Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14579470670).jpg){kind=link}
_(14765851282).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
this picture seems a unauthorized copy from http://www.ultrahdfreewallpapers.com/flower-hd-picture-0126/ Txolo (talk) 02:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – copyright violation. --jdx Re: 07:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
This image seems an unauthorized copy from https://wallpapersontheweb.net/16478-animal-seal/ Txolo (talk) 02:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – copyright violation. --jdx Re: 07:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from http://kochane-konie-999.blog.onet.pl/2010/06/16/rysunki/ Txolo (talk) 02:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – copyright violation. --jdx Re: 07:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PTGOxqKyE4M/maxresdefault.jpg Txolo (talk) 02:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – copyright violation. --jdx Re: 07:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
this image seems an unauthorized copy from https://i.pinimg.com/originals/86/05/73/8605736bfdf8b5968ae9e30ffadd6299.jpg Txolo (talk) 02:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – copyright violation. --jdx Re: 07:26, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
This file shows a flag of the ethnic group, which lives in different countries of the same region. But it hasn't any references. So I think it's original work and must be deleted. Wertuose (talk) 09:24, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept, file is in use and thus within project scope. Kameraad Pjotr 20:16, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
This is not flag of the Lezgian people. Sharval (talk) 00:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Keep Commons does not editorialize on files that are in use in Wikipedias.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)- Keep I agree with the previous party. Хаджимурад (talk) 06:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep The flag is in use by other Wikimedia projects (several Wikipedia articles) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this flag should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any flag at all. After stop being in use, you can request again deletion from commons.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: This file is in use therefore is project scope. You can still consider using the template {{Factual accuracy}} but only after discussion in the file talk page. -- Geagea (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
This is not Lezgi people flag. This is flag of organization "SADVAL" in 1990-1995 years. ALDKL (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Because:
- The flag is in use by other Wikimedia projects (several Wikipedia articles) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this flag should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any flag at all. After stop being in use, you can request again deletion from commons.
- If name or description are wrong, this is not a reason to delete. It is just a reason to gather consensus to fix them.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:52, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: This file is in use therefore is project scope. You can still consider using the template {{Factual accuracy}} but only after discussion in the file talk page. -- Geagea (talk) 20:53, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Have better version File:Lezgin flag.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 22:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
@A09090091, it is only used in File:Lezgin flag.png, which is the exactly the same of this file. If it use not useless, then we can upload lots of duplicates and just use them in one version of it. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This file has been here since 2006. The so-called "better version" (which I can't see any difference in) has only been here since 2012, so the comparison is irrelevant. It shouldn't be deleted so that older versions of pages that used it will still be legible.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:09, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Dr.Wiki54: Prosfilaes was faster than me. I don't see a difference; older files should be kept and their newer duplicates deleted. A09090091 (talk) 11:59, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091@Prosfilaes ok, i am not against the version which was written by @A09090091. But in that case one should move all pages into oldest one. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- No, history merge IMHO is not needed. Their difference is 1 px on y axis and that is too small of a difference for human eye. The best thing would be a SVG version of flag, not another small resolution JPG file. A09090091 (talk) 14:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091 ok, i asked for a help to move all of them. Now all of File:Lezgin flag.png have been moved into File:Flag of the Lezgi people.svg. I think there is no need for "png" versions. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 18:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- No, history merge IMHO is not needed. Their difference is 1 px on y axis and that is too small of a difference for human eye. The best thing would be a SVG version of flag, not another small resolution JPG file. A09090091 (talk) 14:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091@Prosfilaes ok, i am not against the version which was written by @A09090091. But in that case one should move all pages into oldest one. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: kept the older flag, deleted the newer file:Lezgin flag.png per COM:REDUNDANT and made redirect to avoid red links on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 22:47, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_Lezgi_people.png Sharval (talk) 01:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep As per that link.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Didym (talk) 02:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
This is not Lezgi people flag. This is flag of organization "SADVAL" in 1990-1995 years. ALDKL (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Go do something productive, instead of reopening the DRs on things that disagree with your political agenda. We've had recent DRs on this and the other versions of this recently that have been closed with keeps.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:22, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Kept: -- Geagea (talk) 09:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
I agree with Pere prlpz 18:52, 29 June 2015 (UTC): If name or description are wrong, this is not a reason to delete. It is just a reason to gather consensus to fix them.
What about renaming the file "Flag of SADVAL.svg"? Hosmich (talk) 10:26, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
This is not flag of Lezgi people. ALDKL (talk) 15:31, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Third DR with no new reasoning provided. More likely vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2015 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
This is not Lezgin flag! Vendettaaa (talk) 03:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- I will rename the file to "Flag of SADVAL.svg".
- Hosmich (talk) 09:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Renamed image Kept; redirect from old name deleted. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
She is not Lezgian 37.190.59.98 06:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Keep: Maybe she’s not, maybe you can even prove it. It would be a reason to rename the file, and to stop using it to illustrate Lezgians in other projects. Either way, this deletion request is useless. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 05:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Kept: In use Basvb (talk) 12:44, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Shen is not Lezgian. 109.252.73.48 08:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy keep, per above discussion. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 08:55, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. -- Geagea (talk) 12:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free movie poster DanielPenfield (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Rudolphous at 08:18, 7 Oktober 2017 UTC: ' --Krdbot 12:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
copyvio, see (c) in the watermark on the right Pippobuono (talk) 08:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Rudolphous at 08:36, 7 Oktober 2017 UTC: ' --Krdbot 12:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free post-1989 advertisement in US--see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Advertisements DanielPenfield (talk) 08:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Rudolphous at 08:22, 7 Oktober 2017 UTC: ' --Krdbot 12:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free post-1989 advertisement in US--see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Advertisements DanielPenfield (talk) 08:22, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Rudolphous at 08:22, 7 Oktober 2017 UTC: ' --Krdbot 12:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free post-1989 advertisement in US--see Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Advertisements DanielPenfield (talk) 08:22, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Rudolphous at 08:23, 7 Oktober 2017 UTC: ' --Krdbot 12:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
PicsArt 08-18-07.41.09 ng Amanbisauri (talk) 08:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Invalid reason & COM:INUSE. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:18, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Refers to File:PicsArt 08-18-07.41.09 ng.jpg. --Achim (talk) 12:55, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Pretty clear copyright violation of the text and likely the image. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Agreed! Thanks! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 13:18, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader agreed with deletion request. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
You can't see anything useful in this image - out of scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:02, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Agree! Not sure why this was included with my bath upload! Thank! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 13:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader agreed with deletion request. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:46, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
É temporario, voltarei! Hugoness (talk) 18:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, almost empty anyway. Taivo (talk) 18:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this is fake download by web 2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Keep The original file is on Commons with proper metadata and uploaded by a trusted user. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 06:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - a correct license is provided. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
No evidence of release under a Creative Commons license. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:31, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - en:File:Seal of MORC Myanmar.jpg - non free. --Ronhjones (Talk) 21:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Caliifornia Constitution (1849) signature page.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Loma Fire 201609026-0333PM.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:USDA Drone poster.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rashi Khanna.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mahesh Babu in Spyder.jpg
_signature_page.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
this not take by this user download by web 2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - a correct license is provided. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
this is fake download by web 2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:04, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - a correct license is provided. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:J. Jayalalithaa.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ranvir Shorey press meet Blue Mountains (cropped).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parineeti Chopra,Arjun Kapoor From The Cast of 'Ishaqzaade' visit Planet M, Jaipur (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Bollywood Hungama does not own the rights to the poster next to Alia. This image cannot be hosted here unless the copyright parts are removed. FredWalsh (talk) 14:01, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Keep now as I've cropped the image to remove the excess non-free component. The closing admin can just delete the older version from the history. —SpacemanSpiff 15:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: done Basvb (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
File is not (or no longer) present at the source. Fanofbollywood (talk) 08:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Delete For the above reason. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 06:39, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Keep I don't see why that matters. If it was at the source, it was released with a CC license. - Themightyquill (talk) 12:38, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Kept: File was reviewed by a trusted user, it is free. PierreSelim (talk) 10:00, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banyan Tree (6708442469).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Armenian Church, Chennai (6708453705).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Theosophical Society (6708435263).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
this is fake download by web 2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - a correct license is provided. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lighthouse, Marina Beach after Cyclone Nilam (8141155728).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bus stop, Chennai (6111511340).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Udhagamandalam (5712229637).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:San Thome Basilica, Chennai, India (14203442597).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arijit Singh Photo.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
same picture existing as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Isaiah_Thomas_(34300573362).jpg El Funcionario (talk) 15:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Billinghurst at 00:37, 8 Oktober 2017 UTC: content was: "#REDIRECT File:Isaiah Thomas (34300573362).jpg", and the only contributor was "Billinghurst" (talk) --Krdbot 03:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
To my mind this is a copyright violation of the text. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by MichaelMaggs at 03:35, 8 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: speedy deleted as obvious copyright infringement --Krdbot 06:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of the posters. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
_05.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by MichaelMaggs at 03:36, 8 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: speedy deleted as obvious copyright infringement --Krdbot 06:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
_05.jpg){kind=link}
Redundant to File:Publisher2013.png Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Internet image with a watermark, non free Timmyshin (talk) 17:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 21:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Internet image with a watermark, non free Timmyshin (talk) 17:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 21:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Internet image with a watermark, non free Timmyshin (talk) 17:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 21:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Like the other 3 pictures uploaded by this user, found on the Internet Timmyshin (talk) 17:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 21:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Christopher DOMBRES (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. User needs to prove it is own work. Please correct me if I am wrong.
- File:MICHÈLE MERCIER.jpg
- File:UNA VITA VIOLENTA.jpg
- File:PIER PAOLO PASOLINI.jpg
- File:The Bible (illustration).jpg
- File:PATRIARCHAL EDUCATION.jpg
- File:RESTORE HOPE.jpg
- File:CREDIT RATING AGENCY.jpg
- File:Original is dead.jpg
- File:WOMEN AND RELIGION.jpg
- File:Vladimir Putin (illustration).jpg
- File:CLIMATE CHANGE.jpg
- File:LIBERTE D'EXPRESSION.jpg
- File:THE NEXT WAR.jpg
- File:EXCEPTION CULTURELLE.jpg
- File:MAGICAL THINKING.jpg
- File:ISABELLE ADJANI.jpg
- File:PAUL VALERY.jpg
- File:LA Ve REPUBLIQUE.jpg
- File:HSBC (illustration).jpg
- File:Heritage of Hate.jpg
- File:CORRUPTION CULTURE.jpg
- File:Zouzou (illustration).jpg
- File:ELLIOTT GOULD.jpg
- File:FACING CHANGE.jpg
- File:Das Problem.jpg
- File:Liu Yang Chinese astronaut.jpg
- File:Global warming illustration.jpg
- File:OVERCONSUMPTION.jpg
- File:Miss World.jpg
- File:LEGION D'HONNEUR.jpg
- File:Art Monopoly.jpg
- File:Marie-Antoinette.jpg
- File:ALICE IN WONDERLAND.jpg
- File:TRUST.jpg
- File:YOUR GOD.jpg
- File:LA COMEDIE HUMAINE.jpg
- File:TRUMPOCRACY.jpg
- File:Self Fulfilling Prophecy.jpg
- File:The Toaster Incident.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
It's Kong of Lazers 你好 16:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep in general. Christopher Dombres has a Flickr account which appears to be 100% legit. The files there are CC0, public domain. However, some may be derivative works, and they should be individually reviewed. Guanaco (talk) 02:07, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
- ticket:2017090310025536 is in reference to this issue, but it shouldn't be needed. Guanaco (talk) 01:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete in general out of scope hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 10:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. --Vera (talk) 08:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Per Guanaco. And it IS in scope. Some files are actually in use. It's sometimes the only file we have to illustrate some topics. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Christopher DOMBRES (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. Some may be Commons:Derivative works.
- File:T-shirt prints.jpg
- File:Sin Free.jpg
- File:Consumption (sign).jpg
- File:Body Count (band).jpg
- File:Mass media.jpg
- File:PAPARAZZI VICTIMS.jpg
- File:Western Culture.jpg
- File:Irony (art).jpg
- File:Shopper.jpg
- File:Serge Gainsbourg (illustration).jpg
- File:News Networks.jpg
- File:Living Under Copyright.jpg
- File:Transgender Venus.jpg
- File:Brian Wilson (art).jpg
- File:Allen Ginsberg (art).jpg
- File:Noam Chomsky (art).jpg
- File:Burnout (art).jpg
- File:Dubito.jpg
- File:Enemy of the State.jpg
- File:Man Made.jpg
- File:Cashier (art).jpg
- File:Musée de la Contrefaçon.jpg
- File:Copyright Free Face.jpg
- File:Karl Marx (art).jpg
- File:Toy Industry.jpg
- File:Ian MacKaye.jpg
- File:MANGER PLUS.jpg
- File:William Burroughs (art).jpg
- File:Geek Chic.jpg
- File:CRASH.jpg
- File:Eat What You Kill.jpg
- File:Enduring Freedom.jpg
- File:HOME HEALTH AID.jpg
- File:Mocking Skills.jpg
- File:Uncanny Valley.jpg
- File:British Petroleum.jpg
- File:Corruption (art).jpg
- File:Les Soldes!.jpg
- File:ITALIAN AMERICAN.jpg
- File:Faux News.jpg
- File:Trust youth !.jpg
- File:Battle of Copyright.jpg
- File:Battle of Copyright symbol.jpg
- File:THE BATTLE OF COPYRIGHT (orange).jpg
- File:Weed Venus.jpg
- File:CONSPIRACY THEORIES.jpg
- File:The Wild Wild West.jpg
- File:Deliverance (1972).jpg
- File:The Holy Mountain.jpg
- File:El Topo.jpg
- File:Santa Sangre.jpg
- File:Teen Spirit.jpg
- File:Charles Darwin (art).jpg
- File:LA RÉPUBLIQUE IRRÉPROCHABLE.jpg
- File:Blanche Neige.jpg
- File:Simone de Beauvoir (illustration).jpg
- File:Virgin Mary (art).jpg
- File:Police brutality.jpg
- File:Corporate greed.jpg
- File:CINDERELLA (restaurant hostess).jpg
- File:Le rire.jpg
- File:La fureur de vivre.jpg
- File:Monopoly (big).jpg
- File:SOPA.jpg
- File:When we were apes.jpg
- File:Le Voyou.jpg
- File:Soleil Vert.jpg
- File:Competition.jpg
- File:Public Domain (art).jpg
- File:Waste Industry.jpg
- File:Ronald McDonald (art).jpg
- File:Evolution (art).jpg
- File:Kenneth Anger.jpg
- File:Mai 1968.jpg
- File:Anonymous (art).jpg
- File:Claude Jade (fan club).jpg
- File:JEAN-CHRISTOPHE AVERTY.jpg
- File:Copies (LET THERE BE COPIES).jpg
- File:Gun Culture.jpg
- File:Michel Foucault (portrait).jpg
- File:1984 (art).jpg
- File:On the road (art).jpg
- File:Luxury industry.jpg
- File:The Duchamp Paradox.jpg
- File:The Oracle (art).jpg
- File:HENRY FORD.jpg
- File:HACKERS SYMBOL.jpg
- File:Lady Gaga (illustration).jpg
- File:THE RULING CLASS.jpg
- File:Conrad Veidt.jpg
- File:Planet of the Apes.jpg
- File:La droite et la gauche.jpg
- File:XENOPHOBIA.jpg
- File:ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH.jpg
- File:BLOOD SCIENCE.jpg
- File:Le génie.jpg
- File:Zeitgeist.jpg
- File:Amazons.jpg
- File:King Kong (illustration).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Guanaco. — Jeff G. ツ 15:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep See above in the first part of the DR. If some may be considered as derivative works, launch separate DR. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 05:48, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:18, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
private pic George3331 (talk) 20:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Vandalism. Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 23:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 13:55, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE -> Too small and too blurry to be useful in a project. Takeaway (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Taivo: :This user is continuously removing tags from his nominated images, and he is blanking his talkpage! BukhariSaeed (talk) 15:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:35, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE -> too small and too blurry to be useful in a project Takeaway (talk) 17:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:36, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
promotional -- no educational purpose George3331 (talk) 02:55, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 02:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Unambiguous advertising or promotion in en wiki. O1lI0 (talk) 02:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 03:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BENED MIGHTY (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:BALANCE UP.jpg
- File:POSITION.jpg
- File:FOOT BALL.jpg
- File:Mighty the senator.jpg
- File:Bela m.jpg
- File:Bela bela.jpg
- File:Mighty b.jpg
George3331 (talk) 03:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:46, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:52, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 03:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:04, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eounus Ali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 04:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:48, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:18, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING George3331 (talk) 04:48, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:21, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional images
- File:Juicecafelogopage.jpg
- File:Jawed qadir.jpg
- File:Customers delivery base.jpg
- File:Customers base.jpg
- File:Banner final ver 2.jpg
- File:Logo ver 2.jpg
- File:Logo ver 4.jpg
George3331 (talk) 04:52, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:21, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 04:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:21, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 05:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 05:02, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 05:04, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 05:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:22, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VivaElAnonimato (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:34, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VivaElAnonimato (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 05:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:23, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
per COM:PACKAGING George3331 (talk) 05:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, depiction of copyrighted design without permission, no way to crop out or obscure the design without rendering the image unusable. seb26 (talk) 14:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 05:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 05:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 05:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 05:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 05:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 05:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 06:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hasib Sarker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal promotional photos with various architectural sites from Bangladesh. Out of project scope?
- File:Bangladesh National Museum.jpg
- File:46424382149804 608x1080-ARGB 88881026975373.jpg
- File:National Museum, Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Curzon Hall, University of Dhaka.jpg
- File:Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman NovoTheatre.jpg
- File:Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Novo Theatre.jpg
- File:Bangabandhu NovoTheatre.jpg
- File:Lalbagh Fort (Dhaka).jpg
- File:Barendra Research Museum.jpg
- File:Varendra Research Museum, Rajshahi.jpg
- File:Varendra Museum.jpg
- File:Varendra Museum, Rajshahi.jpg
- File:Tomb near Chota Sona Mosque.jpg
- File:Choto Sona Mosque, Chapai Nawabganj, Rajshahi (5).jpg
- File:Choto Sona Mosque, Chapai Nawabganj, Rajshahi (4).jpg
- File:Choto Sona Mosque, Chapai Nawabganj, Rajshahi (2).jpg
- File:Choto Sona Mosque, Chapai Nawabganj, Rajshahi (3).jpg
- File:Natore Rani Vabani Rajbari (15).jpg
- File:Natore Rani Vabani Rajbari (11).jpg
- File:Natore Rani Vabani Rajbari (12).jpg
- File:Natore Rani Vabani Rajbari (10).jpg
- File:Natore Rani Vabani Rajbari (9).jpg
- File:Natore Rani Vabani Rajbari (7).jpg
- File:Natore Rani Vabani Rajbari (5).jpg
- File:Natore Rani Vabani Rajbari (1).jpg
- File:Natore Rani Vabani Rajbari (2).jpg
- File:Natore Rani Vabani Rajbari (3).jpg
- File:Natore Dighapatia Rajbari (Uttra Ganababhon)22.jpg
- File:Natore Dighapatia Rajbari (Uttra Ganababhon)20.jpg
- File:Natore Dighapatia Rajbari (Uttra Ganababhon)19.jpg
- File:Natore Dighapatia Rajbari (Uttra Ganababhon)15.jpg
- File:Natore Dighapatia Rajbari (Uttra Ganababhon)9.jpg
- File:Natore Dighapatia Rajbari (Uttra Ganababhon)7.jpg
- File:Natore Dighapatia Rajbari (Uttra Ganababhon)6.jpg
- File:Natore Dighapatia Rajbari (Uttra Ganababhon)5.jpg
- File:Kushumba Mosque, Naogaon, Rajshahi 7.jpg
- File:Kushumba Mosque, Naogaon, Rajshahi 6.jpg
- File:Kushumba Mosque, Naogaon, Rajshahi 5.jpg
- File:Kushumba Mosque, Naogaon, Rajshahi 1.jpg
- File:Mujibnagar Muktijuddho Smriti Complex (Mujibnagar Memorial)13.jpg
- File:Mujibnagar Muktijuddho Smriti Complex (Mujibnagar Memorial)12.jpg
- File:Mujibnagar Muktijuddho Smriti Complex (Mujibnagar Memorial)11.jpg
- File:Lalon Akhra.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
22.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
20.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
19.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
15.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
7.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
11.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~Moheen (keep talking) 06:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hasib Sarker (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Natore Rani Vabani Rajbari (13).jpg
- File:Natore Dighapatia Rajbari (Uttra Ganababhon)13.jpg
- File:Natore Dighapatia Rajbari (Uttra Ganababhon)1.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~ Nahid Talk 03:53, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 05:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
superseded by File:Microsoft Word 2013 logo with background.png Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor copy. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
superseded by File:Internet explorer.svg Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:52, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Unused and low-quality. —Codename Lisa (talk) 05:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused poor copy. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Imim gojali (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused COM:SELFIEs.
HyperGaruda (talk) 10:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution phtograph of mallard (for which we already have countless pictures...) Totodu74 (talk) 12:04, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, useless. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused and non-notable subject, article deleted from Bangla Wikipedia. ~ Nahid Talk 12:52, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wilson Rodriguez Martinez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files, out of scope with no coverage of the person or their organisation on projects anywhere
- File:COLOMBIANOS EN EL EXTERIOR -ACOLVAL VALENCIA.jpg
- File:Wilson Rodriguez Martínez.JPG
- File:Wilson Rodriguez en Conferencia.JPG
seb26 (talk) 13:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:35, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
(1) Unused personal image/selfie (2) No likely other educational use due to poor image quality and subject not clearly demonstrated seb26 (talk) 13:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Blurry and out of scope image. Wikicology (talk) 13:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use.
- File:A women shopping at evening.jpg
- File:Une femme travaille dans un bureau.jpg
- File:Madagascar at Night.jpg
- File:Some Friends take a pictures.jpg
- File:Friends Playing the basket ball.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 13:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. -- Geagea (talk) 13:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file/selfie seb26 (talk) 13:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. COM:ADVERT also applies (Advertising my mother's shop). Wikicology (talk) 13:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
(1) Unused personal image/selfie (2) Low quality and unclear depiction of subject makes educational reuse difficult seb26 (talk) 13:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Due to small image dimensions and lack of description about its purpose or date made, places or people depicted, the educational reuse potential of this file is very limited and it is not worth keeping seb26 (talk) 13:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:43, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 15:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 15:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 15:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
no education purpose -- unused George3331 (talk) 15:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amit Cheema (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:SHOOT PIC.jpg
- File:SHOOTING SHOT.jpg
- File:SHOOTING TIME.jpg
- File:SINGERS.jpg
- File:FREE WORK.jpg
- File:Wakhra Swag.jpg
- File:Amit Cheema.jpg
- File:BEACH PIC.jpg
George3331 (talk) 15:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 15:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of India.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jotin Khanganba Konjengbam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:BeautyPlus 20150520151532 fast - Copy.jpg
- File:JOTIN.JPG
- File:JOTIN.png
- File:BeautyPlus 20150525071712 fast - Copy.jpg
George3331 (talk) 16:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hiri-Bedja.show (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 16:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:26, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 16:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 16:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seyyedhassenmohitzade (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
- File:Mohit zade hassan director.jpg
- File:Hassan mohit.jpg
- File:Hassan mohit zade.jpg
- File:Mohit zade .jpg
- File:Seyyed hassan mohit zade 1732 .jpg
- File:Seyyed hassan mohit zade.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
exidental upload of museum plaque. No encyclopadic value Wuselig (talk) 17:04, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Self-promotion. Other global edits: Creating his own CV on en.wikipedia. Zaccarias (talk) 17:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Advertisment. Out of Commons:Project scope. Also the company is one out of thousands of such firms, see: http://www.brillmindz.com/about-us/ Zaccarias (talk) 17:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : single-file-upload on 29 November 2015, not in use at Wikimedia Commons projects, potentially copyright issues or out of scope ? Roland zh (talk) 18:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 19:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seventhleveldev (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 19:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Berna Lencinas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 19:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
very tiny 2kb blurry unused profile pic George3331 (talk) 19:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 19:55, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nutnicha W. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 19:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT George3331 (talk) 19:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT George3331 (talk) 20:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 20:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 20:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 20:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 20:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 20:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bhuvneshiftm (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
George3331 (talk) 20:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 20:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional images
George3331 (talk) 20:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
no educational use, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 20:48, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image George3331 (talk) 20:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
LosJPC Losjpc (talk) 13:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism deletion request Cambalachero (talk) 18:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
0997856871 fui bautiza do aqui nevesito un certificado... ayudenme por fabor..... 186.47.214.186 23:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: : Nonsense req by IP. --Achim (talk) 16:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
RENE VISCARRA UNA SOLA VOZ (talk) 21:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Keep Nonsense req. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 07:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Wikimedia Commons is not personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
personal image, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Majidirfanbaba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope of Commons: The files are not educationally useful as they are private images of the uploader, who is non-notable.
- File:MAJID IRFAN BABA 8.jpg
- File:MAJID IRFAN BABA 5.jpg
- File:MAJID IRFAN BABA 7.jpg
- File:MAJID IRFAN BABA 6.jpg
- File:MAJID IRFAN BABA 3.jpg
- File:MAJID IRFAN BABA 4.jpg
- File:MAJID IRFAN BABA 1.jpg
- File:MAJID IRFAN BABA.jpg
- File:MAJID IRFAN BABA 2.jpg
Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 23:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:10, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Obvious self-promotion of a non-notable Youtube personality that first began uploading in 2017. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 23:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
subpage it is 최광모 (talk) 08:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Speedy delete CSD U1: User requested deletion in own user space. --bjh21 (talk) 14:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jennyepezsanchez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photographs of works by Edwin Jimeno (1974–) [1], a Colombian artist. They lack (1) attribution of the photographer, (2) permission from the artist to depict the works.
- File:Cuandohayascortado.jpg
- File:Pasiondolorosa.jpg
- File:Sensacion1.jpg
- File:Tragodelaamargura.jpg
- File:Nacimiento2.jpg
- File:Edwininfante.jpg
- File:Edwinpremio.jpg
- File:Edwinperformance.jpg
- File:Edwin.jpg
- File:Edwinjimeno.jpg
- File:Sensacion.jpg
seb26 (talk) 13:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Small photos with no EXIF Metadata, possible copyvios.
- File:African work 44.jpg
- File:African work (39).jpg
- File:African work s (37).jpg
- File:African work 35.jpg
- File:African work 32.jpg
- File:African work 30.jpg
- File:African work 26.jpg
- File:African work 25.jpg
- File:African work 22.jpg
- File:African work 19.jpg
- File:African work 16.jpg
- File:African work 13.jpg
- File:African work 10.jpg
- File:African work 7.jpg
- File:African work 6.jpg
- File:African work 3.jpg
- File:Africans farming working.jpg
- File:African work 1.jpg
- File:Jobs-in-africa-pic.jpg
- File:Burundi-Africa.jpg
- File:Africans coastal working.jpg
- File:Africans modern working.jpg
- File:Guiardo.jpg
- File:Africa with love.jpg
- File:Africans working.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Wikicology (talk) 13:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:São Paulo
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Brazil not permanently located in public places. Temporary exhibitions.
- File:350 Razões para acreditar no futuro - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:350 Razões para acreditar no futuro - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:350 Razões para acreditar no futuro - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright holder is "Daniel Msirikale". Evidence of permission is required. Wikicology (talk) 13:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elishaamry (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright holder is "Jeremiah Mchechu". Evidence of permission is required.
Wikicology (talk) 13:37, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright doubt: Unlikely to be own work given small thumbnail size, otherwise lacking source or authorship information to evaluate copyright status seb26 (talk) 13:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pastor Ndyahabwe Bruno (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio. BTW...COM:ADVERT also applies. We do not offer or help people to get job here.
Wikicology (talk) 13:48, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This one is not the picture I wanted to upload, sorry GuillemMedina (talk) 13:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small photo with no EXIF metadata. Possible copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 13:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Small photo with no EXIF metadata. Possible copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 13:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete speedily, found at this blog dated in August two months prior to upload here. Blog author is the photographer. seb26 (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
it uploaded two times Amanbisauri (talk) 08:52, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Private image, out of scope. --Achim (talk) 12:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete CSD G7: Author or uploader request deletion. --bjh21 (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
If the place is unknown, then the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Images with no EXIF metadata. All the images are online. See here for example.
- File:Bukavu centre ville.png
- File:Kadutu quartier populaire de la ville de bukavu.png
- File:Unc de vital kamerhe rdc.png
- File:La cite de panzi bukavu rdc.png
- File:NOYADE SUR LE LAC KIVU.png
- File:La ville de bukavu 2017.png
- File:HOPITAL St vincent à kadutu quartier poppulaire de bukavu.jpg
- File:MOSOLE DES EVEQUES A BUKAVU.png
- File:College alfajiri de bukavu.png
- File:Universite evangelique en afrique UEA faculte d'agronomie.png
- File:Kadutu buholo 4.png
- File:Paroisse St PIERRE CLAVER NGUBA.png
- File:Bukavu.png
- File:Lac kivu.png
- File:BUKAVU POPULAIRE.jpg
- File:Vk01-fcb.jpg
- File:VILLE DE BUKAVU.jpg
- File:BUKAVU.jpg
Wikicology (talk) 13:55, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Incorrect deletion request: None of the images listed here above can be found on the website provided as evidence by the nominator. The uploaded images were all made in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, whereas the link provided by the nominator show photos of Tbilisi and Mtskheta in the state of Georgia, Europe. - Takeaway (talk) 10:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no exif, some have watermarks, seem to come from different online sources. I found e.g. this one, via this page. --Jcb (talk) 15:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 14:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The uploader made a photo of a "car guard" in South Africa. It does not seem to be a "personal" image but an illustration of the occurrence of car guards in South Africa. It is also a fairly good photo. - Takeaway (talk) 11:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Takeaway. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:14, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rondo12369 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files using copyrighted material/characters.
GeorgHH • talk 14:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 14:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Again I do not agree with you. This is the typical picture we need to illustrate articles on women doing unusual jobs, women's rights, etc. It's not a mere portrait, the helicopter in the background is fine for use in such articles. Ji-Elle (talk) 09:27, 10 October 2017 (UTC) .
Kept: per Ji-Elle. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BarraBahia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Missing Exif, some found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work.
- File:Clinicasantarita.jpg
- File:Saojoao.jpg
- File:Hospital São Rafael.jpg
- File:Estadiodebarra.jpg
- File:Faroldabarra.jpg
- File:Prefeituravelhadebarra.jpg
- File:Centrocultualdebarra.jpg
- File:Prefeituradebarra.jpg
- File:Vista de Barra.jpg
- File:UFOB.jpg
- File:BarraUFOB.jpg
- File:Escola Sylvia Araújo.jpg
- File:Colégiosantaeufrasia.jpg
- File:Topo do mercado.jpg
- File:Palacioepiscopal.jpg
- File:Catedral de Barra Bahia.jpg
- File:Catedral de Barra.jpg
Hystrix (talk) 14:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:21, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
I have concerns regarding personality right here. Furthermore I think such an image is outside of Commons project scope D-Kuru (talk) 21:56, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
I really doubt tht this is an "own work" image: pixeled; no image meta data information; too small, etc. 83.236.129.194 00:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
写真の質が悪いため。 TekuraDF (talk) 00:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I disagree that the quality is bad, but since the uploader requests it and a similar image (which is sharper and displays the wings better) of the same species & gender at File:Lestes sponsa(Male,Japan,2017.09.12).jpg is available, then I think this can be deleted. seb26 (talk) 14:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Requested by uploader Bodhisattwa (talk) 01:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
because of copyright violation. See Makita official homepage. Lombroso (talk) 01:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:36, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
is not a monument Txolo (talk) 01:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
See this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY087Tb7bIU It is a monument in Plaza Mayor de San Jerónimo, in Andahuaylas, Peru. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santiagostucchi (talk • contribs) 02:12 7 oct 2017 (UTC)
- I think it was a mistake, should keep the image.--Ovruni (talk) 17:22, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Its not a monument Txolo (talk) 02:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- I think it was a mistake, should keep the image. --Ovruni (talk) 17:26, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ovruni Yes, was a mistake. But I think the categories about monumental features moust be removed.--Txolo (talk) 03:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no cats, no description = useless. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
its not a monument Txolo (talk) 02:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- I think it was a mistake, should keep the image. --Ovruni (talk) 17:26, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ovruni Yes, was a mistake. But I think the categories about monumental features moust be removed. --Txolo (talk) 03:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no cats, no description = useless. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Its not a monument Txolo (talk) 02:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
This is a monument to dogs. See this: http://www.dogster.com/lifestyle/dog-statues-dog-art — Preceding unsigned comment added by Santiagostucchi (talk • contribs) 03:47 7 oct 2017 (UTC)
- Txolo, can you please explain more clearly why this image should be deleted, according to Commons:Deletion policy? I don't initially understand what you mean when you wrote "its not a monument". seb26 (talk) 14:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Txolo, I think it was only necessary to remove the monument categories for the revision of the Wiki Loves Monuments, but not delete the image.--Ovruni (talk) 17:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Santiagostucchi First of all, thank you for participate in wlm 2017, I'm likes this sculpture in Campo de Marte's park, and the dogs too :) . About this image, yes, this is an sculpture to the people that loves dogs, but sadly doesn't be a monument in Perú. Even so, if you think this is a monument image, we can keep it in wlm 2107. Seb26 In a first moment I thinked this image was part from a personal collection (by the pet) without monumental feature (sculpture is not in prime plane and is cropped), but seems I wrong and this image have a monumental relevance. Ovruni Yes, I agree with you, is not necessary delete this image, and, about the categories, I don't be sure right now.--Txolo (talk) 03:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Not "own work" by the uploader; the logo was designed by the ASHA Studio - see source 1 and 2) for a British organisation, "League Against Cruel Sports".
Furthermore, the threshold of originality is very low in the UK so this image is copyrighted. - Fma12 (talk) 02:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete considering UK threshold of originality and the design's original shape & elements. seb26 (talk) 14:26, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
False statements about authorship, about copyright ownership and about licensing. Copyright violation. This is a House of Commons official photograph. The House of Commons does not offer its photographs under free license. -- Asclepias (talk) 04:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Initially, I can't see any free arrangement for House of Commons material. The photo page for this politician says "(c) House of Commons" and the important notices page suggests permission needs to be sought for reuse. seb26 (talk) 14:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lRzGIlD2Wks/Um-FnB173UI/AAAAAAAAG9A/xoJeyouCj7Q/s1600/machu-picchu-130.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to http://i25.tinypic.com/90sz6q.jpg Ovruni (talk) 05:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete, earliest appearance online is this forum post in 2008 from a tourist who published a set of similar photos. seb26 (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Images are stated to be the uploader's father, taken on movie sets. All are sourced to "my computer". While the uploader states they are the author (author listed as variants on the username), it seems more likely to me that they are just photos of the author's father which were taken by others. I raise this request so that we can get the uploader's take on matters in a formal setting. Edit: uploader has now edited the images, listing various people as the authors. On the grounds that the uploader is not the author, to me this is now a copyright violation as we have no evidence that the author agreed to release the images under a free licence.
- File:HadjSmainHassanElHassani1.jpg
- File:HadjSmainePortrait.jpg
- File:HadjSmaineLesEnfantsDeNovembre1.jpg
- File:HadjSmaineHassanElHassani1.jpg
- File:HadjSmaineBenaissa.jpg
-mattbuck (Talk) 07:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Ahadjsma: I'm not really sure whether I'm supposed to answer to Mattbuck on this interface, I tried elsewhere but was redirected here. If this is not where I was supposed to, kindly forgive my ignorance as I'm not very familiar with wikimedia Commons policy and procedures. My answer as far as the pictures I have previously uploaded is as follows: At the time of upload back in 2009, I was not aware that "Source" meant the actual "reference" or that "Author" meant the actual "Person". Since the shots uploaded were stored on my computer at the time, I put in the word "Computer" as the "Source" because that's where I was uploading from. The same happened as far as the author goes, I thought that what was meant by "Author" was "The person uploading the pictures" and hence, I named myself as such. There was no malice or misrepresentation intended. Now, to the clarification of the "Pictures" I had uploaded back in 2009, those are not NOT pictures, they are SCREENSHOTS of different films. There has NEVER BEEN A PHOTOGRAPHER TAKING SUCH PICTURES. The current names stated as both "Source" and "Author" are not that of a photographer but rather a Director of Photography (DP) who shoots scenes of films, NOT STILLS. Those are NOT pictures that were taken by an ACTUAL PERSON, they are Screenshots of films. There is no Commercial, or Monetary benefit to be gained from such SCREENSHOTS. There is no widespread copying of images of single films to justify calling it a "COPYRIGHT VIOLATION". It is "fair use" of a few Screenshots taken by my person (Myself) from very old films in which my father participated. Ahadjsma. October 9th. 2017.
- Ahadjsma, I'm afraid that you seem to misunderstand the purpose of Wikimedia Commons. We do not exist as a library of useful media, we are a library of useful media which is freely usable. Images must be explicitly released by their copyright holder, or otherwise allow that anyone can use them for any purpose, including commercial works or derivatives. In particular we do not accept "fair use" arguments, as not all juristictions allow "fair use".
- You are saying that these images are screenshots - that makes the copyright holder the movie studio. We cannot host these unless we have an explicit statement from the studio that they agree to release the images under a free licence (or the movie is old enough to have fallen into the public domain). From what I understand these are screenshots from Algerian films. Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory#Algeria, Current Algerian law states that photos and films are protected for 50 years starting from the end of the publication year, after which they are in the public domain. However, all photographs which were first published before January 1, 1987 are in the public domain. As screenshots from a film, the photograph exception does not apply, so anything from 1966 or earlier would be ok to host, but the earliest of these photos is from several years after that, and some from the 80s. I'm afraid these are copyright violations. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sarbananda Sonowal
[edit]Derivative works of deleted File:PM Modi at 85th Annual Conference of Srimanta Sankaradeva Sangha, at Sibasagar, Assam (25013010326).jpg.
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Sarbananda S.jpg
- File:Sarbananda Sonowal-cropped.png
- File:Sarbananda Sonowal.png
- File:SarbanandaSonowal.jpg
Rahul Bott (talk) 07:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- also file:MorenoMunicipio.jpg
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Gare de Torfou-Tiffauges.jpg
Old postcards. Are they enough old for public domain? Date "XX century" is very unclear. Taivo (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
File:Gulfstream-mediterranean coasts' temperatures- 17th January 2017, 12 PM ... Forecast-MAP of Windows 10 weather-app. (31986250010).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per the file description, this is a screenshot of a Windows 10 weather app. It is unclear if the image can be hosted here on Wikimedia Commons under the present license. Takeaway (talk) 09:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, Under Flickr license CC-BY-2.0, OK for Commons. --B dash (talk) 12:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment@B dash: The uploader to Flickr might have given this image that license but the copyright actually belongs to the creators of the app, and it is not with the person who took the screenshot. - Takeaway (talk) 13:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, agree, the map content is likely to be copyright Microsoft/Bing Maps. seb26 (talk) 14:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Derivative from an image that is not the uploader's own work. An unaltered photo can be found at http://camarche.ma/sar-le-prince-heritier-moulay-el-hassan-de-miami-a-rabat/. HyperGaruda (talk) 09:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Not available at Panoramio, no License Review, so validity of license cannot be checked. Lymantria (talk) 10:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Ahmadi Sinaga (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in id.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Ahmed naha-hamdeih.jpg
Ahmed naha (talk · contribs) and his sockpuppet have done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpages in fr.wiki and uploading selfies about himself, which are used only on the userpages. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
AhmedElserafy2016 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in ar.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Armaan Khatri (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright Deshumanizado (talk) 11:52, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- The copyright does not apply to this image, since it was not made from another protected image, this file was made by a program of editing and creation of files with portable graphics (png), delay 3 days to create such a file, and was even a very difficult job, because I had to search such dimensions and similar colors, so it seems to me that they do not report well before proposing a deletion proposal. Keep in mind the effort of other users. Thank you very much --Daniel Urango (talk) 14:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Either this is close enough to the copyrighted original that it is a copyvio or it is different enough so that it does not infringe on the copyright, but in that case it is personal art which is not useful for any educational purpose. Either way, we can't keep it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be a photo of a painting, own work unlikely. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyright doubt: (1) Found in two places on the internet prior to 2017 without statement of free license [2][3] (2) Uploader included "bing.com" as the source likely meaning they obtained the image from a search engine result seb26 (talk) 12:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 12:56, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- No creo que se trate de una obra derivada. Se trata de un anuncio en una marquesina de autobuses con un grafiti. Hacer fotografías de manifestaciones políticas en la calle no viola ninguna regla.--Benjamín Núñez González (talk) 08:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Bueno, el problema es que la foto de la chica en bikini es un elemento fundamental de la foto tomada y, por tanto, el copyright de dicha foto permanece en la obra derivada (en este caso, es de tercera mano): foto de chica en bikini (con su correspondiente copyright) + graffiti (con el suyo) + foto del conjunto. Para poder invocar libertad de panorama, se requeriría una exhibición "permanente" en la vía pública, algo que, en el caso de publicidad efímera no aplica obviamente.
El grafiti solo tiene sentido en relación a la foto de la chica (por cierto, el grafiti también tiene derechos asociados). En definitiva, la foto que has subido tiene tres derechos diferentes asociados: el de la foto de la chica, el del grafiti y el tuyo (a efectos de commons, irrelevante, en el caso de la legislación española, 25 años, pero aquí lo obviamos). Tú puedes ceder tus derechos (como haces con todas tus fotos), pero no los del resto de autores. De minimis tampoco es aplicable (si se quitan la foto de la chica y el grafiti no queda nada) y, en todo caso, habría que ponderar si la parodia es un eximente (desconozco el lado legal del asunto, aunque posiblemente tampoco se cumple la primera condición: evocar una obra existente, de la que debe diferenciarse de manera perceptible, porque evocar, lo que se dice evocar... más bien se usa en su totalidad). En todo caso, el parodista no eres tú, sino el autor del grafiti. Como ves, hay muchas aristas involucradas, aunque, como regla de oro, en general, si tú haces, en España, una foto de un anuncio en el cual dicho anuncio es la parte fundamental de la foto, entonces es una clara obra derivada y los derechos de la obra original prevalecen. Espero que haya quedado más o menos claro :-) --Discasto talk 14:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Image is corrupted. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment It looks to me like the upper three-quarters of the image is ok. Would it be an option to crop out the corrupted part (though ideally the original file would be uploaded so the whole thing is intact)? Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 15:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - can be cropped if needed. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
(1) Unused personal image/selfie (2) Advertising/inappropriate use of Commons indicated by description and URL link which is actually a link to the person's resume seb26 (talk) 13:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Small photo with no EXIF metadata, possible copyvio. See here Wikicology (talk) 14:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
No convicing origin, geolocalised in Africa (where there is no hummingbird), imported by an Indian contributor (country where there is no humming bird), initially titled "KINGFISHER" (doubtful one can make such a good picture without knowing anything about birds), and a weird black line one the lowest part of the picture could indicate a it is a printscreen. The uploader contributed twice, to impot this image and the beautiful File:OUR NATURE.jpg. Totodu74 (talk) 14:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
I first nominated this for speedy deletion as no evidence of permission, this logo having previous publication history. That was challenged by an IP editor for: "ineligible if copyright at the first place, it is too simple to be copyrighted". I think it is above COM:TOO#Australia in the country that this organization was founded in and where the logo presumably originates. Finnusertop (talk) 14:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep text - not protected by copyright. peace symbol - again not protected by copyright for being below ToO. A circle and three line segments. The rocket: ellipse/parabola and a couple of quadrilaterals: they are basic geometric shapes, ToO. Anyone can draw it in like five to seven minutes as everything is just basic shapes.
Agastya (talk) 14:56, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete If this is Australian it is clearly a no (it is way too original in comparison). Assuming it is not Australian [citation needed], while "elipse/parabola and a couple of quadrilaterals" are basic figures, copyright protections are not about how "basic" these elements are, but how much creativity is given to those elements. In this case the rocket is original enough to be copyrighted. Tbhotch™ 00:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Australia has very low ToO. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yourname921 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be movie screenshots and promo photos.
- File:Evan Henderson Nicholas Brown with Sandman.jpg
- File:Sandman 24 Hour Diner Morpheus Dream.jpg
- File:Sandman 24 Hour Diner Dr.Dee Photo.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
I am one of the creators of the film and included these photos from our film for a Sandman film page I am editing. The poster that was deleted was to be used for that page. I used the * File:Evan Henderson Nicholas Brown with Sandman.jpg to prove myself as the creator to another user. The other two photos are used to show the onscreen appearances of these comic book characters and have already appeared in other places on the internet. I've given permission to do so. ex. http://nerdist.com/the-sandman-fan-film-revisits-neil-gaimans-24-hours-comic/ https://www.mactionplanet.com/blog/mac-on-tokyo-evan-henderson/ --Yourname921 (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs a free license via OTRS from the producer of the film and from the sculptor of the sandman. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
The logo has two problems. At first, only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. At second, ISDAG is not mentioned in en.wiki, probably the company is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 15:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment file is in use on userpage. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, almost illegible. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be a photo of a photo, therefore a derivative work Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Giulio tegaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works : small sizes, no EXIFs, other uplads were copyvios
Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oxford-Academy-Lahore-Pakistan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Even when I can't read it it looks like an advert (
It looks like a duck to me) to me, COM:ADVERT, so I'm clearly for Delete of all of this SPA users uploads.
- File:State Life Insurance.jpg
- File:Spoken English,bise,aiou,pu,9th,10th,Matric,FA,ICom,BA,BEd,ADE,MA.jpg
- File:State Life Insurance Pakistan.jpg
- File:Home Tuition Online Lahore Pakistan Aiou allama iqbal.jpg
- File:Oxford Academy Lahore Daroghawala (3).jpg
- File:Home Tuition Online Study Spoken English Lahore Pakistan.jpg
- File:Oxford Academy Lahore Daroghawala.jpg
- File:Dars e nazami deeni asnad Equlance.jpg
- File:Allama Iqbal Univsty,bise,aiou,pu,9th,10th,Matric,FA,ICom,BA,BEd,ADE,MA 2.jpg
- File:Oxford Academy Lahore Pakistan 03004978440 02.jpg
- File:Oxford Academy Lahore Pakistan 03004978440 01.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Steinfeld-feld (talk) 16:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Photographs by J.F.H. Roovers
[edit]The RCE (which released the nominated images) learned that they do not own the rights to the images of J.F.H Roovers. The copyright holder has set out demands to them (to remove the images). As such the RCE asked whether it is possible for us to delete these images. Ticket:2017091210012265 is related.
Because they don't hold the right to the images I believe that we should indeed delete these images.
The issue might be broader than just the 343 images from J.F.H. Roovers, for all circa 54.000 images they got from SHBO (RCE has 700k freely licensed images released, one of their sources was/is SHBO) they are currently investigating whether they hold the rights (or can obtain them) to release the images. I don't think we should try to outpace them by deleting those directly, but if for those images the permission stays under doubt I think we should delete them later on (if that time arrives I will nominate those separately).
- File:3 schuren nr. 8026 - Oudenbosch - 20512006 - RCE.jpg
- File:4-roeden hooiberg nr. 7904 - Meteren - 20513566 - RCE.jpg
- File:Aanbouw en kop- en zijgevel nr. 7535 - Boschhoven - 20505107 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter Klompenfabriek Vogels - Unknown - 20513010 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. - Made - 20475392 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 7438 - Olland - 20504416 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 7522 = AA 10106 - Oirschot - 20458189 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 7534 - De Ven - 20460288 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 7708 - Gemert - 20510149 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 7711 ; dia 2074 - Middelaar - 20499325 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 7729 - Lunen - 20452745 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 7995 - Princenhage - 20505827 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 8114 - Den Dungen - 20501818 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 8195 - Made - 20512817 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 8199 - Made - 20512819 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 8218 - Rijen - 20510125 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel nr. 8219 - Rijen - 20510126 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achter- en zijgevel schuur nr. 7739 - Gemert - 20504491 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevel (met overstek) nr. 8144 - Varik - 20508987 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevel en twee schuurbergen nr. 8148 - Heesselt - 20508980 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevel met aangebouwd afdak nr. 7887 - Rossum - 20502443 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevel nr. 7759 - Hedel - 20467577 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevel nr. 7763 - Unknown - 20469502 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevel nr. 7846 - Unknown - 20488406 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevel nr. 7848 - Hedel - 20488404 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevel nr. 8035 - Lage Donk - 20512146 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevel nr. 8118 ; zie dia 4908 - Den Dungen - 20501807 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevel nr. 8151 - Heesselt - 20501848 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevel nr. 8188 - Ammerzoden - 20502415 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevels nr. 7597 - Hushoven - 20473532 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevels nr. 7714 - Mook - 20499321 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevels nr. 7762 - Hedel - 20465282 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevels nr. 7765 - Hedel - 20465283 - RCE.jpg
- File:Achtergevels nr. 8174 - Bruchem - 20502412 - RCE.jpg
- File:Arbeidershuisjes gewit; JFH Roovers, R'dam nr. 8142 - Meteren - 20525812 - RCE.jpg
- File:Arbeidershuizen en een korenmolen langs de dijk; op de achtergrond het kasteel; JFH Roovers, R'dam nr. 7889 - Waardenburg - 20525813 - RCE.jpg
- File:Bakhuis, J. Roovers, R'dam, nr. 7828 - Cromvoirt - 20468732 - RCE.jpg
- File:Binnenplaats nr. 7605 - Nunhem - 20471078 - RCE.jpg
- File:Binnenplaats nr. 7607 - Nunhem - 20471076 - RCE.jpg
- File:Binnenplaats nr. 7659 - Roermond - 20496270 - RCE.jpg
- File:Binnenplaats paarden nr. 7667 - Unknown - 20490275 - RCE.jpg
- File:Boerderij en schuren nr. 8160 - Unknown - 20512873 - RCE.jpg
- File:Boerderij en schuurtje nr. 7558 - Gastel - 20493212 - RCE.jpg
- File:Boerderijen op achtergrond nr. 8122 - Hemelrijk - 20512877 - RCE.jpg
- File:Brabants landschap, boerderijen met cultuurpanden; Roovers 5738 - Gemert - 20521641 - RCE.jpg
- File:Detail lemen wand, Roovers, R'dam, nr. 8217 - Gemert - 20510717 - RCE.jpg
- File:Detail ramen en deur - Maarheeze - 20511958 - RCE.jpg
- File:Detail zijgevel woongedeelte nr. 7541 - De Ven - 20460289 - RCE.jpg
- File:Erf nr. 8149 - Heesselt - 20501851 - RCE.jpg
- File:Erf nr. 8159 - Unknown - 20512874 - RCE.jpg
- File:Geschilderde deuren, zessterren, Roovers R'dam nr 7701 - Unknown - 20520526 - RCE.jpg
- File:Gevel woongedeelte en aanbouw nr. 7439 - Olland - 20504418 - RCE.jpg
- File:Gevels nr. 7678 - Grubbenvorst - 20489103 - RCE.jpg
- File:Gevels straatzijde nr. 7673 - Kessel - 20460264 - RCE.jpg
- File:Gevels straatzijde nr. 7675 - Baarlo - 20449841 - RCE.jpg
- File:Gevels woongedeelte nr. 7677 - Baarlo - 20449840 - RCE.jpg
- File:Hooiberg nr. 7742 - Engelen - 20487522 - RCE.jpg
- File:Houten topgevel nr. 8238 - Nieuw-Ginneken - 20510131 - RCE.jpg
- File:Huisjes voor twee gezinnen, rieten dak; JFH Roovers, R'dam nr. 6919 - Mijdrecht - 20525843 - RCE.jpg
- File:Interieur boerderij J.ROOVERS,R'DAM NR.7492 - Oirschot - 20475395 - RCE.jpg
- File:Interieur boerderij J.ROOVERS,R'DAM NR.7536 - Leende - 20475396 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kar, voor- en zijgevel woning en voorgevel boerderij nr. 8001 zie dia nr. 918038 - Leur - 20512013 - RCE.jpg
- File:Karschop Roovers, R'dam nr. 7500 - Geldrop - 20510787 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kelderwoning; JFH Roovers, Rotterdam nr. 6866 - Amsterdam - 20493390 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel bakhuis en zij- en kopgevel boerderij nr. 7843 - Deuteren - 20506375 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel boerderij en schuur - Haaren - 20454049 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel boerderij en zij- en kopgevel bakhuis nr. 7844 - Deuteren - 20506374 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel met karschop L-vormig tegen boerderij aangebouwd nr. 7510 - Best - 20513065 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 4787 = AA 11582 - Gemert - 20472559 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 5744 - Gemert - 20504253 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7445 - Olland - 20501794 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7487 = AA 7487 - Gemert - 20472558 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7497 - Wintelre - 20504290 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7517 - Oirschot - 20512986 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7522 = STAA 34511 - Oirschot - 20458187 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7527 - Gemert - 20513005 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7547 - Unknown - 20512985 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7694 - Maashees - 20513284 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7697 - Beugen - 20513278 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7698 - Beugen - 20513279 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7699 - Beugen - 20513281 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7700 - Beugen - 20513280 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7732 - Unknown - 20467363 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7740 - Heesch - 20501741 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7741 - Engelen - 20487523 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7744 - Bokhoven - 20477542 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7824 - Cromvoirt - 20504402 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7826 - Cromvoirt - 20454878 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7831 - Helvoirt - 20441297 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7858 - Rosmalen - 20501740 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7859 - Berlicum - 20512892 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 7893 - Neerijnen - 20460852 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 8057 - Horst - 20512242 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 8061 - Oosterhout - 20512243 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 8063 - Oosterhout - 20512244 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 8124 - Boxtel - 20512926 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 8129 - Baarschot - 20512905 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 8133 - Gemert - 20501783 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 8165 - Esch - 20501788 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel nr. 8240 - Ulvenhout - 20452927 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel schuur en boerderij nr. 8012 - Hooge Donk - 20512144 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel stroowanden nr. 8116 - Gemert - 20501750 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel wagen met bieten nr. 7833 - Distelberg - 20501743 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel woning en kop- en zijgevel boerderij nr. 7842 - Deuteren - 20500486 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kop- en zijgevel, nr. 7832 - Helvoirt - 20441296 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel met overstek en paard- en wagen nr. 8126 - Boxtel - 20512927 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel met overstek nr. 7452 - Wolfswinkel - 20501799 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel nr. 13238 - Gemert - 20513003 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel nr. 7734 - Hooge Heide - 20511975 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel nr. 7748 - Bokhoven - 20488273 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel nr. 7827 - Cromvoirt - 20454879 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel nr. 7829 - Helvoirt - 20441285 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel nr. 8208 - Unknown - 20505601 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel schuur en voor- en zijgevel boerderij nr. 8025 - Oudenbosch - 20512008 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel schuur en zij- en voorgevel boerderij nr. 8006 - Etten - 20512041 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel schuur en zijgevel boerderij - Sint Agatha - 20513260 - RCE.jpg
- File:Kopgevel zie dia nr. 4911 - Esch - 20506038 - RCE.jpg
- File:LandarbeiderJFH Roovers, R'dam, nr. 7753 - Well - 20525793 - RCE.jpg
- File:Landarbeidershuizen, rieten daken; JFH Roovers, R'dam nr. 7894 - Unknown - 20525814 - RCE.jpg
- File:Landarbeiderswoning, JFH Roovers, R'dam nr. 7532 - Strabrecht - 20525913 - RCE.jpg
- File:Landweg en voor- en zijgevel boerderijtje nr. 8054 - Bremberg - 20512018 - RCE.jpg
- File:Landweg met op de achtergrond boerderijen nr. 8043 - Lage Donk - 20512147 - RCE.jpg
- File:Luchtfoto overzicht complex nr. 5829 - Genderen - 20512788 - RCE.jpg
- File:Muuranker van de watermolen, cijfer 3; Roovers nr. 7574 - Unknown - 20511804 - RCE.jpg
- File:Muuranker; getal 6; Roovers, R'dam nr. 7672 - Kessel - 20460263 - RCE.jpg
- File:Muurankers, Z-vorm met 3 sterretjes Roovers nr. 7608 - Nunhem - 20471082 - RCE.jpg
- File:Open schuur Roovers, R'dam, nr. 7552 - Soerendonk - 20510770 - RCE.jpg
- File:Open schuur Roovers, R'dam,nr. 7593 - Maarheeze - 20469712 - RCE.jpg
- File:Overzicht - Sambeek - 20513282 - RCE.jpg
- File:Overzicht complec met brug, boerderij en schuur nr. 7875 - Gewande - 20512838 - RCE.jpg
- File:Overzicht complex - 's-Gravenmoer - 20512830 - RCE.jpg
- File:Overzicht nr. 7695 - Vortum - 20513285 - RCE.jpg
- File:Overzicht vanaf weg nr. 7562 - Gastel - 20513106 - RCE.jpg
- File:Overzicht, boerderijen en schuren nr. 7551 - Soerendonk - 20513108 - RCE.jpg
- File:Put, JFH Roovers, R'dam nr. 7503 - Oosterik - 20511217 - RCE.jpg
- File:Rij landarbeiderswoningen, rieten daken; JFH Roovers, R'dam nr. 8140- dia 902628 - Meteren - 20525811 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schouw nr. 7536 - Boschhoven - 20505121 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuren en boerderij nr. 8127 - Baarschot - 20512907 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuren en boerderij nr. 8221 - Dorst - 20512216 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuren en voorgevel boerderij nr. 8047 - Lage Donk - 20512148 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuren, boerderij en bakhuis nr. 7841 - Deuteren - 20506373 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuren, Roovers, R'dam nr. 8045 - Lage Zwaluwe - 20510680 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuren, Roovers, R'dam, nr. 8046 - Lage Zwaluwe - 20510681 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuur en kopgevel boerderij nr. 7488 - Gemert - 20467325 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuur met rieten dak, Roovers, R'dam, nr. 8008 - Etten - 20510684 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuur, J.F.H. Roovers, nr. 8032 - Goes - 20507596 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuur, Roovers, R'dam, nr. 8056 - Horst - 20510694 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuur, Roovers, R'dam, nr. 8073 - Lage Zwaluwe - 20510682 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuur, Roovers, R'dam, nr. 8215 - Oosterhout - 20497972 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuur, Roovers, R'dam, nr. 8216 - Gemert - 20510718 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuurberg - Varik - 20513567 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuurberg nr. 8138 - Meteren - 20513564 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuurberg nr. 8150 - Heesselt - 20501849 - RCE.jpg
- File:Schuurtje met kar en boer kar boer nr. 7530 - Strabrecht - 20460285 - RCE.jpg
- File:Stalinterieur J.ROOVERS,R'DAM NR.13252 - Gemert - 20521344 - RCE.jpg
- File:Stalinterieur J.ROOVERS,R'DAM NR.7501 - Gemert - 20475397 - RCE.jpg
- File:Toegangspoort met brug nr. 7676 - Baarlo - 20449838 - RCE.jpg
- File:Vervallen schuren op voorgrond en boerderij op achtergrond nr. 8048 - Lage Donk - 20512149 - RCE.jpg
- File:Vlaamse schuur, Roovers, R'dam, nr. 7996 - Bremberg - 20510683 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel geit nr. 7885 - Kerkdriel - 20502477 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7178 - Kerkwijk - 20502404 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7437 - Olland - 20504424 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7444 - Olland - 20504421 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7540 - Boschhoven - 20442528 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7702 - Sint Agatha - 20442651 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7707 - Gemert - 20510148 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7709 - Mook - 20499326 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7715 ; dia 2313 - Mook - 20499323 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7717 - Malden - 20471683 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7718 ; dia 902578 - Malden - 20489334 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7721 - Neerbosch - 20452808 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7764 - Unknown - 20469501 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7766 - Hedel - 20465284 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7825 - Cromvoirt - 20504303 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 7855 - Hedel - 20472503 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 8007 - Etten - 20512042 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 8013 - Sint Willebrord - 20512151 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 8016 - Bosschehoofd - 20512009 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 8023 - Oud Gastel - 20512005 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 8058 - Oosterhout - 20462363 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 8119 - Den Dungen - 20477380 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 8176 - Bruchem - 20502413 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel nr. 8210 - Dongenschevaart - 20481748 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel ophaalburg nr. 6918 - Kockengen - 20505770 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel, schuur schuur nr. 7594 - Hushoven - 20472232 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevel, schuur schuur nr. 7595 - Hushoven - 20472506 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voor- en zijgevels van twee boerderijtjes nr. 8034 - Hoeven - 20512010 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 6424 - Schagen - 20482849 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 7537 - Boschhoven - 20504674 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 7687 - Blitterswijck - 20494940 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 7771 - Unknown - 20467653 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 7774 - Unknown - 20462495 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 7823 - Cromvoirt - 20504397 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 7836 - Vlijmen - 20496285 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 7845 - Hedel - 20465285 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 7851 - Hedel - 20488403 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 7861 - Den Dungen - 20501839 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 7862 - Poeldonk - 20501838 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 8031 - Gors - 20512012 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 8181 - Kerkwijk - 20502405 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 8205 - Neerijnen - 20508966 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel nr. 8212 - Dongenschevaart - 20481667 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevel, J Roovers, R'dam nr. 7874 - Rosmalen - 20512839 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevels nr. 7713 - Mook - 20499320 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevels nr. 7856 - Hedel - 20461973 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorgevels nr. 8175 - Bruchem - 20502411 - RCE.jpg
- File:Voorkant schuur Roovers, R'dam nr. 7465 - Opwetten - 20493449 - RCE.jpg
- File:Washok, hout bewerkte voorgevel, Roovers nr. 6672 - Cabauw - 20510854 - RCE.jpg
- File:Washok, ht. bewerkte voorgevel Roovers nr. 6669 - Unknown - 20510815 - RCE.jpg
- File:Washok, ht. bewerkte voorgevel, Roovers nr. 6673 - Unknown - 20510820 - RCE.jpg
- File:Weg met aanliggende boerderijen nr. 7879 - Gewande - 20512835 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zii- en voorgevel nr. 8009 - Hooge Donk - 20512145 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij en achtergevel boerderij en zij- en achtergevel bakhuis nr. 8024 - Oudenbosch - 20512007 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel en hooiberg nr. 8141 ; dia 911958 - Meteren - 20508955 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel nr. 7443 - Olland - 20504422 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel nr. 7538 - Boschhoven - 20504677 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel nr. 7539 - Boschhoven - 20504680 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel nr. 7712 - Unknown - 20499319 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel nr. 7761 - Hedel - 20467576 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel nr. 7849 - Hedel - 20488405 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel nr. 8185 - Ammerzoden - 20502417 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel nr. 8198 - Made - 20512822 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel nr. 8202 ; dia 902636 - Opijnen - 20508972 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel nr. 8204 - Neerijnen - 20508964 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en achtergevel nr. 8246 - Gemert - 20501537 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel boerderij en zij- en kopgevel bakhuisje nr. 7512 - Unknown - 20513008 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel en schuur nr. 7857 - Rosmalen - 20488814 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7499 - Unknown - 20472560 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7514 - Unknown - 20513009 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7515 - Unknown - 20512974 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7521 - Oirschot - 20512987 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7523 - Oirschot - 20512988 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7528 - Gemert - 20513006 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7691 - Groeningen - 20513283 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7724 - Wijchen - 20489038 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7747 - Bokhoven - 20475556 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7758 - Unknown - 20499041 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7760 - Hedel - 20499040 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7775 - Hedel - 20499039 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7864 - Distelberg - 20512866 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7876 - Gewande - 20512837 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 7877 - Gewande - 20512836 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8062 - Oosterhout - 20512246 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8076 - Hooge Zwaluwe - 20503199 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8078 - Hooge Zwaluwe - 20506456 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8080 - Made - 20475394 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8081 - Made - 20475391 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8112 - Made - 20475393 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8121 - Hemelrijk - 20512879 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8123 - Hemelrijk - 20512878 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8128 - Baarschot - 20512906 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8130 - Baarschot - 20512904 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8134 - Gemert - 20501784 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8135 - Helvoirt - 20512864 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8153 - Unknown - 20512886 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8155 - Unknown - 20512871 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8157 - Unknown - 20512872 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8163 - Esch - 20501786 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8167 - Boxtel - 20512924 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8168 - Boxtel - 20512925 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8189 - Made - 20512824 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8222 - 's-Gravenmoer - 20512829 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8227 - Unknown - 20505600 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8239 - Ulvenhout - 20452925 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel nr. 8241 - Ulvenhout - 20452920 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel schuur en kopgevel boerderij nr.7892 - Neerijnen - 20460853 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en kopgevel schuur en zij- en kopgevel boerderij nr. 8077 - Hooge Zwaluwe - 20506457 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel boerderij en kop- en zijgevel bakhuis nr. 8059 - Oosterhout - 20462364 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel en erf nr. 8053 - Bremberg - 20512037 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 6629 - Aalten - 20468257 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 6914 - Wilnis - 20505771 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7435 - Olland - 20504425 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7436 - Olland - 20504423 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7442 - Olland - 20504420 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7531 - Heeze - 20490292 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7596 - Hushoven - 20473531 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7606 - Nunhem - 20471077 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7660 - Roermond - 20496271 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7665 - Heide - 20496391 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7666 - Unknown - 20490276 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7668 - Bussering - 20499333 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7710 - Middelaar - 20499324 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7719 - Nijmegen - 20467054 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7720 - Nijmegen - 20464124 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7722 - Neerbosch - 20500062 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7723 ; dia 902605 - Wijchen - 20489037 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7738 - Unknown - 20513189 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7767 - Hedel - 20465281 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7768 ; dia 902554 - Hedel - 20442801 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7770 - Unknown - 20467652 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7772 - Hedel - 20485382 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7834 - Vlijmen - 20496302 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7835 - Vlijmen - 20496300 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7854 - Hedel - 20488402 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 7884 - Kerkdriel - 20502447 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 8004 zie dia nr. 918044 - Leur - 20512014 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 8022 - Oud Gastel - 20512004 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 8029 - Gors - 20512011 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 8044 - Lage Donk - 20512150 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 8115 - Den Dungen - 20501808 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 8117 - Den Dungen - 20477381 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 8177 - Bruchem - 20502410 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 8187 - Ammerzoden - 20502416 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 8231 - Ginneken - 20505823 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zij- en voorgevel nr. 8237 - Nieuw-Ginneken - 20510132 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel - Hooge Heide - 20468768 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel bakhuis nr. 8230 - Ginneken - 20505822 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel boerderij en kopgevel bijschuur nr. 7486 - Dommelen - 20513168 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel en karschop L-vormig tegen boerderij aangebouwd nr. 7509 - Best - 20513063 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel en overstek nr. 7882 - Kerkdriel - 20502446 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel en put - Unknown - 20513007 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel en schuur nr. 7529 - Strabrecht - 20460286 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel kasteel nr. 7684 - Unknown - 20489027 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel kleine woning nr. 7516 - Unknown - 20512975 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel met bijgebouw - Best - 20455972 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7441 - Olland - 20504419 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7502 - Oosterik - 20504682 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7511 - Best - 20513064 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7518 - Oirschot - 20512989 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7525 - Unknown - 20512984 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7544 - Maarheeze - 20511957 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7571 - Unknown - 20489713 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7572 - Unknown - 20489714 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7686 - Blitterswijck - 20488249 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7733 - Hooge Heide - 20511976 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7752 - Well - 20499038 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7830 - Helvoirt - 20441292 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7878 - Gewande - 20512834 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7998 - Bremberg - 20512040 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 7999 - Bremberg - 20512038 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 8000 - Bremberg - 20512039 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 8064 - Oosterhout - 20512245 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 8136 - Helvoirt - 20512863 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 8162 - Esch - 20501785 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 8164 - Esch - 20501787 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 8196 - Made - 20512818 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 8197 - Made - 20512823 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 8209 - Unknown - 20501450 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 8214 - Dongen - 20481720 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 8245 - Gemert - 20501539 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel nr. 8248 - Gemert - 20501540 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel put met haal nr. 8243 - Chaam - 20501542 - RCE.jpg
- File:Zijgevel schuur nr. 8213 - Dongen - 20481698 - RCE.jpg
_nr._8144_-_Varik_-_20508987_-_RCE.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Basvb (talk) 17:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
_(14579470670).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14579470670).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is not clear this has any added value to Commons Kees08 (talk) 21:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
_(14579470670).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
_(14579470670).jpg){kind=link}
_(14765851282).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14765851282).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It is not clear this has any added value to Commons Kees08 (talk) 21:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
_(14765851282).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
_(14765851282).jpg){kind=link}
Probably a copyrighted file. Sanandros (talk) 21:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Because it tries to obscure African origins 81.178.165.8 21:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Africa is quite visible at the top of the picture. --bjh21 (talk) 14:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: It clearly shows African Origin. Perhaps the the person making the request is unfamiliar with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dymaxion_map projection? See also http://www.bfi.org/static/images/dymax_redux/final_lrg/173.jpgDGedye (talk) 00:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- widely used. cannot be dleted except for copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:13, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
WordArt files
[edit]Is "WordArt" below the threshold of originality? If so, these files should be re-tagged to reflect that. If not, they should be deleted.
Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hmm... It's hard to say. While it is has multiple ways of being created as different font styles, different font sizes, different shadows, different colours, different 3D positionings, and among other things, it is part of applications such as Microsoft PowerPoint. However, these WordArts can be customized by any user of PowerPoint to fit any style they would like. Sometimes they can be customized to any form of artistic style. But they also have some form of styles that are above "simple".
- And what other tags are possible for these "WordArts"? Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 07:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - simple words cannot have a copyright in the USA, no matter how original the font. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
So I originally nominated this for speedy before I realized that there was a previous discussion on it. So I undid myself. Then after reading that discussion I realized that it was only closed as keep on procedural reasons. Apparently it was too large of a batch so it was closed without anyone actually looking at the images mentioned.
So, instead of going back and forth I just going to bring it here. This is a derivative work of a US state that claims copyright. So it is a copyvio in my opinion. Majora (talk) 23:27, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Than you can delete all pictures, sorry ! (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
The larger version, from which this file was extracted, was deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Matthau - May.jpg. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio [4] Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:31, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Web resolution, unlikely to be own work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Based on the user's other uploads and the {{PD-user|Tokle}} tag, I think it's safe to assume this is the uploader's own work. --Guanaco (talk) 23:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 23:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to http://www.peruvian-experiences.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/lima-palacio-de-gobierno.jpg Ovruni (talk) 05:01, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:13, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
I am the uploader, but please delete, my mistake (identical with another file). पाटलिपुत्र (talk) 06:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:13, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 109.238.80.74 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Miguel Ángel Ocano.jpg. This is the original "unadulterated" photo. -- User: Perhelion 08:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, no valid reason for deletion, it is more appropriate to maintain both versions for transparency. I updated both files to link to each other in the
other_versionsfield. seb26 (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per seb26. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:14, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:St Mary's Church, Rhuddlan
[edit]Clearly derivative works of the crest, failing COM:DM. Question is whether the crest is PD-old. Without proof I think we need to delete.
- File:Church of Saint Mary A Grade II* Listed Building in Rhuddlan, Denbighshire 01.jpg
- File:Church of Saint Mary A Grade II* Listed Building in Rhuddlan, Denbighshire 02.jpg
- File:Eglwys y Santes Fair, Rhuddlan 08.JPG
-mattbuck (Talk) 10:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: cf. [5]. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:16, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: w:File:Britain First New.jpg. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:17, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Imagen duplicada Oilisab (talk) 13:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- The duplicate file is File:Bergondo-Iglesia de San Salvador 08.jpg. Delete. Oilisab, for future reference, it is better to use {{Duplicate}} template. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 14:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 4nn1l2 as no permission (No permission since) Hystrix (talk) 14:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC) Simple design Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Book cover? --Hystrix (talk) 14:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: It was a close call ,but there are enough creative elements on the page to be subject to copyright in most countries. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:19, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 4nn1l2 as no permission (No permission since). Simple text logo? Hystrix (talk) 15:56, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Considering that calligraphy plays a vital role in Iranian-Islamic art, and is particularly protected by the Iranian copyright law, I think we need permission from the copyright holder. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: too comple for PD-textlogo. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
(Sorry french) Fichier qui n'est plus utilisé + probable copyvio (pas d'exif et vient probablement du site de la fédération de catch qui utilise ce titre) Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 16:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-o/0a/4c/8b/b7/plaza-de-armas-pisco.jpg Ovruni (talk) 16:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
No fop in Luxemburg Vera (talk) 16:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Extracted from deleted file, tagged "license laundering" See note at File:Steve Cauthen and James Wood 1976.jpg Montanabw (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Logo may be above COM:TOO --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Why is this logo not eligible for copyright? A better rationale is needed than "terror = no copyright" --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: until we come up with a license for this was created anonymously by a terrorist organization, and no one will ever be able to claim the copyright, we shall deem these copyrighted. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Circuito POP is a non-notable radio channel (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki). Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, third party logo, but otherwise ineligible in my opinion. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Looks OK to be tagged as PD text logo from my perspective (for the US). There are no substantial design elements. We don't have any documentation on COM:TOO about the source country Italy however. seb26 (talk) 14:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Very simple design, unlikely to be above TOO in Italy. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
ADVENT SHOKO (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except 2 userpages and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpages. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
This design is probably protected with copyright and needs OTRS-permission from issuing organization.
Этот дизайн вероятно защищен авторскими правами и требует OTRS-разрешения от организации, выдавшая этот диплом. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/6120061.jpg Ovruni (talk) 14:52, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://www.rei.com/adventures/images/assets/adventures/images/trip/gallery/latinamerica/mpv_05 Ovruni (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, real source is https://wiki.beeldengeluid.nl/index.php/Bestand:BobRooyens.jpg. Image does not have a compatible license (see https://wiki.beeldengeluid.nl/index.php/Afbeeldingen_in_de_Beeld_en_Geluidwiki) Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://toposperu.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/00963.jpg Ovruni (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:30, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files from Unsplash uploaded by Robert.rodriguez35 (talk · contribs)
[edit]insufficient source information (no link to individual file); therefore no verification possible if a suitable license for keeping is applicable.
Depending on the upload date on unsplash a CC-0 license may or may not be applicable. See below:
|
This image is from Unsplash and was published prior to 5 June 2017 under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. Note: On 5 June 2017, Unsplash switched the old sitewide license for all uploads from Creative Commons CC0 to a custom license arrangement which does not meet the free content licensing requirements for Commons. Therefore, media published on Unsplash from 5 June 2017 onwards is not considered to be freely licensed and can't be accepted on Commons. Files uploaded to Commons after this date should be subject to careful license review, verifying that the publication date on Unsplash is prior to 5 June 2017.
|
 
|
This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. |
| The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law. You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission.
|
- File:Kids-playing-1253096 1280.jpg
- File:John-sting-112628.jpg
- File:Kelly-sikkema-266805.jpg
- File:Kid-notebook-computer-learns-159533.jpg
Zaccarias (talk) 16:52, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Files claimed to be from pixabay uploaded by Robert.rodriguez35 (talk · contribs)
[edit]insufficient source information (no link to individual file) therefore:
- no license verification possible
- no additional information obtainable (almost no information provided by the Commons uploader)
to 2.: As per Commons:Project scope file are collected here for educational purposes. Image with very poor description and no additional information on location, date taken and other circumstances are hardly of any value for this project here. Information should ideally be given at the time of the upload. Also direct source links should be given to enable other users check back and maybe obtain more information from the source. Nothing is the case here.
Proposal: Delete, if the uploader does not give any information.
- File:Weapon with miles.jpg
- File:Teamwork Development.jpg
- File:Team on line.jpg
- File:Soldier Training.jpg
- File:Soldier on Knee.jpg
- File:Advanced Rifle Marksmanship.jpg
- File:Casevac.jpg
- File:Kicking door.jpg
Zaccarias (talk) 17:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: I spent a while going through each of these images and properly sourcing them. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:52, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
possible copyvio; see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Headshot 2016.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Personal use here Facebook © 2017 https://www.facebook.com/JamesBryhan/photos/a.425200564263790.1073741825.425199884263858/1075936799190160/?type=3&theater and © 2016 James Bryhan here http://james-bryhan.wixsite.com/actor/gallery?lightbox=dataItem-ivpg0i6g COPYRIGHT Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Enough of this crap. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kowpeenam1960 Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Coming 3rd in local sporting event does not make the person depicted somebody of encclopaedic relevance. Zenwort (talk) 17:46, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Looks like she's one of the top female ultra runners in the world, which is likely sufficient notability. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:37, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://www.boletomachupicchu.com/gutblt/wp-content/images/construccion-de-machu-picchu.jpg Ovruni (talk) 18:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
The source states "Except for a single copy made for personal use only, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, republish, upload, post, transmit, or distribute any documents or information from this site" and doesn't seem to mention CC-BY-3.0 anywhere.
- File:Walnut and Maple Laser Engraved Invites.jpg
- File:Laser cut wedding invitation booklet with font cutouts..png
- File:Real walnut wood custom laser cut wedding invitations with inserts printed on plantable paper..png
- File:Classic black damask lace custom laser cut wedding invitations..png
bjh21 (talk) 18:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://www.flickr.com/photos/69698335@N03/6336297588 Ovruni (talk) 18:26, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://www.tripadvisor.es/LocationPhotoDirectLink-g2092517-d4086690-i134189795-Castillo_de_Lamas-Lamas_San_Martin_Region.html Ovruni (talk) 18:30, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
duplicate copy Amanbisauri (talk) 09:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Urheber doch nicht einverstanden Dirkmuel (talk) 17:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Urheber doch nicht einverstanden Dirkmuel (talk) 17:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Bad Name and better Version: File:Porzellanmanufaktur Fürstenberg-3011.jpg Wuselig (talk) 17:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : seems to be a montage from potentially different sources, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: affected File:Lourdes of kerala.jpg, File:Korattymuthy Shrine Our Lady with Poovan Banana.jpg which are not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : seems to be a montage from potentially different sources, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: affected File:Lourdes of kerala.jpg, File:Korattymuthy Shrine Our Lady with Poovan Banana.jpg which are not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:41, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely flickr user is original author, not old enough to be in public domain. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:55, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Agreed but I am unable to fathom US copyright and relied on the Flickr contributor's knowledge and experience. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 00:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for signs in Denmark. Eiðis is in the Faroe Islands, which is part of Denmark. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prateek Dutta(CPDF) (talk · contribs)
[edit] Delete Out of scope file. Non-notable.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Riley Huntley (talk) 20:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prateek Dutta(CPDF) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images. Small, no EXIF. All of this editors other uploads have been deleted as obvious copyvios.
- File:Mr. Prateek Dutta with R Major General Gagandeep Bakshi or G.D Bakshi a retired Indian army officer .jpg
- File:**BE A SELF MADE MAN**.jpg - deleted as out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:56, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded by Error, also not produced by me. Liberaler Humanist (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment As a web-cam the image can be kept. Illustrates both the concept of eagle cams and a nice view of this bird. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request shortly after upload. --Jcb (talk) 08:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Gennaro Nigliato - Variant Ascari - Autodromo Nazionale Monza.jpeg
It seems to me, that these photos are not own work. OTRS-permission from copyright holder FotoMorAle or at least from author Morgese is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 09:47, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
it is not correctly identified. see:http://cigarhistory.info/Frauds-Fakes-Fantasies/English_fantasy_tins.html 75.140.149.153 19:31, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hi there, not correctly identified is not a reason for deletion. I have had a look at an adervert from the same brand and they indeed copied the main part of the advert. But since this was a 1920's advert, no copyright excists any more. So the only thig i think should be done, is move it to a category like Fake cigarette tins. Regards, Alfvanbeem (talk) 06:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Alfvanbeem. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
I think it is too original for pd-textlogo, at least enough to warrant a discussion Kees08 (talk) 20:38, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - this logo is too simple and fails originality. If you don't like the license, change it to {{PD-simple}}. This isn't rocket science and shouldn't even be discussed. Corky Buzz by the Hornet's Nest 22:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - I disagree with myself now. After reading the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices section, it is pretty clear that this is not a copyrightable image. Kees08 (talk) 02:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of an screenshot of uncertain copyright status Discasto talk 19:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://q-ec.bstatic.com/images/hotel/max1024x768/890/89025126.jpg Ovruni (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:57, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://q-ec.bstatic.com/images/hotel/max1024x768/890/89025141.jpg Ovruni (talk) 19:47, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:57, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to https://r-ec.bstatic.com/images/hotel/max1024x768/961/96145114.jpg Ovruni (talk) 19:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:57, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be a copyright violation. Zaccarias (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 109.238.80.74 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G1|nothing meaningful. This definitely isn't what the criterion's intended to handle, but at the same time, I don't see how this image can be useful for anything; it's not in scope, as far as I can see. Nyttend (talk) 21:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
"Copyright 2017. All rights reserved." Possible copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 21:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:12, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely that flickr user is original author, also unclear if the original publication date was before 1923, which would qualify it for {{PD-US}}. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Noted, passed to forensics, Eddaido (talk) 00:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- I have received a message from the uploader to Flickr and the body of it is: "It was a photo advertisement postcard which I found for sale on ebay and digitally copied. In Australia photos prior to 1954 are in the Public Domain and I guess New Zealand would have similar rules, where I should think this photo would have been taken. As it is obviously a photo prior 1954, I believe there is no copyright on it."
- The photo is clearly intended to display the car and would have most value (implying publication) around 1920 when it was a current model and after that would be obsolete. Would that be enough for PD-US?
- Is that OK Jon or should I send out the team again? Eddaido (talk) 07:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: The "Buick 6" was built from 1919 to 1924. The date of 1920 is reasonable and there are no reasons to doubt it. Ruthven (msg) 22:55, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Jon Kolbert as no permission (No permission since). Simple design Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Book cover? Hystrix (talk) 18:36, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I personally think the little bird design on the cover is above the threshold of originality, if it weren't for that I have no objections to keeping it as {{PD-simple}}. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:48, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I am the photographer for this image, the co-editor of the book, an executive for the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation who published it, the guy who uploaded the file, and legally able to grant the permissions I gave when I assigned a Creative Commons license. It's just a photo of a book cover; we want people to be able to use it when discussing the book. (Previously the Wikipedia page was using a photo of an earlier edition of the book). Please advise what else I need to do, without jumping through too many hoops. I do not intend to set up a media assets page on the Foundation website; that's beyond the scope of what this is for. Marco Walsh
Deleted: per nomination - please contact OTRS to provide evidence of authorship. --Jcb (talk) 22:54, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Not PD - the CC notice on the National Archives of Australia website explicitly states that it does not cover items in its collection. Per the NAA factsheet on copyright (http://www.naa.gov.au/collection/fact-sheets/fs08.aspx) this image created in 1987 is still under copyright. Nick-D (talk) 21:52, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. No one is claiming that this image is public domain. The NAA is an Australian government agency. Its copyright statement states that: "Save for the content on this website supplied by third parties, the National Archives logo and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the National Archives has applied the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence". The image in question was produced by the Australian Overseas Information Service (OIS), a defunct government agency. The Australian government cannot be a third party to itself! Furthermore, because the OIS merged into the Department of Foreign Affairs of Trade (DFAT) in 1994, the copyright for the image is specifically held by DFAT, which has also released its archives under a CC-3.0 licence. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 07:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- You are deliberately ignoring the part of the NAA creative commons page you link to which is clearly titled "Collection copyright" and states that items in the collection have different copyright statuses. Nick-D (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- That section refers to the fact that the NAA hosts both government-produced/owned content (i.e., Crown Copyright) and privately-produced/owned (copyright is not held by the government). As stated above, this image falls into the first category and has thus been released under the Commons licence; ergo, it is suitable to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- You are deliberately ignoring the part of the NAA creative commons page you link to which is clearly titled "Collection copyright" and states that items in the collection have different copyright statuses. Nick-D (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:41, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Not PD - the CC notice on the National Archives of Australia website explicitly states that it does not cover items in its collection. Per the NAA factsheet on copyright (http://www.naa.gov.au/collection/fact-sheets/fs08.aspx) this image created in 1989 is still under copyright. Nick-D (talk) 21:52, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. No one is claiming that this image is public domain. The NAA is an Australian government agency. Its copyright statement states that: "Save for the content on this website supplied by third parties, the National Archives logo and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the National Archives has applied the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence". The image in question was produced by the Australian Overseas Information Service (OIS), a defunct government agency. The Australian government cannot be a third party to itself! Furthermore, because the OIS merged into the Department of Foreign Affairs of Trade (DFAT) in 1994, the copyright for the image is specifically held by DFAT, which has also released its archives under a CC-3.0 licence. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 07:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- You are deliberately ignoring the part of the NAA creative commons page you link to which is clearly titled "Collection copyright" and states that items in the collection have different copyright statuses. Nick-D (talk) 09:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- That section refers to the fact that the NAA hosts both government-produced/owned content (i.e., Crown Copyright) and privately-produced/owned (copyright is not held by the government). As stated above, this image falls into the first category and has thus been released under the Commons licence; ergo, it is suitable to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. (By the way, in future maybe post these all under the same header so we don't have to have the same conversation three separate times). Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- That is not correct at - you are - the NAA explains the copyright status of items in its collection in the factsheet linked above, which explicitly states that Commonwealth Government owns the copyright to the non-PD Commonwealth records (and then explains when this will expire for the different types of records), and also states that the Commonwealth has no say over the copyright status of the private items in the collection as it does not own them. Combined with the clear text of the CC page, it is quite clear that the collection is not CC. Nick-D (talk) 10:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not disputing that the Commonwealth Government owns the copyright to this. I think you might be under a misapprehension about what the terms "public domain" and "copyright" mean. The copyright on this image will expire in 2039, at which point it will become public domain. Up until that point, the author (i.e., the Crown) has the right to control / limit its usage. Creative Commons licences do not extinguish copyright, they are merely a method of controlling how works are used. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 16:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- That is not correct at - you are - the NAA explains the copyright status of items in its collection in the factsheet linked above, which explicitly states that Commonwealth Government owns the copyright to the non-PD Commonwealth records (and then explains when this will expire for the different types of records), and also states that the Commonwealth has no say over the copyright status of the private items in the collection as it does not own them. Combined with the clear text of the CC page, it is quite clear that the collection is not CC. Nick-D (talk) 10:14, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- That section refers to the fact that the NAA hosts both government-produced/owned content (i.e., Crown Copyright) and privately-produced/owned (copyright is not held by the government). As stated above, this image falls into the first category and has thus been released under the Commons licence; ergo, it is suitable to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. (By the way, in future maybe post these all under the same header so we don't have to have the same conversation three separate times). Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- You are deliberately ignoring the part of the NAA creative commons page you link to which is clearly titled "Collection copyright" and states that items in the collection have different copyright statuses. Nick-D (talk) 09:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The NAA's website states in it's copyright notice for the website: "Please note there are additional terms to those provided by the Creative Commons licence that apply to use of the National Archives’ collection material." It goes on to refer readers to it's fact sheet in relation to "collection copyright" which the copyright page clearly treats differently to "website copyright".
- At best, the copyright notice is ambiguous in relation to "collection copyright". The better view, in my opinion, is that the image cannot be regarded as having been released under a CC licence as the copyright notice clearly separates "website" content from "collection" content, notwithstanding that the collection is accessible via the website.
- In relation to @Ivar the Boneful's comment regarding DFAT releasing their content under a CC licence, I'll point out that the DFAT copyright page only applies to content on the DFAT website; the image is taken from the NAA's website and clearly doesn't fall under the copyright licence on DFAT's website. Kb.au (talk) 20:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Re DFAT, I agree that the image isn't covered by Template:DFAT – if that were the case, things here would be a lot simpler. My point was that these Australian government agencies have a clear intent to issue material under CC licences; this isn't just some loophole that has been manufactured based on a single ambiguously worded paragraph, but rather a substantive policy present across multiple government departments (cf. Template:GGAU). It would be a perverse outcome if we decide to nitpick organisation's statements to find ways not to accept images that have prima facie been released under CC licences. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 18:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:43, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Not PD - the CC notice on the National Archives of Australia website explicitly states that it does not cover items in its collection. Per the NAA factsheet on copyright (http://www.naa.gov.au/collection/fact-sheets/fs08.aspx) this image created in 1989 is still under copyright. Nick-D (talk) 21:52, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. No one is claiming that this image is public domain. The NAA is an Australian government agency. Its copyright statement states that: "Save for the content on this website supplied by third parties, the National Archives logo and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, the National Archives has applied the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence". The image in question was produced by the Australian Overseas Information Service (OIS), a defunct government agency. The Australian government cannot be a third party to itself! Furthermore, because the OIS merged into the Department of Foreign Affairs of Trade (DFAT) in 1994, the copyright for the image is specifically held by DFAT, which has also released its archives under a CC-3.0 licence. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 07:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- You are deliberately ignoring the part of the NAA creative commons page you link to which is clearly titled "Collection copyright" and states that items in the collection have different copyright statuses. As the image was sourced from the NAA, the status of items DFAT posts elsewhere is not relevant. Nick-D (talk) 09:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- That section refers to the fact that the NAA hosts both government-produced/owned content (i.e., Crown Copyright) and privately-produced/owned (copyright is not held by the government). As stated above, this image falls into the first category and has thus been released under the Commons licence; ergo, it is suitable to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- That is not correct at. Aside from the clear text on the CC page, the NAA explains the copyright status of items in its collection in the factsheet linked above, which explicitly states that Commonwealth Government owns the copyright to the non-PD Commonwealth records (and then explains when this will expire for the different types of records and that permission needs to be sought to reproduce non-PD images), and also states that the Commonwealth has no say over the copyright status of the private items in the collection as it does not own them. Nick-D (talk) 10:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not disputing that the Commonwealth Government owns the copyright to this. I think you might be under a misapprehension about what the terms "public domain" and "copyright" mean. The copyright on this image will expire in 2039, at which point it will become public domain. Up until that point, the author (i.e., the Crown) has the right to control / limit its usage. Creative Commons licences do not extinguish copyright, they are merely a method of controlling how works are used. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 16:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- That is not correct at. Aside from the clear text on the CC page, the NAA explains the copyright status of items in its collection in the factsheet linked above, which explicitly states that Commonwealth Government owns the copyright to the non-PD Commonwealth records (and then explains when this will expire for the different types of records and that permission needs to be sought to reproduce non-PD images), and also states that the Commonwealth has no say over the copyright status of the private items in the collection as it does not own them. Nick-D (talk) 10:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- That section refers to the fact that the NAA hosts both government-produced/owned content (i.e., Crown Copyright) and privately-produced/owned (copyright is not held by the government). As stated above, this image falls into the first category and has thus been released under the Commons licence; ergo, it is suitable to be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 10:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- You are deliberately ignoring the part of the NAA creative commons page you link to which is clearly titled "Collection copyright" and states that items in the collection have different copyright statuses. As the image was sourced from the NAA, the status of items DFAT posts elsewhere is not relevant. Nick-D (talk) 09:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:44, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Commons:Village pump/Copyright
[edit]These passports weren't created by the uploaders but by the government.
Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Stefan2 - the coat of arms of Guatemala is not subject to copyright. I'm on my phone now, but can look up the relevant legislation later. FlyingAce (talk) 01:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- There are no coats of arms on these passport covers. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry. I thought it was the other passport image I uploaded. The local copyright law is not too clear in that regard, and I don't have time to research it further. Guess I'll check at en-wp whether it qualifies for fair use. FlyingAce (talk) 15:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, feel free to delete the Guatemalan one. Another user has uploaded a better image locally. No opinion on the Salvadorean passport. FlyingAce (talk) 15:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry. I thought it was the other passport image I uploaded. The local copyright law is not too clear in that regard, and I don't have time to research it further. Guess I'll check at en-wp whether it qualifies for fair use. FlyingAce (talk) 15:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- There are no coats of arms on these passport covers. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Stefan2 - the coat of arms of Guatemala is not subject to copyright. I'm on my phone now, but can look up the relevant legislation later. FlyingAce (talk) 01:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:47, 2 December 2017 (UTC)