Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/04/08

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 8th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad name, empty Rcbutcher (talk) 03:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty category. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hien hjjh.gif

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ميساء فاطيمة 129.45.116.45 08:29, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedily: Test by an IP. --Achim (talk) 12:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete the background image is found online on several websites in varying states but its copyright status is unknown, however several of the individual icons are most likely copyright and certainly not the work of the uploader for them to release freely. More details are needed but the images look like smartphone screenshots.

Ww2censor (talk) 10:33, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of permission Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 14:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai importé cette image par erreur en suivant un tutoriel du WikiMOOC. Cette image n'est pas sous licence libre. Merci de la supprimer Dr Melano (talk) 05:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 21:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:PACKAGING Daphne Lantier 07:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not my own image! I just cropped the original on commons and intensified the contrast a bit. Therefore, if the image needs to be deleted it should be a question for both copies. --RX-Guru (talk) 07:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this video looks like a video of a smartphone screen and features several well known icons that are copyright to their organisation. Those are certainly not the work of the uploader for them to release freely. Ww2censor (talk) 10:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OOS as well. Ruthven (msg) 21:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not a selfie repository TJH2018talk 23:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy, as above. ~riley (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Embedded Data Bot as Embedded data (embedded data) and the most recent rationale was: suspect=1|1=After 7.4KiB (7581 bytes): Unknown MIME Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like corrupted PDF file --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy delete Yep, it is corrupted. --jdx Re: 18:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Poesias (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images out of scope Commons is not a selfie repository

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen (keep talking) 06:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: http://znamlit.ru/editorial.html?id=4 Andrei Romanenko (talk) 09:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS permission granted. --Sealle (talk) 14:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, blurry and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:30, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person is irrelevant (He created the upload on his own), I own the rights and don't want it to be published Eugen Caberra (talk) 15:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person is irrelevant (He created the upload on his own), I own the rights and don't want it to be published Eugen Caberra (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have the rights and don't want it to be published 2A02:8109:83C0:1277:A598:D37B:64D9:798A 16:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 21:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 14:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 14:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 14:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal (or passport) photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:04, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. And does the uploader have rights to give away for the background image ? Acabashi (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. No indication of rights to publish background image. Acabashi (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Sealle: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Unused personal files - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Temporary deletion for history cleaning or revision suppression: author's request on creation week

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Temporary deletion for history cleaning or revision suppression: author's request on creation week

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Temporary deletion for history cleaning or revision suppression: author's request on creation week

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:41, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Temporary deletion for history cleaning or revision suppression: author's request on creation week

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:41, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Temporary deletion for history cleaning or revision suppression: author's request on creation week

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:41, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Temporary deletion for history cleaning or revision suppression: author's request on creation week

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Temporary deletion for history cleaning or revision suppression: author's request on creation week

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Temporary deletion for history cleaning or revision suppression: author's request on creation week

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Temporary deletion for history cleaning or revision suppression: author's request on creation week

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Temporary deletion for history cleaning or revision suppression: author's request on creation week

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused low quality photo of human hand. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jdx: Mass deletion of pages added by ManssouRi

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jdx: Mass deletion of pages added by ManssouRi

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan from a textbook, so no "own work". 2001:A61:12A0:8601:B1DE:D47F:1253:E8F1 10:49, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created it by mistake Rcbutcher (talk) 23:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 21:42, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, maybe Sreejith K (talk) 03:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, maybe ? Sreejith K (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Unused private holiday snaps taken at unidentified locations. Outside project scope.

DAJF (talk) 01:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused private holiday snaps taken at unidentified locations. Outside project scope.

DAJF (talk) 07:15, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 14:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Re-creation by automated bot of files previously deleted following DR as out-of-scope (private holiday snaps). File names need to be salted to prevent repeated automated re-creation by the same bot.

DAJF (talk) 05:23, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:25, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 3

[edit]

Images with only private character, out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   16:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping closure - already deleted by Shizhao. --Storkk (talk) 15:55, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 4

[edit]

Panoramio images with private character or no educational content.

GeorgHHtalk   20:35, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep at least procedurally. These images are all very different from each other, and many of those that have not yet been deleted actually do show what some geographical location looks like, which is no less educational than most panoramio images. Some of them do seem out of scope, others do not. Batch COM:SCOPE nominations for images as wildly different as these aren't useful. I came here from File:Luca - Gianna - Paolo - panoramio.jpg, which I just put some geographical and topical categories on – I wouldn't call it out of scope merely because there are also people posing on the photo, especially as it could be used to illustrate the touristic significance of the subjects behind these three tourists. darkweasel94 00:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:08, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 5

[edit]

Unused personal files. As it is uploaded by a bot, I can't tell who is the one responsible for that, but they all seem to be uploaded by the same person.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 6

[edit]

COM:DW of painting(s). No FoP in US.

Эlcobbola talk 22:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 7

[edit]

COM:DW of copyrighted statue; no FoP in US. The replica Statue of Liberty in Las Vegas has it's own copyright, separate from the original (see Registration Nos. VAu 1-090-876 and VA 1-882-070 at copyright.gov and the infamous w:Statue of Liberty Forever stamp case).

Эlcobbola talk 00:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 8

[edit]

Promotional content have no suitable use. Possibly out of scope‎.

~ Moheen (keep talking) 04:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 9

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern models

Daphne Lantier 08:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) 10

[edit]

Selfie images

Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xavedawg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out-of-scope. The author obviously has a rich fantasy life but expressing it through hoax articles on en.wikipedia and hosting the images on commons aren't encyclopedic.

Cabayi (talk) 08:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also copyvio, shutterstock and gettty images watermarks. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 12:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used Avron (talk) 12:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hasra3372 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 12:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 00:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martinalhaja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:56, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 15:04, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

foute categorie Harry Ningen (talk) 15:32, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Categorie kan gewoon worden aangepast. --Jcb (talk) 00:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fatememo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, same subject at various period, small sizes, no EXIFs, other uploads were copyvios

Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Fatememo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:Screenshots.

XXN, 11:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax? Personal picture? Out of project scope. XXN, 21:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 21:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Is above COM:TOO due to that lion head. XXN, 21:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cocorayado15 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful authorship. Unlikely to be uploader's own works.

XXN, 21:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sadeghkolahghermezi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

XXN, 21:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably screenshot of a copyrighted mobile app, but might qualify to be {{Pd-simple}} or {{Pd-text}} Sreejith K (talk) 03:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also see File:Les parametres de slowdns.png--Sreejith K (talk) 03:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 00:31, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Florakarimova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photo of the same subject in at various period. The uploader claimed also to be the depicted person [1] therefore can not be the copyright holder. Very unlikely to be own works. Included some screenshots.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Florakarimova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photo of the same subject in at various period. The uploader claimed also to be the depicted person [2] therefore can not be the copyright holder. Very unlikely to be own works. The user has also been warned.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 06:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 06:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 06:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:41, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:47, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:49, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 07:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 08:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 08:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 08:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 08:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 08:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Turkjakrapun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Middle section is a previously published image, not 2017 own work: [3]

BethNaught (talk) 10:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Turkjakrapun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-trivial corporate logo, no evidence of permission.

BethNaught (talk) 10:20, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Turkjakrapun (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User's other uploads are copyvios. These are derivative works or not plausibly own work. Apply COM:PRP.

BethNaught (talk) 10:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:31, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused sports club logo, not notable. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small image without EXIF data, uncertain copyright. Yann (talk) 13:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hackgooding (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image/unknown people : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 00:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie photograph. Wikimedia is not a personal photo-album. Acabashi (talk) 14:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you decide to delete the pic please crop and keep the municipal emblem because I don't know how to. We may use it at the town article in any WP. Thanks. E4024 (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 00:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ali.rajaei71 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not a personal photo repository; user has one edit to userpage on id.wiki TJH2018talk 16:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Амор Фати (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Ukraine

Dogad75 (talk) 10:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most per nomination, kept one per Frze, although this might be borderline. --Jcb (talk) 11:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NeeQ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:Screenshots, derivative works.

XXN, 21:29, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mwafy32 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos - out of project scope.

XXN, 22:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be from a television show (c. early 1970s). It's doubtful the uploader created it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 03:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roberto lerici (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, the other uploads were copyvios, and the name in the EXIFs is not the same of the uploader

Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not a personal photo repository TJH2018talk 16:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope. --Sealle (talk) 04:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died in 1994. To be undeleted in 2064.Ruthven (msg) 12:16, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panam2014 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope; all unused and massive amounts of uploads by a new user; no educational value. We are not a personal photo repository.

TJH2018talk 16:47, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
@TJH2018: But no, the file is educational since the person being photographed is capped in a certain way and is dressed in a certain way. No rule has been violated or it is shown to me. I plan to create fashion items and other contributors can still do it. I am not a new user. Also, the woman is a model. We could restaure the files who are not duplicate. Panam2014 (talk) 21:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Panam2014: I don't think you understand. We don't need 300+ photos of the same lady with the same darn haircut wearing different things. It's completely unnecessary and just a waste of resources that should be kept to Flickr (even though COM has almost limitless storage). For example, I can claim that this photo is educational because she is wearing a purple shirt, and I can't find a picture of a lady wearing a purple shirt. Does it mean it should stay? No. Regardless of whether they are a model or not, 99% of these photos will ever be used on other projects, and will most likely be seen once or twice a year. TJH2018talk 23:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I think you have uploaded enough photos for that. I recommend you to start creating such articles. If they are indeed appropriate I don't think there would be more doubts about the suitability of these images when they are (properly) used to illustrate them. Platonides (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright concerns

Question: If the clothes and accessories themselves are the focus of the image, will images like this (t-shirt art) and this (earring as sculpture?) be a source of copyright concern? Thanks. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:23, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion - in scope. --Sealle (talk) 05:10, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Panam2014 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

 I withdraw my nomination These are all screenshots from the YouTube HaYu channel, which describes itself as: "hayu is the place to watch your favourite reality shows whenever and wherever you want. With loads of shows the same day as the U.S. and thousands of episodes of binge-worthy Box Sets from the start, hayu is the undoubted home of reality TV. And if all of that wasn't enough, we've got exclusive clips, snippets you can share and your fave stars' social media all in one place."

In other words, this content isn't actually created, or owned, by HaYu. So I don't think they can release it under a free license.

GRuban (talk) 16:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per nominator's withdrawal. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The university would have to release this officially, not just a random uploader who claims copyright. Bri (talk) 02:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

better version: File:Wikipedia logo bronce.png – no need to create a manually resized version Od1n (talk) 03:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: replaced with a redirect. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

better version: File:Wikipedia logo gold.png – no need to create a manually resized version Od1n (talk) 03:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: replaced with a redirect. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremly bad quality. No educational value with that low quality CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 20:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Screenshot. XXN, 21:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 08:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:26, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine - modern model Daphne Lantier 08:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:26, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Drabdullayev17 (talk) 08:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:26, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The creator of this artwork died in 2013, so permission is needed. Quedel (talk) 08:34, 8 April 2017 (UTC) Even the same under:[reply]

--Quedel (talk) 08:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marko Semioni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non free logo http://www.acu-ca.com/ + duplicate images

Habertix (talk) 12:14, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:26, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Updated with cleaner file Dirtyharry667 (talk) 14:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Better Version Uploaded Dirtyharry667 (talk) 14:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:27, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not a personal photo repository TJH2018talk 16:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en.wikipedia LTA. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 17:10, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by sockpuppet of en.wikipedia vandal. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 17:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by an infamous English Wikipedia vandal. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 17:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo with limited realistic educational uses from a user who contributed nothing else to any of the wikis. Green Giant (talk) 17:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation [4] MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, also personality rights violation, per Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Germany. Kleeblatt187 (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I don't see the personality rights violation, but I agree it's out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 12:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not creative commons MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:31, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, not creative commons MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: with {{PD-textlogo}}. --Jcb (talk) 12:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not want my real name to be linked to anything on Wikipedia since I am trying to remove pictures from my account that I don't want. I just don't want my name anywhere on here. Cufi15 (talk) 19:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:32, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not copyright violation, but out of scope anyway. --Jcb (talk) 12:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused userpage image Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 20:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

include

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 21:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover - Copyrighted. XXN, 21:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Video game item - copyrighted content. XXN, 21:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted banner. XXN, 22:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation maybe? Not clear whether the photo is eligible for {{Pd-textlogo}}. Also see File:FTP logo.jpg Sreejith K (talk) 03:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 13:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source link does not work Daphne Lantier 03:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Drabdullayev17. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:15, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I assume the account which uploaded the picture actually belongs to the newspaper, but it is still a copyright violation, and OTRS is needed. Ymblanter (talk) 08:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Pugilist (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i1.alfi.lt/15873/72/86.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:31, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional photograph but no EXIF. One of two uploades by uploader. The source field says איגל צילומים (Eagle Photos?). Seems that the uploader is not the photographer. OTRS permission is needed her. -- Geagea (talk) 14:44, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This Picture was uploaded also to Hebrew wiki by another User see here and User talk:Yinnonba. THis is realy a picture a that need an OTRS permission, and I do not understand why Yann removed the request. Hanay (talk) 05:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from book page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:29, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Couverture de livre, non libre Habertix (talk) 19:20, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Couverture de livre trouvée dans google image tout à fait libre. toutefois si vous voulez une lettre de permission de l'auteur dites moi où et comme je vous l'envoie et je vous la donne cette semaine au besoin. toutefois, il faudrait que cette page soit restituée d'abord. Dhtjp (talk) 17:06, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Les images retournées par Google sont publiques (puisque publiées sur internet). Mais, sauf mention contraire, elles ne sont pas dans le domaine public, ni libre de droits.
L'autorisation de l'auteur du livre ne sert à rien. Il faut celle de l'auteur de la couverture (ou son ayant-droit, généralement l'éditeur), et probablement aussi celle de l'auteur de la photo pour mettre tout ça sous licence libre.
-- Habertix (talk) 11:36, 13 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"photo Yucki Goeldlin." sans autorisation explicite du photographe par OTRS Habertix (talk) 19:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Où voulez vous que je vous donne l'autorisation? je vous la donne quand vous voulez - quoique comme cette photo m'appartient personnellement, et que c'était tout simplement hors de politesse que j'ai donné le crédit à la photographe, il ne me semble même pas que cette permission soit nécessaire. Dhtjp (talk) 17:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
La mention "Source : travail personnel" doit être utilisée quand vous avez vous-même pris la photo.
Que possédez-vous ? Le négatif et les droits associés ou un simple tirage ? Ce n'est pas parce que vous avez acheté un exemplaire d'un livre que vous avez le droit de le copier et de le mettre sous licence libre.
Les procédures possibles sont indiquées sur cette page.
Cordialement. -- Habertix (talk) 11:09, 13 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:35, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non libre. Habertix (talk) 19:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Comment est-ce que cette photo que j'ai moi-même trouvé sur google (qui est une source publique - tout apparaissant dans google images étant normalement de droit publique), n'est pas libre? quelles sont vos bases pour dire cela? la conception graphique et le dessin sont d'ailleurs de l'auteur - je peux nous procurer sa permission d'ici demain au besoin (j'ai prit contacte avec lui pour la rédaction de la page) (Dhtjp (talk) 16:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Une chose à rajouter : en plus de pouvoir recevoir la permission d'utiliser cette photo, par le pays où je me trouve je peux également faire appel à Exceptions au droit d'auteur de wikipedia https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipédia:Exceptions_au_droit_d%27auteur . (Dhtjp (talk) 11:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Les images retournées par Google sont publiques (puisque publiées sur internet). Mais, sauf mention contraire, elles ne sont pas dans le domaine public, ni libre de droits.
La mention "Source : travail personnel" doit être utilisée quand vous avez vous-même dessiné l'image ou pris la photo.
Les exceptions aux droits d'auteur ne sont pas acceptées sur Commons.
-- Habertix (talk) 10:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. See COM:L, COM:DW and COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 14:36, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted work. It is NOT simple. Aspedro (talk) 19:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used for deleted memorial page on enwiki only Kusma (talk) 19:57, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:38, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:04, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

include

File:Kekö.jpg


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some map of Europe of poor quality. It's not clear what it depicts either from description or title. Unused. No COM:EDUSE. XXN, 22:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 14:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused userpage picture - out of project scope. XXN, 22:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will not use it. I agree with deletion TuTAH 1 (talk)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Martine Martine is born in 1932 and still alive. The depicted atrworks are not in public domain. 90.2.102.46 22:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + no photographer's permission. --Sealle (talk) 14:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Penal.direito (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As acknowledged by the uploader, most of the pictures have been taken from "internet". The remaining ones likely have the same source as they have different or inconsistent exif information

Discasto talk 22:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublty own work, Pink Panther has copyrights and too complex to be a free image Sfs90 (talk) 22:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 14:41, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, the first uploader is a person on the photo. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Florakarimova Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Tasnim watermark and no Tasnim photographer credited at source Daphne Lantier 04:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work MB298 (talk) 04:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo doesn't seem to have the right permission as it depicts the image of a private company Kj1595 (talk) 04:49, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted corporate logo Citobun (talk) 07:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: with PD-textlogo. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 07:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free logo / logo non libre Habertix (talk) 07:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: scientific bogus from a Mr. Makarov Tolomm (talk) 10:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: scientific bogus from a Mr. Makarov Tolomm (talk) 10:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work. May be old enough, but more information needed: date, author, source, etc. Yann (talk) 09:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work. May be old enough, but more information needed: date, author, source, etc. Yann (talk) 09:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not own work. May be old enough, but more information needed: date, author, source, etc. Yann (talk) 09:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:02, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete incomplete deletion request made by the uploader within an hour of uploading - likely changed their mind, so we should respect their request Ww2censor (talk) 10:42, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Please delete because this image was turned into a redirect but an incomplete deletion request still remains. Ww2censor (talk) 10:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Implausible to think that this is in scope, stated source is "Google Images" - Reventtalk 10:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete incomplete deletion request made by the uploader within two hours of uploading - likely changed their mind, so we should respect their request. It may even be a copyvio because tineye finds several versions https://tineye.com/search/7e88ba8852277e479ae787480750664bdb5d6143/?sort=score&order=desc

Ww2censor (talk) 10:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What about 2D works? Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Czech_Republic. Yann (talk) 12:16, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It's not visible whether this is a public place and it's probably not permanently located there. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What about 2D works? Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Czech_Republic. Yann (talk) 12:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably not permanently located. Phone numbers and email addresses are subject to changes. It's clearly visible that this poster can be replaced with the help of a screwdriver. --Jcb (talk) 16:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Daphne Lantier as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: as per COM:DW What about 2D works? Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Czech_Republic. Yann (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It's not visible whether this is a public place and it's probably not permanently located there. --Jcb (talk) 16:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in scope. See Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#File:ABEY_GEORGE.pdf. - Reventtalk 13:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It is also a derivative of a non-free image. The photograph used there was en:File:Abey George.jpg. It had a free licence as "own work" but this could not be verified. De728631 (talk) 17:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mirasamirkhanov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlike ly to be own work (very small size without EXIFs)+likely out of scope too

Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file Dirtyharry667 (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unknown copyright situation. --Jcb (talk) 17:01, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, Not CC, Commercial poster MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of newspaper, not own work MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Saqib as no source (No source since) uploaded by a newbie. likely copyvio. no meta data. low size. Saqib (talk) 09:07, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a low quality duplicate with no global use of: Map of comune of Fiscaglia (province of Ferrara, region Emilia-Romagna, Italy).svg Krepideia (talk) 09:33, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Daphne Lantier as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: as per COM:DW What about 2D works? Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Czech_Republic. Yann (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn as per Yann -- a mistake on my part. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Daphne Lantier as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: as per COM:DW What about 2D works? Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Czech_Republic. Yann (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn as per Yann -- a mistake on my part. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Daphne Lantier as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: as per COM:DW What about 2D works? Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Czech_Republic. Yann (talk) 12:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn as per Yann -- a mistake on my part. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Daphne Lantier as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: as per COM:DW What about 2D works? Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Czech_Republic. Yann (talk) 12:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn as per Yann -- a mistake on my part. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tanjir H Chowdhury: likely false authorship claim based on the low resolution, missing metadata, and the uploader's history. The uploader has clearly demonstrated that his/her authorship claims cannot be trusted. I did not get a chance to respond to the closing argument, but of course it is silly to believe that just because you can't find this particular photo using Google Images, it hasn't just been nicked from somewhere like all the others. There is plenty of web content that doesn't get indexed by Google. LX (talk, contribs) 13:06, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:17, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because of the copyright to the Chagall's picture. Abraham (talk) 13:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused image without EXIF data, uncertain copyright. Scope? Yann (talk) 13:28, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Объясняю: фото сделано лично мною, Юлия Зильберквит недавно была в Москве. Я имею в виду ч/б фото. Цветное фото она мне предоставила лично специально для википедии. Никаких нарушений авторского права нет.! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Олег Черкасский (talk • contribs) 07:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: smaller jpg copy of File:Юлия Зильберквит.pdf (in use in her article on ru.wiki) -- a higher quality jpg could be made easily. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a COM:DW of the photograph. Unsure of FoP in Cape Verde. Aspedro (talk) 14:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:26, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are three copyrights here

  • the first copyright is for the photograph, which is properly licensed on Flickr
  • the second copyright is for the graffiti art, which is not covered by the Flickr license -- it would be covered only if the the Flickr photographer were the graffiti artist, which he is not. It is said that the graffiti is licensed under "Creative Commons Paternity", but that is not a license I recognize and not all CC licenses are acceptable on Commons.
  • the third copyright is for the photograph of Assange on which the graffiti is based, which appears to be the one shown here http://www.coindesk.com/julian-assange-told-googles-eric-schmidt-embrace-bitcoin/ and here http://www.working-minds.com/action/wikileaksJA.htm.

Only the first of the three copyrights is licensed in a form acceptable to Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of airlinersgallery.smugmug.com/Airlines-Africa/Airlines-Cape-Verde-Islands/TACV-Cabo-Verde-Airlines/i-vvgHXb3/A Aspedro (talk) 15:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Superseded by File:Cook 2017 track.png Keith Edkins (talk) 17:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 17:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed to be an official band photo, we would need OTRS confirmation for the licensing claimed Whpq (talk) 12:01, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What? This is my image, created by me with me in the photo and edited by me. My logo was added by me. Why would you want to delete this? I authorise the use for this image anywhere in thr world.

also, why am i being singled out, it's like the community here is ganging up on me now. there was no issues with this image for years. then there was the over the top and unbelievable deletion of an unrealted page i created .... now you are creeping into eveything i've done in the past? there is a name for that behaviour and it is not good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pagandawn456 (talk • contribs)

At issue is that really, nobody really knows who you are. As an official band photo, there would need to be confirmation that you are indeed authorised top release this under a free license. Commons:OTRS provides more information about the steps you need to take. -- Whpq (talk) 12:48, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely ridiculous - i uploaded the photo and filled in the correct licensing info that you wanted. It is MY photo. Completely idiotic - now the page has no photo. This is completely ridiculous. Put that photo back immediately!

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely personality rights violation, per Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Germany; uploaded by meanwhile blocked user (sockpuppeteer) Kleeblatt187 (talk) 17:40, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original file is: File:Defense.gov News Photo 081209-M-5633L-004.jpg this doesn't contain the original author, and adds not educational value Avron (talk) 17:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

identical to File:Harvard Theatre Collection - M. B. Curtis TCS 1.6602 - cropped.jpg, lower resolution, derivative source Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:56, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected not own work TherasTaneel (talk) 18:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely personality rights violation, per Commons:Country specific consent requirements#Germany; once uploaded by meanwhile blocked user (sockpuppeteer) Kleeblatt187 (talk) 18:33, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, one-file-upload used for use page, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:36, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho seriously personality rights issues as showing people who are clearly identifiable as individual human beings, but missing permission for publication, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version here MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:15, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo. possible advertisement, not CC MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, no usage for copyrighted material [5] MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:20, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Already exists at File:CNN Türk logo.svg MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation invalid usage of logo MohammadtheEditor (talk) 19:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has been supersceeded by File:NashvilleSoundsJerseys.png, which should be used instead. NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:33, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

needs to be replaced by better file (new Wiki user errors) Seauton (talk) 19:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 20:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious derivative work Discasto talk 20:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremly bad quality. No educational value. Can't we stop this Panoramio garbage? CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 20:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a capture or photo extracted from a file. Questionable authorship. XXN, 21:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyrighted by LG, have already deleted two previous versions of this, also I think it was the same uploader who uploaded this uploaded the previous two without permission. Govvy (talk) 21:37, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. 1936 picture, no indication that the author would have died before 1943. Jcb (talk) 23:39, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jcb has deleted the original file, so what about this derivative? Tolomm (talk) 10:52, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mouton-duvernet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@EugeneZelenko and Otourly: Bonjour. J'avoue ne pas voir où il y a un problème, les images étant toutes libre de droit dans le domaine public. Mettre des images médiévales dans ce lot me semble d'autant plus surprenant, elles sont à l'évidence libre de droit. Quant aux images issues des fonds de la seconde guerre mondiale, le gouvernement français à autoriser leur libre diffusion depuis plusieurs années. La personne qui a créé les images fait partie de l'institution des archives et les a produites dans le cadre de son travail. Enfin, une copie fidèle d'un document libre ne crée pas de nouveaux droits, non ? @ Oroutrly, tu pourrais m'expliquer ce qui n'a pas été bien fait ? Cedalyon (talk) 19:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Cedalyon and EugeneZelenko: La notion de libre de droit n'existe pas en France. Au mieux c'est dans le domaine public ou sous licence libre. Clairement certains documents ne devraient pas être supprimés même si ces documents appartiennent aux archives et que les archives pourraient vous expliquer qu'ils possèdent des droits dessus. Je demande l'avis sur le bistro pour une meilleure réponse. Otourly (talk) 06:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comme l'explique User:EugeneZelenko, les informations (auteur, date, licence) doivent être précisés. Actuellement l'uploader a tout laissé par défaut. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On pourrait distinguer au moins trois catégories de cas : 1) des photographies de documents anciens en trois dimensions, 2) des reproductions photographiques de documents anciens en deux dimensions, 3) des reproductions photographiques de documents du 20è siècle.
  • 1. C'est un peu subjectif, mais en ce qui concerne les photographies d'objets anciens, comme File:Echange entre le chapitre de Lyon et le comte de Forez, 1173 (verso).jpg et File:Bulle d'or de Frédéric Barberousse sur les privilèges de l'église de Lyon.jpg, il ne serait pas déraisonnable de dire que ces photographies montrent des «documents» en tant qu'objets, avec leur apparence et un peu de contexte, plutôt qu'en tant que simples reproductions de textes. Elles seraient ainsi acceptables en tant que photographies d'objets libres en trois dimensions. Le contributeur affirme être le photographe et en tant que tel il affirme avoir des droits d'auteur sur les photographies et il les assortit d'une licence libre, ce qui est accepté par Commons si on retient cette qualification en tant que photographies d'objets en trois dimensions. Il manque peut-être une meilleure description des objets, mais ce n'est pas une raison de suppression.
  • 2. Par contre, d'autres photographies de documents anciens, comme File:Cartulaire du chapitre de Saint-Jean - f ° 4 (v).jpg, semblent davantage des reproductions de documents en deux dimensions, tel que cela est compris sur Commons. Certains pays peuvent accorder des droits d'auteur sur certaines reproduction et d'autres n'accordent pas de droits d'auteur. Dans de tels cas, la politique de Commons est à l'effet qu'il n'est pas acceptable pour un contributeur de prétendre à des droits d'auteur sur une reproduction de ce type. Autrement dit, un photographe pourrait avoir des droits d'auteur sur des reproductions dans certains pays où cela serait possible, mais la politique de Commons ne lui permet pas d'offrir de telles reproductions sur Commons avec une affirmation de droits d'auteur. Il y a alors deux possibilités : 1) convaincre le photographe d'abandonner volontairement son affirmation à des droits d'auteur sur la reproduction, ou 2) supprimer le fichier comme incompatible avec la politique de Commons en ce qui concerne les reproductions réalisées personnellement par les contributeurs. Par respect pour les droits du contributeur, je ne pense pas qu'on puisse le forcer à laisser ses photographies sur Commons tout en retirant sans son accord sa déclaration de droits d'auteur, comme cela a été fait sur le fichier mentionné au début du présent paragraphe. Si le contributeur a fait une erreur de bonne foi en croyant que la politique de Commons lui permettait de verser ses reproductions et s'il n'est pas d'accord pour retirer lui-même son affirmation de droits d'auteur, la solution est de supprimer les fichiers de Commons.
  • 3. Des documents du 20è siècle peuvent avoir trois types de problèmes. Premièrement, le même problème qu'à la catégorie 2 ci-dessus, lorsqu'il s'agit de reproductions sur lesquelles le contributeur affirme avoir des droits d'auteur. Deuxièmement, les auteurs du document photographié dans File:Rapport des délégués régionaux à la famille de la XVe région - p. 10.pdf sont connus. Il faudrait donc les mentionner et déterminer si le document est libre ou non libre et si les droits d'auteur ont expiré en France. Troisièmement, il faudrait préciser l'année de première publication. Pour un document publié en 1941 en France, les droits d'auteur ne seraient pas expirés aux États-Unis, ce qui peut affecter ou pas leur acceptation selon la politique de Commons, dépendant des opinions à ce sujet. Cedalyon écrit «le gouvernement français à autoriser leur libre diffusion», mais, dans les cas où le document ne serait pas libre par expiration des droits d'auteur, il faudrait 1) établir que les droits d'auteur appartenaient à l'État français plutôt qu'aux auteurs, 2) établir que le gouvernement français est le propriétaire des droits d'auteur de l'État français et 3) mentionner la source démontrant que le gouvernement français aurait offert ces documents au domaine public ou sous licence libre.
-- Asclepias (talk) 14:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Même pour les documents anciens on n'est jamais trop prudent... il manquerait plus que le comte de Forez et le pape reviennent d'entre les morts pour faire valoir des droits d'auteur. C'est un coup à se faire excommunier. --KidA42 (talk) 21:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete "File:Rapport des délégués régionaux à la famille de la XVe région - p. 12.pdf", "File:Rapport des délégués régionaux à la famille de la XVe région - p. 11.pdf" and "File:Rapport des délégués régionaux à la famille de la XVe région - p. 10.pdf" : The tree files are reproductions of three pages of a longer document written in 1941 and its two authors are named on the cover of the document (see "File:Rapport des délégués régionaux à la famille de la XVe région - Couverture.pdf"). Unless evidence is provided that the actual copyright owners released the patrimonial authors rights, the document could be assumed to still be in copyright in France unless both authors died before 1947, and in copyright in the United States because the authors of a document they wrote in 1941 can't possibly have died before 1936. Delete "File:Décret de nomination du premier directeur de l'École Nationale de Police.pdf" (formerly "File:Arrêté de création de l'école de police.pdf", the filename has changed since the opening of this DR) : I'm unsure of the status of the original text. As a text whose authorship is attributed to someone who died in 1951, it may still be in copyright. Anyway, it is a mere reproduction of a two-dimensional support, reproduction on which the uploader himself claims a copyright, a claim that is against the policy of Commons, and the file must be deleted. Delete "File:Cartulaire du chapitre de Saint-Jean - f ° 4 (v).jpg" : Although a border is somewhat visible on the left, this image can probably not pass for a photograph of a three-dimensional object. As a photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional work, reproduction on which the uploader himself claims a copyright, the file is against the policy of Commons and must be deleted. Keep "File:Echange entre le chapitre de Lyon et le comte de Forez, 1173 (verso).jpg", "File:Confirmation par Renaud de Forez de la donation par son frère, le comte Gui, du mas du Ratis à l’obéance de Neulise (recto).jpg", "File:Confirmation par Renaud de Forez de la donation par son frère, le comte Gui, du mas du Ratis à l’obéance de Neulise (verso).jpg" and "File:Bulle d'or de Frédéric Barberousse sur les privilèges de l'église de Lyon.jpg" : Although it is a matter of subjective evaluation of each image, the practice on Commons might be to consider those four images as photographs of three-dimensional objects (not mere reproductions of two-dimensional works), although the objects are documents. Therefore, if the uploader is the photographer, as he states, the free licenses he offers on those photographs would be fine. The texts are from the middle ages, so there is no problem with them. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:31, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. File:Cartulaire_du_chapitre_de_Saint-Jean_-_f_°_4_(v).jpg. Recorded as "Cartulaires de l’Église de Lyon. 10 G 576* Grand cartulaire : bulles pontificales, diplômes impériaux, chartes royales ou épiscopales, actes divers établissant ou confirmant les droits de l’Église de Lyon, relatifs à la primatie, au spirituel ou au temporel (852-1328) [Aaron XXXVI bis], 1350(!!!)" in the Archives of Rhône departement. See p. 26 read here the inventory. This document have been officially recorded as a copy made in the XIVth century, it's not a copy from a book but a single page of a bigger compilation of the titles and rights of the church of Lyon (the 3D object that you can see on the left side... that you rather consider as an physical object). Please Asclepias refer to the inventory of the archives of Rhône (the institution which downloaded this files) for status. Merci de faire preuve d'un peu de discernement quand des administrations françaises font l'effort de verser sur Commons et de leur accorder un minimum de bonne foi. Si une institution publique française accepte le versement des documents c'est qu'ils sont clean (de ce côté-ci de l'Atlantique en tous cas). Votre "copyright" nous est étranger (c'est quoi un objet en "deux dimensions" ? Ca n'existe pas physiquement !), ce qui serait constructif de la part des contributeurs sur Commons serait de pousser un peu les recherches documentaires avant de balancer le bébé avec l'eau du bain. Il y a fort à parier que l'administration française ne versera rien officiellement à Commons (n'attendez pas un engagement contractuel), mais elle en laisse l'usage, c'est déjà pas mal, non ? Cordialement--KidA42 (talk) 21:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. File:Rapport_des_délégués_régionaux_à_la_famille_de_la_XVe_région_-_p._11.pdf. Public report of the administration of l'Etat Français (puppet government of Germany (1942–44)). The "authors" are representatives in charge of the report. Le régime de Vichy va-t-il intenter une démarche judiciaire contre Commons ? Le suspens est à son comble ! --KidA42 (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all of them on procedural grounds. This large batch-nomination includes images with many potentially different copyright statuses — there's literally almost a thousand years of difference between some of the oldest and some of the newest items. All items should be nominated separately, unless this discussion has convinced the nominator that one or more should not be deleted. Nyttend (talk) 04:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep L'ensemble. Les documents médiévaux ne posent pas de problème. Les documents issus de l'administration de Vichy non plus, ils sont à présent dans le domaine public depuis une loi récente. Le seul point délicat est la compilation d'articles de presse, mais j'ignore la jurisprudence sur ce point. Je vais demander. Cordialement. Cedalyon (talk) 11:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: procedural close as per Nyttend. --Daphne Lantier 18:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mouton-duvernet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents, photos and newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

* File:Cartulaire du chapitre de Saint-Jean - f ° 4 (v).jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Otourly: J'ai commencé à placer les renseignements demandés. Tu penses que je peux enlever les bandeaux de suppression à mesure ? Cedalyon (talk) 07:16, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Voila, j'ai passé en revue l'ensemble des images qui posent problème. Que dois-je faire d'autre à présent ? Cedalyon (talk) 07:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@EugeneZelenko: all the descriptions have been reviewed and completed, dates and authors corrected. All documents created before the 19th century are obviously in public domain. The documents edited during World War II by Vichy France are in public domain by French law. An official partnership is pending between Wikimédia France and the Archives départementales du Rhône. The only document that should stay nominated for deletion until copyright status is identified is this one: File:Article de presse et photographie relatifs à la Journée des mères 1944 à Lyon.pdf, as it was edited by a newspaper that stopped publishing in 1942 (w:fr:Le Temps (1861-1942)). Romainbehar (talk) 19:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know French :-( So please ask help of administrator who know it. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: All OK now. --Yann (talk) 06:57, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text has copyright unless the copyright has expired due to age. Sreejith K (talk) 03:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Obviously not own work as claimed. In order to restore it, we will need to know who the author was and when he died. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HyperGaruda as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://ashokkoul.blogspot.com/2015/11/kashmir-sufis-saints-and-shrines.html Probably PD-Art. Yann (talk) 08:46, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion per Yann. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unrelated redirect BukhariSaeed (talk) 01:17, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Needs a proper license to determine copyright status. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

well, this file comes from the Central Government Archives (CDA) with the status of PUBLIC DOMAIN from the mid-fifties. There is NO REASON to be deleted. However NO SPECIFIC "PROPER LICENSE" could be produced. Thx, rgds, --(TO) (talk) 23:31, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@(TO): I believe you're looking for {{PD-BG-exempt}} or {{PD-BulgarianGov}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed, BOTH look quite suitable to me; however i have no idea what to do about it ... Thx, rgds, --(TO) (talk) 20:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I've gone with PD-BulgarianGov -- if that's wrong we can use the other license or delete this -- no use letting it sit here collecting dust. --Daphne Lantier 02:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]