Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![116 File:Jayhawks "Big J" evolution.gif](#File:Jayhawks_"Big_J"_evolution.gif){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Copyright violation The NMI User (talk) 03:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Works from NASA are in the PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Licensed under PD NASA but source specifies an author Christine Churchill. 8.3.123.6 08:38, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation The NMI User (talk) 03:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Works from NASA are in the PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:19, 19 March 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Copyright violation The NMI User (talk) 03:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Works from NASA are in the PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Movie Poster as Fair use and Copyright Tvcccp (talk) 03:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
User 1: Why do I even bother? PokestarFan (talk) 16:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per user's request. --Achim (talk) 19:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete Seems to be a duplicate of File:110th US Congress House of Reps Current.png. PokestarFan (talk) 18:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- PokestarFan, in the future please use {{Duplicate}} for reporting duplicates. --Achim (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: speedily: Obviously not a dupe. --Achim (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
This is apparently an editing mistake, but we don't need a template:early life about humans; early life would be something like single-celled plants. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Abuse of template for promotional purposes. --Achim (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect use of template! Commons is not social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Abuse of template for promotional purposes. --Achim (talk) 19:14, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Incorrect use of template! Commons is not social media. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Abuse of template for promotional purposes. --Achim (talk) 19:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
this is just a joke file by non-sense person because wikipedia use linux-libertine font and this is 3d logo in which the upper a;phabet does not exist Mission Kashmir III (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
This file was initially tagged by Gamma+ as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: delete this is invalid logo you can check this arabic word is flying in air and wikipedia does not accept this kind of logo Achim (talk) 16:41, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Keep I think this could be for arabic wikipedia. PokestarFan (talk) 18:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: incomprehensible deletion nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Used for vandalism Ravave (talk) 07:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Combining two images does not automatically transfer copyright. Green Giant (talk) 11:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This appears to be a scan from a map issued by the Aberdeen Harbour authority. As such it would be licence laundering at Flickr. Even if it was photographed off an outdoor sign, it would not be covered by freedom of panorama in the UK which requires "artistic craftmanship". De728631 (talk) 23:13, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is run by a private company funded by the U.S. Government. Unlike works of the U.S. Government, works produced by contractors under government contracts are protected under U.S. Copyright Law. (See Schnapper v. Foley). Works by LLNL are generally not eligible for PD-USGov-DOE. See Template talk:PD-USGov-DOE#NOTE ON THIS TEMPLATE. Note also that the video itself has a copyright notice at the end. Kaldari (talk) 18:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- I think you meant en:Template talk:PD-USGov-DOE#NOTE ON THIS TEMPLATE. — Jeff G. ツ 01:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Regarding the videos of the test explosions recently digitized by LLNL, copyright status would depend on who originally produced the films (prior to digitization), which is unclear (although it seems plausible they are in fact PD-USGov-DOE). Kaldari (talk) 18:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also, this video was uploaded to YouTube under the 'Standard YouTube License', which is not free enough for the WMF barring an EDP. Furthermore, https://www.llnl.gov/copyright-and-reuse says:
| “ | Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory grants certain permissions to reuse content created by Lawrence Livermore. These permissions are governed by Creative Commons copyright license CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, more commonly referred to as "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike." Under this license, Lawrence Livermore permits others to remix, tweak and build upon original works created by Lawrence Livermore, as long as appropriate credit is given to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, any reuse is not for commercial purposes, and any remixed works are shared under identical copyright terms. | ” |
- That page goes on to explain CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 further. The NC (NonCommercial) aspect of the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license is also not free enough for the WMF barring an EDP. That does not mean this video and the ones to which it refers could not be uploaded to English Wikipedia under their EDP for fair use in articles on nuclear weapons and their testing and proliferation. — Jeff G. ツ 00:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Não autorizado. 179.127.168.51 00:17, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:38, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
COM:Flickrwashing: © Glenn James/NBAE via Getty Image (t) Josve05a (c) 07:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- I doubt intentional flickrwashing, but this is what the EXIF indicates. (t) Josve05a (c) 07:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Duplicado mala calidad Profesionalperuano (talk) 23:32, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept, the file is heavily used and no better file is shown. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
escudo falso Profesionalperuano (talk) 20:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: false or not, it is used. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
duplicado falso mala calidad Profesionalperuano (talk) 23:41, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept, no new arguments, no correct file is shown. The file is used in 3 projects. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
duplicado del escudo ya existente Usuarioperuano2 (talk) 10:45, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Kept, no replacement file is shown, the file is still used in 3 projects. Taivo (talk) 18:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
file in copyviol (no CC license). Danyele (talk) 00:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio from http://f1.dziel-pasje.pl/f1_foto-McLaren_MCL32_01_pktf1_jpg-2017_f1g_prezentacje_f1g_McLaren_f1g_.html. Green Giant (talk) 19:56, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
User 1: I can delete my own userspace PokestarFan (talk) 03:46, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User requested deletion in his own user space. --Achim (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ANIMATION48 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images and artworks. Similar images to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pig48
- File:My soldier pig 2017.jpg
- File:HTFE48 3 RSEP48 sharin ayatsuki pig kangaroo.jpg
- File:Tenya osarui soldier pig kangaroo.jpg
- File:Tora tentsuki soldier pig kangaroo.jpg
- File:Sanjoku utsusami soldier pig bull.jpg
- File:Pig soldier.jpg
- File:Anigif ghost facebooke 2017.gif
- File:Chanon saiwilai fower sakura 2019.png
- File:Chanon saiwilai 2008 in love.jpg
- File:Chanon saiwilai 2008.jpg
- File:จำรัส คำกุร.jpg
- File:Chanon saiwilai 2006.jpg
--ghouston (talk) 02:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lenkastaya (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AE RAJAWI AJT (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on this series which appears to be screenshots and web copies, small sizes, no meta, blurry "televised" appearance, and so on.
- File:Messanger.png
- File:Green boys.jpg
- File:Real player.jpg
- File:RCA.jpg
- File:1DELL1.jpg
- File:DELL2.jpg
- File:DELL5.jpg
- File:DELL 10.jpg
- File:Dell1.jpg
- File:DELL3.jpg
- File:DELL6.jpg
- File:DELL11.jpg
- File:2000DEDE.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. About a dozen uploads on 20 March also need to be looked at. TimothyJosephWood 15:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AE RAJAWI AJT (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted low resolution image.
Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 14:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AE RAJAWI AJT (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted and low resolution images.
- File:Ferdddd.jpg
- File:Messanger.png
- File:Green boys.jpg
- File:Real player.jpg
- File:RCA.jpg
- File:1DELL1.jpg
- File:DELL2.jpg
- File:DELL5.jpg
- File:DELL 10.jpg
- File:Dell1.jpg
- File:DELL3.jpg
- File:DELL6.jpg
- File:DELL11.jpg
- File:2000DEDE.jpg
Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 14:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AE RAJAWI AJT (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-trivial logos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Briser, intérieur 0007.jpg
- File:Ae rajawi ajt.jpg
- File:Rose2005.jpg
- File:FiRE.jpg
- File:WiLD.jpg
- File:Arm fire.jpg
- File:Fire face.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
- File:張崇玹拍戲照12.jpg
- File:張崇玹拍戲照8.jpg
- File:張崇玹拍戲照11.jpg
- File:張崇玹拍戲照6.jpg
- File:張崇玹拍戲照5.jpg
- File:張崇玹拍戲照2.jpg
- File:張崇玹拍戲照1.jpg
- File:張崇玹拍戲照3.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a selfie repository TJH2018talk 01:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 02:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:52, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by P.ryaposov (talk · contribs)
[edit]According to EXIF, the author and copyright holder is Andrey Sipatov. Permission needed.
Яй (talk) 05:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata (the only three photos that have camera metadata were taken with three different cameras; metadata identifies authors by several different names), the nature of several of several of the images, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history.
- File:Le-look-de-pnl-au-we-love-green-2016.jpg
- File:Poterne5.jpg – https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-TmiGhEXUeTI/V1h3oWieRRI/AAAAAAAAJi8/4zSXJwb_sIQ2laxRJcEz2Ru2c0JHylZyQCLcB/s1600/poterne5.jpg, grabbed from http://www.paysbasque1900.com/2016/06/la-poterne-bayonne.html
- File:Place du Réduit après l'effondrement de l'échauguette.jpg
- File:Place du Réduit dans les années 1920.jpg
- File:Porte de France Bayonne.jpg
- File:CPA-Bayonne-le-réduit-et-le-pont-Saint.jpg
- File:Le Roi Léon à Noël 2016.jpg – taken by Bertrand Lapègue according to the metadata and http://www.sudouest.fr/2016/12/13/les-lanternes-eclairent-sur-les-mesures-a-ameliorer-3022475-4018.php
- File:Échauguette de Bayonne.jpg
- File:Lil Wayne in Concert 2.jpg
- File:Zumanjaro-vertical-shot-gondolas-dropping.jpg – taken by Ron Wyatt according to the metadata
- File:Donjon de l'Extrême2.jpg
- File:Donjon de l'Extrême.jpg
- File:Roi Léon en 2007.jpg
- File:Ob 94fe61 canamwywyaaklcs.jpg
- File:Roi Léon.jpg – https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cw5_usbWEAAW1HL.jpg:large, grabbed from https://twitter.com/Fetes_Bayonne/status/796714836507754496
—LX (talk, contribs) 12:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:50, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jamesflare (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos of companies with no apparent notability. Appears to have been uploaded by an SEO spammer for promotional purposes on English Wikipedia. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:31, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete all these images are tagged as All rights reserved on Panoramio and being relatively recent uploads there is no reason to think the images were freely licensed and are now ARR such a short time later.
- File:Church in Bideyiz Village.jpg
- File:Igreja Matriz de Santa Luzia do Norte.jpg
- File:Paprét.jpg
- File:Вид на ліс с. Воронки.jpg
- File:Памятник скульптура-мемориал «Вечный огонь».jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 18:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SANGEETA CHANDORKAR (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hafeezkhan9696 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope, vandalism used for hoax articles on enwiki Acroterion (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope, vandialism used in hoax articles on enwiki Acroterion (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work Discasto talk 23:37, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
not own work Fetx2002 (talk) 13:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Photoshopped duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lho-133A.jpg, no need to have this meme image. Also no indication this uploader created this meme image either. See http://s211.photobucket.com/user/leibrandt/media/LeeHarveyBanjo.jpg.html and https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-v2G_sCLZagw/TwxUGaNVSnI/AAAAAAAAMmY/fTGTioLT0As/w500/lee-harvey-oswald.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work; small size, no exif, found elsewhere on web. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:23, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Non photographic JPG (also wrongly upscaled), replaced by official new PNG version -- User: Perhelion 00:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:23, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Very small file. Can not be used in any wikiproject. Out of scope. -- Geagea (talk) 02:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
I don't know what this image is, but it's not what the caption indicates. The image was used in an article at Simple English Wikipedia that was deleted for being a hoax. Auntof6 (talk) 03:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
looks like screenshot MB298 (talk) 04:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio - photo by Bor Sumrada at summitpost.org, not openly licensed. — Yerpo Eh? 06:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Insufficiently sourced, derived from pinterest Ebyabe (talk) 07:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:24, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Crosswiki spam from MediaWiki.org Mainframe98 (talk) 08:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 09:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:25, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Fair use?? Amyloreha (talk) 10:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Social-worker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims. Previously published elsewhere in higher resolution.
—LX (talk, contribs) 11:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
©onacvg web, presumably Gyrostat (talk) 12:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
G7 own work <7 days. Duplicate of File:Irish Rail logo.svg, discovered when trying to deploy this file. Certes (talk) 12:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
DW rather than own work. No source for the map. Adding a red dot does not make you the author of the map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 12:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
As per [1] uploader is propably not creator, and hasn't established whether photographer has licensed image as CC. Shudde (talk) 12:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Low-resolution pic with no exif data. This image was published in 2012 by alertadigital.com. An OTRS permission is required, since own work is claimed in 2016. Strakhov (talk) 13:19, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:27, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims.
- File:Headrick headshot.jpg – the uploader claims that this is his or her own work, calling him/herself "headrick" in the author field while linking to his/her user page. There is no metadata except for some indications that it's taken from a social media site. Previously published in higher resolution at http://tresvistasrecovery.com/about-us/drug-treatment-team-in-orange-county/ and http://headrickmedicalcenter.com/index.php/our-founder/.
- File:Ameropaheadquarters.jpg – the uploader claims that this is his or her own work, calling him/herself "Zivy" in the author field while linking to his/her user page. According to the metadata, the author is Nicole Miescher-Zivy.
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:31, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Per [2] the uploader has stated they have no COI, and therefore no personal or professional relationship to the subject. Therefore it is unclear how they have managed to obtain this image without some sort of license violation. Incomplete license information therefore nominating to delete. Shudde (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Based on the file format and description, this is presumably not the uploader's own work, but rather a screenshot of non-free content. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:17, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Picture published on several other websites before it was uploaded on Flickr, like this one in 2011 (with ©DR written on the bottom right). No proof it's public domain. No authorization. Titlutin (talk) 14:31, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raúl Díaz de Dios (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Very bad quality. Almost only noise. Not used. DavidIvar (talk) 14:53, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- DeleteI agree. 8mins of audio should not be 122 kilobytes. PokestarFan (talk) 16:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Also, it seems not notable. It is just some guy reading his diary that we cannot hear. PokestarFan (talk) 16:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nhật Tường (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://mblogthumb3.phinf.naver.net/20150804_242/parangbi__1438656743810aDh8L_JPEG/%C2%B1%C3%83%C3%81%C3%9F%C3%80%C3%9C%C3%88%C2%A4%C2%BB%C3%A78.jpg?type=w2.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nhật Tường (talk · contribs)
[edit]Speedy requested Images of United Kingdom royalty are highly unlikely to be own work of this uploader as they include images which are easily recognized as popular images of the family.
- File:The Queen was mostly met with smiles and respectfully muted applause as she viewed the flowers.jpg
- File:Queen and philip.jpg
- File:World war II.jpg
- File:Diana 1984.jpg
- File:Thái hậu.jpg
- File:George vi.jpg
- File:Taiking.jpg
- File:Queen mother.jpg
- File:Molly brown.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Comment File:Queen and philip.jpg is Getty Images #78971286. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:30, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded with the intent to be used solely for purposes of vandalism, personal attack. File name translated from swedish is "sexual harassments?" DavidIvar (talk) 14:58, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:31, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Private image of non notable individual. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Not used. DavidIvar (talk) 15:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:32, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Private image of non notable individual. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Not used. DavidIvar (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Private image. Not used. No useful contributions from user. DavidIvar (talk) 15:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Private image. Not used. No useful contributions from user. DavidIvar (talk) 15:28, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete: The current Panoramio source pages shows an ARR licence but I've also checked all the Wayback Machine archives that go back to 2009, 5 years prior to this being uploaded and they are all ARR. One snapshot was made within 3 weeks of the upload. Despite this being a nice image I doubt it was ever verified to be under a free licence. PCP applies. Ww2censor (talk) 15:35, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete based off of Wayback machine evidence. It was "all rights reserved" both before and after the upload date, and in all other snapshots, making it highly unlikely that it was ever available under such a license. I also second that the precautionary principle should be applied. Opencooper (talk) 15:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Canary Islands (simple).svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:14, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Invalid PD claim. Described as published in the US without a copyright notice, but the stamp on the back of this photo contains French-language text and identifies the magazine where it was published (in 1977) as the French magazine Cine Revue. No evidence of US publication in the relevant time period. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
No information provided regarding the date, place, or manner of original publication. Just an image found online with no verifiable source information The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:32, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
No evidence establishing US publication, or information regarding the date, place, or manner of original publication. Photo has an Australian seller, reducing the likelihood it was intended for US publication. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:37, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of US publication, therefore no valid PD claim. Identified by the ebay seller as a "Spanish press" photo and the stamp on the back of the photo is Spanish-language and appearsw to indicate it was used by a Spanish publication The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
No evidence regarding the date, place or manner of original publication. Just an image found online with no source information. Even if taken in 1919, the date of original publication would be controlling. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Described as "Photo of French actress Jeanne Moreau from a Belgian ladies weekly". No reason to believe the person who uploaded it to Flickr decades later had any authority to license the image. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of US publication, therefore no valid PD claim. Text attached to back of photo is non-English and indicates publication outside the United States. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 18:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
No indication of stated license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IrakliGuna (talk · contribs)
[edit] Delete these two image are found in much higher resolution attributed to © SPUTNİK / SHAHPERİ ABBASOVA" at https://sputnik.az/azerbaijan/20160311/404126051.html, so I doubt the Flickr user is the copyright holder. It looks like flickwashing to me.
Ww2censor (talk) 18:30, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Germany and that the other one of these was nominated by its uploader. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Reklamemarke Kaufhaus Fillisch.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:36, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Illustration, possibly taken from a book. Doubtful own work. Ruthven (msg) 19:17, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Not likely to be uploader's own worlk: a widely reprinted press photograph credited to Justin Lane, EPA (European Press Agency, not US Environmental Protection Agency) Animalparty (talk) 19:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks unlikely to be own work MB298 (talk) 19:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work. MB298 (talk) 19:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:36, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Not own work. MB298 (talk) 19:44, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Not own work. MB298 (talk) 19:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Book scans. See COM:DW.
- File:Слава и гордость аэрофлота в журнале Гражданская Авиация 1985 год.jpg
- File:Газета города Лейпциг.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Photo of a copyrighted character, can be found here among other places. Howicus (Look at what I found!) (talk) 20:21, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Holiday snapshop. Not depicting anybody of encyclopaedic relevance. Zenwort (talk) 20:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Uploader used pic from some website but that photo was taken by Michael McCartney, see for example https://www.amazon.co.uk/Remember-Recollections-Photographs-Michael-McCartney/dp/080502283X Mikano (talk) 21:06, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Uploader just took it from a website that clearly isnt't the rightful owner to that photo. Mikano (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
This image is easily found in much better quality on the web, see for example [3]. Therefore I highly doubt that the uploader is the copyright owner. --King Rk (talk) 21:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
![[3]](http://bigpicture.ru/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/0056.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:21, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. DferDaisy (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep We have an entire Category:Cats on roofs so this image is in the scope of Commons too. And if anyone happens to need an illustration of a greenhouse with a number on it, this photo will also be useful. De728631 (talk) 21:53, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: as per De728631. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work. MB298 (talk) 21:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:39, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. MB298 (talk) 21:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Likely a copyright violation. Derivative of non-free work. The trophy design almost certainly falls under copyright. Levdr1lp / talk 22:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Looks like professional photo. MB298 (talk) 22:36, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Uncorrect license -- Tomasina (talk) 22:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
User:LukePetersen11 is not the author of this work. See here for the logos. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 22:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
![22:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/03/19#c-Corkythehornetfan-2017-03-19T22:59:00.000Z-File:Jayhawks_"Big_J"_evolution.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
![00:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/03/19#c-Daphne_Lantier-2017-03-26T00:40:00.000Z-File:Jayhawks_"Big_J"_evolution.gif){kind=link}
duplicado falso Profesionalperuano (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, the file is used in 6 projects. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Taivo. --Daphne Lantier 00:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
No Existe esta imagen Rujomar (talk) 03:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the redirect if nothing wrong with the name. 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
No evidence of US publication, therefore no valid PD claim. No information regarding the date, place, or manner of original publication. The (handwritten) text on the back of the original photo appears to be Spanish-language, and the ebay seller is located in Argentina. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Image without permission authorized by the author. Pablodiego15 (talk) 09:28, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 19 March 2017 (UTC) This is a method of self-study study references on many documents And went through the experimental process in many customer units and I build it. What is the specific problem of it !?
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:47, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
erreur nom du tableau Roxaneweb (talk) 20:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request shortly after upload. --Jcb (talk) 12:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
erreur de téléchargement de la photo Roxaneweb (talk) 20:31, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request shortly after upload. --Jcb (talk) 12:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, poor quality. DferDaisy (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, poor quality. DferDaisy (talk) 21:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Image without permission authorized by the author. Pablodiego15 (talk) 09:28, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:00, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
|
This file has been superseded by Charter Oak Chair, made from the historical Charter Oak Tree, Hartford, Conn (68389).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
|
.jpg)
|
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Great image, but it appears to be copyrighted by the Imperial War Museum: [4] so unfortunately it isn't a free image. Potentially it could be uploaded to Wikipedia for use with a fair use rationale but it seems unsuitable for Commons. AustralianRupert (talk) 11:17, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- This was the version of the image when nominated: [5]. The uploader has since reverted and updated the file documentation. Happy to withdraw the nom if that resolves the situation, but as far as I can tell the IWM has only published the file with a non-commercial licence, which I believe means it is still incompatible with Commons requirements (which requires a file to be non-commercially and commercially free). Can an admin please clarify the situation? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 12:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Brunei1962IWM.jpeg&oldid=237649127){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:03, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello no explaination was given for its deletion so please restore.
No permission from Pietro Liberati. Jcb (talk) 12:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Fate quello che volete con la foto, visti i precedenti per me potete anche "fumarvela"! (sono anni che non contribuisco più a wiki!) Do what you want with the photo, given the precedents for me, you can ALSO "fumarvela"! (For years now no longer contribute to the wiki!)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Although this was presumably uploaded in good faith, the underlying story which has been recorded is not necessarily out of copyright outside the US, the author died in 1957. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oysteroide (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://dqbxmpf592qhl.cloudfront.net/jpgTK62015030617.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC) @EugeneZelenko: Hi Eugene, re- File:System 7 at the Glade Festival 2004.jpg (photographer Antonio Pagano) re- File:System 7 amami eclipse 2009.jpg (photographer Kotaro Manabe) I have been given express permission by the photographers to use these photos to enhance the System 7 wikipedia page. These photgraphers are friends of System 7 and work closely with them. If you like I can obtain emails from the photographers confirming this. Please do not delete these photos. Thankyou.. Oysteroide (talk) 15:30, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- You need to ask photographers to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). Then you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard with permission review. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Image prise par Fred Renier qui n'est pas la personne qui l'a mise en ligne, il faut une preuve du consentement de l'auteur, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 15:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Invented flag which does not exist in the real world. Its use harms the prestige of WM Commons. E4024 (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: In use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:05, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Google Image Search yields no similar image. User is probably abusing Wikipedia and Commons, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yenicubuk.png. Why does tr:Gemerek, which deals with the district and the town, not contain a flag? Wikiwerner (talk) 11:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 20:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, poor quality. DferDaisy (talk) 21:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- I think the picture is useful and has no problem --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:07, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
|
|
This file has been superseded by Collier's new encyclopedia - a loose-leaf and self-revising reference work with 515 illustrations and ninety-six maps (1921) (14777253902).jpg. It is recommended to use the other file. Please note that deleting superseded images requires consent.
|
_(14777253902).jpg)
|
- Please do not supersede with this scan. You can just post it as an additional version if you wish. It is not cleanly clipped; it is badly named; it offers no advantages over the existing illustration that I see. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 14:41, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 00:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- COM:TOO. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 00:27, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: complex logo, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:15, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Image source: https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/9912/sexaubv_hunter_big.jpg The NMI User (talk) 03:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:17, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of 
(TBHFx). Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 05:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- named better ;) thanks. W!B: (talk) 13:18, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redir. --Wdwd (talk) 13:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Iudexvivorum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not uploader's own work and perhaps still under copyright - please see Google image Amitie 10g (talk) 07:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no reliable information (date, authorship) given: COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Iudexvivorum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not uploader's own work - please see Google image Amitie 10g (talk) 07:41, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Iudexvivorum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not uploader's own work - please see Google image Amitie 10g (talk) 07:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Wrong file format for BSicons; replaceable by File:BSicon WSLa+l grey.svg. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 09:21, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of another image Olsen24 (talk) 19:14, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Which image is that? De728631 (talk) 21:42, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of the file MTA Bus 3803 on the M57 bus route.jpg Olsen24 (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:03, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of another image Olsen24 (talk) 19:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of the file 4122 M57.jpg Olsen24 (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:03, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of another image Olsen24 (talk) 19:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of the file MTA Bus 4859 on the Rockaway Pky bound B6.jpg Olsen24 (talk) 15:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of the file MTA Bus 5721 on the M79 at Broadway Olsen24 (talk) 20:53, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redir. --Wdwd (talk) 13:32, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of the file MTA Bus 5721 on the M79 at Broadway Olsen24 (talk) 20:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep and delete File:MTA Bus 5721 on the M79 at Broadway.jpg instead which is slightly smaller. In this case it's only the matter of a few pixels but we always keep the largest version of a series of duplicate images. De728631 (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, added redirection on Broadway-File. --Wdwd (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Not own work as per EXIF and file size, and the image already found in websites before uploaded here. Do a reverse image search. ~AntanO4task (talk) 08:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, probably taken from [6]. —Vensatry (Ping me) 15:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
![[6]](http://up.bjp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/12474091_939059882797867_4315278126045701750_o.jpg){kind=link}
- Vensatry, do you even checked the date of the link you provided? Even the URL indicates it (2016), and this file has been uploaded in 2010. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- My bad, for some reason 2010 seemed like 2016 to me. Add that to 'recent activism' in the article. —Vensatry (Ping me) 08:48, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Vensatry, do you even checked the date of the link you provided? Even the URL indicates it (2016), and this file has been uploaded in 2010. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Google Image Search didn't returned any results prior to the date of upload (October 2, 2010). Please provide a valid proof of copyvio. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: seems to be own work.--ÂkBY$ 10:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- The current image is a clear copyvios. Look at the edges of the outline of image. It is photoshoped image by removing/changing background. This image is bigger than this image. So, where is original image? Do the reverse image check with this and see the result. The image might have been copied from official site. --~AntanO4task (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- @~AntanO4task: The article is of year 2016.--ÂkBY$ 14:53, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- As the file is attributed as Own work, should be better to request OTRS permission rather than accusing Copyvio. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:10, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- ÂkBY$, how indiatimes gets the image that shows his hand while the current image has cropped image?--~AntanO4task (talk) 02:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Amitie 10g, I have tagged hundred of images for copyvios while they mentioned "own work", and other do the same. You may response the above question if you feel it was not copyvios. The official image has embedded images like slide shows, and I am unable to go through it since it has non-English content. --~AntanO4task (talk) 02:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- No deep research is required to determine it is very likely to be Own work: The copyright disclaimer at the official website says «© 2014,Yogi Aditya Nath. All rights reserved», that matches the subject of the photo; in other words, that is the official website of the person depicted in the photo. Anyway, OTRS permission may be required, but is easier to assume the user assumed good faith when claiming his photo is own work (likely a self-portrait). --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't yet have an opinion on the nomination but I will just like to state that many a times, people change the copyright year when they update the website without much knowledge of the copyright issues involved. As a matter of fact, I do not understand myself either what does changing the year imply. So Amitie's argument that 2014 is mentioned on the official website might not amount to much. We still need to explain as to how the indiatimes photograph has hands too while the one on Commons does not. Rahul Bott (talk) 05:45, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- No deep research is required to determine it is very likely to be Own work: The copyright disclaimer at the official website says «© 2014,Yogi Aditya Nath. All rights reserved», that matches the subject of the photo; in other words, that is the official website of the person depicted in the photo. Anyway, OTRS permission may be required, but is easier to assume the user assumed good faith when claiming his photo is own work (likely a self-portrait). --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Can you answer to my point or not? Don't divert the point.--~AntanO4task (talk) 13:12, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 08:35, 27 March 2017 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Yogi Adityanath.jpg (Missing permission as of 19 March 2017). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:58, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
foto di taglio troppo "professionale", possibile copyviol. Danyele (talk) 00:14, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 00:31, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Signatures in Taiwan are considered as calligraphic work and copyright protected. See Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Momocalbee and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fei Yu-ching's signature 20001017.jpg. Wcam (talk) 03:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's partially in English. The top part doesn't look like his Chinese name, rather a message (though I guess we'd need a Chinese speaker to determine that), which hardly constitutes "calligraphic work". If all else fails, we can keep the English part as his signature. I doubt English letters are considered as calligraphy in Taiwan. Teemeah (talk) 09:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I as a Chinese speaker can confirm that the top part is his name "杰倫". There has been a court ruling that handwriting showing unique characteristics and the creator's creativity is subject to copyright protection. Another ruling established that the handwriting of the English word "Taiwan" is also copyright protected. --Wcam (talk) 19:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure that squiggly line is under the threshold of originality. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The source given is extremely vague. No indication the author is uncredited. I do not believe this really counts as an anonymous work. Possibly unfree in the UK. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- This is a US actor; I don't think it was impossible to obtain a photo that was US-sourced and PD. File:Frankie Darro 1935.jpg Just found this. ;) We hope (talk) 20:24, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The source given is extremely vague. No indication the author is uncredited. I do not believe this really counts as an anonymous work. Possibly unfree in the UK. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:26, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
アップロードを間違えた Yoritsuki (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Usernamekiran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-credible statement appended to one of these three photos " English: Because a similar image was nominated for deletion, and an arrogant rollbacker was not providing me guidance (and possible user-biting) I contacted the actress, requested to wear same clothes and took photograph myself." I think this is highly unlikely and original image from this series is at http://www.bollywoodmantra.com/picture/gehana-vasisth-244/, which is unlikely to be same as uploader.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: thanks for the reply. I saw the image on the link that you provided. But I still stand on my statement, it was me who took that photograph by my camera, thus making me the owner of the copyrights. But as I mentioned earler, I gave this file to the actress first. And for uploading it on wikimedia, I asked her, she consented and sent the file through email. She might have provided this image to bollywoodmantra in the meantime.
- Kindly take the appropriate action that you think suits the best for the situation here.
.
The old saying "beauty and brains dont reside at same place", i think it is correct for most of the times.
The pun is at the actress, who happens to be my friend as well (I am not a professional photographer).
I apologise for all the trouble I caused regarding this image. - As I took the photo myself, the copyrights belong(ed) to me. Even when I asked her her explicitly if the image was uploaded to internet, she said no. Thats why I uploaded it on wikimedia. It was because of her this (inaccurate) statement that I held my grounds, and requested for re-consideration on deletion. I apologise again.
- PS: I uploaded another image of her again, would you please take a look if that image is okay on legal levels?
- Thanks a lot, and I apologise again. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: The image has been marked as OTRS received. ticket:2017031910005101.
- But again, kindly take aprropriate action that the situation calls for. I have already proved myself as an idiot due to this image issue. This whole scenario has been humiliating for me.
—usernamekiran (talk) 19:30, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- The statement that an OTRS ticket was received (by me) simply acts to delay a deletion for no permission, it does not establish that the permission is sufficient (I do not claim to have attempted to check). - Reventtalk 00:09, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Revent: i know
What is supoosed to be the next event now? —usernamekiran (talk) 12:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Usernamekiran: This DR is going to end long before the ticket gets to the front of the OTRS queue. - Reventtalk 19:41, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Revent: Now I think the image should be deleted. Would you please delete it? I'm sorry for all the trouble. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Revent: i know
- The statement that an OTRS ticket was received (by me) simply acts to delay a deletion for no permission, it does not establish that the permission is sufficient (I do not claim to have attempted to check). - Reventtalk 00:09, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:54, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially copyright isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
There is no indication why the COM:COPYVIO tag was removed from this file; which if nothing else is a recent colorization of an older image or a more recent painting. There's no provenance information on the image at all, and yes the gentleman died long ago, but that doesn't guarantee the image is contemporary with his life dates.. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of the file MTA Bus 5898 on the M79 at Broadway Olsen24 (talk) 20:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of the file MTA Bus 5898 on the M79 at Broadway Olsen24 (talk) 20:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Redundant. Superseded by similar image with colors: File:Galt Collegiate.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Ce fichier est protégé par un copyright détenu par les ayant-droit du dessinateur créateur. Vulson (talk) 21:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Encore faudrait-il identifier le dessinateur créateur... ou qu'il se manifeste ! Ce dessin représente en tout cas une réalité qui n'est pas sous copyright. --Cyril-83 (talk) 06:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:15, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
