Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/11/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 9th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality personal photograph Robert Weemeyer (talk) 10:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 14:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No context, no source/date/author, no usage, no relevance. Commons is not a personal gallery. Lordtobi (talk) 12:17, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 09:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK how delete it Bimal...


Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akasi10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope. Commons:Derivative works from non-free software screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy deleted as per criterion G7. --jdx Re: 04:38, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality private image: out of scope Takeaway (talk) 20:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Out of project scope - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

page is empty Thiotrix (talk) 11:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan talk page. Comment has been moved to User talk:Inaia with a reply. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphan talk page. Message moved to User talk:Luismirocio#File:Gaviota patiamarilla Islas Cíes.jpg with a reply. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 21:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV screenshot, no permission. Yann (talk) 00:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Website screenshot, no permission. Yann (talk) 00:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Kiara.gato

[edit]

The user has uploaded several spam-ads from websites and put them all in Category:Art. The user also has a collection of unsubscribe message jpgs from various websites which could be part of another deletion discussion. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spamming. --lNeverCry 07:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:JudddFill

[edit]

The user took some spam-ads from websites and uploaded them in Category:Art. Same game as Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Kiara.gato. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spamming. --lNeverCry 07:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant advertising. Also doubtful that the uploader owns the rights to the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Steveenglishteacher

[edit]

Screenshots of a YouTube video. The video (YouTube link) does not have a license compatible with Commons. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of http://www.wlvt.org/home/, IMO above COM:TOO, unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 10:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Sbronner

[edit]

Writer uploaded the covers of his books; these would be licensed by the publishers, not by him, and probably under copyright, unless there is evidence otherwise. Also there are his faculty portraits, which are not "own work" as claimed and may be copyrighted by photographers and/or schools. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from https://twitter.com/sardarnohani Wikishovel (talk) 13:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:23, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is empty Bungert55 (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:27, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover. TOO is very low in the United Kingdom, and this may be copyrighted. Storkk (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free album art. Binksternet (talk) 05:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by User:Storkk. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:50, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from photos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:27, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found else where on the net.

Affected:

Mhhossein talk 15:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cover of copyrighted album Bultro (talk) 16:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from AP photo, Flickr license is invalid: http://arizonasports.com/story/853046/john-chayka-displaying-chops-coyotes-gm/ Ytoyoda (talk) 16:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cover of copyrighted book Bultro (talk) 17:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image at this size is all over pinterest as can be seen on this google search. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is all over the internet, and was in use prior to this upload (at same size) http://www.curatedtravel.com.sg/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/W1_Suitcase.jpg ... notice that one was uploaded in 09/2014, this one in November 2014. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:30, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIOs. No sources of the seven images on this collage other than "tomas de internet" which means Taken from Internet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:31, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a recreation of file previoulsy deleted. No source for the photographs. At least one is copyvio, from Google Street View. User with history of copyvio. Frodar (talk) 17:58, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:58, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture was used on fr.wp to vandalize the article "cretinism". Do not follow (talk) 20:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:31, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image from [1] where is original size image with logo Bogomolov.PL (talk) 21:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 07:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image belongs to myself Corinne Cumming. This was taken for Rock Sound Magazine. The original photo can be found at this link: http://www.rocksound.tv/photos/view/this-is-what-twenty-one-pilots-legendary-reading-festival-show-looked-like My watermark has been cropped out and I have already found copyright violations which have cost me money. Please take this down and contact me at capturedbycorinne@gmail.com when this is completed.

Thanks, Corinne Cumming Professional Photographer 86.176.229.114 21:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --lNeverCry 08:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 21:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 09:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file a rischio copyviol. Danyele (talk) 23:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 09:36, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file a rischio copyviol. Danyele (talk) 23:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 09:36, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file a rischio copyviol. Danyele (talk) 23:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 09:36, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file a rischio copyviol. Danyele (talk) 23:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 09:36, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, likely a hoax; and if not, no permission Lordtobi (talk) 13:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. part of Grand Theft Auto game (c). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France, sculptor Élie-Jean Vézien died in 1982, the sculpture should be PD in 2053.

Coyau (talk) 15:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je suis d'accord; cordialement. Finoskov (talk) 12:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I really was excited to find this image and wanted to use it in a project, but it looked a little too good for a flickr image. This photo is a cropped version of a photo by Nathaniel S. Butler on Getty Images that is licensed as All Rights Reserved. Here's a link: www.gettyimages.com/license/1965707 IronShikra (talk) 16:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reported the Flickr image to Getty Images via email. (tJosve05a (c) 20:09, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, uncertain copyright. Poor quality shot of ordinary guy, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 00:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, uncertain copyright. Poor quality shot of ordinary guy, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 00:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, uncertain copyright. No permission from Lionel Cottin. Yann (talk) 00:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, uncertain copyright. Poor quality shot of ordinary person, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 00:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader did not provide too many information about, this file must and could of be copyrighted. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 00:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, uncertain copyright. Poor quality shot of unidentified people, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 00:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, uncertain copyright. Art by non notable artist, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 00:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:FelipeIImedal.jpg Discasto talk 00:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is non of Дмитрий Сусликов, but Мария Сибирякова [2] Maksmilian (talk) 01:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio - professional shot taken with pro-DSLR, uploaded by user who doesn't appear to be copyright holder.. Nilfanion (talk) 01:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image is made available by the Scottish Rugby union for non-commercial activities. You will find this headshot and others like it being used extensively by various organizations such as the BBC, RBS 6 Nations, Exeter Rugby ect. They are intended for distribution to familiarize the public with players.--STKS91 (talk) 12:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Deleted many times in the past. Please see this deletion log. K-iczn (talk) 02:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nomination. Kathisma (talk) 02:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gilmar-Pimenta-2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-created artwork: out of scope.

Takeaway (talk) 02:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is an inappropriate remix of the real image using slang/profanity. Helpfulrandy (talk) 03:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sidney amaral (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern artworks. The arstist https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Amaral is alive. We need a permission be send to OTRS.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategoried, small size image with no metadata and a claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategoried, small size image with no metadata and a claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategoried, small size image with no metadata and a claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work, look at the overprinting on original version, the size and the lack of metadata. Also unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HollyFabius (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Contemporary art which may be by uploader, in which case it's artwork by non-notable artist, or it might be by someone else, in which case we don't have the artist's permission. In any case, the images are not in use or categorized.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom : either autopromotion or copyvio. Kathisma (talk) 02:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:23, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused sketchpad "Galaxy note" drawing by non-notable artist, not in use, not categorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source given on this image leads to a totally different picture, there's no way to know if the license is correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused logo or personal design, uncategorized, and of no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this composite image of a photo and calligraphy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support -- confusing per Ellin Beltz --WPPilot (talk) 06:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks more like a poster than an image taken by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the photo is likely own work of uploader, the contents of the billboard isn't and without additional information to location, it's impossible to tell if there is any chance of Freedom of Panorama or not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused group shot with no category, unlikely to be educational. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wingman Gerald Green (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works in these collages, plus no apparent indication of user's own work, and no educational utility - unused and uncategorized.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image with no apparent educational utility. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:42, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is not a real source on this very small image. There is a word in the source field, but it doesn't provide the kind of information required by COM:EVID. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:43, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this group of four team shots. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this unused and uncategorized image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Notice the (C) and artists name in the lower right corner of this mural image. It's not graffiti, the artist retains copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:46, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused uncategorized logo for an apparently non-notable company. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this unused, uncategorized image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by I-say816 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Smaller than Facebook images, without metadata, all uploaded on a single topic, could be some form of promotionalism for the company, but there's no indication the company is notable, nor that these images were created by the uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image of two people with overprinting. No apparent educational utility, small size, uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unlikely claim of own work on this image obviously copied from a book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keraninho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This is a series of promotional or self-promotional uploads, of artworks and book covers by an apparently living artist, but I was unable to find notability on the artist, and unable to determine permission for the images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SPMTelugu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images more suitable for facebook or other social media, not in COM:SCOPE, especially not two copies of one image.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:38, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely claim of own work on this tiny professional looking image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication of permission on the link given as source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hsueh Kai Tien (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIO: These are marked (c), it looks like a series copied from another website, and not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erincronican (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There are both photographs of people, as well as artwork here. For the images of people, they're all very small, two have no metadata, and the other two have different cameras. Then there are three artworks alone and two artworks int he background of one of the small portraits. There is not any indication of user's own work here, neither the photos nor the artwork.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD and size of Facebook image, no indication of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Nivoaudio

[edit]

The metadata for both contains: "Author: Daniel Ursache, Copyright holder: Memorymaker Srl-d, Copyright status: Copyrighted." No evidence of permission to license copyrighted photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: John, Copyright holder: John Clark." The description isn't clear about the author of the art or give permission to license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Weg1302

[edit]

Low-quality personal photos, not in use, out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality personal photo, not in use, the uploader's only contribution; no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is apparently by this professional photographer, who puts the same watermark on her portraits and has them under copyright. There is no evidence otherwise, and no evidence of permission to license and distribute the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Toptopview2016

[edit]

Self-promotion of a music studio business. None of the files are in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Copyright holder Minnesota Public Radio." On their website it is "MPR photo" and lists the author. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader states this is a "graph from a publication." Not own work, no licensing information given, no evidence of permission to use and license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm going to assume the uploader did not take this microscopy photo and false-color it themselves, the rest of their uploads are copyright violations and webgrabs. Source, permission, and license are missing. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Medartclinics

[edit]

Advertising for a plastic surgery clinic. The files are not in use. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality. Unused. No educational value. Zinnmann (talk) 10:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion; even if for a charity, it is still advertising. The file is not in use. In addition "Please seek permission to use" an image is not compatible with Commons licensing parameters. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect date, incorrect source, incorrect author and incorrect license . HombreDHojalata.talk 10:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect date, incorrect source, incorrect author and incorrect license . HombreDHojalata.talk 10:41, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BiwashKhatiwada (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. No educational. Out of scope.

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 11:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, self promotion Berthold Werner (talk) 12:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Latvia. The Latvian copyright law permits taking pictures of architectural works, photographs, visual arts, design works and the works of applied arts when displayed permanently in public places. The pictures can be used for non-commercial purpose. Such permission is not valid on Commons. Wikicology (talk) 12:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

painting by Duško Šojlev (Skoplje, Makedonija 1930. - Zagreb 2003.) Sporti (talk) 12:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF Data says copyright holder is "RAJWANT RAWAT". Unless, there is a compelling evidence to suggest that uploader is the same person as "RAJWANT RAWAT ", this image should be deleted per PRP. Evidence of ownership should forwarded to our support team using the email template here. Wikicology (talk) 12:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, blurry, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is probably not a free im age. See here. Wikicology (talk) 12:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

selfie, out of scope Berthold Werner (talk) 12:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that uploader was granted the permission to freely licence this image. Evidence of peremission should be fowarded to our [[COM:OTRS|support team] Wikicology (talk) 12:55, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that uploader was granted the permission to release this image under a freely licence. Evidence of permission should be forwarded to COM:OTRS. Wikicology (talk) 12:57, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Sporti (talk) 12:55, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Sporti (talk) 12:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Sporti (talk) 12:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:57, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 13:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text-only document, and one with expired information. Out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work. Permission is required from the artist before this can be uploaded here. Wikicology (talk) 13:10, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is a hoax, and not official whatsoever. Lordtobi (talk) 12:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Lordtobi (talk) 13:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say I was not the original uploader; I simply made it a pure vector image.--Carnby (talk) 14:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Lordtobi (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission. Lordtobi (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test upload. Lordtobi (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test upload Lordtobi (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proposed image of non-existant game (hoax) Lordtobi (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Lordtobi (talk) 13:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission Lordtobi (talk) 13:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 古武 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, drawings and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:27, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho doubtful claimed 'owned work' and rather potentially copyright-protected content, small-sized format and imho primarly for promotional use – i.e. massively over-categorization of that category by "Rathish Ravi Art Gallery" – files not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons > other opinions ??

Roland zh (talk) 20:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC) [edited Roland zh (talk) 21:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)][reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:37, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining uploaded photo. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:26, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a copy of a signed print, so unlikely the uploader is the original photographer Andy Mabbett (talk) 13:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:50, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 13:33, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je sui partis 90.5.187.68 14:02, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selbst hochgeladen. Ich habe das ersetzt durch eine Tafel mit anderer Bezeichnung. Diese ist jetzt überflüssig. Geo-Science-International (talk) 14:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Please keep the file as it was the original logo for the organization and the organization is recognize by this logo only.

Non-free logo, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yebhi_logo_2013.jpg where it's fair use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD? Don't think the Deutsche Telekom agreed to that and I'm pretty sure the uploader has no copyright for this card Sicherlich talk 15:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Commons:Derivative works from posters. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Florentina Pabón (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LindaPaul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Irrelevant to articles. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Mhhossein talk 16:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality photo. Mhhossein talk 16:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ka vini ienaca Latvija 78.84.243.7 16:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An advertising photo. Mhhossein talk 16:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Didini Tochhawng (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images were upload for Wiki Loves Earth 2016. Since the competition is over, I want to delete the files

Didini Tochhawng (talk) 16:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 23:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:National Emblem of the People's Republic of China.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete useless rasterisation of an existing SVG. Kathisma (talk) 02:49, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 17:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo uploaded only for advertising, the user's only contribution, the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A thumbnail that is not legible. The user's only contribution, the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 18:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Matasg as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong licencing, copyright violation as per http://www.vpb.lt/db/rezult3.php?appnum=2015%201642. Should be compared with threshold of originality, but in my opinion this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for statues in the United States. howcheng {chat} 18:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo uploaded to promote a website, the file is not in use, the user's only contribution. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user uploaded his personal logo. The only contribution by the user. The file is not in use by the user and has no potential value for anyone else. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:55, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:79 ОАеМП.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 18:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:1 бат 79 ОАеМБр.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional or personal logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:2 бат 79 ОАеМБр.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like an advertisement, right down to including the phone number in the ad. There's several photos, it's all claimed own work and likely isn't. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text document appears to be out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:3 бат 79 ОАеМБр.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No inidication of user's own work on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

company internal presentation, no educational content, not used Avron (talk) 19:30, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:55, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this obviously prior published image of Richard Nixon and some of his supporters. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

another nonsense contribution by this user - not of any encyclopedic use Denniss (talk) 16:30, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It cannot be deleted for this reason because editing is restricted! Go!Mario (talk) 17:11, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only page, no apparent educational utitlity. Date is obviously wrong. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Viel besseres Originalbild in Gänze verfügbar: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hartmann_%28neu%29.png Mehlauge (talk) 19:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks for me like a small version of a professional picture. I don't know if we can trust the uploader Avron (talk) 19:36, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:Рппо 79 ОАеМБр.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:Іср 79 ОАеМБр.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:Ррхбз 79 ОАеМБр.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:44, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sources for both images in this composite. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sources for the four images in this collage. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:3 бат 79 ОАеМБр.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1958 photo, own work is in doubt. Who is real photographer? When and where the photo was published? Taivo (talk) 20:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nitrogroup incorrectly represented; replaced by File:Chlornitrofen.svg. Leyo 20:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:45 АеМБр.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 20:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:1 АеМД.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 21:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho potentially copyright or personality right issues, micro-file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho potentially copyright or personality right issues, micro-file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 23:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}. (tJosve05a (c) 23:06, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dublicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ac_source.png Ritarisk (talk) 23:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashley Pomeroy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}.

(tJosve05a (c) 23:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used without permission and outdated Hhsb123 (talk) 23:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by RockMagnetist as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Apparent copyright violation: Photocopy of image from a 2002 issue of a scientific journal. Here since 01-2014, we can afford a proper DR. Beside, this is very simple. Yann (talk) 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete (I was the speedy deletion nominator.) If you go to the article web site, you'll see that they are charging 39.95 USD for a copy of the article. RockMagnetist (talk) 00:49, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just for the record, I don't think this is relevant here. Yann (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand why you'd say that. For that matter, I don't see why it's even open to question that it's violating copyright laws to use a photocopy of a 14-year-old image from a prestigious scientific journal. Just to be conscientious, I made an effort to find a specific statement to that effect, and although a charge for a copy of the article is not airtight, it's a pretty good indicator. RockMagnetist (talk) 23:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept The article as a whole certainly has a copyright and charging for copies is entirely legitimate. This image, however, is not the whole article, but a simple graph. The data cannot have a copyright and the graph is so simple that it does not have one either. There is no caption. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by RockMagnetist as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Apparent copyright violation: Photocopy of image from Nature magazine 2002 Here since 12-2013, we can afford a proper DR. Beside, this is quite simple. Yann (talk) 00:16, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete (I was the speedy deletion nominator.) If you follow the Rights and Permissions link at the article site, you'll find that they want 793.50 USD for permission to post the figure on a website for commercial purposes. RockMagnetist (talk) 00:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Just for the record, I don't think this is relevant here. Yann (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't understand why you'd say that. For that matter, I don't see why it's even open to question that it's violating copyright laws to use a photocopy of a 14-year-old image from one of the world's most prestigious scientific journals. Just to be conscientious, I made an effort to find a specific statement to that effect, and charging for permission to use the figure seems a pretty clear indicator. RockMagnetist (talk) 23:36, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: On the other hand, the two full sentences of caption here do have a copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the object of the picture (the coin) is not protected under copyright any more, it's actually a 3D object and therefore, pictures are not in the PD as well. As far as I understand, it might not be compatible with commons Discasto talk 00:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Per Commons:Currency: a photograph of a coin has two requirements before it can be included. The first is that the design of the coin itself is not copyrighted, or permission has been obtained. The second is that the photographer agrees to license it under a free licence. --Discasto talk 17:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I understand, the copyright owner explicitly rejects the commercial use, making the "license" useless for commons :-( --Discasto talk 14:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The copyright holder must send a free license to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dennis1989 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this series of photographs of trophy cups and a 1975 image of a player.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have proof to have permission using this profile picture of Martijn Reuser. He sent me the picture personally on Twitter. The 1975 in the file name was meant to be the year of birth. The throphy images were adapted from existing pictures on Commons and have been checked already. Dennis1989 (talk) 15:48, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The images of the four trophies all infringe on the copyright belonging to the creators of the trophies. It is unlikely that Martijn Reuser actually has the right to freely license the photo of himself -- that right almost certainly belongs to the photographer. In any case, it cannot be restored unless the actual copyright holder sends a free license to OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dennis1989 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poor extractions of trophy images from the web - have already listed other trophy images for deletion. Even if they are from the uploader's own photos, 2D images of trophies are under copyright.

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:27, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by WayKurat as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. User uploaded this selfie of his and used it for his personal article he created for himself in en.wiki. lNeverCry 09:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom - the uploader has been using this photo for his article for himself in the English Wikipedia. -WayKurat (talk) 08:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Unhelpful: the article was deleted lNeverCry 09:08, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by User:Netito777 --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by WayKurat as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. User uploaded this photo and used it for his personal article he created for himself in en.wiki. lNeverCry 09:09, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom - the uploader has been using this photo for his article for himself in the English Wikipedia. -WayKurat (talk) 08:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False image, actual island looks different Lordtobi (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This file is widely used, so a variety of editors on WPs think it is useful as is. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too dark picture, the ship can hardly be seen Robert Weemeyer (talk) 13:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's a problematic image as I agree it is unlikely to be of much educational value. If an alternative scan of this plate can be found, then it can be deleted as a very, very, poor duplicate. Until then, It has a tiny amount of value as a place-marker for someone searching through this 1880 book. -- (talk) 13:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: totally unusable, but kept as per discussion. P 1 9 9   15:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I had speedy deleted this image, but the uploader drew my attention to this notice on the newspaper website: "We give free and unlimited permission for the use of images of our front page for illustrative purposes in other publications and platforms, such as WikiMedia." I wonder whether this statement is enough. Moreover, I wonder whether the publisher of this newspaper has the right to grant such licence for all the photographs included in the front page. BrightRaven (talk) 15:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep PD-Iran --47.150.89.223 00:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: at the link there is no evidence that the image is licenced as cc-by-4.0

 Keep as PD-textlogo?? Alan (talk) 16:21, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD text logo. P 1 9 9   15:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soy Juampayo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}.

(tJosve05a (c) 23:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Josve05a. Soy el autor de las fotos arriba mencionadas. Primero, quiero decir que he contactado a la empresa Surlat solicitando su autorización para que la imagen File:2016-10-29 sábado 115606 - Yogur Surlat Kids.jpg permanezca en Wikimedia Commons. Hoy comenzaré el contacto con las empresas que se relacionan con las demás fotos. Por lo anterior, te rogaría que me dieran un tiempo antes de borrar las imágenes para poder hacer dicho contacto y recibir las autorizaciones. De no recibir respuesta o si la misma es negativa, yo lo notificaré y solicitaré el borrado de los archivos respectivos. Gracias y saludos. --Soy Juampayo (talk) 16:44, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by E4024 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s).
(Derivative work of copyrighted image/artwork.)
If the images on the package is PD for any reason (like age or shape), that should be specified by using {{Licensed-PD}}.

(tJosve05a (c) 23:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Это не Рафаэл Геррейру. It is not Raphael Gerreiro. Asevov (talk) 20:39, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even if he is not Raphael Gerreiro (which is not proven), he is still a player training with the professional team. So clearly there is no reason to delete the file. --XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 20:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


It's definitely not Guerreiro, At least rename the file so that no people mistakenly thought it was Guerreiro. The picture player Maxence Derrien.


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Just add {{Fact disputed}} if you think the info is wrong. P 1 9 9   15:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lordtobi as duplicate (Dup) and the most recent rationale was: licate|Gta advance cartridge by zeartul.jpg lNeverCry 23:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Neither is a particularly good image, but both are in use, so some WP editors like one, others, the other. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too many same photoes. H10729064 (talk) 14:43, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:52, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although it seems the file is a screenshot of this video which is uploaded with a CC licence, I am doubtful if the youtube channel itself is genuine. I noticed that this channel "KBS View" has no "blue tick" while other official KBS youtube channels have the blue tick (such as this). I am requesting the community to help evaluate this. Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:55, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lemongirl942: Many korean language official KBS youtube channels has no "blue tick". Look this channels. → My love KBS, KBS News, KBS Drama, KBS Documentary, KBS Life, KBS Entertain, KBS Kpop — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exj (talk • contribs)
@Exj: I am not sure. For example, you linked KBS Drama which has no blue tick. But I found another KBS Drama and it has a blue tick. It seems like these are unofficial youtube channels. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Seems not all KBS channels have 'Confirmed' tag. No 'Confirmed' tag is not a good reason for a deletion per se, I believe you need to bring more convincing reasons, such as you found more authentic versions elsewhere (or from confirmed location). — regards, Revi 15:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but there is no evidence that these are official youtube channels of KBS. If these are not official youtube channels, then we cannot assume that KBS has agreed to release these under a creative commons license. For example, https://www.youtube.com/c/kbsworldtv is the official youtube channel of KBSWorld - it has a blue tick and is also linked from the website kbsworld.kbs.co.kr. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:55, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per the precautionary principle. There is no indication that the channel in question is an official channel of the Korean Broadcasting System. None of the other KBS channels publishes their videos using a CC license, making it even more unlikely. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]