Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/08/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
There is no freedom of panorama in Estonia and the sculpture is modern. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 06:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept, sorry, I forgot, that the sculpture is in public domain. For details, please look Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Independence War Victory Column. Taivo (talk) 07:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 07:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mardetanha talk 11:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
I am the subject of this photograph and would very much like it deleted. I don't look that bad! Please. 2601:14F:4400:2D58:2D58:C0B:2D0A:D97E 04:49, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: malformed request. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Mauricio Valiente - “Lo más importante de las personas que luchan es el legado que dejan” (05).jpg
[edit]possibly COM:DW Daphne Lantier 04:32, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Keep Fixed --Discasto talk 08:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Discasto -- fixed by cropping. Daphne Lantier 01:35, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Source is from Livepedia and the media coming from there have quite a high level of uncertainty on whether they are truly GFDL. I was the original uploader of the file some years ago, but after reassessing I think it is better to remove this file from Commons and have it available in local wikis as fair use. Furthermore, Livepedia has recently gone out of operation making it even harder to confirm both verifiability of info + validity of licence. Gts-tg (talk) 16:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Es wurde versehentlich ein falsches Bild hochgeladen. Welldo321 (talk) 22:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Also:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:IDF soldiers in Yatta.jpg - added by Geagea
- File:Halamish terror attack aftermath.jpg - added by Geagea
- File:Map-of-rockets-launches-from-gaza-from-2014-07-08-to-2014-07-31.jpg - added by Geagea
not free use Tomtom (talk) 22:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- As far as I know, It's OK to use images that were released under a Creative Common license, exactly like [1] here, can you please correct me if I'm wrong? Doodoo Bo (talk) 22:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- No proof for your claim that the photo was released under a Creative Common license Tomtom (talk) 13:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- How can I prove it, Tomtom? What is the different between this and [2] this photo? What is the right way to use photos that were released by IDF official spokesperson? Doodoo Bo (talk) 18:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- show OTRS Tomtom (talk) 08:25, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- How can I prove it, Tomtom? What is the different between this and [2] this photo? What is the right way to use photos that were released by IDF official spokesperson? Doodoo Bo (talk) 18:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- No proof for your claim that the photo was released under a Creative Common license Tomtom (talk) 13:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- None of these files are in public domain. Hanay is just received permission for a few photos from IDF spokesmen, hopfully they will releace all the flickr stream or facebook stream , but till then they should be deleted. I'm going deleted these files but first I'm wondering regarding to license review. User:Guanaco, can you explain please how this license review passed? -- Geagea (talk) 18:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- I made a dumb mistake and misinterpreted {{IDF}} to include all such IDF images. Guanaco (talk) 19:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Thanks Guanaco, I'll fix the template to avoid any mistakes. -- Geagea (talk) 19:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
not free use Tomtom (talk) 22:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: According Commons:Deletion requests/File:IDF Generals Halamish.jpg. -- Geagea (talk) 19:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Dieses Bild wurde versehentlich eingebunden. Welldo321 (talk) 06:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Daphne Lantier: versehentlicher upload
Es wurde versehentlich ein falsches Bild hochgeladen. Welldo321 (talk) 22:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Daphne Lantier: versehentlicher upload
falsche Plattform für diese Bilder. Sorry Welldo321 (talk) 21:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Daphne Lantier: versehentlicher upload
wrong platform for these pictures.sorry Welldo321 (talk) 21:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: versehentlicher upload
falsche Plattform für diese Bilder. Sorry Welldo321 (talk) 21:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file
falsche Plattform für diese Bilder. Sorry! Welldo321 (talk) 21:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: versehentlicher upload
falsche Plattform für diese Bilder. Sorry! Welldo321 (talk) 22:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file
falsche Plattform für diese Bilder. Sorry! Welldo321 (talk) 22:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file
falsche Plattform für diese Bilder. Sorry! Welldo321 (talk) 22:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file
falsche Plattform für diese Bilder. Sorry! Welldo321 (talk) 22:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file
just delete Doctorwaqasahmad (talk) 18:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Just Delete This Doctorwaqasahmad (talk) 18:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The uploader admitted that this file is not an own work but is a copy of the picture on this website, see w:zh:Talk:烏克蘭_-_歐盟聯合協議. WhitePhosphorus (talk) 02:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
File:US Navy 090612-N-2456S-111 Cmdr. Brian Peterson, executive officer of the amphibious transport dock ship USS Nashville (LPD 13), congratulates Aviation Boatswain's Mate (Fuel) 3rd Class Daniel Zubiria after a five-month deploym.jpg
[edit]Can you remove page 2601:144:200:CD1C:215C:E58B:8069:2D89 03:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- If there are private reasons for removing the image, then please follow the procedure at COM:OTRS to send an email. It is not usual to delete a file which has been on Commons for 8 years without a reason that meets COM:D. In this instance, I would Keep as the photograph is still hosted and public domain at the quoted source http://www.navy.mil/view_image.asp?id=72639. There should be a take-down at navy.mil before deletion at Commons on courtesy grounds is considered. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 08:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 11:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Logo - copyvio or trivial? Dmitry89 (talk) 07:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of focus Ymblanter (talk) 10:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
advertising, out of com:SCOPE Pippobuono (talk) 15:06, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Sorry but no FoP in Russia for sculptures
- File:Statue près du Kremlin.jpg
- File:Vladimir the Great Monument in Moscow (2016-11-04).jpg
- File:Памятник святому равноапостольному князю Владимиру на Боровицкой площади в Москве.jpg
A.Savin 22:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep for File:Vladimir the Great Monument in Moscow (2016-11-04).jpg: this photo was intentionally shot in such a way as not to violate the commercial value of the sculpture and copyright respectively.
Delete for others. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC) - Keep for File:Vladimir the Great Monument in Moscow (2016-11-04).jpg. It's a story photography. There are only hardly noised and blurred outlines of part of the sculpture. This usage doesn't violate the author's rights by law. DonSimon (talk) 08:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- But the statue is, nonetheless, the main purpose of the photo, which disqualifies it for de minimis. --A.Savin 11:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- This case doesn't belong to de minimis. But on other side, this likes blurred and noised copyrighted parts of our images. For example icons in smartphones (1, 2, etc) and outlines of part of the sculpture (1). Look this category on Commons. In these pictures like on my photo you can see only blurred and noised outlines of part of sculpture. You can guess what sculptures, icons, etc are but couldn't see these. DonSimon (talk) 12:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- But the statue is, nonetheless, the main purpose of the photo, which disqualifies it for de minimis. --A.Savin 11:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- Согласно пункту 1 статьи 1276 ГК РФ: «Допускаются без согласия автора или иного правообладателя и без выплаты вознаграждения воспроизведение и распространение изготовленных экземпляров, сообщение в эфир или по кабелю, доведение до всеобщего сведения произведения изобразительного искусства или фотографического произведения, которые постоянно находятся в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, за исключением случаев, если изображение произведения является основным объектом использования или изображение произведения используется в целях извлечения прибыли».
- Возможно, просто нужно указать другую лицензию? Лицензии на английском, я не английский юрист, мне тяжело в них разобраться. Если есть желающие дополнить проект, прошу помочь в указании лицензии на файл File:Памятник святому равноапостольному князю Владимиру на Боровицкой площади в Москве.jpg. Удалить чужой труд дело нехитрое.--Дмитриева Ирина (talk) 11:53, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
- Здесь вам никто не поможет. Согласно политике лицензирования Викисклада для загружаемых изображений должны быть разрешены коммерческое использование и создание производных работ, что запрещено п. 1 с. 1276 ГК РФ. Желающие дополнить проект загружают изображения непосредственно в соответствующий раздел Википедии, где это разрешено. И вам давно пора привыкнуть к тому, что в википроектах чужой труд никто не ценит. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: File:Statue près du Kremlin.jpg, File:Памятник святому равноапостольному князю Владимиру на Боровицкой площади в Москве.jpg because of com:FoP#Russia, File:Vladimir the Great Monument in Moscow (2016-11-04).jpg because of low quality (underexposed, noised, motion-blurred images of snowflakes across the frame). --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Russia. Statue from 2016, see w:Monument to Vladimir the Great.
- File:М псгевч.jpg
- File:Памятник Владимиру Великому в Москве.jpg
- File:Памятник князю Владимиру 2018 01.jpg
- File:Памятник князю Владимиру 2018 02.jpg
- File:Памятник князю Владимиру в Москве.jpg
Stefan2 (talk) 12:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- The rule is quite elusive, actually. As stated here, we can't upload an image when the protected work is the main object of the photo (for example, it takes up most of the photo). When I uploaded the file, I considered the monument to be a part of a larger composition with the Kremlin tower also being an important object. Anyway, I am new to this concept, so let more experienced users decide on whether it can stay here. Q-Wert-273 (talk) 15:52, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
- The template {{NoFoP-Russia}} talks about an accessory compared to the main represented or handled subject and in your case it looks as if the statue is the main subject, or perhaps both the statue and the building are the main subjects. I don't think that your image is fine. I think that the provision is meant for pictures like File:Vladimir Putin and Patriarch Kirill on Unity Day 2016-11-04 11.jpg where the main subject clearly is Vladimir Putin, although a small part of the statue appears in the background. You might have noticed that the Putin photo wasn't nominated for deletion. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
Sorry but no FoP in Russia for sculptures
A.Savin 22:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Согласно пункту 1 статьи 1276 ГК РФ: «Допускаются без согласия автора или иного правообладателя и без выплаты вознаграждения воспроизведение и распространение изготовленных экземпляров, сообщение в эфир или по кабелю, доведение до всеобщего сведения произведения изобразительного искусства или фотографического произведения, которые постоянно находятся в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, за исключением случаев, если изображение произведения является основным объектом использования или изображение произведения используется в целях извлечения прибыли».
- Возможно, просто нужно указать другую лицензию? Лицензии на английском, я не английский юрист, мне тяжело в них разобраться. Если есть желающие дополнить проект, прошу помочь в указании лицензии на файл File:Памятник Патриарху Ермогену.jpg. Удалить чужой труд дело нехитрое.--Дмитриева Ирина (talk) 11:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
- Здесь вам никто не поможет. Согласно политике лицензирования Викисклада для загружаемых изображений должны быть разрешены коммерческое использование и создание производных работ, что запрещено п. 1 с. 1276 ГК РФ. Желающие дополнить проект загружают изображения непосредственно в соответствующий раздел Википедии, где это разрешено. И вам давно пора привыкнуть к тому, что в википроектах чужой труд никто не ценит. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
File:1 Архивное фото. Пустырь на месте Малого Николаевского дворца, Чудова и Вознесенского монастырей.jpg
[edit]Unknown authorship, not surely Public Domain A.Savin 22:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Вероятно, нужно просто убрать не правильно указанную лицензию и обосновать добросовестность использования. Фото размещено на многих сайтах в интернете, оно уникально - показывает масштаб разрушений исторических зданий в Московском Кремле. Но у меня не получается вставить соотвествующий шаблон.--Дмитриева Ирина (talk) 18:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Нету на викискладе лицензии добросовестного использования. --A.Savin 18:24, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Derivative from copyrighted book, no permission A.Savin 23:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Гражданский кодекс РФ. Статья 1274. Свободное использование произведения в информационных, научных, учебных или культурных целях. 1. Допускается без согласия автора или иного правообладателя и без выплаты вознаграждения, но с обязательным указанием имени автора, произведение которого используется, и источника заимствования. --Дмитриева Ирина (talk) 16:56, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Увы. Нужно, чтобы в ЛЮБЫХ целях. --A.Savin 17:00, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Википедия - это информационные, научные, учебные и культарные цели. Зачем же в любых?--Дмитриева Ирина (talk) 15:28, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Такова политика викисклада. Не я придумал. --A.Savin 15:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Так разные лицензии есть. Что же все описывают только использование для любых целей? Прямо неразрешимая ситуация какая-то: Гражданский кодекс РФ позволяет использовать фото, а русскоязычная Википедия не хочет. --Дмитриева Ирина (talk) 16:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Здесь не русскоязычная Википедия, а Викисклад. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Так разные лицензии есть. Что же все описывают только использование для любых целей? Прямо неразрешимая ситуация какая-то: Гражданский кодекс РФ позволяет использовать фото, а русскоязычная Википедия не хочет. --Дмитриева Ирина (talk) 16:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Такова политика викисклада. Не я придумал. --A.Savin 15:47, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Википедия - это информационные, научные, учебные и культарные цели. Зачем же в любых?--Дмитриева Ирина (talk) 15:28, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- Увы. Нужно, чтобы в ЛЮБЫХ целях. --A.Savin 17:00, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charles McNeel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal artworks.
- File:G^g^Dess.jpg
- File:The future on line 2 @ elbow lake.jpg
- File:Rigged.jpg
- File:Panem et circeses.jpg
- File:Laundry chute escape.jpg
- File:CLIP0110.JPG
--ghouston (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Quince propuestas de los Foros Locales aprobadas en Villa de Vallecas, Moratalaz, Tetuán, Chamartín, San Blas-Canillejas, Salamanca y Villaverde (01).jpg
[edit]COM:DW of the sign, and everyone has their backs to the camera, so also perhaps no COM:EDUSE Daphne Lantier 03:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The sign and the photograph are both works of the City of Madrid, so I think it's covered by the license. Probably not a very useful photo though. Guanaco (talk) 21:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Retrato estadístico fiable, conducta ejemplar de las instituciones, pequeños y grandes gestos, una suma necesaria para las ciudades de paz (02).jpg
[edit]COM:DW of the screen Daphne Lantier 03:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
made error with copyright Markanderson72 (talk) 03:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. Editosaurus (talk) 04:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation Editosaurus (talk) 04:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation Editosaurus (talk) 04:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mhlongokhetho (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I found the photo in Internet at http://13depository.blogspot.com.ee/2002/02/character-names-m.html since 2002. Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Veronikakocianova
[edit]Unused self-portraits. No potential educational value. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Amit paswan jee (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Logo borrowed from here. No evidence of permission. ErikvanB (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Theatre poster. No evidence of permission. ErikvanB (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image Steinfeld-feld (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Probably from youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGJTLu2LNNo GeorgHH • talk 17:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wanderson81 (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal images and artwork
- File:Imagem016q.jpg
- File:Imagem015h.jpg
- File:Imagem020pn.jpg
- File:Imagem032mo.jpg
- File:Auto35014.jpg
- File:Auto35013.jpg
- File:Auto35012.jpg
- File:Auto35011.jpg
- File:Auto35009.jpg
- File:Auto35007.jpg
- File:Auto35003.jpg
- File:Auto35005.jpg
- File:Auto35004.jpg
- File:Auto35002.jpg
- File:Auto35.jpg
- File:Auto33u.jpg
- File:Auto35016sdfdfd.jpg
- File:Gtuku.jpg
- File:Gdfminah cara 7.jpg
- File:Pintura ed.JPG
- File:Pinturaaaa.JPG
- File:Palhaçada2.JPG
- File:Palhaçada.jpg
- File:Preto e branco.JPG
- File:Vilolao.jpg
- File:Echer.JPG
- File:Hioerlindo.JPG
- File:Motocao.jpg
- File:Motoca.JPG
- File:Desenhi.jpg
- File:Wanderson lima aamral.JPG
- File:Wanderson pintura.JPG
- File:Wanderson moto.JPG
- File:Wanderson pintura 2.JPG
- File:Wanderson lindao.JPG
- File:Wanderson Lima Amaral.jpg
Daphne Lantier 21:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status, considering multiple authors involved: "Tiago e Máfia Comum", "Don Pablo Videoclipes", " Jeff Lenburg (enviado por Gmhl)", "Marcela Almeida". Multiple issues to solve, needing further details & permissions via COM:OTRS.
- File:Família, 2015.png
- File:Mano Fler, 2016.png
- File:Walter Lantz, 1927.png
- File:Henry G. Saperstein, Robert Goulet, and Director Abe Levitow in 1962.png
- File:Rael da Rima, 2014.jpg
- File:Rael da Rima, 2016.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 00:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ZinavoTechnologies (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
It is unlikely that these are the own work of the uploader, as claimed. Even if these are the own work of the uploader, as works previously published elsewhere with a non-free license, we need permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Adele au Grammy 2013.jpg — previously online at [3], [4] credited to Keystone Press.
- File:Adele et son grammy awards en 2013.jpg — Getty Images rights-controlled photo ID #161407163 by Jason Merritt.
- File:Adele au Grammy Awards en 2013.jpg — previously online at [5].
- File:Adele au Buckingam palace en 2013.jpg — Getty Images rights-controlled photo ID #457861953 by John Stilwell.
- File:Adele au Brit Awards 2016.jpg — previously online at [6].
- File:Adele et ces Grammy en 2012.jpg — previously online at [7] credited to Allen J. Schaben.
- File:Adele au Brit Awards en 2011.jpg — previously online at [8] credited to PA Photos.
—RP88 (talk) 14:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Estebanguti24 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Investigación en Ikiam.jpg
- File:Campus de nivelación.jpg
- File:Nuevo edificio Ikiam.jpg
- File:Ikiam toma aérea.jpg
- File:DJI 0006-4.jpg
- File:Foto-3-REVISTA.jpg
- File:DJI 0057-2.jpg
- File:Ikiam.jpg
- File:Ikiam Campus Muyuna.png
- File:Comisión Gestora Ikiam 2017.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://media.iccnews.ir/Larg/1395/09/15/IMG16152786.JPG.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Small files without EXIF data, some are derivative works, user with bad history, unlikely to be own works.
- File:بیگی.jpg
- File:بالن هوای گرم.jpg
- File:قنبر رحیمی.jpg
- File:Prtg.jpg
- File:Server room.jpg
- File:تشریح .jpg
- File:طراحی سرور روم.jpg
- File:فیلمبرداری زیرآب.jpg
- File:جایروپلن 5.jpg
- File:فرستنده کوه نوح.jpg
- File:High altitude balloon.jpg
- File:Aerostar scientific high altitude balloon.jpg
- File:اسکله ساحل (1600x1200).jpg
- File:Photo 2017-07-21 17-25-00 اسنوتراک.jpg
- File:Zohrabbeigi.jpg
Yann (talk) 09:46, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
Yann (talk) 23:06, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
as per COM:ADVERT Daphne Lantier 23:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This is the uploader's only image on Commons. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 23:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image (only use is an inappropriate posting, now archived, on the talk page of the Avril Lavigne article) Daphne Lantier 23:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 23:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Unused image downloaded from October 2015. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Low quality, out of scope
TFerenczy (talk) 23:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:14, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE -- simple text Daphne Lantier 22:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 22:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:18, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
as per COM:ADVERT Daphne Lantier 22:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bitesizehappy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Augustus Elia (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 20:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aulapedromercedes (talk · contribs)
[edit]no COM:EDUSE
Daphne Lantier 20:59, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maikku sarvas (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope — unused personal images
Daphne Lantier 21:05, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
as per COM:ADVERT Daphne Lantier 21:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chiefhacker.harry (talk · contribs)
[edit]as per COM:ADVERT -- self-promo
- File:Hari om Chaudhary (Tech Writer).jpg
- File:Author Hariom Chaudhary Advance Ethical Hacking and Cyber Security Boot Camp at Delhi, India.jpg
- File:Author Hariom Chaudhary.jpg
Daphne Lantier 21:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tryndamere2121 (talk · contribs)
[edit]as per COM:ADVERT -- self-promo
Daphne Lantier 21:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal images/self-promo
- File:Indo Uae.jpg
- File:Author3.png
- File:Author2.png
- File:Author1.png
- File:Author.png
- File:INDO UAE ECONOMIC RELATIONS.jpg
Daphne Lantier 21:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope.-- VideoCore (talk) 21:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 21:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:54, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
as per COM:ADVERT Daphne Lantier 21:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Daphne Lantier 21:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LynnGilbert5 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two images have been deleted before File:Lillian Helman portrait ©Lynn Gilbert 1977.jpg. File:Denise Scott Brown portrait by ©Lynn Gilbert, 1977.jpg as "no permission". All files claim to be taken by "©Lynn Gilbert, 1977, New York". Having a similar user name does not confer ownership. These should be verified by OTRS.
- File:Lillian Hellman 1978 © Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Denise Scott Brown 1978 © Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Tatyana Grosman 1978 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Sylvia Porter 1978 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Susan Sontag 1979 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:RB Ginsburg 1977 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Margaret Mead 1977 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Elizabeth Langer 1977 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Louise Nevelson 1976 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Frances Steloff 1978 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Gloria Steinem 1977 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Ada Louise Huxtable 1976 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Diana Vreeland 1978 ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Tatyana Grosman ©1978 Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Betty Parsons ©Lynn Gilbert 1977.jpg
- File:Grace Murray Hopper, in her office in Washington DC, 1978, ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Betty friedan ©Lynn Gilbert.jpg
- File:Barbara Walters ©Lynn Gilbert.gif
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Permission received and I tagged the file pages with appropriate templates. I am still working on the deleted files. 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. OTRS permission added. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 17:49, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:09, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Banner from a website, goes beyond threshold of originality, website has copyright information. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
downloaded from instagram. no evidence of compatible license John from Idegon (talk) 06:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:43, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Personal picture. Commons is not a private photo album Sreejith K (talk) 19:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Personal picture Sreejith K (talk) 19:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:04, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Legal issues with file: Copyright violation. Zhangj1079 (T|C|U) 00:06, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate (File:Jacob Jordaens - Prometheus Bound - WGA12000.jpg) José Luiz disc 00:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
This is released under a non-commercial license Kees08 (talk) 00:32, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Multiple uploads under copyright
[edit]Drawings made by Calvi, under copyright. Trizek from FR 00:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The uploader could be his son or grandson (same family name), maybe with Calvi's approval. The OTRS procedure should be explained to him. Kokonino (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- I've indeed been contacted by the uploader who told me to be the son of Calvi. I've redirected him to OTRS to provide an authorization. Trizek from FR 22:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
More accurate version exists: File:Flag of Azai, Shiga.svg Xeror (talk) 01:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I doubt the given license is valid here. JuTa 02:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrassy66 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files appear to have been uploaded by indefblocked globally locked puppetmaster User:A3cb1.
- File:Inaugurazione della XXVII Legislatura.png
- File:Mantova - Via Portazzolo.jpg
- File:Ritratto di Giangastone de' Medici.jpg
- File:Ciceruacchio.jpg
- File:Camillo da Correggio.jpg
- File:King George V and King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy.jpg
- File:Leopold Joseph Graf von Daun.png
- File:Porträt des KönigsWilhelm III von Grossbritannien.png
- File:Pallade Tributaria.png
- File:Ritratto di Benedetta Gonzaga Nevers.png
- File:Ritratto di Costanzo Patrizi marchese di Castel Giuliano.png
- File:Cavaliere02.png
- File:Cavaliere01.png
- File:Ritratto di carlo Emanuele III di Savoia con la famiglia.png
- File:Trinità in Gloria tra Angeli e Santi.png
- File:Ritratto di luisa Francesca di Borbone.png
- File:Il Carosello Mantovano.png
- File:Vinciguerra d’Arco.jpg
- File:Nicolò d’Arco.jpg
- File:Ritratto di Roberto Castiglioni.png
- File:Ritratto di un Personaggio della nobile famiglia Castiglione.png
- File:Villa Malboni.jpg
- File:Miracolo di S. Mauro.png
- File:Ritratto di Gerolamo Martinengo.png
- File:Stemma dei Marchesi Cavriani.png
- File:Luigi Gonzaga di Sabbioneta.jpg
- File:Tarquina Molza.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ 02:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Salve, first of all, I do not know who this A3cb1 is. Since not the hop files that are uploaded, and because the files that I want to restore are completely excluded from copyright protection, being portraits, and vintage photographs ,,,, you can not and should not ignore these requests, Just because if you restore them the date won to the sock or the puppet, "I find that this behavior is not right" I did in time to see some of this busy user's bargains, and I have to say that hundreds of images are PD license So much and certainly with very high probability, excluding copyright protection,,,, I'm not a puppetmaster, do not confuse water with oil for courtesy--Andrassy66 (talk) 12:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrassy66 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files appear to have been uploaded by indefblocked globally locked puppetmaster User:A3cb1.
- File:Sigismondo d' arco.jpg
- File:Tarquinia Molza.jpg
- File:Portrait of Vincenzo I Gonzaga.jpg
- File:Vinciguerra d’Arco.jpg
- File:Albert Edward, Prince of Wales and Frederick, Crown Prince of Denmark.jpg
- File:Christening of Princess Victoria Eugénie of Battenberg at Balmoral.jpg
- File:Reception for the Emperor of Russia and the King of Saxony in the Saloon at Buckingham Palace.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ 03:39, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- File:Vinciguerra d’Arco.jpg was reuploaded. — Jeff G. ツ 03:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
C: SCOPE Retrato de pessoa não relevante tentando se promover em PT.WP ~ Raphael Muller (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
C: SCOPE Retrato de pessoa não relevante tentando se promover em PT.WP ~ Raphael Muller (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
C: SCOPE Retrato de pessoa não relevante tentando se promover em PT.WP ~ Raphael Muller (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Rien a faire sur Wikipédia. CROUS (talk) 04:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no EXIFs. The uploader already uploaded copyvios Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
No indication of when it was first published but probably in her husband's memoirs, which came out late in his life. Licensing seems wrong to me. I am not sure whether the publisher can provide authority but they're not even the uploader. Sitush (talk) 05:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- It seems I forgot to add the OTRS tag when uploading them. The ticket is located here. Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:16, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Photo: w:YG Entertainment. No evidence that the owner of flickr account named "Republic of Korea" may license images made by someone else. Sealle (talk) 05:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PCP: we do have permission from the account owner but there is obvious doubts that he owns the rights on this picture based on his statement on the FLickr pic. --AntonierCH (d) 22:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Este archivo no tiene un permiso para reutilizarlo. Soosie. (talk) 05:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Obviously cropped professional photo of an actress, lacking metadata. Would need better evidence that this is "own work". Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Actor red carpet photo covered in a watermark; to be found anywhere via Google; not own work. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Low-quality image of a person; no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
The metadata states "Author: Bill Virun, Copyright holder: Copyright© 2013 Visually Attractive, Inc." So, not own work. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Low-quality image of a person; no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
The metadata states "Author: MakuLopez, Copyright holder: MakuLopez." No evidence that the uploader is that person or has their permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Claimed authorship is questionable; the image is already widely used on the internet, for example here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 06:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
photo downloaded from Instagram. No evidence of compatible license John from Idegon (talk) 06:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
No need to set up this redirect. Techyan（Talk） 06:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- It's a commonly known abbreviation or typo. =) --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 04:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Cross-namespace redirect, no benefit here. --Achim (talk) 17:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
downloaded from instagram. no evidence of compatible license John from Idegon (talk) 06:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xuxa e Luis Inácio Lula da Silva.jpg + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sobrevoo das áreas atingidas pela chuva no Espírito Santo - 02.jpg (and eventually other related DR's). This is not a work by Agência Brasil, considering the credit "Roberto Stuckert Filho/PR" (PR = " Presidência da República"). Usually, photos from photographers of Agência Brasil are tagged with [Name of photographer/Agência Brasil] (or "Abr") and photos from other sources are credited according to the source. Permission needed.
Nominating also a crop:
- Agree ~★ nmaia d 17:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status considering cropped from (as indicated) File:Grabstätte Napoleon Seyfarth.7514.jpg, deleted in 2016. Gunnex (talk) 07:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Because this track is wrong 112.67.218.79 07:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Dubious license, picture fpound on the web , http://jakobolrik.dk/pressebilleder-2/ Pugilist (talk) 07:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
"Girl cat" looks more like some kind of promotion here, no? E4024 (talk) 07:59, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
This is not the own work. OTRS-permission from author is needed. see here. Y.haruo (talk) 01:11, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 01:04, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
1. There is the name of a copyright holder in the metadata, 2. the uploader claims to be the subject and claims "own work" but it is not likely a self-portrait, 3. An uncropped version of the photo is located on this website. Need clarification about authorship and copyright status. A file with an identical name was previously deleted, maybe same issue. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 12:35, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Ticket:2019021510008989 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 23:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 11:03, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Metadata says: "Copyright Premier Corp. 00". OTRS-permission from corporation representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
unused png superseded by svg. also the design is factually incorrect. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 08:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Sculpture by Niki de Saint Phalle (1930-2002). No freedom of panorama in Denmark. Bot upload Pugilist (talk) 08:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Missing verifiable source information. Kelly (talk) 09:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like the image is from here, which is a part of this larger article. I don't see a claim of copyright anywhere on the blog, but more research is needed. Geoff Who, me? 22:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Wopiaccount
[edit]Self-promotion of an organization; the files are not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Show case how careless ebc.com.br are using images. Per Category:Agência Brasil related deletion requests this is not a work by Agência Brasil/ebc.com.br, considering being a duplicate of File:Darcy Ribeiro.jpg (2006), btw licensed by uploader @André Koehne: with Cc-by-sa and NOT cc-by... Gunnex (talk) 09:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Nathaniel Rosa is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
This photo does not need permission from Nathaniel Rosa, the photo and copyright is owned by the charity, Sea Cadets. They employed the photographer to take the pictures and paid him for ownership of all images shot on the day. The credit on the photo is to be polite to the photographer and recognise his good work. It is not legally required.
- So far they are only your words. I believe more EXIF, which says: author and copyright holder Nathaniel Rosa. Taivo (talk) 06:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-trival third party logo, equivalent at Engllish Wikipedia is non-free w:File:2000 UCI Road World Championships logo.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 23:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
uploaded by mistake Erezger1 (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- also file:CCC Contract Award picture Ken Taylor 10.10.07.jpg
OTRS-permission from author Optilan representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Not own work , third party logo, but I'm only seeing simple text. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:04, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
yes, sorry that I uploaded it it was already up at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCR_International_Series#/media/File:TCR_International_Series_logo.jpg but because haven't seen it on TCR 2017's season's site I uploaded it accidentally Bracci (talk) 13:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused, not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:04, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Spam. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Personal pic, image out of scope Ariadacapo (talk) 10:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio or self promotion Pippobuono (talk) 10:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
No-FoP in Japan. this work is created by Rokuya Nagae (長江録弥, source) who died in 2005, thus this is not in public domain. Kkairri (talk) 12:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted artworks of M. C. Escher Rodrigolopes (talk) 12:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Piece of contemporary art on exhibition at "Statens Museum for Kunst", no freedom of panorama in Denmark; bot upload Pugilist (talk) 12:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Sculpture by Wilhelm Freddie (died 1995), no freedom of panorama in Denmark, bot upload Pugilist (talk) 12:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
No-FoP in Japan. this work is created by Go takahashi (高橋剛, source) who died in 1991, thus this is not in public domain. Kkairri (talk) 12:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Not a Free image; Image was posted on Twitter before being uploaded, copied, and cropped to Flickr; https://twitter.com/never1959/status/891433856875745281 98.193.98.26 12:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Please delete this image--taken without consent and is very low quality. LMC33 (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- {{Vd}} Low quality due to blurriness. Consent doesn't matter, the photo was taken in a public place with no expectation of privacy. — Jeff G. ツ 17:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Blurry or not, it is in use and therefore in scope. Personallity rights/privacy (etc.) would be the only reason I can muster to rationalize deleting an image being in use. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Josve05a: Fine, keep it then. — Jeff G. ツ 21:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Blurry or not, it is in use and therefore in scope. Personallity rights/privacy (etc.) would be the only reason I can muster to rationalize deleting an image being in use. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Daphne Lantier 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Blurred tourist photo, uploaded by bot. There are several pictures of Tivoli Gardens and Nimb. Out of Scope Pugilist (talk) 13:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Blurred tourist snap shot uploaded by bot. there are many others (better) pics of Tivoli Gardens and Nimb Pugilist (talk) 13:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Tourist snap shot of low and blurry quality. There are many other and better pictures of Tivoli Gardens and Nimb. Bot upload Pugilist (talk) 13:32, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Violating somebody else's copyright. Derivative work from Burqa Afghanistan 01.jpg. 195.88.117.25 13:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Installation "Please, Keep quiet!" on display at Statens Museum for Kunst. Artists still alive. Even though the picture is just a part of the total art installation still considered a copyright infringement. No freedom of panorama. Bot upload. Pugilist (talk) 13:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Installation "Please, Keep quiet!" on display at Statens Museum for Kunst. Artists still alive. Even though the picture is just a part of the total art installation still considered a copyright infringement. No freedom of panorama. Bot upload. Pugilist (talk) 13:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Installation "Please, Keep quiet!" on display at Statens Museum for Kunst. Artists still alive. Even though the picture is just a part of the total art installation still considered a copyright infringement. No freedom of panorama. Bot upload. Pugilist (talk) 13:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Installation "Please, Keep quiet!" on display at Statens Museum for Kunst. Artists still alive. Even though the picture is just a part of the total art installation still considered a copyright infringement. No freedom of panorama. Bot upload. Pugilist (talk) 13:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Installation "Please, Keep quiet!" on display at Statens Museum for Kunst. Artists still alive. Even though the picture is just a part of the total art installation still considered a copyright infringement. No freedom of panorama. Bot upload. Pugilist (talk) 13:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Installation "Please, Keep quiet!" on display at Statens Museum for Kunst. Artists still alive. Even though the picture is just a part of the total art installation still considered a copyright infringement. No freedom of panorama. Bot upload. Pugilist (talk) 13:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Installation "Please, Keep quiet!" on display at Statens Museum for Kunst. Artists still alive. Even though the picture is just a part of the total art installation still considered a copyright infringement. No freedom of panorama. Bot upload. Pugilist (talk) 13:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Installation "Please, Keep quiet!" on display at Statens Museum for Kunst. Artists still alive. Even though the picture is just a part of the total art installation still considered a copyright infringement. No freedom of panorama. Bot upload. Pugilist (talk) 13:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
See article here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Drenche and notable sources in the article: several national medias, for several years. Kango (talk) 14:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal or promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://media.linkonlineworld.com/img/original/2017/7/9/2017_7_9_20_37_36_638.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from icon. Is it in public domain? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal or promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be replaced with File:Kenny-Flowers-est-now.svg EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF/credited to other people.
- File:03 PanchoName 1er rally Aca.jpg
- File:02 PanchoName kart01.jpg
- File:01 Pancho Name perfil wiki.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://institutoronald.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/familia_neves2-300x198.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation Gorlingor (talk) 14:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- I could not find a license statement on the source site: [9]. --Gorlingor (talk) 14:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
File:HK food 即食麵 Korean instant noodle 電磁爐 Induction cooker n bowl handle 煲滾水 boiling water August 2017 Lnv2 Ottogi brand.jpg
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging. Should be cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- I am the uploader of this work, feel free to delete it, it had been replaced by a more updated map and is no longer in use. Tdunsky (talk) 18:55, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Admins explode from time to time. No need for their flag's explosion. OoS. E4024 (talk) 14:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a screenshot from the episode. EXIF data is missing. Vera (talk) 22:27, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Copying discussion from COM:UD:
Extended content
|
|---|
|
It's not a screenshot. I took this picture myself, as I stated in the description. There's only one telecamera in the film studio that could make an image like my picture and that's the one in the back. The other cameras are too close to the stage. Said telecamera is positioned in the middle of the stand and does never move to the sides, it only zooms in and out. If you draw a straight line from the telecamera to the board behind presenter Harm Edens, the line would touch Edens as well as the Teleprompter in front of him. My picture was clearly not taken from any point on this line, but from one to the left of it. |
- Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 20:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Caudex Rax is a trusted editor. I can vouch for him. No reason to not believe his story. Natuur12 (talk) 20:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: found on http://img1.bdbphotos.com/images/orig/b/o/boi5vq5b8t3lbli8.jpg?skj2io4l dated from 01.10.2014 (prior to commons upload). JuTa 21:12, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Seems to be TV screenshot. Commons:Derivative works from photos anyway. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per previous DR not a screen shot and the photographs are DM. (Cannot be avoived / are incidental.) Natuur12 (talk) 15:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Natuur12. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Available at higher res here: https://444.hu/tag/habsburg-gyorgy; Given the absence of useful source information on the Thai Wikipedia and the user's upload record, I seriously doubt the license is correct. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Likely photograph or screenshot of copyrighted broadcast Ytoyoda (talk) 15:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Very small picture taken from somewhere. I made a cat for this "Laton American" dish with a couple of better images. It is used in a WP but can be replaced with one of them. E4024 (talk) 15:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Image from http://www.infobae.com/2015/11/24/1772140-mauricio-macri-se-reunio-cristina-kirchner-la-residencia-olivos/ Gastón Cuello (talk) 15:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Triple pals, OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
File is a translation of File:First Ionization Energy.svg, but that file is switch-translated SVG. The translations have been mrerged into that file and credited to User:Wiki LIC. Spanish is displayed if lang=es is specified. Forking files makes maintenance more troublesome. Glrx (talk) 16:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Self promotion only, not in scope, unused. GeorgHH • talk 16:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted poster, not covered by FoP because it's obviously only a temporary exhibition 79.223.91.84 16:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
false colors, unusable, out of scope 79.223.91.84 16:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
false colors, unusable, out of scope 79.223.91.84 16:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
grayscale picture, unusable, out of scope. Also possibly copyrighted architecture for which FoP wouldn't apply because FoP doesn't apply to interiors of buildings. 79.223.91.84 16:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xuxa e Luis Inácio Lula da Silva.jpg + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sobrevoo das áreas atingidas pela chuva no Espírito Santo - 02.jpg (and eventually other related DR's). This is not a work by Agência Brasi/EBC, considering the credit "Beto Barata/PR" (PR = " Presidência da República"). Usually, photos from photographers of Agência Brasil are tagged with [Name of photographer/Agência Brasil] (or "Abr") and photos from other sources are credited according to the source. Permission needed.
Additonally, {{EBC}} is identical affected by license change as {{Agência Brasil}}. See Category:Agência Brasil related uploads affected by license change for details. Gunnex (talk) 16:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Nominating (per above) also
Gunnex (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy delete ~★ nmaia d 09:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Not uploaders own work. Several sites show this image, e.g. http://www.sitcomsonline.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/28687 GeorgHH • talk 16:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Justin Bieber in 2017
[edit]Appears to be screenshots from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUc_8oqL62U
- File:Justin Bieber Purpose World Tour (Bogotá, Colombia - 2017) (cropped).jpg
- File:Justin Bieber Purpose World Tour (Bogotá, Colombia - 2017).jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted picture, photoshop edit, no sources Judor92 (talk) 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted and from imdb Judor92 (talk) 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Looks to me pretty much out of scope. JuTa 18:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Higher res version here: http://sport.gentside.com/jean-pierre-rivi%E8re/nice-eric-roy-bientot-limoge_art30347.html Ytoyoda (talk) 18:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
looks like a screenshot from likely copyrighted software. JuTa 18:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Seems the PDF version states the CC licence is non-commercial. FunkMonk (talk) 18:13, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Seems the PDF version states the CC licence is non-commercial. FunkMonk (talk) 18:14, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
No indication that the image is free anywhere on the provided source website; the original full-size image also has watermark on it Snowflake91 (talk) 18:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete the nomination, the licence is fine – it was a wrong link which didnt show the licence. Snowflake91 (talk) 18:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : personality right isusseshence, potentially non-free content ? 
Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : unused upload, personality right isusses, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 18:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: and blocked - reupload of deleted file by user who was previously warned for the same offense. --Jcb (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
COM:DW of COM:TOYS/3D-work, not covered by COM:FOP --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Not sure if COM:FOP extends to 2D-posters placed on buildings which do have COM:FOP exceptions in the US.Would be similar to photographing a small poster made out paper on a wall. Therefore a COM:DW. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Wrong image file size. ClintBruex (talk) 19:04, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The paintings seem modern and I suspect artists' copyright violation. All four paintings and their artists must be identified to determine copyright status of the photo. Taivo (talk) 19:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nella quadreria in questione c'era libertà di fotografia senza particolari divieti. Essendo peraltro un ufficio pubblico non ritengo violi alcun copyright. Moxmarco (mi scuso se non firmo correttamente ma il cellulare non me lo consente). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moxmarco (talk • contribs)
- You say, that the gallery does not prohibit photographing. This is likely. Nevertheless, there is still no freedom of panorama in Italy. Who are four depicted persons and who are the four artists? Taivo (talk) 08:36, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Template that references itself. I do not see how this is useful. Sreejith K (talk) 19:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Template with an infobox about the creator. {{Out of scope}} Sreejith K (talk) 19:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: intended for self-promotional puposes. --Achim (talk) 21:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution image which looks like a new paper image or a scan of it. Sreejith K (talk) 19:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Info: Also affected: copyrighted (EXIF) File:Nayak Singh.jpg. --Achim (talk) 21:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, enough alternatives inside Category:Ceratonia siliqua.-- VideoCore (talk) 20:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope: just a sign showing "Carruba".-- VideoCore (talk) 20:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
low quality snapshot, even in Category:Katherine Maher in 2014 are enough better alternatives.-- VideoCore (talk) 20:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1995 by Volodymyr Ropetsky. No Permission.
See also:
Микола Василечко (talk) 20:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Files from Category:Incorrect circuit diagrams
[edit]- File:Demux1.png
- File:EMISOR COMUN.jpg
- File:Io780x constant current source.svg
- File:Outdoor light.svg
- File:SBS 1.PNG
- File:Triyak sembol ve esdeger.gif
- File:12V charger.JPG
Unused images in the category Category:Incorrect circuit diagrams. --Apocheir (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Unused low-quality circuit diagram Apocheir (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I cannot find the source of the actual image. The image sourced and described is actually File:New DC-10 First Class.jpg. Since this image has been on here a few years, I decided to open up a deletion request instead of a no source tag Elisfkc (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
It's an almost-duplicate of File:212 Logowanie OSA EK.jpg – and it's not used, except in the uploader's galery. CiaPan (talk) 20:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:42, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
probably © design, Cjackh (talk) 22:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I have doubts about authorship of this image. No metadata, no high resolution, watermark in Chinese, new user with only one editing across all Wikimedia projects + this photo evidently belongs to photo series at http://ru.fanpop.com/clubs/amy-acker/images/39998039/title/amy-acker-shanghai-comic-con-2016-photo. Harold (talk) 22:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
probably © design, Cjackh (talk) 22:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Modern architecture, Iceland has only non-commercial FoP. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Apparently copyrighted image taken from online TimothyJosephWood 22:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Misclick. Meant to nominate for speedy. TimothyJosephWood 22:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 22:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:35, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
re-uploaded by different user - see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sharifur Rahman Adil.jpg Ronhjones (Talk) 22:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
as per COM:ADVERT Daphne Lantier 22:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
as per COM:TOYS Daphne Lantier 22:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 18:34, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no permission (No permission since) Hystrix (talk) 22:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC) A photo with EXIF, not found on google or via TinEye. Hystrix (talk) 22:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- EXIF says the author is Kaveh Khazravi ICC. This is a web size. Upload history doesn't give me much confidence. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Both unlikely to be an "own work" (object and uploader of the photo are the same) and out of scope of the project as uploaded for mystification article (vandalism) trying to present herself as a "Romanian writer born in 1929" 147.134.108.217 22:59, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
See [10], 2016. Yann (talk) 23:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
I was not ready to upload it. I have to upload another one. Tumaini Letu (talk) 23:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) tag here on the flickr source is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication (CC0) licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time....and that is why Commons does not take this license from a private individual unless the work depicted is by an artist who has been dead for 70 years A license change is needed here. Leoboudv (talk) 23:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Can be found on numerous other sites such as [11]. Evidence of own work should be provided. --ghouston (talk) 23:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:43, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Per Category:Agência Brasil related deletion requests. This is not a work by Agência Brasil, considering the credit "Fernando Maia/Riotur" (see also exif). Usually, photos from photographers of Agência Brasil are tagged with [Name of photographer/Agência Brasil] (or "Abr") and photos from other sources are credited according to the source. Permission needed. Gunnex (talk) 07:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Nominating (per above) also:
- File:Sargento Pimenta 1067310-1% 20-% 2027022017sgt09.jpg
- File:Sargento Pimenta 1067311-1% 20-% 2027022017sgt010.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 07:37, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping, 9 August 2017 Daphne Lantier (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Sargento Pimenta 1067311-1% 20-% 2027022017sgt010.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE -- tiny 7kb shot Daphne Lantier 21:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Daphne Lantier 21:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
unsourced collage Daphne Lantier 21:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE Daphne Lantier 21:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
as per COM:DW Daphne Lantier 21:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
likely copyvio -- photo of an older photo print Daphne Lantier 22:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
out of scope: unused youtube extract.-- VideoCore (talk) 20:14, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. The image illustrates a notable subject, as demonstrated by articles in several Wikipedias (see usages of File:Cláudia Semedo.png). It comes from a properly licensed source (an educational one at that, for what it's worth), is well categorized, and provides a different view of the subject than the other available images. I can't see anything the project would gain from removing this image, on the contrary. --Waldir talk 21:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Waldir: I'm asking you personally: Can you see the artifacts?--VideoCore (talk) 22:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, the image is not perfectly sharp due to the video compression. That said, I think the signal-to-noise ratio is quite acceptable, as the image still illustrates the subject clearly, IMO. --Waldir talk 22:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Per Waldir. Also this is an image of a very notable portuguese actress. Tm (talk) 20:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
violation de copyright, créateur indiqué sur le fichier et est un GIP et non l'uplooder de l'image Lefringant (talk) 07:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, vous avez raison, la présentation peut prêter à confusion. La mention des coordonnées de la Réserve Marine procède de la volonté d'indiquer les coordonnées du GIP responsable de sa gestion afin que ce dernier puisse être consulté par toute personne qui voudrait s'assurer de la véracité de ces informations. Ce n'est pas un copyright.
Je propose d'enlever la mention du GIP et de reposter une carte après l'avoir enlevé.Requinou (talk) 08:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Retirer la mention du GIP n'y changera rien puisque le fond de carte entier a été créé par la réserve. Cette carte est en violation des droits d'auteurs, ce qui justifie normalement une suppression immédiate. Cordialement, Goodshort (talk) 09:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright holder should confirm license by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:53, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Vorwort-f-85.png
The text is enough long for literary copyright. OTRS-permission from copyright holder (GFKI representative?) is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
@Hi Talvo. Das pic ist gleichzeitig ein Beleg zur Programmatik der Initiative. (wie anders als durch solche Aussagen und die Programme selbst soll man die sonst belegen?) Da die Gesellschaft seit 30 Jahren nicht mehr existiert und der Text nicht von einer Einzelperson stammt sondern ein allgemeines Vorwort ohne Autorengabe darstellt, wird meiner Meinung nach das Urheberrecht nicht verletzt, weder das eines Einzelnen noch das eines Autorenkollektives. Aber ich lasse mich natürlich eines Besseren belehren, ich wollte das nur mal zu bedenken geben. Vielen Dank für Hilfe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikihuegi (talk • contribs)
- Wikihuegi explains, that copyright holder, legal person GFKI has been liquidated without legal heir. Taivo (talk) 06:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: We do not consider orphan works to be Public Domain. --Storkk (talk) 09:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
The map depicted on this page doesn't show correct map of india, in this image jammu and kashmir is not correct. 129.97.47.240 18:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Most of the maps showing the Indian Subcontinen don't show the territorial claims. This map show the international de facto border. India and Pakistan have their frontier there by now. None of them recognize it as the definitive border, but this map is a linguistic map not a geopolitical map, And by the way it doesn't talk about languages on the region in dispute.
Fobos | ¿algo que decirme? 18:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Most of the maps showing the Indian Subcontinen don't show the territorial claims. This map show the international de facto border. India and Pakistan have their frontier there by now. None of them recognize it as the definitive border, but this map is a linguistic map not a geopolitical map, And by the way it doesn't talk about languages on the region in dispute.
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_congratulates_Aviation_Boatswain's_Mate_(Fuel)_3rd_Class_Daniel_Zubiria_after_a_five-month_deploym.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Fort_Worth_(LCS_3)_transits_through_the_Menekaunee_Bridge_in_Green.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map-of-rockets-launches-from-gaza-from-2014-07-08-to-2014-07-31.jpg){kind=link}
,_congratulates_Aviation_Boatswain%27s_Mate_(Fuel)_3rd_Class_Daniel_Zubiria_after_a_five-month_deploym.jpg){kind=link}
,_congratulates_Aviation_Boatswain%27s_Mate_(Fuel)_3rd_Class_Daniel_Zubiria_after_a_five-month_deploym.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[10]](http://www.cleyet-marrel.com/site/IMG/jpg/MadagascarBaobabs06_1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: In use, therefore in scope. If you disagree with the map, create one sufficiently better that its use can replace the uses of this file. --Storkk (talk) 10:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
There's no link to review, but perhaps this is simple enough for PD-Shape? Daphne Lantier 05:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Commons:Threshold of originality#Japan : (...) eligible for copyright when it is a production in which thoughts or sentiments are expressed in a creative way ...", I think it is creative enough. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrinknp_200_200/AAEAAQAAAAAAAATSAAAAJGFiMWJhZGJjLTgwMDQtNGU0YS1hZmFhLTM5YjJlOTZhYTQxZQ.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
The picture was taken by me in the studio at the left side of the 32 fader Neve DFC mixing console in the WFDiF Studio 1 Warsaw, Poland I was working many years, using small camera in low light conditions. I have a full rights to the picture.
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by It's gonna be awesome (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:DW.
- File:Controlled med warning in Republic of China aka Taiwan 中華民國管制藥品標籤.jpg
- File:Front appearance of Concerta's container 專思（注）達的藥罐外觀.jpg
- File:Ritalin LA exterior、outward appearance、藥罐外觀.jpg
Techyan（Talk） 06:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- I've asked a question for this before I uploaded these simple pictures. =) Please refer to Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2016/12#Can_I_upload_a_picture_I_took_of_a_bottle_containing_a_type_of_medication.3F--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 03:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I think it's ok. The text is mainly, name, description and list of ingredients, nothing very artistic or creative IMO, the logos are rather simple and very small. Maybe there is a little issue with the first image and the Chinese characters but I am not competent. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Christian Ferrer. Ruthven (msg) 18:06, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by It's gonna be awesome (talk · contribs)
[edit]{{PD-ROC-exempt}} only covers textual documents but not photographs, as indicted by previous DRs, e.g., Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chen Shui-bian, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chiang Ching kuo.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yen Chia-kan.jpg.
Also, no evidence of permission for the {{Attribution}} tag.
Wcam (talk) 15:49, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Reply:
|
Copyright Act in effect in Taiwan:
Article 9 The following items shall not be the subject matter of copyright:
The term "official documents" in the first subparagraph of the preceding paragraph includes proclamations, text of speeches, news releases, and other documents prepared by civil servants in the course of carrying out their duties. WORKS OF STATE RUN ENTERPRISES ARE NOT AUTOMATICALLY FREE OF COPYRIGHT. This work is from any of the items above and is in the public domain in Taiwan administered by the Republic of China and possibly other jurisdictions. For images of traffic signs and road markings, please see also Template:PD-ROC-Traffic Signs and Template:PD-ROC-Road Markings. |
 |
- Documents prepared by civil servants in the course of carrying out their duties.
- The only criteria to satisfy the missing permission is to prove those works were not created in the course of carrying out their duties.
- Also, by definition of document, photos, classified as printed information, are of course included. Just check out there exists a bunch of pictures with such certificate. Taiwanese government has never accused Wikimedia commons of breach of government's copyright.
- Adding attribution is asked by a Chinese Wikipedia administrator. I just followed his/her advice.
- --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 16:02, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for having me here. I would like to give some example use of pictures with Public Domain in Taiwan. Too many to list.
For example:
- File:全中運暨2017臺北世大運之夜-美聲律動之夜_04.jpg
- File:全中運暨2017臺北世大運之夜-美聲律動之夜_02.jpg
- File:臺北順利奪得2017世大運主辦權_03.jpg
- File:2015光州世大運閉幕致詞_03.jpg
- File:熱情迎接光州世大運聖火_01.jpg
- File:張善政照片.jpg
- File:Flag_of_Taipei_City.svg
- File:Taichung_MRT_Lines_Planned_in_1998.png
- File:新北捷運三鶯線LB8站模擬圖.jpg
- File:新北捷運安坑線K2站模擬圖.jpg
- File:新北市捷運建設願景圖.jpg
- File:1990年台南都會區大眾捷運系統規畫路網之替選方案四.png
- File:2009年台南都會區輕軌運輸系統整體路網.png
- File:Advanced_Public_Transportation_Systems_Tainan.png
- File:竹竹苗輕軌運輸系統路網圖.png
- 衛武營藝術文化中心.jpg
--It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 16:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- The {{Attribution}} tag is valid for these files is because of this copyright notice, which the website where you retrieved your images lacks. --Wcam (talk) 16:41, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- They're works by public servants in the course of carrying out their duties. --It's gonna be awesome!#Talk♬ 16:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 00:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
File:US Navy 110928-N-IC287-002 The littoral combat ship Pre-Commissioning Unit (PCU) Fort Worth (LCS 3) transits through the Menekaunee Bridge in Green.jpg
[edit]_Fort_Worth_(LCS_3)_transits_through_the_Menekaunee_Bridge_in_Green.jpg){kind=link}
_Fort_Worth_(LCS_3)_transits_through_the_Menekaunee_Bridge_in_Green.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: per exif data it's not a work of US federal governmant but of Marinette Marine Corporation and published with permission - PD-US Navy is invalid Daphne Lantier 09:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep As there is no evidence of take-down or qualification at the source, I propose we apply CC-0 as a better license and explain that it is reasonable to use this license in the permissions parameter. The EXIF makes no copyright claim by MM Corp, just the word "released". If anyone is excited about the image, they might benefit from writing to https://www.marinettemarine.com/contact.html, MM Corp now being owned by Fincantieri. --Fæ (talk) 09:13, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fae, you know (or should know) better - Released just means cleared for public release (like contains no secret elements). It's not a copyright statement. The image is clearly not a work of the US federal government so any related PD license is plain wrong. Marinette Marine Corp is the copyright holder and we need explicit permission from them to use this image under a license they specify.--Denniss (talk) 11:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- That is not how the website works. The DoD have an explicit PD copyright release as part of the upload process. --Fæ (talk) 12:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- And that is completely irrelevant if these images are not original fedgov work. That's what courtesy means, a work is published but authored to someone else outside of fedgov laws/regulations. --Denniss (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Wrong and we have been here before. You are stretching as there is no significant doubt here per PRP. The copyright release is guaranteed for Commons, so long as a DoD agency gives a VIRIN. See:
- Stone clad, black and white evidence which we can use in court. --Fæ (talk) 02:18, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- And that is completely irrelevant if these images are not original fedgov work. That's what courtesy means, a work is published but authored to someone else outside of fedgov laws/regulations. --Denniss (talk) 20:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- That is not how the website works. The DoD have an explicit PD copyright release as part of the upload process. --Fæ (talk) 12:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- And again this answer from an unknown DVIDS employee is completely irrelevant as they are not the copyright holder. If there's no permission from Marinette Marine Corp then we can't keep this image. I'm really wondering (and worrying) that OTRS agents start to accept third party's view/statements about licensing.--Denniss (talk) 10:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- Correction, a known DVIDS employee. Their full details are in the ticket, and they are officially using the primary email address. DVIDS is the official media outlet for DoD. Just as Commons has an official release on upload and provides notices informing the uploader on their legal obligation, so does DVIDS, with the added security that only approved accounts can do so. Your argument about all this is unchanged since the DR linked above. The last photo was correctly kept as there was no significant doubt. Let's find real copyright violations to worry about, rather than files like this which have been on Commons so long, they are eligible for a grandfathering rationale. --Fæ (talk) 11:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Fae and his tickets. --Sanandros (talk) 20:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
File:US Navy 110928-N-IC287-002 The littoral combat ship Pre-Commissioning Unit (PCU) Fort Worth (LCS 3) transits through the Menekaunee Bridge in Green.jpg
[edit]_Fort_Worth_(LCS_3)_transits_through_the_Menekaunee_Bridge_in_Green.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Nominating this file for deletion again, for background see previous "Kept" DR above and email from DVIDS, and see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:F-35B Lightning II Completes First Land-based Ski Jump Launch 150619-D-AW822-318.jpg which was resubmitted and closed as Delete.
Reason: This photo is credited to Marinette Marine Corporation, not an employee of the US Federal Government, so {{PD-USGov}} does not apply. There's no proven basis for the US Government releasing non-government employee work into the Public Domain, and no evidence of a free license.
The DVIDS copyright page states "In general, DoD VI [motion and still media files] that are works of authorship prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are not eligible for copyright protection in the United States; however, some of the DoD VI available on this publicly accessible website may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property rights owned by non-DoD parties, regardless of whether the VI is marked with a copyright notice or other indication of non-DoD ownership or interests. Any use of this DoD VI other than as expressly authorized in this notice may subject the user to legal liability, including liability to such non-DoD owners of intellectual property or other protectable legal interests."
To me, this quotation confirms that their third party content which is not created by the US Government is not automatically PD or freely-licensed, this contradicts the email from DVIDS which was the basis for the previous "Keep", and generates a significant doubt that the photo is free (COM:PRP). We need evidence that the photographer or Marinette Marine Corporation released the photo under a free license. Consigned (talk) 14:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment See also the similar re-submitted DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:F-35C Lightning II at-sea trials 141104-N-ZZ999-017.jpg. Consigned (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete it's a shame, but these courtesy photos are not PD-USgov. Quite a few have slipped through and end up being deleted without much fuzz. I would have expected this photo to have been deleted back in 2017. Multichill (talk) 15:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Anything produced by U.S. Government employees in the course of their duties is public domain; anything else must be explicitly released to the public domain or to an acceptable license (such as what SpaceX did with their images for several years). Stating "released" or "courtesy" does not mean they have released their rights to an image, merely that the image has been released for publication.
- — Huntster (t @ c) 20:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I would recommend someone reach out to the Navy Public Affairs office and Marinette Marine Corporation before this is closed, as I would imagine the response will be similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:An F-35 Lightning II completes a flyover of USS Zumwalt (DDG 1000). (29774535153).jpg, where the USAF Public Affairs office and (two months later) Lockheed Martin both confirmed the photos taken by a Lockheed Martin photographer were in fact released. Elisfkc (talk) 19:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
._(29774535153).jpg){kind=link}
Up for deletion at English Wikipedia on the grounds of a lack of evidence of permission ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
I own the copyright to the image and have proof of that--Tarnowster — Preceding unsigned comment added by tarnowster (talk • contribs)
- Then please provide the paperwork to the relevant COM:OTRS queue. Thanks ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
I don't know what that means, relevant queue. Provide me a link or an email, I will send evidence of permission.--Tarnowster
- Did you read the linked page? that gives the releavant e-mail address. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Yes, thank you. So I received an email of permission from the photographer himself. But then I asked that they forward the email directly to the one provided on the linked page. Hopefully this is sufficient. If there is indeed a 61 day queue it seems the photo will be deleted before it can be considered. The photographer's website does state that they release the copyright to the person who paid for the photo, and I am building the wiki page for that person, and was given the photo by that person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by tarnowster (talk • contribs)
- Don't worry about the 61-day backlog. I am handling the ticket now. The copyright holder had not specified a license. I sent him an email. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- I see that an email has been replied to the ticket from the copyright holder agreeing to release the copyright and publish the content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. This should settle the matter of the permissions. --Tarnowster (talk) 02:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per tarnowster. --Sanandros (talk) 19:34, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
your opinions are asked : although transferred from EN-WP, potententially copyright issues, ref http://groundreport.com/everything-of-beauty-has-art-behind-it-in-some-way-or-the-other-rashi-mal/ ?? Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- Delete –
I was the user who transferred the file from the English Wikipedia, and I agree that I made a mistake here. Upon closer examination of the source, the image was released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license, which is incompatible with the Commons. I must have misread the source at the time. My apologies for the error.Mz7 (talk) 19:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)- Upon closer examination, it's a bit more complicated. This is an archived copy of the source from July 2014, a few months after I transferred it from the English Wikipedia, and it clearly states at the bottom: "This is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License." The Attribution 3.0 license is compatible with the Wikimedia Commons, and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. However, another consideration is whether the source copied the photo from another source, in which case, the license would only apply to the original text of the source. Indeed, a reverse image search found that the image originally comes from the Facebook page of the subject, not from the source specified, and the image there includes a watermark for a "Vineet Modi Photography" (website), which has not released the image under a free license explicitly. Therefore, we should still delete the image, but for a different reason than me simply misreading a source. Mz7 (talk) 20:05, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per mz7. --Sanandros (talk) 20:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from painting, icons and sculptures. Are they in public domain?
- File:SCarloBrugherio CappellaIemale Tabernacolo-SX60 1091.jpg
- File:SCarloBrugherio CappellaIemale TabernacoloOriginale-A70 0381.jpg
- File:SCarloBrugherio CappellaIemale MadonnaAttuale-SX60 1089.jpg
File:SCarloBrugherio CappellaIemale MadonnaQuadro-A70 2339.jpg(The art reproduced here is in the public domain)- File:SCarloBrugherio CappellaIemale MadonnaOriginale-A70 0377.jpg
File:SCarloBrugherio CappellaIemale Crocifisso-SX60 1092.jpg(The art reproduced here is in the public domain)
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
These are photos of monuments of [:it:Chiesa_di_San_Carlo_(Brugherio)|Chiesa di San Carlo (Brugherio)]] that participate to "Wiki Loves Monuments" (Wiki-id: 03B2120005).
You can see where they are placed from this photo: File:SCarloBrugherio_CappellaIemaleVuota-SX60_1086.jpg.
The copyright holder granted the permissions (should be the ticket #2015052910017749) -- Lucabon (talk) 16:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- There is no Commons:Freedom of panorama in Italy. Old churches may use modern works of arts. You need to find out information author/date/country of creation if works of arts. Some may be in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
- I set the appropriate permission for File:SCarloBrugherio CappellaIemale MadonnaQuadro-A70 2339.jpg and File:SCarloBrugherio CappellaIemale Crocifisso-SX60 1092.jpg (they are in the public domain). I cannot find information about the other works of art, so I cannot be sure if they are in the public domain or if the commercial copyright ("Diritto patrimoniale") was transferred to Chiesa di San Carlo (Brugherio) due to an agreement with the author. -- Lucabon (talk) 01:40, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2017 (UTC)