Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 20th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled down version compared to existing one at https://polepositionradio.wordpress.com/2013/03/13/otra-vuelta-mas/. Quiet Worker (talk) 05:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination- speedy - copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:INTERIOR, FIRST FLOOR, TYPICAL WINDOW - Atlanta University, Stone Hall, Morris Brown College Campus, Atlanta, Fulton County, GA HABS GA,61-ATLA,10A-11.tif Commons:Deletion requests/File:Taunggyi, Myanmar (Burma) - panoramio (93).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poorly rendered JPG inside a PDF; not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, this picture is not covered by the eldiario.es license. As stated in other pieces from the same newspaper (see here), the image belongs to EFE, a news agency, and not to eldiario.es. As an example, the EFE authorship is stated in here as well. Discasto talk 09:30, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The image was first published by eldiario.com (on 22 September 2017). The other image was published five days later (on 17 September 2017). It is not clear that it belongs to EFE, eldiario.com does not attribute it to EFE in its page. EFE may have used the image from eldiario.com. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 10:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Have you followed the links I've provided? I'll try again: clearly attributed to EFE. On the other hand, a news agency stealing contents from its customers does not seem sensible, doesn't it? :-) --Discasto talk 16:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC) PS: even clearer[reply]
Yes, I had followed the links and so I made that explanation about the dates. But I suppose you're right, you have more experience than I in this subjects. ;-) Thank you very much for your effort and your kindness! Best regards. --BallenaBlanca (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jdx at 02:16, 21 Oktober 2017 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Asteroide DX --Krdbot 06:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Didn't realize there was better SVG version, tried to create redirect PlanespotterA320 (talk) 21:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:15, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 21:28, 21 Oktober 2017 UTC: Previously deleted file File:THASAVATHARAM TAMIL STORY.pdf --Krdbot 00:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate image file. Danielfrori (talk) 23:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 06:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I loaded by mistake, the photo already exists in this category William Ellison (talk) 01:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 02:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 02:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source link is dead, and image is not original enough to qualify for copyright protection. Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 02:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the image is really not original enough for copyright protection. I'll change the license, PD-simple is correct. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Byralaal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poor quality, unused image, with a black shadow/a stroke on the pictures.

B dash (talk) 03:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Erase it... --Byralaal (talk) 15:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete and quality is really bad. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NejadYemen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused COM:SELFIEs.

HyperGaruda (talk) 03:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph EXIF data shows the photographer as Mustapha Ennaimi, who has their own account on Flickr. The link included by the upload bot is to a different photograph of the same footballer. On Getty the linked photograph on Flickr is credited to someone completely different. Without an explanation, the source Flickr account must be presumed unreliable.

Fortunately a search for this Flickr source on Commons only gives this one photograph as a match. (talk) 04:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

: look at these edits: Revision #99381379. — Vort (talk) 05:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A confusing result. Please consider this DR withdrawn. -- (talk) 08:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I was about to check how I using a FlickrBot uploaded the wrong picture, so I'm pleased it was made clear already. Aʀvєδuι + 16:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, nomination is withdrawn. I'll fix the image. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

在清華大學校史館翻攝的照片 應該違反版權 葉又嘉 (talk) 04:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

翻攝照片 未取得自由版權 葉又嘉 (talk) 03:58, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Small unused photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertizement Out of Scope. Kkairri (talk) 05:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More by same user

[edit]

Advertisement. Out of Scope. Evrik (talk) 22:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, speedily as spam. I'll delete file:Get Trained in IBM NETEZZA Online Training from Experienced Trainers - IQ Online Training.png due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: biography.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining upload. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:48, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 06:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 06:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license: logo can't be own or free. Spamer's contribution, Bilderling (talk) 08:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, this is incorrect: textlogos are enough free. The logo is used in 2 projects, so it is in our project scope too. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use (possibly deleted since last request) Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 03:14, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Close duplicate of File:Felicitation_Ceremony_Southern_Command_Indian_Army_Bhopal_(107).jpg Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 08:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I agree, and 107 is a bit better file. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by Kriegsbergturm Stuttgart, 001.jpg Gerd Leibrock (talk) 08:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hasanmahmood1992 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project's scope: personal photos.

~ Nahid Talk 08:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 09:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. Together with File:Ubaidullah Khan image.jpg. E4024 (talk) 09:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all contributions of UbaidKhan (talk · contribs) as unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should not have been uploaded under creative commons license. I have uploaded a new version under the correct license. Mrsox87 (talk) 11:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, scaled-down file:Wiki-Simply Business.jpg. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only this picture available on the Flickr account where it has been found. Very dubious. The low resolution and the absence of metadata are also bad signs. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete No proof that the Flickr account belongs to the copyright holder, the copyright holder must contact OTRS for verification. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ne pas supprimer: Emilie Carpuat est bien l'auteur de la photo, un mail a été adressé à Permissions- Wikipédia francophone le 17 octobre à 17h01 indiquant comme il se doit qu'elle était l'auteur de la photo et qu'elle donnait son autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0 ci-après

je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif des droits d'auteur attachés à l'œuvre publiée à l'adresse : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AlixBenezech.jpg et sur la page wikipedia suivante : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alix_Bénézech Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0. Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre, y compris dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence. Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées. Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc. Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia.

Mardi 17 octobre 2017, Emilie Carpuat Samsara95

Bonjour, je suis Samsara95 2 choses à savoir : Emilie Carpuat est bien sur Flickr avec plusieurs photos. Ce nouveau compte Flickr "Carpuat Emilie" a été créé pour la mise en place de cette photo à ma demande. D'autre part un mail a été adressé à Permission Wikimédia Francophone, le 17 octobre à 17h01 indiquant comme il se doit qu'elle était l'auteur de la photo et qu'elle donnait son autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC BY-SA 4.0.

--Samsara95 (talk) 08:56, 22 October 2017 (UTC)Samsara95[reply]



Kept: OTRS confirmed. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:13, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Ryan5970 (talk) 06:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Ryan5970 (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private pic Ryan5970 (talk) 18:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private Image, Deletion request by the uploader SoumeshBanerjee (talk) 12:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:37, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion request by the copyright owner/ uploader SoumeshBanerjee (talk) 12:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unidentified student. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

deletion request by copyright owner/ uploader SoumeshBanerjee (talk) 12:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, does not look like selfie, probably not own work. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a Copyrighted picture by Rohullah Fakhrabadi (IIDCYA Art expert in Yazd province) can seen in this link : http://ketabnak.com/book/71251/شعر-قند-و-عسل#desc_start, page 3. and Fakhrabadi is still alive. Rafic.Mufid (talk) 13:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed, no CC-BY-SA on source site. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've uploaded it for a page, but did not use it. Norb90 (talk) 13:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD G7: uploader request --bjh21 (talk) 16:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've uploaded it to use in a page, but did not use it in this form. Norb90 (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD G7: uploader request --bjh21 (talk) 16:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. Got from off. site and declared as own and free Bilderling (talk) 13:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed, no free license on source site. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've uploaded it to use in a page, but did not use it in this form. Norb90 (talk) 13:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD G7: uploader request --bjh21 (talk) 16:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, Tom Wan isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, en:Pierre Dumas died in 2000 and fr:Pierre Dumas shows 4 men, last of them died in 2004. So depicted person is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, en:Jose Sanchez has 15 names, no one of them from Puerto Rico. So depicted person is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request (I want to upload a similar picture with a different format) B.Lameira (talk) 15:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD G7 --bjh21 (talk) 16:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, by Jcb with reason "Uploader request (I uploaded a similar picture with a different format and better quality)". Uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Motohiro Tanabe isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, Pilar Milagros isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Depicted person is not en:John Wayland, so this is non-notable person. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Joel Melendez isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Thousten Pfau isn't mentioned neither in de.wiki nor in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Carl Moen isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright problem -- TV logo at the right top corner Vlsergey-at-work (talk) 14:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Petr-elfimov-700.jpg: small photo without camera data. These are the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New election apportionment diagram has been created. Barzdonas (talk) 14:48, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Unused and incorrect map. There are more accurate and used map in Category:Maps of the Roman Empire in 117 AD (year when Empire was the largest). -- 109.238.80.74 15:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, bad map. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Unused map. There is more accurate and used version: File:Map-TurkicLanguages.png. -- 109.238.80.74 14:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oh my! My country is controlled by Al Qaeda!!! Please delete this absurdity. E4024 (talk) 14:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, after laughing out loud, I deleted it speedily. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Unused and very incorrect map. There are more accurate versions in Category:Religion maps of the world, for example more used File:Major religions distribution.png. -- 109.238.80.74 15:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image of non relevant person, out of scope The Photographer 14:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 14:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation see school website John from Idegon (talk) 15:28, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, OTRS-permission has arrived. Taivo (talk) 15:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orts or not, this image is CLEARLY marked as Trademarked, making it NOT freely reusable. EIther it isn't Trademarked, which means it shouldn't be marked as such, or it isn't freely reusable. It cannot be both. Please leave a note on my En-wiki user talk, as I do not watch Commons. John from Idegon (talk) 01:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@John from Idegon:  Keep Trademark status generally only prevents use in the context of labeling a related business. For example a private school in Michigan could be sued for using a similar logo. Commons policy allows trademarked images, but we tag them as a courtesy to possible reusers. See COM:Trademarks. Guanaco (talk) 02:18, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS permission confirmed. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request (redirect not being used anywhere). B.Lameira (talk) 16:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on creation day. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 16:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Only 90×100 pixels, blurry. Taivo (talk) 15:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 16:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 16:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, although the file is used in Wikidata, the Wikidata record qualifies for deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 16:46, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Fozanahmed (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except self-promotional userpage in en.wiki and uploading 3 selfies, which are used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope and I'll delete all his selfies. Taivo (talk) 16:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 17:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal images, duplicates of each other. Apocheir (talk) 17:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably help if I included the other image. File:Abey george .jpg. -Apocheir (talk) 17:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 17:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ajaypandey763 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images

Apocheir (talk) 17:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 17:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 17:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:17, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 17:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 17:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pmister (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion

Apocheir (talk) 17:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, seems like some kind of unused advertising. Taivo (talk) 16:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

outside project scope - used to promote album for which no article exists DS (talk) 17:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, promotional poster of concert happening on 29th July of 2007. This was 10 years ago. Taivo (talk) 16:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 17:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 17:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, collages need source and license for every used image. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 17:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:33, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader request. B.Lameira (talk) 17:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 17:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rohanakudus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 17:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FinnMac7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 17:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, next world-famous youtuber. Taivo (talk) 16:45, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by QTimePictures Lci (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 16:48, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ouldhocine chrif (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Axelkpo11-YT (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ناقض حق تکثیر Mahdi Mousavi (talk) 19:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Speedy Delete Apparent copyright violation. Also the nominator has uploaded the photo himself :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obzord (talk • contribs)

 Deleted, by Jcb with reason "Apparent copyright violation". Taivo (talk) 16:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 17:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:30, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 17:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, Equivalent at English Wikipedia non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Football is not simple. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MthobeliPass (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is no private photo album, out of scope.

Achim (talk) 19:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims. Previously published as http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_52QpsLy-bYc/TVFhCqre_4I/AAAAAAAAAJs/lyYWGuJQc4o/s1600/CIMG0039.JPG at http://papelerade-reciclaje.blogspot.com/2011/02/torre-de-santa-elena.html. LX (talk, contribs) 19:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TEGA LEE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 20:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE Ryan5970 (talk) 20:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, empty file. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 20:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 20:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by We de Mg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images/artworks

Ryan5970 (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

March 2015 : This user is blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing. It is not necessary that Commons hosts non usable files. DePlusJean (talk) 20:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, his autobiography was 7 times speedily deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

March 2015 : This user is blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing. It is not necessary that Commons hosts non usable files. DePlusJean (talk) 20:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, his autobiography was 7 times speedily deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

March 2015 : This user is blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing. It is not necessary that Commons hosts non usable files. DePlusJean (talk) 20:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, his autobiography was 7 times speedily deleted. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Ryan5970 (talk) 20:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Lelodawa isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 20:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikiarules1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 21:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:42, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leo Lacroix (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 21:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikitorres4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 21:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Wikitorres4 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading 3 selfies, which are not used outside userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leonel Da Costa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 21:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Starlingnovasjr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 21:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:31, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identique à File:Collin - Trente poésies russes, 1894.djvu27.png DaraDaraDara (talk) 22:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol, not a 'own' work. Danyele (talk) 22:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, poster. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol, not a 'own' work. Danyele (talk) 22:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, cover. Taivo (talk) 11:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol, not a 'own' work. Danyele (talk) 22:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, cover. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol, not a 'own' work. Danyele (talk) 22:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, cover. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol, not a 'own' work. Danyele (talk) 22:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, poster. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in copyviol, not a 'own' work. Danyele (talk) 22:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, poster. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Jcb (talk) 22:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. I'll delete file:Primeira Banda de Música Marieta Monteiro.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by СашаСапицкая (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 22:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 22:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Ryan5970 (talk) 22:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, fails Nigerian FoP as NOT "permanently situated in a place" Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE Ryan5970 (talk) 23:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, poster. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photo of a 3D-object (COM:COIN). 62.117.83.50 09:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The medal was created in 1855, so it's in PD due to age. But photographer's permission is needed. Source claims, that the image is taken from website of an auction-house. All websites of auction-houses I have seen so far have license "All rights reserved". Taivo (talk) 12:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soniku.space (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own works, small sizes without EXIFs, "FBMD" in the metadatas (facebook), the user already uploaded copyvios...

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's all in the source already, as usual. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Asclepias. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Авторские права на изображение? MisterXS (talk) 15:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative copyvio. Permission of Ravil Sattarov's legatees is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:39, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 2014. No Permission.

See also: Category:Statue of Danylo Halytskyi in Ternopil - created 2002. No Permission. Do not delete all files: only those that show the details of the work.

Микола Василечко (talk) 17:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ViamarisBalbi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The Aeromar photo is not own work, as explained in its own DR. Other images are also extremely unlikely to be the work of this person.

Gijón16 (talk) 15:36, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The first photo is in public domain due to age. Depicted person died in 1870. Source country is Dominican Republic. Copyright for photos lasts there 50 years from publishing and if not published, then 50 years from creation, that means, 100 years from creation in worst case. Taivo (talk) 16:05, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: and kept per Taivo. --Jcb (talk) 11:57, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jakabl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. en:Dazzle does not contain any companies. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 02:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 02:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diego Sastree (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal image out of COM:SCOPE

Eurodyne (talk) 02:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - I agree, out of scope. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused COM:SELFIE. HyperGaruda (talk) 04:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ajitesh thakur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo, no educational use. Out of scope.

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 04:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: small, unused personal image with no EXIF.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope due to low size of just 9 KB (replacement present).----- Reagan Denver (talk) 05:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Replacement image is speedily deleted due to copyright violation. But I suggest to delete the nominated photo too: it is very small and unused, quality is bad. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Game logo may be copyrighted. Commons:Threshold of originality. Quiet Worker (talk) 05:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Linaj2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images

Ryan5970 (talk) 05:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 05:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Qué significa "Campeona del Mundo"? OoS? --E4024 (talk) 08:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. I categorized the photo and added into en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Taivo. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LAURY OROPEZA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 05:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miigueeel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 06:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 06:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 06:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Centocinquantacinque

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Centocinquantacinque (talk · contribs):

Small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exist, then always different. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - I searched for 4 file with google and I found prior results for 3. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Celebsteven

[edit]

Celebsteven (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Small photos without metadata, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 07:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Ismael Castelo Branco

[edit]

ISMAEL CASTELO BRANCO (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage and sandbox in pt.wiki and uploading 2 photos about himself, which are used only on the userpage and sansbox. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Otelul2

[edit]

Otelul2 (talk · contribs) uploaded these logos:

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Football is not simple. Taivo (talk) 07:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Raulbarattini

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Raulbarattini (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos and mostly without metadata. User has history of uploading copyright violations. I suspect not own work, but copyvio. Taivo (talk) 07:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, I found an obvious copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Resources Global

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Resources Global (talk · contribs):

Unused files with unknown importance, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jjrr87

[edit]

Jjrr87 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+copyvio for the teeshirt photos. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jennalev

[edit]

Jennalev (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Unused tourist photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo may be copyrighted. 141.196.214.194 22:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal and not used 141.196.214.194 22:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 23:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Plinskarch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no COM:EDUSE

Ryan5970 (talk) 23:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Letoftheworld (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no COM:EDUSE

Ryan5970 (talk) 23:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-Italy}} MPF (talk) 00:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Seems like this is artistic work (modern sculpture). Taivo (talk) 07:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's not an artistic sculpture: it's a scarecrow in a field. --Jaqen (talk) 16:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I agree with user Jaqen. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, not at all an artwork, and it doesn't belong to architecture (which is what the Italian NO-FOP and copyright law are about). It's a simple object, nothing more than that, and the fact that it is exposed to the public vision has nothing to do with a potentially expected enjoyment of art: its sole and sufficient function is to be seen, just like traffic lights, but notably a scarecrow is there to be seen by birds and hopefully frighten them no matter their artistic proficiency. It is indeed as much creative as a homemade cake can be: they are both made with care and shaped with emotion, they are usually garnished and often smell a little, but that's all: they are only handmade objects, not even the product of some craftsmanship. Free for us, legitimate picture. --g (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Jaqen. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{NoFoP-Italy}} MPF (talk) 00:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Seems like this is artistic work (modern sculpture). Taivo (talk) 07:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's not an artistic sculpture: it's a scarecrow in a field. --Jaqen (talk) 16:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - I agree with user Jaqen. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, not at all an artwork, and it doesn't belong to architecture (which is what the Italian NO-FOP and copyright law are about). It's a simple object, nothing more than that, and the fact that it is exposed to the public vision has nothing to do with a potentially expected enjoyment of art: its sole and sufficient function is to be seen, just like traffic lights, but notably a scarecrow is there to be seen by birds and hopefully frighten them no matter their artistic proficiency. It is indeed as much creative as a homemade cake can be: they are both made with care and shaped with emotion, they are usually garnished and often smell a little, but that's all: they are only handmade objects, not even the product of some craftsmanship. Free for us, legitimate picture. --g (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Jaqen. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:49, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wiki image 2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These three recently uploaded photos are identified as {{PD-USGov}} with a source of www.secretservice.gov/data/press/reports/USSS_FY2015AR.pdf. While they may be public domain, the source PDF does not contain these photos, so we don't have any evidence that they are, in fact, public domain.

RP88 (talk) 00:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission + likely out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:28, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scaled down version from championship website: https://www.fiawtcc.com/event/race-of-argentina-2015/. Quiet Worker (talk) 05:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file is uploaded into Commons in 2013, so it cannot be taken from 2015 event website. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Questionable copyright - it was likely scaled down from a previous year's website - and File:Termas de Río Hondo.svg is superior anyway. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Navyprad

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Navyprad (talk · contribs):

Camera data is missing, probably not own works, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 07:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose Yoursmile (talk) 19:24, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY (TALK) 10:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concerned about copyvio as the URL given as source does not clearly indicate a free license (a "free download" and a free license are not the same), and since I cannot backtrace the exact file. I see that the image appears elsewhere such as on this URL. Finally, the filename is absurdly vague and should probably be salted afterwards. I note personally that if this is kept en:Party.png needs to be moved elsewhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:04, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:35, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't know if this is the same file with this file name twice deleted before but certainly it is a private party, personal album pic. No place here. I mean no educational use possible. Better party pics available. E4024 (talk) 13:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mhhossein as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is probably copyvio, too. See File:LegPressMachineExercise.JPG. -- User: Perhelion 14:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

12 years old heavily used files don't get speedydeleted because of "probably" no EXIF & no souce. -- User: Perhelion 14:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Perhelion: Why? --Mhhossein talk 15:48, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. This image was uploaded at a time where information formatting wasn't as standardized, which is why the bot tagged it. There's no evidence that this was not own work by the uploader. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: What is still missing in existing collection of explicit images? Low resolution. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Only 180×135 pixels. Taivo (talk) 11:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a true depiction of the Rock Warrior edition Toyota Tundra. The wheels and headlights are not OEM but are in fact aftermarket. Please delete this photo or replace with an authentic image of the vehicle. 216.140.155.151 14:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A wrong description is not a valid reason for deletion.  Keep --MB-one (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, this is not a reason to delete a file. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Unused map. Seems like shot from gif-animation File:Linguistic map Southwestern Europe.gif. -- 109.238.80.74 15:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; promotional photo used on promotional page on en.wiki TJH2018talk 15:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment At moment the file is used in en.wiki in article, which is nominated for deletion. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

geq6tewfwwdwwatree ccaadddqqrbytgjegreeyyccxxzzurhhuuutsgrrreddd ccgfhgrftfftttttrrdffddrrrr 168.10.180.25 16:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this should be deleted, it shows the new Budd RDCs purchased by TriMet before they have painted them.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Core2idiot (talk • contribs)

 Keep At moment the file is used in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 15:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: disruptive nomination of a useful image. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 16:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:54, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 17:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 18:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious {{PD-Textlogo}} claim. Probably above the threshold of originality. LX (talk, contribs) 18:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Probably not a textlogo. Taivo (talk) 07:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 20:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:28, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, also watermaked, suggesting not "own work" Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of João Carapeto

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of João Carapeto (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exist, then mostly different. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

All these files are my own. Most of them were taken with my mobile phone camera (Samsung), hence they are small. Other were taken by me with photografic cameras. Some of them may have had image treatment, made by me. There is no copyright violation, I can assure. João Carapeto (talk) 18:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, these pictures are used in WP articles and the small size is quite suitable. E.g. [[1]], [[2]], [[3]], [[4]], [[5]]. All these images are my own work, they are being used and useful for some WP articles. Therefore I do not agree with their deletion. João Carapeto (talk) 15:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Christian Ferrer and João. Ruthven (msg) 10:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Joseph Ascanio

[edit]

JosephAscanio (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

In my opinion they are out of project scope due to small size (500×331) and bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: good quality enough for Wikipedia usage (where std size is 250px). Ruthven (msg) 10:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These ladies are having a good time in their vacations while we work voluntarily in Commons. This is a vacation album picture and has no educative or whatsoever value for Commons. In other words it is OoS, of course IMHO. E4024 (talk) 08:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No educational value due to bad composition. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 10:56, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Gregjose936

[edit]

Gregjose936 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

In my opinion they are out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: cannot be reasonably used. Ruthven (msg) 10:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sara Mazzaglia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. Logo can't be own or free Bilderling (talk) 13:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm official representative of Obozrevatel, and I have full powers to use it's logo. Жайворонок В'ячеслав

 Delete. Logo can be own or free, but as Commons does not know, who is behind a username, OTRS-permission is needed to keep the logo. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The logo as well as online media Obozrevatel is a property of LLC "Golden middle". Documents are attached Жайворонок В'ячеслав http://prntscr.com/h1tbu6 http://prntscr.com/h1tcez


Deleted: per Taivo. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Anonymous work published in 2012 and still copyrighted in Turkey (see here). Art work is above the threshold of originality. — Racconish ☎ 16:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the caption is not neutral, and there is no evidence that the poster of this image has the right to grant us permission to use this image. The img is sourced to his wife Homolka and the taken by his wife and the author is listed as B&H Photography and Films. For that matter I'm not even sure this really is Bernardo. Meters (talk) 20:15, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How can I make the caption neutral? And this photo is in public domain because it has educational purposes.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate image I want this taken down it's my photo Adamomarinelli9 (talk) 18:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Unfortunately this is the only photo about Paul Bernardo we have. But it likely violates Karla Homulka's copyright. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo; it's copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 11:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirect does not describe subject. There are better matching files that could be named this. Unless someone thinks it should be salted as intrinsically ambiguous. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: orphan redirect. Ruthven (msg) 11:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata of the pdf enwrapped JPG contains "©michaeltubiana 2017", much doubt that Frédéric Rouvillois himself made this photo, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 13:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Here is the XMP metadata: Can a trusted french wikipedian call Mr. Tubiana if he has permitted the free licence belonging to his image?

  • XMPToolkit  : XMP Core 5.4.0
  • SerialNumber  : 6019816
  • FlashCompensation  : 0
  • ImageNumber  : 122605
  • LensID  : 2147483647
  • Lens  : AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED
  • City  : Paris
  • Country  : France
  • AuthorsPosition  : photographe
  • DateCreated  : 2017:06:26 19:27:28
  • Headline  : CERCLE COLBERT
  • CreateDate  : 2017:06:26 19:27:28
  • CreatorTool  : Aperture 3.6
  • Rating  : 1
  • ModifyDate  : 2017:06:26 19:27:28
  • CreatorWorkEmail  : michaeltubiana@construction-suivi.com
  • CreatorWorkTelephone  : +33609925333
  • CreatorCity  : Paris
  • CreatorWorkURL  : www.construction-suivi.com
  • CreatorAddress  : 14, bd Soult
  • CreatorPostalCode  : 75012
  • UsageTerms  : 0609925333
  • Description  : DEBAT FEDERALISME OU DECENTRALISATION TRAVELLERS CHAMPS ELYSEES
  • Rights  : ©michaeltubiana 2017
  • Creator  : MICHAELTUBIANA

Deleted: per nomination; wrong format anyway. Ruthven (msg) 11:12, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le bourodakimo est une marque déjà utilisé https://bourodakimo.wordpress.com/

Bourodakimo n'est pas un rappeur 193.49.96.238 13:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I do not see free license on source site. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Taivo. Ruthven (msg) 11:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akangmursid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos

Apocheir (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal image. -- 109.238.80.74 17:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the author is unknown, how is the uploader able to place the image under a free license? C.Fred (talk) 19:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal low-quality photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims, as the uploader appears to be the subject, rather than the author of this photograph. LX (talk, contribs) 19:37, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, definitely not own work as claimed. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And also:
Ankry (talk) 11:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 21:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo looks fake, I don't think it's real. An IP-user said this about this picture: "Is this a fraudulent photo? The text looks imposed to me. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The file is used in 5 projects, so it is automatically in scope. But there's no freedom of panorama in United Kingdom for text and maybe the text is enough long for literary copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. Ruthven (msg) 11:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1965 portrait, author died 1974. This is public domain only if it was published before 1978 without a copyright notice. Guanaco (talk) 09:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to remember. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. -- Geagea (talk) 12:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.beesona.ru/id6895/paint/2117/ 141.196.214.194 22:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination ([6]). -- Geagea (talk) 11:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trocche100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful own claim for several images uploaded by this user (who's blocked undef on it.wiki, and that tried to "avenge" himself here with some vandalic uploads). There are coins (which copyrighted status is unclear), mosaic images (with no source for the photos), animated gifs withour source, etc.

Ruthven (msg) 12:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bayoo73 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 17:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Herryluskay (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. No camera data, own work is unlikely. Taivo (talk) 17:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leandro Zehnder (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 18:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leo Dulas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Ryan5970 (talk) 21:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:05, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imwaleedkhann (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low-resolution personal photos of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims, as the uploader is likely the subject, rather than the author of these photographs.

LX (talk, contribs) 14:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:32, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZAnatoly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: One file is in use. Other deleted. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ryan5970 (talk) 19:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of 20WashingtonPaul

[edit]

20WashingtonPaul (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There's no freedom of panorama in Italy. The photos violate architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 08:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope (COM:EDUSE) because of extreme blurryness.---- Reagan Denver (talk) 05:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:49, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Román Martínez del Cerro

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Román Martínez del Cerro (talk · contribs):

Mostly historical photos, often photos of photos. Own work is under doubt, probably different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it is the work of himself, as it is mentioned, it must be maintained. Anjo Sozinho (talk) 00:32, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:50, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, no encyclopedic value. Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 08:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:50, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of DavidPC13

[edit]

DAVIDPC13 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

First group. Unused photos about non-notable person (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki), out of project scope. Depicted person died in 1969, own work is unlikely.

Second group. Depicted person is probably not en:Carlos Herrera Araluce. That case he is also non-notable (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki), out of scope. Some photos are clearly not own work (for example with pope) and distorted. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Victoriaro

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Victoriaro (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. Probably not own works, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Visionjohnny

[edit]

Visionjohnny (talk · contribs) uploaded these images:

Small unused photos without metadata, maybe not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Kndra s

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Kndra s (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, different filesize. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Quality isn't so good too. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Zuhairali

[edit]

Zuhairali (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Akmal Akku is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Qaylo

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Qaylo (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tropicalmaster (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope and copyvio. -- These have limited descriptions and no useful categories. A page on the subject, Arturo Mojiica, has been deleted from WP:ES. He does not show up on the first page of Google, so may not be notable. The EXIF shows a different name as copyright holder from our username. There is no evidence of permission from the artist for the use of his works.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:59, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smktsz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo materials. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete all of them but the 3 sekolah or school images could be  kept as they were taken of the same school with the same camera (iphone 5) by the euploader. That looks like own work. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Leoboudv: all deleted as possible copyvio except File:Sekolah*.jpg (AGF). --Wdwd (talk) 17:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smktsz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/incosnsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

trademark, not user's own work fringio · α†Ω 12:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Commons does not care about trademarks, but this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 12:07, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on the article Perfection (game show), inappropriate and inserted for vandalism to the page. Iggy the Swan (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:57, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are, with few exceptions, copyrighted to their country of origin and/or artist who created the work. Germany is not such an exception. See also: Commons:Currency#Germany. Hammersoft (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are, with few exceptions, copyrighted to their country of origin and/or artist who created the work. Germany is not such an exception. See also: Commons:Currency#Germany. Hammersoft (talk) 13:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are, with few exceptions, copyrighted to their country of origin and/or artist who created the work. Germany is not such an exception. See also: Commons:Currency#Germany. Hammersoft (talk) 13:07, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are, with few exceptions, copyrighted to their country of origin and/or artist who created the work. Germany is not such an exception. See also: Commons:Currency#Germany. Hammersoft (talk) 13:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete National sides of Euro coins are, with few exceptions, copyrighted to their country of origin and/or artist who created the work. Germany is not such an exception. See also: Commons:Currency#Germany. Hammersoft (talk) 13:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:55, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 13:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of deleted page (bnwiki) Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license - logo cant be own, spamer's contribution Bilderling (talk) 13:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. This is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution flag of Nigeria, but not an exact duplicate because it's a different shade of green. Guanaco (talk) 09:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test page. Brateevsky {talk} 20:05, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the uploader's history, I'm finding it hard to believe that this low-res, professional-quality photo in PNG format is "own work". Ytoyoda (talk) 20:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission.. It is possible that the cover of this book uses a PD-old photo and is otherwise below the TOO, but more information is needed I think. Storkk (talk) 15:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 05:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the could-be creator is Roger Chancel, who died 1977 http://data.bnf.fr/10781303/roger_chancel/ Goesseln (talk) 13:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, I am more-less sure, that the artist is Roger Chancel. The poster can be restored in 2048 (70 years from death). Taivo (talk) 14:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, 1925 photo can be well copyrighted. More information is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 14:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyvio issues: source is "own work" (user:Eekamouse), author is "David Lau", and EXIF credits "Steph Donaher". Image also readily found online, but in lower resolutions. P 1 9 9   18:48, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, OTRS-permission from Steph Donaher is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 14:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW, no permission. Jcb (talk) 21:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, covers can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the license review has passed. Taivo (talk) 14:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://artsynature.com/artists/paintings-by-jose-castro-dopico/ Tarawa (jo ta ke irabazi arte) 12:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Soy el propietario de toda la información que se ha publicado tanto texto como imágenes de los cuadros realizados por José Castro Dopico. No entiendo por qué se ha borrado la página de mi padre ni de sus imágenes. Mi nombre es José Miguel Castro Jorge y soy el hijo y propietario de los derechos de explotación de las obras de mi padre, fallecido en Enero de 2.017. --Migsoftware (talk) 14:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

La página web oficial de mi padre está en un subdominio de mi servidor con mi dominio principal http://castrodopico.migsoftware.es, donde están recopilados los cuadros de mi padre e información sobre sus exposiciones. --Migsoftware (talk) 15:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Big watermark, not own work. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a screenshot, not user's own work fringio · α†Ω 12:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. In my opinion the logo is still too simple for copyright. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely claim of Own work - same logo is used at http://eorailway.co.uk/ and there is no evidence of permission. Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 19:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Source country is United Kingdom. The logo would probably pass as textlogo in United States, but likely not in UK. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:25, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Incorrect license. There are not "simple geometric shapes or text" here. . HombreDHojalata.talk 20:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Keep. Simple geometric forms and text under originality threshold as per spanish regulations. --Brgesto (talk) 17:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The football is not simple. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Is not an originality design, is composed of geometrical white and black areas, reason why LaLiga entity did not copyrighted or trademarked it. --Brgesto (talk) 20:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have never seen such football in logos. This must be original design. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot without permission. . Sequa20 (talk) 20:51, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know the exact definition of "screenshot". This is not a copy of a computer screen, but a picture of the giant screen in the hall where the doctorate honoris causa was given in a public meeting. You can notice the projector lights. See also e.g. File:SwissTech Convention Centre Campus 01.jpg same day same building.--MHM (talk) 19:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Yes, this is called screenshot. Computer screens are not the only screens. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:26, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie. OoS. Having cats like striped bikinis means nothing. The other people whose pics we delete for OoS can also be added to many cats according to the stripes or colour of their shirts, to cats about trousers, to cats about body position (sitting men, standing women etc) or according to their graded or sun glasses. None of these cats make a file worth to keep, IMHO. E4024 (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ich kann nich Deutsch sprechen, but thanks to Google Translate I understood what you say and I think you are wrong. OoS means Out of Scope.  Delete --E4024 (talk) 07:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In scope. Usable in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selfie or simular articles. --Ralf Roleček 08:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete due to bad composition. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Ralf Roleček. Frage: I have DR'ed many Indian and Bangladeshi youngsters' pics for similar reasons. I never saw you opposing. What was wrong with those selfies? Ah, perhaps they were not within your scope or watchlist, sorry. --E4024 (talk) 08:35, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I view it at User talk:Panoramio upload bot --Ralf Roleček 08:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Image in scope. Also, for the record to the closing administrator, is funny that the DR requester E4024, a sockpupetter in EN Wikipedia was talking to an IP of another sockpupetter INC. Tm (talk) 13:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Reasonable good image that can be used in articles like „Selfie“ or “social media“. —�88.66.254.125 08:23, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal image; we have thousands of pictures of bikinis, with and without the girls inside. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files credited to Pixabay user Skeeze

[edit]

These files are from an unreliable Pixabay user and I couldn't find the origins of these photos. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files by pixabay user skeeze and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from Pixabay user Skeeze. I've corrected File:Cougar 01.jpg and File:Army rescue exercise Camp Ramadi 2011-03-15.jpg but I haven't been able to identify the images listed here.

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Unused copy of File:Europe polar stereographic Caucasus Urals boundary3.svg. -- 109.238.80.74 18:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Copy of File:Europe countries map ru.png. -- 109.238.80.74 18:35, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Redundant. Unused copy of File:Europe-UK.svg. -- 109.238.80.74 18:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a copy. It was uploaded one month before the file you mentioned. --RaviC (talk) 19:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not exact copy, invalid reason for deletion. "better" in one opinion is not policy. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly not own work. Essential information about its author and data on his original publication is missing. It say: "Dibujo publicado en un libro que contenía información de Beatriz" (Drawing published in a book containing information about Beatriz). Which is the book? Who is the author? The drawing has a signature, who is the artist? A OTRS permission is need even if all these data are provided. Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 19:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see why this file is PD. Sanandros (talk) 21:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-PhilippinesGov}}? LX (talk, contribs) 21:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah actually at the right corner is written: "All content is in the public domain unless otherwise stated".--Sanandros (talk) 20:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a Philippine government work and I've tagged it accordingly. I'm actually retagging all the PIA images in Category:Marawi crisis to {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}. --Sky Harbor (talk) 07:35, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 12:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the website from which this image came says that all its content is available as per Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0), they also specified that " Sono vietati l'utilizzo, la riproduzione anche parziale dei contenuti testuali, fotografici,audio dell'impianto grafico del presente sito internet ai fini di lucro" - which is to say, "It is forbidden to use, even partially reproduce the textual, photographic and audio content of this web site for profit purposes." Restrictions on commercial use are not Commons-compatible. DS (talk) 18:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(as per the site's Disclaimer page). As per the precautionary principle, we should assume they meant the more restrictive (and Commons-incompatible) license. Note that this also applies to all of this user's other uploads. DS (talk) 18:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:54, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files were initially tagged by David Eppstein as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photos merely posted on a government web site should not be assumed to be works created by the federal government. Other photos within this collection are clearly family snapshots. As an image of unknown provenance with no open license associated with it, it must be assumed to have an incompatible copyright. The copyright statement at https://www.nlm.nih.gov/copyright.html clearly warns "When using NLM Web sites, you may encounter documents, illustrations, photographs, or other information resources contributed or licensed by private individuals, companies, or organizations that may be protected by U.S. and foreign copyright laws. Transmission or reproduction of protected items beyond that allowed by fair use as defined in the copyright laws requires the written permission of the copyright owners."|source=https://cfmedicine.nlm.nih.gov/gallery/photo_76_7.html

I found a source which states "Photo credit: Ruth E Dayhoff, National Library of Medicine". In my opinion, this specific attribution to a federal employee is sufficient evidence.

Guanaco (talk) 00:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any evidence that Ruth Dayhoff was acting as an employee of the National Library of Medicine when she took this photo? (If indeed she took it rather than merely supplied a copy of it; it looks professionally-lit and she was not a professional photographer.) en:Ruth Dayhoff says nothing about employment at NLM. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is found in the "Senado" web site, but it is write "divulgação", that means the Senado is not the owner of the rights of the image, and there is no information about the copyrights by the owner. Paladinum2 (talk) 04:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, now I see it is an image in public domain in brazil because of this:
Public domain
This work is in the public domain in Brazil for one of the following reasons:
  • It is a work published or commissioned by a Brazilian government (federal, state, or municipal) prior to 1983. (Law 3071/1916, art. 662; Law 5988/1973, art. 46; Law 9610/1998, art. 115)
  • It is the text of a treaty, convention, law, decree, regulation, judicial decision, or other official enactment. (Law 9610/1998, art. 8)
  • It is a work whose authors' rights belong to the Brazilian government (federal, state, or municipal), for which the economic rights shall be protected for a period of 70 years from the first of January of the year following that of their disclosure or that of the author's demise, whichever is later. ([7])

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  日本語  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  +/−

So it's only needed to change the licensing Paladinum2 (talk) 02:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality copy from File:Delpech - Louis X of France.jpg. Both are the same engraving by the same artist. Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 19:46, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment At moment, the file is used 67 times in 38 projects. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The redirect would work or even a replacement with CommonsDelinker. --Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 04:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have put the command on Delinker. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, delinker did its thing, file no longer in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikimedia Commons has several photos of the outside of this church from this or similar angles. This one is low resolution & very over-exposed. Motacilla (talk) 20:56, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: The only other photos from approximately this angle are File:East Hendred, parish church of St. Augustin of Canterbury - geograph.org.uk - 1760092.jpg and File:St Augustine of Canterbury Parish Church in East Hendred - geograph.org.uk - 1308811.jpg, but both of those suffer from converging verticals, having been taken from much closer range, looking up. --bjh21 (talk) 22:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Does not match any of the reasons in {{PD-Japan-exempt}} Jcb (talk) 22:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you see my upload log from 2011, there is a link to g-reiki; it is the legal database of laws and notices from the town. I'll find the updated link when I get home. I'm at work but this is zscout370 logged out. 2600:100B:B020:50C6:6A9D:A42:D75E:FF83 03:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Crap, the link is 404. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 09:10, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't matter wether you find a working link, {{PD-Japan-exempt}} does not include symbols or emblems. Jcb (talk) 10:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If "(i) the Constitution and other laws and regulations;" does include construction specifications for these symbols, would it be covered by the template or no? User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 10:14, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, unfortunately not. Jcb (talk) 10:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Something to keep in mind for next time; can this be marked for moving back to en.wikipedia or other fair use eligible places before deletion? User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 10:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & over one month since last discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]