Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/09/14

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 14th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identical image on http://www.onlinefilmiduniya.com/bhojpuri/actress/amrapali-dubey/ http://www.onlinefilmiduniya.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/amrapali-dubey1.jpg Jim1138 (talk) 08:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 08:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image added by me IndianWikipedians this image is wrong please delete IndianWikipedians (talk) 06:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing: I don't see CC-BY license at YouTube but "Standard YouTube License" instead. Lymantria (talk) 09:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC) sorry, this upload is my mistake, i don't have any opposition of the deletion. --Puramyun31 (talk) 09:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy by consensus with uploader. --Lymantria (talk) 16:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing: I don't see CC-BY license at YouTube but "Standard YouTube License" instead. Lymantria (talk) 09:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC) sorry, this upload is my mistake, i don't have any opposition of the deletion. --Puramyun31 (talk) 09:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy by consensus with uploader. --Lymantria (talk) 16:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong picture added by the author CruelPaul (talk) 11:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix: Author requested deletion of page

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. License does not apply. Jcb (talk) 23:48, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 10:06, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Obvious derivative of File:DIScott Monkey Selfie Wikimania 2014.JPG (addition: and File:Wiki-Conference New York 2009 portrait 46.JPG). but uncredited, against the requirements of their CC licences. Also the dates are an obvious fabrication. No monkeys were available for comment. See also File_talk:Macaca_nigra_self-portrait_large.jpg#Actual_copyright_holder Andy Dingley (talk) 09:28, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. There is a serious doubts over the authorship and copyright status of the original monkie selfie image. In the past the EXIF was stripped by Commons Sysop "Odder" to hide that his derivative image was created by Slater as far back as 2009:11:07 10:01:29Z diff. The Wikimedia Terms of Use states that Commons must host "Free Cultural Work" as defined in the WMF Resolution . To satisfy the definition,

   These are the additional conditions in order for a work to be considered free:
   Availability of source data: Where a final work has been obtained through the compilation or processing of a source file or multiple source files, all underlying source data should be available alongside the work itself under the same conditions. This can be the score of a musical composition, the models used in a 3D scene, the data of a scientific publication, the source code of a computer application, or any other such information.

But Sysop 'Odder' deleted the source file containing the EXIF meta data from which User:AJF generated the new file. How is this to be reconciled under policy and Terms of Use ?

So it is important that this image be kept to preserve the trail of copyright piracy practiced by Commons sysop to pirate works.

The argument that no monkeys are available for comment is spurious considering that no authorship is claimed on behalf of any monkey. The EXIF is correct and true and asserts the author of original monkey selfie is Annette Vandam (human). That the Facebook source page for this image clearly says that author of this mashup is "'Mohsin Pathania' (mpathania@cyberlawpractice.com) and Licence : CC-BY-SA-3.0 (Creative Commons) incorporating material from Wikimedia Commons, The author additionally permits his creative work to be freely uploaded to Facebook and other social media sites.

The 2014 file is equally a derivative of unattributed Wikimedia Commons files or an obvious forgery. 103.30.143.106 10:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from several other aspects, you misunderstand the subtleties of an EXIF "Create Date". Also the Forest of Dean is known for its badgers, wild boar and the extinction of its last two bear, but not its macaques. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If anything it shows that David Slater's EXIF is dubious (and not this image's EXIF) and was manipulated by his syndication agency. I probably understand the subtleties of EXIF as well as anybody else here, a later EXIF "Date Created" usually indicates that the file was COPIED after the "Date Taken" field value which fits in with the 2008 creation date in this image. The EXIF which sysop 'Odder' deleted doesn't have any "Date Taken" field, a curious omission for what is claimed to be an original work. 103.30.141.33 16:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could you be more specific on why this image is any more out of SCOPE than say File:Santa Claus makes an anonymous donation to Wikipedia's fundraising drive.png since it is similarly "extremely high quality satire on Wikipedia" and "in COM:SCOPE" diff being highly educational parody about "monkeys" who attend Wikimania to snap selfies with females. 103.30.141.33 16:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The message Commons is already communicating to the world with these selfies is, "We will bankrupt small photographers for the lulz." Andy Dingley (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No disagreement here. WMF Legal and certain Commons regulars must squarely take the blame for this one. 103.30.141.33 07:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We are not deleting the selfie here. This is a derivative work (mostly of another file, but which pastes in part of the selfie) which seems to serve no educational purpose. Plus has a laughably manipulated EXIF. The court settlement changes nothing; just re-started discussion at which point this particular image came to light. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
From private communications I've just received, this image was deliberately uploaded to Facebook by the copyright assignee after extensive correspondence with all involved parties (incl. WMF Legal) . Removing it will significantly weaken the case for retaining Slater's "2011" derivative version. The salient point is that this image is not created using Slater's monkey selfie (which is a derivative of the 2008 one used here). 103.30.141.33 07:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete per Don't Be A Jerk. Although my position is firmly in the camp that the original Macaca photo is not subject to copyright, the parade of derivative images like this is a mean-spirited attempt to antagonize Slater. Wiki[pm]edia should not be used as a forum to bully people, even people with whom we have an opposing view. We should be better than that. TJRC (talk) 18:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dont be a Jerk is an essay. The image is subject to copyright as WMF Legal is well aware and has only pushed the potential legal liability onto their "volunteer" users. Vandam and Slater's positions may not be adverserial here. NewYorkBrad's op-ed had the right pitch on this. 103.30.141.33 07:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd hoped I'd made clear from my additional commentary that it's an essay with which I agree and whose rationale I am adopting in this discussion. TJRC (talk) 19:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Please keep this file. I am the uploader and there is no copyright problem here. It is an educational file of immense potential value to this project which I uploaded from Facebook with verification of its Wikimedia compatible licence, ie. CC-BY-SA-3.0 and Facebook source attributes the work is based on files from Wikimedia Commons. The image EXIF is exactly as from the source and is not manipulated by me. I can see from earlier discussions that there is huge disagreement between editors here over copyright status of Slater's monkey image, however, this 'mashup' is based on the original Annette Vandam photo of 2008 and not on David Slater's 2009 derivative of it which is being sued. If required I can contact the copyright holder of the monkey selfie "mpathania@cyberlawpractice.com" to send a confirmation to OTRS. I agree with the other editor that this file is as much in 'scope' as the Santa Claus cartoon and should be retained. It is unclear why exactly the image is claimed to be not in scope. If the issue here is the authenticity of this image, then Annette Vandam is the daughter of the erstwhile Holland envoy to Indonesia (and sister of Marinka Van Dam) and has taken this photograph in 2008 using Slater's camera. In 2008 itself she assigned this photograph and it became popular in a 2009 calendar. Thereafter a copyright dispute came between Vandam and Slater over royalties for the calendar image. Slater in 2009 issued his own version and to bypass Vandam's assignment claimed that this photo had been snapped by the monkey using his camera. Then you Oder colluded with Slater and removed Slater's EXIF and claimed monkey image is in public domain. So I think it is good that all monkey selfie images based on Slater's 2009 derivatives are removed from Wikimedia Commons and the wikimedia compatible licenced CC-BY-SA-3.0 Annette Vandam original is obtained from the assigned copyright holder. NylesLyons (talk) 00:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for your update. I had already contacted the assignee, who has kindly sent me links to some emails exchanged with WMF Legal and Slater which are summarized at diff. He essentially confirms what you have written, additionally Vandam had a 4 year exclusivity deal from 2008 so Slater re-released this image in 2012 and Slater's syndication agency mucked up big time. The assignee is unwilling to discuss licencing their own original monkey selfies themselves to Wikimedia. BTW, this image is already covered under this deletion request as a keep. 103.30.141.33 07:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @NylesLyons - it is difficult to take you seriously as you persist in falsehoods.
This image is a derivative of two non-macaque images from Commons:
  • Their licensing conditions have both been breached in that they are not credited. Yes, "there is a copyright problem here."
  • One of those images is obviously from 2014. It is thus untrue to use it in a composite and to claim that this composite dates from 2011.
As a result, you have no credibility for any further claims, particularly the outlandish ones of creation in 2008 or 2009. Copies of this "2009 calendar" would be of profitable interest to a number of UK newspapers right now, so if you can produce one (I do not believe such a calendar ever existed), then now would be a great time. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • " Annette Vandam is the daughter of the erstwhile Holland envoy to Indonesia (and sister of Marinka Van Dam)"
Until now I have been thankfully unaware of the existence of either of these people. I am still unaware as to who the "Holland envoy to Indonesia" might be - although the Netherlands do have an ambassador to Indonesia.
I would refer the interested to http://www.marinkavandam.com/ which is the sort of bile-spewing Wikipedia-hate site that makes Wikipediocracy look like a fanclub. What an astounding coincidence that someone with such a dislike of Wikipedia should also happen to be the sister of our secretive macaque photographer from a few years earlier. The website shows its "true colours" in its graphic design too, apart from the tasteful use of Comic Sans for its tagline, "Wikipedia, the alternative facts encyclopedia any government stooge like Sean Spicer can edit" More illustrative though is the insipid lilac used for the page backgrounds - an unusual hue, chosen because its hex codes are "#C1cada", which becomes rather clearer in relation to their c1cada.html and banned sock C1cada on Wikipedia.
I do not find these claims to be at all credible in relation to image authorship. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And so it unravels...
Andy Dingley (talk) 10:39, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No Sir, you are wrong. BLP violations removed--Ymblanter (talk) 22:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC) NylesLyons (talk) 16:05, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In other words, this is an attack image born out of a previous argument here, and thus subject to speedy deletion (however valid the initial argument was, but that should be irrelevant here). With incorrect author information and dates, and other EXIF fabrications, to boot. The provenance of the actual monkey selfie images seems pretty rock solid, that they were done with Mr. Slater's camera in 2011, with no public information to the contrary. If the WMF took no action on a claim, not sure why we would. There are copyright issues -- none of the actual authors are mentioned, and two fictitious authors are. Those are fixable, but the educational purpose really is not. Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Out of scope.--Prosfilaes (talk) 19:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Closing this speedy as delete, since (i) this is an attack page; (ii) this is likely a copyright violation; (iii) the uploader has been blocked indef, the only keep votes come from new accounts; (iv) the uploader started to add liberlous content to this and other pages. --Ymblanter (talk) 22:16, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bluesymamal417 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official symbols and docuemnts. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Laurenz baars (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of com:SCOPE, commons is not a gallery of photoshop

Pippobuono (talk) 15:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 13:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luttappylutts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probable copyvio, see watermarks of television channels or websites. And some screenshots of recent movies

Pippobuono (talk) 09:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:47, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by کیوان صداقت (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not free materials (see watermarks), or promotional, or derivative of probably copyrighted materials

Pippobuono (talk) 10:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by کیوان صداقت (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 09:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete File:کیوان صداقت (Keivan Sedaqat)11.jpg due to same reason. Small unused personal photos without metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, screenshot of television program of Rai2HD Pippobuono (talk) 10:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio : screenshot of television program Pippobuono (talk) 10:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, screenshot of television program Pippobuono (talk) 10:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 05:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Belindahermosakawaii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos

Begging bowl (talk) 00:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete--Desyman (talk) 01:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Youtukpop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos

Begging bowl (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 7Jackson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos

Begging bowl (talk) 00:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uriel Heianna Nehuen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal photos

Begging bowl (talk) 00:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipidia, where the subject's draft was speedily deleted in November 2016 as spam. Out of project scope. xplicit 01:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in December 2015 as spam. Out of project scope. xplicit 01:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's draft was declined as non-notable in February 2014, declined as promotional the following week, and ultimately deleted in December of that year as abandoned. Out of project scope. xplicit 01:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subjects' articles were deleted in July 2012 as spam. Out of project scope.

xplicit 01:51, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Createhabits (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Does not appear to have been used on any project since being uploaded in June 2016. Commons is not a web host and out of project scope.

xplicit 01:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's draft was declined as non-notable and promotional in May 2015, ultimately being deleted in November of that year as abandoned. Out of project scope. xplicit 01:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not a place to advertise. xplicit 02:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcia maria de jesus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not an own work, once it is found in the link: https://www.flickr.com/photos/micheltemer/11092363975/in/album-72157637915353403/ Paladinum2 (talk) 03:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted twice in July 2014 under author request. However, it was marked for speedy deletion as spam and non-notable, respectively, in both instances before the author blanked the page. Out of project scope. xplicit 05:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's submission was declined as non-notable, and ultimately deleted in December 2013 as abandoned. Out of project scope. xplicit 05:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zarood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a place to advertise.

xplicit 06:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Beauty + Intelligence + Elegance!" - Sheer self promotion. E4024 (talk) 07:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, third party logo, COM:TOO doesn't mention Spain specfically, so DR on the basis that the equivalent at English Wikipedia was marked as non-free w:File:AlmirallLogo.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, third party logo design, Equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free w:File:Samco-Securities.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:31, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional, see .TM Pippobuono (talk) 10:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal art, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a picture of me and i do not approve of this. 5.179.80.199 11:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused. --Jianhui67 TC 09:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AkshayNjarangal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://scontent-iad3-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/19932930_1744100899223017_179951467480743936_n.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shakeel77715735 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, not in use, out of [[COM:SCOPE[project scope]].

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mayuk Barman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of project scope.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion of the uploader. E4024 (talk) 14:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Jianhui67 TC 09:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:NOTHOST: personal photos

Takeaway (talk) 19:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images not in use, out of project scope, advertising content.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images. Out of project scope.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kevinlopezvoooo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chand pasha khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chand pasha khan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 10:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anoop Shukla (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not in Wikimedia Commons scope

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be same as File:Raashi in Lakme fashion week.png E4024 (talk) 14:51, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Elcobbola. --Jianhui67 TC 09:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

使用しなくなったため Ktmchi (talk) 15:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of mine uploaded by mistake Zakroxxor (talk) 20:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a 1x1 pixel png. out of scope Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible promotion, out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 23:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal attack material 182.239.90.116 00:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal attack material 182.239.90.116 00:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 00:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo, needs to be updated locally Obsuser (talk) 00:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CheapApples12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted in January 2016 via deletion discussion. Out of project scope.

xplicit 01:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kumargargavinash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images where exif has been stripped, the 100women image is a high-profile, high-security function so photos can't be taken without press credentials, and the exif suggests that the image was pulled off of Facebook. COM:PRP applies in all these cases.

SpacemanSpiff 01:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poster is copyrighted Kamolan (talk) 02:04, 14 September 2017 (UTC) Thank you for your message, I poster have been circulating since it's a movie[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong file uploaded Nikhil B (talk) 02:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent unused upload. P 1 9 9   14:21, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://szarka.ssgg.sk/Vyuka/Prednaska-5/P55_Express_Chipset_322641.pdf Solomon203 (talk) 04:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from a Ferrari press release Hektor (talk) 07:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non trival logo design, The Wikipedia source (mentioned here) is currently non-free w:File:Voorpostlogo.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It is believed that the use of low-resolution images on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, of logos for certain uses involving identification and critical commentary may qualify as fair use under the Copyright law of the United States. Runologe (talk) 16:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is Wikimedia Commons, not Wikipedia. Fair use is not permitted here. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no Fair Use on Commons. P 1 9 9   14:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GIA KARIMA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album.

Hystrix (talk) 08:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; kept one as per User:E4024. P 1 9 9   14:32, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ahmed hassab (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AHMEDOSAMA529 (talk · contribs) has made userpage in ar.wiki, where he has no edits in mainspace, and uploaded a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Azzam Almesbahi (talk · contribs) has made nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in ar.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused personal photograph. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality and useless Mbazri (talk) 11:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:17, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to File:Koningin Juliana (1968).jpg Lev. Anthony (talk) 13:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - The nominated file was uploaded earlier, so no need to delete you own upload. The other file has to be nominated. Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 14:26, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: and deleted newer duplicate file as per User:Richardkiwi. P 1 9 9   15:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal and promotional images. Out of Commons scope.

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 05:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kept few o'them, followinf Dharmadhyaksha advice. Ruthven (msg) 11:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photographs with no encyclopedic value

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 11:21, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:46, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. Out of scope 2. Personal images 3. Not uploaded by original creator of work 4. Images from web with no valid copyright information 5. Promotional

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 14:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. Out of scope 2. Personal images 3. Not uploaded by original creator of work 4. Images from web with no valid copyright information 5. Promotional

Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 15:11, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

photo of Ross Anthony Bartolomei is the property of Ross Anthony Bartolomei. Also I give complete authorization for this image to appear on Wikipedia. Notability, celebrity hairstylist, the movie Curly Sue, Uncle Buck, the untouchables, also Personal hairdresser to Rock Star Jim Peterik, noted for creating Jim Peterik's Signature Branded Purple hair. Ross also works on the set for the nationally aired tv show, the cornerstones of Rock.

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IyxLBIiWjo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep,these photo is just describe about uniform,FGO4YbqnzW (talk) 00:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused. And likely no permission of subjects, personality right issues. P 1 9 9   15:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D depictions of oil paintings by John Everett published online by the Royal Museums Greenwich

[edit]

According to John Everett, the painter's death date was in 1949. Consequently we cannot presume these are public domain for another 3 years. The uploads should be marked for undeletion in 2020 (71 years post-death date). There are 266 images in this DR, but since spotting the problem with this collection, I have added a specific filter and there are many more files available from the same archive that have been skipped. Unfortunately there's no obvious way to discover artist death date automatically, as though the RMG has descriptive metadata for the artist, death date is not included.

(talk) 06:45, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Do any of these meet 'fair-use' criteria on English Wikipedia? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:51, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, though probably only if the painting were critically important to the article. The version there would be terrible resolution too, so it's really just a prompt for the reader to click on the source site.
Refer to en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#High quality photographs of 19th-century British ships, sailors and exploration. -- (talk) 09:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - I added this DR to the undeletion cat. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower-resolution duplicate of File:Labib.jpg B.Hort (talk) 15:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal photo; no meaningful contributions by this uploader. P 1 9 9   15:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SELFIE; unused, poor quality image of non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 14:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE - unused image of non-notable person. May also be a copyvio (background is colourised version of background commonly used in memes/gifs, e.g. [1]) Эlcobbola talk 15:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE - unused image of non-notable person (uploaded by sockmaster apparently for WP:NOTHERE personal bio on en.wiki) Эlcobbola talk 16:28, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Half is useless Artix Kreiger (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:37, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry to be of educational use. Wikimedia already has many non-blurry images of rabbits. Takeaway (talk) 17:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AntonioK talk 18:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used in now-deleted spammy page on en.wiki. No encyclopedic value, outside of COM:SCOPE Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:53, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This media file is missing evidence of permission. It may have an author and a source, but there is no proof that the author agreed to license the file under the given license. Further, the listed author and source links are highly questionable. --The Fifth Horseman (talk) 14:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no self made work, rotpunkt on image Thraen (talk) 13:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jowie2138 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents, drawings and photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Llmonkll (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SCOPE: Extremely blurry image of..... something??? Unlikely to be used in a project. Takeaway (talk) 17:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content Magnus (talk) 17:49, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GinnyWestcott (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It is unclear if uploader is indeed the copyright holder as is claimed.

Takeaway (talk) 17:50, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion the photo has no educational value. Taivo (talk) 19:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no freedom of panorama in South Africa. SA demands 50 years from death, depicted person died in 1903 and the sculpture was likely erected before WWII, so by principle the sculpture can be in public domain due to age, but evidence is needed. Who is the sculptor, when (s)he died and when the sculpture was erected? Taivo (talk) 08:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This suggests that statue date to 1908: [2] - Themightyquill (talk) 08:19, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
en:Copyright_law_of_South_Africa says, "Anonymous works are protected for the shorter of fifty years from first publication or fifty years from the year when it is reasonable to presume the author is dead. For works with multiple authors, the fifty years from death are calculated from the death of the last author to die. Government works are protected for fifty years from first publication." Either way, I think the image is fine. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, thank you, Themightyquill, for finding the article! Now I can give correct license and even correct date. Taivo (talk) 08:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already on commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Porte_Dauphine,_Paris,_France_-_panoramio_(5).jpg Fmvh (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 10:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already on commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Porte_Dauphine,_Paris,_France_-_panoramio_(4).jpg Fmvh (talk) 20:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 10:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the rather unlikely claim that the copyright of this photo has expired. LX (talk, contribs) 21:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 10:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/900734057218056192/kTPPCC8w.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 10:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

being used for vandalism on enwiki Artix Kreiger (talk) 16:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + out of scope. --Themightyquill (talk) 10:54, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of copyrighted artwork. Hakken (talk) 17:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 10:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. The novel was published in 1983 so the art is still copyrighted (may be not, but there is not information about the drawings - author?). - Fma12 (talk) 01:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:10, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the metadata would not indicate that the image is a photograph of the user's taking; may be copyright and should have permission sought  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem a little strange. Also, it seems identical to File:Pedal DH17 FIFTY-FIFTY.jpg, uploaded by the same user, but with different metadata. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:12, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo taken from enWP where it is claimed by the uploader. The claim would seem doubtful.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened a discussion at en:Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2017_September_22 as well. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Japan[3], sadly. FunkMonk (talk) 03:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already on commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Porte_Dauphine,_Paris,_France_-_panoramio_(6).jpg Fmvh (talk) 20:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Themightyquill at 10:48, 22 September 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Porte Dauphine, Paris, France - panoramio (20).jpg --Krdbot 12:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:27, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is "grafika google", author is "grafika google", so probably a copyvio. Apocheir (talk) 20:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same applies to a number of User:Marlinek4's other images:

-Apocheir (talk) 20:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Nepal. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Thuresson (talk) 08:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image error Rantemario (talk) 14:58, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Double images Rantemario (talk) 18:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image error Rantemario (talk) 14:58, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Double images and image error Rantemario (talk) 18:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desatualizado Duarteramiro (talk) 02:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image from w:File:Black_Velvet_Cocktail_Layered.jpg and the claim to copyright seems doubtful due to production and lack of metadata  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:28, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The same user uploaded another similar image around the same time. It's questionable, but I'm not sure it's a copyright violation. I'm surprised by the lack of exif data, for sure, but they aren't super low resolution. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same as: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Porte_Dauphine,_Paris,_France_-_panoramio_(7).jpg Fmvh (talk) 10:52, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @Fmvh: use {{Duplicate}} next time. Thanks. Ruthven (msg) 11:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same as: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Porte_Dauphine,_Paris,_France_-_panoramio_(3).jpg Fmvh (talk) 10:55, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @Fmvh: use {{Duplicate}} next time. Thanks. Ruthven (msg) 11:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission Mbazri (talk) 11:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mbazri: I called the Newspaper of source, they said "It is a picture of last Khatami visit of France as president, published in public domain after used for a public poster of his visitation\ pilgrimage of Mashhad". then, i believed it's ok for uploading here. --Chyah (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Chyah, this kind of Permission i mean "calling to the newspaper and etc" are not acceptable to commons.wikimedia. You have to prove the Permission of the photo publication Based on Wikipedia policies & rules exist in the section of Image publication policies. So far, the publication of this photo has not been proven.--Mbazri (talk) 10:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. We need the newspaper to send us in an OTRS permission. Ruthven (msg) 11:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission Mbazri (talk) 11:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Mbazri (talk) 11:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission Mbazri (talk) 11:41, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission Mbazri (talk) 11:51, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permission Mbazri (talk) 11:51, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version at File:108_Mahadev.jpg Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 14:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Superseded}} instead. Ruthven (msg) 11:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

typo, redir not needed Pikador (talk) 14:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The link doesn't provide evidence that the song was released under a CC license, mostly because it's broken. Hakken (talk) 17:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The link doesn't provide evidence that the song was released under a CC license, mostly because it's broken and the author's account does not seem legit. Hakken (talk) 17:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no reasonable rationale that the author is the owner of such works Hakken (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Provide an URL that shows the copyvio, please. Ruthven (msg) 11:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr washing. Uploaded from Flickr from an account with files from various other sources. Larger file can be found at: [4] (Image: [5]). LittleWink (talk) 17:25, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no freedom of panorama in Lithuania and the buildings are modern. Buildings under construction have also copyright. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some kind of solution should be found in this awful situation. Wikipedia is not a commercial product and this regulation prohibits from displaying modern buildings for free encyclopedic usage. Maybe Wikipedia rules should be modified when we are speaking about the modern buildings by allowing to use images in articles which prohibits commercial use because author of the picture can do nothing to publish it with a suitable license. -- Pofka (talk) 16:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are talking about fair use. This is prohibited in Commons, but allowed in some local projects. You can upload pictures about modern buildings directly into Lithuanian Wikipedia. For more information, see lt:Vikipedija:Fairuse. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Taivo: Just for clarity - when you say buildings under construction also have copyright, where do you get that information? We have numerous images of buildings under construction (e.g. Category:Construction of Burj Khalifa) that have been considered acceptable because they aren't complete. Do we have a written policy on this? - Themightyquill (talk) 11:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I did not find such policy, but even architectural drawings without building at all are copyrighted, so logically half-built buildings are copyrighted too, if enough copyrightable architectural drawings are seen. Taivo (talk) 13:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that follows. A completed drawing would certainly be copyrighted, whether it's a drawing of a building or not. Maybe we should take this to the village pump? - Themightyquill (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The construction here does not meet the threshold of originality, so we can keep this assuming that the background buildings are de minimis (they could be cropped eventually). Regards, Yann (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Yann and Themightyquill. Ruthven (msg) 06:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LMU Dozent Medizin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo . Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both photographs are cropped and amended versions of the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PierreJanet.jpg
Description English: Photograph of the French psychologist Pierre Janet (1859–1947) by Paul François Arnold Cardon a.k.a. Dornac (1858–1941).
Date before 1942
Source http://www.artfinding.com/images/svv/2/324/paul_marsan_dit_dornac__docteur_pierre_janet-115-1.jpg
Author Paul François Arnold Cardon
File:PierreJanet-crop-small.jpg is in use on de.wikipedia.org. Please don’t delete. -–LMU Dozent Medizin (talk) 18:51, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Paul François Arnold Cardon died in 1941. Ruthven (msg) 06:33, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted as Copyright vio, unlikely to be own work JGHowes talk - 02:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Author is Gatis Dieziņš and Exif copyright information not compatible with Commons (no commercial use). Maliepa (talk) 22:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is completely out of date and misleading. Reviewer 07 (talk) 03:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use proper templates and comments. Besides, it's in use. Ruthven (msg) 20:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not an own work, similar images exist in the web, therefore a free source has to be provided Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:02, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image is not taking by you IndianWikipedians (talk) 05:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Preceding comment is by User:Heerentanna, not me. DMacks (talk) 05:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In this edit, User:Heerentanna forged my signature on his comment. DMacks (talk) 11:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
According to Cambridge Dictionary, to forge means "to make an illegal copy of something in order to deceive": Does this have no sanctions at all, Admin(s)? User:Heerentanna, thinking of making harakiri or something like that? --E4024 (talk) 08:01, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@DMacks: Well, for starters, the source is given as cinejosh. That's a pretty solid piece of evidence that the author is not the uploader. The lack of exif data is also troubling. Also, the uploader has only made two edits on commons, both uploading images that are under discussion for deletion. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:58, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Concur that this now appears to be non-ownwork. Note that by history, the image had a source of ownwork (the uploader) at the time of my comment. DMacks (talk) 06:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment @DMacks: Dmack, I am new to wiki editing and used the same format as it was done in the comment above mine.i apologize, it was not my intent to forge your signature. I thought of it as a reply to your message. ill stop doing editing for now and learn wiki formatting first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heerentanna (talk • contribs)

Deleted: ok, copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 20:04, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nowsza wersja stworzona: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Procentowe_wyniki_wybor%C3%B3w_do_Sejmu.png Golubioji (talk) 10:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant file as have now uploaded higher quality PNG version (File:Gallium PSMA PET scan.png). I am the uploader of both files Beevil (talk) 08:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

already on commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Musee_marmottan_paris_FR_-_panoramio.jpg Fmvh (talk) 09:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source site has been taken down. That's what happens, if the license isn't reviewed for 5 years. I am not sure, that the license was ever valid. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is from FishBase where it has a Noncommercial CC license, which is not compatible with Commons. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dembele "dans la salle de bain" does not look so very much in scope to me. E4024 (talk) 13:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:11, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1939 photos are likely copyrighted. When the author B. van Ness died? Taivo (talk) 14:09, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sie hat mit der Seite nichts zu tun Volker Bauer (talk) 14:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:14, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

이 사진 외에 더 잘 나온 다른 사진을 등록하고 싶습니다. Cho park (talk) 14:18, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. @Cho park: -> 이 파일의 새로운 버전을 올리기. Ruthven (msg) 20:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio and/or needs UTRS ticket. Found on web via TinEye: http://www.barrettvantage.com/photos/press-3901-thumb.jpg Bri (talk) 14:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as a copyright violation. The uploader is quite clearly not the photographer. There is no EXIF data. The image is identical in every way, including the dimensions, to the one on the subject's official website here. The same image in a slightly better quality and explicitly credited to Chris Carroll appears on this page of her official website. Both pages are clearly marked © 2017 by Korliss Uecker. All rights reserved. This archived version of the website shows that it has been there since since at least February 2016, well over a year before File:Korliss Uecker.jpg was uploaded on Commons. Note that uploader has explicitly stated that he is not Korliss Uecker here. Voceditenore (talk) 13:25, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see evidence that this diagram is indeed licensed as CC-0. The source website is password-protected. Sandstein (talk) 15:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:27, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot see how a dragon is a simple geometric shape. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 16:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auf den nicht-aktuellen Versionen sind versehentlich Menschen in ihrem Privatbereich zu sehen. Andreas Lippold (talk) 19:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept and hid former versions, even if nobody is udentifiable. Ruthven (msg) 20:29, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution (and slightly darker) version of File:Severn Tunnel Junction Locomotive Depot (geograph 2082336).jpg. DR rather than {{Duplicate}} because of the difference in brightness. bjh21 (talk) 20:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Courtesy deletion of recently uploaded photograph not used in any articles, requested by uploader. The photographer, who regularely licenses valuable photos under a CC license and is happy to see them on Wikipedia, has removed this image from the set of photographs I uploaded and would appreciate it being removed from Commons as well as it shouldn't have been in the photoset. I believe it is in our interest to allow CC-licensing photographers to make mistakes without having to live with them forever, especially if soon corrected and with regards to images that are not used on any Wikimedia project. Julle (talk) 21:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the subject of the photograph and I do not give permission for the photo to be on Wikimedia Commons. Please remove immediately. OK, let us focus on the first discussion. If it helps, I could make sure to have a more neutral image uploaded. Not that there’s actually an article about me to put it in, though.-- Francesca Phrannest (talk) 20:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: There are now two deletion requests for this image. I'd humbly urge anyone looking at this to not throw them both out because you disagree with the reasons stated in one of them. /Julle (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. BTW, the author seems to be Sanna Pudas, from which the permission would have been needed. Ruthven (msg) 20:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-resolution near-duplicate of File:Crewe Works geograph-2606488-by-Ben-Brooksbank.jpg. This version is slightly darker, but I don't think this warrants keeping both. It might warrant darkening the high-res one, but that's a matter for someone with better aesthetic sense than I. bjh21 (talk) 21:43, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, ok, delete it - when I uploaded it the higher-res one hadn't been uploaded to Commons, and I didn't know how to get a high-res copy from Geograph. --Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 20:18, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per requests. Ruthven (msg) 20:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-resolution (and slightly darker, hence DR) duplicate of File:Guildford Locomotive Depot geograph-2672620-by-Ben-Brooksbank.jpg. bjh21 (talk) 22:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:34, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission.
Только простые логотипы могут быть в Викискладе без OTRS-разрешении. Taivo (talk) 10:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived work of a copyrighted artwork. Ruthven (msg) 11:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the rather unlikely claim that the copyright of this photo has expired. LX (talk, contribs) 21:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture should be copyrighted, but maybe the design is so simple, that we can keep it. That's why I signal it here.

Ruthven (msg) 21:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Berthoud60 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work. No exif, small resolution. Most files seem scanned from a book.

Jcb (talk) 23:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW, no permission. Jcb (talk) 23:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW, no permission. Jcb (talk) 16:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This picture that is not straight is obviously taken by an amateur and probably by the person who uploaded it. Malosse (talk) 01:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please click on the word DW and read that page before you respond to the nomination. Jcb (talk) 10:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Derivative work of a presumably copyrighted sign. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of this screenshot is not part of the development team, therefore he doesn't own rights to release any work of the game. Hakken (talk) 17:28, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The link doesn't provide evidence that the author is the owner of such work. Hakken (talk) 17:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be a self-created artwork without obvious educational use. AntonioK talk 19:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Logo of volunteer firemen is unlikely work of government. Taivo (talk) 19:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information. No permission. Jcb (talk) 23:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Picture made by member of this church, family said it's allowed to publish" is certainly not good enough. - Themightyquill (talk) 10:38, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an old logo. Alieninfluenza (talk) 08:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've added it to Category:Obsolete logos. Whether CtgShop is notable enough that this is within scope? That's another question. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:02, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the uploader and the nominator are the same. What's going on here, Alieninfluenza? Why have you uploaded this file and then asked for it to be deleted? - Themightyquill (talk) 08:03, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect redirect for my current user page. Fausto Pereira Guerra (talk) 19:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be the uploader's own work as claimed. This is clearly a police booking photo, and it is available on several websites, http://amwfans.com/thread/55?page=14 for example Meters (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Agreed, seems unlikely to be own work. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks unlikely the photo here is actually the work of the FBI, more likely something they just used. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Indeed. According to the FBI's website: "None. Commercial use is strictly prohibited. Descriptions and pictures of the “Ten Most Wanted Fugitives” are provided for the sole purpose of eliciting public assistance in tracking fugitives." (therefore incompatible with Commons requirements). — Rhododendrites talk02:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:59, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lifted from https://filmymantra.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/18-768x1152.jpg. No indication that they have made this copyright exempt or this person represents the website Jupitus Smart (talk) 13:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flickr account doesn't look legit. I really doubt this photo is his work. If he was a professional photographer, there would more than two fotos in his account. The other image is also stored in Commons. Hakken (talk) 17:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The link doesn't provide evidence that the song was released under a CC license, mostly because it's broken. Hakken (talk) 17:16, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Vivek Bhurtel has only been interested in making himself a user page. Also include File:Vivek Bhurtel.jpg please. E4024 (talk) 13:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outdated XGL screenshots

[edit]

These screenshots were created by me about 10 years ago, but when I gave permission to have these files used on a Wikipedia page, I didn't realise they would still linger around 10 years later. These images contain some personal information (two are showing my email address) and some other information that could lead back to me (if the right persons see them). I did not consider this well enough 10 years ago (when I was still very young, I might add). I feel that these images are no longer really relevant, because they show off a state of technology which is now very dated. Other, more up-to-date images could be used instead (if pictures are necessary at all on those pages). As such, there should not be a big impact of deleting these files. --Eiroshli (talk) 08:49, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eiroshli, please replace those images with others where they are used and then ping me. --Ruthven (msg) 20:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The cat (background) image was never explicitly released by it's copyright holder (assumining it is the uploader), only that the screenshot's software was freey licensed. Deleting these files both as a courtesy due to privacy, but also due to copyright cnserns regarding the cat image. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 04:39, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright belongs to city not uploader Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Magog, what's the source to say that, and how is it different from all other Maltese local council flags? --Dans (talk) 12:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've sent an email to the Birzebbugia administration, let's see if/what they reply. --Dans (talk) 14:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I can't comment without seeing them. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment this probably should apply to File:CoatOfArms Birzebbuga.jpg as well. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:46, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No GPLv2+ compatibility (GIMP) with FAL/CC BY-SA 2.0/GFDL 1.3 (File:Heckert GNU white.svg).

The GNU head was also not properly sourced, as required by previously mentioned licenses. All previously mentioned licenses have automatically terminated rights to distribute this work. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 11:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per [6]--Praveen:talk 18:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I have opposed User:Praveenp very clearly in the latest revision of the deletion request linked and await for their reasons for disagreement and clarification over unfounded opinions or votestacking. 2001:2003:54FA:2751:0:0:0:1 21:33, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: I have rebutted ip's argument, very clearly in the latest version of the deletion request linked. :-)--Praveen:talk 02:09, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: we do accept combined works where different licenses apply to different parts. --Jcb (talk) 23:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inutilisé dans ma page brouillon concernant le sculpteur Robert Darnas Aldebaran0101 (talk) 23:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Robert Darnas est mort en 1980, donc ses oeuvres sont encore couvertes par le droit d'auteur. Ruthven (msg) 20:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inutilisé dans ma page brouillon concernant le sculpteur Robert Darnas Aldebaran0101 (talk) 23:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Robert Darnas est mort en 1980, donc ses oeuvres sont encore couvertes par le droit d'auteur. Ruthven (msg) 20:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inutilisé dans ma page brouillon concernant le sculpteur Robert Darnas Aldebaran0101 (talk) 23:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Robert Darnas est mort en 1980, donc ses oeuvres sont encore couvertes par le droit d'auteur. Ruthven (msg) 20:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inutilisé dans ma page brouillon concernant le sculpteur Robert Darnas Aldebaran0101 (talk) 23:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Robert Darnas est mort en 1980, donc ses oeuvres sont encore couvertes par le droit d'auteur. Ruthven (msg) 20:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inutilisé dans ma page brouillon concernant le sculpteur Robert Darnas Aldebaran0101 (talk) 23:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Robert Darnas est mort en 1980, donc ses oeuvres sont encore couvertes par le droit d'auteur. Ruthven (msg) 20:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inutilisé dans ma page brouillon concernant le sculpteur Robert Darnas Aldebaran0101 (talk) 23:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Robert Darnas est mort en 1980, donc ses oeuvres sont encore couvertes par le droit d'auteur. Ruthven (msg) 20:36, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Patches of Soviet manned space missions

[edit]
  1. File:Vostok1patch.png
  2. File:Vostok-1 patch.svg
  3. File:Vostok-2 mission patch.svg
  4. File:Vostok 3 4 Mission Patch.svg
  5. File:Vostok-4 mission patch.jpg
  6. File:Vostok 5-6 mission patch.jpg
  7. File:Vostok 5-6 mission patch.svg
  8. File:Voskhod-1 mission patch.svg
  9. File:Voskhod-2 patch.svg
  10. File:Voskhod1 patch.jpg
  11. File:Voskhod2patch.png
  12. File:Soyuz 9 patch logo.svg
  13. File:Soyuz 9 patch.png
  14. File:Soyuz 10 mission patch.png
  15. File:Soyuz 11 mission patch.gif
  16. File:Soyuz 18 mission patch logo.svg
  17. File:Soyuz 18 mission patch.png
  18. File:Soyuz 32 mission patch.png
  19. File:Soyuz T-9 mission patch.png
  20. File:Soyuz TM-8 mission patch.svg
  21. File:Soyuz-tm8.jpg

See also - another deletion request for Patches of Soviet manned space missions - there was not any special patch before en:Apollo–Soyuz progamm (see for example https://web.archive.org/web/20120922000810/http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/content/numbers/213/47.shtml). After that and until en:Soyuz TM-12 "Juno" flight (1992) mission patches had been designed only for international missions. Soviet only mission had just general patches - like COA or flag of USSR, or logo of en:NPP Zvezda, and etc. These files are more like usual badges/pins for commercial sale to citizens. Alex Spade (talk) 17:00, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid reason for deletion. If you think that the descriptions are incorrect, then change them. — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 04:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is not the descriptions of files. The problem is license of files. They are not free. These files are not PD-RU-exempt or they are COM:DW from files/works, which are not PD-RU-exempt. Alex Spade (talk) 08:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Then why the reason for the nomination is "There was not any official patch before Soyuz-Apollo program."?
And, since these files are very widely used, it would be, so to say, polite to start a discussion at space-related portal/project pages (at least in Russian and English Wikipedias) instead of just nominating them here for deletion. — Mikhail Ryazanov (talk) 09:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Only official signs can be {{PD-RU-exempt}} (tag used for files under discussion).
If you like to inform some projects about this and that another discussions - fill free to do it. Alex Spade (talk) 17:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These loges were fabricated? By whom und whereto? --Ras67 (talk) 23:04, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Precautionary principle - it is unimportant, who has fabricated/created and/or uploaded unofficial signs but have marked them as official signs (as {{PD-RU-exempt}}). So, we do not have to prove non-free status of these works, but we have to proved free status (the official status in these cases). Several sources about history of the Soviet space missions (one of them I have mentioned above) confirm that 1st official patch had been created for en:Apollo–Soyuz program, not early. After that and until en:Soyuz TM-12 "Juno" flight (1992) mission patches had been designed only for international missions. So these works are not {{PD-RU-exempt}} or based on works, which are not {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Alex Spade (talk) 08:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Many files are below ToO.
Agastya (talk) 14:50, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination, kept one for being below TOO and in use. --Jcb (talk) 09:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown copyright situation for both files. Also out of scope: apparently a fantasy CoA without usage. Jcb (talk) 16:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

fichier provisoire, utilisé à des fins pédagogiques pour illustrer une proposition de blasonnement litigieux. si vous voulez le virer, je m'en contrefous. --Ssire (talk) 02:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]