Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/02/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 22nd, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a book cover therefore it is under copyright laws. NerdyKaiExpo (talk) 03:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:32, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a book cover therefore it is protected under copyright laws. NerdyKaiExpo (talk) 03:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 09:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Themightyquill: Rubbish. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- I didn't see the subject was notable. --Themightyquill (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain black panel, not clear how this is "Conservation International Sagi Haviv" DMacks (talk) 03:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Fixed. (Read Help:SVG#Stylesheet for more information.) TilmannR (talk) 07:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looks fine now thanks! DMacks (talk) 15:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 15:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not found at URL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 15:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file can be seen in several web pages: this and [1]. The file doesn't show the proper license on those web sites. Luisalvaz (talk) 18:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Reupload of COM:NETCOPYVIO. --1989 (talk) 06:57, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation? DirkVE (talk) 13:59, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 07:40, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibile violazione di copyright Dipralb (talk) 23:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk at 13:58, 23 Februar 2019 UTC: Likely copyright violation, see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. --Krdbot 01:58, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 16:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Captain-tucker at 05:16, 24 Februar 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Berekara U. Pius --Krdbot 07:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original author (myself) requested Ilovetopaint (talk) 13:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:35, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:47, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boxtoni1979 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MifterBot as no license (No license since). It should probably qualify as a PD but I cannot ascertain authors death date. Green Giant (talk) 15:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license for 7 days. --Jcb (talk) 18:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gywyjq1314 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible derivative work, dubious

Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover copyright violation? DirkVE (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 10:47, 24 Februar 2019 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 19:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:21 Coptic Martyr of Libya Icon.jpg 15gryffin (talk) 10:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permision. --JuTa 00:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsplash no longer CC0, not free use Elisfkc (talk) 00:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YAMANUK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Rodrigolopes (talk) 01:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph by Lee Mitchell Anyon + own work? E4024 (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permision is needed. --1989 (talk) 03:46, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this DW legitimate? E4024 (talk) 01:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:47, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

State government is NOT Federal government and is therfore not PD Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:47, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from http://www.worldlicenseplates.com/ page on Albania Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:48, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Taken from here, which does not hav a license compatible with Commons. No evidence present to suggest this is the property of the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 02:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:49, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality content that does not add value beyond our existing coverage of the same topic Nv8200p (talk) 02:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image that does not add value beyond our existing coverage of the same topic Nv8200p (talk) 03:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture is from the Tesla Model 3 page which is likely copyrighted Vauxford (talk) 03:50, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture grabbed from the web which has been circulating on many websites, not likely taken by uploader and lack of exif Vauxford (talk) 03:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=27&v=3TaHJaFyEF8 Not likely own photo. Vauxford (talk) 03:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken from Tesla Model 3 page which is copyrighted Vauxford (talk) 03:59, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ryesavage (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Ronhjones  (Talk) 04:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:55, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ok a related discussion to Commons:Deletion requests/File:CoupeCachou.jpg. As the French description appears to explain, this trophy is an hommage of sorts for a little dog named Cachou. Out of scope - or maybe belongs in a category for self-made trophies or man/dog love? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn: used. --Ankry (talk) 17:01, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, no permission. Yann (talk) 05:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed. On top of that, this is a fake trophy, so who knows what the image actually shows. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vancharles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted works and out of scope.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 06:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pgrigio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and promo photos. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:25, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pgrigio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted works

Rodrigolopes (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 06:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of likely non-free content.

B dash (talk) 06:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

STOP YOUR ACTIONS !!!! It's not necessary !!! If you don't like it, DON'T LOOK IT !!!! --ComputerHotline (talk) 06:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 03:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 07:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @B dash: out-of-focus poster in the background, partly obscured by the subject, would be COM:DM anyway. Regardless, to improve the usefulness of the image, I cropped it to the actual subject. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unscharf/ blurred Thorbjoern (talk) 07:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Sharp enough to illustrate the subject, COM:INUSE. Donald Trung: ik lust die dingen echt niet. Jij? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Ik vindt ze best lekker. 😋 I'd also say  Keep as it useful enough and actually in use, but I would advise anyone currently in the Kingdom of Belgium reading this to buy one and take a better photograph. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Currently it is the only one picture of a Belgian tompoes on Commons. Perhaps technically not excellent, but shows good the difference between a Dutch and a Belgian version of tompoes cake. The picture is used in an article about tompoes cake on pl.wp., and is needed there.  Keep. Hortensja Bukietowa (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 04:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the source provides no free license Andrei (talk) 07:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted file, according to the source website Andrei (talk) 07:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not good enough Øyvind Holmstad (talk) 08:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:04, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

©Thomas Vanhaute 2018, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Mahesh Mahadev, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:43, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per (c) Mahesh Mahadev, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Mahesh Mahadev, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant: I uploaded this image twice under different names Levana Taylor (talk) 13:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bkup Dabbuganeshpur (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Magog the Ogre. --1989 (talk) 04:10, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have tons of good pictures from Copenhagen Opera House and Copenhagen Harbour. This picture is a tourist snap shot strangely dark and unlikly to be used. No educational purpose and out of scope. Pugilist (talk) 14:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Carl Ha (talk) 14:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen capture from Charmed episode CallyMc (talk) 14:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is claimed as "own work" by a editor User:Sarina.naidu, It seems unlikely that they personally own the rights to this corporate logo, though they appear to have attempted to disclose a relationship at w:Wikipedia talk:DISCLOSE. They previously uploaded it to enwiki, making the same declaration. ColinFine (talk) 14:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have also nominated w:Wikipedia talk:DISCLOSE for speedy deletion, but the user also attempted to disclose a relationship it at w:User:Sarina.naidu. I have explained this to them, and informed them of this nomination, at w:WP:Help Desk#Replace incorrect company logo with correct company logo --ColinFine (talk) 15:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS permision is needed. --1989 (talk) 04:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:14, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from worldlicenseplates.com page on Albania Upwinxp (talk) 15:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from worldlicenseplates.com page on Albania Upwinxp (talk) 15:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from worldlicenseplates.com page on Albania Upwinxp (talk) 15:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Museum sign with copyrighted text and image. FunkMonk (talk) 15:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Déku1796 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ar558a (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ana Carolina Roque (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain nonsense, nowhere in use. Associated article was speedily deleted at de:wp. This is obviously out of COM:SCOPE. AFBorchert (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from worldlicenseplates.com page on Albania Upwinxp (talk) 16:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarah7ever (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surasak.sa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Satishsixteen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in vanity article.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Iraq. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:23, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of a Commoner/Wikipedian. Also probably not an "own work" as declared. E4024 (talk) 07:31, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Hi dear .. I think this is my personal Picture and it does not belong to you to decide if it is going to be used or not (it was Before) and even if in case it was not own work wich it is own work in fact ,it is mine and represent me so kindly there are other more important Pictures that you can help (for you for managing them) than a personal pictures especially I can see a lot of notification for Delete request on your work on your Take Page about it and I think you can fix your own work befor fixing others..and by the way thanks for your help on the Category fixing issue but in this request I do not agree with you and try to fix bigger issue not to go against good beginar's work just becuse they may do not agree with you on some other issue Sarbast.T.Hameed (talk) 12:55, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Though it's true that the image is not used, the user is an active participant to our project, and the image is categorized in a user category. Note that, as per our policy : "Such categories must be categorised only under Category:User categories" I have edited the category [2]. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:54, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 04:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:23, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IAMSATYAJIT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jollys88 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last remaining files, professional images and small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:26, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hornerbb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Promo photos of company of questionable notability

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Simeon k. Unity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of scope.

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 16:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small photo with no exif data. Possible copyvio T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 16:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 05:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Cc1 Levasseur GMP/COM, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miggelee 65 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Trijnsteltalk 16:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Albert Mennel exclusiv.li, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:59, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) VITALY KISLOV kislov.com, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Увёнок (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope selfie of non notable person

Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 17:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not sure if canadian government signs are public domain Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 17:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:54, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic; Wikimedia commons is not a personal image-sharing site The Anome (talk) 21:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic: Wikipedia is not an image-sharing site. See user page for declaration of intent by submitter. The Anome (talk) 21:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:scope Wvdp (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Michael Helms Photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement RomanM82 (talk) 23:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement RomanM82 (talk) 23:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Jared Ribic - Identity Crisis Studio, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Jared Ribic - Identity Crisis Studio, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://storiesig.com/stories/emagarcia Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 04:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 04:25, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely blurry, low quality image. We have plenty of the Bellagio property and crosswalks on the Vegas Strip that are more usable. Highly unlikely this image will ever be used. Missvain (talk) 17:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Intentionally erroneous information. This is not an accurate depiction of the alignment system in any edition of Dungeons & Dragons whatsoever, and is entirely made up the uploader. It misleads and is useless. oknazevad (talk) 17:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Also "from the internet", which makes me doubt the licence (but maybe it's below COM:TOO?). --bjh21 (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self photo; no real license Euro know (talk) 19:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded this picture with half of it cut off, and thus the picture is not of any relevance to any subject. C Pistolero (talk) 20:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I accidentally uploaded this photo in too low resolution, which makes it unusable for Wikipedia. I will upload one with a higher resolution, so this one can be deleted. C Pistolero (talk) 20:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pallavi das 1811190 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SS

Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Edgar181 noted chemical mistakes. Seems fixed in File:SQDG-to-SQ.gif by same uploader. DMacks (talk) 22:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crossed bonds, atom-labels overlapping bonds, too small to see details, one of many poor images by the user Sreejith K (talk) 16:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Quality is bad, but the file is used and so automatically in scope. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Massive chemical nonsense. Kept on a technicality, but now replaceable (and replaced) by File:Saudin.svg DMacks (talk) 22:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion. --Leyo 14:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ArzelVorster (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE peoplke. Besides copyvio of https://www.polycat.com/about

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jcb. --1989 (talk) 00:19, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Debe ser borrado 181.176.106.202 06:19, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Este es un archivo de musica y este archivo fue publicado sin permiso del autor por eso debe ser eliminado. DANIEL GONZALES RUIS (talk) 17:56, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Esta inagen debe ser borrada porque esta publicado sin permiso de autor. 181.67.21.40 16:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: possibly copyright violation, and likely out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author requesting for deletion; superseded by File:BruceMcPherson (cropped).jpg Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 07:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:30, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 15:59, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:13, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ma.hinterberger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last remaining files, small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 16:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No own artwork, too. -- Kürschner (talk) 20:48, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 17:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The source has the copyright sign. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: the sculptor (it:Gianfranco Meggiato) is still alive Parma1983 (talk) 18:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation: the sculptor (it:Gianfranco Meggiato) is still alive Parma1983 (talk) 18:44, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

on web site, it's written in French language : Tous droits réservés = All rights reserved.

Je recopie ce qui est écrit sur le site Disney :

Euro Disney Associés S.A.S. est titulaire de tous les droits nécessaires à la diffusion et l’exploitation du site internet et des éléments le composant (notamment les informations, textes, images, personnages, vidéos, logos, dessins, marques, infographies, data visualisation, etc. – ci-après les « éléments du site Internet »).

Euro Disney vous concède le droit non exclusif, gratuit, non cessible et non transférable, de visualiser les éléments du site Internet pour votre seul usage personnel, à des fins non commerciales et dans les limites et conditions des présentes Conditions d’Utilisation, ce pour la durée pendant laquelle le Site Internet sera disponible.

Aucun des éléments du site internet ne peut être copié, reproduit, republié, téléchargé, mis en ligne, transmis ou distribué d’aucune manière que ce soit, sauf (i) autorisation d’Euro Disney ou (ii) pour effectuer une copie des éléments du site Internet sur un ordinateur à des fins exclusivement personnelles et non commerciales, et sous réserve que l’Elément du Site Internet copié ou téléchargé ne soit pas modifié et que l’ensemble des mentions de propriété intellectuelle (notamment le copyright) soit conservé. Euro Disney autorise l’utilisation des communiqués de presse, infographies, dossiers de presse, chiffres clés publiés sur le Site par des journalistes professionnels uniquement dans le cadre de leur activité.




AntonyB (talk) 22:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joyce Dennys died in 1991. It has never been PD in the source country (UK) and therefore can not be kept. See ticket: 2019022010007051. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doubts has also been raised that the posted never was published in the United States before 1924, since it was a UK-only poster. So, might not even be PD in the United States either. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non free image. Not own work
Converted by me to DR, as the nominator provided no evidence for his copyvio-claim. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:25, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted picture due to copyvio Vauxford (talk) 04:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:EuroAustralia.svg. Mahir256 (talk) 05:39, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:EuroCamboya.svg. Mahir256 (talk) 05:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of the image wishes to change the license of the image. Fysiksektionen, the author, plans to trademark it. HotOpiz (talk) 12:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of a free license to begin with. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of the image wishes to change the license of the image. Fysiksektionen, the author, plans to trademark it. HotOpiz (talk) 12:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of a free license to begin with. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not Чръный человек's own work! He photographed the icon as a derivative work. We also need the artist's permission via OTRS to release a photo from his icon under a free license. Ras67 (talk) 17:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:57, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enmanuel2307 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Please provide evidence that picture has been published more than 60 years ago.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:35, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What type of evidences? --Enmanuel2307 (talk) 23:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment If you don't have any, then the images must be deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
https://twitter.com/perezjimenez52/status/767494025838489601 https://www.facebook.com/lavenezuelainmortal/photos/a.192793934152881/320235708075369/?type=1&theater--Enmanuel2307 (talk) 17:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Enmanuel2307: Twitter and Facebook have been created 2006 and 2004 respectively so I wonder how it can prove pictures has been published more than 60 years ago in Venezuela... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:17, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment ... anyway seems to have been shot during Pérez Jiménez rule so 1958. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:25, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Patrick Rogel: Certainly I cannot corroborate online when these photographs were taken, because I scanned them from the original files that a Foundation in charge of the protection of Venezuelan photographs has. However, those photos were taken at the time that Marcos Pérez Jiménez was dictator of Venezuela (1953-1958). --Enmanuel2307 (talk) 19:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Published 2014 and 2018. 50 years have not passed since the date of its publication.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Enmanuel2307 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works. Canon EOS 50D for the first one (seems to come from this session: https://www.flickr.com/photos/rupertomiller/14804851493/), Canon EOS DIGITAL R for the second. If deleted I request a block of this user.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haylad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Multiple issues. Copyright infringement concern and COM:SCOPE. Bunch of images that are not realistically useful for educational purposes per COM:EDUSE. In addition, the copyright holder of these images is "Grey concept". If at all these images would be kept, at least we would need a permission from the copyright holder, "Grey concept". Thus, delete per COM:EDUSE and our long standing COM:PRP.

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 16:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose: I am the coordinator of this year's Wiki Loves Africa in Nigeria, and these images were uploaded by the owner during an upload session which happened today. First of all, the vast majority of these images depict people playing some kind of sport or game. They perfectly fit into the theme of Wiki Loves Africa for 2019. I also don't see the COM:SCOPE problem, as these images can definitely be used for educational purposes, contrary to your claims.
The rest of the images basically depict members of the Wikimedia club in the university, while they were on their photo-walk (which produced these images). Again, the norm on Commons is to keep the media coverage of Wikimedia events, which are typically used for documentation purposes on meta. Their deletions definitely wouldn't be justified. Moreover, we do need them to collate our reports for the contest.
Finally, the person who owns the copyright is User:Haylad, as he took the images. This can be confirmed by the other members at the photowalk. The name showing on the metadata of the images, is obviously the name registered on the camera settings by the Camera owner(s). Yes, the camera was rented. So, "Grey Concept" (whoever that is), can not lay a claim on the photos.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comments and for coordinating the contest this year. Your claim that " the person who owns the copyright is User:Haylad, as he took the images." is false as User:Haylad appears in almost all his uploads ( the guy in a light yellow wear). How did he took the images when he appears in them? We will need permission from the copyright holder if at all they would be kept. Per COM:EDUSE, The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative". Unused personal photos like the ones below (from the above list) are not considered realistically useful for educational purposes.
That images of Wikimedia events are allowed does not implies that users may sit down and uploads copyvios at Wikimedia events and expected such images to be kept because they were taken at a Wikimedia event. "They are allowed" is not the same as "They are in scope". We may not host images of people's selfies because they are taken at a Wikimedia event if the photographed persons are not active on Commons or if the images are not used on other Wikimedia projects (including user pages). We may host images of a Wikimedia related meetings for example but may not host the trouser or palms of individual participants of that meeting if there is no good reason to do so. In the images used as example above, the same girl's selfie was taken multiple times and all the images were uploaded. Why? This isn't how Commons work. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 10:45, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Generally, if a fellow member is in charge of photography for a wikimedia event...there are always instances where they give the camera to someone else, so that they can appear in the group photos as well. It's not out of place; neither does it indicate a copyright violation. Moreover, as a work carried out by a recognized group by the WMF/community, the most that would happen is to credit the photos to the entire club.
Once again, the pictures you have selected right above are not out of place. They are images of the attendants of the event. It's not out of place to have them on Commons. There are several portraits of people (including non-wikimedians) which were taken at events. They are never tagged "personal photos". They are meant to be kept to help with documentation for such events.
Finally, since you apparently know Haylad in person, the least you could've done is to actually reach out to him first and ask him about these concerns, instead of deciding to try and sabotage the entire work done by him (a fellow member of your own community) for the community you both volunteer for.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 14:23, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's funny that when you wrote " the person who owns the copyright is User:Haylad, as he took the images.", you didn't mention an instance where a camera was giving to another person (if that ever happened) until you were confronted with the fact that Haylad is a subject of most of these images. What impression do you think this will give others reading your comment here? Well, User:Haylad uploaded the photos as their " own works" meaning they took the images. It was revealed from the images metadata that the author is "Grey Concept", as coordinator of the contest and someone who probably supervised the uploads, you came here to claimed that User:Haylad took the photos. When you were confronted with the fact that Haylad appears in almost all the photos and would not have be the author, the story changed that the camera was exchanged among yourselves. Well, you haven't provided evidence that these images were not taken by "Grey Concept". We do however need that evidence or a permission from Grey Concept if at all these images would be kept. That being said, your accusation of sabotage is insulting but trust me, I would take that as a joke. I'll however encourage you to allow this discussion to focus on the substance of this DR rather than personal attacks. DRs allows Commons community members to make input and this has nothing to do with weather the images were uploaded by my mentee or members of my community. Like many users on this project, I had nominated my own uploads for deletion when I realized that there may be copyright concerns. Several files of Wikimedia projects that I was involved had been nominated for deletion by others and deleted and I can't remember accusing anybody of sabotage. I had nominated images uploaded by members of other communities for deletion. These happens all the time. I share the ideal of a culture where people are treated equally without the need to treat some people with insecticide and others with deodorant. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 15:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to an email from "Grey Concept" containing a disclaimer that they do not take these photos and do not owns the copyrights. Once OTRS processed the correspondence, we can now look at how to deal with other issues; how to properly attribute these images for example. I also want to be sure that you understand the problems. Do you understand that it is wrong to claim that one user has full copyright over images taken by others from a Wikimedia event, including the ones they feature as a subject? Do you understand that a user in charge of photography cannot upload images taken by others as their own work? Regards. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 23:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: Objectively, I intend no disrespect to your concerning views, Commons is a space for educational media and those related to Wikimedia community activities. These are images for a Wikimedia cause and they are funded by WMF. Should we delete images of photo walk, Wikimedia conferences and people laughing at hackathons too?

Danidamiobi (talk) 11:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Out of scope concern" is a tiny part of the issues. WMF does not fund people to upload copyvios and images that are not realistically useful for educational purpose. The expectation of the WMF is that high quality photos that are realistically useful for educational purposes would be uploaded. I understand your frustration but see COM:LICENSING and read my comments above. I am not sure I have anything to add to what I have said in my earliest response. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 11:36, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 00:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Haylad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Needs OTRS permission, a large number of the photos show photographer as Hired Photographer, others have Grey_concept as the photographer in the EXIF, with a similar model camera These files were DR'd before as out of scope, SCOPE is not the issue here - its the lack of permission. "Hired Photographer" implies someone else took them - we need their permission. Can't give special treatment as its a Wiki event.

@T Cells: who nominated them previously

Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gbawden, I indeed took the images that I said are my own with a hired camera. Concerning the images that have Hired Photographer on it, a hired professional friend of mine took those pictures which I indicated with their names. I can get them to show their permission if I am allowed to. I hope to correct this mistake by showing the permission given by those photographers who took those pictures. Can you please direct me on how I can show the permission they gave before I uploaded the pictures?

Haylad (talk) 00:36, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Haylad: Please see COM:OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:22, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: It is quite outrageous that; simply because a user uploaded some images which he truthfully tagged as "hired photographer", you decided to flag everything he has ever uploaded for deletion (including images which were previously discussed at length and were closed for having no copyright problems). Even though it might not be the intention, anyone would feel bullied when attacked in this manner. I hope the images needing OTRS permissions are sorted out appropriately and on time...but this is still sad - this kinda behaviour end up chasing away well meaning new contributors.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There is no bullying here. Hired photographer means someone else took the photo and we need OTRS - not sure why we give these photos special permission. We delete numerous other photos for the same reason Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just about half of the images you listed have "hired photographer" on them. Flagging just the images that have "hired photographer" is perfectly okay. However, deciding to flag everything a user has ever uploaded (including their own works) seems like bullying to me.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:40, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jamie Tubers: Please read my nom - the others have Grey concept as the author in the exif, which does not match the uploader name. Call me overly suspicious but there appears to be a pattern of uploading photos not taken by themselves Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: The issue of 'Grey Concept' has been resolved above in the first nomination. Grey Concept owns the camera and it was hired, so the copyright of the pictures is with whoever hired the camera not the camera owner. – Ammarpad (talk) 07:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@Gbawden: I have asked the photographer to send the mail. Thanks. Haylad (talk) 05:58, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some files have OTRS permissions now. I think this can be all kept. --Krd 09:16, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: These are way to many images to effectivly review (hence why this has been left open since June). I see that OTRS has come in for the majority (all?) "hired" ones. Please open individual DRs for any remaining straglers you deem are suspicios. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, in my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:EuroBangladés.svg. Mahir256 (talk) 15:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kontraer klang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The notation was made available to me with the consent of the componist Stephan Dominikus Wehrle. It was performed in 2016: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxuUhfDrSnM . He already has a larger portfolio of music: https://wehrle.bandcamp.com/ . I would be delighted if this could remain as a reference to the 'action-score' publication. Thank You! --Kontraer klang (talk) 16:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - a permission from the copyright holder must be sent to our permission system. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jwdodge (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (kept the one with the PD tag, the other still has an unclear copyright status). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate; derived from File:Albanian police vehicle registration plate.JPG, which was later cropped as well Upwinxp (talk) 15:42, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:43, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sergioemilio22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:35, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sadie Day Pasha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I used the wrong image Lina Tbeur (talk) 16:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the image is used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:33, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Morocco A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

empty file Palauenc05 (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the only editor was the nominator, and a new nomination have been created, Commons:Valued image candidates/Kiel 50 Pfennig 1918.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:32, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If a selfie, not the uploader's work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:18, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Morari Dmitri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not sure if these flags are public domain

Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 17:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is no mine Ensambleanunnaki (talk) 18:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No corresponde el usuario con la metadata, es decir, no es el autor Alexcocopro (talk) 19:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in Canada for 3-dimensional art, but not for maps. The photo violates map creator's copyright. Taivo (talk) 19:59, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing. I read the licence here as a non-free licence, thus unacceptable for Commons. See Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Alx_91~commonswiki/license too. Nor is the quality of the images (those I've looked at so far) encouraging. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley: What part do you see as non-free?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:45, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I see You may NOT use this image on your own web site or anywhere else unless you release this image and any derivative works (which may include the web page or other medium where this image is used, if it is not considered a "collective work") by following the terms of the following license. as going beyond what we accept as "free licensing" for use in future derivative works, in particular against commercial use. However I have no idea what a "collective work" is in the context of Mexican copyright law. Given that all of these appear to fall under "terrible photo quality of commonplace subjects, with a weird and uploader-specific licensing constraint" anyway, my personal view is to delete the lot. I certainly wouldn't use any of these at WP, although I note that a few are INUSE. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley: How is that not equivalent to the BY and SA components of CC-BY-SA licenses?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If it's exactly the same, why qualify it with the addendum?
I don't know if it is or isn't – such a check requires careful reading of such an addition, because even misplaced commas matter in this sort of work. That's why we deprecate per-uploader licences in favour of clearly understood widely used ones. If you're happy that it is acceptable, then I'm happy to go along with that, I just wanted more eyes over it. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the template may be visually a little aggressive in its presentation (IMO), the text does not impose additional restrictions other than that of scrupulously respecting the license(s). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No se permite bajar videos de este canal, Copyright Dulce Osuna. Roy17 (talk) 22:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment That's contradictory, that YouTube account has uploaded many videos with a Creative Commons attribution license, What's the matter with this? The Salvator (talk) 23:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A few more points:
  1. I think that Spanish description is contrary to the CC-BY licence. (If the community decides this screencap can be kept, then the following points are void.)
  2. A few more images from the same source are pending review. Most contain the same sentence.
  3. special:search/"Dulce Osuna" another 30 or so images have been passed. I tried checking a few. Some do not contain the same line, but their youtube licences have been changed to the standard one. Some contain other forms of copyright notices.
  4. However, most if not all of those that fall under #3 were passed by User:Daphne Lantier.--Roy17 (talk) 22:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by Ronhjones. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence at the source provided that this photo "is a work of a Federal Bureau of Investigation employee, taken or made as part of that person's official duties." Based on the English Wikipedia article, it seems unlikely that the FBI was involved and had cause to photograph Mr. Luna prior to his death. — fourthords | =Λ= | 22:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Product packaging is not allowed! Ras67 (talk) 23:53, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:57, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 11:34, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MambuganNHS1999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - one has "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a scan, shadows present. SecretName101 (talk) 14:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no evidence that this image actually predates 1923, and the site it came from is long dead. One could say AGF, but I think this would be more than AGF: We have to presume someone back in 2006 understood American copyright well enough to know what {{PD-US}} means. Without some evidence, this feels more hopeful than proven. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No detail information about the photo, probably not taken by the uploader. AT (talk) 15:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: anyway the photo is a derivative work of the poster. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:56, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but his hair style is quite notable and can be of help. I would better delete his other pic at File:Ararat Ohanesian.jpg; that one is what I call UPF and OoS. --E4024 (talk) 02:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, honestly, I am not an expert in hairdressing. If you are able to describe the picture properly and put it into proper categories to make it accessible for those who are interested in this kind of things... Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Neither me, but ✓ Done. Three cats added. Timid  Keep. --E4024 (talk) 02:15, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate exists as "File:Wilma Pang - Candidate for the Board of Supervisors, District 3 2015.webm SecretName101 (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate at "Voices at red state Fox News Contributor Katie Pavlich of Townhall.webm" SecretName101 (talk) 07:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think this is own work. Please fix the source and the license. Yann (talk) 09:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a picture of my father - and the picture is from the family album, taken circa 70 years ago - as far as I know there is no licensing issue with it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oronbb (talk • contribs) 12:11, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your father 70 years ago? Wow. How old were you then? If ten, you would be 80 now. I wish you a long life. Keep, if possible. --E4024 (talk) 01:05, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:33, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{PD-Israel}} Yann (talk) 14:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Strona źródłowa usunięta Kriis bis (talk) 10:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - No infos about the author - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:27, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on the net anymore. Taye Nwosu (talk) 08:48, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused, bad quality. --Didym (talk) 12:27, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from a video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6-TAhMhD8Mk Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 15:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not in this video, but still unlikely to be own work. --Didym (talk) 12:16, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Four Provinces Flag.svg Aʀvєδuι + 15:35, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate of the 2014 version. --Didym (talk) 12:20, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from a video : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFXeuhwK9oQ Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 15:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Didym (talk) 12:17, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not their work Buckaroo bob 91 (talk) 17:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep That does not mean it can not be on Commons. This image is too simple in the United States. Fry1989 eh? 17:55, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 12:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I forgot to censure registration plates of private cars, so that this image would be compliant with General Data Protection Regulation. Szczecinolog (talk) 23:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:18, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]