Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/12/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 9th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's a synonym of Albuca bracteata


Kept: moved & redirected. --Achim (talk) 12:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:LL Ulpoad to Flickr, post delete here. Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 02:24, 9 Dezember 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Harry Broadman Bio Photo.jpg --Krdbot 14:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

большой размер Tanya shar (talk) 23:07, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:19, 10 Dezember 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Not found at URL. --Krdbot 14:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

upload failed Abilaash Reddy (talk) 14:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedily: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 20:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

failed Abilaash Reddy (talk) 14:46, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedily: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 20:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was trying to create a category by the name of 'Electricity pylons in Emilia-Romagna' but I made this! GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 18:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Should have been a category. --Achim (talk) 20:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This videoclip is "AdRev for a 3rd Party (on behalf of Xseries); AdRev Publishing" which means its copyrighted which explains why it has No youtube license. Leoboudv (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen at 18:11, 10 Dezember 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 20:13, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

sieht stark nach urv von https://plus.google.com/114195357767550702481 aus Xocolatl (talk) 16:15, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Errore Aaabbb99 (talk) 16:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 20:12, 10 Dezember 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: copyvio from http://www.famedisud.it/il-castello-nel-bosco-e-la-cupa-leggenda-della-baronessa-scoppa-immagini-di-antonio-arico/ --Krdbot 02:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlike the overwhelming majority of files on DVIDSHUB, which are taken by members of the US military in the performance of their duties, and which are therefore public domain as a policy of the US federal government, this one was taken by a Finnish soldier. It seems to have been given to DVIDSHUB as a courtesy (see the label "courtesy photo") but that doesn't make it public domain. Sorry. GRuban (talk) 20:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, good catch. Should be removed from Commons. // sikander { talk } 13:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This videoclip is "AdRev for a 3rd Party (on behalf of Xseries); AdRev Publishing" which means its copyrighted which explains why it has No youtube license. Leoboudv (talk) 19:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen at 09:38, 11 Dezember 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 14:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/netherlands-goalkeeper-tess-wester-reacts-after-making-a-news-photo/501589098 Behanzane (talk) 21:26, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:54, 13 Dezember 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: unfree stock imagery --Krdbot 14:09, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image looks as though it would be covered by copyright if UK and 1957  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: flickr washing. --JuTa 16:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Ashmore and Cartier Islands have no separate flag, per Flags of the World (https://www.fotw.info/flags/au-ashmr.html) and Ausflag (http://www.ausflag.com.au/external_territories.asp). The islands are uninhabited, so this flag must have been designed by a third party. The image was uploaded as a public-domain "official item legally exempt from copyright". It is *not* an official item, so that tag is incorrect. Given the image is well above the threshold of originality, the copyright would remain with the original creator, who has not been identified; nothing has been provided to support the claim that it is public domain. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 13:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:21, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Удалите пожалуйста Ikabar4765 (talk) 09:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely not own work as claimed. --JuTa 01:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Я являюсь автором, прошу удалить этот файл Ikabar4765 (talk) 09:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:19, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Дэ.svg

out of project scope: unused personal logo George Chernilevsky talk 16:19, 16 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adiga75578 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Удалите это изображение Ikabar4765 (talk) 09:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable format of chemical structure (3 PDF pages); redrawn in SVG as File:Theonezolide A.svg based on doi:10.1021/ja00068a024. Wostr (talk) 00:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject cannot be the owner of the copyright, unless proper permission is released

Discasto talk 11:22, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:44, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of the uploader out of COM:SCOPE, one without a license, all with questionable "self" attribution.

  — Jeff G. ツ 03:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 01:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos of the uploader out of COM:SCOPE uploaded since the last mass DR, all with questionable "self" attribution.

  — Jeff G. ツ 00:49, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 19:21, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal images of no use, Commons is not for personal family photos. None in use.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:45, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mizzdiv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images of no use, Commons is not for personal family photos. None in use.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:46, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaawopullo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images of no use, Commons is not for personal family photos. None in use.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:47, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faramodir380 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images of no use, Commons is not for personal family photos. None in use.

BevinKacon (talk) 13:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:49, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality structure, different bond angles and widths, one OH group is misplaced. Two other versions exist: File:Reveromycin A.svg without defined stereochemistry at one stereogenic centre and File:Reveromycin A structure.svg based on doi:10.1039/C0OB00654H. Wostr (talk) 15:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality/resolution GIF structure, redrawn in SVG based on doi:10.1039/C0OB00654H as File:Reveromycin D.svg. Wostr (talk) 15:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photo of domesticated peacock. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 14:12, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred undescribed image of an unidentified park and half of a face of an uknown person. Out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 00:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:07, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can't tell if this is highly stylized photograph or computer-created art (possibly screen-cap from something), but either way, no evidence uploader owns the license (but istead they have a record of license mistakes in other uploads) DMacks (talk) 05:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is a screenshot. Clearly a copyright violation. --Don-kun (talk) 18:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:34, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No real source, looks as if taken way after 1968 (50 yrs) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown date, no author Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) 50 years Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

damaged image Afifa Afrin (talk) 07:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:39, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has two problems. At first, unused .pdf-files are usually considered out of project scope. At second, first page of the document states: "© Stephen Patrick Fuller. All rights reserved." License is not sure, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:39, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader seems to be the same person as shown on photo, and it's not made as a selfie - thus false "own work". Can be kept with suitable permission from the actual photographer, however, the person does not meet the notability criteria at least in RuWP, thus unlikely to be used Tatewaki (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncropped version of file:КрохаВГ2.png with the same problem. The uploader seems to be the same person as shown on photo, and it's not made as a selfie - thus false "own work". Can be kept with suitable permission from the actual photographer, however, the person does not meet the notability criteria at least in RuWP, thus unlikely to be used. Tatewaki (talk) 00:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If it's a 1991 work, the painter would still be alive or have died later than that, making the claimed expiration of the copyright impossible. whym (talk) 01:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:50, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be (c) RUJAN MOURA per EXIF. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:46, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:51, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dittoalexia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of non-notable person and not used in any Wikimedia projects, out of commons scope.

-★- PlyrStar93 Message me. 01:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio (images from facebook). --Wdwd (talk) 12:52, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jorge Barrios (talk) 03:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wird durch neues Bild ersetzt. Diewickis (talk) 05:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no alternate/new filename as a replacement given. --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wird durch neues Bild ersetzt. Diewickis (talk) 05:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no alternate/new filename as a replacement given. --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wird durch neues Bild ersetzt. Diewickis (talk) 05:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no alternate/new filename as a replacement given. --Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wird durch neues Bild ersetzt. Diewickis (talk) 05:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I do not see a better uploaded substitute (for example with higher qualitiy) of this once to common granted picture so far. So as the main author of Hans Kruzwicki I can't see any reason to delete this picture now and I recommend to keep it. --Stolp (talk) 17:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no alternate/new filename as a replacement given. --Wdwd (talk) 13:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe this is own work. I higher resolution can be found here. No meta data. The other two contributions of the user are in my opinion also not own work. Wouter (talk) 19:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe this is own work. A much higher resolution can be found here. No meta data. The other two contributions of the user are in my opinion also not own work. Wouter (talk) 19:11, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:11, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
redundant, same files and comments are in the DRs below

Personal photos. Out of scope

Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:03, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep: File:محمد ناظم رداد السلامي 13.jpg (I've cropped), File:محمد ناظم رداد السلامي 7.jpg, File:Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami محمد.jpg, File:Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami محمد ناظم رداد السلامي 05.jpg and File:Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami محمد ناظم رداد السلامي 06.jpgas these are cars,

Delete the rest as they're all selfies. –Davey2010Talk 02:28, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion is now below. –Davey2010Talk 03:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami (talk · contribs), Kia Pregio van photos

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC) *Keep as these are all van images. [reply]

Delete the rest as those are all selfies.
And last but not least a huge trout to the nom for not bothering to look at the actual images before nominating them!. –Davey2010Talk 17:12, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: DRs were restructured, "the rest" refers to the DR below. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've added some photos to that gallery that I improved. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Jeff G., Could you kindly explain how the vehicles here (in my !vote) are out of scope ?, I admit a few in my selection include the guy which I'm going to crop out but as far as I'm aware vans don't fall in the remit of "out of scope"..... –Davey2010Talk 20:17, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: The uploader seems to be all about decorating his userspace on arwiki with photos of himself and his van (sometimes together). The van photos are small and are destructively watermarked by his camera. I doubt their educational usefulness. Commons is not his personal webhost or photo album per COM:NOT. I don't think he is adding value to any WMF project.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 20:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree with that statement he has only come here to decorate his userpage but in my eyes the images he's uploaded well the vans atleast are IMHO in scope here and can be used internally and externally, Looking at the vehicles category there are no yellow versions photographed so imho that's enough to keep, They're not great images compared to others in that cat but they're certainly not the worst either. –Davey2010Talk 20:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: the "Candy" watermark can be removed easily. Most of the photos are full HD, how is that small? Not everyone has an 8K monitor you know. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:50, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Alexis Jazz - Sorry to ping you again - I was at some point going to photoshop the candy thing out but if you wanted to I have no problems with that (To be fair I feel you've done enough what with these images and even previous images on other DRs so I'd be more than happy to do these but just throwing it out there), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami (talk · contribs), selfies and the like

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as these are selfies (a few include the van but I feel we have enough crops/angles of the van). –Davey2010Talk 14:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just to add whilst File:محمد ناظم رداد السلامي 99.jpg is a van it unfortunately includes a child standing infront of it and it's impossible to crop him out so unfortunately that has to go too). –Davey2010Talk 14:01, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And why not one picture with a child to make a change? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:59, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: May you tell us what authority you have in Commons to ask user to upload even more pictures of his Kia Pregio van (you have already flooded the category with about 40 pictures of this yellow vehicle after saying "Looking at the vehicles category there are no yellow versions photographed") since the discussion is not over? Please consider too that DR are not vote and avoid modifying the layout of this page. Thanks a lot, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Because there is nothing wrong with the van images he's uploaded, I simply asked him to stop uploading selfie images, Had you bothered to ask him this the first time round we may not of needed to be here for Round 2,
I haven't flooded any category - I have simply categorised all of the van images something you could've done yourself,
avoid modifying the layout of this page - I simply added a number 3 to your DR as well as removed the "!votes" header - Something which I myself added and down the line realised it more confusing than of help hence its removal,
Maybe just maybe had you done due diligence inregards to the mass nomination of all his images maybe just maybe I wouldn't be here. –Davey2010Talk 16:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Davey2010: You still don't reply to my question. IMHO you should have waited an Administrator closes this discussion BEFORE giving user an unauthorized go-ahead (upload even more yellow Kia Pregio van pictures). May you precise when you will be satisfied and end voting Keep: when 50 similar pictures are uploaded? 100? When someone will ask for the block of the user for having uploaded useless and COM:NOTUSED pictures (yes, you categorised them all but you failed to find a destination for a single picture)? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:59, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick Rogel - No I shouldn't because their van images aren't the problem, Their selfies are the only problem here (and that has been proven by Alexis and علاء (Alaa) above me),
This user does not need mine or your permission to upload, I simply left that message so that they would stop the selfie uploads - Leaving this until the DR ends would mean they could upload more between now and whenever this DR is closed - Does this make sense ? ... I left the message to stop the selfie uploads but like I said they're more than welcome to upload van images,
I will keep an eye on this editor and if they carry on then yes I will seek to have them blocked,
Also as an addendum I've also asked the user to not upload pictures of people infront of the vans either.
Davey2010Talk 18:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Davey2010 didn't flood the category, I did. So you're shouting at the wrong person. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:06, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi [[Alexis Jazz, I did move images from Arabic cats to English ones as well as moving them to "Yellow vans" ... so I think I'm to blame unless I've missed something lol –Davey2010Talk 23:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I had categorized 32 files (a few incorrectly, too much selfie, you removed those from the cat again). - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:06, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ah so you did sorry, I had no idea you categorised these but those you did categorise aren't above (hence why they were de-categorised), If you want them kept I'd be happy to add them to the list and recat them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 02:17, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Mohammed Nazem Raddad Al - Salami (talk · contribs), old photos

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 11:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope files

Originally nominated for deletion by Mjrmtg (talk) but then in a single deletion request per file. Instead I collected all of them here.Jonteemil (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page from a book can't be a free work. √Tæ√ 09:26, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. --Mhhossein talk 11:21, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not the Panoramio uploader's own work. Looks like a derivative of an advertising poster. LX (talk, contribs) 11:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 11:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 11:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Mhhossein talk 11:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Mhhossein talk 11:23, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sheetalsoni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the very low resolutions, missing metadata, the nature of several of the photographs, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 11:24, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in italy - Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Italy#Freedom_of_panorama Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:55, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 11:27, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sharp, looks like a TV grab Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 11:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in italy - Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Italy#Freedom_of_panorama Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 11:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does Not appear at the source. Leoboudv (talk) 21:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Mhhossein talk 11:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chana Orloff died 1968. This work will be copyrighted until 2039 Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:55, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 11:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pajpatrek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None of these files is properly licensed. They were all ripped from the internet; many are copyright violations.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:18, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sirlanz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These photos or models don't seem legitimate "own work" images. I assumed they were downloaded from the Internet, but I can't find Google matches to show from where. These three are inconsistent with the other files from this user. Are these reasons enough for deletion?

Senator2029 06:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can't find them anywhere on the Internet because they are original work. I don't understand the basis for saying there is something "inconsistent" about them. sirlanz 08:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
sirlanz, Do you have original photos with EXIF data? ~ Чръный человек (talk) 08:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So maybe the uploader visited the set of Asia's next topmodel. With "my own work" we always have to trust uploaders, because we were not there when the pictures were taken. But since these pictures cannot be found anywhere else I do not see a reason for deletion in these cases. A lack of the Exif data on the other hand is not a good sign. --Gereon K. (talk) 08:32, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, my files have all the original EXIF data. Does that mean you wish me to reupload them? Appreciate your vigilance! sirlanz 08:53, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I see that the 3d picture in question has EXIF data. Since the other look like having been taken at the same event I see no need for reuploading.  Keep --Gereon K. (talk) 14:23, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you would load photos with EXIF, no one would doubted that photos are yours. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 12:41, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Indeed, the picture looks like taken from the internet. However, the user swears he shot them himself. In addition, he knows that he cannot spread anything wrong here without consequences. I scanned the image in the search engine and on my Facebook- and Instagram-Account. Result negative. Therefore, the legal rule applies: in dubio pro reo. Accept the photo; with a low residual risk. And, of course, in order to create confidence it would be great if the user could tell us something about himself on his user page ... Spielvogel (talk) 14:30, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I subscribe to the words of Spielvogel. Dorieo (talk) 06:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete unless the original unmodified image is uploaded. Also we don't need the PNG. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:06, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete For me in dubio pro reo means in the first instance that personality rights should be protected. --Furfur Diskussion 05:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ User: Furfur Photos are not on the Internet Pv sindhu (talk) 05:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@ Pv sindhu I'd more cautiously say that they have not been found there. “Not on the Internet” is one thing but the individual permission to publish them is another. --Furfur Diskussion 05:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete OTRS (from the models) is required. Not likely an user that surrounded in Hong Kong article also photographed models, need many more information. Matthew hk (talk) 08:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strike my vote, as one of the image exif shown it was taken by a iPhone, probably some public function? But with such resolution? Matthew hk (talk) 10:41, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:07, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1988 bust [1]. Not in PD, and COM:FOP Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 14:55, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And also:
Yasu (talk) 14:58, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

アップロード者自身がデザインしたものではなく、大阪21世紀協会が権利を保有していると考えます。ライセンス違反。 Kansai explorer (talk) 11:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, COM:TOO. --Yasu (talk) 15:35, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 19:11, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied as file is corrupt. --Yasu (talk) 15:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, associated with draft on en.wikipedia for a non-notable vanity project. ViperSnake151 (talk) 02:25, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not necessarily own work, 2D artwork containing elements that are above threshold of originality, UK does not have Freedom of Panorama for 2d artworks like signs, a sign being the prominent portion of this media ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:18, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google image search finds multiple hits of this same large size dated well before upload-date. I cannot find the pages themselves in Wayback (no snapshots of the relevant daterange:( to verify. DMacks (talk) 10:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, useless Discasto talk 11:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page has a very odd description. The user misattribute by including a screenshot of a Wikipedia article the user seems not to have written. Fnielsen (talk) 13:10, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal essay. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:54, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP for artwork or sculptures in the US See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Universal Studios Hollywood globe Elisfkc (talk) 14:37, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 15:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 15:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aqsashaheenn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cosmo shuoqi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fatima Tabatabaei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete - I am the person who submitted this image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilatter (talk • contribs) 16:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: anyway the photo is a derivative work of the medal. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in USA for architecture, but not for other kind of art. The image in top of column surpasses threshold of originality and flowerbeds aren't simple also. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per {{FoP-Canada}}, Canadian freedom of panorama does not apply to maps and the photo violates map author's copyright. Taivo (talk) 17:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The idea behind this photo was a). To depict a distinct area. and b). To capture to style and presentation of image.

As this photo is a three-dimensional work, showing surrounding environment and texture of wood frame concrete blocks, and perspective there was no intention for duplication of image.

Gillfoto 20:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is very blurry, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:57, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid licensing information. I don't believe that Bundesarchiv images, unless transferred to Commons by Bundesarchiv, are in the public domain. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:55, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhandoffer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution images with no EXIF or other evidence of being "own work" - some like File:Silva porto 1.jpg claim to be the user's own work from 1860 (the image, if actually from that time, would be PD-old). A reverse Google on many of them also shows fairly widespread usage.

Mifter (talk) 19:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The toys are copyrighted, making this a derivative work. See COM:TOYS. 73.92.132.7 19:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work - appears to be a press photo (see reverse Google) - also no EXIF present Mifter (talk) 19:12, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe this is own work. See here. No meta data. The other two contributions of the user are in my opinion also not own work. Wouter (talk) 19:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (freedom of panorama does not apply to this work) Siddharth Patil (talk) 19:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This videoclip is "AdRev for a 3rd Party (on behalf of Xseries); AdRev Publishing" which means its copyrighted which explains why it has No youtube license. Leoboudv (talk) 19:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zero educational value compared to File:P-yakobovsky-mv-3578.jpg. PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

il y a erreur sur la sculpture Esprit de Vie... la plus grande samare... Je, ANDRÉE PAGÉ, suis l'Artiste. Monsieur Serge Bourassa n'est que le fondeur de la plaque identificatrise. Je demande de retirer cette fausse information de Jean Gagnon à mon sujet et au sujet de Mon Travail de Sculpteure. Merci 66.130.215.13 20:25, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - vous pouvez faire une demande sur sa page de discussion User talk:Jeangagnon. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Retail Investor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, can be created with Wiki Markup.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Transfer from talk page: Geesh. Don't you realize that anything you post on wikipedia will promptly be distroyed by others 'correcting' it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Retail Investor (talk • contribs) 20:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's why I didn't delete the files on sight. I'd like to hear a few opinions. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:32, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:22, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr pages is "All Rights Reserved". Image is claimed to be old (Sandro Botticelli (1445–1510)), however reading the Flickr description we see "The present painting from a follower of Botticelli (London, National Gallery) is a good copy of the original from Sandro Botticelli", so the date claim is not valid. Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:44, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is registered in L'opera completa del Botticelli / Gabriele Mandel, 1967 as 78A. Voir User:Maltaper/Sandro Botticelli. I don't understand deletion policy very well and hesitated an upload from flickr. Google leads the other source [2] --Maltaper (talk) 01:21, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is an official image here. Should I replace it? [3] --Maltaper (talk) 04:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - modern painting. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For me it is a derivative work of the official portrait which is not under a free licence / public domain. Léna (talk) 20:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not free, and not de minimis. --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:46, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, -> ancestry.com, etc could be a good fit. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. I'm creating a wikipedia page about joe borgatti. wikipedia suggested that the file be loaded on wiki commons. so i did.steveborgatti in Lexington — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steveborgatti (talk • contribs) 21:10, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's no benefit to our customers. What can they get from a .pdf they can't get from the article? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 21:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does Not appear at the source. Leoboudv (talk) 21:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

same reason with Commons:Deletion requests/File:신풍루.png. Thanks.


Kept: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked as possible copyvio, since it can be found on https://alchetron.com/Shabana-Rehman-Gaarder#-. The image on the external site is lower resolution, and the web page refers to Wikipedia and CC-BY-SA, and seems to be newer than the upload date for this file. The file also includes exif data. I think there is rather reasonable that the photograph is the uploader's work, and that the file should be kept. 4ing (talk) 21:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken by me. EXIF data wrong. Thought it could be replaced by uploading new version. Old version with EXIF still online. Please delete. Gertgilbert (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: modern building, No FoP in France. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:12, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MUSICOS INTERNACIONALES (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo images. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lupeegonzalez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:47, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE (fr:Stefano Adami and fr:Stefano Adami (Littérature)) Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je ne comprends pas pourquoi ma page a été supprimée. La photo est une photo que j'ai prise moi-même, donc personnelle, les références publiques sont citées. Pourrais-je savoir en quoi je me suis trompée ? Merci d'avance Françoise — Preceding unsigned comment added by Franpau38 (talk • contribs) 10:29, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Franpau38: la photo n'est pas encore supprimée mais le sera bientôt à moins que vous n'expliquiez en quoi elle répond à COM:SCOPE. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel:  Keep per COM:INUSE now. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@VIGNERON: Wasn't in use at the time of the DR since you created this Wikidata entry especially for hosting this picture! By the way may you explain for which sister projects is intended this entry?--Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: , of course it wasn't but it is now in use. Wikidata is a project on it's own, no link to sister projects is needed. And I didn't create this item " especially " for this picture. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@VIGNERON: It's not what I read there : "Wikidata acts as central storage for the structured data of its Wikimedia sister projects including Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wikisource, and others." --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: that merely one goal of Wikidata, not the only one. On the Wikidata main page, the phrase just next after the one you cite is « Wikidata also provides support to many other sites and services beyond just Wikimedia projects! » More than 27 million items (= 51 % of total items) have no sitelink. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I didn't know it was a kind of Facebook for non notable people! Nevertheless it's strange you contradicts two of your fellow Administrators ([4] and [5]) but it's your business after all... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: no need to be snappy, if you don't know Wikidata you could just ask, anyway Wikidata is not at all a kind of Facebook. And just because I follow the notability rule of Wikidata on Wikidata doesn't equate that I contradict or don't follow the notability rule of fr.wp on fr.wp, in fact I think that given the state of the article on fr.wp the speedy deletion was a right thing to do. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:52, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ok, the person seems notable enough, and at first view the photo is not a copyright violation. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by UpdateNerd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP for artwork or sculptures in the US

Elisfkc (talk) 14:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. xplicit 00:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Terrible quality - looks like a capture of screenshot. Vensatry (Ping me) 11:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:27, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image does not appear to have the CC-BY-SA license, there isn't anything that appears on the gallery page or on the specific image page. BUT (and there's always a but...) two other images in that same gallery [6] and [7] do have the CC-BY-SA license noted on the specific image page. I *think* it means this image (and the prior version) is not covered by the license. The uploaded and I discussed on their EN talk page and decided this was the best way forward. Ravensfire (talk) 14:36, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also noticed that the image contains metadata asserting copyright. Ravensfire (talk) 13:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of youtube video, most probably not free Harmonia Amanda (talk) 15:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: Patrick Rogel, I took this photo using my iPhone. 1996Larry (talk) 2 January 2019
@1996Larry: The original photo is not by you since IPhone doen't exist back in the 70s. So who is the original photographer? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho uploaded by Antoniorosset

[edit]

If Antoniorosset (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log isn’t Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho, then the account should be blocked indefinitely for impersonation. If Antoniorosset is Antonio Carlos Rosset Filho, then these photographs were made by an uncredited third person. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:05, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some information missing. See also [8]. Yann (talk) 07:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unless evidence is presented that this would be a US government work - Jcb (talk) 12:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • [9] credits the image to "USS LSM / LSMR Association". They have a (very 1990s) website at [10] where potentially some interested party could contact them and ask if this photo is public domain. --B (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:38, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown Source, Not Free License, Pictures of the 1970s are not PD in People's Republic of China yetAshtray (talk) 07:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:38, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is cover-art for a book, The title concerned is too recent for this to be relicensed as shown, irrespective of what was claimed at Flickr ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:11, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:38, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DC Comics artwork from 1986 would still be copyright, irrespective of what the Flickr surce claims ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:12, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inconsistencies in the details, The source given credits one website, but I can't see an obvious link with the credited author ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an older photo, and given it's subject most likely from an official source in Greece or from news coverage. A photo in a musuem exhbit does not loose copyright because of being present in said exhibit ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Threshold of originality concern in respect of graphic/stylized logo element top left. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:44, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text is copyrighted. No evidence of permission Discasto talk 11:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Babla5252 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-quality personal photos of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 11:35, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photos of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 11:44, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 11:46, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing EXIF for own work--and as the title suggests, "me"--then it is definitely not "own work". acagastya 11:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Mcppankajindia.jpg

Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 11:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe this is own work. Higher resolution photo and a not-cropped version can be found here. It is the only contribution of the user and there are no metadata. Wouter (talk) 12:07, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not load, depending on the thumbnail it seems to be a failed upload Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! Please delete it. File is a failed upload from me and i dont know how to delete it. —SchorschG (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work of art is copyrighted in its source country until after 1 January 2037. Severini died in 1966 Coldcreation (talk) 16:28, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 01:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Painter de:Edmond Goergen died in 2000, hence unlikely to be own work. Thuresson (talk) 00:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC) Da Bild wurde von seiner Tochter Viviane Goergen frei gegeben. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fannigo (talk • contribs) 16:42, 10 December 2018 (UTC) Das Bild nicht löschen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fannigo (talk • contribs) 16:42, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Racconish. --1989 (talk) 20:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Martin Sg. as no permission (No permission since) - sending to regular DR Jcb (talk) 00:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There may be or may not be a problem with the depicted object, but the picture seems to be own work by uploader, so that 'no permission since' is not the correct procedure. Jcb (talk) 00:32, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 21:16, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, artist died in 2002, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 08:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per OTRS agent. --E4024 (talk) 00:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The graphical component of this logo is clearly (to my eye) modern even if the company is old, so we would need evidence that the uploader owns the license to this current version of the logo. DMacks (talk) 06:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's a relatively new logo (2012). Before then they used a different logo -- Spinal83 (talk) 14:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure if this is allowed, but the uploader appears to be a marketing intern at Hooghoudt. If User:Liekemanning has the go-ahead from the company to upload this logo, then it should be handled through Commons:OTRS -- Spinal83 (talk) 14:26, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I am indef blocked on Wikipedia for posting a link to someone's LinkedIn page as part of a conflict of interest investigation. But this isn't Wikipedia and you aren't me, so I'm sure you'll be fine. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:21, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof is given that {{Attribution}} applies. The original map was created by Shelia Waters after sketches by David G. Chandler (1934–2004) for the work The Campaigns of Napoleon, p. 539, published in 1966. This map is a derived work of the original map by Waters and Chandler with very minor adaptions. We would need a written permission by Shelia Waters and the heirs of David G. Chandler to keep this. AFBorchert (talk) 08:10, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author mismatch - Information in photo claims Mike Spicer as photographer. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pinball machine art, may still be subject to copyright, and there was insufficent information on the Flickr upload to determine if this artwork was pre 1978 with no notice ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:25, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jenliggins (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-quality photographs of subjects with no apparent notability. Apparently uploaded for use in attempted paid promotion on English Wikipedia. en:Draft:Philipp Mosimann has been deleted three times, and en:Draft:Mark Mosimann has been rejected. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions and missing metadata.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:29, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:30, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed by the uploader as "own work", this image can be found on the internet, also at a much higher resolution -> https://www.google.nl/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivLBzpPzQ8t7aXNIlxPiSE8kxiAnrXflkhOwcFMCwuG6ajSQdcbpQFKR27f8Nr6tEFzh4yldGIaVUlZdx3tuX6DVGxj7qeG4X2L5NZzjRPX7bkTM9mTTibBKRXpej0eL1g5CxoVdIxrQSalOxK6RpBxJv7jM6mE8kAIc6szyB-unmHGzX1QJyitnZqj-kD8FcURLx6pESqNm-3Wc6k_1Vntyo88T3ZWLBOg5C3ILQfa7zFpixgq786lqvZtawQGVw2lPk79w9Ev6hmCYuF_1JVe_1-E9F7J8gy8zhgrJ-Zu6BlscdpYxAkC6HYEe3aK-TSD09NgMgQF6wr4I8Tl5HVaeVgXzfvyw Takeaway (talk) 12:22, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I question that this is own work. Google gives for example this. The largest image links to this of which I don't expect that these are free images. It is the only contribution of the user and there are no metadata. Wouter (talk) 14:22, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posters at the Shogakukan Building construction site

[edit]

Derivative works of copyrighted material. Yasu (talk) 14:55, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Gustavo Vivanco Leon is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work of art is copyrighted in its source country until after 1 January 2037. Severini died in 1966 Coldcreation (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I had not understood the "source country" aspect until now. Perhaps then it is permitted on the English Wikipedia but not Commons? (I see there are 19 works there.) Daderot (talk) 22:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:41, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work of art is copyrighted in its source country until after 1 January 2037. Severini died in 1966 Coldcreation (talk) 16:28, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:41, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work of art is copyrighted in its source country until after 1 January 2037. Severini died in 1966 Coldcreation (talk) 16:30, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:41, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danuskogoya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:42, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:43, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope MiguelAlanCS (talk) 16:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, promo MiguelAlanCS (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EdgardoMendoz4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scope: using Commons as a web host for personal advertising images

seb26 (talk) 23:32, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EdgardoMendoz4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 21:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ethanpet113 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Transistor Count and Moore's Law - 2011.svg|reason=This is a bitmap capture of the original wikipedia work copied (and sourced) by another website, it seems to have added some data points possibly from the article body, instead File:Transistor Count and Moore's Law - 2011.svg should used as is, be modified to include new points or deprecated in favour of a new vector graphics conversion of this image. DMacks (talk) 21:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Procedurally converting to DR because it's raster vs vector, which has a history of being not non-controversial, and is substantively different content, so it's not a dup. DMacks (talk) 21:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Now switching to my editor's hat, the additional content in this PNG is valuable (there are outliers not present in the SVG and additional annotation detail of various data points). And it runs to 5 years later, nearly to the present day, which is important because there are periodic encyclopediac discussions about whether the Law is about to run into a limit vs another new breakthrough. I would consider changing my position iff the SVG were upgraded with added detail, akin to what Ethanpet113 proposes. DMacks (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep – a substantially different design from File:Transistor Count and Moore's Law - 2011.svg, invalid reason. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:40, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 21:51, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Alfred Theodore Joseph Bastien - Cavalry and Tanks at Arras.jpg Labattblueboy (talk) 20:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not an exact or scaled-down duplicate. --Rosenzweig τ 12:17, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is clearly a picture made from a television screen Edoderoo (talk) 22:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The uploader onto wikiportret states the photo is taken at the football stadium during the game Heracles-VVV this weekend. What he says is confirmed by the metadata of the location and the date. He does not know why the resolution is so bad. Perhaps he used a digital zoom with the Iphone 7. Elly (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Elly. --Gbawden (talk) 14:00, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this photography is most probably not an own work of the self-claimed author/user called Stzeman and therefore the photography can not be marked as CC licensed material. 217.30.65.6 13:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The picture directly from year 1945 - my own historical archive, sorry.--Stzeman (talk) 13:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Stzeman: given that the true author is unknown (and not you), I have updated the license information with the correct tags. For the future, if you have a work that is from more than 70 years ago from the same country with no known author, the generally accepted practice is to use {{PD-anon-70-CZ}} for the license and label the author as "Unknown." The photographs in your archives are great, and I don't want to see public domain material get deleted because it had the wrong tag. –MJLTalk 20:35, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per above.MJLTalk 20:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope MiguelAlanCS (talk) 16:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:SCOPE -- 大诺史 (talk) 10:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and possibly copyright issues anyways. --Majora (talk) 06:51, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original font is above TOO. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Cartoon Network is owned by WarnerMedia, an American company. Original font or not does not matter for PD-textlogo in the United States. This isn't the UK. --Majora (talk) 19:53, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Rh in tokyo

[edit]

Dubious own work claims. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader may be an original copyright holder because quality of two images is better than the source. But the first image File:Corporate corporate img.jpg is a duplicate of the source. (archive on 2018-07-07) It needs OTRS permission. added sign Darklanlan (talk) 01:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:55, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in France, permission from artist needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:54, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OTRS confirmation from author of paintings would be needed. --Majora (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does Not appear at the source. Leoboudv (talk) 21:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It DOES. You should see the image if you clicked the link. Why do you think so? Paranocean (talk) 15:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Picture is present on the source with the specified license. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 19:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

South kKorea has no Freedom of Panorama for modern artistic works. Leoboudv (talk) 23:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the photo subject is clearly packagaing artwork, the concern would be whether the shape shown is sufficent artistic choice to justify the deisng being protected. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The concern here was indeed the shaped design of the bottle, The text is simple as you rightly point out. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For example, File:Fanta 200ml China 01.jpg. Is Which is decorative shape? I think both of them are geometrical shape. --Benzoyl (talk) 01:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Company that makes these is located in Hungary. Judging by what is not acceptable per COM:TOO Hungary it would certainly be plausible that the country has a lower threshold and this level would meet that bar. PCP delete. --Majora (talk) 01:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very inaccurate and therefore misleading, out of scope. FunkMonk (talk) 08:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:16, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This statue is not St. Hannibal Mary Di Francia\ (Annibale Maria di Francia, or Hannibal(born July 5, 1851 in Messina, Italy, died June 1, 1927)) but Blessed Luigi Maria Mont(founder of the Congregation of the sons of the Immaculate Conception, CFIC)(born July 24, 1825 in Bovisio, Italy, died Oct. 1, 1900) Blessed Luigi Mari Monti dedicated his life for orphans, that is why that statue is with children. That statue is in Luguna, because in Pagsanjan in Laguna, there is a religious community that Saint Joseph Oasis.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 20:16, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are several issues with this logo and it needs to be either be redrawn or deleted. JE98 (talk) 16:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 20:18, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the shades and unusual symbols, these are too complex for PD-textlogo. See COM:TOO United States.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the shading is any more complex than the shading in File:I heart my marine.png. The symbol depicted in these logos looks to me to simply be a rushedly hand-drawn version of the symbol in their old logo, which was just a very simple depiction of the shape of the restaurant's roof. –IagoQnsi (talk) 14:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]