Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/01/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 29th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:구형주기율표.png

[edit]

Copyright violation - source is not allow commericial (it's using CC BY-NC-SA) 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 11:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, speedied. — regards, Revi 11:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Markheffron2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Duplicated files of private images outside of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:29, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The subject(s) could be identifiable. Rybec (talk) 19:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There really should be a warning sing for this DR's. Bit awkward to open them at school :p A well out of scope and I agree with Rybec as well. Natuur12 (talk) 13:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Markheffron2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Set of files of wrong format (ogg used for short video, animated gifs) that are of bad quality and low resolution, and mono-thematic. We have much better images/videos for male masturbation. Besides, Commons shouldn't become a free space for exhibitionists because Commons is not an amateur porn site (per COM:PORN).

Ruthven (msg) 09:02, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Markheffron2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User is still using Commons as a personal hosting website for low quality nude/porn photographs. Per COM:SCOPE and COM:PORN.

Ruthven (msg) 11:45, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - speedy deleted as well as other uploads not nominated - obviously out of scope. User have been warned too, next time block. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by I am real admn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

theinstantmatrix (talk) 00:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily deleted as per criteria G.3: attack page. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malhação2017 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Highly unlikely to be own work. Uploader tried to license review it themselves and was repeatedly reverted. Any tags asking for additional information were also removed. Time to just launch a DR and be done with it.

Majora (talk) 05:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: speedily: Copyvios, source found via Google image search. Faked license review by uploader. --Achim (talk) 16:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-sd.svg

[edit]

Logo is a hindrance in naming the newly designed logo for Sindhi Wikipedia, currently named as file:Wikipedia-logo sindhi v2-sd.svg. مھتاب احمد (talk) 16:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Kept: This doesn't require a deletion request, the file can simply be overwritten. Furthermore, a Commons file doesn't directly influence the logo visible on the actual wiki, as those have been served from a Git repository for quite some time now. Plus, the community still needs to agree for the logo to be changed. odder (talk) 17:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Odder: I am sorry I am not getting you completely kindly see this link. It might tell you my concerns. Thanks.--مھتاب احمد (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@مھتاب احمد: Yes, I understand that you would like to have the logo for your Wikipedia updated with this new version by @Goran tek-en. An update like this does not require a deletion request; you can simply overwrite the existing logo with the new version. However, this will not affect the logo you see in the top-right corner of your Wikipedia, as that file is served from the mediawiki-config Git repository (specifically from here). So, in order to change that logo, you need to gain your community's consensus to do so, and then start a new request in Phabricator. I'm sorry to see that you appear to have been given incorrect information, but if you follow the process I outlined, there should be no issues with updating the logo. Thank you, odder (talk) 17:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Odder: I have submitted a ticket here, and community consensus is going on [[:sd:Wikipedia:نياتي_باب#لوگو_جي_تبديليءَ_لاءِ_ھمايت_%DA%AF%DA%BE%D8%B1%D8%|here]]. Thank you--مھتاب احمد (talk) 18:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Calvaire sur la route D133.jpg

[edit]

File:Calvaire sur la route D133.jpg Photo de mauvaise qualité Nadine TOUDIC (talk) 16:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Jcb at 16:02, 29 Januar 2018 UTC: File is corrupt, empty, or in a disallowed format --Krdbot 19:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Minggu Pagi Onan Peyon.jpg

[edit]

unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 02:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Azhar Bryar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:09, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Azhar Bryar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Random personal photos of no educational value

Adamgerber80 (talk) 07:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ouranosaurus by PaleoGeek.jpg

[edit]

Older inaccurate paleoart of mine, not needed, to keep wikipedia's from using it by accident. Was more of a test than anything. PaleoGeekSquared (talk) 00:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Dyolf77 at 22:59, 29 Januar 2018 UTC: Older inaccurate paleoart of mine, not needed, to keep wikipedias from using it by accident. Was more of a test than anything. --Krdbot 01:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ss fans.jpg

[edit]

Copyrights Clutching (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Sreejithk2000 at 22:15, 29 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Non-free image from http://www.fcesteghlal.ir/ --Krdbot 01:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ren Yoshikawa.jpg

[edit]

Not found at URLCopyright (C) 2011 PRESTIGE. All Rights Reserved anyway. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, straight ahead copyright violation. --Tabercil (talk) 04:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zwerge mit Schi auf dem Dach (26808741629).jpg

[edit]

Problematic per COM:TOYS. There is no indication that freedom of panorama could apply here. AFBorchert (talk) 14:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Olympiaübertragung auf dem Smartphone (7814068298).jpg

[edit]

The main focus of this photo is a screenshot of a copyrighted video where we do not have a free release. This is no longer a case of de minimis. AFBorchert (talk) 17:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:"Haut ab, Volksverräter" - Merkel bei Wahlkampfauftritt in Sachsen und Thüringen heftig beschimpft (35838168013).jpg

[edit]

How does this fit into COM:SCOPE? AFBorchert (talk) 17:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bakery Photography (30299829436).jpg

[edit]

COM:DW Steinsplitter (talk) 19:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gib mir den Apfel (38421432652).jpg

[edit]

Per COM:TOYS. AFBorchert (talk) 17:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Marcus Cyron at 15:59, 30 Januar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wuestenigel --Krdbot 19:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kind findet den verloren gegangenen Ball (38397556906).jpg

[edit]

Per COM:TOYS. AFBorchert (talk) 17:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Marcus Cyron at 16:00, 30 Januar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wuestenigel --Krdbot 19:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eine Gruppe von Arbeitern beim Streiken (37738544424).jpg

[edit]

Per COM:TOYS. AFBorchert (talk) 17:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Marcus Cyron at 16:00, 30 Januar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wuestenigel --Krdbot 19:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Consumers Distributing.jpg

[edit]

Not used on Wikipedia, not very good resolution 76.66.194.134 23:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ellin. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Consumers Distributing.jpg

[edit]

Not used on Wikipedia, low resolution Omergreat (talk) 19:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of File:Consumers_Distributing_logo.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 21:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by James vyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Personal photos. Using on user pages as social media.

Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 07:23, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by James vyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Personal photos. Using on user pages as social media.

Godric ki Kothri talk 11:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by James vyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Random personal photos of no educational value

Adamgerber80 (talk) 07:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by James vyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Personal photos. User using site as social media. Please block him if possible.

Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 16:23, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erick Schiavon.jpg

File:Erick Schiavon.jpg

[edit]

And also:

Out of COM:SCOPE: photos of non relevant person. --Stegop (talk) 10:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erick Schiavon.jpg

File:Erick Schiavon.jpg

[edit]

And also:

Out of COM:SCOPE: photos of non relevant person. --Stegop (talk) 10:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erick Schiavon.jpg

File:Erick Schiavon.jpg

[edit]

And also:

Out of COM:SCOPE: photos of non relevant person. --Stegop (talk) 10:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erick Schiavon.jpg

File:Erick Schiavon.jpg

[edit]

And also:

Out of COM:SCOPE: photos of non relevant person. --Stegop (talk) 10:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erick Schiavon.jpg

File:Erick Schiavon.jpg

[edit]

And also:

Out of COM:SCOPE: photos of non relevant person. --Stegop (talk) 10:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:War is over!.svg

[edit]

Copyrighted poster, not own work. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:اذكروا الله.jpg

[edit]

Unused image of a not notable artwork. E4024 (talk) 11:46, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:صورة فوتوغرافية لشخص غير معروف.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:محمد تكليف.jpg

[edit]

we not need this image علاء فحصي (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, OoS file.  Delete --E4024 (talk) 16:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:شعار نادى الجواء.jpg

[edit]

copyright violotion علاء فحصي (talk) 16:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Colette film 2018.jpg

[edit]

violazione copyright Bart ryker (talk) 16:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reverse of the Samsung Galaxy S9.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely own work. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Original shirt ESP 12-1 MLT.jpg

[edit]

Uploader did not create the images of the players, nor the object shown in this image. Seems highly derivative to me, with both the Adidas logo and the Football Club logo as well as photo of the player. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Salam marvan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of Indian actresses, small size, no meta data, unlikely own work, more likely copied from somewhere else not noted.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by L rodrigues9 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication that these small, smaller and smallest photos were actually taken by the uploader, and to suggest they are not, no meta data, low quality, mono-topic upload.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alejandro tambare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work on architecturals and city scapes. Notice lack of metadata, variability of size, and that one (at least) is a drawing.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Do you like the Miracle Morning so much as I do? -earlybird -imwiesbaden -im703wiesbaden -triathlontraining -happy -morning -dawn -sun (28681316646).jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo about a personal achievement in the morning. This does not appear to fit into COM:SCOPE. AFBorchert (talk) 17:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:New eddition of Taj Tehran Logo By Mohammad Mahdi Malayeri.png

[edit]

Professional logo of a club, not own work Clutching (talk) 17:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:صوري top.jpg

[edit]

JPEG derived from File:VLC Icon.svg. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fernando Muñoz.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:45, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bonvallet Hotel.jpg

[edit]

Debido a que existe una investigación realizada por la Policía de Investigaciones de Chile (PDI), debido a la publicación indebida de las imágenes de la muerte de Eduardo Bonvalett. PDICYBER (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bonvallet Hotel.jpg

[edit]

Debido a que existe una investigación realizada por la Policía de Investigaciones de Chile (PDI), debido a la publicación indebida de las imágenes de la muerte de Eduardo Bonvalett. PDICYBER (talk) 20:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bonvallet Hotel.jpg

[edit]
PDICYBER (talk) 20:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pud00 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

First we don't both similar images. Secondly this is a photomontage and a free source must be provided for each images.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pud00 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of own work on drawings claimed from 1860, and 1867 as well as photo from 1932, city logo, city seal and a sign.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:London Can Take It.jpg

[edit]

Author en:Harry Watt dies in 1987. The given license {{PD-old}} is not valid. JuTa 19:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC) --Gabriele Diana (talk) 02:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination by Jcb. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chooka Talesh FC.png

[edit]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theweddinngcardsonline (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Product presentation, out of project scope.

Achim (talk) 20:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:29, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Burgundy Poland Union Swoon.JPG

[edit]

Graffiti, may also fail FOP Elisfkc (talk) 20:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*  Comment I am the uploader; someone else uploaded a different/modified image (photographed by someone other than me) over my photo for unexplained reason. I have reverted to my original upload. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:24, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep (referring to my own upload, again occupying this title) Seems in line with other allowed graffiti photos. Certainly unauthorized (I recall while I was photographing the building owner came out expressing his displeasure with the vandalism to his historic building!). -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:30, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Evolène centre.jpg

[edit]

Mauvaise qualité de téléchargement Virginny88 (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:50, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Louis-Jacques Rondeleux.jpg

[edit]

Does not look like own work, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Dyolf77 at 00:08, 31 Januar 2018 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Louis-Jacques Rondeleux.jpg: Does not look like own work, probably copyright violation. --Krdbot 01:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adrien Cayla-Legrand — DS — The Day of the Jackal (1973).jpg

[edit]

Stills photography taken on a French set for a French-British feature and licenced thru a multi national company (via its French domain). Any proof that it had been first published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 03:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Adrien Cayla-Legrand — The Day of the Jackal (1973).jpg

[edit]

Stills photography taken on a French set for a French-British feature and licenced thru a multi national company (via its French domain). Any proof that it had been first published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 03:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mehdi.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal file, out of Commons scope. E4024 (talk) 11:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 12:40, 31 Januar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli --Krdbot 19:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mehdi.jpg

[edit]

Is this file empty or do I have a browser problem? I DR it due to lack of MD and user behaviour. E4024 (talk) 16:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - file is indeed empty. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MUHAMMED RAFI.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 16:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Casey redmond under control by jredmond123456-dc1k4r8.jpg

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused and unusable image of minor, who is probably still identifiable. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

just because Jredmond1999 (talk) 23:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, could also be personal attack/harrassment. --Yann (talk) 04:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious free images from Bollywood Hungama

[edit]

Bollywood Hungama, the source of these files, is a website dedicated to Bollywood in general and other Indian film related activities. They have released some images under free licenses; refer Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama. But the subject two three images are of American actors shot at the Academy Awards function. It is possible for the website people to fly to LA and click these pics or they can upload it from any other source that has given these pics under the same license. But i am still suspicious about that. Should we trust this website in this case?

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out to another such image. Have enlisted it as well.
The site hosting these images in "parties and events" category doesn't actually confirm that they own these images. The OTRS email releases copyrights on images which have been created by their photographers. The site also has film posters, screenshots of films and other promotional photos, the copyrights of which are not owned by the site and hence cannot be released by them. Also, i have come across many times with examples where party and event photographs have actually been uploaded in movie-still category by the website. So blindly following this-category-is-safe is wrong. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:12, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I assume these images are from photo agencies and that we can't trust Bollywood Hungama here. Hekerui (talk) 21:47, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FASTILY 08:10, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama

[edit]

For the reasons stated in the previous DR Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have just read why same images uploaded earlier are deleted. I strongly object. If u doubt integrity of bollywood hungama then why not doubt copyright status of every image in events section of bollywood hungama? Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan were invited at Oscars 2011 and bollywood hungama being leading website about bollywood news, its photographer travelled with them and took these shots. U have problem if bollywood hungama take pics of hollywood stars while present in hollywood? Neo. (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Read what Hekerui said. There are examples there of why this isnt trustworthy. I found more. File:AmyAdams.jpg's uncropped full version is copyrighted by Richard Harbaugh/©A.M.P.A.S. over here. Similar with Paltrow over here and Kunis over here. I made a mistake in opening this DR instead of directly going for speedy deletion requests. But one good thing is that it at least got documented now. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Any website can pick up images from bollywood hungama and claim copyrights. If my websites based in African countries copy images from bollywood hungama and claim copyrights, will you start nominating images for deletion? If not, why?
Bollywood hungama reporter Devansh Patel had travelled to cover Oscars 2011. His report is here. His twitter id is this. These are https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=%40Pateldevansh+oscar&s=typd&x=17&y=15 some of his tweets to confirm that he covers hollywood also. If admins delete images on basis of guesswork and suspicion then it means there is simply no rule of law on Commons. Neo. (talk) 11:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose you have failed to notice that the examples i have give are uncropped images whereas BH's images are cropped versions. The one who has uploaded full images is likely to be the owner/copyright holder. And yes... we have no rule of law. We strive to protect the rightful copyright holder and also the likely possible copyright holder. We are not a court of law. In case BH thinks they own the images, they may sue the false copyright claimants.
Also, its not absolutely necessary to be at a certain place to write about it. And the Indian copyrights laws are not at all strict. Copyvios by topmost publishing houses is not uncommon in India. So if some Patel is actually copying images of others and posting on his name, i wouldn't be shocked. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The EXIF of other bollywoodhungama photos from the 83rd Annual Academy Awards 2011 [1] confirms that this photos are from A.M.P.A.S.. The pictures all have no bollywoodhungama watermark. So the license not applies, simple case. This also applies to the other 83rd Academy Awards photos:

--Martin H. (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out to two more such images. Have added them too in DR. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:45, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: All pictures nominated are cropped from other copyrighted source. --PierreSelim (talk) 08:43, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama

[edit]

COM:DW?

Yann (talk) 12:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 01:24, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama

[edit]

None of these Bollywood Hungama images were taken at Bollywood events or parties. We have TV shows, fashion week, jewelry week, book launches, and images of celebrities just out and about. In order to qualify for the OTRS release the image has to have been taken at a Bollywood party or event. These do not qualify.

Majora (talk) 22:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This comes up every now and then. The permission is for all pictures by Hungama photographers, not only for events organised by Hungama. We have interpreted that in a broad sense: all images from Hungama quality, unless there is evidence to the contrary (events outside India, film stills, specific copyright claim, etc.). Regards, Yann (talk) 08:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Who is "we", Yann. Because there is a lot of evidence to the contrary that whatever agreement these "we" had was never disseminated to the masses and if it exists it has been routinely ignored. Was this OTRS agents? Was this Commons users? Was it admins? Not only does the template, {{Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama}}, explicitly say otherwise, but so does precedent. I just had other Bollywood Hungama images deleted under this same rationale last week. So have many other image reviewers. You really need to link to this discussion and perhaps ensure that more people know about it. As for "events outside India" that covers some of these images but not all. --Majora (talk) 23:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We means the Commons community. I know the template is ambiguous, but so is the permission. You are free to propose an improvement. My comment is only general regarding your rationale for deleting these files. I didn't look at the files themselves. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Would it be possible to dig up the discussion, Yann? It seems highly unorthodox for the community at large to decide something based on a ticket most of them cannot see. I just want to make sure what actually was said before I go about redoing the template. Yes, the ticket is ambiguous, but wouldn't that be cause for airing on the side of more caution (more strict interpretation)? I'll change what I'm doing to whatever the community wants me to do but I need to know what exactly that is. Thanks. --Majora (talk) 21:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama and its talk page, as well as Commons:Deletion requests/All files in Category:Files from Bollywood Hungama. There were also numerous DRs and discussions on COM:OTRS/Noticeboard. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:57, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Really? Obviously I've already looked at the template and its talk page. It clearly says it must be a "Bollywood party or event". The template talk page says nothing whatsoever about "all" images from Bollywood Hungama are acceptable. In fact, it says quite the opposite. So that was incredibly unhelpful to tell me to go read that. I'm also aware of the numerous DRs. Many of which use this same exact reasoning and were deleted. Again, wholly unhelpful as is linking to the main OTRS noticeboard. The only actual thread that you linked to does not change a darn thing. It was withdrawn with another link to the OTRS noticeboard from 2012 that explains, once again, nothing. So all in all, you never actually answered my question but instead gave me a bunch of useless links that change nothing. I can't, and won't, change the way I review images and how I interpret the license and the OTRS ticket unless you can actually give me a link that says I should be doing otherwise. Which you have not. I still believe that these images do not fall under the OTRS release that was given to us and will remain there until you can actually give me a link that tells me otherwise and not conflicting DRs and useless RfCs. --Majora (talk) 21:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to add more, but my connection went off, and I am also busy IRL. The template says Bollywood Hungama grants everyone permission to use some of their images under a CC-BY-3.0 license. However, this applies only to images at sets, parties, and press meetings, and not screen-caps or photos copyrighted by other sites. Emphasis is mine. And you have to understand who they are, and how they work. Hungama is a paparazzi company which hire photographers to make photographs of Bollywood people, and sell high resolution copies. Giving away small copies with a watermark is a benefit, not a service for them. It is free advertising. So Hungama grants a free license for these small copies made by their photographers, who only work in India. They can only license images of which they own the copyright, that's why screen-caps or photos copyrighted by other sites, and pictures from outside India are excluded. Everything else is included. As I said, we already have had this discussion several times. I hope it is clear enough. Regards, Yann (talk) 05:34, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In yet, you continue to miss actually linking me to this discussion that you claim you have had several times. I will not put my own ideas into the permission and I certainly won't make it more permissible than what the template clearly says without an actual link that proves otherwise. It being free advertising is completely and totally irrelevant. Especially considering most of the watermarks are cropped out of the photos by uploaders making your entire point moot. Why do you continue to fail to prove your point? All I'm asking for is a link, which if there has been several discussions, should be relatively easy to find. It is on you to prove your point. I'm not going to go hunting for it and I'm not going to change the way I interpret the license when there have been numerous DRs that have resulted in deletion with the same rationale. So obviously it has been acceptable before. I've also read the ticket and the ambiguity should result in a more strict interpretation. Not a "well it is ambiguous so everything is acceptable!" That isn't how Commons, as I know it, works. Ambiguity always falls on the side of caution. We have an entire policy that revolves around that for a reason. This DR is a reflection of that and a reflection of both the template and how the OTRS ticket is actually written. --Majora (talk) 22:38, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I provided all the explanations everybody else has. I can't do anything if you fail to understand the issue. Regards, Yann (talk) 03:47, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your failure to adequately back up your point of view is noted. It isn't my understanding that is faulty. --Majora (talk) 04:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed these pictures, which were made by Hungama photographers in India, so the permission is valid. Again Hungama doesn't organise events. It sends its photographers to events organised by others, where Bollywood people are present. Regards, Yann (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. These pictures were made by Hungama photographers in India, so the permission is valid. --Yann (talk) 04:31, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama

[edit]

I have some doubt about these files: no watermark, link only to BH main page, different naming convention, and these are not Bollywood actresses, but fashion models. May be OK, but I would like a second opinion.

Yann (talk) 09:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Fixed links. Please check. ~MOHEEN (keep talking) 04:52, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Moheen: Do you have any idea why they do not have a watermark? Regards, Yann (talk) 04:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Those files are posted two years ago, maybe that time they didn't use the watermark. Most of the files look like that. But the licenses is ok, IMO. ~MOHEEN (keep talking) 07:53, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 09:41, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama

[edit]

Not taken by BH photographer, these are promotional posters released by the production house or cast.

CptViraj (talk) 04:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CptViraj: I'm not doubting your decision. But are you sure. I think one or more image don't qualify for deletion. And BH files template display it accepts files from on the set. So I upload few files on the set of Nikamma. Does BH not allow files on the set. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:04, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@C1K98V: They are allowed but it also says "taken by a Bollywood Hungama photographer". These files were published by production house and/or cast on their social media. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:10, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@CptViraj: , how to find out that taken by a Bollywood Hungama photographer. Guide me in this. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are instructions at Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 14:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:UrquhartU.jpg

[edit]

Uploader don't provide any Flickr link. ✓Jæ✓ 11:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reddelicousbyharry.jpg.png

[edit]

out of scope; personal image/selfie; blurry; used to vandalize an article on enwiki theinstantmatrix (talk) 00:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SC-Flop-eg.jpg

[edit]

Tiny low quality personal image of an unidentified person, the file is not in use; out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sedrun 2007 - panoramio - Geert Vercruysse (1).jpg

[edit]

Blurry personal vacation photo dumped from panoramio; unused, contains no educational value; out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tamy.jpg

[edit]

Unused low-quality selfie; out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:32, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Casey Carter.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal image; out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:32, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Husen Zokirov.jpg

[edit]

unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 01:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andrew confidence.jpg

[edit]

unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 01:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Final Moment.jpg

[edit]

It seems to be a TV screenshot. 4nn1l2 (talk) 02:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lyonlogo.png

[edit]

Copyrighted logo. It's not the own work of the uploader. Rapsar (talk) 07:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:38, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gtst-logo-2017.png

[edit]

copyright logo 84.199.103.113 07:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Farasat1988 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Random personal photos of no educational value

Adamgerber80 (talk) 07:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahesh DM408 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Random personal photos of no educational value

Adamgerber80 (talk) 07:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination+ one is a copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mahesh DM408 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 14:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kerjabatamcom.png

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused text-image and possibly promotional. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo-272x90-thozhil-nedam.png

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused text-image and possibly promotional. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pakistani Handsome Boy 10.jpg

[edit]

User dedicated to self promotion in Commons. Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pakistani Handsome Boy 11.jpg and the other (mass or individual) DRs concerning this so-called user. All their personal images, including this one on their userpage) must be deleted and he must be blocked if continues to do only this in Commons. Please note that files in user pages do not count for COM:INUSE and I'm not referring to this user, but others who copy this boy's images to their own pages. E4024 (talk) 08:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jorge andres.jpeg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 08:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jordyn.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 08:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Spéculateurs (Les).jpg

[edit]

Work of an artist which is still alive, autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 08:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1423679256309636800jpg-207x138-.jpg

[edit]

I found this file in Category:Stages. In scope? E4024 (talk) 09:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peaw fanpage1.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely own work by uploader. Similar images (same setting, same clothing) of the depicted person are shown on her Instagram page. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Persona con su pareha.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sin su permiso - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Probably too dark/unclear to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tu basura - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Too dark to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tu trabajo - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Too dark to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ángela presente.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:47, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ángela Díaz.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:47, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alejandro Moreno.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused (except a teahouse) personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 11:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Muhammad Farhan Arif Bodla.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 11:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Er. Sandeep Gupta.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. Sorry, Sandeep, you are not a real (active) Wikipedian. E4024 (talk) 11:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vikram Jit Singh.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused (except a WD item for a non-notable businessman) personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 12:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Salman Zaman.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 12:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leo-valencia carabobo.jpeg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Panna-Pic.png

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 12:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sample picture.jpg

[edit]

out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 04:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:28, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PickCharacter.png

[edit]

not in project scope DS (talk) 06:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

and in fact this applies to all the user's other uploads too. (Note that this isn't a first offense.) DS (talk) 18:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:تخت.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:33, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Après douche hhhhh.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:33, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Berhanu Feser.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 12:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jose Fuego in 2017.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 12:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:34, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Agustin Prades Simó.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 13:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:35, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Name711.jpg

[edit]

Is this in scope? Arabic-speaking users? Ashashyou, Rafic? E4024 (talk) 13:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:35, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Feb22 2005 Annah Disneyworld 080 - Flickr - GregTheBusker.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 13:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BYOMKESH NAYAK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BYOMKESH NAYAK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files, out of project scope

Jianhui67 T★C 15:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Piyush101010.jpg

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amira McCarthy.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 14:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Abdullah Shah Paacha.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 14:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Des. Mário Albiani.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. "Desembargador", is that a notable position? E4024 (talk) 14:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A very handsome man.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. Note:One time upload by probably a very handsome man. E4024 (talk) 14:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A Sudhakar Raju.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. Note: I don't know if they got to enter the Guinness record book, then could have some scope, but the pic is so small, looks like not own work. E4024 (talk) 14:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jonathan Armstrong Selfie.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. I found it among the UPFs and added to Category:Rappers but dubious notability/scope. E4024 (talk) 15:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yousuf AH Fudol.JPG

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 15:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Noor Ahmed 2.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 15:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mahmoud Ahdy.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ابوذر ربیع زاده هفشجانی 4.jpg

[edit]

corrupted unused photo. SlowManifesto (talk) 16:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ابوذر ربیع زاده هفشجانی 2.jpg

[edit]

corrupted unused photo + no FOP in Iran. SlowManifesto (talk) 16:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohamed Traore en Decembre 2016.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John golden (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion. Subject unlikely to be copyright holder (don't appear to be selfies). Out of scope

Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Indonesian Childrens.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ivonne photo.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Private photo, won't be any useful. 06Ivonne (talk) 03:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roryfresco.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Patnitop Hill 1.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Patnitop Hill 2.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hermosa mujer con hoyuelos.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sba7 l3id.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andy1.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bettascema.jpg

[edit]

out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:תצלום דיגיטל בלום.jpg

[edit]

out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rich.shebiebe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of scope.

— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Nova Scotia trunk shields

[edit]

Unused, superseded by File:Nova Scotia 1.svg and similar files. This version is missing the square outline, see various images in Category:Roads in Nova Scotia. Also see COM:HWY/P.

Rschen7754 07:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Imzadi 1979 → 15:01, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Way to tajmahal.jpg

[edit]

Probably too blurred to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Churning.jpg

[edit]

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 21:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:בת הים הקטנה, little Mermaid.jpg

[edit]

No FOP for sculptures in Denmark. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blur but brautiful.jpg

[edit]

Too blurred to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pesquet.jpg

[edit]

Very unlikely to have been shot by the uploader aboard the ISS... Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cette photo a bien été prise à bord de l'ISS. Thomas Pesquet est le parrain du bateau Initiatives Coeur, et il avait emmené une maquette du bateau à bord. Il a lui même posté cette photo sur sa page Facebook le 28 novembre 2016: https://www.facebook.com/ESAThomasPesquet/photos/a.181446708731477.1073741828.145778288964986/535357490007062/?type=3&theater
Facebook conditions of use are incompatible with a Creative Commons licence. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 12:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PedroAznar.jpg

[edit]

Ser watermark Fixertool (talk) 00:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NandanaVarma.jpg

[edit]

Copied from https://www.facebook.com/pg/NandanaOfficial/photos/?ref=page_internal Eastmain (talk) 00:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Diagrams of route signs of Newfoundland and Labrador

[edit]

Replaced by File:NL Route 2.svg and similarly named SVGs. These versions use the wrong colors and font, and in some cases are PNG. Also see COM:HWY/P.

Rschen7754 00:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chanchokit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

方幹民 was a Chinese painter who died in 1984. His works will not fall into the public domain until 2035.

4nn1l2 (talk) 22:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

Wcam (talk) 03:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your request, 4nn1l2.

In reply, according to Article 21 of the Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China of February 26, 2010 (http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=186569), where a work is created in the course of employment where a legal person (cf. natural person) enjoys the copyright, the right of publication, the right of exploitation and the right to remuneration in respect of the work shall be fifty years, expiring on December 31 of the fiftieth year after the first publication of such work, in contrast to the usual rule that copyright expires fifty years after the lifetime of the author.

In relation to the 11 works flagged, File:1936 孙中山先生授嘱图.jpg was created by Fang Ganmin during his employment by the National History Department of the Chinese Nationalist Party (中國國民黨黨史編纂委員會史畫部). In relation to File:1934 白鸽.jpg, 蔡元培像.jpg, 静物.jpg, 男裸体肖像.jpg and 秋曲.jpg, they were created by Fang Ganmin during his employment by the the China Academy of Art (中國美術學院前身). I can provide further details if you so request. Accordingly, their copyrights had all expired on or before year 2000 and the works therefore belong in the public domain under Chinese law (PD-PRC).

In relation to the five remaining works (File:1982 江南水乡.jpg, File:1982 西子湖边夕照明.jpeg, File:西湖黄龙洞.jpg, File:秋光丽色.jpg, File:拱寰橋北河道風光方幹民.jpg), I agree that they be deleted from Wikipedia Commons. Thank you. Chanchokit (talk) 23:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Although some of these works were created during his employment by these agencies/organizations, there is no indications that these works were created to fulfill his job duties. These works are personal works, as he signs his work with his own name with no mention of the employers. Therefore, the employers/legal persons are not the copyright holders. --Wcam (talk) 02:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment 孙中山先生授嘱图 was clearly created during the course of Fang's employment and in the fulfilment of his duties. The agency of his employ was the KMT Historical Record Department. The very purpose of Fang's employment was to create artwork FOR the department and its archive. Such is the case with all departments of this nature. The content of the painting is especially telling - it is the record of a historical event and was likely to have been used for political or propaganda purposes. All indications point towards this not being the work of a private or personal nature. Note that there is no personal signature on the painting and it was never published on Fang's own behalf.

In relation to 白鸽.jpg and 秋曲.jpg, likewise there is no personal signature on the paintings. They may have been created during his employment by the China Academy of Art for the purpose of being used as class material. The fact that they were retained by the China Academy of Art (where the copyrights currently reside), even after Fang's departure, is indicative.

Therefore, in relation to these three works, I am of the opinion that their copyrights belonged to legal persons, and accordingly insist that they are now in the public domain according to Chinese law. They should not be deleted from the commons. Chanchokit (talk) 14:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chanchokit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Painter 胡善餘 died in 1993. Per {{PD-China}}, paintings not PD in China until 2043.

Wcam (talk) 03:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chanchokit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Painter 顏文樑 died in 1988. Per {{PD-China}}, paintings not PD in China until 2038.

Wcam (talk) 03:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chanchokit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Painter 羅工柳 died in 2004. Per {{PD-China}}, paintings not PD in China until 2054.

Wcam (talk) 03:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chanchokit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Painter 詹建俊 is still alive. Per {{PD-China}}, paintings not PD.

Wcam (talk) 03:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chanchokit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Painter 高泉 died in 2014. Per {{PD-China}}, paintings not PD in China until 2064.

Wcam (talk) 03:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chanchokit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Painter 朱士傑 died in 1990. Per {{PD-China}}, paintings not PD in China until 2040.

Wcam (talk) 03:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chanchokit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per {{PD-China}}, photos takes in 1980s are not PD.

Wcam (talk) 03:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chanchokit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per {{PD-China}}, photos takes in 1980s are not PD.

Wcam (talk) 03:46, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chanchokit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

{{PD-PRC-exempt}} is irrelevant and does not apply to these images.

Wcam (talk) 12:45, 29 January 2018

The copyrights of the three pictures of 李鐵夫 are clearly in the public domain. These pictures were undoubtedly taken before 1967 (Li died in the 50s), putting them safely beyond the 50 years expiry period. PD-PRC is clearly relevant. I object to their deletion. Chanchokit (talk) 13:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-PRC-exempt}} is clearly irrelevant, if you read its content at all. {{PD-China}} may be relevant, but you need to provide when and where the photos were first published and who created them or held their copyright to make a definitive call, and also to prove that these images are in the public domain in the US to be kept on Wikimedia Commons. --Wcam (talk) 14:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I said PD-PRC is relevant. If the photos are in the public domain but the wrong label was used, it seems entirely backwards to delete the photos altogether instead of editing to to PD-PRC. Chanchokit (talk) 20:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that {{PD-PRC}} does not exist. There is no such label here on Commons. It is your responsibility, as the uploader, to provide correct source and copyright info for images you upload. If you claim the photos are in the public domain, the burden of proof is on you. --Wcam (talk) 20:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:18, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens757.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens289.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens287.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens286.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens285.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens284.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens283.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens282.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens280.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens279.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens278.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens277.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens276.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens275.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens274.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens273.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzrheindorf(Bonn)St.Maria und Klemens272.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Schwarzheindorf Fenster Chor.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter17.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter19.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter20.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter21.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter22.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter4020.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter449.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter451.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter456.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter466.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter471.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter478.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter479.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter484.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter493.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich(Bonn) St.Peter75.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich-stiftskirche-st-peter-07.jpg

[edit]

artist Benner died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vilich-stiftskirche-st-peter-32.jpg

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wollersheim Heilig-Kreuz224.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chanchokit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Painter 朱士傑 died in 1990. Per {{PD-China}}, paintings not PD in China until 2040.

Wcam (talk) 03:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:上海街景.jpg

[edit]

Painter 林達川 died in 1985. Per {{PD-China}}, paintings not PD in China until 2035. Wcam (talk) 03:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 03:08, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Losango.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. In the background of source site, there is a mark of "all rights reserved" Leon saudanha (talk) 23:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:14, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mollyholly01.jpg

[edit]

Copyrighted file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 23:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:OEIRAS.png

[edit]

Copyright violation. The uploader did not prove the author of the file, and the site where the file has been retired does not indicate belong to the uploader which invalidates the license presented. Leon saudanha (talk) 23:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LG-Ericsson.jpg

[edit]

This image has a copyright sign © on the bottom right part Carnby (talk) 12:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-trivial}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:13, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ericsson-LG.png

[edit]

This is a derivative image of LG-Ericsson.jpg which has a copyright sign on the bottom right part Carnby (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-trivial}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:15, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ácido benzóico.png

[edit]

Unused and low quality compared to many raster and vector alternatives in Category:Benzoic acid: has uneven alignment, barely visible key bond between ring and acid C, and huge margin DMacks (talk) 07:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Parviz Khosravani Taj Owner.jpg

[edit]

Without permission, False license Clutching (talk) 17:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Extensiones de Cabello Natural Antes y Después.jpg

[edit]

Imagen con copyright de https://www.lamaisondelcabello.es Geom (talk) 17:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Protesis capilar.png

[edit]

Imagen con copyright de https://www.lamaisondelcabello.es Geom (talk) 17:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PDdknFvMp I.jpg

[edit]

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Leonardgarment.jpg

[edit]

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Correst - B2B Marketing.png

[edit]

contains 6 lines of plain text only. Achim (talk) 19:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prótesis capilar antes y después.jpg

[edit]

La imagen es una copia editada de esta otra https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Protesis_capilar.png que se ha propuesto para borrado por violar derechos de autor. Geom (talk) 19:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:27, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SGI Gohonzon.jpg

[edit]

Desrespeito a uma religião. Trata-se de um objeto de devoção e deve ser preservado. Não é permitido fotografar ou divulgar essa imagem. É lamentável encontrá-la exposta na internet. É uma falta de respeito. Baliharafly (talk) 03:58, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion given. File is in use. INeverCry 00:21, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SGI Gohonzon.jpg

[edit]

Soka Gakkai do not allow this Myjak rasmussen (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Transcription of work by "13th-century Japanese priest Nichiren" according to accompanying en:wiki. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SGI Gohonzon.jpg

[edit]

delete:The uploader “Crazysigns” neither is the real author of this image nor owns its copyright. This particular style of Gohonzon is published and used solely by the Buddhist organization Soka Gakkai International, which has the sole right and ability to reproduce it using a sacred woodblock. This specific style of Gohonzon was first published in 1993 by SGI, and its copyright is still in effect. SGI has never given any permission to post the image of Gohonzon to neither Crazysigns nor Wikimedia Commons; therefore, the image of Gohonzon needs to be deleted since SGI’s copyright has been violated 63.175.16.9 17:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This in turn would mean that it’s not a Gohonzon by 26th High Priest Nichikan (1665–1726)? So it’s a hoax?? Interesting stuff! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.130.198.116 (talk) 19:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, I do not believe, that SGI has sole right to reproduce the letter, because its copyright has expired, and I do not believe, that SGI has sole ability to reproduce it. If you claim, that it is work of SGI, then this makes the image a hoax, but it is used nevertheless in multiple projects. No strong evidence for recent work has been given, only indirect hints. Conclusion: evidence for copyright violation is weak, probably the work is very old. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Screenshot 5akskas.png

[edit]

Unused screenshot of copyrighted program Microsoft Excel. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chestnutbrown.jpg

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Silly crossed eyes.JPG

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Screenshot 43ii3i3.png

[edit]

Unused screenshot of copyrighted program Microsoft Excel. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Crossed eyes.JPG

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Screenshot 33333.png

[edit]

Unused screenshot of copyrighted program Microsoft Excel. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Downtown Pittsburg, Kansas 9-2-2012.JPG

[edit]

This photo is 6 years old and is now very outdated. The buildings represented in this image have seen substantial improvements since its publish date. It's the first image result when searching our community and it doesn't present the city in a positive light. Skrunyon (talk) 19:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The image is in use on about 15 Wikipedias, from ar:بيتسبرغ (كانساس) to zh-min-nan:Pittsburg (Kansas). Commons should not delete used pictures just because they're outdated. See COM:INUSE for details. In any case, we have almost no pictures of the town itself (as opposed to railway locomotives in the town) and if the area has changed that's all the more reason for keeping historical pictures. --bjh21 (talk) 13:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in Use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:John the Painter.jpg

[edit]

The en: image is marked as "do not copy to commons" as having no source. JuTa 20:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It was originally uploaded by en:User:Historymike who is both a historian and bona fide colleague.
  2. Further, James Aitken's biographer Jessica Warner provided input for ExecutedToday.com where image under discussion is shown.
  3. The only thing that is annoying, I was also unable to locate the primary source and User:Historymike to our great detriment is inactive.
  4. Nevertherless, I took the liberty to rectify several file's deficiencies which were rightly pointed at by User:JuTa.

--Taterian (talk) 08:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, all references point to this as a 1777 illustration and uploader to en:wiki is Historian (although unfortunately not active). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20160829-Road Trip Day 2 - 3 - Marsh - Billings - Rockefeller NHP (43) (29639681643).jpg

[edit]

Screenshot of File:20160829-Road Trip Day 2 - 3 - Marsh - Billings - Rockefeller NHP (43).webm, known Flickr2Commons issue Elisfkc (talk) 20:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tatto Cover.png.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. Tatto single art work. Skivsamlare (talk) 20:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rybin-tambov.jpg

[edit]

Cropped from image here: http://fc-tambov.ru/modules/content/page.php?id=1712 Ytoyoda (talk) 20:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Autoportrait au pastel de Charlotte Roimarmier.jpg

[edit]

Painter who died in 1959, so not in the public domain, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 21:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Usama Mukwaya award.jpg

[edit]

The file has been already deleted once: Special:Undelete/File:Usama_Mukwaya.jpg, Flickr washing? jdx Re: 21:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chandakuda, Odisha 755006, India - panoramio (11).jpg

[edit]

flood of the Baitarani river in the own neighbourhood GeorgDerReisende (talk) 21:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Berdyaev2.jpg

[edit]

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 21:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Usama at the 2017 Young Achievers Awards.jpg

[edit]

Flickr washing? Exif data suggests that the photo was copied from Facebook. jdx Re: 21:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:15, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beregovo city coa.png

[edit]

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Распопов Владимир Николаевич.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chandakuda, Odisha 755006, India - panoramio (18).jpg

[edit]

sports site with the Baitarani flood GeorgDerReisende (talk) 21:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blackboard1225.jpg

[edit]

Maybe out of scope, very dark. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nightpic.jpg

[edit]

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:B612 20170524 053352.jpg

[edit]

The object is probably too unclear to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Merdha, Odisha 755006, India - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

flood at unknown place and nothing to see GeorgDerReisende (talk) 21:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (& the finger). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DGol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

very unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 22:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vologda, Vologda Oblast, Russia - panoramio (46).jpg

[edit]

Redundant. Superseded by almost similar view with better light File:Vologda, Vologda Oblast, Russia - panoramio (47).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chandakuda, Odisha 755006, India - panoramio (27).jpg

[edit]

finger in photo GeorgDerReisende (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:André da silva rugby rwc.jpg

[edit]

copyvio, as seen with the "gettyimages" watermark - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 22:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dialogue of Light. Giorgio Morandi & Ettore Spalletti at Galleria d'Arte Maggiore G.A.M..jpg

[edit]

No evidence of permission from the photographer, Michele Alberto Sereni, nor from the artists whose works are represented, Giorgio Morandi and Ettore Spalletti. Morandi died in 1964, Spalletti is (I believe) living. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MoreniMaggioreGAM.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of permission from the photographer, nor of the artist Mattia Moreni, who died in 1999. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:11, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Equipe baptem.jpg

[edit]

Vincent Curutchet / ALeA / TJV2017, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taj Local Cup 49.jpg

[edit]

https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivLxx5WS0DAkpp3--a_1QwvoZQjYHO3hsw3gHfxLkvRCUgYjfO1_1rYtIVsNm5Ja9DklJqKekH3Q5iYIRYIkxNdY_1hNIFpg5kvJYkv70_1aoV8qjiRg8arhL2QJE_1qj1aYNXfzJWun6LbSyp8zyyqLXOstF16Xw5I02PK6kYcrZj9GTofS6KWVCap_1rfVXlwDbEnXxOAiIYh6Oo28g1hkcf4KrjkGOmcA-d-eiXm7MHynIhTLmZPxWH32DYEMYyGvwKqAvhUjkXiM27zZMIvo3aELNzzTPqdjl-mtOmELCZfjDFDoM6gLXB3GS6GT7dzOO51dzje1_1M7q-vG3cN3YfvAvu6oJi-g Clutching (talk) 17:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: THere is no evidence this was published more than thirty years ago. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:16, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TAJ (Esteghlal) F.C Champions of 1970 Asian Club Championship (AFC Champions League). Tehran. Iran.jpg

[edit]

Photo is not personal/ 50 years have not passed/ copyrights YenWitch (talk) 21:42, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TAJ (Esteghlal) F.C Champions of 1970 Asian Club Championship (AFC Champions League). Tehran. Iran.jpg

[edit]

https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiskWRp8nAkjbMXCjzCURinIxptNmFhUq_1WyAptn2kcQnM2yq5QQ9w2NkM1bezNtZ4HNCifr6OvDiGF6_1YRxuruQgiDdC93NWlC4C1LDEpWRKWDuVKTHwFjEGLQxUOIX-PcGCRjlS45Jb7wn-mLuAE72kQjoOLDqZMLCxvLVZ_1E-asTr4fuNigPe7_1hkipv2o0GPvd4aKIzpYBQgC5IAKHd3aLfIiEQt5DbJyAb6PQYCanqaXwVB4YBOlVxjPNUCEnVovgIXiYpiMajUhLLDfNWBWsiD4GCQ166o75WSQ6DPsAYDMHjxOjpF_1Br5bHnMpMS5jkfOPQJDkAg7XRVYKO5VdZiOlQ From Internet Clutching (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: THis might be PD if it had been published in Iran more than thirty years ago, but there is no evidence of that. This image is not a halftone, so it probably came out of someone's scrapbook. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taj1353.jpg

[edit]

https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisaAXFwn4uwOnHR2zQMYpT8QBuloIC2h2FS0KOW24_16sGYnHpB1TGn2rf9Er-dLTSN1F_1bU7KXDBUVRAFzuStrqzBMdnKlFTiVAXBo34IDb-kdq3E8B1TUBRxH5UWspk-75_152tFsGGFOOGSopEvcP0mmUa6cog7csm6flEZt7yLL0csXYlUjI_1Ka6CELPzDicbzrnvKQJr7MT12zL3YsYZCyFkTZgo6TSdhdXzFsqRj3NYnOVN_1g2TUrUqK2q4g5eB78bvmmbibmQk8n0JUYE0cKA9h0Z_1D3kf9mouPFNpdL6Iu3u2DaWxCu9M0nIO55x4KBqLonEJS66B8nQk3ZKfyXNXsQ photo from other websites without permission Clutching (talk) 17:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There's no evidence this is PD. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Donya Dadrasan.jpg

[edit]

this file is with my photo and i want it to be deleted :) 59.102.34.116 01:45, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: seems that the photo was taken with your consent. Please write to commons@wikimedia.org to clarify. Ruthven (msg) 17:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Donya Dadrasan.jpg

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE. Likely to be promotional. Ahmadtalk 21:11, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:John In Mount St Helens crater - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. Plus, we have a cat and even a special page with many pics of the Mount. E4024 (talk) 09:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Geo Swan, thank you for your interest to this DR. The problem is, it is not an image with tourists, it is the image of a tourist. --E4024 (talk) 06:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I wrote of tourists, in the plural, because I wrote of images like this, in the plural.
Were you agreeing that images of Mount St Helens, with multiple tourists, would be OK, but objecting to any with just a single tourist? Geo Swan (talk) 11:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Stick to discussing this unused, personal, OoS file please. Or categorize some uncategorized files like I'm doing most of the time. --E4024 (talk) 11:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
How about sticking to deletion guidelines? Views from experienced contributors should be encouraged, especially when they have made more contributions to this project and for several years longer than yourself.
Being unused is not an acceptable deletion rationale, please stop repeating that irrelevant tangent, this is not a political campaign where repeating fakenews is a way to win arguments. The file is not especially "personal" in the sense described at Commons:Deletion policy#Not educationally useful, the case would have to be clear that this has no educational value and the norm is that once others find reasons that an image may be useful, it should be kept. If the intention is to raise DRs for every photograph with a person in it as "personal", then we may have to revisit the policy to stop Commons being unnecessarily disrupted. --Fæ (talk) 11:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"If the intention is to raise DRs for every photograph with a person in it as "personal", then we may have to revisit the policy to stop Commons being unnecessarily disrupted." Thanks for the threat. Let me pronounce the last the first: If I'm blocked for one hour here due to your baseless claims I will never come back. Then you may continue your happy editing without me disturbing you. If you looked at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rodrigo tagle mariquez.JPG you might see that even if there is a person in the center of the image I support keeping the pic, because the person is irrelevant there, the fish is relevant. (Id est: I have no preconceived concepts like if someone is there in the middle xxx whatsoever...) I really have a difficulty in understanding your anger, do I personally touch your nerve ends? Thanks, no answer is required. Summary: I DR'ed the file for the reasons I tried to explain. I see no educational use in John's Mount St Helens visit. If others think differently, I respect their position. --E4024 (talk) 11:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • 4024, please don't interpret Fæ's comments, or my comments, as threats or insults. Civil, good faith questions and expressions of concern, are not personal attacks.

    The WMF is over fifteen years old, and the policies on its projects are in constant gradual state of evolution. They have been changed to clarify their intent, and have been changed to have different intents. Compliant contributors roll with those changes. They do not interpret them as attackOs.

    In 2005, when I was a very new contributor, the wikimedia commons allowed images with a license that barred commercial use. Yup. I know it seems bizarre now. But it is true.

    I wasn't aware the policy was going to change, and that images I had uploaded to illustrate articles on the Canadian military and Canadian Coast Guard were all going to have to be deleted. Initially it was an unpleasant surprise.

    Some other people who had uploaded similar images tried to think up tricks to fool the community into thinking their favourite image were OK, after all. But I spent the next weekend looking for replacement images taken by members of the US military, when Canadian ships were on joint exercises. It was a lot of work, and some of those images weren't as good as the ones that had to be replaced, but I found replacement images.

    I think all Fæ was suggesting was a policy change. This is not a personal threat to you, or anything like that. If that change is made, you are as welcome to participate as before, so long as you comply with the new policy, just as I was welcome to find replacement images from the DoD. Geo Swan (talk) 21:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • 4024, I am a monoglot myself, so congratulations on knowing several languages.

    My reply was about this image.

    I agree with Fæ, your interpretation of "personal" is unnecessarily and unhelpfully restrictive.

    You compared this image with another that contained a tourist, about which you wrote "...see that even if there is a person in the center of the image I support keeping the pic, because the person is irrelevant there..." Tourists, in an image from a site visited by tourists ARE relevant. People who write about the site, as a site visited by tourists, should be able to pick images of that site, that show tourists, to illustrate it is a tourist site. Geo Swan (talk) 21:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note to the closing Admin: From now on I will keep away from this discussion, therefore I resume my position and beg leave. I see this file as a personal image where a person visiting a place "poses" to the camera to create a souvenir of the moment. He is in the center of the image. Does not have a big fish at hand that he just caught or an interesting parrot or falcon that by coincidence parked on his shoulder. If we cut him out, the rest of the pic will not serve much. The views of the mountain we already have. The gentleman in the image is not a notable person. This is an image one asks someone to take, in order to put it on his Facebook page or at the "status" section of the WhatsApp account, so that his friends will know he visited a mountain. Forgive me if I insist that Commons is not the right place to deposit or keep this file and others like it. I see no benefit in having them here. (Which implies I may continue to DR similar images or support deletion in other users' similar DRs.) I have no more arguments and will not reply other people's arguments. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 09:11, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. We have another similar photo : File:Heading into Mount St Helens Crater - Flickr - brewbooks.jpg, which can be, like this one, cropped of the climber/tourist if necessary. Besides that, there are few images of Mt St. Helens crater in 2001. Ruthven (msg) 17:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Perspectiva aérea.jpg

[edit]

Photograph of a work of art, reflecition can be seen in the glass of the frame, unknown author, most likely not own work and not pd-old ☣Banjo tell me 11:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rzayev Sadiq Ramil oğlu.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal file, out of scope. E4024 (talk) 11:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: userpage image. Ruthven (msg) 17:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rzayev Sadiq Ramil oğlu.jpg

[edit]

Not used any more. His friend decided to DR the image but was not well-completed. E4024 (talk) 16:08, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused personal file, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 13:32, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Samuel Assefa.jpg

[edit]

"Ausschließlich zur Nutzung für die aktuelle Berichterstattung" - das ist leider keine freie Lizenz. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Red blazer.jpg

[edit]

Unused file, image of a not notable person. E4024 (talk) 12:20, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep incorrect argumentation for deletion. It is photo of a kind of clothes, namely blazer, not a photo of a notable or other person. In my opinion the clothes look best if they are weared on human models, much better than on the clothes hangers. Regards Stan old (talk) 12:46, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: can be used. Besides we don't have a lot of photos in the blazer category (can be resubmitted if there will be valid alternatives). Ruthven (msg) 17:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:High Seas Fleet.png

[edit]

No evidence of copyright status in Germany. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 13:45, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}}. Ruthven (msg) 17:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Capture d’écran 2018-01-29 à 15.59.09.png

[edit]

Name incorrect To25 (talk) 15:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio: Copyright © 2018 - MIGSO. Ruthven (msg) 17:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alayli-alfiyya.jpg

[edit]

Not an own work. If you can find a better license the file may perhaps be kept, but not my area. E4024 (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-Lebanon}}. Ruthven (msg) 17:28, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lakshmi Puri speaks at 'How to do good', Lincoln Center, New York City, 8 May 2017.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work of screenshot with unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cabane - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Part of mass upload: blurry random image of non-descript structure, no educational value and unusable. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikipedia-logo-sd (2).png

[edit]

Logo is a hindrance in naming the newly designed logo for Sindhi Wikipedia, currently named as file:Wikipedia-logo sindhi v2-sd.svg. مھتاب احمد (talk) 16:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikipedia-logo-sd.svg

[edit]

Logo is a hindrance in naming the newly designed logo for Sindhi Wikipedia, currently named as file:Wikipedia-logo sindhi v2-sd.svg. مھتاب احمد (talk) 16:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:You are amazing hh.jpg

[edit]

copyright violotion علاء فحصي (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ZiconoFlamengo.jpg

[edit]

Posted here http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1XOpiZmmJWU/TzF23wC8GHI/AAAAAAAAAtc/zK5_dkPMHAQ/s1600/zico2.jpg BEFORE being posted at Flickr Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-sd.png

[edit]

Logo is a hindrance in naming the newly designed logo for Sindhi Wikipedia, currently named as file:Wikipedia-logo sindhi v2-sd.svg. -مھتاب احمد (talk) 16:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 17:30, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TAJ Ladies ( 1970 -1974).jpg

[edit]

Not ownWork Clutching (talk) 17:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per {{PD-Iran}}. Ruthven (msg) 17:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ben-butler-boxing.jpg

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work, no metadata, small size, low quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:لوگو سروش.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Freshman404 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: logo, however this seems to be composed of simple shapes and is in use. Please explain further! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is logo of this company--Freshman404Talk 06:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 17:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of Abkhazia.svg.png

[edit]

Duplicate of File:Flag of Abkhazia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo tfx (ex-nt1).png

[edit]

Ce n'est pas le véritable logo et il n'est pas utilisé Gustave2001 (talk) 20:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chandakuda, Odisha 755006, India - panoramio (9).jpg

[edit]

flood of the Baitarani river in the own foregarden GeorgDerReisende (talk) 21:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not usable. Ruthven (msg) 17:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chandakuda, Odisha 755006, India - panoramio (12).jpg

[edit]

flood of the Baitarani river in the own foregarden GeorgDerReisende (talk) 21:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: usable. Ruthven (msg) 17:34, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taj57.jpg

[edit]

https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuKfVdjoMRv06bcBAKC_1hpmPgY7xqUi5L1hyehHHhAJiznRx70nFgXb2QU2otbdSpzx0C96SyMLVSou5-_1SfMcLoNxNHtI6NiwQ1ZIzMKJb6tp-f2-tytQ0NkZNkv37KukpeYh6crUmGvvDVkxsJvawMWtwecOGDx924dNn39uBeEPJ3PN5xwl-5T0MDr0bGv2t7MfTBQKrrmX733BG8X_1K6ZlPq9sBcH6MWu9tDreEE002HIoxduR7m8z3U4Sl3EEntxVt2RBd-dX8BRZEe3XaPcDr4E4bfBQXWLvstmIYVdyYEjAsJwkkBJ-Z0Q441xqT6FiDHZxHLNwP3I7gp8jisUKz6w Clutching (talk) 17:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:03, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Athabascan123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution, most images contains no EXIF info, dubious own work.

Wcam (talk) 02:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:St.JohannesTübingen015.JPG

[edit]

artist (windows) died in 1968, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The windows are extremely unsharp, a bit like masked. So I think we can keep it. --Hic et nunc (talk) 14:51, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . --Didym (talk) 22:54, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maharashtra state road transport.png

[edit]

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:52, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Manĝaĵoj de SOJO.jpg

[edit]

accidental duplicate of File:SOJO 02.jpg ~★ nmaia d 13:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:50, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paulino.jpg

[edit]

Photo : IVAN ALVARADO Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:49, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:49, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:622 dff5ae77-eeb5-382e-abef-225205d7955e.jpg

[edit]

Any metadata, false date, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:49, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emelec2 0.jpg

[edit]

Any metadata, false date, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2014 12 06 0820 1417908014 original.jpg

[edit]

Hoax, any metadata, false date, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anton Nag.jpg

[edit]

Not an active user. E4024 (talk) 14:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:48, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Blanca Rego.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: re-uploaded, https://sonarplusd.com/es/programs/barcelona-2017/ponentes/blanca-rego
No speedy, +7 day. (see discussion on file page) Wdwd (talk) 15:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:36°45´N - 021°56´E.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Lutheraner as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Es handelt sich hier um ein Werk des lebenden Künstlers Dimitris Tzamouranis, es ist nicht ersichtlich, wieso der Hochlader die Rechte dafür haben sollte, es unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen
See file discussion page: +7 days for OTRS. Wdwd (talk) 15:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:45, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Georgi.adamiya.jpg

[edit]

Picture clearly has watermark, which goes against the stated rationale of "own work". No evidence that the stated website gives permission for use of file El cid, el campeador (talk) 15:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:42, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Do I jump on the orange or on the coconut^ - Je choisis l'orange ou la noix de coco - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Part of mass upload: low quality random image, no educational value and unusable. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:42, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mahmoud Ahdy 1.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope and unused (out of user page) personal file. User not active in any WP. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Toprocker Boom Rider.jpg

[edit]

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Samsung Galaxy S9.jpg

[edit]

Unlikely own work, presumably copyrighted software on the image. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:40, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Beyoncé signature

[edit]

File:Beyoncé Assinatura.png is derived from File:Beyoncé signature.svg, though neither file provides any source URL containing this signature, which makes it hard to verify that this in fact isn't just a fabrication. SNUGGUMS (talk) 01:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Actually the SVG is derived from the PNG. Both are in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Facetoface.jpg

[edit]

Hi! I posted this with the intention of putting it on the Wikipedia page for the new version of Twin Fantasy, entitled Twin Fantasy (Face to Face). However, every time I try to insert it, it pulls up another "Facetoface.jpg". I want to either delete this and resubmit it under a new file name or just have someone with the power to do so change the filename. TakyonDrive (talk) 04:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@TakyonDrive: Yes, there's a different picture at en:File:Facetoface.jpg which masks the copy on Commons. Renaming this file would be easy, but I think first you ought to provide a link to the actual source of the image so that it's possible for someone to confirm that it really has been released under the claimed licence. Without that, it looks awfully like a copyright violation. --bjh21 (talk) 14:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader's request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:04, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reicha QuatuorPourFlutes-2 Esmuc.ogg

[edit]

It was uploaded by Alex Hinojo (Amical Viquimedia) to check technical problems experienced by me, a new user without previous experience in wikipedia and wikimedia. Problems are already solved. Thanks! Enricguaus (talk) 08:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

test uploading ÀlexHinojo (talk) 14:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fischbach-Oberraden (Eifel); St. Borromäus i.jpg

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo an die Experten Martin K. und Reinhard Kraasch. Ist die Löschung von diesem Bild gerechtfertig? Es könnte ja sein, dass demnächst sehr viele Innenaufnahmen von öffentlichen Gebäuden / Kirchen gelöscht werden müssen. Wie sollte man zukünftig z.B. einen Kirchenraum / Chor mit neuzeitlichen Elementen eines Künstlers fotografieren? Sollte man vielleicht die Fenster/ die Elemente mit einem Fotoprogramm ausschneiden und erst dann hochladen? Zählt denn nicht mehr das Gesamtensemble eines Raumes?--Colling-architektur (talk) 13:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Colling-architektur: Leider ja. Da ja sonst wenig auf den Bild zusehen ist, sind die zeitgenössischen Fenster hier so bilddominierend, dass sie kaum als Beiwerk durchgehen dürften - zumal der zugehörige Künstler ja auch eindeutig dabei steht. Dies kann bei anderen Kircheninnenräumen und anderen Perspektiven aber auch anders sein - kommt ganz auf das konkrete Bild an.
Du könntest die Fenster natürlich weiß überstrahlen lassen, so dass man sie nicht mehr erkennt.
Alternative könntest Du aber auch mal versuchen, den Künstler bzw. seine Erben zu kontaktieren und um eine Freigabe zu bitten. // Martin K. (talk) 14:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für die Antwort. Eine neue "bessere" Version dieser Datei wurde soeben hochgeladen - es gibt nun keine lizenzrechtlichen Gründe mehr für die Löschung der Datei. Martin Sg. bitte ich um die Löschung des Löschantrag auf der Commons-Löschungsantragsseite. MfG--Colling-architektur (talk) 16:45, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Version deleted the original version of the file. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2013-08-20 Kath. Pfarrkirche St. Winfried und Salesianer Don Boscos Mission, Sträßchensweg 3, Bonn IMG 5055.jpg

[edit]

contemporary artwork (building 1968), no fop in germany Martin Sg. (talk) 12:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:07, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Catanzariti

[edit]

All files uploaded by Catanzariti (talk · contribs) are from copyrighted website https://nazmiyalantiquerugs.com/ without permission. --Smooth O (talk) 12:46, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chorhalle Apostelzyklus2.jpg

[edit]

artist (windows) died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chorhalle Apostelzyklus.jpg

[edit]

artist (windows) died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AachenerDomApsis.jpg

[edit]

artist (windows) died in 2015, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What about the other files in Choir of Aachen Cathedral (interior) ? LoKiLeCh (talk) 18:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Matare1.JPG

[edit]

artist died in 1965, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:49, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Herrmann der Lahme im Pfarrhaus Veringenstadt.jpg

[edit]

artist died in 1968, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Veringenstadt St. Nikolaus. Maria und Hermann der Lahme.jpg

[edit]

artist died in 1968, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:11, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MBROUE2.jpg

[edit]

pas d'autorisation du photographe, inconnu - Broué (téléchargeur) ne peut être le photographe (il est sur la photo). Confusion entre sujet de la photo et auteur de la photo. Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour. Cette photographie m'a été donnée par Benjamin Stora, auteur du livre "La dernière génération d'octobre", Éd. Stock, 2003, où elle a été publiée. Elle avait été prise par un ami commun. Je me renseigne sur le nom du photographe (qui ne me revient pas à l'instant) et reviens sur cette page dès que j'ai l'information. Il est parfaitement clair qu'il n'y a aucun problème de copyright, tout ceci relevant d'évènements anciens et de rapports très amicaux. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michel Broué (talk • contribs) 13:20, 29 January 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted for now, we need OTRS permission to restore the image. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HGBI-Rundfenster.jpg

[edit]

artist died in 2013, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 12:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dann wären in der Category:Heilig-Geist-Kirche (Bielefeld) alle Innenaufnahmen zu löschen - das glaube ich nicht. --K@rl (talk) 19:18, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rajkiran.jpg

[edit]

Doesn't seem to be an active user. E4024 (talk) 12:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:13, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NASA TRL Meter.jpg

[edit]

I have uploaded an improved PNG version, made from the original GIF. No need for this inferior JPEG version! Ras67 (talk) 13:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vinxenzo1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted two, changed license to PD-old-assumed of the other two. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:18, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Retrato de Mujer.jpg

[edit]

Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dorota w netcie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SinemBannaBlackWhite.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Jimfbleak as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: As per this edit, the downloader claims not to know the subject of this posed image, previously claimed as own work, so the claim appears to be false. I requested clarification, but have received no reply Wdwd (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sinem Banna.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Jimfbleak as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: As per this edit, the downloader claims not to know the subject of this posed image, previously claimed as own work, so the claim appears to be false. I requested clarification, but have received no reply Wdwd (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I searched the file in Google but could not find. From which site it has been taken? --E4024 (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Øystein Sevåg Cosmopolite (221832).jpg

[edit]

The subject, Øystein Sevåg, would like to have it removed Profero (talk) 15:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the photographer and uploader of the image. There is an alternative photo of the subject that's being used, so I don't have any issues with deleting it. Toresetre (talk) 16:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. --Profero (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. This is the best photo about Øystein Sevåg we have. Taivo (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Sevåg himself has explicitly requested it to be removed from commons, and I will soon receive from him an even better image than the current one he asked me to use in the meantime as the default. --Profero (talk) 12:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I agree with Taivo, also all such request must be made via OTRS to verify the identify of the requesting person. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tigran Mitr am (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Philippines currency - see Commons:Currency#Philippines

Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sealle (talk) 18:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Why not? The first two were spotted because they were new uploads. Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And were copies of non-free images from en-wiki en:File:New PHP100 Banknote (Obverse).jpg and en:File:New PHP200 Banknote (Obverse).jpg Ronhjones  (Talk) 13:46, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, please file a separate DR for any other banknotes you think violate our rules. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:27, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Think Big (14524490702).jpg

[edit]

Sorry, but this is obviously a recent sculpture and thereby still in copyright. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in the US for non-buildings. So, we need permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

Sorry, go ahead. Triplecaña (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rang Tohare Naam Ke (Aaradhya Music.com).jpg

[edit]

copyright violotion علاء فحصي (talk) 16:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kukuan Hydropower Plant01.jpg

[edit]

Photograph of a copyrighted image with no copyright waiver from the image creator.--Kai3952 (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Kai3952: ：閣下您好，我是這張照片的原拍攝者，請問您提出刪除的理由是什麼？謝謝。Eric Deng (talk) 22:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Eric850130: I know this picture was taken by you. As you can see, the six images in File:Kukuan Hydropower Plant01.jpg are not yours. You can't copying the work without the original author's permission. Unless you can get "authorization" from the original author or the original author's agent. So my question is, how do you prove that the six images in File:Kukuan Hydropower Plant01.jpg are your works?--Kai3952 (talk) 11:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        • By the way, you can read at "http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=J0070017".--Kai3952 (talk) 11:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
          • @Kai3952: ：大致了解閣下的刪除理由。台灣電力公司已公告政府資料宣告，其宣告與創用CC之授權並無衝突，因此可套用至此照片。但依在下所聽到的風聲，先暫時不要再處理此照片的相關狀況，待管理員定奪照片之留存後，再決定如何重新獲得授權並發布照片。話說...閣下明明會中文，刻意用英文回應，究竟有何居心.....？Eric Deng (talk) 13:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
          • @Eric850130: 我明白你的居心，你刻意不告訴我，你想要我用中文對你說，好讓你現在可以指控「閣下明明會中文，刻意用英文回應，究竟有何居心」，這樣居心不知道可使你獲得什麼？關於台灣電力公司已公告政府資料宣告，我發現二個問題：
          • 以上，你問我有何居心，來Wikimedia.Commons只是編輯照片，提報刪除只是一部分，就與你在中文維基在寫條目是一樣，不符關注度就會被提報刪除，這麼平常的事也能被你看成有居心？我告訴你，這證明你不適應維基的環境。請你問你自己的居心：讓人有理由刪除而反控別人是想怎麼樣？我能說的就是告訴你怎麼做( 參見：第一、第二 )，但我「沒有義務」幫你，你也別指望別人不會對你的照片提報刪除。除非你上傳照片時就有一切做好，否則你不適應維基的環境可以離開，你不用讓自己這麼難過。--Kai3952 (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
          • @Kai3952: ：閣下不必這麼激動想要趕人走嘛？只是純粹真的好奇為何要特別用英文回應您就如此大動作回應，在下覺得大可不必。畢竟明明知道閣下也是臺灣人，但我用中文回應您後，您接連使用英文回應，不免讓人想像啊，沒特別意思。

另外，照片遭您提刪的部份，在下其實沒太多想法，請勿自行腦補太多，就是因為英文能力自認不佳怕自己會錯意，僅能大略瞭解您的提刪理由而提問，如果確認已侵權當然在下無話可說僅能刪除一途，不會有什麼太大的情緒波動，台電的政府資訊開放公告部份，在下僅是提供您台電已公布此授權條款，已有多座電廠的照片可以透過此授權條款發佈在共享媒體上，因此也想說谷關電廠的照片，如台電已在官網上公開，也可利用這種方式，這是在下的想法，提供閣下參考，僅此而已，請勿做太多聯想，感謝您。Eric Deng (talk) 08:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To the Admins: After I talked to him, his attitude is telling me that it is unreasonable for others to request the deletion of his works. He think he has done to comply with Commons:Licensing, provide evidence of copyright permission should be done by others. But my problem is: he could not prove that the six images in File:Kukuan Hydropower Plant01.jpg were his own, so I can't assume that he is the original author. I have told him what to do, but he still didn't use OTRS to provide evidence for copyright permission. I think he did not get the original author's authorization because no one is willing to be photographed their own work by others. As far as I see it now, source in summary is "own work", it will make people think that six images in File:Kukuan Hydropower Plant01.jpg is his work. I hope the administrator will pay attention of every file he uploads.--Kai3952 (talk) 13:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Kai3952. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Taj SC Museum 1970s.jpg

[edit]

copy right. Live person. It's not been fifty years old. 66.160.188.53 17:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its copyright protection has already been expired. It's a photographic work which is protected for 30 years. This photograph has been taken at the latest in 1979 which has already passed the copyright duration according to Iranian copyright law. Read this section: In the following cases works fall into the public domain after 30 years from the date of publication or public presentation (Article 16):
  • Photographic or cinematographic works.
  • In cases where the work belongs to a legal person or rights are transferred to a legal person.

FaraM 18:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per FaraM. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Camphejazi.jpg

[edit]

https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZis0P0iL2wuZjvBKuySJHleH6tjvLzMK9LnsYXtaJdc1tlueZUxyJZgnSt6l8aCnzjWvZRF5W01O1clbGhkwB62pBJST4oLwQdarIrcDwhbFSrPDjYgPz9iUoONC8vcc33J6jXOXmvJKD6Xl23cbowz_1oBmQRkusb17ynH2aZwwZ_1wyGMW8_15lzNGTTLI0aH9FGLhTGk2m7-Rl-TotllFzxcj1aWYB9nbX7ScFjwpJSXJ5vWLWf04POJlolHRZKNu3Id_1lYw7Jq8vQBoev60ZzYXQHizvOGy8vRGqP-egUysbFsRUazCy48N9asSO6WmolCRVuMVVLMVPQ2Ue34bGixfo65iLA False license   Copyrighted Clutching (talk) 17:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Feet5.jpg

[edit]

Poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:32, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Feet5.jpg

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 23:03, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. Ed (Edgar181) 19:16, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Feet4.jpg

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Quality seems fine. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Courtesy deletion, uploader request, not in use. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Feet2.png

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Feet1.png

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request, not in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:35, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lips1.jpg

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lips1.jpg

[edit]

no/missing permission Andiemyk (talk) 17:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:36, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eyes1.jpg

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nose nostrils 2.jpg

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nose nostrils.jpg

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:36, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kumquats in Bowl.JPG

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, uploader request, not in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yuck.jpg

[edit]

poor photo quality Larali21 (talk) 19:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion, uploader request, not in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Evelina_Pereira.jpg

[edit]

I am Evelina Pereira and I have not gave permission for the publication of this photo. Please advise what is the next step to have this photo removed.Thank you 81.193.131.240 08:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This next text is copied from here

 Keep The photographer is a italian fashion photographer. Further more, this photo was taken in a public event, the Portugal Fashion 2005. This fashion model is a well known portuguese model, appearing several times on rhe press and television. The personality rights of this model - also a singer and actress, but is better known in Portugal as a fashion model.(if the ip that is requesting this deletion is the same as the model), according to the portuguese law, in this especific case is weak, as to according to paragraph 2 of the article 79 of the portuguese civil code, makes several exceptions to the image rights.

A rough translation:

"Its not necessary the consent of the person portrayed when so justify by their notoriety, his job, requirements of police or justice, scientific, educational or cultural purposes, or when the reproduction of the image comes framed in public places, or the facts of public interest or that has occurred publicly."

So this image is fine for several reasons:

1- Was taken in a public event in the catwalk on the presentation of the portuguese fashion designer Miguel Vieira, that is inclusive televised and extensively covered by the Portuguese press.

2- Its a notorious person.

3- The person portrayed is acting on its most notorious job.

3- Its framed in a public place and in a event that has occurred publicly.

4- Its a fact of the public interest.

So is image, as taken by a fashion photographer (see is flickr profile and this on a portuguese photography site.), in a public event as several that he as acess, so the copyright is with a photographer that as licensed with a creative commons license, so i see no problem with this image. Tm (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Evelina Pereira.jpg

[edit]

This photograph was not taken on the catwalk but in the backstage where the models have the right to their privacy. The photographer did not have permission to publish the photograph since the photo was not taken during the model's performance in the fashion show but backstage. Russweber (talk) 20:42, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy  Keep for the reasons stated above, on the first DR made 8 years ago and also because there is no proof it was taken in the backstage, even if this backstage is a public place per the event and portuguese law. The user that made this DR is a new user, Russweber that made an account today (January 29 2018) and only made editions related with the deletion of this image. He also made several editions on Evelina Pereira article on PT and EN Wikipedias, attempting to supress other image of this model on the same event or her birthday, besides some useful updates.
This image, as stated above was taken in Portugal Fashion 2005, at the time the biggest fashion event in Portugal, and she was and is one of the most famous portuguese model, actress and singer. She participated in this event as fashion model. The personality rights of this model - also a singer and actress, but better known in Portugal as a fashion model, in this specific event is weak, according to the portuguese law, as to according to paragraph 2 of the article 79 of the portuguese civil code, makes several exceptions to the image rights.
A rough translation:
"Its not necessary the consent of the person portrayed when so justify by their notoriety, his jobI, requirements of police or justice, scientific, educational or cultural purposes, Ior when the reproduction of the image comes framed in public places, or the facts of public interest or that has occurred publicly."
So this image is fine for several reasons:
1- Was taken in a public event in the Portugal Fashion on the presentation of the portuguese fashion designer Miguel Vieira.
2- Its a notorious person.
3- The person portrayed is acting on its most notorious job.
4- Its framed in a public place and in a event that has occurred publicly.
5- Its a fact of the public interest.
Even if this was taken in the backstage, the backstage is full of models, hairdressers, fashion designers, photographers and and so is not a private, to the contrary of what Russweber states. Even the backstage is televised and extensively covered by the Portuguese press and this assertion can be quickly proven with several examples: one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten examples that prove that the backstage is a public place, where there is a extensive photographic coverage and so no expectation of privacy.
Even if taken in backstage the depicted person, Evelina Pereira, is clearly looking and posing to the photographer, Roberto Santorini an italian fashion photographer well known in the fashion industry, and about consent, is clearly stated in Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Portugal as there it stated that the Article 199 of the Portuguese Penal Code says that(in bold):
“Unlawful recording and photographing. 1. One who, without consent, a) records another person's words not intended for ::public knowledge (...) is punished with prison up to one year or a fine (...). 2. The same penalty applies to whom, against ::their will, a) photographs or films another person, even taking part in events in which their presence is lawful; or ::b) uses or permits to use such photographs or films, even if obtained lawfully.”.
However, in public places, it is not the photographer that must ask to permission to photograph persons but that the depicted persons that must show explicitly that they are against being photographed by some other person, for taking images and reproduced said images. For example in 2007, Marinho Pinto (today Bastonário of the Portuguese Bar Association, the only Order that can certifies and aproves the Portuguese lawyers and barristers), citing the Article 199 of the Portuguese Penal Code, pointed out that “the only case it is not allowed to take photos is when there is an explicit refusal by the affected individuals. One has to actively oppose to beeing photographed by another person,” he said, referring to a case of a hobby photographer arrested by the police just for taking photos of kids at a funfair (they thought him to be a pedophile). Although the police justified this measure by claiming the missing parental consent to take photographs of their children, there is a general consensus among legal practitioners that the police was not acting legally.
In this context, the parents should have shown active opposition to the taking of images of their kids. The Portuguese courts are very clear in mentioning that, unless someone actively opposses being portrayed, there isnt any consent needed as, if article 79(1) of the portuguese civil code says that "The portrait of a person is not allowed to be exhibited, reproduced or put in commerce without the person's consent;", the article 79(2) of the same code says that, in exception to the former artcile "It is not required the consent of the portrayed person when so justifies scientific, educational or cultural purposes [and Wikimedia Commons is in said exception as it has educational purposes and this images put to DR depict the traditions and costumes of portugal, in music, old people feeding peageons, carnivals, markets, and other events that are at the same time in public places, facts of public interest and have occurred publicly], or when said reproduction is framed in public places, or framed in facts of public interest or have occurred publicly.". To the contrary of what Russweber, states, consent to be photographed, in public places, is responsibility of someone being portrayed and not of the photographer.
The Portuguese courts and law in that are very clear in this case. The only example were the photographing of person present public places is forbideen by default, is in a courthouse in some cases, per article 88(2c). The portuguese courthouses is a public building but it is forbidden to capture images or sound of processual acts, specially court hearings, except in the case that a judge permits it, but even it that case it is still forbidden, to film or capture her voice of a person if that person activally oposes it (as this case shows, if this law mentions this particular case and phroibition without consent of the judge and person portrayed, in general, it is permissible to make images of people in publicly acessible places).
Portuguese courts have explicitly said what is permissible and what is not:
Even in a case of private properties there are areas the portuguese courts define as "public acessible locals". A case decide by the "tribunal da Relação de Lisboa said that:
"A photograph of a minor, taken in a college patio, in a festivity day and with the presence of many peoples,doesnt need of consent to be reproduced in posters.
II - The reproduction made in the Portuguese Comunist Party posters, of one of this pictures doesnt ofend the right to image, because it is a fact that accurs publicaly."
Citing this same decision the "Tribunal da Relação do Porto",about a case of photos, taken in the weeding ocorred in publicaly acessible garden being used in a divorce case said:
"In first place, when the image is squared in public places or in facts of public interest or have occurred publicly. That is, when the image of the person is undoubtedly integrated in the image of those places or events and dissolves in it.b) Secondly, when it is relevant to 'notoriety or position (job) performed ». A decision from the same tribunal, dated 16/03/1993, even if it verses about a crime of other kind,it applies , mutatis mutandis, to the case in appreciation,where it says “Does not commits the crime of interference with private life, per Article 179 º of Criminal Code of 1982, who shoots,from a street or a house for turned to it, a discussion or a disorder, or an exchange of insults, occurring within a workshop whose door is open so that such situations are easily visible from said street or house, "or, on the contrary, if the garden where are the assistant and the lady with the newlyweds, whose image was captured,corresponds to a private residence of the bride or groom, their parents, or any garden or farm reserved specifically for the wedding in the assistant participated as a guest, or the garden of a hotel, with forbidden acess to other users of this hotel and other persons accessing this same hotel and thus unlikely to the wedding party be viewed by people outside the group / circle of people invited by the couple.
The same can be said about the other images: in the first, where once again the assistant appears photographed in a garden, the same considerations apply here about this site; and in the second, where we see a banquet/lunch where there is many people, it is unknown whether the place where lunch, corresponds to a private residence or farm reserved specifically for the wedding party and therefore inaccessible to the general public, or whether on the contrary, that room represents a dinning room in a hotel or restaurant, with several other dining rooms, where that lunch (or not, as so often happens) just the bride and groom and their guests have lunch but the other users of the hotel and other people that are in that hotel are lunching, with a possiblity moving to said weeeding, with ability to view (as is the case so often in the daily life of all), the room where they celebrate the wedding breakfast and the people participating in it.
By the way, and about the penal protection of the spoken word, to wich it is applicable the rules available to pictures and movies, its worth mentioning, with the necessary adaptations, the considerations made by Prof. Manuel da Costa Andrade, saying that, are public the words said in public organs (municipal townhouses, courts, etc), even if there isnt any aaistance (…) Also are public the words made in political rallies (even with sparse assistance) (…) in realizations as conferences, even if the presence of persons are limited by the previous acquisition of a entrance ticket. And that even if the number of admissions is very limited, if this same events are accessible to any person. Also the decision, in process nº 239/06.5GAVNC.G, of “Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães, dated, 28/9/2009, says “Does not constitutes proof obtained by intromission in private life, so being admissible as proof in court, the photo taken to the arguido, when he, in a coffee terrace, induced a minor of seven years to touch is pennies. Being the arguido in public place, in the company of other persons (..) he cant invoke the reserve of private life, not even, in casu, the right to image.”


So this image is perfectly legal as this image was taken in public place, of a very public event and of public interest and has "scientific, educational or cultural purposes".
For last, with the deletions on EN and PT Wikipedias and the attempt to delete this image, this smells like an attempt to shape and massage the articles about Evelina Pereira, by someone related to Evelina Pereira, possibly someone with PR duties. Tm (talk) 21:52, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • A message from an anonymous IP contributor came in, eight years ago, asserting they were Eveline Pereira.

    In my opinion, they should have been advised to initiate correspondence through OTRS. We have no way to trust that 81.193.131.240 is Ms Pereira. I think it should have been essential to have used OTRS to confirm this request was coming from Ms Pereira, not a troll, or a rival.

    Even if an image is properly licensed, and our lawyers advise us that it complies with the laws of both the USA, and the country where it was taken, we do agree to courtesy deletions, on a case by case basis.

    Nominator Russweber, is your nomination based on a recent interaction with Ms Pereira? Can you explain how you know it is the real Evelina Pereira? If so, please withdraw this nomination, request Ms Pereira open a ticket with OTRS, and satisfy them that she is the real Evelina Pereira. Once she has confirmed her real world identity, then I think it is appropriate to re-open this discussion.

    Russweber, you wrote: "This photograph was not taken on the catwalk but in the backstage where the models have the right to their privacy."

    Could you explain how you know where the image was taken? I can't tell, just by looking at it, whether it was taken backstage, or on the catwalk.

    A comment, from the first discussion, asserts that, under Portugese law, since she is a celebrity, it doesn't matter whether she gave permission. You didn't explain why you believe that assertion is incorrect. If you have reason to believe it is incorrect, once Ms Pereira confirms her identity, through OTRS, perhaps you could explain this. Geo Swan (talk) 23:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:39, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Screenshot Android 7.0.png

[edit]

Background image does not belong to uploader, unknown copyright status on that image Elisfkc (talk) 20:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RE
La licencia fue reemplazada correctamente con la plantilla:
{{free screenshot|{{Apache|The Android Open Source Project}}}}
Que Wikimedia Commons configuro para los trabajos de Android bajo las licencias "Creative Commons 2.0 Attribution License" y "Creative Commons 2.5 Attribution License" (esta última para versiones modificadas y/o exactas)
Esto se puede leer en el ariculo "Licencias de Contenido de Android"
Victor Gibby (talk) 23:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
La imagen usada de fondo es de dominio público File:Pillars of creation 2014 HST WFC3-UVIS full-res denoised.jpg

Kept: NASA background image. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:County of Edessa 1135 locator.svg

[edit]

DW rather than own work. No source for the base map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Looking at the user's other contributions it seems very likely that this is indeed a self-made map. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Seal-Telecom logo.svg

[edit]

Copyright violations: Logo might meet the threshold of originality, COM:TOO theinstantmatrix (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm from the agency responsible for the SEAL Telecom company and we have created the page to tell the story of the company that will complete 30 years this year (2018). They own the logo and have authorized us to place it in the page. How can we make sure it won't be deleted?--MTrugilho (talk) 13:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MTrugilho: Look at COM:OTRS for guidance. The best approach would be to put this image on the company Web site with a statement that you're releasing it under CC BY-SA 4.0 and then mention that in the "source" field. The second-best would be for you to send email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org based on the email templates. --bjh21 (talk) 13:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: OTRS required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vologda, Vologda Oblast, Russia - panoramio (48).jpg

[edit]

Redundant. Superseded by better straightened view File:Vologda, Vologda Oblast, Russia - panoramio (47).jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This perspective is a more compelling image than the alternative, so I decline to delete. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus for deletion (although both images are horrible). --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Band of the National Guard of Ukraine 2017.jpg

[edit]

PD-Ukraine seems not to cover photographies, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Никитенко.jpg

[edit]

Взято с интернета, чужая работа MisterXS (talk) 22:41, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:El que trae aguardiente de Yca. 1820).jpg

[edit]

Imagen repetida. Ya existe esta misma imagen, a peor calidad. Lo que voy a hacer es reemplazar la imagen en el correspondiente archivo. Miguel Alan Córdova Silva (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the only other version (File:Pancho fierro el que trae aguardiente de Ica.jpg) is much smaller resolution. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Catching the icicle, got you^ L'art d'attraper un glaçon. - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

Part of mass upload: random tree without educational context or value, out of scope. P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I'm usually not a fan of our mass-uploaded Panoramio images, but this is quite unique and has an okay quality, in my opinion. It would be good if someone was able to identify the kind of tree, though. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:26, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:35, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:François Hollande - 2017 (39617330042).jpg

[edit]

Informations diverge : link says cc-by-2.0 but EXIF says Copyright - joaomakesphotos.com | Joao Pedro Correia Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent an email to João Pedro Correia about copyright information for the photo. Thanks. // sikander { talk } 23:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The photographer, João Pedro Correia, has confirmed by email that WebSummit holds the copyright and WebSummmit published the image under Creative Commons. Email conversation has been forwarded to OTRS team. // sikander { talk } 14:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 12:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:François Hollande - 2017 (27869823159).jpg

[edit]

Informations diverge : link says cc-by-2.0 but EXIF says Copyright - joaomakesphotos.com | Joao Pedro Correia Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent an email to João Pedro Correia about copyright information for the photo. Thanks. // sikander { talk } 23:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The photographer, João Pedro Correia, has confirmed by email that WebSummit holds the copyright and WebSummmit published the image under Creative Commons. Email conversation has been forwarded to OTRS team. // sikander { talk } 14:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 12:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/01/29&oldid=292078966"