Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/04/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 3rd, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images/unused images of non-notable people/groups of people

INeverCry 03:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 CommentFile:Aarons-CustomerCore-1000StoreCelebration-7402 (10929000135).jpg is now in use at w:Hair#Curly hair – Wdchk (talk) 03:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment – Given that so many of these nominated images are now in use within Wikipedia articles, it appears that the nominator has simply nominated for deletion most, if not all, of the images within the Category "Unidentified people" without regard for their content or possible usefulness for educational purposes. More care needs to be taken before nominating files for deletion, and mass nominations such as this one should be discouraged. ̴̴̴̴

̽ <bɾ>

  • Oppose – Little or no attempt has been made by the nominator to determine if any of the listed files may have an educational purpose, and in fact most of these files do have educational value, and many of these files are now in use within Wikipedia articles. The nominator is attempting a mass-deletion of files based solely on the fact that each was listed in the category “unidentified people”, despite the fact that many of the above files are mis-categorized because the people in many of the files are identified. The indiscriminate culling of files based on nothing more than categorization (or mis-categorization as the case may be) is not acceptable. Dolovis (talk), 15 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Delete to the Aarons-CustomerCore images, they serve no educative process, and that Dolovis has gone and added that rubbish to articles to try and justify their usage/etention is somewhere between ridiculous, and a disappointing abuse. The others, really do we have to step through a non-thematic compilation of images and try to provide an opinion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 07:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete File:2tone SG Dallas Shoot.jpg for licensing/impersonation problems (either it is uploaders own work and they are impersonating the subject, or it is someone elses work and the subject hasn't provided evidence of authors permission).
 Delete the entire Aarons-CustomerCore-1000StoreCelebration collection because these are out of scope and have been added to articles with tenuous links - this sort of photo stream is more appropriate to the company website or You-Twit-Face,
 Keep File:Actstrange1.jpg because it does fit into the article it has been added to but needs a description,
 Delete all the ones from File:Adima Porträtfoto.jpg to File:By MuRaT11.jpg as unused and/or out-of-scope (including the ones added to articles in a rather weak attempt to provide EDUSE's),
 Delete File:Capo (Rapper).jpg because although it is in use at de-wiki, it is of questionable copyright status based on this Google search limited to similar images before 1 October 2012,
 Delete all the ones from File:Cardan.jpg to File:Djwars.JPG as unused and out-of-scope images. Green Giant (talk) 01:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: one kept, rest deleted as blatantly out of Commons' scope FASTILY 09:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

images of unknown persons - not in use - no educational value (no COM:EDUSE)

CoCoCounty97 (talk) 00:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unidentified ladies lamenting Keopuolani's death.jpg is in use.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 01:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A historical image from the US National Archives of President Franklin Roosevelt's funeral is of "no educational value" because the people pictured are not identified? It seems pretty clear the files nominated here haven't been individually considered, and this seems kind of disruptive. Dominic (talk) 01:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hanxu 2.JPG is obviously identified.--維基小霸王 (talk) 01:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is an insane number of mutually unrelated images to take up in a single request. That said, on the four images of mine I see among those nominated:
Disruptive, as Dominic wrote above, appears to be an appropriate chracterisation of this mass deletion request. Concerning the three files made and uploaded by me (1, 2, 3): They are part of a concert gallery, Category:Manu Delago Handmade (Popfest 2014). I'd rather not believe, that images of musicians are not welcome here, because only the bandleader has an article (yet). --Tsui (talk) 01:20, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hotel Bristol dinner.jpg is clearly identified, and is in use on dewiki. I'd  Keep on principle since the nominator has failed to properly check to see whether the files that have been put in this category actually meet the criteria specified in the DR. Overeager deletionism of historically valid images in use on Wikimedia projects benefits nobody. —Tom Morris (talk) 01:22, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at a few of these, more or less at random:
I propose a speedy close and keep. If some of these merit deletion, let's see them nominated in some reasonable manner. - Jmabel ! talk 01:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with all above, speedy close and keep. Nom clearly hasn't done their homework. My 4 that are listed are historic and clear enough that historians would be able to identify whom they seek.
 Keep Clearly a sloppy, disruptive and verging on vandalism DR. The files uploade by me (as others) are clearly educational and in scope:

Images of movie premieres: File:Dreamgirls Premiere (366221052).jpg File:Miss Potter Premiere (313202507).jpg File:Miss Potter Premiere (313202986).jpg File:P1090527 (155443143).jpg File:Wolfgang Petersen - Poseidon Premiere 5.jpg

Closing ceremony of the 2015 Military World Games File:Cerimônia de Encerramento (22218092771).jpg

Informal meeting of the EU competitiveness and telecommunications ministers File:Informal meeting of competitiveness and telecommunications ministers. Arrival and welcome Delegate (35856017401).jpg File:Informal meeting of competitiveness and telecommunications ministers. Arrival and welcome Delegate (35988640145).jpg

Organization of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation

File:Επίσκεψη ΥΦΥΠΕΞ Κ. Γεροντόπουλου στο Ερεβάν της Αρμενίας (11355064175).jpg

Brazilian Senate

File:Solenidades. Homenagens (21768451894).jpg

In a few words, all in scope and sloppyly nominated for deletion. Tm (talk) 01:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It seems that this vandal as nominated thousands of images, in this DR and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unidentified men. Speedy close all of them and was blocked as a possible sockpuppet of a former prolific user. True or not, this Drs are pure vandalism, so better not waste peoples time with this actions. Tm (talk) 02:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep There are other things in many of those photographs than just people. I am fine with deletion of few useless images but such large DR seems like waste of time. --Jarekt (talk) 02:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep and re-nominate in smaller batches, preferably less than 25 at a time. Artix Kreiger (talk) 02:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. File:Nickfalcon.jpg is in uses in en:w:Nick Fallon (as can be seen on the image page); apparently shows notable person in scope, though uploader unfortunately neglected to put a proper text description on Commons. Seems a sloppy mass deletion request done without checking usefulness/use of individual images. I suggest closing the batch as kept as too much useful would be lost. Individual images or more thoughtfully/carefully selected sets of images may be resubmitted for deletion request; this batch is too large and diverse. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • [1] - a notable in scope person in a notable location; another person in the photo is not identified, so the nomination states "images of unknown persons - not in use - no educational value". This nomination is simply irresponsible and completely inappropriate. "Category:Unknown persons" is *NOT* an inherent reason to delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KEPT per Artix Kreiger and other comments above. Inappropriate and irresponsibly sloppy mass deletion request. (This is a decision on the mass deletion listing; individual images may be relisted.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:CSD F10 personal photos of non-notable people.

RZuo (talk) 19:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abdul.Rehman.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abdulkerimeroglu kp instagram2 (16176478361).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abhishek Verma.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abi Franklin.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abperfil.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abraham Contreras.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:ACE LOGO.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dieses Bild wurde versehentlich vom mir hochgeladen (AnitaDSK) und ich beantrage bitte die unverzügliche Löschung. Danke im Voraus! AnitaDSK (talk) 08:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abdul.Rehman veer.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luqman younas.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the user's only upload. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 00:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Bad name}} Med saghou (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

作者于游戏内截图,使用CC4.0授权 邻城 (talk) 14:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 22:11, 3 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Screenshot of non-free video game --Krdbot 00:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test, invalid ogg ~nmaia d 15:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted – Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --jdx Re: 03:58, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, source=http://collectionerus.ru/media/items-large/a/ay/ayuzpck0fzwbfssk.jpg. Yellow Horror (talk) 20:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 22:12, 3 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: http://collectionerus.ru/media/items-large/a/ay/ayuzpck0fzwbfssk.jpg --Krdbot 00:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created after 1943, no FoP in Russia for sculptures A.Savin 18:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As it seems, sculpture by K.S.Suminov who died in 2002: [2] [3] --A.Savin 18:47, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Currently, the OTRS is expected to be approved, negotiations are in progress with the right holder. Yours faithfully, --Dogad75 (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2018 (UTC) Приветствую! В настоящее время ожидается разрешение ОТРС, ведутся переговоры с правообладателем. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 07:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Withdrawn. --A.Savin 12:41, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the image by mistake and do not know how to delete it- can you please remove it- thank you. Cherryboom90 (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 12:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted video screenshot of Chinese Central Television Channel 13, not a CC BY-SA picture Tanimodori (talk) 11:39, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 01:44, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, likely Internet image. Wcam (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 01:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Wcam (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 01:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Wcam (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 01:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. File is nothing but raw text. Appears to be fanfiction or an original story or something, possibly written by the uploader. IagoQnsi (talk) 17:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 01:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user page image not in use CoCoCounty97 (talk) 00:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:38, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was created by a state government (Mississippi), not the federal government. RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:39, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reason: British coins are copyrighted by the Royal Mint and thus unfree according to COM:CUR. Moreover, as the date of production is confirmed as 2014, the design of the coin is unlikely to be in public domain. 廣九直通車 (talk) 02:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As suggested by admin User:Jcb, I am now requesting a DR for this photo.廣九直通車 (talk) 03:00, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: As the user who suggested to use regular DR instead, do you have any comments on this file's copyright status?廣九直通車 (talk) 16:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you are right and that this file should be deleted. This is however not a valid reason for speedy deletion, for such cases a normal nomination (like this one) is needed. Such a nomination lasts at least 7 days, so that others have the opportunity to come up with eventual comments. Jcb (talk) 16:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: Learnt it! Thanks a lot!.廣九直通車 (talk) 02:41, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Today is the seventh day of the Deletion request. Do anyone thinks that more discussions were needed?廣九直通車 (talk) 06:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: As the admin, can you make the decision for this file?廣九直通車 (talk) 14:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are miscalculating and impatient of no reason. First the DR cannot be closed yet. 7 April is four days after 3 April, not seven. Second, the DR can be closed after seven days, but we are not in a hurry. We have some backlog. A DR like this is not helpful when fighting the backlog. You have already tagged me four times in this DR, that means that I was distracted from what I was doing already four times. Jcb (talk) 14:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:40, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of unknown women; out of Commons scope. E4024 (talk) 07:06, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:41, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file; out of scope. E4024 (talk) 08:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:44, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence from source that the image is released as claimed 31.185.214.254 08:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. There is no free licence in the newsletter that was presented as source of the image. De728631 (talk) 21:30, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:47, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete this cute kitten per nom. (A pity though... :) --E4024 (talk) 08:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imsagarparmar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPECOM:ADVERT and COM:NOTHOST apply.

jdx Re: 12:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Germany for temporary installations. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:28, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Annadierksen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images are unlikely not own work and can be find on instagram for example.

Migebert (talk) 12:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Francis Johan francis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Earodriguezo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by THE TOURI TRAVELS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies and personal tourist type shots. Unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject is not the creator. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marufkhanoviii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies and personal photos. Unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ĸãdá hádąđ 79 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 20:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Didym at 14:42, 10 April 2018 UTC: No permission since 2 April 2018 - --Krdbot 18:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work, but seems to be an edited version of this image [4] SamHolt6 (talk) 21:00, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan from Magazine (apparently the (Czech?) Aerospace magazine Letectví+kosmonautika. No evidence that it has been legitimately released under a CC-SA-4.0 licenseas claimed. The subject is a prototype Soviet aircraft which first flew in 1944 and did not enter service - for PD-Russia-1996 for an unknown author, it needs to be demonstrated that the photo was published before 1946.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:30, 3 April 2018 (UTC) Nigel Ish (talk) 22:30, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: фото 1934 года Dogad75 (talk) 20:56, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment says "Doubts in authorship and license: Photo of 1934".
Filename says "D.P. lagoons and the A.T. Lagoon". Probably another military-related Soviet picture. And another case of a photo taken of a photo by this user.
Okay, interesting case. This seems to be an unpublished photo. Given the age, the user could very well even be the heir of the copyright holder. But we can't prove that so I doubt this will be kept. Maybe @Incnis Mrsi: can say something about this? - Alexis Jazz 21:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: the filename, of course, does not say anything about lagoons and its meaning could be inferred from the context even without help of #fileinfotpl_desc. What to say here? Yet another uncredited COM:DW off an ancient photo with an unclear copyright status. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Фото, скорее всего, из семейного архива изображённого лица. А авторские права на фотографии принадлежат фотографу и его наследникам. Кроме того, даже если автор неизвестен, дата обнародования также неизвестна, скорее всего фото обнародовано только сейчас. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 11:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment above: "The photo is most likely from the family archive of the pictured person. And the copyright of the photo belongs to the photographer and his heirs. Also, even if the author is unknown, the date of promulgation is also unknown, most likely the photo is published only now. Sincerely"
@Incnis Mrsi: Thanks for looking. I was thinking about PD-1996 for a moment (if copyright in the home country had expired) but that only applies to published works. I had seen the "lagoon" in translations before so that's why I guessed military-related. Maybe the translator actually meant platoon. - Alexis Jazz 14:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Google Translate says the Russian description 'Первый пред. колхоза "Имени Кирова" д.Козловичи (БССР Слуцкого ра-на) Лагун Д.П. с женой - главной солисткой первого национ. хора в 1934 году Лагун А.Т.' is 'The first before. collective farm "Name of Kirov" village of Kozlovichi (BSSR of Slutsk district) Lagun DP with his wife - the main soloist of the first nation. chorus in 1934, Lagun A.T.' and that the caption at ru:Козловичи (Слуцкий район) ('Kozlovichi (Slutsk district)', 'Первый пред. колхоза Козловичи (БССР Слуцкого ра-на) Лагун Д.П. с женой Лагун А.Т.', reads 'The first before. collective farm Kozlovichi (BSSR Slutsk district) Lagun DP with his wife Laguna A.T.' I believe the uploader Lagun D L is D. L. Lagun, a descendant of the male line of Lagun from the subjects D. P. Lagun and his wife A. T. Lagun. The photo appears to have been taken in 1934 by a professional photographer in or near the Kirov collective farm, Kozlovichi village, Slutsk district, Byelorussia, USSR (now Belarus). The vast majority of professional photographers do not sell the copyrights of their photos to the subjects of those photos because they are too expensive. Unless the uploader can prove that the subjects of this photo bought the copyright or that the photographer died before 1968 (>50 years ago) per {{PD-Belarus}}, under Commons policies and guidelines we cannot accept this photo until 1934+120+1=2055 at the earliest.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Message from User:Lagun D L (the uploader) that got lost in strange places:
"когда появились у нас "Авторские права" и лицензии? Не подскажите? Многие архивные фото из личных коллекций(архивов) давно не имеют никаких связей с давно почившими фотографами и давно не существующими фотоателье. Оформлять и платить же за авторство своих фотоматериалов будет далеко не каждый, только едениницы алчные до заработки денег в надежде на обогощение. В итоге получится, что любой пытавшийся (вроде меня) пополнить эту "свободную" электронную энциклопедию, нарвавшись на Ваши "кирпичи" и отсутствие человеческого понимания, бросит эту пустую "забаву" вообще заниматься этим. В итоге этот Ваш "проект" останется только вашим и со временем просто заглохнет на всегда. Тем более мне непонятно такое "ръяное" (считаю предвзятое) отношение именно ко мне. Я Вам обеспечиваю известность, притягиваю (к Вашему сайту) различными интересами людей и тем самым рекламирую его через общественные соцсети - и вы все это просто не цените??? Тогда я вообще в обиде на Вас ухожу от сюда и делайте что хотите. Просто обидно за себя потраченных своих трудов и своего личного времени. А по поводу авторства, так это так не делается как это делаете Вы. Занимайтесь тогда только с музеями и оф. источниками, которые смогут Вам офиц. доказывать все это авторство. Пока еще к Вам с уважением, надеясь на взимопонимание. Просто обидно..."
Automatic translation:
"When did we have the copyrights and licenses? Don't tell me? Many archival photos from personal collections (archives) for a long time have no links with long-pochivshimi photographers and long-time non-existent photo studio. Make and pay for the authorship of their photomaterial will not be everyone, only edeninicy greedy to earn money in the hope of Obogoschenie. As a result, any tried (like me) to replenish this "free " electronic encyclopedia, into on your "bricks " and the lack of human understanding, will throw this empty "fun " In general to do this. As a result, this your "project " will remain only yours and eventually just stall to always. Moreover, I do not understand the "Rjanoe " (I think biased) attitude to me. I foresee you the fame, magnet (to your site) various interests of people and thus advertise it through social social networks-and you all it simply do not appreciate??? Then I'm going to take a grudge against you and do what you want. Just a pity for yourself spent his labors and his personal time. And about the authorship, so it's not done as you do. Then only go to museums and off. Sources that will be able to Jose you. To prove all this authorship. While still to you with respect, hoping for Vzimoponimanie. Just a pity..."
Half the words I don't understand. But I did not nominate this photo for deletion. (Я не назначил эту фотографию для удаления) (I hope this doesn't say I put bananas in my nose) Also, this is not my project. (Это не мой проект) (again with the bananas)
I have no bias against you. You have provided incorrect information for files you have uploaded, claiming you are the author of news articles, magazine articles, state documents and some other things. Together with Incnis Mrsi I have even saved some of the files you uploaded from deletion.
Пожалуйста, прочитайте Лицензирование. (please read COM:L) - Alexis Jazz 14:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: рьяное means approximately “overzealous” in this context; translation failed due to spelling irregularity. «Занимайтесь тогда только с музеями и оф. источниками, которые смогут Вам офиц. доказывать все это авторство» means “make deals only with museums and government(?) sources then, [because these sources] can legally(?) prove authorship is all details”, but this misspelled rant for most parts can be discarded. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:16, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: Unused personal photo. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jobayer Shibli (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 18:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:06, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal photo 219.79.127.134 07:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, by E4024. I identified the place. Taivo (talk) 20:25, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Semmi sem utal arra, hogy a képet az 1930-as években készítették, publikálták. Akár az 1950-es években is készülhetett a kép. Ez bizonytalan jogtisztaságú. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 00:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. --Regasterios (talk) 18:14, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --Sealle (talk) 06:22, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation from http://eu.univ.kiev.ua/departments/naukovo-navchal%60nyy-tsentr-ins/?PAGEN_1=6 Ата (talk) 15:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

anvsu.org.ua
  1. File has been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from http://anvsu.org.ua in 2012.
  2. In 2011, 2016, 2017 license on anvsu.org.ua was Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike (see in Internet Archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110904043056/http://anvsu.org.ua/index.files/ZBORY/2011/Konf11_%20inf.htm)
  3. In Internet Archive page https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://anvsu.org.ua/index.files/Biographies/Pozur.htm has one captured version of 2016
  4. In Internet Archive page https://web.archive.org/web/20130727121523/http://www.anvsu.org.ua/index.files/Za%20abetkoju.htm has captured version of July 2013 where we can see link to page of Pozur
  5. In Internet Archive site https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://anvsu.org.ua has captures since 2007
eu.univ.kiev.ua
  1. On page http://eu.univ.kiev.ua/departments/naukovo-navchal%60nyy-tsentr-ins/pozur-volodymyr-kostyantynovych/ last edits were in October 2013
  2. In Internet Archive page https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://eu.univ.kiev.ua/departments/naukovo-navchal%60nyy-tsentr-ins/pozur-volodymyr-kostyantynovych/ is absent
  3. In Internet Archive page https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://eu.univ.kiev.ua/departments/naukovo-navchal%60nyy-tsentr-ins/?PAGEN_1=6 is absent
  4. In Internet Archive site https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://eu.univ.kiev.ua/ has captures since 2013

--Butko (talk) 08:03, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Butko. Ата, this file could not be copied from eu.univ.kiev.ua, if only because there is a watermark there. --Sealle (talk) 06:32, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensed as CC-SA-4.0, but appears to be a scan from a newspaper or magazine, No evidence that photo has been released under this license. Nigel Ish (talk) 22:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:36, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of Gran Turismo 4. ©SCEI 220.137.15.98 14:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We cannot pur a master plan of government poperty without permission, Please delete it. Riad Hasan Rayhan (talk) 04:01, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - out of scope. --E4024 (talk) 14:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:13, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i couldn't find a free license on this webpage or on other webpages which uses the pic. Sanandros (talk) 05:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sanandros: The website has a sign stating that 'GRANMA © 2014', which is enough to prove the file is not free.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yea but also other websites use that pic that's why probably the website is not the copyright owner. That's why I started a DR.--Sanandros (talk) 05:27, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation: JPL and Southwest Research Instittute (SWRI) hold copyright, JPL is PD but SWRI is not, unless someone can find a specific case for this image. Kees08 (talk) 06:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Sorry, you have failed to do your homework before making such a request. First, I do not understand what this image has to do with JPL? New Horizons is not a JPL mission and JPL does not perform any work on this project. As to this artist rendering it is free to be used for any purpose as their image use policy indicates (... New Horizons is a NASA mission and adheres to the space agency's guidelines for image use and reproduction ..."). Ruslik (talk) 20:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Per the link you did not look at, the copyright belongs to Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory and to Southwest Research Institute (I meant APL instead of JPL, my mistake there). Even though it is a NASA mission, NASA does not do every aspect of the mission, and therefore may not own copyright for certain things. Kees08 (talk) 06:33, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn, per above. Kees08 (talk) 07:29, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   16:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Radwan Duski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:38, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ved Deshwal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From her own internet page. E4024 (talk) 09:06, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OOS. P 1 9 9   16:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misuse userpage Elizabeth'94 (talk) 06:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:USERPAGE. P 1 9 9   16:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images by Edwin Boeckxstaens

[edit]

Irrelevant images from a unimportant painter. Some of them have been deleted earlier. You can find the images on the userpage of Edwin Boeckxstaens. (The user is blocked indefinitely on the Dutch Wikipedia due to a death threat.) Elizabeth'94 (talk) 06:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: proper DR started at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Edwin Boeckxstaens. Please comment there. P 1 9 9   16:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an out of scope personal file, does it not? E4024 (talk) 09:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, plenty of other images from the same place JiriMatejicek (talk) 09:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In Commons:Deletion requests/File:DJ-IRIDIUM LOGO.png, DJ Iridium was considered non-notable. Now, 1½ years later, he is still non-notable. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyvio from here (detail from the background image). See also the deletion request to an identical picture. Anna (talk) 10:38, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please check other uploads by the same user also. I cannot find the other images on the company website, but they are photographed in very much the same style as this one, presumably by a professional product photographer. They are definitely not "own work". Uploader has promised to check with the photographer about the license, but I haven't heard from him since. --Anna (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictitious and misleading Sodacan (talk) 11:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, OOS. P 1 9 9   16:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE — regards, Revi 11:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no freedom of panorama for temporary exhibitions in Germany. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, no freedom of panorama for temporary exhibitions in Germany. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:51, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, from newspaper article (deleted): http://www.capital.ro/episodul-3-1999-2000-dormim-linistiti-pana-azi-statul-co-participant-la-frauda-fni-139217.html and http://www.pozeleonline.ro/o_anunturi/medium/8340.jpg DieselEngineRO (talk) 08:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:56, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a historical image, therefore not an own work. Please show the source and find a suitable licence and do not leave me with the burden of conscience of having contributed to the deletion of a good image. E4024 (talk) 08:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: proper source, author, and license have been added. P 1 9 9   18:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe a copyvio because the lack of metadata, slow resolution and history of the uploader Ezarateesteban 12:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like anything (poster, album cover, music review etc) but an own work. The other files of the same uploader are also dubious "own work". E4024 (talk) 12:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random bits of ground somewhere in Berlin, not in scope.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am not sure this is a permanent exhibition. We also have much better historical photos of the area. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:DW. P 1 9 9   18:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work by a one-time uploader. Not used and probably out of scope. Personality issues. Note:Meta data photo date a year before upload and the declared click date. E4024 (talk) 12:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posters are generally CR'ed. Dubious own work or DW. E4024 (talk) 13:01, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dwbariyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 20:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found this previously deleted unused out of scope personal image in Category:Martial arts of France. E4024 (talk) 13:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Photo appears to be fairly old (The note "ΕΑΜ - ΕΛΑΣ" suggests it's from World War II era) but the date is listed as 2010 and the uploader claims to be the author. It's unlikely that the uploader really took this photo ~70 years ago, and it's not old enough for {{PD-old}}. IagoQnsi (talk) 13:15, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9   18:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of personality rights in Germany Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:12, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We've got two of these and they look like self promotion. E4024 (talk) 13:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:13, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, not educationally useful Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random image of a ground with shadows, not educationally useful Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a non-public artwork, freedom of panorama does not apply Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AskaRobz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Front covers of well known magazines are likely copyright to the publisher and as such require permission from the copyright holder.

Ww2censor (talk) 13:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: on 10:27, 3 April 2018, by EugeneZelenko. P 1 9 9   18:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Posters are generally CR'ed. E4024 (talk) 13:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: File used in personal userpage. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion, out of scope, no longer used on user page (deleted as self promotion) Cabayi (talk) 13:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Useless information.颜邯 (talk) 14:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:21, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Bad quality.颜邯 (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When did author die? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: text-only doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:22, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:55, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:23, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Claimed "Own work". Photo is of subject during a "Photoshoot". No EXIF data. Would need OTRS permission to remain on commons under a free license. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and promotional as well, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:25, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jackmegill (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Went through, found nothing exciting since it's all old stuff, partly pre-1923, partly Navy related. One file requires special attention—File:Washington Navy Yard female lathe operators 1 Jan 1943.jpg. --Taterian (talk) 06:28, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Also went through, updated some licenses and other small things. I don't see any problems. - Alexis Jazz 18:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   18:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JAVIER TZOC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ERRORE MIO Esparco86 (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, failed upload. P 1 9 9   18:28, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio: Personal photo of the uploader himself. Possible promotional photo. Would need OTRS permission from the photographer to remain on commons. Sixflashphoto (talk) 15:24, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please note that user name is only a nickname. The possibility of the uploader being Federico Sassi is not too bigger than me being a motorway in Europe. Delete if there is any suspicion. --E4024 (talk) 15:30, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:29, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of photo found at http://www.une.edu/president/strategicplan/about-une Ytoyoda (talk) 15:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version of photo at http://www.une.edu/sites/default/files/styles/une_banner_home/public/biddefordlocation.jpg?itok=7pX3fZiU Ytoyoda (talk) 15:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable copyright. This is a copy of an image from http://www.fox8live.com/story/37863514/miami-seo-expert-george-llizo-is-offering-free-marketing-consultations-through-llizo-marketing, which gives no indication that it's freely licensed. The fact that there's no EXIF data in the file adds to the suspicion that it was downloaded from that site. RoySmith (talk) 15:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fichier inutile AndreTS (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   18:31, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serves no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 16:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:31, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 16:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:31, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 16:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:31, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2009 Martin Sg. (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2009 Martin Sg. (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2009 Martin Sg. (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2009 Martin Sg. (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2009 Martin Sg. (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2009 Martin Sg. (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2009 Martin Sg. (talk) 16:17, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2009 Martin Sg. (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2009 Martin Sg. (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist died in 2009 Martin Sg. (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo IagoQnsi (talk) 16:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serves no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 16:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, exists on other sites: Pinterest, saved from another site, and also appears here. I see a lot of images that came from Pinterest, so maybe it's OK, although in this case the Pinterest image came from somewhere else, so I don't know what to make of it. Anachronist (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serves no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 16:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:34, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was marked speedy: File:Description des reptiles nouveaux ou imparfaitement connus de la collection du Muséum d'histoire naturelle et remarques sur la classification et les caractères des reptiles (Plate XX) BHL4039644.jpg by user:Jeff G. Previous revision was cropped and Fæbot uncropped it making this a copy of that other file. User:Fæ may want to revert that uncrop? - Alexis Jazz 16:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you mean the opposite of your words. -- (talk) 20:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@: On 1 November 2015, you uploaded the smaller in pixels 2,030 × 2,790 (964 KB) version I call "cropped". Then, on 7 February 2018, your bot uploaded the larger in pixels 2,470 × 3,354 (668 KB) version with the comment "Uncrop" and unexplained fewer KB.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Because the original file was supplied cropped, by the IA on their Flickrstream. Their crops are intended to make automatically extracted images more useful for the public, rather than whole pages from the book. It is not a very reliable process, hence the uncrop/manual recrop process. Background: User:Fæ/Project list/Internet Archive -- (talk) 16:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@: Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   18:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo (well, only use is on en:User:Mr. Rahim uddin, a page I've just tagged for speedy deletion as unambiguous advertising—should be long gone when this deletion request closes) IagoQnsi (talk) 16:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:37, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AhsanShaokat786 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos with no educational value. One of the photos is used in a Wikipedia draft, but that page is currently nominated for deletion (disclaimer: I'm the nominator).

IagoQnsi (talk) 17:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:39, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG version of File:Exterior martinez valero.jpg, not used on Wikipedia and JPEG version is superior to this. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:11, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refer to a description of Image. Suz-b (talk) 17:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says www.reflectionmediausa.com is the copyright holder Ytoyoda (talk) 17:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license, please see uploader's comment Jvs (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo, appears to be taken from an arabic linked in profile and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:47, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie/photo of friend and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Claimed "Own work", per metadata, Author Kelvin Nguyen Copyright holder Kelvinphotography Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was intended for a deleted promotional item Regi51 (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:47, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope, one of two uploads Pibwl (talk) 19:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doesn't seem to be in a scope Pibwl (talk) 19:13, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

all vehicles are so obscured, that there is no real educational use Pibwl (talk) 19:14, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Tm. P 1 9 9   18:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

oupt of scope, some promo Pibwl (talk) 19:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

oupt of scope, some promo, along with File:Beyond Advertising.png Pibwl (talk) 19:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promo - doesn't seem to be in a scope Pibwl (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Obviously, the file of another author. MTinka (talk) 19:31, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 20:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:51, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE.. This user has six edits on Commons and one on WP:EN. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. All he has done since this nomination is turning his userpage into self promotion. still no meaningful contributions. Feel free to reupload after a while. Why not first learn the ropes?. P 1 9 9   19:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dasfasdfds (talk · contribs)

[edit]

 Delete the uploader now claims these painting as own work when clearly they are the by an artist who only died in 1994 per de:Heinrich Maria Hunger. The images do not comply with the Austrian freedom of panorama requirements as described at Commons:Freedom of panorama#Austria.

Ww2censor (talk) 21:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 22:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

图像质量低,模糊不清。 Tyg728 (talk) 12:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. Even if it's a low quality image, we consider images used by Wikimedia sites as in scope and normally keep them. --whym (talk) 08:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: This is a possible copyright violation as it looks like artworks from the company ChemoMetec https://chemometec.com/cell-counters/cell-counter-nc-200-nucleocounter/ Fnielsen (talk) 07:56, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:06, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Léonie Humbert-Vignot died in 1960. Copyright violation.

Chassipress (talk) 16:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: OTRS authorisation needed from the author's heirs of by Musée des Beaux-Arts de Lyon. Ruthven (msg) 11:15, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work: Would need OTRS from the author Hans Op de Beeck to remain on commons under a free license. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Obviously, the file of another author. MTinka (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:30, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, Claimed "Own work", per metadata Author Philauc, Copyright holder Photo de Philauc, tous droits reserves. Sixflashphoto (talk) 19:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OTRS authorisation needed from the author Philauc. Ruthven (msg) 11:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nizzoli died in 1969, so this is presumably still in copyright. The uploader is likely to be globally-locked nuisance editor Alec Smithson – see https://tools.wmflabs.org/guc/?user=79.51.135.102 (which is surely Smithson). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dudovich died in 1962, so this is presumably still in copyright. The uploader is likely to be globally-locked nuisance editor Alec Smithson – see https://tools.wmflabs.org/guc/?user=79.51.135.102 (which is surely Smithson). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:39, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:11, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Iran. sculptor, Hasan Arjangnejad is alive. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historic image (postcard?) [5], not the uploader's own work. El Grafo (talk) 14:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also affects:


Deleted: per nomination. — regards, Revi 12:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-permanent installation, freedom of panorama does not apply. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:03, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mariana (20886692429).jpg. E4024 (talk) 07:35, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak delete Jeff gave Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bori (30530322012).jpg as a reason for keeping this in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mariana (20886692429).jpg but the photo nominated here is (imho) not great quality. Don't really see much educational value besides "example of bored looking woman", but there is no shortage of that. - Alexis Jazz 15:15, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: no reason on Earth to delete. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:18, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Autokennzeichen sind nicht anonymisiert Jo.Fruechtnicht (talk) 07:36, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ein Duplikat mit unleserlich gemachten Autokennzeichen ist als "Datei:Neuer Pferdemarkt Nord.jpg“ vorhanden. --Jo.Fruechtnicht (talk) 16:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Overwritten photograph with an identical one with licence plate numbers blanked. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:29, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely not a photo that was made by uploader. image can be found numerous times in google search. it has also been used on posters: https://leylabilge.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/leyla4.jpg JD {æ} 09:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. (see ie https://leylabilge.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/leyla4.jpg). For sure it was uploaded after it first appeared publicly elsewhere. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One-time upload in a draft page. Any chances for the draft to become an article? If not, it's out of scope, IMHO. E4024 (talk) 12:28, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:36, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work without metadata. E4024 (talk) 13:25, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be a free work. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:40, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like personal promotion. If kept reduce the cats please. E4024 (talk) 14:07, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:SCOPE. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:05, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zork was first published in year 1977 (U.S.), thus this is not in public domain and is non-free? (en.wiki has non-free use rationales for images of Zork.) (COM:L) 84.250.17.211 16:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Apparently, the game shown in the screenshot is actually not the commercial game Zork but Dungeon, the MIT predecessor of the Zork series, and this might be under a free license? Gestumblindi (talk) 22:05, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Whatever, it's not the game to be showed but a disclaimer page. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:08, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was certainly not published prior to January 1, 1923. Another image from the same event is marked {{PD-USGov}}, but I see no evidence that this would apply for this image as well (as far as we know this may just as well have been taken by a foreign press person). El Grafo (talk) 13:28, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I have problems understanding your point. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 17:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Blackcat: the copyright status is unclear. It uses {{PD-US}}, which says that it is in the Public Domain, but gives no reason as to why that would be the case – apart from "often because its first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1923", which is certainly not the case, because the image was taken in 1943 (= 20 years after 1923). Forget what I wrote about other images and PD-USGov etc. – I was just trying to find a way to keep it but there's no evidence supporting that. --El Grafo (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@El Grafo: , the image is not PD-USGov. It was taken by Hulton agency in 1943 (here the original), then the archive was donated to BBC, in 1988 was acquired by Deutsch and became Hulton-Deutsch and eventually it entered in the Getty picture archive. The Egyptian copyright law states that a photograph passes to pd 50 years pma, but the fact is that we don't know the name of the photographer nor which country they is national of. If the photographer were from a country of the EU we might apply the rule of anonimity (PD-EU, 70 years past first publication). I am pretty sure this photograph is in PD or almost, being 75 years old and but so far we can't be sure. I am afraid I have to delete it. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 10:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion: no ultimate evidence of absence of whatsoever copyright though is very likely to be free. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 10:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be lifted from http://www.wac.ma/site/fr/palmar%C3%A8s. Regardless, trophy images belong to designers and/or competition organizer, not to uploaders. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:39, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image imperfections and file format suggest this is a screencap of a video, not an original photograph Ytoyoda (talk) 15:01, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eternal and life (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images previously published at by EPA and http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/culture/culture_general/342981.html

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:37, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:45, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Image is a selfie by pt:Kelps Lima, but there's no evidence that the uploader actually is Kelps Lima. The user's other upload was also a copyright violation. Image should be deleted per COM:PRP. IagoQnsi (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio, see [6]. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely from Twitter: https://twitter.com/omarammache/status/976777398824955904 Ytoyoda (talk) 17:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: According to Exif metadata, it is not the uploader's own work but an image from Facebook. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:03, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Minuteman III MIRV path.svg IagoQnsi (talk) 17:27, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Redundant/bad quality. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Dc all five.svg IagoQnsi (talk) 17:28, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Redundant/bad quality. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google screenshot MTinka (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Primaz da ICAB.jpg, and File:Duartecosta1.jpg Small size, no metadata. Obviously, the files of another author. No Permission. MTinka (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work": most likely it's copy https://www.igrejabrasileira.com.br/onacimentodeumsanto Lentoster (talk) 22:56, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The permission stated prohibits commercial use. Mys_721tx (talk) 20:23, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Black and white original may be out of copyright in Japan (compare File:An Jung-geun.JPG). But the colorized version that was apparently grabbed from some website (see water mark) may be subject to additional copyrights owned by the person who colorized it. El Grafo (talk) 13:54, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — regards, Revi 06:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Useless information.颜邯 (talk) 14:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - well in scope. Not an amateur porn or nudity image. --E4024 (talk) 14:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: weak reason for deletion, not out of scope. --Achim (talk) 20:05, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work which looks more like taken from a printed material like a book, magazine or paper photograph. E4024 (talk) 07:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hayır bu foto yu kendim çekmişim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reheval (talk • contribs)

(Uploader says they have taken this pic themselves.) --E4024 (talk) 08:40, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bu fotografı kendim çektim ama efekt vererek biraz eskitmiştim

  • The uploader, User:Reheval wrote something in Turkish and I translated it (see second para please). Now an IP comes and speaks in first person singular (I mean as if the uploader were themselves) in an almost perfect Turkish. (They forgot to add the final period only.) Two issues: User:Reheval knows how to "talk", does not "invent" a template to express himself/herself. S/he knows how to speak in a -kind of- "naive" Turkish proper to people of Southeastern Anatolia. Therefore, we have the uploader and an IP claiming to have uploaded the pic. IMHO two different people, but only God is never mistaken. FYI, closing admin. --E4024 (talk) 06:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Let me try to translate the so-called "template" more or less "mot a mot": "I took this photo myself but I had made it look older by giving an effect". --E4024 (talk) 15:31, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per the precautionary principle. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:30, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: Artwork possibly(???) from ChemoMetec https://chemometec.com/ Fnielsen (talk) 08:01, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality colorization of an old photograph. If we want to keep this, the meta data need some updates. But do we normally keep this kind of fantasy image? El Grafo (talk) 14:00, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Irrelevant document of questionable notability used in article about university. Could be replaced with web link. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Single upload on a draft. Probably out of scope. Still at least one week to create an article. E4024 (talk) 15:18, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:32, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficiently free license. Although the map data (OpenStreetMap–ODbL) and application code (GPLv3) for OsmAnd are both freely licensed, the design elements including the UI, layout, icons, etc are under CC-BY-ND-NC (an unacceptable license on Commons). Not to mention that some elements such as icons are under proprietary licenses. Screenshots of this app are thus not permissible on Commons. The app's license can be found here.

IagoQnsi (talk) 18:21, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider Threshold_of_originality
dulliman Dulliman (talk) 11:13, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For example on this image all GUI elements are obviously below Threshold of originality. And I assume it's the same for all other images. --Alexrk2 (talk) 14:34, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Only one image had a proper license tag, all others were "licensed" under a clearly invalid CC license. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:35, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Partially restored: Per UDR request. --Majora (talk) 21:15, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Discussion moved to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kusner-Trump family 19113714 10155532515197682 4727968954922492068 n.jpg.


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:36, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Needs evidence for the claim of the uploader Mriguel that he/she owns the copyright on this photograph by Alexandre Deschênes. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:36, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"oeuvre d'art" exposée en France mais il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France. et la photo esy copiée de http://www.electric-art.eu/pages/oeuvre_eng.html Habertix (talk) 22:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment uploader = artist. --Te750iv (talk) 22:56, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Indeed, it looks like it's the artist. But given that the photo was already published, although apparently in a smaller size ([7]), on at least two websites of the artist, with a strict "reproduction prohibited" warning and a mention that the rights are managed by the agency ADAGP, it would be safer to have confirmation through OTRS of the uploader's identity. The uploader placed a note on another of her files, mentioning that she sent something. If the mail in question comes from this address or from another address publicly associated with the artist, that could probably serve to validate her account for all her uploads. However, I would be curious to know if the rights-managing contract, concluded between the agency ADAGP and the artist, allows the artist to also manage the rights herself in parallel and to directly issue licenses, in particular free licenses. It would be useful if the artist or ADAGP would clarify that point, to be sure that there is no misunderstanding. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
CommentHello, I sent my permition by email on March 26, 2018 19:56 to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the text: "I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following license Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. " Could you confirm the receipt?

I also sent the original file as proof that I am the author. It's me who uploads it on the page of Wikipedia, it does not come in copy of any website. Do you want a copy of my mail? All members of ADAGP have the right to manage their copyright themselves.--elena (talk) 09:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no freedom of panorama in France. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: ticket:2018032610010973. Yann (talk) 18:12, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]