Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/09/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_in_Vlodrop_Holland_-_CC_BY-NC-ND_1000x368.jpg){kind=link}
copyvio. screen grab Saqib (talk) 07:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Replied at Commons:Deletion requests/File:OwaisiMM.png. A screenshot from a youtube video uploaded with CC. Royroydeb (talk) 09:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Inclusion of skull element renders this non-trival, equivalent at English Wikipedia w:en:File:The Punisher logo.jpeg considered non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 12:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
doubtful own work Eurodyne (talk) 16:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: was reuploaded after deletion. --Jcb (talk) 21:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saqibjaved1.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BC2.jpg L3X1 (talk) 18:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, copied off official website L3X1 (talk) 18:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, copied off official website. L3X1 (talk) 18:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BC2.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:BC3.jpg L3X1 (talk) 18:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:28, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
copyvio https://shop.dylanhaegens.nl/producten/accessoires/cap-zwart-wit Kattenkruid (talk) 20:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Achal Harsh (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images fail COM:EDUSE. User blocked on English Wikipedia for creating autobiographical pages.
- File:Achal harsh with sharukh khan 06.jpg
- File:Achal harsh with sharukh khan 05.jpg
- File:Achal harsh with sharukh khan 04.jpg
- File:Achal harsh with sharukh khan 02.jpg
- File:Achal harsh with sharukh khan 01.jpg
- File:Achal harsh with sharukh khan 03.jpg
Utcursch (talk) 02:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 18:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
out-of-scope personal photo kennethaw88 • talk 07:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:03, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
out-of-scope personal photo kennethaw88 • talk 08:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused, personal, OoS image. E4024 (talk) 11:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 08:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out-of-scope personal photo kennethaw88 • talk 08:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file -
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. No indication of significance for any Wikimedia project. Blakegripling ph (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Ultra low quality: blurry with an obvious lack of brightness. Really useless if intended to illustrate the Clio II BarnCas (talk) 02:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:07, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Ultra low quality: blurry with an obvious lack of brightness. Really useless if intended to illustrate the Clio II BarnCas (talk) 02:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- "English: Imagem de baixa qualidade de carro capotado..." I took this from the description of the file. The uploader knew from day 1 that this was an "imagem de baixa qualidade". And that "baixa qualidade" is so notorious that if you took the pic from the Category:Renault Clio II, where it is now, to Category:Truman Capote that wouldn't make much a difference. Indeed, as we can device the silhouette of a man in the pic, but no car at all, we could assume more easily that the file Capote3 is about the writer. Delete --E4024 (talk) 07:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:07, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope: w:Special:Undelete/User:Nikkehiru. MER-C 04:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope: w:Special:Undelete/User:Zeechyelectronic/sandbox MER-C 04:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Moved to Category:Holi in the United States and Category:Spanish Fork, Utah. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, Non trival third party logo design, Equivalent at English Wikipedia considered non-free w:File:Santa Tecla FC.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Article at fr wiki fr:Lumberjack_(DJ) was deleted. Also, likely copyvio as the subject and alleged rights holder are the same, but it's not a self-portrait. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality slide scanned at low res, high res version is File:(1)Quarantine Station013.jpg Sardaka (talk) 08:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Quarantine_Station013.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality, scanned at low res, high res version is File:(1)Quarantine_Station012.jpg Sardaka (talk) 08:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Quarantine_Station012.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible violation of personality rights/privacy. Subject(if correct description) has no wp-page. Notable? No metadata/exif. Not used. DavidIvar (talk) 11:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Source is dubious. The image is also here, allegedly collected from a facebook site: https://www.flickr.com/photos/33014369@N00/891423006
Deleted: per nomination and comments. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Does it fall within our scope? Mhhossein talk 11:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Added to two different wikipedia articles. --Themightyquill (talk) 13:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Small picture, the only upload of the uploader. (Before DR'ing topless men I began to check the uploader.) It has been in the cat rappers but I'm not sure if that is a professional occupation. On the other hand, the "own work" claim seems not realistic to me. Maybe someone sent this image by WhatsApp. E4024 (talk) 14:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 12:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file. OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also subject and attributed source are the same, but it doesn't appear to be a self-portrait. --Themightyquill (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file. OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also subject and attributed source are the same, but it doesn't appear to be a self-portrait. --Themightyquill (talk) 13:41, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file. OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - also subject and attributed source are the same, but it doesn't appear to be a self-portrait. --Themightyquill (talk) 13:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Richrocksb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: w:Special:Undelete/User:Richrocksb/sandbox.
- File:Rich Rock SB Music.png
- File:Rich Rock SB - i Love u (upcoming official song).png
- File:Rich Rock SB Studio.jpg
- File:Meri Jane Jana - Rich Rock SB.jpg
- File:Baby - Rich Rock SB.jpg
- File:Rich Rock SB Photoshoot.jpg
- File:Rich Rock SB Profile.png.jpg
- File:Rich Rock SB Music Logo.png
- File:Rich Rock SB Logo.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
MER-C 04:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edwin Boeckxstaens (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal artwork, no or little educational value, out of scope. Commons is not for advertising/promoting oneself.
- File:IMG 0896 kopie.jpg
- File:Painting door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Embleem door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Child Art door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon van mannetje door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon van man -Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Cartoon van bootje edwin boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Visual art Edwin .jpg
- File:Stilleven met blokjes door Edwin Boeckxstaens .jpg
- File:Portret van persoon door Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Orange studie door Edwin boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Modern Art portret van vrouw door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Modern art Mini-schilderij door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Modern art Edwin.jpg
- File:Modern art Edwin-Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Modern Art edwin--.jpg
- File:Modern Art edwin-.jpg
- File:Modern Art edwin.jpg
- File:Modern Art door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Modern Art door Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Cartoon schilderij door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon Potret van vrouw door -edwin -boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon Muzikanten door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon modelstudie door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Acrylic paint Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Cartoon Boeckxstaens Edwin.jpg
- File:Acrylic paint Edwin Boeckxstaens----.jpg
- File:-Modern Art Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:-Modern art edwin.jpg
- File:-Majorelle bleu edwin-.jpg
- File:--head edwin.jpg
- File:---self-portret edwin.jpg
- File:----Man Edwin Boeckxstaens----.jpg
- File:---Cartoon Edwin Boeckxstaens---.jpg
- File:Modern Art portret door -Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Triestige vrouw.jpg
- File:Portret van gebroken iemand.jpg
- File:Gebroken portret.jpg
- File:Portret van vrouw.jpg
- File:Gebroken relatie.jpg
- File:Schilderij van man in auto door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Portret door Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Schilderij door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Tekening door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Portret door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Fishtank door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Hereniging.jpg
- File:Fotoheemdalvzw 298.jpg
- File:Fotoheemdalvzw 297.jpg
- File:Schilderij Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Nelson mandalla.jpg
- File:Groepstekening Edwin & vrienden.jpg
- File:Make art not war door Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Tekening van Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Drakenalfabetvoor scherm Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Edwin ontwerp.jpg
- File:Edwin .jpg
- File:Man op Boot.jpg
- File:Portet van vrouw.jpg
- File:Spelende Kinderen.jpg
- File:Vrij werk van Edwin Boeckxstaens.jpg
- File:Edwin Boeckxstaens met eigen werk.jpg
- File:Edwin Boeckxstaens-.jpg
- File:Portret van vrouw in psychiatrie.jpg
- File:Portret van man.jpg
- File:Portret van man in tuin.jpg
- File:Schilderij van man met auto.jpg
- File:Fotoheemdalvzw 286.jpg
- File:Edwin Boeckxstaens.JPG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 18:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as OOS, COM:ADVERT. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:23, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Per derivative.
- File:Pincone 11 sided.jpg
- File:Pincone 8 sided.jpg
- File:Pincone 5 sided.jpg
- File:Pincone 4 sided.jpg
- File:Pincone 3 sided.jpg
Mhhossein talk 04:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Images have no context or information about them; have little to no educational value and no foreseeable use.
- File:Jennartz1.jpg
- File:Pincone 10 sided.jpg
- File:Pincone 9 sided.jpg
- File:Pincone 6 sided.jpg
- File:Pincone 7 sided.jpg
~Kevin Payravi (talk) 23:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:59, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused textlogo of non-notable company (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 07:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Logo is not neccessarily simple as claimed, equivalent media at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Chicago Bulls logo.svg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 12:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Image is not necessarily simple as claimed, contains non trival elements. Image would meet non-free use criteria for English Wikipedia ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 12:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Not simple as claimed, logo contains substantial non-trival elements. Equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:Iowa Wolves logo.svg considered non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:41, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 12:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Not simple as claimed, logo contains moderate non-trival elements. Equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:Lakeland Magic logo.svg considered non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 12:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Not necessarily simple, Non trival logo element replaces U in logo, Equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:San Antonio Spurs.svg is considered non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 12:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not necessarily own work as claimed, Element contains a non-trival element (right). Equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Tunisian Ligue 1 (logo).png . ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 12:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
All seem to be non-trival third party designs, a number tagged as simple. I am willing to assume good faith about this uploader being unfamiliar with what is permitted on Commons, compared to other projects, but for the fact that there seem to be a LOT of warnings about copyright compliance on their talk-page, prior to my earlier DR nominations (excluded from this one).
- File:Memphis Hustle.svg
- File:Washington wizards.svg
- File:Utah jazz.svg
- File:Tor logo.svg
- File:Sacramento kings.svg
- File:Phoenix suns.svg
- File:Philadelphia 76ers.svg
- File:New orleans pelicans.svg
- File:Milwaukee bucks.svg
- File:Memphis grizzlies.svg
- File:Los angeles clippers.svg
- File:Houston rockets.svg
- File:Portland trail blazers.svg
- File:Minnesota timberwolves.svg
- File:Dallas mavericks.svg
- File:Cleveland cavaliers.svg
- File:Charlotte hornets.svg
- File:Boston celtics primary.svg
- File:Atlanta hawks logo.svg
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Most (maybe all) can be found on en-wiki as non-free fair use images Ronhjones (Talk) 13:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Norihiro Okada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal artworks, out of scope
G I Chandor (talk) 11:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - even if in scope, stay the copyrights issues. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file, also dark or blurry, will not serve any purpose. E4024 (talk) 11:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot? Has any notability? E4024 (talk) 11:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + logog above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A personal pose at the Blue Mountains. Perfect for WhatsApp status. OoS. E4024 (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @E4024: Please also see this related categories for discussion request covering photos by the same Flickr user as well as this discussion. Ubcule (talk) 13:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. I had not seen them. I did not read them either. I'm tired of long discussions, that is one reason I edit nowadays more Commons than any WP. I saw the pic in the Category:Unused personal files (first page) and noticing that the person is more focused than the mountains I DR'ed it. When I looked at my contributions I saw that it was uploaded by a certain user, whom I prefer to avoid. (See, even without their presence we are discussing here. I don't want to discuss certain things.) I simply DR'ed a UPF. If I made something wrong please either tell me directly what it is or correct it. If this file was very important keep it. I only want to discuss simple things like opening or not a new cat, how to name it etc. If you wish I may also withdraw this nom. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- @E4024: ; Okay. You're getting way too defensive and reading too much into my message.
- It was just a "heads up" to let you know that the image was already part of a (much) larger issue that was already under discussion and avoid duplicated (i.e. wasted) effort.
- You're free to ignore it if you wish.
- I'm just another user involved in the case above. I'm *not* a proxy for the "certain user" you were talking about(!), and I didn't know your background. Ubcule (talk) 14:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. I had not seen them. I did not read them either. I'm tired of long discussions, that is one reason I edit nowadays more Commons than any WP. I saw the pic in the Category:Unused personal files (first page) and noticing that the person is more focused than the mountains I DR'ed it. When I looked at my contributions I saw that it was uploaded by a certain user, whom I prefer to avoid. (See, even without their presence we are discussing here. I don't want to discuss certain things.) I simply DR'ed a UPF. If I made something wrong please either tell me directly what it is or correct it. If this file was very important keep it. I only want to discuss simple things like opening or not a new cat, how to name it etc. If you wish I may also withdraw this nom. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The pic could be taken from LA Casting. E4024 (talk) 12:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio http://lacasting.com/elfaizi. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr. Frauke Bayer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical paintings and documents.. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. w:de:Bernhard Nowak died in 1985.
- File:Bernhard Nowak- Atelierspuk- Ein Kleemännchen führt den Entarteten eine artige Palette vor, um 1938, Tusche koloriert, 25 x 19 cm.jpg
- File:Künstlerbund "Die Unabhängigen" in München.pdf
- File:Staatlich anerkannte Zeichenschule München.pdf
- File:Bernhard Nowak- Dame Politik, um 1932, Holzschnitt, koloriert, 18,2 x 11,5 cm.jpg
- File:Bernhard Nowak- Heinrich lass die Mauer..., um 1940, kolorierte Tuschezeichnung, 16 x 9,8 cm.jpg
- File:Bernhard Nowak- Festspielpublikum, um 1931, Tusche, laviert, 22 x 14,5 cm.jpg
- File:Bernhard Nowak- o.T. (Die Trinkerin), 1932, Tusche, 14,2 x 13 cm.jpg
- File:Bernhard Nowak- o.T. (Das schöne Paar), 1930, Tusche laviert, koloriert, 21,7 x 16 cm.jpg
- File:Bernhard Nowak- Zukunftsträume, um 1965, Collage, 25,5 x 9 cm.jpg
- File:Bernhard Nowak- o.T. (Nacktes Paar, sitzend), 1957, 42 x 42 cm.jpg
- File:Bernhard Nowak- o.T. (Not leidende Kinder 1), 1946, Tusche, 26,5 x 14,5 cm.jpg
- File:Bernhard Nowak- Coldwar, um 1946, Gouache, 34,5 x 23,5 cm.jpg
- File:Bernhard Nowak- Krieg, 1946, Collage mit Zeitungspapier, Farbe, 59 x 46,8 cm.jpg
- File:Brief von Ferdinand von Habsburg an Bernhard Nowak.pdf
- File:Bernhard Nowak- Großstadt, 1930, Mischtechnik, 39 x 54 cm.jpg
- File:Bernhard Nowak. Blick zum Monte Baldo, 1927, Bleistift, 25 x 41 cm.jpg
- File:Schulzeugnis von Bernhard Nowak, 1915.pdf
- File:Berhard Nowak, Fotografie um 1925.jpg
,_1932,_Tusche,_14,2_x_13_cm.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_1930,_Tusche_laviert,_koloriert,_21,7_x_16_cm.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_1957,_42_x_42_cm.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_1946,_Tusche,_26,5_x_14,5_cm.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. No indication of significance for any Wikimedia project. Blakegripling ph (talk) 01:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree (just like the other image) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in June 2009 as non-notable. Out of project scope. ℯxplicit 02:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Mistaken for CC BY-SA 2.0 when actually CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 Ham105 (talk) 02:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. The logo is in en.wiki as fair use. Taivo (talk) 07:25, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Logo design is not necessarily simple as claimed, equivalent media at English Wikipedia considered non-free w:File:Agua Caliente Clippers logo.svg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 12:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
UPF and OoS. This is not Facebook. E4024 (talk) 07:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small photo without metadata, the uploader is himself depicted and this is not a selfie as claimed, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Nice picture but should not have a Water mark Geertivp (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:26, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
out of scope. this is snap photo of unnamed person. eien20 (talk) 09:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:29, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Do we need to make advertisement of Nike.com? Do they make any donations to the WMF? This is sheer advert. E4024 (talk) 12:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused textlogo of non-notable organization (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 13:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammad Jawad Rahimi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Standing for Justice.jpg
- File:Getting ready for a professional future.jpg
- File:Graduation Day2.jpg
- File:Speaking for few thousands of people.jpg
- File:Graduation Photo.jpg
- File:Mohammad Jawad Rahimi.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lRzGIlD2Wks/Um-FnB173UI/AAAAAAAAG9A/xoJeyouCj7Q/s1600/machu-picchu-130.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Apparently this is not a free image. This is similar to http://i25.tinypic.com/90sz6q.jpg Ovruni (talk) 05:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete, earliest appearance online is this forum post in 2008 from a tourist who published a set of similar photos. seb26 (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: low quality: out of focus. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by José Marcos Barrientos López (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal pic, clearly OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation: https://www.jens-zimmermann.org/pressefoto/ - without permission this picture cannot be used Squasher (talk) 15:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 16:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 16:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 937caveman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images of user with no other contributions. Commons is not Facebook
- File:Dannny.jpg
- File:Caveman 937.jpg
- File:Daniel C. Howard.jpg
- File:Danny C. Howard.jpg
- File:937Caveman.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 19:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Self-promotion Apocheir (talk) 19:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 22:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Coming from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2267926/figure/F1/ (mentionned as such in source=) but the initial publication is not CC-by-sa compatible Habertix (talk) 23:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PRP. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
{{NoFoP-Ukraine}} Alexander Roumega (talk) 09:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
bad uploaded Микола Василечко (talk) 17:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Is this a dress, a work of art? The uploader has only passed by to leave this image; therefore I cannot ask them. Please someone convince me that it is not OoS. E4024 (talk) 07:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- By the way who is Franck Turner-Smith, a famous designer? I know Franck Turner, the musician, but not him. If this is an art work don't we need a permission from Mr. Franck Turner-Smith? --E4024 (talk) 07:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. This is not Facebook. E4024 (talk) 07:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Also: File:Rao dhruv with Ammy yadav.jpg, File:Rao dhruv selfie.jpg, and File:Editing audio's and video's.jpg. --E4024 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Mistake, i want to delete this picture. Lephamtrongthienvnm (talk) 07:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work, readily found on the internet. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Mistake. I want to delele this picture. Lephamtrongthienvnm (talk) 07:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work, readily found on the internet. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, in my opinion the photo is out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Eudald Palma (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in ca.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not an acitve or meaningful contributor. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Vandalism. Done with the purpose to mocking fun of somebody Ravave (talk) 11:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Vandalism. Done with the purpose to mocking fun of somebody Ravave (talk) 11:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}} (at least, unused anywhere correctly); out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 07:20, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Previously deleted. Now to prevent deletion added to an irrelevant Wictionary page. E4024 (talk) 11:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Three unused personal files from one uploader. This is not a personal gallery of pics, Facebook or similar. They are OoS. E4024 (talk) 12:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- The other UPFs are: File:Sero2.png and File:Sero3.png. --E4024 (talk) 12:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Own work? I doubt. OoS also. E4024 (talk) 15:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope, poor qualit Batholith (talk) 23:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and probable screengrab derivative. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Лука Влајковић (talk · contribs)
[edit]doubtful own work
- File:Ми.јпг.jpg
- File:5bf583819f76925cd947a8500d392dee--african-hats-tanzania.jpg
- File:082910f78ed908ae298f6894fea420a7--tanzania-kenya.jpg
- File:M16090 tz.png
- File:Fiji-people11.jpg
- File:Чулмици1,јпг.jpg
- File:Пчулмицијпг.jpg
- File:Чулмицимм,јпг.jpg
- File:Мапа дијалеката1111.јпг.png
- File:Мапа дијалеката11.јпг.png
- File:Ах.јпг.jpg
- File:Ахајци.јпг.jpg
- File:Ерзја застава.јпг.jpg
- File:Kapa eryjanke.jpg
- File:Deca eryijanci.jpg
- File:Телеути-жена.јпг.jpg
- File:Телеути.јпг.jpg
- File:Диј.зетско рашки.јпг.jpg
- File:Dijalekti.jpg
- File:Чамци.јпг.jpg
- File:More i čamac.jpg.jpg
- File:Čamac.jpg.jpg
- File:Дан бурјатског.јпг.jpg
- File:Дете Бурјат.јпг.jpg
- File:Buryatskiy-yazyk-s-sayta-rubur.ru.jpg
- File:Soyoti web 002.jpg
- File:TASS 355166 opt.jpg
Eurodyne (talk) 16:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:22, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Ata Bozaci is a living artist. There is no evidence that he has given permission for these to be on Commons.
- File:Ata bozaci-mp-mls transparent.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-ba-e street-2013.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-ba-point of view-2007.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-ba-satan in heaven-2003.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-ba-church-orange-2003.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-ba-black devil-2003.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-toast birdy-2008.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-toast pink white blue-2011.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-toast swing-2004.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-toast poppy-2011.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-toast in the box-2001.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-toast in heaven-1999.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-toast bonedog-1997.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-toast-1992.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
The files are various images of artistic works attributed to Ata Bozaci and other artists. As the are no proper permissions (such as link to source page, or OTRS permission) for the files, their permission status is unknown, and should be deleted if no permissions from the artists are given.
- File:Ata bozaci-imme-springer-2019.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-frei-astronaut-2017.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-toast swing-2004.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-fsof-nackt schwimmen-2017-1.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-fsof-online-2016-2.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-lb-loosing eyes open.jpg
- File:Ata bozaci-hype-1.jpg
廣九直通車 (talk) 05:04, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect chemical structure. Cycloastragenol does not have the double bonds that are shown in this structure. Compare with correct structure File:Cycloastragenol.svg. Ed (Edgar181) 13:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thats true, sorry... that image should be deleted. I dont know how... An Administrator is going to do that?... My image was wrong because i was uncertain about 'spirols', 'cycloalcans' and those 'bridges that form above or below planar alkan-atom-constructs'... i will be more carefully before i upload next time.. i did already an 'edit-undo' on the two respective pages... wtf... why can i do not delete my partly self constructed image?!... no, sorry i dont want to know... sorry for from me produced inconvinience... because i would assume that edgar and me are thinking the same about the "former image was much better", i would suggest that the "red x" could maybe be removed which somehow insulted the former picture of maybe not congruent with 'chemspider' or something. tx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ot577 (talk • contribs) 21:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC) (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Delete: the source page shows no copyright details for this image. The bottom of the page specifically states: Text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0, images are available under various licenses, see each image for details. So without a license of any kind the claim this is a public domain image is false. Ww2censor (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Many thanks for checking this information. I had not seen this, and did not know how to handle such a file on this site. This is why I added {{LicenseReview}} and . I have also asked the author to add a license to the file. If he does, and use one acceptable to wikimedia, it can be restored later. Thanks again, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 10:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- If the copyright holder changes the license to one we accept, then the image can be kept, or if it has been deleted, it can be restored. You would then at first ask the deleting admin to review the deletion or take it to the undeletion request page. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 10:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No license given at the source to indicate if this particular image is free. Can we assume it is a certain license? --Leoboudv (talk) 04:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 08:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Per this nomination. Mhhossein talk 04:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Doubtful own claim. Original photo should be scanned and uploaded. Ruthven (msg) 13:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
no fop in USA 149.254.235.43 05:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Just emailed the national park service and got this reply:
Hello, Thank you for your interest in Jefferson National Expansion Memorial. There is no restriction on use of images of the Gateway Arch grounds. Feel free to use your panorama, lovely shot. Jennifer Clark -- Jennifer Clark Archivist Jefferson National Expansion Memorial 11 North Fourth Street St. Louis, MO 63102
- --Dschwen (talk) 15:29, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Also, the arch was completed before 1978. I challenge you to show me the copyright notice. Certainly nobody prevented the public from photographing it before 1978 (on the contrary I'd say). --Dschwen (talk) 15:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- As a side note, in a follow up email the NPS archivist considers the Arch a building, which also would make FoP apply. --Dschwen (talk) 17:25, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Keep per Dschwen. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)- This photography was recognized several times, for example as „Picture of the Day“ in 2008. So it is very silly to come around with a deletion request in 2017. Keep --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 19:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Dschwen et al. Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
copyvio. screen grab Saqib (talk) 07:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Replied at Commons:Deletion requests/File:OwaisiMM.png. A screenshot from a youtube video uploaded with CC. Royroydeb (talk) 09:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
copyvio. screen grabs Saqib (talk) 07:25, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Replied at Commons:Deletion requests/File:OwaisiMM.png. A screenshot from a youtube video uploaded with CC. Royroydeb (talk) 09:25, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Royroydeb. Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
copyvio. screen grab Saqib (talk) 07:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Replied at Commons:Deletion requests/File:OwaisiMM.png. A screenshot from a youtube video uploaded with CC. Royroydeb (talk) 09:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Royroydeb. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
copyvio. screen grab Saqib (talk) 07:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Replied at Commons:Deletion requests/File:OwaisiMM.png. A screenshot from a youtube video uploaded with CC. Royroydeb (talk) 09:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Royroydeb. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
copyvio. screen grab Saqib (talk) 07:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Replied at Commons:Deletion requests/File:OwaisiMM.png. A screenshot from a youtube video uploaded with CC. Royroydeb (talk) 09:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Royroydeb. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Video unavailable. Not sure about license for a BLP ~Moheen (keep talking) 08:00, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
видео не открывается, не работает Панн (talk) 16:21, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
copyvio. screen grab Saqib (talk) 07:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Replied at Commons:Deletion requests/File:OwaisiMM.png. A screenshot from a youtube video uploaded with CC. Royroydeb (talk) 09:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Royroydeb. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
copyvio. screen grab Saqib (talk) 07:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Replied at Commons:Deletion requests/File:OwaisiMM.png. A screenshot from a youtube video uploaded with CC. Royroydeb (talk) 09:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Royroydeb. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
copyvio. screen grab Saqib (talk) 07:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Replied at Commons:Deletion requests/File:OwaisiMM.png. A screenshot from a youtube video uploaded with CC.Royroydeb (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Royroydeb. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
copyvio. screen grab Saqib (talk) 07:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep:@Saqib: The video uploader has uploaded the video in youtube with a Creative Commons license allowing it to be reused. (The same reply to all other nominations). For a list see [[Category:Screenshots from "47 YouTubers Laugh Without Smiling"]], [[Category:Videos available on YouTube]]. Royroydeb (talk) 08:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Royroydeb: . I see. and what about File:FazlulRahman.png? I do not think this video of 92 News channel is under CC BY SA license. --Saqib (talk) 08:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- And similarly I do not see the permission if this and this video are also under CC by SA license. Though I can see the CC BY SA tags in the video description but the copyright owner (the news channel( and uploader of videos on YouTube are two different entities. --Saqib (talk) 08:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Saqib: The Fazlul Rahman video had been uploaded by the news channel with Creative Commons license. Yes, the screenshot of Janab Owaisi's debate with Rajdeep Sardesai's video is uploaded by someone else (and I dont know what to comment on it), but his speech at Makkah Masjid is a property of uploader Siasat Daily only (there is watermark). Royroydeb (talk) 08:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- And similarly I do not see the permission if this and this video are also under CC by SA license. Though I can see the CC BY SA tags in the video description but the copyright owner (the news channel( and uploader of videos on YouTube are two different entities. --Saqib (talk) 08:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Royroydeb: . I see. and what about File:FazlulRahman.png? I do not think this video of 92 News channel is under CC BY SA license. --Saqib (talk) 08:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Royroydeb. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
copyvio. screen grab Saqib (talk) 07:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Replied Commons:Deletion requests/File:OwaisiMM.png. Royroydeb (talk) 08:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Royroydeb. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Adamgerber80 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Taken from a youtube video from a channel called Planet Bulletin. The video since has been deleted but the channel itself does not release any of it's content under any licesne as per their currnet channel [1] Ronhjones (Talk) 22:48, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept, the file was nominated for deletion in the past and was kept. I do not see good new arguments here. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. This is not Facebook. E4024 (talk) 07:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- @E4024: We have Category:Diplomas. Doesn't this fit? - Themightyquill (talk) 12:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't know that. Let me check if I can find my Oriental Languages Diploma and take a picture of it to add in there. After giving a smile to my favourite admin (since Daphne abandoned us, I mean as an admin :) frankly I saw this as a "personal" document. Isn't it? Can you read what it says? P.S. I remember Çetin Altan writing about people who thought erotic books written in Ottoman times were sacred text. I cannot read this. Sorry for DR'ing something I cannot read. Keep it if you wish. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 12:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- It's absolutely a personal document, which is why I wouldn't upload something like this (a diploma, a driver's licence, a birth certificate, etc). But we know some people upload all kinds of personal images to commons that most people would be uncomfortable sharing. I agree, however, it would be nice to have better metadata about this, from someone who can read it. - Themightyquill (talk) 17:07, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't know that. Let me check if I can find my Oriental Languages Diploma and take a picture of it to add in there. After giving a smile to my favourite admin (since Daphne abandoned us, I mean as an admin :) frankly I saw this as a "personal" document. Isn't it? Can you read what it says? P.S. I remember Çetin Altan writing about people who thought erotic books written in Ottoman times were sacred text. I cannot read this. Sorry for DR'ing something I cannot read. Keep it if you wish. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 12:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: logos and writings might be copyrighted. Ruthven (msg) 13:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Logo of non-notable company (no mention in en.wiki). Article project about the company was rejected due to promotionality. Indian company Cigniti is twice mentioned in en.wiki, but the nominated company is situated in Texas. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:34, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:41, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
user Steve Engelhardt claims to be the author of this image, but it shows "M. Kahnke" as a signature. Just plain Bill (talk) 13:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- I helped, and I am sending this to Michael Kankhe so he can say what he thinks here. You are being ridiculous bill --Steveengelhardt (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Low quality, hard to decipher. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:12, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Aside from the possible copyright violation, the image is full of w:chartjunk, the graphic equivalent of word salad. "Hard to decipher" is a serious flaw in an information graphic. This one carries an aroma of cargo cult science, with stylish features but elementary, trivial content. One particularly meaningless bit of content is the distance labeled "X", which indicates a slant range between two arbitrarily determined points; it is not explained how this relates to any real-world application. It may be meant to represent height above sea level, or altitude, for small values of theta, but the graphic goes far beyond those small values. I see this image being used on pages promoting fringe flat-earth views, hosted at Eric Dubay's site, at the Atlantean conspiracy site, and at Steve Engelhardt's own flat earth wiki. Notice that the NASA base image is labeled "imaginary ball Earth."
This image no longer appears in Wikipedia article space, and does not appear to serve any educational purpose. There are clearer diagrams available, used for example at w:Zenith and w:Horizon. See related Commons:Deletion requests/File:Earth's Curvature.jpg regarding a derivative image. Just plain Bill (talk) 19:57, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Do Not Delete. I've spoken with Michael Kankhe, he's told me that he is preparing a response to these accusations. --Steveengelhardt (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. One week has passed, and still no responde. In case, fill an UNDEL request. Ruthven (msg) 13:35, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Low image quality, that one is much better and also can replace this image. B dash (talk) 14:12, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This image was taken by a different satellite than the suggested replacement. The outline of the coast is also stronger in this image. The images are not the same (but very similar). The image proposed for deletion is high quality and should not be deleted. AHeneen (talk) 19:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per AHeneen. Ruthven (msg) 13:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Low image quality, that one is much better and also can replace this image. B dash (talk) 14:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This image was taken by a different satellite than the suggested replacement. The outline of the coast is also stronger in this image. The images are not the same (but very similar). The image proposed for deletion is high quality and should not be deleted. AHeneen (talk) 19:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Images are similar.Kishfan (talk) 08:38, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 13:36, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Dear EugeneZelenko, it is not of my own work. As I have already mentioned in the image file. While reading the article, I thought it should have a photograph to recognize. In that case, I searched online and get this photo. Moreover, I have mentioned the website from where, I have get this. Even-though, there is an option in the licence area in such a case. I do not need a licence in my name. I would like to have this photo on this article and its licence can be belongs to that website. Thank you for your review... Willy-nilly (talk) 11:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Image could be kept if it's in public domain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory. Current license tag is definitely wrong. Source information is missing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Willy-nilly: You can sometimes upload non-free content to English wikipedia under fair use. See en:Wikipedia:Non-free content. But it's unlikely to be acceptable here on commons. - Themightyquill (talk) 12:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi! Dear Themightyquill, Thanks its fine to get such an idea. Let me try that. --- Willy-nilly (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of a drawing in a banner Discasto talk 23:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: license not compatible with COmmons. Ruthven (msg) 13:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
File:20130723 MERU (Maharishi European Research University) in Vlodrop Holland - CC BY-NC-ND 1000x368.jpg
[edit]_in_Vlodrop_Holland_-_CC_BY-NC-ND_1000x368.jpg){kind=link}
_in_Vlodrop_Holland_-_CC_BY-NC-ND_1000x368.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
License to check. The CC BY-NC-ND part in file name suggests that the image is not CC-BY-SA Habertix (talk) 23:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The file was uploaded with free licenses, no traces of different copies on th Net. Ruthven (msg) 13:41, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted recently uploaded unused file per uploader's request. JGHowes talk - 01:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Turns out it was not the version I created, it was a similar one that was not created by me. My apologies for the mix up as I thought I was uploading the right file. Penguizilla (talk) 15:08, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Works of Malaysian government are protected with copyright 50 years. The organization was established in 1972 and the logo is probably even younger. The logo needs OTRS-permission from organization representative to stay in Commons. Taivo (talk) 08:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Works of Malaysian government are protected with copyright 50 years. The organization was established in 1973 and the logo is probably even younger. The logo needs OTRS-permission from organization representative to stay in Commons. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
{{NoFoP-Ukraine}} Alexander Roumega (talk) 09:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
com:PENIS Pippobuono (talk) 09:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Typo, --cfr File:Hexaflex.JPG Lotje (talk) 11:15, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, and SVG is preferred over JPG. Rename if necessary. Ruthven (msg) 12:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
與File:TW CHW165a.svg重複 TimChen (talk) 13:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. You can use {{Rename}} next time. Ruthven (msg) 12:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Wrong file format makes it OoS. Ruthven (msg) 12:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
This is not a 2016 pic nor own work. I bet one of my plates with a good wine. (See my uploads to choose the dish. :) E4024 (talk) 14:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Seems OoS and there is some watermark which I cannot read. Maybe its a copyright warning? E4024 (talk) 15:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Émile Dacier died in 1952. Copyright violation. 90.61.170.176 19:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:37, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Émile Dacier died in 1952. Copyright violation. 90.61.170.176 19:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
No meta data, and maybe not his or here own work Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free software subject to EULA. ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:06, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palais de la Porte Dorée
[edit]No FOP in France. L'architecte, Albert Laprade est mort en 1978. Concernant les bas-reliefs, le sculpteur, Alfred Janniot est mort en 1969.
- File:Expo 1931 Musee.jpg
- File:Cité-Immigration-Façade.JPG
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée exterior.JPG
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée.jpg
- File:P1030711 Paris XII Palais de la Porte-Doré détail façade rwk.JPG
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée portico.JPG
- File:Paris Palais de la Porte Dorée.JPG
- File:Paris Palais Porte Doree 1.JPG
- File:Paris Palais Porte Doree 2.jpg
- File:L'entrée du Palais de la Porte Dorée, Paris juin 2013.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée, Paris 2013.jpg
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée @ Paris (23287924674).jpg
- File:P1030713 Paris XII Palais de la Porte Dorée détail fresque rwk.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 01.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 02.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 03.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 04.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 05.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 06.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 07.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 08.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 09.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 10.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 11.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 12.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 13.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 14.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 15.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 16.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 17.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 18.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 19.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 20.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 21.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 22.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 23.JPG
- File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 24.JPG
- File:Jardin de Palais de la Porte Dorée.JPG
- File:Marseille sur le bas-relief d'Alfred Janniot (CNHI).jpg
- File:Musee.jpg
- File:MuseeDesColonies-1erEtage.JPG
- File:MuseeDesColonies-SalonDuMaréchalLyautey.JPG
- File:MuseeDesColonies-SalonDuMinistreReynaud.JPG
- File:Aquarium tropical.JPG
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée 1, Paris 2 March 2013.jpg
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée 3, Paris 2 March 2013.jpg
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée Bureau Lyautey.jpg
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée central court ceiling.JPG
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée central court floor.JPG
- File:Palais Porte Dorée Plaque inauguration.jpg
- File:Paris (31233407216).jpg
- File:Paris - panoramio (823).jpg
- File:Paris - panoramio (838).jpg
- File:Paris - panoramio (846).jpg
- File:Paris - panoramio (849).jpg
- File:Paris - panoramio (852).jpg
- File:PPD Foyer.JPG
- File:PPD Fußbodenmosaik.JPG
- File:PPD Salon.JPG
- File:PPD Zentralhalle.JPG
- File:Art Musee.jpg
- File:L'espace intérieur de la CNHI.jpg
- File:La salle des fêtes du Palais de la Porte Dorée, Paris juin 2014.jpg
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée 2, Paris 2 March 2013.jpg
- File:MuseeDesColonies-EscalierEst-1erEtage.JPG
- File:MuseeDesColonies-EscalierEst-RdC.JPG
- File:Swastika Paris.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Thesupermat (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Concernant MuseeDesColonies-SalonDuMinistreReynaud.JPG il ne s'agit pas de l'oeuvre d'Albert Laprade (mort en 1978) mais cela ne change pas l'existence d'un problème de droit d'auteur car, si le mobilier est de Jacques-Emile Rhulmann (mort en 1933, donc il y a plus de 70 ans), les peintures sont de Louis Bouquet (mort en 1952) et donc encore soumises au droit d'auteur jusqu'à fin 2022. Concernant MuseeDesColonies-SalonDuMaréchalLyautey.JPG, il ne s'agit pas non plus de l'oeuvre d'Albert Laprade (mort en 1978) mais également cela ne change pas l'existence d'un problème de droit d'auteur puisque le mobilier et l'habillage sont d'Eugène Printz (mort en 1948, droits d'auteur jusqu'à fin 2018) et surtout les peintures de Ivanna et André Lemaître (morts en 1973 et 1965) dont les droits d'auteur s'éteindront fin 2043 et fin 2035. Faute d'information contraire, on peut effectivement supposer qu'Albert Laprade est l'auteur des couloirs et escaliers à l'intérieur du bâtiment et qu'il dispose encore de droits jusqu'en 2048 pour MuseeDesColonies-EscalierEst-1erEtage.JPG, MuseeDesColonies-1erEtage.JPG et MuseeDesColonies-EscalierEst-RdC.JPG. Donc, merci de bien vouloir supprimer ces 5 photos dont je suis l'auteur dès que possible.
- Pour les autres photos, certaines représentent l'oeuvre Pierre-Henri Ducos de La Haille (mort en 1972) et non d'Albert Laprade ou Alfred Janniot, mais cela ne change rien, elles sont aussi à supprimer.
- En revanche, Keep Palais Porte Dorée Plaque inauguration.jpg qui me semble être un simple plaque non soumise au droit d'auteur.
- O.Taris (talk) 10:29, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment @Thesupermat and O.Taris: Vous pouvez me faire des listes séparées pour chaque auteur/décision à prendre? Ainsi la résolution de ce cas sera plus rapide. Merci --Ruthven (msg) 12:37, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ruthven : j'ai détaillé le motif de suppressions de certaines photos de l'intérieur du monument, en précisant l'auteur des oeuvres photographiées, mais cela ne change pas grand chose, toutes les photos de la liste sont à supprimer car, quel que soit l'auteur de l'oeuvre photographiée, ces oeuvres ne sont pas encore libres de droit. Avec une seule exception selon moi, Palais Porte Dorée Plaque inauguration.jpg qui me semble être un simple plaque non soumise au droit d'auteur. O.Taris (talk) 07:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- O.Taris D'accord, fichiers à supprimer, mais comme les dates de mort ne sont pas les mêmes, il faut des listes séparées afin que les fichiers soient récupérés 70 ans après la mort de l'auteur. --Ruthven (msg) 16:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ruthven, je ne savais pas. Donc voici la liste.
- dernier auteur décédé en 1952
- File:MuseeDesColonies-SalonDuMinistreReynaud.JPG
- dernier auteur décédé en1969
- File:P1030713 Paris XII Palais de la Porte Dorée détail fresque rwk.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 01.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 02.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 03.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 04.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 05.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 06.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 07.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 08.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 09.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 10.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 11.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 12.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 13.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 14.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 15.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 16.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 17.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 18.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 19.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 20.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 21.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 22.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 23.JPG, File:Fresque façade Palais de la Porte Dorée 24.JPG, File:Marseille sur le bas-relief d'Alfred Janniot (CNHI).jpg, File:Paris (31233407216).jpg,
- dernier auteur décédé en 1972
- File:Art Musee.jpg
- dernier auteur décédé en 1973
- file:MuseeDesColonies-SalonDuMaréchalLyautey.JPG, File:Palais de la Porte Dorée Bureau Lyautey.jpg, File:PPD Salon.JPG
- dernier auteur décédé en 1978
- Toutes les autres photos sauf File:Palais Porte Dorée Plaque inauguration.jpg selon moi du domaine public et peut-être sauf File:Swastika Paris.jpg (je ne sais pas qui est l'auteur des mosaïques sur le sol de la grande salle).
- O.Taris (talk) 18:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ruthven, je ne savais pas. Donc voici la liste.
- O.Taris D'accord, fichiers à supprimer, mais comme les dates de mort ne sont pas les mêmes, il faut des listes séparées afin que les fichiers soient récupérés 70 ans après la mort de l'auteur. --Ruthven (msg) 16:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Ruthven : j'ai détaillé le motif de suppressions de certaines photos de l'intérieur du monument, en précisant l'auteur des oeuvres photographiées, mais cela ne change pas grand chose, toutes les photos de la liste sont à supprimer car, quel que soit l'auteur de l'oeuvre photographiée, ces oeuvres ne sont pas encore libres de droit. Avec une seule exception selon moi, Palais Porte Dorée Plaque inauguration.jpg qui me semble être un simple plaque non soumise au droit d'auteur. O.Taris (talk) 07:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, but one. J'ai signalé les fichiers à récupérer quand ce sera le moment. Ruthven (msg) 18:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Palais de la Porte Dorée
[edit]The architect of the 1931 Palais de la Porte-Dorée in Paris, Albert Laprade, died in 1978, so his works are still copyrighted in France, and the files should be deleted. There is no commercial freedom of panorama in France. The sculptor who created the bas-reliefs on the exterior, Alfred Janniot, died in 1969, so his copyrights will extire before those of Laparade. The files can be restored in 2049.
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 01.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 02.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 03.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 04.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 05.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 06.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 07.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 08.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 09.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 10.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 11.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 13.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 14.jpg
- File:Le Palais de la Porte Dorée 15.jpg
- File:Mare Nostrum (105884607).jpeg
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée en 1931.jpg
- File:Palais Porte Dorée - Paris XII (FR75) - 2021-06-26 - 3.jpg
- File:Palais Porte Dorée - Paris XII (FR75) - 2021-06-26 - 4.jpg
- File:Palais Porte Dorée - Paris XII (FR75) - 2021-06-26 - 5.jpg
- File:Palais Porte Dorée - Paris XII (FR75) - 2021-06-26 - 6.jpg
- File:Paris 12e Palais de la Porte Dorée 056.jpg
- File:Paris 12e Palais de la Porte Dorée 057.jpg
- File:Paris 12e Palais de la Porte Dorée 059.jpg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-06-26_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-06-26_-_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-06-26_-_5.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-06-26_-_6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 18:12, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- File:Palais de la Porte Dorée en 1931.jpg is not the uploader's own photograph and should not be restored before 2052 (with PD-old-assumed) unless the actual photographer is found, then 70 years pma (but not before 2049). --Rosenzweig τ 19:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
We are not told where this is. If it is permanently installed in a place that has FOP for sculptor, then it can be kept. Otherwise in order to keep it we must have a free license from the sculptor. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
No permission from David R. J. Stiennon
- File:Streit Shakespeare chair side view.jpg
- File:Streit Shakespeare chair seat up rear view.jpg
- File:Streit Shakespeare chair seat down front.jpg
- File:Streit Shakespeare chair seat up front view.jpg
- File:Streit Slumber Chair partially exploded.jpg
Jcb (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Highly unlikely that uploader is the copyright holder, as claimed. (Could make an argument for threshold of originality.) Apocheir (talk) 20:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree it's unlikely own work, and TOO is iffy. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: карты по умолчанию защищены авторским правом. Dogad75 (talk) 20:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:07, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Delete: actually the Twitter posts refer to non-commercial licence which we do not accept. Maybe the uploader can request the copyright holder for a specific Creative Commons license such as {{Cc-by-4.0}} or {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} that we accept. This is effectively currently licensed as {{Cc-by-nc-3.0}} and certainly not as PD. Ww2censor (talk) 22:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is non-commercial, why would an image require commercial use? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 23:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Darkwarriorblake: Indeed wikipedia is non-commercial and at first that seems a bit curious to uploaders but because there are other users of wikipedia material who may sell their products, so we only accept freely licenced images with no commercial or derivative restrictions. Perhaps COM:SCOPE will help you understand, specifically this section. You could ask the copyright holder to upload the image to a separate webpage, not linked to any other if they don't want it easily found, and attach a free license to it, such as {{Cc-by-4.0}} or {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} but it must be released by the copyright holder who is usually the photographer and not the subject of the image. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 23:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: , I've emailed the photographer and she's fine with it being licensed under either creative commons licenses you mention. What do I need to do? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 21:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- You need to have her follow the procedure found at COM:OTRS but preferably using the Interactive Release Generator! or much quicker because the OTRS team are quite backlogged at 47 days, she could upload the image to a new webpage on her own website with a statement indicating the exact copyright she prefers, or if she has a Flickr account she could upload it there and choose one of the acceptable license as indicated, though Flickr uses version 2.0 not the updated 4.0 version of the Creative Commons licenses. Then just add that source to the image with the tag {{LicenseReview}} or {{Flickrreview}} as appropriate so a human can verify the license at the new source. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 21:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: , what happens if I ask her to upload it to Flickr and it only has this less up to date option? Will it still be acceptable? I don't want to ask her to do a tonne of stuff when she is doing us a favour. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- I understand that asking copyright holders to do special things is a pain. In practice there is too much practical difference between subsequent version numbers of Creative Commons licenses but if you really want to read the details go here. At the present time Flickr only offers the older version 2.0 and they have close to 300 millions images using various CC licenses of which more than 110 million use a license we accept, so there is no problem for us using {{Cc-by-2.0}} or {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} that Flickr provides for users to choose. We have thousands of images under those licenses. Don't sweat it. Ww2censor (talk) 21:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Darkwarriorblake: How do you want to go forward? Flickr is definitely the easiest way, as I did with Joris de Man's image. I've seen different versions of original images on Wikipedia before, so I don't see a problem there. Cognissonance (talk) 17:59, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- I understand that asking copyright holders to do special things is a pain. In practice there is too much practical difference between subsequent version numbers of Creative Commons licenses but if you really want to read the details go here. At the present time Flickr only offers the older version 2.0 and they have close to 300 millions images using various CC licenses of which more than 110 million use a license we accept, so there is no problem for us using {{Cc-by-2.0}} or {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} that Flickr provides for users to choose. We have thousands of images under those licenses. Don't sweat it. Ww2censor (talk) 21:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: , what happens if I ask her to upload it to Flickr and it only has this less up to date option? Will it still be acceptable? I don't want to ask her to do a tonne of stuff when she is doing us a favour. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 19:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- You need to have her follow the procedure found at COM:OTRS but preferably using the Interactive Release Generator! or much quicker because the OTRS team are quite backlogged at 47 days, she could upload the image to a new webpage on her own website with a statement indicating the exact copyright she prefers, or if she has a Flickr account she could upload it there and choose one of the acceptable license as indicated, though Flickr uses version 2.0 not the updated 4.0 version of the Creative Commons licenses. Then just add that source to the image with the tag {{LicenseReview}} or {{Flickrreview}} as appropriate so a human can verify the license at the new source. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 21:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: , I've emailed the photographer and she's fine with it being licensed under either creative commons licenses you mention. What do I need to do? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 21:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Darkwarriorblake: Indeed wikipedia is non-commercial and at first that seems a bit curious to uploaders but because there are other users of wikipedia material who may sell their products, so we only accept freely licenced images with no commercial or derivative restrictions. Perhaps COM:SCOPE will help you understand, specifically this section. You could ask the copyright holder to upload the image to a separate webpage, not linked to any other if they don't want it easily found, and attach a free license to it, such as {{Cc-by-4.0}} or {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} but it must be released by the copyright holder who is usually the photographer and not the subject of the image. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 23:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & no action since 21 September. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
No information on the photographer of this 3D object. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- We don't have another image of this pieces, as far as I can see. Can we crop out the frame? - Themightyquill (talk) 13:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- That would be possible, but a bit complex, because there are 3 frames and the picture is partly tilted. Maybe the Graphic Lab could help here? Jcb (talk) 14:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Commons:Graphics_village_pump#Cropping_and_tilting_3_segment_painting - let's see what happens. Jcb (talk) 14:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- They are working in it, see File:Lamentation with Saint John the Baptist and Saint Catherine of Alexandria.png. Jcb (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks to Offnfopt we now have a version without borders with a much higher quality. I have replaced usage, so that the jpg can safely be deleted. Jcb (talk) 17:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- They are working in it, see File:Lamentation with Saint John the Baptist and Saint Catherine of Alexandria.png. Jcb (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Commons:Graphics_village_pump#Cropping_and_tilting_3_segment_painting - let's see what happens. Jcb (talk) 14:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- That would be possible, but a bit complex, because there are 3 frames and the picture is partly tilted. Maybe the Graphic Lab could help here? Jcb (talk) 14:55, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 12:45, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- die fehlenden Angaben nachträglich zugefügt. --Paul - eine Silbersonne (talk) 13:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Source states: "© Geoportal Berlin" - no mention of a free license. Jcb (talk) 15:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Anlässlich anderer Scans (dieser Art!= wurde beim Quellenverwalter nachgefragt und von Geoportal/ Landesarchiv Berlin geantwortet mit beigefügter Erläuterung.--Paul - eine Silbersonne (Diskussion) 13:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Please send the permission to OTRS. Jcb (talk) 14:42, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Anlässlich anderer Scans (dieser Art!= wurde beim Quellenverwalter nachgefragt und von Geoportal/ Landesarchiv Berlin geantwortet mit beigefügter Erläuterung.--Paul - eine Silbersonne (Diskussion) 13:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Source states: "© Geoportal Berlin" - no mention of a free license. Jcb (talk) 15:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and one month no action. If OTRS received/approved the file may be restored. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- Here's a likely source: [2]
- The book's author, en:Marshall Broomhall, died in 1937, but I have no idea if he was the author. No attribution listed in the book that I can see. Thoughts? - Themightyquill (talk) 13:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
COM:DW Magnus (talk) 18:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- § 57 UrhG. Der Inhalt der Plakate ist nur Beiwerk, unabhängig davon, was nun der eigentliche Gegenstand der Aufnahme ist, nämlich der Unterbau der Brücke, deren Widerlager oder das Thema Plakatwände. Man könnte jdenfalls das Foto so ändern, daß anstelle der gezeigten Plakate ganz andere Plakate zu sehen wären, ohne daß sich der Charakter des Bildes ändert. Vielleicht kann ein kundigeer Benutzer das Bild so bearbeiten, daß durch Veränderung des Kontrastes und/oder der Bildschärfe im fraglichen bereich die eigentlichen Plakate nicht mehr erkennbar sind. Löschen ist also nicht notwendig. --Matthiasb (talk) 17:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Keep Die Plakate sind ohne Zweifel bis Ende ihrer Lebensdauer, also bleibend, dort angebracht. Damit laut § 59 UrhG im Rahmen der FOP zuläsig. --Stepro (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Stepro (Panoramafreiheit). Ruthven (msg) 18:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
