User talk:Arthistorian1977
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:02, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Dormition Abbey 1.jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 15:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Uploads
[edit]Please make sure to upload the highest resolution available at Flickr for the images you choose. I fixed this one for you and another editor did another. I'm not sure if there are more. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 16:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Nimrod Fortress 2.jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 21:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Tel Aviv city council.jpg
[edit]
Túrelio (talk) 21:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Arthistorian1977,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Haig Papazian of Mashou Leila.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ww2censor (talk) 09:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:David Adika.jpg
[edit]
Ww2censor (talk) 14:16, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Konstantin Somov with Boris Snezhkovsky.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Konstantin Somov with Boris Snezhkovsky.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Konstantin Somov with Boris Snezhkovsky.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 18:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Alexander-Nikolayev-Usto-Mumin.-1897-1957.-Dutar-player.-1920s.-Tempera-on-panel.jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:Alexander-Nikolayev-Usto-Mumin.-1897-1957.-Dutar-player.-1920s.-Tempera-on-panel.jpg was recently deleted by Андрей Романенко for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1)
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:43, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Usto Mumin - Spring.jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:Usto Mumin - Spring.jpg was recently deleted by Андрей Романенко for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1)
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Usto Mumin - 4.jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:Usto Mumin - 4.jpg was recently deleted by Андрей Романенко for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1)
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Usto Mumin - 1.jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:Usto Mumin - 1.jpg was recently deleted by Андрей Романенко for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1)
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 10:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Tamotsu Yatō-1.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Tamotsu Yatō-1.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Tamotsu Yatō-1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 10:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Eitan Rosenzweig child.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|