Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 13th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of http://www.mqminternational.org/images/video/thumbnail/BusinessMeeting.jpg Fences and windows (talk) 22:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.Tryphon 08:57, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reinstatement of image deleted following deletion request: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Paulharding150. Possible copyright violation from specified source. However, the uploader has now linked to a copyright statement that may be acceptable, [1]. Verbcatcher (talk) 11:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: reuploaded after a deletion, furthermore the link providded say "reproduced accurately", that mean "no derivative, and this is not allowed here. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a news image: http://gshow.globo.com/programas/video-show/Bau-TV/noticia/2015/02/veja-e-compare-elenco-de-mulheres-de-areia-22-anos-depois-da-estreia.html Ytoyoda (talk) 17:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fotografía de una transmisión de TV Genericool (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fotografía de una publicación impresa recientemente Genericool (talk) 17:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just a cart. --Yann (talk) 20:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arturo mochelena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these cartoons, title images, tiny photos of people, and so on.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:18, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in addition complex logos and studio photo credited to Diego Velasquez. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Facebook file, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as copyright violation, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Adris Frety..jpg due to same reason. They depict a non-notable artist. Article project about him was rejected a year ago. I deleted all art of the painter speedily as copyright violations, because "own work" was not acceptable license. OTRS-permission is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as copyright violation: Facebook file. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, almost totally black, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:43, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Horst Eichhorn isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in de.wiki. Small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josh5678 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader has constantly removed the categories to these images and has started separate deletion requests citing personal info .... And with good reason! - The dozy uploader has left the coords in on the images which seems to pinpoint his house location and not where the image was taken, Unless there's a way to remove the coords then I would suggest these be deleted due to privacy/security concerns, Thanks,

Davey2010Talk 20:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • That explains why the locations were off. It's pretty simple to use exiftool to strip out GPS data (exiftool -geotag= your_filename.jpg). I can take care of that; someone should still suppress the old revisions. Mackensen (talk) 03:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, as much as I understand, new versions are uploaded with better EXIF. Now I can delete older revisions and keep newer ones. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It contains a complex logo, and it is not de minimis Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as photographer's copyright violation. Facebook file, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - external source - no permission. — TBhagat (talk) 06:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martin Couceiro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in November 2016 as spam. Out of project scope.

xplicit 06:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of scope and copyvios too. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not a place to advertise and out of project scope. xplicit 06:43, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Az Futuro isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in de.wiki. In addition, the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused screenshot of number matrix; no use apparent; can easily be replaced by wiki markup Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Madson Moreira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the Portuguese Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in May 2015 as spam and non-notable. Out of project scope.

xplicit 07:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused screenshot of number matrix; no use apparent; can easily be replaced by wiki markup Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted via deletion discussion in December 2016. Out of project scope. xplicit 07:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Leyo 08:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Facebook file, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hannolans as no permission (No permission since) Hannolans (talk) 23:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: License review: Non-free license, or license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low scale duplicate of File:Logoestia.png. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:Estia modif.png due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Must be deleted because a clear and bit higher resolution svg file exists in Commons i.e, File:Android Logo (2014).svg.  HPD   talk  13:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page clearly states usage of the android typeface is forbidden: https://developer.android.com/distribute/tools/promote/brand.html Cityuser (talk) 09:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, textlogo. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 09:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also another promotional file of spiritual life coach file:Tuulas.jpg. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:37, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has a copyright notice. WDCDECDCDC (talk) 10:51, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, "© mysticalpics.ch" Taivo (talk) 11:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2015 film-not own work and copyrighted. We hope (talk) 11:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I deleted speedily or nominated for deletion most uploads of the user. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work-[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chehra_(2013_film) 2015 film and copyrighted. We hope (talk) 11:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, posters can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free album cover 淺藍雪 11:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also poster file:Tini - Violettina proměna (Czech Logo).jpg. Posters and album covers can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission from copyright holder. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 13:29, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:00, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. XXN, 13:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Can you provide more evidence about your assumption @XXN: ? If yes, please enter more information about the Copyright infringement and Copyright holder details for further community investigation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.227.40.207 (talk • contribs)
@37.227.40.207: Precautionary principle. --XXN, 15:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:06, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 13:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image - out of project scope. XXN, 13:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted emblem. No evidence that it is released under a creative commons license. Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, 1961 organization, so the logo is not in PD due to age. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:31, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's either a non free logo or a personal artwork. Neither are allowd. Natuur12 (talk) 14:07, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:38, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - external source - no license - no permission. — TBhagat (talk) 06:18, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:47, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because i am in this photo and i dont wont to be on google. Please delete this photo now 94.69.95.120 07:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do so. The uploader -- Kürschner (talk) 07:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete this photo now please i dont want to be on google. Gliagias 94.69.95.120 07:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same here. Delete my photos immediately. I dont want to be on google 94.69.95.120 07:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Protected by copyright: http://www.a12.com/files/media/originals/mg_2215.jpg Py4nf (talk) 11:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Protected by Copyright: http://www.a12.com/noticias/detalhes/dom-darci-nicioli-toma-posse-na-arquidiocese-de-diamantina-mg Py4nf (talk) 12:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work": published in 2013 by http://www.arquidiocesebh.org.br/site/noticias.php?id_noticia=5296 Py4nf (talk) 12:10, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be "own work": http://www.ctv.va/content/ctv/it.html Py4nf (talk) 12:17, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 14:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, very pooe quality. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 14:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, really bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, bad composition. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I did not understand, what is depicted. Description and categories were not helpful. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atahzmania (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not your personal free web host and Commons is not an amateur porn site against COM:NUDE

Tiven2240 (talk) 06:04, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, mostly small photos without metadata. All big photos are credited to Odintheviking. Some photos have different watermarks, some have even © on photo. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission under Creative Commons at the source website http://visnyk.ua/uk/news/1-ukrayinska-ekonomika-yak-poznachilosya-zovnishnye-pokraschennya (it says Всі права захищені, which means All rights reserved). Internet Archive could not find any evidence of permission in the history either NickK (talk) 15:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. I'll delete also derivative work file:Роман Насіров.jpg. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i will add another one, this is some mistake , i have to delete Khoshhat (talk) 16:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally chose the version of this image with one of my friends in it, rather than the version with no people. I do not have her permission to post her image on Commons. Runner1928 (talk) 16:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, nobody is identifiable here, but ... uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from https://twitter.com/ssaribi/status/809980511145758720 Ytoyoda (talk) 16:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://twitter.com/ssaribi/status/803063250703126528 Ytoyoda (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File name, and FMBD in meta show this was in and out of Facebook before upload here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Facebook file. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable logo, unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the organization is not mentioned neither in en:Lado nor in es:Lado. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused second frame of File:Eriko Hatsune (24096322835).jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused copy. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. На фото стоить знак копирайта LITTLE FURRY Dogad75 (talk) 17:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, watermark "© Little Furry". Taivo (talk) 11:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Era una prova e non intendevo renderla permanentemente disponibile Rb19460609 (talk) 17:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Did not crop gallery at bottom. Will re-add cropped photo. Please delete this version. Billmckern (talk) 18:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

promotional meterial, not used Avron (talk) 19:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:RAMT.png as unused art of non-notable artist. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ej0b (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably a copyvio, requesting deletion per COM:PCP These images are likely to be Papa John's promotional content, and are unlikely to be self-published by Ej0b. File:Gdfgsdgfsdfgsdfgsdfgsdfg.jpg was found on https://papajohns.ie/about-papajohns/, and File:A starving african child begging an upper class citizen of Ethiopia for some memes.png may be from a commercial.

Sunmist (talk) 20:59, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 21:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gilfrido Derecho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very low resolution (150px square pictures), missing EXIF details - questionable authorship. Also, in such resolution some of these photos are unclear and does not have encyclopaedic value, thus being out of project scope.

XXN, 21:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all his contributions as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, likely out of scope. Sunmist (talk) 21:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyright violation, the uploader's only contribution. Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 14:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erenn BülBül (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted content.

XXN, 21:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 21:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-Indian event (Cape Town, South Africa) and so not covered by the Bollywood Hungama OTRS ticket. - Reventtalk 21:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 21:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:História Panasqueira José Luis C.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:27, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cajorys (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The camera detail's (metadata) show that the author is kore and in the information the uploader has written as self

Tiven2240 (talk) 05:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I added 4 photos for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I guess, this one is promotional image. Seems like Advertising purpose. Out of scope. — TBhagat (talk) 06:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Spam. --Achim (talk) 15:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by PrashantMahajan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luismendez17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FrostedH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://fundacionmaradentro.cl/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/uah.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JWeathers (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo images. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, all copyvios. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Quiqueflores1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://ilarge.lisimg.com/image/8453419/768full-paola-longoria.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:58, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jossartgallery (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted as non-notable in January 2016. Additionally, as most are works of art, COM:OTRS is required. Out of project scope.

xplicit 07:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lionkruce (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flag doesn't exist. Someone has "invented" a series of flags that do not exist and the people in Dutch WP have accepted them without any investigation. E4024 (talk) 14:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. but the file is used in nl.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: It's not the task of Commons administrators to tell Dutch (=nl) wiki which images they should use. --Jcb (talk) 01:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Asad Mahmood Arain

[edit]

Here are all uploads of Asad Mahmood Arain (talk · contribs):

Unused perosnal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nutrello (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional uploads, COM:PACKAGING, COM:ADVERTising.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 夢之助 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, images credited to "soshi", various cameras - no indication of user's own work other than license.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ennarportfolio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

looks for me like promotional material, not used in artickles

Avron (talk) 19:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 21:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 21:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photoshopped picture - out of scope. XXN, 21:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 22:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 22:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 22:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Upscaled low-resolution photo, unlikely to be uploader's own work. XXN, 22:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely out of scope too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GromFallen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unidentified logos of unclear notability - out of project scope.

XXN, 22:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nueva versión en File:SANJOSEmunicipiosLibertad.svg CITY MVD (talk) 00:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment But the file is still used in 2 projects. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Suhaib aghbari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old images with watermark, poster movie stil - stolen in all possible kinds of images

Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook sized, no indication of user's own work, other uploads were speedy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is obviously not the user's "own work". Thus, the copyright status is unclear 86.20.193.222 02:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!I'm the guy who put it. I do not own Coptic 21.jpg but the person who drew it, Tony Rezk allows the Orthodox Coptic Church to put the icons in their churches. He signs his name in all of his Icons. (Including this one.) And thus owns ownership. However, Icons are simply used for memorizing a saint(or more) and can be put anywhere. In churches, articles, newspapers, houses and I think it shall also be used in Wikipedia as well. The image which I got was the first result in google images, there were also many other images of the SAME icon, yet they don't have a copyright on it. If you guys want me to change the picture, I can change it slightly to "claim it as mine." I also want to say that in order to recognize these important martyrs, we have to keep them in out hearts, which is why draw icons. Everyone should be able to see the icon freely and I think Wikipedia is a great place to see it.

Your Wikipedia-er, Mr.Muddy Pig — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrMuddyPig (talk • contribs)

P.S: If you want to contact me, edit this page. And please don't delete the icon when there's other solutions.

 Delete. Tony Rezk should send OTRS-permission. And if you slightly modify the file, then you cannot claim own work, because it will remain derivative work. Please sign your posts using four tildes: ~~~~. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Requires a free license from the artist using OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" declaration is in contradiction with license template used (which require published source) Ankry (talk) 02:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I added a photo for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its not in the village specified in the title. Mistaken upload related to another village. Vin09 (talk) 03:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This is not a reason to delete, because we can always rename files. Which village the photo was made in? In addition, the file is used in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: THis is in scope -- he's a Bollywood actor -- but a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Also copyright violation: per EXIF, author is Duriya. Taivo (talk) 10:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Very much in scope -- see François Hauter, but as noted by Taivo, the EXIF shows an author different from the uploader. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:50, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Article about depicted person is nominated for deletion in ne.wiki due to non-notability. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Small photo without metadata, own work is not sure. Depicted person en:Draft:Professor Dr. Md. Anwarul Islam is borderline notable. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Again, in scope, but copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 21:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Author and copyright holder Athar Qadri. Taivo (talk) 14:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sree Vasista (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted book covers, COM:DW.

XXN, 21:29, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not from the 'parties and events' section of the BH website, and so not covered by the OTRS ticket as we interpret it. As a 2003 image, it probably does not belong to BH, but is instead licensed by them. It's unfortunate that BH does not attribute such material. - Reventtalk 21:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I wasn't aware of the situation until another pic from BH in 2003 got deleted. Anyway, like the other one, we are not sure about it, so probably delete. – Frankie talk 22:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not of educational importance, not clearly a Mainline Vin09 (talk) 04:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. Clearly can be categorized into category:Fences in India, but quality is not the best. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: general scenery, in scope. P 1 9 9   14:44, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low resolution, many better files in this cat Oursana (talk) 05:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. But the file is used in 3 projects, apparently its quality is not so bad. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   14:45, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 06:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:45, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, and no info on photoshopped images Monfulta (talk) 06:17, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test image; no use apparent Jochen Burghardt (talk) 06:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the Bahasa Indonesian Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in December 2015 as non-notable. Out of project scope. xplicit 07:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknow author, not sure licence is available Presse82 (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Source – archive, author – unknown. As depicted person died in 1945, the photo can be in PD due to age, but more information is needed. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Strooitje

[edit]

Strooitje (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Unused art of non-notable artist (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in nl.wiki) is generally considered out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Commons is not for publishing own artwork. P 1 9 9   14:48, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Amir.delhi

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Amir.delhi (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable violation of personality rights. --Leyo 08:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Personality rights warning template is enough. Taivo (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   14:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Sedat,demirci

[edit]

Here are all uploads of Sedat.demirci (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Different resolutions and cameras, mostly small size, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of GulGeGul

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of GuLGeGuL (talk · contribs):

Unused signatures of non-notable person, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image is out of scope - it was once used on an eswiki user page as if it was a social media page but has been removed from there twice, apparently by the user with a 2nd userid - little if any educational value Ww2censor (talk) 11:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncertain copyright status, image from forum http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=249417&page=115 Hzh (talk) 11:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The uploader was previously warned not to upload copyvios and now I blocked him for a week. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MGMEDIOS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope.

Яй (talk) 12:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. XXN, 12:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality private photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 13:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 13:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. XXN, 13:40, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo - out of project scope. XXN, 13:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This crest has been altered to contain the statement "Hilter Did Nothing Wrong, The South Will Rise Again". If possible, can we obtain the user name of the person who uploaded this to wikimedia? It makes us look terrible! 170.185.83.19 13:43, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cdn.colombia.com/sdi/2015/10/15/1bb2337105bb471fa3f9ce17b777cb88.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 15:50, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, perhaps intended for a tutorial, but not apparently necessary now that PubMed has changed its app. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es gibt neuere/bessere Versionen auch hinsichtlich der Bildqualität Turmi (talk) 18:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Here I agree with nomination. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es gibt bessere und genügend Versionen, überflüssig Turmi (talk) 19:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, yes, quite bad quality. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, alternatives available. P 1 9 9   15:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', for instance, thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify claimed 'own work' - your opinions ? See also File:Lockhart Tea Plantation Experience.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 20:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, readily found on the internet. P 1 9 9   15:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started as imho rather content - see also related uploads - of personal interest, but also personality rights isusses, and missing EXIF data to veryfiy claimed 'own work', doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons. file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: pls see also File:Lockhart Hill Munnar.jpg, and imho potentially also affected File:Lockhart Tea Plantation Walk.jpg, File:Lockhart Plantation Trek.jpg,File:Polaris ATV Track at Lockhart Munnar.jpg, File:ATV Track at Lockhart Munnar.jpg, File:17 C Camping Munnar.jpg, File:Campers at 17 C Camping.jpg, File:17 C Camping Munnar - Campfire.jpg, File:17 C Camping Munnar- Campers enjoying.jpg, File:17 C Camping Munnar - Overlooking Chokarmudy Hill.jpg, File:Lockhart Tea Factory, Munnar.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 20:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Taivo (talk) 14:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: only the original nominated file. The other files didn't have deletion warnings and some are in scope. P 1 9 9   15:18, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax image, it's actually just File:Cheese Curds with scale measurement.png but reversed. Seeing as it's just an existing image that has been reversed, it should be deleted. Sunmist (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Generic picture of an unidentified bird (a seagull?) with a watermark and no description. Oaktree b (talk) 22:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tag for removing watermark, add a category for Unidentified birds, and  Keep image. There are no problems with COM:EDUSE, probably. Someone will identify this bird;)--XXN, 22:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per User:XXN. Removal of watermark is allowed, since license allows adaptations. P 1 9 9   15:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

may not be allowed Hartman456 (talk) 23:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mifciw

[edit]

Mifciw (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Mostly small photos and (with one exception) without camera data. Different resolutions, one is credited to another person. I suspect not own work, but other photographers copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:48, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It should be a proper table in the article. NOT an image. SkywalkerPL (talk) 17:10, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Replace it, then DR it. INeverCry 04:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image replaced by wikitable at ca:Soil Moisture Active Passive Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I added an unused copy for deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image replaced with wikitable at en:Academic grading in Nepal Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Princenasir288

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Princenasir288 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. Own work is under doubt, probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image replaced with wikitable at en:Prelog strain Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by William Schnabel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted book covers.

XXN, 13:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jose Reinan Ramos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.colorretalcirurgia.com.br/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/drreinan1-625x321.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

VisitFlorida is a corporation that is a private/public partnership, not a division of Florida's state government so the provided license does not apply Ytoyoda (talk) 14:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but this looks like a modern architecture and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Greece. A.Savin 15:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This picture does not violate any Greek copyright law as it is certainly an "occasional" reproduction of a work, as I explain in the following lines.

I copy from the relevant Commons page [[2]]: "It remains unclear what exactly "occasional/casual reproduction and communication by the mass media" (η περιστασιακή αναπαραγωγή και διάδοση με μέσα μαζικής επικοινωνίας) encompasses.

Well, to any Greek native speaker, like me, the meaning of the adjective "περιστασιακή" (peristasiakí) that precedes "αναπαραγωγή" (reproduction) is not at all unclear: it simply means "not occurring on a regular basis", or "not frequent" if you like. It is the only apropriate opposite to the word "τακτική" which is most of the times translated as "regular". So it also means "not regular".

If something happens on a daily basis (eating breakfast, going to school etc), it is regular and not occasional. If something takes place every single year (spending a few summer days in Greece or Spain), it is also not occasional. If something happened twice in one's lifetime, like getting married, it is certainly and logically "not regular". People usually do not get married "on a regular basis". If something only happened once ("John's Grandpa died last year") it is certainly not regular.

Now, the action in question is REPRODUCING pictures of modern buildings that are someone's work and of Onassio Hospital in particular. I only reproduced once a picture of Onassio; I do not do it on a regular basis! Something cannot possibly be "regular" or "frequent" if it only happens once! And to anyone who will point out that it is difficult to interpret "legal texts" one could respond "Why did you translate legal texts in the first place, then?"

Another sentence on the Commons page [[3]]: "Even if "communication by the mass media" is seen as an extension of mere "reproduction", the interpretation of "occasional/casual" reproduction remain to be clarified by jurisdiction or an scholarly interpretation."

It is perfectly clear that the above "remain to be clarified" is just an expectation and the Greek courts are infamous for the speed of dealing with any case. Until clarification on a certain subject is given by a Court of Law (and maybe that never happens!), one retains a right to do something unless it is explicitly prohibited.That is a really basic principle.

CONCLUSION: Anyone (including me) has a right to "occasionally" reproduce images of buildings like Onassio Hospital, without having to ask for permission due to copyright issues. If a reproduction of a certain building (via photography, for example) only takes place once by one person, it is without any doubt an occasional action.

Argos 04:47, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me Argos, but this all is irrelevant, since pictures on Commons should be eligible for any reproduction, including commercial usage (see COM:Licensing). Uploading a picture of Onassio Hospital is legal, but hosting it on Commons under CC-BY(-SA) License is not, as long as there is no FoP in Greece and the architect has not been dead for at least 70 years. --A.Savin 03:22, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Dear A.Savin, you may disagree with my point of view, but I hold that there is in fact FoP in Greece as long as reproduction is "occasional"; that is not at all irrelevant. What I simply say is that according to Greek Law, as mentioned on Commons:FoP#Greece [[4]], " occasional reproduction and communication by the mass media of images of architectural works [...] which are sited permanently in a public place [like Onassio], shall be permissible, without the consent of the author and without payment ". In other words, there is no need for Lisence, because the reproduction of Onassio by photographic means is not regular; it would be regular, if I took photographs on a daily basis, on a weekly basis etc. If you take or reproduce pictures "every now and then", then you only do it occasionally. --Άργος (talk) 19:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Άργος, actually the key words are "by the mass media of images". With a free license you can't assure that the photo will be reproduced only by the mass media of images. And a photo available in a non-free license isn't eligible in Commons. --C messier (talk) 23:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Images here must be free for any and all use, not merely occasional use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits ANDY HOLDSWORTH Ytoyoda (talk) 16:50, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits photo to Yoon S.K Ytoyoda (talk) 16:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely taken from http://liza.ua/fashion/trends/anastasiya-ivanova-predstavit-svoyu-kollektsiyu-na-ukrainskoy-nedele-modyi/ Ytoyoda (talk) 16:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits SEBASTIAN SONNTAG Ytoyoda (talk) 17:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits SEBASTIAN SONNTAG Ytoyoda (talk) 17:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alambreproducciones (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work, professional shoots. These uploads are of small size and very poor quality, unlikely to be own work of the actual photographer, also note account name, promotional!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this obviously older photograph. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pakistannews (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files seemed to be taken from twitter profile of the person. All pictures from the net are not free

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 17:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of a 1993 work of art (artwork is in the Smithsonian's collection, which may factor into this) Elisfkc (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Megalibrarygirl: The issue there is that the Flickr uploader is on our bad authors list for Flickr Washing. It is not your fault, as UploadWizard doesn't check the source or anything. In the future thought, I'd suggest using Flickr2Commons, as it will check the source (against the list), bring in the correct license, and the largest size of the image. Elisfkc (talk) 17:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK! I'll try using the Flickr2Commons next time, Elisfkc. I'm very much a novice with the images. I get excited when I find something I think I can use on Wikipedia to go with an article I or another editor is writing. :) I appreciate the advice! Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Focused on copyrighted material. Not de minimis. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, here's nothing except copyrighted material. No freedom of panorama in Japan for 2-dimensional work. Taivo (talk) 12:21, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete useless file. Esby (talk) 22:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Balloon. Yann (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Previous images of this same balloon have been deleted (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PanoraMagique at Disneyland Paris). Elisfkc (talk) 21:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's an error. We have many pictures of balloons more complex than that, even in France: Category:Hot air balloons of France. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Balloons are also copyrightable. Balloons in these categories are either very simple or very old. In my opinion this design is not simple. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What about File:Montgolfière survolant le pays de Forcalquier.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Leon hot air balloon festival 2010.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Leon international hot air ballon festival nov 2012.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hot air balloon sans darth vader.jpg, and Category:Special shape hot air balloons? Regards, Yann (talk) 14:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Other stuff exists is never a valid argument. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:38, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 19:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 14:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 16:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:33, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 15:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:49, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:32, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no COM:FOP in France; recent building and park. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France & images of copyrighted characters of the Walt Disney Company

Elisfkc (talk) 19:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Just a car. Yann (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France & copyrighted character Elisfkc (talk) 19:29, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep General view, and nothing with a copyright. Yann (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. The file was once kept as general view and in my opinion this was right decision. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The only thing with a copyright here is behind a tree and far away. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Amitie 10g: Pretty sure that FOP overrides quality image. Elisfkc (talk) 02:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The question is why tyou thing FOP applies here? --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is a piece of complex art. Elisfkc (talk) 02:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: FOP does not apply -- there is no FOP in France. Ordinary copyright does apply. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, см. http://www.redgp.ru/?lightbox=dataItem-iwccl6c7, http://www.nashermak.ru/anons-pervogo-matcha-sezona-ermak-sokol/ Dogad75 (talk) 19:50, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Surely promotional, not own work. Taivo (talk) 13:21, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The video includes content from SpaceX webcast (e.g. rocket landing views) that is not available under PD-NASA. Similar videos have been deleted before. Msaynevirta (talk) 20:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was previously published elsewhere online, such as at Twitter and here. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 21:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a painting (it's not in the public domain yet) - derivative work. --XXN, 21:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a painting - derivative work. XXN, 21:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Baba black (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, no permission. See also File:Film Invasion LA Q A.jpg.

Yann (talk) 21:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture published on several other websites, like this one. No OTRS authorization. // Image publiée sur de nombrex autres site comme celui-ci : une autorisation par OTRS est nécessaire. Habertix (talk) 22:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine Dogad75 (talk) 23:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely claim of own work on this file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Eileen, you have the wrong woman. This book is by Charlotte Champe Stearns Eliot, mother of TS Eliot. She's as American as apple pie. However that is moot. It's a 1926 work, so it may well still be under copyright if there was notice and renewal, but this image shows nothing copyrightable -- the first five lines don't have one and the rest is completely illegible. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:13, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Iowa does not release its images into the public domain unless they are Legislative portraits, which this is not. MB298 (talk) 23:43, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — TBhagat (talk) 06:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — TBhagat (talk) 06:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Music from iMovie (Apple Inc.) may be "licensed", but I doubt under CC-By-SA 3.0. App icons in the beginning of the video (0:02) is copyrighted logos. (tJosve05a (c) 06:45, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This can be deleted, it is no longer needed and was replaced by a professional video from Victor with correct attributions and music licenses. I'd delete it myself but I can't figure out how.


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Marbuzpin

[edit]

Here are both contributions of MARBUZPIN (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Josy buhr

[edit]

Here are both uploads of Josy buhr (talk · contribs):

OTRS-permission from author Di Messina is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image consists TM and uploaded without permission ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another version of the image has been uploaded the trademark watermark has been removed which will not change the copyright of the image please stop uploading copyrighted images --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Svarog1

[edit]

Svarog1 (talk · contribs) uploaded these images:

Svarog1 has problems with copyright (look his/her talk page). The photos are small and if camera data exist, then always different. I suspect not own work, but other photograüher's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Adriana Muñoz Gonzalez

[edit]

Adriana Muñoz Gonzalez (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

First group. Uploader is herself depicted, so own work is under doubt and I suspect copyright violation.

Second group. In my opinion here uploader is not depicted, but as the photos are similar to first group, maybe they are not own work anyway. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Luca-marchi

[edit]

Luca-marchi (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Small photos without metadata, one is credited to another person. Probably all copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mdseverson

[edit]

Mdseverson (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Small unused photos without metadata, probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of PrawicaComPL

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of PrawicaComPL (talk · contribs):

Historical photos, own work is under doubt. Who is the photographer? When and where the photos were first published? Taivo (talk) 10:18, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Pvirginiopinho

[edit]

Here are last remaining contriubtions of Pvirginiopinho (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.editionsdelamartiniere.fr/ouvrage/nouveau-manuel-d-histoire/9782732480275 (always the same with propagandist, here SOS éducation) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 10:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.. This image infringes on the creator's copyright. Also, the image has no categories and no location, so it is not useful. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncertain copyright, image appears to have been taken from forum - http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1641957&page=160 Hzh (talk) 11:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for billboards (not permanent in public space) Wdwd (talk) 12:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 3carb3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable authorship. Low resolution picture in 3 edited versions, obviously cropped from a bigger old photo.

XXN, 12:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gregorcollins (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works. Painter - Ruth Rogers-Altmann (December 31, 1917 – October 11, 2015). These works aren't in public domain.

XXN, 12:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I added a painting from same artist for deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has been previously published at various locations online, such as here and here. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 13:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims this is own work and was taken in 2017; photo is evidently quite old, so date is wrong, and image was probably made before uploader was born. No exif metadata, plenty of reason to delete per precautionary principle. KDS4444 (talk) 13:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Depicted person died in 1992. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)}}[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:43, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Screen grab from the series, not the work of the uploader. Example can be seen 1:07 into this on YouTube. Authoritative source example at http://www.hbo.com/ballers, but that is behind a registration (not pay) wall. Hammersoft (talk) 14:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the University of Michigan digital library, no indication that the license is valid: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/b/bhl/x-bl013332/bl013332 Ytoyoda (talk) 14:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ANDRESPAZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.andresexposito.es/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/foto3b2.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From a paywalled paper, I doubt this is CC licensed. FunkMonk (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it if you will. It was mostly posted to show the reference to the commission pic
Well, that should never be done with false licensing. If you want to upload copyrighted images so you can post links, you can use Imgur FunkMonk (talk) 17:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото ищется до загрузки на Викисклад https://sport.nur.kz/1311708-gennadiy-golovkin-khochu-v-sleduyushchem-go.html, http://vesti.kz/profi/213113/, http://sport.bigmir.net/boks/profi/1756201-Trener-Golovkina--Glupo-bit--Uorda--chtoby-drat-sja-s-Mejvezerom. Dogad75 (talk) 15:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos are all derivative of the relief sculptures on the plaques. I can't think of any reason the sculptures would be in the public domain, as the first players weren't inducted until 1936, which is well after the U.S. PD-old date.

Powers (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I totally agree with Beyond My Ken - Fma12 (talk) 15:36, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well that's funny, because I asked him for clarification but haven't gotten a reply yet... so I guess I should ask the same question of you. What is it about these plaques that exempt them from our interpretation of current law? Powers (talk) 02:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Some time ago, I went through this category and DRed all of the plaques that either had notice or fell in the period when no notice was required. All of the remainder, including these, had no notice and were put up before March 1 1989. Therefore, while both the sculpture and the text would have a copyright, the plaques are all PD-Nonotice. Note please, that it is only this technicality that saves them. "Ordinary common sense" has little to do with copyright law, particularly USA copyright law. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of these people were inducted into the baseball Hall of Fame after 1989. Therefore, no notice was required for their plaques to have a US copyright. These images infringe on those copyrights. All of the other HOF plaques (I think) are from the period when notice was required and therefore are OK for Commons.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the original en-wiki uploader owns the copyright, as the photograph seems to give credit to the subhject Ytoyoda (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechte Bildqaulität, überflüssig Turmi (talk) 19:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Uploader's request 1½ years after uploading. Normal quality, no similar photos in the category. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Taivo. --Daphne Lantier 18:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright by Level 5 / Nintendo. Grueslayer (talk) 20:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by similar image, which is sharper: File:ரயில்.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete both. Per COM:PACKAGING OTRS-permission from toymaker is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicated photo. I (the photographer that owns the copyright uploaded it wrong 2 times. Sorry and thanks!) JFer (talk) 22:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded twice the photo for the same article. Sorry! Thanks. JFer (talk) 22:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pamphlet is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 23:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. [5] [6] G I Chandor (talk) 23:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. G I Chandor (talk) 23:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture published on other websites, like this one. No OTRS authorization. // Photo déjà publiée sur d'autres sites, comme celui-ci. Une autorisation par OTRS est nécessaire Habertix (talk) 23:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. The logo is textlogo and not copyrightable, but what about plaque below it? If its artist is Leonardo da Vinci, then its copyright is expired. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I agree, if it is a da Vinci work, then it is PD -- I suspect someone will come up with the answer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jameslwoodward: it's not, that's the Astro Orbiter vehicle (I linked to the category for the California version, fyi). Elisfkc (talk) 01:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and my comment above. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced image with wikitable in en:Software patent Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:53, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced image by wikitable in en:Ochratoxin A Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image replaced by wikitable on en:Computation of radiowave attenuation in the atmosphere Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image replaced by wikitable at et:Takso Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replace image by wikitable at uk:Аналіз функціональних точок Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image replaced by wikitable at uk:Аналіз функціональних точок Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replace image by wikitable at uk:Аналіз функціональних точок Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image replaced by wikitable at uk:Аналіз функціональних точок Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image replaced by wikitable at uk:Аналіз функціональних точок Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete. Out of scope, un-educational. Very bad quality photo of object, that finally bears a weak resemblance to the famous en:Spoonmaker's Diamond of Topkapi Museum (for comparison see this). Seems the statement by user H. Gouvas: "I (Harry Gouvas) created this work entirely by myself" is literally true, meaning that this is not a photo of the original item, but of a "replica" (one more among other "exhibits") of Gouvas' pseudo-museum. ——Chalk19 (talk) 10:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, used 13 times in 8 projects, so clearly in scope, but I'll delete it nevertheless as likely copyright violation: small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 17:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete. Possible copyright violation. The plan is obviously an "amended" scanned original (apparently from a book or leaflet published by the Greek Ministry of Culture, sold on the spot to visitors). Apparent additions by user H. Gouvas to the unsourced, copyrighted original: captions in English (e.g. "Central Court", "Entrance" etc.), No. 10 in the rooms up-left, and the same number in list "ROOMS FOR THE PRIEST"/"ΔΩΜΑΤΙΑ ΙΕΡΕΩΝ" (probably misleading, since not included in the original plan). Plan supposedly, as stated, "issued" by H. Gouvas' pseudo-museum (=promotional claim). ——Chalk19 (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image replaced by wikitable at en:Physisorption Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:25, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by Caz06330

[edit]

Uploaded by Caz06330 (talk · contribs). These are used in out of Wikimedias. It may be copyvio. --Kkairri (talk) 13:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 14:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:21, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 14:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 14:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 14:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 14:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, apparently no educational purpose DCB (talk) 14:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork of unknown artist of professional fotography with unknown copyright situation --> Copyvio? Jbergner (talk) 06:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unknown photographer, modern photo. Taivo (talk) 17:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. imho rather small-sized format and missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not made from easily accessible place, probably not own work. Taivo (talk) 17:32, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

misidentified subject, Google search shows it is not her MB298 (talk) 23:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is Deborah Collins Stephens, who is mentioned in the caption of the image from which this is cropped (see Google). I think the caption writer included Ellspermann and excluded Stephens by mistake -- it should be the other way around. It looks like other Google images of her.

We don't have an article on her, but she is mentioned at This Is Not the Life I Ordered and I think we should keep it. I'd like a second opinion, though. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: I'm fine with that. MB298 (talk) 02:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, potentially notable subject. I'll rename file into file:Deborah Collins Stephens.jpg. Taivo (talk) 17:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tiven2240 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non free logo Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 19:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Boats are OK. Yann (talk) 20:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Boats aren't the focus. The water feature (not sure if it is a lake or a pond) and the bridge are the focus. Elisfkc (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Bridge and giant book behind it are so dark, that they cannot be main objects. In my opinion bridge and book are de minimis, main objects are boats, which are free. Taivo (talk) 13:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, this is in Disney and this is entirely a decor (pond, rock....), all is arranged in a voluntary and entirely for a pictorial purpose. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:45, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong colors Joschi71 (talk) 15:56, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:59, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:59, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 16:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechte Qualität, überflüssig Turmi (talk) 19:01, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid permission via OTRS. (ticket is in german) Wdwd (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Marketing LR

[edit]

Here are both uploads of Marketing LR (talk · contribs):

No metadata. Username means probably "Marketing Lorenzo Riva". Own work is not sure, maybe real photographer's copyright violation. OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unlikely to be own work, uncropped versions available in the web. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a map under CC-BY is quite unlikely to be correct. Not even when uploaded via panoramio. Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by XXN as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://kmb3.kloop.asia/2010/04/13/alykul-osmonov/ Since he died in 1950, [15] it must be an old photo. Could it be old enough to be public domain? whym (talk) 12:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright statut without more infos (author, date, country). Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete. Copyright violation. Apparently part of the map shown here, which was uploaded (as stated in the article) with the permission of the Greek Biotope/Wetlands Centre, and the Society for the Development of Amvrakikos Bay. User H. Gouvas (who has a long history of copyright violations in Greek WP; exampl. File:Μακέτα Μνημείου Ζαλόγγου, αεροδρόμιο Βενιζέλος.JPG, Αρχείο:Μνημείο Ζαλόγγου στό Προεδρικό Μέγαρο.JPG], etc.) had uploaded localy the map shown in this site, and stated that it was his own creation. The file (Αρχείο:Trikastro._Map.PNG]) was deleted because of copyright violation. ——Chalk19 (talk) 00:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, in all cases the map has no source and at least the copyright statut is unclear. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Panasonic DMC-TZ8 ist kein Handy am Stick, sondern eine richtige Kamera, die ein Fotograf halten muss. Dieser Urheber ist hier nicht angegeben bzw. hat keine Freigabe/Lizenz erteilt Jbergner (talk) 07:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, it don't look as a selfie. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es gibt bessere/neue Versionen Turmi (talk) 18:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. Uploader's request 1½ years after uploading, but this is also quite good photo. Category:Fernmeldeturm Solingen doesn't have even very similar better photos. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: ok for me the uploader uploded better pictures. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation - small size - own work claim doubtful. — TBhagat (talk) 06:31, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment. In my opinion the logo does not surpass threshold of originality. But article about depicted person en:National Assembly (South Korea) has different logo. Maybe the nominated logo is hoax? Better source than "own work" is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Really not sure about this one, but it deserves a discussion. The original file is obviously not the work of Andrew Bone, but could it already be free per French law? I don't know enough to decide. Badzil (talk) 06:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • To add some context to assist the decision. The picture its self comes from an Arbel brochure that was released for the 1957/58 Geneva Car show. The company no longer exists and I have not been able to find anything to suggest its copyright still exists. However, as I am not an expert in French law, this is not to say that there may be some protection under it or that someone may have a right to the Arbel. NealeFamily (talk) 06:53, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per NealeFamily's comment on my talk page. Badzil (talk) 12:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:27, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a public domain image and is not an official U.S. Congress photo with the source showing a different image. This photo came from the Oklahoma Government, which does not release its works in the PD. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 02:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. @Corkythehornetfan: Would you be able to take up the task of replacing all instances of this image with another? Thanks! MB298 (talk) 03:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@MB298: I've started, but will do the rest on Monday when I have access to my computer. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 03:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Corkythehornetfan: Thanks! MB298 (talk) 03:37, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]