Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/09/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 28th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

제 실수로 저작권이 잘못 설정되었습니다. 빠른 삭제 바랍니다. Dreamy (talk) 13:08, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Non commercial. --4nn1l2 (talk) 16:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. ~MOHEEN (keep talking) 15:12, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:22, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not free lisence [1] and not own work. アルトクール (talk) 11:42, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted. Obvious copyvio. --Majora (talk) 00:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the author is unknown or dead for 70 years Aymatth2 (talk) 13:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this file was previously nominated for deletion in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Julien Vinson.jpg, closed after two days with the reason "no valid reason for deletion: ridiculous request." The discussion continued at User talk:Yann#Commons:Deletion requests/File:Julien Vinson.jpg. Notes follow that try to clarify the issues raised.

  • The file comes from La pensée nouvelle : les matérialistes (1865-1883), an album of 33 photographs, which the Bibliothèque nationale de France (BnF) considers to be a collective work in the public domain since it was published more than 70 years ago. However, the individual contributions in a collective work may still be covered by copyright. There is no claim by the BnF that this or any of the other images in the album are individually in the public domain.
  • French law, as of 1 July 1995, says copyright lasts for 70 years after the author's death. If the author were still alive in 1949 or later, the file would be non-free in 1995 and still non-free in 2018.
  • A sample of articles in the English Wikipedia in category:photographers and category:1949 deaths thru category:1955 deaths turned up 90 results, of which 16 were for people born before 1867. That is, if the photographer was a young adult when they took the photograph, there is a roughly 20% chance they lived long enough for it to still be covered by copyright today. (See here for sample query.)
  • The author is not given in the source publication, but no evidence has been given of a search to identify the author.

Aymatth2 (talk) 13:28, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Author is unknown, and work is more than 120 years old. Meets {{PD-old-assumed}} criteria. A consensus of Commons put 120 years as the threshold for that when we don't have the death date of the author. Stop trying to make end-runs around that. Abzeronow (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Abzeronow: I did not catch the link to {{PD-old-assumed}} in your previous comment, and did not realize you were referring to a formal discussion. 120 years seems very short, since it implies no more than 50 years between creation and death. My crude sample of photographers with Wikipedia articles indicates they they often started photography early and lived long. Still, I will accept the consensus and close this debate. The closure by user:Yann as "no valid reason for deletion: ridiculous request" was uninformative at best. After closure Yann claimed the BnF had said the photo was public domain, then brought up French wartime copyright extensions. So I assumed he knew nothing about copyright in France and decided to contest the closure. Aymatth2 (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Rehash of previous arguments based on a likely misunderstanding of French copyright law. This is not a collective work as meant in French law since the fundamental characteristic of such collective work, "l'initiative d'une personne physique ou morale qui l'édite, la publie et la divulgue sous sa direction et son nom", is missing [2]. There had been speculation in 1910 this could have been a publication of the magazine La Pensée nouvelle [3] [4], but according to BnF catalog, this publication stopped in 1869. So we have no idea who published this, nor who took these photographs. We don't even know for sure who the sitters are in some of the pictures. {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} (either collective or individual) applies here. — Racconish💬 17:19, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Comments from previous deletion discussion
No indication that the author has been dead for 70 years Aymatth2 (talk) 19:41, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yann: The photographer could have taken the picture as a 18-year-old apprentice in 1883, then lived past age 82. Or as a 22-year-old, lived past age 86, etc. Unlikely, perhaps, but not wildly implausible. There is significant doubt about whether the image if free. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:52, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yann: My grandparents were all born in the 19th century. They had relatively comfortable lives, and three of them lived into their eighties. My maternal grandmother was born in 1883 and died in 1973, aged eighty nine. Any photographs or other creative works by any of them would still be covered by copyright. In the case of my grandmother, who painted and wrote poetry, copyright would last until 2043. Aymatth2 (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • If my grandmother had been born twenty years earlier, took the picture when she was twenty, and lived as long as she did live, it would be covered by copyright until 2023. This is a plausible scenario. There is significant doubt about whether the image if free. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • No. You don't understand what "significant doubt" means. It is not about a particular case, but about the probability that the file would still not be in the public domain. And that probability is very low. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:59, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete In the EU (etc.) you need to know who the creator of a work was or know that the creator is unknown to assume it is public domain. Unless such documentation is provided, we shouldn't be saying it's public domain in its source country and this can't be safely reused unconditionally by people in the EU. Aymatth2 is right. —innotata 17:48, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: ridiculous request. The image comes from the National Library of France, which asserts that it is in the public domain. If you want to contest the copyright status, write to them. --Yann (talk) 05:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Otalazt (talk • contribs) 15:27, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, per {{PD-old-assumed}}. Thanks to user:Abzeronow for pointing out this policy. Aymatth2 (talk) 23:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 219.79.96.15 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4|Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eiffel Tower Paris honor our victims "Fluctuat Nec Mergitur" (22707193477).jpg. There is still a dispute of whether the light exceeds COM:TOO or not. Similar case like this was being kept. B dash (talk) 17:16, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Redirect as dupe. --B dash (talk) 09:26, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works. Freedom of panorama doesn't extend to 2D works in the UK. See COM:FOP#United Kingdom.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:48, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 09:47, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Puebla2018 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of the project scope.

Edslov (talk) 03:45, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 09:47, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trevor Ludeman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 09:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trevor Ludeman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:23, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:36, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahmoud shakria (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 09:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~MOHEEN (keep talking) 09:49, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не отображается видео, ошибка при произведении Sergb95 (talk) 22:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: отображается. --Sealle (talk) 09:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine и No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 01:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:21, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Well-Informed Optimist: Hello there! The monument was established in 1901 [5], so NoFoP in Ukraine is not a valid reason to delete the photo --アンタナナ 10:01, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: wtihdrawn. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Remove duplicate, hassle with upload Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 05:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 06:18, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

トリミング名前を間違いましたので削除をお願いします。 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 00:14, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:12, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

名前を間違いましたので削除をお願いします。 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 00:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:36, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Бойкита (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:31, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo has an incorrect date (Nabiyev died in 1993) and a false authorship: the photo was taken 1992-07-06 by photographer Sergey Guneev from RIA Novosti. GAndy (talk) 20:38, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: grabbed from the Web, no permission. --Sealle (talk) 20:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not licensed as free.[6] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is on enwiki. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:LeamyInAction.jpg --- Simon Villeneuve 01:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:36, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COMMONS:SCOPE and no actual use at Wikimedia projects and pages. Sfs90 (talk) 02:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COMMONS:SCOPE and no actual use at Wikimedia projects and pages. Sfs90 (talk) 02:57, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COMMONS:SCOPE (fictitious diagram) and no actual use at Wikimedia projects and pages Sfs90 (talk) 02:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COMMONS:SCOPE and no actual use at Wikimedia projects and pages. Sfs90 (talk) 03:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COMMONS:SCOPE and no actual use at Wikimedia projects and pages. Sfs90 (talk) 03:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COMMONS:SCOPE and no actual use at Wikimedia projects and pages. Sfs90 (talk) 03:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COMMONS:SCOPE and no actual use at Wikimedia projects and pages. Sfs90 (talk) 03:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded a test image to test camera upload function Misaochan2 (talk) 08:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Vanity selfie used for hoaxing on en.wp. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, perhaps a book cover? Migebert (talk) 21:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:10, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no realistic educational value - mediocre photo of an owner by a common car- along with File:A man ontop a white Zastava 750 or 850.jpg Pibwl (talk) 21:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; self-promotion (personal images and essay about the uploader).

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:14, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mitzuri Ordoñez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Ensayos personales; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crespin claude alain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

名前を間違いましたので削除をお願いします。 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 00:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 16:42, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by +vibe21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Gbawden (talk) 09:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:10, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mapi96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TPJ 1984 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Snapshot in low quality of non-notable person. Uploaded for purpose of writing article on dawp (article now deleted). No encyclopedian value. Pugilist (talk) 06:12, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Datei inklusive Internetadresse. Verstoß gegen die Richtlinien. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:27, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:15, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Files with small resolution without metadata. Missing permission. minhhuy (talk) 07:41, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Files with small resolution without metadata. Missing permission. minhhuy (talk) 07:41, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Files with small resolution without metadata camera. Missing permission. minhhuy (talk) 07:42, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Files with small resolution without metadata camera. Missing permission. minhhuy (talk) 07:42, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die unter meinem User-Profil veröffentlichen Bilder scheinen gegen einige Wikimedia-Regeln (falsche Kategorien, Beschreibungen, etc.) zu verstoßen. Eine genauere Bearbeitung der Bilder wir aber nicht zugelassen, da sich die einzelnen Punkte entweder nicht öffnen oder bearbeiten lassen. Mein User-Profil scheint hier probleme zu haben. Ich bitte daher als User mitsamt der anhängenden Bilddateien gelöscht zu werden. Sascha Grosser (talk) 09:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user stated this is his work under the Creative Commons, but this image was produced by Metro İstanbul Inc. It also writes copyright is reserved on the map. see also Uğurkent (talk) 09:09, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user stated this is his work under the Creative Commons, but this image was produced by Metro İstanbul Inc. It also writes copyright is reserved on the map. see also Uğurkent (talk) 09:10, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is not clear. Author claims incompatible copyright (http://www.rahirezvani.com/) Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:32, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this picture Mominsk786 (talk) 09:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Alexander Roumega (talk) 11:41, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Alexander Roumega (talk) 11:41, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Alexander Roumega (talk) 11:42, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the owner of this image, and would like it taken down. It is not used on any pages 130.85.231.206 12:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of this image, and would like it taken down. It is not used on any pages Adam huganir (talk) 12:41, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:30, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lmdolar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by J. Baixas (b. 1911), missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:08, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, see Copyright on a Painting: Who Owns It?. --Sealle (talk) 22:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dit was een upload om de Commons mobile app op Android te testen, het beeld is een uitsnelde uit https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Koningsweg_2,_Den_Bosch,_voorzijaanzicht_1.jpg en voegt feitelijk niets toe. Mag dus weer weggegooid worden OlafJanssen (talk) 12:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:36, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heralune (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photo by Julia Dunlop, autorization of the author needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr

Shev123 (talk) 13:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour c'est le service media de la société CLIMEWORKS qui m'a donné accès à leur PRESS MEDIA KIT et c'est libre de droit d'après ce que j'ai compris, puisque c'est la société qui le met à disposition, je vous copie l'email : Good morning Laurence,

thank you so much for your interest in Climeworks and for your work! I'd like to assist you, as much as I can.

First of all: Feel free to use one or two press images you'll find here for the Wikipedia entry: lien DROPBOX /Climeworks_Press_Kit (see Copyright in the file name). Second: We have already a German Wikipedia entry - there are some of the articles about Climeworks integrated: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climeworks More articles you'll might find in the Press-Section of the website, here: climeworks.com/press/.

So, hopefully this helps to motivate you, doing following steps. Please give us a sign, when we can review the article. We have French speaking employees, so that’s fine for us.

Thank you! .... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heralune (talk • contribs) 15:20, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:39, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Heralune (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Album covers, promo photos, video clip, newspaper. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.granma.cu/cuba/2018-06-15/a-90-anos-del-nacimiento-del-che-sus-ideas-encuentran-seguidores-15-06-2018-11-06-51 Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:41, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Danishwarshi Danishwarshi (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 22:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the source and author information for this image: "This is personal image of Dr.Tanya Ekanayaka. The copyrights belong to her." BoogieWithStu (talk) 18:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, permission needed. --Sealle (talk) 22:24, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to deleted this image because i am selling the copyright of this image. Ummidnp (talk) 11:51, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i am seeling this image Ummidnp (talk) 09:12, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Creative Commons licenses are irrevokable. You still own the copyright and can sell the image as you wish. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:17, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a promo photo without exif data, and one where Commons has likely been used to spread the use of this copyvio. Should be deleted —SpacemanSpiff 22:40, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:18, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 10:10, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by accident, meant to upload it using a different method. Bulldogsandfootball (talk) 18:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 10:11, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old newspaper scan. Authorship claim seems dubious Discasto talk 22:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 10:13, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illustration has no relation to Dervish movement contrary to use on Wikipedia. It is taken originally from a work of fiction titled Young Tom Bowling by John C. Hutcheson. Its use on Commons and WP in relation to Dervish movement is thus not educationally useful. Kzl55 (talk) 22:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep currently in use on multiple projects (COM:INUSE). If any of those projects use it to (mis)represent real-life events, that's their problem and it should be fixed locally, not by deleting the image here. The image description on Commons doesn't say anything about the Dervish movement, so that's no reason to delete it. As an illustration from a public domain book that could be transcribed at Wikisource, the image is definitely within COM:SCOPE. clpo13(talk) 23:17, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment. The illustration is currently exclusively used to to represent real-life events when in reality its a work of fiction, of little educational use in these articles, furthermore it is not related to Dervishs at all as per cited source. If the issue was only in the English WP it would be easy to rectify it on that Wiki and keep the image. The problem is that it is used for the same purpose on multiple Wikis, making the act of fixing the problem in a language editors from that particular Wiki would understand a little tricky, hence the deletion request. Would removal of the image with an English edit summary on non-English WP sites be acceptable? --Kzl55 (talk) 08:24, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Kzl55: I'm not sure what the best course of action is. You could try to remove the image from a project using it incorrectly, but if the local editors object and revert you, you would need to explain your position and get consensus for the change, which would be extremely difficult if you don't speak the language. You would also need to be sure the change is okay by the project's policies and guidelines, which may differ greatly from what you're used to on your home project. It would probably be better to leave a message on the talk page of the offending pages regarding the image. Messages in English may not receive a response on non-English projects, but it's worth a shot (and definitely better than leaving only a machine-translated message). Ultimately, though, Commons can't (and won't) control what other projects do with the media hosted here, per COM:NPOV, so incorrect usage elsewhere is not by itself a reason to delete. clpo13(talk) 23:32, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep – nonsense nomination. There is no "use on Commons in relation to Dervish movement". Clearly within Commons' project scope. No valid reason for deletion. LX (talk, contribs) 08:28, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 10:14, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The permission should have been sent to the mail OTRS. If not, remove the file.

And also

Микола Василечко (talk) 20:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:44, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplikat von "Feuerwehr am Flughafen Düsseldorf - 02-2013.jpg" Tetzemann (talk) 00:02, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 02:39, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture likely copyrighted Vauxford (talk) 17:01, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marufahsan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No metadata, taken from facebook

Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

google search shows the image taken from Twitter Zackmann08 (talk) 18:49, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The little Mermaid is copyright protected Pugilist (talk) 07:34, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:09, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The little Mermaid is copyright protected Pugilist (talk) 07:36, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:10, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Only useful as an example of how not to take a backlit subject, and this building, as far as I remember, doesn't tilt. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:28, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:11, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Roger Hummel est mort en 1983, il y a moins de 70 ans. Ce monument n'est pas encore dans le domaine public (et il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France). Ces images ne peuvent donc pas être placées sous licence libre. Pierre André (talk) 13:59, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, same as File:Gulf logo.png, low resolution because jpg format 185.92.26.8 14:30, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:58, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:59, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:14, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crystical (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Currency#Norway

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:08, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Refutation

I believe I have followed the guidelines for "reproduction in electronic media", the notes are not of higher resolution than 72 DPI and "specimen" is written clearly across the note. --Crystical (talk) 18:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - no reason given for deletion. Concur with Crystical re low resolution/specimen clearly stated. --Philly boy92 (talk) 19:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Little Mermaid is copyright protected. Bot upload. Pugilist (talk) 07:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion request was listed among a long list of other requests of 28 Sep. I guess the administrator mistakenly thought that this image was part of a group that should be kept, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/2018/09/28#File:Copenhagen_2018-03-03_(27542872658).jpg No rationale for keeping the file. The other requests of 28 Sep for deletion of similar images of The Little Mermaid resulted in deletion. So please, review again. Pugilist (talk) 18:17, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pugilist, the fact that the file still appears at Commons:Deletion requests/2018/09/28 means that the admins haven't decided whether it should be kept or deleted yet. The backlog with unclosed deletion requests goes back all the way to June. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The original request was archived, so a decision was actually made. Not much doubt btw as similar requests made the same date regarding two almost identical motives were deleted without any fuss. Pugilist (talk) 14:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Pugilist: Please provide some basic supporting detail for your claim. Year of conception, lifetime of sculptor, etc. A bald claim is insufficient to progress. FWIW the request is still listed at the earlier page, so is still undetermined.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The pictures of The Little Mermaid are routinely uploaded to Commons and routinely deleted by experienced administrators. I am not going to spend much time on this issue, but if you are in doubt I suggest you take a glance at Category:Statue of the Little Mermaid (Copenhagen) or leave the conclusion to another. —Pugilist (talk) 20:01, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
One of Denmark's most famous sculptures. Category:Undelete in 2030 is full of deletion requests for photos of this sculpture because the sculptor hasn't been dead for 70 years. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as Pugilist correctly points out this will be out of copyright in 2030. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1956 is not 70 years ago yet, therefore this photograph is still copyrighted. And since we do not know where this picture was first published, if at all, it's completely unclear whether the {{PD-Germany-§134}} template applies here to begin with. 95.222.31.109 11:18, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Obviously uploaded with a bogus license. --Rosenzweig τ 21:49, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte diese Datei nicht mehr zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:30, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request (not long after upload). --PierreSelim (talk) 07:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte diese Datei nicht mehr zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:31, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request (not long after upload). --PierreSelim (talk) 07:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte diese Datei nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:31, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request (not long after upload). --PierreSelim (talk) 07:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte diese Datei nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen, da sie auf eine Homepage mit rechtlich bedenklichem Inhalt verweist. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:32, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request (not long after upload). --PierreSelim (talk) 07:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte diese Datei nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request (not long after upload). --PierreSelim (talk) 07:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte diese Datei nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte diese Datei nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:17, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte diese Datei nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:34, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:18, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtliche Änderungen, daher kann ich diese Zeichnung nicht mehr zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:34, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:18, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtliche Änderungen, daher kann ich diese Zeichnung nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:18, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Urheberrechtliche Änderungen, daher kann ich diese Zeichnung nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:18, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte diese Datei nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 10:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Der Aufkleber ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Dieses Foto kann demnach nicht weiter zur Verfügung stehen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich will sie nicht weiter zur Verfügung stellen. Sascha Grosser (talk) 10:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Der Aufkleber ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Dieses Foto kann demnach nicht weiter zur Verfügung stehen Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Aufkleber ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Dieses Foto kann demnach nicht weiter zur Verfügung stehen Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Aufkleber ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Dieses Foto kann demnach nicht weiter zur Verfügung stehen Sascha Grosser (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Валерий Шанцев на Молодёжном фороме (cropped).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transparency issues:

Good Bad Also bad

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:10, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Olen vahingossa ladannut tämän kuvan otsikon Hömmönkankaan salpalinja -alle Wiki loves moments-kilpailuun. Jaana Ronkainen Jaana Ronkainen (talk) 06:02, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer in use Oliverchoihk (talk) 06:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:44, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer in use Oliverchoihk (talk) 06:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File should be kept. Per CSPAN policy, "Video coverage of the debates originating from the chambers of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate is in the public domain and as such, may be used without restriction or attribution.". Sagecandor (talk) 08:57, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 06:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Strother, Steve (sstrother@c-spanarchives.org)" <system@sent-via.netsuite.com>
Reply-To: "Strother, Steve" <messages.812761.4701870.90cce25dde@messages.na1.netsuite.com>
To: af@sowhy.de
Video coverage of the debates originating from the chambers of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate is in the public domain and as such, may be used without restriction. This does not apply to Committee Hearings or other C-SPAN copyrighted material.

Thank you for your interest in the C-SPAN Networks.
Seems to me that  Delete is the correct way to go forward. Regards SoWhy 13:15, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Delete - However, the link in Template:PD-CSPAN contradicts the assertion that material such as this in in the public domain. If C-SPANs Copyright & Licensing terms contradict the law, we should not link to them.- MrX 11:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC) ETA: It seems that the video is not actually in the public domain.- MrX 15:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What evidence is there that C-SPAN's claim 'contradicts the law'? The only other keeps seem to refer to C-SPAN itself which as you agree actually does seem to claim this isn't in the public domain. The general issue is that works of officers and employees of the US federal government, made as part of their official duties are ineligible for copyright but it's not clear to me who made these. Above it seems to be implied it's C-SPAN employees, not even contractors. BTW, in case it's unclear Template:PD-CSPAN itself says "This does not apply to Committee Hearings or other C-SPAN copyrighted material; such content is free only for non-commercial use and is thus not acceptable under Commons' licensing policy.". It's not just links in it. Nil Einne (talk) 15:02, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If C-SPAN claims that they own the rights, and require a license for commercial use, that is in direct conflict with the premise (stated in the template ["This file is in the public domain"]) that the video is in the public domain. Works in the public domain cannot be constrained in that way. Evidently, this video is not in the public domain.- MrX 15:13, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Under C-SPAN's copyright policy a license is generally not required to post a recording of C-SPAN's video coverage of federal government events online for non-commercial purposes so long as C-SPAN is attributed as the source of the video. (...). Keeping a C-SPAN logo on the screen during the non-commercial use constitutes sufficient attribution under this policy. Federal government events include:
Congressional committee hearings.
source K.e.coffman (talk) 16:49, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how that's relevant. NC only licence types are explicitly rejected on commons per Commons:Licensing as insufficiently free for our purposes just like they were on wikipedia. If the media is available under another sufficiently free licence, or in the public domain this would be moot but all the evidence I've seen thus far suggests it isn't. Nil Einne (talk) 02:24, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per SoWhy. BMacZero (talk) 18:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete It's worth repeating in full the license relied upon. Note the final clause.
Public domain
This file is in the public domain in the United States because it is a video, video still, or audio sample from the chambers of the US House or US Senate as published by C-SPAN. Such media are the work of the US federal government and are in the public domain in the United States. See the C-SPAN copyrights and licensing policy for more details.
This does not apply to congressional committee hearings or any other federal government events other than those mentioned above; such content is free only for non-commercial use and is thus not acceptable under Commons' licensing policy.
"This does not apply to Committee Hearings," we are advised. Such content is "not acceptable under Commons' licensing policy." How much clearer can it be? KalHolmann (talk) 19:16, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
KalHolmann, I added that to the template today per being advised as such in the email above. GMGtalk 19:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ah okay thanks for the clarification. I quickly checked the template's editing history before my first comment above but didn't bother to check if there was any transclusions etc. Nil Einne (talk) 02:26, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I guess to clarify further, what I edited was the English version of the template. The main template is just a tool for organizing the different language versions, which are their own individual templates that display depending on your language settings. GMGtalk 03:11, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
comment typically extemporaneous speeches are PD, but prepared written remarks are copyright author. and she is not a federal employee. see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Activist Gloria Steinem Tells Women's March Protesters 'Put Our Bodies Where Our Beliefs Are'.webm regretfully -- Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that, there are other sources e.g. [7] which could be use to make a replacement for this file, if it hasn't already happened but sounds like that's out too. Nil Einne (talk) 09:15, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation de droit d'auteur (bâtiments récents couverts par le droit d'auteur, car l'architecte Ieoh Ming Pei est contemporain . Pierre André (talk) 09:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:46, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The licensing information claims it is pubic domain in Isreal. Based on the template, this photograph does not meet the criteria outlined for the public domain license applied. 1. This photograph is clearly not "a statute, regulation, Knesset protocol or court decision". 2. This modern coastline photo has no evidence that it "was created more than 50 years ago" by the state of Isreal. In fact, beyond an assertion that it appeared on a Ministry of Tourism website, there is no evidence that this is a government work. It could be sourced to stock photos as an example. Whpq (talk) 19:05, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you stated, it appeared on the Ministry's website. So, they have—by definition—obtained the right to release it to the Public Domain. 13zmz13 (talk) 19:22, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did not state it appeared on the ministry's web site. I stated that there was an assertion that it appears in the site. That assertion was made by you on the file information page. I don't see the image on the source page given. Assuming it does appear on the web site, I'll point out that the site specifically states in the footer "Copyright © Ministry of Tourism, Government of Israel. All Rights Reserved 2015" which very clearly shows that the government has not released the material on the site in the public domain (assuming they held the rights to the photo which is not at all clear). -- Whpq (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation du copyright; armoiries créées par Frédéric Luz (Armorial de France et d'Europe n°3 - 1992) Vulson (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:35, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [8]. Yann (talk) 07:57, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of copyright. I'm the creator of this coat of arms, published in my Armorial de France et d'Europe n°3- 1992, page 41; ISSN:1151-0978, I will not demand the delete in my name is mention as author. Frédéric Luz Vulson (talk) 22:21, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Brewster Model 239 (SA-kuva 150332).jpg. Kwasura (talk) 18:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. Will tag as a duplicate instead. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Legitimate use of PD-Russia-Exempt. Kges1901 (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 11:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 22:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep According to the uploader (see Discussion page) this photograph is taken by one of their family members around 1900. Before 1923, anonymous (family) author: no copyright violation. Vysotsky (talk) 19:52, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
He states that his family owned a physical copy of the picture, not that they are the author. 1923 is an unimportant date for anything that's not from the US. Around 1900 (on upload they stated 1910) is not old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}, so with the information we have now there is no valid ground to keep this file. Jcb (talk) 20:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment His statement: "that is my foto, taken [by] one of my family member". But as that particular family member can't be identified, the photographer remains anonymous. The copyright acts from the Austro-Hungarian Empire (= the Dual Monarchy, up till 1918) apply. They were followed up by Austrian law, under which the copyright of these works ends 70 years after creation. (§ 61. Das Urheberrecht an Werken, deren Urheber (§ 10 Abs. 1) nicht auf eine Art bezeichnet worden ist, die nach § 12 die Vermutung der Urheberschaft begründet, endet siebzig Jahre nach ihrer Schaffung.). Still public domain. Vysotsky (talk) 21:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Austrian copyright is 70 years PMA, not after creation. No indication that this would be an anonymous work, that's only your wishful assumption. Jcb (talk) 22:05, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I already supplied the original text of the Austrian Copyright Act to make this clear. The German word Schaffung means creation. My English translation of the German text above (Austrian copyright act § 61): The copyright of works whose author (§ 10-1) has not been made clear in a way that establishes the presumption of authorship according to § 12, ends seventy years after its creation. Vysotsky (talk) 22:38, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but what you did not provide is evidence that this part would apply in the first place. You did not provide any evidence that the identity of the author was unknown at the time. Given the nature of the picture, this would be highly unlikely. Jcb (talk) 23:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader response (also on talk page):

"Hi and thanks Your attention ! The photo was taken around 1900, since that, my grandfather's father the photo owned in my family original paper format.(on the photo the Austro - Hungarian Monarchy -Habsburg soldiers;not on a dutch flea market found...) from march 02 2017 the photo on wikimedia You found yesterday, that after one and half year. if somebody has problem with that can identify and say copyright abusive or not. (i) think the only existed one original photo have, but if somebody has other one really like to meet with him, contacting; interesting the basic historical story behind them and like listening that.(can (You) tell me something new about this History?) so until that i am the original owner the foto, that is my foto, taken one of my family member, and the years You can count from 1900 until 2018: 118 years long existing... You can choose,- or anybody: can we save here ( informative ) heritages for new generations or deleting simply... "because" Thanks and good understand the reasons! cheers Vaterdingo 07:33, 29 September 2018"

I removed the arrow and cropped the person it was pointing at: File:OMM csendőrség csoportkép (cropped).jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:37, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Vysotsky. — Racconish💬 15:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]