Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
El archivo https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/f/f6/20171013063603%21Flag_of_Anzo%C3%A1tegui_State.svg debe ser eliminado ya que es un error mio que he subido subido. Perdonen si me equivoqué. Jlannons99 (talk) 06:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy keep. This deletion request is vandalism. User has been blocked. - Jmabel ! talk 14:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete Watermarked, and readily found on the Internet. Impossible to prove this license as stipulated, and no evidence provided anywhere that the license is confirmed or confirmable. Hammersoft (talk) 02:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete Watermarked and unlikely to be available under the license stipulated. Can't confirm license. Hammersoft (talk) 02:50, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete Watermarked and unlikely to be available under the license stipulated. Can't confirm license. Hammersoft (talk) 02:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete Taken from weibo.com, and unlikely to be available under the license stipulated. No metadata present, and the other uploads by this new editor all appear to be copyright violations as well. It appears the uploader just found these images on weibo.com and uploaded them here. Hammersoft (talk) 12:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:26, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete Taken from weibo.com, and unlikely to be available under the license stipulated. No metadata present, and the other uploads by this new editor all appear to be copyright violations as well. It appears the uploader just found these images on weibo.com and uploaded them here. Hammersoft (talk) 12:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:26, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AZIZ SAAADI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Advertising or self-promotion
User's only edits are on his own page and he was already warned about out of scope uploads.
- File:AZIZ SAADI (عالي الدقة).ogg
- File:MON JOLI PHOTO.jpg
- File:AZIZ SAADI.wav
- File:MICROSOFT.jpg
- File:AZIZ SAADI IM HAPY.jpg
- [Tycho] talk 00:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 01:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AZIZ SAAADI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope
- File:Aziz saaadi king.jpg
- File:Moi aziz saadi.jpg
- File:Allah-akbar.png
- File:Ahmed Fakhro.ogg
- File:Star wikipedia.png
- File:MON PHOTO JOLI.jpg
- File:SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSAZIZ SAADI.jpg
- File:AZIZ SAADI.png
- File:AZIZ SAAADI.png
- File:IL LOVE YOU WIKIPEDIA.png
- File:Cupid2.png
Train2104 (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 20:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution, missing metadata and previously published, less tightly cropped versions found elsewhere, e.g. https://res.cloudinary.com/perfectstay/image/upload/t_pfs/v1498123260/property/521/020_Anahita_Golf_and_spa_Resort_Beach.jpg. Spammy file description. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hotel ile maurice.png and Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mahthamrazi. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:27, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 21:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Missing informations : no metadata. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:45, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Why would this photo be deleted since the person who posted it has the copyrights for it, and actually took the photo a few days ago? user:Beanatascha1
- @Beanatascha1: To sign your posts you press the pencil or the four squiggly lines in the edittools.It's Kong of Lazers talk to me 00:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Keep File:Bea G2.jpg seems to be the same photo with EXIF data. Unsure if one of them may be deleted as duplicate. Ankry (talk) 15:28, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- The nominator's rationale is not a reason for deletion. But could be deleted as duplicate. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Images merged. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Is there an image here that I cannot see due to a browser problem or is it an empty page (which should maybe be an RD)? E4024 (talk) 12:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: It was a redirect to File:Bea G2.jpg until you overwrote the page. --bjh21 (talk) 13:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- How did I do that? --E4024 (talk) 13:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Bjh21: Please be more careful with your accusations. — Jeff G. ツ 18:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @E4024: I apologise. I had confused the two edits. --bjh21 (talk) 19:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as a redirect to File:Bea G2.jpg, kept above. — Jeff G. ツ 18:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Nothing worth deleting here, my apologies for messing up the redirect. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Preexisting version available at https://hyperallergic.com/3120/timothy-greenfield-sanders/. No indication the uploader is the subject of the photo or authorized to release it. For those with OTRS access, see also Ticket:2017101310007856. GMGtalk 14:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- This is not the right image — will try to follow up later.--Sphilbrick (talk) 17:50, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Can confirm. Will withdraw until we can get things sorted out. GMGtalk 00:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: deletion request withdrawn by nominator. Feel free to renominate if needed. --Ankry (talk) 12:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be downloaded from https://www.greenfield-sanders.com/, which says, All Images Copyright Timothy Greenfield-Sanders. No Reproduction Permitted. © Copyright 1973-2018 by Timothy Greenfield-Sanders RoySmith (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no free license at source. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
copyright violations Tvcccp (talk) 18:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by DMacks at 06:27, 14 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: Copyvio - see [https://www.google.co.th/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisvfPJpOpPfEhA8HipOxg8LxkTtn-zf46NQD9YzwMXJAZ2yTTIMqhVpgRhWfU_1mMSz_1aPJMVCFLtyQ9LGNaic_134xVJ4_1P9cmU9RFkCbEigN5-CS3w-cgfV8dL7Bhq_1-RolbJDsqrFTHH-k3WkM46haEerqr... --Krdbot 12:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Obviously not fair use. Taken from pinterest. Zackmann08 (talk) 18:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 03:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Iojhug (talk) 19:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 05:52, 15 Oktober 2017 UTC: Out of project scope --Krdbot 12:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Iojhug (talk) 19:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 05:52, 15 Oktober 2017 UTC: Out of project scope --Krdbot 12:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 04:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope and possible privacy issues. —howcheng {chat} 16:50, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Mattbuck at 05:54, 16 Oktober 2017 UTC: Appears to be someone creating fake IDs --Krdbot 12:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrigth violation of this webpage. --Leon saudanha (talk) 17:10, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, specifically this photo. — Jeff G. ツ 19:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from modern TV channel logo. Should be removed to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: , I have uploaded the file above. It has the file but cut to remove tv channel logo. Artix Kreiger (talk) 03:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Replaced with File:Toon Heads 328 - Private Snafu.ogg. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wikikhansab (talk · contribs)
[edit]All different cameras if any exif available. IMHO is the claim of own work shaky at best.
- File:MSO delegation met Ahmed Patel.jpg
- File:MSO delegation met Foreign Minister Mr.SM Krishna.jpg
- File:MSO Conference on Ala Hazrat in Kerala.jpg
- File:MSO delegation led by President Syed Muhammad Qadri met Chief Minister of Rajasthan Ashok Gehlot.jpg
- File:MSO Milad at Jamia Millia Islamia.jpg
- File:MSO national President Syed Muhammad Qadri in Milad rally at Jaipur.jpg
- File:MSO delegation in Gopalgarh.jpg
- File:MSO North east Conference.jpg
- File:MSO delegation met Kapil Sibal.jpg
- File:MSO Scholars Conference.jpg
- File:MSO Ajmer Resolution times of India.jpg
- File:MSO Conference in west Bengal state.jpg
- File:MSO delegation met Salman Khursheed then Minority affairs Minister.jpg
- File:Mawlid in Jaipur city.jpg
- File:MSO LOGO.jpg
- File:MSO organised protest March against Israel attack on Gaza.jpg
- File:MSO of India Flag.jpg
- File:MSO Azmat-e- Rasool Conference in Aligarh.jpg
- File:MSO Aligarh bringing procession on the occasion of Mawlid un Nabi.jpg
- File:Sufism counter to Terrorism Conference.jpg
- File:Aligarh Muslim University Pro Vice Chancellor Syed Ahmed Ali in MSO's Azmat-e-Rasool Conference.jpg
- File:MSO Conference against Terrorism in Rajasthan.jpg
- File:MSO poster.jpg
- File:MSO leaders met Chief Minister of Assam against killing of Minorities.jpg
- File:MSO leaders in MSO Meet in MP's Club.jpg
- File:MSO National Secretary in Global March to Jerusalam.jpg
- File:MSO Delhi state protested against Talibani terrorism.jpg
- File:Aligarh Muslim University Vice Chancellor Dr.PK Abdul Azeez speaking in Azmat-e-Rasool Conference.jpg
- File:Seminar against legalization of Homosexuality.JPG
- File:MSO National Meet Banglore.jpg
- File:All India Delegates Meet of MSO of India.gif
- File:MSO's Freedom of Palestine and Al Aqsa Mosque Conference 2012 in jaipur.jpg
- File:Sufism counter to Terrorism by MSO of India in 2015.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:ANITA MLA EVENT.jpg
- File:Anita yadav mla minister.jpg
- File:ANITA YADAV MLA ATELI.jpg
- File:ANITA YADAV MLA HARYANA ATELI.jpg
- File:ANITA YADAV HARYANA.jpg
- File:ANITA YADAV MLA HARYANA SONIA GANDHI in 2006.jpg
- File:Anita Yadav MLA Haryana.jpg
- File:ANITA YADAV MLA HARYANA.jpg
- File:ANITA YADAV MLA.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Uploader has been grabbing images from the web, mostly Twitter and Facebook and adding them here, a few were deleted, then he went on to upload the same at en.wiki (now deleted) and one has even found its way back here via anohter user based on en.wiki to commons transfer!
- File:Anita yadav haryana minister with Asha hooda.jpg
- File:Anita yadav haryana minister with Ambika soni.jpg
- File:Anita yadav minister haryana congress rahul gandhi.jpg
- File:Anita yadav congress haryana.jpg
- File:Anita Yadav haryana minister meets gulam nabi azad.jpg
- File:Samrat Yadav.jpg
- File:Samrat Yadav Maruti Event.jpg
- File:Samrat Yadav Indian Rally Driver.jpg
- File:Samrat Yadav Rally.jpg
—SpacemanSpiff 07:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Though some of those screenshots and graphs are used to illustrate allegedly " freely available web server ", example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperPose , I see no evidences when following the links provided in the articles, example http://wishart.biology.ualberta.ca/SuperPose/ that the softwares (or databases, or servers..) have been released under free licenses. But maybe I missed something.
- File:Metabolome fig1.png
- File:Metabolome fig2.png
- File:PolySearch fig1.png
- File:PolySearch fig2.png
- File:PolySearch fig3.png
- File:PolySearch fig4.png
- File:Roccet fig2.png
- File:Roccet fig1.png
- File:CGView fig1.png
- File:ProteomeAnalysis fig1.png
- File:SuperPose.png
- File:SuperPose2.png
- File:SuperPose4.png
- File:SuperPose3.png
- File:SuperPose5.png
- File:CGView.png
- File:Gencard link.png
- File:Shiftx table1.png
- File:Proxy fig1.png
- File:Proxy fig2.png
- File:ECMDB pathway browse.png
- File:ECMDB metabolite browse.png
- File:VADAR fig1.png
- File:VADAR fig2.png
- File:SHIFTCOR fig1.png
- File:ECMDB reaction browse.png
- File:ECMDB metabocard.png
- File:ECMDB browse page.png
- File:ProteinChemicalShiftPrediction Fig1.png
- File:ProteinChemicalShiftPrediction table Fig2.png
- File:RefDB fig1.png
- File:RefDB home.png
- File:YMDB browse.png
- File:YMDB reactions.png
- File:YMDB metabolite.png
- File:SMPDB pathway browse.png
- File:SMPDB SMP00457 Lactose degradation.png
- File:SMPDB search.png
- File:T3DB toxicity.png
- File:HMDB abn conc.png
- File:HMDB biological.png
- File:HMDB clinical.png
- File:HMDB metabolite.png
- File:HMDB chemical physical.png
- File:HMDB logo.png
- File:DrugBank ChemQuery.png
- File:DrugBank drugcard.png
- File:DrugBank browse.png
- File:DrugBank logo.png
- File:Plasmapper.png
- File:DrugBank.png
Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, taken directly from https://twitter.com/kylekulinski 108.17.15.158 00:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Taken from https://twitter.com/kylekulinski Buffaboy (talk) 00:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Deo Surah tanzania (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios. The images are owned by different copyright holder, "Rory Russouw ", another copyright holder is "ROBIN NGONYANI DREAMS MULTIEDIA STUDIO ". Thus I do not trust other uploads. In addition, the multiple camera model is a red flag
- File:Pilika za mtaani.jpg
- File:Mafundi wa nyumba.jpg
- File:Biashara popote.jpg
- File:Baba na baiskeli.jpg
- File:Maisha ya kijijini.jpg
- File:Tinde village,.jpg
- File:Another day, another hustle.jpg
- File:Street vendor at Ubungo.jpg
- File:A woman in the kitchen with the kid.jpg
- File:A woman cooking food.jpg
- File:Young men at the workshop.jpg
- File:Mkulima wa Chumvi.jpg
- File:Mnoa visu.jpg
- File:Muuza chakula.jpg
- File:Truck pusher.jpg
- File:Muuza mitumba.jpg
- File:Young people helping each other.jpg
- File:A man is pulling cages at market.jpg
- File:A woman selling soaps.jpg
- File:A young man at the workshop.jpg
- File:A doctor at office.jpg
- File:A man cooking.jpg
- File:Street vendors in Mwanza city Centre.jpg
- File:Women of Kiabrakari.jpg
- File:A hairstylist at his saloon.jpg
- File:Mishe mishe za town.jpg
- File:Muuza makufuli.jpg
- File:A girl selling commodity to the train passenger.jpg
- File:Business at the train station.jpg
- File:A woman in Tabora train station.jpg
- File:Women are going to sell food.jpg
- File:Mama Lishe.jpg
- File:Farming season.jpg
- File:A girl selling mangoes.jpg
- File:Children with bottles.jpg
- File:Station master at work.jpg
- File:Men at the Railway.jpg
- File:My bicycle,my life.jpg
- File:Women selling Fruits.jpg
- File:A Nyamwezi woman cooking.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 11:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album.
- File:DMT 051.jpg
- File:DMT 050.jpg
- File:DMT 049.jpg
- File:DMT 048.jpg
- File:DMT 047.jpg
- File:DMT 046.jpg
- File:DMT 045.jpg
- File:DMT 044.jpg
- File:DMT 043.jpg
- File:DMT 042.jpg
- File:DMT 041.jpg
- File:DMT 039.jpg
- File:DMT 040.jpg
- File:DMT 038.jpg
- File:DMT 037.jpg
- File:DMT 035.jpg
- File:DMT 032.jpg
- File:DMT 034.jpg
- File:DMT 031.jpg
- File:DMT 026.jpg
- File:DMT 027.jpg
- File:DMT 025.jpg
- File:DMT 023.jpg
- File:DMT 016.jpg
- File:DMT 013.jpg
- File:DMT 012.jpg
- File:DMT 011.jpg
- File:DMT 009.jpg
- File:DMT 010.jpg
- File:DMT 003.png
Wikicology (talk) 13:02, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oakland Cumbiero (talk · contribs)
[edit]False authorship claims by copyvio-only uploader.
- File:Camp d'Esports d'Aixovall 2.png – http://www.stiftland-groundhopper.de/nonground/120710%20Aixoval_Stadium/Aixoval_2.jpg, grabbed from http://www.stiftland-groundhopper.de/nonground/120710%20Aixoval_Stadium/index.htm
- File:Estadio Nacional de Andorra.png – https://twitter.com/daplast/status/517245131238670337
- File:Camp d'Esports d'Aixovall.png – http://euro.stades.ch/Aixovall-1.html. Watermark deliberately cloned out to conceal the copyright infringement.
- File:Jesús Julián Lucendo.png – https://curiosidadesdelfutbol.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/lucendo_barc3a7a.jpg fom https://curiosidadesdelfutbol.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/lucendo-y-su-sueno-envenenado/
- File:ConIFA euro 2015.png
- File:Logo ConIFA 2014.jpg
- File:Logo ConIFA world cup 2016.png
- File:UE Santa Coloma mini.png
- File:Santa Coloma mini escudo.png
- File:Exclusivo.png
—LX (talk, contribs) 15:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by White.star1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, and appearance.
- File:المجلس البلدي بجدة.jpg
- File:مستشفى الملك فهد.jpg
- File:مسؤلين.jpg
- File:حفل المصمك.jpg
- File:الشيخ عادل الكلباني.jpg
- File:حفل المصمك2.jpg
- File:حفل زفاف.jpg
- File:نبراس 1.jpg
- File:نبراس.jpg
- File:جريدة.jpg – obviously a reproduction of a printed publication
- File:سيببليث.jpg
- File:معالي.jpg
- File:الصحاب المعالي.jpg
- File:عكاظ 1.jpg – smartphone screenshot of what appears to be an article on a news site
- File:تكريم1.jpg
- File:كاوست.jpg
- File:Cosat.jpg
- File:نعي والد فهد الجوفي.jpg – reproduction of a text document that's obviously long enough for textual copyright
- File:صورة الشهادة.jpg – reproduction of a certificate issued by an organisation called TMIPU (dead link), a photo and several logotypes which are unlikely to all be the uploader's own work
- File:مكتب.jpg
- File:صحيفة.jpg – obviously a reproduction of a printed publication
- File:مستشفى 53753.jpg
- File:مستشفى 537531.jpg
- File:مستشفى 537532.jpg – the graphics at the bottom suggest that this was taken from https://www.57357.org/
- File:المعاقين 2.jpg
- File:المعاقين.jpg
- File:2017-10-02-PHOTO-00000257.jpg
- File:2017-10-02-PHOTO-00000256.jpg
- File:2017-10-02-PHOTO-00000255.jpg
- File:2017-10-02-PHOTO-00000254.jpg
- File:2017-10-02-PHOTO-00000253.jpg
- File:2017-10-02-PHOTO-00000252.jpg
- File:2017-10-02-PHOTO-00000244.jpg
- File:2017-10-02-PHOTO-00000247.jpg
- File:2017-10-02-PHOTO-00000248.jpg
- File:Fahad.aljofi.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 20:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 01:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by White.star1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own work. Unsourced work withe EXIF data. Also see this nomination.
Mhhossein talk 07:53, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete along with the rest of the user's uploads. I recognise several of them as files that were deleted as a result of the previous deletion discussion. All of those should be speedily deleted, as they have been recreated outside of process. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by White.star1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]As I said in the second deletion discussion, I recognise several of these files as the same ones that were deleted as a result of the first deletion discussion, and I believe all the user's uploads should be deleted again.
- File:جريد مقال.jpg
- File:تكريم صالح كامل.jpg
- File:تونس 2.jpg
- File:استلام الي لقب سفير النوايا الحسنة1.jpg
- File:مدينة الملك عبدالله الاقتصادية.jpg
- File:استلام الي لقب سفير النوايا الحسنة.jpg
- File:مستشفى لسرطان الاطفال57357 1.jpg
- File:مستشفى لسرطان الاطفال57357.jpg
- File:مستشفى للسرطان57357.jpg
- File:1اليوم العالمي لذوي الاحتياجات الخاصة.jpg
- File:اليوم العالمي لذوي الاحتياجات الخاصة.jpg
- File:مستشفى جدة لسرطان الاطفال5.jpg
- File:مستشفى جدة لسرطان الاطفال4.jpg
- File:3مستشفى جدة لسرطان الاطفال.jpg
- File:مستشفى جدة لسرطان الاطفال1.jpg
- File:مستشفى جدة لسرطان الاطفال.jpg
- File:1شهادة سفير النوايا الحسنة.jpg
- File:فهد الجوفي.jpg
- File:حضور مؤتمر.jpg
- File:تونس444.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 11:29, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 12:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by White.star1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Same thing again. How many times are we going to have to do this?
- File:فهد الجوفي.jpg
- File:فهد العلي المحمد الجوفي.jpg
- File:File27.jpg
- File:File26.jpg
- File:تونس333.jpg
- File:File22.jpg
- File:جامعة ام القرى.jpg
- File:ساند5555.jpg
- File:مستشفة 57357.jpg
- File:ساند3333.jpg
- File:ساند4.jpg
- File:ساند3.jpg
- File:ساند2.jpg
- File:File4-1.jpg
- File:ساند.jpg
- File:السجون 2.jpg
- File:File3-2.jpg
- File:وادي مكه-2.jpg
- File:وادي مكه.jpg
- File:صورة شخصية قهد.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 05:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 11:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
File:This is life without a purpose nothing but blinded hope driven by unfelt or unseen faith 2013-08-04 05-32.jpg
[edit]Out of scope - no educational use. --ghouston (talk) 00:34, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:33, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:46, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:49, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:49, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:50, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Farhan hirsi matan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
SinCity702 (talk) 01:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:56, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 01:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:02, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:17, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:30, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE - Commons isn't a dictionary SinCity702 (talk) 02:34, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image SinCity702 (talk) 02:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
self promotion, out of scope. Jcornelius (talk) 08:02, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 00:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
posible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 00:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio - source listed - fair use not applicable to this living person EricEnfermero (talk) 00:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:28, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Category replaced by Category:Sculptures of a Turtle in the Nativity Facade of the Sagrada Família--Io Herodotus (talk) 02:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No need to delete, a category redirect will do. — Jeff G. ツ 00:46, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- No please, this was a spelling mistake. Absolutely no need to keep it.--Io Herodotus (talk) 02:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy delete CSD C1: Renamed or duplicate category. --bjh21 (talk) 14:02, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete If this category was kept it would be a risk for mistakes.--Io Herodotus (talk) 02:30, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: spelling mistake, redirect not need. --Hystrix (talk) 13:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MuhammadIzzatulFaqih (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
SinCity702 (talk) 01:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by George Chernilevsky. --Hystrix (talk) 13:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
really needed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Estopedist1 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Sure, why not? It's got two photos in the gallery. — Jeff G. ツ 01:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- I am not familiar about Commons policy related to pages in namespace 0, but I think that it should be created only in exceptional cases (is there any?). For example, what is the point of the page Иосиф Виссарионович Сталин? Also because users mainly moves between categories then language links should be found there not in the namespace 0--Estopedist1 (talk) 07:27, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1: NS0 here is for galleries, please see COM:G for details. — Jeff G. ツ 21:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- I am not familiar about Commons policy related to pages in namespace 0, but I think that it should be created only in exceptional cases (is there any?). For example, what is the point of the page Иосиф Виссарионович Сталин? Also because users mainly moves between categories then language links should be found there not in the namespace 0--Estopedist1 (talk) 07:27, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: COM:G: "... galleries can turn into something much more.". --Hystrix (talk) 13:43, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
this cat the correct one : "Templates related to Palestine" -— Preceding unsigned comment added by عماد الدين المقدسي (talk • contribs) 07:10, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No need to delete, a category redirect will do. — Jeff G. ツ 01:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with Jeff G. — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 22:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: category redirect is created. --Hystrix (talk) 13:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful SinCity702 (talk) 01:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful SinCity702 (talk) 01:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be from campaign website. No indication of license. MB298 (talk) 01:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be from campaign website. No indication of license. MB298 (talk) 01:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be from campaign site. No indication of PD. MB298 (talk) 01:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fawad Ali Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
SinCity702 (talk) 02:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
wrong picture Bellerophon- (talk) 02:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content. --Hystrix (talk) 14:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fazaian Ghulam Mujtaba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
SinCity702 (talk) 02:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; one in use. --Hystrix (talk) 14:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ruskimeister (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
SinCity702 (talk) 02:26, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:21, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imtiaz iak (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
SinCity702 (talk) 02:27, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:22, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a stock photo grabbed from the Web, uncertain licence, source page doesn't exist. jdx Re: 03:02, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
With an image of a globe featuring Africa in its middle, I don't believe this logo "consists of simple geometric shapes or text" and thus "does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection". Rather, I believe its presence here is copyright violation. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 03:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no copyright infringement, but approval required. --Hystrix (talk) 14:33, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
copyright violations Tvcccp (talk) 04:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Copyvio and crazy picture, delete it asap. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by DMacks. --Hystrix (talk) 14:46, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Archivo subido sin el consentimiento del autor. Soosie. (talk) 05:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f6/Flag_of_Anzoátegui_State.svg Jlannons99 (talk) 06:26, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- How is that a reason to delete this photo? - Jmabel ! talk 06:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- I think that this nomination was created by mistake like Commons:Deletion requests/User talk:Butko --Butko (talk) 09:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Butko: I blocked the user for nominating your user talk page for deletion, considering that vandalism. User has four prior warnings. But if you think I've overreacted, feel free to unblock. - Jmabel ! talk 15:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 16:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
unused; pixelated png version of File:BSicon BAHN.svg Jc86035 (talk) 06:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
The unused photo of a non-notable person. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:43, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
wrong format see File:Ori2.svg Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
wrong PDF format see File:Fiber-sagnac.svg Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:27, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Donor Coutinho wanted this photo deleted. Hansmuller (talk) 07:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; weitere Begründung auf der Diskussionsseite des Antragsstellers. --Hystrix (talk) 16:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
and
- File:ASC Leiden - Coutinho Collection - 27 02 - House in Ziguinchor, Senegal - 1973.tiff
- File:ASC Leiden - Coutinho Collection - 27 03 - House in Ziguinchor, Senegal - 1973.tiff
- File:ASC Leiden - Coutinho Collection - 4 03 - PAIGC soldiers and weapons in Guinea-Bissau - 1974.tif
Die Fotos wurden ursprünglich von Hansmuller zur Löschung vorgeschlagen. Ich sah keinen Löschgrund und habe es Hansmuller auf seine Diskussionsseite begründet. In der Antwort darauf („Please remove this file and the others i requested. The donor simply wants them removed, as i indicated. We don't have to speculate why. I think we should grant wishes of a donor of 750+ images. Otherwise they won't donate another time with good reason. For Commons they are not important files anyway (no encyclopedic value).“) hat er allerdings nochmals für mich nachvollziehbare Gründe für die Löschung dargelegt. Hystrix (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Hystrix asked me to comment. I should have explained better: the images I wanted deleted are part of a large and important donation of images of Guinea-Bissau during the war of independence with Portugal in 1973-1974, see Category:Guinea-Bissau_and_Senegal_1973-1974_(Coutinho_Collection) and Commons:Guinea-Bissau and Senegal 1973-1974 (Coutinho Collection). There are unique images for instance of the Cuban medical help, part of Fidel Castro's worldwide policy of help to rebels. The photographer of these images, Dutch medical prof. Coutinho, donated them and I uploaded them to Commons in 2016. Prof. Coutinho asked me to delete the few not very encyclopedic images listed above of a house in Ziguinchor, Senegal (27_01 - 27_03) and of some soldiers (4_03): there are many such photographs in this collection. I think we should as much as possible respect the reasonable wishes of content donors, also because otherwise they will think twice before donating content again. Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 07:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I deleted the two that looked reasonably Out of Scope, but kept two valuable images. @Hansmuller: License agreements are irrevocable, please explain that to the generous prof. Coutinho. What if the files were already in use in some project? Ruthven (msg) 22:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Please delete this image of NO encyclopedic value. Deletion was requested by its donor. It is part of a large and important donation of images of Guinea-Bissau during the war of independence with Portugal in 1973-1974, see Category:Guinea-Bissau_and_Senegal_1973-1974_(Coutinho_Collection) and Commons:Guinea-Bissau and Senegal 1973-1974 (Coutinho Collection). The photographer of these images, Dutch medical prof. Coutinho, donated them and I uploaded them to Commons in 2016. Prof. Coutinho asked me to delete a few not very encyclopedic images of a house in Ziguinchor, Senegal Hansmuller (talk) 05:54, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:05, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Donor Coutinho wanted this photo deleted, unknown house, not the hospital Hansmuller (talk) 07:33, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; weitere Begründung auf der Diskussionsseite des Antragsstellers. --Hystrix (talk) 16:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Donor Coutinho wanted this file deleted, unknown house, not the hospital in Ziguinchor Hansmuller (talk) 07:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; weitere Begründung auf der Diskussionsseite des Antragsstellers. --Hystrix (talk) 16:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
File:ASC Leiden - Coutinho Collection - 4 03 - PAIGC soldiers and weapons in Guinea-Bissau - 1974.tif
[edit]Donor Coutinho wanted to delete this file. Hansmuller (talk) 07:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; weitere Begründung auf der Diskussionsseite des Antragsstellers. --Hystrix (talk) 16:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Bkkoh (talk) 07:49, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:CSD#G7 uploader's request. — Jeff G. ツ 14:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Likely to be duplicate to the jpg version. B dash (talk) 08:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
unclear copyright status + maybe out of scope too Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: single upload 2009, unused totay. --Hystrix (talk) 17:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ChimélChimél (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image / no quite notable people : out of scope
- File:Pkundotta.jpg
- File:CZD Veranstaltungen.jpg
- File:Eheleute Pastor Jürgen Kennedy Laubing und Otta.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. No educational value. ArgonSim (talk) 08:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of the project scope. ArgonSim (talk) 08:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE: advertising media company Takeaway (talk) 12:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 14:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file. E4024 (talk) 14:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file. E4024 (talk) 14:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file. E4024 (talk) 14:50, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file. Also blurry. E4024 (talk) 14:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Another selfie. OoS. Unused. E4024 (talk) 14:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file. E4024 (talk) 14:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:59, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file. E4024 (talk) 15:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zhangzihang (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused logos of questionable notability : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
© 2001 Laurent Lucas. Identity of user Olga Jaouen should be verified via OTRS ticket (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:OTRS). Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
image en copyvio : voir http://www.facilavie.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/logopreveranges.jpg --Ssire (talk) 16:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete copyvios per Ssire and Chatsam. — Jeff G. ツ 03:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete and it's not a coat of arms, this municipality seems to don't understand heraldic rules... Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 09:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Conserver en attendant confirmation : qui a copié sur qui ? Le site Facilavie est le site d'un service de portage à domicile pour personnes âgées. Il a une page de "liens utiles" où sont répertoriées les communes qu'il dessert, par des images qui sont des logos ou blasons (au sens naïf du terme). Ces images lui sont fournies probablement par les mairies, et donc l'image de Préveranges (qui date peut-être de 2011) a été téléchargée en 2016 par Facileavie à partir d'un document appartenant à la Mairie. C'est donc Facileavie qui fait un copyvio (à bon escient !) et n'est donc certainement pas le propriétaire de l'image et du logo. --ManiacParisien 17:33, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- le dessin est fourni par la mairie selon ce qui était sur son site maintenant en reconstruction. C'est un logo, donc image fixée par un illustrateur susceptible de droit d'auteur. Or l'image est "forcée" sur Commons, sans accompagnement d'un droit à l'utilisation. Utiliser aveuglément cette image sur Wiki présente donc un risque.--Ssire (talk) 17:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
voir Commons:Deletion requests/File:Blason de preveranges.jpg c'est le même --Ssire (talk) 21:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete copyvios per Ssire. — Jeff G. ツ 03:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 04:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Probably not own work (low resolution and no EXIF).
- File:Taylor Lapilus et Damien son frère.jpg
- File:Taylor Lapilus Crossfight, Paris.jpg
- File:Taylor Lapilus à la supreme league.jpg
- File:Tgv wiki2.jpg
- File:Taylor Lapilus.png
- File:Taylor Lapilsu dans la cours des grands.jpg
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 10:02, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
please delete it Prince ki zindagi jita hu (talk) 10:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
This Header picture with UCK on it is very offensive for serbian civilans kiled in name of Big Albania, please change it or remove or i will do! Cheers Soulart (talk) 15:27, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:02, 25 March 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
U.S. President George W. Bush has made it clear the war against terrorists will be unremitting and relentless. Even those countries affording shelter to terrorists will not be spared. These words come too late for the Serbs, Gypsies, Jews, Turks and other non-Albanians who have been driven from their ancestral homes in Kosovo by the terrorist Kosovo Liberation Army. It is too late as well for Macedonia, which has been forced by the United States, the European Union and NATO to yield to all the demands of the Albanian terrorists in that country. This double standard and lack of consistency when dealing with terrorists calls into question the policies the United States and its NATO allies followed in the Balkans. It also underlines the necessity for the United States and its allies to clean up their act if they wish to retain credibility in the war against terrorism. The bombing of Yugoslavia in the spring of 1999 allegedly to stop ethnic cleansing and prevent the Balkans from becoming once again the powder keg of Europe has backfired. Kosovo has become exclusively an Albanian province with the exception of a few stalwart Serbians in the Mitrovica area who live surrounded by barbed wire and are threatened daily with murder and mayhem by their Albanian neighbours. The Balkans, since the end of the bombing, have been in constant turmoil caused by the KLA terrorist activities, wich is also known as UCK in this picture. Soulart (talk) 10:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion specified. --Jcb (talk) 00:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not Istagram. Wikicology (talk) 11:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JeffTodford9 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i.imgur.com/Rrh2T6p.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Photo created solely as an attack on a BLP Funcrunch (talk) 17:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope, was used for vandalism on fr.wp. Do not follow (talk) 21:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahadat154 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on any of these images.
- File:Dainik.Bajroshakti.FirstPage.jpg
- File:Dainik.Bajroshakti.Logo.jpg
- File:Mozammel.haque.mp.gazipur.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shahadat154 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own work. For example, one of the files has also been uploaded as someone else's work, see w:File:MdBayazidKhanPanniMP.jpg.
Stefan2 (talk) 22:05, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Images can be found on the internet Ronhjones (Talk) 01:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
self — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llywelyn2000 (talk • contribs) 08:47, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
{{Vd}} as a courtesy to the uploader. Not in use. It can be rotated if that's the perceived problem. — Jeff G. ツ 04:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Jeff, and many thanks! The only reason I suggested deleting this image is that other similar images have been deleted eg Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:St Mary's Church, Rhuddlan on the grounds that they contain 'derivative works, failing COM:DM'. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 06:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Llywelyn2000: I don't think we have to worry about derivative works of a cross from the 1400s. — Jeff G. ツ 21:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Then please keep. The info may be of use to someone one day. thanks! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 21:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Llywelyn2000: I don't think we have to worry about derivative works of a cross from the 1400s. — Jeff G. ツ 21:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Jeff, and many thanks! The only reason I suggested deleting this image is that other similar images have been deleted eg Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:St Mary's Church, Rhuddlan on the grounds that they contain 'derivative works, failing COM:DM'. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 06:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, uploader changed opinion. — Jeff G. ツ 21:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:34, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
License at Picasa cannot be verified (anymore). Uploader mentions Flinfo at the talk page, which suggests a valid cc-by license. My position is that as long as this cannot be verified, we cannot keep this file, despite of Flinfo. Lymantria (talk) 08:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment: Does any Admin or trusted user know the answer to this problem? The uploader says this (Flinfo says that the image is licensed under the terms of cc-by-3.0) in the talkpage but I don't know if it is provable. Guanaco, Túrelio or Krd This Flinfo data is a mystery to me. --Leoboudv (talk) 09:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Tegen verwijderen (＝
Keep) Het beeld is duidelijk gepubliceerd onder de licentie {{Cc-by-3.0}}. Flinfo nog steeds dient als verificatiemiddel om de licentiesituatie van een Picasa foto vast te stellen. Zie voor voorbeelden:
Foto Flinfo output Licentie Toegestaan in Commons? Auteur Andere foto van dezelfde auteur in Commons Nebukawa Sta. Flinfo 
Takashi Shimada 
夕焼け Flinfo 
kikuko yamada 
Hamagiri Flinfo 
しろあん。[1] - ↑ De auteur heeft zijn bijnaam veranderd.
Tsushima Flinfo
椎林隆夫 
.svg){kind=small}
,_Yokosuka_01.jpg)
_en_Tsushima_(MSO-302)_in_Yokosuka,_-18_mei_2015_b.jpg){kind=spacer}
Kept: clicking the provided Flinfo link in the talkpage, does indeed provide the verification that the image is cc-by-3.0. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:42, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
I don't think the Flickr account have right to license this logo/emblem. + maybe out of scope too Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Bad quality image (iPad...) and big doubts about the paternity of the picture. Lyon-St-Clair (talk) 09:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: more than adequate quality, in scope, and no reasons given why "paternity" is called into question. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:45, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
there is a fold on the left, it seems a photo of a photo (or a scan) + maybe out of scope too Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
No use, Uploaded to create nonsense article on he.wiki. Also aphoto of minors with no permmision Assayas (talk) 11:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete out of COM:SCOPE. — Jeff G. ツ 14:59, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused photo about smiling unidentified woman. E4024 (talk) 12:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused photo about smiling unidentified woman. E4024 (talk) 12:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep AVN participant photos are likely to have value if the person can be identified, but identification is never going to be happen if we delete the photos. There are unlikely to be CC-BY photographs of them elsewhere due to their commercial value. --Fæ (talk) 14:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep In scope. This image is about the AVN Adult Entertainment Expo that was articles in 11 languages. Also this is most probably an unidentified porn actress, adult or erotic model, per Fæ. Tm (talk) 01:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Artwork made by French artist Vincent Roux, who died in 1991, so less than 70 years. Not free, no authorization. Titlutin (talk) 12:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Artwork made by French artist Vincent Roux, who died in 1991, so less than 70 years. Not free, no authorization. Titlutin (talk) 12:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marilia Milne (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused selfie. Depicted Steven Zeta isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission from the author of the poster and the photo to upload it under free license--Interfase (talk) 19:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- А возможно нет. Где вы читали такие правила ? --Taron Saharyan (talk) 13:48, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete COM:DW. There are multiple copyrights to be considered here:
- The photographer who snapped the photo of the artist Faegheh Atashin, better known by her stage name Googoosh, for her music production company BLUE ART Productions - no evidence of release under {{Cc-by-4.0}}
- The copywriter who wrote the text of this ad for BLUE ART Productions - no evidence of release under {{Cc-by-4.0}}
- The ticket agency «Tomsarkgh» LLC (using websites ticketbox.am and Tomsarkgh.am) in Yerevan, Armenia that produced this ad for placement there for Googosh's concert at 19:00 on 31 August 2017 at the Karen Demirchyan Sport Complex there - no evidence of release under {{Cc-by-4.0}}
- The photographer uploader Taron Saharyan who snapped the photo of this ad - released under {{Cc-by-4.0}}
- In addition, this photo is of rather poor quality, due to what appears to be low uneven light. — Jeff G. ツ 15:12, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
weird, unencyclopedic edit. Original file is much better for use. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete Promotional headshot of the entertainer. Source is a google search, which isn't much of a valid source. One version of the original is on the entertainer's facebook profile here. No indication anywhere that this image is available under a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 19:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete Taken from the source indicated, but no indication there that this logo is available under the license indicated, nor any other license compatible with Commons requirements. Hammersoft (talk) 19:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:54, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
"The best in the world" says the description. 176.239.84.122 23:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Small, unused personal file with exaggerated claim from Instagram, out of COM:SCOPE. — Jeff G. ツ 20:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
No description no use no need 176.239.84.122 23:20, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Small, unused personal file from Picasa via Facebook, out of COM:SCOPE. — Jeff G. ツ 20:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for sculptures in USA. (COM:FOP#United_States) This public artwork was not installed before 1923. CZmarlin (talk) 15:01, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Sculpture erected in USA in 1925. Looking at multiple photos online, I can find no evidence of any copyright notice. (Any Wikimedians in Manhattan that can walk by and double check? I will change my vote to delete if there is a posted copyright notice.) -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- This monument was unveiled after the 1923 cutoff year. The lack of FOP in the U.S. is not my choice, but even images of "public" artwork are clearly described as not in the public domain according to WP Commons guidelines as explained here. CZmarlin (talk) 01:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- What is clearly explained, if you take time to read it all, is that such public artworks from before 1978 are subject to the same copyright laws as published US works such as books and magazines. Meaning for works so old as the 1920s, that they have fallen into the public domain per US law UNLESS there was an explicit notice of copyright on the work, AND the copyright was filed, AND subsequent renewals of copyright were correctly filed in the decades since. No notice on the original work from 1925 thus = {{PD-US-no notice}}. Hope this helps. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:54, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- Subsequent renewal; one renewal after 28 years was enough to hold it the remaining 67.--Prosfilaes (talk) 17:48, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- What is clearly explained, if you take time to read it all, is that such public artworks from before 1978 are subject to the same copyright laws as published US works such as books and magazines. Meaning for works so old as the 1920s, that they have fallen into the public domain per US law UNLESS there was an explicit notice of copyright on the work, AND the copyright was filed, AND subsequent renewals of copyright were correctly filed in the decades since. No notice on the original work from 1925 thus = {{PD-US-no notice}}. Hope this helps. -- Infrogmation (talk) 01:54, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- This monument was unveiled after the 1923 cutoff year. The lack of FOP in the U.S. is not my choice, but even images of "public" artwork are clearly described as not in the public domain according to WP Commons guidelines as explained here. CZmarlin (talk) 01:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
The suculptor (en:Frederick Roth) died in 1944, thus this pic is in the public domain for jurisdictions where death of author +50 years applies. It will become public domain for 70-year-jurisdictions in 2014. {{PD-old-50}} might therefore also be possible. --Cú Faoil (talk) 13:26, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- As a US work, it has to be PD in the US. PD-old-50 can't be used.--Prosfilaes (talk) 18:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- The picture is not a US work; it was apparently taken by a Bulgarian national and therefore presumably first published in Bulgaria. I wouldn't be so sure about US law being the only applicable one here. --Cú Faoil (talk) 19:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- The photo may have been first published in Bulgaria, but is licensed properly, so that aspect really isn't an issue. We are trying to figure if it is a derivative work of another copyrighted work or not, and per usual Commons policy, we generally use the law in which the statue/building is located to determine that aspect (whether the object is PD or if FOP applies). In this case, the statue does indeed have a copyright notice with a date of 1925,[1], so it can't be PD on those grounds. The copyright holder is written there as F.G.R. Roth. Now that renewal records are online, we could check those though. The renewal would have had to be in either 1952 or 1953. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- I see no reason to think it was published in Bulgaria. Most photos taken by users and uploaded to Commons are first made generally available by the Wikimedia Foundation, a US publisher with US servers.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:54, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- If the user was in Bulgaria when they uploaded it to Commons, it was arguably published in that country -- publication may be the moment it gets distributed from the author to Wikimedia. I'm sure there are a thousand technicalities with that question too. But, I think that is almost always irrelevant, since current-day photos are virtually always copyrighted and require a free license no matter what the country. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:26, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- The picture is not a US work; it was apparently taken by a Bulgarian national and therefore presumably first published in Bulgaria. I wouldn't be so sure about US law being the only applicable one here. --Cú Faoil (talk) 19:38, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- While the statue does have a copyright notice, I can't find a renewal in the artwork sections for either 1952 or 1953. I think it was public domain by January 1, 1954, so {{PD-US-not renewed}} would appear to be the correct license for the statue itself. Keep, I think. Carl Lindberg (talk) 21:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- While the statue does have a copyright notice, I can't find a renewal in the artwork sections for either 1952 or 1953. I think it was public domain by January 1, 1954, so {{PD-US-not renewed}} would appear to be the correct license for the statue itself.
- I added {{PD-US-not renewed}}. That should probably be enough to close this discussion. --Cú Faoil (talk) 13:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
As noted above, it does have notice, but no renewal. Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:43, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
For a reason different from previous nomination. There is no information on the photographer and there is no applicable license for the picture. The picture is not software code of course. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep It was uploaded in 2006; it's pretty clear it was first uploaded to the English Wikipedia by w:User:Uris, with a BSD license. If you're concerned, then an admin on the English Wikipedia should be able to check the history there. The BSD license is not terribly clear for this, but I see no way to interpret it as non-free for photos; "Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution." clearly gives us the right to use the photo, no matter what you think source code means with respect to this file.--Prosfilaes (talk) 02:54, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The BSD license is still a free license. Not the best for photos, but it's still free and still conforms to COM:Licensing. The uploader claimed copyright, so assume good faith. No reason for deletion that I see. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:37, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
it is above ToO IMO Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted work of art by Patrick Dougherty Selbymay (talk) 11:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted work of art. Selbymay (talk) 13:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Dieses Gemälde hängt im Stadtmuseum Neumarkt, die Reproduktion war nicht autorisiert 2003:C5:8BD1:1C00:C171:6C22:C990:639E 14:30, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Das abgebildete Gemälde ist auf Grund seines Alters gemeinfrei --DALIBRI (talk) 08:19, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Auch dieses Gemälde befindet sich im Stadtmuseum Neumarkt, die Reproduktion wurde nicht autorisiert 2003:C5:8BD1:1C00:C171:6C22:C990:639E 14:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Das abgebildete Gemälde ist auf Grund seines Alters gemeinfrei --DALIBRI (talk) 08:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sahincatary (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://images2.onionstatic.com/onion/2921/8/16x9/1200.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Promo photo.No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:11, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/566336108/caguiton.JPG. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Could be copyrighted. Read the watermark please. E4024 (talk) 15:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no EXIF. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
violazione di copyright Bart ryker (talk) 15:53, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
no freedom of panorama in italy 151.42.98.99 20:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- In fact, an executive order emanated by the Italian Government, the "decreto legge 83/2014", later converted in ordinary law, the law number 106 of 29 July 2014, introduced a degree of freedom of panorama that in the opinion of many does allow this kind of pictures to be shared on wiki. --Conte di Cavour (talk) 21:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
no freedom of panorama in italy 151.42.98.99 20:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be some sort of joke, a picture without any notability whatsoever Simen113 (talk) 20:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Artwork made by French artist Vincent Roux, who died in 1991, so less than 70 years. Not free, no authorization. Titlutin (talk) 21:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Girl with book
[edit]When did the sculptor die? Missing author information of the artwork. Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Russia
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:34, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded within the competition - Wiki Loves Monuments 2017
--AlixSaz (talk) 17:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
No information on the photographer of this 3D object. Also no applicable license for the picture, license only applies to the depicted object itself, not to a picture of it. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:43, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation as every other image of this car brand uploaded by the user was. I can't find a source, but we have no reason to believe given the other images that they had the right to release it under a compatible license. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:30, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @User:TonyBallioni, until you mentioned the link at the bottom left, I never noticed it before. I'll submit a delete request for every image I found, especially the first one that got my attention. (Regushee (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC))
- Delete Although I couldn’t find one as high in resolution, TinEye shows several smaller copies online, as much as a year and a half older than the upload date here. This, together with the lack of EXIF data and the uploader’s history, makes the own-work claim quite dubious.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 22:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete In addition to the mentioned points, the filename format is typically used for YouTube thumbnails. So the image description likely does not include the correct source and/or copyright owner. Delete per COM:PRP. GermanJoe (talk) 12:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
I took this photo and it has been used here on wikipedia under false pretenses and without my permission. I was asked Aug 1 if wikipedia could use this photo and I was initially agreeable. I changed the licencing to allow its use but told the requester that I'd upload a better version of the photo that evening. He nevertheless immediately uploaded initial version this to wikipedia. Soon afterwards, I informed him that CBC (who broadcast The National) was going to supply better shots and to use those and not this one, and I told him that I reinstated the copyright on this photo. Yesterday I was surprised to discover these photos were still up, despite having informed the uploader via e-mail I was no longer granting free use. Wikipedia has since told me that the licence is irrevocable, something I was not informed of at the time, and certainly wasn't clear in the e-mail I was initially sent. and I was also told that there is a 7-day grace period during which time the uploader could take down the photo. I had informed the uploader the same day - August 1 - that I was no longer granting free access, and this was ignored I now realize.
I request that this photo and its derivative works be deleted from the wikimedia commons.
Jeremy Gilbert Canada Jack (talk) 23:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Canada Jack: , I'm sorry I didn't realize that you wanted the picture removed from Wikimedia after you had mentioned that CBC would be providing a better picture. This image was transferred using the Flickr2Commons tool and the @FlickreviewR: bot verified that the license on the file at the time of transfer was cc-by-sa-2.0. CBC did provide a better image of the new hosts (File:Hosts_of_The_National_-_2017.jpg) but the discussion about licensing and watermark on that image went on for a month without a resolution. Unfortunately, I don't have admin access so I cannot remove the file myself. I have no objection to it being deleted. My intention was never to mislead or trick you in any way. Regards, @sikander (talk) 23:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- First off, I requested you use the updated version which I'd post later that day - you went ahead and, against my wishes, took the unprocessed photo off my flickr acooun despite my instructions. Further, I quite clearly did request removal, Siqbal. First, in this e-mail sent Aug 1:
- Hi Sikander: The folks at CBC have a far better 4-shot that they'd prefer you'd use - and the shot of Rosemary is very unflattering so please don't use that! I will set that up, I've told them about the free licence etc so please don't post my photo as a much better studio shot of the four (which can be cropped for the individual hosts) will be forthcoming!
- Just in case that wasn't clear enough, later that same day: Hi Sikander: Given that CBC has forwarded that better photo, I took off the licence allowing usage on wikipedia off for the photo I took.
- I informed you that a) CBC had a better photo, so don't use mine and b) I had reinstated the copyright for the photo. Yet I see that my photo is being used and the copyright I informed you of is being ignored. "Copyright" means I decide who uses it - I clearly withdrew that permission. So, remove the photo and its derivatives. Canada Jack (talk) 14:21, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Here, for the record, are the e-mail posts and my arguments for removal.
- 1) I was never informed that waiving copyright was irrevocable, which is what one editor has since told me. In terms of copyright, this is all Sikander told me in terms of how I can donate the photo via licence change on Flickr: You can either change the license on the image to "Attribution ShareAlike" or "Public Domain" and then the image can be freely used.
- 2) I informed him when I changed the licence that I'd later upload a processed version of the image to Flickr which I'd post later that day (Aug 1 2017) and at which time I'd inform him. I've changed the Flickr licence for the 4-shot to the one noted. ....I'll also be upgrading the initial photo as it is the out-of-camera jpeg with zero upgrades (no contrast or colour adjustments, etc) so I'll let you know about that as well when it is done.
- My clear intent was that he'd use the processed version of the photo - he instead immediately (as per the time stamps of my e-mail and of wikipedia) uploaded the old version of the photo, and the latter version was never uploaded, contrary to my instructions.
- 3) Within the hour, on the same day, my employer, CBC, saw the image. They told me they have a better 4-shot and that that should be used, not the photo I posted - I immediately told Sikander not to use my photo, which, any reasonable person would take to mean as remove the photo. The photo and its derivatives were not removed: Hi Sikander: The folks at CBC have a far better 4-shot that they'd prefer you'd use - and the shot of Rosemary is very unflattering so please don't use that! I will set that up, I've told them about the free licence etc so please don't post my photo as a much better studio shot of the four (which can be cropped for the individual hosts) will be forthcoming!
- At this point I don't think I was aware that Sikander had already posted the photo hence the line: "don't post my photo as a much better studio shot of the four (which can be cropped for the individual hosts) will be forthcoming!" Yet, not only is the 4-shot still in the commons, so are individual shots, including the one of Rosemary Barton which I specifically mentioned and said not to use!
- 4) Just in case there was any confusion, I later that day informed Sikander that I had reinstanted the copyright on my photo, so it was no longer to be used on wikipedia. Hi Sikander: Given that CBC has forwarded that better photo, I took off the licence allowing usage on wikipedia off for the photo I took.
- Any reasonable person would see I had withdrawn permission. The response to this from a different editor? "The image has been live for more than 7 days, so even a courtesy deletion (only by the uploader) would not be possible." According to wikipedia it seems the fact that I, as the creator of the image, have no say in the removal of the photo despite my repeated instructions - only the uploader does? This is nonsense.
- Remove the photo and its derivatives immediately!
- Jeremy Gilbert Canada Jack (talk) 15:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jeremy,
As I've said before I have no objection to the photo being removed from here, but I am not an Administrator and I don't know the rules around that.
However, I am not happy about your accusation that I somehow misled or tricked you or did not explain what a non-free image means. In my first couple of emails to you:
- I explained how the process works
- what the licensing requirements are
- where the images would be used
- that the agreement cannot be withdrawn
- that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
-
Initial email -
Licensing details
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![43 File:Farhan "Swaglord" Rahman.jpeg](#File:Farhan_"Swaglord"_Rahman.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_z22.jpg){kind=link}
-72dpi.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14915365745).jpg){kind=link}
![172 File:Croix "Le Christ aux bras ouverts".jpg](#File:Croix_"Le_Christ_aux_bras_ouverts".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Panda.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![01:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/10/13#c-SinCity702-2017-10-13T01:37:00.000Z-File:Farhan_"Swaglord"_Rahman.jpeg){kind=link}
![05:09, 20 October 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/10/13#c-George_Chernilevsky-2017-10-20T05:09:00.000Z-File:Farhan_"Swaglord"_Rahman.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_z22.jpg){kind=link}
_z22.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_z22.jpg){kind=link}
_z22.jpg){kind=link}
-72dpi.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-72dpi.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
-72dpi.png){kind=link}
-72dpi.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14915365745).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14915365745).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(14915365745).jpg){kind=link}
_(14915365745).jpg){kind=link}
![13:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/10/13#c-Selbymay-2017-10-13T13:15:00.000Z-File:Croix_"Le_Christ_aux_bras_ouverts".jpg){kind=link}
![14:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/10/13#c-Jameslwoodward-2017-10-21T14:08:00.000Z-File:Croix_"Le_Christ_aux_bras_ouverts".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Again, it's fine with me if the image is explicitly deleted from here. I'm not going to insist on technicalities on something trivial like this. CBC did provide a better image and it led to a month-long discussion by email between CBC and Wikimedia Commons volunteers about licensing requirements and the file was eventually deleted. @sikander (talk) 22:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Hi Siqbal:
- I'm a semi-professional photographer and I have every right to instruct you on usage of my photo. The version you saw was not processed, I wouldn't want that to be uploaded in the first place, which is I why I gave you specific instructions. Re-read the second e-mail - I told you that I would later upgrade the photo I had on flickr and that I would inform you when that was done. What did you do? You uploaded the image anyway! Why? I had just informed you I'd let you know when I had the version I clearly preferred to be used put onto Flickr! You had no right to upload that initial photograph, yet you did.
- Then, when CBC said they had a better one, I told you NOT to use the photograph, and then several hours later - presuming you had respected my wish to wait to upload the processed version - I informed you that I had re-instated the copyright. What did that mean? It means I withdrew consent! It didn't matter that that was "irrevocable" because I had instructed you to upload the processed version, you should never have had the unprocessed version uploaded in the first place.
- And you argue that I didn't explictly say "remove the photo" - what, are you suggesting that I didn't want you, personally, to use the photo but that didn't apply to others on the wiki commons? What do the following words mean: "don't post my photo as a much better studio shot of the four (which can be cropped for the individual hosts) will be forthcoming!" It means I had withdrawm permission and that I presumed you hadn't ignored my instructions and already uploaded the photo. When I was made aware the photos were still up, I immediately asked they be removed.
- Canada Jack (talk) 14:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
- If wikipedia wants to claim that there was no copyright on the photo when uploaded, then I invite you, Siqbal, to show me the e-mail where I informed you that the processed photo had been posted to Flickr and you could now upload it to wikipedia. Otherwise, you did not have my permission to upload the photo. Canada Jack (talk) 00:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
To re-iterate:
1) Siqbal misled me, not mentioning that copyright was irrevokable in his initial e-mail (as can be seen in his first post). I decided, based on that e-mail, to go the route whereby I'd change the licence on my flickr account. In the subsequent e-mail, he had drafted a note for me, which mentioned the non-revocable part, but since I was going via the flickr licence route, I didn't bother to read text which I'd not be signing.
If he had approached me in the up-front manner he implies he did, he would have right away informed me this was not revocable, a fundamental issue in terms of usage of my property. Instead, it was buried in the text of a subsequent e-mail, in verbiage I'd not necessarily read if I wasn't going to go that route.
2) Siqbal ignored my request to upload the processed version of the photo, and that I'd inform him when that was ready. As one can see in the second e-mail he posted, when I informed him that I taken the copyright off, I also told him because it was an out-of-camera jpeg (and hence of relatively poor quality), I'd inform him when I had replaced that image on Flickr with a photoshopped version of it, anticipated to be that same evening.
Instead, as I now realize upon looking at the time stamps, he ignored my request and immediately uploaded my photo, and ran a bot which confirmed the "no copyright" notice on the photos, which, several editors who responded to my complaints about this told me means it is irrevocable. I was absolutely stunned that he had done this. I was acting in good faith - he was not. By the text of the e-mail he himself posted, it should have been clear I never intended that version of the photo to be posted.
I made the good-faith presumption that he would not upload a photo which would have to be deleted within a few hours. It made no sense to me he'd upload it - what for? He'd have to replace all the files - the original photo and the individual shots of the 4 hosts in the photo. Further, my e-mail indicated that I obviously did not want that version of the photo to be uploaded as I'd be later revising it with a better, processed version. It's hard for me not to conclude he was acting in bad faith, instantly uploading the inferior image despite my stated instructions and running a bot so that the donation of the photo was irrevocable. Now, I have an inferior version of a photo presumably posted forever. This is completely unnacceptable.
3) Within the hour of me saying I'd later upload a processed version of the photo, I informed him that CBC had a better photo to use, and not to use my photo after all. Siqbal says that I never asked him to delete the photo. But why would I do that? I'd not informed him yet I had uploaded the version of the photo I'd allow him to use. Further, when I said not to use the photo, that means only one thing - the photo is no longer to be used in the commons, even if it was there and I was not aware of it. How do we ensure a photo isn't used? We delete the photo. Siqbal is being disingenous.
4) Later that day, I sent him another e-mail telling him I had returned the copyright to the image, given that CBC was going to supply a better image and did not want the one I had posted used. That should have underlined that this photo was no longer to be considered for the public domain. So, if he was going to upload the processed version, the copyright notice was now affixed. I never informed him I had changed the photo on Flickr - but that was a moot point since I had told him several times the photo was no longer to be used.
But since I had presumed in good faith that he would use, as I had instructed, the processed version of the image - he in fact said, yes he'd upload that when I told him - I didn't expect him to hold on to the inferior versions and keep them in the commons!
5) Despite these clear and specific instuctions, he again acted in bad faith by not subsequently deleting the photos he had uploaded. I was informed by another editor once I realized last week these photos had an irrevocable open source licence that as an uploader, Siqbal had a seven-day grace period to remove the photo(s). All the e-mails I described above were written on August 1st. He had more than six days to delete the photos. He did nothing. Again, it is hard for me not to conclude he was acting in bad faith.
Jeremy Gilbert Canada Jack (talk) 17:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: I find most of the claims by Canada Jack to be hogwsh. He claims to be a semi-professional photographer, so if he was not already familiar with CC licenses, he shold have read the license before he agreed to it. We rarely delete images due to donor's remorse as seen here, but given the level of angst shown and the fact that the image and its four crops are unused, I have deleted them. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Advertisment is not de minimis. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 23:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The sign is not de minimis. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 23:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The logo in the background is not de minimis. GiorgioGaleotti (talk) 23:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
possible copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 23:57, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - EXIF is from newspaper. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no freedom of panorama in italy 151.42.98.99 20:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 14:17, 21 Oktober 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Torre Allianz.jpg --Krdbot 18:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image. Likely copyvio -- subject claims "own work" and it does not appear to be a selfie, therefore the copyright belongs to the actual photographer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
No source given, no permission. {{PD-Egypt}} but not public domain in the US due to the URAA restoration. Guanaco (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Flennbelike (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-15f-APkbcU/maxresdefault.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
_Panda.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Panda.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
не фото автора (гуглится: https://www.google.ru/search?q=Geely+(LC)+Panda&newwindow=1&dcr=0&tbm=isch&source=iu&pf=m&ictx=1&fir=n9MmFZAO30n3gM%253A%252CeOYD5ugp5SJ3CM%252C_&usg=__-xccVoBM_QYTwiEX7Wp8WdYo1CM%3D&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiNtKO0_e3WAhVoJ5oKHWRNDy0Q9QEILjAD#imgdii=lJxpsH-PK6aoBM:&imgrc=n9MmFZAO30n3gM:) Barbarian (talk) 16:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
_Panda.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
_Panda.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope Iojhug (talk) 20:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Iojhug (talk) 20:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
if it is in PD sor a specific reason, then the relevant PD tag shoud be added Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Clearly dated 1955, no PD rationale that I can find. --Guanaco (talk) 13:04, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
derivative work from a 3d photo, the photo is unlikely own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:52, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't see any reason to doubt the uploader's claim that it's from a photo of his boat. However, this logo is recent enough to almost certainly qualify for copyright. Taken by itself, we can't apply a de minimis exception for the use of the logo. --Guanaco (talk) 13:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Imagen duplicada, existe otra versión de mayor tamaño Alonso de Mendoza (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; File:La_Garrovilla_2.svg is better for all uses I can imagine. --Guanaco (talk) 13:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Existe otra versión idéntica pero de mayor tamaño Alonso de Mendoza (talk) 14:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; superseded by File:La Garrovilla1.png and possibly other files. --Guanaco (talk) 13:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
La déclaration de consentement devrait vous parvenir dans un ou deux jours par Xavier Caupenne l'auteur de la photo.
Kept: OTRS permission. --Guanaco (talk) 13:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 13:09, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
imagens do acervo do museu 179.232.142.162 17:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: apparent copyvio: https://www.flickr.com/photos/artexplorer/3071125237/in/album-72157610520400614/. --Guanaco (talk) 13:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
very small : unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 13:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission. Verification via OTRS needed. Jcb (talk) 21:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per Jcb, we need permission from Javier Perez. — Jeff G. ツ 18:21, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission not received. --Guanaco (talk) 12:57, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Basil is needed. Taivo (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 12:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Bogus {{PD-textlogo}} claim (and not exactly the uploader's first). 3D effects and shading obviously exceeding the threshold of originality. en:File:Volkswagen logo.png is clearly marked as non-free. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Also: File:Volkswagen Commercial Vehicles.png. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Please note that the threshold of originality is high in Germany. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't know about Germany, but in the US these appear to qualify for copyright. We have to take the worst of both countries. --Guanaco (talk) 13:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Bogus {{PD-textlogo}} claim (and not exactly the uploader's first). 3D effects and shading obviously exceeding the threshold of originality. en:File:MAN logo.svg (which is simpler than this) is clearly marked as non-free. —LX (talk, contribs) 21:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Please note that the threshold of originality is high in Germany. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently above TOO in the US. We have to consider both US and German law. --Guanaco (talk) 13:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission. Inappropriate usage of PD-textlogo, not below TOO. Jcb (talk) 23:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- let me check back with the radio station. will take a day or two. Maximilian (talk) 18:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Please note that the threshold of originality is high in Germany. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently above TOO in the US. We have to consider both US and German law. --Guanaco (talk) 13:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Nelumbo does not have infructescences but capsules (fruits). This category makes no sense. --Pharaoh han (talk) 17:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 13:13, 25 October 2017 (UTC)