Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/11/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since). However, there is an OTRS tag on the file description page. Please explain why you think another permission statement is needed. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Ошибка, прошу простить и снять файл с удаления. Mitte27 (talk) 00:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --4nn1l2 (talk) 00:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Private property, the owner does not allow the photographing of private buildings and requires deletion. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#"House_rules". Next time also do not decategorize a file you nominator for deletion. This is highly disruptive. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I know that buildings are free to photograph in Sweden, but I was on private ground when I took the images. Without the owner’s permission it is not allowed to take photographs when you are on private property. I had no permission from the owner. Therefore the owner wants the images to be removed. I once again I ask you to delete the picture. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please read the previous closure statement. If the owner of the building thinks that they have a legal base for their request, they can contact OTRS, so that we can direct them to our legal department. --Jcb (talk) 09:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Private property, the owner does not allow the photographing of private buildings and requires deletion. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:02, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#"House_rules". Next time also do not decategorize a file you nominator for deletion. This is highly disruptive. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I know that buildings are free to photograph in Sweden, but I was on private ground when I took the images. Without the owner’s permission it is not allowed to take photographs when you are on private property. I had no permission from the owner. Therefore the owner wants the images to be removed. I once again I ask you to delete the picture. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC) Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:43, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please read the previous closure statement. If the owner of the building thinks that they have a legal base for their request, they can contact OTRS, so that we can direct them to our legal department. --Jcb (talk) 09:49, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Private property, the owner does not allow the photographing of private buildings and requires deletion. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#"House_rules". Next time also do not decategorize a file you nominator for deletion. This is highly disruptive. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I know that buildings are free to photograph in Sweden, but I was on private ground when I took the images. Without the owner’s permission it is not allowed to take photographs when you are on private property. I had no permission from the owner. Therefore the owner wants the image to be removed. I once again I ask you to delete the picture. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC) Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:43, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please read the previous closure statement. If the owner of the building thinks that they have a legal base for their request, they can contact OTRS, so that we can direct them to our legal department. --Jcb (talk) 09:49, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Private property, the owner does not allow the photographing of private buildings and requires deletion. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#"House_rules". Next time also do not decategorize a file you nominator for deletion. This is highly disruptive. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I know that buildings are free to photograph in Sweden, but I was on private ground when I took the images. Without the owner’s permission it is not allowed to take photographs when you are on private property. I had no permission from the owner. Therefore the owner wants the images to be removed. I once again I ask you to delete the picture. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC) Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:44, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please read the previous closure statement. If the owner of the building thinks that they have a legal base for their request, they can contact OTRS, so that we can direct them to our legal department. --Jcb (talk) 09:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Private property, the owner does not allow the photographing of private buildings and requires deletion. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#"House_rules". Next time also do not decategorize a file you nominator for deletion. This is highly disruptive. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I know that buildings are free to photograph in Sweden, but I was on private ground when I took the images. Without the owner’s permission it is not allowed to take photographs when you are on private property. I had no permission from the owner. Therefore the owner wants the images to be removed. I once again I ask you to delete the picture. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC) Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please read the previous closure statement. If the owner of the building thinks that they have a legal base for their request, they can contact OTRS, so that we can direct them to our legal department. --Jcb (talk) 09:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Private property, the owner does not allow the photographing of private buildings and requires deletion. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:04, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#"House_rules". Next time also do not decategorize a file you nominator for deletion. This is highly disruptive. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I know that buildings are free to photograph in Sweden, but I was on private ground when I took the images. Without the owner’s permission it is not allowed to take photographs when you are on private property. I had no permission from the owner. Therefore the owner wants the images to be removed. I once again I ask you to delete the picture. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC) Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please read the previous closure statement. If the owner of the building thinks that they have a legal base for their request, they can contact OTRS, so that we can direct them to our legal department. --Jcb (talk) 09:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Private property, the owner does not allow the photographing of private buildings and requires deletion. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:05, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#"House_rules". Next time also do not decategorize a file you nominator for deletion. This is highly disruptive. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I know that buildings are free to photograph in Sweden, but I was on private ground when I took the images. Without the owner’s permission it is not allowed to take photographs when you are on private property. I had no permission from the owner. Therefore the owner wants the images to be removed. I once again I ask you to delete the picture. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC) Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please read the previous closure statement. If the owner of the building thinks that they have a legal base for their request, they can contact OTRS, so that we can direct them to our legal department. --Jcb (talk) 09:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Private property, the owner does not allow the photographing of private buildings and requires deletion. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:07, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#"House_rules". Next time also do not decategorize a file you nominator for deletion. This is highly disruptive. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I know that buildings are free to photograph in Sweden, but I was on private ground when I took the images. Without the owner’s permission it is not allowed to take photographs when you are on private property. I had no permission from the owner. Therefore the owner wants the images to be removed. I once again I ask you to delete the picture. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC) Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please read the previous closure statement. If the owner of the building thinks that they have a legal base for their request, they can contact OTRS, so that we can direct them to our legal department. --Jcb (talk) 09:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Private property, the owner does not allow the photographing of private buildings and requires deletion. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:05, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#"House_rules". Next time also do not decategorize a file you nominator for deletion. This is highly disruptive. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I know that buildings are free to photograph in Sweden, but I was on private ground when I took the images. Without the owner’s permission it is not allowed to take photographs when you are on private property. I had no permission from the owner. Therefore the owner wants the images to be removed. I once again I ask you to delete the picture. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC) Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please read the previous closure statement. If the owner of the building thinks that they have a legal base for their request, they can contact OTRS, so that we can direct them to our legal department. --Jcb (talk) 09:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Private property, the owner does not allow the photographing of private buildings and requires deletion. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#"House_rules". Next time also do not decategorize a file you nominator for deletion. This is highly disruptive. --Jcb (talk) 16:14, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I know that buildings are free to photograph in Sweden, but I was on private ground when I took the images. Without the owner’s permission it is not allowed to take photographs when you are on private property. I had no permission from the owner. Therefore the owner wants the images to be removed. I once again I ask you to delete the picture. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC) Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:47, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: please read the previous closure statement. If the owner of the building thinks that they have a legal base for their request, they can contact OTRS, so that we can direct them to our legal department. --Jcb (talk) 09:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Steinsplitter as no permission (No permission since). However, the original uploader on the English Wikipedia has been en:User:Harrygouvas which corresponds to the name given in the author field. The image has been transferred to Commons 8 years later. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- I overlooked that, fine with speedy keep. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --4nn1l2 (talk) 12:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abbos700770 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion of non notable person (Abbos Axmedov.jpg on Wikidata). Besides since he's the subject he can't be the photographer.
- File:AzCapital.jpg
- File:Abbos Axmedov.jpg
- File:Member of AUCC busines forum 2018.jpg
- File:AUCC business forum 2018 with Mr Mark.jpg
- File:AUCC member Abbos Axmedov.jpg
- File:American Uzbekistan Chamber of Commerce business forum 2018.jpg
- File:Love job.jpg
- File:Office group.jpg
- File:Work place office.jpg
- File:Work place too.jpg
- File:Это я на фото.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:10, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abbos700770 (talk · contribs)
[edit]all files exist elsewhere on the internet, none of them are likely the uploader's own work.
- File:Mirabbos Akhmedov.jpg
- File:Aziz Halikov.jpg
- File:Shahlo Ahmedova.jpg
- File:Mirabbos Axmedov.jpg
- File:Axmedov.jpg
CodeLyoko (talk) 22:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Griff dab.gif
- File:BkhuoupI 400x400.jpg
- File:Griff InMK1Brodie Helmet.jpg
- File:Griff Dab.png
- File:Griff Cry.gif
- File:Griff.brodie.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:05, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Delete Cuentacuenta (talk) 16:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
same two image upload Jageshwer Verma (talk) 11:20, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 01:09, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
i do not want upload this Hanhi20 (talk) 12:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 01:13, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
renamed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baom (talk • contribs) 2018-11-03T01:07:46 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 01:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
spelling wrong. the correct one is Category:Ngṳ̀ng-cĕng-duáng. - I am Davidzdh. 05:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: empty cat. --JuTa 00:30, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Facebook metadata, similar to http://www.tarona.net/clip/lola_ahmedova_sog_39_intirib_video_clip/2017-02-07-964 Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Billinghurst at 13:30, 3 November 2018 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lola Ahmedova.jpg: Facebook metadata, similar to http://www.tarona.net/clip/lola_ahmedova_sog_39_intirib_video_clip/2017-02-07-964 --Krdbot 02:03, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: seems to be commercial porn, missing EXIF, user has a documented history of uploading porn-related copyvios (now bloked for a week). 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:49, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 19:55, 3 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): https://www.faponix.com/galleries/103401/black-babe-sandi-jackmon-likes-when-a-couple-of-guys-fuck-her-face/ --Krdbot 02:03, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Autor alterou seu direito autoral de uso de imagem no Flickr Di1977 (talk) 20:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, by Túrelio: Flickr user is in bad user list. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Imagem inexistente no Flickr Di1977 (talk) 21:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, by Túrelio: license review failed. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
content moved — Preceding unsigned comment added by KlaasZ4usV (talk • contribs) 14:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, user requested deletion in own userspace. Taivo (talk) 18:34, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
None Renzo Brandano Perviú (talk) 02:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:34, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
inapropiated Renzo Brandano Perviú (talk) 02:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
標題錯誤 鏌翷 (talk) 08:05, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 02:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
標題錯誤 鏌翷 (talk) 08:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 02:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
inapropiated Renzo Brandano Perviú (talk) 02:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 21:33, 4 November 2018 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1960 1 Canal 12 Córdoba.png: --Krdbot 01:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xd lyricists (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:SYROS TV1 - Syrostv1.gr.png
- File:Syros TV1 Logo.png
- File:Σύρος TV1.png
- File:FM1 Λογότυπο 2018 - Μπλέ.png
- File:Syros TV1 Λογότυπο 2018 - Μπλέ.png
- File:Syros TV1 Λογότυπο 2018.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:46, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:46, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Image with a weird photographic montage Mel22 (talk) 10:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Delete as small duplicate.Commons has many better images of this painting (Category:Francis I - Jean Clouet - Louvre INV 3256). But could you please tell where there's supposed to be a montage in this image? -- Asclepias (talk) 14:17, 4 November 2018 (UTC)- @Asclepias: Regarde bien au dessus de l'épaule à gauche... et il doit trouver cela drôle... Mel22 (talk) 21:01, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- En effet. Merci d'avoir satisfait ma curiosité et bravo. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Asclepias: Regarde bien au dessus de l'épaule à gauche... et il doit trouver cela drôle... Mel22 (talk) 21:01, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination. Out of scope montage. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete vandalism, incrustation of a photography (over the shoulder, on the left). Akela NDE (talk) 19:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:01, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aquintanafe (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work as claimed, proof of permission required
- File:Captura de pantalla de la app educatica C is for Cow.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de la app educativa Pearson English Kids Readers.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de la página web British Council.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de la app educativa Kidioms.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de la App educatica Aprende Inglés con Zoe.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de la app educativa CreAPP Cuentos.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de la app educativa Busuu.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de la app educativa Pili Pop.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de la app educativa Funny Pets.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de la app educativa Speaking Pal.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de la página de British Council.png
- File:Captura de la app educativa memrise.png
- File:Captura de pantalla de la app educativa DIC DIC.png
- File:Captura de pantalla class dojo.png
Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyright infrinhement from here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1HEGloSoh0 Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 22:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Copyright infringement from here http://www.teofilopatini.org/bestie Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 22:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
copyright infringement from Here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYtAo4xJf7g Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 22:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
- File:Go to PVS For wach TIGER ZINDA HAI.jpg
- File:Come to home from college.jpg
- File:Come to home from college Renew by facebook.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos. Out of scope. Commons is not your web host
- File:Red resort.jpg
- File:In Resort.jpg
- File:FROM MEERUT.jpg
- File:Billa KHAN.jpg
- File:REAL PIC.jpg
- File:ANOTHER.jpg
- File:SELFI.jpg
- File:TIGER ZINDA HAI.jpg
- File:JOKER.jpg
- File:WITH JOKER.jpg
- File:IMG TOTEL.jpg
- File:JACKET.jpg
- File:SALMAN.jpg
- File:SHADAB.jpg
- File:AAZAM.jpg
- File:RUSTAM GUL.jpg
- File:FOUR TREE.jpg
- File:DAILLY.jpg
- File:MISC DEF.jpg
- File:MMMSHA.jpg
- File:DEFFERENT.jpg
- File:EACH OTHER.jpg
- File:FROM ALI Copy.jpg
- File:RUSTAM ALI.jpg
- File:SADIQ.jpg
- File:RUSTAM.jpg
- File:IMG SHAHADAT.jpg
- File:NADEEM.jpg
- File:MAN GATE.jpg
- File:In PVS.jpg
- File:Go to PVS For wach TIGER ZINDA HAI.jpg
- File:Come to home from college.jpg
- File:Come to home from college Renew by facebook.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 17:46, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Commons is not a photo repository.
- File:At Australia.jpg
- File:At jhbdsk.jpg
- File:At mibhv.jpg
- File:In djh.jpg
- File:At Fraod.jpg
- File:AT SHssd.jpg
- File:At lowert.jpg
- File:At Crown.jpg
- File:At Sholdyl.jpg
- File:AT Mond.jpg
- File:At Flat.jpg
- File:At Goa.jpg
- File:At Room.jpg
- File:At Meerut In Ganga Nagar.jpg
- File:At Oxford IN American .jpg
- File:In England After Fever.jpg
- File:At london.jpg
- File:City Of Mumbai IN india ON 15 October.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:29, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from toy. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
photo prise en 1938, aucune indication sur l'auteur, il est peu probable que Billioud soit l'auteur et il n'indique pas qu'il est ayant droit sur OTRS Pierrette13 (talk) 14:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour,
Cette photo est de source familiale ; elle a été utilisée pour différents ouvrages dont le dictionnaire des marseillais édité par le Professeur Jean Chelini etc.......
Par ailleurs, cette même photo constitue l'incipit d'un hommage rendu par l'archiviste Pierre Guiral à mon grand-père Joseph au lien suivant ; https://archive.org/details/JosephBillioudHommageParPierreGuiral1963
Merci--BILLIOUD (talk) 12:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Je reviens sur cette question de photo...ainsi, je ne souhaite pas particulièrement faire figurer cette photo de mon grand-père, si cela pose de si grandes difficultés !............Aut regem aut fatuum nasci oportet !--BILLIOUD (talk) 19:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC) --BILLIOUD (talk) 19:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Shxahxh (talk) 01:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:21, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Shxahxh (talk) 01:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 01:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 01:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 01:54, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
obvious self-promotion, out of scope, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Svgemanagement. Te750iv (talk) 01:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:23, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 01:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:23, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 02:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:23, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 02:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:23, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 02:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 02:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 02:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 02:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 02:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Bad photo that I regret uploading (way overexposed, and wouldn't be a particularly interesting photo even if the exposure was fixed). We have plenty of better photos of Gonzalez from the same match. IagoQnsi (talk) 02:49, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Who is depicted Brinker? You can look at en:Brinker, but in my opinion the file is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 08:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 08:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 08:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:27, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- also file:MOCAYCO.png
I cannot find the company neither from en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:28, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PureShayan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos. Out of Com:PS.
Hanooz 13:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:29, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of com:PS. Hanooz 13:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 13:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kamranbaig007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images (en:Muhammad Anwer Baig)
- File:Baig04.jpg
- File:Baig 05.jpg
- File:Baig 06.jpg
- File:Baig 10.jpg
- File:Baig 09.jpg
- File:Baig 08.jpg
- File:Baig 07.jpg
- File:Baig 02.jpg
- File:Baig03.jpg
- File:Baig01.jpg
- File:Screenshot 20181101 232016.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:39, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 13:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
unknown person Adelfrank (talk) 13:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Street view. Not a picture of a person.
Keep --Insider (talk) 06:25, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:32, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:32, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:32, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Not own work. Watermark is still in the lower right hand corner. 104.238.59.170 16:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Not own work. Watermark is still on the photo 104.238.59.170 16:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Not own work. Has watermark 104.238.59.170 16:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Not woen work. Has watermark 104.238.59.170 16:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Cjp24 (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 20:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:34, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope Migebert (talk) 20:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Argh, image is not unused. Sorry. --Migebert (talk) 20:43, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:34, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
{{Delete}} — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.132.14.190 (talk) 11:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:35, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Henry Ngao (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
- File:D. wedding 36.jpg
- File:D. wedding 37.jpg
- File:D. wedding 35.jpg
- File:D. wedding 33.jpg
- File:D. wedding 34.jpg
- File:D. wedding 32.jpg
- File:D. wedding 31.jpg
- File:D. wedding 30.jpg
- File:D. wedding 28.jpg
- File:D. Wedding 27.jpg
- File:D. wedding 29.jpg
- File:D. wedding 26.jpg
- File:D. wedding 25.jpg
- File:D. wedding 24.jpg
- File:D.wedding 21.jpg
- File:D. wedding 23.jpg
- File:D. wedding 22.jpg
- File:D. wedding 20.jpg
- File:D. wedding 19.jpg
- File:D. wedding 18.jpg
- File:D. Wedding 17.jpg
- File:D. wedding 16.jpg
- File:D. wedding 15.jpg
- File:D. Wedding 14.jpg
- File:D. wedding 12.jpg
- File:D. wedding 10.jpg
- File:D. wedding 9.jpg
- File:D. wedding 8.jpg
- File:D. wedding 7.jpg
- File:D. wedding 6.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete useless without context.--BevinKacon (talk) 13:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Henry Ngao (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Olandos4.jpg
- File:Olandos3.jpg
- File:Olandos2.jpg
- File:Olandos5.jpg
- File:Olandos6.jpg
- File:Olandos8.jpg
- File:Olandos9.jpg
- File:Olandos7.jpg
- File:Olandos10.jpg
- File:Olandos13.jpg
- File:Olandos12.jpg
- File:Olandos16.jpg
- File:Olandos15.jpg
- File:Olandos14.jpg
- File:IDorcas w2.jpg
- File:Dorcas w1.jpg
- File:Dorcas wp.jpg
- File:Dorcas w7.jpg
- File:Dorcas w.jpg
- File:Dorcas w0.jpg
- File:Dorcas w11.jpg
- File:D. weddin.jpg
- File:Dorcas w12.jpg
- File:Dorcas w10.jpg
- File:Dorc wedding.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:35, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Henry Ngao (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal files, no clear eduse. Out of project scope
- File:Girls in Sec 2018an.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18u.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18y.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18t.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18r.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18e.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18w.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18q.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18a.jpg
- File:Kinda term1 -18.jpg
- File:Mori SDA church.jpg
- File:Mori SDA.jpg
- File:Bass students.jpg
- File:Bass students 2.jpg
- File:Bass students 1.jpg
- File:Bass students3.jpg
- File:Bass students24.jpg
- File:Bass students4.jpg
- File:Bass students5.jpg
- File:Bass students6.jpg
- File:Bass students7.jpg
- File:Bass students8.jpg
- File:Bass students0.jpg
- File:Bass students9.jpg
- File:Bass students10.jpg
- File:Bass students11.jpg
- File:Bass students12.jpg
- File:Bass students13.jpg
- File:Bass students14.jpg
- File:Bass students15.jpg
- File:Bass students16.jpg
- File:Bass students17.jpg
- File:Bass students18.jpg
- File:Bass students19.jpg
- File:Bass students20.jpg
- File:Bass students21.jpg
- File:Bass students22.jpg
- File:Bass students23.jpg
- File:Bass students25.jpg
- File:Bass students27.jpg
- File:Bass students26.jpg
- File:Bass students28.jpg
- File:Bass students29.jpg
- File:Bass students30.jpg
- File:D. wedding 5.jpg
- File:D. wedding 4.jpg
- File:D. wedding1.jpg
- File:D. wedding 3.jpg
- File:D. wedding2.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:03, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:Nitroguanidine tautomers.svg. Leyo 22:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 17:25, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Phenol-phenolate equilibrium.svg. Leyo 22:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 17:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned, i.e. probably replaced by a better version. Leyo 22:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. File:Azo-coupling-A-mechanism-2D-skeletal.png is a high-quality image focusing on the actual reaction named in the title. DMacks (talk) 18:51, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 17:24, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
No permission Shxahxh (talk) 00:20, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be a copy of an instagram post. Likely to be a copyright infringement. See http://www.odishabytes.com/karan-johar-alia-bhatt-wish-madhuri-dixit-birthday/ Nick Moyes (talk) 00:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Shxahxh (talk) 01:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
No proof is given that the source licensed this image under the CC-BY-SA-4.0. im temtem • hOI!! • fsfdfg 06:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Flickr not found
[edit]Images not found on Flickr so we can't use {{Flickr-no known copyright restrictions}}. Another tag may apply.
- File:Dannebrog-TRLD.jpg
- File:Den lille Hornblæser.jpg
- File:Gefionspringvandet.jpg
- File:Rebildfest.jpg
- File:Rådhuspladsen-TRLD.jpg
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:43, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
The file can be found using Google image search in Internet since 2013. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW: Face of Heather Heyer ist to prominent. 85.212.151.141 09:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:17, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
There is a weird photographic montage in this photo, commons doesn't need this. Mel22 (talk) 10:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: There are better photos of that location, the date looks wrong and there's no metadata, so I suppose it can be deleted. But could you please specify where there's supposed to be a montage in that image? -- Asclepias (talk) 14:05, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Asclepias: regarde bien au-dessus du mot liberté à droite. L'image n'a été versée que pour cette raison.Mel22 (talk) 20:57, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oui, une fois qu'on a vu le truc sur les autres images, ça devient évident sur celle-ci. Merci. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination. Out of scope montage. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
This image is just a copy of this image only with a weird photographic montage, commons doesn't need this. Mel22 (talk) 10:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Delete as duplicate. (But could you please tell where there's supposed to be a montage in this image?) -- Asclepias (talk) 13:44, 4 November 2018 (UTC)- @Asclepias: Regarde bien en haut à droite de la cheminée. Mel22 (talk) 20:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Ah oui, merci. C'était subtil. Bravo pour l'avoir repéré ! -- Asclepias (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Asclepias: Regarde bien en haut à droite de la cheminée. Mel22 (talk) 20:59, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination. Out of scope montage. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:21, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
The photo is out of project scope, because it is very blurry. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The panel shown in this photo is situated on the house in Čyčeryna Street, 19, Minsk. I'm not sure, but I assume that this work is at least post 1945 and the exact date and author should be known to decide to copyright status. Jarash (talk) 10:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope Geohakkeri (talk) 11:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 21:23, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vinaykumar khatu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Inspirational journey of under 19 cricket team captain prithvi shaw , 'कपडे विकणाऱ्या बापाचा लेक ते विश्वविजेत्या संघाचा कर्णधार'.pdf
- File:Maharashtra farmers march Implementing collective forest rights more important than individual claims to land.pdf
- File:11-page-4.jpg
- File:ICC U-19 World Cup 2018 Prithvi Shaws mentor on Indian captain's early struggles, hard work and emergence as a star.pdf
- File:पृथ्वी शॉ - एकलव्याचा वारसदार - अजब समाचार.pdf
- File:India vs England Bring on James Anderson and Co, says Prithvi Shaw; mentor stresses on temperament.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yolscreamo22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All uploads claimed as own work, yet one is watermarked to an unfree stock site, the rest are very small & no meta data & different resolutions.. very unlikely own work.
- File:Planta de Tratamiento.jpg
- File:Tubería De Acueducto.jpg
- File:Residuos Tratamiento.jpg
- File:Contaminación del Ambiente.jpg
- File:Contaminación Atmosférica.jpg
- File:Construcción Pozo Inspección Alcantarilla.JPG
- File:Planta Modular Tratamiento de Agua.jpg
BevinKacon (talk) 16:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by American Musician brand (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused logo of questionable notability, out of project scope
- File:American-Musician-Brand-logo gif.gif
- File:American-Musician-Brand-reg.gif
- File:American Musician Brand llc.gif
- File:American Musician brand logo.gif
- File:American Musician brand.gif
- File:American Musician Brand.gif
Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
unused files, unlikely to be own work (inconsistent metadata). Only used in userpage draft
- File:Ryval salon Taipei.jpg
- File:Ryval Montre connecté femme.png
- File:Présentoir produit ryval.jpg
- File:Ryval présentoir.jpg
- File:Ryval powerbank k7.png
- File:Ryval Action cam 4k.jpg
- File:Ryval cable long lightning.png
- File:Clé USB Ryval Biscuit.jpg
- File:Clé USB Ryval cartable.jpg
- File:Be-curious-hd2.jpg
- File:Ancien logo ryval2.jpg
- File:Action-cam Y10 - Ryval.jpg
- File:Logo ryval gris.jpg
- File:Logo et oeuf.png
Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Buddy street couture (talk · contribs)
[edit]non-notable brand, out of project scope
- File:Buddy street couture 5.JPG
- File:Buddy street couture 4.JPG
- File:Buddy street couture 2.JPG
- File:Buddy street couture.JPG
- File:Buddy street couture 3.JPG
Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Roblox Corporation is no longer using the red logo, according to their corporate website and their official social media channels. Roblox should reflect the company's current logo. CriticalSass (talk) 20:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
These stained-glass windows inside a German building are by the artist Walter Womacka. Womacka died in 2010, so they are still protected until 2081. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. Some of the photos are from the German Bundesarchiv, but I assume their permission covers the work of the photographers, not that of the artist.
- File:2014-09-23&2218152014-05-22&162311 Berlin Staatsratsgebäude Glasfenster.Jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-C1001-0001-007, Berlin, Staatsratsgebäude, Fenster.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-C1003-0003-043, Berlin, Staatsrat, neuer Amtssitz, Besichtigung.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-C1009-0020-008, Berlin, Staatsratsgebäude, Fenster.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-C1009-0020-009, Berlin, Staatsratsgebäude, Fenster.jpg
- File:Fenster im Staatsrat 1.jpg
- File:Fenster im Staatsrat 2.jpg
- File:Fenster im Staatsrat 3.jpg
- File:Fenster im Staatsrat.jpg
- File:Walter-Womacka-Staatsratsgebäude-Berlin-Glasfenster-a.jpg
- File:Walter-Womacka-Staatsratsgebäude-Berlin-Glasfenster-b.jpg
- File:Walter-Womacka-Staatsratsgebäude-Berlin-Glasfenster-c.jpg
- File:Walter-Womacka-Staatsratsgebäude-Berlin-Glasfenster-d.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
These stained-glass windows inside a German building are by the artist Walter Womacka. Womacka died in 2010, so they are still protected until 2081. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. The stamps are not in the PD as well, as we have known for some time.
- File:Fotothek df n-30 0000551 Farbglas Mahnmal Sachsenhausen.jpg
- File:Fotothek df n-30 0000552 Farbglas Mahnmal Sachsenhausen.jpg
- File:Fotothek df n-30 0000553 Farbglas Mahnmal Sachsenhausen.jpg
- File:Fotothek df n-30 0000554 Farbglas Mahnmal Sachsenhausen.jpg
- File:Kzsachsenhausen-24-k6.jpg
- File:Stamp Sachsenhausen.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1968, MiNr 1346.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1968, MiNr 1347.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1968, MiNr 1348.jpg
- File:Walter Womacka Sachsenhausen 1.jpg
- File:Walter Womacka Sachsenhausen 2.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Leaning Keep These are all in state public buildings in the former DDR, no? It seems very unlikely that the artist kept his copyright under the terms of the commission - they were presumably done under the DDR equivalent of "work for hire", in which case presumably now free. Johnbod (talk) 14:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- There is no "work for hire" in German copyright. Anybody commissioning a work may acquire usage rights if the contract says so, but the actual copyright remains with the artist. -- Rosenzweig τ 17:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the user's only upload. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo not used Civitas13 (talk) 12:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, low quality, not used Civitas13 (talk) 12:43, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:50, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:51, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 13:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:51, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Paintgol
[edit]Most probably the uploader is not the author. See
- File:Kozak liudm.jpg - Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author.
- File:Antomonov Yuri.jpg - Small size, no metadata. Old photo, probably of photocopy. Most probably the uploader is not the author.
- File:Kononenko alex.JPG - Small size, camera Canon EOS-1D Mark III. Most probably the uploader is not the author.
- File:Vysheslavsky Glib.jpg - Small size, camera Canon PowerShot G9. Most probably the uploader is not the author.
Others files is camera DSC-W570, but small size
Others files is photocopy by camera DSC-W570, but small size
Others files is small size, no metadata, probably copy by painting, autor uk:Голуб Олена Євгенівна.
And also File:Goub.port.07.jpg is artistic photo processing.
@Paintgol: , you is uk:Голуб Олена Євгенівна? Please explain the download.
Микола Василечко (talk) 15:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Алиса Янович (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work, inconsistent sizes and metadata
- File:11 jay.jpg
- File:Lake Studio FW17 18 preview3.jpg
- File:F8A9753-2-2.jpg
- File:Moreca Bag Future.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:56, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by W.hidayanto87 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:00, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Italian911 (talk · contribs)
[edit]complex logos/packaging, COM:OTRS verification of permission required.
- File:Sostenibilita 02.png
- File:Bolton-Group2.jpg
- File:Bolton manitoba brands.png
- File:Bolton alimentari.png
- File:Schermata 2016-05-13 alle 18.33.34.png
- File:Logo-bolton-group.png
- File:Bolton Group.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:52, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Super editor 2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]All user's uploads are PNG format conversions of existing JPG images. None of the PNG versions appear to be in use, and there is no obvious reason or justification for the multiple formats.
In addition, none of these appear to be the uploader's own work, despite the (presumably left at the default setting) claim otherwise, and none credit the original image as the source (although in all cases the original image can be found in the same category).
- File:Neil Diamond.png
- File:Adam Brody.png
- File:James Franco.png
- File:Billy Joel.png
- File:Seth Rogen.png
- File:Joe Lieberman.png
- File:DustinHoffman.png
Ubcule (talk) 18:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
test Ashish19907 (talk) 18:21, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ghostmotard42 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution, no metadata.
Cjp24 (talk) 18:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:04, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wikimedia in Brazil GLAM initiative with Arquivo Nacional - Missing license and more
[edit]Insufficient information on photographer names and lifetimes, countries shot in, years shot in, and years published in, sufficient to verify their alleged PD licenses. See also COM:VPC#Files within Category:Wikimedia in Brazil GLAM initiative with Arquivo Nacional.
- File:Arquivo Nacional visto do Campo de Santana - 2011-11-03.jpg
- File:Conjunto arquitetônico tombado do Arquivo Nacional - 2007-09-04.jpg
- File:Escadaria do Arquivo Nacional - 2009-12-01.jpg
- File:Fachada do Arquivo Nacional - 2011-11-03.jpg
- File:Palmeiras do Arquivo Nacional - 2009-09-03.jpg
- File:Pátio do Arquivo Nacional - 2007-08-04.jpg
- File:Pátio do Arquivo Nacional - 2010-08-27.jpg
- File:Pátio do Arquivo Nacional - 2012-11-29.jpg
- File:Pátio do Arquivo Nacional com destaque para suas palmeiras - 2009-07-13.jpg
- File:Stefan Zweig, Fundo Correio da Manhã - 2.tif
- File:Alain Resnais (1965).tif;
- File:Alberto Sordi (1960).tif;
- File:Alexander Calder, escultor (1959).tiff;
- File:Alida Valli, Fundo Correio da Manhã.tif;
- File:Ann Sothern, sem data.tif;
- File:Anna Magnani e Anthony Quinn.tif;
- File:Anouk Aimée, sem data.tif;
- File:Antonioni em um dos sets de Zabriskie Point, sem data.tif, etc.
- File:Betty Blythe, Hank Mann, Susan Cabot, Mack Sennett e Peggie Castle.tif;
- File:Bárbara Stanwyck (1941).tif;
- File:Charles Trenet (1955).tif;
- File:Darius Milhaud, sem data.tif;
- File:Fernand Leger (1955).tif;
- File:Fidel Castro, 1972.tif (1972, sic);
- File:George Sanders, sem data.tif;
- File:Giuletta Masina.tif;
- File:Hans Steiner (1940).tif;
- File:Helmut Schmidt (1972).tif;
- File:Henri Langlois (1965).tif;
- File:Jerry Lewis (1969).tif;
- File:Jean-louis Trintignant (1969).tif;
- File:Josef Von Sternberg, Fundo Correio da Manhã.tif;
- File:Joseph Paul Goebbels (1936).tif;
- File:Joseph Paul Goebbels, sem data.tif;
- File:Le Corbusier (1965).tif;
- File:Marcel Marceau (1961).tif;
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- An unfortunate Delete. Uploader needs to provide more information to verify if any of these photographs are in the public domain. COM:PCP is clear on this, and there is significant doubt that these historical photographs are free of copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 01:22, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
-
- Abzeronow did you notice that we have several different cases, so what is the ones that you think that should be deleted?
- First this request should not exist at this moment, the community is already discussing about a great portion of this files at Village Pump copyright, and also I do not believe that Jeff G. should be involve on this request, he turn it in a personal agenda, that could blur his visions.
- Moreover, this deletion request have a lot of different types of files and include all in the same sack is not productive and can led us to commit bad judgments.
- For example:
- File:Pátio do Arquivo Nacional - 2012-11-29.jpg what's the problem with this file?
- The source, the author, the date, the license is there.
- If the "an institution of the Brazilian Ministry of Justice and Public Security" is declaring that this files are PD, why can you contest?
- About files from the Fundo do Correio da Manhã, away different cases.
- What I know is: I participate of workshop from Wikidata and I uploaded some files, 4 or 5 that should not be uploaded, I was expecting the discussion around the Village Pump and was taking a time to not escalate the wave of violence installed against me.
- Correio da Manhã was a newspaper, is fair to assume that they didn't care about who did the photos back that 1900's, 30's, 40's... and they do not exist anymore, so this information we may never have, as a lot of PDs other files that we have here from unknown authors. More information, I simply don't know, I'm not responsible for this digitization, I just did a workshop.
- And you do not fully understand the {{PD-Brazil-URAA}}, or you are ignoring it.
- .
- We have 8 petabytes under the domain of National Archive, we have a lot of educational possibilities inside it, hunting this digitization as witches at dark era will not be helpful, we need to see if there are problems, but we must not assume zebras, when we hear hoofbeats.
- For now, nothing more to add. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 17:07, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I've been following the Village Pump discussion. I suspect the "work for hire" portion is why File:Pátio do Arquivo Nacional - 2012-11-29.jpg got nominated, because I cannot find a rationale for that otherwise (Brazil has FoP). The Goebbels photos, for example, may be public domain, but I very much doubt Correio da Manhã was first to publish, but even if so, you need to provide us evidence of when Correio da Manhã published said photograph so we might be able to ascertain who the photographer was (who was probably German). Abzeronow (talk) 17:38, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
-
- @Rodrigo.Argenton: Your project of uploading Correio da Manhã images is doomed due to lack of copyright-relevant metadata, please stop it and consider an alternative outlet. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:38, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
-
- q.e.d. Jeff G. shouldn't be involved on this request, he is not even reading the messages.
- Abzeronow, I didn't upload any Goebbels photos... so I, I do need to provide things, I believe that didn't use the correct pronoun.
- But why not a Brazilian photographer who traveled? And why you have so confident that Correio da Manhã was not the first to publish this particular photos? Again, they are photojournalists of 30's, we will probably never know their names, and why you are demanding this, if the law do not?
- And you also doubt that Correio da Manhã was not the first to publish this File:Marcel Marceau (1961).tif?
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 10:49, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Rodrigo.Argenton: It's clear that every other files of non-Brazilian people (see Joalpe user's page) have been already deleted since I've provided evidence these pictures haven't be shot in Brazil nor first published by Correio da Manhã. The list above are "suspect" files for which I'm quite sure the persons pictured have never visited Brazil : for File:Yves Saint Laurent (1960).tif, I had to prove that this person never visited Brazil; for File:Frank Lloyd Wright, Fundo Correio da Manhã.tif I had to fight against your bad faith or to do the job your workgroup should have done BEFORE uploading. In short and though you're not responsible for the digitalization your workgroup should haver never uploaded these files full of "sim data" (any information available). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
-
- This not about me, as the discussion at Village Pump is not about me, I recommend you re-write without the harassment, and without scream at me, again.
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 11:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
-
- You're the one who is asserting under the license that these were first published in a Brazilian newspaper. Please at least provide us a statement that such-and-such photo was published in such-and-such issue at such-and-such date. Even with COM:AGF, it might be possible that these were published years later in Brazil after initial publication in another country. As discussed in the Village Pump Copyright thread, there is not even an affirmative statement from Arquivo Nacional that these are free of copyright restrictions. I want to believe the word of Arquivo Nacional but it doesn't seem like these photographs have had their provenance properly researched. All we seem to know is that at some point, these photographs were published in a Brazilian newspaper. We don't know if this is where they were first published. Abzeronow (talk) 16:49, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Rodrigo.Argenton: I am reading the messages. I started the request. I know from firsthand experience that sometimes newspapers get sent photos that never even get published due to lack of space, time, or other resources. Is it possible you are uploading some of those? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Pinging @Joalpe, too. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:58, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Comment I appreciate the effort to curate content that was uploaded. In general terms, issues that were raised are well-taken, and I apologize. These images are associated to a very large GLAM partnership, with a very important institution that faces real challenges (just like the Museu Nacional, it is under fire hazard condition), and from what I can see these cases of inappropriate upload are an annoying minority. I am learning from these discussions, and therefore I appreciate the good work that is being done to curate this content. Guidelines that are being discussed here are informing drastic changes of the scope of what we are uploading, as there have been identified rightfully obvious copyright flaws in the metadata. A constructive approach from this discussion is for asking your support before uploads happen. In more practical terms, we are going to upload a large set of non-artistic pictures of street protests in Brazilian history, particularly of the military dictatorship period (1964-1988). What are possible caveats we might expect to encounter with this set? Thanks. --Joalpe (talk) 01:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Joalpe: Thank you. What were the circumstances of the photography that lead you to believe that the resulting photographs of street protests were "non-artistic"? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:54, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: These pictures are from a documental fund of descriptive images in accordance to Brazil URAA. --Joalpe (talk) 14:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Joalpe: Thank you. I think they would be acceptable. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:40, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: These pictures are from a documental fund of descriptive images in accordance to Brazil URAA. --Joalpe (talk) 14:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Let's organize
[edit]- Recent photos requested by Arquivo Nacional.
- File:Arquivo Nacional visto do Campo de Santana - 2011-11-03.jpg
- File:Conjunto arquitetônico tombado do Arquivo Nacional - 2007-09-04.jpg
- File:Escadaria do Arquivo Nacional - 2009-12-01.jpg
- File:Fachada do Arquivo Nacional - 2011-11-03.jpg
- File:Palmeiras do Arquivo Nacional - 2009-09-03.jpg
- File:Pátio do Arquivo Nacional - 2007-08-04.jpg
- File:Pátio do Arquivo Nacional - 2010-08-27.jpg
- File:Pátio do Arquivo Nacional - 2012-11-29.jpg
- File:Pátio do Arquivo Nacional com destaque para suas palmeiras - 2009-07-13.jpg
- Goebbels files (should wait the discussion at Village Pump)
- Portraits of non Brazilians
- File:Stefan Zweig, Fundo Correio da Manhã - 2.tif
- File:Alain Resnais (1965).tif;
- File:Alberto Sordi (1960).tif;
- File:Alexander Calder, escultor (1959).tiff;
- File:Alida Valli, Fundo Correio da Manhã.tif;
- File:Ann Sothern, sem data.tif;
- File:Anna Magnani e Anthony Quinn.tif;
- File:Anouk Aimée, sem data.tif;
- File:Antonioni em um dos sets de Zabriskie Point, sem data.tif, etc.
- File:Betty Blythe, Hank Mann, Susan Cabot, Mack Sennett e Peggie Castle.tif;
- File:Bárbara Stanwyck (1941).tif;
- File:Charles Trenet (1955).tif;
- File:Darius Milhaud, sem data.tif;
- File:Fernand Leger (1955).tif;
- File:George Sanders, sem data.tif;
- File:Giuletta Masina.tif;
- File:Hans Steiner (1940).tif;
- File:Helmut Schmidt (1972).tif;
- File:Henri Langlois (1965).tif;
- File:Jerry Lewis (1969).tif;
- File:Jean-louis Trintignant (1969).tif;
- File:Josef Von Sternberg, Fundo Correio da Manhã.tif;
- File:Le Corbusier (1965).tif;
- Very likely to be a photo took here.
The fist segment, we could probably contact the Arquivo Nacional, and request a cc license, or a justification for PD, my knowledge do not allow me to have any conclusion, I believe all of you neither.
The second, would be better wait for the discussion at Village Pump copyright, and see what is best. But, for me this could be a newspaper register.
The third is grey, we should evaluate case by case, however, this probably is the real problem, and most of it should investigate, they have a very high educational content, and even if the newspaper didn't publish (I'm not saying that was not), they could be already in PD by other ways.
The fourth, well, with marks to cut, and not being a well structured photo, this is very likely a photo took before a presentation/speech.
I made a quick research and find out that Marcel did a international tour starting at 50's and that he visit Brazil [1] at least some years later, but very likely to be here before.
Fidel having being visiting Brazil since 50's also, [2], however in 1972 we was under... well a Military dictatorship in Brazil. Looking the photos of his visit at 1959, and photos of him from 1972, they are probably from 1959. I suggest keep it, and change the date, that's probably wrong.
-- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 18:06, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope, because it is blurry everywhere. Taivo (talk) 20:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
https://www.amazon.com/Joseph-Tartakovsky/e/B07BZW5RM7 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
If shot in France not public domain yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Of course, you are right. My mistake (I uploaded it). I will add a speedy delete on it. Ketil3 (talk) 02:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 13:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
unknown persons Adelfrank (talk) 16:21, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
I think, that the image is out of project scope due to small size. We have enough pictures in category:Night in Venezuela. Taivo (talk) 17:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Unknown subject, article was deleted because of out of scope Ciell (talk) 17:28, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
damaged image Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:48, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
File:Hillside Club Venue for Art, Culture, Music. Lectures, Private Parties, Membership Available.jpg
[edit]File name, and description are pure promotion for this venue. Archie02 (talk) 19:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
File name, and description are just promotion for this venue. Archie02 (talk) 19:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in France, permission of artist needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
But I didn't understand : the graffiti is the reproduction of a photo free of rights or I made a mistake ? Celette (talk) 21:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- I read Commons:Derivative works, ok. Celette (talk) 21:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Image issue d'une émission télévisée et donc sous droits d'auteurs, il faut l'autorisation de la chaîne, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 20:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Sculptor dead in 1988 (my mistake). In France, we have to wait 70 years. Celette (talk) 15:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Private image. No other contributions by user. Not used. DavidIvar (talk) 23:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Self-promotion. Private image. No other contributions by user. DavidIvar (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
out of scope; no indication of purpose of upload, and doubt that it is user's image — billinghurst sDrewth 13:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, orphaned. Leyo 22:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (replaceable by File:Histamine tautomers.svg). --DMacks (talk) 01:44, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Likely a contemporary work by an artist not dead since >70 years. As Romania has no FoP provision, copyvio. Túrelio (talk) 23:10, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
I don`t want Metadata to appear with my photo. Just my nickname would be great. Geo000 (talk) 02:50, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No FoP in Romania. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:04, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. The picture of this 3D object is probably not old enough to be out of copyright. Jcb (talk) 11:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:16, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 12:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
The artist died in 1962. NO PD-Art, NO PD-Austria-1932 (it´s not a photo): copyvio. Walter Anton (talk) 13:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
The artist died in 1962. NO PD-Art, NO PD-Austria-1932 (it´s not a photo): copyvio. Walter Anton (talk) 13:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
It was uploaded as a test to determine whether the camera function was working for upload on the Android app. StoppedGalaxy (talk) 13:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
uploader is not the author as of this change in log Migebert (talk) 20:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 10:35, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Not educationally useful. I really don't see how that particular image is useful for the human knowledge. Clarities (talk) 00:39, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: request from LTA. Ruthven (msg) 14:36, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 06:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- The picture has been taken from original source [3], just was edited and cut in Photoshop --Анна Липська (talk) 14:32, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Photo is posted on the page Gennadiy Vasyukov, but this is not your page and not your post, and here you download it. There is no proof that this is your job. If this is your job, download the original metadata file. --Микола Василечко (talk) 16:44, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:51, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyright issue Nahid Hossain (talk) 08:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Bien, si se tiene que borrar, adelante. Sin embargo la imagen ya fue revisada antes y no parecía tener problema, al menos en ese momento. Como dije si existe algún problema de derechos, pues nada una disculpa. saludosLilian89 (talk) 15:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This is a screenshot of a video licensed under Creative Commons. ℯxplicit 01:38, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Explicit. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:53, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Low quality Dilshad Roshan (talk) 10:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Low quality Dilshad Roshan (talk) 10:38, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:40, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Insignificant Dilshad Roshan (talk) 10:38, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Poor composition Dilshad Roshan (talk) 10:39, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Low quality Dilshad Roshan (talk) 10:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Poor image quality Dilshad Roshan (talk) 05:52, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:13, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims. For obvious reasons, it is very unlikely that these paintings, photographs and publications are all the uploader's own works.
- File:Old Metal 60x90 oil, canvas.jpg
- File:David Finkelstern. Mother.jpg
- File:David Finkelstern. Daughter.jpg
- File:David Finkelstern.jpg
- File:Vladimir Viardo.jpg
- File:Борис Симский.jpg
- File:13simfShost.jpg
- File:Programma.jpg
- File:Simsk3.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 18:01, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:48, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.
—LX (talk, contribs) 11:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyright iusses: no metadata and the picture is said to be a "own work" of "Tech Trojans" but it was uploaded by user "Jlemmer" without evidence that the picture was relased under a free license Civitas13 (talk) 12:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: small size without EXIFs, unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
unknown person Adelfrank (talk) 13:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
the file is not for educational purposes Леонид Макаров (talk) 09:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, it could be used to illustrate rubbish in the streets during the winter, this could be used to illustrate how rubbish is collected in its country of origin, or how it might not be collected. Also as I can see that you're the author of this file, just because you didn't take it to educate anyone doesn't mean that it is incapable of being used for educational purposes. In fact most photographs on Flickr are uploaded for social purposes but get imported here to be used in encyclopedia articles and Wikivoyage travel guides so I highly doubt that this image falls outside of this scope (it does require a better name and description, though). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Donald Trung. --whym (talk) 12:46, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
bad quality - unknown persons Adelfrank (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- The photo shows an antique viaduct of 1280. We have other photos of this object? The photo may be cropped on the right. Keep --Insider (talk) 06:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- You can find the same pic from the same photograph and the same date in a (little) better quality here:
Delete Adelfrank (talk) 10:23, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- You can find the same pic from the same photograph and the same date in a (little) better quality here:
.jpg){kind=small}
Kept: Per Insider. Unless we have vastly better pictures of the subject in terms of quality and quantity, I believe these shold be kept. --whym (talk) 12:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyright (in metadata) is credited to © Jackson County TDA / Keith Kunstmann. Likely not own work, permission needed. Hiàn (talk) 20:48, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 12:44, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded for promotional purposes by a user blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry and spamming. Possibly not truly their own work. If it is their own work then it is spam. DanielRigal (talk) 00:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- For educational purposes
This photo could be used for non-commercial, educational purposes, doesn't look like for promotional purposes as described by DanielRigal. congdugngonhanh (talk) 04:29, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Educational? I don't think one can learn how to make a film just by looking at a picture of a group of film people standing around. No. This is just to promote one specific film-maker. This is spam. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:07, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Please note that congdugngonhanh is blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry. See [4] --DanielRigal (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded for promotional purposes by a user blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry and spamming. Possibly not truly their own work. If it is their own work then it is spam. Also, it is out of scope and, if it really is an official document, it could possibly be used for identity theft. DanielRigal (talk) 00:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused image of no use to the project. DanielRigal (talk) 00:20, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded for promotional purposes by a user blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry and spamming. Possibly not truly their own work. If it is their own work then it is spam. DanielRigal (talk) 00:21, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded for promotional purposes by a user blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry and spamming. Possibly not truly their own work. If it is their own work then it is spam. Looks suspiciously like a photograph of another photograph which would suggest that the uploader does not own the rights to the original image. DanielRigal (talk) 00:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded for promotional purposes by a user blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry and spamming. Possibly not truly their own work. If it is their own work then it is spam. The strange vertical artefacts in the image suggest that this was possibly scanned from a printed image which suggests that the uploader may not own the original image. DanielRigal (talk) 00:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded for promotional purposes by a user blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry and spamming. Possibly not truly their own work. If it is their own work then it is spam. DanielRigal (talk) 00:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded for promotional purposes by a user blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry and spamming. Possibly not truly their own work. If it is their own work then it is spam. Note the vertical line artefacts and the signature to the bottom left. This is clearly a scan of a printed photograph which suggests that the uploader may not own the original image. DanielRigal (talk) 00:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused image of no use to the project. Uploader by a promotional user for promotional purposes. Actual ownership unclear. DanielRigal (talk) 00:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused image of no use to the project. Uploader by a promotional user for promotional purposes. Actual ownership unclear. DanielRigal (talk) 00:28, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused image of no use to the project. Uploaded by a promotional user for promotional purposes. Actual ownership unclear but very unlikely to be public domain as it has a capation indicating that it is a professional publicity picture. DanielRigal (talk) 00:31, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded for promotional purposes by a user blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry and spamming. Possibly not truly their own work. If it is their own work then it is spam. DanielRigal (talk) 00:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Non Commercial
Photo seems like could be used for non-commercial, educational purposes, doesn't look like for promotional purposes as described by DanielRigal. congdugngonhanh (talk) 04:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- How is this educational? If we wished to use an image of a man and a woman for educational purposes we would use one that is unambiguously validly licensed. No. This is not educational. This was uploaded solely to decorate and promote the people shown in spammy Wikipedia articles. If this was done with their consent then it is spamming. If it was done without their consent then it is still spamming and also an invasion of their privacy. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:05, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Please note that congdugngonhanh is blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry. See [5] --DanielRigal (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded for promotional purposes by a user blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry and spamming. Probably not truly their own work as it seems to be a scan of an old photograph (but not old enough to be out of copyright). DanielRigal (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- educational purposes
Photo maybe use for non-commercial, educational purposes, doesn't look like for promotional purposes as described above. It is very old, should be out of copyright. congdugngonhanh (talk) 04:20, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Educational? This is an old family photograph of a specific family. We should not be intruding on their privacy as there is absolutely no evidence that we have any right to use this image, never mind any need to. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Please note that congdugngonhanh is blocked on English Wikipedia for sockpuppetry. See [6] --DanielRigal (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since). However, there is an OTRS ticket on the file description page. While some doubts had been casted on the validity of the ticket, it was not invalidated. Please explain why you think another permission statement is needed. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:46, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - the OTRS ticket does not come from the author and there is no explanation at all, let alone evidence, that the sender would be the copyright holder - Jcb (talk) 10:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
not public domain because image NOTES it is licensed as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/; in particular a crop of this image (which is a transformed version) is being used illegally on en.wikipedia.org Joeyconnick (talk) 01:21, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 14:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think I follow... the NASA licence says "unless noted". That's not a "Flickr licence" in that it's not imposed by Flickr—if NASA wanted to "not note" any licence restrictions, why didn't they simply select a public domain licence or a licence that fits with their overall/default guidelines rather than "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic"? Flickr doesn't force the selection of any particular licence, so we have to assume if there is a licence listed on a NASA photo, it is there because they chose for it to be there, and hence that is them "noting" the work is not unrestrictedly within the public domain. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- As sad as it is but the uploading NASA employees have no clue regarding NASA's copyright. Photographs of NASA photographers are free despite any licence on a private picture service like Flickr. --Ras67 (talk) 22:55, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, that is definitely unfortunate. —Joeyconnick (talk) 23:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- As sad as it is but the uploading NASA employees have no clue regarding NASA's copyright. Photographs of NASA photographers are free despite any licence on a private picture service like Flickr. --Ras67 (talk) 22:55, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think I follow... the NASA licence says "unless noted". That's not a "Flickr licence" in that it's not imposed by Flickr—if NASA wanted to "not note" any licence restrictions, why didn't they simply select a public domain licence or a licence that fits with their overall/default guidelines rather than "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic"? Flickr doesn't force the selection of any particular licence, so we have to assume if there is a licence listed on a NASA photo, it is there because they chose for it to be there, and hence that is them "noting" the work is not unrestrictedly within the public domain. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
derivative work (crop) of original with license specifically forbidding derivative works https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/ original claims because NASA origin, it's public domain, but NASA licensing blurb says public domain only if not noted otherwise, and photo on Flickr clearly notes otherwise Joeyconnick (talk) 01:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep These are free NASA works, the Flickr licence is irrelevant for us, see here! This "problem" is solved since December 2012. --Ras67 (talk) 14:10, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
In this video the object is mirror imaged. This is a common a problem with micro-CT scans. I fixed it and uploaded a new version. Strauss MAE-USP (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:06, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
In this video the object is mirror imaged. This is a common a problem with micro-CT scans. I fixed it and uploaded a new version. Strauss MAE-USP (talk) 03:43, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:06, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
A lot of matching images in Google's Image Search. It is very unlikely that the uploader is the author of this image. im temtem • hOI!! • fsfdfg 06:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:06, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
As "own work", but is found on https://www.niwa.co.nz/blogs/critteroftheweek/204 as the fourth image. The image caption has Another shot of the juvenile specimen of Paralomis zealandica, collected on the Ghoul Seamount, Chatham Rise at 936 m. [Rob Stewart, NIWA. Vulnerable Deep Sea Communities] including three symbols which show "attribution", "non-commercial", "no derivative works"
Image 4 of 4
Jim1138 (talk) 07:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:06, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- include
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:05, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Low quality Dilshad Roshan (talk) 10:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: We do not have any equivalent view of the garden that is higher quality. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:05, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Poor composition Dilshad Roshan (talk) 05:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "Poor composition"? --67.184.0.138 20:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 21:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Insignificant Dilshad Roshan (talk) 10:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Walter Womacka
[edit]These stained-glass windows inside a German building are by the artist Walter Womacka. Womacka died in 2010, so they are still protected until 2081. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany.
- File:Walter Womacka Glasfenster HUB 2.jpg
- File:Walter Womacka Glasfenster HUB 3.jpg
- File:Walter Womacka Glasfenster HUB.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 11:02, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Walter Womacka Unser neues Leben
[edit]This mosaic inside a German building is by the artist Walter Womacka. Womacka died in 2010, so it is still protected until 2081. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany.
Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Womacka Gemälde
[edit]These photograph show paintings by the German artist Walter Womacka. Womacka died in 2010, so the paintings are still protected until 2081. There is no freedom of panorama inside buildings in Germany. The photos are from the German Bundesarchiv, but I assume their permission covers the work of the photographers, not that of the painter.
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-73785-0001, Walter Womacka, Gemälde "Junge Genossenschaftsbäuerin".jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R0510-0325, Berlin, Palast der Republik, Gemälde Womacka.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 11:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Flickr says 'All rights reserved' ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe it is something that should be grandfathered. But we should discuss. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Calgary Police service pipe band Canmore 2016 (29407990911).jpg, it has been discussed in February, and I believe that @Elisfkc: or @Mattbuck: might have looked at this video as well. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Gone_Postal I have no idea why you think I know anything about this. It was never flickr reviewed, it's ARR now, COM:PRP applies. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:04, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:חיים לוי.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Flickr says 'All rights reserved' ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 13:30, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Maybe it is something that should be grandfathered. But we should discuss. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Camp fire video (23557624241).jpg, it has been discussed in February, and I believe that @Elisfkc: or @Mattbuck: might have looked at this video as well. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:49, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ulfat Khann as Copyvio (copyvio) Alan (talk) 13:47, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Permission is missing. Possible copyvio.Ulfat Khann (talk) 13:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per [7] as OTRS is missing. HumTum12 (talk) 19:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
bad quality Adelfrank (talk) 14:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:02, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused, not centered, SVG exists: c:File:USB Type-C icon.svg 78.50.147.38 00:56, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:02, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Unused, SVG without text exists. c:File:USB Type-C icon.svg 2.247.1.10 14:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Bonjour, cette image est libre de droit car cette illustration a été réalisée entre 1901 et 1910 est donc tombée dans le domaine public depuis longtemps. Merci d'avance de la conserver.Evynrhud (talk) 15:31, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per Evynrhud, it is public domain in France. Fixed license tag. Abzeronow (talk) 15:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
I dont know hot to delete Keerthy Vasan (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, personal image request by uploader, nonnotable. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
No free licence is listed on Vimeo or the website. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 16:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- If you look at the historic version on archive.org here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180510040740/https://vimeo.com/190704685
and view the page source, you can see that it was released under a cc-by 3.0 license.
Victorgrigas (talk) 18:01, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:38, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
The manin subject is the TV program, so derivative work without permission. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Cool video. However, it is a DW of the design on the mug. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 17:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Accd. to http://www.glasmalerei-ev.de/pages/b2483/b2483.shtml, these stained glass windows in a chapel in Luxembourg are mostly the works of Émile and Denise Probst, who died in 2004 and 1980 respectively, which means their works are still protected for decades per the usual 70 years pma formula. One file (File:Iohannes Dei Gratia Rex Boemie ac luxemburgensis comes, Glaciskapell-101.jpg) is from another artist and dated 2009, so it's definitely still protected by copyright. Per COM:FOP#Luxembourg, there is no freedom of panorama in Luxembourg, so the files should be deleted along with the then-empty category.
- File:Consecratio Sacelli - Aweiung Neipuertskapell, Glaciskapell-101.jpg
- File:Cuius livore sanati estus, Glaciskapell-101.jpg
- File:Destructio Luxemburgi, Glaciskapell-101.jpg
- File:Ego sum resurrectio et vita, Glaciskapell-101.jpg
- File:Iohannes Dei Gratia Rex Boemie ac luxemburgensis comes, Glaciskapell-101.jpg
- File:Kevelaer filia matris, Glaciskapell-101.jpg
- File:Patrona civitatis, Glaciskapell-101.jpg
- File:Pio IX Coronatur, Glaciskapell-101.jpg
- File:R.P. Jacobus Brocquart Initiator - Jacques Brocquart, Glaciskapell-101.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 21:32, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
As before: Accd. to http://www.glasmalerei-ev.de/pages/b2483/b2483.shtml, these stained glass windows in a chapel in Luxembourg are the works of Émile and Denise Probst, who died in 2004 and 1980 respectively, which means their works are still protected for decades per the usual 70 years pma formula. Per COM:FOP#Luxembourg, there is no freedom of panorama in Luxembourg, so the files should be deleted along with the then-empty category.
- File:Luxembourg, chapelle Glacis (5).jpg
- File:Luxembourg, chapelle Glacis (6).jpg
- File:Luxembourg, chapelle Glacis (7).jpg
- File:Luxembourg, chapelle Glacis (8).jpg
Rosenzweig τ 17:31, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
This was uploaded by myself, but I uploaded a better (larger) version right after this, here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oleander_hawk_moth_%E2%80%93_John_Curtis_(1824-1839)_British_entomology_volume_5_1299x2100px.png Jürgen Eissink (talk) 18:28, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted website/software, Instagram. Hiàn (talk) 18:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, it seems to be a photo of an historical image. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Missing metadata for own work, small file size is another hint. acagastya 19:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
bogus license for this complex logo Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW of http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2016/07/13/01016-20160713ARTFIG00188-le-policier-face-a-dany-le-rouge.php, not old enough to be public domain in France. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- I thought that the graffiti on the photo was to little to be took in consideration, but OK. Celette (talk) 21:19, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, private artwork Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:54, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
not own work, see File:Lincoln and McClellan 1862-10-03.jpg Avron (talk) 20:03, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Source doesn't match. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
La pintura la vi en un museo y la fotografié. Está bien? 186.174.149.130 12:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- Poor quality AI-processed image, obviously based on some other source. Derivative work, possibly copyrighted. Falsified colors of awards and other elements (forgery). Lesless (talk) 13:00, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This original colorization can only mislead about what the clothes of this hictorical figure looked like. No educational value, out of the scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:47, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Contemporary art corp. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted work by Okamoto Yasuaki (b. 1980), artist's permission needed via COM:OTRS.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:31, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Inferior re-upload of File:21st Century Fox logo.svg IagoQnsi (talk) 21:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Bird minute in image and full silhouette, no chance of identification beyond order, so no educational use - out of commons scope MPF (talk) 22:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Bird minute in image and full silhouette, no chance of identification beyond order, so no educational use - out of commons scope MPF (talk) 22:38, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Though this article is freely licenced, the image itself was taken from an earlier, non free paper: [8] FunkMonk (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm, then wouldn't this[9] skull diagram of Irritator from Sales and Schultz (2017) also be invalid for Commons? Since just like the Spino skeletal,[10] it is modified from another, non-free paper (Sues et al. 2002)[11] - According to PLOS ONE's Licenses and Copyright page, authors have to be given express permission from the owners of these images that approve of them being used under the CC BY license, and PLOS also has to be given evidence of this.[12] They state that "The following policy applies to all PLOS journals, unless otherwise noted." and I'm not seeing any indication of this on Hendrickx et al.'s paper, unless I missed it. But if I didn't, the image should be fine for us to keep. PaleoGeekSquared (talk) 03:35, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- That one seems to be completely redrawn based on an earlier figure, but this one is an image of a 3D model taken directly from the original article. FunkMonk (talk) 03:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, but it remains that Hendrickx et al. were supposedly given permission to reuse the image in their article, releasing it under a CC BY license. But if the issue is too ambiguous then it's probably best to ask the authors themselves. PaleoGeekSquared (talk) 04:09, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- The ambiguity lies in whether "permission to use" means releasing it under a CC licence... Have a similar issue discussed here (bottom comments):[13] FunkMonk (talk) 04:32, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, but it remains that Hendrickx et al. were supposedly given permission to reuse the image in their article, releasing it under a CC BY license. But if the issue is too ambiguous then it's probably best to ask the authors themselves. PaleoGeekSquared (talk) 04:09, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- That one seems to be completely redrawn based on an earlier figure, but this one is an image of a 3D model taken directly from the original article. FunkMonk (talk) 03:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no discussion or action since 4 Nov. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Blurred, unidentifiable; no educational use so out of commons scope MPF (talk) 23:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
THE ORIGINAL SITE THAT UPLOADED THIS PHOTO HAS TRIED TO REMOVE IT FOR ME...WHEN I GO TO THE PAGE FOR 'ORIGINAL AUTHOR' THE PHOTO IS NO LONGER THERE, YET IT STILL APPERS ON MY WIKIPEDIA PAGE(HOLLY KNIGHT..THAT'S ME). I WOULD LIKE IT REMOVED Queen Knight (talk) 16:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Queen Knight: If you're Holy Knight, you're a famous person, so you must accept, a person give a photo of you anybody. A bot of us checked, that a person on flickr, that said, that he or she is the author, give anybody the license to use this image (CC BY 2.0). He can't remove license. If the person, that publish it on flickr has no copyright on this picture it would be a valid reason for deletion, but I don't think so. Keep Habitator terrae 🌍 16:48, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 12:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
copyright infringement Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 14:10, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- ciao Tostapane , mi spieghi in parole semplici cosa non va di questa fotografia che vuoi cancellare ? Grazie
--Luigi Pericle (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see any evident copyright issue here --Sailko (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks so much ! --Luigi Pericle (talk) 23:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Delete The user Luigi Pericle is not the author of this publication. --Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 22:09, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- A simple index is not eligible for copyright. See Template:PD-ineligible, or this example --Sailko (talk) 14:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Deletion procedure can be stopped due to OTRS mail received. Processing. --.avgas 10:51, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:44, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
SVG exists. c:File:USB Type-C.svg 2.247.1.10 13:55, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- User:Niridya, this one is an exact equivalent. It seems a PNG version of the original SVG was downloaded, then uploaded to bgwiki and later transferred by a bot to Commons. Is there a rule to delete PNG files derived 1:1 from SVG? 92.231.177.90 19:38, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- The template {{Duplicate}} exists, but I am not sure we can use it for PNG to SVG... --Niridya (talk) 21:17, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Not visible as SVG Jamiewithane (talk) 15:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Fixed. Pbroks13 (talk) 13:53, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Nobody asked me for the publication of my portrait. Please delete this file, thanks. Lucie Prost. 176.158.177.181 15:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not used. --Yann (talk) 10:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Also File:Provisional Government of Saskatchewan flag.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearcat (talk • contribs) 18:44, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Incorrectly titled image, quite likely a hoax. The claim is that this was the flag of the Provisional Government of Saskatchewan, an extremely shortlived independence movement in the 1880s; however, there is no historical evidence that it was. What does appear to be the case is that sometime during the rebellion, one Orange Order-aligned shopkeeper briefly had the Fenian flag hoisted on his store's flagpole by the rebels to troll him personally, although (a) it was removed again as soon as the shopkeeper saw it, (b) there's no historical evidence that the rebellion ever adopted the Fenian flag as its official symbol (which is incredibly unlikely anyway, since the rebellion was a Métis thing, not an Irish Catholic thing, and the Métis primarily flew the flag of New France otherwise), or that they ever hoisted a Fenian flag anywhere else besides John Schultz's store, and (c) this wasn't even the actual Fenian flag in the first place. I can't determine whether this flag was self-invented by a Wikipedian, or self-invented by somebody else and then copied onto Wikipedia as a good faith error — but either way, it's a self-invention by an internet denizen in the 2010s, and is not historically supported as ever having been the real flag of any polity at all. Other than Wikipedia mirrors, the only other sources that use this flag image at all are a WordPress blog and the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan site, both of which specifically address the lack of historical support for it — and given that the image was uploaded here in 2010, both of those sources are later ones and I can't find any evidence of the flag ever having existed anywhere else prior to it being uploaded here, our use of this flag appears to have been partially or entirely the cause of those sources having to address its lack of evidentiary support. Bearcat (talk) 17:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Deletion is the only way to go with this made-up flag Thank you for nominating this file for deletion.-- [[User:Kayoty|Kayoty]] ([[User talk:Kayoty|talk]]) (talk) 06:55, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree that the files are undocumented and that as such they are not useful and they can be deleted. However, part of the deletion rationale confuses Manitoba with Saskatchewan, 1869 with 1885, and it is pushing the negative argument to a too extreme level. Actually, the Schultz shop anecdote is related to the year 1869 in the territory that would become Manitoba. The pranksters were not Métis but likely the Irish-American neighbours of the Orangeman. What they flew to compete with his personal flag may have been an Irish-themed or a Fenian-related symbol, but that's anecdotical. Now, about the flag of the Provisional Governement in 1869 and 1870. The Provisional Government and the Legislative Assembly of Assiniboia, who voted in 1870 to join Canada as the province Manitoba, comprised people from the various origins who lived there, Métis, Irish, American, etc. All accounts written by the witnesses from that era seem to concur on the following facts: there was indeed a flag of the Provisional Government (flown starting 10 December 1869) and the elements on that flag included the fleur-de-lys and the shamrock. That much seems solid. Beyond that, however, the accounts are imprecise or diverge and no exact description is known. Today, people may legitimately speculate and draw their personal interpretations of what the flag may have looked like, but they can't tell what it really looked like. Specific depictions are hypothetical and can't be presented as accurate depictions of the real flag. If, when speaking of the Wordpress blog, the nomination refers to this, it's a serious blog and it has a good article about the flags in that area. Again, all that is about Manitoba, whereas the titles and descriptions of the two nominated files claim that the image is about Saskatchewan. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:21, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
- There may be some historical confusion going on, admittedly, but what I wrote above was a summary of what the WordPress blog and the Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan website say about this flag. The John Schultz story is the context in which both of those sources place and discuss the historical questions about this specific flag image — so if there's confusion going on between Saskatchewan and Manitoba, it was committed by those sources and not by me personally. Bearcat (talk) 17:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Files are in use on several pages on English and French Wikipedias. Based on COM:INUSE, these should be kept until those uses have been removed. See COM:NPOV for details. --bjh21 (talk) 18:08, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Its only actual use is via the "flagicon image" template, which automatically calls any image with the filename specified after the pipetext, rather than being hardcoded as its own thing, so by definition it's impossible to remove those usages before the image goes away — and at any rate, images very regularly get deleted while still technically in use, and then have their usage calls removed from the wikipedias after the deletion has already been performed. The fundamental problem remains that it's a false image that's being misrepresented as something it isn't, so "usage" is not a free exemption from the fact that it's a hoax. Bearcat (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't understand why it's impossible to remove uses. Surely one could either remove the use of
{{flagicon image}}or change the filename in it (to File:Flag placeholder.svg if nothing else)? As far as I can see, the whole point of{{flagicon image}}is that unlike{{flag}}it doesn't make any assumptions about file naming. If you don't like how the file is described on Commons, there's an "edit" link on every page that you can use to change descriptions, and a "move" link to request that the file be renamed. I've minimally tagged both files with {{Factual accuracy}} as a start. --bjh21 (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't understand why it's impossible to remove uses. Surely one could either remove the use of
- Its only actual use is via the "flagicon image" template, which automatically calls any image with the filename specified after the pipetext, rather than being hardcoded as its own thing, so by definition it's impossible to remove those usages before the image goes away — and at any rate, images very regularly get deleted while still technically in use, and then have their usage calls removed from the wikipedias after the deletion has already been performed. The fundamental problem remains that it's a false image that's being misrepresented as something it isn't, so "usage" is not a free exemption from the fact that it's a hoax. Bearcat (talk) 18:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 10:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
enzyklopädisch unbrauchbar, Privatsphäre der Besucher missachtet 79.249.21.106 22:48, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not used. --Yann (talk) 10:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Street art in Montpellier
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France.
- File:Grafitti (44019932095).jpg
- File:Montpellier (29248325344).jpg
- File:Montpellier (29248356184).jpg
- File:Montpellier (29761927422).jpg
- File:Montpellier (29840141996).jpg
- File:Montpellier (29875514815).jpg
- File:Montpellier (29875535465).jpg
- File:Montpellier (29875627675).jpg
- File:Painted door, Montpellier (36098740236).jpg
- File:Painted shutter (44019933325).jpg
- File:Violin direction in a Street Art (26602151318).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hello EugeneZelenko,
When I see your global account information, heartiest congratulations ! ten years already on Commons
Oops… I made a mistake
Indeed, I should not have uploaded the file Grafitti (44019932095).jpg.
But, it seems to me that the other files present in the category: Street art in Montpellier (France) conform to the existing files in the categories Street art by country and more specifically Street art in France, unless I'm mistaken.
My wish and my goal is to import files for purposes of illustration and pedagogy. And of course we complement our differences and skills to go in the same direction.
Cordially, —— DePlusJean (talk) 00:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)- This may depend on age of street art. You could also try to get permissions from artists via Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hello EugeneZelenko,
Thank you for your reply.
For the files Montpellier (29761927422).jpg and Montpellier (29875514815).jpg, these topics have existed for about twenty years (link), it is not possible to take a picture in the neighborhood without taking these colored markers that belong to the place. For the files Montpellier (29840141996).jpg, Painted door, Montpellier (36098740236).jpg and Painted shutter (44019933325).jpg, without taking great risks, subjects have been around for at least ten years. The file Violin direction in a Street Art (26602151318).jpg is a small graffiti of street corner, this one to the conceptual graphic feature of mentioning the direction to go to the faculty of law and political science (French) nearby (Location link). The last four files : Montpellier (29248325344).jpg, Montpellier (29248356184).jpg, Montpellier (29875535465).jpg et Montpellier (29875627675).jpg, are ephemera (French), displays that do not degrade the media on which they are placed and are tolerated by the city, as in Paris for example.
But taking the example of this file (Portail grapphé.jpg) and the content of its discussion page (Graffiti in Paris and Copyright rules by subject matter#Graffiti), it seems to me more appropriate to change the categories for some files and to apply a corresponding banner {{Non-free graffiti}} for others.
If it is available, I allow myself to solicit Léna to guide me in this confirmation of learning of the approach.
Cordially, —— DePlusJean (talk) 00:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hello EugeneZelenko,
- This may depend on age of street art. You could also try to get permissions from artists via Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: While graffiti can sometimes be kept on Commons it must be confirmed that it was, indeed, and illegal act. Most of these look more like murals than graffiti and the fact that the Paris government tolerates the others makes me believe that a credible copyright claim could be made here and enforced. That coupled with France's FoP restrictions lands this one a PCP delete. --Majora (talk) 20:57, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Por favor, ¡No! Es una orquesta que se creó en mi ciudad, de hecho yo soy músico partícipe de ella!! Las tres imágenes son de dominio público, publicadas por el fotógrafo personal de la orquesta bajo licencia libre de uso!! Y en cuanto al archivo .ogg que me mencionaron, agregare los derechos originales. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrnanico (talk • contribs)
Deleted: per nomination. Insufficient information to confirm license. --Majora (talk) 21:00, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Music from https://www.last.fm/music/yunomi/_/Bamboo+Disco, it it will be uploaded without music or somebody can show where the licence came from, then ok, otherwise it's a copyvio. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 16:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio music. After nearly six months this can't be here anymore. We have a lot better examples of stop motion anyways and this is unused. --Majora (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Source is the English Wikipedia [14]. The file uploaded to English Wikipedia is probelematic itself. Its author and source has been provided as "Thamir Ghadhban" (depicted in the picture himself). Uploader is User:Zoozth. Permission of copyright holder (whoever they are) is needed. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:48, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2 and Zoozth: I consider your question whoever they are as malicious. Who else then Zoozth could have taken these pictures? They must have been taken by an insider. Please notice this:
![59 File:Photo of musical artist "Ruben SVGE".jpg](#File:Photo_of_musical_artist_"Ruben_SVGE".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
missroyaltz_designz_0110_03.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_(14774311034).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_&_Thuyet_Tran_(Thuyet_Buon_Vua).jpg){kind=link}
![195 File:"First Man" Premiere at NASM (NHQ201810040114).jpg](#File:"First_Man"_Premiere_at_NASM_(NHQ201810040114).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_volume_5.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![244 File:Garden landscape in the zoo of Stuttgart "Wilhelma" - panoramio (7).jpg](#File:Garden_landscape_in_the_zoo_of_Stuttgart_"Wilhelma"_-_panoramio_(7).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![01:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/11/03#c-Te750iv-2018-11-03T01:58:00.000Z-File:Photo_of_musical_artist_"Ruben_SVGE".jpg){kind=link}
![17:23, 10 November 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/11/03#c-Jon_Kolbert-2018-11-10T17:23:00.000Z-File:Photo_of_musical_artist_"Ruben_SVGE".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
missroyaltz_designz_0110_03.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
missroyaltz_designz_0110_03.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
missroyaltz_designz_0110_03.png){kind=link}
missroyaltz_designz_0110_03.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_1346.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_1347.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1968,_MiNr_1348.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14774311034).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14774311034).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(14774311034).jpg){kind=link}
_(14774311034).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_%26_Thuyet_Tran_(Thuyet_Buon_Vua).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%26_Thuyet_Tran_(Thuyet_Buon_Vua).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_&_Thuyet_Tran_(Thuyet_Buon_Vua).jpg){kind=link}
_&_Thuyet_Tran_(Thuyet_Buon_Vua).jpg){kind=link}
_&_Thuyet_Tran_(Thuyet_Buon_Vua).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![01:21, 3 November 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/11/03#c-Joeyconnick-2018-11-03T01:21:00.000Z-File:"First_Man"_Premiere_at_NASM_(NHQ201810040114).jpg){kind=link}
![23:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/11/03#c-Ellin_Beltz-2018-12-14T23:07:00.000Z-File:"First_Man"_Premiere_at_NASM_(NHQ201810040114).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_volume_5.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_volume_5.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_British_entomology_volume_5_1299x2100px.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![22:48, 3 November 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/11/03#c-79.249.21.106-2018-11-03T22:48:00.000Z-File:Garden_landscape_in_the_zoo_of_Stuttgart_"Wilhelma"_-_panoramio_(7).jpg){kind=link}
![10:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/11/03#c-Yann-2018-12-30T10:28:00.000Z-File:Garden_landscape_in_the_zoo_of_Stuttgart_"Wilhelma"_-_panoramio_(7).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![[14]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ghadhban_Obama.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
--Racker88 (talk) 22:23, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- No, that is not malicious. Stop talking about me, assume good faith, and focus on the content. If User:Zoozth is the copyright holder, they should have claimed "own work" clearly. When author field differs from the uploalder's user name and there is no own-work claim in the file description page, the file will be tagged with {{Npd}}. 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 00:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No license given for the performance. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 17:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- This performance is still used past 1980s as it is an anthem. As an anthem, it is not protected by copyright under Hungarian Copyright Act. RainbowSilver2ndBackup (talk) 03:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Comment That's if this particular performance is by a Hungarian state organization. However, we don't have adequate source information as to who performed this particular recording or where it is from, so it could very well be copyrighted. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 03:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- It is allowed by Articles 1(4) and 1(7). RainbowSilver2ndBackup (talk) 21:58, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Audio works involve multiple copyrights including, for example: melody, lyrics (not germane here), and performance (sound recording). While the melody may indeed be public domain by age (Ferenc Erkel died 1893), this particular performance thereof is contemporary (1980s) and not a legal provision, state direction, resolution, announcement or document (i.e., is not {{PD-HU-exempt}}). Accordingly, we require evidence of permission from the author of the sound recording (i.e., the performer(s) whose performance is fixed, the record producer who processes the sounds and fixes them in the final recording, or both). --Эlcobbola talk 17:12, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright and PD Egypt Violation, the creation date is 2014, and it created by anonymous and not created or publish in Egypt before, it also created by modern software and may be violate copyright rules. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 09:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Info: Public domain in Egypt for Non-creative photographic or audiovisual works that published prior to 1987 --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 09:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:11, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
this is not public domain in Egypt, the creation date: 2014, the public domain in Egypt for works that published before 1987 Ibrahim.ID ✪ 14:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
Comment The date in the information box is when the file itself was created, not when the image it is representing was created. The Muslim Brotherhood logo, which the flag is derived from, was created in the 1930s. The flag is simply the logo on a field (usually green) -Thespoondragon (talk) 02:06, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per above. This seems like a below-TOO COM:DW of a public domain work. The "source imagery" is public domain, the only "new thing" from 2014 is the green background which does not warrant a new copyright. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:50, 21 November 2019 (UTC)