Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 7th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo, copyvio Wcam (talk) 00:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted by Christian Ferrer per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 06:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload, unusable blurry image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   04:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   04:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photographer works against the spirit of Commons, 2A02:810D:9540:1A60:ADC0:56F4:C8C:482B 22:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Robin Krahl but the Uploader is Ireas and there is no OTRS ticket for this picture. 176.53.81.67 16:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Ireas is Robin Krahl (check the PGP key). --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AhmedShameelKhokhar786 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Commons:Derivative works from other images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and probable copyvios. --Yann (talk) 18:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 18:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 2 photos whose the subject is himself. Civa (talk) 09:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Julo (talk) 13:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 02:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP in Japan. Tokumeigakarinoaoshima (talk) 11:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of myself that I uploaded by mistake (as part of a photo set) from a Flickr account. I want this to be deleted, appealing to my privacy rights and as courtesy. Thanks. Warko (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused personal photo, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrick-sg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, no evidence of a free license. Source says "(c) 2017. www.schiffgiganten.de. All rights reserved."

Yann (talk) 09:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

www.schiffgiganten.de/.com and the website www.daskreuzfahrtschiff.de are my websites, lock at the "impressum". Owner is patrick martini. certainly the photos for wikipedia, i have reduced the pictures on a size from 1500 px /1200px ....

The pictures are allowed for wikipedia. regards patrick!. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrick-sg (talk • contribs)

@Patrick-sg: Hi,
A permission "for Wikipedia" is not sufficient, and for Wikimedia, the highest resolution is the best. And as for all documents previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission for a free license is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Senator2029 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:15, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ה-זפר (talk · contribs)

[edit]

What is copyrights status of Jordan currency? Will be good idea to expand Commons:Currency.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - if we don't know, we have to assume that they are copyrighted. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A .svg version of this file exists and this .png fil is no longer used. VateGV taper la discut’ 21:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused and replacable with File:Logo En Marche !.svg. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in metadata, shows this has been in and out of Facebook before coming here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in metadata, shows this has been in and out of Facebook before coming here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this poster. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Al-Douri (talk) 23:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erika149913 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private photos. Not sharp. Not used.

Kulmalukko (talk) 20:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raphael stolz555 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a place to advertise and out of project scope.

xplicit 00:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in January 2013 as non-notable. Out of project scope. xplicit 01:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is not any indication that the original author, Matt Martyniuk, have granted permission to use this image in Wikipedia. Rextron (talk) 02:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, http://dinogoss.blogspot.fr/2012_12_01_archive.html. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The subject asked for deletion Satdeep Gill (talk) 02:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation, uploader's claim of authorship is dubious. The photo is widely available on the web. Metadata indicates "Software used Instagram". Monochrome and cropped version of an image here (high-ref version), where captioned Photo prise pour un reportage (à paraître ?) dans Télématin (Photo taken for a report (forthcoming?) In Télématin). Télématin is a French TV program - this suggests a professional photographer. The only contribution from this account. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: derivative work from non-free original. Description says "Photo retouchée de la couverture du dossier de presse du film "La Reine Margot [...]" (Retouched photo of the cover of the press file of the film "La Reine Margot" [...]). Similar to this non-free film poster. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable perosnal organization. Out of scope. (tJosve05a (c) 03:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, photo of non-free film poster. No Freedom of panorama in France. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope, promotional image. Also, no evidence of permission. Mifter (talk) 03:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is unsourced (no author given), but even if it were, it is a derivative work. See COM:FOP#United States. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very low quality, bland image, out of scope Jedudědek (talk) 22:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks ok to me. On the contrary looks more real than the other somehow staged images. Unregistered (talk) 22:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is from real demonstration, published on wiki since 2015 and there was no problem. I thinks it a good proof of "real kung fu." Teplolp (talk) 23:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Support This picture is very bad and bothersome. As a Jedudedek. OJJ (talk) 05:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Easysport (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the French Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in July 2011 as spam. Out of project scope.

xplicit 05:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+complex logos. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ErenKodları (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the Turkish Wikipedia, where the subject's respective articles were speedily deleted as spam in July 2015. Out of project scope.

xplicit 05:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RUPARAM SAIN KURCHHI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 3 photos whose the subject is himself and his family.

Civa (talk) 10:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adem Külük (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 6 photos whose 5 of them are about himself and family

Civa (talk) 14:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo was first published in 2015, according to source. {{PD-China}} does not apply. Wcam (talk) 15:52, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep temporarily. I don't know this photo's actual publish date, but I think there is no problem with this file. Hung was born in 1948 and the photo is taken before 1958, I think. (中文翻译:暂时保留,我不知道这张照片的确切拍摄日期,但我认为这张图片没有问题。洪秀柱生于1948年,依我看这张图片拍摄于1958年之前,是符合公有领域范围之内的。故暂时保留。)--Shwangtianyuan (talk) 05:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Source (dated 2015-7-25): "洪秀柱的办公室,最近向媒体提供了洪秀柱在幼儿园毕业典礼上的照片". translation: Hung's office recently provided to the press a photo of Hung at her kindergarten graduation. It is published work so according to {{PD-China}} it has to be 50 years after it was first published that this work enters the public domain. When the photo was taken is irrelevant here. --Wcam (talk) 11:43, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was taken in the 1950s but was not published until Hung became a notable politician, at least after the 1980s, therefore it hasn't been 50 years since its publication. Timmyshin (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Previous decision did not consider URAA. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, blurry/grainy, no context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   04:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MariyaPetrova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's two drafts were deleted as abandoned in September 2013 and January 2014, respectively. Out of project scope.

xplicit 05:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description says " I DID NOT TAKE THIS PICTURE. IT WAS FOUND ON CAF'S WEBSITE. ALL RIGHTS GO TO Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles." so doesn't belong on Commons David Biddulph (talk) 05:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from omniglot.com Clorox (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

about license
  1. reloaded from w:Image:Uncial_alphabet.png
  2. Log of File:Uncial_alphabet.png
  3. 06:55, 12 October 2005 Mysid (talk · contribs) uploaded w:File:Uncial alphabet.png (w:Uncial alphabet (see w:Irish orthography). Original JPEG uploaded and licensed under GFDL by EamonnPKeane)

So, File:Uncial alphabet.png is licensed under w:GFDL.

Yuriy V Dzyadyk (tc), 21:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]


Kept: This is not the same image as that on Omniglot.com. The layout and content are different. While a given representation of an alphabet may have a copyright in the UK, where Omniglot is based, that only covers the given representation, not all versions. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

stolen from omniglot.com Clorox (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Subject has a WP:EN article. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably copyvio -- not a selfie, so subject is not author. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Subject has IMDB article, so falls within scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal & promotional image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The subject has articles on both WP:EN and WP:ES, so this is definitely in scope, but it is almost certainly a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Czech politician -- certainly in scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Subject has IMDB article, many Google hits. In scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Subject has a WP:EN article, so this is certainly in scope, but unless the mural is in a country that allows FOP for 2D works, we need a free license from Loughery for the mural. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: WP:EN article deleted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only Jiri Zelenka I could find on any Wiki project is https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ji%C5%99%C3%AD_Zelenka_(1972) who was born in 1972. Obviously COM:OTRS required for works of living notable artists. Some of these images appear to have been taken from published sources without attribution, all are claimed "self".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These phantasmagorical "ufologic" drawings are obviously not created by the mentioned ice hockey player cs:Jiří Zelenka (1972). Nor by the well-known north-Bohemian businessman Jiří Zelenka, leader of the regional political party Severočeši.cz. Nor by the percussionist of the "Bratři Ebenové" musical group.
Most of the drawings are obviously not created by artist, and thus not by notable artist. They seem to be some amateur pseudoscience or mythology rather than art.
I suppose (but I'm not quite sure) that Jiří Zelenka is a civilian name and Bokshorn a nickname of the uploader, Pohled 111. If it is so, OTRS confirmation would be nonsense and needless. Only the several images which seem to be copied from some publication needs an explanation about their origin and authorship. An internet footprint of this Jiří Zelenka outside Wikimedia Commons seems to be minimal. Some "Jiří Zelenka" is mentioned at the page about parapsychologic mysteries of Houska castle, that's all.
A real problem of all the drawings is that they probably represent some generally unimportant and marginal theories of an unimportant individual. The theories are not notable and serious enough for Wikipedia projects. Hypothetically, some original theories can have their place at Wikisources or Wikiversity, but I have doubts that the uploader is capable to create some meaningful text which can use the drawings (and not capable to explain the sense of the drawings). Thus, all the drawings are probably out of scope of Commons. --ŠJů (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope+derivative works issues (book cover, photomontages...). Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

G I Chandor (talk) 23:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope - extremely poor quality (even for a regular DR) No part of the CSD mentions extreme bad quality as a reason for Speedy (and bad quality is a subjective term) Amitie 10g (talk) 00:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, many better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   13:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proofs it was created by the uploader. Image has been scanned from a print material. It can also be found on other sites. RedAndr (talk) 00:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheDeltaDude (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the Russian Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted repeatedly as recently as July 2016 as spam. Out of project scope.

xplicit 00:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal & promotional image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:41, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 05:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted as spam last March. Out of project scope. xplicit 06:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, spam. P 1 9 9   13:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i don't have rights on this pic 77.37.182.228 06:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. P 1 9 9   13:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the watermarks including the dotted lines makes this image useless for others Wouter (talk) 08:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional - not in use Pierpao.lo (listening) 08:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:30, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 09:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 2 photos whose the subject is himself. Civa (talk) 09:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 10:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, uncertain copyright, promotional content, out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:19, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional photo ; image stroked with URL as multiple watermarks Civa (talk) 11:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 11:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uplaoder's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the owner and I want to remove this file Jaime2017! (talk) 12:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused recent upload. P 1 9 9   13:41, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata. Own work is not sure, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not found elsewhere on the internet. P 1 9 9   13:43, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising image, added to now-deleted promotional userpage on enwiki, now no longer used anywhere The Anome (talk) 12:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, spam. P 1 9 9   13:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use : Commons is not a private photo album Civa (talk) 13:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Father, mother and two children, photographed from behind, so they are not recognizable. In my opinion the photo is in scope for illustrating families. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: This is a beautiful picture. I used it in Wikinews. That is enough. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   13:44, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 13:41, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, too bad quality. Taivo (talk) 13:35, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per user:Fae. Very few alternatives available of such composition. P 1 9 9   13:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is used here: http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Allison_Crooks


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. Have a bunch of 3D renderings in Category:Aspartic acid and subcat thereof DMacks (talk) 14:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, non educational BeckenhamBear (talk) 14:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Awoyemi.olayemi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 12 photos whose the subject is himself and his family.

Civa (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:52, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by A.Shameel.K (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Morris obuhuma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:54, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Morris obuhuma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Morris obuhuma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s).

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 14:02, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aft1292 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only 4 photos whose the subject is himself and his family.

Civa (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Support deletion request, as imho advertisements, hence, unused file out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:56, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:56, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giulio Tavoni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Giulio Tavoni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Giulio Tavoni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   13:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC) - Buongiorno, servono dei documenti di certificazione? Se si, si prega di richiederli , e verranno subito spediti, grazie. 1. Ho il permesso scritto e l'autorisazione del proprietario del duplicato, che é proprieta' PRIVATA di ELECTRIC BAR BIEL/BIENNE -CH 2. Ho la permissione scritta che Electric Bar Biel/bienne-ch ha dato il permesso a Multiversum Design di fotografare le opere di proprieta privata di Electric Bar Biel/bienne-ch della decorazione interna del Bar, per esclusivo uso per la copertina del libro per la casa editrice AUGUST VON GOETHE FRANCOFORTE e per l' ononimo libro "IO LUCE NELLA LUCE" anche in altre lingue. 3. anche Multiversum design ha gli stessi documenti e permissioni del proprietario di ELECTRIC BAR Biel/Bienne-ch. 4. possiedo anche una licennza specifica personale di creative commons italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/it/legalcode - Se serve altro, si prega gentilmente di richiedermelo per e-mail. e verra' spedito immediatamente.[reply]

grazie


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art by Jiří Zelenka

[edit]

Alleged "art" made by the uploader. No real educative or documentary value, no notable artistic value of the depicted composition. --ŠJů (talk) 15:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tapu Mondol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tammuriah1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Book covers and book excerpt. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chio02 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, derivative image from Shorpy.com. Image shows Shorpy watermark. Public domain version is available from LOC at http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/det1994000885/PP/ 24.96.53.202 15:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced with LOC version. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:26, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: photo is PD regardless of source. P 1 9 9   14:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file with unknown purpose, out of project scope. Should be .svg, if really useful. For example, there exists file:Gfi-set01-andreascross.svg. Taivo (talk) 16:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Derrick Simmons is a politician, so in my opinion actor and director Derrick Simmons is not mentioned in en.wiki and is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; no educational value TJH2018talk 17:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not a selfie repository; no educational value TJH2018talk 17:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JemLaMusic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logos, no evidence of permission.

XXN, 17:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad version of File:Logo_Privatmolkerei_Bechtel.png Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 17:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal art is considered out of project scope. Google translates author as "Pulse development" and image title as "Amulet pulse". Taivo (talk) 18:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Self-promotional only, no educational purpose. Not used. George Chernilevsky talk 18:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:18, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Roda (4749645016).jpg ~nmaia d 18:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file uploaded for advertising/promotional purpose. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 18:47, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some kind of promotional upload complete with website and phone number Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and apparently non-notable logo Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 19:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Quangcaovtcdienthoai84 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos appear to be press photos/shop photos of the Microsoft Surface. A reverse google search also reveals they are in use on various PR websites. Likely not freely licensed

Mifter (talk) 03:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Jdx. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie trailer. Not clear whether the YouTube uploader really has permission to release it under a CC licence. McGeddon (talk) 10:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://yt3.ggpht.com/-f3hRvYHGPkg/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/jwg2IakKmVs/s900-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio https://www.everythingrf.com/community/what-is-a-dual-directional-coupler SpinningSpark 15:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio https://www.everythingrf.com/community/what-is-a-dual-directional-coupler SpinningSpark 15:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trezoro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Magazine. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tunnel thing copied from Amazon! https://www.amazon.com/WOODLAND-SCENICS-Curved-Tunnel-10x16-5/dp/B0012G99QM Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: it's obviously a celebrity selfie, not "own work" of the uploader Brianhe (talk) 19:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

to special category -Carl Ha (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears elsewhere on the web (IMDb), albeit in lower quality. FlickreviewR failed. Dispenser (talk) 20:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:AGGM logo.svg and File:AGGM LOGO.png. Leyo 20:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:37, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivitive of 3D artwork Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivitive of 3D artwork Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:28, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not educationally useful. The object is not clear. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep as this appears to be one of a set of three photos of the outside and demonstrated output of a machine designed to duplicate en:Young's interference experiment. This one in particular appears to be a closeup of waves of red laser light playing on a faux wood covered baseboard heater. Laser light rarely shows up well on camera. See the uploader's contributions on ruwiki.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:54, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, then it should be kept. --Kulmalukko (talk) 13:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   14:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially copyright isusses since there are no EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   14:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is subject's image at https://www.usnews.com/topics/author/fatima-zahra-mansouri, unlikely this one is the original it is only 600x600 px Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 16:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tilted photo with finger, there are many other available Triplecaña (talk) 21:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sloppy transfer from English Wikipedia with no evidence to support the {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} claim. User:Lamiot inexplicably changed the license from {{cc-by-3.0}} to {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} when transferring en:File:Judasgoat.jpg here and failed to preserve the information in the permission field, which points to http://www.flyafrica.info/forums/showthread.php?8718-Judas-Bok-Judah-Goat&p=285177#post285177. That doesn't mention any specific licensing terms and is nowhere near the sort of acknowledgement of waived rights that we'd expect for releases from third parties. LX (talk, contribs) 18:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User:Magog the Ogre correctly tagged the file as missing a valid copyright tag, but User:Lamiot blanked out the problem tag without adding a copyright tag. LX (talk, contribs) 18:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok it is unclear. And we are not sure to know the true author of the photo also on the english wekipedia. Thanks. (picture to suppress from Commons, and also from english wikipedia).--F. Lamiot (talk) 07:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:54, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.coca-cola.dk/brands/coca-cola/coca-cola-light/ 95.41.35.156 18:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clear copyright violation. --Herby talk thyme 08:59, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reopenning on UDR request. Ankry (talk) 08:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Amitie 10g: While the Coca-Cola logo is clearly PD, some dobts concerning the bottle design may appear. Also. as it is low-res image it might be out of scope. Ankry (talk) 08:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The photo of the bottle is from the web, and could be copyrighted. (tJosve05a (c) 08:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Whm, could be a valid reason for deletion, but another photo will not make any difference. Should be a good idea to take another photo anyway. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per above. --Ankry (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art no otrs Pierpao.lo (listening) 08:32, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:35, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source or evidence of a free license, per this image is likely not self-taken. Mifter (talk) 03:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's unlikely to be own work of the uploader. And given the birth date of the depicted master, it is not old enough to be PD. jdx Re: 06:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

They claim "© Oreet Ashery" and that the museum does not know the copyright status, and that the musum does not claim copyright. That does not mean that the creator does not claim copyright. Without permission from the author, or a statement by the musum that they retined copyright form the creator, we can't keep this, since it is missing a licene. (tJosve05a (c) 08:22, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of permission from the claimed author, Chauntz Williams. The same photograph was uploaded here in May 2016, before the claimed date of this. No exif data. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation ? (https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiu1c5e8SmboAIR7TTYhHUsbm0Uiawrtuqjt1-odzYR1kMt1kLeQ4Q4dp5xxRnUWKCFIUr5FuSCkSC0RK3GfGvMOjmEdR_1cpNE21cpLzXiOvxT3JgZm8x4E3a59HGu7mtBfw2noTCGUX1O_1o9VS7mkuUAg5gDhCgQ0i2YQvSMxC7qntdNIG3LrxW4IZkGD8hALXXZ6CxRi59VVkl6E2ZCFdyXeXnXG8AkUczraRsKXWFdHtz1jaShHBVFoUJXApZC-uraAdkI1WDmuIPg1NjEgaR0jEjR0r86s0bLRFKN6m14gpNL7gA7VA9fbs5jFxNmwHXwxwWtIvwswVGrg7FTxxyaM0UzzpTR-rOAlldzW8QMpzfU_120Kmn-cIeIRm3YewaVt7WHt9bSAaDb2bmUVzrmXHfhwSSGozGFG56cgM0YavuiSejm8S3YXdQUOnArIuB-hfuh9AJAsrUYDDYfxAlcuGvCqlQfiWDLT7M2vblAdSEDxTW23wK5yw72rUhjk2hLc3s8SNFk76iaeJ6dlxo1fVuuCsMge7R4YiPak4H3H7_1jV3E4Q3t4moWuMZSGhS1_1rZ0zAIotUWFHbwbLITZHsGz3jQpz6WpZLTpGly7kRJc5I-9S4-zijAJJ5pk3HrRCf7RKMaH-biTzR6E9vqJhrGY1-8JPfa0nIrJ7-XeUc5cgHe2kmDiZRhcejkzwWxLAwvrE8woe0BbVLlqOeBdwgFFCX8NNuC3A7RCrP8ds8Qa_1RVFiTSeCDKgqhm4wvGZBBUtgpSM2pKJlYSML76QKyBTljZ-3D79JdlnIWiOQ6MZnnu8QXFVr8BwovfZ-HFapL0m_1HzrpoHCwIotRaT4faW4GIk-S01ln6Bj5kyteWXYNCu4z5kavZNiNSCOUmZPiYH2TJ_1fIa_1bL7j2HQfn7daPQUpTc2WVsQSD_1Qx3No3jZdMBxVS2cW7hysyLsCgHGOCGSmvD-1UcXInAFJajhOIM_1he6NhgjHq6H099IUeVEGhHQlA0jXHYPy1hFDgdkGYT7QVmkDkVZB8rq6fQvjQ6sf3dbyPDkE9SVAKx7OCaLsIM95WFbX6HNLzzp1P2_1-L3ofVrGWTvVt8omDqE3OLw5Ohu9np5sdBbHHThlKnDTKjiQ9TmwBQjJWfUsvUeNkMjGKjNRSB_1IwPoh2Kfm1S7TqdK0yv4LHa27ujITaeyCxVQ4dHIdR-I4SPIjnQ2HcXE-P7jkXQAANMrf-JOn_1sOCr3LSMrMHhYJrHYT92So8kA6gZseZLTI3H6xKUM4TRLjfPimExz7Yty1ObvccL5iGyL3r1YB8NS3IwdGtVw9sHGLWeLpotCzXJ20ZAm-JawJd9S5WmXNaLPCNstXdlbv_185w58spDNR3sbDX1fzve7_1LAfqxqF5xJyw5SK3IES_1T9ff-waf16r-mIqrdglqq-Ow5gMudCgy0a4lB4Ob8dAKBt7U2Vu9VDqihSCpbstWSuXWvYLuvEdk83W8e2F3F_1DuH26EA1fc5zf0HASOfwisOBLGIkFkK4MW0TwPpbUbqEmR-6OjWDHdMKwPi2b1Movh-1XYBlWBWZ-qkbp-oPJGtkYiNbZ-2LUMQIIPKz8Slx8S9V4heLUNhvnjWYC3ypoH6R1liRQm66IeJvVvDENXG_1IhzzcwAEuhDKkA-H3rmKeFp3Nyr482cXWncJQ6lvkbg2kL5P-KQwDQg7nJfQ_1WrU&hl=fr-US) Supporterhéninois (talk) 12:39, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING: complex package designs and are not de minimis.

Wcam (talk) 13:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was previously published here in October 2015. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 15:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is a publicity photo for which the uploader states the source as "jazz music festival". Other instances found on the web like this one identify it as a supplied photo. I do not see anywhere which indicates that this image has been released into the public domain. We would need OTRS confirmation of such a release. Whpq (talk) 15:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Finchk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable, blurry, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Macedoniahandball (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logos. Without OTRS permission, to be uploaded only on local wikis with fair-use.

XXN, 17:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from given source without permission Mai-Sachme (talk) 17:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from given source without permission Mai-Sachme (talk) 17:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from given source without permission Mai-Sachme (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncertain about copyright validity SecretName101 (talk) 18:29, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josepicols123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josepicols123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely false authorship claims and Flickrwashing. File:Rectoraucvv.jpg, which has very low resolution and no metadata was transferred here from https://www.flickr.com/photos/148090415@N06/33060301261 on the same day it was uploaded there. That Flickr account has one other upload, https://www.flickr.com/photos/148090415@N06/32383362953, which is a copyright violation from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/33419312, and which the uploader tried to upload as File:Parque de la aviacion militar.jpg. File:Rectora de la ucv.jpg is just a photo of a screen displaying the same image, which the uploader also tried with the other one; see File:Parque aeronautico 01.jpg and File:Parque aeronautico 02.jpg. The uploader has a long history of uploading copyright violations.

LX (talk, contribs) 19:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josepicols123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this image, small, over printed, etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found this image older at http://arealibros.republica.com/entrevistas/entrevista-a-alejandro-corletti-estrada-autor-del-libro-kayros.html, but it is not attributed there. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acorletti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This series of illustrations appear to be copied from somewhere else because they are too small and too blurry to be originals.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Soy Alejandro Corletti y no sé que está pasando con estas imágenes que son de mi propiedad Intelectual y diseñadas por mí ¿por qué razón se está proponiendo su borrado? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acorletti (talk • contribs)

The images are very small, some contain drawings and illustrations, few to none are in use. When images are small and blurry, it is simple to assume that they were not created by uploader, since anyone uploading images would put the highest quality largest image available to them. Some of these appear to be copied, partially or in whole, from other sources. Please sign your name with four Tildes ~~~~ to automatically sign and date your notes. Por cierto, no soy un hombre. Cheers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Even if they are original works by the uploader, the diagrams are too small and blurry to be useful, and content like File:Mapeo QCI DiffServ.jpg is better presented in a wikitable than in a raster image that will only get resized beyond readability. De728631 (talk) 00:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acorletti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:59, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because this is use in another username Adil Adi. WorldLinkUS (talk) 20:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: file has been deleted. --Daphne Lantier 20:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Détenteur du droit d'auteur : C.M. Manikmati Photography, autorisation de l'auteur nécessaire voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. G I Chandor (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per COM:TOYS. (tJosve05a (c) 17:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-NC-SA File (ko:사용자토론:양수지) ChongDae (talk) 03:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-NC-SA File (ko:사용자토론:양수지) ChongDae (talk) 03:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. CC-BY-SA unknown. ChongDae (talk) 03:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-NC-SA File (ko:사용자토론:양수지) ChongDae (talk) 03:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-NC-SA File (ko:사용자토론:양수지) ChongDae (talk) 03:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC-BY-NC-SA File (ko:사용자토론:양수지) ChongDae (talk) 03:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivatives of non-free originals, no FoP in Russia for sculptures.

Яй (talk) 06:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown authorship, invalid license, above COM:TOO. Wdwd (talk) 11:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; possible copyvio TJH2018talk 17:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fralambert as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio of https://twitter.com/AmpCogeco/status/778621017564545024].. According resolution and EXIF tags, could be an upload directly by the photographer. Dereckson (talk) 00:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Valérie Patry : Bonjour, j'imagine que vous êtes de la communication de l'exploitation de l'amphithéâtre ? Pour pouvoir publier cette photographie, il y a lieu de demander une autorisation au photographe, apparemment JS Désilets, de la placer sous licence libre. Vous pouvez suivre la procédure ici : Commons:OTRS. Si le photographe n'est pas d'accord, nous supprimerons l'image pour sauvegarder ses intérêts. --Dereckson (talk) 00:19, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:50, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

POE Copyright infringement, not original creator. Pivox (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ---- Deleted: per nomination: copyvio from BBC. Ruthven (msg) 20:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'd like to remove this work that I made, because I've uploaded a better version (scalable, more accurate, etc.) Poke2001 (talk) 02:08, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use - no link to new version provided. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I created this graphic. But then I did a better version, scalable and more accurate (File:Color temperature of a black body.svg). The scale was wrong on the first one. Please delete ! Poke2001 (talk) 11:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 20:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette image n'est pas utilisée et j'ai réalisé depuis de bien meilleures versions, plus précises et en svg. J'aimerais qu'elle soit supprimée, pour ne pas prendre de risques inutiles et libérer de l'espace. Bhutajata (talk) 08:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: on n'a pas de problèmes d'espace et l'image est utilisée dans une conversation. Ruthven (msg) 22:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

requests deletion JamesCartmell (talk) 15:31, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cartmell currently has a Wikipedia article published but the article uses a different more up to date image. Could this one be deleted? Fishmuknu (talk) 02:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

better picture has been uploaded that is in use in the article Fishmuknu (talk) 19:35, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

other image in use in published article Fishmuknu (talk) 19:36, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 02:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Harcourt Paris est une agence de photographie de Paris, leur autorisation est nécessaire voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 16:41, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'avais crée ce graphique mais il est totalement faux. Depuis j'ai crée mieux. Il ne faut pas l'utiliser. Autant le supprimer. Bhutajata (talk) 18:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de souci pour moi, puisque l'image PNG que tu avais créée était ma seule source pour la vectorisation. Pour ma culture personnelle, peux-tu me montrer ta nouvelle image de référence ? --Flappiefh (talk) 19:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: author's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of painting of the artist, who deceased in 1970 Elly (talk) 15:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I made the photograph with the permit of Museum Direction. Mika58 (talk) 07:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Sry thats TOO.--Sanandros (talk) 12:38, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Sanandros. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alinea as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio, Rothko died 1970 Achim (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No other statement than aforementioned: done with permit, --Mika58 (talk) 19:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mika58, do we have proof that the museum allowed you to take that picture (e.g. an OTRS ticket from the museum)? And does the museum own the copyright in the picture? Because owning a picture and owning the copyright in in it is not the same. Actually, it would be quite strange for the museum to hold the full copyright in the picture. Thanks, --Gnom (talk) 09:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to contact with the museum. Will you be waiting, please, some days :) --Mika58 (talk) 12:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's me again. After having contacted the Museum, I had not had the right to put it on Wikipedia Commoms. Please apologise. --Mika58 (talk) 11:00, 11 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]


Deleted: per Mika58. Ruthven (msg) 20:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

G I Chandor (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:43, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

G I Chandor (talk) 23:19, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, kept one per Robert Weemeyer. Ruthven (msg) 20:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. G I Chandor (talk) 23:21, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING.

G I Chandor (talk) 23:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was previously published at http://www.houstonmethodist.org/faculty/mauro_ferrari and elsewhere online. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 23:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Diannaa. Ruthven (msg) 20:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source page states CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 if you click the photo, thats not ok for commons. Druschba 4 (talk) 23:59, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: All contents of the Scania Media Provider are copyright © Scania CV AB (publ), SE-151 87 Södertälje, Sweden, or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.

Contents of the Scania Media Provider – such as material, images, films, sounds and video-clips – may not without prior written consent from Scania CV AB (publ) be used, downloaded, altered, transferred or distributed, except for strictly private use. Ruthven (msg) 20:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

POE Copyright infringement, not original creator. Pivox (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yurtta sulh konseyi.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A derivative of a logo (slight color change(?)) above COM:TOO. {{Logo}}-copyvio (tJosve05a (c) 03:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Gaussian function, same as in File:Gaussian 2d.png
I do not think one can copyright the shape, which follows a math equations derived long time ago for eigenvalues of L-shaped membrane. So how close can we get in the presentation of the function and not step into copyrighted territory? When 9 years ago I created this image, I chose my own colors, rotation angles and reflectance parameters, which in the end resemble Matlab logo. I think that is withing the guideline of Commons:Fan art. If the issue is that it is not far enough, than I can change the the function or parameters to look less like it. For example Gaussian function in the image is a very different shape with similar color. I can pick other shapes which are closer. --Jarekt (talk) 05:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Jarekt. --Daphne Lantier 19:39, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Borderline TOO case. See COM:TOO#United States. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This image is below the threshold of originality in the US. Just compare it to examples from COM:TOO#United States.
Comparison
This image Images below COM:TOO
--Rezonansowy (talk) 19:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: borderline, but looks to be just below COM:TOO for US. --Daphne Lantier 19:39, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files ubloaded by J kvjbvb

[edit]

All his feles are copyright violation --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: please use VisualFileChange to nominate the files for deletion. --Daphne Lantier 19:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Miss Fire (アップロードするファイルの間違い) Akihiro Nagai (talk) 08:34, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L'auteur de la sculpture n'est pas mort depuis plus de 70 ans. Sammyday (talk) 08:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammyday: Qui est l'auteur? --Ruthven (msg) 20:35, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L'auteur de la sculpture n'est pas mort depuis plus de 70 ans. Sammyday (talk) 08:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Tomas62 (talk) 09:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files ubloaded by M.R.H. speed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All his feles are copyright violation:I think that these files are non-free television screenshots and some files have names and descriptions says it from specific works of art (See also ar:محمود عزت (ممثل) and https://www.flickr.com/photos/138333283@N07/) .Thank you (See also Special:Diff/236240139) --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:43, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unbiassed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images which are possible COM:COPYVIOs due to use elsewhere on web with differing licenses.

  • File:Reforger 88 newspaper story.jpg found at [1]
  • File:1st Infantry Division Patch "The Big Red One".jpg found at [2], marked 2014 Forbes.com LLC™ All Rights Reserved
  • File:Reforger 1988 Field.jpg found at [3]

The following photos are of such low size and poor quality that I am nominating them for failing COM:SCOPE

  • File:Strawn wagner sign.jpg
  • File:Strawn-wagner diamond.jpg
  • File:Talaga.jpg
  • File:Easter sunrise diamond.JPG
  • File:Ericscuba.jpg

The following image is not possible to be "own work" of user, due to age of image.

  • File:Bernhard Gopel.jpg (at a minimum incorrectly license, otherwise COM:COPYVIO)

The following images are unused, of a purely personal nature and fail COM:SCOPE

  • File:Leon talaska records.jpg
  • File:Top secret clearance.jpg
  • File:Bernhard mayor 25 years.jpg
  • File:Dr-leon-talaska.JPG (this one additionally is incorrectly licensed)
  • File:Dr leon talaska degree.JPG

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 14:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unbiassed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo, stamp and badge. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 2 deleted and 1 kept as per Robert. --Daphne Lantier 19:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ciphers, Lanhiaze, Obayd, Tarawneh, محمد عصام, and مصعب: Does one of you want to weigh in on this issue for your wiki?  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:15, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be a page from a manuscript, probably the first page of a book. The same user has created several pages that look like test pages (albeit a bit sophisticated) with similar content in different namespaces of Arabic Wikipedia and Wikisource, which makes me believe this image is hardly relevant to any Wikimedia project. Thus, I suggest that it be deleted. --Lanhiaze (talk) 21:49, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ABBA photo from the 1970s, not free, even if it is outside the museum, no FoP-Sweden. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 17:55, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tyvärr är det lite för kort svarstid som användare av ifrågasatta bilder har för att hinna bekräfta upphovsrätten. Har man ett heltidsjobb, är livligt fritidsengagerad och dessutom är bortrest åtskilliga veckor varje år blir wp-sysslan sällan en prioritet men väl en trevlig överkurs på fritiden.
Svarstiden för ifrågasatta bilder bör utsträckas – om man vill att användare ska hinna leta upp rätt personer bakom bildrättigheter, ta deras tid i anspråk och få dem insatta i olika regler för att slutligen mejla in rätt dokument.
Samtliga av mina raderade bilder är godkända av personal på plats och med lite mer tid till godo kan jag säkert få digital bekräftelse . /--FrankieF (talk) 22:29, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Det räcker tyvärr inte med att "bilder är godkända av personal på plats". Det krävs en OTRS-licens. Det kan ta lite tid. Under tiden anger man att ORTS är ansökt, då ifrågasätter ingen din bild. Din bild har funnits sedan 2013 det är lång tid. Allt detta vet du som rutinerad fotograf på WP. Även jag är en flitig fotograf här men tycker att det ska gå rätt till. --Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 11:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted magazine, requires a free license from the publisher via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The magazine is released under a free license, see the second page:
La tuta enhavo de ĉi tiu revuo krom la uzitaj bildoj en la paĝoj 2 kaj 3 estas eldonata laŭ la permesilo Krea Komunaĵo Atribuite-Samkondiĉe 4.0 Tutmonda (CC BY-SA 4.0), disponebla ĉe https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.eo.
La bildoj, kiuj estas uzitaj en la paĝoj 2 kaj 3 estas faritaj de Freepik.com, disponeblaj ĉe:
http://www.freepik.com/free-vector/a-trip-to-space-poster_796774.htm
http://www.freepik.com/free-vector/journalist-press-concept_765216.htm
(Translation from Esperanto to English):
The full contents of this magazine except the used images on the pages 2 and 3 are published according to the license Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0), available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.
The images, that are used on the pages 2 and 3 are made by Freepik.com, available at:
http://www.freepik.com/free-vector/a-trip-to-space-poster_796774.htm
http://www.freepik.com/free-vector/journalist-press-concept_765216.htm
Robin van der Vliet (talk) 12:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Evidence of licensing found, thus no valid reason for deletion. --Jusjih (talk) 21:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Le blason qui figure sur cette page n'est pas le blason de la commune de Saint-Méen. Nous ne parvenons pas à insérer le blason officiel sur cette page. MAIRIE DE SAINT MEEN (talk) 12:43, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour MAIRIE DE SAINT MEEN,
Wikipédia indique que le blason de Saint-Méen dans le Finistère se blasonne ainsi : "D'azur à la Vierge à l'Enfant, assise sur un siège antique, le tout d'or". Ce qui est conforme au dessin dont la suppression est demandée
Il convient de rappeler qu'un blason n'est pas un logo, qui est "figé" et doit toujours être strictement reproduit à l'identique tant dans son graphisme et ses proportions que dans ses couleurs/teintes ; en revanche le "style" d'un même blason peut grandement différer d'un dessinateur à l'autre, la seule contrainte est que le dessin respecte la description héraldique (le blasonnement) donnée. S'agissant du blasonnement donné pour Saint-Méen, la seule "consigne" est de représenter sur fond bleu une vierge à l'enfant dorée ou jaune assise sur un siège antique de même couleur. Ce qui est le cas ici.
Mais peut-être le blasonnement donné n'est-il pas exact ou est incomplet (par exemple, la vierge à l'enfant à représenter sur le blason pourrait correspondre à une statue située à Saint-Méen. Dans ce cas le blasonnement doit le préciser de façon à ce que le dessinateur sache que la représentation de la vierge n'est pas laissée à sa seule appréciation), ou peut-être y a t'il confusion avec une autre commune ?
En bref quel est le blasonnement des armoiries de la commune de Saint-Méen ?

Cordialement--Tretinville (talk) 08:50, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the image is widely used, so it cannot be dleted for this reason. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:22, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a wax sculpture locked away in a vault and no longer exhibited (see en:Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci)). In a comparison photo of the sculpture and a bronze replica, the previous owner of a mold made of the sculpture says that the photo is from the book Otto Letze and Thomas Buchsteiner: Leonardo da Vinci: Scientist, inventor, artist. The book was published 1995-1997. Felcotiya (talk) 17:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader posted[4] on my talk page that the photo "appeared in the exhibit catalog of the Eriksberghallen exhibit in 1994-95" and that "the photo is listed in the catalog as coming from the owners of the piece who lent Horse and Rider to exhibit as requested of them by Carlo Pedretti, a co-curator of that exhibit. Not only is the photo in the public domain, but Carlo Pedretti himself gave permission to use it as well as any other documentation at his disposal.". --Felcotiya (talk) 00:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This photo has been and continues to be in the public domain. It has been featured in hundreds of news papers, television presentations, magazines, and publications. As I understand, it is one of the only pictures available for public use and depicts the statue before substantial deterioration from time and the elements. As such, it should not be removed. --Tradernet (talk) 08:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The image is almost certainly not "own work" as claimed. It apparently comes from at 1990s book, which certainly has a copyright. The fact that it has appeared in many places proves nothing about its copyright status and the fact that we would very much like to keep it does not remove the fact that it is probably a copyvio. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]