Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/01/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Files uploaded by AbdallahAbdullah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused, what I believe are personal images. Mass serial uploader with other questionable uploads. I didn't nominate others. I can see one or two to illustrate something but not 1 or 2 dozen.
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 86268.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8768.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8755.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8741.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8734 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8710 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8721 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8705 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8681 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8695 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8672 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8661 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8651 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8622 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8616 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8603.jpg
- File:Maid zulmapadrusnika 8603 - Kopie.jpg
- File:Looslut servilia 7677.jpg
- File:Looslut servilia 7674 b.jpg
- File:Looslut servilia 7671.jpg
- File:Looslut servilia 7668.jpg
- File:Looslut servilia 7662.jpg
- File:Looslut servilia 7659.jpg
- File:Looslut servilia 7656.jpg
- File:Looslut servilia 7653.jpg
- File:Looslut servilia 7650.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 01:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Commons is not Wikipedia (nor LinkedIn) jdx Re: 08:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation JiiQo (talk) 05:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:03, 13 Januar 2018 UTC: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons: Copyright violation --Krdbot 13:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
The label (specifically, the artwork of the camera) may be copyrighted. A version with that artwork cropped out is already available at File:British Museum 2nd century bronze jug.jpg. Mike Peel (talk) 12:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- This DR should be considered controversial and should stay open for at least 7 days. The simple camera icon in the sign may be such a small component that it is de minimis. The camera icon is unlikely to be the property of the museum and some searching may reveal its use elsewhere, it may well be copyright free or be on a suitable licence for reuse. --Fæ (talk) 13:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep Some quick research shows the camera icon to be free clipart, very widely used. Now uploaded to File:Camera-pictogram.jpg. --Fæ (talk) 13:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The rationale for deletion has been answered by verifying the free license on the camera icon. Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, absolutely de minimis and perhaps that should have been considered by the nominator first. seb26 (talk) 13:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The icon is free, and de minimis anyway. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, the copyfraud label is the imporant part of this picture, the icon is free and the text is too short for copyright imho. Lionel Allorge (talk) 14:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, per the above. Andy Mabbett (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, per the above. Leutha (talk) 18:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete - The icon is not in fact adequately licensed, so far as I can tell. I reproduce here the text of the license information on FreeClipArtNow.com which is listed as the source on the upload page of File:Camera-pictogram.jpg. In my view, the final line is sufficient to exclude the file from Commons' scope, as clearly the licence does not extend to reproduction for any purpose. I hope everyone !voting with that justification will review their vote in the light of this. Further, I don't think either the icon or its role in this image is neglible enough for de minimis to apply. Regards, The Land (talk) 20:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- FreeClipartNow.com grants you a nonexclusive use of the clipart images available on our website in accordance with these terms and conditions (the "license").
- Product Usage
- You are free to download and use clipart images found from this site on all projects. It's not necessary to provide a link back to this site, but it would be greatly appreciated.
- You may NOT use any component of our clipart or site content to produce what could be directly or indirectly considered a competitive venture against us.
- You may wish to review your vote in the light of the other DR discussion that Mike links below. There's more than one source and the alternate is clear about a CC0 release. If you have other reasons to see this photograph deleted based on discussions about this photograph elsewhere, it would be useful to put them openly in this DR. --Fæ (talk) 20:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, de minimis. Site says "public domain clipart"[1] If it was not public domain than they should not say it is public domain. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment just to note that I've expressed my concerns about the claim of public domain, and de minimis, at Commons:Deletion requests/File:British Museum Fortuna statue, with copyfraud notice.jpg - the same concerns apply here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, per the above. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:00, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Doc James · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 20:02, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep even if the label is the primary subject of the image, the information above satisfys me that the image of the camera is freely licensed CC0/PD Gnangarra 02:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per consensus. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Issakha Abdraman khan fan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
copyright logo under a wrong license. Saqib (talk) 11:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyright violation. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. If, as suggested by the subcategories, Gregory Artynov was the architect, it's clearly out of copyright, as he died in 1919. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Pre-1917 building. PD-RusEmpire. --Anatoliy (talk) 21:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Seems copyrighted material. Any reason to be put under cc-by-sa-4.0. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Josve05a at 22:19, 13 Januar 2018 UTC: Mass deletion of copyrighted content; see Commons:Licensing. If the deleted image was public domain, please file a COM:UNDEL with evidence. - --Krdbot 01:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Seems copyrighted material. Any reason to be put under cc-by-sa-4.0. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Josve05a at 22:19, 13 Januar 2018 UTC: Mass deletion of copyrighted content; see Commons:Licensing. If the deleted image was public domain, please file a COM:UNDEL with evidence. - --Krdbot 01:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Seems copyrighted material. Any reason to be put under cc-by-sa-4.0. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Josve05a at 22:19, 13 Januar 2018 UTC: Mass deletion of copyrighted content; see Commons:Licensing. If the deleted image was public domain, please file a COM:UNDEL with evidence. - --Krdbot 01:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Image with SVG 1.2. Inсorreсt image User 699 (talk) 10:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The current image has Russian text, and content can be eventually overwritten. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- This file was downloaded in the PNG-format --User 699 (talk) 15:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 06:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Image with SVG 1.2. Inсorreсt image User 699 (talk) 10:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The current image has Russian text, and content can be eventually overwritten. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- This file was downloaded in the PNG-format --User 699 (talk) 15:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Not a valid argument for deletion. Again, keep the SVGs. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- This file was downloaded in the PNG-format --User 699 (talk) 15:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 06:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
probably copyright Nyamok (talk) 05:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 11:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Considerr gfhfhdjribcbwg 197.128.214.129 09:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi folks. I took this picture 1998 in NY after Nas released an album with AZ and Foxxy Brown at MTV Studios near Times Square. Its taken with a Hasselblad 500c on Ilford HP5 on 800 ASA developed in Kodak Xtol and printed on Ilford Multigrade Fiber paper. This is probably the best picture of AZ around. So don't delete it, please. Best regards, Mika
Kept, this is vandalistic nomination. We have OTRS-permission to use the file and the file is used in multiple projects. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
picture stolen from my website without permission - www.poczet.com 78.10.75.191 16:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: reproduction of 2D work that is in the public domain. Ruthven (msg) 16:25, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
picture taken from poczet.com without permission 87.105.244.252 09:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, you have no right to demand permission. The image is too old for copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Die Datei zeigt nicht das Wappen Peenemündes. Dazu fehlen drei Kronen. Diese zu ergänzen ist allerdings nicht notwendig, da schon eine entsprechende Datei auf Commons existiert (File:DEU Peenemünde COA.svg) Fränsmer (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- User: Perhelion 14:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Soll nicht veröffentlicht werden Lums26 (talk) 23:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:14, 14 Januar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: Speedydelete --Krdbot 13:40, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Wird nicht mehr verwendet Lums26 (talk) 22:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deleted by Taivo. (non-admin closure) LaundryPizza03 (talk) 14:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
versehentlich hochgeladen; sollte zunächst nur ein Test sein; Sorry Charlydia52 (talk) 15:40, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation (no license) JiiQo (talk) 05:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Screenshot of a game, probably it does not really have a CC license. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:55, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:08, 15 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: proprietary software --Krdbot 19:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mouadgarwan5 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats
- File:File to nawar.pdf
- File:Pdf to nawar.pdf
- File:Lkahraba2.pdf
- File:Lmowasala 2.pdf
- File:Lmowasala.pdf
- File:Fard.pdf
- File:Ayou.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Similar to http://www.speeed.ch/system/html/Tomas%20Andrade.PNG-98477de1.png, not own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:21, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Copied from https://enunabaldosa.com/2008/05/28/saucedo-sergio/ (uploader claim it). Missing basic data: date and place where the picture esa Taken. This footballer was active since 1976 and 2000. Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 01:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Upgrade: this picture shows the footballer playing for Sporting Clube de Portugal. This footballer only played for this club on season 1985/1986 from Portuguese league. The photo seems to be taken inside the stadium of the club (located un Lisbon). I do not know the copyright status for a photograph taken under those conditions. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 05:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: grabbed from the web. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
selfies by uploaded by [[User: Jeevan sinha5| Jeevan sinha5 ] (talk · contribs) - out of scoop. Kalbbes (talk) 18:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Dyolf77 at 22:11, 15 Januar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jeevan sinha --Krdbot 01:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Selfies by [[User: Jeevan sinha5| Jeevan sinha5 ] (talk · contribs) Out of scope. (Except one attached to his user page). Kalbbes (talk) 18:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Dyolf77 at 22:11, 15 Januar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jeevan sinha --Krdbot 01:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. If, as suggested by the subcategories, Vasiliy Listovnichiy was the architect, it's clearly out of copyright, as he died in 1919. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Speedy keep 1910-built (see gray palte on building). PD-RusEmpire. --ReAl (talk) 23:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)- Delete In Ukraine no "freedom of panorama". The Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" exclusively owns the exclusive rights to use works of architecture, urban development, landscape garden art exclusively to their authors (Part 4 of Article 15 of the Law). File must be delete --Yuriy Urban (talk) 13:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Duration of copyright-protection is not eternal. --Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- the author has heirs --Yuriy Urban (talk) 14:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ukraine has 70 years pma[2]. Copyright ended in 1989. --Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ok. I will draw attention to photos of new buildings and monuments of this user --Yuriy Urban (talk) 14:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ukraine has 70 years pma[2]. Copyright ended in 1989. --Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- the author has heirs --Yuriy Urban (talk) 14:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Duration of copyright-protection is not eternal. --Túrelio (talk) 13:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Obviously free. We can see year 1910 on the plate on the building. So it falls under PD-Rus_Empire. --Anatoliy (talk) 18:43, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. If, as suggested by the subcategories, Vasiliy Listovnichiy was the architect, it's clearly out of copyright, as he died in 1919. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The same as for Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Vinnytsia_Pushkina_str_-38_(12).jpg. 1910-built, PD-RusEmpire. --ReAl (talk) 23:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete In Ukraine no "freedom of panorama". The Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" exclusively owns the exclusive rights to use works of architecture, urban development, landscape garden art exclusively to their authors (Part 4 of Article 15 of the Law). File must be delete --Yuriy Urban (talk) 14:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ukraine has 70 years pma[3]. Copyright ended in 1989. --Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: 1910 building - PD-RusEmpire. --Anatoliy (talk) 19:07, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MatteoGelardi1957 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from music and other works.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear EugeneZelenko, why are my uploads deleted? As for File:Art&Science_di_Matteo_Gelardi.webm, this is an original performance I myself have been organizing and playing out with artists and scientists in theatres and arenas since 2015. the music is all played live and the costs on copyright in Italy (SIAE) have been covered. File:The_dance_of_the_ciliated_cells_-_Matteo_Gelardi.webm was shot and edited with CC music by myself few years ago. They are both partecipating in Wiki Science Competition Italy 2017. What is the issue? Alexmar983 Thank you
--MatteoGelardi1957 (talk) 17:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- I warned they could have done it MatteoGelardi1957, I told you in my talk briefly about copyright status, I did not stress at the time because we had another issue. In any case I was prepared to save the file and show them apart the Italian jury, so we are aware of them. and I drafted a list of things to check before the final prizes on the Italian jury checklist (more info in Italian in your talk) and I also verified a little bit based on what I could find online that the file in the theater was ok. Of course you are you, and I am aware of it, now you only have to prove it to commons. We will probably use the OTRS system.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Please read Commons:OTRS. For me there is NO other reason your authorship may be doubted, so I am not by default pushing in this direction unless strictly necessary. In the meantime I add your description to your file. For another user, we decided to remove a music to be sure. in your case, we did not discuss directly. But again, we had the situation quite under control in the competition files. I simply don't poke the bear with a stick. But we are ready. In the meantime can you find the original information about the CC music?--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear EugeneZelenko and Alexmar983, I sent the OTRS email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org according to the model in Commons:OTRS. I attached my passport and copy of the certificate of purchase of the music used in File:The_dance_of_the_ciliated_cells_-_Matteo_Gelardi.webm. webm. I thought It was CC, but I purchased instead the individual license for the song from the Jamendo platform a couple of years ago.--MatteoGelardi1957 (talk) 20:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- thank you MatteoGelardi1957 I has no doubt you are expert on that side and I hope this is enough not to delete this file right now, we will define additional details later if necessary.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
We cannot afford to see these files deleted with no additional feedback... if anyone thinks we need to give more information, tell us something. I strongly support to keep the files, we can simply refine additional details later.--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:40, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 06:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. If, as suggested by the subcategories, Gregory Artynov was the architect, it's clearly out of copyright, as he died in 1919. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, a lot of sources suggest it was built before 1910. Like this . Nothing to be copyrighted. Nomination is a personal vendetta from uk.wikipedia.org--Brunei (talk) 20:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Kunbari's manor is not copyrightable because {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. If, as suggested by the subcategories, Gregory Artynov was the architect, it's clearly out of copyright, as he died in 1919. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Built before 1910, Keep Nothing to be copyrighted. Nomination is a personal vendetta from uk.wikipedia.org--Brunei (talk) 20:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Kunbari's manor is not copyrightable because {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. If, as suggested by the subcategories, Vasiliy Listovnichiy was the architect, it's clearly out of copyright, as he died in 1919. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The same as for Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Vinnytsia_Pushkina_str_-38_(12).jpg. 1910-built, PD-RusEmpire. --ReAl (talk) 23:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete In Ukraine no "freedom of panorama". The Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" exclusively owns the exclusive rights to use works of architecture, urban development, landscape garden art exclusively to their authors (Part 4 of Article 15 of the Law). File must be delete --Yuriy Urban (talk) 14:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ukraine has 70 years pma[4]. Copyright ended in 1989. --Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: captain Chetkov's manor is not copyrightable because {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:40, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. If, as suggested by the subcategories, Vasiliy Listovnichiy was the architect, it's clearly out of copyright, as he died in 1919. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The same as for Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Vinnytsia_Pushkina_str_-38_(12).jpg. 1910-built, PD-RusEmpire. --ReAl (talk) 23:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete In Ukraine no "freedom of panorama". The Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" exclusively owns the exclusive rights to use works of architecture, urban development, landscape garden art exclusively to their authors (Part 4 of Article 15 of the Law). File must be delete --Yuriy Urban (talk) 14:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Didn't you read that the architect has died in 1919? Duration of copyright-protection is not eternal. --Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing to be copyrighted. Nomination is a personal vendetta from uk.wikipedia.org--Brunei (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: captain Chetkov's manor is not copyrightable because {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. If, as suggested by the subcategories, Vasiliy Listovnichiy was the architect, it's clearly out of copyright, as he died in 1919. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The same as for Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Vinnytsia_Pushkina_str_-38_(12).jpg. 1910-built, PD-RusEmpire. --ReAl (talk) 23:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: captain Chetkov's manor is not copyrightable because {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. If, as suggested by the subcategories, Vasiliy Listovnichiy was the architect, it's clearly out of copyright, as he died in 1919. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The same as for Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Vinnytsia_Pushkina_str_-38_(12).jpg. 1910-built, PD-RusEmpire. --ReAl (talk) 23:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete In Ukraine no "freedom of panorama". The Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" exclusively owns the exclusive rights to use works of architecture, urban development, landscape garden art exclusively to their authors (Part 4 of Article 15 of the Law). File must be delete --Yuriy Urban (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ukraine has 70 years pma[5]. Copyright ended in 1989. --Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: captain Chetkov's manor is not copyrightable because {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. If, as suggested by the subcategories, Vasiliy Listovnichiy was the architect, it's clearly out of copyright, as he died in 1919. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The same as for Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Vinnytsia_Pushkina_str_-38_(12).jpg. 1910-built, PD-RusEmpire. --ReAl (talk) 23:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete In Ukraine no "freedom of panorama". The Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" exclusively owns the exclusive rights to use works of architecture, urban development, landscape garden art exclusively to their authors (Part 4 of Article 15 of the Law). File must be delete --Yuriy Urban (talk) 14:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ukraine has 70 years pma[6]. Copyright ended in 1989. --Túrelio (talk) 14:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: captain Chetkov's manor is not copyrightable because {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. Is the architect known? -- Túrelio (talk) 20:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- In Ukraine no "freedom of panorama". The Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" exclusively owns the exclusive rights to use works of architecture, urban development, landscape garden art exclusively to their authors (Part 4 of Article 15 of the Law). File must be delete --Yuriy Urban (talk) 13:41, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- This is all known. However, the duration of copyright-protection is not eternal. Who is the architect? --Túrelio (talk) 13:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Building is of 1901 year construction. Architect is unknown. --Brunei (talk) 18:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- This is all known. However, the duration of copyright-protection is not eternal. Who is the architect? --Túrelio (talk) 13:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not copyrightable because {{PD-RusEmpire}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Barhudarov (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]
- File:Роман Муртазаев на пресс-конференции перед матчем с пражской "Славией".jpg
- File:Казахстан - Узбекистан 3-2.JPG
- File:Муртазаев №14.JPG
- File:Матч Казахстан - Латвия.PNG
- File:Узбекистан - Казахстан 3-1.JPG -2.JPG
- File:Кубок Содружества - 2013 г. Казахстан-Узбекистан.JPG
- File:Муртазаев Роман в игре премьер лиги Казахстана.jpg
- File:Кубок Содружества - 2013 г. Казахстан-Киргизия.JPG
- File:Роман Муртазаев на презентации состава клуба "Шахтер" Караганда (2014).jpg
- File:Муртазаев Р. (слева) на презентация команды "Шахтер" Караганда.jpg
- File:Лига Чемпионов - 2013.jpg
- File:Голландия.jpg
- File:Сборная Казахстана.jpg
- File:Муртазаев (в центре) в борьбе за мяч.jpg
- File:Борьба с игроком сборной Латвии.jpg
- File:Лига Чемпионов.jpg
- File:Казахстан - Исландия.jpg
- File:"Актобе" - "Шахтер".jpg
- File:Матч премьер лиги Казахстана.jpg
- File:Кубок Казахстана - 2013.jpg
- File:Кубок Содружества - 2014.jpg
- File:Муртазаев Р..jpg
- File:Муртазаев Роман (в центре).png
- File:Тренер Муртазаева Р..jpg
- File:Казахстан - Франция.jpg
- File:Квалификационный раунд Лиги Чемпионов - 2013.jpg
- File:Сборная Казахстана (U-21).JPG
- File:Кубок содружества - 2013.jpg
- File:Молодежная сборная Казахстана.jpg
- File:96XVkxHk.jpg
- File:Роман Муртазаев.jpg
- File:1U-pkzOw5Bw.jpg
Mitte27 (talk) 20:40, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:18, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 강남유흥 010 2139 6232 마동석부장 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Spam, uploader blocked indef. --Achim (talk) 21:42, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
there is already the same file with another name CRIBAR (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Not quite, this is a cropped version of File:Maxim Kantor.jpg. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 14:21, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 09:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Uploader request. Not used: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?target=Approved-Banner.png&title=Special%3AGlobalUsage&limit=50 Batreeq (talk) 00:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Complex copyrighted logo ΔΞΤΩ Work • Talk • Mail 00:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:16, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by the subject of the photo under CC license as his own work, but metadata gives "Author: If found contact Bentham Imaging - LA2 7HE Tel 015242 63405" and "Copyright holder: Copyright - Jon Brook", so the photo would seem to be commercially copyrighted. BabelStone (talk) 00:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Poor quality (blurred); orphaned. Leyo 00:55, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:20, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:29, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kedargupta22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Private image, not realitically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jdorjdor44 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realitically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 09:40, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jdorjdor44 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope. No educational value. Commons is not an amateur porn site.
- File:At work in sandy'd pantyhose.jpg
- File:New panties.jpg
- File:Sue's stockings.jpg
- File:Wearing Sue's panties.jpg
- File:Sues's panties.jpg
- File:Sue's panties.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Some small personal photo with category "Idiot". Looks like a prank M5 (talk) 11:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Heavily modified picture of Maracas Beach (Trinidad) without value for Wikipedia. Grueslayer (talk) 12:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 13:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amarat meh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AllanHirsch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: advertisement and promo photos of company of questionable notability.
- File:Hirsch's advertisement in the 1980s.jpg
- File:Hirsch's newspaper advertisement in the 1980s.jpg
- File:Hirsch's newspaper advertisement in the 1980s featuring Allan Hirsch.jpg
- File:Allan Hirsch, owner and CEO of Hirsch's Homestores.jpg
- File:Timeline of Hirsch's Homestores from their beginning to current day.jpg
- File:A picture of the Hirsch Family - left to right, Luci Hirsch, Allan Hirsch, Margaret Hirsch and Richard Hirsch.jpg
- File:Outside view of one of Hirsch's Homestores first store in the 1980s.jpg
- File:Aerial view of Hirsch's Homestores first store in the 1980s.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:30, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alvi Z. and AlviZaman11
[edit]Fake logos and unused Wikipedia screenshots uploaded by a troll.
- File:Wikipedia Built For The Future.png
- File:Wikipedia new homepage Dark Theme.png
- File:Wikipedia new homepage.png.png
- File:Roosevelt High Logo.jpg
- File:Utica Mott High School logo.png
Train2104 (talk) 15:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete all. No potential usefulness. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 04:18, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
non-notable site and publication Saqib (talk) 15:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CuriosityModifier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, multiple times del. on DE Nolispanmo 16:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. MasoodHA (talk) 17:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
not notable. out of project scope. MasoodHA (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:23, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Selfies. Out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Selfies. Out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 18:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Selfies, Out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 18:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
unused personal file uploaded by panoramio bot, Roland zh (talk) 18:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Book or personal essay; copyright violation or out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:20, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused COM:SELFIE. HyperGaruda (talk) 22:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Migebert (talk) 22:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images Migebert (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:18, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images Migebert (talk) 22:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images Migebert (talk) 22:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Private photos, not used.
- File:Goto-nao.02.png
- File:Goto-nao.jpg
- File:SIVA NAGISETTI.jpg
- File:Wynne November 2017.jpg
- File:Yishaan Varma A Chief Executive Officer .jpg
Kulmalukko (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, self promotion. Дима Г (talk) 01:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused logo.
Дима Г (talk) 01:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, promotional usage Triplecaña (talk) 01:40, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope poster, unused. Дима Г (talk) 01:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, no repository, personal image unused (promotional usage) Triplecaña (talk) 01:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal images and unlikely to be used in a project. Commons has a scope.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Millerjd111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal images and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Joshua Dairen Profile.jpg
- File:Joshua Dairen Stairs.jpg
- File:Joshua Dairen Wild.jpg
- File:Joshua Dairen Gate.jpg
- File:Joshua Dairen Bridge.jpg
- File:Joshua Dairen.jpg
- File:Joshua Dairen Look.jpg
- File:Joshua Dairen Google Play.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M.M.Motalib.Mia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yorangabrielmelo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:55, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Widakki with his girlfriend.jpg
- File:Ankit Gautam.jpg
- File:Widakki.jpg
- File:Widakki On Bike.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal images, poor quality and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image. Sixflashphoto (talk) 07:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 07:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 07:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfie/image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 07:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VIAYEC VIAJES (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:45, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VIAYEC VIAJES (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not a place to advertise.
- File:TARJETA REGALO.jpg
- File:Certificado Q.tif
- File:AGENCIA VIAYEC 4.jpg
- File:AGENCIA VIAYEC 3.jpg
- File:AGENCIA VIAYEC 2.jpg
- File:LOGO VIAYEC GRUPO STAR.jpg
- File:AGENCIA VIAYEC 1.jpg
- File:AGENCIA VIAYEC.jpg
ℯxplicit 06:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. -- ~~
Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:45, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sanjaychaudahry949 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination also corrupt file. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
I've been going over the policies concerning deletions and I am going to nominate this as borderline COM:EDUSE, and I don't think it could illustrate any subject well concerning standards for encyclopedic material. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:55, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: It seems to be "transfered" from imbd: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt7201238/mediaviewer/rm3843108096 ....HMS (talk) 22:01, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singer Kamran Alam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photos/selfies and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:Syed Kamran Alam9.jpg
- File:Syed Kamran Alam7.jpg
- File:Syed Kamran Alam6.jpg
- File:Syed Kamran Alam5.jpg
- File:Syed Kamran Alam4.jpg
- File:Syed Kamran Alam3.jpg
- File:Syed Kamran Alam2.jpg
- File:Syed Kamran Alam.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maria falconi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:Hernánpradosunrise.jpg
- File:Hernánprado.jpg
- File:HernánPrado.jpg
- File:Hernanprado.jpg
- File:Hernán Prado y Reno Rojas.jpg
- File:Hernán prado.jpg
- File:Hernan prado.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfies and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nabil Mahbub Khan Nader (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal document; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
dubious own work Eurodyne (talk) 03:49, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:04, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused and Advert. Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:01, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused personal image. Unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sharmamire (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Low quality, unused image with alternate SVG version available. B dash (talk) 04:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:58, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fahadahmedkhokhar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal images and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image. Unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:55, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unused photo of unknown person. Unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal images and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pablo2017server (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfie/image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ayaan12345643 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal selfie/image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope Mbch331 (talk) 08:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused Selfie and personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by امیرلکستانی (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Unused personal images. Appears to be personal and family photos. Unlikely to be used in a project.
- File:Lakestan11.jpg
- File:Lakestan10.jpg
- File:Lakestan9.jpg
- File:Lakestan8.jpg
- File:Lakestan5.jpg
- File:Lakestan2.jpg
Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: File::lakestam10.jpg in use. --Hystrix (talk) 10:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Screenshots or scans from paper. File:Rasim-foto.jpg seems like screenshot from TV-translation. No permission, probably copyvio.
- File:Bir qolun tarixcesi-cover.jpg
- File:Спорт-14.09.1991 - копия.jpg
- File:Futbol Extra-2011-fevral-kapak - копия.jpg
- File:Ballon d'Or 2017 vote.jpg
- File:Викторина журнала Весь Футбол - копия.jpg
- File:Kicker Qarabağ.pdf
- File:Rasim-foto.jpg
Dmitry89 (talk) 07:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:11, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:12, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Low quality scan Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- yes, thank you, I am sorry, I have noticed this directly and have loaded up another two (!) different pictures in a larger size and connected them with the lemma Erich Peter (Dirigent), but was unable to delete the two low quality scans myself. Please delete them, thank you!--MuellerLuedenscheidt (talk) 11:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:15, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Book scan, questionable license Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:16, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Probable Copyvio. Copyright in meta data:Sander Sisask 2014. Claimed as "Own work". Sixflashphoto (talk) 03:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Low quality, unused image with alternate SVG version available. B dash (talk) 04:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:31, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Vandalism plus no real licence JiiQo (talk) 05:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation, (photo of living human) JiiQo (talk) 05:07, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maheshjaat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos. While "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page... is allowed", these are all unused and therefore likely out of scope.
- File:Mahesh Jaat Sahab 9897592755.jpg
- File:Mahesh Jaat.jpg
- File:Mahesh jaat sahab 9045175730.jpg
- File:Mahesh Choudhary 9045175730.jpg
Storkk (talk) 13:30, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maheshjaat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 07:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope theinstantmatrix (talk) 07:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
اِحْذِفْ اِحْذِفْ أسامة الجزري (talk) 08:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 11:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 12:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
2003 book cover, would be copyrighted by the publisher, G.P. Putnam's Sons, unless there is evidence otherwise. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 12:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Photograph of a copyrighted book cover. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 11:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 12:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hossein.income (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots from a non-free game (41148) from http://fanaeigames.com/ Meta-tags has been edited by the uploader.
- File:یک موجود شیطانی در مقابل سینا تنتا بازی 41148.png
- File:یک موجود شیطانی در 41148.jpg
- File:خخخخ 41148.png
- File:41148 سینا تنتا و چکمه قرمز.png
- File:41148 سینا تنتا.png
- File:یک موجود پیر در بازی 41148.png
- File:فونوس نمد 41148.png
Meisam (talk) 11:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 12:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
the upload claims this is his own work. i dont think so. no meta data. the resolution makes thing doubtful. Saqib (talk) 11:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- The uploaded has been banned on EN WP for socking and paid work. --Saqib (talk) 11:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 12:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Matrix Teil9.png
- File:Matrix Teil7.png
- File:Matrix Teil8.png
- File:Matrix Teil5.png
- File:Matrix Teil4.png
- File:Matrix Teil6.png
- File:MatrixTeil iii.png
- File:MatrixTeil ii.png
- File:Matrix Teil3.png
- File:Matrix Teil2.png
- File:Matrix Teil1.png
- File:ModellierenStrömungPazifikHumboldfinal.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Snacks von Lazy Vegan in Geschmacksrichtungen Provencale Herbs und Mexican Spices (38103049976).jpg
[edit]As per COM:PACKAGING. Yann (talk) 16:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
No proof of source Ariam (talk) 21:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 21:35, 13 January 2018 (UTC) There is no need to delete the file photo of Mr. Vincent. It doesn't interfere with anybody. LET IT BE
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Regardless of who took the photograph, the copyright of the painting probably belongs to Colin Davidson (artist) (born 1963), making this a derivative work. We would need credible evidence of permission (e.g. to COM:OTRS) from Colin Davidson that his original painting is freely licensed. Animalparty (talk) 22:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Regardless of who took the photograph, the copyright of the painting probably belongs to Colin Davidson (artist) (born 1963), making this a derivative work. We would need credible evidence of permission (e.g. to COM:OTRS) from Colin Davidson that his original painting is freely licensed. Animalparty (talk) 22:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:55, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
not own work Triplecaña (talk) 22:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
not own work Triplecaña (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
© Sandra GUADAGNINO / sg-photos.book.fr. Identity of Lan-ce-lot, le seul avec des tirets should be verified via Commons:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Found elsewhere on the Internet (http://www.masonicforum.ro/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/1_2.jpg), not own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- The photo was taken personally and not taken from that webpage mentioned in masonicforum. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merino jesus.msn (talk • contribs)
- Hi again @Merino jesus.msn: please tell us how do you explain that the file you uploaded is a cropped version of the one found at http://www.masonicforum.ro and has a larger size ? Anyway, if it comes not from http://www.masonicforum.ro perhaps it may comes as well from Facebook again with a tag in the bottom right (knowing that the Facebook conditions of use are incompatible with a Creative Commons license). Kind regards, Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Scan from a journal Migebert (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Scan from a journal Migebert (talk) 23:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
non-free content, lidar maps are licensed in the Czech Republic — Draceane talkcontrib. 23:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF: unlikely own. Ankry (talk) 23:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:ARPES.png
- File:Density Chi Chiv gamma-eps-converted-to.pdf
- File:3D tRR-eps-converted-to.pdf
- File:3D rRR-eps-converted-to.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Federicovallesar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:27-F 03.jpg
- File:27-F 05.jpg
- File:27-F 01.jpg
- File:27-F 04.jpg
- File:27-F 02.jpg
- File:Concierto Chacao 1989.jpg
- File:Concierto Petare 1990.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Yeshiva of Flatbush in memoriam.pdf
- File:New York University.pdf
- File:Flatbush forum p. 2.pdf
- File:Flatbush forum cover p.pdf
- File:Brooklyn College Alumni ID (1).pdf
- File:FBI BA,MA,LLB.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:59, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Historical documents and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 07:16, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, per resolution and watermark Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete — On the English Wikipedia, we have
{{math}}and<math></math>for exactly this purpose. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 14:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright, see COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Too much artistic work for PD. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-free, see derivative works Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Agree. This was part of a batch of images I moved for the en Wikipedia article on w:Jefferson High School (Daly City, California). Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 17:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Green Giant (talk) 19:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
The photo comes from "self-promotion wiki" http://www.corradorizza.it/ and its legal status is uncertain/unknown. jdx Re: 14:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
The sculptor, Teiji Nakagawa (中川貞司) is still alive. Not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- I uploaded it. I didn't know such a rule. Please delete this work. --Sinryow (talk) 06:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and uploader has requested deletion. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chemical diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
There is no evidence that he is the owner ir this photo. 201.145.246.109 16:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Camilo324. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:30, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Does not appear to be "own work" Ronhjones (Talk) 18:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
間違った登録をしてしまいました。 篠原幹夫 (talk) 23:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, uploader request.. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 14:55, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 01:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- The PD notice lists "Dashwortley" as the author. User already notified by Hogweard, but has not yet replied. Could plausibly be PD since FOP in UK. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 14:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- FoP is not the issue in this nomination. There is (currently) no 'own work' claim from a user. Jcb (talk) 17:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Until Dashwortley replies we are a bit stuck. I moved it to Commons with a bot without individually checking the code nor of course asking the originator for details. Let's see if he responds and says if he took the picture. Hogweard (talk) 20:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- FoP is not the issue in this nomination. There is (currently) no 'own work' claim from a user. Jcb (talk) 17:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Was uploaded to English Wikipedia at a time before information boxes were common. The license gave the authorship, which was fine then, and it's fine now. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 09:02, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- In use on user page. --Hystrix (talk) 12:26, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no longer in use. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Regressionspolynome Auswanderung.png
- File:Berechnung verschiedener Regressionspolynome.png
- File:Rohdaten Bevölkerung.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Funktionen mit Schieberegler.png
- File:Lineare Regressionsgeraden.png
- File:Graphische Darstellung der Ein-und Auswanderung Deutschlands.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate from this file JiiQo (talk) 08:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep because you've nominated the wrong file, The file you've nominated has all the OTRS stuff and green ticks whereas the other file doesn't. –Davey2010Talk 01:31, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Copy of https://www.margaretriver.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/26170947_1289500354488713_1767448829296465323_o.jpg, photo by 3abroad Photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC) Permission is being sought with 3abroad Photography's director and photographer Dean Knowles. Thanks Permission has officially been granted by it's author Dean Knowles on Sunday January 2014 at 07:30am. Thanks
- @Serge Le Goueff: then permission should be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Yours, Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Patrick I shall attempt to do this immediately. Permission sent! :-)
Kept: OTRS Recieved. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:48, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Mutawakkilite Kingdom of Yemen.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
from official FB profile, missing EXIF [18] — Draceane talkcontrib. 23:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:59, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Per Commons:Screenshots, a screenshot of software is only free if the underlying software is also free, or all non-free parts (such as icons and such) are cropped out. As the non-free parts are the purpose of this image, showing the UI of the non-free software, cropping is not possible. Thus I allege this is copyvio. Trlkly (talk) 23:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
The current license would need OTRS permissions to prove that the uploader actually created the image. I also think it is likely too complicated for PD:textlogo, but am unsure, hence putting it under discussion. The uploader also has a history of apparently uploading images related to this subject under a free license that should be fair-use. Trlkly (talk) 00:04, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gerrama
[edit]Gerrama (talk · contribs) commits gross copyright violations – how is (s)he not blocked yet? Only obviously stolen images are listed, further check is warranted. Feel free to add more images to the list below with explanations. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:Marina Azze fica ruiva.jpg – look at EXIF; is it likely a photo?
- File:Marina Azze Apresentando Programa Tem Gente.png – a microphone with logo of pt:Marina Azze’s TV programme is prominent.
- File:Festa de estreia programa TEM GENTE.jpg – from http://www.marinaazze.com.br/p/eu-ja-fiz.html
- File:Com Larissa.jpg – likely a still video frame
- File:Agora se vira meu bem 1.jpg – evidently not own
Deleted, I do not want to block Gerrama yet. I will simply delete all his/her uploads as copyright violations (including those not mentioned in these request: mostly small photos without metadata, if camera data exist, then always different). Taivo (talk) 10:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Low quality, unused image with alternate version available. B dash (talk) 03:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Well, a double image. Sorry about that. Nino Marakot (talk) 04:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose because of the poor nominating statement as it is perfectly acceptable to have double or tripple images of a system even if 1 is older than the other.Jason Rees (talk) 10:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, with alternate version available. --B dash (talk) 11:10, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use. For duplicates, please do not open a DR, but use {{Duplicate}}. Thank you. Ruthven (msg) 18:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate at lower resolution of File:Pierre-Jean De Smet - Brady-Handy.jpg. Unused on WM projects. Pete Forsyth (talk) 05:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Pete Forsyth: Please use {{Duplicate}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 18:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Guido Melli potresti inviare un'e-mail con il permesso di pubblicazione, se sei tu l'autore? Grazie. Ruthven (msg) 18:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sathesfaction25 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Unused personal selfies. Unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 07:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, but two are in use. Ruthven (msg) 18:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio, photoshoped image. Störm (talk) 07:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 18:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Under the copyright link at the bottom of the source it says "All online documents and web pages as well as their parts are protected by copyright, and it is permissible to copy them and print them out only for private, scientific and noncommercial use." Non-Commercial restriction. Leoboudv (talk) 08:58, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- That's in the terms for the site in general. The source page (now gone) contained a more specific notice. See https://web.archive.org/web/20130726034745/http://www.ethz.ch:80/media/pictures/management/president. On the other hand, that notice doesn't contain anything that would grant the right to create derivative works. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 22:21, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
There is no information that the source give permission under Creative Commons license Andriy.v (talk) 13:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Source says: ©2012 «Урядовий кур’єр». Усі права застережено. Ruthven (msg) 18:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Intendo cancellarlo per un utilizzo commerciale privato Elio Pallard (talk) 14:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: non è un motivo per cancellare il file, che è stato rilasciato con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale. Puoi dare l'autorizzazione, con un'altra licenza (o la stessa) per un uso commerciale. Ruthven (msg) 18:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Utilizzo commerciale privato Elio Pallard (talk) 14:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: non è un motivo per cancellare il file, che è stato rilasciato con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale. Puoi dare l'autorizzazione, con un'altra licenza (o la stessa) per un uso commerciale. Ruthven (msg) 18:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Utilizzo commerciale privato Elio Pallard (talk) 14:20, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: non è un motivo per cancellare il file, che è stato rilasciato con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale. Puoi dare l'autorizzazione, con un'altra licenza (o la stessa) per un uso commerciale. Ruthven (msg) 18:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Utilizzo commerciale privato Elio Pallard (talk) 14:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: non è un motivo per cancellare il file, che è stato rilasciato con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale. Puoi dare l'autorizzazione, con un'altra licenza (o la stessa) per un uso commerciale. Ruthven (msg) 18:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Utilizzo commerciale privato Elio Pallard (talk) 14:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: non è un motivo per cancellare il file, che è stato rilasciato con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale. Puoi dare l'autorizzazione, con un'altra licenza (o la stessa) per un uso commerciale. Ruthven (msg) 18:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Utilizzo commerciale privato Elio Pallard (talk) 14:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: non è un motivo per cancellare il file, che è stato rilasciato con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale, che non si può ritirare. Puoi dare l'autorizzazione, con un'altra licenza (o la stessa) per un uso commerciale. Ruthven (msg) 18:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Utilizzo commerciale privato Elio Pallard (talk) 14:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: non è un motivo per cancellare il file, che è stato rilasciato con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale, che non si può ritirare. Puoi dare l'autorizzazione, con un'altra licenza (o la stessa) per un uso commerciale. Ruthven (msg) 18:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
False SVG file — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 18:58, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. While there is regrettably no FoP exception in Ukraine, I strongly doubt that the depicted inscription is really above the threshold of originality required for copyright-protection. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Can't see anything worth protection. --Brunei (talk) 21:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Text is below the threshold of originality. Design above is de minimis. --bjh21 (talk) 15:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There is no artwork --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:20, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 18:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. While there is regrettably no FoP exception in Ukraine, I strongly doubt that the depicted inscription is really above the threshold of originality required for copyright-protection. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Can't see anything worth protection. I blocked user Yuriy Urban in uk.wiki yesterday during the conflict with user Dgho. Now he tries to retaliate in such disgusting manner. I can suggest speedy closure of all nominations. --Brunei (talk) 21:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There is no artwork --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 18:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yuriy Urban as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. The depicted building looks rather old to me. Is the architect known? -- Túrelio (talk) 20:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- In Ukraine no "freedom of panorama". The Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights" exclusively owns the exclusive rights to use works of architecture, urban development, landscape garden art exclusively to their authors (Part 4 of Article 15 of the Law). File must be delete --Yuriy Urban (talk) 13:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- This is all known. However, the duration of copyright-protection is not eternal. Who is the architect? --Túrelio (talk) 13:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Comment Another image has been kept by Well-Informed Optimist --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 17:41, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't seem a recent building or one above ToO. Ruthven (msg) 19:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for billboards. In my opinion no COM:DM - billboard is the central picture element. Wdwd (talk) 20:26, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The image is of a medal for an award created in 2016 by the International Union of Soil Scientists. There is a linked copyright statement at the medal page, http://www.iuss.org/index.php?article_id=631. StarryGrandma (talk) 20:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Also File:מדליית המדען הצעיר ע"ש דן יעלון – צד אחורי.jpg, the reverse side of the medal.
both the file in the linked and the files on this page where created by the same person. he asked me to put them on this page. would a authentic letter from his with his permission to use them will be fine? Adam0707 (talk) 22:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:01, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
No FOP for sculptures in the USA. The sculpture is the main focus. 67.84.96.111 23:13, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
The relief was installed in 2000 (the 12th year of the Heisei era) [19]. Not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 05:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
The lengthy correspondence in the OTRS file is entirely from g-mail accounts, including the message from the photographer that purports to come from the Times of India. It is hard for me to believe that the Times of India allows its staff to use g-mail for such matters. There is also the fact that the image prminently displays a copyrighted award, for which there is no permission. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment. I was a relatively inexperienced OTRS agent then. The OTRS emails started out as the subject making some valid complaints about content in the article about her, and eventually morphed into a thread about photo permissions. By then I had no doubt that the person I was communicating with was indeed Parul Yadav due to the personal nature by which the thread started out. If I were handling the ticket again, when the permission letter from the photographer came from a gmail address purporting to represent someone from the Times of India, I would have demanded proof of identification. I see two paths forward here: (a) delete the image and let the chips fall where they may, handling the inevitable response in OTRS more properly, or (b) resurrect that OTRS ticket and ask for confirmation of identity from the 'Shiv Kamal' person claiming to be the copyright holder. Anachronist (talk) 22:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- I agree completely that the part of thread from Parul Yadav seems entirely authentic. It would be very easy to assume that the license from the photographer was also authentic. Perhaps its just because I've seen so many bad actors here that I get suspicious when I see the facts as above. However, to some extent the license from the photographer is moot, because the image is clearly derivative of the copyright for the award. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- I honestly hadn't thought of that angle. A photographer doesn't own the copyright of his photo of a person if that person is holding an award? In India? I can see that might be the case if the award were the sole subject of the photo, but in this case it's more of a prop for the primary subject, so I'm not sure where to draw the line. One other possible path forward would be to move the image to en-wiki and declare it 'fair use'. The next-to-highest resolution of this photo shows the award in low resolution. Anachronist (talk) 14:47, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- I agree completely that the part of thread from Parul Yadav seems entirely authentic. It would be very easy to assume that the license from the photographer was also authentic. Perhaps its just because I've seen so many bad actors here that I get suspicious when I see the facts as above. However, to some extent the license from the photographer is moot, because the image is clearly derivative of the copyright for the award. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. This image has been replaced in all wikis where it was used, so this image isn't needed anymore. It's best to delete it with the questionable permission as discussed above. Anachronist (talk) 20:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and Anachronist. --Green Giant (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Does Iran have FOP for this bridge? Leoboudv (talk) 10:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, There are no rules prohibiting this in "Iran". JomaIranگفتگو 10:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: The Iranian copyright for the building has expired (30 years) and because the US has no copyright relations with Iran, it is in the public domain in the US. You can also check this link. Mohammad13701 (talk) 22:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Question The protection is 30 years after creation if the bridge was built for a "person of legal position". When was the bridge built? --Ruthven (msg) 18:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2045. Ruthven (msg) 08:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation JiiQo (talk) 05:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- @JiiQo: Why? You have to give some reason! Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Secondarywaltz: this is not my work but the user in new and we have livings people, and this photo like a making of a photoshoot, and I am sorry, my english-0. thank you.JiiQo (talk) 05:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep not copyright violation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.169.160.9 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Piss poor nomination however it is indeed a copyvio - The lighting and poses make it obvious tbh. –Davey2010Talk 01:30, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - As i declared photo is free. It was captured during a concert, which held at a auditorium. Alexander Basilov (talk)
- Keep The uploaded says it's free and he took it at a concert unless you want to delete the other pictures of concerts on this website you should keep it 71.161.214.1 17:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment to admins - Just to note both IPs here are either friends or the same person, The lighting, the poses ... everything about it makes it obvious it's a copyvio. –Davey2010Talk 20:11, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:29, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio, downloaded image. Störm (talk) 07:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Störm you should give more information. Downloaded from where? --Ruthven (msg) 18:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Please upload the original image, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 06:35, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio, downloaded image. Störm (talk) 07:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Störm you should give more information. Downloaded from where? --Ruthven (msg) 18:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Please upload the original image, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Yann (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. -- ~~ Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- In use on user page. --Hystrix (talk) 11:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- It was my previous understanding that putting an image into a sandbox/userpage months ago and showing no interest in finishing it didn't count as being used on a userpage but it doesn't make a difference to me. I can avoid them in the future. There are plenty of out of scope images and copyvios out there. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:44, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Most probably not notable enough to have an article, no other contributions. --Yann (talk) 06:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:Mondip rajkonwar 2.jpg and File:Mondip rajkonwar 3.jpg in use on user page. --Hystrix (talk) 12:07, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- It was my previous understanding that putting an image into a sandbox/userpage months ago and showing no interest in finishing it didn't count as being used on a userpage but it doesn't make a difference to me. I can avoid them in the future. There are plenty of out of scope images and copyvios out there. I do have "own work" concerns as well though. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Most probably not notable enough to have an article, no other contributions. --Yann (talk) 06:49, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Unknown person, unused and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:40, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- In use on user page. --Hystrix (talk) 12:11, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- Again, I have no issue with images being kept but now seeing the metadata Author: JK and if this is a photo of him, I have doubts about "Own work" on this as well. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Most probably not notable enough to have an article, no other contributions. --Yann (talk) 06:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahbaz Ali Shahani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:Shahbaz ali shahani.jpg in use on user page. But own work? --Hystrix (talk) 12:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- I don't believe it was in use a week ago. If the user wants to use an image that's fine and it could be kept. The much bigger issue is the meta data Author: jk. I also have doubts about "own work". -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 13:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Most probably not notable enough to have an article, no other contributions. --Yann (talk) 06:51, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:55, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Cropped version of http://www.whitehousemuseum.org/furnishings/bellange.jpg, taken from http://www.whitehousemuseum.org/furnishings/bellange.htm, where it is credited to the White House Historical Association. As explained at http://www.whitehousemuseum.org/special/about.htm under "Licensing Images", the White House Historical Association is a non-governmental organization. False PD rationale. —LX (talk, contribs) 05:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Naturally, this also applies to the uncropped version at File:BlueRoombellange.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 06:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as per LX. --Yann (talk) 07:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Alreday exist a newer version File:GKLKV Integrated Transit Map -KwongTN.svg *angys* (talk) 11:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: in use. --Yann (talk) 07:22, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, low-re image, similar to http://static1.purepeople.com/articles/3/16/78/93/@/1987130-lilian-renaud-a-son-arrivee-a-la-950x0-2.jpg and others, dubious own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:23, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation Fache (talk) 14:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:23, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
non free logo per https://www.rmsi.com/ 1997kB (talk) 16:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. The photo is a modern bridge. Олег Кущ 18:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Author is not unknown but Imre Sárai. Comp. File:Horthy Miklós (2).jpg. We don't know his death date. It might occurs that he died less than 70 years ago. We know that he was alive in 1940. Regasterios (talk) 19:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep:
Author is unknown. Imre Sárai is n o t the author. The picture postcard was printed by the Factory of Sárai Imre (A képeslap Sárai Imre Rotációs Fényképsokszorosító Budapest IX. Angyal u. 7-A gyártmánya). Sárai Imre was a factory owner. Please do not delete my remarks. https://www.flickr.com/photos/59061037@N02/39654655241/in/dateposted-public/ --Elekes Andor (talk) 11:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Even if the author is unknown the year when the photo was taken is too close to the border. Even the {{FAL}} license is wrong. --Regasterios (talk) 20:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
The photo in question was taken in 1940. The photo in question was published in 1940. The author is unknown. You say: the year when the photo was taken is too close to the border. You could apologize for beeing wrong about the author. No, your only aim is to delete an important photo. Date of publishing + 70 years. Capisco ? --Elekes Andor (talk) 12:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Sárai Imre must be the author. He owned this factory shared with Sárai Sándor, and in September of 1940 he was alive so did Sárai Sándor, see here. According to this phone book published in September of 1940 Sárai Imre lived at 20 Tömő Street, Sárai Sándor lived at 69 József blvd, the factory based at 7/A Angyal Street, its phone number was 130-650. (The word "fényképsokszorosító" means photo manufacturer, "fényképészmesterek" means masters of photography in English.) In 1942 the factory was already at 16 Vajda Hunyad Street, (see here, the number is the same: 130-650). Finally see the phone book published in December of 1950. Names and address was the same, although the number had changed. Less than 70 years ago... --Regasterios (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Sárai Imre and Sárai Sándor were "producing", manufacturing post cards. Some of theese postcards were their pictures, most of the photos on the postcards were n o t taken by them. The author is unknown. --Elekes Andor (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Because of the factory was theirs they must be the copyright holders even if the photo has not taken by they. --Regasterios (talk) 08:35, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Beeing the owner of a factory, doesn't mean you are the holder of the copyright of the photos you use for manufacturing a postcard. There is no such connection. The factory must have a license agreement to use the photo of the author/copyright owner. But holding a licence agreement does not mean to get the copyright from the author. --Elekes Andor (talk) 16:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
How do you know that Sárai Imre (or Sárai Sándor) not to be the author? They both were masters of photography. There is Sárai Imre's name on the rear side of the postcard. You say the author is unknown although you can't prove it. Do it if you can! --Regasterios (talk) 19:58, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
I say: the author is unknown. You say: the author is Sárai Imre. You have to verify your statement, not me. Sárai Imre might be the factory owner, but this fact doesn’t verify that he would be the author too. Negative statement’s can’t be verified. --Elekes Andor (talk) 13:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
„You have to verify your statement, not me.” An administrator will decide it. --Regasterios (talk) 13:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
The name of Sárai Imre isn't on the rear side of the postcard. There is the name of the FACTORY, embedding the name of Sárai Imre. But it's not the name of a person, but the name of a factory. --Elekes Andor (talk) 13:15, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Of course, Sárai Imre had nothing to do with the factory which named after him in his life and to found and boss was out of the question. It's a very interesting idea. --Regasterios (talk) 13:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
The author: a natural person, who made the piece of art. Not a factory, not a guess, a proven fact. Here in the wikipedia, this is sooo complicated….. --Elekes Andor (talk) 10:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Probable photographer was alive in the 1950s. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal selfies/images. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- in use --Hystrix (talk) 11:29, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- It was my previous understanding that putting an image into a sandbox or draft/userpage months ago and showing no interest in finishing it didn't count as being used on a userpage but it doesn't make a difference to me. I can avoid them in the future. There are plenty of out of scope images and copyvios out there. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:04, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- "Delete' - the Draft page it is used on is a promotional draft and the user page is a U5 violation. Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Gbawden and OP. ~riley (talk) 05:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Reddogsix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://myspace.com/lukaslauermann/photos
Converted by me to DR, as the linked external hit is not very convincing (smaller size, not dated). However, here the image is clearly credited to © Rosa Fuerpass . -- Túrelio (talk) 10:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep for now, as the link provided with the photo by Rosa Fuerpass was published in 2014 (the upload on Commons is in 2013). Moreover, the published photo by Rosa Fuerpass has no metadata from the camera. --Ruthven (msg) 18:44, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 05:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 10:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Karisma Kamdani (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in id.wiki and uploading 2 photos about himself (one now deleted), which are used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:09, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Looks like photo of a TV programme. jdx Re: 15:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chemical diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 17:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by J.varshini (talk · contribs)
[edit]as per File:Sculpture sin.png potentially screenshots and copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons,
Roland zh (talk) 18:54, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Although Utreras authored the vectorized logo, he isn't the creator of the logo and it has not been released under a free license. Furthermore, another version was previously deleted as there was no permission to publish it here, and is not simple enough to be ineligible for copyright 186.79.158.91 05:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:FA Chile.png
- Spanish: Los nombres de los diseñadores del equipo del Frente Amplio ya fueron agregados al "resumen" del archivo. Los diseños de logotipos e isotipos de partidos y coaliciones políticas no pueden restringir su uso libre porque identifican a uno o más grupos colectivos y movimientos sociales los cuales no pueden lucrar con este tipo de imágenes, ya que estas no son marcas registradas, aunque si podrían, o no, poseer registro en INAPI en Chile. A nivel ideológico el Frente Amplio tampoco permitiría algo así, una coalición que desarrolla su trabajo en base al trabajo voluntario de cada uno de sus militantes. Respecto al diseño complejo, véase representaciones de logos de partidos como el Partido Comunista de Chile
que pueden permanecer perfectamente en Wikipedia por los mismos motivos que he entregado. No hay razones para solicitar la eliminación del archivo, soy además el autor del trabajo de vectorización. No quiero pensar que es alguna clase de vandalismo ideológico reiterado con eliminaciones al mismo contenido de un archivo en reiteradas veces.
English: The names of the designers of the Frente Amplio team have already been added to the Summary" of the file. The designs of logos and isotypes of political parties and coalitions can't restrict their free use because they identify one or more collective groups and social movements which can not profit from this type of images, since these are not registered trademarks, although they could be, or not, to have a registration with INAPI (Chilean intellectual property agency). At the ideological level, the Frente Amplio would not allow something like that either, a coalition that develops its work based on the voluntary work of each one of its militants. Regarding the complex design, see representations of logos of parties like the Communist Party of Chile that can remain perfectly in Wikipedia for the same reasons that I have given. There are no reasons to request the deletion of the file, I am also the author of the vectorization work. I do not want to think that it is some kind of repeated ideological vandalism with deletions to the same content in a file repeatedly. --- 
Pablo Utreras | Discusión
- For sure it isn't ideological vandalism (I am myself a FA supporter) but they have not released this logo under a free license, and so it cannot be hosted here. Provide proof it has been released under a free license or this has to be deleted. It's "simple enough to be public domain" claim has already been contested before and the logo has been deleted. --186.79.66.51 02:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- .For the record, the vectorized version was taken from this url which is linked from Revolución Democrática. Names of authors and collaborators of the logo: [20] --186.79.66.51 03:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Well, for the record, it looks that Diego Grez (long-time banned from wiki sites for disruptive editing) is still campaigning here under IP addresses. Very interesting. --Sfs90 (talk) 03:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- The logo was based on the Facebook profile image [21] with the colors of [22] It can be easily vectorized due to the shapes, any user with a medium level of knowledge in Illustrator or GIMP can create a logo representation. In fact, this version does not even have the "Andes Black" typography of Latinotype due to license conflicts. It is paradoxical that you doubt a contribution to which I dedicate myself, being that you do not have any substantial contribution and you work on an anonymous IP. And if what the user Sfs90 (person who I respect enough for the quality of their editions and above all the patience that you have in each article where it contributes) indicates is true, it makes me think that you are only looking for polemics in Wikimedia Commons. --- Pablo Utreras | Discusión
- User 186.79.66.51 have just eliminated part of the discussion. You are violating basic rules in this place, you are demonstrating behavior similar to the indicated profile. --- Pablo Utreras | Discusión
- Do not recur to ad hominem fallacies, Pablo, it undermines your well-intentioned reasonings. I have made a point based on a previous decision and the fact that this has not been released under a free license as you have stated. Also, I have removed Sfs90's comment because it is both an attack and violates my right to edit anonymously. Please do not re-add it again. --186.79.214.233 03:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- You don't put the rules here and your personal information was never revealed, you chose your real name as a username here. You can't bleach a discussion because you do not like a comment, also it is not an attack, it is a truth. Anyway, everything is in the history. See this Sockpuppet Investigation. It is a matter of reviewing how many accounts have blocked you due to bad intentions, conflicts of interest and mistreatment of Wikipedia contributors. Regarding the licenses, I'm already corroborating with the FA design team its use in Wikipedia and Commons, just to have a backup and that your wrong prejudices don't delete a file that is useful for everyone. You can't compare the credibility of two users with 9 years in Spanish Wikipedia versus a blocked user of 4 different user names (if not more) and more than 10 dynamic IP addresses. If you feel attacked again with this, I invite you to report my behavior to see if I'm wrong. You have no credibility to edit or retry collaborating on any of the Wikimedia sites. It is more than proven. Have a good week.- Pablo Utreras | Discusión 04:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- You don't put the rules here and your personal information was never revealed, you chose your real name as a username here. You can't bleach a discussion because you do not like a comment, also it is not an attack, it is a truth. Anyway, everything is in the history. See this Sockpuppet Investigation. It is a matter of reviewing how many accounts have blocked you due to bad intentions, conflicts of interest and mistreatment of Wikipedia contributors. Regarding the licenses, I'm already corroborating with the FA design team its use in Wikipedia and Commons, just to have a backup and that your wrong prejudices don't delete a file that is useful for everyone. You can't compare the credibility of two users with 9 years in Spanish Wikipedia versus a blocked user of 4 different user names (if not more) and more than 10 dynamic IP addresses. If you feel attacked again with this, I invite you to report my behavior to see if I'm wrong. You have no credibility to edit or retry collaborating on any of the Wikimedia sites. It is more than proven. Have a good week.-
- Do not recur to ad hominem fallacies, Pablo, it undermines your well-intentioned reasonings. I have made a point based on a previous decision and the fact that this has not been released under a free license as you have stated. Also, I have removed Sfs90's comment because it is both an attack and violates my right to edit anonymously. Please do not re-add it again. --186.79.214.233 03:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- User 186.79.66.51 have just eliminated part of the discussion. You are violating basic rules in this place, you are demonstrating behavior similar to the indicated profile. ---
- The logo was based on the Facebook profile image [21] with the colors of [22] It can be easily vectorized due to the shapes, any user with a medium level of knowledge in Illustrator or GIMP can create a logo representation. In fact, this version does not even have the "Andes Black" typography of Latinotype due to license conflicts. It is paradoxical that you doubt a contribution to which I dedicate myself, being that you do not have any substantial contribution and you work on an anonymous IP. And if what the user Sfs90 (person who I respect enough for the quality of their editions and above all the patience that you have in each article where it contributes) indicates is true, it makes me think that you are only looking for polemics in Wikimedia Commons. ---
- Well, for the record, it looks that Diego Grez (long-time banned from wiki sites for disruptive editing) is still campaigning here under IP addresses. Very interesting. --Sfs90 (talk) 03:44, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Spanish: Los nombres de los diseñadores del equipo del Frente Amplio ya fueron agregados al "resumen" del archivo. Los diseños de logotipos e isotipos de partidos y coaliciones políticas no pueden restringir su uso libre porque identifican a uno o más grupos colectivos y movimientos sociales los cuales no pueden lucrar con este tipo de imágenes, ya que estas no son marcas registradas, aunque si podrían, o no, poseer registro en INAPI en Chile. A nivel ideológico el Frente Amplio tampoco permitiría algo así, una coalición que desarrolla su trabajo en base al trabajo voluntario de cada uno de sus militantes. Respecto al diseño complejo, véase representaciones de logos de partidos como el Partido Comunista de Chile
- So, in your opinion, being banned in one site because three guys made a coalition to get me banned on the basis of lies, unfounded assumptions and, best of all, personal attacks is your reason to "destroy" my argument? Learn to have a discussion without having to use fallacies to win it. Kind regards and have a nice day. PS. I was a contributor to Wikimedia since 2006. Drama Queens got me pissed off and that is the reason why I left nearly two years ago, voluntarily, from all Wikimedia projects. The English Wikipedia events frustrated me enough to do so. Sfs90's constant witch-hunt is harassing. They can't understand It is my choice to edit anonymously. I changed my account's password to something I will never remember again, so it's not possible anyway to resume editing with it. I don't want to, neither. And, what my opponents never say is that I contributed several Good Articles, both on the English and Spanish Wikipedia, featured lists on the English Wikipedia, dozens of DYK, many featured articles on the English Wikinews, several thousand files here in Commons. In all, lots of quality content that make me proud. So please stop making unfair attacks. Had I wanted to get the English Wikipedia lifted, I could have. I did not even bring opposition when they actually discussed the ban. It's not worth it. You are proving me right why it's not worth to contribute here anymore. 201.219.237.169 23:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Finally, I am not banned or blocked anywhere but the English Wikipedia. It is my right to edit anonymously, and Sfs90 and anybody should not out me. I'm pinging admins to comment, if they please. @Rama: (um, oh, I don't recall anyone else...long time) 201.219.237.169 23:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Seeing Pablo Utreras' arguments, I am afraid there is nothing of relevance:
- names of the designers of the Frente Amplio team have already been added to the Summary" of the file: that is indeed a requirement in any case, but it does not grant a right to freely license the file
- The designs of logos and isotypes of political parties and coalitions can't restrict their free use because they identify one or more collective groups and social movements which can not profit from this type of images, since these are not registered trademarks: it would be interesting to know whether it is indeed trademarked or not, but even if it was not the argument does not hold because 1) there will be legal protection against counterfeiting and 2) the question here is mostly of copyright
- at the ideological level, the Frente Amplio would not allow something like that either: irrelevant, the question is of compliance with the law, not with Frente Amplio wishes or assumed wishes
The question here is that of copyright. Copyright is automatic, and defined by law. What we could do here is have the copyright holders either license their work under a Free licence (it is precisely the fact that they hold the copyright that allows them to do so), or renounce their copyright (to the extend to which this is possible at all — it will probably only be possible to renounce the pecuniary rights of the author but not their moral rights). For any of these, we will require a precisely worded documents (a mail to the OTRS would do) indicating that the author is the copyright holder (either the designers, or the political party if copyright was transferred to them — they should state so clearly if that is the case since this is not automatic), and under which precise licence they want to publish the work. The version by Pablo Utreras is a re-implementation of the original work, and as such it carries the copyright of the original authors (it is not clear whether Pablo's work in vetorising the logo would yield a copyright to him as well; in the affirmative, both copyrights would be in effect on his version, and the agreement of all the copyright holders would be needed to use the file). Hope this helps. Cheers! Rama (talk) 09:13, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you so much Rama! I'm waiting the reply of the designers and the Frente Amplio communications area for resolve this as soon as possible. Today was a non-working day in Santiago, Chile because the Pope's visit. I will be aware of this case and I will write it here. --–– Pablo Utreras | Discusión 01:46, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- I think it is unlikely they will release it under a free license for the moment. They may need a coalition agreement I think, it's not that simple. Or either they update their website adding new copyright information. For the moment, this is not freely licensed and should be deleted. If that changes, it can easily be restored following common procedures. --186.79.137.194 03:02, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you so much Rama! I'm waiting the reply of the designers and the Frente Amplio communications area for resolve this as soon as possible. Today was a non-working day in Santiago, Chile because the Pope's visit. I will be aware of this case and I will write it here. --––
- Well, let's wait until this deletion request is over. We don't have any hurry in closing it at this time, so I think we could wait for some days until we have new information about permissions or that stuff. It looks that the IP is too impatient to see this file deleted, but the guidelines says we have to wait when new information is expected. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- When did I say it should be deleted immediately? 201.219.233.60 17:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't say that you said that ;) --Sfs90 (talk) 17:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- You said I was impatient to have this file deleted, which is not true. That is, of course, your own obstructed view. 201.219.233.60 18:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, go ahead with your personal attacks ;) --Sfs90 (talk) 01:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- You said I was impatient to have this file deleted, which is not true. That is, of course, your own obstructed view. 201.219.233.60 18:18, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't say that you said that ;) --Sfs90 (talk) 17:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- When did I say it should be deleted immediately? 201.219.233.60 17:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- Well, let's wait until this deletion request is over. We don't have any hurry in closing it at this time, so I think we could wait for some days until we have new information about permissions or that stuff. It looks that the IP is too impatient to see this file deleted, but the guidelines says we have to wait when new information is expected. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, no OTRS for more than month. If the permission arrives, then the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alifath1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: personal documents including letters, administrative orders, and such.
- File:سند-انتصاب-یحیی-فتح-نجات-به-سمت-سرپرستی-روزنامه-اطلاعات-در-استان-کرمان.jpg
- File:تایید-جزوه-قصه-گویی-در-مراکز-پیش-دبستانی.jpg
- File:تقدیر-از-تالیف-جزوه-نقش-اسباب-بازی-در-آموزش-علوم.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 10:01, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There are documents of interest. --Hystrix (talk) 12:34, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:سند-انتصاب-یحیی-فتح-نجات-به-سمت-سرپرستی-روزنامه-اطلاعات-در-استان-کرمان.jpg is a letter from 29 years ago (copyright issues?) which says that Yahya Fath Nejat is appointed as the editor-in-chief of Kayhan newspaper office in Kerman Province of Iran. The author (and probably the copyright holder) is the Kayhan Institute.
- File:تایید-جزوه-قصه-گویی-در-مراکز-پیش-دبستانی.jpg is letter from 30 years ago which says that a certain pamphlet about storytelling for kindergarten kids written by Yahya Fath Nejat has been studied by a local authority in the Public Education office of Kerman Province, and that officer has deemed the pamphlet appropriate for kindergarten instructors.
- File:تقدیر-از-تالیف-جزوه-نقش-اسباب-بازی-در-آموزش-علوم.jpg is another letter from the Public Education office of Kerman Province dating back to 31 years ago which says that a certain pamphlet written by Yhya Fath Nejat concerning the role of toys in education and concentration has been studied and is being acknowledged.
- To be honest, I cannot see any realistic educational use for these personal documents. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, per 4nn1l2. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 10:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Jcb: . D'accord et pourquoi pas, mais est-ce que cela ne concerne pas toutes les photos prises dans le studio Elvira et pas signées 😳?😳?😳?
- You are right, the other files should be checked as well. Jcb (talk) 14:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Bonjour @Jcb: J'ai remplacé cette photo sur la page WP:fr par une autre photo d'elle, du même atelier File:Salome1914.jpg.
- You are right, the other files should be checked as well. Jcb (talk) 14:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
On peut penser qu'elles sont de la même date (je ne prends pas en compte la date indiquée dans l'intitulé dont je ne sais pas d'où elle vient). Lou Andreas Salomé est née en 1861 [23], sur cette photo, elle a au maximun 40 ou 50 ans non ? Donc la date de 1914 semble plausible. Donc le photographe s'il est en vie, doit avoir 110 ans ou 120 ans... Par contre, la photo est scannée, elle est pê copiée d'un livre...... --Pierrette13 (talk) 17:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, source country is Germany, author is unclear. 1907 is not enough old to assume public domain without evidence. In addition, source is missing. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Triplecaña as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: the image is from 1904 but it is copyrighted by the brand, it cannot be used here
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. If the image is from 1904, then it can hardly be still copyrighted. It might be protected per Trademark. Therefore, I have added the trademark-template to the page. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept, I could not make sure the artist. Probably this is anonymous work. As it was published in 1904, it is in public domain due to age. Taivo (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexander Sadovski (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
No effort to discern authorship. No info on original publication from source: http://www.talkinghistory.org/stelton/historyofferrer.html czar 20:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, date was given "circa 1890" and this would be enough old to assume public domain without evidence, but considering, how Kropotkin looks like, 1910s is more likely and this is not enough old to assume public domain without evidence. {{PD-RusEmpire}} is another possible license, but for that publication data is needed. I googled the photo and probably this is anonymous work, but this may be not enough, if source country and first publication data is unknown. If more information is presented, then the photo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
possible copyvio from de:WP check if upload to commons is possible for this file Migebert (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- According to the dewiki file, it is in the public domain under German law, having been published over 70 years ago. I do not know, however, whether it could be copyrighted in the United States. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 02:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, copyrighted in USA due to URAA. Will be undeleted in 2034 (95+1 years from first publishing). Taivo (talk) 12:34, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This image is said to be published in 1928 (which looks plausible by style), so the author is most likely not dead for 100 years, as the license template suggests dealerofsalvation 21:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:37, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
This image is said to be published in 1928 (which looks plausible by style), so the author is most likely not dead for 100 years, as the license template suggests dealerofsalvation 21:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:38, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Powers of π by Ferman
[edit]Attention! Some π-related works of Ferman (talk · contribs), such as this, are perfectly valid mathematically, so don’t lay waste to all his contribs, please.
Each of belowmentioned images contains an equality implying that π is an algebraic number, more specifically, that for some natural the power is rational. It is contrary to the established wisdom. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
![81 File:Школа телевидения Ольги Спиркиной "Останкино ТВ".png](#File:Школа_телевидения_Ольги_Спиркиной_"Останкино_ТВ".png){kind=link}
∴여대생미러▤강남매직미러△강남야구장∧접대∥강남매직미러←강남야구장010=3386=6373.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![225 File:מדליית המדען הצעיר ע"ש דן יעלון – צד קדמי.jpg](#File:מדליית_המדען_הצעיר_ע"ש_דן_יעלון_–_צד_קדמי.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![[1]](https://www.freeclipartnow.com/electronics-technology/cameras/camera-pictogram.jpg.html){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%8B_%22%D0%A8%D0%B0%D1%85%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%22_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B0.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%B2_%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%8C%D0%B1%D0%B5_%D0%B7%D0%B0_%D0%BC%D1%8F%D1%87.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
%E2%88%B4%EC%97%AC%EB%8C%80%EC%83%9D%EB%AF%B8%EB%9F%AC%E2%96%A4%EA%B0%95%EB%82%A8%EB%A7%A4%EC%A7%81%EB%AF%B8%EB%9F%AC%E2%96%B3%EA%B0%95%EB%82%A8%EC%95%BC%EA%B5%AC%EC%9E%A5%E2%88%A7%EC%A0%91%EB%8C%80%E2%88%A5%EA%B0%95%EB%82%A8%EB%A7%A4%EC%A7%81%EB%AF%B8%EB%9F%AC%E2%86%90%EA%B0%95%EB%82%A8%EC%95%BC%EA%B5%AC%EC%9E%A5010%3D3386%3D6373.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%E2%88%B4%EC%97%AC%EB%8C%80%EC%83%9D%EB%AF%B8%EB%9F%AC%E2%96%A4%EA%B0%95%EB%82%A8%EB%A7%A4%EC%A7%81%EB%AF%B8%EB%9F%AC%E2%96%B3%EA%B0%95%EB%82%A8%EC%95%BC%EA%B5%AC%EC%9E%A5%E2%88%A7%EC%A0%91%EB%8C%80%E2%88%A5%EA%B0%95%EB%82%A8%EB%A7%A4%EC%A7%81%EB%AF%B8%EB%9F%AC%E2%86%90%EA%B0%95%EB%82%A8%EC%95%BC%EA%B5%AC%EC%9E%A5010%3D3386%3D6373.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[21]](https://scontent.fscl8-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/21106798_1320577241400993_1432394710584219488_n.png?oh=6a2343197f711b781b8036316a16b4eb&oe=5AFBC163){kind=link}
![[22]](http://frente-amplio.cl/sites/all/themes/frente/img/footer_logo.png){kind=link}
- @Pi.1415926535: really not interested? What is this nick for, indeed? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:15, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
- File:Hex1Pi34.GIF
- File:Hex1Pi36.GIF
- File:Hex1Pi33.GIF
- File:Hex1Pi35.GIF
- File:Hex1Pi42.GIF
- File:Hex1Pi38.GIF
- File:Hex1Pi48.GIF
- File:Hex1Pi7.GIF
- File:Hex1Pi58.gif
Deleted, incorrect math. Taivo (talk) 12:45, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information. No publication information, so that the 'before 1923' claim seems made up by the uploader. Picture could have been created after 1923. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:50, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Claimed to date from 1933. No indication that the artist would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 21:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Question User:Eric Corbett, you (via en:User:Malleus Fatuorum) asserted 1933 rather than the original uploader's assertion of "late 1800s" is correct--could you explain how you know? Note that the original uploader is indef'ed on both en and commons (unrelated to this sort of content issue) and will not be able to respond.
- In either case, this is likely a license owned by a company (work for hire) that is now defunct and I'm not surprised it's "author unknown" 85 years later. Question How are corporate authors considered for PD-old ideas in the UK? What PD-old term is there? DMacks (talk) 20:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- This may come from an artist who was not an employee of the zoo and this artist may be named e.g. at the inside of the cover, so that both 'corporate copyright' and 'unknown author' may not apply. Jcb (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- According to Belle Vue Guides, this guidebook is from 1927. Not that that makes any real difference of course. But the rule for PD in the UK for works with an unknown author, like this one, is that copyright lasts for 70 years from the date of first publication, which would mean that the copyright ran out in 1997. But the file is an orphan anyway, so no harm would be done by its deletion. Eric Corbett (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Again, there is no evidence that the artist would be unknown. We do not even have the inside of the cover, where the name of the artist may be. Jcb (talk) 21:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Here is a scan of the whole guidebook from 1928, in which I did not see any credit for the cover art. That site appears to be fairly authoritative and has lots of official material, so I would trust that year. But even if it's off by a few (we have claims of 1927 and 1933 also) or the same art was used in several years I checked a few other guidebooks on that site from near the early 1900s and none have credits for cover art in them. The back cover, which has different art, is marked "George Falkner & Sons". Apparently that company was known as both a designer and printer,[24] of various types of art[25] so it's reasonable that they would have had artists in-house. DMacks (talk) 22:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Again, there is no evidence that the artist would be unknown. We do not even have the inside of the cover, where the name of the artist may be. Jcb (talk) 21:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- According to Belle Vue Guides, this guidebook is from 1927. Not that that makes any real difference of course. But the rule for PD in the UK for works with an unknown author, like this one, is that copyright lasts for 70 years from the date of first publication, which would mean that the copyright ran out in 1997. But the file is an orphan anyway, so no harm would be done by its deletion. Eric Corbett (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- This may come from an artist who was not an employee of the zoo and this artist may be named e.g. at the inside of the cover, so that both 'corporate copyright' and 'unknown author' may not apply. Jcb (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, anonymous drawing from UK from 1927 is in PD in source country since 1998, but due to URAA not in US. Will be undeleted in 2023 (95+1 years from publishing). Taivo (talk) 12:59, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Hungarian stamps where the designer has not been dead for 70 years are copyright and should not be featured on Commons without permission. See Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Hungary Malatinszky (talk) 07:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Looking into this further, I've noticed that there are about 1800 Hungarian stamps categorized under Category:PD-HU-exempt (stamps). All of these files use {{PD-HU-exempt}} to claim PD status, even though Hungarian stamps are not considered to be PD unless the general term of protection (author's life plus 70 years) has expired (see Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Hungary and the relevant sections of Commons talk:Stamps/Public domain). Most of those probably need to be deleted as well. --Malatinszky (talk) 21:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:05, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Jcb as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See exif. However, the photo was taken over 150 years ago and is likely in the public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:27, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Magog the Ogre: Did you notice the 3D frame? The picture inside the frame may be old enough, but I don't think the picture of that picture is old enough and the 3D frame makes that new picture eligible for copyright, so that the copyright claim in the exit is probably legitimate. Jcb (talk) 09:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Then we could mark it with {{Non-free frame}} or crop it. No need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- The frame can be cropped out of course, but this DR cannot be closed as keep before removing the frame. Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Jcb: Then we could mark it with {{Non-free frame}} or crop it. No need to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Cropped the frame and hid the original version per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:13, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Human Rights Peace Prize is not mentioned in en.wiki. All people here are unidentified. Some explanation about notability is needed, maybe the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:13, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 20:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Looking in the Official webpage of the goverment institution (https://www.xunta.gal/aviso-legal-do-portal-da-xunta), the content of this portal can be reused within two conditions:
Queda prohibida en calquera circunstancia a desnaturalización do contido da información.(It is forbiden to unnaturalized the content under any cirunstances) O usuario queda obrigado a citar a fonte dos documentos obxecto da reutilización. (The user should cite the source of the document that is going to be reused)
- It seems that we meet the conditions here. --Lathir (talk) 14:47, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- The first term here makes me think this is essentially a Non-Derivatives licence, which is not free and so would have to be deleted. James F. (talk) 05:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Music from 1907, original lyrics from 1890. It's PD-Old.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 13:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
- The first term here makes me think this is essentially a Non-Derivatives licence, which is not free and so would have to be deleted. James F. (talk) 05:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Source of the file? Who did perform it? License unlikely. PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:17, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Based on context in wikipedia:Mayor Quimby and wikipedia:Springfield (The Simpsons), unlikely to be GFDL/CC and presumably non-free or a derivative of a non-free work. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 20:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:15, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}