Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/10/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Kindly delete..Uploaded wrong picture Tomtwist (talk) 01:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Strakhov at 02:17, 29 Oktober 2018 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emmanuel Etim 2.jpg: Kindly delete..Uploaded wrong picture --Krdbot 08:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User: Eider Yoldi
[edit]- File:Gema Arrugaeta.jpg
- File:Sección de frutería.jpg
- File:Pescadería en BM Supermercados.jpg
- File:Bm Pagola.jpg
- File:Mandarinas Selecta.jpg
Reasons for deletion request: These images were all uploaded by me. There is a copyright violation. I had not the permission from the author to upload them.User:Eider Yoldi
Kept and blocked, no valid reason for deletion. You have been warned and even previous been blocked for this offense. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded it and then discovered it was fair use Rbcshw (talk) 01:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 16:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Accidentally created a user page when I wanted to write on the user talk page. / Julle (talk) 19:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 21:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: original photo with EXIF was uploaded. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
copyvio and promo MiguelAlanCS (talk) 21:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 04:07, 31 Oktober 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file --Krdbot 08:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Porque lo he subido dos veces. Inma Gasteiz (talk) 20:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 18:02, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
por repetida Inma Gasteiz (talk) 20:15, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 18:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
por repetida Inma Gasteiz (talk) 20:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 18:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:31, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DAMAN NISHAD (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0046.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0045.jpg
- File:DAMAN NISHAD.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0035.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0034.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0032.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0033.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0031.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0028.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0029.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0027.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0025.jpg
- File:RUPESH KUMAR DEWANGAN.jpg
- File:NARAYAN SINGH SAHU.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DAMAN NISHAD (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0046.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0045.jpg
- File:DAMAN NISHAD.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0035.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0034.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0032.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0033.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0031.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0028.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0029.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0027.jpg
- File:IMG-20170109-WA0025.jpg
- File:RUPESH KUMAR DEWANGAN.jpg
- File:NARAYAN SINGH SAHU.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:30, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Praveenvb.in (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album nor a place for self promotion
- File:Praveen VB Photos.jpg
- File:Manchi Godhumulatho Album Poster.jpg
- File:Praveen VB Singing Photo.jpg
- File:Yesutho Nadavalani Asha-CD.jpg
- File:Yesutho Nadavalani Asha-CD Opening.jpg
- File:Yesutho Nadavalani Asha -Wall Poster.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:30, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chrisgarigani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:Chris garigani 04.jpg
- File:Chris garigani 03.jpg
- File:Chris garigani 01.jpg
- File:Chris garigani 02.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jubaraj Singh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope, also unlikely to be own work
- File:DPL Wallpaper 16.jpg
- File:Jentupiez DaveWorld Artist.jpg
- File:I Am Jentupiez.jpg
- File:TheBill.jpg
- File:Self Made Man.jpg
- File:Real Jentu Man.jpg
- File:Jentupiez Celebrated Celebrity.jpg
- File:Thanks Free.jpg
- File:Doing It All At His Former School 60th Anniversary.jpg
- File:Jentupiez During One of His Concert.jpg
- File:Jentupiez.jpg
Didym (talk) 16:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:27, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Poy saturday (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
- File:Lion Air JT610.jpg
- File:Upload by yopee detuine 3.jpg
- File:Upload by yopee detuine.jpg
- File:Upload by poy saturday 2.jpg
- File:Upload by poy saturday.jpg
- File:Upload by Poy saturdae.jpg
- File:Logo detuine.jpg
Didym (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 07:26, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Poy saturday (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused, uncategorised. Not notable musical group
- File:Detuine 5.jpg
- File:Detuine 4.jpg
- File:Detuine 3.jpg
- File:Detuine 2.jpg
- File:Detuine.png
- File:Yopee saturdae.png
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:28, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
por repetida Inma Gasteiz (talk) 20:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 18:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image - logo of an organisation. Exists already on some wikis as such. Number 57 (talk) 15:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
wrong filename extension 옐로보이 (talk) 04:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:20, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW // other copyvio-reason (some might be TOO)
Delete as nominator. The screen (icons, UI and wallpaper) is copyrighted. Josve05a (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination per PD-textlogo etc. Josve05a (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination per PD-textlogo etc. Josve05a (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination per PD-textlogo etc. Josve05a (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- nothing copyrightable here (unsigned; se discussion below)
- I withdraw my nomination per PD-textlogo etc. Josve05a (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator. The logo might be PD, but the blue gradient is copyrighted/above the TOO nonetheless. Josve05a (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 16:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator. The logo might be PD, but the yellow/white backround is, in my opinion, above the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 16:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. There is an artwork/painting on the package. Josve05a (talk) 16:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- nothing copyrightable here (unsigned; se discussion below)
- I withdraw my nomination per PD-textlogo etc. Josve05a (talk) 16:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- nothing copyrightable here (unsigned; se discussion below)
- I withdraw my nomination per DM. Josve05a (talk) 16:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 16:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 16:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 16:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. This is not DM, since the main focus is the packages'. Josve05a (talk) 16:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Image on the label plus text that is not a font, and in my opinion above the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 16:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 16:06, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- nothing copyrightable here (unsigned; se discussion below)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW, and per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bottermarquenationale1 1.jpg ("[The] package as a whole has a copyright, and, of course, the text may have one also" -Jim). Josve05a (talk) 16:12, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator. The screen (icons, UI and wallpaper) is copyrighted. Per COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination per DM. Josve05a (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- nothing copyrightable here (unsigned; se discussion below)
- I withdraw my nomination per PD-textlogo etc. Josve05a (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator. The logo might be PD, but the yellow/white backround is, in my opinion, above the TOO, and per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bottermarquenationale1 1.jpg ("[The] package as a whole has a copyright, and, of course, the text may have one also" -Jim). Josve05a (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- nothing copyrightable here (unsigned; se discussion below)
- I withdraw my nomination Josve05a (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW.
- I withdraw my nomination per PD-text. Josve05a (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- nothing copyrightable here (unsigned; se discussion below)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. There is an artwork/painting on the package.
- nothing copyrightable here (unsigned; se discussion below)
- I withdraw my nomination per PD-text. Josve05a (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW, and per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bottermarquenationale1 1.jpg ("[The] package as a whole has a copyright [...]" -Jim). Josve05a (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator. The screen (icons and wallpaper) is copyrighted. Josve05a (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- nothing copyrightable here (unsigned; se discussion below)
- I withdraw my nomination per below the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- nothing copyrightable here (unsigned; se discussion below)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. The tablets-image. Josve05a (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator. The logo might be PD, but the blue/white backround together with the rainbox-image is, in my opinion, above the TOO, and per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bottermarquenationale1 1.jpg ("[The] package as a whole has a copyright, and, of course, the text may have one also" -Jim). Josve05a (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. Josve05a (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination per below the TOO. Josve05a (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bottermarquenationale1 1.jpg ("[The] package as a whole has a copyright, and, of course, the text may have one also" -Jim). (COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW) Josve05a (talk) 16:23, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Josve05a (talk) 13:27, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Comment File:Colgate_Alcohol_Free_Mouthwash.jpg was even explicitly kept (by me) as not copyrighted. It seems to me that quite a lot of the objects depicted in the files listed above are not actually protected by copyright. Like File:Dextroamphetamine.jpg, where's the copyrightability of that pill bottle? --Rosenzweig τ 21:25, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Keep A mass DR is nonsense here. You may file DRs for individual files or very small groups. --Leyo 22:38, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- I have tagged those, which show nothing copyrightable, IMO. --Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: As per Leyo. Natuur12 (talk) 22:27, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in these photos is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and are therefore unacceptable derivative works. These were previously nominated for deletion above, but kept on the basis that they should have been nominated separately or smaller groups instead of a large batch deletion request.
ℯxplicit 05:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ℯxplicit 05:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ℯxplicit 05:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ℯxplicit 05:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:22, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope. ~Moheen (keep talking) 09:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Колохусенка (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image.
Mitte27 (talk) 10:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 10:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
— regards, Revi 11:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 07:50, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:24, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nominationNo COM:FOP in Syria. Permission of the artist needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC) @Hanooz: My bad, big mistake of me, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: What is the art piece in the photo? Hanooz 12:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Hanooz: . Copyright is not limited to "artistic" items. Syrian copyright law states that photos as well as two dimensional "artistic" works are both protected for 10 years starting from the production date. So either the portrait is 10 years old and it's OK either it's not old enough and it's not OK. It's up to you to find out when the work was created. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi. Sorry, I don't understand what is copyright-protected in this photo. If you mean that little thing in the glass box, that's Com:de minimis. If anything else please let me know. Hanooz 12:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Hanooz: . Copyright is not limited to "artistic" items. Syrian copyright law states that photos as well as two dimensional "artistic" works are both protected for 10 years starting from the production date. So either the portrait is 10 years old and it's OK either it's not old enough and it's not OK. It's up to you to find out when the work was created. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 23:13, 1 November 2018 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors; see COM:SELFIE (F10) --Krdbot 01:57, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 11:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope and probably a copyvio Gbawden (talk) 11:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination Fma12 (talk) 11:10, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:27, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by blocked en.wiki vandal, appears to be outside of Commons:Project scope. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
I made this file entirely by myself , so why on earth should it be deleted ? And why does he say it is out of Commons:Project scope ? Anybody might need it / want it ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by X027 (talk • contribs) 12:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- See Commons:Project scope, which requires that a media upload "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
With Administrators like you, any non-admin would want to study " the relentless persecution by Administrators " . — Preceding unsigned comment added by X027 (talk • contribs) 13:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
By the way , I have to go to study now , so say anything you might have to say tomorrow 9:00 (UCT) onwards . — Preceding unsigned comment added by X027 (talk • contribs) 13:15, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Even if one were to wish to study persecution by administrators, this picture would be of no assistance. --bjh21 (talk) 19:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Very well, delete my hard work if you want to , but you all are welcome to use and try to vandalise my new website , "Harry Kane the King and Co." , which will open about a month from now on .
No love lost,
X027 — Preceding unsigned comment added by X027 (talk • contribs) 07:07, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Completely worthless. AshFriday (talk) 07:56, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:27, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by blocked en.wiki vandal, appears to be outside of Commons:Project scope. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
I made this picture entirely by myself , so why should it be deleted ? Just because of the word of some administrator ? Isn't there any freedom of expression here ? Signed , X027(User talk:X027) 18:34 ,29 OCTOBER 2018 (IST)
- See Commons:Project scope, which requires that a media upload "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
So what ? Anybody would want to study " The relentless persecution by Administrators " ! Then they would need this file ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by X027 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Delete Completely worthless. AshFriday (talk) 07:58, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:27, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
The man spoils the image. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Likely Internet photos.
Wcam (talk) 14:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Spam...... Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KarkonoskieTajemnice (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:29, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:29, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:29, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:29, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:29, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Files created by User:Surya edit background
[edit]I believe those pictures are out of scope. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
- File:Ptopta.jpg
- File:San felipe puerto plata.jpg
- File:Muelle turístico pop.jpg
- File:Cuidad de puerto plata.jpg
- File:Cuidad de Puerto plata.jpg
Didym (talk) 16:09, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
blurry photo uploaded in batch Flickr upload Mindmatrix 16:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vermont as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 17:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Very low in resolution, and out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 17:15, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 17:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 17:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 17:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Willy1018(talk) 17:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project. Willy1018(talk) 17:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project. Willy1018(talk) 17:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project. Willy1018(talk) 17:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project. Willy1018(talk) 17:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project. Willy1018(talk) 17:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/User:Assam Knowledge
Files uploaded by عمار الجزيري (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:33, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Still copyrighted, as 2009 magazine cover? BarnCas (talk) 00:09, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't want it here. I can't get any answers to questions about using this site -- I can't even ask a question on your page that is supposed to be for questions. I simply don't understand what you do here or how. The FAQ is like reading a foreign language. Please, take down my images. Gsdcraig (talk) 22:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pleclown (talk) 07:49, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
I am confounded by this site. I don't do code and everything here requires it. I'd rather not use this site since I can't get any help understanding how to use it. Gsdcraig (talk) 22:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pleclown (talk) 07:49, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
I don't understand how to use this site -- or even ask a question. I don't code and that stuff is everywhere. I can't understand the site; the FAQ's are a foreign language. The coding that shows up means nothing to me. Answers to my questions are nowhere to be found. Please, just delete my images. This site is too complicated and lacks explanations for use than can be understood by a layman. Thanks. Gsdcraig (talk) 22:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, in addition to that the author requests it to be removed. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:21, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pleclown (talk) 07:49, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Egy writer claims to be himself 70 years dead. Real creation year, real author and evidence for free license are needed. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete @Taivo: All user images with inappropriate licenses and must be deleted ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, by Jcb. Taivo (talk) 08:43, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ehanmusic1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Only used on the English Wikipedia, where I've deleted the contributor's sandbox and draft as spam. Out of project scope.
- File:Photo 17-08-18, 4 31 50 PM.jpg
- File:Photo 11-03-18, 1 19 24 AM.jpg
- File:Photo 23-05-18, 10 55 12 AM.jpg
- File:Public.jpg
- File:Photo 09-08-18, 12 18 44 AM.jpg
- File:Ehan picture 2.jpg
- File:Ehan picture.jpg
ℯxplicit 04:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the contributor's sandbox and draft were speedily deleted in August 2018 as spam. The user was subsequently blocked for promotional editing. Out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 04:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:40, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Unused and unencyclopedic personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
corrupted image; possibly copyrighted; unused Papuass (talk) 09:14, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, fake map created after the Brazilian elections of 2018 —Tks4Fish! talk•contribs 18:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:42, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SameenaMohdali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Appears to be promotional or memorial in nature, but certainly not own work. Notice captions.
- File:Self Portrait of Dr. M Akbar Ali.jpg
- File:Karnataka Sahitya Academy Award.jpg
- File:1984 Rajyotsava Award.jpg
- File:Akbar Ali Jeevana Sahitya.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Uploader does not appear to be the author (as they have uploaded other images with different authors). Number 57 (talk) 15:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Uploader does not appear to be the author (as they have uploaded other images with different authors). Number 57 (talk) 15:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image; logo of an organisation. Already hosted on some wikis as such Number 57 (talk) 15:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
copyvio MiguelAlanCS (talk) 15:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
File seems to be a screenshot from a video, so source quite probably not own work. Because of this possible copyvio and not fair use. Redalert2fan (talk) 17:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur (Mar 26, 2015, 7,678 views). Dispenser (talk) 20:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur (Apr 9, 2017, 45,968 views). Dispenser (talk) 20:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur (Sep 15, 2018, 2 views). Screeenshot of website, unlikely to be own work or CC-BY-SA. Dispenser (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur (Apr 9, 2018, 222 views). The flurishes of a fin, tail, and flame likely make it ineligable for {{PD-textlogo}} Dispenser (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:12, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Derived from Imgur (Aug 26, 2013, 142 views) uploaded years ago, unlikely entirely the author's own work. —Dispenser (talk) 20:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
copyvio & promo MiguelAlanCS (talk) 21:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:11, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Small and unused image, out of project scope B dash (talk) 00:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no other images at this time. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:02, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Small and unused image, out of project scope B dash (talk) 00:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no other images available at this time, no reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:03, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
At size and quality, unlikely own work; would also appreciate an understanding of the notability of logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Clearly a YouTube screenshot BugWarp (talk) 01:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jobayer Hossain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvio logo and portrait.
- File:Logo of Rajarhat Pilot High School.jpg
- File:Logo of Rangpur Govt College.jpg
- File:ফিরোজ সাঁই.PNG
~Moheen (keep talking) 09:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:04, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded the wrong file, another version without the visible calendar should have been used. Tsui (talk) 20:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Changed to a request for speedy deletion. --Tsui (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Unfortunately I do not see Archive.org saving the licence. This simply keeps loading and never loads the licence information. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- if you view the page source code you’ll see it there 71.184.117.135 20:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Confirm, seeing CC0 in the source. Can't 100% confirm it's for the video and not something else on the page, but seems likely to be for the video. -- GreenC (talk) 21:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Having checked the source, I see CC0 licence mentioned twice. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Sealle (talk) 19:33, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
Непідходящий BogdanLemberg (talk) 20:21, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 19:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
This image is released as Attribution-Non Commercial. But I thought Commons does not accept non-commercial images? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Speedy keep @Jan Arkesteijn: it was released as GFDL 1.2 + CC BY-NC and licensed before 15 October 2018. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Does GFDL comply with BY-NC? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jan Arkesteijn: this file has two licenses. CC BY-NC, which Commons completely ignores but re-users can pick if they like, and GFDL, which is (though not practical) commercially usable (problematic but not impossible) and it was allowed before 15 October (and now grandfathered). Re-users usually pick only one. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- I understand those licenses are not compatible, right? Then why do we allow a license we do not allow...?Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jan Arkesteijn: this file has two licenses. CC BY-NC, which Commons completely ignores but re-users can pick if they like, and GFDL, which is (though not practical) commercially usable (problematic but not impossible) and it was allowed before 15 October (and now grandfathered). Re-users usually pick only one. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Does GFDL comply with BY-NC? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- In addition to a free license, you can add any license you want. I can multi-license my work with CC BY-SA and the-sort-of-free-license-that-requires-you-to-stand-on-your-head-while-shouting-the-name-of-the-author. Commons will ignore the latter, and probably most re-users. But it would be allowed as an additional license. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Jan Arkesteijn: would you care to withdraw the nomination based on your understanding of the license? I'm only asking because there's a backlog of deletion requestions and nominations that's currently around 5 (five) months or so. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- In addition to a free license, you can add any license you want. I can multi-license my work with CC BY-SA and the-sort-of-free-license-that-requires-you-to-stand-on-your-head-while-shouting-the-name-of-the-author. Commons will ignore the latter, and probably most re-users. But it would be allowed as an additional license. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, @Jan Arkesteijn: just to explain the type of situation Slowking4's old licenses represent are called "dual licenses" which are allowed if "the most permissible license" is compatible with Commons:Licensing, personally I would prefer there to be a dedicated Commons:Dual licensing guideline that would explain this to novice users, but the thing is that despite one of the licenses being unfree the other license is free and (the file as a whole) can therefore be considered "Commons compatible". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: you mean Commons:Multi-licensing? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: , yes, thank you.
--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: , yes, thank you.
- @Donald Trung: you mean Commons:Multi-licensing? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- comment if you looked at my user page before nomination, you would find this history: Commons:Deletion_requests/User:Fir0002/credits ; Commons:Requests_for_comment/AppropriatelyLicensed ; now that we have reconsidered, Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2018/08#No_longer_allow_GFDL_for_some_new_uploads ; the old ones appear to be grandfathered, but i could change it, if the consensus were to require it. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 23:30, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jan Arkesteijn (talk • contribs)
Kept: per discussion, Commons:Licensing#Multi-licensing. --Sealle (talk) 19:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
I have been reviewing photos on commons and old WWII newspapers. This photo is still copyrighted because while it was first published in 1944, there was an attribution to Aleksandr Less (1909 – 1972), so it can't be added to Commons until 2047. Corrected information, listed for undeletion in 2047. Ready for deletion. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger asls 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:49, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger asls 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger asls 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger asls 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger asls 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:35, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:46, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:35, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork from de:Ernst Jordi. --Wdwd (talk) 10:46, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork (Artwork from Robert Schär, died 1973). --Wdwd (talk) 10:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork (Artwork from de:Robert Schär, died 1973). --Wdwd (talk) 10:43, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork (Artwork from de:Robert Schär, died 1973). --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork (Artwork from de:Robert Schär, died 1973). --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork (Artwork from de:Robert Schär, died 1973). --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork (Artwork from de:Robert Schär, died 1973). --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:39, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork (Artwork from de:Robert Schär, died 1973). --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:39, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork (Artwork from de:Robert Schär, died 1973). --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
URV -Frist weniger als 70 Jahre Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork (Artwork from de:Robert Schär, died 1973). --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Kirche Urtenen Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 10:40, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging; the details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work.
ℯxplicit 05:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The only copyright elements are the biscuits shown on the bags, and they are well below the normal application of DM. --Fæ (talk) 07:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- The copyrighted elements are the main subject, they are not in the photo by coincidence. COM:DM would apply if the elements happened to be in the picture when the main subject was something else. ℯxplicit 23:29, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:47, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by André Moretti Grupo DPSP (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most of these have a company logo in them from Pacheco Drogarias. not own work and no evidence of permission
- File:Grupo DPSP.jpg
- File:Campanha de Doação de Sangue 2016 Drogarias Pacheco.jpg
- File:Campanha de Doação de Sangue 2016 Drogaria São Paulo.jpg
- File:Logo Drogarias Pacheco.png
- File:Logo Drogaria São Paulo.jpg
- File:Campanha de Doação de Brinquedos 2015 Drogaria São Paulo.jpg
- File:Campanha de Doação de Brinquedos 2015 Drogarias Pacheco.jpg
- File:Loja Drogaria São Paulo.jpg
- File:Loja Drogarias Pacheco.jpg
- File:Funcionários Drogarias Pacheco.jpg
- File:Campanha do Agasalho 2016 Drogarias Pacheco.jpg
- File:Funcionários Drogaria São Paulo.jpg
- File:Campanha do Agasalho 2016 Drogaria São Paulo.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ClarsTarras (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist(s)/heir(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Capri213.pdf
- File:Kroki0027.pdf
- File:Capri238.pdf
- File:Capri451.pdf
- File:Kroki287.pdf
- File:Krok1567.pdf
- File:Kroki6.pdf
- File:Kroki20.pdf
- File:Kroki23.pdf
- File:Kroki3.pdf
- File:Krok12.pdf
- File:Kroki1.pdf
- File:Urnan.jpg
- File:Björn 1.pdf
- File:Björn Ericsson (1932-2008) var född och bosatt i Stockholm.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:16, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
No proof this is PD. FunkMonk (talk) 18:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Painting by Robert Griffing, a living artist. https://www.paramountpress.com/fw-15/ Abzeronow (talk) 19:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
There is a jpg file so this file is no longer needed. MLS037 (talk) 06:16, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: PNG version far superior than JPG version, not the same. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
This file is no longer used. 옐로보이 (talk) 05:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Book cover Thyj (talk) 06:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Freewolf or copyright holder F. Limacher is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
False date, similar to http://www.sify.com/movies/wallpaper.php?cid=13048896&scid=2590&tab=2&id=10061721&flag=1 Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- The user uploaded the file is LTA 1. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 03:00, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 37.230.242.197 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: Blurred, bad quality. I do not want to delete the file speedily, but quality is really bad and description hints weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Found as early as 2009 at https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2009/05/krauthammer-torture/, COM:LL Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:03, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
copyvio, artist born 1956 Martin Sg. (talk) 13:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
copyvio, artist born 1956 Martin Sg. (talk) 13:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
We need the author's permission via OTRS, the source file was already deleted! Ras67 (talk) 14:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Agree with the proposed deletion as uploader of this cropped version. This is a self-uploaded picture of a former political candidate who promised to send a permission but, as far as I can remember, failed to do so and probably stopped communicating after the election was over. --Marek BLAHUŠ (talk) 14:39, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
London Underground map is copyrighted by TfL; same reason as to why the following file got deleted: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Lego_London_Tube_Map_Lego_Store_Leicester_Square_London_United_Kingdom.jpg Simeon87 (talk) 14:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
low quality: the tower is cut Jumpy01 (talk) 15:02, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 16:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 16:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jrachi - Jcb (talk) 16:36, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 16:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jrachi - Jcb (talk) 16:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Portrait is a artwork from artist Chuck Close. ORTS ticket from creator Chuck Close needed. Artmax (talk) 18:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Because the contents of the photographed board is incomprehensible and a better photograph is uploaded. Pete (talk) 20:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Huronevict as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 17:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --whym (talk) 14:29, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Person depicted withdraws consent. See this Twitter thread. The source Flickr channel has deleted the image: it now gives 404 error. MartinPoulter (talk) 15:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC) Update:she says her complaint applies to two photographs, so I've added the other. MartinPoulter (talk) 10:10, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It passed a Flickr review. Not a reason for deletion. Added a personality rights warning though. Abzeronow (talk) 17:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: That the image existed on Flickr with an open licence at a particular time is not relevant if they made a mistake and were not entitled to share that image in the first place. We don't just use that criterion because if we did we'd be enabling licence laundering. MartinPoulter (talk) 19:52, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. So the issue is not what licence the original publishers put on the image on Flickr, the issue is whether the subject of the photograph's personality rights are being respected (as required at COM:IDENT). Now, this photo seems to have been taken in Geneva, and Switzerland seems to have particularly strong privacy right. "Just taking a person's photograph is an offensive act and consent must be obtained from any person recognizably depicted as an individual." In this case, the subject states that she did not give consent for the photographs to be taken. So, we should delete it. The Land (talk) 19:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete The request is also at OTRS ticket:2018081010008952. They have had the Flickr images removed. They confirm that they were published without their consent. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Switzerland and Ticket:2018081010008952. --4nn1l2 (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Dublicate of File:Wappenbesserung Falquet.jpg, but in lower quality. Saippuakauppias (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:44, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the US. FunkMonk (talk) 02:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:58, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Licence review is not passed. It is sad that it took so long. It is possible that it was under a free licence before. Since this was a featured "image" then we should not speedy delete, and maybe somebody will come up with a way to confirm original free licence. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- A look through the history shows that Majora (talk · contribs) recently removed the license review that The Photographer (talk · contribs) gave for his own file. I would think that one or more of the participants in the featured candidate discussion would have checked its licensing as well. To be sure, one user said it was not suitable even though it has a "free license". I think it was freely licensed and we should Keep it. Killiondude (talk) 05:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Pinging @The Photographer, Colin, RTA, Johann Jaritz, Hubertl Pinging @LivioAndronico2013, INeverCry, ArionEstar, Poké95, Yann Pinging @Σπάρτακος, Medium69 Do any of you remember checking the licence? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment on archive.org it says Creative Commons. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment It was creative commons compatible license when I uploaded it. Video2commons dont't have a automatic license checker when the image is uploaded like flickr2commons. Please, we need this feature before more valuable videos are irretrievably deleted. Pinging @Zhuyifei1999, Steinsplitter --Photographer 23:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- I really can't think of a way to make this secure, trustworthy, and automatic :( --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:08, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- In a similar way as Flickr uploads work. They would still need to be reviewed by a human being to confirm that the licence is correct. Perhaps a separate bot can can exchange the {{LicenseReview}} with {{LicenseReviewVideo2Commons|date=2018-11-12|licence=CC-BY 3.0}}, which would say that it was reviewed by a robot, but human review should still take place. It would need to be a separate bot pass in order to prevent people from adding it manually. Of course, somebody can still do that themselves, but such a thing can be detected. In a sense it will not be more threatening than if somebody would add a full {{LicenseReview}} without being a reviewer. Alternatively we can have much more people becoming reviewers. I have an now, but for some videos I am not quick enough. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 08:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Gone Postal: there are a million ways to fake reviews. There is a picture with a bullshit license review and OTRS permission.. undetectable, unless you look at the history and notice no license reviewer ever edited it. Some methods are also visible in the wikicode. No need to report, this is known and considered unavoidable. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 16:51, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- In a similar way as Flickr uploads work. They would still need to be reviewed by a human being to confirm that the licence is correct. Perhaps a separate bot can can exchange the {{LicenseReview}} with {{LicenseReviewVideo2Commons|date=2018-11-12|licence=CC-BY 3.0}}, which would say that it was reviewed by a robot, but human review should still take place. It would need to be a separate bot pass in order to prevent people from adding it manually. Of course, somebody can still do that themselves, but such a thing can be detected. In a sense it will not be more threatening than if somebody would add a full {{LicenseReview}} without being a reviewer. Alternatively we can have much more people becoming reviewers. I have an now, but for some videos I am not quick enough. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 08:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- I really can't think of a way to make this secure, trustworthy, and automatic :( --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 07:08, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the video on youtube is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND (frame at 7:50). — Racconish 💬 17:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Please ask the photographer to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 04:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:03, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Please ask the photographer to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 04:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 17:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Dakar Rally video that is apparently made by 'Global PC Security'. In addition to that I highly doubt the licence on the music. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 17:04, 16 November 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dakar 2018 Camiones KAMAZ.ogv --Krdbot 19:44, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
The page should NOT be deleted at all as I received this particular photo directly from the copyright holder (the lady on the picture) , together with permission to use her photo on Wikipedia. I don't see on what basis my upload is tagged for speedy deletion within 5 MINUTES (!!) after upload, without properly investigating its source and authenticity. Then, the person who marked my photo for speedy deletion refers to an earlier copy of the photo at https://www.facebook.com/235356203625496/photos/a.235356250292158/293338434493939/?type=1&theater , which is just a fan page on Facebook, of which authenticity cannot be proven and the author definitely did not request permission at all to use the particular photo.
So in the end, my photo is tagged for speedy deletion, because a previous -UNOFFICIAL- photo exists somewhere on social media (which according to the Wikipedia Guidelines is not considered an official or legitimate source of infirmation / reference in the first place).
I'd appreciate it if you correct the judgement mistake and not (speedy) delete my upload. Sorry if this message is put in the incorrect way, but after 2 hours of studying links, faq's and guidelines I don't feel like searching any longer for the correct place to put this comment. JayDee2014 (talk) 23:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
wrong pic uploaded Jinesh20 (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Similar to File:France_road_sign_B33_(50).svg but in PNG instead of SVG, and less fidelity to actual signs (see examples in Category:B33_(road_sign,_France)). It appears in User talk:LuisCosta that many other signs uploaded by this contributor were deleted.Marc Mongenet (talk) 00:01, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Images contain ceramic figures. Will need sculptor's permission. No evidence that the flickr owner is the sculptor.
- File:IA Light Painting Ceramic 0.jpg
- File:IA Light Painting Ceramic 1.jpg
- File:IA Light Painting Ceramic 2.jpg
- File:IA Light Painting Ceramic 3.jpg
- File:IA Light Painting Ceramic 4.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 02:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Correct. The sculptor is Nuala Creed, and in a recent email to me she agreed to have these photographs under the CC-BY-SA-2.0 license. I will sent the email to OTRS. Vysotsky (talk) 10:47, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: OTRS Ticket#2018103010004726 has been received for all the images in Category:Internet Archive ceramic archivists which include the nominated ones. The artist has been asked to reply directly to OTRS. Ww2censor (talk) 11:18, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- If you know the background story behind this, it's pretty heartless to even nominate this for deletion.. This isn't like any other random statue/artwork.. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- You're completely right, but don't worry. The artist has filled in all the relevant paperwork for ORTS, and I'm confident this will turn out OK. Vysotsky (talk) 09:06, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS ticket. --Jcb (talk) 20:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Subject is out of focus, will likely never be used. Mhohner (talk) 13:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Subject is out of focus, will likely never be used. Praveen 91299 (talk) 16:03, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Turkmenistan. acagastya 17:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Je suis le propriétaire. Je ne vous autorise pas à publier cette photo. 82.127.167.57 12:39, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Je crois que ce ne sera pas possible : Pouvez-vous produire le titre de propriété de cette porte ? En France, il est possible de photographier ce que l'on veut depuis le domaine public (regardez Google Earth, vous serez surpris). S'il se trouve un administrateur qui peut l'ôter, merci de me le faire savoir ; ça me fut refusé dans le passé ... et dans ce cas, je réitérerai ma demande. --François GOGLINS (talk) 12:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC).
- Peu importe qui est le propriétaire, le droit de propriété d'un bâtiment est indépendant des droits d'auteurs du bâtiment (cf. l'article 11-3 du CPI « La propriété incorporelle définie par l'article L. 111-1 est indépendante de la propriété de l'objet matériel. ») et aucune autorisation n'est nécessaire pour une prise de vue depuis le domaine publique. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:18, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --VIGNERON (talk) 10:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
The uploader states: Rob Lipsett, photo used for main social media presence, authorization granted by Lipsett for use in his Wikipedia Article. The authorization must be granted for all uses via OTRS Anna (Cookie) (talk) 03:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of permission Ronhjones (Talk) 00:50, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: "use in his Wikipedia" is not sufficient. We need a permission for a free license. --Yann (talk) 13:57, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Image may subject to copyright. hueman1 (talk) 03:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:58, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Please ask Gary Milano to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 04:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- I contacted Andrew Young and asked him to ask Gary to contact OTRS. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 13:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Please ask the photographer to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 05:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
duplicate & uncorrected document, see alsoFile:Voyager_plaque.svg 观赏植物 (talk) 07:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://twitter.com/ayelet__shaked/status/993113948676345856
Converted by me to DR, as the uploader objected[1]. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: To me, it seems that both this image and the image on Twitter derive from 1 common original image, as the facial expressions of the depicted persons and the angle of view are identical. --Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Dear Patrick Rogel
I took this photo with my camera, i own the rights,
there were other people who attended who also took a photo
and the other photo taken with a different camera
was the photo that was tweeted by ayelet shaked.
they were all smiling for 1 minute so all photos of course look alike,
but see the difference between my photos and shaked photo,
1. In my photo you can see the "Israeli Flag" behind the man
2. My photo was taken "Horizontal", the photo that shaked tweeted was taken "Vertical" clearly 2 different photos.
3. Look at the man in the photo, you can see his smile is slightly different in each of the 3 photos.
4. I can prove it to you that it's my photo, with another photo that i took with my camera,
see this link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mk_shaked3(1).jpg
in this 3rd photo you can see the israeli flag, and also see you picture frames hanging on the wall.
you can clearly see it's taken from a different camera, also from the same pose,
it looks different than the photo that Ayelet Shaked tweeted.
look at all 3 photos, the 2 from my camera i uploaded
and the 1 photo from Twitter
and you will see each is taken from a different camera and a different angle.
https://twitter.com/ayelet__shaked/status/993113948676345856
_2.jpg)
.jpg)
--Joecento (talk) 08:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
@Joecento: As confirmed by you the two pictures have been shot the same place and the same day. Unfortunatelly the dates doesn't match. The Twitter photo has been posted May 6 and the one you uploads shows October 25 in the EXIF files. So feel free to reupload your file directly from your camera at full resolution and with the entire EXIF files enclosed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
@Patrick Rogel That's because when i upload the photo from my camera to my computer, it automatically creates a new date on the image, as you can see
the date of the 3rd photo is today's date
see link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mk_shaked3(1).jpg
this is 1 of the photos that i took, and it is very different
then the photo that was tweeted here: https://twitter.com/ayelet__shaked/status/993113948676345856
the man's smile looks different, you see the israeli flag and the wall with picture frames
which is not seen in the photo that was tweeted,
just proves you, that there was a 2nd camera taking photos at that time,
because my photos with the photo on Twitter do NOT match,
so as far as a copyright claim,
copyright would mean, if both photos are identical.
then you claim, that i took the photo from twitter,
how is it possible, that my photo that i took, the source is from twitter,
if my photo has an israeli flag and the photo on twitter does not have an israeli flag or frames on the wall ?
--Joecento (talk) 12:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Joecento. Different enough. See also the DR for the 3rd photo, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mk shaked3(1).jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with Túrelio's assessment that, although cropped differenly, both images are completely identical in all details and appear to derive from the same original. Since the twitter image, wherever it originally came from, was published before the Commons image, the Commons image is not the original publication. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with @Jeff G. I see Joecento is correct, he provided three different photos, Different enough to pass WP rules, he also uploaded additional photos with the date created before it was published on Twitter. --Algemeiner (talk) 06:08, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
@Patrick Rogel You requested I should upload the original photo that has date created may 6
To prove that I took this photo, I connected now my camera to WiFi and uploaded the photo direct to wiki I think it should say date created May 6 Here you go see link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MK_Shaked.jpg
--Joecento (talk) 04:48, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks @Jeff G. for pointing out that my 3rd photo proves I took it Since it’s very different then the first 2, But now I found on my camera picture 4, Here is a 4th photo of this I also uploaded it direct from my camera so it should have the May 6 date that it was captured,
All the photos taken at that time are very similar Because it was taken the same time But since it was taken from other cameras it’s slightly different This photo number 4 is a little different then the above photo number 3 I just uploaded Here are the small differences
On the right side bottom corner you don’t see the man with white hair wearing a white and blue shirt on the wall in picture number4 And the above photo number 3 you see the man with white hair wearing white and blue shirt in the photo on the wall Also on the left side on top the 3rd shelf you can see in this photo the full frame brown color In the above photo you see on the 3rd shelf only a half frame brown color.
Here is the link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shaked_1.jpg
--Joecento (talk) 05:08, 30 October 2018 (UTC) --Joecento (talk) 05:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. Ownership by uploader has been convincingly demonstrated IMO. --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:01, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
A derivative image dominates the picture. Leoboudv (talk) 09:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep but cropping it to remove the copyrighted image. --Discasto talk 21:44, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 13:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyright infringement (the original photograph isn't the uploader) Odeesi (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Not found at URL.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:35, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
File:الصورة الأصلية للقارئ يوسف نوح احمد.png can be found at the URl, but i doubt that the image is available under creative commons license. Please delete those files. --Johannesfff (talk) 21:44, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:MK Shaked(1) 2.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as evidence for Commons:Deletion requests/File:MK Shaked(1) 2.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio. This billboard is not covered by FOP as it is not deployed permanently. BTW the uploader has been blocked indefinetely, the reason I can' t see. dealerofsalvation 11:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:04, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio. This billboard is not covered by FOP as it is not deployed permanently. BTW the uploader has been blocked indefinetely, the reason I can' t see. dealerofsalvation 11:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:04, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
remove as reverted to the same file 19 20 the same day Витольд Муратов (обс, вклад) 12:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 14:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
merely fictional without any provided source ! 2A0A:A540:A15E:0:9587:50A2:E8B7:B7DC 14:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- the flag image was stolen from a hindu flag used by a temple in Gujarat and thus not possible to be a muslim sultanate flag- see File:Takhteshwar Temple 03.jpg—87.78.121.173 00:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Yann (talk) 14:10, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
merely A fictional Flag without any provided source ! 2A0A:A540:A15E:0:9587:50A2:E8B7:B7DC 14:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- The flag is not fictional. I can not find any literary source to provide but the image is based on a flag of Gujarat Sultanate shown and described in a city museum of Sanskar Kendra at Ahmedabad. I have no image of it to prove but I will take an image on my next visit. I am OK if you remove this file from use on Wikipedia until I provide proof. But there is no need to delete it right now.-Nizil Shah (talk) 05:45, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- the flag image was stolen from a hindu flag used by a temple in Gujarat and thus not possible to be a muslim sultanate flag- see File:Takhteshwar Temple 03.jpg—87.78.121.173 00:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- Similar looking flags used by different people at different places and in different times should not be assumed impossible. I have agreed not to use it until I provide proof. There is no need to delete it right now.-Nizil Shah (talk) 11:26, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
- the flag image was stolen from a hindu flag used by a temple in Gujarat and thus not possible to be a muslim sultanate flag- see File:Takhteshwar Temple 03.jpg—87.78.121.173 00:14, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- you have no source to provide here and world is not waiting for your pic! in a same state hindu temple and muslim sultanate have the similar flag what a coincidence or it is a part of new safranization of current indian govt. ! dont tell any fairy tale"!! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A0A:A541:302D:0:7438:DB6B:836C:A594 (talk) 13:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- we Can See a huge edits war now on Wikipedia englisch Page „Gujarat Sultanat“ Page for a unsourced Flag Upload here- such unfortune
There is already SVG Flag of same image available File:Flag of the Gujarat Sultanate.svg! why the hell you need a low quality gif flag to overcowd uploading the wikicommons — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A0A:A541:302D:0:7438:DB6B:836C:A594 (talk) 13:32, 6 November 2018 (UTC) Nizil Shah remove the flag image from other articles too- you people are making wikipedia cheap mass!! resume good faith edits and don't upload image without source — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A0A:A541:302D:0:7438:DB6B:836C:A594 (talk) 13:38, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Please replace, and renominate. --Yann (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:11, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Low-quality distribution map of a fictional creature Parantaja asiantuntija (talk) 15:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 16:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: PD-textlogo, but unused JPEG. SVG should be used instead. --Yann (talk) 14:14, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
'Publickly available' does not imply 'free of copyright' Andre Engels (talk) 10:31, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: non-free license. Also out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 19:50, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 16:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: PD-textlogo, but unused JPEG. SVG should be used instead. --Yann (talk) 14:16, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 16:37, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: PD-textlogo, but unused JPEG. SVG should be used instead. --Yann (talk) 14:16, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hystrix as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 16:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 14:17, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hystrix as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 16:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Small file without EXIF data. --Yann (talk) 14:17, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hystrix as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 16:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Small file without EXIF data. Also poor quality. --Yann (talk) 14:18, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 17:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 14:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1942. Jcb (talk) 17:47, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Author unknown. License looks OK to me. --Yann (talk) 14:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Renominating after consulting with closing admin. 'author unknown' is not listed as a valid rationale in {{PD-Russia-2008}}. We have no information at all on the publication, so that we don't have the slightest indication whether "published anonymously or under a pseudonym" may apply. Closing admin had to admit that we are "left in the dark" about this file. The creation date 1937 is way too recent to assume PD. Closing admin somehow thinks that works created in 1937 are somehow anonymous by default, while there are probably tenthousands of examples to the contrary only on our servers. As long as COM:PCP is an official policy at Wikimedia Commons, we cannot go on wishful thinking. Jcb (talk) 12:13, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 23:25, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Unneeded, not in use duplication of file:נחלת אחים Nahlaot IMG 4316.jpg. Please delete. Ldorfman (talk) 18:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Unneeded, not in use duplication of file:נחלת אחים Nahlaot IMG 4316.jpg. Please delete. Ldorfman (talk) 18:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:22, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
No proof of PD. FunkMonk (talk) 19:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Painting by Ernest L. Blumenschein (1874-1960) 1950s painting(date on painting looks like 1958 or 1959). Undelete in 2055 (edit: er...2024 based on Smithsonian info). Abzeronow (talk) 19:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info, how did you identify this and the other painting? FunkMonk (talk) 20:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- On this painting, trial & error with Google. "fort orleans indian bride return" had its 3rd result that matched the "E.L" first initals that are on the painting on the bottom left corner. On the other one, artist was named below licensing section. (Someone else edited now so description is correct) Abzeronow (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Smithsonian says "circa 1917-1928". If they're correct, 1927 is my guess then (it looked more like 195X to me) (although that third digit doesn't quite look like a 2). https://www.si.edu/object/siris_ari_362750 Abzeronow (talk) 21:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- This book dates it from 1923-1924. On the description page [2], it was added that the source of the file is a Smithsonian webpage. I don't think that's correct. The original uploader's logs at en.wikipedia show that he uploaded on 22 September 2007 several photos of paintings in the Missouri State Capitol and their EXIF show that they were taken with the same camera as other photos taken by this user. It seems reasonable to conclude that he took the photos. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree that the original uploader took the photos. I added that Smithsonian url in the source category for pertinent info on the painting. I'll edit again so it's clear that we don't doubt the original uploader took the photo. Abzeronow (talk) 16:47, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, then I moved that url out of the source field and into the description field. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree that the original uploader took the photos. I added that Smithsonian url in the source category for pertinent info on the painting. I'll edit again so it's clear that we don't doubt the original uploader took the photo. Abzeronow (talk) 16:47, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- This book dates it from 1923-1924. On the description page [2], it was added that the source of the file is a Smithsonian webpage. I don't think that's correct. The original uploader's logs at en.wikipedia show that he uploaded on 22 September 2007 several photos of paintings in the Missouri State Capitol and their EXIF show that they were taken with the same camera as other photos taken by this user. It seems reasonable to conclude that he took the photos. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info, how did you identify this and the other painting? FunkMonk (talk) 20:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. As PD-US-no notice. (The PD-old tag from upload was obviously wrong. It is changed now.) -- Asclepias (talk) 15:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- How do we know there was no copyright notice? There is some tiny text in the lower left of the image, who knows what it says... FunkMonk (talk) 16:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- It is the signature of the artist and the year. This is similar to other murals in the same location, with the signature and year in one corner of the mural, for example File:Nuderscher The Artery of Trade 1922.jpg, "Frank Nuderscher 1922". In the case of the Fort Orleans mural, it is "E. L. Blumenschein 1924 Taos". (The Taos part is hard to see on this photo, but Blumenschein used to place it with his signature, see for example on this other painting.) -- Asclepias (talk) 12:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- If that's the case, we should be able to upload a much better version of it than the one here. FunkMonk (talk) 13:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- It is the signature of the artist and the year. This is similar to other murals in the same location, with the signature and year in one corner of the mural, for example File:Nuderscher The Artery of Trade 1922.jpg, "Frank Nuderscher 1922". In the case of the Fort Orleans mural, it is "E. L. Blumenschein 1924 Taos". (The Taos part is hard to see on this photo, but Blumenschein used to place it with his signature, see for example on this other painting.) -- Asclepias (talk) 12:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- How do we know there was no copyright notice? There is some tiny text in the lower left of the image, who knows what it says... FunkMonk (talk) 16:45, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per Asclepias above. --Yann (talk) 14:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
copyrighted stamp Cymbella (talk) 19:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
The image was proposed to be eliminated as fast deletion. I would like to debate, as in the file url says the web site is the owner of the file. If it uses a copyrighted image to make another kind of file, is it copyright violation? Paladinum2 (talk) 14:56, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Ragesoss. --Yann (talk) 15:11, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Because the png is incorrectly generated, this SVG file should probably be deleted until the svg->png previewer is fixed.
The svg file itself seems fine with every svg viewer I've tried it with, and Inkscape has no problem converting it to png or pdf. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin k (talk • contribs) 01:34, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Yann (talk) 15:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
The person depicted does not represent Ottokar Eugen Nováček but his father, Martin Nováček, as shown in file:Martin Novacek (1834-1906).jpg. --Dr-Victor-von-Doom (talk) 22:42, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Instead of deleting the picture, it might also be renamed to a file name referencing Martin Nováček. My well-founded renaming request was declinded by User:Hindustanilanguage for dubious reasons. --FordPrefect42 (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Decline was based on global usage at that time. --Muzammil (talk) 02:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Renamed. --Yann (talk) 15:13, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 22:35, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep It doesn't matter who is the author (known or unknown); because this photo has been published until 1991 the protection term is expired according to the Decree no. 321/1956 of June 18, 1956 Chapter 1 Article 7. See also Template:PD-RO-photo. Donarius (talk) 18:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per Donarius. --Yann (talk) 15:34, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Content produced (i.e. date taken) after 23 February 2017 is not under CC BY 3.0 BR anymore. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:35, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Content produced (i.e. date taken) after 23 February 2017 is not under CC BY 3.0 BR anymore. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:29, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:35, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Seems promotional for a product that is not notable or accepted as being educational for the purposes of our Com:Scope — billinghurst sDrewth 20:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
This image is used widely on the web on sites like Rotten Tomantoes, IMDb, Wikidata, Fandom and others, it is clear from the copyright so others can take it and use it (for example, for their data or fan-sites) without worrying that they will be sued. I had been contacted by a person this summer who asked me can I upload a series/season cover to the Commons because he wanted to practice in Wiki and create a page on the site for the series. It took me a lot of time to finally upload them and I had described the files exactly as what they are, if it is some problem with the naming I believe that it can be fixed. I'm clearly don't understand what it is all about. I uploaded this image for the people, so they can use it and I believe this is within the Commons scope. Vasily Levanov (talk) 23:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:Superhero Landing Title Card.png. Ruthven (msg) 12:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Seems promotional for a product that is not notable or accepted as being educational for the purposes of our Com:Scope — billinghurst sDrewth 20:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
This image is used widely on the web on sites like Rotten Tomantoes, IMDb, Wikidata, Fandom and others, it is clear from the copyright so others can take it and use it (for example, for their data or fan-sites) without worrying that they will be sued. I had been contacted by a person this summer who asked me can I upload a series/season cover to the Commons because he wanted to practice in Wiki and create a page on the site for the series. It took me a lot of time to finally upload them and I had described the files exactly as what they are, if it is some problem with the naming I believe that it can be fixed. I'm clearly don't understand what it is all about. I uploaded this image for the people, so they can use it and I believe this is within the Commons scope. Vasily Levanov (talk) 23:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate of File:Superhero Landing Title Card.png. Ruthven (msg) 12:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Seems promotional for a product that is not notable or accepted as being educational for the purposes of our Com:Scope — billinghurst sDrewth 20:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
This image is used widely on the web on sites like Rotten Tomantoes, IMDb, Wikidata, Fandom and others, it is clear from the copyright so others can take it and use it (for example, for their data or fan-sites) without worrying that they will be sued. I had been contacted by a person this summer who asked me can I upload a series/season cover to the Commons because he wanted to practice in Wiki and create a page on the site for the series. It took me a lot of time to finally upload them and I had described the files exactly as what they are, if it is some problem with the naming I believe that it can be fixed. I'm clearly don't understand what it is all about. I uploaded this image for the people, so they can use it and I believe this is within the Commons scope. Vasily Levanov (talk) 23:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Album cover seems in SCOPE. Ruthven (msg) 12:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
No evidence that the flickr owner is the sculptor Ronhjones (Talk) 19:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Racconish at 12:42, 26 Januar 2019 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) - --Krdbot 19:27, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Chemical nonsene. It is not the carbanion *replacing* an H, but instead an excess-electron on the ring itself with still 10 H (compare to the cites at en:Sodium naphthalenide). The original image uploaded at this filename at least has the chemical formula correct, but use of "pretty 3D image" falsely implies that this is the known 3D form (position of K vs Nap) DMacks (talk) 15:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- You're equivocated. Naphthalenides have one less hydrogen as you can see in https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/15682833#section=Top. And the formula is C10H7K and not as it appears on English Wikipedia. I suggest not to touch this file. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 15:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- The image is actually the Na not K complex, so https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/13651362 is the relevant entry. But doi:10.1021/cr940053x is quite clear that dissolving any of those metals gives the radical anion with all H intact. That is also what doi:10.1021/ja01303a022 seems to say, which is what you yourself cited in the eo:Natria_naftalenido article you wrote. The carbanion does exist (PubChem is not wrong here) but your article is at best mixing up two different chemicals. This ref, which I found cited in the eo:Kalia_naftalenido article you wrote, states that there is a reversible reaction between naphthalene and the metal, which makes sense if they are complexed but is completely impossible if H are lost. And File:Sodium naphthalenide.svg and File:Potassium naphthalenide.png are correct (though the creator data you put on that potassium version you created is dubious). DMacks (talk) 16:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- I will give three examples:
where one atom of hydrogen is substituted by OH, SH and -CH2-COOH. In all these case the aromatic essense is not lost, even with the loss of hydrogen atom, because it is substituted by other radicals. And I did not mean that potassium/sodium naphthalene is reversible, except in water medium. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 16:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- I have reversed the file on discussing and till I find new sources it will remain as before. Thank you for your opinions. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- You're equivocated. Naphthalenides have one less hydrogen as you can see in https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/15682833#section=Top. And the formula is C10H7K and not as it appears on English Wikipedia. I suggest not to touch this file. Claudio Pistilli (talk) 15:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg_and_File:Maya_Plentz_Fagundes_(40894093322).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![205 File:Haddad wishes "good luck" to Bolsonaro and says that he has a mild heart.jpg](#File:Haddad_wishes_"good_luck"_to_Bolsonaro_and_says_that_he_has_a_mild_heart.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_var_f%C3%B6dd_och_bosatt_i_Stockholm.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:T%C3%BArelio#File:MK_Shaked(1)_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Fort-orleans-return.jpg&diff=next&oldid=325851297){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&oldid=325510053){kind=link}
.jpg&diff=next&oldid=325510053){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- I agree that there are many 1-substituted (H lost) derivatives of naphthalene. My only point here is that the metallated versions do not have that structure. My mention of the reversibility of the M-naphthalene is that peer reviewed refs do support that it is reversible, which contradicts the idea of it being a 1-substituted metal structure.
- I looked up CAS#3481-12-7 in SciFinder, which reported tells me "C10H8.Na Naphthalene, radical ion(1-), sodium (1:1)". Unfurtunately, PubChem will list (as its disclaimer says) whatever depositors tell it. And then it autogenerates additional data from there, and it often gets things wrong for that reason. I looked up C10H7Na in SciFinder, and found CAS# 52498-97-2 (1-naphthalenyl-sodium). The refs there do not directly support that formula, and some even actually contradict it. DMacks (talk) 16:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep File is in use! @Claudio Pistilli There is nothing wrong with it and it has a good resolution! ;-) Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:53, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: In use. And it has been updated as a result of this discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 16:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 16:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Because the title is incorrect and a correct version is already uploaded. Pete (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Ballapete: could you provide a link to the correct version? Gbawden (talk) 08:32, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of corrected File:Etzbach Auslass unter K 254.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 11:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Created 1968. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 21:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:18, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Turkmenistan, the subject is the building. acagastya 17:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
COM:TOYS Ronhjones (Talk) 17:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
If this pic is illegal, then why was this pic approved?: File:Topaketa_errunikoak_2011_0010.jpg Kurzon (talk) 18:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- It wasn't. It simply hasn't been nominated for deletion yet. Also, the third-party elements in File:Topaketa_errunikoak_2011_0010.jpg are less significant and less original than in File:WH40K battle 8one6.jpg. --bjh21 (talk) 20:01, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- What about COM:DM? I think the use of copyrighted work here is too minimal to be of concern to the law. The toys in this pic are small, and not the focus. Rather, the pic attempts to capture the whole experience of playing a WH40K game, of which the toys are merely one element. The other elements of the image include two players enjoying each other's company, dice, generic non-copyrighted terrain models, a can of Mountain Dew, snacks, etc. The game table takes up less than half of the pic. The WH40K models are also incorrectly painted -- their paint jobs do not match what you see in the publicity photos from Games Workshop. For instance, this publicity photo from the Games Workshop website shows what a Tau model is "supposed" to look like, whereas the Tau models in this disputed pic are black (black primer; their paint job is unfinished).Kurzon (talk) 01:58, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Bjh21 and Ronhjones: Can I get a final verdict on this pic or what? Kurzon (talk) 07:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 01:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Cuba stamps are not free, but coprighted images Cymbella (talk) 19:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba#Stamps. --Majora (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Modern stamps of Cuba are not in public domain or their status is unknown Cymbella (talk) 19:39, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete As it stands right now, we must delete. But somebody should really try to figure out the copyright laws for cuban contemporary stamps. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba#Stamps. --Majora (talk) 01:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Modern stamps of this country are not in public domain or their status is unknown Cymbella (talk) 19:39, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba#Stamps. --Majora (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Modern stamps of Cuba are not in public domain or their status is unknown Cymbella (talk) 19:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba#Stamps. --Majora (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Modern stamps of Cuba are not in public domain or their status is unknown Cymbella (talk) 19:40, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba#Stamps. --Majora (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Modern stamps of Cuba are not in public domain or their status is unknown Cymbella (talk) 19:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba#Stamps. --Majora (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Modern stamps of Cuba are not in public domain or their status is unknown Cymbella (talk) 19:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba#Stamps. --Majora (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Modern stamps of Cuba are not in public domain or their status is unknown Cymbella (talk) 19:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba#Stamps. --Majora (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Modern stamps of Cuba are not in public domain or their status is unknown Cymbella (talk) 19:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba#Stamps. --Majora (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Modern stamps of Cuba are not in public domain or their status is unknown Cymbella (talk) 19:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba#Stamps. --Majora (talk) 00:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Modern stamps of Cuba are not in public domain or their status is unknown Cymbella (talk) 19:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Cuba#Stamps. --Majora (talk) 00:47, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
nobbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb 115.153.178.92 21:59, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:31, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
我覺得我用了許多年的名字被玩坏了 Chenguamyself (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 00:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
I accidently uploaded this picture. User:Mujeebcpy was the one who took this picture, we were using the same camera. I would like to move this picture to his uploads. Also I can bring his agreement to upload this photo to commons. Kannan Talk 09:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (uploader's request). --Rosenzweig τ 23:13, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
This picture is from 1999 (when elected) and was published http://www.ville.lorraine.qc.ca/client_file/upload/document/Reflet_2018/RefletMars2018Web.pdf (page 8) 185.132.117.130 15:03, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Similar to https://www.amazon.com/Testament-Frank-Lloyd-Wright/dp/B000O911AU Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- And? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 00:04, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- File was published 1957. There's no evidence on the informations you gave that the picture has been published earlier in Brasil. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:39, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
-
- Where is the evidence that this "file" was published at "1957"? This version of this book was published at 1957...
- Did you read the license? {{PD-Brazil-URAA}} + {{Arquivo Nacional PD-license}}?? And did you notice that is a digitalisation program in partnership with a Justice ministry equipment?
- And I must demand that stop removing source and ID information, as you did in other files.
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 07:47, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- You're right : cover photo is 1949 by Valentino Sarra, an American photographer. Frankly I don't see what {{PD-Brazil-URAA}}, {{Arquivo Nacional PD-license}} have to do with this issue since this picture is not a Brazilian work. Please note too that this digitalisation program misses essential informations needed on Commons like where, when and by who has been shot those pictures attributed to Correio da Manhã. Besides -and I agree with you- you can mofify source and ID information by yourself, especially in the funny Adolf Hitler files you've once uploaded. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:08, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. For photos, we need information on photographer names and lifetimes, countries shot in, years shot in, and years published in order to make accurate determinations of copyright statuses. If Correio da Manhã can't or won't provide such information, we don't need their photos. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:46, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Who is the artist and when (s)he died? Taiwan needs 50 years from death. Taivo (talk) 13:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no source, yet not old enough to be PD.--Roy17 (talk) 22:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
台湾是中国不可分割的一部分，不接受任何形式的分割台湾，这个中国地图没有台湾，应当删除 2A01:CB0C:1F9:9500:BCD1:66DB:BC50:7888 14:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- You are free to update this map, and all the other similar ones of continental China, in order to add Taiwan. Please help yourself instead of asking for deletion. Many thanks. --Croquant (talk) 15:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. We aren't going to involve ourselves in international disputes like this. --Majora (talk) 19:28, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by PaleoEquii (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Balaur bondoc and baby sitting on branch.jpg
- File:Maraapunisaurus.jpg
- File:Mahajangasuchus sunning.png
- File:Estemmenosuchus wallowing.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Err, why is it unlikely? The artist is in contact with Wikipedia editors here[3] If you are concerned these could have been found on Google, wouldn't it be a good idea to first demonstrate that they can even be found there before prematurely nominating them for deletion? The fact that they are all in the same style should also hint that they are not just randomly uploaded images. I'm pretty baffled by this DR, we have thousands of user made reconstructions of extinct animals, why single out these? FunkMonk (talk) 18:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- If you visit my deviantart account where you found the images offline, you’ll see that I admit I am PaleoEquii on Wikipedia in the description of the Arambourgiania painting I told you I’d make before it was uploaded. PaleoEquii 12:44, 2 November 2018 (EST)
- Commons:OTRS will be best way to solve this problem. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- No, because the uploader is the artist. There is absolutely no requirement for OTRS in such cases. You are making it harder for people to donate their art to Commons than even Commons policy indicates. FunkMonk (talk) 16:45, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Commons:OTRS will be best way to solve this problem. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- If you visit my deviantart account where you found the images offline, you’ll see that I admit I am PaleoEquii on Wikipedia in the description of the Arambourgiania painting I told you I’d make before it was uploaded. PaleoEquii 12:44, 2 November 2018 (EST)
Kept: A link between the creator and PaleoEquii can be found here (as stated above). Pretty good evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder in my mind. --Majora (talk) 23:48, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- also file:People walking on the Boulevard of Sabana Grande, Caracas Venezuela. Recorded by Vicente Quintero.webm
People walking on street, video qualuity is not good, for example the videos do not suit for illustrating the street. Out of project scope due to weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:49, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
COM:DW of https://pgamagazine.com/wp-content/media/2013/03/HoF-Bios.pdf Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Just keep the extracted image of Renee. Thanks. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Extracted file marked with {{Extracted from deleted}}. --Majora (talk) 23:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
I don't think this is simple enough to tag with PD. Even if it is a silhouette it is a pretty famous and recognisable silhouette (designed by Leonard Boyarsky). Vätte (talk) 22:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- New, non-copyrighted version uploaded. --Kigsz (talk) 14:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: New, non-copyrighted version uploaded. --Kigsz (talk) 14:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as no permission (No permission since) UN logo (PD) + text Didym (talk) 16:32, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Licensing fixed. --Majora (talk) 19:24, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hystrix as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 16:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Jimmy Tan might be User:Chinesestar.--Roy17 (talk) 22:15, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Whether or not they might be someone is not good enough. The photo lacks metadata. It is unused and after all this time no indication that it is licensed properly. --Majora (talk) 19:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Œuvre d'un artiste toujours vivant donc sous droits d'auteurs (autorisation nécessaire) et autorisation de la photographe nécessaire également, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 21:19, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
L'oeuvre est dans le domaine public : elle est entrée dans les collections du Musée de la Camargue. L'auteure a donné ses photos pour les verser lors de journées contributives (cf. projet:naviguer sur le rhône ) à Arles en octobre 2018 dans le cadre d'une action de l'association Mise à jour en collaboration avec Wikimédia France. --Floch30 (talk) 14:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
- Tout cela devrait être documenté. En ce qui concerne la photo, vu que la photographe n'a pas elle-même versé le fichier, il faudrait que sa déclaration de licence soit vérifiable quelque part et que la page de description du fichier sur Commons permette aux lecteurs d'en connaître et d'en vérifier l'existence et la teneur. En ce qui concerne la sculpture, il faudrait prouver l'affirmation que l'oeuvre est dans le domaine public, par exemple en fournissant une déclaration de l'auteur ou une référence vérifiable à un contrat par lequel il aurait renoncé à ses droits d'auteur. Ou, sinon, une déclaration de sa part d'une licence libre ou au moins de son consentement à la publication de la photo sous licence libre. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:51, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
To Asclepias Bonjour, quand vous dites "devrait être documenté", où les documents (autorisation de l'auteure ou de l'artiste) doivent-ils être versés? Je n'ai toujours pas compris comment on pouvait justifier autrement que par la bonne foi de la contribution sur Commons? Dans le cas des journées contributives, nous avons souvent des contributeurs et des personnes ressources. Les contributeurs/trices qui versent des images ne sont pas souvent les auteur(e)s. Faut-il faire signer une autorisation à chaque "donateur"? Et si oui, elles doivent être versées où? Merci --Floch30 (talk) 13:37, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Floch30: Comme expliqué plus haut, les documents doivent être envoyés à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org . Voyez COM:OTRS/fr pour les instructions. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:16, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No evidence of any permission sent into OTRS that I can find either. --Majora (talk) 02:53, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
In the beginning there appears to be footage from Google Earth or some similar site. I also am unsure about the song. The rest of the video can be kept. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- I'm trying to clean up these old requests and I'm not entirely sure what you want admins at DR to do with this, Gone Postal. I don't have video editing software and I doubt many admins are proficient in such things. There is Commons:Graphic Lab/Video and sound workshop that could perhaps do something but as of right now this contains material that cannot be here. So again, not quite sure what you want an admin to do here. --Majora (talk) 02:42, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- I do not know what to do in this case either. I don't want a free work to be removed, but in here it is couples with non-free work, and non-free work should be deleted. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:51, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: regrettably and without prejudice. This has been open long enough and as mentioned above we can't keep non-free work here forever. Anyone that is willing to take this work, found here, and make it acceptable for Commons is welcome to reupload it. --Majora (talk) 02:38, 22 April 2019 (UTC)