Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/11/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_-_gundam2345_(1).jpg){kind=link}
p.12.jpg){kind=link}
![369 File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png".jpg](#File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png".jpg){kind=link}
![370 File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png".jpg](#File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png".jpg_2){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![403 File:Пам'ятник "Герої не вмирають" на вул. Маршала Тимошенка, 18 (Київ).jpg](#File:Пам'ятник_"Герої_не_вмирають"_на_вул._Маршала_Тимошенка,_18_(Київ).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio from a 1950s promo photo, see [1] for a cropped version, invalid source and author info. GermanJoe (talk) 08:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Possible copyvio, see [2]. Invalid source and author information. GermanJoe (talk) 08:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
From the date of upload this file is not review by an admin. So, this file is a possibly copyvio. ChemistLaw (talk) 09:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 10:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
out of com:scope McZusatz (talk) 14:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --McZusatz (talk) 14:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vlout as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.seniortip.cz/portal/cz/seniortip/article/3163/Image/svobodova.gif May be old enough, but more info needed. Yann (talk) 14:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Irena Svobodová died in 1980, in any case it is not photo taken in 31. 10. 2016 by Tomasbecak. --Vlout (talk) 14:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Cessna 208B PH-JMP (cn 208B0583) at Teuge.JPG Marc Lacoste (talk) 10:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Qualifies for speedy deletion: exact duplicate of another file as mentioned in the deletion rationale. --De728631 (talk) 16:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, в Рувике указан другой автор, см. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Баскет.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 13:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Arif_%C5%9Fahin.jpg Ritarisk (talk) 01:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 09:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE, personal image, blurry, not uploaded by user, … Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- I'm the admin of the German facebook group "Pilze und Schwammerln". Tanja Hindemith allowed me to upload her foto on Commons. But I found no screenshot of her comment on my computer. Also it seems that she isn't a group member anymore or she's using a nickname which I can't remember. So I couldn't ask her for any action. And I don't know how I could jump to the discussions earlier in june. The search of fb is bad. I'll try to find her with the help of our group members... --Ak ccm (talk) 13:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Basvb, Tanja Hindemith sent me a screenshot of the E-Mail with her permission. Please stop the deletion request. How can I avoid a deletion request in the future? Should I remove "Facebook" at source? --Ak ccm (talk) 06:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- It is good to use the actual source in this case that was a facebook image (although image by Tanja Hindemith) might be a bit more descriptive. The permission looks good and looks like it was send to the right channel in June, I will check this evening in the OTRS system why there was no Template:OTRS on the file to show that the permission is in order. Thank you for the informative replies and getting all these wonderful images on Commons. Basvb (talk) 10:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- I see that the Tanja recently (15 nov) replied to the open questions on the OTRS ticket, it is in German, a language I understand, but not to a level where I feel confident enough to close the ticket. The file can be kept under 2016060910009229 likely in a bit so I will withdraw it. Basvb (talk) 17:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- It is good to use the actual source in this case that was a facebook image (although image by Tanja Hindemith) might be a bit more descriptive. The permission looks good and looks like it was send to the right channel in June, I will check this evening in the OTRS system why there was no Template:OTRS on the file to show that the permission is in order. Thank you for the informative replies and getting all these wonderful images on Commons. Basvb (talk) 10:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: withdrawn per discussion. --Basvb (talk) 19:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Vietnam.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
this video is actually from the other documentary, Manoj Pandit and others not the one who uploaded it, and its not in completed form. One can google something like, "documentary greater nepal", original will pop up for sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Learnerktm (talk • contribs) 2016-11-06T18:46:46 (UTC)
- @Learnerktm: So you are saying this is a copyright violation of this? (I did not watch it all to try to find this bit) Reventtalk 04:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- YES, you don't need to watch it just try searching in google once, and the uploaded file is also incomplete and not helpful.
The user who uploaded is not the creator himself for sure. user:Revent
Learnerktm (talk) 05:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Learnerktm: Ok. Skimming over it, I found a bit that matched exactly... enough to prove to me that this is an 'obvious' copyright violation. Thanks for reporting it. Reventtalk 05:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - copyright violation, excerpted from a copyrighted movie. --Reventtalk 05:21, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A duplicate of File:Nikki Sexx at AVN Awards 2011 2.jpg. Russian Rocky (talk) 16:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected - @Russian Rocky do you know the template {{Duplicate}}?. --JuTa 15:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
per official policy:"Commons:Screenshots are Commons:Derivative works and as such subject to the copyright of the displayed content"
: Please see also Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle Thank you for your time. Sincerely,--Tokorokoko 09:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
per official policy:"Commons:Screenshots are Commons:Derivative works and as such subject to the copyright of the displayed content"
: Please see also Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle
Thank you for your time. Sincerely,--Tokorokoko 09:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Software screenshot. MKFI (talk) 09:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation. Smaller-res version is credited to AFP here: http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/qKEXRQwhOT1/Nice+Guys+Photocall+69th+Annual+Cannes+Film/oLyhN85hS0j MKFI (talk) 09:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: No permission since 9 November 2016
Files uploaded by Gjergjshqiperia (talk · contribs)
[edit]See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats
- File:Serbia permes fraksionit te eulexit smund te me bej asgje.pdf
- File:E drejta per Liri e Lugines.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gjergjshqiperia (talk · contribs)
[edit]As above.
- File:Vetevrasjet a vrasje ne burgje te Kosoves.pdf
- File:Vazhdon gjykimi politik i EULEX.pdf
- File:Terrori dhe aktet terroriste te Serbise kunder familjes Jashari.pdf
- File:Tendenca e Serbise per ta cilesu Grupin e Dobrosinit si grup terrorist islamik.pdf
- File:Serbia permes fraksionit te eulexit smund te me beje asgje! 1.pdf
- File:Rusia e viteve 1991-2000.pdf
- File:Kerkesa per hudhje te aktakuzes.pdf
- File:Rusia.pdf
- File:Rreziku nga Lindja!.pdf
- File:E drejta per Liri e Lugines 1.pdf
- File:Korrupsioni dhe ndikimi politik ndwrkombwtar.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:16, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Homework, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juma A.Mkiwa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Selfies and homework, out of scope.
- File:PHY 201 TUTORIAL 31-Oct-2016 17-43-03.pdf
- File:Family photo (94).jpg
- File:Family photo (11).jpg
- File:JUMA'S daughter.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Olivier RIBERA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works of book covers, logos, or scanned images. File:Escola-Poeta-Foix.jpg is a clear copyvio from http://www.institutmontserrat.cat/event/les-escoles-de-primaria-del-districte-ens-visiten/escola-poeta-foix/.
- File:Escola-Poeta-Foix.jpg
- File:Vista de l'escola pf.jpg
- File:Foto 103 wefrerwf ewr.jpg
- File:Foto 102 wsfsdf sd.jpg
- File:Foto 101 gttrew.jpg
- File:Foto 101 gt.jpg
- File:Logo resta t.jpg
- File:Fr fi 1.jpg
- File:Smllieee.jpg
- File:Zb fff.jpg
- File:Zigy zigy.jpg
- File:Images 6low.jpg
- File:PITOT vell.jpg
- File:Portada de la novel.la Cops de bec a Pasadena.jpg
- File:Portada imatge 1.jpg
MKFI (talk) 16:12, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted book or magazine covers and logos.
- File:Homes i no.jpg
- File:Doble o res 3.jpg
- File:Doble o res 2.jpg
- File:Doble o res.gif
- File:Mossegar-se la cua 2.jpg
- File:Mossegar-se la cua.jpg
- File:Trajecte final.png
- File:Log thread.jpg
MKFI (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:NETCOPYVIO of robotic products nominated here instead of speedy due to volume. All appear elsewhere on web.
- File:Amigo robot.png
- File:Allegro Hand.png
- File:Pepper robot.jpg
- File:Pioneer LX.jpg
- File:ABB robot.jpg
- File:Innok robot.jpg
- File:RMPv3.png
- File:Alpha by nex.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 22:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Despite bogus self authorship claim, both sourced to ros.org, which states "the ros.org web pages are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0" This is too vague to be acceptable per COM:EVID/COM:PRP. "Web pages" are distinct from, say, "content" (i.e. images), and the language does not include, for example "the ros.org web pages and all content thereon", which is vastly more typical for such notices. Essentially, there exists a reasonable interpretation that the disclaimer applies solely to text. Indeed, the interpretation that the notice applies to images as well also exists, but policies and common sense require explicit articulation.
Эlcobbola talk 23:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Damian betke (talk · contribs)
[edit]Internet images, small resolution and no EXIF. http://shop.wwe.com/asuka/, https://twitter.com/gangstaofnxt, http://www.fcwprowrestling.com/nxttagchampionshiptitehist.htm
- File:Manager nxt william regal.jpg
- File:Wwe nxt champion shinsuke nakamura.jpg
- File:Nxt womens champion.jpg
- File:Nxt tag team championi.jpg
- File:Logo wwe nxt.jpg
- File:Liv morgan.jpg
MKFI (talk) 09:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jofeibarbal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted cover art. The portrait image has no EXIF and is a suspected copyvio.
- File:Tradiciones moqueguanas.png
- File:Panes, herencia y tradición de Moquegua.jpg
- File:Nuestros Panes. Recetas de familia.jpg
- File:La cocina tradicional de Moquegua.jpg
- File:José Fernando Ibárcena Balbuena.jpg
MKFI (talk) 09:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Twitter profile image: https://twitter.com/HossamShorbagy MKFI (talk) 09:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. MKFI (talk) 09:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
All uploads are sourced externally, but have no indication of permission.
- File:Rosaline Hostel.jpg
- File:New Academic Complex.jpg
- File:Prime Minsiter & President Visit in April' 1950.jpg
- File:New Central Library at ISM Dhanbad.jpg
- File:Swimming Pool at SAC.jpg
- File:Dept. of CSE.jpg
- File:Jasper Hostel.jpg
- File:Dept. of Petroleum Engg.jpg
- File:Oval Garden.jpg
Basvb (talk) 11:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Roughly half of the images has Facebook or Dareknews.bg as a source but no evidence of permission. The other half is claimed to be own work. Everything has a low-medium resolution and only one file (File:Празник на зелника - обща снимка.jpg) has exif data. File:Празник на зелника 1.jpg (claimed own work and uploaded in 2016) can be found at this 2015 news article. This combined gives me reason to significantly doubt the own work on all of the uploaded images by user Patzata. @Patzata: please explain us whether you took the images yourself or do have permission and if you took them yourself please explain how they ended up at an external website.
- File:PJ01.jpg
- File:J010616 3.jpg
- File:J010616 4.jpg
- File:J010616 5.jpg
- File:J010616 1.jpg
- File:J010616 2.jpg
- File:2016a.jpg
- File:2016b.jpg
- File:Surova20163.jpg
- File:Surova2016.jpg
- File:Surova20161.jpg
- File:Surova20165.jpg
- File:FK2011.jpg
- File:FK2010.jpg
- File:FK2012.jpg
- File:Певческата група на читалище "Съгласие".jpg
- File:Кукери, с. Жабокрът.jpg
- File:Петльовден2.jpg
- File:Петльовден.jpg
- File:Петльовден1.jpg
- File:Празник на зелника - обща снимка.jpg
- File:Празник на зелника 1.jpg
- File:Майсторът на зелниците.jpg
- File:Празник на зелника.jpg
- File:Културен форум "Панагия" 2013.jpg
- File:Читалище съгласие.jpg
- File:Съгласие.jpg
- File:Празник на плодовете.jpg
- File:Празник на плодовете в гр. Кюстендил.jpg
- File:Празник в гр. Кюстендил.jpg
- File:Булка и младоженец - кукерски празник за 2016 г.jpg
- File:Обща снимка - кукерски празник за 2016 г.jpg
- File:Kukeri2016.jpg
- File:Kukeri Zhabokrat Kn 6.jpg
- File:Kukeri Zhabokrat kn 4.jpg
- File:Kukeri Zhabokrat kn 2.jpg
- File:Kukeri Zhabokrat kn 3.jpg
- File:Kukeri Zhabokrat kn 1.jpg
- File:Kukeri Zhabokrat kn.jpg
Basvb (talk) 11:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Siavash shahabi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most of the images include different external sources (facebook, news sites) but no evidence of permission. A few our own work but these are also of different resolutions and without exif data. As such I believe most if not all of these files are copyright violations.
- File:Ilo-bahram.jpg
- File:Hkk-kongere9-24.jpg
- File:Iran-embassy-berlin.jpg
- File:Iran-tribunal-2012.jpg
- File:IT-Logo-1.gif
- File:Iran-tribunal-1.jpg
- File:Wpi-cyo-germany.jpg
- File:Farideh-arman.jpg
- File:Dsc 0337-e1410471076875.jpg
- File:Ahadi-sharia-alman.jpg
- File:060210pod08.jpg
- File:Unnamed-28.jpg
- File:Hkk-kongere9.jpg
- File:Anternasional584.png
- File:Ilo-elia10.jpg
- File:Wpi-site-logo.jpg
- File:Homa arjomand.jpg
- File:مراسم ۱۶ آذر ۱۳۸۵.jpg
- File:مصطفی شعاعیان.jpg
- File:منصور حکمت.jpg
- File:بزرگداشت حزب کمونیست کارگری.jpg
- File:برخی اعضای فعلی حککا در زمان عضویت در حکا.jpg
- File:Hikmat-taghvaie.jpg
- File:کنگره نهم حزب کمونیست کارگری ایران.jpg
- File:حزب کمونیست کارگری ایران.jpg
Basvb (talk) 11:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- not Pholiota microspora.' it's Pholiota adiposa. --Togabi (talk) 00:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Just request the file renaming to the correct taxon. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: use {{Rename}} instead. --Jcb (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Satyamanandjee (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self promotion by uploader, not a notable person. Out of scope.
- File:Satyam Anandjee`s Great Show — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:More Listeners entering in the hall, as my music spreads everywhere By Satyam Anandjee— at Eco Park.jpg
- File:Satyam Anandjee performing With his 'HARMONIUM' — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:Fun Filled Event By Satyam Anandjee !! — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:Blissful Performance by Satyam Anandjee !! — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:Satyam Anandjee & Team!! — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:A continuous 2 an Half hr. of musical performance by Satyam Anandjee !! — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:All the blessings are being seen on my face!! — at Eco Park - Satyam Anandjee.jpg
- File:Delightful Event By Satyam Anandjee !! — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:Enjoyment at my musical event with Satyam Anandjee !! — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:Satyam Anandjee - My Favorite !! — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:Satyam Anandjee Performed at ISSYOGA INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY, occasion of GURUPURNIMA — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:Gurumaa showered her blessings to Satyam Anandjee !! — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:Satyam Anandjee feels so nice to be praised by all !! — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:Pradip Ghosh & Satyam Anandjee Live Performance !! — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:A 'Superb' Event and 'fabulous' performance of music and only music for GURUPURNIMA by Satyam Anandjee !! — at Eco Park.jpg
- File:Satyam Anandjee In Full Musical form at Kolkata Event !! — at Eco Park.Kolkata.jpg
- File:Live Ghazal Concert By Satyam Anandjee At Ahmedabad.jpg
- File:Live Ghazal Concert By Satyam Anandjee At J.W Marriott.jpg
- File:Live Ghazal Concert By Satyam Anandjee At Grand Hyatt.jpg
- File:Satyam Anandjee Performing For Antarrashtriya Issyoga Samaj.jpg
- File:Satyam Anandjee With Anup Jalota.jpg
- File:Satyam Anandjee Youth Festival Winner 2011.jpg
- File:Satyam Anandjee Performing At Ujjain.jpg
- File:Satyam Anandjee.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 13:58, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
very low quality image, we have many more photos of better quality Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- In the scope of Wiki Lovesw Earth 2016? --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:40, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Just because it's been uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth doesn't mean it's in scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 14:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 14:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A Rainha das Artes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private selfie gallery. Unused, out of project scope.
- File:Luna D´Nogueira Diretora.jpg
- File:Luna D´Nogueira.jpg
- File:Luna Blue.jpg
- File:Luna D´Nogueira .jpg
GeorgHH • talk 14:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from photos. Should cropped/blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 17:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 17:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file looks to be a derivative from an older image and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. The file could fall within the public domain because of its age. If this is the case information about the source, author and date of the original work should be given to verify this. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 17:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
by mistake Hwangsj1994 (talk) 17:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Unused, out of project scope. GeorgHH • talk 19:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Mache ich mich nach § 106 UrhG strafbar, wenn ich diese Partitur ausdrucke? 84.61.138.217 19:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kingbossix (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Off-Set Hole.png
- File:Off-Set Pin.jpg
- File:Bristol 4 Spline.jpg
- File:Mortorq Super.jpg
- File:6 Lobe Pin.png
- File:7-Star.png
- File:Line Type 2.jpg
- File:Hex with Pin.jpg
- File:Penta Nut.jpg
- File:SIT Drive.jpg
- File:ACR Slotted Drive.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Patzata
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hranjan11
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Siavash shahabi
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hranjan11
저작권 침해(Copyright violations), http://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=382&aid=0000472576 -- 메이 `토론 02:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Broken copy of File:Deinotherium giganteum .jpg. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
The file was previously deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:White-rose-2016.jpg. As the photo is previously published, OTRS-permission from photographer (not from band members) is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: previously deleted. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violations: movie/TV series poster, facebook image, TV screen shot. No EXIF in any, small res.
- File:01e8QBx4 03956b .jpg.jpg
- File:Screen Shot jpg.png
- File:13221007 Jamesji.jpg
- File:13239079 jamesji.jpg
- File:CBqh9 yUkAIypPn.jpg
MKFI (talk) 09:48, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
I am not the owner of this file i found it on Google Shihab20 (talk) 20:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:58, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Given other upload by user of same image this is likely a copyvio Basvb (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: broken copy of File:Fotografía de la banda.jpg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment Hmm... I can find it on the band's FB page here. And I can find it on the photographer's FB page here. Neither place seems ot have anything resembling a Wikipedia release for it. Tabercil (talk) 00:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, per nomination and Tabercil. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Two images are clear copyvios (watermarked) the third is likely a copyvio as well
Basvb (talk) 11:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Externally sourced images without evidence of permission. Other uploads with own work claims could also have some issues.
- File:صما.png
- File:قرية صما في الخمسينات.jpg
- File:فريق نادي صمّا للكرة الطائرة.jpg
- File:Oaijordan10.jpg
- File:المجاهد احمد عبدالله عبدالقادر القعاونة.png
- File:المجاهد.png
- File:المجاهد احمد العبدالله العبدالقادر القعاونة.png
- File:مدرسة صما 1974.jpg
- File:قرى الطيبة والوسطية.jpg
Basvb (talk) 11:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, some images were also claimed to be "own work", although clearly they aren't. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Official press image from Bugatti Automobiles SAS. You can clearly see the Bugatti HQ reflected in the car. 2A01:E35:87EB:41C0:50A5:F4A9:8595:3364 12:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the Flickr user never claimed to have taken the image, so authorship and license are wrong. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
One image credited to facebook user, other image has exif data with copyright holder. Other two images no exif and likely copyvios as well.
Basvb (talk) 12:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:39, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mc87, this DR was related to an old version that the uploader admitted to have taken from Facebook. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Flickr file washing: Not the flickr user's creation. Copyright holder is not the flickr uploader. Image comes from here and is available in higher resolutions on the web everywhere. For example here 188.110.78.19 14:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A duplicate of File:Nikki Sexx at AVN Awards 2011 1.jpg. Russian Rocky (talk) 16:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
low res no exif images of which one is an aerial shot. Own work unlikely
- File:Campus-aerial-photo.jpg
- File:Buckingham-building.jpg
- File:Buckingham-uni2.jpg
- File:Buckingham-bulding.jpg
- File:Buckingham-uni.jpg
Basvb (talk) 16:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Bild ist schief, habe ich nocheinmal unter anderem Namen hochgeladen. Schlipstraeger (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete request by uploader, unintentionally uploaded file, correct file now is File:Königsleitenspitze.JPG. For smaller changes you can consider to upload a new version of the same image the next time. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO, notice this image has had the top cut off to hide the source http://pelan.tv/show/745687/solmazhesari/%D8%B3%D9%88%D9%84%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D8%AD%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO an uncropped, larger version of this was previously published at https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://rozup.ir/view/1801849/%25D8%25B9%25DA%25A9%25D8%25B3%2520%25D8%25B3%25D9%2585%25DB%258C%25D8%25B1%25D8%25A7%2520%25D8%25AD%25D8%25B3%25DB%258C%25D9%2586%25DB%258C%2520%25D8%25B4%25D9%2587%25D8%25B1%25DB%258C%25D9%2588%25D8%25B1%252095.jpg&imgrefurl=http://javuni.ir/news/195495&h=937&w=750&tbnid=O-PiHTF2IezIZM&tbnh=251&tbnw=201&usg=__w85Eu3hPdTZT8FFaydGLOWrF4EE=&docid=NVElZA_E6zX1xM Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO. This image was cropped down from a larger one, as shown at https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xft1/t51.2885-15/s640x640/sh0.08/e35/12558910_916954591752258_66799644_n.jpg&imgrefurl=http://mulpix.com/instagram/%D9%81%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%85_film_%D8%B3%D9%8A%D9%86%D9%85%D8%A7_%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%B2%D9%8A%DA%AF%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86.html&h=640&w=640&tbnid=Y-wASKVHmZVedM&tbnh=225&tbnw=225&usg=__x4JnH-Q7uiWgdlf2UFRFGu-CdLI=&docid=Y3tHTEm-v4rTAM, to hide the signature of the creator which shows barely at her left shoulder in the commons version, and clearly in the uncropped version. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO an uncropped version of this image is found at http://rouzegar.com/fun/actor-pic/roya-mirelmi - it has wider field of view and overprinting than this version. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete While the linked image is not the source (too small, watermark), considering the user's history this is very unlikely to be the user's own work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO, this image occurs widely on the internet, one version http://jigili1.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/roya-mir-elmi-jadid-1.jpg from earlier than this upload, omits the top of her head, but gives a credit line. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIOs. Music CD covers and logos promoting various bands, but claimed as own work and all obviously not.
- File:Ghost Brigade - Guided By Fire Vinyl Artwork.jpg
- File:Ghost Brigade - Guided By Fire.jpg
- File:Ghost Brigade - Isolation Songs.png
- File:Periphery - Periphery III- Select Difficulty.jpg
- File:Periphery - Juggernaut- Omega.jpg
- File:Periphery - Juggernaut- Alpha.jpg
- File:Triosphere - The Heart Of The Matter.jpg
- File:Baroness - Green.jpg
- File:Amorphis Logo.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
probably copyvio (https://www.tineye.com/search/056f43f738bca9a1346aafa91c353f3693097ae2/) 2003:D2:1BE0:5EBE:6989:4CE1:8A38:EA4E 19:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Athar_Azeem.jpg Ritarisk (talk) 19:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:58, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Low resolution duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Estacion_Morris.JPG FedericoMP (talk) 19:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: redirected. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Farm-Fresh_medal_gold_1.png Ritarisk (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: redirected. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This is from US Patent 6,305,620 wich was filed in 2000 and granted in 2001. It is therefore coyrighted and cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from Antonio Marchese, the inventor. See http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,305,620.PN.&OS=PN/6,305,620&RS=PN/6,305,620 and Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Patents. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:05, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 20:52, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Copyfraud: Image cut out of a Youtube video ([3]) which was posted with a cc-by license by a fan-made blog/news website called mapleleafshotstove.com ([4]). The original video in turn was uploaded the very same day by the official Maple Leafs account ([5]) with a standard Youtube license, hence copyfraud. Jfvoll (talk) 21:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, account of that YouTube video has been closed due to copyright violations. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of date and/or place of first publication. PD-Russia is no longer a valid licence for hosting on Commons. russavia (talk) 22:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
- Keep This ship sank in 1942. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 03:09, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Kept: As per Nard, changing licence to PD-Russia-2008 russavia (talk) 06:55, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Photo could be have been taken up until 1946. No longer valid for hosting under PD-Russia. Undelete in 2024 Dogad75 (talk) 21:58, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Did you seen the previous DR? --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- No evidence of date and/or place of first publication. This ship is decommissioned in 1954. With regard to the previous total: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Russavia&diff=155281066&oldid=147082792. --Dogad75 (talk) 07:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Messed up the files, I'm sorry. This ship sank in 1942, https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Щ-311. --Dogad75 (talk) 07:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: nomination retracted. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Duplicate of higher quality image [6]. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nelson_Downtown2l.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: redirected. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bachchor_Stuttgart.jpg Ritarisk (talk) 23:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: redirected. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bachchor_Stuttgart.jpg Ritarisk (talk) 23:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: redirected. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:20, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Attributes image to Google Street View (i.e. copyvio of Google) (t) Josve05a (c) 23:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. MB298 (talk) 02:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Srittau: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dca0220
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Srittau: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mikewiese
COM:NOTUSED: no Wikimedia project pages use this file, and it has no foreseeable educational use. RJaguar3 (talk) 18:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Thank you, Rjaguar3, I had forgotten about this horrible day. I agree this image and description is better kept out of the Commons. -SusanLesch (talk) 00:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Athar_Azeem_Pic.jpg Ritarisk (talk) 19:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Both were unused personal image, one was a crop of the other. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
The uploader has just lyed, this file is copyrighted issued by WWE.com page, it is copyrighted and must be deleted immediately. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 20:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Only contribution of uploader. Cropped, but higher resolution here: [7]. Likely copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GTA_San_Andreas.svg Ritarisk (talk) 21:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Alt-Treptow.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Baumschulenweg.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Baumschulenweg.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 01:41, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: not duplicates. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Grünau.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Bohnsdorf.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by Image:Berlin Ortsteil Gatow.svg Friedrichstrasse (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Image to be deleted is different from the one to be kept, so both can stay at Commons. No copyright problems found. Alpertron (talk) 13:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Gatow.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Staaken.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Wilhelmstadt.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by Image:Berlin Ortsteil Frohnau.svg Friedrichstrasse (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Image to be deleted is different from the one to be kept, so both can stay at Commons. No copyright problems found. Alpertron (talk) 13:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Frohnau.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Rummelsburg.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Lichterfelde.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by Image:Berlin Ortsteil Mariendorf.svg Friedrichstrasse (talk) 15:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Kept: Image to be deleted is different from the one to be kept, so both can stay at Commons. No copyright problems found. Alpertron (talk) 13:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Mariendorf.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: This image was not the same as the one suggested to replace it. No problem to keep both. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Karlshorst.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Marienfelde.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Halensee.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Substituted by a better map (File:Berlin Ortsteil Falkenberg.svg). I'm the author of this file Arbalete (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work. Copyright situation of depicted work unknown. Jcb (talk) 21:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AZOV_logo.svg Ritarisk (talk) 22:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Same reason as with Commons:Deletion requests/File:José María Albiñana 1916.jpg (author died in 1936). Label as Category:Undelete in 2017 Discasto talk 00:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Same reason as with Commons:Deletion requests/File:José María Albiñana 1916.jpg (author died in 1936). Label as Category:Undelete in 2017 Discasto talk 00:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Same reason as with Commons:Deletion requests/File:José María Albiñana 1916.jpg (author died in 1936). Label as Category:Undelete in 2017 Discasto talk 00:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Same reason as with Commons:Deletion requests/File:José María Albiñana 1916.jpg (author died in 1936). Label as Category:Undelete in 2017 Discasto talk 00:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be in the public domain. Author was born around 1870 and therefore could have died in the 1930's or 1940's. Law in Spain states 80 years pma as copyright term Discasto talk 00:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jhrhj%C3%B1ljkh.png Ritarisk (talk) 01:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Nizil Shah (talk) 01:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Nizil Shah (talk) 01:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Nizil Shah (talk) 01:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Nizil Shah (talk) 01:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Nizil Shah (talk) 01:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Nizil Shah (talk) 01:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Nizil Shah (talk) 01:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Nizil Shah (talk) 01:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Nizil Shah (talk) 01:32, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
self-promotion Nizil Shah (talk) 01:33, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Advertisement Nizil Shah (talk) 01:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:33, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
unused personal image Amada44 (talk) 06:19, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Wknight94 talk 17:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 02:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 3family6 as no license. Quote: as the author is unknown, we can't be sure the c. 1928 date qualifies the image under PD-old. JuTa 04:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wdwd as no license. Well, there is a {{PD-textlogo}}, but there is much more than text. JuTa 04:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- I've uploaded it in a lower resolution on cawiki in order to avoid any licensing problem. I agree with the deletion request. --Xavier D. (Messages) 14:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
The depicted artwork is not own work of the uploader as claimed. We need to know the artist and/or the time when it was painted to be able to decide if i.e. {{PD-old}} could apply here. JuTa 05:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello JuTa, I am new to Wikipedia to create page. It is a photo of Thangka painting in a Buddhist monastery in my village tinno. The painting has been painted recently. Is it possible to upload it? Otherwise please remove it. avnish 06:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
درخواست کاربر Smorteza (talk) 06:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete User requests deletion of his own photo from his user page. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unfinished duplicate of File:USA 2012 to 2016 presidential election swing (relative).svg Korakys (talk) 07:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- I didn't know that Magog the Ogre has already created one, so this file can be deleted. Ali Zifan 06:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational. OUT OF SCOPE Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational. Commons don't host selfies. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational. Out of scope Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jenny Najar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational
- File:Pablo Espinosa y los voluntarios Ruralive.jpg
- File:Pablo Espinosa y familia Ruralive.JPG
- File:Yunus Y Ruralive.jpg
- File:Pablo Espinosa en Ruralive.jpg
- File:Lanzamiento de Ruralive en Colombia.JPG
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Etanushreekalita (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational. Out of scope
- File:Pankajkalita10.jpg
- File:Pankajkalita9.JPG
- File:Pankajkalita5.jpg
- File:Pankajkalita6.JPG
- File:Pankajkalita2.jpg
- File:Pankajkalita.jpg
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 09:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Updated by File:Kerr-Trajectory1.jpg B wik (talk) 09:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, uploader's request, unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused and encyclopedically irrelevant. Requested by the autor. Víctor (talk) 09:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
I, the author requested to delete this. — TBhagat (talk) 09:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Identical to File:Reince Priebus crop.jpg, but this particular crop seems to have issues with certain thumb sizes being displayed correctly. I.e. see Category:Reince Priebus. Effeietsanders (talk) 09:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is not from party or event category in Bollywood Hungama and so the OTRS permission does not hold. — TBhagat (talk) 09:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is almost certainly a copyright image from NDTV Convergence Limited and can be found at [8], which asserts copyright on its website [9]. Green Giant (talk) 13:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
![[8]](http://drop.ndtv.com/albums/ENTERTAINMENT/bodyguard/kareena1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleted by Tabercil JurgenNL (talk) 11:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
This image is not from party or event category in Bollywood Hungama and so the OTRS permission does not hold. — TBhagat (talk) 09:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is not from party or event category in Bollywood Hungama and so the OTRS permission does not hold. — TBhagat (talk) 09:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
too complex logo, without source Bloody-libu (talk) 10:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
too complex logo, without source Bloody-libu (talk) 10:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
too complex logo Bloody-libu (talk) 10:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Promotional Takeaway (talk) 10:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Could fall under PD-textlogo, but I doubt that. Basvb (talk) 11:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
I believe that this logo is too complex to be considered to be below the Threshold of originality and as such should be deleted. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MayorGalvan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:Zionist Terrorist Racist Jewish Welfare Whore Pigs at Facebook.JPG
- File:Zionist Terrorist Racist Jewish Pigs at Facebook 2015.JPG
Basvb (talk) 11:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:39, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
That's not true. Facebook was not a source, you can find this photo in several other places. We are talking about this person and this user. The same person. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 00:29, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Sujet privé Robin Chubret (talk) 11:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: le visage est trop pixellé et seulement un peu est visible. Impossible à determiner l'identitie du subjet- raison sujet privé inapplicable.--ClemRutter (talk) 21:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete While I don't necessarily follow the original reason (privacy violation), this photo has a pretty bad quality and no educational purpose. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per Sebari. --lNeverCry 23:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
sujet privé Robin Chubret (talk) 11:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: le visage total n'est pas visible. Impossible à determiner l'identitie du subjet avec certitude- raison sujet privé inapplicable. (Le maillot vien de Monoprix!)--ClemRutter (talk) 21:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
sujet privé Robin Chubret (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: le visage n'est pas visible. Impossible à determiner l'identitie du subjet- raison sujet privé inapplicable.--ClemRutter (talk) 21:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
sujet privé Robin Chubret (talk) 11:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: le visage n'est pas visible. Impossible à determiner l'identitie du subjet- raison sujet privé inapplicable.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- I have got a permission from the copyright holder to release it under a free license. Geonarva (talk) 11:58, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Is it possible to verify this permission via Commons:OTRS? Basvb (talk) 12:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
wrong license – please fix according to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Upload/Unknown_author_or_license or send OTRS Commons:OTRS or it will be deleted Albinfo (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
I am not the owner of this file i found it on Google Shihab20 (talk) 20:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, based on a user-made map. I fixed the author information, this should be fine now. Nevertheless, since it's unused and not up to today's standard of SVG maps, delete as a courtesy. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:39, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
I am not the owner of this file i found it on Google Shihab20 (talk) 20:25, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:39, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Self promotion (contributions in spanish is only for her user page), low image quality. The Photographer (talk) 13:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 13:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
No evidence that this file is truly more than 70 years old. Basvb (talk) 11:37, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:40, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:40, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Copyright violation from http://www.e-politic.ro/Republica-Moldova/Marian-Lupu-Republica-Moldova-dispusa-sa-rezolve-conflictul-transnistrean_120636_32.html (:Julien:) (talk) 09:49, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
-2011-08-18T09:49:00.000Z-File:Lupu.jpg){kind=link}
- The picture has been published on flickr on May 10th, 2010 (and is copyright protected). (:Julien:) (talk) 09:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. russavia (talk) 07:39, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Since the page itself has been requested to be deleted it is acceptable for me. I only collected the spoken agreement by the copyright holder and do not have any proof. --Tro düsseldorf (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
From external source without evidence of permission Basvb (talk) 11:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:50, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ungureanulucian (talk · contribs)
[edit]Four images sourced from facebook, one claimed own work but with small size and no exif data I doubt about that.
Basvb (talk) 11:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Deleted the obvious copyright violations. No hits on Google Image Search for the last image, but I did not look deeply into it. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kathisma (talk) 03:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Own work unlikely Basvb (talk) 12:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
own work unlikely. Exif data mentions www.karpiy.com.ua. Basvb (talk) 12:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file looks to be a derivative and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
File with different author in watermark than the uploader. Basvb (talk) 12:14, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Own work of official logo unlikely Basvb (talk) 12:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:48, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitpisit (talk • contribs) 2016-11-07T10:42:52 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitpisit (talk • contribs) 2016-11-07T10:42:44 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
The file has been in DeviantArt since at least 2008 in http://anthonycrowley.deviantart.com/ That case OTRS-permission from photographer (not from depicted person) is needed. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, unused, personal pic. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- also redirect file:6tag 111015-141106.jpg
Small unused personal photo without camera data, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Norway. 4ing (talk) 13:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Logo likely above TOO Basvb (talk) 13:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Promotional, out of project scope 4ing (talk) 13:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Neither Colin Browne nor novel "Baggage handler" is mentioned in en.wiki. In my opinion the file is not usable as stock photo, so it is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Per precautionary principle. No data about who the author is, or date of production. May be copyrighted. - Fma12 (talk) 13:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Low quality image of a lion in India, without proper description, location, or categories. We already have hundreds of similar photos of better quality. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- In the scope of Wiki Loves Earth 2016? --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Just because it's been uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Earth doesn't mean it's in scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:50, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Logo-letter-white.png
Seems like these logos do not belong to en:Dayco. Simple logos with uncertain notability, maybe out of project scope. Daycohost is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Taivo (talk) 13:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:37, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JesusOfficial30 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of COM:SCOPE.
Gauss (talk) 13:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 13:50, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information. Jcb (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:51, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See EXIF: Author CCH Tireau Jérémy Copyright holder Jérémy Tireau©armée de Terre . So it is not the work of the uploader. Please check all other uploads of the user. 188.110.78.19 13:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality photo of some river in an unidentified location - no educational purpose Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Сомнения в лицензии: логотип не государственного органа власти Украины, защищён авторским правом Dogad75 (talk) 14:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination According to the Article 10 of the Law of Ukraine on Copyright and Related rights this work is in the public domain within Ukraine and possibly in other jurisdictions because it is one of the following: (d) State symbols of Ukraine, government awards; symbols and signs of government authorities, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations; symbols of territorial communities; symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 14:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Info Как объект природно-заповедного фонда, зоопарк подчиняется Министерству охраны окружающей природной среды Украины. Более того, относится к коммунальной собственности территориальной общины г.Киева и подчиняется Главному управлению экологии и охраны природных ресурсов исполнительного органа Киевского городского совета (Киевской городской государственной администрации) — в соответствии с Распоряжением исполнительного органа Киевского городского совета (Киевской городской государственной администрации) от 12.10.2010 N 839 «О некоторых вопросах деятельности предприятий, учреждений и организаций, которые принадлежат к коммунальной собственности города Киева». --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 14:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --lNeverCry 23:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
No permission. Jcb (talk) 14:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Логотип негосударственного органа власти, а политической партии, защищён авторским правом, необходимо разрешение на публикацию под свободной лицензией Dogad75 (talk) 14:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination According to the Article 10 of the Law of Ukraine on Copyright and Related rights this work is in the public domain within Ukraine and possibly in other jurisdictions because it is one of the following: (d) State symbols of Ukraine, government awards; symbols and signs of government authorities, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations; symbols of territorial communities; symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations. С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 14:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --lNeverCry 23:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probably a statue by Fernando Botero, see here for comparison. We need the precise location of it to assess the possibility of freedom of panorama, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 14:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 14:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
very low quality image of an unidentified place - no educational value Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Huge resolution, so poor cuality is hardly applicable; waether and the hour of the day that has been taken also affect the photo. In the Scope of Wiki Loves Earth? --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:39, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Huge resolution does not automatically mean that an image has good quality. Once again, just because something is technically part of a competition, does not mean it's automatically in scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:44, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
out of scope and invalid license Basvb (talk) 14:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This appears to be the work by Josef Picker who died in 1984 (see this article.) This is an in-door photograph, hence we do not have a freedom of panorama exception. AFBorchert (talk) 14:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Flickr source does have a free license, but it is a derivative work of another photo (http://www.outofaces.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/denise-milani-tennis-7.jpg ) and we don't have a license for that. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete That Flickr channel seems to be dedicated to create compositions of Denise Milani. As such I doubt the license claims. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
1951 statue (as written on the file description). Not in PD in the United States, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such statues. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
_-_panoramio_-_gundam2345_(1).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio_-_gundam2345_(1).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The plaque below the monument says it was built in 2003 (15th year of the Heisei era). Not in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
low-quality variant of File:Codeine molecule spacefill.png, not used, unsourced (should be based on crystal structure or reproducible geometry optimisation to be useful) starless 15:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:54, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be a Flickrwash. Source states the photographer is Manolo Campion, so we would need a license from him. Confirmed by other copies on the web (possibly NSFW -- http://fashioneditorials.com/2015/04/27/lisa-seiffert-by-manolo-campion/ ) Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The wrong authorship claims cast enough doubt that I would say delete per PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:18, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e15/14334355_1120123201414845_2383633869195706368_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTM0NDM3NDgxMDA0MTYyNDQ2Nw%3D%3D.2. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ernesto Guillermo De Guevara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused flag of questionable notability.
- File:Bandera oficial de la República fluvial del Turia.jpg
- File:Bandera oficial de la República Fluvial del Turia.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/file storage album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nonnobis2013 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical maps and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Plano de Jeroni Berard.jpg
- File:Call judio sebastia sans.jpg
- File:Call judio.jpg
- File:Antoni llobet autoretrato.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Image appeared here on 18. October 2015, before 24. October 2015 upload to en.wiki. That article credits image to "Twitter" (no indication of the specific Twitter account or whether related to en.wiki uploader.) COM:NETCOPYVIO without OTRS. Эlcobbola talk 15:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- I notified the original uploader on en.wp. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
No credible claim of free licensing. This is a fifty-year-old newspaper, and its copyright does not belong to the person who scanned it. It may be PD under local law, or not -- if UK copyright law applied at the time of publication, it wouldn't be -- but an "own work" license is all but certainly invalid. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 16:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
No credible claim of free license. This is a decades-old photograph, and the "own work" license is apparently based on having scanned or captured the image rathe than owning the copyright to the original photograph. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 16:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 16:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
See w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 30#File:Joe Howe1.JPG Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [10]. Yann (talk) 08:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
![[10]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=651958020#File:Joe_Howe1.JPG){kind=link}
Files uploaded by InfoAktuell (talk · contribs)
[edit]all images are claimed to be own work. However the ones of the machines on white background are unlikely own work and derivatives. The older (black and white) images are also unlikely own work. The recent images all have different camera's in their exif (5 out of 5) and others without exif, all small res. Thus I doubt that any of these works are truly own work.
- File:Positionshonen.jpg
- File:Formhonen.jpg
- File:Sondermaschinen.jpg
- File:Smarthone.jpg
- File:Solohone.jpg
- File:Powertrainhone.jpg
- File:Lifehone.jpg
- File:Microstar.jpg
- File:Deephone.jpg
- File:Verschiedene Werkzeuge.jpg
- File:Honmaschine.jpg
- File:Schneidmittel.jpg
- File:Gehring USA.jpg
- File:Gehring India.jpg
- File:Gehring France.jpg
- File:Gehring Brazil.jpg
- File:Gehring China.jpg
- File:1991 - Juni, wir sind wieder in Naumburg.jpg
- File:1965 - Firmeneingang.jpg
- File:1961 - Bau der neuen Shedhalle.jpg
- File:1985 - Das Unternehmen in Ostfildern.jpg
- File:1949 - 1.Honmaschine ist gebaut.jpg
- File:1952 - Neue Montagehalle.jpg
- File:1926 - Auto-Reparaturwerkstatt.jpg
- File:1935 - Erste Honmaschinen.jpg
- File:1940 - Christoph Willi Gehring.jpg
- File:1938 - Heinz Gehring.jpg
Basvb (talk) 17:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wdwd as no license. There is a {{PD-ineligible}}, but is this valid for such a drawing? JuTa 04:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Info See also this discussion (in german).--Wdwd (talk) 15:04, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, above TOO. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT - also sourced to facebook so not sure about copyright lNeverCry 06:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:09, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
I still need the autor of this photo Lemontrend (talk) 15:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
This file looks to be a derivative from an older image and I doubt whether the copyright holder of the original work has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. The file could fall within the public domain because of its age. If this is the case information about the source, author and date of the original work should be given to verify this. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 17:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No evidence that the licence is correct. Also, the threshold of originality seems to be very low in Hungary so PD-textlogo will probaly not work either. De728631 (talk) 17:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Pascual Marín died in 1959. Unless this work belongs to the Marín Collection, this work is not in the public domain Discasto talk 17:38, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Hipodromoaren inaugurazioa Tribunen giroa eta zaldi lasterketak19160702Novedades19160716 p14.jpg
[edit]
Unless this picture belongs to the Marín Collection (GureGipuzkoa), this work is not in the public domain, as the photographer died in the 1950's and 80 years pma rule in Spain Discasto talk 17:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Same reasons as those for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hipodromoaren inaugurazioa Tribunen giroa eta zaldi lasterketak19160702Novedades19160716 p14.jpg Discasto talk 17:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Donostiako alkatea Eustaquio Inciarte eta beste agintariak hipodromoan. Novedades,n.360, (19160813)p.12.jpg
[edit]p.12.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
p.12.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Same reasons as with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hipodromoaren inaugurazioa Tribunen giroa eta zaldi lasterketak19160702Novedades19160716 p14.jpg Discasto talk 17:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No apparent educational utility in this very tiny icon copied from somewhere else. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Боровков Роман (talk · contribs)
[edit]All images were uploaded as "own work" but seem copied from the internet.
- File:Алнашетри.jpg
- File:Хват.jpg
- File:Майбутнє1.jpg
- File:Копорн.jpg
- File:Людина-свідок.jpg
- File:Рогоносніцер.jpg
- File:Мокеле.jpg
- File:Пінгвін1.jpg
- File:Great pachamac, Austrobrontus gigas.jpg
- File:Капед молокс.jpg
- File:Ктулу.jpg
- File:Ориксозавр.jpg
- File:Гетеродонтозавр1.jpg
- File:Гіпсилофодон деревний.jpg
- File:Зауролоф.jpg
- File:Перьеголовие тир.jpg
- File:Неотитанозавр.jpg
- File:Крібрум.jpg
- File:9JwouF88kwU.jpg
- File:Рамфор.jpg
- File:Dwarfmokele.jpg
- File:Cockadrak.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 03:26, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
Dinosaur and game images copied from the internet, not own wokr.
- File:Ситодзьоб.jpg
- File:Рогоносніцер2.jpg
- File:Дебарил.jpg
- File:Полардин.jpg
- File:Руколап.jpg
- File:Microraptor mmartyniuk3.png
- File:Крібрум2.jpg
- File:Tyrannosaurus rex by durbed1.jpg
- File:Мікрораптор2.png
- File:Вікізавр.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Some files have source and sourced files are usually published under CC-BY-SA, so they do not violate copyright. But Delete all as out of project scope. These animals are fictional, they have never existed. They come from website of fictional animals. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright and scope issues, per Taivo. Note - some were in use and therefore in scope, but except the last two, they appear to be copyright violations. The last two have had their license fixed and are in scope, so were kept. Storkk (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Боровков Роман (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIO and COM:HOAX. There are different kinds of images in this gallery. Type one: Amateurish sketches, claimed to be animals but looking nothing like anything real. Type two: Professional images copied from a variety of websites - all without permission of their original creators.
- File:Рапторекс.jpg
- File:Карнотавр.jpg
- File:Мікроцератопс.jpg
- File:Мегараптор.jpg
- File:Марсозавр.jpg
- File:Spino.jpg
- File:Динозаври.jpg
- File:Трицератопс.jpg
- File:Tyrannosaurus концепт.png
- File:Тірекс.jpg
- File:Velocipes guerichi.jpg
- File:Celofyzy.jpg
- File:Тімурленгія.jpg
- File:Сіамозавр.jpg
- File:Махамба.jpg
- File:Сігілмасавр.png
- File:Нгума-монене.png
- File:Касаірекс.jpg
- File:ФотоЙохонсона.jpg
- File:Раптор.JPG
- File:Ламетазавр.jpg
- File:Нанукзавр.jpg
- File:Романська мова.jpg
- File:Дилофозавр.jpg
- File:Проковт ганеозавр.jpg
- File:Раптор.gif
- File:Мікрораптор2.png
- File:Вікізавр.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- I deleted the obvious copyvios for now. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Non-credible claim of own work on this image from 1967. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
This image looks like it was copied from a printed source, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this tiny image of a celebrity. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Photo was previously published here. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 18:25, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The license is wrong 202.62.16.115 18:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The version uploaded to en.wiki shows the author as David Geary, Option D Films, and states that the image "is a still shot gathered form a section of film used in an Option D Film reel. It was given to the artist and to me specifically for use in media about artist, Amanda Matthews". Uploader's username is a match for the author David Geary, but an OTRS ticket is still required. Diannaa (talk) 18:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Looks copied from some printed material, whose original source is not provided. -- Asclepias (talk) 18:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
maps of unclear copyright statut
- File:Карта-схема. Боевой путь 1109сп. 25.VII.44-25.IV.45. Польша.jpg
- File:Карта-схема. Боевой путь 1109сп. 18.ІІІ-24.VII.44. Белоруссия.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Small, illegible, poor-quality personal image, the uploader's only contribution, not in use, no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:39, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ASUS_Logo.svg Ritarisk (talk) 18:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, uploaded after the SVG version. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
The data for the Standard International Version of G Subscript C is incorrect in this chart Bernoulli2016 (talk) 19:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Bhadauria1
[edit]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Logos uploaded by a single-purpose account for advertising. The files are not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 19:16, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Scope and copyright concerns. Logo copyright holder should confirm free license via OTRS. If kept, it also needs a {{Rename}}. Storkk (talk) 19:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
![19:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/13#c-Storkk-2016-11-13T19:19:00.000Z-File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
![00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/13#c-INeverCry-2016-11-20T00:05:00.000Z-File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png".jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photo, out of scope. If kept, it should be renamed to something less misleading. Storkk (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
![16:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/13#c-Storkk-2017-07-19T16:14:00.000Z-File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png".jpg_2){kind=link}
Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:05, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
![09:05, 25 July 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/11/13#c-Fanghong-2017-07-25T09:05:00.000Z-File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png".jpg_2){kind=link}
In the details, this map have several wrong points, and after all these years it was never corrected. See the comments at the down of this page https://web.archive.org/web/20061201123517/http://plattweb.free.fr/g/articles.php?lng=fr&pg=48 Kaoh (talk) 19:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
superseded, got permission from uploader to delete it Kopiersperre (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
superseded, got permission from uploader to delete it Kopiersperre (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
superseded, got permission from uploader to delete it Kopiersperre (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
superseded, got permission from uploader to delete it Kopiersperre (talk) 20:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
superseded, got permission from uploader to delete it Kopiersperre (talk) 20:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
superseded, got permission from uploader to delete it Kopiersperre (talk) 20:08, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:19, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, в Рувике указан другой автор, время и источник, см https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Медаль_Талант_и_Призвание_Всемирного_Альянса_Миротворец.jpg Dogad75 (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
bad quality Ritarisk (talk) 22:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Mappa errata e obsoleta, sostituita da una mappa corretta (File:Italia - mappa strada statale 7 quater.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe Arbalete (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Mappa errata e obsoleta, sostituita da una mappa corretta (File:Italia - mappa strada statale 7 bis.svg). Sono l'autore di entrambe Arbalete (talk) 23:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Bonita mujer, but Commons is not een familie album. Commons is not a family album. Jos1950 (talk) 23:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:06, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- File uploaded in 2005 and widely in use. Have you proof that Bernatff is not the photographer? [11] [12]. However, no Exif. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- No EXIF, but also low resolution and no own work claim by uploader. Jcb (talk) 16:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No source. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:11, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Have you proof that Dodo von den Bergen is not the author of this specific design of the Sargans COA? --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- This image is also at the site of the municipality, see here. So verification via OTRS will be needed at least. Jcb (talk) 16:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No source. Unknown copyright situation, no evidence that the stated license would apply. Jcb (talk) 23:13, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: You could see the history of the American Broadcasting Company and providing proof of copyright notice/registration before making DRs without researching. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- It's the other way round. We need to have a clear indication for the absence of a copyright notice if we want to keep the file. Jcb (talk) 16:28, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Also no source and no permission. Jcb (talk) 23:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1956. Jcb (talk) 23:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Google employees
[edit]On Flickr it states "Photo by Dan Pupius. Post-processing by me." We're missing license release from the photographer.
- File:Doodlers (all).jpg
- File:Doodlers (E).jpg
- File:Doodlers (first O).jpg
- File:Doodlers (G).jpg
- File:Doodlers (L).jpg
- File:Doodlers (second G).jpg
- File:Doodlers (second O).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(t) Josve05a (c) 23:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- At least the author attribution is wrong. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 00:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Clear Keep Its an educational diagram, with a used version of the image at File:Post-Canine_Megadontia_Timeline_2.gif. I am not sure why there are two seperate files, but its a relevant topic for academic study (doing an excellent job expanding ). Sadads (talk) 14:03, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Sadads. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Actually in the PD in Brazil? Amitie 10g (talk) 16:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep@EugeneZelenko: The file exist since August 27, 2011 and now, 5 years later, define that file as no permission, why? The information about permission is clearly described as: {{Insignia}} {{PD-BrazilGov}}. Raphael Figueira (talk) 17:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Is this organization part of government? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe Wikipedia has the answer. Also, as the official page mentions, the CEMEP is dependient on the Municipality of Paulínia, therefore {{PD-BrazilGov}} apply. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Yes, this organization is part of government! I studied ther, is a municipal school. Raphael Figueira (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Schools and other educational institutions could have own logos, even if they are public. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- But municipal schools logos are associated to country laws, consequently subjects of the country laws! Raphael Figueira (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
- Municipal school = Municipal organism > Municipal Government > National Government = PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Schools and other educational institutions could have own logos, even if they are public. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Yes, this organization is part of government! I studied ther, is a municipal school. Raphael Figueira (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe Wikipedia has the answer. Also, as the official page mentions, the CEMEP is dependient on the Municipality of Paulínia, therefore {{PD-BrazilGov}} apply. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Is this organization part of government? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: the wording of {{PD-BrazilGov}} makes me believe this is indeed PD. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ~viley as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: No proof that the author published this image with the stated license jdx Re: 18:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by ~viley as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: No proof that the author published this image with the stated license jdx Re: 18:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:21, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ошибка определения вида. Можно не удалять, а переименовать в Rhododendron sp. 95.28.22.181 21:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Какой смысл удалять файл, если проблема не с ним, а исключительно с названием и категоризацией?--Хомелка (talk) 06:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as long as Google Translate does not deceive me: no valid reason for deletion, possibly misnamed file and description. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
complex logo above TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Organization of Mexico, {{PD-Coa-Mexico}} and {{PD-MX-exempt}} apply. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:10, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- As far as I can read the MX © law, schools aren't mentioned / covered. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- The fact that it is not mentioned in the Copyright Law does not mean that the Schools are not "recognized organizations" in Mexico. Even, the UNAM is also considered as a recognized organization in Mexico. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Actually it does mean exactly that. But, if UNAM is recognised as such, then it will certainly apply to sub-levels of this organization. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- The fact that it is not mentioned in the Copyright Law does not mean that the Schools are not "recognized organizations" in Mexico. Even, the UNAM is also considered as a recognized organization in Mexico. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:08, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- As far as I can read the MX © law, schools aren't mentioned / covered. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as far as I understand {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}, this is PD. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Giakhanghp (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Thu Phuong 2004.jpg
- File:Giữ lại hạnh phúc 2015.jpg
- File:Giulaihanhphucsingle.jpg
- File:Thu Phương đnmp 2004.jpg
- File:Thu Phương with Lâm Nhật Tiến 2004.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Please don't delete those files. I am granted a permission of this artist to upload my photos. I sent a permission email. Giakhanghp (talk) 06:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Giakhanghp: having and sending us the permission from the photographer is one thing. Uploading promotional content is another one. One or two images might be useful for a Wikipedia article if the performer is notable. I see no educational use for more. Ankry (talk) 19:27, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios (http://www.mtvvietnam.com.vn/news/news.php?newsid=2287) or/and precautionary principe. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://afamilycdn.com/k:thumb_w/600/BccccccccccccP5pPwyP9MpQcsU42J/Image/2015/09/AfamilyGTThuphuongxucdonghatbenanhtraivachigai13-0b32f/mua-thu-cua-phuong-4.jpg.
- File:Thu Phương ending stage 2013.jpg
- File:Thu Phương in Haiphong Spetember 2015.jpg
- File:Thu Phương with singer Phương Thanh 2013.jpg
- File:Thu Phương with siblings 2013.jpg
- File:Thu Phương October 2013.jpg
- File:Thu Phương parents 2013.jpg
- File:Thu Phương ending 2013.jpg
- File:Thu Phương memory 2013.jpg
- File:Thu Phương opening 2013.jpg
- File:Thu Phương mtcp 2013.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Please, I am granted a permission of this artist to upload my photos which I took for her to Wikipedia. I sent a permission email. Thanks. Mtcp1316 (talk) 06:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Es gibt ein Foto, das im gleichen Artikel das betreffende Gebäude exakt und in gleicher Perspektive abbildet ohne individuelle subjektive Verbrämungen. Ein höherer künstlerischer bzw. historischer Wert der im Jahr 2014 erstellten einfachen Zeichnung scheint fragwürdig. Jo.Fruechtnicht (talk) 09:40, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep the image depicts a cultural heritage monument and has OTRS permission. Of course one could argue that for Wikipedia articles a photo is better than a drawing, but this is no reason for deletion (instead, you can replace or remove the image on Wikipedia). Holger1959 (talk) 10:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Artwork by a non-notable artist. Since we have a good quality photo from exactly the same position, I see no reason to keep this around. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:14, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion! Or you delete over 250 images from this cat too? :-)
Kept: We can have multiple works on one object. In this case the art work is in scope as it depicts an object for which it can be used. --Basvb (talk) 08:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
@Ssilvers: : The file has a permission on it, but not one via OTRS, would it be possible to get this permission into OTRS? Or do we as a community believe this 2011 indirect permission to be sufficient? Basvb (talk) 10:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- The permission link is not valid anymore. Nevertheless I'd believe the claim and Keep. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: If the link were live, we could add license review, but since it is dead, we have no way of confirming it. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Whoa! (Jameslwoodward), I missed this discussion. Is there any way we can save this delightful photo? -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- In order to restore it, the actual photographer must send a free license using the procedure at OTRS. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 11:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose I think it is a publication for "a copy of a premium award" and therefore not covered by copyright outside the named license. --Jos1950 (talk) 17:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- This could be below TOO, but the license seems to be wrong in any case. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- For below TOO the battery of logos at the bottom could form an issue. If this is somehow in PD altogether I'm in favor of keeping, but I doubt it fully is. Basvb (talk) 08:51, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: The logos and the CoA are all small enough so that I don't see a problem. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
I am not the owner of this file i found it on Google Shihab20 (talk) 20:27, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- Keep In use, made based on a user-made map. I fixed the author and source information, this should be ok now. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
wykorzystanie wizerunku bez pozwolenia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Englishriviera (talk • contribs) 2016-11-07T02:20:15 (UTC)
- Keep The EXIF data is consistent with other photos uploaded by User:Artur Andrzej in 2014, including this obviously completely unrelated one: File:Ulica Dąbrowszczaków w Gdańsku.JPG. This makes me think that the image in question was taken by the user and so it's authorship, source, and license statements are correct. On the other hand User:Englishriviera's only other contribution is this file: File:Yachfilm2013.jpg. This makes me guess that Englishriviera is maybe related in some way to the Yach Film Festival and tries to claim a non-copyright violation. In any case such a request must be made through OTRS. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:27, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Sebari. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:01, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- This file was incorrectlly nominated, because I have talked to the author of the photo prior to uploading the photo to Wikimedia commons. The photo author (Марія Поливач) has given me explicit permission to release the photo under a free license and upload it to wikimedia commons. In case of any doubt please feel free to contact Mariya (https://www.facebook.com/mariapolyvach) and ask her if she had really given the permission. --Maximaximum (talk) 17:15, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Maximaximum: Please follow the instructions at OTRS. Thank you! --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
This file has "Facebook" as source, because of that I doubt whether the copyright holder has given permission to release it under a free license. Reasoning as indicated at Precautionary principle is not valid on Wikimedia Commons and we need explicit permission from copyright holders for publishing files under a free license. If you are the copyright holder please contact us via OTRS and indicate that you did so on the deletion request. If you feel that this file was incorrectly nominated please respond. Basvb (talk) 12:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Es una foto antigua de nuestro pueblo que editamos en un libro con muchas imagenes de nuestro pueblo. La edicion la realizo nuestra Asociacion Cultural de Amigos de Alhondiga. Tanto esta foto, como otras muchas, las facilitaron los vecinos del pueblo para editarlas en el libro. La imagen no tiene "propietario" o el autor de la foto es desconocido (tendra cerca de 100 años). Algunos de los vecinos que tiene una copia de la misma en papel, es quien la digitalizo y subió a facebook para compartirla con todos nosotros. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polux137 (talk • contribs)
- Is the author unknown? If so can you please state the date the file was created (if you don't know precisely please estimate the date). Basvb (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: At the time this was made, copyright in Spain lasted for 80 years afrter the death of the photographer, so 100 years is too recent to assume that the photographer died before 1936. In order to restore this, we will need details of when and where it was first published or who the photogrqapher was and when he died. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Supposed permission cannot be verified and is also unclear. 'You can do whatever you like' may mean: 'Steve Smith can do whatever he likes'. Jcb (talk) 23:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Right - the "you" in Mr. Chan's "You can do whatever you like..." bit did refer to me, and was in response to my specifically asking if I could upload it under a free licence. How would you like the permission to be verified? I remain in contact with Mr. Chan, so verification shouldn't be any trouble (though I've always had some difficulty with the notion that an e-mail from an address purporting to belong to the author is any more "verification" of permission than my initial assertion that permission was granted. Steve Smith (talk) 23:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- The best thing to do is to contact OTRS. Jcb (talk) 16:00, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Steve Smith: , did you contact OTRS? --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:25, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- The best thing to do is to contact OTRS. Jcb (talk) 16:00, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no recent OTRS message with either "Sarcasticidealist" or "Chris Chan". . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Looks like it was copied from myspace (https://a2-images.myspacecdn.com/images02/118/bd7f82dc8591441bbe6d50c2715476c3/full.jpg ) where it has existed since at least 2010. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hard to judge, since the image also exists of the Flickr account since 2010. And interestingly all other photos on that channel are marked as "All Rights Reserved". --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Also, the Flickr channel is linked from [13], which seems to be the model's official site. This gives the CC claims a bit more credibility. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- That's a very fair point. The question then is if she had the right to license that photographer's photos. But it may be enough to keep. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Info: For Flickr, the only reliable way to get the dat of upload is using the Flicr API (the method is flickr.photos.getInfo, where the relevant field is "posted" inside the row "dates"; the date is in UNIX Timestamp, so, it can be easily converted to the local date format).
- According to the date of posting returned by the Flickr API, the file has been posted to Flickr the April 05, 2010 (the same day of taking), therefore, please provide the exact date when the picture has been posted to Myspace, in order to compare with Flickr. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- The server date on the MySpace link is February 21, 2010. No EXIF information in there. However, if the Flickr user put that up with that license with permission from the photographer, it would still be valid. Since that seems to be the subject's personal Flickr account, that remains a possibility. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:42, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. This is a marginal call, however what pushed me over the edge is that the model's Flickr is not complying with the stated license by attributing the author. Nor are we, for that matter. --Storkk (talk) 09:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Looks to be a Flickrwash. Appears to be from a photo session in 2011 by photographer Gary Silver (https://twitter.com/kataxennakova/status/743543360921698305 ). Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- As above, this actually seems to be the model's official Flickr stream, on which most photos are "All Rights Reserved". This gives the CC claims a bit more credibility. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yep, tougher call than I originally thought. Not sure she had the right to license it that way (photographer may well still own copyright) but it's not a slam-dunk copyvio either. Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: In this case, considering the model is not complying with the Attribution clause of the license (on Flickr), I think we would need to archive an assertion of copyright transfer via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitpisit (talk • contribs) 2016-11-07T10:43:51 (UTC)
Kept: It looks like very simple texts and limited graphic to be trademarked but not copyrighted. --Jusjih (talk) 20:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
One file sourced instagram one facebook. Other files claimed own work however from different cameras and also older and aerial images. Doubts about all files being own work.
- File:Pasqua 2000 (2).png
- File:Pasqua 2000 (1).png
- File:Basilica Interno.jpg
- File:Interno della chiesa santa maria cuglieri.jpg
- File:Venerdì Santo a Cuglieri.jpg
- File:Statua processionale della Madonna delle Grazie (Cuglieri).jpg
- File:Santa maria cunfrades.png
- File:Sabato Santo.jpg
- File:Processione santa caterina.jpg
- File:Santa maria vista aerea.jpg
- File:Madonna-delle-grazie-cuglieri.jpg
- File:Santa Maria ad Nives.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Basvb (talk) 13:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Message from Mc87 copied from my (Basvb (talk)) talk page: dear Basvb, two images are not mine (fb and instagram), the rest belong to my archive although different devices so I can share them. Whether to proceed with the cancellation, only I propose to the two images in question. Yours sincerely Mc 87
File:Santa Maria ad Nives.jpg File:Basilica Interno.jpg
And more message Mc87: If you have noticed, some are images captured from a VHS, other scanned (developed photos in photo paper), and others kindly offered me. Was not my intention in any way violate the rules of sharing wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mc87 (talk • contribs)
- For reference: I have version deleted the old version of File:Santa Maria ad Nives.jpg. A new version has been uploaded since. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Mc87: Could you tell us, which of those images above you have photographed yourself? --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
@Sebari it's a vintage photos taken from a liturgical booklet (1960) 17:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Mc87: Sorry for not being clear: Which of the 12 photos on the list above are photos have you taken yourself? Unfortunately we can not keep photos you have scanned in, even if it is from an old source. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no proof of authorship. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:56, 24 November 2016 (UTC)