Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/12/29
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
This is a page of encyclopedic nature, fit for Wikipedia. Il s'agit d'une page de nature encyclopédique, propre à Wikipedia et non Wikimedia Commons. J'ai averti l'utilisateur/trice (débutant) FAIMDO sur sa page en lui expliquant la chose. Fa suisse (talk) 06:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 07:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
This image seems to be a copyvio. SirEdimon (talk) 04:26, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Fugitron as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.rauantiques.com/the-russian-emigres-by-lucien-levy-dhurmer-1 Yann (talk) 14:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Seite wird für Verschiebung benötigt MKBler (talk) 14:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: to make way for a file move, author's request. --Achim (talk) 16:19, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Робионек Д. С as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: File:Eso1509a - Mars planet.jpg Yann (talk) 14:54, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Yann: Seems like they wanted to say that it's a scaled down duplicate of File:An artist’s impression of Mars four billion years ago.jpg. I've added the correct tag. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate. I updated the information on the other file. --Yann (talk) 17:11, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Photo is blurred Norman.seibert (talk) 08:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This graphic can be deleted! It´s not in use anymore! Replaced by this better graphic: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ethyl_Amine_Structural_Formula_V1.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. Ed (Edgar181) 03:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
moved to
or
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 09:43, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
old flile name for a coat of arms for family Wijnbladh
Kept: back to redirect. --JuTa 09:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This is an article of encyclopedic nature and thus does not belong on Wikimedia Commons Fa suisse (talk) 07:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: No images & promotional content. --Achim (talk) 16:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Can be deleted, not needed anymore. Gohe007 (talk) 15:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: own userspace. --Achim (talk) 15:52, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Can be deleted, not needed anymore. Gohe007 (talk) 15:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: own userspace. --Achim (talk) 15:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Can be deleted, not needed anymore. Gohe007 (talk) 15:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: own userspace. --Achim (talk) 15:52, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
ichwarya ray 105.67.5.56 17:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 15:49, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Unfortunately there's only one image of Bars and Melody and this is it however there are 2 people to this group and the image only shows one person,
The image unfortunately is of poor quality and due to the other member not being shown it makes the image useless, The image isn't being used on any Wikimedia project because of this, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
WITHDRAWN. –Davey2010Talk 15:53, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- It's not used on any project because you removed it. It depicts Leondre Devries from Bars & Melody, so it's usable. Mbch331 (talk) 08:35, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- I've since cropped the image and he's more seen that I thought however because of the pink background IMHO it still makes the image unusable IMHO,
- It would've made more sense if you photographed them together or atleast both seperately .... I don't know who's photographed but for instance we have Bars ... but we don't have Melody ... (or viceversa),
- Journalists etc will want an image of both of them (together or seperately) ... meaning they're more than likely take one from the internet or make arrangements with someone,
- Ofcouse the cropped version could be used in an article but it would be nonsensical to use a picture of one act and not the other ....
- Another point to make is that Yes I agree a picture is better than no picture however for this case I would say no picture is better than this picture (because of the poor quality, lighting, lack of 2), - The lighting is certainly not your fault and if they didn't allow cameras then neither is the quality but it is what it is,
- If you had a picture of the other member I'd be more than happy to wrap this up and mass-add that image to all articles but like I said this image on its own is useless internally and externally,
- Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:14, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- I don't why I uploaded a photo of only Leondre (Bars) back then. We don't only publish photo's for journalists. Anyone that wants to use the photo and follows the rules of the license can reuse it. That's what Commons is for. I've uploaded a more recent photo File:Bars and Melody 2018.jpg today. Hope that's better usable. (Not easy making photo's with a phone while also trying to enjoy the concert.) Mbch331 (talk) 15:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oh brilliant thank you :), That's a thousand times better, Exactly when you're enjoying a concert the last you're going to care about is images I completely understand,
- Anyway as you've very kindly provided another image it means this image can be used, Although I still think it's unusable my main issue was the only one member which you've resolved so I withdraw my nomination,
- Many many thanks for again providing a better image it genuinely is much appreciated, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:39, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- I don't why I uploaded a photo of only Leondre (Bars) back then. We don't only publish photo's for journalists. Anyone that wants to use the photo and follows the rules of the license can reuse it. That's what Commons is for. I've uploaded a more recent photo File:Bars and Melody 2018.jpg today. Hope that's better usable. (Not easy making photo's with a phone while also trying to enjoy the concert.) Mbch331 (talk) 15:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Found at https://www.facebook.com/jenniferhardyck/photos/a.1873701962695352/1873702002695348/?type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme at 13:04, 30 Dezember 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 20:36, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Umsetzung von Methanol mit Kohlenstoffmonoxid unter Natriummethylat-Katalyse zu Methylformiat.svg
[edit]This file is not in use anymore! It can be deleted! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Requested by uploader. --Leyo 23:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Herstellung von 2-Ethylbutanol durch Aldoladdition von Butyraldehyd und Acetaldehyd mit anschließender Dehydratisierung und Hydrierung.svg
[edit]This old file can be delteted, because I replaced it with this one: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aldolkondensation_von_Butyraldehyd_mit_Acetaldehyd_und_nachfolgender_Hydrierung_zu_2-Ethylbutan-1-ol.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:20, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (by uploader). --Leyo 00:44, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/Gonvill Commons:Deletion requests/Plantila desbloqueo Commons:Deletion requests/User:187.145.11.166 Commons:Deletion requests/Vim (text editor)
Insufficent license SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 17:03, 3 Januar 2019 UTC: PDM - --Krdbot 19:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Insufficent license SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 17:03, 3 Januar 2019 UTC: PDM - --Krdbot 19:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Insufficent license SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 17:02, 3 Januar 2019 UTC: PDM - --Krdbot 19:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vüqar Qocayev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Qocayev Vüqar Osman oğlu.jpg
- File:Əziz İnsanlar!.jpg
- File:Qocayev Vüqar Anası ilə birgə şəkillərindən,,,,,.jpg
- File:Qocayev Vüqar.jpg
Ies (talk) 09:26, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vüqar Qocayev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. As the uploader removed the delition request, this is the second one!
- File:Qocayev Vüqar Osman oğlu.jpg
- File:Qocayev Vüqar Anası ilə birgə şəkillərindən,,,,,.jpg
- File:Qocayev Vüqar.jpg
Ies (talk) 10:06, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vüqar Qocayev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: files already deleted by Fitindia. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:37, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/https://www.hdmi-experte.com/fire-tv/
[edit]taken from https://www.hdmi-experte.com/fire-tv/
- File:Fire-TV Stick Back.jpg
- File:Fire-TV Stick Front.jpg
- File:Fire-TV Stick 2016 (2. Generation) Back.jpg
- File:Fire-TV Stick Remote.jpg
- File:Fire-TV Stick 2016 (2. Generation) Front.jpg
- File:Fire-TV micro usb power on the side.jpg
- File:Fire-TV Stick 2016 (2. Generation) + Alexa Remote.jpg
- File:Fire-TV Stick 2016 (2. Generation) Alexa Remote.jpg
- File:Fire-TV Stick and HDMI-Adapter.jpg
- File:Fire-TV Stick and Remote.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
---
The mentioned website above (https://www.hdmi-experte.com/fire-tv/) clearly defines the taken images as "License: CC Attribution 4.0 International (Link required)". This information can be found below every image.
Br-278 12:03, 29. December 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for changing the license. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Licence information have been fixed, hence it's keep!. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:47, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Not free : Obviously «inspired» from Takeuchi, 2010, p.139 Camion (talk) 00:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Here is the comparaison. Only the names have been changed, but all the dispositions are the same. -- Camion (talk) 13:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Ce diagramme n'est pas une photocopie du diagramme provenant du livre et il a été créé ex nihilo. Le copyright ne s'applique qu'au texte pas aux idées. Malosse (talk) 06:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Classical case illustrated. If this diagram is to be deleted, a lot of diagrams of Category:Minkowski diagrams are to be deleted too. The form of this diagram is also notably different of the source (color, nomenclature..) --Jean-Christophe BENOIST (talk) 08:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This diagram is created ex nihilo. No copyright trouble.--Dimorphoteca (talk) 09:48, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This diagram is created ex nihilo. Manacore (talk) 13:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:49, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's two article was speedily deleted in September 2018 as non-notable. The contributor was subsequently blocked as "Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia". Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 01:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was speedily deleted in September 2017 as misuse of Wikipedia as a web host. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 01:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dylanpizza358 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:TOYS and out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 01:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andres velasco hernandez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Mmssss.jpg
- File:78321 n.jpg
- File:40483857 n.jpg
- File:8235544665716664360 n.jpg
- File:2661367807760648470 n.jpg
- File:960344386 n.jpg
- File:392350826812435928 n.jpg
- File:66227 n.jpg
- File:5 n.jpg
- File:Graffiti 96k oaxaca de juarez.jpg
- File:SSSS(1).jpg
- File:Graffiti in Oaxaca.jpg
Yann (talk) 07:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:52, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Corriejunior (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs, album covers, promotional photographs of a band "Masterpiece" all uploaded for obvious promotional purposes.
- File:Masterpiece Live in Sibu, Sarawak.jpg
- File:Masterpiece live in Sibu 2014.jpg
- File:Masterpiece after a concert in Sibu during the Borneo Cultural Festival (2015).jpg
- File:Masterpiece Logo.jpg
- File:Mastepriece Merindang Ke Bintang album cover.jpg
- File:Masterpiece Rock & Roll album cover.jpg
- File:Ngap Sayot album cover.jpg
- File:Masterpiece Live in Aramaite Frenz Club Kuala Lumpur.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Dear Ellin Beltz, not sure if I'm replying you on the right box as of now. Appreciate if you can help me to extend the duration of the existing photos to be in the article until I get a better sources. I will try to look and improvise my knowledge on this part. Please advise if I can re-upload a different version of each photo and change the details, source, license etc. Thank you Ellin and wish you have a nice day ahead. Corriejunior (talk) 08:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- If you didn't have a source for them when you got them, why did you upload as own work? Please do not reupload images, that could result in your account being blocked. It is not possible to free-host (c) images on Commons. If at some point in the future COM:OTRS valid permission is received, the images can be restored by the OTRS administrator. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Motopark (talk) 05:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Corriejunior (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo images, and small images without EXIF data. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS, or upload the original files.
- File:Masterpiece in Miri.jpg
- File:Masterpiece 2017.jpg
- File:Rocktoberfest Borneo stage.jpg
- File:Watt Marcus in 2011.jpg
- File:Harold Vincent in 2011.jpg
- File:Kennedy Edwin.jpg
- File:Masterpiece AMD 2014.jpg
- File:Masterpiece (band).jpg
- File:Masterpiece band 2015.jpg
- File:Masterpiece band 2014.jpg
Yann (talk) 13:43, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gino Bosio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works. Thus, the uploader does not own the copyrights
- File:Gino Bosio - Sociedad Nacional de Industrias (SNI) Dic.jpg
- File:Gino Bosio (SNI).jpg
- File:Gino Bosio - Sociedad Nacional de Industrias (SNI).jpg
- File:Gino Bosio SNI 1986.jpg
- File:Gino Bosio SNI.jpg
- File:Premio cinta de plata 1998 POP.jpg
- File:Distinción Cinta de Oro 1999 10 años "Peruana de Opinión Publica" (POP) a Gino Bosio & Cía.jpg
Discasto talk 18:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gino Bosio (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader is not the photographer. Proper permission must be handled
- File:Gino Bosio Yale.jpg
- File:Gino Bosio genealogía.jpg
- File:Gino Bosio 1995.jpg
- File:Familia Bosio Perich.jpg
- File:Gino Bosio Vicepresidente del comité de servicios SNI -1986.jpg
- File:Gino Bosio.jpg
Discasto talk 18:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gino Bosio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and documents. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Carmela Rodriguez Massa de Bossio.jpg
- File:Partida de Bautismo de Joseph Bosio Calandrona 14.02.1814 archivio storico diocesano di savona - noli Genova Italia.jpg
- File:Partida de nacimiento de Stephano Bosio.jpg
- File:Emperatriz Elena Perich Rossini.jpg
- File:Luis Bosio Suito.jpg
- File:Hugo Fernando Bosio Perich.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File:Partida de Bautismo de Joseph Bosio Calandrona 14.02.1814 archivio storico diocesano di savona - noli Genova Italia.jpg Changed it to PD-old-70-1923. Abzeronow (talk) 16:05, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted the files with unclear copyright situation. --Amada44 talk to me 14:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gino Bosio (talk · contribs)
[edit]small size, mostly no exif. uploader does has many delete files because of copvio.
- File:Gino Bosio.jpg
- File:Premio Cinta de Oro 1999.jpg
- File:Comunidad Campesina de Sayán, Local Comunal.jpg
- File:Comunidad Campesina de Sayán.jpg
- File:Gino Bosio 1990 la mejor empresa del año.jpg
- File:Renzo Hugo Bosio.jpg
- File:Itala Gelle Bosio.jpg
Amada44 talk to me 14:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:00, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 15:33, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete There is a bottle in the photo; presumably the design exceeds TOO, violating COM:PACKAGING. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 10:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of Com:PS Hanooz 00:26, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrearmond (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only used on the Portuguese Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in October 2018 for being written in a foreign language. Out of project scope. Additionally, the EXIF data lists Daniel Britto as the author, which requires COM:OTRS.
- File:Andre Armond photoshoot 2018 by Lellis.jpg
- File:Andre Armond photoshoot by Italo Lellis.jpg
- File:Andre Armond photoshoot 2018.jpg
- File:Andre Armond.jpg
ℯxplicit 01:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's two articles were speedily deleted in January and March 2018 as non-notable. Out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 01:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Personal photo of indef blocked en-wiki editor. No unique value, out of scope. EnPassant (talk) 02:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Has watermark from carsales.com.au in bottom right corner. 118.210.54.231 05:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Has watermark from carsales.com.au in top left corner. 118.210.54.231 05:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Has watermark from carsales.com.au in bottom right corner. 118.210.54.231 05:30, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Has watermark from carsales.com.au in top left corner. 118.210.54.231 05:30, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation, this map is from Google and All right reserve. *angys* (talk) 05:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, JPEG waste. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
bogus license, unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
bogus license, unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Has the watermark of this website, need information about the original creator or license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Appears to be taken from the web; it appears at https://www.vietgiaitri.com/xa-hoi/the-gioi/201607/tiep-nhan-tau-canh-sat-bien-van-tai-tong-hop-hien-dai-2547064/? among other places. Needs OTRS permission. Carl Lindberg (talk) 09:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
From a YouTube video with a standard YouTube license and no indication of the public domain license indicated by the uploader. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:17, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
According to the source page, drawn by an artist who died in 2007, so not yet in the public domain. May also be copyrighted by the university indicated. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Grainy low res image, nobody of encyclopaedic relevance depicted 2001:A61:346E:7701:C3EC:52E3:FEFB:A6E8 10:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Grainy low res image, nobody of encyclopaedic relevance depicted 2001:A61:346E:7701:C3EC:52E3:FEFB:A6E8 10:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Grainy low res image, nobody of encyclopaedic relevance depicted 2001:A61:346E:7701:C3EC:52E3:FEFB:A6E8 10:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Self-promoting image uploaded for SPAMMING. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Developed from this thread where the uploader claims that
“ | I name many of my pictures in different languages and different alphabets in order to try to make them accessible to speakers of other languages. | ” |
By the way, @4nn1l2: any comment about the word? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: I don't think your line of reasoning is good. You would be surprised to learn how and where people travel. The useful information is whether EXIF data match other uploads by the is user. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:20, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for consideration of the name. It either means "nature" or "naturally" in Tajik. I'd appreciate it being renamed once someone finds out what it is, I don't know. I would appreciate if the rename to whatever consensus is could remain in Tajik. Thankyou E.3 (talk) 08:42, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Also as a list of words that I think cause a lot of misunderstandings when considering deletion requests I think
- allegedly - claims - deletion - meaningless
I think we should try and avoid these words, as people with less cultural understanding or poor comprehension of English may feel very offended by them. E.3 (talk) 08:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
One user has used the words "dubious" "alleged" "claims" in this one deletion request and discussion elsewhere. I don't judge them, they have good intentions. I just suspect that many would be offended by these words which are directly questioning my integrity which is established elsewhere. I respectfully request might be renamed "Thankyou. We request your involvement in a speedy legal discussion about this image" with an orange traffic light. E.3 (talk) 09:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: "Табиист" in Tajiki Persian is the same as "طبیعی است" in Iranian Persian. Tajiki Persian is written using Cyrillic script, whereas the Iranian Persian is written using Arabic script. You may use this converter [1] to convert the scripts and then use Google Translate for translation, because Iranian Persian normally gives you better results. Anyway, Табиист means "is natural". It consists of a copula and an adjective. Obviously, this is not a useful file name, and I wonder why some shrubs in Kenya, Africa should be named in Persian. Local language or the de facto International language (i.e. English) would be fine. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- For the record, @4nn1l2: That’s your interpretation of the our filnaming policies? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Does Commons have "filnaming [sic] policies"? 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:28, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, Commons does: Commons:File naming. And we also have rules advising against petty pointing-out of trivial typos, as well as conduct rules for admins. Interesting to see how in one single sentence you disrespect all three. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 07:20, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm afraid Commons:File naming is not a policy, but just a proposal. 4nn1l2 (talk) 07:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- And you think your suggestion above is better? Only English or the local language(s)in flienames? Why don’t you try to make it fly? (As for renaming, which become the subject of this discussion, there is COM:FR, though, which is an official guideline and it is pretty clear about language matters.) Anyway, beware of the other two policies you infringed, though: I’m sure that accpeting an admin to engage in snide typo-spotting while discussing unrelated matters is frown upon more solidly than in just a mere policy proposal. I didn’t look it up, but we could ask someone else’s opinion. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- For the record, @4nn1l2: That’s your interpretation of the our filnaming policies? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The DR rationale is moot, per {{Own}} added to the file page (with COM:AGF). Any discussion about the filename should be held in the file’s talk page. Renaming a file based on the choice of language is not acceptable by COM:FR. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 02:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Request withdrawn: the problem is about the filename, not the image. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ralphmolina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:RalphMolinaMarketHouse.jpg
- File:Ralph Molina Commisioner At-Large 01.jpg
- File:Ralph Molina Commisioner At-Large 03.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:34, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
non free image MiguelAlanCS (talk) 23:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete image please. --Gmagno (talk) 16:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
This is a work with an unclear publishing date by a Spanish author who died in 1949. Granted it will be PD-70 in a few days, but isn't Spain effectively life+80? Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Spain Prosfilaes (talk) 23:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Spain is exactly Life + 80 for authors who died before 1987. So undelete around July 30, 2029. (Will add Undelete in 2030 tag just in case) Abzeronow (talk) 04:43, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:19, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:17, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:16, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
copyvio MiguelAlanCS (talk) 23:43, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:43, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:59, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:19, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:20, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: has been cropped in the meanwhile. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Vanity selfie, outside of project scope, only use was on a now-deleted page at en.wp. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:27, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and likely a copyright violation anyway. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:11, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:48, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 22:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violations Turkmen talk 20:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:17, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violations: https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1067777615396777985/7e6ZfAyn_400x400.jpg Turkmen talk 20:16, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:17, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 20:26, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 20:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:09, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:08, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
No evidence of permission(s). Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 21:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Photo by Catherine Khristozova, http://tumentoday.ru/2018/08/24/mihail-samarskij-privez-v-tyumen-spektakl-po-svoej-knige-raduga-dlya-druga/. http://samarsky.ru/about can't license a photo which is not his own. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 16:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Photo by Catherine Khristozova, http://dombulgakova.ru/%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8B%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B5/%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%B0-%D0%B4%D0%BB%D1%8F-%D0%B4%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%B0/?instance_id=79146. http://samarsky.ru/about can't license a photo which is not his own. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:03, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 16:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of the copyrighted magazines depicted B (talk) 22:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:04, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 18:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 18:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:00, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:05, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Yes it is damaged, I am new here and forgotten to remowe it. I will try to remowe it. Sorry for bad english, swedish is my nativ language.
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
явно видно, что копиво https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5af7bc2b5a104f8cefdf728d/opasaites-rodstvennika-gerpesa-5ba3ca8342ef5c00af0db7b9 Панн (talk) 19:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
blank photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:42, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 19:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 20:03, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
The uploader asked me to do this. This photo was uploaded with a watermark, which is not desirable. Another better photo will be uploaded later. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:07, 7 Januar 2019 UTC: requested by uploader --Krdbot 19:54, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
I tried to upload a newer version, but the server wouldn't let me due to both files being too large to replace. So, I uploaded a newer version, called it: "File:Who Needs Energy When We Have Freedom, v2.ogg", and would like to take the first step of replacing this file with version two by requesting that this file be deleted so that I may request a move (a renaming) of version two using a close variant of this file's name: "File:Who Needs Energy When We Have Freedom.ogg". I wish I understood merger functions, but they are beyond my comprehension. I'm still new here. This is a significant update since I replaced slides and deleted audio to reflect an alteration of opinion in which "no moving parts" becomes "one free-spinning part" similar to a synchronous generator. Vinyasi (talk) 18:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted as nonsense. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
wrong PD, Wellcome has any rights in the picture Goesseln (talk) 11:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Source? --Fæ (talk) 11:27, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The source reports a CC-By license. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:30, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep CC-By license. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 17:38, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kevinpedescoll (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo of subjects with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
This is my own picture But I don't want this on wiki common Waqasanjum171 (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
This is my own picture But I don't want this picture on wikicommon Waqasanjum171 (talk) 20:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
This is my own picture But I don't want this picture on wikicommon Waqasanjum171 (talk) 20:26, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
This is my own picture But I don't want this picture on wikicommon Waqasanjum171 (talk) 20:26, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
This is my own picture But I don't want this picture on wikicommon Waqasanjum171 (talk) 20:27, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
copyvio:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Du_WUoRVYAAFFk6.jpg:large Turkmen talk 20:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 10:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
A widely available image of this person, not own work. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Concur. Widely available indeed. Only edit of uploader, and likely does not understand our policies. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Damaged image Afifa Afrin (talk) 12:06, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of focus, not realistically usable. --Gbawden (talk) 10:35, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Damaged image Afifa Afrin (talk) 12:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Not seeing any damage. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:KalilWilsonVRJazz.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2018123010001663. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:KalilWilsonVRJazz.jpg” under ticket:2018123010001663. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:27, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS permission received and action by another editor. Cleaning up. --Gbawden (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Promo photo and non-trivial logo, No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Auralimited (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KARIMOV. GANG. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused logo (not own work and possible copyvio), out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 11:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1986 года, автор, скорее всего, неизвестен, оцифровано в наше время. Необходимо обращение в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 00:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
bogus license, unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
bogus license, unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:05, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
bogus license, unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:08, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Personal photo of no encyclopedic use. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 08:16, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Russia SealMan11 (talk) 16:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:21, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pankaj verma 23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos, videos and web site screenshots. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Mahesh Bhatt Apologises For Aashiqui 2 Talent Hunt.webm
- File:Pankaj Verma Funny Original Video Aashiqui 2 Star Hunt.webm
- File:Funniest Moments of Aashiqui 2 Auditions.webm
- File:Super funny audition by Pankaj Verma Aashiqui 2 Star Hunt.jpg
- File:Aashiqui 2 Star Hunt.png
- File:Aashiqui 2 Star Hunt Funny Audition Pankaj Verma Online Marketing SEO Company Ganpatizone.jpg
- File:Funniest Moments of Aashiqui 2 Star Hunt - Pankaj Verma.jpg
- File:Sahib Singh Verma.jpg
- File:Karol Bagh Market.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 17:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
No FOP in France. Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France#Freedom_of_panorama. With an obvious date of 1919, there is a resonable chance the artist has not been dead for 70 years. Ronhjones (Talk) 00:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. There is a visible sign Paris 1919 A. Gilbert who I couldn't find anywhere. Church brochure does not mention it. --Mates (talk) 12:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
</noinclude>
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 13:11, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MOHAMMED MAFIQUR RAHMAN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted photos, Taken from facebook and different website
- File:Shams-ul-'Ulama Allamah Saheb Qiblah Fultali رحمه الله تعالى.jpg
- File:Mawlana Husam-ud-Din Chowdhury Fultali.jpg
- File:Sahebzadah-e Allamah Fultali Mawlana Husam-ud-Din Chowdhury Fultali.jpg
- File:Allamah Fultali Saheb Qiblah.jpg
- File:Allamah Saheb Qiblah Fultali رحمه الله تعالى.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 12:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 13:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Unknown author, country, and license, not old enough to be in the public domain. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:27, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 13:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hafeez Abbasi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 13:19, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 13:21, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, last remaining files, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 13:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mates (talk) 13:24, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Atilla.Alpturk1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work, bogus license. If public domain, please provide source, date, and a correct license rationale.
Yann (talk) 14:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and user contributions history. --Mates (talk) 13:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Too complex for PD-textlogo, no permission. Yann (talk) 13:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Its jpg precursor was removed in January for the same reason. --Mates (talk) 13:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Professional image from a commercial studio. EXIF Metadata states Copyright holder is Felicitas Matern/Feel Image (https://feelimage.at/web/en). Image has previously been published. If uploader is an official representative of Medical University of Vienna, and copyright has in fact formally been transferred from the creator to the university or MedUniKommunikation (talk · contribs), then evidence of permission should be sent COM:OTRS. --Animalparty (talk) 00:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the US, the land of the free, has No Freedom of Panorama for modern artworks and sculptures, unlike the UK , Mexico or Canada, unless the artist died more than 70 years ago. This is not possible here. Leoboudv (talk) 01:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination == this is a post 1989 work, so it has a copyright regardless of whether there is a copyright notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Resolution 2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:3059:23F4:AEC9:98E8 02:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: File is in use on en:Touchscreen and wikt:smudge attack. Per COM:INUSE, that makes it immune from deletion on grounds of quality. --bjh21 (talk) 12:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per comment. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
As the name suggests, copied from Twitter and not Own work // sikander { talk } 03:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Doubtful that the flickr uploader owns the rights to any of this clip art B (talk) 03:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Yes understand this now please delete E.3 (talk) 09:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Why is the photograph free in the source country? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- @User:Hedwig in Washington. This image is not eligible to be subject to copyright and therefore is in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and lacks original authorship and was made before 1989... --CRAW309 (talk) 20:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Yes and it is used in many sources because it lacks original authorship ...--CRAW309 (talk) 21:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Nonsense. What other websites do is of no concern. Lack of authorship is no reason for anything to be in the public domain. And no, it does not consists of entirley common information. 1989 is irrelevant, the image is most likely part of a film, MAYBE made in 1972? What is the country o origin? Why is the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center one of the authors? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:34, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in the United States between 1924 and 1977 without a copyright notice. See Commons:Hirtle chart for further explanation. Note that it may still be copyrighted in jurisdictions that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works (depending on the date of the author's death), such as Canada (50 p.m.a.), Mainland China (50 p.m.a., not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany (70 p.m.a.), Mexico (100 p.m.a.), Switzerland (70 p.m.a.), and other countries with individual treaties. --CRAW309 (talk) 02:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Regarding what you let me know, I already corrected it --CRAW309 (talk) 02:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nonsense. What other websites do is of no concern. Lack of authorship is no reason for anything to be in the public domain. And no, it does not consists of entirley common information. 1989 is irrelevant, the image is most likely part of a film, MAYBE made in 1972? What is the country o origin? Why is the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center one of the authors? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:34, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
I have put the correct source and the corresponding license. I suggest you check and if I'm committing let me know. Thank you. --CRAW309 (talk) 08:34, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- Note that in addition to the copyright for the photograph, which is unsourced, there is a copyright for the dummy. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
It is pure text and thus belongs to Wikipedia. It states text which can be found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fully_feathered_basket Fa suisse (talk) 07:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Moved from tp --Achim (talk) 16:07, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I do believe the deletion request should be honored and that much further discussion is not necessary. As part of my Wikipedia contributions, I've been uploading photographs including several fully feathered baskets. I am also confident that I made technical mistakes when doing so; thus, the odd entry of text with no photo. Much of what I am doing on Wikipedia and Wikipedia Commons is new to me and when I try something, it does not always result in what I planned, or I simple do accidentally do something. I plan to travel some and gather further photos of these amazing baskets to upload to Wikipedia Commons and will try to avoid such further error. Thank you for notifying me.Hu Nhu (talk) 17:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
The collector of the images has simply not stated who the pictures author is. That's not being anonymous
Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 11:03, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
bogus licenses, unclear copyright status
- File:CAAZAPA-MUNICIPALIDAD.jpg
- File:Buena Vista Emblema.jpg
- File:Escudo Municipalidad Santa Rita.jpg
- File:Municipalidad de DM de Irala.png
Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
bogus licenses, unclear copyright status
Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo of the uploader, apparently not own-work. Need info about the photographer and permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC) I understand the photo is public domain. That said, I have not been at NYU for some years and don't know who the photographer was. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Galeotti (talk • contribs) 16:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Although YouTube page states CC licence I don’t that is correct. Copyright undoubtedly belongs to ABC not to uploader Dr Helen. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:08, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Headlock0225: Thanks for the help - I appreciate you pointing out the likely copyright holder - please delete the clip. Many thanks, Heron5110 (talk) 10:50, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Heron5110: thanks for your thanks!I am not an Administrator so I cannot delete. However eventually it will be picked up by an Admin who will review and delete if she/he thinks appropriate. It can take a while as there is quite a backlog.
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
The source website clearly displays a Noncommercial CC license, which is not compatible with Commons. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:11, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
The work of a "commissioned photographer" with copyright information in the metadata. Need permission from the copyright holder. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Apparently from this journal article, the contents of which are copyrighted by the journal. Otherwise would need evidence that the photographer still holds the copyright and then permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:30, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AsanakaMaduranga (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Asanka Maduranga Actor.jpg
- File:Asanka Maduranga fix.jpg
- File:Asanka Maduranga blue.jpg
- File:Asanka Maduranga hot.jpg
- File:Asanka Maduranga (actor, born 1998).jpg
- File:Asanka Maduranga.jpg
Ies (talk) 10:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- On hold. In my opinion we should wait at least until the draft on en.wiki is closed. Per Com:Scope: Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope. --Mates (talk) 14:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: While "in use" ordinarily prevents deletion, that is not true in cases where the only use is an article on WP written by the subject. We will not keep an image on Commons just because the uploader has made use of it somewhere. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Files of User:Beko75
[edit]Paintings and a photograph by a living artist; need clarification that the uploader is the artist or permission from the artist to license their work. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:OS1229.jpg
- File:Osej 1.jpg
- File:AC 1.jpg
- File:Light OSCAR.jpg
- File:OSB 20180423.jpg
- File:邱志宇-BHL.jpg
Ies (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Derivate work: no permission for shown original photograph Wdwd (talk) 17:42, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Apparently a scan of a publication; need information about the publication and the source of the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Superseded by files of better quality A1AA1A (talk) 20:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: different crop and colours compared to the other versions, and quality is not so bad to warrant deletion anyway. --Rosenzweig τ 21:46, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Files by Ani Antonyan KG 2018
[edit]- File:Stuttgart Neues Schloss 300cmyk.jpg - "Copyright Kultugipfel": [2]
- File:Stuttgart Neues Schloss 300rgb.jpg - same image with different colors
- File:MÜNCHEN Allerheiligen Hofkirche Foto Lioba Schöneck 1 300rgb.jpg - title/exif: "Foto Lioba Schöneck"
- File:Herkulessaal ResMü Foto Bayerische Schlösserverwaltung schloesser bayern de.jpg - exif: "© Bayerische Schlösserverwaltung www.schloesser.bayern.de"
- File:MÜNCHEN Brunnenhof der Residenz Foto Philipp Schieder CarminaBurana.jpg - title/exif: "Philipp Schieder"
- File:Herkulessaal ResMü Foto Bayerische Schlösserverwaltung schloesser bayern de 300 cmyk verbessert.jpg - exif: "© Bayerische Schlösserverwaltung www.schloesser.bayern.de"
- File:Cuvilliés-Theater Zuschauerraum Foto © Philipp Mansmann.jpg - title/exif: "© Philipp Mansmann"
- File:Cuvilliés-Theater Foto © Philipp Mansmann 72rgb.jpg low resolution duplicate with watermark
- File:Cuvilliés-Theater Foto © Mark Kamphuis 2 300cmyk.jpg -title/exif: "© Mark Kamphuis | www.mkfotografie.nl"
- File:Stuttgart Neues Schloss Weißer Saal Foto KG (7).jpg eventim: "Texte und Bilder sind urheberrechtlich geschützt. Eine Nutzung ohne Genehmigung ist untersagt." [3]
- File:Stuttgart Neues Schloss Weißer Saal Foto KG (8).jpg same series
- File:Schloss Stuttgart .jpg "Foto: Martin Olbrich": [4]
--85.212.193.146 09:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; not own work, taken from numerous sources. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 122.8.238.185 as Copyvio (copyvio) — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; found on web, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense category show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 11:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo of the uploader, the metadata lists the copyright holder "Terry deRoy Gruber/Gruber Photographers"; need their permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Il n'existe plus. Warinhari (talk) 11:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete fictionnal, not in use, out of scope Kathisma (talk) 14:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Katrin Bajri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
http://arhangelsk.bezformata.com/listnews/novozhilov-pozdravlyaet-kollektiv-sgmu/63616963/ копиво Панн (talk) 15:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alternativer~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violations Turkmen talk 19:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; taken from jasonstrout.com. --Gbawden (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violations Turkmen talk 19:54, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; not own work, taken from jasonstrout.com. --Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violations Turkmen talk 20:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; taken from the web, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Per Admin, this file is a copyright violation for the following reason: C-SPAN created stuff is copyrighted WikiFixur (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
WikiFixur I honestly am not too sure how to maintain this file on this site. Therefore, it may be better off deleted in order to avoid further copyright issues.
Deleted: Already kept. Clearly PD DHS. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete the previous version (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/1/17/20120823114644%21Confederate_General_Robert_E._Lee_poses_in_a_late_April_1865.jpg) which us not related to the people only *angys* (talk) 05:37, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Kept: --JuTa 06:10, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Improper sourcing to determine that this image is public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:50, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
No evidence of permission(s) Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 16:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
No evidence of permission(s). Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 16:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, artist died in 1985 Martin Sg. (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Keep as per Commons:De minimis --FocalPoint (talk) 12:52, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. As the file name says, and as it was used in Wikipedia articles about Emila Medková (artist who died in 1985), the exhibition of photographs by Emila Medková is certainly the actual subject, the point of this image - although they don't take up that much space, without them it would be meaningless, so it can't be de minimis. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Low quality private image with nonsense license. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 11:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
screenshot from Google Maps must not be used in WP Majo statt Senf (talk) 11:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Benzoyl as Speedy (SpeedyDelete) and the most recent rationale was: more clear similar picture exists... File:前列の人は膝に手を (44670008180).jpg Not an exact duplicate, no reason for speedy deletion. Yann (talk) 14:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Keep or delete, Either is fine. I hope delete. Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 00:06, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Not exact duplicate but other version is clearer. --Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; photo of a photo. --Gbawden (talk) 12:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
This is not "own work", it is Crown Copyright. Stated license is incorrect. However, it's possible that it was later released under the {{OGL}}, but we would need a source which says that. The EXIF explicitly says it is under a non-free MOD custom license: Distributed under the terms and conditions of the MOD News License: http://www.defenceimagery.mod.uk/fotoweb/20130715_Crown_Copyright_MOD_News_Licence_V2.pdf I have seen lower resolution versions on some other UK government sites which have a site-wide OGL license, but not this large, and it's fair to wonder if it is indeed OGL given the EXIF. Do we have a source for this image which shows a OGL license being applied later? If not, it is non-free. The MOD does release some of their images under the OGL explicitly, and uses this license for the rest. I do not see an image of this ship on their site, though I see even larger versions on the BBC site and the like using google image search. But we would need some explicit confirmation of the OGL to override the license in the EXIF, I would think. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: I found the image here - https://des.mod.uk/hms-medway-named-in-glasgow/#iLightbox[55474bd82574c3ca590]/5 - and from https://des.mod.uk/terms-conditions/ it appears that it is released under OGL. Source and license needs updating Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: Yep, though that is lower resolution. May be safer to use that version explicitly if we go that way. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: License fixed. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
The source website states the photo is courtesy of the person in the photo, but has no information about the photographer; need their permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:17, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; source is ARR. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danisperez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial flags. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Venezuela sheet.gif
- File:Bandera de Angostura de 1817.png
- File:Bandera de Venezuela de 1817.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated for speedy deletion). But one is used and therefore kept. Taivo (talk) 16:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
The source website appears to have no licensing information, no indication of where the Creative Commons license came from. Assume it is copyrighted until the license is clarified. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:42, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 04:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
The flag had the copyrighted logo of the football club, which is not "own work" the user had upload copvio image many time Matthew hk (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Es falso, el autor soy yo. El usuario Matthew hk miente. Simplemente basta ver la versión de la web del club para notar las diferencias [5]. Ha emprendido una persecución personal y falseado datos de articulos. --Xabel10 (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- It did not qualify as your creation. The club flag had 9 stripe as per the official website. You can't claim it is your own work if you just copy the design of the flag and put the element together in photoshop by yourself. Your "design" also have 9 stripe and have the exact color code, which the club logo you just make it ellipse instead of circle. But it still looks almost the same as the official club logo. Matthew hk (talk) 21:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Parecido claro que es, no voy a inventarme una bandera que no se parezca a la original. "Casi igual", no es lo mismo que decir que es la misma. --Xabel10 (talk) 10:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Derivative work. --Strakhov (talk) 04:48, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 10:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:13, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Metadata suggests it is from Facebook, the photo has the watermark of a photographer that does not appear to be the uploader; need clarification of authorship or permission to license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:59, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:14, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
The texture on this image is too complex for PD-textlogo. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:06, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, send back to De.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:04, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Руслана Юрейко (talk · contribs)
[edit]Architect maps, no permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions.
- File:Фасад театр Фонтебло 5.jpg
- File:План театр Фонтебло 1.jpg
- File:План театр Фонтебло 2.jpg
- File:Розріз театр Фонтебло.jpg
- File:ФасадФонтебло.jpg
Yann (talk) 13:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:11, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Appears to be spam anyways. --Majora (talk) 01:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete both per nom.--Roy17 (talk) 20:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Wahrscheinliche URV, siehe Bildangabe "Bild aus dem Landtagswahlkampf 2017"; keine OTRS Freigabe Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 15:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Image from Facebook. Obviously not own work. --Majora (talk) 01:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative work from software screenshot. Should be blanked to keep.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
The flag had the copyrighted logo of the football club, which is not "own work" the user had upload copvio image many time Matthew hk (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:14, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
This is copyrighted logo of the football club, which is not "own work". the user had upload copvio image many time Matthew hk (talk) 19:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Despite not the same computer file. But it looks exactly the same as the logo from the official website (from wayback machine) Historia (in Spanish). Real Avilés. Archived from the original on 23 November 2011. Retrieved on 29 December 2018. Matthew hk (talk) 21:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:14, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Unused logo Whpq (talk) 01:20, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Duplicated Usamasaad 03:41, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
The flickr user https://www.flickr.com/photos/brizzlebornandbred/ seems to upload images from a variety of sources with no indication that they own the copyright to any of them. They certainly don't own the copyright to the newspapers on the left and it is doubtful they own the copyright to the photo on the right. Would the closing admin please add https://www.flickr.com/photos/brizzlebornandbred/ to the bad flickr list? B (talk) 03:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thankyou I have no idea when Flickr users breach copyright E.3 (talk) 03:48, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- @E.3: Anyone can create a Flickr account, upload files, and tag it however they want. https://www.flickr.com/photos/157937919@N04/45179290915 is what the interface looks like and someone looking at this isn't going to have the foggiest idea that adding a "license" to someone else's work is not appropriate. --B (talk) 04:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Can someone explain to me when newspapers are allowed in the commons if someone else took the pictures? Thanks.
Of course happy for deletion E.3 (talk) 09:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- It depends on country. For the U.S., before 1978, this one would be copyrighted for 95 years after publication, so it will be OK in 2069. For EU countries, if the photographer was not named, it would be 70 years from publication, and if they are named, it would be their lifetime plus 70 more years. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. If you don't want to bother with the details, stick to stuff at least 120 years old, which is not always OK (people can live more than 50 years after they make something, or sometimes unpublished stuff can last a lot longer) but usually will be. As for Flickr users, see Commons:License laundering. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- In addition to Carl Lindberg's very good answer, I have elaborated on E3's talk page. --B (talk) 18:36, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Metadata shows (Icon SMI SecretName101 (talk) 07:03, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:59, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Graig Abdl SecretName101 (talk) 07:11, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:59, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://copecart-public-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/image/91/file1525884028.jpg&imgrefurl=https://www.copecart.com/marketplace&h=1065&w=1600&tbnid=JxlNuw8gRNYgVM&tbnh=183&tbnw=275&usg=K_N1yzTYkAxJqg0WwKEicgvrmytyg=&docid=Wv8E38XNVFPOvM AFBorchert (talk) 07:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
This photo is currently unused and even uncategorized. It was uploaded for an already deleted article at de:wp which was deleted as Coaching-Spam. Hence, this appears to be out of scope. We should not delete this as a copyvio as this photo has apparently not been grabbed from somewhere on the Internet. Instead it looks like a professionally made portrait which was very likely used with the permission of the depicted person (not necessarily with that of the photographer but such processes would be handled through our support team if we would be interested in keeping this photo). --AFBorchert (talk) 08:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Info: I've notified the original uploader. This has not been done before. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I called it a copyvio as it was obviously a crop of https://copecart-public-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/image/91/file1525884028.jpg, so the remote web page could not be using the de-wiki or commons image. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:48, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- But in this case it is far more likely that the uploader works on behalf of the depicted person. If we would actually consider this portrait to be within COM:SCOPE we should ask for a permission through OTRS instead. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, last action 1 January, I think we can stop waiting. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:59, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
The link is dead, but the poster uses a photo taken by the photographer indicated; need their permission to license the photo and work that uses it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:58, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
NFC logo of the football club en:Real Avilés http://realaviles.es/club/simbolos/ redraw of such logo is not "own work" Matthew hk (talk) 11:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:58, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
This drawing is not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:05, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- It is a technical drawing and does not feature artwork by the illustrator. Therefore, it is free work. --Gwafton (talk) 12:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- That's not how copyright works. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Would you explain more specifically please? Technical drawings are not copyrighted according to the Finnish copyright law (published in a Finnish magazine in the 1960s), this is not artwork, so I still fail understanding the rationale of the deletion request. --Gwafton (talk) 19:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- That's not how copyright works. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- As an example, here is a statement of the Finnish Copyright Committee concerning technical drawings of a camera parts. The statement says that the threshold of originality is not exceeded because the drawings don't include "mental creative work". --Gwafton (talk) 20:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:58, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Miss Worl 1954 was held in UK: any reason for Egyptian law to apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Unless evidence is found that this was first published in Egypt. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:58, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Historical documents. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:IndeksUJ MieczyslawZiolko.jpg
- File:Patent Oficerski Mieczyslawa Ziolko.jpg
- File:Korespondencja offlag Mieczyslaw Ziolko.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:58, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
This piece of possible copyright infringement does not pose potentials usability here. There are so many golfball images here. Kindly take down. Danidamiobi (talk) 15:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
No longer in use. AdamFilinovich (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
No longer in use. AdamFilinovich (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
No longer in use. AdamFilinovich (talk) 16:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
No longer in use. AdamFilinovich (talk) 16:12, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:57, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
The name of the file is misleading as the Baltic States are not part of the Nordic countries. That could be fixed by changing the file name but considering that there are a lot of maps of the Nordic and the Baltic countries and considering that the files is not used it makes more sense to delete. It the file is kept it should be renamed. Pugilist (talk) 16:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
PS: I can now see that the Shetland Islands and the Orkney Islands are also included in the map. It makes no sense. Pugilist (talk) 17:00, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violations Turkmen talk 19:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violations Turkmen talk 19:54, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The original YouTube movie is provided with CC BY.--Asgawaji (talk) 12:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per http://archive.fo/afuKd, https://imgur.com/a/CiA3luF (HTML code cc-by license info) Puramyun31 (talk) 18:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
False license; graphics may be copyrighted material Piotr Bart (talk) 20:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
we have better version: File:Uroczystości w Krakowie z okazji rocznicy wymarszu Pierwszej Kompanii Kadrowej (1-P-3205-3).jpg Gower (talk) 22:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:55, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Hochlader offensichtlich nicht identisch mit Urheber / Rechteinhaber Lutheraner (talk) 11:05, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission. --ℯxplicit 07:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
The photograph has been taken on December 27, 1934, but a publishing date is unknown. The source "KGB Archive" is not verifiable. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Temporary undeletion justified by consensus, but community discussion needed in view of previous DR — Racconish 💬 19:05, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Is this an integral part of a document? Alex Spade should be called up, I suppose. --Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 22:43, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- I had written argumentation on similar case here Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agamir Mamedov 2.jpg. In short: NKVD, KGB, MVD, FSB, and etc. mug shots are not PD-RU-exempt. They are anonymous works for hire in the best case, and can be in PD if they are published before
19481949[HNY] (date of creation is not enough). Alex Spade (talk) 02:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- I had written argumentation on similar case here Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agamir Mamedov 2.jpg. In short: NKVD, KGB, MVD, FSB, and etc. mug shots are not PD-RU-exempt. They are anonymous works for hire in the best case, and can be in PD if they are published before
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:01, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
it is a fake SVG, superseded by: 1)SVG at File:Illu_mouth.svg 2)PNG extracted at File:Illu_mouth_new_eu.png — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 15:47, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Please, don't delete it. I tried to make it following the rules: putting the origin of the file, its author, used license and date of the original file. I used Eazydraw program to export the original PNG file to SVG format. I'm not an expert user of wikimedia commons and I might have made some mistake, but my work was serious and trying to respect the rules as far as I know. Please, if something is wrong, tell me exactly what can I do for my work not to be deleted: it is important, because these images are translated into Basque language for a educational version for children of Wikipedia called Txikipedia, the first wiki encyclopedia for children within the Wikipedia, of which I am the promotor with the help of the Basque Wikimedian Association. --Koldo Biguri (talk) 09:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Illu mouth.svg is a vector version of this file.
File:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/12/29 → File:Illu mouth.svg
For more information, see Help:SVG. |
This file has been superseded by Illu mouth new eu.png. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
|
- The file is superseded by
- There is no need for this file any more.
- — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 10:39, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Koldo Biguri: can this file be deleted? Since it is replaced by better version, I don't see a sence in keeping it. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 17:40, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- @JoKalliauer: Hi! Yes, of course. No problem. And thank you very much.--Koldo Biguri (talk) 17:59, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --JuTa 06:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This is a FakeSVG, the extracted Image is at File:Illu01_head_neck.jpg — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 15:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Please, don't delete it. I tried to make it following the rules: putting the origin of the file, its author, used license and date of the original file. I used Eazydraw program to export the original PNG file to SVG format. I'm not an expert user of wikimedia commons and I might have made some mistake, but my work was serious and trying to respect the rules as far as I know. Please, if something is wrong, tell me exactly what can I do for my work not to be deleted: it is important, because these images are translated into Basque language for a educational version for children of Wikipedia called Txikipedia, the first wiki encyclopedia for children within the Wikipedia, of which I am the promotor with the help of the Basque Wikimedian Association. Best regards, --Koldo Biguri (talk) 10:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This file has been superseded by Illu01 head neck eu.jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
|
- @Koldo Biguri: Sorry my mistake, I extracted the jpg to File:Illu01_head_neck_eu.jpg, threfore problem solved
- Delete — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 11:01, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 06:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Following undeletion request, to allow community discussion. — Racconish 💬 18:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment. Looks rather simple, but I don't know what Poland's TOO is. Abzeronow (talk) 18:55, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- TOO? Anyway, in Poland copyright law protection only applies to works which show some factor of creativity. But should such work be treated the same as public domain? I am not 100% sure. But given that for example Adidas logo is considered public domain (because lack of creativity), I would say in this case similar rules should be applied. That's why I changed CC license to PD. In my opinion it resolves the issue, but I am not an expert. --Tuwarg (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- An article concerning the subject of this logo has been deleted from Wikipedia per community desision and is unlikely to reappear. Therefore the logo is out of scope with no educational value. ~Cybularny Speak? 12:49, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --JuTa 06:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)