Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/31
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
_dan_tidak_menutup_kemungkinan_TCL7_juga_memproduksi_produk_pakaian_lainnya_2014-06-18_22-12.jpg){kind=link}
_by_TCL7_further_info_visited_www-tcl7-co-id_2014-06-18_22-16.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_по_нефти_в_годы_Великой_Отечественной_войны-_2014-06-29_11-03.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
![248 File:Cover of "Modern Lovers".jpg](#File:Cover_of_"Modern_Lovers".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
page sourced from "got celeb" I coouldn't see anything on that site that indicated a compatible license to allow us to import their pictures WereSpielChequers (talk) 05:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation: http://www.gotceleb.com/laura-marano-z100s-iheartradio-jingle-ball-2016-in-new-york-2016-12-10.html, no license, no evidence of permission. Green Giant (talk) 15:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Image contain no source of information and without EXIF meta data ! Nudity should be under consideration - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 15:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + obviously out of scope - speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted Getty Image with time, venue and photographer given http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/stefanie-scott-attends-the-oceans-los-angeles-blue-carpet-premiere-at-picture-id161278757 94.221.84.142 09:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot from copyrighted video interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yze_SxyaZk 94.221.84.142 09:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; no educational value TJH2018talk 21:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – clear copyvio. --jdx Re: 21:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Uploader requests to delete the file. Not CC. Unintentional error from the uploader. Sorry Bodhisattwa (talk) 20:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 22:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Martine Boulart.jpg
This image, which was originally posted to Flickr under the license NonCommercial-ShareAlike, which isn't compatible with Commons. Elisfkc (talk) 20:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Non-free Flickr license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works
- Restored: License OK at source now. See [1]. Yann (talk) 18:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=239435525#File:Pierre_Yves_Gomez2.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Peter17 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copied from http://pierre-yves-gomez.fr/a-propos/zo2h-l2s/ reproduction is forbidden per http://pierre-yves-gomez.fr/Mentions-Legales/
- Since Peter17 is abusing the system by continuing to nominate this file for speedy deletion. Natuur12 (talk) 19:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- You nominated this file for deletion: [2]. As I already explained, this file was already published with a copyright notice. There is no proof that the uploader (here or on Flickr) is the author of the image. I asked the uploader to use OTRS to clarify the situation. Peter17 (talk) 08:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete Has been also deleted twice under a different file name File:Pierre Yves Gomez.jpg - first deletion there as copyvio of https://twitter.com/PYvesGomez/status/823549098477363200 Ronhjones (Talk) 17:13, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3APierre_Yves_Gomez2.jpg&type=revision&diff=242882003&oldid=242881968){kind=link}
Deleted: as per Ronhjones. Daphne Lantier 20:54, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Might be a copyrighted image but I don't know J R FSHG (talk) 21:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lourdesholycard1.png: Might be a copyrighted image but I don't know
Might be a copyrighted image but I don't know. J R FSHG (talk) 21:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fatimaholycard1.png: Might be a copyrighted image but I don't know.
This logo contains more than simple geometric shapes and text, and it's clearly above the threshold of originality (making it eligible for copyright protection). User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 06:26, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, this file is deleted. Germudo 1 (talk) 01:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Image contain proper information regarding source and Without EXIF meta data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 16:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Wiki Zero file sharing. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Can be copyrighted and no source has been provided, also without EXIF Meta data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 16:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope, probably uploaded as tests or vandalism (see descriptions). Also no evidence of permission. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jdx: File contains additional embedded data (CSD#F9).
Subject is outdated. The 2012 version does not reflect the Trump presidency. Its use is misleading. Mr. Guye (talk) 20:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. An outdated file can be updated. And even if it is not updated, it can be simply unlinked in relevant Wikipedia articles. There is no reason to delete a file for it is just outdated (see Commons:Deletion policy). Otherwise all historical maps should be deleted.--Neo-Jay (talk) 04:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Updated. And I have uploaded a new version to reflect the 2017 Trump presidency although I do not have to do it. --Neo-Jay (talk) 07:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Withdrawl per the Neo-Jay update. Sorry, I'm new to Commons.-Mr. Guye (talk) 16:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing source as of 25 March 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.
Il en JPG, apparemment il le faut PDF Mickael Pariente (talk) 10:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted: copyright violation, scan of a recent magazine. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:30, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Ce fichier JPG devrait etre changé par un fichier PDF Mickael Pariente (talk) 12:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. Copyright violation. 1998 newspaper scan. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:31, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept after OTRS permissions were received for all files. Regards, HaeB (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC) OTRS agent (verify)
Files uploaded by MarthaDaisy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright for these files belongs to cinematographer Antonio J. García: see here.
- File:Ana Rujas hops into a flower-covered window on the set of Alice Waddington-directed Disco Inferno.jpg
- File:Ana Rujas surrounded by a FX wall of fire on the set of Alice Waddington-directed Disco Inferno.jpg
- File:Ana Rujas turns off a wax record player on the set of Alice Waddington's Disco Inferno.jpg
- File:A still of Alice Waddington's Disco Inferno, featuring actress Ana Rujas.jpg
Cordless Larry (talk) 13:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
I contacted the cinematographer so he can approve the images this weekend. please do not delete them.
Thank you
MarthaDaisy
- OTRS agent (verify): An email has been received at OTRS concerning this file. The email is in a queue awaiting processing. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Obviously this is not own work, and also the stock character from GoAnimate. HarvettFox 96 21:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC), edited on 22:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- A mistake on my end, apologies. GoAnimateFan199Pro (talk) 22:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Not in scope. - Reventtalk 10:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:11, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Taken from here — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 23:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for sculptures in the USA. 67.84.96.111 23:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for sculptures in the USA. The use of image filters does not change the copyright status of the subject. 67.84.96.111 23:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
The photo was previously published at https://twitter.com/gsocho. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 23:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ДРОВОСЕК 29 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 07:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 07:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Bangladesh
[edit]Copyright belongs to the government of Bangladesh, which we have no proof has licensed the notes freely. Compare with the 1962 law from Pakistan which was used to justify deletion of Pakistani money (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pakistan commemorative banknote.png).
- File:10 Taka 2006 obverse.png
- File:10 Taka 2006 reverse.png
- File:2 Taka 2011 obverse.png
- File:2 Taka 2011 reverse.png
- File:2 TAKA.JPG
- File:5 Taka 2011 obverse.png
- File:5 Taka 2011 reverse.png
- File:Bangladeshi taka (500, 100, 50, 10).JPG
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not an expert, but there is a "no infringement" section of the Bangladesh Copyright Act, 2000 (sec 72). It allows for "review, whether of that work or any other work". --Bequw (talk) 01:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Please wait for an expert to look into this. Thank you. বব২৬ (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Sec. 72 is about Fair use. Fair use is not comapatible with Commons requirements. If the notes are governement copyrights or anonymous/pseudonymus works, they should be copyrighted 6-0 years since published. Otherwose, 60 years since author death. I see no way that they may be PD in US earlier. Ankry (talk) 17:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
- Please wait for an expert to look into this. Thank you. বব২৬ (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 20:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Bangladesh
[edit]Bangladesh is not listed in Commons:Currency. But Bangladesh tends to have the same copyright as Pakistan - and images of currency are not allowed here. Checking https://www.bb.org.bd/currency/note.php - I see no evidence of free use.
- File:10 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:10 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:100 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:100 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:1000 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:1000 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:2 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:2 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:20 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:20 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:5 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:5 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:50 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:50 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:500 BDT Obs 2011.jpg
- File:500 BDT Rev 2011.jpg
- File:Img836 — копия — копия (2).jpg
- File:Img837 — копия (2).jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশী ব্যাংকনোট- ৫ টাকা, ২০১১.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ronhjones (Talk) 00:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 22:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Banknotes of Bangladesh
[edit]Copyright in Bangladesh is Publish date + 60 years for government works. As best I can tell, none of these bills are 60 years old. In fact, the presidential decree that created Bangladesh's central bank was issued in 1972, less than 60 years ago (and Bangladesh became independent country in 1971).
- File:Bangladesh 100 taka.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 10BDT 1996 1.jpg
- File:Bangladesh 10BDT 1996 2.jpg
- File:Bangladesh bb 100 taka 2019.00.00 b352k p57 1593703 r.jpg
- File:Bangladesh bb 500 taka 2019.00.00 b353k p58 4920091 f.jpg
- File:Bangladesh bb 500 taka 2019.00.00 b353k p58 4920091 r.jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 10 Taka back bart Circulated 11th oct 1976.jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 10 Taka Front part, circulated 11th Oct 1976.jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 10 Taka Polymer year 2000 Back part.jpg
- File:Bangladeshi 10 Taka polymer year 2000 front part.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 1000taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 1000taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 500taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 500taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 5taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh 5taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh10 taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh10 taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh100taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh100taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh2 taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh2 taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh20 taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh20 taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh20 taka 20192 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh20 taka 20192.jpg
- File:Banglaesh5 taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh5 taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banglaesh5 taka 20192 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh5 taka 20192.jpg
- File:Banglaesh50 taka 2019 r.jpg
- File:Banglaesh50 taka 2019.jpg
- File:Banladesh 50taka r.jpg
- File:Banladesh 50taka.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ১৯৭৩ সালের ১৮ই ডিসেম্বর.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ১৯৭৯.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা প্রথম নোট পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ২রা মার্চ ১৯৭৩.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা প্রথম নোট সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ২রা মার্চ ১৯৭৩.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ১৯৭৩ সালের ১৮ই ডিসেম্বর.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১ টাকা সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ১৯৭৯.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ১১ই ডিসেম্বর ১৯৯৭.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ৩রা সেপ্টেম্বর ১৯৮২.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট পিছনের দিক, প্রচলন ৭ই জানুয়ারী ২০০২.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ১১ই ডিসেম্বর ১৯৯৭.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ৩রা সেপ্টেম্বর ১৯৮২.jpg
- File:বাংলাদেশি ১০ টাকা নোট সম্মুখভাগ, প্রচলন ৭ই জানুয়ারী ২০০২.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:51, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial images of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Long code065.png
- File:Long codeG.png
- File:Long codeE.png
- File:Long codeF.png
- File:Long codeD.png
- File:Long codeC.png
- File:Long codeB.png
- File:Long codeA.png
- File:Long code064.png
- File:Long code063.png
- File:Long code062.png
- File:Long code059.png
- File:Long code060.png
- File:Long code061.png
- File:Long code058.png
- File:Long code057.png
- File:Long code056.png
- File:Long code055.png
- File:Long code054.png
- File:Long code053.png
- File:Long code052.png
- File:Long code051.png
- File:Long code050.png
- File:Long code049.png
- File:Long code048.png
- File:Long code047.png
- File:Long code046.png
- File:Long code045.png
- File:Long code044.png
- File:Long code043.png
- File:Long code042.png
- File:Long code040.png
- File:Long code041.png
- File:Long code039.png
- File:Long code038.png
- File:Long code037.png
- File:Long code035.png
- File:Long code036.png
- File:Long code034.png
- File:Long code033.png
- File:Long code032.png
- File:Long code031.png
- File:Long code029.png
- File:Long code030.png
- File:Long code028.png
- File:Long code025.png
- File:Long code026.png
- File:Long code024.png
- File:Long code023.png
- File:Long code022.png
- File:Long code020.png
- File:Long code021.png
- File:Long code019.png
- File:Long code017.png
- File:Long code018.png
- File:Long code016.png
- File:Long code015.png
- File:Long code014.png
- File:Long code013.png
- File:Long code012.png
- File:Long code010.png
- File:Long code011.png
- File:Long code009.png
- File:Long code008.png
- File:Long code007.png
- File:Long code006.png
- File:Long code005.png
- File:Long code002.png
- File:Long code003.png
- File:Long code004.png
- File:Long code027.png
- File:Long code000.png
- File:Long code001.png
- File:Long codeH.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by jcb, closed by. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; possible copyvio; files are 0kb, so mild suspicion
- File:B066.png
- File:B064.png
- File:B065.png
- File:B062.png
- File:B063.png
- File:B061.png
- File:B060.png
- File:B059.png
- File:B058.png
- File:B057.png
- File:B056.png
- File:B053.png
- File:B055.png
- File:B054.png
- File:B052.png
- File:B051.png
- File:B050.png
- File:B04uso.png
- File:B04G.png
- File:B04D.png
- File:B04E.png
- File:B04A.png
- File:B04C.png
- File:B04B.png
- File:B049.png
- File:B048.png
- File:B047.png
- File:B046.png
- File:B043.png
- File:B045.png
- File:B044.png
- File:B041.png
- File:B042.png
- File:B039.png
- File:B040.png
- File:B038.png
- File:B037.png
- File:B035.png
- File:B036.png
- File:B034.png
- File:B033.png
- File:B031.png
- File:B032.png
- File:B029.png
- File:B030.png
- File:B027.png
- File:B028.png
- File:B026.png
- File:B022.png
- File:B025.png
- File:B024.png
- File:B023.png
- File:B021.png
- File:B019.png
- File:B020.png
- File:B018.png
- File:B017.png
- File:B016.png
- File:B015.png
- File:B014.png
- File:B013.png
- File:B012.png
- File:B011.png
- File:B010.png
- File:B009.png
- File:B008.png
- File:B007.png
- File:B006.png
- File:B004.png
- File:B005.png
- File:B003.png
- File:B000.png
- File:B001.png
- File:B002.png
TJH2018talk 17:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Outside Commons:Project scope, should be SVG, likely not useful as barcodes are generally specific text. Also, as this is the third DR for this user (apparently over the same thing) we may wish to warn them to cease making such uploads.
- File:SimbMM000.png
- File:SimbM002.png
- File:SimbM003.png
- File:SimbM004.png
- File:SimbM000.png
- File:SimbM001.png
- File:SimbA.png
- File:Simb056.png
- File:SimbB.png
- File:Simb054.png
- File:Simb055.png
- File:Simb053.png
- File:Simb052.png
- File:Simb051.png
- File:Simb048.png
- File:Simb049.png
- File:Simb050.png
- File:Simb045.png
- File:Simb047.png
- File:Simb046.png
- File:Simb044.png
- File:Simb042.png
- File:Simb043.png
- File:Simb041.png
- File:Simb040.png
- File:Simb039.png
- File:Simb037.png
- File:Simb038.png
- File:Simb036.png
- File:Simb035.png
- File:Simb034.png
- File:Simb033.png
- File:Simb032.png
- File:Simb031.png
- File:Simb028.png
- File:Simb030.png
- File:Simb029.png
- File:Simb027.png
- File:Simb026.png
- File:Simb025.png
- File:Simb024.png
- File:Simb023.png
- File:Simb022.png
- File:Simb019.png
- File:Simb021.png
- File:Simb020.png
- File:Simb018.png
- File:Simb017.png
- File:Simb014.png
- File:Simb016.png
- File:Simb015.png
- File:Simb010.png
- File:Simb012.png
- File:Simb013.png
- File:Simb011.png
- File:Simb009.png
- File:Simb008.png
- File:Simb007.png
- File:Simb006.png
- File:Simb003.png
- File:Simb005.png
- File:Simb004.png
- File:Simb000.png
- File:Simb002.png
- File:Simb001.png
Mifter (talk) 06:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
dubious free media El Funcionario (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 18:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Patrash Hembrom (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos - out of project scope.
XXN, 18:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Jan Roeder foto@janroeder.de is the author as per EXIF. This obviously does not match the name of the uploader and declared copyright holder. Sx-mah (talk) 02:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Note that it is in use by 3 projects. — Jeff G. ツ 05:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Please send an email to OTRS to restore the file. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository
TJH2018talk 02:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 05:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Serious doubt about claim of "own work" on this low-res logo. Might be PD-ineligible and if so we could keep it on that basis. User's only other upload is a photo (also very low-res) of this same business. Jmabel ! talk 03:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 05:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Serious doubt about claim of "own work" on this photo that also appears on the company's web site. Jmabel ! talk 03:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Very close to http://static05.kaufda.de/Geschaefte/Wohnorama.v9625.png as displayed by http://www.kaufda.de/Geschaefte/Wohnorama — Jeff G. ツ 05:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO#China (PRC). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 04:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal pic in deleted article in Ar-Wiki Ziad (talk) 04:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 07:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata about non-notable person (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in fr.wiki), the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation, scope is unclear too. Taivo (talk) 07:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation of Antonio J.García Theroadislong (talk) 08:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Please send an email to OTRS for restoring the file. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:14, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yichenli001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope; not a personal photo repository
TJH2018talk 03:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 04:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LibertyConservative (talk · contribs)
[edit]More alt history. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PresidentNixon1960.
- File:Senate1980.png
- File:1980PresPrimaryDem.png
- File:FLSen1980Map.png
- File:WIRecall1978.png
- File:CA2016Sen.png
- File:Senate1978.png
- File:CA1978Gov.png
- File:2016Pres.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 04:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by J.musiclove (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos of questionable notability : out of scope
Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
File is not used in any article in Wikipedia. A higher quality svg file already exists. Kj1595 (talk) 20:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Currently this file is used in en.wp. --XXN, 10:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:INUSE and above. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:18, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
This file is not being used in any articles. A better quality svg format file already exists. Kj1595 (talk) 08:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Keep: Not longer used in articles, but part of a illustrators workshop. Educational value is quite obvious. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)- Keep: No new arguments. --Achim (talk) 11:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 20:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AG Alexis Gilli (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal file
2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 08:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, with the addition of File:W I L D .jpg. — Jeff G. ツ 14:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:34, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file is not being used in any articles. Kj1595 (talk) 08:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. @Kj1595: this is not a valid reason for deletion! This file has educational usefulness, and therefore it can stay here. --XXN, 11:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. 100% agree with XXN. --Arnd (talk) 11:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Nonsense DR. --Achim (talk) 11:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Indeedous (talk) 18:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Albert Andreo i Parera (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
- File:Vincenzo en una mañana cualquiera dispuesto a ir a crear nubes con su globo a paises del tercer mundo.jpg
- File:Vista matutina con Vincenzo en Ennis, Irlanda.jpg.jpg
2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 08:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, with the addition of File:Vista matutina con Vincenzo en Ennis, Irlanda.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ 14:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
test image; can't see any purpose Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
sourced as caperclowns.com, which states "Copyright @ All Rights Reserved", no apparent permission. TherasTaneel (talk) 08:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
sourced as caperclowns.com, which states "Copyright @ All Rights Reserved", no apparent permission. TherasTaneel (talk) 08:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal files
- File:Loc Khuong Combined family photos.jpg
- File:Loc s family at new home 10-02-2005-363x262.jpg
- File:Wedd36-311x295.jpg
- File:Loc family 12-17-2007 004-431x318.jpg
2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 08:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, with the addition of File:Brrom Bride-348x300.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ 14:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused image with a watermark. Better quality version without watermark is available. --62.65.58.38 08:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krassotkin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Nontrivial logo.
No speedy delete; Below COM:TOO and ok for PD-Textlogo? Wdwd (talk) 09:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: with PD-textlogo - below TOO and in use. --Jcb (talk) 20:43, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Persoal phot, outside project scope Poliocretes (talk) 10:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:43, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Berat Ahmetaj (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope. Screenshots of some youtube videos, and one logo promoting an youtube channel.
XXN, 11:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
The file is an obvious scan or screenshot without any source information. Source information was requested and Pokéfan95 understood there was a source. Anyway Discasto talk 12:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 12:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - "{{transferred from|en.wikipedia}}" is not a source of course. --Jcb (talk) 20:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Screenshots. No evidence of permission.
- File:ಸತ್ಯ ಹರಿಶ್ಚಂದ್ರ.jpg
- File:ಸತ್ಯವಾದಿ ಹರಿಶ್ಚಂದ್ರ.jpg
- File:Truth speaker.jpg
- File:ಹರಿಶ್ಚಂದ್ರ ಘಟ್.jpg
XXN, 12:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejandro Mosquera (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos - out of project scope:
- File:Jhonson silicon liquido Alejandro Mosquera.jpg
- File:Alejandro Mosquera en 2015.jpg
- File:Alejandro Mosquera en 2016.jpg
Screenshot:
XXN, 12:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. XXN, 12:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antonio Echevarría García (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos - out of project scope.
XXN, 12:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
XXN, 12:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:00, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:00, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - very low resolution, blurred image, no reason for this to be on Commons. Optimist on the run (talk) 07:24, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image - out of project scope. XXN, 12:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CarlosLlanos1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos - out of project scope.
XXN, 12:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Promotional uploads (see files descriptions). Not much educational usefullness. Not in use. Out of project scope.
XXN, 12:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JuanPinoInformación (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 09:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JuanPinoInformación (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos of unclear notability.
- File:Christian Place - Logo.png
- File:CL - Logotipo.png
- File:Triplesevenlogo.png
- File:Triple Seven Logo.png
XXN, 12:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo of unclear notability. XXN, 12:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Pictures related to some Youtube channel. Promotional uploads. Unused, out of scope.
XXN, 12:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abhattacherjee1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]A poster and a scene from the film - copyrighted content.
XXN, 14:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DSCStudio22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted content.
XXN, 14:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 14:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
No COM:EDUSE. Out of scope. XXN, 14:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 14:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo of unclear notability - out of project scope. XXN, 14:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MOTHERTERESATRUST (talk · contribs)
[edit]The source has been provided with less information, seems copyrighted images. -
- File:MotherTeresaChritableTrust 01.jpg
- File:MotherTeresaChritableTrust 03.jpg
- File:MotherTeresaChritableTrust 02.jpg
Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 14:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ganar Torrejón (IU-EQUO) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official electoral promotional banners. Copyrighted and probably out of scope.
- File:Cartel Electoral diez primeros candidatos. Vota.jpg
- File:Cartel Electoral Paco Hernández Vota.jpg
- File:GANAR TORREJON (IU-EQUO).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
XXN, 14:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
No source has been provided and EXIF meta data not present. Could be copywrighted - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 14:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work, also probably out of scope. XXN, 14:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AnshBabu86 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a screenshot to me. XXN, 14:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alishahryari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://weneedtrees.com/sites/default/files/DSC_0006.jpg.
- File:محمد تاجران در حال برگزاری کارگاه.png
- File:نوجوان مبتلا به بیماری ادرار شربت افرا که به شدت دچار عقب ماندگی ذهنی و آتاکسی است.png
- File:نوزاد سعودی مبتلا به بیماری ادرار شربت افرا. نوزاد بدنی کاملا سفت و سخت دارد.png
- File:کودک مکزیکی مبتلا به بیماری ادرار شربت افرا. حالت نیمه اغما، کلونوس مچ پا، هایپرتونیک.png
- File:نوزاد سه هفته ای مبتلا به بیماری ادرار شربت افرا. علائم هیپوتونی در آن به وضوح دیده می شود.png
- File:آرمن مسیحی کچاریان.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:26, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Video game items & screen captures - copyrighted content.
- File:Naruch.png
- File:Botinki gribn.png
- File:Perch sham.png
- File:Talents prim.jpg
- File:Drevo pri.jpg
- File:Shield and swords.png
- File:Orden frakciya1.jpg
- File:Orden frakciya.jpg
- File:Delytarin2.jpg
- File:Delytarin.jpg
- File:Delytarin1.jpg
- File:Korporetion.jpg
- File:Pochta korp.png
- File:Korp pocht.png
- File:Ceh korp rem.png
- File:Korp remont.png
- File:Хаот.png
- File:8I91uqx.png
The following are too simple to be copyrighted - simple shapes, but being unused are out of scope:
XXN, 14:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carla cayetana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image - out of project scope. XXN, 14:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 14:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kazi fahim sabab (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos - out of project scope.
XXN, 15:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kazi fahim sabab (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope. No educational value and not in use.
~ Moheen (keep talking) 22:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: both in use, therefore in scope. --Storkk (talk) 11:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
File:TCL7 adalah brand clothing asal Indonesia yang akan Go Internasional,fokus utama pada produk Knitwear (rajutan) dan tidak menutup kemungkinan TCL7 juga memproduksi produk pakaian lainnya 2014-06-18 22-12.jpg
[edit]_dan_tidak_menutup_kemungkinan_TCL7_juga_memproduksi_produk_pakaian_lainnya_2014-06-18_22-12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_dan_tidak_menutup_kemungkinan_TCL7_juga_memproduksi_produk_pakaian_lainnya_2014-06-18_22-12.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, promotional. XXN, 15:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:37, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Knitwear Keipatch (Navy-Red Combine) by TCL7 further info visited www-tcl7-co-id 2014-06-18 22-16.jpg
[edit]_by_TCL7_further_info_visited_www-tcl7-co-id_2014-06-18_22-16.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_TCL7_further_info_visited_www-tcl7-co-id_2014-06-18_22-16.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:Screenshot. XXN, 15:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Leonardo Ferreira da Silva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos - out of project scope.
XXN, 15:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fansclub max 33 (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Max istruttore scuola federale csai 2014-06-19 01-17.jpg
- File:Rally talent Max istruttore 2014-06-19 01-13.jpg
- File:Max Messico 2014-06-19 01-11.jpg
XXN, 15:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MI TRAMPOLIN (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos of unclear notability - out of project scope.
XXN, 15:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, selfie, no educational value out of project scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and possible copyright violation. --Daphne Lantier 21:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Downgraded from File:Caminandes- Llama Drama - Short Movie.ogv, no foreseeable use. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 06:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
source given is libertarian party, unless uploader is Georgia Libertarian Party no reason to believe own work. MB298 (talk) 00:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Non free image from en-wiki en:File:Toni Kurz 1936.jpg - copyright is likely to be still valid Ronhjones (Talk) 01:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Useless image. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 06:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a screenshot/fake news repository
- File:Facebook post of Maxim Diamandi about cult «Bnei Baruch» in Moscow.png
- File:Facebook post of Maxim Diamandi 2.png
- File:Facebook post of Maxim Diamandi 1.png
- File:Letter of Maxim Diamandi.png
- File:Maxim Diamandi.jpg
- File:Anti-cult movements.jpg
TJH2018talk 03:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as fake. These files are/were being used in two articles en:Bnei Baruch and wikinews:New terror warnings in Petah Tikva. Track of Israeli anti-cultists about the same subject, using the same language, including "we". — Jeff G. ツ 05:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- One edit undone on enwp; wikinews has more bureaucracy. — Jeff G. ツ 05:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
O arquivo é a minha prioridade ver no link recente enviado por mim: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Duquesa-20170318_134020.jpg - https://www.flickr.com/photos/153462333@N02/33708834576 Leonardo Gabriel Vieira Torres (talk) 05:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
incorrect labelling; fixed in File:Problem2a.jpg which otherwise is a duplicate Jochen Burghardt (talk) 05:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
no sensible description; can't see any purpose Jochen Burghardt (talk) 05:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
advertising top left Flat Out (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
False licensing information has been provided here- image is a corporate logo and appears on copyrighted website http://shalby.org/frontend/images/logo.png Drchriswilliams (talk) 05:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Promotional image about non-notable person. Blythwood (talk) 06:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 07:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo disappeared. そらみみ (talk) 07:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Sorry for mistaking. Now this file is same as File:Gora Station Sign (Hakone Tozan Line).jpg.--そらみみ (talk) 09:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by OrisThePunk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious "own" works
2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 07:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. These images are taken from en:Vainglory (video game), and are "©2017 Super Evil Megacorp." — Jeff G. ツ 15:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Venkatesha.kk (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal files
2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 07:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 14:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Dubious "own" work 2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 07:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Propaganda against w:Álvaro Uribe, probably a derivative work 2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 07:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Work of an artist which is alive, autorization needed Shev123 (talk) 07:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This has been uploaded by a sockpuppet of a long time abuser, Anany (see: w:Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Ananny). Vanjagenije (talk) 19:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama for commercial use in Bulgaria. Steak (talk) 08:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Image on Google Plus, maybe not a free image Shev123 (talk) 08:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. This has been uploaded by a sockpuppet of a long time abuser, Anany (see: w:Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Ananny). Vanjagenije (talk) 19:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama for commercial use in Bulgaria. Steak (talk) 08:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama for commercial use in Bulgaria. Steak (talk) 08:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Small unused photo without camera data about non-notable person (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki), the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is likely too. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 08:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This is the cover of the book "КТО ВЫ, «ПОРУЧИК С.»?" (example). There is enough creative collage. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Souliroots are not mentioned in en.wiki. Probably the file is out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
If "M. Yarozskaya, and A. Kabunskaya" are the real authors, they should be asked for a permission or an OTRS ticket 2003:45:5C47:D201:408:EC99:74E0:8C18 08:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
File:17310287 1347679521966474 1992042434988945488 o -A Young Aspiring Female Leader from Solomon Islands.jpg
[edit]
Not needed anymore Chaniella Meke (talk) 08:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
copyvio http://www.city-data.com/picfiles/pic1498.php / no indication that this picture is CC / main page says © 2017 Advameg, Inc. Seb az86556 (talk) 09:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Amdonaldson (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage and sandbox (and self-reverted vandalism) in en.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Artwork by Gustave Violet (1873-1952) under copyright until 2023 included as there is no liberty of panorama in France Culex (talk) 10:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unedeleted now in public domain (@Culex: ). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 10:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Artwork by Gustave Violet (1873-1952) under copyright until 2022 included as there is no liberty of panorama in France Culex (talk) 10:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
spam uploader, rangat not constitutional org. it's a village, but village have not logo. Kayser Ahmad (talk) 10:57, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Florakarimova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photo of the same subject in at various period. The uploader claimed also to be the depicted person [3] therefore can not be the copyright holder. Very unlikely to be own works. Included some screenshots.
- File:FLORA KARIMOVA 2015.jpg
- File:FLORA KARIMOVA 1965.jpg
- File:FLORA KARIMOVA 1973.jpg
- File:Flora Karimova 1969.jpg
- File:Prof. Doc. Ibrahim Topchubashov Flora Karimova.jpg
- File:Flora Karimova and Zumdur.jpg
- File:FLORA KARIMOVA 2016.jpg
- File:FLORA KARIMOVA "Qanunanamine film".jpg
- File:Leyli and Majnun 1966.jpg
- File:Flora Karimova 1956.jpg
- File:FLORA KARIMVOA "Qanunnamine".jpg
- File:Flora Karimova and her daughter.jpg
- File:Flora Karimova 1973.jpg
- File:Flora Karimova 1972.jpg
- File:Flora Karimova and her husband.jpg
- File:FLORA KARIMOVA LOGO.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Move some to English Wikipedia to continue fair use in w:Flora Karimova, then delete. The other Wikipedias with no EDPs are out of luck. Uploader can host them on an image hosting service per COM:NOTHOST. Once they are emptied, Category:Flora Karimova and Category:Flora Kerimova can also be deleted per COM:NOTWP. — Jeff G. ツ 13:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Florakarimova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photo of the same subject in at various period. The uploader claimed also to be the depicted person [4] therefore can not be the copyright holder. Very unlikely to be own works. The user has also been warned.
- File:Flora Karimova 1970's icon.jpg
- File:Flora Karimova Concert poster 1975.jpg
- File:Flora kerimova latest.jpg
- File:FLORA KARIMOVA "Qanunnamine" film.jpg
- File:Flora Karimova teenager.jpg
- File:Flora Karimova Logo.jpg
- File:FLORA KARIMOVA as baby girl.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 03:22, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:32, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Obivous scanned image. Not own work LMLM (talk) 11:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:44, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be a screenshot of a TV show, probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No, the producer of the TV Show has given his agreement by the right process. --SamuelDubuis (talk) 09:23, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission is needed. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Crop of news photo: http://ghanasoccernet.com/ahmed-toure-targets-swift-return-to-africa-with-bechem-united Ytoyoda (talk) 11:46, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 13:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This picture was taken in London (http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/parties-and-events/world-premiere-of-raavan-in-london/world-premiere-of-raavan-in-london-12/) and foreign-event photos at BH are not free. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Youtube screenshot. No evidence of permission. XXN, 12:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Youtube screenshot I suppose. Non-notable person depicted - out of project scope.
Also: File:LIUGAROUGE.png by the same user.
XXN, 12:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Youtuber's promotional upload - out of project scope. XXN, 12:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Self-promotional upload. Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Yet another youtuber's promotional upload. Out of project scope. XXN, 12:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Youtuber's self-promotional upload. Out of project scope. XXN, 12:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
One more promotional upload of some youtuber. Out of project scope. XXN, 12:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:45, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AquamarinTheOne (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos - out of project scope.
XXN, 12:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Credit: NASA/Northrop Grumman. NASA template requires the picture to be solely created by NASA Discasto talk 12:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Taiwanese signature is copyright protected: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jay Chou signature.gif Wcam (talk) 12:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 12:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Superseded by a superior svg version - File:YouTube Live.svg, uploaded by the same user. XXN, 12:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This logo is above the COM:TOO probably, and therefore is copyrighted by the developing company. Affected: File:Cameleon.png. XXN, 12:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Blurry personal photo, out of scope. McGeddon (talk) 13:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
From http://www.lebal.paris/anastasia-virganskaya-gorbatcheva/ Ytoyoda (talk) 13:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:46, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
EXIF credits JEAN LUCE HURE Ytoyoda (talk) 13:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Larger version available at http://comworldseries.blogspot.com/2015/11/hon-prof-hlengiwe-mkhize-to-give.html, no evidence of ownership Ytoyoda (talk) 13:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Photo credit goes to Michel Bega Ytoyoda (talk) 13:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
From http://nehandaradio.com/2017/01/20/south-africa-reviews-special-permits-zimbabweans/ Ytoyoda (talk) 13:49, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
The images metadata includes the uploaders name and possible personal information Vulcan44 (talk) 13:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unclear if copyright holder has given permission to publish this image under its present license. For uploader: please follow the procedure as mentioned in COM:OTRS. Takeaway (talk) 13:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
The images metadata includes the uploaders name and possible personal information Vulcan44 (talk) 14:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
The images metadata includes the uploaders real name and possible personal information Vulcan44 (talk) 14:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
The images metadata includes the uploaders real name and possible personal information Vulcan44 (talk) 14:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
The images metadata includes the uploaders real name and possible personal information Vulcan44 (talk) 14:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused drawing/logo of unclear notability. Out of project scope. XXN, 14:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. XXN, 14:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:47, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from modern art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alicia Poderti (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted book covers.
- File:Caudillos 136x216.jpg
- File:Portada libro 2007.jpg
- File:PORTADA DEFINITIVA LA HERMANA MAYOR (2).jpg
- File:Tapa belgrano.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
XXN, 15:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 15:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
File:This is a picture that dashawn aka lil rocky toock in his family's shoe store located in Boynton beach, fl 2014-06-17 23-08.jpeg
[edit]
No COM:EDUSE. Out of project scope. XXN, 15:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused jpg logos of unclear notability.
XXN, 15:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cceducaccion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos - out of project scope.
XXN, 15:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JurnaRaluca (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted book covers.
XXN, 15:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:49, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Exact duplicate of File:History of the Armenians in India.djvu from same source. Hrishikes (talk) 15:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, missed it, please delete. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:26, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 15:26, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
COM:Screenshot. XXN, 15:29, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Blatant advertising.
- File:Choosing the Right makeup artists for Your Own Big Day.pdf
- File:Choosing The Process of Having Attractive Nails.pdf
- File:Get the Best Beautiful Look in Your Marriage Day with Amrit’s Hair N Beauty.pdf
Takeaway (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete Non educational, self promotional content. Besides Gouvas' own claims, there are no citations and references in literature about OSTOUN, supposedly the "first medical software in Europe". Seems another incident of self-promotional material by user Harry Gouvas who has a well known WP record of highly promotional bio promos and many claims for medical firsts that lack secondary sources documentation. ——Chalk19 (talk) 15:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Image contain source and without EXIF meta data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 15:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Image contain no source and without EXIF meta Data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 15:48, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted and no information reagarding the source has been provided - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 15:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
No license info on refrenced page, and uploaders name not th given photographer Yger (talk) 16:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Image contain no EXIF meta data and as well no source has been provided - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 16:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal Image and contain no EXIF Meta Data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 16:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Can be copyrighted as no information regarding source has been provided and image contain no EXIF Meta data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 16:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- delete, this image was found on Google. -Reagle (talk) 16:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
A higher quality svg image exists. This file is not used in any article. Kj1595 (talk) 16:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted material. Al-Douri (talk) 16:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Copyright violation: creative work by an alive artist, not originally released as copyleft Huji (talk) 16:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation: creative work by an alive artist, not originally released as copyleft Huji (talk) 16:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation: creative work by an alive artist, not originally released as copyleft Huji (talk) 16:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This amateur image has no significance and is not used in any articles Kj1595 (talk) 16:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:51, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 18:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Per a Google-translation of the Albanian-language article that uses this logo, this is a British company, so quite obviously over COM:TOO UK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M Sohail Mian Hassani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not useable in current form with watermarks
- File:Head Botala.jpg
- File:Masjid Farooq e Azam, Botala.jpg
- File:View near Hospital.jpg
- File:Govt. Boys School, Botala.jpg
- File:Bridge Near Hospital, Botala.jpg
- File:Masjid (BurhanoO Wali) , Botala.jpg
- File:Botala-Hadali Morr.jpg
- File:Brick Kiln, Botala.jpg
- File:View of Bus Stop , Botala.jpg
- File:Pahari near Head , Botala.jpg
- File:Dera, Botala.jpg
- File:View Near Boys School , Botala.jpg
- File:Govt. Elementry School for Boys Botala.jpg
- File:Botala Adda view.jpg
- File:Bridge, Pindi, Botala.jpg
- File:Botala-42 MB link road.jpg
- File:Zong Tower , Botala.jpg
- File:Botala Miner.jpg
- File:Hamoka Miner Canal , Botala.jpg
- File:Hadali Miner Botala.jpg
- File:Play Ground Botala.jpg
- File:Janaza Gah Botala.jpg
- File:Darbar Baba Qamer Ali Botala.jpg
- File:Botala Union Council.jpg
- File:Botala Irrigation system.jpg
- File:BOTALA Adda.jpg
_,_Botala.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
TJH2018talk 16:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository TJH2018talk 16:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:55, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Image contains digital watermark and it's not used in any article. An svg high quality file aleady exists. Kj1595 (talk) 17:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Kj1595: please provide a link to that SVG file. --XXN, 19:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Kj1595 (talk) 00:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Personal image as no source has been provided and missing EXIF Meta data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 17:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This has been replaced with Template:Hamburger Buergerschaft. We could redirect the page but I don't think it would be a common search term. De728631 (talk) 17:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted and no information has been provided as source, also EXIF Meta Data not present - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 17:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Croatia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nirmal Detergent (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope; not a promotional photo repository
- File:White3.png
- File:Wash-hands-linen-Waching-cloths-in-handTR.jpg
- File:Laundry-detergent-powder.jpg
- File:Nirmal Detergent.jpg
- File:Nirmal Detergent 1.jpg
TJH2018talk 18:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
File is not used in any article in Wikipedia. A higher quality svg file already exists. Kj1595 (talk) 20:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Currently file is in use!
File usage on other wikis
|
|---|
|
"The following other wikis use this file: Usage on en.wikipedia.org
Portal:NATO
Albanian Joint Forces Command
Portal:NATO/Member militaries
Portal:NATO/Member militaries/13
Usage on sq.wikipedia.org
Stampa:Infobox Organizate ushtarake
Stampa:Infobox Organizate ushtarake/dok "
|
--XXN, 22:16, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- How can that not be a valid reason? A better quality svg file already exists. What's the point of having a duplicate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kj1595 (talk • contribs)
- @Kj1595: you'll have to replace this file across all Wikimedia projects, and only after that the file will be eligible for deletion on the basis of this rationale. --XXN, 13:45, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
- How can that not be a valid reason? A better quality svg file already exists. What's the point of having a duplicate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kj1595 (talk • contribs)
This file is not being used in any articles. A better quality svg format file already exists. Kj1595 (talk) 08:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: No newer and stronger reasons provided since the prevoius DR. Raster graphics superseded by SVG are usually not deleted. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: No need for deletion. --Achim (talk) 11:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Daphne Lantier 01:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation https://twitter.com/alicewadd/status/685505943501717504 Theroadislong (talk) 08:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
No, this is not a copyright violation. The photos are credited to DJ and photographer Pascal moscheni, who has given his permission for them to be used via Creative Commons. Email him yourself and ask: pascalmoscheni@gmail.com (his site only includes DJing but you can find more about him by googling him, email is the best way to reach him) https://soundcloud.com/pascalmoscheni
By the way, the twitter you refer is Alice Waddington's who is the subject of the article -she is not the author of the photos, Pascal is-. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarthaDaisy (talk • contribs) 09:01, 31 March 2017 (UTC) (UTC)
- The photographer needs to contact Wikimedia to provide permission rather than the other way around, MarthaDaisy. See Commons:OTRS for more information on what is required. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
OK, please do not delete the images. I am getting in contact with the photographers and asking them to use the direct OTRS tool instead of the email form. Patience...
Question: What is in the last page of the https://tools.wmflabs.org/relgen quick authorship submission tool? I am trying to explain it to the Spanish photographers so they know what I am asking them for but I could not reach that stage of the formulary... thank you
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 08:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation of Andre Paduano Theroadislong (talk) 08:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation of Andre Paduano Theroadislong (talk) 08:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Ana Rujas and Aitana Sánchez-Gijón on the set of Alice Waddington-directed Disco Inferno.jpg
[edit]
copyright violation of Antonio J.García Theroadislong (talk) 08:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi! This is not a copyright violation. The images are available for free use according to creative commons. You can ask the author himself at http://antoniojgarcia.com if in doubt. Please do not delete them. Thank you.
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:16, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 09:26, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Goforex is a very good application for users to learn about Forex trading. I hope that the page will not be deleted so more people can learn about Forex trading too. I did not know that the username will matter in the publication of the article. It was just to make it easier to remember the log in details.
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of relationship between the web page and the uploader. Anyone can choose the user name s/he wishes. OTRS is needed Discasto talk 12:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment: If the relationship between the user and the page was not questionated in more than 10 years, why questionate now? Requesting permission via OTRS should be a better idea than claiming the user assumed bads faith. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:53, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Provided that the place where such relationship was not questionated is not a place know by its diligence with regard to image copyrights, I can't see the point (in fact, such dubious images shouldn't have been transferred ever here, but that's another story). --Discasto talk 22:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ce fichier JPG devrait etre changé par un fichier PDF Mickael Pariente (talk) 12:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ce fichier est jpg. il faudra le changer avec le meme en PDF Mickael Pariente (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Ce fichier JPG devrait etre changé par un fichier PDF Mickael Pariente (talk) 12:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Pourquoi ? -- Asclepias (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of permission. Probable copyvio. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Ce fichier est JPG il faudra le changer en PDF Mickael Pariente (talk) 17:00, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation. Taken from here Discasto talk 12:34, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Claimed as own work, but, could be the mycroscope photos be copyrightable? --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Comment Two different issues here. Own work requires actual own work. That is, that the acknowledged author (that of the book) submits an OTRS authorization (that is, links his/her wiki identity with that of the actual author). With regard to microscope photos, I've got no strong opinion, but mind that we're not seeing here a microscope photo but a derivative work, with appropriate lighting, colouring and contrast. Is it creative enough? I do think so, but other opinions would be valid as well. --Discasto talk 08:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This seems a bit too close to the copyrighted figure to be permissible: http://research.amnh.org/paleontology/embolotherium-andrewsi FunkMonk (talk) 12:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- This seems... okay... no good argument to me but possible a reason. If there is no other way, then it is just so. But I can tell, each line was made by myself and the source of this is known and written down, that's an important point (there is a second source: Matthew C. Mihlbachler: Species Taxonomy, Phylogeny, and Biogeography of the Brontotheriidae (Mammalia: Perissodactyla). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 311, 2008, pp. 1-475 (p. 8) but a bit off, since there is a complete life restoration of the head). To be very close to the original is not a flaw, it is the only way to be sure that the drawing or reconstruction has scientific value and ist trustable for the reader or user of wp. A big part of private made life restorations of dinosaurs, fossil birds or mammals on commons are without any source. They are sprung from the imagination of the drawers, often combined with scientific errors, based on older descriptions etc. That's why they represent original research, it is not a problem to upload or use them on commons, but it should be one on the wp.. My two cents...Sincerly --DagdaMor (talk) 18:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah; I'm sorry if it has to go, but there is a fine line to walk when it comes to Commons:Derivative works. Perhaps there are some other views on this, but the fact is, the original is someone's copyrighted artwork, if something is traced directly after it, it is derivative of that artwork. So we should try to make drawings based on other drawings as different as possible, while still reflecting the source. FunkMonk (talk) 10:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Who determines this fine line? You say This seems ...., so you're not sure about this? And in the case that no further one will respond and the picture is deleted, is this a clear act of administrative arbitrariness? The scientific work is hardly imaginable without any derivative work, it is important that the sources are indicated. What does not go are life restorations without any indication of sources and so far original research. Is there any way to ask the amnh directly to see if they have problems with this derivative work, or even Matthew C. Mihlbachler..? So this fine line could be defined more precisely... Sincerly --DagdaMor (talk) 21:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- If this had been a free-hand drawing, where the lineart diverged somewhat from the original, I think there would be more leeway. But I tried overlaying the images in Photoshop, and it is an exact match.[5] The lines appear to have been traced directly. Tracings are problematic, unless the original artwork is general enough to be copyright-free, but the life-restoration outline is equal parts science and artistry, so it is still copyrighted. FunkMonk (talk) 23:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Of course, I used the original as a blueprint because of the proportions (this is a skull reconstruction). But may be this was my mistake and is problematic. I think I will make a freehand drawing in the next few weeks... I have to think about the best way (but the proportions I will not be able to change significantly, it should be scientifically correct, and I have no brontothere skull...). So for me is EOD here, thanks for your input. Sincerely --DagdaMor (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- The skull itself is of course a solid object and can't be changed whatever you base it on, but there is a lot of wiggle-room for the soft tissue. No one knows the exact shape of the snout, the ears, eyes, nostrils, etc., other than that tbey might have been "rhino-like". Mihlbachler, who proposed the giant snout, even explicitly that the "the true position of the nostrils is uncertain". See the discussion here (a good place to post future restorations for review):[6] FunkMonk (talk) 08:31, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Of course, I used the original as a blueprint because of the proportions (this is a skull reconstruction). But may be this was my mistake and is problematic. I think I will make a freehand drawing in the next few weeks... I have to think about the best way (but the proportions I will not be able to change significantly, it should be scientifically correct, and I have no brontothere skull...). So for me is EOD here, thanks for your input. Sincerely --DagdaMor (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- If this had been a free-hand drawing, where the lineart diverged somewhat from the original, I think there would be more leeway. But I tried overlaying the images in Photoshop, and it is an exact match.[5] The lines appear to have been traced directly. Tracings are problematic, unless the original artwork is general enough to be copyright-free, but the life-restoration outline is equal parts science and artistry, so it is still copyrighted. FunkMonk (talk) 23:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Who determines this fine line? You say This seems ...., so you're not sure about this? And in the case that no further one will respond and the picture is deleted, is this a clear act of administrative arbitrariness? The scientific work is hardly imaginable without any derivative work, it is important that the sources are indicated. What does not go are life restorations without any indication of sources and so far original research. Is there any way to ask the amnh directly to see if they have problems with this derivative work, or even Matthew C. Mihlbachler..? So this fine line could be defined more precisely... Sincerly --DagdaMor (talk) 21:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah; I'm sorry if it has to go, but there is a fine line to walk when it comes to Commons:Derivative works. Perhaps there are some other views on this, but the fact is, the original is someone's copyrighted artwork, if something is traced directly after it, it is derivative of that artwork. So we should try to make drawings based on other drawings as different as possible, while still reflecting the source. FunkMonk (talk) 10:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Сухин Василий Данилович - секретарь Чечено-Ингушского обкома ВКП(б) по нефти в годы Великой Отечественной войны- 2014-06-29 11-03.jpg
[edit]_%D0%BF%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%84%D1%82%D0%B8_%D0%B2_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%8B_%D0%92%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D1%8B-_2014-06-29_11-03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%BF%D0%BE_%D0%BD%D0%B5%D1%84%D1%82%D0%B8_%D0%B2_%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%8B_%D0%92%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D1%8B-_2014-06-29_11-03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused family photo - out of project scope. XXN, 15:26, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Did you read the descriotion? Sukhin Vassily Danilovich (Сухин Василий Данилович) seems to be a relevant person. As the photo was created during the Great Patriotic War, Copyvio could be the only valid reason. --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as per COM:PCP. --Daphne Lantier 01:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
The source has not been properly described - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 15:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- The author gave the uploader the file directly. Source field updated accordingly. OTRS pending. --Ryan (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Image contain no EXIF meta data and as well no source has been provided - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 16:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Also no proof that the image is of the person named. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
very poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 17:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Joschi71: I wouldn't say so. --XXN, 19:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per XXN. --Daphne Lantier 01:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository TJH2018talk 18:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:03, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RavenBoy13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, user blocked for copyvios (x2). Unlikely to be own works.
- File:Vesselka Mega Star.png
- File:Самоводене.jpg
- File:Николай Милайковски.png
- File:Лиляна Гецова.png
- File:Клуб на пенсионера и инвалида „Родолюбец“.png
- File:Василка Попова.png
- File:Dimitar Rachkov.png
Yann (talk) 18:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted as no information regarding source and no EXIF Meta Data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:21, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 18:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Akhil gunde (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos - out of project scope.
- File:Mister perfect 1.jpg
- File:He is a perfect man 3.jpg
- File:He is a perfect man 4.jpg
- File:IMAGES OF AKHIL SCIENTIST 02.jpg
XXN, 18:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:03, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image contain source and without EXIF meta data - Onlyraffael (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused personal image - out of project scope. XXN, 18:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Grupo de la Campaña informativa sobre el trastorno de personalidad múltiple a los Alumnos De 4 Año Sección “B” del L.P “José Leonardo Chirinos” ubicado en Santa Teresa Del Tuy Estado Bolivariano Miranda.jpg
[edit]
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 18:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 18:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation Mehman 97 18:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photos - out of project scope.
XXN, 18:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tecalumnos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
XXN, 18:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 18:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No information has been given such as Author, Source and no EXIF Meta Data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 19:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep: Clearly a self portrait of the subject, therefore the copyright holder. Effectively withouit a license, however. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:23, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Low resolutin and out of scope of Common education guideline, also no EXIF Meta Data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 19:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Copyright issue; accidental upload by new user EH9890 (talk) 19:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
![19:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/03/31#c-EH9890-2017-03-31T19:15:00.000Z-File:Cover_of_"Modern_Lovers".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
![01:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/03/31#c-Daphne_Lantier-2017-04-07T01:05:00.000Z-File:Cover_of_"Modern_Lovers".jpg){kind=link}
Promotional image and can be copyrighted, missing EXIF Meta Data - Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 19:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Promotional image and can be copyrighted, missing EXIF Meta Data - DayanaFabiche (talk) 20:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal images Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook.
- File:Ryderland151030.jpg
- File:Ryderland2009.jpg
- File:Ryderland2011.jpg
- File:Ryderland2012.jpeg
- File:MRY Ryderland.jpeg
- File:Ryderland.jpg
- File:Ryderland 2017 .jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:13, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
What about the copyright of the model? This is a derivative work. Yann (talk) 20:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:07, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Assuming this photo was published in 1961, it was not PD in India in 1996, because 60 years must pass before becoming public domain. it will not become PD till 2022 at the earliest per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/India. Green Giant (talk) 20:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- "it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days)" While the picture was likely taken before 1961 it was published in India in 1961, but, it was only published in the US when the SSB Prize website was first launched which was (according to the Wayback Machine and the Copyright) somewhere between 2012-2014 making the photo in the public domain in the US. FlagFlayer (talk) 20:41, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- To be hosted on Commons, the photo must be either licensed by the photographer or be in the public domain in both the US and India. In 1996, the URAA date for India, the photo would not have been in the public domain for US purposes unless it was published in 1935 or earlier because of the 60 year rule. Given the subject was born in 1917, and he appears fairly aged in the photo, it is not possible that this photo was published in 1935 (when he would have been 18). Assuming it was 1961, the URAA would add 95 years of copyright from publication, meaning it enters the public domain (as far as US recognition of copyright goes), around 2056. Even the copyright period in India would not end until January 2022. Green Giant (talk) 23:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, then I'm sorry for wasting your time, the template said that if "it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days)" it's fine so I thought this was okay, my bad FlagFlayer 03:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- @FlagFlayer: on the contrary, no time has been wasted because we are all volunteers and it's not like I had anything better to do at the time! You picked what you thought applied to the file and we have had a civil discussion. All is not lost though. I believe you could upload this file directly to English Wikipedia as a non-free photo that is not really replaceable. That way you can use it for at least one and quite possibly both articles it is currently on. Green Giant (talk) 20:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- @Green Giant: I didn't know there was a policy for that, thank you for informing me! The policy is kind off confusing but I think I got the gist of it. If I understood correctly, then this file on Wikimedia Commons has to be deleted since Wikimedia has no exceptions, and it can be uploaded to the English Wikipedia as non-free content as its copyright template. Is there any way to quicken the deletion of the file so I can reupload it on the English Wikipedia with the template? Feel free to tell me if I got anything wrong about the policy FlagFlayer 13:13, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- @FlagFlayer: on the contrary, no time has been wasted because we are all volunteers and it's not like I had anything better to do at the time! You picked what you thought applied to the file and we have had a civil discussion. All is not lost though. I believe you could upload this file directly to English Wikipedia as a non-free photo that is not really replaceable. That way you can use it for at least one and quite possibly both articles it is currently on. Green Giant (talk) 20:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, then I'm sorry for wasting your time, the template said that if "it was first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days)" it's fine so I thought this was okay, my bad FlagFlayer 03:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- To be hosted on Commons, the photo must be either licensed by the photographer or be in the public domain in both the US and India. In 1996, the URAA date for India, the photo would not have been in the public domain for US purposes unless it was published in 1935 or earlier because of the 60 year rule. Given the subject was born in 1917, and he appears fairly aged in the photo, it is not possible that this photo was published in 1935 (when he would have been 18). Assuming it was 1961, the URAA would add 95 years of copyright from publication, meaning it enters the public domain (as far as US recognition of copyright goes), around 2056. Even the copyright period in India would not end until January 2022. Green Giant (talk) 23:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:22, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
We still do not have freedom of panorama in France, right? The lighthouse was built in 1948.[7] Ymblanter (talk) 20:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Following the link provided by Ymblanter we can read "The present lighthouse is a copy of the 1861 lighthouse, which was destroyed during World War II". There were not a new architect creation, or at least not new designs, therefore not new copyrights. Christian Ferrer (talk) 01:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Just a few exemples that we can find in the web, we can look at this 1900 postal card (the buildings in front don't exist anymore, but you can compare with this other photo made by me and taken from near the same point of view, the visible area is exactly the same, and this is the view just after the destruction in WWII) or at this 1892 painting or the other photos in this page [8]. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- 1857 begining of the construction of the lighthouse, you can see it in the background just at right of the ship, photo of Gustave Le Gray (1820 – 1884) full resolution
- 1900
- obviously prior to WWII good view for the whole lighthouse
- prior to 1917 (postal date)
- obviously prior to WWII
- obviously prior to WWII
- 1944,
- nowadays, the same lightouse rebuilt without artistic addition Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- I just eat, this Sunday lunch, with my grandfather born in Sète in 1926, present on the site at the time of destruction and at the time of reconstruction of the lighthouse. Of course one can trust me or not and one can consider this as evidence or not. But I asked him about the lighthouse. He was resistant during this war. He said me that German soldiers installed defensive armament on the breakwater (the place where is the lighthouse), and the planes of the Allied army bombed the place and destroyed the lighthouse on the same occasion that they targeted the german armament. He also told me that during the reconstruction of the lighthouse though the material was not the same, they used blocks of cement in place of stones, the outer appearance is exactly the same. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- A protected work in France is a "...work of the mind (Art. L112-1). Hence there must be a human intellectual contribution to the work.". There are obviously no intellectual contributions from the guys from 1948 in this exact copy of the former lighthouse. Without additional intellectual contribution it can not be any additional copyright.Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- I just eat, this Sunday lunch, with my grandfather born in Sète in 1926, present on the site at the time of destruction and at the time of reconstruction of the lighthouse. Of course one can trust me or not and one can consider this as evidence or not. But I asked him about the lighthouse. He was resistant during this war. He said me that German soldiers installed defensive armament on the breakwater (the place where is the lighthouse), and the planes of the Allied army bombed the place and destroyed the lighthouse on the same occasion that they targeted the german armament. He also told me that during the reconstruction of the lighthouse though the material was not the same, they used blocks of cement in place of stones, the outer appearance is exactly the same. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- I did have photos deleted after I provided similar argument (i.e. the deleted administrator would say nothing and delete a file, or say that unless it is an exact replica new design is always involved), so I assume it is not universally accepted. Let us see what others think.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Christian Ferrer. --Daphne Lantier 01:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Probably copyvio. Says it's by Errol McGihon of the Ottawa Sun; are they doing CC licenses these days? Ntsimp (talk) 20:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Author did not die in 1943 - that was the subject. Author could have lived much longer Ronhjones (Talk) 20:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
This sketch is claimed to be PD-US, but there is no rationale whatsoever why that should be the case. The author given is A cartoonist in the US based on testimony, the source link has no further information. Unless it is convincingly shown that the drawing is somehow indeed in the public domain or under a free license, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 21:02, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Also includes File:Lbsfsketch.jpg by an "unknown" author. --Rosenzweig τ 21:05, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted photograph http://www.rksband.com/home Theroadislong (talk) 21:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Used for vandalism Ravave (talk) 21:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- This file was uploaded in 2015, although I don't understand why... well, more or less I understand: I don't know who is this man, but the text says in Spanish "I enjoy humiliating my pupils". --Ravave (talk) 21:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy delete: Clear vandalism and deffamation. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:52, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; no educational value; not a personal photo repository TJH2018talk 21:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Picture depicts author, writer, musician, producer Josquin Des Pres. Contemporary 20th century author of over 18 music instructional books for Mel Bay and Hal Leonard as well as music featured in well over 500 TV shows. what kind of educational value do you think would suit him on wikipedia? Bebfire (talk) 21:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep currently this image is used in an article on enwiki and therefore it can't be deleted for this reason. --XXN, 23:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep used in an article. In scope. --FocalPoint (talk) 07:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete COM:COPYVIO Metadata reads "FBMD" which shows picture has been in and out of Facebook prior to arriving here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Ellin Beltz. --Daphne Lantier 01:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository. Non notable minors. Agora (talk) 21:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository. Non notable minors. Agora (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository. Non notable minor. Agora (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository. Non notable minor. Agora (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Delete based on the Gambia Copyright Act WIPO document p 33-34 which extends for 50 years pma or 50 years for corporate work as with most other current or ex-UK colonies, the two upright stamps and their first day cover were issued on 28 October 1978, so they are still in copyright until 2028. The other two stamps were issued in 1966 (Bakano) and 1963 (Amhurst Starling) so they might have fallen into the public domain in 2017 and 2014 respectively so long a the designers are truly anonymous, {{PD-UKGov}} would be applicable unless URAA applies to these stamps.
- File:Gambia FDC (27776066925).jpg
- File:Gambia Izard Buzzard (26839455203).jpg
- File:Gambia Bulbo Lacteus (27170415050).jpg
- File:Gambia Bakono Keraa (26837639054).jpg
- File:Gambia Amythest Starling 1 (27375368311).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ww2censor (talk) 21:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Copy of http://a142.idata.over-blog.com/500x285/1/28/85/88/Images-9/Beauvais-06-10-12-2.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 18:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC).
Delete Larger version found here http://www.thomasjoly.fr/article-rappel-plus-que-quelques-jours-pour-reserver-pour-le-dejeuner-conference-avec-johan-livernette-yv-116880153.html, also older - suggesting this image is just repeated a lot and that ours is also a copy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:11, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tsvia Walden
[edit]Blurred, not used. Cannot be used to any educational use. Out of project scope.
-- Geagea (talk) 22:54, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Support Hanay (talk) 06:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:10, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
No source about the layer (the background map) used in this map; it may not be a free content. Kumkum (talk) 23:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal image, selfie, no educational value, self-promotion, out of project scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Lo subí cuando recién me inicié en Wikipedia, haciendo pruebas. El archivo no tiene sentido Remoyromulo (talk) 23:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Lo subí cuando recién me inicié en Wikipedia, haciendo pruebas. El archivo no tiene sentido Remoyromulo (talk) 23:24, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Lo subí cuando recién me inicié en Wikipedia, haciendo pruebas. La foto no es mía Remoyromulo (talk) 23:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. If it's from SOFIA, as claimed, then the license is invalid. SOFIA is not NASA. Jcb (talk) 23:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Poor quality from mass upload. Sitacuisses (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:11, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}