Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/11/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 1st, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

मिस्टेक Piyush01022 (talk) 02:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 07:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sbyder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, no metadata, picture certainly found elsewhere on the web.

Cjp24 (talk) 04:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a private company in Russia. OTRS permission needed. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MOHHANBABU (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo.

Cjp24 (talk) 05:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali.arab2018 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems out of COM:SCOPE. Might be better as wikicode instead, in Wikibooks.

im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation found on https://i.4pcdn.org/hr/1533228373020.jpg (thread: https://archive.4plebs.org/hr/thread/3213326/) Jim1138 (talk) 07:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the bottom of the website:

© 2018 MLS. All Major League Soccer trademarks and copyrights used by permission. All rights reserved.

No proof is given that the pic is licensed by MLS under the CC-BY-SA-4.0. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was testing upload from camera function of Commons app, sorry Misaochan2 (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy G7. --Majora (talk) 22:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:57, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No use this image Sameemakhtar93 (talk) 14:36, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:08, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User did not provide properly used. Darling (Talk) 22:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 02:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect process and reference picture - will upload updated version Zsoltnyiri (talk) 22:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Grace be with you (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Different places and periods, unlikely to be own work.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:12, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Grace be with you (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely false authorship claims. The uploader obviously either doesn't understand or doesn't care what the words "own work", "author" or "copyright holder" mean.

LX (talk, contribs) 15:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Support deletion/nom. Clearly just grabbed (and cropped) from all kinds of different places around the internet. Zero indication that the uploader is the author of all of these varied images (or otherwise entitled to release them to open licences of this type). Delete all. Guliolopez (talk) 00:38, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:26, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: in the file description is written "copy from www.suzki.co.id" (and in the pages of this website is written © 2018 Suzuki Indonesia. All rights reserved.) Civitas13 (talk) 10:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:17, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found easily in the internet via reverse image search. It is very unlikely that the uploader is the author. COM:PRP. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 18:24, 3 November 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Grace be with you - --Krdbot 01:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two matching images in Google's image search. It is unlikely that the uploader is the author. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 06:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 18:24, 3 November 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Grace be with you - --Krdbot 01:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نسخه دیگری از پرونده موجود است Mostafameraji (talk) 08:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 19:45, 3 November 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 01:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:42, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 17:45, 3 November 2018 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors; see COM:SELFIE (F10) --Krdbot 01:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy from https://www.facebook.com/bhaifa2013/photos/a.545211392168119/1761326623889917/?type=1&theater דגש חזק (talk) 15:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 I withdraw my nominationTaken in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Asclepias: Yes, you're right : PD-Italy. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:19, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture of Sophia Lillis can be found a lot in the internet via reverse image search. The uploader is unlikely the author of this pic. COM:PRP. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:15, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No PDRussia - [1] - authors died at 1975 and 1983; so there is no 70 years since their death. Статья 1281 ГК РФ. ч 1 не применима - не прошло 70 лет с момента гибели авторов (соавторов), произведение авторское. A5b (talk) 15:53, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex Spade: , из текста шаблона шаблона:PD-Russia совершенно не очевидно почему 50 лет для фильмов (по какой статье какого кодекса) и с какой даты отсчитывать. `A5b (talk) 16:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
withdrawing of a deletion request - отзыв запроса на удаление - Статья 6 Федеральный закон от 18.12.2006 N 231-ФЗ 1945+70 - ап юр лиц `A5b (talk) 16:51, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohamed Walid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons project scope unused personal files

George Chernilevsky talk 19:32, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohamed Walid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, bogus licenses.

Yann (talk) 13:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flisoluio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons project scope unused, and almost all uncategorized photos of not notable persons. Also some photos watermarked

George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Quickstrike22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This user uploaded some blatantly stolen images which are now speedy deleted. Their remaining uploads have no no meta data and widely different data, except File:Largothroughglass.jpg (uploaded 1 year after being taken) and File:Plovdiv view from above.jpg (uploaded 3 years after being taken), both with different cameras. I excluded two old looking images where the copyright might have expired.

BevinKacon (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ujjwal Patni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

inconsistent metadata, resolutions. Doubtful own-work. likely copyvios

Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons project scope unused personal file George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle at 05:19, 8 November 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Flisoluio --Krdbot 07:48, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Cjp24 (talk) 01:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 05:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE. Image is used only for self-promotion in enwp. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pierpao.lo (listening) 16:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:28, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 17:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:28, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 17:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 17:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 17:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. I guess it is a border for flower beds but the photo is of a bad quality. The “Corten” looks like a commercial trademark. Jarash (talk) 17:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 17:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:31, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope SecretName101 (talk) 18:53, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:32, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope SecretName101 (talk) 18:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:32, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope SecretName101 (talk) 18:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope SecretName101 (talk) 18:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope SecretName101 (talk) 18:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:33, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:42, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harshvasistha89 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logo, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:54, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edson.towers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-notable band, out of scope. I suspect uploader is one of the band members pictured, as they've uploaded nothing else. Might meet speedy deletion G10.

BevinKacon (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yetayzarshein (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All uploads are promoting uploaders software company, but none are used anywhere, and user has no other productive contributions anywhere. No use.

BevinKacon (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 14:36, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Cjp24 (talk) 02:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Cjp24 (talk) 02:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Cjp24 (talk) 02:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Cjp24 (talk) 02:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Cjp24 (talk) 02:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Cjp24 (talk) 02:28, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Cjp24 (talk) 02:30, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep In my opinion the photo should not be deleted. The photo is of good quality and shows very well the side of the motorcycles (that takes most part of the photo); it also true that the picture shows a person pretending to drive the motorcycles but, in my opinion, is accetable since the person do not pose in a extreme manner, like a model. Moreover I think that, if necessary, the picture can be cropped in order to delete the person and keep only the motorcycles, obtaining a decent result. -Civitas13 (talk) 11:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: indeed out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution with no Exif. Copied from the internet and can be found via several links which uploaded in previous. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

~Moheen (keep talking) 05:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Moheen: where did ZI Jony claim that he is the same person as rakib hera, a known flickr-washing account? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Incnis Mrsi: Sorry for the script mistake! But it seems rakib hera is not the original creator or owner. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Moheen: if you have no evidence that ZI_Jony = www.flickr.com/people/81795419@N04, then you may not post here and there that ZI_Jony claims third persons’ works as his own. Please, remove baseless allegations. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You don't think those files are not Copied from the internet? ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IsmailFaroui.90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User has long history of uploading copyvios. Appears user owns Samsung Galaxy J1, but all other images likely stolen from web, low res, no meta data, suspicious file names etc. So those have been nominated.

BevinKacon (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leominaopiedadshabuuser (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these images are watermarked, some far worse than others. Questionable copyright on some, I suspect upload is reseller of designs and not the original artist. Even if the watermark was removed, none of these photos are taken parallel to the pattern, so perspective is off, and they're also all labelled in the corners. All unused.

BevinKacon (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by Jermster108

[edit]

Election maps from made-up elections (not from a notable work of fiction) plus one photo of a real en:John Lindsay (who supposedly ran in some of these fictional elections) but which has no real source (only a fictional one). B (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:59, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bathusaii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logo, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:07, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:56, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:55, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GlobalExecutiveMarketing (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logo, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"unused" is no valid argument, but these probably are out of scope (GEM is "GlobalExecutiveMarketing") and/or need permission (Independence Care Services is clearly above TOO). - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gmdistibuidor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logo, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:54, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:51, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:50, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, insufficient author information and likely wrong license. Polarlys (talk) 20:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:50, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused template, unlikely to be used in the future now that we have Wikidata Mike Peel (talk) 22:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused template, unlikely to be used in the future now that we have Wikidata Mike Peel (talk) 22:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own file. No Exif. Can be found via several links which uploaded in previous. ~Moheen (keep talking) 05:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:00, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a recent artwork. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:24, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of recent artwork. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:24, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hatter14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nothing in the website says that the logo is CC-BY-SA-4.0. OTRS permission is needed.

im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:20, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE. Might be better as wikicode. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:24, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless with the current amount of information. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:00, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:23, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: per UDR request --Majora (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 17:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:44, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BM Ashraf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons project scope unused personal files. The draft was declined

George Chernilevsky talk 19:28, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:42, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taj Afridi (Artist) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion, out of project scope. Mediawiki user page got deleted for promotion too.

‐‐1997kB (talk) 11:18, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by NahidSultan. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screen shot to me Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons project scope unused personal file George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons project scope unused personal file George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivanno Macci (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons project scope promo files

George Chernilevsky talk 19:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sir Sneak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File:Unesco chocolate hills.jpg claimed as own work, stolen from File:Chocolate Hills overview.JPG (original), and all other uploads available elsewhere at same res or higher via Google image search. And their own personal logo. No other productive contributions from uploader.

BevinKacon (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons project scope promo file George Chernilevsky talk 20:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons project scope unused and uncategorized promo file George Chernilevsky talk 20:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons project scope unused personal file George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

corrupted file, bad upload George Chernilevsky talk 20:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons project scope unused and uncategorized logo George Chernilevsky talk 20:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:00, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's designed by me, but it's just bad. This club never played in this in 2016 Arntor (talk) 21:40, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:1-3 dipole tiokarbonyloylid-007.svg. Leyo 23:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 17:25, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is solely a compilation of copyrighted cover art. That it was "compiled" physically by hand rather than digitally is not relevant. None of this can be claimed as COM:DM. GMGtalk 15:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture depicts a monument designed by Pierre Vigoureux (1884-1965), a French artist who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and, as there is no Freedom of panorama in France, it won't be freely shared before 1st January 2036. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.

Note that File:Monument morts Avallon 12.jpg and File:Monument morts Avallon 19.jpg don't meet the threshold of originality as they are details of the work.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 13:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:42, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD metadata, and the image's resolution is low. Might be a copyright violation. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:31, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 07:18, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrectly depicted OH group (bonded through hydrogen instead of oxygen), incorrect bond angles and different bond widths. Wostr (talk) 22:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 12:29, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Boris Borvine Frenkel died in 1984. No freedom of panorama in France. No OTRS. Copyright violation. 90.43.160.118 15:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 16:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicado Pachug (talk) 03:28, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I don't see a duplicate. --Achim (talk) 10:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see Commons:Galleries#Galleries_vs._categories. --JuTa 10:37, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked for speedy deletion by Srittau. Uploader claims specifically this is a crop of a photo they took own themselves. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Where does the uploader claim this? Anyway, this looks suspiciously like a screen grab, not a photo. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, im the uploader. Yep, I croped this image from a large image. I'm original image's owner (I take the photo... well, a friend take it with my phone) this is the original Image.--Paynalton (talk) 00:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Srittau: here. @Paynalton: give your friend a link to COM:OTRS. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Paynalton. As Alexis says, please forward the link to COM:OTRS to your friend. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:51, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as stated bu the uploader "a friend take it with my phone" is not an own work. No permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Cjp24 (talk) 01:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The motorcycle model is probably useful. The parts and advertisements/sponsorshops which can be identified are useful as well. Darwin Ahoy! 02:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Darwin. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete at the request of the author Ninsative (talk) 01:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:26, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Cjp24 (talk) 02:31, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: on Commons there are a lot of images of picture of motorcycles during motorshows where males or females are sitted on motorcycles so I wouldn't be so severe in classifing this picture as a "personal photo". In my opinion the image could be useful in some way, for example, considering that it is not a bad quality picture, I think that the image should be cropped in order to include only the front part of motorcycles. -Civitas13 (talk) 11:49, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image seens to be copyrighted from Facebbok as seen in this site https://ultimosegundo.ig.com.br/luis-fernando-pezao/53e8f25608ec508e5700009f.html Paladinum2 (talk) 02:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it seens to be cutted from a photo or video. Please give the original file and proof you are the owner, uploader. Paladinum2 (talk) 03:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:30, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not uploader's owner work. Clearly a screenshot from a TV broadcast SecretName101 (talk) 05:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:31, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the bottom of the website:

© 2018 Original Joe’s All rights reserved.

No proof is given that the image is licensed by Original Joe's under the CC-BY-4.0. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Totally understand. They haven't made the CC notice visible on the site. Give me till 5 Nov. If the CC notice isn't apparent I will stop by and take the same picture again myself and upload it instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kentcamp (talk • contribs) 15:51, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:32, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found here via reverse image search. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:33, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+per metadatas "FBMD"+unclear if it is in scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found in the internet a lot via reverse image search. The uploader being the author of this image is very unlikely. COM:PRP. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:42, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:35, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found a match here via reverse image search. The uploader might not be the author of this image. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 05:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:36, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chinese calligraphy is not simple geometric shapes. (Even computer font was in fact copyrighted and owned by DynaComware) In both case not qualify for public domain but NFC logo Matthew hk (talk) 06:07, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Typo: Even Chinese computer font was in fact copyrighted and owned by DynaComware. Matthew hk (talk) 06:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:40, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious upload, possible copyright violation. It is claimed by the uploader that it is their work from 26 December 2014. However, I found this exact image from an April 2014 article (https://solecollector.com/news/2014/04/sole-watch-best-nba-pe-sneakers-of-april). Image can be found here https://images.solecollector.com/complex/image/upload/kdqrhzeq0xexixjjjnhp.jpg DaHuzyBru (talk) 06:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:41, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader admitted they are not the author. But no proof is given that the real author licensed this image under the CC-BY-SA-4.0. OTRS permission is needed. im temtemhOI!!fsfdfg 07:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:42, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: screencap of youtube video with no indication as to why image is available under suitable license — Racconish💬 07:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/name/alan-geisler-obituary?pid=122376939 — Racconish💬 07:32, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not "Own work". https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderAizenshtat/photos/a.179743715402671/1537206756323020/?type=1&theater — Racconish💬 07:51, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:47, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image does seem to have a source. No time is given for this video clip's appearance on the given source either and I did not see it on the source. Leoboudv (talk) 08:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv: I corrected the source. --Senior9324 (talk) 11:16, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:51, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book covers are protected with copyright and need OTRS-permission from author. Taivo (talk) 08:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree. Primary object is book cover, because this can be fully seen, but you almost cannot see book signing. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The title indicates that the subject is the author performing an action. That's how it's used in the article. I stick by my opinion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:01, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per Taivo. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:56, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. The club was founded in 1896, but the logo is probably younger. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys! This Logo was recreated and it is the official logo of this Wrestling club. Dont remove things which are valid! See www.acoberstein.de

J. RÖMER second chief of AC Oberstein — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roemerwelt (talk • contribs) 08:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe, that the logo is valid. But Commons does not know, who is behind usernames, and by policy OTRS-permission from club representative is needed – or evidence, that the logo is in public domain. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:57, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CS Volvic isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in fr.wiki. Unused logo of probably non-notable club, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+above ToO IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:03, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:38, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio unless the Gerry Embleton who created this illustration for a book works for the Turkish Navy. Underlying lk (talk) 01:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:SELFIE. Godric ki Kothritalk to me 08:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. The chips are not simple. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless with the current amount of information. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment it could be used to depict a home in the slums and seeing the people in the photograph it could be in either East Africa or South Asia. I wouldn't say that this image isn't educational and just because "I can't see what's in the picture" because the uploader wasn't an expert on the subject doesn't mean that the image has no inherent educational value. I would say that someone with more knowledge in the depicted subject could simply add more information to the description but then the image wouldn't change so the inherent educational value of the file wouldn't change either so I don't see how it will benefit Wikimedia Commons or its users to delete this image. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 08:43, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried to identify its location based on other Flickr files taken by the author? Usually these things are in albums, but in this case it was just lazily imported to Wikimedia Commons without categorisation. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 09:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Donald Trung and Castillo blanco: it's in Rajasthan, India, based on the Flickr album name. Additionally, I agree with Donald that the usefulness of this photo doesn't hinge on the location. clpo13(talk) 16:00, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless with the current amount of information. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

signed picture MiguelAlanCS (talk) 08:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad quality, not usefull now other pictures of good quality are available in Commons and widely used. Would allow to lower the environmental impact of the digital media. Léodras (talk) 09:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + "Copyright holder Massimiliano De Giorgi". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad quality, not usefull now other pictures of good quality are available in Commons and widely used. Would allow to lower the environmental impact of the digital media. Léodras (talk) 09:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + "Copyright holder Massimiliano De Giorgi". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:45, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gino DePinto is mentioned in en:Dragpipe, but maybe he is still non-notable. That case the photo is out of project scope. EXIF says, that this is selfie; it is small photo without camera data and the user's only upload, maybe copyright violation as well. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. The link to the State Librart of New South Wales says that "May be copied only for educational purposes. Permission must be obtained for all other uses" that makes this image not accettable for Commons. Note that in Commons page description of the image is written that the image is a courtesy of the SEARCH Fondation but there is no evidence that the foundation agreed to give the image to Commons. In my opinion the image must be deleted (unless the picture is in pubblic domain for some other rule -I don't know Australian copyright rules-) Civitas13 (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio MiguelAlanCS (talk) 10:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio MiguelAlanCS (talk) 10:47, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made up coat of arms. Not used – neither official, nor unofficial. B****n (talk) 10:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of unknown thing, no categories, nonsense description. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 11:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. If evidence is given, that the logo belongs to governmental organization, then the logo is free. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from https://glarnerlandrat.ch/liste_glarus/#_roland-goethe Drahreg01 (talk) 11:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from photographer Adrian Sulyok is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fayçal FRIKHA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OOS unused personal images in violation of COM:ADVERT. Half of the uploader's uploads have already been deleted.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: 3 November 2018 Jon Kolbert deleted page. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine, building erected in 2000. Oleg (talk) 12:40, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot find 69 globale neither from en.wiki nor from fr.wiki. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 12:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Google search leads to [2] where the image was published in 2011. However I'm not sure whether the image was copyrighted there. Maybe someone who knows Chinese can help. Jarash (talk) 14:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Watermark clearly shows source. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/images/Andr%C3%A9_Breton/1310255 Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://histoiredurock.fr.gd/Bill-Haley.htm Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep we have no proof that histoiredurock.fr did not copy this pic from us--Pierpao.lo (listening) 19:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Pierpao: Who is "us", please ? Haven't you noticed that this picture is a cropped version of the one at https://histoiredurock.fr.gd/Bill-Haley.htm with a watermark of the photographer? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tachfeen claims it his own work. Its clearly a breach of copyright. See: Computer facial reconstruction of Nicolaus Copernicus made by Dariusz Zajdel from Poland's Central Forensic Bureau. Photo: Central Criminal Bureau of the Police Headquarters in Fromborku, Poland. https://culture.pl/en/article/copernicus-revelations-about-the-renaissance-man Creuzbourg (talk) 15:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deseo borrar esta obra de mi autoria de la plataforma por que esta siendo usada de forma indiscriminada, muchas gracias por su atencion Wagner Camacho Salas (talk) 15:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who's the painter ? Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

modern artwork, unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from my talk page :

"

Hi Christian Ferrer,

As you can see on the copyright status, I am the artist for the picture. I would like to know how to make my copyright status better so that I can avoid deletion request? FYI, this is my second entry on the matter as the first one also encountered copyright problems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamerson fargone (talk • contribs) 08:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"

It is very common that people claims to be the copyright holder while they are not. Our relevant policies are com:Licensing and com:scope. Have you really created all that we see in the image? the background, the person, ect, ect.... If you have not copied anything to create this artwork then firstly congratulation, it is not so bad. But sadly, in this case, there is likely a potential scope issue "Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills are not realistically useful for an educational purpose". I see that the image is currently used. Note that if you are a notable artist or if the image have already been used for another publication, e.g. a book cover, then the image is indeed useful for the project and in this case the copyright holder (even if it is you) must send a permission to com:OTRS. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! @Christian Ferrer: It is safe to say that image is not for me to display my skills and a portion of it will be used in an upcoming publication of the book Holy Emperor Guan's True Scripture to Awaken the World. The status of this book is, it is a Copyright PD-1923, and the image is of a historical person that existed before copyright laws. So can you direct me to get a permission to use this image please? Much thanks for telling me so. (Jamerson fargone (talk) 11:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC))[reply]

  • I tend to be neutral, if I well understood this drawing is your creation and your interpretation of the character. Then let the community decide if the drawing falls within the eligibility criteria of our project scope. As nominator I will not be the one who will close this discussion/nomination. Sorry again for the potential annoyance. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, image copyright is unclear. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm nominating this photo as the uploader for being out of scope. Not educationally useful in its current form! Meisam (talk) 18:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping... 8 November 2018 Jcb ) deleted page. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the photographer, per communication on en:Talk:Sigma Phi Epsilon. Source website does not have license terms noted on it, so assumption is all-rights-reserved. C.Fred (talk) 18:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a modern stained glass window. Need location and date of creation. Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:50, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons project scope unused personal file. The draft was declined three times George Chernilevsky talk 19:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purports to be a family photo album, but this is obviously newsprint B (talk) 19:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo does not depict the species in question. This is a Whimbrel on the page for "Long-billed Curlew" 70.183.170.36 19:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The english picture is incorrect because it states that latitude runs north to south instead of east to west. It does the same with longitude stating that it runs east to west instead of north to south. Thank you! 81.13.209.24 19:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Latitude lines do indeed run north-to-south (think latitude -- ladder). Pbroks13 (talk) 13:50, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Britdeanna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons project scope unused personal files. The draft was declined

George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in USA for 2-dimensional art and the photo violates artist's (Utah county?) copyright. OTRS-permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1958. https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/463659724112062666/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Pinterest page you linked leads to a dead random Tumblr blog, not exactly the most reliable of sources. I'm more willing to trust a National Archive. Nevertheless, I don't see how that would invalidate the PD status. Opencooper (talk) 04:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Opencooper: This picture is a cropped version of the Pinterest one so it's not the original one. Besides the date of shooting is wrong too. So all we have in the file description is... nothing since the photographer and the location is unknown too. It's not the first time files supposed to come from Correio da Manhã are deleted (see Joalpe's talk page). There are plenty of others under scrutation. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong date, https://marypickford.org/stories-from-marys-contemporaries/edward-knoblock/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:55, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lubitsch died in 1947. Filename changed to File:Ernst Lubitsch smoking a cigar.tiff. Thuresson (talk) 00:50, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:01, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The information for the above file has been updated; its upto you whether you want go forward with your plan of deleting that image.Sachinthonakkara (talk) 06:40, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Never scanned anything from the book, only the formulation was copied from the book.(If copying text is not acceptable in wikimedia commons, i will paraphrase it) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachinthonakkara (talk • contribs) 00:28, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The image was taken using my tablet phone. This mandl's paint was prepared as part of a demonstration class, since i took two demonstration class, i uploaded two images of the same. Since i am a lower member of the teaching faculty i can not call that my own work, that is where wikimedia commons comes into play (publish it here).00:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachinthonakkara (talk • contribs) 00:41, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The best example explain these things is the head of the country (excluding countries ruled by monarchy), where the incumbent head of the state can not call himself that, that is him (excludes woman because their education is different). So my first work is not mine but a senior faculty who allotted the class to me. The second according to the hypothesis that i just mention, can be called my own.Sachinthonakkara 01:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachinthonakkara (talk • contribs) 01:01, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Everybody can see that this picture was not taken this way. At least something has been editted away at the bottom of the bottle. Jcb (talk) 01:35, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Do you mean that wikimedia commons does not accept modified images, I kept that bottle on a table and took the image; if you observe even closer into the bottle even the door can be observed in the back ground. If you want to delete the first upload, its ok, if the image does not comply with wikimedia policies.-Sachinthonakkara 01:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sachinthonakkara (talk • contribs) 01:58, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I never mentioned anywhere that the formulation mentioned on wikimedia commons page of this file belongs to me, I just uploaded a image of mandl's paint which i demonstrated in class. Just introspect yourself, self awareness is the basic key. If your such a big shot you can verify the curriculum followed in indian medical universities; then type a reply.-Sachinthonakkara (talk) 02:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Just producing text that has nothing to do with the deletion request won't help. I don't need to follow some medical curriculum in order to be able to nominate copyright violations for deletion. Jcb (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Thuresson (talk) 00:55, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer for the files is listed as 'Allied Navy', so the U.S. Navy license ('work of a sailor or employee of the U.S. Navy') is invalid.

Underlying lk (talk) 00:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Allied Navy yes but there is no reason to doubt that an US employee took these photographs within allied Navy operations. H.Hannopps — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.7.123.43 (talk) 17:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even read the nomination? The author field literally states 'Camera Operator: ALLIED NAVY'. They're most emphatically not the work of an US employee.--Underlying lk (talk) 18:41, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep license says "photos by US employee" not "photos of US ships"--Pierpao.lo (listening) 19:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, perhaps valid that PD USN is not technically true, but the ones like https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6495672 say "Use Restriction(s):Unrestricted". According to Commons:Batch_uploading/US_National_Archives_2 "unrestricted" items from NARA are fine as PD-USGov. Maybe there is some overriding policy about NARA beyond that. Mosst of the "DN-" DOD images were moved to NARA a few years ago when DOD shut down their website. --Dual Freq (talk) 23:09, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update, I checked every one of these images and added NARA templates. They are all listed by NARA as "Use Restriction(s): Unrestricted". I would think that means all of these are free for Commons to use with some kind of PD-USGov license. --Dual Freq (talk) 18:20, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The comments aren't making any sense. The photographers were not working for the US Navy, because the author field specifically states the photo was taken by someone working for an allied navy. NARA tags are irrelevant, they were clearly added in error in this case, as the US government cannot release the rights to something they do not own.--Underlying lk (talk) 18:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done No substantial claims have been presented who photographed these vessels. It doesn't even have to be "allied navy", it might as well be allied airforce or coast guard from Norway, India, South Korea or Japan or somewhere else. Thuresson (talk) 18:34, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This video has been removed from RN7's channel. I personally believe that it was under a free licence before the removal, but a discussion is necessary. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 05:35, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I can't find this video listed on their YouTube channel anymore. This video consists for the most part of archival material from 1944 of the bombardment by the allies of the city of Nijmegen and its aftermat. It's reasonable to assume they didn't get a full license from the local archive. When would it finally be safe to assume that video from 1944 has become PD? 2044? 2060? there are categories here on commons by year undeletion. Vera (talk) 08:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done The video from 1944 may or may not be {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} but some video and all audio are modern. The clip can not be found at RN7 Youtube channel; clips there sometimes have a Creative Commons license, sometimes not. Thuresson (talk) 05:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eliel Kilpelä (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. I already fixed the information of File:HKMS000005 svenska teatern.jpg. The most likely the rest have also been released by the Helsinki City Museum and can be found from https://finna.fi/. ––Apalsola tc 18:09, 1 November 2018 (UTC) –– (grammar fix) Apalsola tc 08:54, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All of the files should have a valid author, source and license information now. ––Apalsola tc 19:56, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: proper source and license. --Ezarateesteban 23:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:32, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to the Nike swoosh, but this logo is German. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 08:45, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. --Majora (talk) 04:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name des Fotografen bekannt, Freigabe liegt nicht vor Schnabeltassentier (talk) 15:08, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Habe gerade auf der Diskussionseite von Schnabeltassentier gelesen, dass der Fotograf Hans-Juergen Sommer das Bild per mail unter dem Ticket#: 2018110110006401 frei gegeben hat. Vielleicht hilft der Hinweis, dass jemand den Löschantrag storniert? Würde mich für den Artikel freuen, der ein Bild vertragen kann. Grüße --BoDoW 14:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bodow (talk • contribs) 14:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Würde mich auch sehr freuen...Ben hat das Bild sehr gefallen und mir eine Freigabe erteilt (liegt vor)... --2003:EA:73C8:DC00:C5E3:26F6:C30A:2A5C 14:58, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Guten Morgen...Eigentlich müsste alles vorliegen damit das Bild veröffentlicht wird ;-) ...Wenn nicht, einfach hier tippen... --Aristides2 (talk) 06:48, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ich versteh ja, dass Ihr viel zu tun habt, aber nichts zu tippen, wie es weitergeht...Na ja...Motivierend ist das nicht...Ich hätte noch viele Dinge, die ich einbringen könnte, aber wenn das immer so läuft, muss ich mir das schwer überlegen...Gruß --Aristides2 (talk) 09:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept for now. I do see an OTRS ticket on file and I marked the image as such. I'll see if I can find a German speaking OTRS agent to process it. In the meantime closing this and letting OTRS handle it. --Majora (talk) 02:05, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsification, edited version of File:Chopins_Unterschrift.svg Kattenkruid (talk) 16:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Why a "falsification"? The SVG file as well as its JPEG source File:Chopins Unterschrift.jpg were uploaded years later, so this can't be derived from these. There are also slight differences in the writing, so it's not a straightforward copy/adaptation from the same source, it seems. It does look strange with the signature "mirrored" upside down, but it might be some kind of authentic 19th century playfulness? Gestumblindi (talk) 00:42, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 02:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]