR, as file does not qualify for speedy. However, a courtesy-deletion might be possible. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, no, I do not agree to give courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Filo gèn' as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no good quality
Converted by me to DR, as file does not qualify for speedy. However, a courtesy-deletion might be possible. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I do not agree to give courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Filo gèn' as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: no good quality
Converted by me to DR, as file does not qualify for speedy. However, a courtesy-deletion might be possible. -- Túrelio (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I do not agree to give courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Georgia Ymblanter (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, that's right, but I do not see any copyrighted details. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Georgia Ymblanter (talk) 11:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, that's right, but I do not see copyrighted details here. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Georgia Ymblanter (talk) 11:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I thought long time and decided, that ceiling is here copyrightable. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in addition, maybe out of scope. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced upload without EXIF by a one-time visitor. Clearly seen that it is the scan or photo of a photo. E4024 (talk) 14:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in addition, maybe the photo itself is a copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Based on the metadata, shadows, and odd skin color transition between the neck and head, it appears that this image has been edited to change the head of the subject in a problematic way. This issue was originally reported in en:WP:IRCHELP. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:Brigadier Sikandar Khan.png due to same reason. Small photos without camera data, the uploader's only contributions. Probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 12:20, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author: "Badirkhan", uploader another name. E4024 (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a near duplicate of File:Poplar Gate, Leeds (35590125842).jpg with only minor colour differences, possibly due to some image editing. Schlosser67 (talk) 15:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:26, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion pic without a date, presented as "own work". I would ask for a permission through OTRS. E4024 (talk) 15:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, date exists in EXIF, but as this is really promo photo and the uploader's only contribution, I'll delete it as likely copyvio. Taivo (talk) 12:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maribelceballosdelf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not own work. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, work of Indian government is protected 60 years from creation. As creation year is unknown here, the file should be deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Georgia Ymblanter (talk) 16:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, that's true, but I don't see copyrighted details here. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. AT (talk) 17:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@AT: but why?, i had places the authors, whats wrong man? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimas Laksani (talk • contribs) 22:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So you consider the author is the photographer of the photo? I dont think so.-AT (talk) 09:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@AT: we dont know, but i took that image from that website, he is the author of that image. Dimas Laksani (talk) 12:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
He claim it only. As you can see the original source of the photo, the date he uploaded is 22 November 2018, but there are lots of links show that the date is eariler than the website you provide. For example, 2018-11-01, 2018-08-22 etc. Also as a promote photo, it should not be got the permission to upload to wikia and there are no information of the photo, which means it is not taken by the uploader probably. Dont you think so?-AT (talk) 14:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh sorry, as you uploaded a lot of copyvio photo, I think we do not have to discuss anymore. Thank you.-AT (talk) 14:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I did not find copyright message on source site, so that's likely copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:55, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most possibly PD by age, but "own work" it is not. Therefore please provide original source, author, date etc. E4024 (talk) 18:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Commons cannot accept this photo without source. Taivo (talk) 13:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from the author (Konstantin Y. Kosminkov) must be sent to COM:OTRS. Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Лушников Владимир Александрович: Konstantin Y. Kosminkov is deceased - Simonov inherited the photo.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Then  Delete: having a paper copy doesn't mean inheriting copyright. --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 11:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Лушников Владимир Александрович: He received the whole collection on a hard drive after Kosminkov's death.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 12:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No matter. Official heirs of the deceased photographer should clarify the issue via OTRS. --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 12:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What is there to clarify? The copyright transfer is clear. (Kosminkov → Simonov → Commons) I think this can be considered copyright paranoia.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 12:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please be civil and follow Commons' policies (COM:EVID, COM:PRP). --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 12:55, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Did you see the "Я подтверждаю, что это фото – из моего архива, и я дал разрешение PlanespotterA320 добавить его в Wikimedia Commons в соответствии с этой лицензией. Андрей Симонов (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)" note in the infobox?--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 12:57, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Do you understand there's no evidence that Андрей Симонов is the proper copyright holder to license other person's works? --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 13:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The precautionary principle here is an explanation for why orphaned works can't be on commons (ie, if copyright status is unknown). Extreme precautions like "what if somebody secretly found out who the author of this anonymous work was within 70 years" and "what if somebody changed their mind about the copyright heir after they died" are not in the spirit of the precautionary principle. Prior to these images being added to Commons, they were not published at all. You can do a reverse image search to see that all publications of the photo are after the image was added to Commons.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Look, you can't exaclty ask a dead person to write an email addressed to wikimedia organization. Are you asking for a photo of a floppy disk with notation or something?--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User:PlanespotterA320, are you able to follow the discussion? The permission must be granted by official heirs of the author. --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 13:26, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Simonov will be responding to this deletion request in a few hours, please wait until then before deleting it.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
У Константина Юрьевича Косминкова не осталось наследников. Его единственный сын умер раньше отца (детей у сына не было). С женой Константин был разведён. Родители Константина Юрьевича тоже умерли... Андрей Симонов (talk) 19:43, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, I thought couple of days and decided, that under such circumstances Andrey Simonov is rightful heir of this particular image and can publish it under free license. Taivo (talk) 19:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет источника. 109.252.72.112 03:33, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There is no freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan and the building looks modern. The photo maybe violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Uploader account does not match Author account. Strakhov (talk) 11:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nerseh Khalatyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrrighted artwork by Nerseh Khalatyan, artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS. Unlikely to be within COM:SCOPE too.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:29, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am the artist of these works, and I uploaded them --Nerseh Khalatyan (talk) 05:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; Please send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: unfortunately modern stamps of Poland do not appear to be freely licensed per Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Poland. Probably still in copyright until 70 year pma.

The other stamps in this group certainly pass the de minimis test. Ww2censor (talk) 15:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:55, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Нет источника. 109.252.72.112 03:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source is own work, file has EXIF. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Uploader account does not match Author account. Strakhov (talk) 11:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. Ruthven (msg) 11:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to be a copyrighted image: http://solarviews.com/cap/venus/mead.htm. It looks like it is based on https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA00148. Either way, it's licence is not compatible with Commons. jdx Re: 19:15, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: This image is Copyright © by Calvin J. Hamilton. Any commercial/for-profit use of this image needs to be addressed to Calvin J. Hamilton. Image not present at source. Ruthven (msg) 11:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 10:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The image on the gravestone was made on the basis of a 1949 photograph. At the moment there is no evidence that the author of this photo gave the applicants copyright. -- НоуФрост (talk) 18:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary FoP in Russia This gravestone is located in the cemetery on the island of Buromsky . The cemetery on Buromsky island is HSM No.9 in accordance with the Antarctic Treaty [8](Revised List of Antarctic Historic Sites and Monuments). According to the Treaty, its territory does not fall under the jurisdiction (except visiting it scientists) of any of the States - parties of the Treaty and the objects located on it are free for photographing, replication and distribution. The author, who took a photo of the gravestone, issued a permit for its free distribution under this license. No reason to delete — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.71.133.170 (talk) 15:28, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The release date of the article, where the -- НоуФрост cut out the photo RPR (page 47), 2016, the date of manufacture of the plate 2000 (see the documents for the manufacture of plates [https://drive.google.com/file/d/195xMyawM1JrN45D_PXvf7bFcGpMWBNSL/view payed order on production according to the sketch of the customer who granted all rights of the free distribution of plate's images. Following the logic of the -- НоуФрост, on the plate was used a photo wich was published 16 years after the plate was made — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.71.133.170 (talk) 18:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Free availability of a similar image from open sources on the Internet "Russian Polar Reasearches magazine RPR p.47. Certified written permission issued by this magazine for free distribution , including all posted images (inside documents of the OTRS Ticket#2018011510006814). Certified permission issued by author of photography inside Ticket#2019030410002931 . Certified permission issued by customer of gravestone with documents on payed order inside Ticket#2019030410004939. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.70.120.143 (talk) 14:04, 7 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.70.120.143 (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This image has not been issued a ticket OTRS. -- НоуФрост (talk) 14:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
you mean reply on permission request with ticket number 2018011510006814 ? yes, in violation of present inside of OTRS Ticket#2018011510006814 documents , namely the certified written permission issued by Russian Polar Researches magazine (wich is freely available as open source in Internet RPR-25) for free distribution this and all other images available on pages 46-48 under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 license. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.100.190.86 (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I once again inform you that the permission for this photo is not confirmed - this photo. As part of this ticket, my OTRS colleague was granted permission for text only. -- НоуФрост (talk) 17:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Разрешение подтверждено только на текст в статье «Павел Кононович Сенько. К столетию со дня рождения» из журнала «Российские полярные исследования», OTRS–тикет 2018011510006814. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
to -- НоуФрост yes, namely on this and other photos on pages 46-48 that respected magazine in the public domain gave permission under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 license, but your colleague once made the wrong decision and is now trying to make it double when he nominated a photo of the gravestone that has the permission of the author of the photo to be removed. At the same time you're referring to a magazine photo published 16 years after gravestone was made... — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.71.141.192 (talk) 20:08, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I refer to the photo of 1949 -- НоуФрост (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
no. following link that you insert above this photo with image that you and your colleague cut out from page 47 here RPR-25 Year 2016, everyone can compare and verify that your image from a magazine published 16 years after the gravestone was made in year 2000. In addition to which the magazine issued a permission for free distribution under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 license. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.66.236.51 (talk) 23:37, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"which"? No, not everyone. I can check - I am an OTRS agent. You report false information. Sealle? -- НоуФрост (talk) 23:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
no false information. citation from permission of magazine from January, 2018:
"Настоящим журнал «Российские полярные исследования» , заявляет, что является единственными обладателем исключительных авторских прав на следующее произведение, выполненное автором (ФИО) , включающее    фотографии ...Ссылка на  произведение: RPR...Журнал «Российские полярные исследования» согласен на частичное или полное воспроизведение (копирование ) данного  произведения на условиях свободной лицензии Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ , либо иной открытой лицензии на выбор) или более новой." 

Translation from russian : "The magazine "Russian polar research" hereby declares that it is the sole owner of the exclusive copyright to the following work, made by the author (data) ,including photos ... Link to work: RPR The magazine "Russian polar research" agrees to partial or full reproduction (copying ) of this work under the terms of a free license Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/, or other open license to choose from) or newer." End of citation.

This document inside ticket 2018011510006814, you wish receive it repeatedly? In addition, repeatedly, article in magazine published 16 year after gravestone was made. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.66.236.51 (talk) 00:44, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Endless story"... Volunteers, it's time to finish this kind of "dancing on the bones" of long-dead people you started . . Delete file.--Николай Сенько (talk) 06:53, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeletionFooter|KEPT|I accept the OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Taivo, добрый день. А как вы можете подтвердить разрешение OTRS (которого никто не выдавал) на производное изображение с фотографии, права на которую не принадлежат фотографу? И там это не единственная проблема в тикете. Вы OTRS агент? У вас есть доступ к тикету? -- НоуФрост (talk) 17:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I re-opened the request. OTRS-member is needed to close that. Taivo (talk) 20:27, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS declined release. --JuTa 19:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see [9]: 本網站上所刊載以雲林縣政府名義公開發表之著作,即著作人為雲林縣政府者,在合理範圍內,得重製、公開播送或公開傳輸,利用時,並請註明出處。 * 本網站上之資訊,可為個人或家庭非營利之目的而重製。

Author of the image is 雲林縣政府, see [10]

shizhao (talk) 03:01, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The file has 5 extracted images and they all must be deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Shizhao: The Yunlin County Government has changed their license to the "{{GWOIA}}" (政府網站資料開放宣告). Just like what I wrote on the file page, "為利各界廣為利用網站資料,雲林縣政府網站上刊載之所有資料與素材,其得受著作權保護之範圍,以無償、非專屬,得再授權之方式提供公眾使用,使用者得不限時間及地域,重製、改作、編輯、公開傳輸或為其他方式之利用,開發各種產品或服務(簡稱加值衍生物),此一授權行為不會嗣後撤回,使用者亦無須取得本機關之書面或其他方式授權;然使用時,應註明出處。"--It's Our Time (talk) 06:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is the newest license that used by the governments of the Republic of China, surely include the Yunlin County Government (雲林縣政府), I think the license you said is the old ones.--It's Our Time (talk) 06:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
see 著作權聲明: "雲林縣政府網站上刊載之所有內容,除著作權法規定不得為著作權之標的(如法律、命令、公務員撰擬之講稿、新聞稿等請參考著作權法第條規定)外,其他包括文字敘述、攝影、圖片、錄音、影像及其他資訊,均受著作權法保護。" and see 政府網站資料開放宣告: "部分的影音、圖像、樂譜、專人專案撰文或其他著作,經機關特別聲明須經同意方可使用者。". 所以根据政府網站資料開放宣告的要求,雲林縣政府已经在“著作權聲明”中特别声明了“本網站上所刊載以雲林縣政府名義公開發表之著作,即著作人為雲林縣政府者,在合理範圍內,得重製、公開播送或公開傳輸,利用時,並請註明出處。本網站上之資訊,可為個人或家庭非營利之目的而重製”。所以看起来,这张图片这不属于政府網站資料開放宣告所包括的范围。--shizhao (talk) 02:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
当然,这个网站上关于的著作权的声明有些含混,可能理解上出问题,最好还是去信问一下--shizhao (talk) 02:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Shizhao and It's Our Time: 他應該是受到著作權法保護,但是政府網站資料開放宣告也同時依據著作權法,授權那些版權資料的使用。為釐清問題,已代為致信詢問雲林縣政府。個人也曾利用開放宣告上傳不少中華民國行政機構的圖片到共享資源上。雲縣府很可能是因為轉換時忘記撤下先前的聲明。--S099001 (talk) 12:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Shizhao and It's Our Time: This is the reply of Yunlin County Government:" 3月27日致縣長信箱收悉。台端所提本府網站有關『著作權聲明』項目,將於4月2日從該網站移除。" They have seem remove the "著作權聲明", but Shizhao's url is still able to visit now (but there is no title), I don't know what the xxxx they think... do you need I send another e-mail to ask again? --S099001 (talk) 12:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because we can't find a link through any page on the site except visiting the url Shizhao gave, so I think the file can be  Keep.--S099001 (talk) 12:40, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: In my view, the governments of Taiwan is changing their license lately years, Yunlin is one of the cities that has changed. We could follow the new rule. Shizhao, thank you for your reminding and thanks S099001 for asking Ms. Chang Li-shan. In fact, I didn't know there was the "著作權聲明."--It's Our Time (talk) 09:33, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: impossible to prove the old license. --JuTa 19:17, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]